Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout006-400-0477 777" AWk�' c � aa.aage' Charaeteri 0 g., Some off:sate A1i(�1 ' r v' �l�eii this • � ng rroblems `-,,"� project may add to that impac# : ,, -�� d Annual Rainfall (norntd): '2,0-24" per year, e Limiting Factors:. Poor ;drainage. Visual/Scendc Quality: Good;. 6, Acoustic Qudlity: Highway 99 noise. 7 alit Quality: Goadexcept when stagnant air, patterns ucCui ih,; the, 'Biological Environment: 8. Vegetation: gasses and weeds. '8E'ildlife Habitat: Where are no laiowia endangered o�" threatened wil' � species; known to exist on-site. Cultural .Environment r 10. Archaeological and historical FLesources in "the aricac Nigh a e , t giggicsl' sensitivi .y area. `11 Butte County' General Plan designation: Commercial, 4 ' 1: Existing Zoning: G2. 13 Existing Land Use on-site; Vat.t. 14. Surrounding Area: a.' Land Uses: Highway 99, vacant, and: the golf. caurse . b; Zoning: C_2 2,; M-1: - - a Ciera: pian Designation: Commercial, industrial, Clrcha"rd and .1 drops,:, t a, and Agricultural Residential ". d. Parcel Sizes« 1-8 acres., " e• Population: Urban '• to Urban Fringe. 1.5:, u Character of.Site and Area: Urbanized area, 16.; Nearest Urban Area: Chaco. 17. 18. ` z, Relevant Spheres of Influenced luhico, adjacent to Improvenit nts Standards, Uxban Area: des.' 19. ?fire Protection 'Servce« a. ' Nearest County (State) Eire Station« Station b. Water,Availtibility: Hydrants will be require ?ansate in addition 4b l anal fire sprinklers Schools in •Area« Chico "Unified School District: I' t j T r• w 4,7 t' ii ti f7 'Z't _ 57 7777 'v BritZ"Alw, R]EFER E' VCE MATET�iAL, 1. Map II -1, Earthquake and Fault Activity:; Seismic 5afet Fi6i " Butte County General Plan revised ]'-77, by Cjg2' Hill.,Y ab • Mdp II -2, Uque&ction Potential: Seismic Safety " 'E1eir ent' 13 County i Cameral Plan revised 1-77, byHTVf;Hili.. ,'� 3+ Map ` III -1, Sutsidenee & I-andslide ' Potential'. 9 ; Safety tler�. Butte County General Plan revised l-'�7, b CII J y 2M Hill. 4, Map IM, Erosion Potential: Safety F.;le en 'Butte Count} r revised 1-77, by CH AI 14111. y e ' I Plan 5 Map. III -30 Expansive Soils: Safety' ]E[ement, Bufte'' Count � " � ;[ Plan revised 1-77, by CH1ViC Hill. Y . e�. Map IV -1, Noise: Noise Element Butte Coun .,, eCal lPlan. � , `w d 1-77, by CH2M bIi11. Ciera 7« Map V-1) Seenic Highways: Scenic Element, Butte Cdrts�fPjgndral Plan revised 1-77, by CHEM Hill. 13x MCap Natural . Pire Hazard Classes: Safe ty. ,. Element, , Btiffounty General Plan , ;revised 1.77; by CHiM .Hill.. , 9•' &dfiaeological Sensitivity. Map by James P _ Planning Department; 1983. 1dlannin for Btttdiunty l4: School .bistrict Map, Butte County';Plaraning Department:. , .7 1l. = Ctco Nitrate Study 1VIaF, Nitrate Concentration in 'W1yjtefya 1' dater Tl;eso urces' Nortli A genc3',;Sta a of Cal�`for western , Liistrict,.. �'Ite;rarces y l2. ky Agrrcu[#ural Preserves 11�Iap, established `by resolution IVo; 67-17► r, County B6ard 'of Supervisors, December .^. 5, 1987. 13. Flood Insurance. 47ate Maps, 'National; Rlood Insurance Pxo ram Emergency Management Agency, 1988, g f , '' 14. USGS Quad 11%>;aps, Nord Photo .Revised ,x969„ l5. Soil Map, Chico (1920%(,lroA a 1926 Area o A gricultctre, , U,S. pePatt�d % "N� 1ti, Soil; Survey of Chico(1925)%Qroyille 196 . e "D A racultu �e; Area IU.S, parR , y of g_ i Ptnject .90-340 � j within California: Xsolated on manor drainages along the castcrn ;margins of the PROJECT* ItINPgNGS •$acra'mcrito . Walley, the area never experienced the Spanish colo,aization, influx ofgold-seekers, rapid urbanization, extensive Prehistoric 1 bli cis, ; ecreatiorial, development(uuhl recently), or No evidence of prehisforle u' i ,toyernrraent land management actavtaes on accupafiara was obset'ved `within ilio poet x - large scale. As >transportation and'irrigation area. ; technology improved following I3idweli's original settlement in.the arca, particularly in the'decadesjust before and aanmediafely after Early Historic 1�e�ource the turn-of-the-eentu.sy, the project; vicinity Y benne more accessible, �f,'heprimary impact Na evidence of historic taso� of #his increased, contact with the rest of the occupation was observed wathin the ptbrct state was not so rrauch modification to the area. Physical 'landscape, but. rather a decrease., in the 1aca1 Native papulatioia: "Comparatively, 4_ the physical; impacts to both prehistoric and Contemnoraru l"le vents, early historic sites resulting, ,from historic t activities _has been minimal, however, and it j was expected that any, major sites which Evidence of cotttemporar�! uses a1x, I might have been located within fhe' present activities was obscrwc;tl in the farad$ t project area would be discovered to be generally intact.' existing fences around taloa in the vaGlaiit'� 'i the property, contemporary structures it, 1. area, access roads, , and occasional' f; 'Want implements, None Of this tnateri t ' iepreseaii_, „ T:ield .al potentially significant cultural resources,^u�d�,;", these features were not rerorded,durii -- Field Work for the present project was present project: - 1 undertaken, on �11�ay ,11, 1989 by.J'ensen 8c w Associates. Ground cover eonsasts of ;a 11�C0t1Rl�ENY�ATit(DN variety ofntroduced grasses, and past tilling is in evidence throughout the; entire parcel, Ibis 'action would ,have disturbed and ,; l3ased on the negative rests; perhaps severely, impacted, blit not achieved during botli the records searcliaiiil necessarily. ,have totally destroyed, any field survey, archaeological clearance ilk pre hastarac site(,) which might once have existed within the l To ddt area recommencled 'for the proposed Dias 1"a$i'ii split and tlevelopfrient , > protect, with to followaug general provisions 5ho4l rhe field survey involved, vpalking subsequent construction or'de Vulopmeit systematic'transectsbock and forth across the actavaties expose buried ardifacts' or alk"uat' c.,9-,acceparcel, moan _,imPg average transect 30 None evidence of `prehistoric, or.;' early' histoa ib spa xng at'e. meters; of the project . occupatioai, a'.qualified archaeologist sh6it1 pare'el was excluded fronn examanation;:and bc:.cotttactc immediately'iar; order`'to na obstacles were encountered during the the pototial impacts of the: project tq tl L course;of field work. culturdl:resourcesencountered. �y C a.ttr'aated both abo.r3.girxal and; Eur`b-AmellriYaan,on`.s. Therefore, p4 we recomme'nd', that. an araha'eo j o � iiy�_ conduced _be of th'e entireo r:o �±at o;_.__-__area- b �... " f i e d arehaeologis,t prior to pro i'eet operate 'Thank..yo'u for your ,aonaern inprop pr�eser ving. Ca�.ifornla tural r heritage. + � Si,�ncer,e, I nr: Makoto Kowta, Coord,'nator . d'ot Northstar Engineering e: V J y� r 5i it f tl J , , I t4 1 I l I 1.. , i 1 v l7 GOi`'NfiERCIAI Primary T.Tses Structures and activitied' providitg � �ui1' range of merchandse and serv.ces to the ger�dxal pudic'. Secondary Uses,jrTho7t;a1e.tora,e and distribut,on� Lvi os's ,and Manu actura.ng, t2,.An, %ent iodgin y dwe11 �. sand iota i quarters;, hose occupations., uti� hies, public and' quasX�pub, uses;._ Site Designation Crit..0ma ,Nleeded for commercial development within 20 years, 2. Good road acce.saibil.ity'to service area or txaveiing" public. 7j. Adjacent or near utilities, walkways. and commexc$al dei' velopment: 4. less than 2CP/o s].'opes. 5. Adequate fire and ,police protection. 6. �.de nate ��alter a n , supply and sewag� c3a.aposai ca abi.li�es. p intensity of Use : i'linimum parcel sizes, dimensions and set.: backs to facl.litate cammerci al ,devellopment, " Resclenta1 acid izidustrial uses limited to.mibimi,ze conflicts with c,ommerGis „ Consistent Zones.: C -'I "C-2 CCki-C N -C PA -C y �7 1 , zoning Factors J. :misting tykes of commercial and non-commercial. uses ;L - area. 2. �Prafk1c volumes on nearby streets. 5. Number of residents in' service ares. 4,. i'arc"e:l' sizes. A 5. Effects on. adjacent users, water- quaff;� ty, sir quality, noises; trar"fic= flow and safety, :and ;general: environmental quality. . 6.. Local deli es.. 1 f y , ) J I. I k ^WxT.xbTri? r ail f �• ''" l .. / JfjFL'// rb F ,i �� .., .. . �,df i , ,� , f.L a f.,f,k ,. ..-;. k ' Y r § , 1 ns SU aIVIpER 'S flameJ/lo oat e Project AP 1r> Xistyn9 use (s) of the land Proposed arse (s) of the 1,and .' E'C.�'9�; 1 3. ImproVem'erits proposed (See Ch. 20-21 County 'Code] 4. Public ,areas proposed �q u 5: Tree r n p7a��t �/ ce�iovai ,(appr6x' hi #OjIj f� } Preltiminary cagy of 'any to 49 1"�st is Ve, r �er��a 16 s ; ex7sting ori proppsed shall beached, tr, t►a'i,s staterrieril , or coVenn�, � r' ,attached' 'n` e 4 n - S tate type°of division privateoadban 1 e rUr'a' etc 04 y � X471 121,'a f MOOI I iV IL I�1�� 20ARp N R V` �, CHICa, C1�1,l�QRN(AA G(vll Engl plannersM�' g"' yQ� 95926 �1C�d9J�1600 r� :r Job Na...�?/ Date 9 Attn� ►RAINSMMINGTHE FQLLOVWiNG: -_ "lrrWith 'F0 R,: „ APPrav "F Seporaie cover---=--- ---:-. Infarma#i'b STATUS Ohec{tirll Your use, rass Irsa S• V Irl — ---- -s- +� p9V8W,'tyI'i4EW E:�S�GE:+-44 k 7 +I Y:. _ .. j,-.. "i:K%tfi, .lip mq@• 1`� a Sjgi A- 60 A;. P11 13 ht z -hall be:,shi' lded, And directed e as t: create li�ht ',g' -.lar -e' o n, ad not, 6 c, or propevitiegi These I.p�ghe' shorn � On the , pi shail, b e- e ans zo m; tt he time building j)drrait. process." Complywith, the grotindwater' mitigation 'meai3u!re,,- of winter groundwater eklevati ior, q, reco n on t rdi1gL::thd ,f nal niu 41 ' ' Complete site and -other req 9m, " , , J � 1 1 required ph,�s'stcal'i mproveMent u bseq'q0n,,L v c6tL om� of to ls groundwater elevation. A ve _d 4, gi T,"'�A �7 -z"I V u POV111 Col. to I" ! ' i r t, JDZAS►€?M, AP 06(7 47, pairces nn thy; ane 'side ak iiia east a . �rltersecti'on with State H axne W3' 'r X 99.. Ch ragzneer: arthSta Engxnee'ring_ l ub c uff rks condi tions: ndscate a SO ft.. building setback from. the center�an� Tine. da'rnar Shbw all `easegients of rec6xii. on che''fin' a1= map, , ovi.dee P rmanent soi.ution £or.drainage., Pay off any assessments. j tbtain eracZ'aaChmerit ;permit for all oonstx`uct, ti� drivewags, ;new bx exist ng, and Fags any ci3nMenti 4 taxe s or current taxes as,requi,red. r i Meet. the require men.ts of the $utte Countq Fire De artm p ent I I fi rq i. I i y . t I r t dt I I Y # i • r l y 41 k. Kf, 1 , r: • r t I i A : I ff t � F 1 r ' 1 ' a ! 1 fl' �ly .,fl 1 { � Y nrwrm45C629 • �•`t1 0 .� �� I '`i y f�7 iGY: Wi11 the proposal result Ahl a. 'Use of slabctant A , apounts of fuel ox energy? ` b, SiaSstdaitial inex©ase i,, demanh upon "es(xsting soul, ces--6k. nergy or iegoire, the development of new sources of energy? r � UT;YLTT2E5, U411 the proposal result in a need for new sysCemst or substanCial alterations Co Che foll owing :: a. power" r or natural gas7 % b.CoIiIIIltinications systems? c water availability? ,J11 d. sealer, or septic systems?`w-r, e, ,siCarm water drainage? ' r+M�irr iiMb.+ f. , .-,sojid,wastm and disposall Id4AtE HEM," -j' Will thte proposal, result in= ai Creation of any Health hazard or potential hazard (bxclud tig mental healthj? =-.•.=.� �^ b: Exposure of people to patonti,a $ealth hazards? ., AESTHETIC r Will the proposal reE:lt in the nbstructiod of any sd4hid vistia or view open to the publico or wili� the proposal. result in the 11 creatsorn of an,aegthetically affenszve•,.site open to p�iblic view? 19.. RBCREATiOH. Will the, proposal result �in an impact upaAthe quality or quantity' of existing ,recreat tonal opportunities?---- IIOA CnTUP-4 L RESOURCES. a • will., the proposal result an trig altea�ation o • ,destruction. o. a ' �` ,prehistoric or historic archaeolog%cal site". ' U.. "Will the'Priioosal` result Yri adverse" pY►ysical or aesthetic: effects Ile to a prehistoric or histdric bal,04t,� structure or object? Doese proposal hav's'the oten�xat Eo cagte a phtaical change which +could affect unique skulic etsltural values? �• R--� � d. Will Ilia pxopadal restei6t eaistin� V-11 ions or sacred hoses 5vifh �i ' the potential impact area? r { I 1 7r -is CSF'. ��7AL;X7�TCGTV r. f i 3 AS if � ' y i, I rel I ry l iY + q •t� 11 � I �� rF r ;1 :e wb ...�d � �� & i c« Drainage Characteristics: Somie aff=site poy,,,irig:prablezY�s project may acid toi that impact, d. Annual RainfalDnormal • 2Q 24" (. } Per year.:: e« Limiting Factors.. Poor drainage. S, Visual/Scenic Quality: Good. 6. Acoustic ual Highway 99 noise. iEi Q t3'� g Y i. Air Quality: Good except when stagnant alt patterns occur, in tfie: ' Biological Environment= 8: Vegetaton: Grasses and weeds.; 9: 'Wildlife Habitat: Tl ere arc no know n' endangered:ar ,threatened w It specie known to exist on-site. Cultural:lEnvirr'°; ent• 10. Archaeological and flistorical Resources in the ,area; 1=ligty ax4 , rc� t�gical sensitivity areae �1. Butte County General Plan designation: Commercial. 12 ExistingZoning: C-2;' 13. Existing Land Ilse on-site;Vacant. 14. Surrounding Area: a« Land Uses: Highway 99, vacant; 'and the gtilf cairirse, b. Zoning: C­2, M-1. c. (Jen. Plan Designation:, Commercial, Industrial, i�rch'ard atid` P` Crops, and - Agricultural-R.esidontial: Parcel Sizes: 1-8 acnes: Population:.. to Urban Fringe.. 15. Character of Site a drban Are Urbanized ;area: et 16« Nearest urban area: 'Chico,. - 17: 18. Relevaiif S heres of tAuurid;e: ` P Chico,. adjacent to t✓SA X25. Improvements Standards iJxDian_ Area: `'s. -� 29. Fire Protection Service: a. Nearest ,Count State Fia'o Stati'an: Y. ( Statid�n X41« lr„ Wate'r Availability: Hydrants will be required on sif e;n additicSrot%rnal fire sprinklers. 20. 5claools in Area:' Chico Uinilxed Schoot Districtz f f ` 1 ars ,4 Y 1X f �r r EIS[^,C) ENT, ]EF19RENCE MATE , Mg,rp -1, Eart}lttuake. and ;fault Activity: Seismic Safety Elemk�n�Bette Co' '' �,Yenerst ;`'iar� revised l'=77; by PT-i'�� Milt, �� 2• IVi<�p Ii42,.i'quef`attian �Potenfials Seismic Safety F,leinent revised` i-77, b Cftt u, Y M I ll, tte. Counjj% tj6j ral plan 2 yA, Map III -1, Srt`lasidence & Landslide T"ntential: Safe Ele e t revises bar Ci Hall.. �'. to �n , �utie Cotzntyr �f p, del Plan a 4. hiap2,'Ertsian Safety EyenientButteCotfY G1 filar# 1-77by CHZM Hneher, 1,, 'f pans ive Sails; Safety ElementButte CountyCenerHII.CH2m 7, Y 6. map Iv -1, hlaise. Noise Elemcnf, Butte County General Pian revised 147 . 11111. 7•, Map V-1, Scenic Highvrays: SceM , highway Bement Butte Cour ty'Generai ' �i wised 1-77, by CfizM ii11. P) , Map IYI», 1+tatural Fire Hazard. Classes; Safety ElerriFwnt Butte ' e revised. l-77, vy.0 i i mill. f Coun4y C;#Ajoy" , Paan 9• Archaeolpgical Sensitivity Map by JairieS P. MA ening► for t�utte Cotr#y ;�Itiryg' Department, 19837 1U. ,Schsaol -District. XViap,' -Butte County 'tanning Department, al. C}iio Nitra#e `Study Map, itrate Concentration in Shallow- CJS/ 11s,1983 , 1 :exit of eater ResaiircNorhwstein, Distrc#, Tfie Resn�iie's A �e , ' Ye��' ; Stafe n Y,, of C',►!fa Agricultural Preserves Iufap, estalalisheil by Z2esoluticin; No: 67 lig, Bu#te faun ` of Sixpe�rvist�rs,cernber' S, 19$7.'le l3. , Mood. ;<nsur�trfee Rute a M ps, National ,t i�lopd Management Aericy, .1.8$, uran�re Program, Ff,d`eral�cy . 14: USGS uad ; 1Vi� s P.P ► Nord rhoto Revised; :19�9, . 1S iI, Sa 1VIap, Chita. (1925)�'Oiroville G� Area, U:S Beart dent af: A griculture I. 9Sail SuiveY, croa(Aea; U�S department' A of gricult, l7, ButteCounty Fixe Pr -0 ecti*rn Jurisdictions an+d Facilities Tia ; $uf �Departmenf and California Depar#metit pf liorestry,,, Counplari#iin i Rre ,$uffe D AL Ir ;.a , ep�et,,, � _ _ t u ,, . „.71 j (f x „ l�Pp lican#. Jim Dlas a AssessoQ 9 PIst VV""PA/r�� DATA SHE, ET ►. Ct �3 1 tl0n Type of Proj4t: '7Centatiye Parcel Map, 2�rief l)'escription: request to divide 8.8 acre parcel i�io tw€► L ate�ttreels, 1 Ca) I*c�res anu 1@3.8A LoCaiioi�. On the -east side of Crarner Lane `at the intersection of .at t` ghway 9, irit;the Chico area., 4. Proposed Density of. Development - N ;mount oflxnpervious Surfer!rig: 7AM80% depending ori #he)ci yc�op d oposal . fi. ;Access and Nearest Public ltoad(s): Garner Ione; ” 'Meth6d of Sewage Disposal. Septic tdnk anal 'leacltrtelds. Source ;af mater Supply: Individual wells. Proximity of 'Power'Liines: , Alorng Garner Lane.,, T'otential for ;furthcx land( divisayns and development: es.. l3. &An onamental Setting Phy'sical Environni6n TerrairL, General Topographic.Cliaracter t b Slopes:, 1Vane oh site. �l levatian: '175 ft. !1.S.L. d`, Limiting Factors. oneii Suns a. Types qnd Characteristics: Vine clay loat_01 that retainsmoisture well, but has ppor surface dttd subsixr fatr� xdr'atu" Lrmitiitg Factors:.+%rie Or rise. .3 - Natural atards of the I✓hrxd. M- .' , . Af r, a Earthquake .one:l.l ,of Butte Caunty is located withen a r�querate; F..arthquake• Interis'e1y Zo a 'VIII.. j \ Ir Erosion Potential: None. t c.< IA dsIWO Potential: ' Low. `, cl Fire Hazard.'' Unclassified, 'e. Expansive Salt. Potential•,' 1Vloderate� ,4 , 4. HydrolQgy a Surface Water. None ori -site. Ground Water. ;Area'of heavy griiuridr�a#er �a�ithrawa' and tcs�clate to nigh liquefaction •and, alsq a potential suiisilence',area„ � r I 41. IV "I MA ..7" Otm J. ., t ;�)I, , J, 7 r , f l" M, t t it. It, up Yk' ;"v) 1 IIIAlt ;,n tt­ It. rr�_21 "ZI I I'A n , 4 CRDER..NO 449 CLTA. GUARWtV,EE s 7. AGRICUZTUR&LSTATEMENT DEVELOPMENT, OF" ACRNOWI,EDGEl N't'; i EXECUTED, BY: LAURIE L. WOOD RECORDED APRIL 23, 1986; UNDER BtypTE . COUj4Ty RECO "rT�.l S' SERIAL NO..' 86-.12692.. A VARIABLE ;XNaEBTEDNESS IN THE INTEREST 'RATE:DEED OF TRUST Tp SECfJREr ORIGINAL PRINCIPAL ANY OTHER AMOUNTS DATED: SIJj�j "OE AND/OR OBLIGAT20NS SECUREt7 THE EBy `6pGAD ;� D TRUSTOR: IKAY 31 199.7. CT4ARENCE V. WOOD AND LAURIE TRUc.TEE: L. , WOOD MARRIED TO EACH OTnR ! E BENEFICIARY, BUTTE COUNTY TITLE CQNiPANY ' TRT COUNTIES; BANKt- RECORDED t- .. ; JUNE 11, 15914 UNLGR BUTTE COUNTY RECORDrS ' SERIAL1J0. 51-2,3046 � TAX m6TE 3 GENERAL„ AND SPECIAL BUTTE COUNTY TAXES FOR THE FISCAe YEAFZ 92, IST >*NSTALLMENT: $66.36; PAID ; 2ND INST�f,ItLMEtaTT: $66 r-3 EXEMPTION.r $-p- -' ASSESSED:,: A'P p06-400-048.000 SEPARATELY CGDE AREA 0'62107 1ST "INSTA L1�itNT- $2,143:Oa�, PAID. 2ND I,NSTAL'r.OENTr $2,14 'R 05,, FAIp. EXEMPTIO „7 .ASSESSED: SEPARATELY oat--4p9-aoo (:QpE AREA. 06-»j;�j 7 r THE LAND �iEREIN WAS, IN BOO CREATED' By PARCEL t%JAp, RECORD �7U TSE VESTEEHEREIN,ACQUIRED`TrVIE, EY DEED,""RECORDED �Tf7L N BOOK 1765, GE 6446, c#FIT,CI�T, REcoRD5. , TPrLJiH' 'MIR 9, 3992 T 7,