Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout 83-39 REZONE A-SR TO PA-C 4 OF 5BUTTE. CQIINIFY P N�i�G com' MISSIOBJ % COUNTY CENTRIVE U[?OVILI_E, GAI.iFORNTA596 PHONE: 534-,6611, 'Xo: City of Chico DATE: June 27, 1983' V.0 Box 3420 Chico, Ca. 95927 RE: PRWECL' REW7.EtiJ AND ENVI:RONMNN'TALIVAbUATION Enclooed is preliminary data our office has received or generatod concerning the following projgot: 83-39 Jay Halbert - Rezone from A -SR to PA -C of 20.74 acres for proposed development of 98 small, unattached, s ngle'family Victorian homes located approx. 900 feet west of Oak Lawn Ave., on the south side of West Sacramento Ave., east of Big Chico Creek s a es, i en z le a;s AP 43- -lz,p 43 -2 -T -TEF anct a portion of AP 43-29-15, Chico, We are making an assessment of possible environmental impacts and will be preparing an environmental, document,, either a Negative Declaration, Mitigated Negative Declaration or an Environmental Impart Report: Please 'provide any factual statements, ideas for investigation, or ojj' pions you can offer in your area of concern or expertise that relate to either physical, social, or economic impacts that this project may generate. Please respond within 14 days of the above -noted date, If no response is generated by this inquiry, then it shall be assumed that there are no significant environmental impacts which are potential from the project. We appreciate any assistance you can provide. Sincerely, David R. Hironino s Associate Planner Comments: 8equ re full urban Improvementlz on W. Sacramento and Sidweil Avenue frontages,. Provide a second access to Bidwell Avenue tul4e Co. Plann ng COMM J U L ".,' 1983 oroviilei califtituin ME C (Write or type in space provided & reti.urn this JUN 28 1983 PLANNING OFFIOE .T CHICO 17 �. i w dry«^vsy.s;`4.. ' p'�U`TMIM LAtq r rVA'I LI DEPARTMENT i�V E-A I. T II TMCNT 0(vCLAY vOt3It2;pCpyirUItLYEL, Ea1rCGI'ecLllYgIFOr oFltlt<►1S COUNTY "'IT11Dlt,, T'rtphong,f916) 534,4'81 Canute WILLIAM Butte Co, Punning NpUl) rii.tnt.ltMr (Vl� 18 193 May 18, 1gn Orovillo, Calitur� N R y Halbert 2, Box 102 Clico, GA 95926 RE' ''"IterFOr�l f� AP 43-2y..08 & 48 29-12 & 75 Dear Mr. N��lbert & 1,, (Por:. � Please be adv' sed subdivision Ivill be )e PI1�C a On May 25 by the ptj e Co i It for the abovo- 1983. The - aPP 7c Coulat referenced conditions tzs listed Public lJorks [r y Scrbcl7v�P�� , an the sheet, ►vi 11 reeo risen rI jrrrthe CCo The attached meeting Iv 11 commence at ��3 County Center Drh v�, at 9:30 a.In in tf Urovillo, 'a7i-FtheI Onference ►^porn located If ,You should have a),y yues � i ons r.:' this, office, egarc ing this matter; Please contact Very truly yours, Clay Castleberry D, rector Of Public WOilk8 0"9111al signers n,. JOHN MENOONS, john Mendol7sa jMIns Assistant Di'roctor Attachment cc; plannin �nvironlrgiental vHealth nee 1 R�V1eW ITartmont IF e (J' -'y I�lalbeit 123 units►i�proximat ly WKrDRFORD PA -C UBDIVISION, ( y t 1100 ft. t,jes't of 1Rose �1ve►7ue, an 'ie north side of C31c.it�rell Avenue, east o f Big Chico Creek Estates :est of Highland Park Sul�dl v7 Sion, Chico Assessor's Parcel Number: 43-27.-08 and 43-29-12 & 15 (ptn.) public Works Department randit;ions are: 1. Submit road and drainage plans to the Departmont of Public Works for approval and install the required facilities. 2. Provide 20 -ft radius property line returns at all street intersections. 3. Provide right -of -gray for standard No. S-5 at all street intersections. 4. Indicate a 50 -ft. building setback line from tho centerline of Sacramento Avenue, 5. Street; signs sliall be provided by the developer at all street intersections per County requirements. (Submit five alternate street names for each street: to the County address coordinator for approval of street names.) G. Deed 30 teen from ithe centerline of Sacramento Avenue -to the County of Butte. 7. Construct one-half street section on Sacramento Avenue to RS -3-A road standard with vertical curb, gutter, and sidewalk and 2" AC, D AB, _SC250 prince, fog seal and 95% relative Compaction. Construct full street Section On all interior streets to section sicotgn on _tentative neap. $. Provide monumentati on as required by the Department of Public Works in accordance With accepted standards. 9. Street grades and other features shall comply t�aith the butte County Ordinances, design resolution and oilier accepted engineering standards, 10, Provide permanent solution for drainage. ll All easements of recordto be shown oil the final map 12. Meet the requirements of the butte County Fire Dppartmo►it or other responsible agency, 13, Street lighting shall he provided in accordance with butte County requirements, accepted design criteria, and recomMendati Otis of PG&E - Continued on next sheet t 14. fay off assessments. 16. Meet the requirements of the ui:i l i Ly companies (i . e, , PG&E, Pacific Telephone, water, sewer) 16. nay any delinquent taxes. 17. File a tentative and final subdivision map and pay appropr'ia'te fees. 18i Developer shall provide call required traffic safety si (JIIS, including st+•p signs. a McC,A IN ASSOCIATES 1100; FORTRESS ST. CHICO,CA.95926 891^8830 CONSULTING ENGINEERS SURVEYORS Buffe Co. Planning Comm. May 3, 1983 1AAY 41983 Orov11104 Calitorhi* planning Department Butte County 7 County Center Drive OrOVille, CA 95965 Attention: Mr. Steve Streeter Rei Swallowtail Subdivision B.I.R. SCIS 79080708 Dear Mr. Streeter: Enclosed please find a response to the Caltrans comments on the E.l.R• for the subject projecti If you have any questions, please call me. Very truly yours, McC:AYN ASSOCIATt8' Mark E,, Risso MP,R d enc: } r t,t� � r.y•.. yE GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN aovFnNon Apri1 '22, 1983 *aft .of Talif rmin � GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OFFICE OF _PLANNING AND RESEARCH 1400 TENTH STREET SACRAMENTO 95814 (916) 445-0613 Mr. Stephen A. Streeter Butte County Planning 7 County Center Drive Oroville CA 95965 Subject; SCH# 79080708 SWALLOWMM SUBDIVISIM PA -C Dear Mr. Streeter, APPENDIX D Buffo Co. Ptanning.Como)l APR 26 1983 oroyille, Cagi QrU4 The State Clearinghouse submitted the above nawed draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to selected state agencies for review. The review period is closed and the comments ofthe individual agency(ies) is (are) attached.' if you wou].d like to discuss their concerns and recommendations, please contact the staff from the appropriate agency(ies).� When pr6pari.ng the final EIR, you must include all comments and responses (CEQA Guidelines, Section 15146). The certified EIR must be considered in the decision- making process for the project. In addition, we urge you to respond directly to the commenting agency( es) by writing to them, including the State Clearinghouse number on all correspondence. A 1981 Appellate Court decision in Cleary v. Cg=t;y oi= (118 Cal. App. 8d 848) clarified requirements for responding to review comments. specifically, the court indicated that comments must be addressed in detail, giving reasons why the specific comments and suggestions were not accepted.` The responses must show factors of overriding significance which required the suggestion or comment to be ,; e j,acted. Responses to comments maent:s must not be conclusory statements but must be s,.pported by empirical or experimental datar scientific authority or explanatory information of any kind. The court further said that the responses must be a good faith, reasoned analysis. In the event that the project is approved without adequate mitigation of si.cj nificant effects, the lead agency must make written findings for each significant effect and it must support its actions with a written statement of ovR= rsic ing coni- 3iderations for each unmitigated significant effect (CEQA Gui,del$ner� Section 15088 and 15089) if the project requires discretionary approval from any strte agency, the Notice of Determination must be filed with the secretary for Rdsj;�urces as well as with the County Clerk. Please contact Anna Polvos at (916) 445--0613 if you have any questions about the environmental review process. sincerely, Ron Bass, Director state Clearinghouse CC: Resources Agency attachment i .M.0 in orand ui'1'1 To Mr. Ron Bass Executive Officer State Clearinghouse 1400 Tenth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 From DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION District 3 Subled: Date: April 14, 1983 File 03 -But -32-7.8 Swallowtail Subdivision SCH 79080708 en51 Caltrans, District 3, has reviewed the supplemental EIR for the 123 -lot subdivision west of Highway 32 kxxmn as Swallowtail Subdivision. This subdivision is adjacent to the Big Chico Creek Estate Subdivision, for which a previous EIR has been prepared. We axe concerned about the eumu.Lative traffic impacts as a result of this and other�sabdivisions, as identified in Item 6, on page 8b, particularly as it rely?,�zs to Highway 32 traffic. As this area continues to develop, Highway 32, Alm experience more congestion. We concur with the need for a traffic study Utdch addresses these problems and possible solutions, and we urge the County ztd/or the City of Chico to include Highway 32 in this study. L. V e GALL IGADi AL -Ling Dista: ict Director of Transportation ., 4�7 U. 19193 R. D. Skidmore .ASR �rChi.ef, Exivironmental Branch State Cloar#ugPxoiiso SWALLOWTAIL SUBDIVISION STAFF RESPONSE TO STATE CLEARINGHOUSE REVIEW CONCERN: Cumulative impacts on Highway 32 will cElube additional congestion on Highway 32. Either City Or County should conduct a traffic study for the Chi(:o Area which includes an of impacts on Highway 32. RESPONSE: J.H.K. and Associates has prepared a roport entitled "Chico. Urban Area Transportation Study", dated November 1982. The report addresses the anticnat;t�cl congestion that will be generated by the area near West Sacramento .Avervue. Present traffic volume on Fighway 32 SecoStreet is between West SacramenthA Avenue erddayst Thusn�Hiahway 32 approximately 15,000 ve P presently provides a "D" level of service and is at 93% of capacity. The report anticipates that the volume will increase to 21,200 vehicles per day by the ,year 2000 and 27,300 vehicles per day at full build o'�Then;rethe ortChico estimated (population 11build estimated at 170, 89 0 . P .. out occurring in 2032. ` The report further recommends that Highway c32 s e widTh s to a 5 -lane facility with widening is scheduled for a 10-20 year me f ame. service e widened roadway would provide a B for vehicular traffic anticipated in the year 2000. The report examines two methods of financing the improve meats, i.e., assessment districts and developer fees. It. (Gest Sacramento Avenue) not be concludes that this area included .n such a district The developer fee recommended in the report is $1720 per unit, and, if the toe d beoappropriatedforetheythe county developer t of Bute, then tt would PP contt:bate the fee. The City Of Chico has officially accepted the report but has not adopted any measures to implement the report to crate. } { MESSAGE .4 — TIME PHONE DATE r iLjTelephoned ❑ Please Call C1 W{II Call Again Was In Wants to See You Returned Call Neto and �iniormotion ot Ro•rnuta ❑ Reply ❑ 5i9nature Cotr,men► / ❑Return b Investigate ❑ Approval ❑ Forwarded Request 0 Contact MO[-jFile Per '' MASSAGE _�'`�--`�'�-- E .. / k:, - .3 711, "�, ice' .•Mink PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 PHONE; 534.4601 march 28, 1983 Mark Itisso McCain Associates P. 0. Box 2178' Chico, CA 95927 Dear Mr. ltisso: I reviewed your fiscal impact analysis for the Swallowtail Subdivision. your sales and use 'tax calculation should lie amended to follow the outline as suggested by County Auditor Jim Johansen in his memo of march 17, 1983 attached. This would yield a sales tax revenue of $50283.67, as opposed to $13,972.80 in you-:- analysis, In addition, the Public Works, Planning and BuildLi g Inspection budget of $705,915.00 sho'ul( probably be changed to something on the order of $50010,000 in order to reflect the actual 82/83 budget as adopted by the Board of Supervisors, I suspect you had reasons for including this lower figure, and T would be willing, to discuss with you this point, The metllodoloy you use, which divides cost by the relative li effort devoted to residetial vs. commercial and industrial properties in the county, is not acceptable. The factor of time spent on residential effort should either he omitted before this fiscal impact analysis is included in the draft environmental impact report I oi`isllecific justification should be submitted Which details 'the justificsti.oii for the split between commercial/industrial acid residential effort spent on the part of county agencies in 1311tte County, a.nd which justifies the implicit assumption in this methodology that o per capita revenue sources i o toward. comriorcial or industrial: serlice Costs. With these chanjTes, tli s fiscal impact analysis should be appropriate For inclusion in the draft environme11I:al imflact report 5incere- ly, Bili. Turpin S'etdor Planner BT+sb Ce., Jerry Bolster - Dttkke homes BOX 1 ()f Butte PI 1;.7T 11 Xky (,,MMiP)iS7,oY1, xd1 k��Y�"Yr� u�nu��ta��Sc� oza�4��0;l.n�;n�s d :nu c l t �axp, x ��x�, z x ti l rta cast , raor moanto Aven4e nth rldv gddveus is W. ° Hca 40t'jn tOjy oppcaxmd t6 '� IAI n `+ rz�tGr1��pon�; <' � "�' "; 4` �?� 1 itt1� aFm48#,*rta m 'uuti :in torr bld 0011l:�.tir��l« 41jr rd ffivauzo intersedtioax tia 'txa��'Jr. on;0 Illid �S``+' GillFJi All �`iLi 116 f1�7L1 i" i 'i'F�'�II2 tii iu on 1��.4� water* city sov ays tom though. ' have o cou i:ttt�;! ►:r :L2 ttr�t aour tmoat -ho oou".d. be "� p� � .. am OUt ropglrt;r . %to afar avouud � w a. ur ia�xxaci ,na p turrounding our N401i go ing ,.� :s-a�t�� i', 'trey rear 3l1 nt�:ct. wore , romicoa y �� � o�xd ��.�4pe`����o���.��io�o4�ar�r�0rac"a .�Strjoto r38 UAO ti,E9,C' # i �Ou ti;j to be �, to ro �r��+�t oox a O rorty (Inti ht , till rt Om r' ION Ifua'Co, M6 cw►itg9 provillof �alifa+ N"�tR�Lt.,tS'd.Y V Muir +•r"i.YNi i1�i�Nw,�44i�� County of Butte Dr�,-Pt. o�C Public llorks (LAND DE VI'MOPMENT) 7 County Center Dr. Ox"ovil le, tri 95926 r• fxilrf'.1..��p[J J� �r tf Io l.,at it) ?)a'sJ jA °; nazo tdjrin 23 J �� ORr S r.O;fiv tY. Clu parcgj d1wt*?r Js rctfjm ill',' � 2191 la. SzAcra4mm,to ".VentAv", r� r1 :�inl w.�,;ir Pw50d G^ d�;t� n�•r ��'+�;�6%���JCt+�n�¢ �2z� in E."Ln :e4X' `R `�ltr�liL'.. ei.;:rsd It Ckt•;! rRg Nord t'fvt9iali! j21iiiSai;sRl;' :+r ix3it?+:µwv�It ►.fir na3' f'i►'!!.i'�tR•h ut'l'2 bo ora ctify ?*%tear., 1^:.i Ct 1! �.2..1. �. i.t5r ri V.V dni. .'.'.15�' �71�f!?7" w`.''S �fV/♦� �.ii �.: �",C!.�. �4 �ilR tiov. eu CQUI :c_ t fid. •i , , <,y+�:�r! ::.5'".'rstua., is -4; our we'll ;;04r) I. Irto 012.3e r•R,; C k'S�F `' 1" '^,► ii✓4 :1 y`.i'3 'i i31t, ,* - ,y iu5� 11 f. 19 F ste, bl#"atJ.i1e19Eiw t5$ T1,ry N`te l�elj,Q,i1t��.'� %:Gi �l .;t�fiY` �"1:+.rr, i'+�::�•C �r,,�aszfq,� � �, + v ti.:�i:�5 %£� +� ":"V�,i.t..�ts.- t. #i +auwr+.i!!:'t'sG. F?,�,"j'}i.,•• ,� ; • Y.I RlT �" iy t� i ♦ s 4 ,} �{. r tom, .�y y r J y,. R+1,;. ^•++-lj,. tw 'M 6i wt Sat% b � i �i i:.f� � ri.�"� k w1 � fV ��.�'f' � en+5 Y9yr �� • - .Lf;,�iti{i, •', .� 1RI~ rJ;?f',i.I •`♦ �+.c .i f r ♦ t. �,•. K f% .pp ' dI V'Njtfi� �:.,0 ^�►i:Z'�Sl,��' ' �'TAII3 • � s ►� 14 r .Yi S: i } FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS for SWALLOWTAIL SUBDIVISION PA -C AP NCI. 43-29-12 43-27-03 43--29-13 PROJECT APPLICANT: jyj I• ALEERT FRRPAP,ED BY MCCAIN ASSOCIITNS B0 2178ou.t}e 95527 CO. Planning Comm. CHICO CA. w MARCH 1933 orov [le. Calitornta FOR 8onp1ITTAL TO PLANNING 08PA[ TMETAT BUTTE COUNTY I COUNTY CENTEII DRI�7V OROVZLLE�, CA. 95`965 r LOGR2�11-1502 l F� � e DESCRIPTION This project consists of 123 residential, single - family homes which the developer intends to m7,t^l et at vat ialj.s prices ranging from $89,000 to $130,000. It is contempla(c,,rl that build out will occur in tura years; The interior street and sewage disposal syst:ej,i will be private and will be maintained by the Pomeowiier's Associ'l- tion. The West Sacramento Avenue frontage will he fully improved to centerline in accordance with Butto County Stand- ards for urban improvements. Utilities will be provided by the local utility companies, i.e.; California Water Company, Pacific Cas and Electric Companv, Pacific "",.-l.ephone and ,State. Cable TV. All interior improvements will be installed by the developer, including storm drainage and street lighting. The interior improvements will be maintained by the ilomeowner';s Association. �1 V E C ZA14ALYSIS The following fiscal analysis it based upontiper with the exceptiO',' Of p'ropertY capita multiplier" methods ax 1�--venue i.00 and sales tax revenues. Property t sales tax, j.^ovenuO by usinq projected unit sale Prices estimated by assuming disposable income per unit bil-sed minimum income qualifiCaticns for purchase of thc unit- projec-tions are generally based upon the Revenue I . unty Bonrcl of Super- 1982-83 uper1982-83 budget adopted by the Butte Co 1 V4 1 e county revenue Primarily consisUl -t property visors. Th forfeitures and penilties; state and sales to CS; fines, fO- contributions throu(ill highway users taxes incl other state aid; transportation aid and mis-ellaneous contribttiOnsr including welfare aid: Federal aid includes tra.,isportationt welfare and cr.jTA fundino. Revenues received for welfare] CB�VA and some trans in this analysis as they portation futdinq are not itcludod the various programs and edited directly to are denerallY credited .general fbndi All co,.,,ts con- do not become a part of the 50hecvanLst clovernment 8idoted were those that were not,met y aid or fees - Costs were allocated in various manners. AdMinis.- olleCtoArl Asses8orr includes the Treasuto/TaX C tration, which The ASSOS$MOnt --�Ppea'8 Recorder, Board of supervisors an services: It was estimated. 80ar6k are qenorallY c0unty-iAiide servi (I to residential that 50% Of L-1-10 so , costs could be allocate uses: 4Z^" 8"notior Court Judicial costs include those Court Work Rof--rrable Pr05taml Municipal Court System I i ices County Clerk and Family Court. These are county services and it is estimated that 80% of those costs Could be attributed to residential 'U-Sefsi 0 Health and sanitation services include mental health P - _ wird and public health services. These services aro county and it is estimated that 80% of these costs can be directA'y related to residential populations. District Attorney, Public Defender and Court Repor,l:er offices, although a part of the judicial system, were listed as a separate county -wide function. 80% of the casts were apportioned to residential population Juvenile Hall, Probation Department, Public Guardian and Juvenile Court Wards are also county -wide services: 80% of the costs were attributed to residential users. Public Workse Planninq and Buildinq Inmoaction are operating on a fee supported basis. 8owever, kho budget in- dicates that these operations are not fully self-»supportinq and additional funds are required to maintain these operations. It is estimated that 75% of these costs can be aOtributed to residential users. Agricultural services and Farm/Eomo Advisor are County -wide services. 10% of their costs can be related to residential users. Fish and Game, Veterans Services and Veterans Halls are county -wide operations. 100% of their costs are generated by residential users: Animal. Control is primarily in the unincorporated county areas. 100% of costs .for animal control can be Utibuted to residential users: Welfa- a and library are county wine. 1001 of their costs can be attributed to residential. users. -3- TOTAL DWELLING UNITS (DU) 123 CAPITA PER UNIT: 2.33 SCHOOL ACE CHILDREN PER UNIT: 0.56 COUNTY POPULATION'c 156x300 UNINCORPORATED POPULATION 93,030 ANNUAL REVE14UES PROPERTY TAX REVENUE Assume average selling Price per dwelling unit of $106,$00.00 Property tax rate - 10 of market value Butte County percentage Of collected property tax: 22,55% (106,500) (123) M-01) (.2255) = 29,539.31 SALTS AND USE, TAX Average disposable housebold income $35,500i00 80% spent locally 28,400ioo 40% spent on taxable goods 11,360400 1% Of total taxable sales to County 113.60 S lo. Total amount to county (123)(113.60),$13,972.80 FINDS; FORFEITURES AND PENALITIE8 Budget 8715,114A0 Population 156,300 Per Capita 4.58 Per Unit (4.58) (2,33 10.0 Total to county (123) (10.67) $Io312i58 STATE HIGIITIAV- USERS TAX 2104 Pund $1t5511693j00 2106 Fund 5200000400 Total to County from State 21071j691.00 Population 156,300 Per Capita 13.25 Per Unit (2,33) (13.25) 30,87 Total to County (123) (30681) 31797AI f Mt)1l1C1 t VtHICLE IN -LIEU 'SAX .r ri Total from State $2,009,672.00 156;300 population 12.86 per Capita Per Unit (2..33) (12.86) 29.96 Total to County (123) (29.96) 3,685,0$ STATE AID (not including welfare) Total from State $6,022,164.00 156,300 Population 38.53 Per Capita 'ger Unit (2.33) (38.53) 89.77 Total to County (123) (89.77) 11, 041:71 FEDERAL AID (not including welfare and CETAA) Total from Federal $713,796.00 Population 156,300 Per Capita 4.57 Per Unit (2.83) (4,57) 10.65 Total to County (123) (10.65) 1,309.95 GOVERNMENT TRANSPORTATION AID Total from Government $2,029,043.00 Population :1.56, 300 Per Capita 12.98 Per Unit (2:33) (1.2:98) 30.24 Total. to County (123) (30.24) 3,719.52 TOTAL ANNUAL REVENUE 68,378.02 PER UNIT 555.92 -6 r. ol ANNUAL COSTS ADMINISTRATION $2,302,781.00 Budget 50% for Residential 1.,151,351.00 County Population 156,300 Per Capita 7.37 Per Unit (2.33) (7.37) 17.77 County Cost (123) (17.1.7) 2,31.2.91 FIRE PROTECTION Professional Budget $2,153,653.00 Volunteer Budget 187,160,00 $2,3404822.00 Total. Budget 90% for Residential 2 oG,740.00 Unincorporated population 93,030 Per Capita 22.65 Per Unit (2.33) (22.65) 52.77 County, Cost (123) (52.71) 60490.71 SIER7FF 55,29907].1.00 Budget 70% for Resident1al 31709,798.00 County Population 156,300 Per Capita 23.74 Per unit (2.33) (23.74) 55.31 County Cost (123) (55.31) 6,803.1.3 L70DICZAL 5 ;7 V1 GAS Superior Court $ 3150860.00 Municipal Courts 933,184.00 County Clerk 489,564.00 4 l JUDICIAL SERVICES (cont'd) M County Work Retraining $ 1.9, 064.00 43;608.00 Family Court Total Judicial 1.1801,380.00 County population 156,300 11.52 Per Capita Per Unit (2.33) (11.52) 26.84 County Cost (123) (26.84) 3,301,32 IiEALTH AND SANITATION Public Health -- Mental. Health $ 1,072,223.00 80% for Residential 857,770.00 County Population 156,300 Per Capita 5,49 Per Unit (2:33) (5.49) 12.79 County Cost (123) (1:2.79) 1,573.17 DISTRICT ATTORNEY, PUBLIC DEFENDBR4 COURT REPORTERS $ 2,052,162.00 Budget 80% for Res-idential 10641,730.00 County Population 156,300 10.50 Per Capita Per Unit (2.33) (10.50) 24.47 County Cost (123) (24.47) 3,009.81 JUVENILI HALL, p:ROBATION DE1'ARTMt�T, PUBLIC GUARDIAN, JUVENILE COURT WARDS $ 1, 59]., 052.00 Budget 80% for Residential 10272,842.00 County Popiilation 166t300 8.14 Per Capita Per Unit X2.33)(8,14) 18.97 County Costs (123) (18:97) 2,333.31 i i d PUBLIC WORKS, PLANNING AND BUILDING INSPECTION Budget $ 7051,915.00 75% for Residential 529,436.00 Unincorporated Population 93,030 Per Capita 5.69 Per Unita (2.33) (5.69) 13.26 County Costs (123) (13.26) 1,630.98 AGRICULTURAL SERVICES AND FARM/HOME ADVISOR- Budget $ 514-,020.00 10% for Residential 51,402.00 w156 � County population 300.00 Per Capita 0.33 Per Unit (2.33) (0.33) 0.'77 County Costs (123) (0.77) 94.71 FISH AND GAME, V.`t; t rTYS SERVICES AND. HALLS Budget $ 82,934.00 County Population 155,300 Per Capita 0.53 Per Unit (2.33) (0.53) 1:23 County Costa (123) (1.23) 151.2".) At4IMAL CONTROL Budget $ 122,000.00 .Unincorporated population 93,030 Per Capita 1.31 Per Unit (2:33) (1.31) 3.05 County Costs (123) (3.05) 375.15 ■ D •r1 _. WELFARE if Budget $ 205,640.00 County Population 156,300 Per Capita, 1.34 Per Unit (2.33) (1.34) 3.12 County Costs (1.23) (3.12) 383.76 LIBRARIES Budget 1,059,195.00 County population 156,300 Per Capita 6.78 Per Unit (2.33) (6.78) 15.80 County Costs (12'3) (15.80) 1,943.40 TOTAL COUNTY COSTS $ 30,203.65 PER UNIT 245.55 t NOTICE nr: COMPLETION 0 (of Draft Environmental- Impact Report) SCH # 79080708 (Big Chico Creek Estc.":t0s Subd. -, DEPARTT`IENT : RESPONSIBLE PONSIBLE AGENCY: xi Planning r q County of Butte Supplement to Environmental Impact Rep 9:f.x�A. f3C.itL, t;(unty Q(er PROJECT TITLE: Big Chico Creek Estates Subdivision for A. JACINTHI Swallowtail Rezone and Subdivision PA -Y . bupuf AP 43-29-12, 15 and 43"27-08 Planning' # 83-3,9 •. CITY: COUNTY: ADDRESS.-' Qroville Butte 7 County Center Drive AREA CODE: noNE CONTACT PERSON: 534-4601 B. A. Kircher, Director of Planning F_PROJECT pESCR ION ...EAND BENEFICE (Planned Area-C].tister) creating 91 detached single-family d«elxlnos and 3.2 11nultiple-:f amity dvtellings on 20.587 acres adjacent to `Test roximately 1.600 feet west of Etighway 32, west Sacramento Aavenue pP Chico, The density equates to 5.91 units per acre which is in I conformance with the General Plan's low de�►sity designation for the area. PROJECT LOCATION CITY: PC r) -rVr'T LOCATION COUNTY: Butte Chico .., ._ Tt\IE PERIOD PROVIDED FOR REVIEW, 30 days April 251 1983 Plenning Department, a 95�J65 Appendic 7 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE OFFICIAL BUSINESS PENALTY FOR PANAT=' ='Miclo R INSTRUCTIONS USE TO AVOro PAYMENT OF POSTAr3E, sioo �' ` print oss, end 21P Cato n the space below. items 1, Y, end 3 an the ravnjtn front of srticlo It apace PORT11% 1 affbt to beck of article. rticle"Return 1`1901 t Requested"o number. RETURN TO Btitte Couinty Planning {r-brw of Sender) 7 County Center DriVe (Street or PA Box) 8'3-39' Oroville CA _'95965 (City, State, and ZIP Code) SSGwNDa�Kt al PAanCllowti CaroPlnddAadSow teuIn the ' - spin on c tdve[lo. 1. The follawbtg service la togteslcd (check one,).... ne )..... —R :. )o[Sltnw to whom and date dellvered. C1 $how to Whrnn, date and address oi'deijrety. •---Q ,� C1 itGSTlticTTaD DL•LIY'iRY to Sltow to whom and dato dcitveftd••�• .— © RLi.ST1t1GTL'D DF-IAVERY, Show to whotn, date, and address of dclivety.S (cot4suLlr POST N.A.�R FOR FEES) 2 ARTICLE ADD"MED To% m State Clearinghouse m3, ARTICLE DESCCIPCERTIPIED NO• iN$URED Nn m gEd15TERED NO, P17J 9971926 t have ati4ed esefibed aoov htc. SiciNAT ,,0Authoaod Avant Ir lin ,. . 1► V!li S, hDkfiltw&9 ICaMplstn on1Y if t�Y Mail «a• State Cl ear3ncnouSe.lA00 Tett, Rm 121 ' Sacramento, CA 95814 -- 416/1611 5eo i�3Tt`6riv++'�'"-'�-""�'�'� NO .11YtRONM-ifTAL DOCUMENT TRANV1iI'riAL FORM NOTICE OF COMPLETION I04 �A SCH t ,•._.._ is Pro�ec» Title: Swallo�vtaa 1_ Subd vis i on T'A-C ______ .. Stephen A. Streeter Butte COu'nty Planning 3. Contact Person: 2. Lead Agency: Qro'V l i 7.e County Center Drive ''b, :r I ' "sa. Stree:%+egress: 3e Phone: 916,i3`I- 607. III f-te 3d' ;lo: 9596S 4 3c. Count-, C4 i c o p?,3.1ECF LOCATION.. 4, Caunty BL1ttE 'a, Community at' Assessor's Parcel No. A3-29-12 15 &4-27x98 4c Sec. 2i�4 _ ioNn, 22N Range_1B— Sacramento rlVerille ? 1Ve5 5b. For tura;, 54. For Uroan, Major of )-Ilghway 32 Nearest roan Cross Streets 32 6b, Airport Ranchero bd: River o. "aittifa 2 miles of: 6a. State Hwys -� (.- 4b and yc bre optional.) TYPE OF. PROJECT FUNDING (approx) TYPEYPE O l_ t5eiect u� to 5} cmo ■2,Ployees ;11P~ 0 -=- ZSe Une al Plan X Resinentia Units 1 2 3 Acres U !! Fea. S NOP t�neral Plan ,..._ Office: Sq.FT. imps— Draft State Draft EIR Elenxnt Adoption —Caneral Pian Amend. �Shopping/ local S Neg Dec �omnercial:5q,�. Specific Plan MttiSated 449 Dec MSoec X Rezoning Industrial/ cmp Privates lere'it (If so Manufacturing:Sq,f•f, X supR Other S orior SCH • 70.708 P.U.O. Water/Sewlrt MGO NEPA 'Subdivision eaP _,ransportation LS --~— Use Pet-mit Mineeal ExtractioncMineral� ....... - _,... nv. AS5eS5tt�11t ,.,._ TOTALS Draft I5 annexation Power Generation/Transmission: _=indiac Na Sig. Irxact Ordinance "-'wattage,_ OtziNr: Master SIR _._.Other: 20 .7 Total Project Acres FOp1�bts USSTON IN OOCU14SUT (Select as many as neeced) r Wildlife Habitat X Lands Grorth Inducing toxic Wastes dobtiviousing Balance ___ His'»pricy wrNew Ladd Use Trend Soil Erosion X iraftic/Circulation X Flooding/Drainage Ai t• Quality fire Hazard Arctieotogical Cw�'ulatve Irrb3c' —0 trier: Wetlan�s „_ +later SupplY-Scnools Soli4 Waste -- cealogic/seismic Coastal lburb-Res Sewer/Septic _;ioise '.�. .. , L.:4D USE AND ZONING A�-SR (Hari ttiltur9.1-SL PP.Esr"3R _ r� creatinr 9> detached. sin 1e� '. PRo.IEC aEsc�tPrtcli FA- C (Plan fanYly dlveli xt s antl._S2 multi te_iamily cltve1i.in s on 2n,537 acres adigent r to 1vost Sacramento Avenue apPVOL'i'itate v 1600 deet .k`est O Eiigh�Yay, 32> aero tith west Chic o Tike density equates to 5.07 Ll Lts Per ich is in w Conformance with the General Plan's 1014 density designation ;dor the area. y.. 7 i SI,G,fIF1C..N'i i:�c'E.:"S, PD55IBL..r MIitGA,lpN A}IO ALT"ckliATtYe5 ooLional .i. 3$EE (jVE±fi TO SUOu"c5T 5iAi f1EV; �A:RS .µ. ti'ghstUrp of tread Agency Roo' " i" KQTc: Clearin�nou3e r�i)) assign idehcifica>ridn tturtber for hi*pro5ec=to If a dumber ai:readY exists for the Drojrtt e.g. rer:i a Nattct of Preparation) please fili in. (reytsea 3/RE replActs REVIEWING AGENCIES X Parks & Recreation Resources Agency Air Resources Board office of Historic Pres. X Conservation:. Native American Heritage oil and Gas Conservation Corps Mines and Geology _ State Lands Cotrlmsson X Fish and Game Public Utilities Comm. Coastal Commission Energy Commission , _ X Caltrans District Food &, Agri culture Boating & Watemays Health: Noise Control 'Forestry Water Board; Toxics y Water Rights Environmental Health • X Water Quality ty Industri al Relations Regional Board Corrections Dept. of Water Resources Consumer Affairs X Reclamation Board Housing & Comm.. Uev. Water Conservation General Services Dam Safely Real Estate Solid Waste X Aeronautics Colorado River Board OTHER: CTRPA (CalTRPA) TRPA (Tahoe RPA Bay Conservation DeV. Comm, FOR SCH USE 014LY Date Rec'd at SCH Date Review Starts Date to Agencies Date to SCH SCH Clearance Date NOTES Gounig I D b F A it I lir Y LAND OF NA I'ti KAI %ril f%,) I if AN 4X PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 PHONE; 53d.4601 March 22, .1983 RE: Supplement to Environme"rital Tmpact'Report foT Big Chico Creel,-, Estates Subdivision, rot, the Swallowtall Rezone and Subd"ivislCin PA -C A'P 43-29-12, 15 and 43-27-08 Planning # 83-39 A draft supplement to the 'Environmental Impact Report for the above project has been prepared and the dOCU111011t publ'Lshod. q,o avoid an), Unnecessary costs, we are not distributing this document to private individuals Or duplicate copies to public agencies. Copies of the above-mentioned SUPI)lement are available for public review at the Planning Department at 7 County Center J)rivie, Orovillo, the Butte County Library branches, Chico State University, and Butte College Library, There is a charge of $4.03 for the supplemental document. Tf you would like a copy of the t..14R., it will be 50111t to YOU Capon -receipt by this office of $4.03 Plus POStaqc Of $.60 'Cor a total of $4465i Shoul.d you have any qUestioll-so please contact this dtpartillent. 81ncorely) ste'phen A. Stroeter senior Planner SAS.11kt i r county " w LAND OF NATURAL WCALTH AND BEAUtY PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLV, CALIFORNIA 9$965 PHONE: 554-4601 March 22, .8:3 RE .Tay Halbert Swal. l owta.i l PA- C AP 43-29-12, 15 (ptn) and 45-27-08 Planning File #I 83-39 To Whom it May Conce k n t The enclosed supplement to the lanvironmental ;Impact Report for Big Chico Crock Estates Subdivision and including Swallowtail Subdivision PA -C is for your information and review, A Notice of Complevtiori of the supplement has been filod with the Butte County Clerk and the Resources Agency of California Secretary: Comments concerning the materi.a.1 contained in the supplement are solicited, Such comments can be submitted to the Butte County Planning Department at the above address until the close of the 39 clay period or review on Monday, April 25, 1983. Should you ]cave any questions, please contact this department. Sincorely, .S�phon A Streeter Sonior Pl armor. SASilkt Ene. A.: NOTTCE Tn TE[S 1'UBL1C Allinterested persons are hereby notified that pplement to the Environmental Tmpact Report has I)e�ott complete(.] for the ,following: Stivallowtail PA-C Rezone and Subdivision (JAY Halbert)it the vicinity Of the Big Chico Creek i stntc:,t Subdivisi AP 43-29-12, IS and 43-27-08 - Rezone Of 20,587 acreson from A-SR (agricultural-SubLIrban-Pesidetiti.;11 to PA-C (Planned Area-Cluster) to create 91 Dict tdhed single -:family dcvell,ings and 32 multip7.e-.f41111i ;ly dwellings, located adjacent to West Sacramento Av..•at_lc% ""Proximately 1600 :Feet west of Highway 32, ivest ChL o, 1,110 density equates to S.97 units per acre. Copies of the above-me.ntioncd supplement to the ]nvi.ronmental Impact Report are available :Col- public I•eviOw at the Butte County Planning Department at 7 County Center Drive, 0"Oville, the Butte County Library branches, Chico State University, Butte College Libral-y and Chico City Library. Public comments concerning the material contained in the draft supplement to the E,I.R are solicited. Such comments can be submitted to the ,Btitte County Planning Department at the address;; listed above until the close of the .30 da April 25, 1983. y revieW period at 5 p. In, B. A. iii r c,ho r Director of Planning Te be publishcd in the Chico Tinterprise Record on MaTth 24, x.983, Thursday, , To...... Library Chico gr -- CO, ...�_ ...4.< ._ ._ anches 4_-,- TI M ..... p1 annxng4 ,Department PHDNe Ndw. ...... 4•--�-•-- _- Tetephone d d Please Cal! Called 'to Ste You d WYII Call Again. , Ci MEssA� �t,rallowta;zl PA ..,...,. .4:..44 ;._ ..4. "G4.?'xo j pct w .SnPplement to HEIR for B . ....w4 4..states SuUd._.,� Ch�.co Creek �tezone` an�`��ui"d r tlie�45t�a11otirtaix ..,.ti pA" C g 3 ,w :,.. _444 44L ,�Ifj�J( .4 n- extra Co th 1. 1• +4 R s bezn 4.foo„ wareu�iement...tii--t1ie +a/wnep /�iay be �ciicua -- Yao so4wthat. ..44.at�� S3Zi to /availa ` `' �,..ut.:,ouni. Ye for .w 11kr-DepartmentULMemOrunabom TO: State Clearinghouse Attention; Anna Polvos FROMI Steve Streeter, Planning suaier"r: Review Period ,for the Swallowtail PA -C Project OATt' March 22, 1983 Please consider a 30 day review period for this project. The reasons are as follows: 1,. The document being circulated is a supplement -to a previously certified. EIR, namely the docum nt for the Big Chico Creel: Estates Subdivision SCH n 79080705. 2. The supplement is not a lengthy document that would require extensive reviely time by responsible and interested state agencies. 3. The 30 day review period will not shorten the review period locally; a 30 day review period is also established for review by local agencies and the public. 4. The developer is operating under time constraints for exercising options, including options for access to finances. 5, Ile •«;l'lx contact the bepartment. of .Fish and Came and the Rec.l.amat'ion Board regarding the shortened ti ie fr,.me. Those two state agencies are the main agencies that may submit comments for this project. SAS IRt State Clearinghouse Chico Area Recreation Dig Cal. State Univ., Chico 1400 loth St. Rm. 121 54.5 Vallombrosa Avenue Arlt Topology Dept 6acramento, California * 0 5.2u. 95814 Chico, Ca. 95926 Chico, Ca. 9 Pacific Gas & Electric 350 Salem Avenue Chico, Ca. 95926 Pacific Telephone Co. 460 11io Lido Avenue, Fm. 102A Chico, CA 9 S 9 2 6 Chico Planning & Public Works Departments Post Office Box 3420 CIA"Lco, CA 9592' Chico Unified School Ibis 1163 E. ?tII Street Chico, Ca. 950/26 1 W4 Dept. o,r Fish. Game Rt i 3; Box 551 (SIjoviden) 959-6 Alta Cal Audubon Society P. 0. Box 3671 (Kimberly.' Chico, California 05927 Butte Co. Sierra Club c/o T. McCready i # 4 Rosemary0role Chico, Ga. 95926 Eco -An bs P. O. 110YxI5*11 87 9 Ohicb4 Ca. 1 5927 Calif. Water Service Co. 340 Salem Street Chico, Ca. 95926 Agricultural Science Ser. Rt: 31 Box 73 (Konnine Av Chico) Ca. 950/26 Butte Co. Mosquito Abate, 5117 Larkin Road Oroville, CA 95965 Butte College Library route 1, Box 183-0 oroville, Ca. 95965 2 Pat -rick Porgans I Post Of"'ice Box 1731 Chico, Ca. 95927 Butte Uollege c/0 Agriculture Dept. Rt. I , Boy- 183A OrOviilOi CA 95065 Air Pollution Control a. 11 . Control conmi8sione X16 Iqe18on Ave. Courier -- \%� i"kr." oroville Butte county Sheriff Dept 4Courier - Otovilje "'PlAblic Works Vtppr-'('!Ien-UI Courier - O.Oville t1i C. Farm A6visov 2279 Del Oro Oroville Cal. Native Plant Socjety Butte County Library t/o J. -jok-erst Tit. ol'oville Box 507B C i CA 98526 9 C,';I-State Univ. , Chico -W-010g-y Dept. M. Anthony 011100, Ca. 95929 Cal. State Univ., Chico 000Vaphy Department - U chio'01 ca;. 95929 0411. State Univ., Chico Idbrary chio'07 ca. 95929 2, Oral. State IThiv., Chico Physical Science Dept. Oldco, Ca. 95929 Cal- State Univ. , Chico c/o R. Davis Rosoarch Centuoc So --r, ness & Economics Chico, Ca. 9592�-` CA-. Dept. Forestg & Butte` Co. Fire D"ptu. X16NelsL Avenue Courler Oroville Envy vonmental Real -Lh Dvo, !; Courier - Orovillo tainguse'100 10h St. Rm. 121 'thico Area Recreation DA Cal. State Univ., Sacramento) California, 545 VOL1101abrosa Avena. 0 Anthropology Dept. Chico, ca. 95926 Chico, Ca. 95929 "'Pacific Gas & Eleo-tric 350 Salem Avenue Chicon ca. 95926 V'i'aciric Telephone Co. 460 Rio tindo Avenue, FM. 102A k CIII-CO, CA 95926 t 'Chico Planning & Public WOrk"s Departments Post- Office Box 3420 Chico, CA 95927 Chico ijilified School Dist 1163 E. 7th Street Chico, ca. 95926 Dept. Of Fish & Game Rt- 3� Box 551 (SnOWden) Chicb, Ca. 95926 Alta Cal Audubon Socj.c_t;,y P- 0- Box 3671 (Kimberly) Chico, Cali2ornia 950,27 4 Butte Co, 8'I brra Club C/O Ti McCready Tlu 4 Rosemary Circle Chlico) Ca. 95926 Eoo-AiaalyGt8 P , U . ii 0 * . ox 1187 Chico, Ca. 95927 L. Cali, Nlatl"ro Plant Society C/o J. Jokerst Ati 4) BOX 5071 Chico. CA Calif. Wats Service Co. 340 Salem Street Chico, ca- 95926 Agricultural Science Ser. Rt. 3� Box 73 (KOnning Av.� Chico, Ca- 95926 IL Butte Co. Mosquito Abate. 5117 Larkin Road Oroville, CA 95065 Butte CollegeLibrary Route I I .lox: 183-c Orovijle, CR4 95965 W10 Patrick: porgal. Post Cffice BOX '1731 Chico; Ca. 95927 Richard Slavich Butte Uollege C/O Agriculture Dept. nt. 1, Box 183A Oro -Ville, CA 95oG5 Air Pollution control Agricultural Commi8sionej 316 Nolnon Ave. *Courier - 01-1ville f v'tuti,c COUnty Sheriff Dept. 4Courier- OrOville Butte 00tuitY Idbrary Orovj ' 110 6y' Cal.StateUniv. , Chico Biology Dept. M. Antljoyly Chico, 0, Ca. 9,929 Ga16 State Univ, Chico Geography Department Chico) Ca- 95929 Cal. State Univ., Chico Library Chico, Ca. 95929 Cal- State Ujjiv_., Ch.100 Physical Scionce Dept, Chico, Ca. 95929 Cal- State Univ., Chico C/O RA Davis ReL­!arch COntor for Busi- !.,088 & Economics Chico) Ca. 95929 Z_ 'CA. Dept. Fore,_,try_ & Butte CO. Fire Dept. 176 Nelson Avenue I *Oour'er OroVille' `-EnvI'X'OnMental Health Dept �k courier - Orovi 11 e -, t Planning Att;n.xrpan - *courier 2- *Q:t'Ovill e cour" qr, ti -4 kWh. Department,. Courier Oroville U. 0, Varm Advisor 8279 Del Oro Otoville 92656 VO OrILIO tV '[00 a@o [o0F1 6LST doL[STU ItxA LZ6S6 V0 `oaxt[o 605£ x0a *0 •d 000.2 ooxuo S-B L An-I L[t[or 9Z656 VO `001t{0 Cl-66T XOU `Z *4-d u ext Q otsnS � stuuo k � LZGS6 V0 `oottt0 s!T2 xog 10 •C1 s • oossv ut�Oolrl 9Z656 'V0 `000 Z0`C Xo£[ `2 zaoctivt.[ Xs d oA Jay Flalbert Rt. 2, Box 102 Chico, CA 95926 LIcCain El Assoc. er p: 0. Box 2178 Chico, CA 95927 Dennis � Susie DurI in Rt. 2, Box 199-D Chico, CA 95926 John Luvaas Chico 2000 p. 0. Box 3509 Chico, CA 95.927 Will Bishop 1579 l"iooker Oak Avenue Chico, CA 95926 ►-~ je can PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE � OROVILLF, CALIFORNIA 95965 PHONE 5.0 4601 l�tr►� rt►ti 1'y ?; , i Sys.; ;J,Iy I I a I bo rt Rt - 4 Box 102 ChicoCA 95920 l2li: Vtscal Anatysis an(I 1111: V'oo Doposit I"ov .SjvIj l()rvttlil 1A -C Vito ff 53-39 1.)o Iv Mr. Ilalbort `c11Is is to noti, I), `ot1 thtlt tt'C' aL'" re(IIIC';'t1lig a i`1scnI Lana lysi's cif` your project. Examplos of Cost/ rovc,nt e analyso"; are avni.labte I,or y0111' r0vLCW. IN ove tt.ia 1 rov ie%vi r1,t; the clfi o ri: s111)h1.c11jlc1nt to t1le pi- .hr l I R r' rccr i vccl last wcol : A deposit or $ 00 is 1'Cttt►c1st0d to Cover eSt]Intl to(I costs. Pl'ior' to the t-1-4110 that the PAC Vezono :is Cons idcrod by thu Pl tlnni.n� CoI11111issto.11 t111d l�ottr�t c1 .I` �ittl�Cr�* .; c�r'4 , the Fiscol ait;1tv"J5 should he pl't-,par•oci otts1 sl:1hmittecl. 1,r ycrtl 1lttec a1,y (1110StionS 1'Cgtr ��lin,; t110 1'i5Ctr1-11rt11ysi1 of HIP cicrposit I`ot• the lily Su1)hlement, p1onse co;►lt"Ict Iii1 t Turpin or t11cr uncle rS i,,nC c1 S: icer O i s hun A. S roo t o o S�trior I'itlnnct' tiAS;lkt cc : Mork Russo, t•1CCLl i n As--- ,.:I rt os UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVic\00)0 OFFICIAL BUSINESS Q � PENALTY OO �A USF. to Avow.eexfco N""`-"'� .W+ SENDER INSTRUCTIONS IM oc PoSTA sn the piss, and'ZIP Code Ii rint youroConplotaritamsf,2,andaanthe oce aiaw,ir,� w�+we+w Attoth to front of art if tpaca permits, •` "" '"` `" otherwho affix o back of AMCIO, E�dorsa article "Hatum Efacaipt flequaslod" dtf� nt to "umbar, 6Wort. AEv x � r183 Butte County Planningorovg10+ t rotor r$ of Sender) County Center DT' (Street of P,O. ) ,lay Halbert PA-C Oroville,. CA 95965 r « �1 S4N MI CamHieto Items 1, 2, and 3. ' ,Add your addttss in die "it MRN TOS' imea on _ reverse. 1, The fpli'owing sorvice Is requested (check one;) (X Show in whom and date delivered............ r ❑ Show to wham, date and addtdss of delivery..._..:,* a ❑ RPs7'ii enD DrLNrky ' Show to whom and date delivered ....... t...,`. ❑ RMTIU(_- DDELtVhltl'. Show to whom, date, and address of delivery,$..._. (C ONSU3.`C POS1'NAS'fL'R FOR PRES) $ AFvnc:LE AbbR[SSEb 10 - Jay Halbor e . 2: ARTICLE DeSCRIPTIONr s w g RCMSTERtct) NO. CERTIFtgt7 No. INt u"itokNo. P25 8996532° lAlwaysalrWin signatute of addressee or agent I have recelved the article described above. SIONATU11t: 13Ad&elu+oO_Autho pd 19=1 . 4,,� OF DELI nV POSSMRK 8. Abb IUM IdomPlets y r �j" onty fV r+Wasts+i! 0 UNAWX TO MUM BECAUSEI CLERKS jNMAL3 z TUFO 1 1079.288.848 R5CEIP1` fOR CEFiTI�IEa MAIL NU INSURANCE GOVnRIh19AL BAIQEO— NOT FOR INTON •T Jay 1-1, l.b fp.,FILL,GEr M 3ku u 14 w• �+ I;. I o w . c� rg yojAL PUSTA0E Afl'0;C:E y poSTMARK 0A pp'TE �c w PLANNING coMMtsstoN 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95465 PHON[; 534-4661' ,1011LIa ry L 2 , `1.953 khay Halbert Rt 2, Sox 102 Chtco, CA 95926 Illi: PA -C Rezone 33-39 Ali 43-29-12, 43-27-08, 43-29-15 Lo t 82-11-15-02 Dear bit-. Hal.bcrt Wo have comp'letod the i.nitial study of potcntla-Ij C,Ily .ronntenta.'l imp;tz is related to Vcur proposed dcve'lopntent. 'Tilts results OF 011'1' evaluation areC:tpla.lned in the enclosed initial study thcc�- :list, Appendix F. r d Deeairrsc of potentially s tvi r icccrit environmental itrtpacts, particu- larly growth induccrncrlt incl cumulative L-Crcets, an impact report is required pursuant to the; rccluy, rcments of the California Dnv i ron- Mental QUa.lity Act and the Butte County Eilvironmontal, Review Guide ltnr sIll this case, wo have determiner' that the D.iq Chico Crook Csttttes Elly is suUnb1c, [or cons ider•ation ol° the current subdivision ,r proposal (per Section 15068 of the CEQA Guidelines) along j�rith a supplcmcnt (per Sections 15067 and 15067.5 off the CCQA Cuidolines). You, as the applicant, arc -required to submit information in the form OC a draft supplen+unt `to the )~. T . Ct. within 200 days from the date o f receipt of this notice that all E. J. R, is required. 1Ve ;, require a deposit or the: estimated costs of F.1.lt. p7`oCoss Ing, prior to 14inal izing your` submitted draft. `rllis cost may vary de- Pending on the completcnc.,ss of the material. 8Ubmitted. hte tail cictermine hour much of a deposit is needed at tilt tithe the draft C C 17 supplenlont is 5-11111 i t t 0d, When the subd i v is tort phase or the PI.-ojec:t i.s compl,etod, the will rofund any unwed rcmaincler or.,the initial fees (`Forthe TSA -C I7ozone and the Tontativo Subdivision ap) or bill you Cor any costs in excess 01" those, deposited. n ,T ty Halbert Page 2 ,Jattu.tr•y 12, l983 T t you tv ish to appeal the requirement fo t• prep;r t tt l i L�r1 'o E an I ;'i,R., you May ri.lc a wr.i.tte" protest spcci.CyirL�r Mite reasons thcrefoL, with the }Manning 0cpartnrcnt. This mtrwrt ho done Within 15 days Ex°om the date of this notice. Tf' nc IV vit tcQ11 Protest is timely filed; r sLip pIcment to t 11 previously govt i tied V,.S.it. tvil t be Veclui vcd supplement should fully address ali Lh(r impacts i.dentii:ied. on the checl`li.st, including cli°ainLi;L� to tile creek, ground and surface water qM �.ty, Cl.00d-carrying Cap, of the Crock, feasibility of septic systems at the proposed density, loss of ag rix ultur`al land to p rodLrction; t ra 1 ric onto West Sacramento AvcrLue and the oC octs oil the school Land recreation districts. Project alternatives should be Frilly explored in the sttpploment. Also, the D.I.R. should (IISQUss fea.sibl.e project cies ig;n features c r future land uses that t�or~r'i.d reduce envirOn- t►rerltal impar ts. ti itigation mcasures should be proposed to address tltr, significant impacts . i urthor study may incllc ate that some faCtorg tv:Ljl, not regLlite slaec;Lal miti ;G�tiorts, 11e tivll'i continuo processing yotrL` project t,rpon receiving your h. i, lt, suppi oritcrit sttbnt_i,ttal and det os it : IV you have any gtrosty.ons , please contact this of'fico. Sincorely; t plzeti A. SenL0r t"LUItiiwa $AS !Rt lanC . cc; Public Works Dept. tole t. - � - tAND K:�T t'AA1uRAt U0 � atTt nr<sL� DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH }'(196 Memorial Way C:1" County Cantor Drive LI 747 Elliott Rood Address y Orovllle California 95965 Porodiae, Colifornia 95969 Reply to Chicoi Gdlilotnio 45926 Tglaphopa 916/52.4281 old (,ono' 91 872-2961, Etst. 58 T'elophohei 916/891.7727 Dutte 6o, Nif9nnfng comm. January 10, 1983 JAN 11 1983 QrOV010, Craliturma A1r. day Elalbert Swallowtail Subdivision PAC Rezone P, 0, Box 4143 Bidwell Avenue, North Side, Chaco Chico, California 9592 APIC 43-29-12., 433 27-08 4 43-29-15 Portion hear Mr, Halbert; I :received your letter concerning the aboveproject, made an initial review of the map and discussed 'the project With the h p In order to clarify your intentions regarding building sites, common area and restricted common area please submit a revised map more clearly indicating, that your plan complies with the concept of a PAC development. Y understand that the numbered sites that appear to be lots are efactuahe lly restricted common areas, The map Should clearly indicate which portions _- area- restrict erty ed common area and building sites or lots. are proposed for common , Where individual building sates are to be sold as PAC lots, this should be clearly shown on the plan A development plan was not, provided for the tl�leaseaindicatedwelling th� onts,b if the mapthese are to remain vacant for uture development; p that the lots, when developed, will be under a PAC amendment: Please also contact the But Count Planning pepartment aiyd Butte County Public i Works, Land Development Section Coticernin the 'map to, minimize the possibility that a revised trap does not moot their respective requirements Very ;truly yours, tote Reid, R. S Division of Cnvironmental. Health TR/ les Public Wovks yPlanning } 4;4, d .J Tot C� F RO.I.1r suv.,txi: ,lay Halbert- PAC Rezone Application APO 43-29-12, 15 and 43-27-08 DATN* D eormber G, 1982 Soil doptbs and percolation rates in the vicinity of the subdi.vIsion are excellOnt. 7`ho proposed lot sizes, though, are considerably substandavd With rc.-; ioct to the Subdivision Ordinance sewage disposal area rcqui. ement: The dojolopers may either redesign the project to provide lots of adequate size fOr the proposed individual septic tanks on individual .lots or proVU10 adequate common area for community sewage disposal, systems, oshould t}1e d veloper. revise the PAG to provide common sewage disposal area, permit appl,ialit,i,on may be required to complete our review: ' . i Real Estate Development & P. o, Box 4143, Chico, C June 21, 1983 Mrs, Betty A. Kircher Director of planning County of Butte 7 County Center Drive orovil.lej 'CA 95965 Re; Waterford Victorian Homes Rezone file no. 83-39 Deur Betty; 1 wanted to let you know that I really you have given m with this project. and I thank you for your counseling.. The engineer is finishing the map which for the entire project. We have design park locations throughout the subdivisi in your office by Friday, June 24 at tt The description used by the Planning De to the project as being 20.74 acres on This is causing n- problems because eve advertised or written about, people tel traffic onto Bidwell Avenue, This is nei E�hbors and as you know S have gone trouble to put traffic onto Sacramento start re to my project as the 20 Sacramento Avenue? I would. appreciate your convents on tr location description, as I do feel th will be in your office Friday afternoc the cmagsicm meeting on July 21, early in the evening? Very truly yours i"/41 �t1 Jay 8, Halbert JSH;sh . tie, a PLANNING COMMISSION i COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 PHONE: 534.4601 June 17, 1983 Tor. Jay Halbert Route 2, Box 102 Chico, Ca. 9592 Re Rezone File 83-3' Dear Mr. Halbert As you are aware the Planning Commission, at their meeting on June 16, continued the herring OPEN on your aPPlication. for a rezone for 20.74 acres on the north side of Bidwell Avenue east of B' .9 Chino Cr ek.Pstates and west of High- land Park Subdi k. on from A -SR (Agricultural -Suburban Residential) to PA -C (Planned Area -Cluster, to July 21, Please feel free to contact olar office,, i questions f you have any Si��c:erely'> A. Kircher /hd Director of Planning cc. MCC4in P, Associates P0Box 2178 Chico) Ca. 95927 N' ro; r vwm. ,uuiCC'T 1) AT TIM l'ott'o County T'lgnnank '1"ort Rccl, I;nva,rolnOntal 11aa1t�. water.foxcl 1�AC - Subraiva:sion, Sac�'c1:lnentO 1`vcntycj Cllco, /`.I)If 0-29-12_15 p;.tl, • cn�fiecl ca11c17 ti�'In:� oar al,l1)`ava], forLllc ol�avc PAC clopaxtlnorits x ecomnl ]'C7.a11L1C o<la s �oshl Iles i.n i.11 COlnhli.ance wJ,tl1 )l�lttc County provide tl. sol;ag1 octal lt';Lt c C�tlal iiy C;4jnt�.03. lloclxcl anti Cal fox:nia rjtxllC Rog" xCcjllixC111Cltts are tai • icle a lCttcx o1 otll.o�' c.locument"t•ion ixonl 11,118 incl ablo to C;s�l.iforn'la 1';atcx' Z. P� ov Service com?"Iny stat.cl►�; that ect. domestic lit'slt�''1 L'O the pxoj r0 �osocl to 1?t� stcispl) e oxclox to pxovidO _required tits ab ].e setaa;c Indicate an tllo tentative mat) those t,aJ 1s th7t` axe � cl Proposed sewage tge hO clestxOyea undev permIt �oxm.t disposal areas. Clostr 5y thco c gC11s t►ndci l ;r xvecl by t}��; 1ta11s to Other approvedi�ntc�' satt�'ces �faciliti6ro sc pziox to xoGoxdi.n final snap . • 1ea.cltCi.e].rl free so'L:back axountl Axa next)' Or within ane lltl;lcl ea provide ;z ano lilndrecl (100 foot exi sti of t�tells cathcx tgitl�in tl►e 1 1• �ro �Oxty hounzt'�xics . (1.00 f-ect) of the p i 1 St,t� s frtctoxy evldonce ill`+ ] iSlird tahomeolr 1ers tahc intenance 5, otho — 1Oaal Ontity 1J 11 be Os�t:nl� ro sir Or. 'v0place ment of tile, setca e disposal systems: `tC1`y 'roils tizall Sanitarian 11I `j Til 5 E eta c June 70 1983 LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND 11 r AUTY PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILL'E, CALIFORNIA 45465 PHONEi 534-4601 Jay Halbert Route 2, Box 102 Chico, Ca. 95925 Re Rezone File 8.3-39 Dear Mr, Halbert: Enclosed is a copy of Staff Findings concerning your application for a rezone for 20.74 acres on the north side of Bidwell Avenue east of Big Chico Creek Estates and west of Highland Park Subdivision from A -SR (Agricultural - Suburban Residential) to PA -C (Planned Area -Cluster). A public hearing by the Commission has been set for their regular meeting on June 16, 1983. This meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors' Room, County Admin- istration Building, 28 County Center Drive, Oroville, and is scheduled to begin at 7:30 P. M. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact our office. /hd Enc, cc McCain 4 Associates P 0 Bax 2178 Chico, Ca4 95927 Sitnterely �R R. A. 1Ca rc} Director of Planning LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY DEPARTMENT OP PUBLIC WORKS CLAY CASTLEBERRY, Director 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE, OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 Telephone! (916) 534=468.1 WIl,1,lA1d (dill) CHEFF Deputy Ditatioe May 311 1983 Jay Halbert RE: Waterford PA-C Subdivision Rt. 2, Box 102 AP 11.5-27-08 and 43=29-12, 15 p n. Chico, CA 95926 Dear Mr. Halbert: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Subdivision Committee helm on May 25, 1933, the Committee reviewed the above-referenced tenative PA-C subdivision. Enclosed please find the list of conditions whish will be recommended by the Department of Public Rorks. The Planning Department will notify you of the date, time and ,place that the Planning Commission will be reviewing this project. If you have any questions "regarding this matter, please cohtlet this office. Very truly your, Clay Castleberry Director of Public Works J hn Mendonsa JM/ds Assistant Director attachment cc Manning Health - annlilg Con ih% (artiviiloi c,biii'artl�i WATERFORD PA -C SUBDIVISION, (Jay Halbert), 123 units approximately 1100 ft. west of Rose Avenue, on the north side of Bidwell Avenue, east of Big Ch4�o Creek Estates and west of Highland Park Subdivi- cion,.. Chico. Assessor's Parcel Number: 43-2��08 and 43-29-12 & 15 (ptr,.) Public Works Department cob ditians are: I. Submit road and drainage plans to the Department of Public Works for approval and install the required facilities. 2. Provide 20 -ft. radius property line returns at all street intersections. 3. Provide right-of-way for standard No. S-5 at all street intersections; 4. Indicate a 50 -ft. building setback line from the centerline of Sacramento Avenue. b. shall be provided by the developer at. all ,, Street signs street intersections per County requirements. (Submit five alternate street names ftr each street to the County .ddress coordinator for approVal of street names.) 6. Deed 30 feet from the centerline of Sacramento Avenue to the County of Butte. 74 Construct one-half street section on Sacramento Avenue to R54 -A road standard with vertical curb, gutter, and sidewalk and 2" AC, 811AB, SC 250 prime, fog seal and 959 relative compaction. Construct full street section On all interior streets to section shown on tentative map 8. Provide monumentation as required by the Department of Public Works in accordance with accepted -standards. 9. Street c-ades and other features shallcomplywith the Butte County Ordinances, design resolution and other accepted engineering standards. 10. Provide permanent solution for drainage. Ili All easements of record to be shown on the final map. 12. Meet the requirements of the Butte County Fire Department or other 'responsible agency. 13. Street lighting shall be provided in accordance with Butte County requirements, accepted design criteria, and recommendations of PG&E. Continued on next sheet r t 14. pay off assessments. e PG&E, requirement' the utility companies ('• 15 ts of Meet the g water, sewer) Pacific Telephone, 16. Pay any delinquent taxes: appropriate 17. Fife a tentative and final subdivision map and pay fees.nsi 18. Developer shall provide all required traffic safety 5 •i � including stop signs. LD -x access road on Victorian Park Drive to lZ� 9- 9, Cons'trus emergencyate on. Bi,dWell Avenue. and construct bxeaka�ay BUTTE. CQUNTY P -L& I SIG COMMISSION , COUNTY CENT. Eli , RIVC •- OROVILLE CP!,LIFORNr 951965 PHONE! 53LI-/1601 TO 13u't tC 'Cor_rnt;y DATFl Novovil)ar 1�, 1982 13r,wi� onntenl.tt.1. 'Ileal h Fl F'TiO� 7 C'i!`X:PVCT;PJ ANI) I±;tdyIR0INt4S[#A_I, ,VA't,UATIOpt &clo sed is pro`iimi.,rrary data our officze t1tA,5 received ox' the fo'll;owing ro •ect: cnerarcd ennc xrtarria 1� � tT� }talber`t' 3-�tJ itcrnr,c From 11-t�i2 tt n�;. a,Cxy Cacti$ aan r Po a'ticil 5 err: e ° �i ' '� l i', 7 0 . ort clrvolo ilielit Of 91 Srhtall ring" . ~tr,bocl > 1U@OS �rtic � '�`�'`'g �'. VC:11.1t victotiall homes, locatod approNx matoly 1100 rclo ' .rest: of Rosv "Cl11'019t Of 1`tlWlland Park Subd, inCfij.co. _ 0 —. r>: <fi-- � resrr� z t°—�� We are matting an aloe€;ament of poE;sibI,c ctivironmental i;rn�,tc#a aricl ���,1�. kae preparin All envi rorimont;al ciocttrt�ent I either a Negative Doal.ara.ti on Miti'gatod Negative J Oclarati.or ot.� an Environmental. I mp''A t I apart ' "' Y YOU' Bari offoreanuy o it factual ;;t�Xtot,0t�t�i, ides, ft�t i21vo t;it;atior.j Or opin..i.onCl Please p ' Y t >a of coticr t'n oil expar, ti em t bat; relate to cit}•ter physical soolul, or economic imluUts that thio Px'OJ0cts ;wiy gonorrite. P1cac;: re pond wi.tharr ill clay,, oi' the abot(,�_Hoted d4�te. 11, rto re.p.onro is generated by tl ,to inrltriry; then it shall be asnumied that there are no s z rr, ricattt impact, which are Iotentia'l, from thepr-o�jcct,. WO altprcc ,-AO 8tV assistance you can provi,do. Si no erelyP 2 {tihG y IZ(1Cil'1,It u Cctmnie'nts' V% .LI_ x Il 6,10 tr±of typo ,i.ti. s rri rt zn Itrtivz,dert rchatrtt ,t,irira akrc�et,�y BUTTE. COUNTY. Ptd`' . NING COMMISSIOtJ 7 COUNTY CENTER �IVE - OE20VILLE., CALIFORN0959-65. PHONE 534-4601 TO: Reclamation Board DATE: November 22, 1982 1416 Ninth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 RE: PROJECT~ REVTEtJ AND ENVIROM ENTALY EVALUATION Enclosed is preliminary data our office has received or generated concerning the following project o P J Jay Hatbrt 8s-39 REzonc From A Sfi to } PA -'C of 20.74 acres For proposed development of 91 small, unattEtched, ung e ami y sc organ omes an a ac Vxctor'ian homes, located app_:oximately 1100 feet west of Rose Avenue, Q11 11 Lim 01 Avenn,5ss,tates and west of Hiahlatld Park bubd in Chico. g p sither, a Ne • _ We are making, an assessment of possible environmental impacts and will be preparing an environmental document, Negative Declaration, Mitigated - Negative Declaration or an Environmental Impact Report. Please provide any factum,, statements, ideas for investigation, or dpinions YOU can offer in your area of concern or expertise that relate to either physical; social, or economic impacts that this project may generate. Please respond within. 14 days of the above noted date. If no x•espo'se is generated by this inquiry, then it shall be assumed that there are no Significant environmental impacts which, are potential from, the project, " We appreciate any assistance you can provide. 5i.ncerely .t ^Ric ;Planning, T^chhician Crsma.eh;ts ;ygr and Minor Tributaries flood conhrol t:ro�eet and ukider The Reclamation �foa?^d � s urisd3:et3.�an Should, runof.f f rom the propo, OeO prd j ect be cori'veyed to Big Chico Creel:; there may be a effect nn the Creek t 8 flood• -carrying Capa ity. This should be explored ih an environmental, dOOUMent. In additi6tl, the project proponent should be advised that approVal of plans Froin the Board it necesear g y �r�.o.r to .stmt of work on any- drainage faci hies:, outfal1 strictures, or o'thor modifications of the. Creek (Waite cru type in spa,jO proVided & rtLurw this , BUTTE. COUNTY PL'1 I NG COMPS ISN I N % COUNTY CENTER LRIVE - OROV I LL.E, CAI„I1 ORN 1 H 95965 f� PHONE: 534-4601 To PG&E DATE: November 19, 1952 350 Salem Chico CA 95926 RE : PROJECT REVIEW AND ENVIVON14ENTAL EVALUATION Enclosed is preliminary data our office has received or generated concerning the following project: ;lay Halbert 83-:39 Rezone flour A -SR to PA -C of 20.74 acres for proposed development of 91 small, unattacb<d, single rami y Vict5rtaTI homes and 32 a ac le , talluly Victorian homes, located approximately 1100 fect west of Rose Aventie Side ln ie, s _ Chtco Creek Estates and west of Highland Park Subd. in Chaco. .1 We are making an assessment of possible environmental impacts aid will ,�-, -n or `ironmental do^"u" ic, e trier a Negative Declaration, Mitigated. Negatyve D,�:c aration or at, Fnvironmental impact Report.. Please provide any factual statements, ideas for investigation, or opinions you can offer in your area of concern or expertise that relate to either physical, social., or --:anomic impacts that this project may generate, Please respond within 14 days of the above -noted date, If no response is generated by this, inquiry, then it shall be assumed that there are no significant environmental impacts which are potential from the project. We appreciate any assistance you can provide. .. Sincerely, `Rick Rodrigue Planning Technic ian Comments: /,L/,GIGLti J'�il%%w.✓r z butte Co. Manning vomm, C E C O 1982 Orovillo, California t� tA�r