The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About006-190-03888-13 Log. tio, File No. Larry Loerke/Nick Gore Nick Gore applicant representative ADDRESS: 325 W. 8th Avenue n Box 360 Chico, CA 9 59 26 Durham, CA 95938 891,-5316 342-9258 PHONa: 4� Same - proppiirty owner ADDRESS: - - 32C3.iF �' yL � a Tyly_ Use Rnrn;i t to allow a 6, 000 square foot warehouse o� south side; of Innsb ook Way 1400 -eet v?est an property zoned r L-1-- located at the Esplanade Chico identified as AP town/area: Agricultural -Residential GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION DATE PFS -APP FEE PAID: $195 50 RECEIPT NW,—bEn X9595 �7 20-87- APPLICATION ACCEPTED; FINAL, APP. PAID: $ f ��C} RECEIPT NUMBER: `��7 L -REZONING PETITION SIG14ATURES CHECKS) PERCENTAGE- MAILING LIST PREPARED MAIL -OUT NOTICES WRITTEN - t-- News: NOTICES tSAILED NUMBER- I t� Public: LEGAL DESCRIPTION PREPARED - PUBLICATION NOTICE WRITTEN_ 2 3 DISPLAY AD'PPEPARED NEWSPAPER PUBLICATION 0 OC P G B R -DATE OF PUBLICATION:INITIAL S—J U Y PREPARED ENG;IRO*ENTAL DETERMINATION: Categorical Exemption FILED Negative Declaration �<1 FILED: Mitigated Negative Declaration FILED: Environmental, Impact R-,qport CERTIFIED: Other: i 4 L - STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER: APPLICANT/kEPRESENTATI6'E NOTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION r rING COMMISSION HEARING(s) BOARD OF SUPERVISORS' MARING(s)s RESOLUTION NUMBER (GPAS) ADOPTED: ORDINANCE NUMBER ADOPTED: NOTICE OF DET"iiM114ATION (Appendix H) FILED 4 d, Larry Loerke/Nick Gore - proposed Negative Declaration regarding environmental impact id Use Permi t�T o allow a 6.000 square foot warehouse as'an expansion of a nonconforming use on property zoned A-5,(Agricultural- 5 acre parcels) located on the south ;side of xnnsbrook Way, 1400 feet west of the Esplanade, identified as AP 006-19-0--038, Chico. The,Commission waived the reading of the staff findings. Staff clarified the letter sent to the Commission for a waiver of time restrictions of the permit s•treaml ning act. The,hearing Was opened to'the 'public. Larry Loerke discussed the road condition. He said the Cost of this condition would be approximately $48,000+ and if the condition remains it would stop his project. HES discussed the illegal businesses on the road with commercial trucks tearing up the road. He said he would not be repairing any trucks an his site. He discussed :the damage done to the'road b the garbage trucks He did not think he should y g g and others. have to improve the whole road, but he was willing -to do his part of the road. He said he has done all the work, on -Lhe road to date. He said there is a, maintenance agreement on the road now. Commissioner; Peabody asked about, the 42 loads of gravel Mr. Loerke put on the road already. He asked if these were transfer loads.,Mr. Loerke said yes: Commissioner Lambert asked what the County's involvement was in aIRoad' Maintenance Agreement and staff said note. She asked about the County's authority over other uses that were established under the A-2 tonin in the e area. Staff said if they have not expanded, they are pre--existing nonconforming uses and allowed. if they have expanded, the Commission has authority over the expans:'.on and 'it would have to be established if there is a zoning violation or not. The hearing was closed. Commissioner Lambert said the road is a neighborhood problem. She said y thin the neighborhood and maybe'a resolution the need'a resolutionwithin of the uses in the neighborhood and whether the 'County is involved or prhapthiwits a thec clmatter. She did not thinkshecould approve this e qs . ondi ian, Staff said that the road will be going-in eventually,and suggested the condition remain with a deferment of one year or, more. The applicant,' has,stated that they are one person away from a majority on the road improvement agreement .......... �� c.� ��T� ��itf�T�' ��V�4�+�� Ci�,��.�w�,LW�1 ��'��' r+ i�j,E�� ''��t•! II �� +{� I � I +tip ' � �' • u i� . :i' ,. �_ � ` � ,� ��,_.�. _;��..��,..��. , of eren't 0a he Commissioner, Forbes said'he would be in favor of aLoe;rkemtohaveto condition. He did nat'tbut was right for develop 'she whole road. hee r. agreed with Public Works that the road should be developed s Lambert said the concern with a deferment is the use woulc� Com��i�sioner be established and the building pus in, ear s deferment would do Mr.'Loerke any Chairman Lynch did not think a y, ro ert good because most financial places will not make end ofathe nyearpdueyto a where the Use permit could be, cancel e eo le in the area have condition t�iacan thegavelled roadfor not rHsaid ta�rea�onably long period of gotten along with time. • oner Lambert said she could support deferrings cishco dation for a Comma ssisper.ified time and 3.f Mr. Loerke needs back to the Commission, but she could ;not take the condition out. completely'because Public Works has estabonishould�nottremoveothemefor entire. Chico Urban Area and the Gomm ssa. one applicant. The hearing was re -opened. year t on the, rme Larry roerke said he could live with a ti ng ondisethenlast parcel; condition. he said that all .they are pes in, it will be the same when the parcel sells and a building g When they have the majority to develop the Whee. situation with the road. ay their share once the road goes in. road, the rest .will,. have to � nathiseda ant lot and is Chairman. Lynch saa_d if another business goes o. ,, said Permit will have to be pp tion. not agricultural, a Use Per it application. e imposed on the next use permit he road condition could b P The hearing was closed. objection to the 2 ear deferment Chairman Lynch .Said he had no moved by Commissioner Lambert, seconded by Chairman' Lynch, and It was unanimously approved as follows A. Find that the requirements of CEQA have been c mlet. and -considered, and adopt a negative declaration -land g+ Find that construction of a warehouse is compatible with permissible under Butte surrounding development on,Ynnsbrook� isiansion of a pr.`e-�existiag County Code Section 24-37 regarding P nonconforming use and meets the requirements be of unreasonably Code Section 24-47, specifically the use wall develo incompatible withor 3.njuxious to surrounding plment and" e g with; theof the area because it will not impar the integrity, conditions attached; and „ Aft Lar r LoerkelNcGore r documen s ha e Uue Permit warehouse on not been `completed (Item on. which enviro south side of°pent ) to allow omental Y zoned nUn (Unclassified 6,000 square foot ntified lnnsbrpok wa ide as AP 6- Y, 1400 feet west 'a Of on the 1988) 19-0=038 Chico. he esplanade, (Continued open from May 12, Staff said the if the archaeological c aP l-icant will learance. was received today. requirement, this agree to a 60 Y• Staff said Staff said item can be day pension oA if the Published for on the _C� Commission would ha�eplicant cines, not a no choice gree to t hearings ori �'uly 14, 1988 but to den he 60 day extension, The hearing was o Y this project. the opened to the public. Larry L,oe rke maintenance e said he had entities• the road. He the information on one is a co said that there the road agreement for same thin mmercial garbage'compan are two,nonconforming needs Cheng (nonconforming with no Use permit Permits Y, Parcel 36 is don tanks, to ollow r comme he He said there him to rcial us,e). He sai th agreed to h�.re are other t have above ground fuel storage auks in the the road; the 60 da extension. He 'iin without permit g ssed the money e P rmits. He. Chairman L Y h.. has put, .into Lynch'said the Pate .able to act an this project. rasion was needed... for the he Commission to be nonconforming, Lambert asked if 2 which would make the the other properties g are mhle in violation, or did t in the area we gal? they go in under the Ae Staff said that s'�ated at the. Mr. L'oerke's Loerke to Podium was acceptable to the 6p' an existing thin effect. Staff said :this :..Staff day extension as, g nonconfor wanted a letter from Property under ming use. applLcat,ion Mr, nonconforming There was a iS) an expansion of 9 under A_2 zoning that was. not warehouLae built on t Some the U zone ille his other opmen.ts in the quires a This use became r deve� areadare le pe ttiit for expansion.' zone legally develo on. Y hot be p rider t A-2 Zone.- 'Soma, m� ed Ll he storage of inflammables required at the , qu fired the time 0 f g land use A--2 the zoning the Mr'. L' oerke said a an that permit. at he would agree to the 60 da Chairman Lynch to publish this accepted the 60 d; Y extension. lxearing for .7'u1y 14, e198gsion agreement Commissioner Lamberts and asked staff this project a� d that there conditions was approved o.h a were no suggested approval.) Would Mr. Loerke be Use permit, She conditions if, looking at if asked what kind of this was recommended for �a staff said road and, drainage conditions,, l.a� �.dscaping. fa Loerlce said the grading of the road was not a far as asphal curbs, sidewalks etc. He said the cost of the road from 'thes problem. He said as he is at the Parcel would Prohibit an constructionEs all th.enway fback atoGhis P y , pproximatel.y $125,000. pPll.cat f said that in the pre --a ,on review Staff to work with the Department of ''able. Works Health for standards and conditions. Process the`aPPl.icant had for a permanent solution to drainage and with Environmental Pu�ilie Works notes the curb gutter and sidewalk and the vend the provision property requirement n install is within the Chico Urban. Area. and subject to This standards, This decision yr hi be made by the Co the hearing on this J to urban area adopted standards Project. Staff cautioned Commission at the time of recommend but tYlewdecisionhinurban whether are the commission, that the Will have to comthe the commission. Standards staff;'will ther these standards are a will be in front of the The curb, d sidewalk standards' will be to the applicant, s propertygutter and sidewalk public road , but the remaining road The hearing was closed. It was moved by Commissioner Forbes, seconded and unanimously carried to sat this forby Commissioner Peabody, x.988. public hearing on 0uly 1 v J11'5; c t Larr d c men�erke� cl--� . - ' Use Core warehouse on Property not 'b en co Permit (Item an propart mP�� eke ) to -allow � �hioh envi:: onmp_ south side o Y, zoned U (Unclassified)ag0 square identified f Tnnsbrook way quare foo .. as AP 006 3400 1400 feet on t The wes� of t Esplanade Commission �ha.co. waived the reading the , t Staff said sti11 the environmental off are lacking ;the c r�ci en.ts ,Pand the Permit to allow hecgical Survey; AIS,ve not been :completed storage of infl� e the they The hearing was ammables,applicant srtould Larry penec� to the Public. 'thaty Loerke said there are when the problems He discussed Y Purchased the Property on the property. from maintenance y they Were Y• One problem is Town. and County °f the,road, given a the,. high cost Y Carpet that ar said the right-of-wa drainage of road re is tearin re is heavy traffic in theg s stem He sai ars and the high cos the road. He disc Y area,, here of assed drain 1�e said at is fuel, be1e Putting in a would age acost nd nowhere to this time with a r g stored on other standstill , o Put the building with the water 90 , 000 road and Parcels the He said on the h" as at tri ►l $2Q,000 r d and a hez edare Other Property, He said' e what i 4: roc th.er storagre of id he fuel o People on of was at a Commissioner n some Of theher parcels who use Lambert, asked Parcels, Mr. Laerlte said. he 3 what �.$ going '$:U be Store Commissioner s rent it out to d the' building? questioned Lambert s�iid t construction: a there being he area _oi�pany. g a road ;Mainte as developed under Staff said a road trance agreement. U or A-2. She owners , Staff maialtenr�nc:e a Property own noted that agreement would be be Commission and the a road mainte a between Condit, comes tot County is Maintenance agreement rvpr°Pert�r ions he final not invsionolved, m. nt is be being applied or. vol' have todboireasoon this project said when the. d for, nobly related,to 'that the Mr. Laerke said he he use that is up in 1985. Purchased the property in 198.3.. and Staff said the issue d.put the building IS the. envra Lewis Everett nmpntal documents He said said he has not being c done the road is getting to some work on tre amPl:ete, .has most of the work at hasa problem. road a number of Chairman L die said times. yx�ch said the been done on the road at Mr. Loei' ke agreerrrent an a private c:aunty can not read. enforce a road The hearing was c1a�seq maintenance Chairman Lynch d sc�assed denying this ar continuing it to 5/19/88, 1�C1'i'�' 000+y Pt, �JCq 1aiC3td 'SSI Tvs AWL R, Commissioner Forbes .said he was in favor of applicant to complete the environmental d'ocumen�ntin,uan,ce and urged the ance' is and I Ok into whethe,r.. or not there ,is a road tmanten agreement, Lofnmissoner Lambert askedifa Commercial z and 'road problems. one would have the drainage Staff said the drainage issue would still be CAxnmssioney Lambert asked the them, continuance plicaz�t if he agreed to the Chairman,, Lynch was in fano of a ccantinuaz�,c The heaving was re=opened e, Sta�wofweeksd if the a Pplicant wantel this hear„ to give him an opportunity w cs�uld be contird, for back and see if there was a -Y t� review the , road mai ntenance agreement. c recc�ro, trace decide wanted to pursue th When the wants�ancontinuance to the 1 �. whether !le atter part of May. s or whether he Mr, 1 Loerke said this was fine, that he could came back a check on the conditions of the road me to Staff suggeSted 2 weeks c and have ti ontinuance to find out ghat the standards of , e r�aad were supposed to be, when the whether the applicant agrees with it, and in two weeks as to whether he .wants to oPcrcels ..were subdivided and time Plicant can report back Mr. Loerke said he Was going to be o continue this or not. he would like to continue this . out of t©wri for He said a - a week and a half so only gave hint days,to do the research, .vao weeks continuance would Chairman Lynch said he could start some e of the research today if he Commissioner Lambert asked if he would like this continued to May 12th. Mr. Loerke said yes, that would help him. Commissioner Lambert said there would be ti',e Ossib: its, of another continuance if necessary and Mr. Loerke s( -1d7. �' .. .... Chairman Lync ,j cphis wuu�.d be ..Fine. continued this hearing open tra Na Y 1.2 Commissioner Peabody?�tron l 148 at 9:pq a»m, 9 y urged that they get re presentati . ,,s of .y P t together with the Comms scion so t if thetPublicVWo Works Deparrntmen of ` - h Y applying condit,i�sns, they know ,�4, i�� r BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDINGS - April 1,x1988 Install curb; gutter, sidewalk and necessary road section Environmental Health: "Prainosed use will not adversely affect code alid ordinance enforced by this department." Department of Forestry: "Negative ',Impact on fire department. (comiliont received "'pr,ior to notification that fuel tinks.Were stored on-site,)" Sheriff: "The primary impact on 'law enforcement for this project Would be 'minima(, There would be no increase In density, Any responses would be primarily for thefts and/or intrusion alarms if 'used." City of Chico: "No comments" ANALYSIS. Theeproperty is currently developed with a 9,000, square _foot Warehouse. TenantsInclude Mike's ;`,utomot l ve and Loerke Insulation. Both 'uses are considered heavy commercial. Also on-site are four large fuel tanks Installed onframesabove'ground.' The warehouse was Completed July 9, 1985 when the property was :zoned A-2. The A-2 zoning district allowed a variety of development'' types I nc l ud i ng heavy commercial w'i t,hout' regard to the underline General Plan designation. The effect of the A-2 zoning on this neighborhood Is striking. Along the Esplanade there is Basque Norte restaurant and two large apartment complexes. East of this warehouse is Town and Country Disposal, and to the northwest is another warehouse, The remaining lots are vacant, In agricultUral production or developed with one single family house. Expansion of the warehouse would not Ise Incompatible with surrounding land uses, although' It is Inconsistent - with' the -General Plan and recently adopted A-5 zoning. The 'A-5 zoning was adopted March 1, 1088 and 'wIll be In effect March 31, 1988. A Use Permit for a 6000 square'„foot warehouse, could be considered under Butte county Code Section 24-37, eXpansion 'of a pre-existing noncon;ormfng use. This use permit has.been published as an Item on which environmental' documents have not been completed, An initla'i study was prepared and malled to the applicant December 7, 1987. Although staff has contacted' Mr. ;Gore repeatedly and spoken with he and Mrs. Loerke, no mitigation measures were ever received. A' record search Is needed to determine whether an archaeological survey should be required. If the record search advises againJt preparation of a purvey, or t:he surVey is submitted, then the environmental documents would be complete. The initial study also discussed permit conditions why ch are required by County Code. For example the use permit should to expanded to allow installation of fuel tanks, or the tanks removed. If storage of ' 2 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDINGS April 1, 1988 Inflammable Is approved by the Planning Commission, the applicant W111 need to install the tanks In:a manner approved by CDF and Air Poll'itloo Control, Innsbrook is patched asphalt to just Proceeding west to the warehouse past tht apartment bulldlnis, approXlmatel 16 ft. Innsbrook 1s dlrt and grAvol y wide. The road WlII have to be Upgraded to I11' heavy commercia'i and/or_'industrial standards adopted by the County, As a Property within the urban area, curb, re4Ulred by the Department of Public Works. An sand sidewalk, drainage an P Is necessary to accommodate storm water runoff from t ge pian 1 approved drama and graveled Parking lot. he large bu l-I,d i llgs And finally, the parking Ict does not meet the'requirel'nents of Butte County Code Sectlon,24-35. A total of .5% of -thep arking area Is required to be landscaped. The application was deemed complete December 18, 1987, Government Code Section 65050 states "A development project shall be months from the appiIcatiori being deemed complete.,, approved within 6 Which to act on this,a iThe six months in was pre-sc•beduled to motivate the applicanteto$subml8t8 t'heheeapplication or' survey. Once submitted, the environmental documents e complete, enabling favorable action on this permit by the Commiswll4rbe sion. RECOMMENDATIONS.r_��- Continue this hearing to 5/19/88'. Direct the applicant to submit an archaeological survey or ,record search recommending against preparatiOf on y prior Ub 5/119/88. formation Is submitted staff, would berabl'e to re ublish the u p e in If th mlt'for the the informatlpn is not submit'4edsethe�recommended motion Is: if Recommendations: A. Find that this Use Permit request Is subject t 2ie80)o requirements ref the Qt„lfornla Environmental � ality Act (Government Code Section B { The applicant has been UhW I I I i ng to coraper, to with staff aff to complete the envirohmenta'l documents; ,and C. Deny the propoSed Use hermit to allow a 6000 sq, ft, Warehouse on AP ' B--19-58 (Larry Loerke/Nick Core) subject to Government Code Sections 15i09,,65950 an g• 4 of t d P he But y ; Review Guidelines.:to Count Environmental 3 W l i iii I: t ball', I Y of 811,11 i ttr '�I ruir i rtccC h� l.etidy cy) Lop, 0 87-11-18-01 1. BAC Jill 1106-19-38 .D 1. ~ Name or proponent LARRY LOERKE/NICK GORE Z. Address of proponent rind representative' (if app] it;ttble) Larry Loerke Nick Gores _ 326 W. 8th Avenue P.O Boy. 360 m, 7� 95938 ;i. Project de'scri atitara USe Permit , II.. MANDA'rORY FINDIN(II, OF f(-N1l-1CANCG YES AIAY111' NO r Does tlic project lr<rvc the potential to degrade the quality of the onvironmeat, substantially reduce the habitat of u 1 ish oa• wildlife species, 'cause EY fish or awi ldl i I`i! population to drop below self- sustaining elfsustaining; levuls; threaten to eliminate a',plant o,r animal community, reduce, the number or restrict the range of a rai le or endangered plant or animal or el minrato impo! hint examples of the ,major periods /1 of` Calii'ornia history or prehistory? lr h. Does asci project have the potential to. achieve short-term henefits to the detriment of long-term, environmental goals: (A short-term impact on the environment is one tN� ich occurs 'in a relatively brief period of time while long-term impacts will enaur(: into tht.' fri'ttt, t.) c. Docs thu prtjek t have impacts wlti.cla are individu- al ly ndividually Iimited,, but cumulatively considerable".e, (A " project may impa 't on two or more separate resources where the impact can each resource is relatively sm,al l , but lwhui tv the effect ect of the total cif 'those impacts on the onvironment is significant.) d 11 1HIr Lpr0JVL't have environmental effects which 1 •rs' stih tantial adverse effects on human buin4!, t'ithtyr- directly or indirectly? I T`T . 111: J:PT IT?SAT MN' ('ria lit! completed by the T,ead 'Agency) � fi)n th(,, hes is of til l , ini tial evaluation: 1.,M. I -�tnd th, I�ar)iitised project COULD NOT. have a i;igni fican't � erfect rn i h i'nt i r.,nt,"nta ..,Alt!'TION will be l�rcpa'rrd nand a NIGATIVI; t)LC'1 j that ;IItItoIIgh the proposed project could have a si,'r,nifl- (,;i n v t 1 °ct ,n thu environment, there trill not be a signs f cant e'i!"c4t ill this; t'•asr bet:autie the wTTGATION hii.ASURI-I5 descrihr''d un ,a*traAAwd �4wct ha vv been added to � Project. fICATIVI: tlr.� the aro"ec't. A N t.i 1)rvIParo0 i iI t'lik> I;ro1:os��J 1)ro,jL,;c t MAY have' a 5igni ficant 'effoct tin t �i�+ , r„ ,l r oti! m,;i t , ,Intl ars ENVI RONMCNTAt, IMPACT 10 'ORT is a`l?tlrl ped., DA'Ih'F December 7,.,198_7_,,___ COUNTY OF filITTH, PUNNING DHPAI'.'IMlJgT I Laura M. ut e, Associate Planner } T� v i ctvetl by TV. ENVIRONMENTAL I STS xp �anat�o o. a 1 "yes" and "'maybe" answe s axe required on attached sheet(s)) I. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant: YESAtA1"1�� `7 IM .,1 NO a. stable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface— rel'ief features? d. Destruction, covering or modificgtzon'of any -unique geologic or physical, features? e. 'Increase in wind or-'water erosion of soils, either Lon or off-site? f. Changes in deposition or-erosion ol— beach sands, ,or changes in si*lta.tior, deposition or eros ion which. may mortify .the channel, of a river or stream or the bed of the Ocean o7, any bay, inlet or lake':' g. Less of prime• .agriculturally productive soils f outside designated urban areas? h. Exposure of people or property to &-ologic hazards such as earthquakes,landslides mud- slides, ground failure or similar hazards? 2. ATR. Will the proposal result in substantial—, a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient airualit? - ' . q Y b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or fumes ? C, Alteration of air movement, moisture, or, temperature, or any change in climate, locally or regionally? 3. WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Changes in 'currents, or the course or direction of water movements in either marine or fresh waters? b, Changes in absorption rates drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? C. Need for off-site surface drainage improve- meets, including vegetation removal, channel- ization or culvert installation? d•' Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?' e. waangeterl7inythe amount o f sur, face water in any f. Discharge into sirface 'wafers, oar in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not ' limited to temperature, - dissol`Ved oXy99P or turbidity? g.. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? h. Change in the quantity or quality of ground waters, either through direct additio's or w'11 h.- drawa.ls, or through nterceptirn of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? iW Reouc:tion in the amount of water other wise- available forublic. water supp zes? j. Exposure of people or property to water - related hazards sluch as flooding? • YBS MAYBI; NO 4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial: Lange in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees,, r shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants')? b. Reduction of the numbers' of .;any unique, raz•e or, endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area x , o ina barrier. to the normal repleni.sh.- meetof existing species? d. Reduction in � creage of any agricultural crop? :4NIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal, result in subota,ntlal: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land an mals including reptiles, ,fish and sheli fish, benthip organ"-sms or insects) ? b. Reduction in tie numbers of -any Unique, rare or endangered species of animals! C. Introduction oe new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the:` migration or movement 1t of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife ` habitat? 6. NOISE.`, Will the proposal result 'in substantial: Increases a.. in existing noise levels? �,. b, ExposLire of people to severe .noise levels? '7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce pignx .can ght and glare? 8. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial til toration of the p7•rscnt or planned land use of an area? r . NATURAL RESOURCES: Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Increase in the rate ;of use of any natural` resources? b. Depletion of any non-renewable -iaturai re5otlTCeS? 10. RISK OF UPSET. WL11 the proposal involve: a. A 'risk explosion or the release of hazard- ous: substances ('includinrr, but not l.inlited to, oil, pesticides 0 chemicals or radiation.) in the event of an a.r, cine'+. o,• u;nso r 'conditions? b. Possible interference with aTj emergency- response plan oremergencyevacuation plan? W, Il- POPULATION,' Will Ithe propo>!dl alter the location, distri utxon, density, or growth rate of the human population? �+ 12. HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand .for additional }rousing? (' aANN& 13. YES qr MAY11V NO TRANSPORTAT7 N/CIRCULATION, Will the paoposa.a resul i n a. Generation, of substantial additional vehale movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, r,r —, demand for new packing? c. Subotantial impact on existing transportal;lon sys t%�ms d. Significant alterations to present pattern+, Of circulation or movement of people-andl of e. Alterations to , a waterbornerail or, i r trr� �Cic? Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehirw j es', bicyclists or pedestrians? [--' 14, PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an el' upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services t a. Fire protection? b. PoliceP rotect' ion. c. Schools? C_- d. Parks or other rer_reati(,nal facilities? e: Maintenance ofublic, i:acil ities, inc]uditl ? p ") roads. f. Other governmental services?` 1S. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of, substantial amounts of fuel.or energy? b.' Substantial increase in demand '- upon existing sources of energy,'or require the development of - new sources of,energy? 16. UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial altera�'ons to the following; a. Power or natural gas? b., Communications systems? c2 Water availability: o. Sewer or septic tank? e. Storm water drainage?� f. Solid waste and disposal? 17 , 14UMj4N HEALTH. Will the proposal result ill: a. rection of any health hazard or potential health hazard (exclud ng mental, health)?b. Exposure o'f People to Potentialhealt}hazards? - - -- 18, AESTHETICS. Will the proposal, result in the o structzon of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensitoPublic view?, ve site open n -4- dift YES MAY119 NO 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in. an impmt upon the' c{uality or quantity of existing :recroational opportunities`? 20 CULTURAL RESOURCES. a. W ll t -H proposal result in the alterat: ov) of or the destruction of a prehistoric 67, historic archaeological. site? b. Will the proposal result in adverse physvcai, or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? C. Does the proposal have the potential to cilmse a' physical change which would affect unii:jua ethnic cultural values'' d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within, the patential impact area? - V, DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP 06-19-38 See attached. DISCUSSION OF EtIVIRONNIENTAL EVALUATION AP 06-19-58 parking will overcover an4estiQm�tedrlb�Qpt warehouse, access road ��rit-) Construction of the ..tie e a � OQ 0 square' feet. Currently 00 t property at 9,000 -square -foot commercial bui1dinq, Parking, i.vid large graveled area ofdof Innsbrook Way. Total compaction and overcoveri'ng will be approximately 259 of the project site, 3b,c: A large ditch its located at the north property line, This ditch may be within and part of the Shasta Union Drainage 01strict facilities and available for use. Construction of a commercial warehouse w i 1 1 require full urban improvements at ,the t i'ma of buil +Jl ng permit. Sh: According to the Health Department$sewe�p disposal for the ,proposed use is not of concern.' Development s anticijDated to be able to comply with the Nitrate Action Plan. rid: The property is not now in agricultural production. However, immediately south Development asro proposed should a productive orchard under Land y'onservatinn Agreement. d not result in any adverse p im acts to'the orchard operation. Ag . Develo Na: Future tenants of the warehouse buildir-ig could include another engine repair, body shop or cabinet operation. Any of those uses has the potential to generate noise. Surrounding land uses are not sensitive; noise is not a significant impact 6: Innsbrook Way at Esplanade is developed with apartment buildings and the Basque Norte Restaurant. Extending westerly along Inn'sbrook are ouses, storage areas, Town and Country Disposal, and vacant lots. Surrounding the property to the north and east are vacant t l ,ar ds to .he south and west are agricultural , operations . Utilization ofhe commerciundingaland -ehouse as proposed is not out of character with of the commerce use. However, this land use pattern does not compl,:r with the adopted General Plan designation. This area has been set aside for agricultural -residentla,l9 rural res denttal uses Non-residential uses were allowed to be constructed under the old A-2 zoning district. Without specific zoning in place, the development was not made to comply Vieth the underlying General Plan Development as proposed does not comply with the General Plan designation. 10a: Along the west side of the existing warehouse are four large fuel tanks on saddles. Although the contents of these tanks were not checked, it would appear that they contain gasoline and/or diesel fuel. The U Zone does not permit; storage of inflammables without a Use Permit. The tanks should be _removed or the necessary Permits obta i r -red Storage of inflammables represents a risk in emergency situations; the tanks may leak, contaminating ground and surface water, or catch ern rite. Improper dispensing oi= the fuels may create localized air quality problems. To offset these potential impact's, the tanks, if not removed, should meet the roquirement.s of the Underground Tank Monitoring Act or the 1962 Uniform Fire Cocle for above -ground' i.nstallatlon, If ahOve-ground installation isproposed, the tanks n . Ah i shall be installed on an impervious surface, Burr"aunded by a berm capable of containing the tank,�s' contents The, tanks c„hral 1 be ventral. permit { s required fr^ rn .the Air Pollution Control fn 'or thi dispensing cf the fuels. 12: Apartment buildings located along Innsbrook near 1,�pianad'e will be impacted to a slight degree by increases in traffic.', 13a., Traffic generated from this project Is estimated to be 38 vehicle i.r -p s per day. This figure refiects the Inst i tuA, of Transportation Eng i veers' standard of 6.46 trips per 1 1J00 square ! oot of building area for light industrial uses. W►'•r i 1 e the abso l ut f 1 OiAr`°r^a is low) Innsbrrook Way will need to be upgr�-leri to server any add i ti on,�1 usesi, The road is now In poor repair, with patchwork asphalt from Esplanade to ,just past the apartment bu i l d i r There are ' numerous pothole. Beyond the apartment build ngs'5 ,, sbrook Is dirt and gravel approximately 16 feet wide. it is r, need of grading and resurfacing. There are no curbs, gutters or sidewalks.: Innsbrook does' not now meet the requ Lre menu for commercial or indust vial uses. 13b Parking shall be provided in accordance with Put',e County Coda sectl on 2435- A total of 5% of the 'park i -lot shall ,be l andsc aped. The existing parking area is n6t paved, ms ad off into individual stalls, or landscaped. When the new pari, , , area is installed, the x i sit i ng one should be upgraded and 7 an��scaped as requl red by code. 13c y f The addition of 33 v ,h i c l e trips .through the intersection of Esplanade and Innsbroak should not res>alt in any severe rrafi=ic hazards. 143: The Fire Department shall be consulted concerning the tanks, and the applicant is obligated to meet their requirements. Fire protection measures for the tanks and the warehouse buildings may be required. 14b: The Sheriff's Department indicates that the proposed development may increase calls for investigation off' theft or trespass. Impacts to the Sheriff's Department are not cans•idered significant. 16e: As noted under item 3, full urbandrainage improvements will be ' required. 20a: The property may contain archaeological or,cultural,artifacts A records search w i f be required to d�a•t.erm i ne whether or not, an archaQ survey should be prepared. The No, Information c.ca 1 og i as 1 Centerat Cir l i f orn ia S " tate `Un l ver"�" s l ty , Ch i c,O can conduct the records sea�^Ch at'the request of the applicant',. The procedures are Outlined In the copper letter. In the event that the university recommends against preparation of the survey, the County, w 1 l i noi~ require, i t . Y mom App)cant,. Larry Loerke/Nick Gore; AP i Log N= 87-11-18-0,1 tk�y, A. �.r. APr [),ATA S_ yE'E'1_ > _ b . i. Desc 1 , Type Of Project.- Use Permit. - Brief %?escr i Pt i on : 7 0 f 1 OH'a dare zoning dist.rict� on On the assifi4, �- Locat i warehouse r n �n Unr;� 1 south side of Inn,' brook dnJrr+ y 0 of The Esi� l anode: g Chico. oo . � ✓ 1 � 4-: Proposed Deas i •� feet West war'°ehouse . y of D. eve 1 opment. ' One 5" Amount o. TtnPer 6. Access v 1 oras Surf a i rag: and Nearest P rnnsbrook Way. ubl i c Roads) -" Access hr r '7- Method of Sewage D i s �m driveway o f f $ 'Source cy; Water Su F osal Seat i c system 9, Proximity6�Ply: Sndiv;dual � la,.:t�,hi field 10" of Power Lines"" Well. Potent i a l for hart To Or i 1 n a 1 Limited b her. land division. and devr� t o y lot con f i gurat i ori end Unci ass If 1 c,;.t 1 OPment. atus. B. Environmental vett�n Ph s i call Environ Beni:. 1. rLrrain a. General Topogr�aPh i c Charac ease b- Slopes. 0-27. Level valle c- Elevations Y land. d D Fact Limiting lib feet See Lever. 2- SO31s or�a• above None. �'- Types and Characteristics: well-draining soil Vina Loam -,deep s br Limiting d~acturs- classified as prime agriCZrltur^al. .3" NatUral Hazards rrf None. the Land' b. Earthquake Zone. Ijoderate ivrosion Potential; ' tz. Landslide, Potential Low, d, Fire Hazard; . Low. e- ExRanslve Ur^banlz�d " Sol N'ydrol0DY, E✓'oi.entaY A Moderate. a- Surface water: grainage ditch at 1 i ne, north_-, l V property b, Groundwater. C Drainage Gener"a l 1 Y" adequate 'to serve Characteristics: most noels„ District. W 1 th i n Shasta !.!n i ort. Gr^a i nage; d• Annual Rairifal l CnoIrmal ). c�. Li Cir i t i ng Factors:, 2u`22'p 51 V i st�al,tScen i s Huai i t N i trate concerns. = Goof to the north and west. _9w Buffo co APPLIFTON 'FOR USE PERMIT JUL 2o y BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMI5sION I�1rw�lm� Il�tar APPLICANT: Read and follow Instructions as set forth on attached sheet, Applinant's name LARRY BOERKE/NICK GORE p hone ft, 891 5316 Applicant's mailfng address 326 W. 8THAVENUE CHICO, CA --------------- 95926 Applicant's interest in property (Owner, lessee, other) OWner owner's name and address Contact person for project (If other than applicant) Meek Gore P-0. BoX17u 60 95938 3 x Yiam y GUS GORE & SONS, INC. 342 c 258 .: Assessor's parcel numbers)8,_ I u s Present zoning ti --------------- Location and 'size of`parcel(s) West Innsbook Wav, Chico par ,el street address , Chico M: Directlons for travel to property (rural and rnountainous areas only): f J Description of proposed development and use Construction of 6000 sq, ft. warehous e :! tc Descrf tion of existingland use an existing 9 400 sq- ft. wareh� c1use � Prapcase; scha 'alin9/assrcrated proleets ......... Antlolpated Incremental development e Building construction (state dimene,ons, square footage and materials used) CL a. ExIsting buildings _ , One 6o► x 150', Metal Buildiri .. b. Proposed buildings- --One-too, ° x ,t 00'' Metal. Building. Hazardous materials to tie used �Inffammables, ex cosi � p vee or strong ch®mica;5) Daily hours ol' operation 18.,'00 a.Mo w 5:00 p.m. mpfayeesT PJumb��r � of Two e . ._ Number of off-street parking spaces Provided----- Rxistinv,•'proposed sewage disposal metho_i: Septic Tan Proximity ity of power and phcne lines: On Property ��`_ rj,s.tarrce to natural water course or storm drain: n%a Antlo paced on and off-site drainage improvements: Drain line in parldng area, Deposit to be ne' 'ed to count for „acme Water source' ` Pr,i Vate weld.. Proximity of water for fire fighting purposes (hyd, �%, ponds, etc.) . 1200 ft e Will euclavatfan or grading be necessary? Cubic yards (estimate). Not neoey I• , List and describe any other related permIts'and o.# r public ap eeppvalS_reqqulrerJ for this project, Inoiurling those required by plty, reg(onal,,State and Federal agencies: Ul dlrigy �11zm lrigu eleotrlo IF RESIDENTIAL, include the number of units, whether units are single or multl-story In height, sphedula of unit sizes, and type ofhousehold 5170 cxpeeted. IF COMMERCIAL, indicate She type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities. iF INDUSTRIAL; indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. Warehouse & storage, t IF INSTITUTIONAL, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading'facilltles, and community benefits to be derived from the project. I •-� ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES* --, Identify potentially significant environmental Impacts associated with the use permit Willi( project design n features or special U_ conditions of approval ,(mitigation measures) are proposed to alleviatepotentlaf environmontta'i impacts? Not applicable 11,_ ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING* Describe the project site as It exists before the project, including Information on topography, soil stability, plants and ani- C.S mals, and any cultural, 1, storical or scenic aspects, Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures, C"L.. Describe the surrounding properties, Including information on plants and animals and any, cultural, historical or scenic aspects.` Lt,.. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc,) Intensity of land use (single-family, apartments, shops, depart- -cc ment stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, Tear yard, etc.), * Use separate sheet for longer responses. Project site is partially developed in an area of similar uses. Previous development of warehouse & shop when area was zoned. A -2. - Site is clear and level. I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that 1 have read and understand the Instructions and that the foregoing statements are true, complete and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, Date Applicant's signature " 7_ t44 Date Property owner's signature Lisa Permit Number�� ;.- Request: Use permit to allow _ Location and size of parcel(s)' VERIFY; UJI A,P. Number(s) Project Description �. Ownership Zoning and Requirements Proof of Agency (If needed) Location Description 16 Copies of Piot' plan t.t..l U. Date Received "' 6 (q,a, Receipt Number '/ c 0 Application taken by �� 06-19-10 06-19-38 Bert & Barbara Allen Larry' & Karen Loerke 5164.Country Club Dr. 326 W. 8th Avenue Paradise, CA 959695926 .:,Chico,, CA,95926 06-19-11 06-19-61 Jerrold & Helen, Arkini Eaton Grove Investors 1375 Montgomery Rd`. 12 Lindo Park Dr. Red Bluff, CA 96080 Chico, CA 95926 06-19-12, etc. 06-19-137 Lewis Everitt Ruby .. A,zavedo 2165 Nord Avenue 3395 Esplanade Chico, CA 05926 Chico, CA 95926 c 006-19-2906-1.9-1313 James`&� Natalie ' Robert & Kathleen Allen Hutton, 148 Tonea [Jay West P .0 . Box 1560 Chico, CA 95926 Chico, CA 95926 06-19-30 06-X19-38 Al & Sharon Vial Nick Gore � ?.'24 �.onea. West .O e 130x 360 P.O.' Chico, CA'95926 ? Durham, CA 95938 06-19-31 ickmann FatmiTrus t 1 j 2 Chico, CA 95926 i 06-19-•32 Marlene Albert a6 1 T nea Wesi. Chico, CA"95926 06-19-35 Rob &Susan Peaches P.O. Box 4810 Chico, CA 95927 06-19-36 Nolen Crowder 145 Spruce Ave. orovil.le, CA 95955 06-19--37 Robert Parker P.O. Box 3218 Chico, CA 95921 'p • : v.� w I j "I r pp 1 t� 4 • �. a �', � 6 O 4 Hill y Iy, • i 1 .J At. . .X. k. . . . . . .(louni ,, LAND of NATURAL WEALTId AND BEAUTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIPORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE; (916) 5364601 April 11, 1.989 Larry Loerke Nick Gore 326 West 8th Avenue Chico, IA 95926 tE: Use Permit 1#88-13 AP# 006-19--0,7038 Dear Mr. Lo,erke and Mr. Gore: Our records showyou have not signed and returned your Use Permit within the specified time period. Butte County Code Section 24-48.6 re��pires the Use Permit to be signed and returned within 30 days from the day you received it. Failure to sign has invalidated your Use Permit approval, andreapplication is required to proceed with your project. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office between 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Sincerely, B.A. KIRCHER Director Of Planning Larry Ara.ter Planning Technician LP fcu VS5.NDEA.t,, q'gjbIt, >aXns1 and 2 Whdrz eddillP"al sorvtabs uru ao, rrnd camploftt Rem1&3 4ur oddness It1 h`4"1R8TU�3N'T''w" Spftci on the reverse Gldo, FuiC4{ tb tp; pia will pravurttthis E� ttom bgitlil tdtdrnod to yr'4 jY�r, ratu�n roe oa WIII ar v cls v ect to tnd qil f e 2164—%kf1. .L@6va afrt.:lrl. i�6r y , Far gaait(aF,nt foesthe fotl6Wlnq .ngr> tree qko avalietalo, rano e fat , ' pthatmastor ddrtj ?don orld 01, , box iai) fi r addfdbnaf sdrVico(s) ri � 16014d, j, �J ShOW to W.h'oirl dulivurad, date, and sdtJ "• Qd'a eddrass. 2. 10, 00110lctdd 'be llvary' ' � xtra� CJtarge)f!); lla dharxa)?' 3, Artlele Addrag6,t4d to: 4. Aftj6ior NkllYlYf 0C } Lary Loek l? 7/19069'9 8'2 6 W. 81uh''v�re Typeofs I Chico, PA t35920 Cl' tae,�iaf Y.dd L� insured �; ±yC �I Cert)floo, Cap „,.�1Ra�'kPros�`ibltrll t AtuUeys bb±(!ln A1�tiptVira o addressee araganttffad�bELIVE1�Eb. r- 5 na ere, Add k+ t 8 d ; A drt sa n d X4dtlteus (ONLY, )J' � ,. '.. Pdquestdda id,fe tidreiJ :',, k 'done ere �—A0 t f 3 1 it Df34e of Dgi)yery «. PS Form 3811, i tir87 " * t!S �,Rl) tl38717�2GB bUAliCY3i fG R�TIlf:pJ 6�k eII'C P 749 806 96 AECEIPT FOR CERTIFIEQ MAIL NO WSW ' _" "AVERAGE PROVIDED NOt Nk , .rvNkTIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) Se t to tarry Loerke/Nick Gore Street And No. 326W. 8th Avenue P 0. State and ZIP Code Chian, CA 95926 Postage Candied. Fed SpeCiaf behvery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee Return Receipt showing to Whom and nate Dekvered o, Return Receipt showing 10W Wis. and Address of Deh,,Pf v U)TAL Postage and Feet , Postmatk or Date , ' 7/25/88 u. AM LANDOF NATURAL W �r EALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING COMMISSION 7 CUUN7Y CHNTER DRIVE ORDVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95945-3397 PHONE; 530.7401 Larry Loerke 326 W. 8th Avenue Chico, CA 95926 aiid Nick, Gore P.p. Box 360 Durham, CA 95938 CERTIFIED MAIL, Re: Use Permit, AP 06-19-38 Dear Mr. Loerke and Mr. Nore We are enclosing the cn '.ginal and one co . Permit No. P1 of your conditional Use X5-1-�' to a:ilow a 6, 000 sgtiare toot warehouse as an expansion of a pre-exiv,.ing nonconforming use oo , located on the south side of Innsbroo�, Wa l property, zoned A-5 deplanaee, Chico: Both copies must be signed 4andfreturned;test to ti the 't..s department Within 30 days from the receipt of th4.s letter. We will then have them validated by the Chairman of the Butte Gounty planning Commission and the original will be returned to you for your records.g Please be aware that failure to return the Signed days will result in the use permit becoming invalid. es within 3n to this department would then be necessary to Re-application project, proceed with this The Usethe applicant, With thepermit is deemed granted, when this permit has been s gn by .. d counter signature of the Chairman of the Planning Commitasion, and said permit is received by the applicant b registered mail, y Should you have any questions regarding this matter, this office p.m between 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 please concact . Sin' r 1Y� ircher Director of Planning BAK:Ir Enc. NEGATIVE DECLARATMN REGARDING ENTVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 1. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the project described beiotq has been reviewed pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (Public Resources Code 21100, et. see,) and a determination has been made that it wiil not have a sign.ificant ,Efect upon the environment. Lou #06-19-38w01 �� 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Use Permit to allow a 6,000 -square -foot warehouse. 3, 4. 5. 6. LOCATION' OF PROJECT, South side of Innsbrook Way, 1400 feet west of The Esplanade, Chico. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROJECT APPLTCANI. Larry Loerke Nick Gore 326 W. 8th Avenue P.O. Box 360 Chico, CA 95926 Durham, CA95938 MTTIGATTON MEASURES: None A copy of the initial, study regarding the environmental effect I of this project is on.file at 7 County Center Drive, Orovillc. This study was : EXI Adopted as presented. Adopted with changes. C, El supporting reasons are 7. A public hearing on this decision making; body, Speciiic modifications and attached. Negative Declaration was held by I the Hearing Body Butte County Planning Commission Da",e of Determination —Jul 14 1988 Determination: On the basis of the initial study of environmental impact, the, information presented at hearings, comments received on the proposal and our own knowledge and independent research: We find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant F-xl effect on the environment, and a, NEGATIVE DJECLARATION is hereby adopted. We find that the project COULD have,a significant effect on the environment but iqill not in this case because of M attached mitigation monsures,described in ite'iv 5 above which are by this reference mad,- conditions, of project approval. A conditional.NEGATIVE DECLARATION is hereby adopted. SignaLiure Robert , G, Lynch, ChairrAall Butte County Planning Commission Title 7/28/88 Date r NO _' =CCE OF D=RRMTnA:—E ON Meal: Office of Planning and Re se"�rcl� ��' Butte County 1400 ,Tenth Street, Room 1 1n, ra A Planning .Department Sacramento, CA 95814, sr^ 7 County Center Drive or JUL 19 198A Oroville, CA 95965 _X County Clerk County of Butte C:^(�I13AQE J.'GF�!JEM, Butte Co. Clorlc I1y _ G. E;MERO Deputy �UB'JECT Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance With Section 21108 or 21152 of erre Public Resources Code Project Title AP li Name use Permit_ 06-19-38 harry Loerke/Mick Gore State Cltearinghouse Number Contact Person Telephone Number (if submitted '-,o' Clearinghouse) Planning Department B.A. Krch,er 538-7601 Project Location South side of innsbrook' Way, 1400 feet west of The Esplanade, Chico. Project Description Use Permit to :allow a 6,000=square-foot warehouse. Th s is to advise that the Butte County Planning Commission (bead Agency or Responsible Agency) has approved the above-described project on July 14, 1988.. and has made (Date) the following determinations regarding the above-described project: 1. The project will, X will not, have a significant effect on the: environment. 2. An Environmental Impact Report wa. x,repared for this project pursuant''to the provisions of CEQA. ._._'X_ A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant ,to the provisions of'CEQA, 3.. Mitigation measures were, X were not, made a condition of the approval of the project 4. A statement of overriding considerations was, _.I_was not, adopted for this project. This is to certify that the final EIR with comments and responses acid record of project approval is, available to'the 'general public at': Butte'County Planning Department 7 County Center Drive Orovilley CA 95965 Date Received for Filing and /" Posting at UPR 7/].5/88 _ („ 19 Signature William A. Turpin Senior Planner 'SI Ie Vovisecl March M6 DUH6 Groan AND OF NATURAL WEALTHAND BEAUTY. PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965.339''7 PHONE; 538.7601 July 15, 1988 Larry 'Loerke 326 W. 8th Avenin Chico, CA 95926 Re: Use Permit, AP 6-19-38 Dear Mr. Loerkes At the regular meeting of the Butte Cnurxt y Planning Commission held July 14,'1988, your request for a Use Permit to allow a 61000 :quare foot warehouse on property {toned U located on the south side of Innsbrook Way, 1.400 feet west of Esplanade, Chico, was approved subject to the following uunditionst 1. Provide a permanent solution to storm drainage, submit plans and ins tall all improvements required by Department'of Public Works. 2. Construct a 24 ft, wide road with 2" A.C., 8" A.B. along property frontage out to the Esplanade, in accordance with Department of Public Works standards and requirements, to be completed within 2 years. 3-. Prior to issuance of Use permits a. Remove existing fuer tanks; or b, Install tanks underground pursuant to the underground tank monitoring requirements' administered by Environmental Health; or c» Install on an impervious surface surrounded by a berxa d capable of containing the tanks, contents & vcnted to release pressure 4. Obtain permits and/or apNtoval from Air Pollution Control DisStot n Division of Forestry _ for dispensing District & California D .,ag, of inflammables. 5. No more than 2,000 gallons of inflammable materials shal], be stored an-site without another use permit issued. by the Planning Commission. w L A N, d OF NATURAL ..�..�...'.._.__' ter` WIcAI1`1I AND BEA, PL,4NNING COMMISSION T COUNTY CENTER DRIVE , OROVII,I.C,, CALIFORNIA 95965.3397 PHONE; 538.7(,Oj July 1, 1988 Larry t,oerke 326 W, 8th Avenue Chico, CA9592E Re: Use Permit, AP 6-19-3$ Dear Mr. Loerke: Enclosed is a copy of the Report concerning our application Permit to allow a 6,000 square foot warehouse onpropertytoned Use located on 'the south side of Tnnsbrook Way, 1400 feet Esplanade, Chaco, west of the: A public hearing has been set for July meeting *ai11 be held in the 14, 1988 at 9:00 e,m, This Board o,f Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville,'California. The Planning commission recommends that the aPPli authorized representatint or their ve carepresentative be present at the hearing to respond to any questions the Commission may have. In the eient t no one represent the applicant, please contact the Planninghorfice,prior=ll tv_ the scheduled public hearing, Should You have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office between 10:00 a,m. and 3:00 p.j. Sincerely, B. A. Kircher Director of Planning s Laura M. Tuttle Associate, Planner UdT; lr Enc,' cc: Nick Gore' a Into partmental Memorandum P TO: r-De la�lning Commission FROM: Staff SUBJECT: Lo erke/Gore, Use Permit, AP 6-19-38 DATE: June 29,'1988 At the regular planningCo submitted a record searh eissiOl,, meeting of June 9, completin his envy prep by the Northeast Inf rmationYLOerke Cente g-ran:mental documents. The Plani2ing Commission is now In a Position Oil .�. vs merits and take a to consider the Use Permit appropriate action. Project setting, char described it acteristcs and histcir*• the April 1, 1988; staff finking. been Previously Basque area mix of commercial and resadent;ia uses along Norte Res4;:aurant, Town & and re 1 including apartments,. and one single -family house. Only Country Disposal, to the assessor t s t acords. � L�'�= ca ' s wax'ehoLase y Parcel 6-1935 �.s vacant according develop--19-35 with a single family make w.,l-1 make it difficul'- to use. Improvementg .uses standards adopted ;y resolution of the Board of Su will req�u,�re an g u 2 A. Cad on the property's fronta e. pervj S-1 ro 8 Class 2 A.B. 1I standards apply to sllfpgoseal, curb, gutter g 36 ft. wide, ,, �h and sidewalk. These improvements would nave been required .wilding permits. The commercial b constructed, would except d c�hpn the Ori , road Private sho athat the owner Trepresented the wa'rehouseuas'his for co P, not a commercial use. mmercial repair of YZeav e warehouse is now being used y quipment and Loerke insulation. The applicant's frontage measures de-sac. Inst=1,ling curb aPProximately 80 ft. balance of the ;street has otter' and sidewalk foralong the cul facilities, 80 ft. when the will'not provide drainage or pedestrian Fromhe Propert wide, t2 1� A i C. 8 "line wide, to Esplanade. ,Public YNorks goad represents tYe'B. road, without curb will require a 24 ft. minimum gutter and sidewalk. This 9.mprovements are necessary to tandard for safe Proposed heavy trucks utilizin the access. Road Support existing ccrrunercial traffic and sac, both road standards cul-de- property g idenathe�rcad totbr1eSe of the cul--dt- are different in terms of will w cul-de-sac. The tsatne degree, from Y lane to the center of the cu sidewalks. wo road standards The use permit Yias inf1amrnables. been expanded to Staff estimates that the foclude the storage of four tanks now on site I (installed without Permit will be conditioned �o re aired toptal of 2,000 gallons. permits) contain or removal: installation of the The ijvo pro er ins tankrt, Recommendations A. rind that the requirements quirelttents of CEA �e been completed & and ado t a negative'declarration* and P B. Find that construction of surrounding'develo a warehouse is compatible expansion of a pre' on Tnnsbrook,' is;permissablunder 2437 requirements of Pre-existing nonconforming unreasonably 24-47 specifically use &` meets the Y incompatible with o the use w11 not _be development and r injurious to surrounding �� . Approve,; .and the proposed use permit to allow a 6,000 and storage of 2.000 s Loerke) 'subject to theafollow ng�cona bones on q ft. wareho��,e AP#6-19-38 (Gore, �• Provide a permanent solution to storm and install _all, on re draina e required b g submit plans 2 • construct Y D..P . W. a _z4 ft. wide road with 2� Property frontage out to the EsplanadeA.C., 8" A.B. along Department of Public Works standards and requirements. in accordance with 3• Prior to issuance of Use Permit: A. Remove existing fuel tanks; or B. Install tanks underground pursuant to tank monitoring requirements administere .zndergroundd by Environmental Health;'or C• Install on an impervious surface surrounded capable of containing the tank's contentsd&bY a berm release pressure, vented to 4. Obtain permits and/or approval, f District & rom Air poll storageutiondiContra/ California Division Of`Forestr f inflammables. Y for spensing & 5•XO more than 2,000 stored on-site gallons of inflammable: ma Planningteria commission. another use it is shall be omission. permit issued by the 6. Future warehouse shall be used exclus , bulk goods. .rely for th materials is Retail sales & Outdoor storaap ofeestorage of expressly prohibited. P ent & 7. Applicant must also com l and local statutes P Y with all. ether 4 Lica <� ordin P b anc P le es, an ,,Mate d r.e.gu�lations. Rim ��, LAN 0 OF NATURAL WcAlTLI Ai1f.'+ bE.?UTY PLANNING COMMISSION COUNT`/ CENTER DRIVE OROVILLC, CAL;IPORN1A 95965.3397 PHONE% 538.7601 May 1.2, 1988 Larry, Loerk;a 326 W. 8th Aventie Chico, CA 95926 r Re: Use Permit, AP .. 6-19-3d Dear Mr'. Loerkea At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held May 12, 1988, the Public hearing was continued open to June 9, 1988 at. 9:00 a.m. to consider your application for a Use Permit to allow a 6,000 square foot warehouse on property zoned "U" located on the south side of, Tnnsbrook Way, 1400 feet west of the Esplanade,,ident,i.fied Lz AP 6-19.38, Chico. This meeting will be Meld in the Board of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, q:roville, California. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact ,this office between 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Sincerely; B. A. Kircher Director of Planning Y I William Ai Turpin Senior planner WATIr cc;Nick Clore zU0' 44I a =+ LAND OF NATURAL 'WEALTH AND BEAUTY c PL.ANNlt, GG COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE •- OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965.3997 PHONE: 538-7611 April 15P 1988 r. Larry Loorke 326 W. 8th Avenue Chico, C,A 95926 Re: iJse'permit, AP 6 1� : -38 Dear Mr. Loerke: r _ At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held April 14, 1988, the public hearing was continued open to May 12 1988 at 9100 a.m. to consider your applilcation for a Use Pe1~neit to allow 6,000 squtre,foot warehouse on property zoned 'rUri located on the south side of Innsbrook Way, x.400 feet west of the Esplanade, identified as AP 6-19-38 Chico, This meeting will be held in the Board of --,pervisors' Room, 25 County Centex, i�riva, 'Oruville, California. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this ,office between 10:00 a.m.. and .31.010 P.M. Sincerely', d t. A. Kircher � Director of Planning 43i7 liam' A-, Turpin Sev,ior Planner WAT:lr cr'�z N,iok Gore „ t PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER'nRIVE — OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965=3397 PHONE: $38.7601 April 4, 1988 Larry Loerke 326 W. 8th Avenue Chico, CA 95926 Re: Use Permit, AP 6.19-38 Deaf, Mr, Loerke:' Enclosed is c copy of the Staff FindiYigs concerning your application for a Use Permit to allow a 6000 square foot warehouse on property zoned U located on the south 'side of Innsbrook Way,1400 feet west of the Esplanade, Chico. A public hearing -has been set for April 14-, 1,988 at 10:30 a.m. This meeting will. lie held in the Board of Supervis,oes' Room, 25 County Center Dive, Croville, California. The Planning Commission recommends that the r.plicant or their authorized rnpre5entafii.ve be pr,asent at the heading to respond to any questions the Cc,,nission may have. In the event that no one will represent the applicant, please contact the Planning office pr1or to the scheduled public hear, -,Ing. olohaveanbetween 1 questions8 p.i.regarding this matter, contact this office y 0:00 a ir. and 3:00 * please Sincerely, B. A. Kircher M ractor of Planning Laura. M. wattle Associate Planner LMT:lr Encs cc: Wiclt Clore lie BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICi� OF PU�0HEARING Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Plannn that Public hearings will be held on Thursda JuJ. Corrsmission y Y, y 14, 1988 of , in the Butte count Board Room, Coun.tr Adminis- Y regarding the foil owin ville, traton Center, 25 Count Center Drive, C?ro Owing items at the following times, California, ITEM O_N W_H CH A NEGATIVE DECLARATION E^�RI)� rNG ENV�� L_ RQNMENTA,L INdPACT WITH MITIGATION MEASC�R, SIA_ S BE, REC1b ENDED 9:00 a.r Community Action Agency of Butte Count Permit tc allow a 19 student y° Inc. Use pre--school publ� c�/quarogram as a Sisi public �zse On ,property zoned SR-1 (Suburban- Residential, 1 acre parcels), the west side of Mari os mateld on P �a P.venue, ` approx.i.rrGately 900 Chico, tte, „ clent.ified as AP#048-03-4-091W fe6 north of Eclat AVen 0 ITEM ON uMIl?F A NEGA'i'I'v -DECLARATIION RE ENVIRONMEDiTA.LIMpAt T HAS BEEN R G 9 a.m. Larry Loerke/Nick Gore -`Use Pe 00 , _ squar, e foot Permit to , a 6 warehciuse as an expansion o 4 r0fo ""TMS-------��" use c property zoned A-5; (Agricultural,M on�conforrnin on the south side' of 1pnsbk.ay, acre j 400 feetparcels)- located west of the Esplanade, identified as,P#�006-19-q--q38, Chico. The above-mentioned appl:r.,at:ions, maps and Negative D�=claration With Mitigation Measures aa-e on file and available -Declaration public 1iing at -the o11utte County Planning Department, llt•7Count CenterDrive0rovi1e, California. Ifthe aboN7e appl.ications in tYOU cxaengeos, may be lim .ted to raising onlythose issues h r _you or someone else raised at the public hearing'described in thisl notice or in written correspondence en ca delivered to the planning Commission, at writ ;en co to, the public hearing. BU_ TTE COUNTY PLANNING ^ONIMS:SSION «A. 'Ft I1 C'H 'f2t DIRECTOR Q, F LAiv'NTNG '1.'o be . published in the Chico Enterprise June 3,0, 1988. Z ise record on Thursday, w•�'yf T,,.y"'r• ite Coun� -_ _ LANs CSF NATURAI Al'TF4 Arr_ gc•;;!1 i - PLANNING COMMISSION { 7 COUNTY CENT -'R DRIVE — OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 PHONE: 538.7601 ;r of yi June 10, 1988. Larry Loerke 326 W. 8th Avenue Chico, CA 95926`' Re Use Permit, AP 6-1.9-38 Dear Mr. Loerke: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Plai,ning Commission ',geld g g June 9 A88 the Commission acknowledged receipt of the records search from the North -mast Information Center, California State for University, Chico. The Commissiohe n, by the applicant P a 60 day Pul?1cion on hearington th q - q staff'to published the is request for a Use Permit for the meeting of ,July 14, 1988: This meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, O'roville, California: Sho-Ild you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact I, this office between 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Sincerely, A • K/Ircher' Director c.c. Planning BAX.lr ac` Nick Gore P.C. Box 360 Dutbam, CA 95558 California(ruiOQU�n tCi, ovrr� Archaeological n cue s�,.+sra Depart(nent of Anthropology Inventory lM1As Srsetrvtxe C-3iitgrnia State Unlversity. Chico SAT-WO 'rcNAum Chico, CA 95929 aaunc r�w�ry (916) 095^6256 ra • � Date: June 6► TO Butte County ? annmg T7 Councy Center. -Dr. Orovi,ll;e; Ca. 95965 re, UP AP-06•-19-38 Loer:kea Dear Count=y plam._s » A review of the Ove project has res ealed the fol low nc;•: The, area indicated as Widlin the project boundaries is considered t,D be at chaatcx3icaliy sensiiwive. Present are: Easy c-1Gcess to natural sources Of water Flat meadowland ar .Flat land near water somth i and/or east i facing slopes Previously recardQd s, tes in the vicinity Other: .... - 4Ve strongly rercx mend ftat an archaeological reoannaissance be ocxedc,tcted of the pared area by a gpalified archaeologist and p ropriate mitigation measures A mown site or sites has/have be-an previcu,sly recorded in the project area. ._ Project operations will have a n 4-`v We re<.�caza��e.^ 1 that a a_z a LuPact: on these cultural resources. qual.ifaed3-jrchaec.)JogisI: be contacted to assess site lents and prepare a mitigatiire proposal. Cher: A survey --- Y 's no:^' recommended four the above xx O However, ,s ou �c�an._; - project. prPh� st±or_ c or ti Lstori ecu l Lural — Mate.�"r af—s' -�be enco'unt,eLed .n-..o-..._.._....,.. wo:t ou a cease imme aat els q pY� o�ect operations,,, all s- no materia s t pena�.nq an ;�tspection of the— -------_....": �. Y a quay a:a aro, aeo`To`g s t� Ch-- i »�-- person 410u, a eabbe t:c, suggest aPpx'apriate mltjaati n, measures Thank you dor; the opportunity to review ark ,=,m-ent ous know what this proposal.Please let regarding the project. �iintrerel�j r, Makoto Xowta tbrtheasty Information Center Qx)rdinator Butte couniq LAND Q hlATUNAI NNEA1111 AIslD R 'f A UT Y PLANNING c0018810,N 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE -' OROVILIA.', CALIFORNIA 95965.3397 PHONE: 536JOI April 5, 1988 Larry Loerke 326 West 8th Avenue Chico; Cl 95928 Re: Use Permit Application, AP'06-i9-38 Dear Mr. Loerke: on December 7, lg87, we mailed to you a copy of the environmental evaluation of your Use Permit application. You were notified in writingthat written response would be required within fifteen tal Impact Re ort. en p days or the County would require an Lnv�.ronm p The timelines established by, the County are for your benefit. It is in the interests of the County and the applicant to process each application as quickly as possible. Mate law requires final. action on projects of this type within six months. The six months' time limit on this permit expires June 18, 1988 Because of the pending time line, and the lack of a written response to the: environmental evaluation, the staff has released your Use Permit for public heating, The Planning Commission will ?-gold a hearing on this project on April 14, 1988, Planning staff will recommend that the hearing be continued to provide yoti Faith a final opportunity to submit the results of a records search for potential archaeological resources. Completion of the records search and archaeological survey, if required, would serve to complete the County's environmental requirements for this project. A second issue discussed in the environmental documents was the existing fuel,tanks. You may choose to expand your Use Permit' request to allow fpr the consideration of these tanks legally, or remove them, in summary,*, you will need: to proctoed with obtaining a records search agree to exp your permit to allow the storage of h and g e tanks., , After you have completed these inflammables, or remove th oracle two steps, staff would bye in ij position to make a more fav Larry L,oerke April 5, 1988 Page 2, recommendation on this Use Permit. if you need any help with obtaining the records search, or have any other questions,, please contact our office any weekday between, the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:0.0 p.m. sincerely,' B.A. KIRCHER �« Director of Planning L Laura M. Associate jianner LMT/sjs BUTTE ^� UT'i':TY �'L�iii Z'_WG CQI•ih1I_SSIO : 1'OTIGE QI (r LiC Ii E. F TNG I;otice is hereby giv n by the Butte County Planninc[ Comission. that I public hearings will be held on T.hursuay, April 1.4 , 1988, in thF,, ButteCounty Board of Sup?ry cors `, Roam, County .Arlr iftistration Center; 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, regax'fl nei the fo? Lowing items at the following times: TEM DETERMINED TO BE CATEGORICALLY I -- FROM ENVIRON ENT Li',EVIEW 10:30 a.m. Derek Cymbal - Variance to ,front yard Sotback to allow a structure 47 feet fi6m the centerlIno of 'Yokum .Avenue on property zoned A-40 (Agricealt:ural,, 40 acre parcels) , Located on the northwest corr�or of Yokum Avenue and Ord ferry Road, identified os AP#039-27--0•-008r Dayton. ITEtd 0�; I C "B E?�i'JIRO?v2 %L DOCiltdEh HA'J ; NOT BEEPS COMPLE'T'E D 10:30 a -m Larry Loerke/dick Gore - Use Permit to all.oW a 6,000 J square foot warehouse on property zoned "U" (Unc.lass .fied) r �•-' located on the south side, of Innsbrook Way ? 40Ci faet west of the Esplanade, identified as AP#005-X1.9-0-038, Chico. ITEI4 ON i-7i?iC14 A NEGATIVE D. QAJw R.ATIGN REGARDING . j7 r1T"I' TeiZ TI-IPACT HAS BEEF FECOti'�SENDED Butte CotY Board. of SuporvisOrs i;riop"ior. of a Specific Ilan alcng the East- AVnenue corridor; irtcorporatinq' ur; General Plan Amendments to Low Density, Residential, public and. CirrOtcrcial Rezones to R-1, P -Q, C-�. and R -P; Development Policies; and co-nsideration of a new, zoning d --Strict - Residential -Professional (P. --P) . The Plan coeurs frontage properties from tjortIl A;t:m.ue to Matipos-M Avenue and properties within n 700 feet of East AverLxe ro', t-14riposa Avenue to Manz&n .ta Avent-e, excepting t11 tT 'frori properties +. i;t7e south _s Sf+, of Ta�� Avenue hett.cO>-L north '%%Pnue ani: Ceres .!�venIu(i, Cha�:0- The above Mentiol c—d applications, „aps and -Negative C1ecl arae z.on�s are • the off • i :.s Butt ec•� i n a �. a. cr.: u�. thy' Bu on .file and a�ra�.la1:.'�e for Public -.,-Jowing prq�ille 7 Cout.- w Center Drive County Planning Department, you lrzia.'' j1 `; au conly those the above Caa4�la caka.ons in court, r+a'l L Cali lirnitrtl' to raising those issues you (.)r someone else raiserl at the public hearing describc�� in this notice Or in written co'r-:.espondence delivered; to the Planning Comr1].ssir�n, at or prior to, _1le public hearing. n g �L,JYJ +� 1. t fiS �%J7 tYt ......-.'i':.1, 1" LY 13.A G"fiER, I3IIrCTUI C7I T"Lr'�.irt I iC; To be published in `the Chico Enterprise: Record on 'Thursday, March_ 31, ,l.')88 suit count -q P'LAN'NING CoMt� 18, 10N 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 PHONEt 530,7601 December 7, 1987 Larry Loerke 326 W. 8th Avenue Chico', (A 95926 Re: User Permit AP 06-19-38 Log No. 87-11-18--01 Dear Mr. Loerke An initial study of your proposed project, a Use Permit to allow a 6,000 -square -foot warehouse, indicates potentially adverse impacts to the environment (refer to ,'the enclosed environmental checklist). To reduce or eliminate these impacts, suitable Miti- gation measures are required a s `part ,of the project. Ctherwiser an Environmental Impact. Reprrt (EIR) is required pursuant to the California, Environmental Quality Act. An early response to this notification, sent, to the Planning Department, will, expedite th6 scheduling sof your project. Please forward your written response within 1.5 clays from the date of this M letter. your project lies in an area where archaeological sites hate been recorded or potentially exist. in order to assess the potentia.l for adverse impacts and to ate, you mayncontact theif afollowinga�fficeeeas ures would be appropra , Y for a xec'ords search and se,nsi.t;ivity eval.uat.on. A site plan and/ or location map (preferably Iwith section, Township, and Range) must be sent with a fee of $10.00 payable to this information Center for 'chis service'. Northeast Information Centex' California mStateent f University' Chico, CA 95925-0400 Attentions' Curator of Records Should the office recommend. that an archaeological survey be conducted, it will then be necessary for you to contact an s BUTTE COUNTY Consultant List SPECIALIZED SERVICES Archaeological --Consul tinsa and Research i. Jensen and Associates Rater M. Jensen Archaleol og i cal Consulting 41' Sk ymounta i n Circle and Research Chico, CA 95926 2. Professional Archaeological Services Alfred Farber Archaeology and Cultural, 6635 Quail Way Resources Management Paradise, CA 95969 3,. Holman & Associates Archaeology and Cultural 3615 Folsom Street. management i San Francisco, CA 94114 4. Public Anthropological Research P . O . Box 160756 Cultural Resource Stud l es Sacramento, CA '95816-0756 5. pr. Kei,th'Johnson California State University, Chico Ar"chaeo l og i ca l Research Program, Archas�o l o0 i ca l Consulting Department 'of Anthropology and Research CSU 1. Chico Chico, CA 95929-0400 6. Susan Lindstrom r.0. Box 3324 Archaeological Consulting Truckee, CA 95734 'I 7. James P. Manning c o Eco -Analysts Archaeological Consulting IU25 Village Lane Ch i co o CA 95926 8 Public Anthropological Research P.'0. Box 160756 Sacramento, CA 95816..0756 Suite, fl?qnly' i PLANNING COMMISSIO K 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE CALIFORNIA ia365.3397 PION,E^ 538.7601 September 1, 1987 i Larry Loerke 326 W 8t:h Avenue Chico, CAS 95926 - Re Use ;permit', AP 06_19-38 Decr Mr., Loerke. Based on a conversation with Mr. Gare in our office on August 27 1987 it is our understanding that yaut wish to withdraw �' our Application for a Use Permit to allow a 6000- square-fot►t warehouse oil the'above-referenced property. Please notify our Office of your intentions in writing as soon as 'Possible. We will be holding your project until we hear from your Tf. You have any questions or i assistance f we can be of further , please contact: us any weekday, bet.jeen the hours Of 10:00 a.m, and 3:00 p.m. Sincerely, B • A KIRCHER Director of Panning Kathy Kel Planning Technician XK/sj hi f�ffi�'1 Jam fie PLANNING OOMMISSICN i COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - QUOVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965.3397 PHONE M-7601 August 24., 1987 Larry Loerke Nick Gore 326 W. 8th Avenue pjo. Box 360 Chico, CA95926 Durham, CA 95935 p RE • Pre-Application Review AP#06_19-3$ Gentlemen: This is to notify you that we have received suf*~fi'z ent assurance from the Butte County Environmental Health and Public 'Works Departments that your project can meet their requirements. This fulfills the Ire--Application review process. Na additional work shall be perf=ormed on this project. until we have received the remaining 'application fees in the amounts of $125'7.50. Please submit these" fees to the Butte County Planning Department in person or by mail. Make checks, payable to the Butte Country Treasurer Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact" this office between the hours of 10-.0v a.m.,and 3:00 P.M. Sincerely, B.A. KIRCHER Di rec for of Planning' rr� C Cra��Dsanders Planning Technician C5 : j1TmG coun PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILL.G, CALIFORNIA 95965.3397 PHON E: 538.7501 Larry Loerite Nick Gare. July '27, 1987 326 W. 8th Avenue P.O. Boas 360 Chico, CA 95926 Durham, CA 95938 HE; Use Permit AP#06-19-38 Gentlemen We received your pre--application review request for the Subject Use Permit. Butte County Pubic Works and Environmental. Health ;have received the information you submitted. The Planning Department will consider this application complete only after we have assurances from the above departments that the Project complies with appropriate ordinances and "1 y conditions mposed,'can be met. It the applicants responsibility to provide any ditional information needed by Public Works or Environmental Health to meet their requirements. Pubi.: Works may be contacted by telephone at 538-7.266 and Environmental Health at 538-7281 for further information as to their evaluation of thesa their quirement . propoaal and The Planning'Department staff will also be reviewing the application for any special conditions or modifications that are appropriate. Should you have any questions about thepre--application review, please contact this office. . Sincerely, B.A. KIRCH8)R Director of Planning i Kathryn rKe 'r Planning Technician XX: j mc' DIES 1_rn=rUrr-20N L-rs'r Hon GcQMMMNITS �'" County Public' Worksscsc rnrA�rr� __,�, ,�-°'County Environmental health Stare Water Resources Department' City of Diggs __ U.S. Forest Service W*'City of Chico' __ U.S. Bureau of -Land Management: City of Grzi.dley Butte County Mining (:ommittee City of Oroville State Department of Fish,& .Game Town of Paradise California Dative Plant Society Planning Department State Div. Forestry - attention State Transportation Department Craig Carter Regional Water'Qual. Control.'Bd,, State; Reclamation Board DOT<Es�raC_ WAMEx Butte Water District SIEWEM California Water Service Co. Richvale Sanitary District Del Ora Water Co. North Burbank Pub. Util.Dist. UWID Skansen 'Sulo. (CSA #21) Thermalito Irrigation District Stirling City Sewer Maint. Dist. Other Theimalito Irrigation District .w (CSA 026) North (Chico) Biggs-W.Gri.dley Water District _A,,,/PG&E PG&E South (Marysville) Butte Water District Pacific Bell Durham Irrigation District State T11 Cable nWID — Viacom TV Cable Paradise irrigation District' Ri.chvale irrigation' District, Table Mountain Irrigation Dist.. t�7CRE PP,01 FCTTON `x'her>malito Irrigation District: El MedioFireProtection Dist. County Fire Department/CDF nQgQTJT'X0 A39A= -MNr nTSTaaCs= Durham, oroville or Butte County' POT-,YCIE PROT7E=XON tate Highway Patrol ounty Sheriff` SCF3001, DTSTRXCT COMME -8, RE CI�.EC _ o Area Recreation District Chico Paradise Pines Architectv.ral Durham Area Rec. & Park Dist. Control Committee Feather River Rec. & park Dist. �� Butte County Farm Bgreau; _ Paradise Rec. & Park Dist. Community Association: Riche ale Rec. & Park Dist, State Parks & Rec. Dept. • BUT. ' COUNTY PLANNING0 7 Count COM MISSx OrovilleY Venter. Drive . CA 95965-3397 ., ( 916) 538-7601 PtanniMg TO. Department ofFStp 1 ore tr 8% Ir DATE: �2 C'�,°c,MUle;alitorni,q RE- PROJECT REVIEW ENV:rRJNMENT7?,I, EVALUATI011 Enclosed .is Prelim - Concerning �. Y data our office conce�nzncr the'. fol, Prp�ect: --•-`_.. has received car � Use Perms #- tom Larry `Loerke,✓Nick Venerated allays a 6 o~�--=r-7� 6��8 0 square �oc�t side of Xnnsbrook 6�a tsar-ehouse, 0 �,ocated o ---- YP l4Q© reef the t m n theSouth Of the Esplanade �- , Chico7 Q We are making"---------.-.--.._.� be Preparir► an assessment of g an environMenta possible ervirOrimental i Negative Declaration w' document imp Impact Report (EIR ath Mi°t:igatifln , e.ithex' a 11ia and will 1 Measures or 9ative" declaration, an Envs.ronmental Please provide an [pinions You can Y factu,s. statements, ideas for inv to ei.+.: n offer in your area ler physical, social., of concern or estg�1tion, or generate. °r economic expertise that of impacts that this Please respond a" project may is generated b ithin 14 days of the no si Y this inquiry, shove -noted date. 9ni�icant thea it If no re. project. environmental shall be sponse impact are' potenaahat there are P wl�x Gla We appreciate the ppreciate any ass stance SinCereay, You can provide. Kathy Rel' �,.. PlannilIg c ni Comments.. '00gative irnpact on i:i�e rip axtm©nt, Does your a9c,.,;Z�� a attaa, `` tial s . receive a C� conha.�' Measures {r U f.•c�r Ne Py of the environt11(.nLKa1 G this De,.0t) 'on (with or without; n9,it ` or �:xt� for this project.) . edutncnt _1,gation N ' .. J n 0 "I7f� `( « BUTT COUNTY PLANNING COMMISaIO 7 'County Center. Drive Orovilie, CA 955C5-3397 �`- (916) 538-7601 r: `i y TO: County Sheriff Buf're Co, P1anniiig m a DATE: -97 G 7 s D c SEP 1 '1987 RE: PROJECT REVIE4L p. ra��ille, C Gfar�iq ENVIRONMENTAL i V',ktU TION Enclosed is preliminary data our office has received) or a concerningthe following generated g ,prajecta Larry Loerlce%Ni c}t Gore. - AP#06-19-3$ Use Permit to allow a ca,000 square foot warehouse, located on the south side of Innsbrook Way, 1400 feet West of the Esplanade, Chico. We are making an assessment of possible environmental impapts and will be preparing an environmental document, either a Negative Declaration, Negative Declaration with Mitigatlon Measures or' an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Please provide any factual statements, ideas for investigation, or opinions you can offer in your area of concern or expertise that relate " to either physical, social., or econor ; t- , �y generate, s that this project, may 1` C. Its Please respond within 14 days or the above--noted date. If no response is generated by this inquiry, then it shall be assumed that there are no significant' environment al impacts which. are potential from the project We appreciate any assistance You can provide. Sincerely; Kathy He 11 ,. Planning c nzc Comments- HE PRIMARY IMPACT ON LA4! ENFORCEMENT FOa�THI�_pR_OsJ� BE --w - BE MINIMAL. THERE ,WOULD BE'NO IINCREASE IN SI [Y.�Y RESPONSES WOULD BE PRIMARLY FOR; THEFTS AID/OR INTRUSION _ALARM ..w._. .k 46 SG -T-.-. !+ `tT' �: "'. Dogs your agency wish to receive a copy of t110 c�nviXi��ur1��L�al rlocume�ht (initial sf uciy for Nog;ative Declaration (witil car %Vithou(r Mitigation Measures) Or 2111-N for this p..:'oject) BCJ� • L COUNTYr, 1, ,A1, 1NG COMMISS N 7 County . ntcr Drive Orovill:e, CA 95.965'=3397 Huf eGo.f'InncingComm. (916) 538-7601 AUG 31 1987 i TO Ciroville, Cda(itarnfta city of Chico DATE 9-24_��, P.O. Box 3420 Chico, CA 95927 RE: PROJECT REVIEW & ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION COURIE� R�MP,IL Enclosed is preliminary data our office has received or g0 concerning the f0llataing project: Larry Loerke/Dick Gore AP#06--19-38 Use Permit to a11ow a 6-----`_ ." ,OOO square, foot warehouse, located on the south ^ 'de of Innsbrook Way, 1400 feet west Ofthe Esplanade,, Chico. We are making an assessment of Possible environmental impacts and will be preparing an e:hvironmental document, either a Negative Declaration Negative Declaration with, Miti.ggati impact Report (EIR). on Measures or an Environmental Please provide any factual statements, ideas for investigat°ion, or opinions you can offer in your area of concern or expertiseto eit_he;r physical, social, or economic impacts t.hatthis Project�maate generate. y 'lease respond wit<'lin 1.4 days of the above--noted date. I f no res. onse is generated by this inquiry, then it shall be assumed that therepare no significant environmental impacts which are Potential from the project. We appreciate any assistance you can Provide. a.incereiyr Kathy Kell _`_a-"G 1527 Planning c n c Comments- Does omments:Does •yolir agoncy wish to receive a co _w� of lice c:•nvironi1, (.,n :a.7. documen (ini ti;�l study for Ncga.trivc+ Decla�•at�ion (��iL17 oz- without Mitigation It Measures) or L'IR for this projcct). Its N0 -