Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
006-081-028
M�-MW //K Rll,� A N C, F IN ^ C ,� .� �' � a,. , � � i s � iw' �. r � f . _ � . � + J � �.�� P r v -�� . Ff r i � 10 �. ,. i i 1 • i 1, '� y 1` - .N I A: �. � �� '1. O• �� 5' } 1 , Y �~•i0 • �'i� �� i.W� �� � y t �� , i,\ 4 .1 t I� • 1 �' \ II ` 1C1.� t ' I I�� �. • ,I y�i. � � �� r1. � � n " p �' . A ,,� ! � �'i j 1, . t f � 'r o" �' r. t �. j 7 �� . :,,t � �� >� �. t �� .� , � ^ � � + �ti.' �r. . � . t'; ,M � '�' ` �, � n ' I' ` �. off ti'� ' ' rt Y ,a a '' » � �d � ' Ci, �n a , ' � v � i' � •.� � �. ,��.� �. � 1 . �. 1 ..�,..�/ ', I (( � F � 11,'` d 1 A� e � � j, t ry ry I , ' � 'i: 11 fir' 1+ - I Y• y�i Yl li'.. . �� r� \ p t � � HI , ,��� 4' NNY''s� \ % t' ,; � c� ..� � S.: ,�nn ��. < `9t �. ,7 IIRR*g 4, l \b o U �,`j M � r �. � 1 .. I�/ 'T �e � � � � , w � o � ...�" ( � �• a tl J� ^-4 m �.� � Vii,- _ � m .. .. _..,._. l .. .0 1 .n . .. ...�Y Loc; NO. 35-11-22-04 FILE N0. 86 —5 R.Z. Inc Gary Anthis or Larry Hopson Americor applicant representative ADDRESS. 4945 Country Vie;. Ln. 448 Red Cliff Dr. Fair Oaks. Cid 95628 Redding, CA I i 961-9917 PHONE`: 223-4800 E Same �- E property owner ADDRESS: P1Za_7jECT nRsc1RT1>aX40_v. Variance -to 50' front yard setback to allow a structure 40' from the centerline of White Avenue -_h-i-_e, en property za. ed C-2 r U locatedvNThe Southeast corner .of 'Whi-_e Avenue & The Esplanade identified as AP 06-0$-1-28 town/area: Chico GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION Commercial -- PRE -APP FEE PAID: $ 135 ,50DATE -RECEIPT NUMBER: 8589 11= DATE APPLICATION ACCEPT -a; FINAL AEP. PAID: $ (4 7. Q9 RECEIPT NUMBER: $fir_'' fs2- - B5 REZONING PET:LiION SIGNATURES CHECICED PERCENTAGE: MAILING LIST PREPARED MAIL -OUT NOTICES WRITTEN NOTICES MAILED NUMBER: LEGAL. DESCRIPTION PREPARED - --- PUBLICATION NOTICE WRITTEN DISPLAY AD PREPARED NEWSPAPER PUBLICATION 0� P G B R DATE OF PUBLICATION: INITIAL STUDY PREPARED ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: � C---tegorical Exemption FILED: Negative Declaration FILL., Ritigated Negative Declaration FILED:' Environmental Impact Report CERT11"M. Other: STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBEn: APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE NOTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING(s): :2-0 %tom ! 3 sass: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS' HEARING(: RESOLD' ON N[MUR (CPAs) ADOPTED: ORDINANCE NUMBER _ ADOPTED NOTICE OF DETERMINATION (Appendix if) FILED e. � � � a � o,',, 4 �� 1 � - � D 1 (�,:., iL � .. 'Sk y M'. r a ( 1 s i... t y. � � ^ � � � � � ;; ti ,;,� :� ,. ;: . y•', d_7 �a i . �. :'. '1,+ `. t y •car` �. t ,� r:., � .' :.': .�1 ,.� �.��) ��... �. �: fA', �y`� .1. 1 9 ` �h�' �J �"" I M''�n ` 86223 4- (2909) Clarification of motion in0usion' of Condition, of approval for R Zinc. variance to 50 -foot (runt yard setback to allow a structure 40 feet from the centerline of White Avenue on property zoned C-�2 and U, property located on the southeast corner of 'White Avenue, and the Esplanade, identified _ as AW 006.08-1-281 Chico, Motion: "AMENDED MOTION IN 141NUTE OkOER 86-207, {l, Z, INC., TO INCLUDE CONDITIONS OUTLINED IN MEMO FROM PLANNING DATED APRIL 4, 1986. "a M Vote. I N 2 Y 3 Y 4 Y 5 Y (Motion carried) 86-209 Ameri car - on behalf of R*. Inca Closed hearing I denial of a variance (categorical !Y 4 s W (65) the Planning Comms ss� an exempt from environmental review) to 50-fa��t yard setback to alto ,F ..... structure 40 feet From the centerline xofl Whitedte Avenue n s��!t�rea'. a s I zoned C-2 (general commercial) property corner of, White Avenue and the Esplanade, Chico, (tom 3J1818`�) Motion: NOTED THAT THE PROJECT IS CATEGO ICA LRE LLY r. EEjp.SP SPECIAL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND'THAT IT CIRCUMSTANCES APPLICABLE OTIl HIT�iEouNLYkWAY THE t'IUSINES IS THE BOARD'S UNDERSTANDING CAN EXPAND AND COMPETE AS LIKE I�SEI �ACk� ANQ¢�rSTRICT IS TO ENCROACH 114TO THE SIDE YARD APPLICATION OF THIS CHAPTER DEPRIVES THE PROPERTY, ��i+J�A. OF RIGHTS ENJOYED BY E ARIE. gTHL0 PROF' NSI VJ oF�'�THE ��EXIs"(IRO APPROVED THE VARIANCE TO '.ALLOW EX,A CONSTRUCTION OF THE DRIVE-THROUGH WINDO4l 40 FELT FROM, "rHE CENTERLINE OF WHITE AVENUE, M Y 4 Y 5 Y (Motion carried) Vote: I N 2 Y i 'a��ti-17�� � ;Americot� - on behalf of R.Z. 11110. - appeals the, Planning Com�'is=ion � denial of � var'ia�►ce (categorically exempt from to 50- fool �aard setback to allow a structure environuntal review) terline of White Avenue on property zoned 40 feet from the cen C,.,2 (genEral commercial) property located on the southeast; corner of i41jite avenue and the Esplanade, Chico. Motion, NOTE' THAT THE PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLYTTHERE ARE EXEMPT' SPECROM IAL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW; AND FIND TH 9 CIRCUMSTANCES APPLICABLE E AND OSURROUNQ I GS THAT SIZE SHAPE, TOPOGRAPHY, LOCATION DEPRIVE THE PROPERTY OF PRIVILEGES ENJOYED BY OTHER. PROPERTY IN THE VICINITY UN ER IDENTICAL TO ZONING ONING CLASSIFICATIONS. MOVE TO GRANT THE VARIANCE THE FEET OCEN7Ef�L DRQ V HOF RITE AVEhI;1F A5OUGH WINDOW RUCTURE SHOWN 40 FEET FROM TH OFJ THE SITE PLAN FOR AP 06.08-128, R.Z. , INC., SUBJECT FROM TO of CONDITIONS LISTED ON THEMEMO 0 TMS 1NE 2 LA NIN COMMISSION DATED FEBRUARY 20, HAT THE `VARIANCE SHALL BE GRANTED DUE AND 5. FIND T TO SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES APPLICABLE TO THI5 PROPERTY IN THAT THE ENCROACHMENT INTO THE SETBACK IS NN OF STHIS FOR ANY EXPANSION AND THAT STRICT CHAPTER DEPRIVES THE PROPERTY ENJOYED. BY OTHER PROPERTY WHICH COULD BE EXPANDING THEIR BUSINESS AREA, MOVE TO APPROVE THE VARIANCE TO ALLOW THE EXPANSION OF THE EXISTING CONSTRUCTION OF THE DRIVE-THROUGH WINDOW STRUCTURE 40 FEET FROM THE CENTERLINE OF WHITE AVENUE oli AS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN FOR AP 06-08.128. M S Vote; 1 N 2 N 3 Y 4 Y 5 N (viotion failed) 86-123 (C0nt'd) 3' Americor on behalf' of R.Z., Inc. w (categorically the pla Commission's denial of a variance ening` y exempt from environmental review, to 5o -foot yard sets;.e!< to allow a structure 40 feet from the centerline r , of White Avenue on Property zoned C-2 (general commercial) on the southeast corner Of White Avenue and the e Esplanadeoperty ,i Chico. SET HARING DATE FOR MARCH 18, 1986 AT'2 00 P.M. AQk AM R. Z. Inc. - Variance (Categorically Exempt) to 50 ft. front, yard 'setback to allow a structure 40 ft. from the centerline of White Avenue,;on property zoned C-2 (General. Commercial) and U (Unclassified) located on the ,southeast corner of White Avenue and the Esplanude, identified az AP 0&08-1-281 Chico. The Commission waived the reading of the staff findings. The hearing was opened to the public. Gary Anthis, Americor, representing R Z Inc., stated that this was a' request to extend 10' to add on a small room. He stated that one concern was traffic. He had no objection to the Night turn only. He d that the did property of surrounding „' y landscaping.' stats y g props � for He felt that their y landscaped. He did not see any problems with the traffic. He discussed the alternatives to addinga drive'thru window. He felt that this was the best location for a drive thru window. Commissioner Lambert questioned the ownership of the area behind the. parking lot. Mr. Anthis stated that they use it for parking and ingress and egress with an easement, that they do not own it. The hearing was closed. Commissioner Lambert was concerned with traffic. she stated that there are traffic, problems there already. Commissioner Walter was concerned with exit close to the curb. He could riot make -the findings for a variance, Chairman Vercruse discussed the different uses in the neighborhood. Commissioner Lambert stated that access was a problem. She could; not justify this proposal. Commissioner Lynch stated that some of the problems might be'elimated if relignment of access drive was behind the storage building. Mr. Anthis stated that they could limit present egress and ingress to exit only and it would help with the traffic problems. He stated that efficiency wise this proposal worked the best. He stated to put this in f back would mean a major alteration of the building;. Cornmissioncrz Lambert asked if the south of th* buildin � objectionable as the area behind the wilding, building'would be as Mr. Anthis stated p arking ,the south pside not ordinance�easa.bre because then they would be in violation ofthe y Chairman Vercruse sympathized with the homeowners on White, but they are co -existing with the restaurant. BUTTE COUNTY r'',LElhiNINc9 cOMN 55x0Yq 14INMg5 µ, reb20 19z�� r, I commissioner 'Lambert could not make the necesrsary findings. commissioner Lynch could not make a finding for a building 251 back from an intersection, he felt this would be a .real accidenthazard.' COMMISSIONER AVIS PRESEN'i' AT THIS TIME It wa moved by Cori nissionet Lambert, seconded %y Com,nissioner Lynch, and carried for denial as follows; A. Note that this project 4s categorically exempt from enstironmental review; , and S. Find that the granting of this Variance would represent the granting of privileges not enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and ander identical zoning classifi'cations; and C. Deny the Variance to allow the construction of a building 40 feet from the centerline of White Avenue as shown on the site play. for AP 06-08'1-28 (R. Z. Inc.) AYES; Commissioners Lynch, Lambert, Walter, aha. Chairman Vercruse NOES: No one ABSENT: Commissioner Avis ABSTAINED: No one Motion carried. APPI_ I CANT Same 0 W 1\1 L'F R a . Variance: to 50 +t',, f rontc REOUEST. allow a structure 40 +t,, frwrar the center -line of White Avemm4 Chico - AP NO. -28 SIZE: ac. LOCATION; The southeast corner a+ White avenue and the Esplande, Chico* C,xISTIme ZONINU*. 0-2 70N1i\jr-i HISTORY; Zoned C-2 DLc- le, 1962 Ord759 SUF�ROUNDIINIG 70NINQt U to�'URROUNDJJ�46 LAND USE: Benerally commercial uses along Esolanade with residential uses to the ej:`,,,t along White A'Went-tc Gr:,�NECAL PLAN DES IGNAT ION"', Commercial 14-49, '24� ZZq Ar,p�..ICASLE PEOULATIONS. tutte County Code Section and 24-105 �ti 5 a lot of 0,ccident5 at present- P r 0 j e- 111.ntersec on has Show hardship." rity o+ neighborhood,, al5o Would aT.fect s,e t ,back intOg The Butte County Environmental Health I)epartmP-nti, the CitY o+ Chico, p G pnd E had no 0bJc-*ctiins or comments. qarianae to tt-re 5(j +t. front yard This project is a reqUL-st to a +rorii s,tbacV-.,, requi''remt-:ntv, an White Avenue to allow a structi-kre 40 -ft- centerline. The structure to be. the drive--thru, w4 ndow +or proposed, e,,,, the reotaurant The aPP1j,cR.nt hawJ 'itated tnat pan .14 :en e,,,,,plared, pv-oyiding drive--thru zervice havP- be t, (AS layout L-%+ the res evoral of internal 00nre are practical due to the PhA1§11,COMMISSION ry 20, 1986 Page 2 such ,,the applicant feels the variance is neweszaryM While Public Works comments indicate that the ikeriect.ion, -has a high accident rate, discussions with the Department, o+ POI Works have indicated that requiring a right turn only sign at the oxisting-entraAM an Esplanade would alleviate the sitQation. Also, tho Department o -f - Public Works feels that landscaping should be limited in the area —�between the proposed driveway and Esplanade in order to maintain adequate site distance at the iRterieqtion, No other variances o+ this type have been granted in the near vicinity, put other-restaurOth in the areahave drive-thru serViae5. In order to computu, thWapplicarat. feels that drive-thru facilities are neclazyry.I Withthe conditions suggested below Department of PGKUWorks feels that tra++ic sa+etY will not be significantly compromised. A. Note that this project is categorically exempt from environmental review; and B. Find that the granting a+ this Varia:e would represent thVgrantinq of privileges not enjoyed by other pr ,;.petty in the vicinity and under identical zoning clasui4icationso and Cn Deny the Variance to allow the construction of a bt.,tilding 10 TO ,Prom thfa --enterlino o+ White Avenue as shown on the site plan for AP 06-08-1-2e (R Z lnc.)a 1+ the Planning Commission can find that there are hardships due to size, shape, topagraphV9 location. or surroundings, and that privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zoning are being denied then it would be proper tot A„ Note that this proje=t is CatcgiricallY eke rom environmental review; and B. Find that there are special circumstances applicable to the property including size, shape, topographyg locationq or surroundings, that deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zoning clasMication; and C. grant the Variance to allow the construction a+ the drive-thru window structure 40 It. +ram the centerline of White Avenue as shown on the site plan For AP 06-08-1-2U (R Z inc-1 u0ject to the fol Lowing conditions 1. Place a right turn only sign at thm existing driveway on 5spl4nade to Pntte County Department of Public works standar0s. 2. Landscaping and any signs other than the existing pole sign to be no more than—2 Q. high in the area west of the drive-ttlru. window and t r s BUTTE COUNTY PI -ANN I NQ CilMMSS I Ohl Page c STAFF I-IhIT INQ - C�'einrr.�ki"'y no, 1986 „� �E��o t w~ m � � c th Y.+W l di n+�3 i � a rare r�°�' .17E ��t�iwte � rMAnty p I�1 the e Depaartme,n'L (7,4 Public Workcs. . C1ee the a+ ti � n ��t_+ +.:! c� rr<ya� v;. y � fz c~ �.���a3,�.c.-Rblc- ',`tta .c bald 10cal. nt:at?,t"t es,'ai'C.'.{;+,f° amr"r« -.a-,,t,,o- un-,y.riimmi s.,.on In 1-tr. �w L 7 Q APPLICAYION FOR VARIANCE BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANT: Read and follow instructions as set forth on attached sheet. Applicant's Name R . Z . IATC Phone No. i 916 9 61— 9 Applicant's Mailing Address 4943 County. View Tana r Fi„�ra]�f2 Applicant's Interest In property (Owner,, lessee, other) Owner's Name and Address --49 4 5 nu,ri r " CGtntact Person for Project (It other than applicant) CS.r, An this Or Lair, y � • 4:4 8 Redcl ff Drive , Reading r �, �. Cam 916 223-4800. Mressor's Paroe''Number(s). 006-08— —028-0 Lot 1 C•-2 Oats Town and country sub Present Zoning 2 �- Loand size of parcel(s)�� unit 1.31' frontacre Qn �hP >� anadP .�.n.cL1 ? S r7 P �+n ren lith i -F P Street address 2398 The Esplanade, Chico, Ca, Directions for travel to property (rural and mountainous areas oniv) __ N, J - Type of variance requested: Lot area or building site Mobile home size Lot width Parking requirements Front yard setback Livestock requirements —A— Side or rear yard setback _ Sign requirements �-- Other (specify)_ Description of proposed use and reasons for variance because of special circumstances (refer to Instruction No. 6 on attached Pheet) .. C AaLi GL. reqelired as the window onion of the dr} extend aPproximatel '�y_ 10_ _£eet into_po� �y Competition in the mune p c7iate area have installed drive thru windows. Description of existing land use 71 ,_e�Rpl 1 i7ri Grp i n Ftac i-a„y�an�. Exist I ng/of9peee6 sewage disposal method: Septic Tank system Proximity Of power and phone lines: main K)OD't?1 power on 7' Water sourcu:California Water Com ani Proximity of water for fire fighting purposes (hydrants, ponds, Will excavation or grading be necessary? Cubic yards (estiriate) v mj,p�av„ pr{ or A material will be require(l. List and describe any other related pea ilii; and other public ;approvals required for this orojectj'djng, inclyi�flt,g city, regional. State and Federal agencis Co in-Lya"Uthose required by a.,ir,.tltle ►..eanu :r euas� -- The following questions pertain only, to variances to the minimum parcel size required within tiro zoning district: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES* conditions Identify ientially significant environmental Impacts associated with the variance. What prolurt rlosign features or special of pp (mitigation measures) are proposed to alleviate potential environmental inihcicts? ENVIRONMENTAL ,SETTING* Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, roil stability, plants and ..i animals, and any cultural, historical or' scenic aspects, Describe any existing 'structures oil the site, and the use of the structures, V_ D�^scrlbe the surrounding properties, Including in�ormation on plants and animals and a1•, Cultural, historical or scenic aspects, In,a;,ate the'type of land use (residential, commer.)ial, etc:.), intensity oi'land use (uinflto.fumily, apartments, shops, depart. ,^rent stor", e,.c,), and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc,), *Use separate sheet for longer responses. Land is Mat. A Taco B(: -.,Il 1. building is located on site. Stye site plan for details of location, sed backs, etc, CL hereby, decia under penalty of perjury that I have read and understand the instructions and that the foregoing statements are true, ccmptelu- and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date Applicant's signature cr r�/r f Date Property owner's signature! ^ J CD W ceit Variance number Rr:quest: Variance to Location and size of parcelts)* located en the_ P. Numbertsi �e"Zoning and Requirements ��nershln ✓ ecalion Description Proof of Agency (if needed) oples of Plot Flair 1i7--;7 - Cr ate Ref'o-W-tved. [ � -2 ( ,"`�1 Cj fj' 5..— Roccfpt Number Application Taken By _— a LU U - U INSTRUCTIONS/ 1If applicant Is not the ownnr, � must be uub� the | =�k/a�nfhe,Application ' V= cm shall be considered vok If not signed bythe owner o'legal agent, 2' �U shall 6e �xad in |y ua pdo06m- |f an item is nnte�d uom/ ,?; | ' /«°'mm' ."'"p"� . ^r' Indicate oythe term "mp/". � � 3. /t Is Important that the, applicant supply an accurate description of the location of the proposed umjonr^ Including -the ' a. Ass6ssor's parcbl number(s) (from the tax bills or Assessor's Maps), b. Street addresses (if available). ,C. bi ances and directions to named otreets, bodies of water or railroads. � ^ '4,`buildingspropose^ 6 8&xI1 inches, shall accompany and bnmade part qfthe " f on'vod` ' Improvements,.�~_-~^. ce", The plo. Ian �,,hall include the following information. a' s) b. Location and dimensions of all existing and proposed improvements on the property, includ- ing6r k, and leach m Location and name of bordering streets, access `roads, nmudys�vanm,bodkm of water and �U '' d' North arrow and scale ofdrawing. � ' 6. The "Application �*Vadonc,"isoo�eu � to d approvalby the P��»�Commission, �Any special conditions of approval shall be made u port of the approved "Variance" and shall he binding � on the applicant. The procedures for County action onvariance applications are stated in Chapter 24 . ` 9fthe Butte County Code. ' ^ G. VARIANCES from the terms of the zoning ordinance shall be granted ou|y when, because of special circumstances oMd|nuble to the property, including size, shape, topography, kooet|cm o,surroundings, the strict application of the zoning ordinance deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other property {vthe vicinity and under identical zoning classification. Any variance granted shall be subject to such conditions as will assure that the adjustment thereby auth, odzed ohoO not oonsthtitu u grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other pro- perties in the vicinity and uuno in which such property is situated. Any such condition imposed upon ' kmumnuo cfavariance must bu related to the use ofthe property for m`'rhthe m;ionuo\sroquysted. A variance shall not be granted for a parcel of property which authorizes u *se or activity which is not otherwise expressly authorized by the zone regulation governing the parcel of property. .^ Application _fees -f ' are in cash or by check made payable to :'Treasurer of Butte County".� ,50 pre - ;A 8. Before submitting a variance application, applicant is requested to discuss with staff all question� about application requirements, County procedures, zoning provisions and "special circurnstances". - 1 1 ' 71�� 1�CJ 06-07-2-2 06-15-M79 06--06- l-'4 i, qp 18 Oak Robert E., Zehider Ray V. Myers Connors Ave. nettijane Sh011 P.O. Box 14) 4945 Country View Ln. .173 'Chico, CA 95926 Chico, CA 91,it127 Fair Oaks, CA 95628 06-08-1-7 06-08-1.-29 06-07-2-3 L. Kenneth E. Bruffy Solway, Euqulm F. Pt" '11110 201 Tonea Way 181 Connors Avenin P.O. Box' 366 Red Blufft CA 9601M, Chico,'' ,CA 95926 Chico, CA 95926 Chico, CA 95927 06-08-1-30,31 06-07-4 Dukes'Cork N Bottle lnr.- aames Q. Molen 1205 Park Ave. i89 Connors Avanue Chico, CA 95926 Chico, CA 95926 06-08-1-32 06-07-2-25 P, 1"%.. 4945'Gountry Viem Ix - M. P. Bafcelo= Robert M. Hicks a'ail- oa!:S, Ga. 95628 P,O, Box 1540 188 White Avenue Chico, CA 95927 Chico, CA 95926 06--08-1-2 06--07-2--26,27 Glai:y kxttbis Larry Hapslml - AmcricOr iaryl r_ - Cleland 'it. Jerry S. Oraj 4.?, Gliff Dr ;reading, (,a. 960CI :02, Pine 212- Estates Dr. !oodlando cA 95695 Chico, CA 95925 Clayton 4, Stradley 6212 Cono,,iS W,-aY SacramentO, CI -i 95842 06-08-1-4 Rober': Ora -mos Schell 10 oaf Dr. Chico, CA 95926 06-08-1-5 Beverly B, CaSebC017 1320 Camino Verde wainut Creck, CA 94,546 ori -n8-1-6 06-07--2-32,34 WerLtZ P.O. Box 232 Chico, CA 95926 06-15-30 Esplanade Plaza 480 Moore Avenue Healdsburgt CA 9544G, 06-15-42,58,59 Poat!-� T'Irj, 96'001 - Donald E. Nelson lz,- "lolle'),olay 18 Oak Dr. 2419 .�,- Es--plan%klo chi.co, CA 95926 C!"liro, CA 95926, 06-08-1-7 06-15-56 Calvin L. Lusk Walter L. Stil-0, 22 Oak Drive P.O. Box 671 Chic6t CA 95926 Chico, CA 95927 0x. ( g -'Z"'!, j a 3 � 1 T I t+i E A C C 0 U N t 7 1:Lr>rtrc;nu PLANNERS TECH f Roceipt for Monies (whets applicablu) Rrtiaw Application (counter) Set up Vile pistttl+tttlon List fy. ;ilhi I`ru'it�t '1'itic ", Mailing List W� Flailing AP R's Address Labels I`rrl �mn:irti clic Review Distribute for Corumalito I'rrvlt,et`Iol7mvnt Review l'�yuq,lrtrd P'tic Isoview and Initial Transmittal l,ettar Rvrhvrr 1, strlhution List initial Study anti ratter s l l t'. 111"Iloct i nit llonrin rloo Lotter gi, I,,$, Tor tichrdul inl Letter on Project r)acision tieHr�lulr IlCarinRs ._. Clearinghatlsc pontis I'�hihit I'rrpa'rntion staff Finding/Pr) Rapotit Ltgai roll Advertising wA } Agenda I wta! I' i indingw Tzth CO"ents j-- Copying I'll R,.Vort1starr findings Co11'at1nR 1 (-hve) Sign better::, RcPocts Appeal Letter I`hctitir C:a l) s : al+l+, Cop. neighbor# - other Laoi )'or My Tickler tit Ito r Calendar for Prof*ct Oetarminations Lnt i r�onmrnxnl_ krt_irw ice. Xacp Tracking/Archives tip to pate Urteek CI'/lntrntory Maps Talk with Plannor Ouout 1,11( i 1'1'Cpare, Initial Study Look for Pila 4I Srty savirw _+- pi5cus< with Applicant Itot irlc FIFI':+/Sut'vrps 5uhmittrd prnl't iettvr on MM, Time Linen etc, AIL hie unov 'an dum ro Butte County Assessor's Office FROM.- Butte County Planning Department sueJEcr: R 7 Inc DATE: May 13, 1986 Pursuant to ,Section 65853.5 of the Government coq_ the pa.rcelJ �' identified as 6-08?�-Z8 iota sMWe i Rezone from . tozanin district. x Granted a variance to allow the cons,t,ruction of a building '40 ft. from the centerline of White Airenue. , Issued a conditional use permit for Suite, _fflounill PLA` rapt NING I ON 7 CC, LVNTF R DPIVE _ OROVI1 f I , f Al IFORNIA'-95965•;4;177 PH©NrS r fd4h111 R� Z. Inc. May 15, 1986 8767 Country View Lane Orangeval.e, Ca, 95662 Re: Variance, AP 6-08-1.-28 Gentlemen.: Enclosed is your validated � �°lance No.. 86--5 to al ,,)w the henstruction of a building 40 ft. from the centerline of White Avenue on propelat zoned C-2, U, .located on the southeast corner rner of Whir c. AVeTIUe and the Esplanade, Chico. Should voti have any questions regarding this natter, please contact this office between 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Sincerely, B'. . Kirchor Director of Planning BAK : lr Enc. cc: Department of Public Work.,; Environmental Health Dept. of Forestry VARIANCE BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORs April I,G 1986 DATE 86-5 VARIANCE NO.; ASSESSOR "S PARCEL7�j � -- Butt�*amt andtt) tiahspecial of the Zc '" � n i r�rg Ordinance r.� f" the County o -r< sandittons sot forth below 1`1 z Inc.. is hereby granted a Variance in accordance w'i ti': application f i# / 85 to a l 1 taw the Cons•ruet i on Of a brei 1 d l ng 40 f t . from the center l 1 neof White Avenue z!g si7own on the site plan SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. Place a right turn on 1 y sign at the existing driveway on E: p l aria�cde to BWtte Cot�rnty Department, 'of Pr,rbl lc Works standards.; 2. Landscaping and any signs otherthan tete exist -Ing s more than 2 r'7- pole i gr°� to he r r) dr i veNay, h' gh rt the area west of the drive-thru window and 3• Meet the requi'remdnts of the Building Division of the Butte County Department of Publ1c Works. Meet the requ i rements of the Butte County Health Department, !a • Applicant ' must also comply with all other- applicable State and local n , and regu 1, a-� i„ons . statutes, ordi ances I hereby declares under penalty of p _ e�r�,iL,., � ti•+r�; � I ' h3ve read t:hr”; ,foregoing conditions, that they ,are -i n pfact the cr tid i t i ons which b.�erIe imposed upon the granting of this varlan'cey and that,J agree �,o abide fully by paid conditions. Dated,:Zvi r A p i r Clarlt -------------- NOTE Issuance of this variance does not waive rogr� i rernent of `obtain 1 n Building and Health Department permits before parting construct i o!rr s nor draw it waive Mn4r re oth r cements. r Chairman of ar~d f ,5upe�trl�ow s cos Department of Publ,lo Works {1,) Health Department Department of For�stx j xr f6w✓ f +x, `fit d7$rsr t b$°ir �� ,6c rnL4 �t-Q.s x sr c aiN :tl�"1Cn� x ,t x >,rz _r - �s+ xxr4.! r r , r " M¢xi1 si�e}:i44 zxf �:w. «+s...i , tnx,,>: ,w -.,a:, x yt� {w., M a �txrs irx � .+ .+ i .• '� S L i S Y �fir��P �. piSjST =. r C - w6 ?e fr , +..��.t.,'e331 `. r..•�t�' ✓��$ vla4.w' 43 twWdc$tYrxJBi:�i 3�FY.JiY@sStx i t 1 ky � n 3 ..�.�,_Vtd'7+ bx z3L=L t $?us tr Nax_ ' Ex ��ss ir5 50011 t3S 1►Q[! IKYlQW yOCIC ^lQVNdr�6QS5r i9icill 1t�AtVI°! �����I�QI ' busin®55eSt Lind publications who send Ueu 1 , For publications, tape an old address label over name and olCl;�rlrttEss s and I `, =`is t t} complete new address. i t e sp3� 0 Il"�� s ��¢r t,3(tj47�Y`•t t ft*+y;�ay� L t7t'�t i'X T7 Your Pant rn'Typil- Last Mame, Fast tiaino• PA'Wla InILA" , - OBS ,!-I 1301 ) Calc WVEI" name � rf fYc arw Slim ' / (K' � {V & n,l ,u�n'siri i to f3cx b 0 tic 011/dl/ � PlimoffiC/JA TILIIa vl XIP 10 �Y Addrress J/J� jyy(jj r tic l" tlnol % .in NO P() t6„. n ti Z, New �' % IVy L�l� � 11), Pam oat- stato AP qiu r. Address B'lere 4nirnr -. x p,{rp nn., pad^,.az m Parma kCUYa1 to to a�ye L; r . �.• sr . t«..,t G5 FJci`ri 3t'r'7..ttiN 199:s � r3FCFt.L� 4 11 i ,ps•. . �,_ . '.n.l � ..:, .,. J,:w. , _ ...: Iw 'rd P. - ¢a r. n a n no .a av road4, • , .. I!•�� s +Mk.f�}.. •ir: '' t •• ... ;. ': ` Y .ci. � .� :;F..,nnb,lrr .F.n x, t::'.. ,..i.,v. '..._.. . .. y .p� vtyy,Jt.N's^.,L�,�?S+r?L %%L`Wy.Jj vt#•F.. Cit -'fit++. r4 .ni Q�,. +•ttr wv=v.wll�.,, pt '� xS is^• x xax r y 1 , „• t '~•'L+., r v.^.i.w:-r 4 " ti e n., i z• 9 {*rt t}z ix ''asz si LL :'fix , , xszl x j ��+ ;" a r �,i1w Gy `, L l n r rL r z xs rz txa.a .5 y : ,astlsz�': f`Lt,3tre!1trta F:!LT� tTeE 9a n g e;: �ttf'w4. :-s ys, s:• :.,: Ri =:c x '# ! t x c s! a a4'�Ckst iyi s s ptrof 4�ir rrr ....x.. .•x,. _�F,:3: ,,:r•Leg.. : c ,�3 t : ., Ltt `yt� ,��_ a L t f ..� ..-j. P 3� �T 4x x ,�: •.,+ r;. .� 1... s.�u..x..x.d;s.K .h :. ra �, i 7 � x S L -G f, ��lG �+r�;14t,�3a'4�4�v.,r,�t jrh` swish .x�7 1 C'c � ,' sL iL Ls q six t ,;'. " ,t °a; . : f{! ���Xr���dk. J•.,�"�`.-4��` rJ��'s".q-S�k'giati i ruE���: +,�_.;?Lr+' b��;xr ; x•.�n� u ax z, x ' � q., x'" r, »�"� � "' r LL r :S,;sc iw. x L,L s,itzc ,o-�,t:; � tL`t s zt�e t sE ��,,�:., dL � L �o .;Q;. , ,;.:.?r_.,.:,,T�,.;i�.,i � ,t c S� ata r s e!ti! z !@P ,t;t a f ;��x. �xr3xzYDroea3.rt� ar .l'�tz �pxx a : Lr3y0i� ;� x zi.;Lz3 : arc3, :% L�•f�,' � , . .••L � I� r -x '. , ! z z3 .fr" i!•Lz. Lr) art n� � .; !€ �L�kG� a: FL°t �3�• 4, s zxx � � v s xt z L t fE 859 r v r ' •.«azk r � �srs3r r!. x a .,. , s ! n . , 3 Yr t� r+~c�v„fi'•�,Ltta tzt'�3�, i .. .. ��4�N a . 1. cl'�.t ..,., ., r. .�....�, ur .i'4JA ttI r',z t .r LYr rrxra..,fi ✓r{. •mR<'S”. C ..wi t�x`�'4. •bJ�Yr,t%A'1•'L�m+i L L.y r ' ?4,e L." 1 H +c L tx IJ*Ebrt¢'i�V�16Ads!1 •� C*.L .x •r✓ .�+. yx. Y 7 >•� �:a• ,zs t' ,,,, ' e -, 4. , ,.r r« .7 S : x ,A; L l xx2 • 4 +: 't;2 t'. ri e, :ry r� u•y r t."' t x L r„1 ,y ; 4♦ L ',.Y r : A. x.. .,.,.. . �, ♦..;,., .. r.rtr+.:Lind .�.. .,. ;M 1..,: ,a . if q1STRATT1,,rE OFFICE COUNTY OF t3U"l r' E, ffa',- Ty 25 t t)UNTY CENTER DR. OROVILLE, CALIFQF3NIA 95985 3080 r (9 16) 534-46,41 o a 1 b LC 47 INA MEMBERS OF THE BOARD h URF HASKCL A. IaINT MARTIN J. NICHOLS CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER JANE DOLAN HILDA WHEELER ED McLAUGHLIN LEN rULTON .April 17, 1986 R. Z. Inc. 4945 Country View Lane Fair. Oaks, ca. 95628 Re: Variance, AP 6-08-1.28 Gen tlenAen Bnclased are t1he original and one copy of ` Your to =allow the construction of a building 40 ft. from �the centerline of White Avenue as shown on the site plan for;propetty zoned C�2 d Chico, an U located on the southeast corner of White ,avenue and `i?7e Esplanaan Please sign both copies and return them, to us. You musts ,n the Variance within t1iirty (3) days of the date of this ].utter. 'rlt will they, have them validated by the Chairman of the. Board of Super visors and the original will be returned to you for yBo recoy:Supe s. Should you have -Y questions regarding this matter ) please I the Planning Dq artment at 534-4601 between 10;00 a,m. and 3 00tact p m, Very truly yours, tiartin 3. Nichols Chief Administrative Off,iL!er -MJN: lr Er,c, Tor: p Board �f Supervisors FROM; Planning SUBJECT: RZ Inc. , Variance, AP 6-03-1-2$ OATF:' April 4, lc86 T'he Board of Supervisors at their regular meeti�ca of April. fid, 1986 app roved a Variance { o alloy: the construction o,: � building 40 'fit. Ytflm the ceaLerl.ine of White Avenue as shown on the site plan on AP 06-023M1• 23 '(R Z lnc. ) Staff is asking that the Btand add to 'their motion OT April 1 1986 to include "subject, to the following conditions, 1. Place a right turn only sign at the existing driveway on esplanade to Butte Coixnty Department of Public Works standards. signs other than the existing pole sign, to be no Landscaping and any more than a it. high in the area west of the drive thru window and driveway. 3. Meet the requirements of tlxe Blxilding Division of the Butte County' Department of Publir. Warks,. 4. Meet the requirements of the Butte County 'Health Department. 5. Applicant must also comply with all other applcabl.e State and local statutes, ordinances, and regulations." % lr cc: County Counsel Cid AD1dYTJ.'YlSTJL ATA V.- �iF-tFjCjP. C'0 L,INT'i, or' B urru, 25 COUNTY CENTER DR., OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95966-3380 1016)'634-4631 o \U jil MEMBERS OF THE IJUAND MA5KEL A� MFIN`I`URF idARTIWJ NIt,hIL,LS ( FHIEf ADMINISTRAWk OFFICER JANE.00LA14 HILDAWHEr,[,eR ELI McLAU,GNL.IN April 2, 1r3.86 L-rN FULTON R. Z. In.~ 4945 County View Lone Fair Oaks, Ca, 95928 Re. Variance, AP 06-08-1_28 Gentlemen; At the regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors held April. 1, 1986, your appeal of b Corrthe Planning unis�si onI s denim. of a Variance to the 5t9 foot ' front 40 feet from the centerline of WhiteeAvenuetback tOnapropert;ytzonedr� C-2 located oil the southeast corner of White Avenue and the Esplanade, f'.hlc°o, was uphel,i. Variance approval is suil the following; co��ditio,ns: ject to 1, Place a right turn only s: Sn at the euist:ing di:ive3aay on Esplanade to Butte County Department County Department of Public Works standards. Ldndscai,, ng and any sign.; other than the existi.r�g pole sign to be no rs.O r e than :' ft, h4 h in 'Lhe area west of the drivaa thru windrow anJ driveway. 3, Meat the, roquirements of the Building Division of the Butte Count./ Department of ,Public Works. 4, Meet the requiremelits of the Butts: Co. Health Dept, 5, Applicant must also comply with all ether applicable State and local statutes, ordinances, and repulation.s. Your Variance wi.l] be issued Lifter the Official approval of the minutes of the Board of Supervisors "ow April, 1, ,IR)�fi. Shout you 86. have a�.y- questions regarding this matter, please co t the I'lann'.ng Depar> rre• � at '534-4601 between 10.'00 a.m. and 3:00 prm. Very truly yours, Ma'r'tin J: Nichols "hief Administrative Cffj- r MJN:lr - CAFADMINISTRATIVP, FFICEry COUNTY CAH BUTrE 811 7�F 25 COUNTY CENT I=R DR. / OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA P5965-3380 ! (916)'534-4631 o ° 0 �d'UWS� MCABERS OF THf'BOARD IWKEL A. AWNTURF GNIHp ADMINISTRATIVE pFFtCt=R JANE DOLAN HILDA WHEELER CD McLAUGHLIN March 21, 1986 LEN PULTON $'A . �#t'4iiot��ryt0it�, R. Z. Inc. 4945 County view Lane MAR 24 1986' 1=a i r. Oaks, CA 95928 Gentlemen: Re: variance, AP 06-08-1-28 At the regular meeting of the Bu -e County Board of Supervisors hold March 18, 1986, your appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of a variance to the 50 Foot front yard setback to allow a structure 40 feet from the centerline of While Avenue on property zoned C-2 ? co -ter of White Avenue and 'he Esplanade, � orated on the southeast to uphold the a J �' Chi�ra, wk.s considered. A motion peal failed. Therefore, this matter will he continued tr, April 1, 1986 as a closed hearing for final action. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Planning Department at 534-4601 between 10:00 a,m, and 3;00 p.m, very t+`uly yours, Martin :J, Nichols Chief Administrative Off'cer M JN/rt cc. Cary Anthis Americor 448 Redc1 i f'f Drive Rodding, CA 96002 �PsYl�lloslur 1 C1-jTT..*ADM1N1STRAT1VEj$FF10E COUNTY OF BUTTE r� �P p 25' COUNTY CENTER DR. / OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 65985-3390 f (316) 53!1.46 1 r�y� L P MEMBERS Or INE 130ARD' HASKEL A, MrINTURF MARTIN J. Nit;d101.15 JANE DOLA14 GHIFFADMINISTRAVVEOFFICER HILDA WHEELER Eb MrLAUGHLIN LEN FULTON Lk. L. .LMC. 4945 County View vane Pair Oaks, Ca. 95928 I Re: Variance, AP 06-08.-1-2g Gentlemen: At the reguiar meeting of the Butte County Board of Supervisors held March 18, 1986, your appeal. of the Planning Commission's denial of a Variance to the 50 ft front yard setback to allow a structure 40 ft, from the centerline of White Avenue on property zoned C-2 located on the southeast corner of White Avenue and the Esplanade, Chi�`o, was denied. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the Planning DoPartment at 534-4601 between 10:00 a -m, and 3:00 p.m. Very truly yours, Martis: J� Nichols C11ief Administrative Officer MJN:It cc! Gary Anthis Americoy: 448 Redcliff Drive Redding, Ca. 96002 Y sr are. I1L.e�1. ; ..� G ,r,�• w 4 p r. i 1r 7;zdt,E;1„r�9 ---�j�tWJ;Md(ACLfIEL1tRYWIP/�llw.u+++e'�:*¢x+crcu..mww.,«..�r.--.--.-..-•�,..— AOL Buffo Co. Punning ' mm FEB 24 1986 0MA110A California P'0. Box 1540 448 Reddiff Drive�RC�vtILE Redding, California 9b099 CA..1✓ ORNIA 916 2234800 February21., 1986 004PL, 01 SUPERVISORS Cathy Pitts, Clerk of the Board / y Supervisors Butte Count .Board of Su er_visor ��� BUTTE COUNTY 25 County Center Drive Oroville, Ca. 95965 Res Appeal of Planning Commission Decision-RZ Inc. 'Variance 06-0.8-1-28, Taco Bell, Chico Dear Mrs. Pitts On February 20, 1986 at 1.0.30 A.Mi the Butte Manning Commission denied a request by R7 Inc., of the Taco Bell restaurant on The Esplanade in Chico the right to install' a Drive-Thru window. RZ, Inc. is hereby appealing this denial to the. Board of Supervisors. Enclosed please our Appeal request payment in the amount of 75.00. it would be appreciated if you could schedule us for the earliest date possible to be heard by the Board of Supervisors. Thank you very much for your cooperation. Sincerely, r, AME OR r� C y D. ,Pnthi.s 11 GDA: sis CCs Mr., Robert Zehnder, R.Z. Inc. (10111nig ... Autze �.3 lAND OF NA TURA,L WEALTH qNd 1JTY PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE .. OROV IEEE, CALIFORNIA RZ Inc. pN 0IJ E. 534.4601 4945 Country View Lane February 13, 1986 Fair Oaks Ca. 95628 Re: Variaiice, AP 06w 08-1.-28 Gentlemen, Enclosed is at copy of the Staff Find fol' a Variance to 50 $v concernn ft. from the centerline- ofont yard Seltbacie to d; Your application White Avenue allow a structure 40 Chico. A public hearing has meeting will be been set for February 20, Drivel (2 held in the Board of Supervic,r1986 at 10:38 Thin rovi.11e, ROORd F '..t 2,r. County Center Uould you have any questions re ardn this office between 10:00 am, agd3i00 phis matter,, please contact Sincerely, ,David R. Hironimus Associate ,Manner 4r40 Rid Aff Drive din . �1 it lsr� I�R4 c�, APA, U W/A WIA ef tj 'a 45, 4W 4yy 4;,/* 7" es C MINE, ADMINISTRATIVAIbF F I C E- COUNTY OF BUT'rE- T 25 COUNTY CENTER DR. OFIOVILLE, C"ALIFORNIlick 95965-3380 a (016) 534-4631 0 0 14.1 MEMBERS OF THE BOARD HASKEL A. McINTUPF MARTIN J, NICt 101 N JANE'DOLAN CHIEF ADMINISTHATIVE OPFICER HILDA WHCCLER E:D McLAUGHLIN L 'N FULTON March 5, 1986 R.'Z Inc. 4945 Country View Lane Fair Oaks, CA 95628 RE: Variancet AP006-08-1-28 Gentlemen: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Board of Supervisors held March 4, 1986, a public hearing'wa,s set for March 18, 1986 at 2:00 p.m. to consider'your appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of a Variance to 50 -foot yarcA setback to allow a structure 40 feet from the centerline of White Avenue on property zoned C-2, property locatedon the southeas-',-- corner of White Avenue and the Esplanad-, Chico. The meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors, Room, County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the Planning Department at, 534-4601. Very truly yours# Martin Ji Nichols Chief Administration Officer e Inter-Departm Mal Memorandum q �q.... T' LAND GF NATURAL WGAGTH ANEW 13E;AUTY PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE -- OROVIL.LE, CALIFORNIA 'W)65.3397 PHONE 534-4601 R Z Inc, February 21,, 1986 4945 Country Viet Lane Fair Oaks, Ca. 9.5926 Re: Variance, AP 06-•0$-1''-28 Gentlemen: At the 'regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held February 20, 1986, your request for a Variance to 50 ft. front yard setback to allow a structure 40 ft. from the centerline of White Avenue, Chico, was denied. Should you desire to appeal this decision ,you must do so, in writing, to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, prior to the expiration of the ezght-day appeal period which is at 5.00 p.m., Friday, February 28, 1986. Should ,you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office between 10:00 a -m. and 3:00 p.m. Sincerely, A. ircher Director of Planning BAK:lr cc: Gary Anthis 448 Red Bluff: Drive Redding, Ca,. 96001 )'ICI: or1^=io�l �,�PEN�tTX 0;198 ., . b. „., ..,�.:.;. T(>. GlflCe of Planning and Research Rpgy�e BUTE COUNTY ]MANNING, 1400 Tenth 5tree't, Room 121 7 County Center. Drive acs amen tm, CA 95814 oroville, CA 9 �g " 4 ?CXX'CoUntjw Clerk County of Buttte�� z5 County Center Drive JAN 0 vQ,-,u µgray l e CCA 959665 I. At4l0 Pr1 }1 KFt7, , t� yr Geri, .1 . P1 6jk i�:le '' r7ame � .... r Variance AP#06'-08-1-28 ' �R. z . Inc!. S c K a�oca�teoa1=�pec` ac The Southeast corner of White Avenue and Th.e Esplanade.' rzaton Chico Butte Iptim fNat� e, per, an neficlarles of l ojec t cents„ terline of Wr, t to a11ow a structure 40' .from the Variance to 50 front and setback l�rne of"� c ncy Appr'nvin a g Butte County Planning Commission P fue of rS aR1 or Agency Carry Prof t — R.z. Inc, Class 5 a . .,MinislQrial (Sec. 15073) .. D'eclared Flnergency (Sec, 13071 nergency ) (Sec. 15071 (b) and �+ XXX Categorical ExemptIM State type and ;bion number, PrO)ect is exempt. - Project meets the definition of a, Class 5 a. Ctanfact Per;5"n `.,�" . Awa C C� lr�ter��lsrr� , B,A. Kircher, Director of Planning (916)534-46,01 T"app",nt, ..a..� 1e Attach certified document of exemption finding. - 2. Has a natio cif e��mPtion been filed by the Public agency approving the prajeCt? yes No Date Received for 511ing 1-6-86 �✓ he Sn A. Streeter p Senior> Planner Til ReVhSed January 19$5 Barite, coun I.AtJb 'UF HATURAI. WCAt1'11 Ah1D R1AIJIY PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILUE, CALIFORNIA 95965.3397 PHONE, 534.4607 RZ Inc. February 13, 1986 4945 Country View :Lane Fair Oaks', Ca. 95626 Ike: Variance, AP 06-08-1-28 Gentlemen Enclosed is a copy of the Staff'Findings concerning your application I or a Variance to 50 ftfrontyard setback to allow a structure 40 ft. from the centerline of White Avenue, Chico. A public hearing has been set for February 2.0, 1986 at '10.30 a.m. This meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office between 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. f , � � � •�;t l ,�: l; f �1 f i � Yr �, / f 1 � f 4 , /1 r leo t, f �. � d...,... ' _.un. , , �..,,...... _ ,_� �. ,.,. l.7 .. -. ., ` ,,� 11uf a Co. Planning CIMM4 FEB OEM 3 1986 drovillo,: Celifomla P.0, Box 1540 448 Redcliff Drive Redding, California 96099 9162234800 January 31, 1986 Mr. David R. Hi,ronimus Associate Planner BUTTE COUNTY 7'County Center Drive- Oroville, Ca, 95965 Re: R.Z. Inc. Variance application Dear Mr. Hironimus: Thank you for taking time yesterday to review the above application. We would like to confirm several points that we discussed in relation to the application: I. In regards to the existing ingress/egress from The Esplanade, we are agreeable to either providing a "Right turn only" sign for our customers exiting onto The Esplanade and/or, we are agreeable to making the entrance to our property an "entry only" with our patrons exiting onto White Avenue to the rear of our property before they would enter The Esplanade again. Of the two options, it is our feeling that the "Right, turn only" concept might be best for us and the County. This would eliminate any of the atherrattionlwciuld�still allow to turn eft our onto The Esplanade, whereas p traffic : to turn left from White Avenue. 2. While we are only asking for approximately 104 square feetofbuilding area into the landscaping, we would be agreeable to enhancing our existing landscaping in front of the new drive thru Lane as well as in front and around the trash enclosure. Mar. Zehnder, the Owner of the property is concerned about the overall appearance of the property, and he wants to insure that the final product will actually be an improvement over the existing facility, We are agreeable to providing landscaping with sufficient, height to create an attractive greenbelt along the north property line. Mr. David R. Hironimus, page two... January 31, 1986 It should be pointed out that the existi,ng facility has substantially more greenbelt for a side street Presently that most any other r Property from' Cohasset north ' property is aver Important feature for our busines to the freeway. we do not wish to violate the integrity of Elle s operation, and setback or the neighborhood. Thereforer Please be assured that, we will enhance Our existing greenbelt area to offset the feet that we are requesting. approximate 104 square It should be illustrated herein, that both staff have agreed not to increase the landscapi and the Owpor Of the new drive-thr-o lane. Ing On the west,side 3. We would like to confirm that we have looked at 4 or 5 different ways in which to develop this drive-thru window. We believe that the Plan that we have developed works to the benefit of both the applicant and the County. The alternative plans were Prohibitive cost wise as `cell as not being aesthetically Pleasing. We have designed signed the drive-thru lane to meet the requirements of Public Work keeping the drive-thru lane 25 feet from the radius return On White Avenue. 4, . The basis for sales since the opening � our '-'�PPlication has been a drop Both Of these facilities Of Arby's and most Ing ities have Drive-thruwindows. Theios. addition of the recently Ch se Drive-thru operations has had an immediate adverse affect on our sales, facilitating the need for our application. In conclusion, we are req uGs into the set back area, ting a very slight encroachment We to e te c we will work with the County nty that want to insureassurthat thhisou raddition to Our facility Will have a Positive affect on the ran Thank YOU very much matter. for Your kind coopei4tion regarding this Sincerely, AME, OR G AME D . An�t' I s GDA: sj s CC: Robert Zehnder William Che.ff -� . ..su ',, 0, F r,l A PLANNING COMMISSION COUNTY CENTER DRIVE .. OROVILI..E:, CAL F I pRNIA 9546!,.;I,1^r PHONE 5344601 January l:� , 1986 Cary Anthis ,�.rrle:rc:or . 448 ROdcliff Drive Redding, CA 96002 Dear Gary; Z regret to inform you that t,re were the variance dor R.Z. not to Inc.lncn January 16, 19$6 as Iedtxle had Previously ass,xred you, holidays and vacations Due to our work load available to complete I Planning staff' ti In was not the PJ.an;xing Commission had re In addition, the Januar, requested g schedule for � 1S, in artier .dor tho>-n to acco� light that Were continued riodate hearings rain the Decembr�r agenda. The project is c��i the tentative st�hedtile 20, 1 as sure for February that the r, You s will make every effort to see for Project t is heard on this date. Thank Your patience and cooperation. Yox Sincerely, Craig Sanders Planning 'technician CS: jmc MM APPMDIX OjIlce, of Planning and Reearch FROM., 7 county cen I3rvr 1400Tenth Street, Room 121 .. �,......1' vi.11e, GS G� w Sac rarnentop CA 95814 xxxCOunty Clerk JAN 9 19$6 ..'�" County of 'Butte 25 Cou1it Y Center prive ELEANOR M, BECK�R, County Clerl; o ;{Lle i CA 95965 A. JACii 7�t r �... By D: -,-0y "iject Til ASE AP 4 06-08-1.-28 R.Z. Trac - variance �`s �� ,��:dCJ4'!-• SCA rorncr of White Avenue and The�1 �� � ».,..�.� The Southeast .� . p,.......».. ".,�. jeCtw i n -Co � tl/ P Lscaticin-Oty Butte Chico ' ... �, m.... , � i arm Of I'�"+�j tirz� of Nature I LWPOSe, �� I��n�f p�,,errp ' Yard setback to al.loc4 a .structure 40' fr��Rn �:h Variance to 50front Y �;.... .."�...�.�" cent(,-, r line of bj; ` Avg. Carra o R } zncy pp�•avieug" '�o "�"� Butte County planning Commission¢o.�,...�-.<".'' r _. ,_». �.......a.�,� . „»,......fF-F^ r, enc Carr"ylr�g t�am� of �r"�r� ar iie—Wpti Chc4� to Ministerial (Sec- 15®73) uzalared E nerpricy (St -c. 15071 � ) l c� e �=ncY project %Sano 13071 (b) , � l� ... Categorlc al Exemption. S ate and � 61e► c ►ai �a•a '�.p:y,wseyaysMuwr.•1t^uuN+`-»R's»v'��µy.4T RCrl,l pro .. �i h Project meo s ti dcfi t az m:. ,O.e F Awe& CO r�tact rn I�l�rszi l (1 (91.6) 5:14-4601. BA Kircher / .a..p. o „� .:aM�b .:,: c .. •• " rpt° 1. , �ttax�h finding. atiai c tion been filed by t�y, lie ag�:no] t'P'l V le'l g 2. Has a ,; Oticr. cue e.elt of 1 II:ate R eceivol- lor° Filing 1-6-86 � � ,�r� �� . � "�✓ �- 3i i7ratU +t' s�e�hen A. Strr:c to " senior Planner 't"atie Revlscd 3VL'WY QISTRIBUTIO N LIST FOR REVA RE ajIESTS; Xc4unty Public Works IRRIGATION WATER County Env. wealth ggs- . Fridley. Water (list. City of Biggs�T_ Butte Water Dist. k City of Chico City of Gridley��`Oroville-Wyand. Durham Irr. Dist. Irr. Dist. City of Orville Town of Paradise %�` '" Pavadise Irr. Dist. % Richvale Irr. Dist. County o"%._..' Table Mtn., Irr. Dist. t�� ransportation Dept. Thermalito Irr. Dist. DURMI'C WATER RI=ATI'ON FACILITIES_ Berry Creek Water Co.� Bloomer Mtn. Mutual Water Co. Chico Area Rec. & Park Dist. Durham Area Rec. & Park Dist. Brush Creek Estates "%- ' Feather River Rec. & _Park Dist. Butte Water District Paradise Rec. & Park Dist. CA Water ServipartCo. RichvStateaParksRec. Park Dist. o '(Chico urban area & � Oroville) __ & Ric. D c. Dept. J Del Oro Water Co. State Fish & Gage Dept. (Paradise Pines) Feather 'Fails (Louisiana SCHOOL DISTRICTS Pacific) j Biggs Unified Forest Ranch Mutual Butte Community College Gann Mutual Skansen Suis a) (Glenwood '^% Butte Coutrty Sup. of Schools Green Acres Or: -Chico) -7`"" CA State University, Chico Gridley Farm Labor Camp Chico Unified Lake Madrone Water Dist. --`i - Durham Unified Ma Alia Co. Water Dist. 9 `�`""` Feather Falls Union Merry Mtn. Mutual (Clipper �%`�` Golden Feather Union Mills) Mulberry Water Chico) � Gridley High (SE Gridley Union Morthwoods Mutual (Forest Ranch) % Oroville Elementary Ramirez Water Springs Living Waters � Oroville Union High of Palermo Unified (Richardson Springs) Palermo Union j Stipling City ' % Pioneer Union (Diamond International) �- Thermal ito Union j Vista Mutual (Durham) COMMUNITY SERVICES SEWERS j Lime Saddle Comm. Serv. Dist. 1 Rirhvale Sanitary Dist. DRAINAGE j N. Burbank Pub, Utility Dist,, _j _ Butte Creek Drainage Dist. (S. Oroville & Kelly Ridge) ELECC`RICA'L POWER j Skainsen Sub. (GSA 21) Pacific Gras & Electric, C141co ! Sterli,g City Sauer Maint. Dist. FIRE PROTECTION Thermalito Irr. Dist. (CSA "6) j E+ Medica Fire Protect. Dist, RESOURCE MAN,AGEMEMT County Fire Department- / State Water Resources Depti, State Division of Forestry � U.S. Forest Service UITO ABATEME4T DISTRICTS �..�. nManagementMO;S U.S. Buireau of Land Manage Durham,. OroV l l e, air Butte CountyU.S. POLICE PROTECTION O;HER 1`1 Y, State Highway Patrol � �• County Sheriff / ��... - µ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT DUN CO- COMM.PRE--APPLICATION REVIEW rORM NOV To: John Mendonsa, rnua�I�p "to'.A' Publ;c Works Date: November 22, 1985' RE: Pre-APplication ReViow Information fog.: R.Z. Inc. 4945 Country view Ln. Fair Oaks, CA 95628 Enclosed is preliminary data o concerning the following ur office has received or `' g Project AP#06-()si. generated Variance to 50' front and setback to cello p o the center i�of Wilhite Avenue, 1oc w structure 40' from -----the S au the a s t corner --o f White Aver�,ue and T_ he-ESplanade Chico e on Please indicate your response by checking the appror ale box. No requirements for this Project. T%e project as proposed can meet this requirements. Sufficient Departments proof has been given that .the applicant;. can meet the f approved: following condi tio,jas dad r Gant ti -*y "" The project as proposed can/does not meet the requirements of this department. A revis,ion of the project will be necessa has been contacted with this fapplicant information. BUTTE CoLf ' I'TN I NG roMIISSION % COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, 'CALIFORNIA �.Ptr�nn;r,r�t•nm+'« PHONE: 534-4601 TO: P . G . & E, . 350 ` Salem St. DATE: 12-23-85 Chico, CA 55926 I 12I: ( 12",T REVX E"d A th) ! I .h!rCC I,c, __vt4 ;ACT�l1y 1 VAC t;A I;nal oseci ir, prr.liminary data 02cr Office has r1!r.�rivod Or nr ratr�tl nr"C!rr.• ille follnWin,, project: R,Z. Inc. r AP#(�C—Ot3�1--� F + rn�r,r rrC7c7� f35-11-•�?2 r .• Variance to 50' front yard s+'tbark to a�O�l llow �l s �.'r, acture q p + .from the centerl_Lne of White Avenue, located on the Sou�klr�a corner of White Avenue and The EsPlanader Chico. We are malting an assessment of possible nllv�ironnenta],_ impacts 7n� tail,i t� }°reparin ate crvar0nmentai, document, eithor a I�lorgjtivc Dia, � h 1r"'f s:ti4ty `; "'1�iI'lt].i`11 1r all Elwivoniiorit,1', �ml'aCf. 1«�I^anon tlita.�:,,,tF1d "t2 Ey �'`T•ti"L•� ies 71'1�� �•�1Ct21a�, k]i,1tr,:�rllt�lli; 1+Ir„a r;l ,..]n cj rs r• , a for 1nvli;tjataC]Il ,, In Vom, arra Of cool ot'n 01' ,+�.porl ... ' 1 j" %i .11tlflil:' fTy �i,^rht w, c',1Li� 1.�C' t]121� I'�al.at+' to r`1.1, t C?I' E"COI1L1112 i1Ti�;C]t'1 i t 'itly„ rr9 C r� ]c.G+ t r ;x :Y: t wii?lits 11c day of they tabo'vv_., gnnPratr' j Ly GC. i, 1x2 llir t�i�n 1DtCCl (�tltf?. If no �! Y+ iFhalh t asaurnrl thot thFr,rr, al��. rl�" iC;niflc-lr e rlr ,"ollml�ntd2_ impacf, , which arT potly2titinl from tl]r; jirc�•jr:t^ , ale; al'pt,oci:atr 'any Ga nistance you cern provido,. 3incexel y1 e 'qq _ Craig`• •Sanders Planning Teahni::an T•s BUTTE. ,(QUNT PLANNING COMMISSIO a COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE) CALIFORNIA 95965 PHONE N, 534--4501 clomm. BuR'ka� CO.Fignr�ing TO: City of Chico DATE: P.O. Box 3420 12--23-85 orovills, CaMorwo Chico, CA 95927 IM 1,'INTEM Afar) ENUTaf�t(�;N`Z'�I��.,�.,.., x�,WAT,"t1A"1�I:ON Enclosed is preliminary data our office has received or f,�> the following project:ct: R. Z.. Inc., AP-406-.03-1--28, �_nc'rated c crnrornin g x,t�C1085 11-2� 2-04,�w Variance to 50' front yard setback to' allow a structure 40' .- ._ . from the centerline of White Avenue, located an the South corner of White Avenue and The Esplanade, Chico. ry We are making an assessment of possible environmental impacts and %.rill be r`repiaring an environmental document, eitber a HeGative Dec.].a�^tit an, flit r�r „ f,'a ."v D claration or an Environmental Impact Poport. Please provide any factual statements id, m, YOU r a>n a.L fe' > in ' « for invP,ti kation, or a innionr your area of concearza or E•xpvrtise that r=elate to either Ft sirai,, social, or economic impact; that thin project may gorerate. plea se rc�„ � P nd within 14 days of the abovo-.noted date. If no resprnr:e :i genetat,�d by this inquiry, then it shall be assumed that there are rig, si nificar;.t environmental impacts Which are potential from the project. lie appreciate any assistance y011 can provide. sincerely, /A Craig Sanders Planning Technician -- 6nn X1,0 q...,1g c Wn � c i '�� n L 7�iri.tc� r � type ixi 41Iaat+r Ppovi ,d ix rr.1 up.rx thi. , okicl >t. o. M�ILr�i�i y� \ `w1T" v� +,rid ,�N".'�+e,_„`•w. ^ _..c`r"r~ .. •,-�+j° °" - -r,.. _ 9"W'a (1kn 01", _ PI-ANNING CCMMI,SSION 7 CgUNTY'CENTER DRIVE - DROVII.I.E CALIFORNIA r?'g1,,5.:f37J R.., ;'' . Inc. PHONE, 534.4601 914; Country View Lane November 22, 1,98,E Fair Oaks, CA 95628 RE., Variance AP#06-08-1-28 Gentlemen We tece:iv e. d CC subject Variance. Pre... application review request for the Prior to the formal a F _ application to the Plannin ��nVirorimental Healriance,. •q Department or the subject ecfi Va you must Provide information 'to the th Department and the Land Development l�xvision of the nepartment of public Works to Compliance with the appropriate Ordinances. insure Contact the Butte County regarding �nvirorimental Healthsewage disposal and water. Division Contact the Butte County Public Works Department any road imProvement,s .and drainage facilities regarding required, es that may be Public Works and Environmental Health have received information rou submitted. e� ved the 534-9266 and- Environmental. Health at 534-4281 1 . Public Works may be contacted at information as to �` ' their evaluation of the proposal ur�her theirevaluation of the requis l and Proposal and their requa.rements. The Planning Department staff will also be rev aPpli.cation for .anv special core' t eiwinr the are appropriate. uho eco s Pre�aPplicatite review, you have an that cons or mod.�.ficat�.or.� y questions about the in between 10:00 a, r Please contact our Office ,at 5:4-4601 m. and 3:00 p.m. weekdays. Sincerely, LA 0,4" _.�.�. Craig Sanders Planning Technician CS : ,jmc BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING N PRE -APPLICATION REVIEWP'FORM ri' To: Lynn Vanhart, Environmental Health Date: November 22 7:985 RE: ?ire --Application review Information for: R.7. 1110, 4945 Country View Ln. Enclosed is preliminary data our OfficePair Oaks, C�� 95Ei8 concerning the following has received Or g Project: generated Variance to 50 AP- --0_ 1 .8 0 5-11-22--04 front and setback to allow a �truci_ure � the centerline of White Ave�nue,_7_ocated on r� 40 from White Avenue and The Esplaxaade Chico. th` Southeast corner of Please .indicate Yorlr response by checking the a Ppx'orate box... 1 Na requirements for this Project. t. The project as Proposed can meet thi requirements. Sufficient s Department- 's the applicant can meet thefollowingowin been give that approved: g Condit;ions The project as proposed can/does not meet the requirements of this dep�jrtment. A revision Of the Project will be necessary. The applicant has been contacted with this information e BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING' COMM I SS , ON % COUNTY CENTER,DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95065 PHONE: 534-460 TO state Highway Patrol DATE: 12-23-85 Chico, St. Chico, CA 95926 RE: PRCJ�C,'"l' I7�V1I,t+1 AND ENV1R0rJJ4A;N`f'A1, EVALUATION .Enclosed is preliminary data our office has received or fPv1.1rAraLer1 concerning` the following project: R. Z . Inc. , AP#06-08-1.-28 r 140 85-11-22-04, Variance to 501front yard setback to allow a Mtructure.40' �.._, - _ from the centerline of White Avenue,, located an the Southeast corner of White Avenue 'and The Esplanade, Chico. We are making an assessment of possible environmental, impacts axed will be preparing an environmental, document, either a Negative Declaration, Mitigated Negative Declaration or an Environmental Impact Report. Please provide: any factual statements, idea., for investigation, or opinion:: ,you can offer in your area of concern or caxpertise that relate to either physical, social, or economic impacts that: this project may generate. Please respond within 14 days of the above -noised date:. If no recponse it generated by this inquiry, then it shall be assumed that there are no significant environmental impacts which are potential from the project. We appreciate any assistance you can prc,Ride. Sincerely, Craig Sanders P1.anriincr Technician Comments,.,- (Write ommeits,.(WJrite or type in space provided 9x return this sheet. RE: PROJECT REVIEW AND ENV1111111111-1,11TAL EIALUATION Enclosed is preliminary data our office han received or, renera[�Od concerning the following r.r'oject: R. Z. Inc. AP#06-08-1-28 t Loq-#85-11-22-04, variance to 501 -front yard setback to allow a structure 401 from the centerline of White Avenue, located on the Southeast corner of White Avenue and The Esplanadet Chico. We are making an asres:=ent of poasible PInvironmental imPactT, andwiI., be preparing a,tj tjvirorimentai document, either a NogatIve reDeclaroi(7)r, Neg!itive .1 Or all EnvIllormontal Imprf a. port. Please provide Auy factual statements, idea,-, fox' t invet-tig i,.)p ,a , or ol,irliono you can of for in your area Of concern or experi.i.qe th-Fit r -late to f�; the- Physdcal, Nocial I Or' (,'crJn0M1.0 iMpa,�'-s that thin projett may enerate. Pleas-- rvrpv�n:i within 14 dal", of the above-nute4 date. If no generatr-,d by thio inquiry, then 4t he assumf1r, t ha' there significant environmental impacts which are Potent'l,al from the projet. We. appreciate �ajjy assistance you can provide. Z 3 incerely, A, 4 Craig Sanders Planning Technician Comments: (Write or type in space v it, 4 A o V return tnin otheot.) `;4i:, �� ( f4' I� t f I � � ��ylu �.N4`. r�. ' %� :�` +� r� it �' �i c .,T r, ��., :'. .h,. �`�..;'• .. a ��,. r /. t . , /�F+r.. i, +�5, � �t,,.�ro:. , b . ,p, a< a .� . . r�,✓�` " ' • �. , ,� . .. �•,; i�,�,� 4 +� i'i. f ', y f'_ ,, tt �. �. �"� A 'tl���'/ A�" r r 'r', � � � rb �5 �a a �. t __c + 1.a. _ i..,.. ,,, , F ���.b T. � i.� �� �'� � k+ ti '� "''K� a ��' ,�,� �s PMA 9 COUNTY OF BUTTEto OFFICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION '% COUNTY G' F � fi 40 ds�p�,vM,nmy¢ao*"!rv�0"w"'vw' ENTER DRIVE nr ' .a 15m6 aee„ ainar '. OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 959(55-3397 Ft''f11►:I27 13 Ca' ti ' a 4 wa ► �,x �� �� �;,.� �°�`a�' °�� �.�,�� ��' � r�� r � (r��r�I��:I r �� � I"'► I �'tL�►'r r41 �°t�l.ar'�It. ;1,j i .a r 06-15-•30 t�"ti��?;a��`` n � �; ` ;;�,�'�' �, spl:anade Plaza46� ax t� �z„«„h'M'' �+�'F V 480 Moore Avenue � '`” Healdsbuxg,:C.� 95448 , �