Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout006-360-009L IIIIUIlfIll I I II II 11191111. (�Illillllllll(( VI��'1 ill►I III( filll� III,1116IIIIq I fl�� i�llli .Ili@91l1,Ifi�i I ► 11191111 ((111119111111i( hu (dI ulll� � 1111i1pq�� illl�lllll) II II I ..11191111.. ((IIIII8111111'( il!II,., Ilp►i � � �IIIIi fl( II�1119111u�II ID fill, 90-26 Donald K. Lancaster reRresentatiVe - applicant ADDRESS: 302 ,Henshaw Avenue Chico, C.A. 95926 343-1894 PHONE: Same as Applicant property owner ADDRESS,, .oJ '�s`cxP2=carr= USE PERMIT to allow a machine shop _ fbusiness as a home occupation v A -R. locatedtincrt'rl side of Henshaw Ave ap rax. , 1320 _ on property zoned west of The Esplanade identified as AP 006-360-009 town/area: Chico GE EP.AL PLAN DESIGNATION ,ow DensityResidential 11081 DATE 11-15 - FpE-App FEE -PAID: $ 195 5 0REcEIPT NUMBER: APPLICATION ACCEPTED; - NUNBEft:-" FINAL APF. PAID:�f7 • �C�RECEIPT - d RE�WNI'tG P--1-TON SiGi��JRE_ OECM PERCENTAGE: r.- MAILING LIST PREPARED MAA -OUT NOTICES W;RITTEN' Public. EU News: v -UMBER: NOTICES'MAILED` TEGAL DESCRIPTION PREPARED ` `? 0 PUBLICATION NOTICE NRITiE*€ DISPLAY AD PREPARED L G P G B R DATE OF PURLiCATION: NEWSPAPER PMLICAXION ?aTTy�I, Sit JDY PREPARED E VIRONHRlMALL DETEWMINATION: Categorical. Exe'Mltic FIi col fe Negative Declaration EILED: K-igateci Negarive Declaration '=, ; " - :nvi TTJ_TL^S3.nt=Simpact .Report CERTIFIED: _ Other: MTECLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER: APPLiCANTiR-rr,ZSENM TIVE iiOM'CATL1ON O `I ROitN 4`r�L ffDETERML^�4T(Z£O^�@t/ �7 pl-UrENG COMMISSION BE Ri`?G(s): P2 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS` ErARUING(s): � ADOPTED: _ _ r- RESOLUTIONTJ, ME €GP_Az i - ADOP= ORDI-LANCE .,iRMSER r`D :iflZIC flP ,E£_^' Lm_pjA =flN Ager v -JTL ne. �` �k r: r. " I Donald K. 14,qcasafer propo,sddl egtiv�clax– action rogardirz�; environmental impact and, allow,a rnacldzm "- shop business as a home occupation. on property zoned A- R( gric It rt n the north side of Henshaw Avenger approximately R ,A: rictzltura.l - ��.esrd.ential,�, located,on, 1,320 feet west of the Esplwnade, identified as AP; 006-360-009, Chico. The Commission waived the reaclin— of the Staff Findings. Commissioner Lynch kyondered what would happen with Condition, 4, if the property was, transferred without being sold. The hearing was opened to the public. Lion Lancaster said he agreed, to the conditinns. Vice-chairman Matson asked about adding a condition for. Mr. Lancaster to modify his sign, out in front of this property. Commissioner Lynch said the regulations of the Dome Occupation code section would control 'the j size of the sign. The hearing was closed.. Comaiiss.ioner Lambert said she had no problems with approval of this project4 She said there is development occurring in the area. It was moved. by Commissioner Lambert, seconded by Commissioner Ostrowski, and unanimously carried for approval as follows: A. Find that the regairenments of. "EQA have 'been completed and considered in making this decision and adopt a. Negative Lx-aration regarding e'nviroarnental impact; and B, rind that the proposed use will not impair the integrity and character of the ,zone in which the land ties and that the use wou ' not be unreasonably incompatible with, or injurious to surrounding propertie,> or detrimental to the health and general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood or to the general health, 'welfare and safety of the County because of the conditions bi ,y imposed; and C. Approve the Use Permit to allow a machine shop as a. home occupation on AP 006-360- 009 (Donald Lancaster) subject to -the following conditions: '. Hours of operation. shall be limited from 7;00 a.m. to 6:00 p,m., Monday through Saturday, t 2. All work .n�:ufite shop. No work shall be done on heavy _ be performed within.h p w a y equipment or vehicles that can not fit withinthe shop, rJT� GoZ Y r�il`7 MIN0��� 777..�r.�l i FITS int).: AP 006.360=009 BUTTE COUN'T'Y PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDINGS - July 10, 1990 APPLICAN z Donald K, Lancaster OWNER: Same REQUEST: ' Use Permit to allow a machine shop as a home occupation. AP LSO.: 006-360009 SIZE: 1 acre LOCATION: On the north side of Renshaw Avenue, approximately 1320 feet west of the Esplanade, Chico. EXISTI, N -,17r ZONING: A -R ' ZONING WST'O,R.Y- Zoned A -R Jan. 2, 1979 Ord. #1991 SU MOUhTI ING ZOl`►IJNG A -R SURROUNDING LAND USt,4 Residential, vacant land GEI14ERA.L PLAN DESK INAi'ION _ : Low Density Residential APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Butte County Code Sections 24-47,24-21195, and 24-200 COMMENTS RECEIVED, i Environmental Health: "1. TT hazardous materials are used, or hazardous wastes generated, applicant must complete P. business plan and submit an annual inventory of hazardous materials used, stored or transpoiled, to the Department of Public x-lealth." i BU;l M C,0,UM PLANIqNG COM-MUSSIO STA.h;I{ YINDINGS .. July 11, 1990 Public orks: "1. Install curb, gutter, sidewalk and necessary 'road paving along property frontage. Install necessary drainage improvements. Submit plans for drainage and roadway improvements to the Department of Public Works for approval." This is a Use Permit request to allow a machine shop business as a hoarse occupation. `'.Che property is located. on the north side of Henshaw Avenue, approximately 1/4 mile west of the Esplanade in Chico. Mae applicant constructed a 1200 square foot structure in 1987. The building permits were issued for a hobby shop/garage: In October 1989 Mr. Lancaster was found to be operating a machine shop in the garage and was notified by the Building Department of the Building and zorii.Ig violation. Mr Lancaster promptly made application for this Use Permit. The structure houses a varietyof metal shaping machines including grinders, lathe, drill p g press, etc. The shop is located on the rear portion of a I acre parcel. The two main concerns of this project are traffic generation and noise. Traffic generated by the project is not expected to be significant. Mr. Lancaster has stated that he gets, on the average, less than one customer a day. He is retired and this machine shop is more of a hobby for him than a business. This amount of traffic generation is far ,less than would be generated by division of the property and development with 3 additional homes. The noise generated from the project could be significant. The processes involved in metal fabrication have the potential to emit loud, but generally short duration, noise levels. The shop structure is located within 10 feet of the easterly property boundary. Currently, the parcel to the ,east is vacant, but it is planned for residential development with densities up to 6 dwelling units pes acre, As this parcel develops a conflict in _land ,use could occur. Generally noise levels of 50-60 dB CNEL,'are compatible with residential neighborhoods. The CN7EL scale is a weighted scale that gives a higher value to noises occurring between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a m. Peak noises that have a short duration are also averaged with quiet periods. The shop structure is finished inside with sheetrock and has been insulated. This will provide substantial` nose attenuation. As longas the doors, to the building axe not open,noise levels should not exceed tis dB at the property lines. c e Public m drainage fee urban road im P proVements and a �9UQ.00 per g project. Since the project is not expected to generate significant amounts of traffic and no new structure or overcovering of the soil will occur, the requests are not considered reasonably related to the use requested and have not been made conditions of the project. 2 1 BUTIE E CO NT Y FLAMING COMMISSION 'STAFF IFWDINCS - jjuly :10, 1990 RECOMMENDATIONS: A. Find that the requirements of CEQA have been completed and considered in malting this decision and adopt a Negative Declaration regarding environmental impact; and B. Find that the.. proposed use will not impair the integrity and character of the zone in which the land lies and that the use would not be unreasonably incompatible; with, or injurious to surrounding ;properties or detrimental to the health and general welfare of the persons residing or working -in the neighborhood or to the general health, welfare , •,;.d safety of the, County because ; and C Approve the Use Permit to allow a machine shop as a home occupation on AP 006-360- 009 (.Donald Lancaster) subject to the following conditions: 1. Hours off operation shall be limited to 7>00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. 2. All work must be performed. within the shop. No work shall be done on heavy equipment or vehicles that can not fit within the shop. 3. Noise levels generated by the opteration shall not exceed 65 dB at any property line. 4. This Use Permit shall be applicable to the current owners of the property and shall become void upon sale of the parcel. 5. Applicant shall meet all the requirements of Section 24200 of the Butte County Code. plan, 6. Submit a business to the Environmental Health Department if required. 7. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances, and regulations. CBS1r Attachments to the Commission and Cities: Environmental Documents Site Plan Location, Map 3 t:AML' i Appel ATI - -RarmingComim, BUTTE COUNTY PL::APlhiiNG COMMISSION NOV 2 8 1989 OMAN it alif=14 APPLICANT! Readand follow Instructions as set forth on attached sheet Applicant's hams=! -_,L.., E/2— Phone No 3L�" j1 i Applicant's mailing address�'1--s q t Applicant's interest In property (Owner, lessee, other) X11 VA!_AR__. Owner's name and address Ir l.trl -< :9�' t. '_ Contact person for project (it other then applicant) Assessor's parcel number(s) ~L�Present zoning Location and size of ;parcel(s) Street address Directions for travel to property (rural and mouritainous areas only) _J Description of proposed development and use 1156 Fe P- rr =o Lt-OLA-)NE�`%') C H 1 SNOr-`19051A)ESAS /A Hat-Ca c.4vf- -7yC)r.4 U. Description of existing land use LI t% AA elf (" Proposed scheduling/associated projects rYI 7 1 f d Anticipated incremental development n hi Building construction (state dimensions, square footage and materials' used) -! `1 a. Existing buildings 7t Y 0 0 b. Proposed buildings— Hazardous uildings Hazardous materials to be used (Inflatnmables, ,explosives or strong chemicals) - y Daily hours of operation '" � Number of employees_ Number of off-street parking spaces provided Exlsting/proposed sewage disposal method:. 7 f` Proximity of power and phone lines: 1y1f Distance to natueaf water course or storm drain. c= `-' ,rr t` Anticipated on and off-site drainage Improvements: Water sourye: Proximity of water for fire fighting purposes (hydrants, ponds, etc.) Will excavation or grading be oecessary? Cubic yards (estlnlatc;p I ' r. leiI r I r List and'descv a :thW related permlts and other,publ.lc approvals;rbquired for this project, Including those required by (city, regional, Stt� ;;% r'edera� agor;cle --� W RCSIDENT11AL, Include the atiambrrr of .snits, wnetNer units are single or n: ;111 -story in height, schedule of Unit Sizes, a,•,d type of household size expected. IF COMMERCIAL, indicate the liype, whather neighbonccod, city oi- regionally oriented, square footage of sales arca, and loading facilities. IF INDUSTRIAL, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facTties, iF INSTITUTIONAL, indicate the major function. estimated employ,nent per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, �p6^ and community benefits to be derived from the project, .._1 R ENViRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES* .I -- identify potentially sigrafficant environmental lmpncts associated withthe use permit. 'C,'ttat project design features or special conditions of approval (mitigation measures) are proposed to allevlatepotentlal environmental impacts? ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING* Describe the project site as i'¢ exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and ant - mats, and any cultural, h.istoricat or scenic aspects, Describe say existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Describe the surrounding properties, including Information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or soeh;o aspects. M Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.) intensity of land use (single-family, apartments, shops, depart- 'e -C mlent stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc,). Use separate sheet for longer responses, xhereby declare under penalty of perjury that t have read and understand the instructions and that the ,foregoing statements Are true, complete and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ate -- i -'-� ( Applicant's signature D r� Date— �:. .� Property owner's signature X '2215191 y Use Permit Num ber ,. Request: Use permit to allow._ Location, and size of parcel(s) a o: nen rBt>C VERIFY* OV A. P. Number(s) _. Project DescriptioOratABG8d culi£arnin Ownership Zoning, and Requirements mants Proof of Agency (if needed) Location Description NCoples of Plot Plan is.!" C.a q0 ' j Date Received _ r �� Receipt Number, Ice) ( ( e ' w Cl A,ppiloAttaq taken by foliel servJoes pro �A6airtld, olid gotYS,pleie iterri9 �f�ERt `Gntmp[eteTtams.l and 2,4v+ ®n addl {. in the 'rU �� TO", �'i'aon °n the revarsn aids, fz�ilure to do thlu will pravanS 'his will pra�+jdayguhe n Mmeg�°Y� (�u r eddress ."RE Yd h urri eceVpt fee ;icArd from being rauurne, to' Y �- k� ed q tNe dote at del ve qr additional fine� the following aervIcea ere OVuHat+Itl, Cionault 'sus aqx dspY utlCtlanol'e9rvicH(G) 4e4uesled tid 2.;Crnl �ppstar far ant9a ,chow toawhbmir ecidote, i&�Ifi and and reaae oliatge)vorY e_ seddr�nae, Amis ddressaa t ___ _------ r�. Artpaie Mumbai` i 4y 811 769 rice A,LD AK, ,. iCAS ER 7Yr*QfSc ]' Insured 302, M9041'.;, fl Nti .' Cl Ragistered } ruorifiod L,�, �t� 1 CO CA 95926 LJ Express MaY e, AIWa°/s b6tain yiSlnatw� ur eddressno I ! or agent and n T, '11= a. Addressev'S Address (ONG 1' if S. Signature - Addtesseo requested aild fee z�uidJ Want y, .......... --- --- -` 7,'D Do 190 Q ,y DOMESTIC R` IE-rU N S;E, "* U.S.G.PA *7 178 286' Eye m1,381 1Nfox,1987 J NEGATIVE 'MPACT ]ECLARAMON RtGARD"NG ENVIRONMENTAL:' q N '0 "I'lM s been M` IS GIVEN that'the ptoject described below has Tevi6wed pursuant to the provisions cif the California Environmental. Quality Act, of 1970 CPublic Resources'Code 211!00, et.,, seq.) and a determitiation has been' made that it, will not have a significant effect upon the environment. AP 006-360-009, Log #90-02-20-01 IPTION OF PROJECT: use Permit to allow a machine shop 12. DESCF business as a home occupation. 3. LOCATION OF PROJECT: on the north side of Hetshaw Avenue, approximately 1320 ft. west of the Esplanade, Chico. 4. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROJECT APPLICANT: Donald K. Lancaster 302 Henshaw A -venue Chico, CA 95926 S. MITIGATION MEASURIF,5! None 6. A copy of the i3O- .ell study reOLarding the environmental effect. of this project .:L6 on file at 7, County Center Drive, Oroville. This study was: Adopted as presented. FX_1 Adopted wits* -hangCPes. Specific modifications and El supporting ,sons are attached. 7.- A public hea-,,ing on this Negative Declar,.ition was heldby the 6� ,Asion making body. Hearing Body Butte County Planning Commission Date of Determination July 26, 1.990 Determination: 'On the basis of the initial .study of envirormental,impact, the information presented at hearina s, comments -received on the 0 proposal and our own knowledge and independent research: We,find the.proposed project COULD NOT have a significant MR effect on the environment, and ;a NEGATIVE DECLARATION is hereby adopted. We find that the -project COULD have a significant effect on the environment but will not in this case because of D attached mitAlgation measure described in item 5 above which are by this reference made conditions of project approval. A conditional NEGATIVE DECLARATION is hereby adopted, Signatu T1 - J atson,, Vice -Chairman Butte County Planning Commission Title::: August 9, 19901'', F-r=c,r--iPT FOR CESTIFIEP MAIL COVERAGE tiLtttNSt " ,f ERIJ%ONAL�IAIL�p f' 6" bNALD ii. LANCASTER 201IENSHAW AVME F Mated ZIP,U"ode NI 0, CA 95926 eFee s4ec m Deliver, Fee ttaci!'d'Dettveri Fee 4f'oum Receipt shaWtng m t i� w Qm arzd' Date Delivered A-itarn Receipt showing to whom.. *- 6 mte, and Addrese sf pehvery,, c.� 5 a "ZTkL Pa6lagta and Fees 5 Awarr.ark or Date c Up#0r06-360-00'--!Lyng !h AWL i� , f . M • i°:t {{ •V-P,T �,� fie LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVEOROVILLE4 CALIf-oRNIA,95965.3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 August 6, 1990 Donald K. Lancaster 302 Henshaw Avenue Chico, CA 95926 GE=IED MAIL Use Pemdt, AP #006-360-009 Deai° Mr. Lancaster: We are enclosing the original and one copy of your condition, `,l, Use Permit No. 90-26. Both copies mast be signed and returned to t s department within 30 days from, the receipt of this letter, We ' will then have them I;dated by the Chairman of the;' Butte County Planning Commission and the iginal will be returned to you f'or your records. Please be aware that failure to re-bam the signed copies within 30 days will result in the use permit becoming invalid. Re-application io this department would then be necessary to proceed with the project. Tle, Use Permit is deemed granted when this ?ermit has been signed ` by the applicant, -vith the counter signature of the Chairman of the Planning Co mmissim , "and said permit is received " by the applicant by registered' mail. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office betwee:l 10,-,00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Since ly, A. che'rs G' Cairector of Planning PAAT<-.jlo Eric. Projects Title, Al' .Name l� .. USE PEP141 ' - 006-360-0e" Donald K. Lancaster State Clear!nahou.se Number _Contact Person Telephone dumber (if submitted. to Clearinghouse) _ Bvk. Kircher, Director of Planning 916 -X536 -X7601. Project Location --- Nor-h side of He Ave. a � _ pprox. 1320' west of the`k�s Esplanade, Chico. Project Description Use Permit to allow a mach tne, shop business as a home occupation,.' This is to advise that the Butte Counter Planning Commission has approved the above-described (Lead Agency or Responsible:4gency) .P _ cribed project on July 26, 1990 and has made (Date) the following detatminations regarding the above-described project; 1. The project �aill, _2___will not, have a significant effect on the envy rnnment 21 .xonmental Impact Report was ,prepared for this project t to the provisions of CEQA., XA Negative Declaration was prepared, for this project pursuant to the provisions,of CEQA. 3. Mitigation ;;»iasures _ were, `X were not, made a condition of the approval of the project: 4. A statement of overriding considerations was, X was not, adopted for this�projeat. This is to certify that the final EIR with continents and responses project approval is available to the general public at. and record of Butte County Planning Department 7,County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Date Received for Piling and Posting at CPR 8/l/90 ignature ---w, ,, B. A, X i.xcher Director Of Planning. Title Rorri.sed March 1086 d[ a. 1 '11.y B All 1M.. utte U ouqq W _.=AND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY —� Cr - PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFbnNIA 95905-8397 7ELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 July 27, 1990 Donald K. Lancaster 302 Henshaw Avenue Chico, CA 95926 Re: Use Permit, A -P; 006-360-009 Dear Mr. Lancaster: At the regular meeting of the Butte Countf planning Commission held July 26, 1990, your request for a 'Lose Permit to allow a machine shop business as a home occupation on property zoned A- R located on the north side of Henshaw Avenue, Chico, was approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Hours of operation shall be limited from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday, through Saturday. 2. All work must be performed within the shop. No work shall be done on heavy equipment or vehicles that can not fit within the shop. 3. Noise levels generated by the operation shall not exceed 65 d13 at any property line, 4. 'Diiss Use Perrp. t shall be applicable to the current owners of the property and shall become Nroid upon sale of the parcel. 5. Applicant shall meet all the requirements of Section 24.200 of the Butte County Code. 6. Submit a business plan to the Environmental Health Department if required, 7. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and .local statutes, ordinances, _and regulations. Should you desire to appeal any of the cor ditioix imposed by the Planning Commission, you must do so in writing with the appeal fee of $494.00, to the Clerk of the ]Board of Supervisors, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, prior to 5:00 pm,, Friday, August 3, 1990. If you do v l U '.. ,} 4''/'filQ1,n 4t' nrno pn 6e° i `O ° u Vaonr 4nWt°n Yrr �� y� ��• A �r � aall o�• � oM�M,n s"'i A � " OL I ,e.6 s. 5 � h 'ay. F`� ♦� r3• vjs r vN' ✓ rnr u 5a � � 6_ AV [� u. 4.. R' G G' n Y J' ,r. ♦ F ��y��. �� _�� a � `_� 4ill �.se : '•T I'°•4 9- Y�r � ? rayv ✓iV B� � r noh 1.,� � r, q J y'II �'�4'�'�� y •q k ,k? G +r.r n ce � � + Qna,bri itrV 8 G 1 sI �, i s u•`i... er op � Gr y 1 P If tie Ur i.l rii err r nd:ell' Gr l els y vnlw°rv_po SualluS t ill 1+. . jk (y P rlleAve. Sch. Ilnr �i+` $ 'F° i' ,('� K'. ''^ aca• d 4,'is. i! A y 7 T 1 .c '°nl° r n Ln. — � g _ ° Mo`�' a�tlr•� � ' a: �.o+"t e.,9wn � o I I ur Wv.Mura n r�+ t Ls W7' o 'iG4 e` ry-•4P tin CII eAue.P rrn r �-' 1Mr' ?• h+ pd". �p �ci O+' '7y`1• y ����f)• ,y U CIf• s >a � 4°, Zj pw• V, Pr•` 74 ,s- Jf' w v" �� ,1 j��\`Y F GMe n�tY 4 � t{' ,tm clfr s .-}�� . F4, �ry 'crrr _ �F''^n \ n a Q`a��'E a ..e r•Ire NNEI. .Y.Y \= 'S \ter. 4n _tee �..nVC, '`:'n hti l b r"°.�'.� \ orwrrx 4 Kannedv M! s AVENUE WEST SACF ♦yT iw`�4 (Ili ..y.» ; r,,,,...._ o�� n'' �� �G pb• 4 +°-�� .F ��r +r,.� 9 r„F `c fur `br �Or an B(Ita (IG'ITIEltt d ��S{'�Ttrd It' � a D B c' •o- V .z•<�. r � 0C� `F �� y 'S' thl.1 area to pada i2!:` �”" ,k 41, �' d,•tr Cyt �r In �� y` rs�` Aq �++✓'ref. '!t Y ' � ^9` 1� � r 'i'F� "kk{ � r J� +��v �. \ ,4 4�� �+` � � ryJ HANt:llliflt)E� t7 Avanue ay yk ro+'` ;� p \`' a tlfi rr �T a r r q• n AIIU 6RT era E S°nta " �� r Avenuo �. S re rr et+tad O 2 4. Itnp�^ 1 Mn Int°Oi \d°t � °utfogy '. I;ni� Are. � \ ,z Mt Into Il AVO �.•t,. Wo � :.+ fLebmd 6 "'+'i�� r` h ' 90 PAS IW Yn VK WT FILE No.BUTTE COUNTY PLA14NINO COMMISS110N �� » ,� . t5t7rr�C:�ma.T'amsJrraRa � ;�:=�ai�.cr.� �--�,�,.�«• �rtm.'t EARIllG OATEN ���� ` �� �' � x+rr �matmmrrramrranx41 u,,.* kEQUEST" 0 EXISTING ZONE, -,,,AR SCALE �, , a mma � w.� w� d�� (1:.r" 5 �. �r s �I re,}�i 7 {, t .. 1jA.., ��, 4 �A r' � 11. �4 I.r�; �'.�. ��. �'� 11, ,'.� �. � �'.i�'� �, ote� �h� ;.��'!� � Y � (�:; '.r ,,..11 •,.: I�. •�• e b ;'.}i %ai'� -: �.` �il •'�� �'�! 1:� u 1., :.;�: h'a , ( 1 ft 1 h .i 1 .tl � 1 _..._ ,,, 1 ,r ` 1 v .7 .�;'. r 1 1 �t �n f. 1 lu w �., � i it 1 t�, � !,_. �' j p r � iA' �' s � z � P � ,.,�, ���r to � � 4 i ml 1 9, n_. . � � '•., APPENDIX I (To be completed by Lead Agency) LOG No. 90--02-20-01 i AP No, 6-36-9 1. Name of proponent Donald K. Lancaster 2 Address or proponent and vepresentative (if applicable): i _T0_2 2 Hens-haw--Avenue-------- Chico, Ca 9592 -- 3. Project description: —USE PERMIT II. MP,I�TDA 'C2RY 1'X7.' -_QJ: <_-S CF" � NSF CA1�7C1J -YES MAYBE NO 1. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat fish of a or wildlife species) cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate ' a plant or animal community, s'ed'uce the number or restrict the range of'a rare or endangeredplant or animal or eliminate important examples of major periods of California history or prehistory? E V1111., 2,, Does the project have the potet'iti.al to achieve short term benefits to the detriment of long-term environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief period of time while long-term impacts will endure into the future.) 3. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable.. (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect: of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) 4. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial. adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? . f V III. I7ET .�?=T.q.AMX0N (Tobe completed by the Lead Agency). On the basis of this initial evaluation: _ I/WE find the proposed project COULD NOT have,a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DE CLARATION will be prepared I/WE find that although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the MITIGATION MEASURES d,scribed on the attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared: I/Ella find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. COUNTi OF BUTTE, PLANNING DEPARTME1vx DATE: Match 2 3 1 9 9 0 By; �� L �-- Craig( n Hers Assistt Plann t Reviewed byt, U Pa'ulaLeasure ,--- _ Senior Plannog }F 1 a IV.a� IErVI67�T.QISIT L!,1w3'T:e�.3� (Explanations of all "YES" and "MAYBE" an;wers aro required on attached sheet(s), b. EE+RM, Will the proposal result in significant: YES MAYBE .to a, Unstable earth conditions, or charges in geologic substructures? b. Disruption, displacement, compaction or overeoV'ering of the soil? c. Change in topography or, ground surface relief features? L' d. Destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? a. Increase in wi.kid or waiver erosion of soils,, either on or off site? f. changes ix,. deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes :in siltation, deposition or erosion Which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlot or lake? g. Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils outs.�de designated urban areas? h. V.posure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure or similar hazards? V 2. AIR. Will the proposal result in sub,stantiali a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality?_ b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or fumes? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change,in climate, locally or regionally? 3._WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements in � ither marine or fresh waters? b, changes Chan es in absa tion fates drainage in absrunorption, nage patterns, or the rate snd amount of � � ^^ c, Need for off-site surface drainaP3 improvements, including vegetation removal) channelization or culvert installation? a. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? e. Change in the amount of surface water in an), water body? f. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited tot d Oxygen or q y,y g emperature dissolve turbidit 7 . g. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? h, change in the quantity or duality of ground waters) either thraugh direct additions or withdrawals, or through interceptir-. of an aqui,far by cuts or excavations? L i. Reduction in tlia amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? s j, Exposure of people or property to water -related hazards such as flooding? 4, PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial:, a. change in the diversity of species, or nmber of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of , plants? y/ c, Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction iii acreage of any agrivultural crop'? 5.. ANT14AL!LIFE. Will the proposal result, in subst•a ttial: YES KAYBE NO a. change in the'diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptilas, fish and shellfish, organisms r or inserts)? b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare ar endanger: p ed species of animals. _ c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration of axisting fish or wildlife hdbitat? b. NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Increases in existing noise levels? b Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 1. LIGH'C_AND GLARE. Will the proposal prostucL significant light and glare". _ 8. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an areal —� 9. NATURAL RESOURCES.. Will tlw% ),roposal result in substantial: a. Increase in the rate of lase of any natural resources? b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural resources? _._ 10., RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event p of an: accident or upset conditions? b. Possible interference with an emergency rei;ponse. plan or emergency evacuation' plan? I- 11. POPUT.MON. Will the proposal alter location, distribution, density or growth rate of the human population? g housing,, create a demand HOUSING. Will the rg osal affect existin housin for. additional housing? �� TW V/- 13. 13. TRANSPORTS,TION/CIRCUdATION. Will the proposal result in a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement! b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact on existing transportation systems? d. Significant altenations to present patterns of ci,rculAtiion or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? ✓/, f. Increase in. traffic hazards to motor vehicles. bicyclists or pedestrians7 V 14, PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new, ,or altered government services: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? !'f Vv c. Schools? d.Parks or other recreatiogal facilities". 4 e. Maintenance of public facilities, in,cliAdi,ng roads? __ f. Other governmental services's \, -15. gi, M- Grf Will the proposal result in: XES �'RAM NO / a;. Vse of substantial amounts of fuel or, n, -- .•• Y1•: Substantial .i.ncrease.. in demand upon existing,, sourc�,s of energy, or require the, develo usnl of ns�ge sources of energy? ' p ---- ?� UTILITIES. Will the }proposal result in a'need for new syste,nS, or substantial alterations to the following: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? .-L— a. Water availability? --"� d. Sewer or septic systems". e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? 17. fMAMI 'HF..ALTH. Will the proposal result in; a. Creation of any health hazard or potential hazard.(excluding msnta1 , V/ health)? - b. -posurP of people to potential health hazards? -�-- 18. AEal IETICS. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic the proposal result in the vista or view open to the public, or will creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? --� 19`. nECREATIGN. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or tantity of existing recreational opportunities? -- —, 20. g,TUM RES0URCFS. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration or destruction of a prehistoric or historicarchaeologicalsite? b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? c. Doesthe proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred ries within the potential impact area? L7ZSCTTr- T0INT JF ENVIRC�"Y�TI�YFNT�,t� 'E�1P.L[7AT�CSN See attached. -4- b 1,1 �1�f ' l lit C� I ✓1 ��I i 'TAi� 'dA11p.J �'i AP # 006-360-009 Project description: This is a Use Permit application to allow a. shop building to be used as a machine shop in -conjunction with a residential use as a home occupation. The shop building exists on-site and no new construction is ,proposed. The project site is 3 acre in size. . Ib,3b No soil disturbances will occu, from this project. All structures are existing onsite. As a tesuft no additional runoff will be generated" 6a: The proposed use will 'probably generate noise levels higher than normally occur from residential uses. The machine shop will be operated entirely within a building. Noise attenuation is going to be a concern as this type of use cart generate occasional noise; levels of 30 db within the structure. The proposed use will probably generate noise levels greater than normally occur from residential uses. The ]Butte County Noise Element States that noise levels of 50-60 dB CNEL are normally acceptable for a residential neighborhood. Noise levels up to 70 dB CNEL can bo conditionally acceptable. The CNEL noise is a weighted scale that gives a higher value to noises occurring from 10 pm to 7 am. Peak noises that have a short duration are also averaged with, quiet periods. Peels noise events of 75 to 30 dB could occasionally occur within the shop structure. Attenuation of these noises will be required. The shop building has been finished on the inside with sheet rock and, according to the applicatit, has leen insulated. This should provide adequate noise attenuation of no more than 65 dB at all property lines except the east property line which is only 10 feet away from the shop building. Additional mitigations to ensu re acc,,ptable noise levels along this property line may be necessary. 8: The Butte County General elan Land Use Element designates this area Low Density Residential. The surrounding properties have bewi developing at a density of 3 to 5 dwelling units per acre. It is expected that the 5 acre parcel directly to the east of this parcel will develop with single family dwelling at a similar density within the next 3 years. A conflict between the proposed use and the surrounding uses may not be present today but may arise as surrounding parcels are developed. 10: The proposed machine shop use involves some welding" The applicant has a acetylene welding out'it. This posesa possible risk of explosion or release of acetylene in the event of an accident. The containers should be secured to prevent tipping. 13 me iti addonal traffic: So ' will be generated by customers. However the additional amount of traffic is not a expected to exceed the amount of traffic this parcel would generate if it were divided and developed with residential units in accordance with the General Plan. Traffic is not Psignificant"m' act unless large trucks or heavy equipment visits the site, expected to be a impact 18: The aesthetics of the property and neighborhood could be affected if the business is not run property and equipment and materials is allowed to pile up outside the building within the public view. 'Wnrlc and materials should be restricted to the building structure only. MP7.�I�pNMF14fILJ114Fr✓aF`n`mw..—••—.—.........��...�..._�.._ Applicant: Donald K. Lancaster As'sessor's Parcel # 6-36-9 Log a" 90-®2= 0-01 py T p gyEFU A, Project Dercribtiorr I 1. Type of Project: Use Permit. 2. Brief Description: A Use Perzn.it to alloy ,a machine shop as a home occupation. 3. Location: Located on the north,side of Henshaw Avenue approxiimately 1./4 mile west of the Esplanade, Chico area. 4. Proposed Density of Development: N/A, 5. Amount of Impervious Surfacing. Slight, 6. Access and Nearest Public Road(s): Parcel has frontage `on Henshaw Road. 7. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual septic system. 8. Source of 'later Supply: Individual wells. 9. Proximity of Power Lines: Adjacent along Henshaw Road, 10, ' Potential for further land divisions ants development: Potential exist for the creation of approximately 4 parcels. B. Environmental eit atg Phvsical Environment: Terra' aGeneral Topographic Character: Level valley land b. Slopes. 0-1%. C. Elevation: + /-180 feet A.S.L. d. Limiting Factors: None. - 2. Soils a. Types andMaracer'istics Fina -fine sandy loam, deep, well draining, prime agricultural sail, k'aipports a '+vide array of crops. b. Limiting lFaOors: None, for development. 3. ' Natural Hazards of fhe hand a., Earthquake Uric: : odera' tarthgoake Intensity Zono 17:1](1. b. Erasion Potential. Low. C. Landslide PoienflaL, None. d. Fire Hazard: Unclassified. e. Jpxpartsivo Soil Potentlah lYfod'p.rate. 4. Hy€lrology. ay Surface 'dater: Undo Channol 2,000 feet South, b. Ground Water: Overlies area of heavy groundwater. .r........... —_ r�i�ia.tidies..wencrCUMSY�IfYlltx+iMCWiI'IVlE91�Ks 11 i C. Drainage Characteristics Within Shasta Union Drainage District. d. Annual Rainfall (noirmal): 26 inches. e. Limiting Factors: None. 5. Visual/Scenic Quality: Fair. 6. Acoustic Quality: Fair. 7. Asir Quelit-;,: Fair t:o poor, depending on traffic and weather. i ]3el .ologico.i Environment: 8. Vegetation: Almond trees, lawn, aeon native landscaping. 9. Wildlife Habitat: 'Limited, small rima,mmals, birdsmay utilize some porfiovis of the property. Cultural Environment: 10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the o,rea': i'_ow. 11. Butte County General. Placa designation: Low Density Residential, 12. Existing Zoning: ASR 13. Existing ;nand Use acre -site: Y single fp.mily residence, storage structures, machine shop some personalagriculturaluses. 14. Surrounding Area: a. Land Uses: vacant parcel to the east, residential uses iia all other directions including a mobile .home park to the southeast. b. Zoning: AIZ,SR, R2. C., Gen. Flan ]Designation: Medium Density Residential and Low Density Residential. d.' Parcel Sizes: .2 acres to 5 acres. e. Population: Lose Tensity Residential. 15. Character of Site and Area: Chico urban area. 16. Nearest Urban Area: Within Chico urban area -19&0 Census. 17 Relevant Spheres of Influence; SUDAiD, CA Water, City of Chico, CARD. 18. Improvements Standards Urban Area: Yes, pursuant 'to ublic Works, 19. Fire Protection Service: e. Nearest County (State) Fire Station: Station #42, 2 1/2 miles; Station 044, 5' mixes. b. Water Availability: Pressurized water is available in, the area. 20. Schools in Area: Chico Unified School District. t I ENVIRONMEIWTAL; REFERENCE MA"TEER.iCA , 1. Map R:1 Earthquake and Fault Activity: Seismic Safety Element, Butte County General Plan revised 1-77, by CI -112M Hill. 2. Map 11-2, Uquefaction Potential: Seismic Safety Element, Beate County General Plan .revised 1-77, by CH2M (fill. 3. ivlap II.f-1, Subsidence &. Landslide Potential:Safety Element,, Butte County General Plan revised 1-77, by CHC d Hill. 4. Map HI -2, Erosion Potential: Safety Element, Butt; County General Plan revised' 1-77, by CHyM Pull. 5. Map M-3, Expansive Soils: Safety Element, Butte County General Plan revised I-77, 'try CH2M Hill. 6. Map IV -1, Noise: Noise Element, Butte County General Plan revised 1-77,' by CT�zM Hill. 7. Map V-1, Scenic Highways Scenic Highway Element, Butte County General' Plan revised I- 77, by -CH2�1 Hill. 8. Map III -4, Natural Fire Hazard Classes: Safety Element, Butte County General Plan revised 1-77, by CH2M Hill. 9. Archaeological Sensitivity Map by James P. Mwini;ng, for Butte County Planning Department, 1983. 10. School District Map, Butte County ?Manning Department. It. Chico Nitrate Study Map, Nitrate Concentration in Shallow "Wells, 1983, by Department of Water Resources, Northwestern District, The R.esoumes, Agency, State of California. 12. ,Agricultural Preserves Map, established by Resolution No. 67-178, Butte County Board of Supervisors, December 5, 1937. 13. Flood Insuraszce Rate Maps, National Flood Insurance Program, Federal ]emergency Management Agency. 1988; 14. TAGS Quad Maps, Richardson Springs, Phot'orevised, 1969. 15. Soil Map, Chico (1925)/Ordville (19,26) Area, L.S. Department of Agriculture, 16. Soil Survey of Chico(1925)/Oroville (1426) Area, US_ Vepartment of Agriculture. 17. Butte County Fire Protection Jurisdictions and Facilities Map, Butte County fire Department and Uilifornia Department of Forestry. Butte County Planning Department. Grp ww _..AUT'! LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH ANd BE, ._. ..,_ PL.i�'-JN1NG [DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE � OROVILLE, CALI' ORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 July 12, 1990 Donald K Lancaster 302 Henshaw Avenue Chico, CA 95926 Re: Use Permit, AP 006-360µ009 Dear Mr. ;L,an.ca-ster: Enclosed is a copy of the Staff Findings concerning your application for a 'Use Permit to allow a naacli ne shop business as a home occupation on property zoned A -R located on the north side of Henshaw Avenue, Chico. A public hearing hp�,: been set for July 26, 1990 at 9:00 a.m. 11 is meetirig will be field in the Board of Supervisors Room, 25 County Ceater Drive, Orovill,e,, California. The Planning_ Commission recommends that the applicant or their authorized representative be present at the hearing to respond to any questions the Commission may have. In the event that no one will represent the applicant, please-,-ontact the Planning office prior to the scheduled public hearing. Shot id you havl any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office bet'weel 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Sincerely, P. A. Kircher Director of Planning r D ' Craig B, Sanders Assistant Planner CBSAr Enc. 71 T ~, LAND OF NATURA;I, WEALTH AND BEAU T Y PLANNING L7EPAR T MENT 7 COUNTY CENTER 0111VE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95955-3397 TELEPHONE: (915) 538-7801 Donald K. Lancaster December 8, 1989 302 Henshaw Avenue Chico, CA 95926 Re' Use Permit, AP4006-360-009 Dear Mr. Lancaster: We received your pre -application review request for the subject Use Permit, Butte County Public Works and Environmental Health have received the information you submitted. The Planning Department will consider this application Complete only after we have assurances from the above departments that the project Complies with appropriate ordinances and any conditions imposed, can be met. -Tt ,is the applicants respons.;iility to provide any additiona-L inf'ormation needet. by Publics Works or S,nvi.ronrrental Health to meet their requirements. Public Works may be contacted by telephone at 538-7266 and Environmental Health at 538-728! for Durtbt-�r information as to their evaluation of the proposal anal their requirements. The Planning Department staff will lal8b be reviewing the application for any special conditions or modifications than are appropriate. Should you have any questions about the pre --- application rdview, please contract this office. sincerely, B.A. KIRCHER Director ,of Planning `arry Pa nter Planning Technician BAK : LP : j me .enw�®ni■��.Pae��srlAl�o.o`�"'Piu► , 4 County Public Worlds F ESOtmCV, P4AN_A< EM-1 N'X County Envi.ronmental, HealthState Water Resources Department City of Higgs U.S. Forest Service City'of Chico' U.S. Bureau of Land Management City of Gridley Butte County Mining Committee City of Oroville State Department of Fish & Game Town of Paradise' California Native Plant Society Planing Departmentr State Div. Forestry -,attention State Transportation Department Craig Carter. .... Regional Water Gual. Control Bd. State Reclamation Board Butte Water District 8EwE1zs California Vater Service Co. Richvale Sanitary. District Del Oro WL-er Co. North Burbank Pub. Util. Dist. OW'I p Skan sen Sub. (CSA 4 21) Therma:l,itu Irrigation District Stirling City, Seiner Maint. Dist. Other The! malito Irrigation District _. (CSA; 4,26) Nor,,,,h, (Chico) MR, Biggs-W. Gridley Vater District PG&E PG&E South, (Marysville) �_ Btatte Water District Pacific Bell Durham Irrigation District . State TV CabeUWID Viacom TV Cable � Paradise Irrigation District Richvale Irrigation, District Table Mountain Irrigation Dist. xa _ rzv�e r T C�s�r Tbermal�.to Irrigation District El Medid Fire Protection Dist. County Fwire ,,Depa:rtment/CDF DRE42N�`,GE D=STRXCIx Durham, Oroville or But,.'-.e County State Highway Patrol _-- ,County Sheriff � 1M2T"_CE3E SC:]EiC�C�+�, D1:STRZGT : S C:OI�ML S S L� 2ONS Y�.��C:RE.E�7CSC3N �'�.0=:ST2F� Chico Area Recreation District ParadisePinesArchitectural Durham ',�.,,sa Rec. & Park, Dist. Control Committee Fea:helt ""ive:r Rec. & Park Dist. Butte County Farm 'Bureau Paradise Ree. & Park Oi.st. Cormiunity Association: Richvale Rec. & Park Lust. „ State Parks & Rec. Dept. _ _ �} Z77 77 77 BUTTE ,','fl`u^.�'^^"A""t. su�® s� Y ���` h Ix BUTTE COUNTYPLANNING DEPARTMENT PRE -APPLICATION REVILV F Q M To: En'4 ironmental Health Date: 'DecemY r '1989 Howard Sl yd.ex RE: Pre -Application 'Review Information fox Donald K. Lancaster 302 Hvashaw. Chico, CA 95w26 Enclosedis prel.ima:_nary data our office has received or generated concerning the following project: AP0006-360-009 USE PFM41r� to allow a machine shop }business as a home occupation on property g ' -- north side zoned A• -R iA r 'cuit.ural•-kes:�derltiaL) Lo_catteded on the .nor of Henshaw Ave. approx. 1320' west of the Esplan&,.e Chico. Please indicate your response by checking the appro•priate box. QNo requirelmen.ts for this project The project as proposed can meet this Departments L�J requirements, Sufficient proof has ti..'een given that the applicant can meet trhe follow xig conditions app=oved: CA _S243d `% Lc l��f-' °J1^l.'a`� ' C LS '•.. • ii The p3_oject as pr, >osed can/does not meet the requirements of, tni s department. A revision of the project will be necc,asary. The applicant has been contacted with this information. signature,. Y , JA"IN orov'11164 GA ' '4 t � {:id'' 4f3a �dp{vt��iP� �u��' i�•� , } BUTTE COUNT'S PLA"An I l'G DEPARTMENT PRE -APPLICATION REVIEW .ECRM" To: Public Works Uate: December 8, 1989 John 14endons a RE Pre -Application Review tnformat4.on. for: Donald K Lancaster 302 Henshaw: Chico, CA 95926 Enclosed is preliminary data our office has received or generated concerning the following project, AP#006-360-009 - USE PEFtMT to allow a machine shop ,business as a home occupation on; property zoned A -R ( Agricultural -Residential) , located on the north side of Henshaw Ave._,' approx. , 1320' west of �--he Esplanade, Chico,_ Please indicate your response by checking the appropriate box. 0 No requirements for this project. The project as proposed can meet this Departments requirements. Sufficient proof has been riven that .the applicant can meet the foll�nwinq conditions ,approved: r ...,r141Zlsr�.."r tC�ier�,,r¢r.' L411.E 'Ve A -A The project as proposed can/does ndt meet the -� tequireirtents of this department. A revision of -the project will be necessary. The applicant haia been contacted with this information. Signat+., IL {J� i Tiff .E COTWTY PIANNTNG COMMISSTOlwi T'TCE F PUBLIC MA�LN Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planninig, Commission that public hearings will be held on Thursday, July 26, 1990, ori the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California., regarding the following item at the following time: ITEMS Oh[ WHICH A I�TEGAI'IVE DECLARATION REGARDI G ENVIRONN EENIAL IMPACT 14,&BEE��T R.ECOMMENTDEIJ 4 9:00 a.m. Stanley S. Smith - Variance to the minimum parcel sizes to allow a 19,15 acre parcel on. property zoned ',�,-20 (Agricultural 20 ache parcels), located at the northeast corner of Hegan Lane and Dayton Road, identified as AP# 039-080-059, South of Chico. 9:00 a.m. Donald K. Lancaster - Use Permit to allow a machine shop business as a home occupation on property zoned A -R (Agricultural - u esidential), located on the north side of Henshaw Avenue, approximately 1,320 feet we.:t of the Esplanade, identified as AP# 006-36G-009, Chico. ITEM ON WTUCH A NEGATIVE DECLAP.AT'ION �J MI MI'TI.OATTON NMA5j'IJRES REGARDING � �.�.—. ENVIl -IONMENTAI�. ,IMPACTS HAS BEEF, DETERMIPdED 10;30 a.m. Paula Kenyon - Use, Permit to allow a priva,.o schooa unpcoperty zoned S- R (Subiwban Residential), located on the south and east side of West Linda Avenue approximately 600 feet west of Lawnwood Drive, identified as AP# 043-610-001, Chico. The above mentioned application, map and Negative Declaration is on file and available for public viewing at the office of the Butte County Planning Department, 7 County Center. IrDi i,ve, Oroville, California. Comments may, be submitted in writing any time prior to the hoe.ring or orally at the meeting listed above or a.S continued to a later date. If you challenge the above applications in court, you maybe limited, to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission, at or prior -o, the public hearing. i BX TIM CljD T`Y PLAI1l'1NDIG COMMISSIOI�t ]BSA. TIRCIEER DIRECTOR OF PLANNTN '" To be published in the Chico Enterprise onJji4T 21, 1990.