HomeMy WebLinkAbout LAND USE PLAND 85-40 3 OF 5NOTICE OF 1DETERMINAV6N
V, �11 "
s
I -
't '
I
CONtb. I
CS U5S0 , 5 At�;R8CQW113N'b"A TO
Il
I
CO230LU5�OT�S
I
I
The Cit�r of 'Orov;i l e . rluiniciparVIM ha' C the
'be
otentil to br►e o the bGt carcral a�ixt.icaz
INorther:n,Oal°forma.
The ntimbez o oprtioris at the%-'ct Qrc��
ruriic.ipal AirSart has r�creasad dur;inq thet 2 Fears
The 90,160 ci'Petatlo ciu�ing tie dear Preoeedin j r9arc:h 1 89
almr st eq,�a. th e of I the :Chioa aid; Acidclinr "Air to ts,
3'The cz tY of Oxovi 1 ie Munici t�,�1 Airarlt sh�ta d
each its: caacit�r. ofQ; Qf30 teetta
dears: -
I'
No a#s aQ-e co.4 th- cit
cad
bro�+ille rinc:aaa. kiir ort and as Y othO�.Irs t.r
t esi nate tra `ic route, rl is an a rs aoe prole em
artie:�paed in tha0 gearstd:Yaioi;
I i
5, 1t7t1io��2` ine=17ar1Ge rk$17Ii 5 LIt C7t1 G
ga.rtar� phasat iMovarerits Y the aix�Yrtw �w=x �atMit otlate
tlttlre tri naat38 r tt l b :come at�t k� n 'c: tLr ; t he 4
to the C_it} oral,
I
1 The oft ShCti1
V, _r�.��.�eY
e
rnrrtt
a!ir 044tPr 6 art�l alr L,
I I a
I
AIO Lib4
I
a r t i '1 �� nl } j,, y� h yw �r }, {,
�t tiyF -1w C;Y �A'1.�. 6
L74a V
r� i L3`rr,'mo t=.
I
1
I
y.. {y i� �w ,� `;
✓ r l{� 1.-�Wl1�i"C7.� �7 s.boU(I 'b 11ay.,Atti 11 Mr 4i +'i iv4 lei Jw
.
to
Yy�nM ,y y�
iTvn' d k'� 4 qq
1 ,
d 'CtJ ' 0.oh'0I ci;b, 1�' at� �J�J�Of, ��1'�XxaZt ih � ���ay ai
�d,5.nz"os
I
Y
„ahSiCai"F
I I -
I '
,
I
I
I
''
I
a ,
i
II
. I
'f.
4. Frequency spectrum of sources (1/3 octave,band iia 1� tlrc t c Y
C
5. Any unusual, gharacteristics of the'. sou r"ce`s(i rripuigivehcys to,t�tlity; etc,)E
thod used to pred"ct. f irture'lwels.
1, Reference tothe prediction model used; if standard (e g,, lilI.VyA«RD-'77-ltl$;
2. If corrections to a standard model .i-pdiamer e�Miused,
state the procedure in detail" �
i
3. S hoW ;typacat `1e�els e, L°
i g,, ,Lig -etc.) at he receptors, -
4, Give ;any other data yielded by the model `you used,
D,
�
Cottou,rs of future ievels;should be lnciuded (down "td, L S,5' Wlietc applicable); and
superimposed 'pr
over ojected pobuta`tion' ireceptor) deiysitics
Y Impact -
A,
Quantify And clpated changes in the noise envlconmen by comparing ambient in('ar-
estimated source emissions, Evaluate the chflnges ' light
standardsith
in of a licfit�le
pp _
$i
i7iscttss holy this project relates ro the Noise Element of file tthplicab a general. lilarr,,
C.
Discuss the anticipated effects of increased noise levels (spccch interference; sleep
distutbance; disruption of�Wildlife habitat; etc.).
vi Mitigation
A.
Discuss how,adverse noise Impacts can be mitigated sb ' d '
g slterr►attVe tech;-
.sung
niques for MI, gatinn;. thele relative effectiveness, and �fcasiblilly of ihiplementa'tion.
ptovi;de a table ltstitig the most and, lest effective techniques, For this tal;�le
effectiveness shot tlu be deiittcl iri `terms': of the` nurnlier of people being exposed to
�.
,'Borne
noise at given level
B,Should
kesponsibility for o ectua in the rriitigation measure s be assigned,
C, ;Discuss
any nolle fmpaets that cannot be rtriti$ated, and why mitigatlnn is not feasi-
ble,
1
PRP'AI2DD 'YM
I
CITY bV, OROUZLZE
I I ,
I
CImY GC7tJNCiL
4
I I
PLANNING ,COMM ON
lana Vii sbn Ni yor
Crbwe i Chir i l an
t'yne Fous,eWorth, Vice
N�aybe�rg Roka sane Ch4irinan
I
Nb�mari, . S��s obexes
I
Anit'Se11
s�aI11E'5 RasS
Barbara op�
I Susan 5ear�
Racat'1 Le C�e-
'Ve S'trej'tex
T7erinl%s �xassey
Ram* `Cri�i,daa
S'u'san. sears
APP OVt'
i
I I I
I
II ,
I
I
r li
is i; I
II.�,
I
I
I
XF
I
Fiahai'
�bpe an , City Atlmirilist� tb
itun�cr
t `Ptb IJ e t,�b s D'�ebcax
y.
Darr S.c�
Q..( t
Cat�`th�a► C�x�i�ta.lle A'v;�,s��-
I,
Cbnsujting g n eei
I
III
I
I `II
I Y,
'I
I
I
I I L
h
p I
I I
I
I I
I
�
I I
I
I I I
I,I I ,
� I I
I
I I
z I
I I
,. II I
I I
CbJ{1V ' &t
eiusx
on
S AND RECOMP2ENDATONS'
Ift F
� ' Lo AND ACG.�SS
Et
i.c
toy
biisa,ness. jets:; Thi �s�amate.�,
m�X11 capacity of the aii-part, ,.considerin.g. t11e imP v me is