Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout006-500-013r, 1 Ar PaulajCpnyonproposed a a.tiye Decloo,ara n : with mitigation moasures re,pr(11119 environmental impact and Use permit to allow a private school as'a public/quasi-publltU lase on property zoned H -C: (Highway Commercial)'located on the west sid0: of Esptanad ' .0.01 approximately 1,100 feet north of Shasta Avenue, Chico. 'VIDEO TAIEN. lixe Commission waived the reading of the Staff JCindings. r� video, was shown of the projel rpt, " airman Matson said there were letters received from odic 1V.[akau, Cathy Jenks, Laurie Offt , �tbara Stinson David and J,.�nce Halimi, and Jami .Byers, in support of the project wi leis lie ; t bxnitted: to staff foi- the record. Cirmi nxissioner Lambert asked about the comments from, the Fire Department stating. '"I'lle ,;�4rivoway to the rear of the property should be maintained to a 12 foot width rip to 12 feet dbo ve round"? , .tatirman Matson said the swimming pool could be a hazy d, .g,idff said it is their understanding 'that the pool will be filled in, I �,,,;eAmmissioner Lyncb said he interprets the comments by the Fire Departm, ent to mean 12 wlde ^. =rance with a 12" higjr clearance for fire vehicles. C:om§34ssioner Lynch suggested that CUP be utiU'�ed to Condition 9 hearing was opened to the public. Piiria. Kenyan said this was her second choice for a 6chool She said this site is better than the f7=.Tt one. She said there were parents in the audience :if the Comlytission had any questions about' t:t -,ry i4iool She said tb.e school will go to 64 students now with a possibility of 104 students irm the rare, rcoaamissioner Nelson asked the hours oft operafio' n? . !Nfist 'Kenyon said the khool will be opened from 8:30 to 3:44 p.m. with some after school care tp.,,4; place,+ to 5.30 or 6,00 p.m.. She said she would like to address Condition 7 on 'roadway' Int xoveniViral street. � nts. She suggested that this condition be deleted. She said the Esplanade in this area yShe said w she wcauld like to help withstreet impravezr+ents when the rest, of Ile, 1 4danade is improved. Staff recommended that the Conunsssion not grant relief on 0,iis condition. .Staff sand,, the Cammission could set a urns limit on doing the improements, but asked that the condition riot ,el deleted. Staff said the condition could be bonded; CaAamissi,oner Ostrowski suggested the Same wording as the condition on an Olive Highway project, to install I prolvernents at such time as development occurs. Staff' said that the difference is tho.t Olive Highway is a State Highway and tb, County does lot low what improvement nt stondlards the State would require. Staff said the Coittmiss on. is lalkiog about the frontage improvements for this facility on a County road, { ,Y <;=, missioner Lambert said thr, CIAD mission should either imp is st on the improvement ,. ` M impose a bond or set a 2-5 year time off said if the Commission is going to defer this condition that it be deferred for a specificefjod off' lime, and .not at some, point when other, development occurs. Staff noted the imp rr�rove pen'l. `' to 5fadelphia square, down the street: fz Kenyon said there is 156 feet of frontage and the school does not have the money at this #jIn lri zaake the improvements. rC oissioner Lambert asked if the future plans for a pre-school would come back to, i'l e cr. ra ission for review?' a'm_6 said at this+ point, in time the. conditions only limit the additional occupancy to the availability a avers. 'There wouxd be nothing to prohibit the Commission from requiring an additional %;se errnit to allow the expansion for additional students. CoMMissioner Lambert said in Condition 4 to provide a written statement from a strupfur+l t%rve eer about the existing structure. She said if there is an enlargement with new structvre� . hflP d not see Where there utas any review by the Commission. ' -, f .said there would be building permits rewired. Staff said the reason for the Use, Per ft r6 irement i because the project is a public school facility', Staff said if the Commissiott Ig an,=z'rned with expansion of this facility ,f ora 60 to 100 students, nothing would prohibit 11)o Go--mmiss on from limiting this Use Permit to 60 and requiring a new 'Use Permit for the expansloi3, 15s. Kenyon said she did not anticipate the expansion requiring any new buildings., G=raissioner Ostrowski asked what the grade .levels were? M.. .Onyon paid first; grade through the ''sixth "grade. ' David Halimi said this site has been purchased with funds raised by the parents. Hesaid their fuadg are Iftnited and if, tris improvements were done it would take money away, f`rorn tyle school, 'roe learitig was closed, Curr missioner Lynch suggested the Commission add to Condition it "when either adjoining.property de-velops or when a connection is made to public sewer, or when permits are requested for egpo lsiot� of the facility', or within 5 years". f Com,myissioner Nelson said the sewer lit es are a few blocks from this property. He said the County .. meed$ a �crar MiUnerAt to do the improvenii pntg. He suggested either requiring a bond or I equiring the itztproventents. He wanted to make sure tide unprovements are done. " fie Was concejQ �vlth ,, Corail issic et, Lynch was cone5med at a later date tearing them owy t to install sewers: ` and then .Ync about da"tag All the street itrtpxs�'Ne:uents required :rp td' T"I 4x M"NxOC g.��bt� 6' p t,ff 5md the conditions of the Use .Pere it would have to he met within of a yeah, axed �thet' . � a k ;Tuv sion for a one year extension, if granted. Staff said it would be all right, to set ar flake limit or to require a bond. Staff said that as far as sewer going in for other developinemt on E,lphi Yak" Vewer was placed within 5 feet in be-ck of the sidewalk at the edge a:f thedight of way, ordrnissioner Lambert suggested that the condition on the swimming pool state "prior to L,).vvl a.nW. She suggested the applicant coordinate with the Department of Public 'o rk$ Tapr°ding a, bond or time lines on Condition 7. She said the Commission could do a Mollm of j 1nfe t and 'contact Public Works on Condition 7. Rdf said That putting time lines on %die condition would make it easier to bring the project Mick i � or rvi ewM L. Ck;mrxrissioner lambert suggested a two year time line. Commissioner Lynch askedhow long until the sewers will be put in? j ,i �Ia.ff said this would be some time in the future, but did not know when. .i Cqmmissio.rler Nelson said he did not have. a. problem with the project, but was concerned with the y. lavrovemerits being installed, He wanted to be assured the improvements would be install etf, mmissioner Lambert asked if the Commission needed a condition requiring review if the prrr, t et i expanded 5daff said the question of expansion could be conditioned to reviews Staff said if the'c nditi:on on. irr�provements required installation of curb, gutter, and sidewalk that would adequately handle the intTeased traffic, there might not be a need to review this unless there is an expansion and new "-, 5I lruction. Gainiftissioner Lynch said the Coimmissiun' 'would not necessarily need to review the pirojcct '&-ezv se of new construction. He said they have two agencies that will be reviewing that new CSMtrUCt1 io. . ft w moved by Commissioner. Nelson, seconded by Commissioner Lambert, and uinanimoub y ' C!led for approval as follows: MOTION: ACCEPTTHERECOMMENDATIONS OF STAFF MEMO DATED FEBRUARY 6, 199'1.; MATS; Tk �' FIRMII'� GS LISTED TJI' DER I'M M AXE TFIE MCAT: I LISTED UNDEIR "B" INCLUDII` G THE CONDIt'I'`tOl' S LISTED 1 Z'[-fROj T()rj 15. A. Find that. 77, "AMMMIA Mal � d 14 An initial study was cora Ietod . Quality Act,P an co�an li nce withivw alae Cforni8.`unhtltal • Said study and comments received thereon environmentalidentified p Je may have had, but: polorkirally sagratll .3rnt ' effects #fiat the pr a• Provisions in theJ ro"ect P platys or proposals made by or agreed to try -Ile applicant would avoid such effects or mitigate such effects to': a point VV11 ke clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. b• There is no substantial evidence before the County that the project d may have a significant effect an the environment. p. J as t'eie, �. Theproposed Negative Declaration with mitigation measures has, Iiwith the California v corn ftse driironmentalQaarFty Act: ¢• Ile proposed use of the property will not impair the znte a r the zone in which the land lies and the use would not be ranreasonab� e charactet of with or, injurious to sura ouandi�i y rnco�xapl�afil1l g Property or detrimental to the health and gener'g1 welfare of the persons residing oz' working in the neighborhood, or to the hcpltlX welfare, or safety of the County, and B. Move to adopt a Negative Declarationwith mitigation rneasures and to allow the operation of a Montessori School on AP OUB -5(30.0? (papula Kthe enyon) t.rse Por it to the following mitigation measures and conditions: yon) suhj�,�t L Contribute $75,00 to the, Voest Chico Fire Station Fund. M) Remove the existing in -ground swilnining pool prior to occupa ncy ,. Tlae occupancy shall be limited to 60 students and staff until ° ae parcel has c to sanitary seer. Q1Rcse sewer is, connected the occu an onneeted P fff).p may increase to X11 arsons students and sta w 4, Ptovide a written statement from a-4hructural Engineer or Architect t stricture conforms with the requirements of the Uniform Prt hat the existing F-dition, Chapter 2.3; on 3; � !ding Cote, 1 Provide eight ($) parking spaces off of the Esplanade and Meet ti +' standard requirements for s`och off.: street parking as specified by S'e, ,,� n �4- nr th,t Pune County or ing C?rd nance. 6'. Provide directional signs�►n floe circular driveway to allow only one-way , and oil the Esplanade to the approval of the ufte Coad n Public traf �w oat Tref/artmnent. is WDrkg 1�J yy yin n } aull^Illl®mow LL — _ L S ]� 1 t II I 77"'^'�A t r �ts P I' I 1 it .l hd i I� + I if 145 I V 1 I r )FILE NO.: (106-500-013 BSE COUNTY PLANNINC, COMMISSIONS�' STAFF FINDING.' » .February 6, 1991 APPLICANT, -Paula Kenyon 0"E R.- Vern and Phyllis .Barfram REQUEST. Use -Permit to allow a private ge'14vaf a,5 a public/quasi public ease, k 006-500-013 I SIZE 11/4 acre ' LOCATION. on 'be west side of Esplanade Road, 1,100 feet n (Chico. orth ofhaG ,(gale, JEVJSTllviG ZONING: �7 H -C 7r�',('� +�'�' 7�/1 gg ry (+jy .l O � INGy 1115 $. �,. R Zoned H -C by Ordinance- x o. 2082 ox) � raM°cls 4? 1980. SURROUNDING ZONING,. S -R) and C-2 81JR .OUNDING LAND USE., Orchards to the west, north and ` ���)ulty, commercial uses to the east. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial APPLICABLE REOIILA►'I.'IONS: 24-47,24-113, 1 � i Ir v -B1rTE COUNTY PLANNIPSIG COM1IS,SI0N STAFFFINDINGS - k+ebruarZr 6, 1991 -C-QMM f el�'sS MCMEI 1 VED.- lrutie County �Ml! tmot of Public Works- "The project as proposed can omelet this De :t�'lIments requirements. Sufficient proof has been given that the applicant Can meet the, following conditions approved: 1. Install vertical curb, gutter, sidewalk and widen Esplanade Ja 4 -lane along property frontage to RS -2A Standard, 2. Provide a permanent solution for storm 4r'ai,nage, 3. Submit plans .for road and storm drainage improvement to Department of Public Works for. approval." Butte Coun lC>eaartment of Environmental Health: "The applicant was referred to the X144 e,giona,! Water Quality Control Board for review of the project relative to compliance with 1110 Chico Urban Area (septic Tank Prohibition Orden. The attached Regional Board 'letter dated fly , 1'9910 and November 21, 1990, indicate the Regional Board will approve this }project to lee, served by septic tank for a rna7tinmm 60 students and staff. On that basis, recommended cop(-Jifions of approval are: I. Meet the requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control, Board. 2. Meet requirements of the Chico Urban area Nitrate Action Plan. 3. Provide a sewage §Y%em in compl ance with Chapter 19, Code of Butte County. 4. Provide domestic water from'A public water supply." "i of Chico: "Pull street improvements are recommended:" ButteCoun Pire Department- "For adequate fire protection., afire hydrant capable of 2,000 O.P.M. should be available within 300 feet of this property. The driveway to the roof" of, the property should be ,maintained to a 12 foot width up to 12 feet above the ground:" Al�A1L'YSIS• This is a Use Permit request to allow a private schoolon property located on the `west Fide of the Esplanade In north Chiro. The property is zoned H -C; which has a provision for achtpls, and the General Phan for the site is Commercial. The applicant proposes to convert an existing 3,500 square foot hoose on 1.26 acres to a private school that uses the Montessori teaching inothod. The applicant anticipates that eventually up to 100 persons tivill use the site, including;td,�nts' and staff. The project is'located on the Esplanade in an area that is a mixture of -commercial tib{ga and, proposed residential subdivisions. The east side of the Esplanade is atmost fully developed with commercial uses. The vest side of the Esplanade 'in this area'has a couple of singly family, residences with large almond orchards to the north, south and west. These orchards ago zoned. for single faml.ly, residential development. Two tentative subdivision maps have been approved' for the area behind the subject property, and are awaiting City of Chico sewer service' Before finalizing the maps. 1:1 0 BUTTE CO$..�1° IT PLAI"ING CwOJli✓IMI s ior, -STAP FTNY)II GS , February 6, 199 d Ile property has good access to the Esplanade with a circular driveway that will fat.lJJl the dropping off, and picking up of the children. The ,Department of Public 'Works ins rer�llt ing tl!ze Esplanade be widened and frontage improvements be installo(l. The res, � trade, .in this area, will be improved as ,a requirement of the subdivision behind tht': school �e lading the installation of a continuous center. left turn lane. This will evet�tualIy d th tate tri l U1 tt�x ing t e to the -school' and commercial rises in the area. The project is located in an area having high nitrate concentrations in shallow, welts., source ofthis 'nitrate contamination has been linked to tl;ke use of sept* c tank and ]each �cld � x��ems in the Chico area, The California Regional Fater Quality Control Board has placed e dP ,Yiaior s i oil new septic s stems within the Chico area. and is requiring new residents to hook tip to sewer' systems by 1995. The California Regional Water (duality Control Board has reviewed oproject acid has given approeal for up to 60 students and staff on site using t4he existing sepTires ystezn. The current enrollment Of the school is 40 students plus staff. The school is anticia t7g a 10 its 6G student per year increase in enrollment for the next two years. This would bring the �rhool to i y ty g�rade.sThey woultudent maximum. like to exp he scnaol currentl teaches students from kindergarten, tl�ra h sixth , expand the operattt�tx to add a pre-school with approximately students briding the total to 100. This cannot be accorn lished until a: sanca A more to the site, p sanitary er,is, rltiailq,ble There is an existing in -grow tic{ swimming pool on site that is nota K school use;, The applicant has stated that the pool will be filled to t appropriate eiie�I�e tory rarea. more � e'e'.t' a on .A. Negative Declaration with mitigation measures has been prepared for the proposed, �.a° in _accordance with the California Environmental QualityAct, p P sed � r sect anticipated from the 'proposed C,.tse Permit. 'No significant efl'ei-Is are LOTION: ACCEPT T 3E'COMMENDATIONS , F ` FEBRUARY 6,1991. KJ , THE s'rAFI� I�MC7 VATED MOTION LISTED TJND � ��,B"� INCL n NG USTED C UNDERVa� z 'I 'THE THROUOH 150!Find that: �An initial study was completed in, compliance with the California �nviroit�r :�;ntal Quality Act, R�- WNI'm��..Am PLANNING Cf11 IMISSZIJIhI l� IV z NSC S February ary 6 191 2. Said study and comments received thereon ide t, environmental effects that the project may have had,abut d potential josillicant a. Provisions in the project plans or proposals made b applicant would avoid such effects ar mitigate such effects Rt a oeti � , y the clearly no significant environmental effects wouldo a'1>hi#fit where , ocr„trr, b. There is no substantial evidence before the County revised may have a significant effect on the environmental tilr`t)ject as 3. The proposed Negative Declaration with measures has mitigation me in compliance with the. California Environnaenta( C;�me ` been cts�inpleted ty Act. 4. The proposed use of thero e F P Pty will not impair the integrity nor charactot- of the zone in which the land lies and the use. would .not be unreasonably i �'< } with or injurious tle o surrounding property or detrimental to_the hea h one[ p,,aerbal welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood or �” welfare, or safety of the County because to thy. health, - ------ —_ . 0 and B. Move to adopt a Negative Declaration with miti atiort measures to allow the operation of a M nt�essori. School on AP' Now 00and grant'fhe I1 c; fpyont subject to the following mitigation measures and conditions: 500-U13 (Paula Cygri) 1. Contribute $75.00 to the 'W'est Chico Fire Station Fund, (Ni) 2. Remove the existing in-ground swimming Pool... 3. The occupancy shall be limited to 60 students and st connected to sanitary' sewer. Once sewer is; connected titeaoc unto n� he , to 10 persons. P . y nYay 1116's-wase 4. Provide a written statement. from a. Structural; E' existing structure conforms with the requirements . o ns7weer °r Architect that Ilse 1988' Edition, Chapter z3; Engineering RegulantsUiform Building q, n._ Provide g eight, (8) Parkcing'spaces off of the Esplanade and e standard requirements for such off-street pa rkin ass Meet let the devele�nr�nt the Bo�tte Coonty Zoning Ordinance. ng Section, 2.4-a5of 6. .Provide directional signs on t I he y � and off the Esplanade to lxecapircular ra driveway to allow only ole-way traffic on DePartrnent.. P f the $utte County PublicWorks �G•��C•'t� �1 JQt `✓ 5Ww�'ifuawu;Wtlea�w�arouary.wS + ;yy� I a G A.P uoard Jay MttlaM4`kt 1 u xr Ls_uk� G W ^ r HosaannaCa ;yI"uurUta m _ Rrve g�oShgct Eb ia Gra Cnod ;f OA I �'cE :3 Lncrmark " . ✓ �� � : Ctr 1lttrlumman, til - b Rio Brava d ..� t �I Slauc ` . w Grllan Meadow U 99 f]usly irl. _ ! \jai BCFOSTA 81 n�.Ma,Opve , Y �x �� p t. yl U Stable Lana i, wY _ 'IlrilsonoxC Kates Lam air C.andtn na. n � r sru / I � a G«' Feta{ t enJ an Ciurar, Keuh LAne H d (amYly,; Coldlimh ! 4 p A f Caballo 1 � c ly 9 " tt Avtl. I! MwIIIMU Ary e J A r r ; .. .«. .. ,,r-,.ww.r.. ';1`a hr, y � aydJ" G• e.YYy lT � ,G LFI.. F sY.T' �efOVL ^' v1wY t.I J P.lC%`w((^cc a'�"yam " • w " � I/ 0 4 L yt ,✓rr sR.. t— -. 4 � �4a �p � d �y �' , iws d TRad t•.t � r.4n,k y, s"" trL�Ra •. �, T. � EAT 11Zl.n �._ N4Ao �• t 5 x J` a. t� _ort I -, � .t;AC •".'i�, ¢ �-r,�fl+'jt /"i'^. ,moi' .,� o N°o � . yftt�'F,y� k �'s g .�, �•p[� � , rxK ! y Y �'„y S :. ✓.,, ry C ��A w, d. q` �a fir• 1' Y � 4 ! % ylQ,i W 1 f� .. �'� �.r4 Y J� „ Ci. f yfy+ 'i(1 /'trr�Vj I (?'�... � (,ir fry � -!4y F+Y a �� � r1 rP ,Y•' Ai' 4 j /fr y�►{�y �^^�- 6.y6 iI��.�y,,J.-�• p�� •��i"-\ �� t � i, tY N ✓✓ t� 4 hhh��•1 s, , °� - �..._. .,•.....:.............»..:. ;. ,,.», +� .. K5 �. °,�'�y'}. J � Aw LY! nxr +its yy+' �•Y \.. �a Q�1 r1� dliri x � � 'r` g '9. r'� U� ..� C pp G•+u�ew'k'i *w+'ww«...;»,wr, ,,;.. ...i- ..,_.. t �' � Y '� ;�c r:±. w"�,,Yi Y C4 4p {Mlmr»r '� _✓ ¢ qua �x!'q L� `rte 'sy .✓<', � �.: N `gt�++r d4p *. °IS rv+” T c,<• J e + ilYenlla _ as ! ,;r.a\j � � Axl ,rn A'' N1 •.,�� � . r �� '" � tri ,.i � .,ln ,,l w, u " birN 30W+ a'.t7t• !.Tob' ...x �' ��.1 \r �.�' �xr� �. �".. ," a �� � � r s , 'f5r O �I+ �,4�x rt tr ,nCr n �. a Ile � u a -a 71fa3 .sa 4. a 4l ern �` xj'-+ Ir eCS k cr'° a S' bt a5 afi.0 I J•� y r�+ ( r wY .n ,. ±l«m1 t� J'a �y. ! ''W "a• � e°�"•ti dltllJd In �"'_'° I V I % .".,-........:... .+«:. sr r ti.wy'. a� '"t• 'fa r,, rp.. rp+ y. ...Tl. .! Y_. J +ie x ..,, E l�cer:xrl nYkr E u! �rsj r d.�x tw3h. a�``-may �'w4 dT" 7 Y� t�� 1 d ryyY4 t1 J�� S � Fr ,. d d d '."i ` 1`q4 :r'* �s' a I I' j Ii1L1'°Itty 777 � i..lsk and describe any other related permits and other pubs a pratrsls t" 4ulredl for this: i city, regional, 01tate and Federal agencieei�a i�} � PTa�eut� Including {"; quired tty IF RESIDENTIAL, include the number of units, whether units are single or multl.slo type of household size expected, ry in holglit,,schodule of ypfl piles, t1t1,,i 1 IF COMMERCIAL, Indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, aqua loading 61 �r�ti�e� 0tram, and facilities. � t If= INDUSTRIAL, indicate type, estimated employment msnt per shift, and loading faciltkiCs. IF INSTITUTIONAL, indicate the major function estimated employment per shfft, estimated atlaupartCyr, Eo€Idl di3 fflr,ilitles, p tend community benefits to be derived from om the project. q i VNNVi1=0ONMENTAL. IMPACTS AND MITIGATION A f EASURES* _ IdUntify Potentially significant environmental impacts associated Witt. the use permit. what project design featuttytj Y (alttfdtkll tc)nditirsns of aoprovat (ming tion measur s) ars pfioposed to alleviate potential environmental Imperils? 61 1 J»NVIRONMENTAL SETTING* rJoscribe, the project site as it exists before the projeot, ineiodrng information on toPo ra ppy, soil stability, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects.]escribe an existing structure pj�atjA arid dni- xon the site, and the use of tf;.o utillclures, I)etscrtbe the surrounding properties,; including information on Plants and animals and any ouiktrra.l, historical 6r sc#pii, a6 Indicate, ` indicate tfte type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.) intensity of land use (single -family, apartments„ el,! t3 , rlt�pats. tnont Stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, . ;back, rear' Use separate sheet for Ie er res o ses, lard, eta,), r'F tt\ t i�t� err.,t.a �.1�611�� a 1 GYkG tom. [ P1 ltQrdby declars el under penalty of perjury that I ha{+ read and and tendt instrGtbtions and that_the areS�oing s)�igmenis �k ttra true, cgcgrrpiets and catrect to the best of my knowledge and belle; jtatP Applloant's'signaturmeDote , t ! �l . Property olivner's signature r lV% Permit Number 4*uest. Usepermitto altow &009tlon and'$ — �^-- 1 ize of parrel(s) - .--"" iZr;RIFY, � ,. � tt., „Mx A.P.u r mber�s) fr r tJwnsrShig G"� Zoning a : e R s Proof of Agency (if needed) ��i�' EZocati�an.pe Crip Ion tG Copies of P, 11 � " f bate Ju' f C� A aAic®tion taken U v� r LLI � . ww �. ice" W M CC H I-` Lr) o--1 U Q' tJ U W U C3 ci u [~} W W Scr- } cn s c' to Uh a ut � Ln tri Ln cn � a LO F- O 1 Ln to tri to C4 LO aLn to m tr1 to H Q > cc > CG Ln J JtI7 JQ7 m Z Z � Z C En rn � Q Q CL injr- G CC CQ m CC CII Gr M I CC m tg C�,1 dr Q ods m oC Q m O t5� ot1 CC in CC 0 tD a ii m m tg t9 m� m ED ' � 0 m Z a J � F of Z {- , `' r � - LU In r- w m Ul to Z � � m Z Ln m z M � • Z , G Z CC G Z C>_ tD U7 Ln CC 0 ul to it .moi Lf7 G W �O.0 @ 113 �ci m = mz WCL IXz tgW¢ CCC aL.t� Qctr � > o t51Cnz Ilt r� mtrt� GEnEfx C� It o Ln 7 I => 4"1 EL 2 �� J tf7 B CC Q>_,d in a. CC t;,OOW Ln 2, :L im0O W c in .Z S Z CZ MLUZ U7 = O <� ee w0 In z Ci m .0 Ln Z Q Z wO Q U3 Ll � u� U 10 Q U� � cl3 LJ .0 CZ w F- F- O -0 L1 �-- F- a t� 10 S o U 'Q to C] mm � 0 Q 3: Fr O tJ tn o (_1 V �aYF--'U3Ulu U'0' n? UW cr 0-0 �►-'tt7Utt1 fir UVU m F-`LnUN MF-cr C C3c GwOOillC3tL L1n O�� M C7W1i1UCC _J �' i0 , C3 .0 � MLl:MO� @ W L3 Cu 'n U7 O h Is- 111 uCU � W LLl � C3 *t 0 s U Cl .. W- M CJ' .• Q C-L —i I)- toUCU Q" .• Q .^^1 2, Ii)„ »• Z Z tit mo0inuc .. mmQ.(jru Q` .. W 03 to I'_ O M 0- +• L11 = In F- 0 � •• 1.11 Z n m0otnUrL M 0. coW' is m t..: Yu CCl CI` - Ci _1', tZS 2�1 U U• !tit py U U J LD tT) U 0` J W W L3 13 J Lzii " L�7 --� .0 C< C+T t� G j iv 0. Li dw W CL_ (L W Cr` .Y-� T Ir U L j w CJ 0 111 t1] 1n -J 3 111 w Lit w w > > >w i H K C Q c cu®r"U1 N M ni to n CCF -a• (> =3o.- =) ED C7 � xr � tr =io,- �t in ez cr i-- V3 d i� uz I_ sry a <1 a• t- In cz C7- r In Q Ci` F- In Q Cw riz L, i to to cam' to in rn z a _' CL "6 i =>a s m ED G to m¢ .- 4 Asx U metl' t� M, to m Z m w Mr U o' m m 0-1 l4 � ?m 1n s r-r cn rn M ,c Q d1 CE lexU na -4 w J1 J V- isILJ .CC Z s-t Zm t9t U m Wx1= i& i-4 Lill tl 4&.t to Z z Q 0 r. m to LO S LL m o ._1 t 11 :;': ja C3 9 M cr m m z Y m rl Q M z t %X m I-, m @ t-7 CC x' iT1 [ J r.i r;C_ 41i o d lU O KL Cu } -+ Cir' to m U to `i CC ,W CU Z Q .SI X t t + U Z' O L3 w �L Q �° �L11Z �F3JXmF" +OQU .L�p� 4 ' is «U� O m J 6810 iSlli-td Mm O LnQCt} M O ti ��3� G m o Cti"ozO LLL1 tj GPi i-i W CJ Y-d triZ ^1 'W L31 •.Z Y J 0 Q- iJ Yaywy-�r- _ 1 Z' %J . 000 ='C1- U- +Y C.,tlM -) -43 -' o Y» Q Z _! a_ CL U ^�W.TZ ,.J, Z -0 U i i y11� d� P. U, Box 5038 P 0, Stats aftl 4-1P QPIA+ A speer rat oo, ,zv Pee Y Re.stArttd as '.'Cvrv, Pct R t tro Rer. w sbawing taa w4 wm ml .smalPa "ati N rllJ Rcatata��iY�xt6 w �rf,^wC, I i i y11� d� I February , '1991 13 t;te County Planning Commission 7 County Centex' Dr.' Oroville, CA. 95965 y 1 Dear Commission Members, Please accept our recommendation to approve the use 006-500--013) requested, by the MC.eonteasori. Elementary Permit f Chico to Operate a school at 310`5 Esplanade in Chico. As p ar h`t�� o` of a child enrolled in the..school. we visited the ed t and examined the existing buildings. We believe t he new locat,z.oti will: benefit the school, the neighborhood, and the community. A The school directors have worked diligently over the course of the past year to locate a facility whish meets public standards and fulfills their needs for additional space. The Esplanade property provides ample room for vehicles •4o safely pull off the i ,road when loading and unloading children. Access back onto the roadway is equally safe because the traffic density and the view in both directions is unobstructed. The primary buildingon the PP P property is large and a ro riately configured for Montessori, style classrooms. Ir_ addition, a large enclosed yard at the rear of the building provides space for supervised activities. We believe the directors have sufficiently addressed all elements of concern with respect to opening the school at this location. A Montessori school will enhance the neighborhood and provide the entire community with an alternative educational Program. We stronglyrecommend be granted a use permit. Sincerely, ci Da;niels Brooks Thoslaksson 1804 Bidwell Ave. Chtico, CA 95525 , California Stat e Dniversit Chico, California 95929 i C}iiCCy $lA student Ern PI Yrne' nt Office Ed Daniels Coordinator of Student Employrrleht (97:6) 895-5255 AT55 8.459-5256 I iC1l i 4f.., .F, { i � r r FAL,,:'.A �J..Y'�yy�n y � yo1 R ri 1. h , k, .. �...,_,.. -,.�e:,�.�.,.,...,.,�wa...,. r «.w ...,• .��..�.+..,, .. �....« ..vu w..�._y._ _.. .r...,�M;.� . r._ -::;. «,.,,.. .. '...:.,....,...�.. :. � 'm.t i, •+t ,... _-.;«k ,.., .�."w..au���. .7�,•.,�r•+•»«_-w.-+w.�' Iw�ra ,� t kw.�:. I o�..�. .f- � w- � '.,. -,-"WAN lu uk 249�.06hapset Rd. PO ��AaaX 3334 Cfq;,..�.}w. '4 A 95.9,2./ r rr � �'7��+i �+`�I,f�lr3l[t St. �"v <."-�'* �':=w ''"`".` '""'"w�A✓ � �. �� �' � C'.",'" r E fox 3334 j CHMOA 35937' r• ' h y/° ,r/ _ i 7661 Frignont St, ' ;CntVWL CA 95932 (%6$ 458 5536 7 t�" F�/*�yr . ��✓`"r'.`,�� r n �,.J:..�F. �''iMa , A >ez.N. ��7k:F-west Ranch way %� ; fd', 9FIrx5t R4="ng GF942 �e Y 'tit�'� f+i✓ }w''J ,...-} ,� �,+y+.+^'� Y. f R /' M_. F`i ! g9�i8r�t 07 fl S' gay ���'5�1�, 7!r•1�, �rJ9� : l' J � � " ✓ Cr w+-�'"�e...�� . d"'G:.•!,�„„�"� ✓r,,,�'t t A4 � Y.,,,.�1 pr ,. ell (915) 973-3313 i+ 5; Oro Datn B)Vd. fs -Z 0,"WHIen CA, 95966 � ,�' �..•.� �:.�: .,,,. �° 4(9iBy X33 777436 I ; 9965- Clack Rd., Ste. A k CA'9&J6,1 � (tiiM) 37Z87 r P -O Sox 3�3i5 CA 95971 , C s 283-0595 ✓" i" �Y y" Z Y, All 655 E �tt�BF � ,.i' Yy/+f�� �.r'i✓ r' ��+'�I� i+.�.,.r�^"�^}M � y �,,// f �„+ fY � WXams, CA 95987 f (9;5) 473-2255 4r .. _ fF Lf'�r°!' L.. ' V..v.'"Ww:✓^ y ,j,,,/r� ! �,,r.7� fj/�... 6s+: 7Z, , ., r , ,:. i` i. �. '+r, - l :+^ _,'tY�+ y ✓'"fin r9 MW Gnaploto (tarns t a end A•. an 2 wh6a addittonii rrc�ttrlap� aro dealt# Rnd cptatpl�t no i ab�Asr fa tip "t�[TUIiR➢#�+� SNaco rin the rayprsp atdd 1=giluro to 06 this will Cdilr r nb,ratir� pt>•to ynu, the ratio r'ocai fes intil ) t sy than eitrta i .liver I -6r, a e n m a+i #' Iht or ses aq c R ox p® to additlona snricafnl r�wln v uthe tro T. Shbwr to B +sp cpo aro ava a , onau S pan alp evh4m dol vote rZlr�r chore, and Rddres§ee a :ddb;' ge) 9. G Fipiy o Itd poldvRry. �. A,rtiatu Addraastld ta; d. AF1t(ralo Number r1c) g'� '�JBG 635 028 L'«"� (lc"r�C 50$ Of prv�rrr-� Clec:. CA 9692,f;-IilRdaredInurod' '4 Pd18dj �OD' AA malf Rdt(vSor 4Cdl �. A -0401n aipFfnttlre pt oddrd r 519 ' tyre d �, art ahfs�gh , Rrfd D rE rikl,i Eo s. ✓! ti, Addressao's" gddrug (ulyL wra . ,Ran 7. Dau of l"f'®jJlrery "e �2i2—b�8-�--.--.._�" 1:® STIC 11 ;3 I rra f n 77 3 i x i %" :install roadway" and drainage improvements on the E�planvWe in aca:ordgnoe j#i� �;i�.e ! specif catie—s of the Butte Countty Department of Publial: "V�Iorks over `�,� y4,he period .frc the date of effectiveness of the Use Perm,ii. off• at the tate ad tf6,, .1� r C ,.property develops, which ever comes first.. , ti Obtain a Certificate of Occupancy from the Butte County Building _ ', Depraa`tmohf: Meet the requirements of the State Fire Marshal and CDF. 110. Meet the Butte County Environinental Heal" Department reguirenients ,inclu�fI"i,��C'Yprovidin domestic water apublic we 1pply, Applicant roust also comply with all other Mate and local strdtutas, ordinaaxces ttt:�� � regulations. $ f Should you desire to appeal any of the conditions imposed by the Planning Commiss 0111 yc>u must do so in writing with the appeal fee of $4941.00, to the Clerk of the:`]Board Of S}j pervisors, 2.5 County Center Drive, Oroville, California prior to 5:00 February 22, 1991• you do 2 appeal and. if there are no other appeal within the 8 .4i-y- appeal period, your use permit will be issued after February 22, 1991. 1R•eceaatly enacted legitslatatzn (AB 3158,' Chapter 1706, Statutes of 1!;)90, effective Jranua /.,a 19191) requires that the Department of Fish and Game impose and collect filing -fees Yo specified to defray i . the cost of managing and - ��atectang fish and wildlife trust resotfme;o, Mese filing fees a ie g re collected during the envie-tunental reviewProcess a nd are to be puf?f at the time the County files a "Notice of Determination" with the County Clerk of i #t< County in which the project is located. This procedure is require c� Pursuant to SeCti��t 21152 of the Public Resources Code, To increase admimistrative efficiency, the statute delegated the collection of filing %e'� ttq the: County Clerk and provided the County authorityto collect'a $25,00' documeaita:t' handling fee. The fee for a DeMinius Negative Declaration is the $25.00 dorumeafti '. handling fee. Check made payable to the County in the amount of $25.00 -hould be submitted to the County by February 215, 1991.. Should you have any questions regard ng this matter, please co, ntact this office betw�y�tt. 10.10 a"tn. and 3:00 p.m. Sincerely; , r ., . clier Directorof Planning BAY' I o 1-r4 04 0 Q) -P b (D "-j U7 is 444k44-) (d 0�4Q) -P n>i0)tOM •a . o (d .a U P ct b y p44 , H O to 4 "0i' q • -1 Q m o 4 a) •d (0 4-f O G) 0 d r-4 -a -P a (ti 'H41 P .-j•a wr�s;o-PTjrisU:> or- --4 a) Qrd0 r-,O•,gr4C:H V.I=dx m at dgJ� U to :1 ;U'oQ)a' (dr-(4roQ` r, - P, O L)W04U•�-!Q)UMm O4U(U O O Q) U N•a td g k Tj o m::s m tcy m)-( P-1 N' r -i a s 4 om U 0 0� ,j -C 0' (n •ri Q1 in 0) C: 4J ki 44 trJ (n P to a) 0 (d . Qi c: Ti (d k•t Q) Q) -d 0 ' fC) Q) 'rte tl.+, m U Q: O -,1 . t) .0 .=+ -a r*�--1 rel 0, JJtts a04 0R4004 �C a dU tTNC;� U 1 ks41 'C) f 1 u) to y t 4J 04--f E* -,-1 9 (1) W aG l r a) U g Q) q4 to Q(T3 041 C; to -P -�-- 0 k g +xf , �" 10 ' a O ti ., M ,4 d U H ki-0 4j o (a C: Tj• 4 O 04 r rd ; H, fnar4) 0 �-�,; o � 0�Coo U �> . p t p ,4 4j 4 m 04 44 -P f-4 IV, p tri t3� )y «I tj ay •r) 0 ya .a .C~ 0 O a .,-f ., Tj . 'd ki is �; 4j s 4.3 N b •O �,", "-4 T%/ Q) Q) -0 O 0) Q) to k� m a) U • 4 •ri rr cry r-) f .� ti) 4 i t; (�} G, RJ srr Q) r•� Q) m p .sem -a id a O O rd Q)-POoa1 OUki '0 rd - 0 m O £; • 0 (t5 .Cw cN Q p tC3 U *) to k i -a >' a) ,t'O.` W �M �a 4400-NU•atn�:f StUr!( v to o ' �- (d -cj Q) 0' Q) .,� ,P r-4 0 kr .r) kfi t7 'e, 4j O' to O Tf U f� O N 'i C�'Q) 41 P O Q ( g w 4 Q, O U IJaa •a p'fn -0 .'�` U �! 0 (d 't 4j O ri 44 tU tdA U Qf(dOQ)m C) �C)P�Om N3aQ)IDp; ch r-( tef U���� '�U. 01,71(Dr4Q)0) 0a)� - to rO -P' d 0 s(A � Am o td 4j 4j k ) 41 .A T9 P-44-4, O • r§ Q3 0 - oJ. 0 oj� `P� -4 0) p� fon a� , Qy, H ON 0 V It -3 U 4-i o� �r 1t -i rA X4,4 P4 (i) •ri 0 W 4 � 0 o �, w w 00 -a Q) O -r4 C"" .r( Q) .1.y ir" 4J iat ti S F O ✓t a) rd I O •, O p 44 ',sj (0 Ol i, ti) tJp � r-) Q) Id v - O Q) .� m �i -N .r �, Q) q C~ �) Qj a Na o w a) rt C 3 O a `� ? .L) (3 (t3 k t c� . •a ` O u� z1 r -f ' >~ •� �J RJ t m c(► O 0 EU m 044-' Q) +y 'd ;F" •a Q) a) 4j -4 a (1) O 4J J 0 (ti tty - (d',d r -i ( N -0 O (a ((d 'o .,4 � 14 � a) U :o g , C H -i Q r4CD44014 ki0OCdO0Z Q)r-iO$4ki -a' Tjco� m t-- o A W o U o rd ', : 4J (tJ W 1.4 )-t (ti .Q 44 0 3 G),4 4 04 Ra CA11forillt stile university, 0"ba Chico: C_=u"' omni 9532-Q•0011 Cvirege of Business _ Department of Amounting and Management Science (91-6) 895-6463 utte county P? a nniAg Commission 7 Counter CentP-r Drive Croville, CA 95965 February 7, 1997 Dear Butte Colan-t:y Plannina coram! on Members - l attar refers tq th 11Se erjli C Ai' P 006-500-013 013 (na iia' Kenyon} which recrgc-sts perxission to allow a Mar essori school at 3105 Bsnlanaae_ As you ]crow, this is tha s� oon � me to iesi�,-= has Stt•'At e r aS�©r7 ��, --�? ve been, sc ohol A site and having the ing visit -�' both i _ - site and the proposed sehor' buj iding Fre feel that the s site is excellent. The buildin�� is a house which ! Will add: to the closeness and facilitate the ? nteraction ! among students, In addit ion tnerp i� j _ outdoors far the chi 7 plenty of room to r-1 r at Lunch roj-- - and recess. After reviewing i�/1nc�t the proj ect, the Butte Counter Planning Departmer_t 4taf i ._ recoMmended the granting of 11Zis permit. Cur daughter ZYennifer, age 7, has been attending this scnhGol for tine past two years and we feel that the educa- tion Yhat sire his b?en receiving is outstanding. The Personal attention that each studer_t receives, the wide 5c`r coy topics - covered, as well as the abi.li y -Lb wOrK at your ow -'A pace are just a fel y of } R Y 4- 1. y- � W of the reasons _ .peel a com-,,*Ment * Menu o �iiis Of edueatlon. Current Overcrowding in our Rosedale school district _ as well as �xc s✓'cLs'..E.ng O A -u-dC'316.s- are 41sit T ==sy-u nrtica'�-'--factor) caimponents of the - public school system. We request the c'ppcitunity to choose t�►is alternative method of educa- tion for our children, r r ' t � �I E+ pER1� `v 9rlt.t AN 71 .0 O � � ' , r m . �. Sincerely, Steven , Adazzqs Sarahs .. Adams Associate Dean Lecturer college of 3usiness Dept. 639 AccQunti ng �alifaxnia State Una varsity Cal ifOXTI S tato Un : "varsityChico, C 959 9—� 1 enzcot CAA 95929-00.1.1' T( -e CAH(urnfa State University I 1, y , t916) 9 o-750'1 r y j jRE PROjECTq j Paula Kenyon - CJse permit AP# 006-500-013 7.� as c is �-�_ :u�a r .a -,.a 0=11, a= �c� Baas =�v7 bake. _ � rQ �4 the Zol lotrii.,y ,oro], ac rPaula Fenyon - USE PEFittl pri!vat8 school, on property zoned HC; (8igh4av Commercial), located on the eas> ,440, Q:6 ;Esplanade Road across itom Commercial Pvenutu, nor UITT., Com �- 7 County D, `l n Ori}vi1.er q -3397' 9 7 t (916) 338-7501 DATE Paula Cen xon Jse' Permit AP# 006-500-013 do F- QL'� rJ ..t,• � _ � :. CSC � �„ i i d w 12.?1 she - 7 iEaS' ": C� - e ` g _J_a.aW..�::C»' `3 '� d..rt Cw F"S�nnr_� way c' �'au_ a Ken�ron CiSE PEamit t'o' -all'oq ty �,,.� to school, cinrc� ert� P P r zoned (Hi ghwav Commercial), locatedn the east ,� a •CSPIAnade Roan across frown Commercial venue, north of Eaton � , identified a� Pll (W)6-300-013. „�-- e are MG:-ing ,=.n assess . of pass: al b prepa�k-i:z5 asa eti�r rotuc: a e e.rivironmelq`, i L E:11taa, dbcL L-z- r pacts an °:�# d ; 1 }�ecla c�.�w C)i! w n s- � c� L 2G_ d Neaati ,rP eCa.c"Y'".c'� , ^•- �,.h, a �h:i M[a�Si13 'cS Or :.:»' paces carport C�+PQ . an 71Z 'Vixonmental 'lease provide aily,. fac- ai sta— �-� u {-- CeIn(: s' ideas =-Or j-7,1 �� �Y t1'K1 OTi5OtI CaiY�Oa..,e'" in your e5 L �ga 4_an,'� Or V»`*�y either, w7l1 B f G . r �StC «3i^ Qr of eQriCey;� OZ n 3r :C z , Se that rvjate C 'ieza e r c'CUliO C=+`1�'cc4.S �i2 'a!S yOroj2^.t +,`i'l 7 11 ease re,5pon.d fN3 :e? n` Y_ gen era ted by t: days Of he above-no ted da -% ��3 s in wt;ir�r, then i shall be no Ma signf -Fant enviro a aS'sllnmd that there r�C s"* xr W .*lig.., i -L'i CtS 4f1ti4-ch are pot eiit=iai' _`C i1 t'N e µ'lm ap*re:C4 ata aTn,,r ass? S%.ai.C= YlOLl can p=o de------------- . Jda-7 A. Kramer P'.lAnnin; Technician co M-ents Your c CeiC�P :q Sri 't` �� ai a .;r G✓G+ft!,'r,,.` i dun+ a '. aj , Sti;C7'? _a1r_� Vt: , p3' - !^�". } i'S. ,_ u,A 41:. i... a r[.rY n''•1 pw�r•vY TM' �4 �k wy��-.-'r �iE a y 1.� s'+�'w.w t,..'JC' y -3.+. w .tr �... «,,,.t... v:...Zat -•' t.VC a� c�.axan """" i jikkt 11F1tAN. _. t��1Kiti'a a knbnrr { � �'O,i LfFORNIA'REGIONAL, WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD— 0 'NTRAL 'VALLEY13EGION �$i V`JTA CASCADE WATSR, HED BRANCH O�:FiCS:Me �?1a KNOt C GSST'DRIVE L �4 � i J4+'vi3 "u'r Ok`ftaPING. CA +1¢00?. ORiONB: C915? 224.4845, .r t 25 July 1,990 Ms. Paula Kenyon Montessori Elementary Center of Chino 1038 The Esplanade Chico, CA 959.26 PERMIT FOR SCHOOL AT 1:1.09 WEST LI}iDO AVENUE, CH CO In your letter ,dated: 27 June 1990 you requested that you: be allowed t6 establish a school for appr,aximately 60 students and staff at the subaz" address.. This property consists of a large singlefa 'l ' home on 1 1� ; acres, and is within the Chirp Urban Area (designated as area B) Area g is s,,.)Ject to the City/County ,,,,trate Action Plan and by the Re ion 5 Water Qual f Control Board Basin Amendment (Order No. 90-1. �'a`� 26This amendment i approved by the State Water Resources Control Board on 19 July 1990.' The Basin Plan Amendment prohibits the discharge of wastewater from any individual system installed after 1 July 1990. If the voluinetHc load1l,, t9 to the septic tank leachfield system does not exceed the equivalent of-th6ft,,Of a three bedroom home on one acre, defined by the prohibition as334 gal/att.re- ,day, the -facility is exempt froir the prohibition. Temporary use of se $ie :1 tanks in area B is alsoallowed Dy the Nitrate action plan if this flaw rate:s not exceeded, Although the Basin Plan Amendment wouldgrant a pero%a,O?Int exemption to a usage that does not exceed the proscribed 334 gal/acre-dWys the flitrate Action. Plan requires hook-up to sewers for any, facility in arde41 as soon as they are available. Because of; the different laws and regulations affecting the insfiallaof new septic tanks in the urban area, there are various, corjytraints that. 1109st be taken into account before approving a. new installation or usage. The primary constraint that 'applies to your facility is the --'Butte County Sewage 01. PQ'Sal ordinance. This ordinance takes into account soil types 1 local 'groundw tier, available surface area for leachfields, and other factor, to determine~ %'he appropriateness of aseptic tank and leachfield. If such a system is appropriate, the ninimum size of the tank and leachfie?ld is also detay no d by the county. y, in making the determination that your proposed facility should be re5tr, ed to 30 persona, the county has consulted their ordinance, the Nitrate Adson Plan, the Mansual of Seotic Tank; Practice, a commonly used and widely g6r,,opted reference, and the Basin Plant Amendment. Then is correct <in the•;t� calculations showing a maximum school population of 30 using the above gamed guidelines and regulations (A population of 30 student/staff on 1 1/3' Of wouhe ret'i hal ly produce approximately^ 450 gal of wastewater per day '' �:3 c � earl' operationd rn . �� the Manual of Se„otic , rich is alri� :Pt g Tank Practice WE „ 7- "ilk a- y OS. PAULA KE YON exactly equal to the race of 334lallacre-da Plan and the Basin plan ,Amendment�e Y a1av�� �n�er � �� However, if the overall nitrate loading Tram y „, our p. eity' examined, based upon a yearsusage, it can opasd faci be shown that the nitrat';',I for ncs , r^a school of 50 as actually equivalent to the regulatory requ7rextiet'i�fE } maximum of �3 gad/acre day averaged over a years usage. This is dui e 4r” fact that the school will be in operation for onlyf' � ` {'=F M' 2B0' t���+�• of the year Because the intent of the Nitrate Action Plan and Basin P'1 �xd Ammendment are to reduce nitrate loading to a level that will be pro-t#61Ve ofri R , the area drinking tinter aquifers, it is reasonable to use annual avera `,';, . "Y ' nitrate loadings to determine when exemptions to the Basin Plana lr�lsor_„"�,", your particular asaoe is much easier to verify than many other usapFS V#j41d be u g , _ _ ,44,,%, (i.e., the number o! students and the annual days of operation' are ea.45 1� verified). Therefore we feel that -,a 'population of 60 at the school follows the 5pV1t and d�' letter of the Nitrate Action Plan and Basin Plan Amendment; and do not. s����-. t` ' I tc your regLest Our approval is based upon a maximum student/staff f 7 and usage of the facility for no mere than 182 days/per year. No a age. ,lmess I of these lattits will be all, and your system must follow all otheC° requirements of the ,Butte County Ordinance and theRegional Board Gu €d '1pes for waste disposal from septic tank'leachfield systems. We caution tip,5i final approval fear your school cannot be granted until all pertinent waste dj�posal information for the site is known. ;i In response to this letter, there are. i.1'o actions the county may take'oh YOU"' request. if„the county decides to allow more than 30student/sta'Ff, $, q will review your current waste disposal system to determine if'expansion of system is necessary to accommdate the daily flows that will occur at t'f,- , i school. _ if expansion of th:- system is not necessary, no installation+ stew ttIO be required. Therefore the Basin Plan Amendment prohi n { ofnewindividual systems after I July 1990 would not a l as the to f6t septic tank and leaehfield alread�X exist. If the county determines tfiaL4, added disposal'f acilities;are needed, then the Basin 'plan amendment would ap V However in accordance with the above paragraph board staff feels that r school as,oroposed would be exempt from this prohibition. If you have any rluii stidns please contact me at (916) 224-4858 or the a4.Mss an the f t age. Ronald Si Dykstra, P,.E. Staff Engineer . , ' RStI•'tch cc:Fir. Tom, Reid, Butte .County Environmental Health, Chico j' I T. 22 N. R. l E. M. D, 8. 8 M. 06-50 OP I too� � 9'� 21 S►J � (�*� ter 40 oC AC. too Att atrrt.bc-'- i J this map may or may not be a survey 0I tile lorid depCctod uPOn It for tarty, purpose other hereon You otaould rwt roiY ; to lie general iai�ntan 61 lite parcel Of Rte. dean 0110006401100064 SCRgthf;C4?., ox�tressly eels Y trt#. depid.151DW cte is dept trey liabiii% for alleged 40S3 ®r+�amagd jvhidh May almit , Ha"galmo on this map. n 42-35 Yrb �S9Q9�t)t b i�tUP Iyc� vC�-�0 �acowty of l uffae, colli M ��yy.,,,� 77 '...i.:L9.L Ayy(,,,,,, Y yy :. ,�t.. }'.y ry� ,i�. :. .0 "riiriJL �.r.�'S. uuvalmaG3.��. oJ4 Ti��: �%.laas► �4i �; �1 �/�.,4'°i r, vie..LG. �i �. ' I�4f�.S'. Y.rRfl Yrs ieAvnj NO DISCUSsIoN OP' ENVIRtJNMEWTAL EVALX1AW:C0 ...: ENyIP.0NMENTA L IMPACTS 1. F. TI•r, will the proposal result in signitlaantc Wnsiable earth conditions, or changes inX The proposal will not affect subsurface earth conditions, a. geologic substructures? X f I ,rt, The y., proposal will not result in any addll.ite b, pr srupkfon, displacement, compaction or �_ din rhe prb�eriy and orcove nl of til n SI (eel 110 pf i Over COYer i ng of the sOi l t allarpradentdecompacti veloped do propo gN any6f f structures in association with the prlVate school, i in topography or ground .rrface X The 'proposal will ,not affect topography because the NJVidlrn' level. change relief features? is nearly d. Destruction, covering or modiflcation of any x The itr loos no unique physical teatutes, unique geologic or, physical features? Increase In wind Or Water erosion of softs, X The proposal will,not cause erosion. e. i either on of off, s 1 tr;? f changas in deposition of erosion of beach X_ The proposal W;II 'not affect any watercourse, sands, or changes in siltation, deposittd whlt'lr may modify the channel Of or erosion a river or stream or the bed of, the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? x i.')<:' Thin proposal does not represent a significant loss of NP"V g Lass of prime adricuiluraily productive agricultural soils. soils outside designated urban areas? +/rlrtr h. exposure at people or property to seotogic x All of hutte county is in a Moderate earthquake Intensity Zane Due to an existing residential dwelling being converted to a s��t',!0 I hazards such as earthquakes, lanrislide5, use the structural Integrity of the home may not meet the mhn rl"arar mudslides, ground failure or similar standards for such a use, An structural Inspection shau'tid< the Ad i hazards? per4ormed to see ►f the existing structure meets req+ritr This would be performed by the t3utte county ryut,iic iWr,`Ys standards. Department. Any required work will have to be performed prtaar occupancy of the school by children. p, AI. wit[ the proposal result in substantial: The will not attect air quality because the increase 16'Sr44 a, ktr emissions or deterioration of ambicin t X proposal number of vehicle trips Is not significant. alt qualitx? x ' The proposal will create objectionable odors, smoke or (00 la, "the creation of objectionable adorn, smolce ;not at fumes? Alteration at aIr mbverrertt, moisture or x The proposal will not affect tilt atmosphere, -. C. in climate, locally lb any ?change r a, 'WATER., will the proposal result In'substantial, x The proposal will not affect any watercollrse, a. changes in current3, or the course or directtoll °of water movements in either marine or fresh waters? x Tile proposal will not result In any Increase In surface water, tu''t�4.4 b. changes In absprption Cates, drainage due to the fact pial no new structures are being considered for x patterns, or the rale and'amount�of surface proposal. However, the Department Of Publ lc'Vlorks is askfrlg that flmrs runotf? applicant install drainage Improvemehis to handle the eglls-fd", runoff. The property Is located within the Shasta Vniasr As5es5sil � Uiainane District and atsessmentdistrict tees will ballevied ofe 1,14 onvirO erttaz checc * Evaluation:Oftrevir6xxm6nta1 Ian�q`ct ,list ��" SE�IBiIROMENTAL ]C"ACTS (Continued) DTSCi7s SION OF ENVIROXMIgNTAL FVALU�i'J'.�4�t res MAvnn nr (Con t I nued 1, C. Need for off-'site surface drainage improvements, including vegetation removal, x The need for on site drainage improvembnts will be deleriulhed 6}X,tiTe Oepartment of Public works channellxation or culvert installatlonv once full Im provement plans aCt ,ubmi'illlud. d W CeraZions to the course or flow of hood X' The proposal will not significantly affect any flood Is or watercourses, control ellal5liif e, change in the amount of surface water in any, water body? x The proposal will not affect any wltercoul'sel I. Discharge into surface waters, or In any aiteratlon of surface water quality, x "'"� The proposal will not significantly affect surlace Watet'quaiiky�✓ Including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity; Al. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow or ground waters? x The proposal Wlll not affect the dIrectlon or flow of ground watWirs h. Change In the quahtily or quality of ground waters, either through direct additions or x The proposal will not directly affect any aquifer. WlthdraWa.is, or through Interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavatioos7 I. Reduction in the amount or,water otherwise available for public water supplies? x The protect is currently on an Individual Well but the appilcihk proposes to connect to callfornia water Service or.r a pubfie Wgit AppIY. The California water Service currently has adequtti e ctiTtfes to provide domesticWater to the project site. Exp1. related z people or property flooin to water, related hazards such as flooding? k M kpe proposal will hot expose people or property to flooding`, d PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal -result In Su Tdant a . a• Change in diversity 'of species, ow number of any sprlrids of pleat t (including,aquatic x The eno sfgnttosal ill not $I plant life because the site conCa'ilrrof numbsshrubs? grass, crops, Andaic life. plant;)?, b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangeted spacies of piantsl X The site contains no rare plants. . c. introduction of new species tri plan,.s into an area, or in a barrier to the normal x The proposal WIII not affect existing plant life. replenishment of GXisting'PeCIO 7 di croop tion In acrqag,e of any agrlcultura t X ite doe Tries snot canna agrireflcultural crops and is'pies Mltli)+ developed a singlecontain family 5. ANIMAL LIPP. will the pfoposaf result in subs t ane I aI. 'With a, changq In the, diversity of species. or numbers of any species of animals (birds, X The proposal will not affect animal life because the site dool 1591 Iand animals including reptiles, fish and support significant animal lite or habitat, shelfrish, benthic organisms or lhsects)l b, Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare or endangored species of animatsi """—` The slke contains no rare animals, t toles ectal Checklist *,Evaluation of FnV i1ronmental Impact .tu 1NMMIROHMMAL X"AC` S ccontinued) YES MAYBE W DISCUSSION OF EP+TVTR01MENTAL 7.SVLS1i AJAJ. 1i/�'!r (continued) c introduction of new species of animals into x The proposat will not affect existing animal life.. an area., or in a barrier to the nigraticn or movew-rit of animals? d. Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife X The site contains no significant witdlile habitat. habitat? B. wtstW. will the proposal result in substantial. a. incr4a,,es in existtng noise ievelsi x The proposal could have a minor Incre.tentat increase in noise Id4e'XIs on sl Le resulting from having outdoor activities tov the chile'11,+, The noise levels would occur only during the daytime and would mt propose any adverse effect to the surrounding propertles; b. Exposure Of people to severe noise le- els? _ V The proposal 4111 not expose people severe noise levels. 7. LICIT' Ann ctAR5. Wit! the proposal produce It The proposal will not result In a substantial Increase in 1191ff" 'Of signil4cant lignl 'and glare? glare created on site or In the vicinity, a. IAN IDmAE. Will the Ptoposal result in a sub5lan.lat X. The proposal will result in some minor alteration of the preterit' Tina aiteration of the present or planned land use or aro planned land use In the area, The vicinity Is 'charar:terl�,dd' by limited and large are9V residential uses areas or agricultural,: land$ on''Ibe west' side of The Esplanade with co;rnserclai properties 13>zif,lrtl predominant on the Cast side of The Esplanade. The project sltd' is ` zoned,H-C (Highway -Commercial) which alldhs rchoois by use Peral, The Butte County General Plan designates this property Sita',It commercial., The proposed project does conform to both the t,enrr.,a Phan and the zoning, T1. NATLRAI ttESCy.,RcEs. W I I I the proposal result In 5u4s,t�nl.iat n a, :increase in .the rate of r.se of any natural __ nt The proposal will not affect any natural resouices. resourcesi b. peuletion of any *on -renewable natural X The proposal will not deplete any natural resource'. 1'esources3 to, rtlsK a P, LPSf will the proposal: involve. a, A risk of explosion or release or hazardous X The proposal' will not involve the use of hazardous materialslint subs'tancris (including, but not limited to, is located ctose to any facilities which store or utlilze, st3lf'ati oft, pesticides, chernicai5 or tadiaticn) in materials. the event: or an accident or upset conditions; b, Possible Intetferente with an emergency X The proposall wilt not affect any emergency services. .response plata or ems rgency'evacuation pians Poriili i 164. ` "HI i Mine proposal al ter location.- X Tine proposal . a"i l 1 not t igni f icantl"y affect the population or il,lfe istrabutton, density or grown, 'rate of .the h=an. arra because the proposed density does not exceed that planned a"ilo poputationf being developed fa the area, 12. a willItheid proposalaffectUonahbuiingghousing, X The proyiosat ,+<i t t not s igni t scantly aY# ect houstng'demarid o cr -. add t;l. 79A.NSKRTATION109ROAATION.' Writ the proposal result ins a. aeneration ojsubs tAnt161addlticnalvehicfe X The.fir000saf will represent an Incremental increase In UAIrld A movement? the area. The pr+opposed project will generate between 15o and 1.90 vehicle trips per day. The Project site is located with frontage'+`din The Esplanade which is a major arterial in the 'chico area, y'JjO Esplanade in this location; does have the capacity to handle, IMIC! r aye 4a>t2lRie'7iD.ial chocrc7list EvAlua-k .oix 0:� 4nvaXc 1wen tat iPpac MAYBe t'� DISCUSSION OI' ENV3,RONMENTAL EVALUATI+J ` ^►� i' .E>liVIROMMMAL A ,..,tACTS (continued) YES (Continued) addbtional traffic generated by this roject. ToU� �he t4d1 Impacts in the Chico area tgeneral, app9!cant WI,� ay �m^l Sitc fees on a change In a - structure. These ees will mitigate the cumulative 1-o o ;rdCr+rx'ts to less Ili a signif[cant level. A condition of (o" Jse 0e;4414 should be to pay the appropriate traffic impact leen )tt accofhrt°4'Ic with Resolution No. a8-132,or the Butte CoUnly Board Of sUpervis",�Ts pertaining to the Chico Urban Area street Facilities Improvements $e4, schedule. in addi';tinr„ the Butte County Department of public is risking that the appilcant widen The esplanade frontage alono e, property to four lanes. b. E(tects on existing parking faclllties, or x The proposal will not affect parking because the propoaal wlll ir,,f4e demand far new patkingt to ctllr�fly wtlh the parking rutrements contained wl thi Iul to the p' eqC+u 'fY Code section C - substantial impact on existing x See discussion for item No. 13 a, transportation systems? d. significant alt,,rations topresent patterns x The proposal will not We,: t'lr present pattern 2! circlllafrot: 't� of Circulation or movement of people and/of the area. goods ? e. Alterations to waterborne, railor air , x The proposal wllt'not affect rail or air ,traftic, , r i, tncr.ease in traffic hazards to motor x The proposal represents an incremental In in traffic ha4a+0 vehicles, blcyclists or pedestrians? to motor vehicles, bicyclists, and pedestrians due to the increa'l number of left -turn movements that will occur off of The 9sprarii4e Ionieacrosscenter a ong sectiondof Esplanaderltiough 141 this The one Is propose 3u �asetf �".i5� d The Esplanade is widened to dour lanes, The major wider° �il'� urian I along this s retch of es slit take P place when propedt'!WS oh either side and behind tills parcel are sUbdivided, The left l':r!,n lane will not be needed u,+ttll these subdivisions go in. Them adequara site distance along this stretch of The Espi trade to rr( 3p traffic an adequate vies,. "a PUBLIC sEMCES. 14I;111 1h8 proposal have an,effect upon, or resrrl In' a need forl new or altered gcver'nrndnt'services; a. Ffre protectfon? The proposal will result 1n a inc'rementa't Irerease in demand, 00" fire protection In the area, Th- Butte county WR Department/ca IIfornla r3ivlsion of Foi,bs trY has indicated fr44, curaulative development in aural areas will Impact their ablflty ('tea provide tire, protection services, kedtilig the requireuv'"rts of 04A state Fire marshaiI Is anticipated tri partially ml� 'site lf,'C impacts oil the county Fire Department, fp add ItIon, iIft hydrd,r� and a pressurized water system is available In the area. Tile closest year-round fully Staffed (Ire station 1's station rix. Axe. approximat,ty S miles away to the east,, The project site Is 16ca044 within an area designated to be served by a new west side W4. stat(oh, To support the cast of constructing And maintefninlf,tfo;i new station, cDF i=as established a development Impact tee of S7S.r'J per lot. The payment of t'hn above Impact -Cee and Adherence to PPIstate Ftse Marshall requirements Is anticipated to adegil 010 raltigate Impacts on tine protection services to a fess RIM signlficanl level. , h. rel ire Protect ion?' _,r x (tor Proposal wi l i not result in any signl110 .nt Ihcrease to dec'*#4 , police protection services In file area. Iinpac't Envy ir6mexttal; Checklist ,4valuatioo Huva r0,�n00:al WN U&!l�d]f °C � �1 �,tM�� (contfnuecff r DISCUS91ON OF ENVI3 014ME14TAL UVALU TICrY YES r�nvau r (con tInued) c, Schools? x The r vosai will not result In any significant Increase Ili tlAlti`�Pd for sLnool services in the area, d, parks or other recreational facilities? x Thee proposal will not result In any. Increase in demand tot pair V14 recreation facilities in the area, e, maintenance of public faciitties, Including X The proposal wlfi result In a minor incremental Increase frr the NO roads? —for maintenance of roan s and other public facilities In the AfNl other governmental serv'ices'? i The proposal wl l I resuf t in an incremental ificrease in demand ftrt #A l other governmental services in the area, 15, FNErtcy. Will the proposal result in: llse of subs,tantlal amounts of fuel or _ _ X the proposal W1i1 not utilize substantial fuel or energy,' enia r g1"� fr Subs IantIaI Increaseindemand upon Ia _� X ,proposal wilt not substantially increase the demand tot br The lb,47 fe soltrces of energy, or require deitelop%nt of new sources,:of energy? 16, rtt'til_1T1Es_ Will the otoposal result In a need fOV new system's-, or substantial alterations tothe toflowfng: a. PoVrer of natural gas? x affect electrical power ar natuf#�: ¢?Ns dililt(bUtignfsyetll emsnot fa, rrrtinunfcatfons systems? x ° Thti'proposalwill n affect communication syitems. C. Wal,er availability? k Iho proposal wlII not affect public water ,Systems: d. scVrer at septic systems? X - Tho project is located in an area having high nitrate concenitafi`rlt1r10 in shallow wells. The source of this nitrate contamination hits be�n ilniked to the use of`septia tank and ieacltiield systems in tfYe rlh`P?�'a area: TiteCal Iforma Regional water tlualItyControl aoardfl�s 1)I` `4�d systems he ' a moratorium ora new septic widilin Chico area 6' reqlufrlho now residents to hook up to sewer, systems by 1 9s., q r is Regional Water Quality co , m e Cali fo n R g C I i y ntroi t38ard has reviewed .1.1 project And has gtyen approval for up to 6o students and star fin Sita usIrig the eXistIng septic system. The current finent bf t'dre ,enrol school is 40 students plus Staff, Tire school IS entitipatirY(f d 'b1 stgdent per year increase in enrol (ment for the next two years. 1` IJ would bring the school t0 Its 6o' student +haximom. the Idht'to7� currently teaches students 'irom kindergar tell. through stxth vea6l They would 'like to expand the operatloo to add a pre–school 10tfh apptoXfmatel,y 40 More Students bringing the total to V06. Tr,cannot be accomplished until a San Itaty sower Is gvaIIable ltv itl),ie Site. sewer is proposed to be brought to the area oGe, tole su'inunding parcelsatesubdivided, ,;n Environmental Impact 00W4tri,expand ;y the sewer system to this area is currently beingpteparE t,inU'tl° such time as, sewer Is available, the applicant wifi ihave � adher e a tdie-eu le Count Heal th Be art" ant �" t t y p m tdqui dot se Yrs lank and leach field systems. An expansion or the eXlst;fnp sy0;0A may,be required. e. Storm Water drainage? X Thd proposal Wil l have to provide a permanent S.gplution tbr,dlaliudt'ik f. Solid waste and disposal? X T11e 000001,W111 not affect solid Waste dfspd5a�: 17, Fs nnni HEn1_Tt4. will the proposal result in; a, Creation of any health hazard or potentl6f' _ xr Tlie proposal will not create ally heal th hazard. haxhrd (eXa,W Ing mental health)., c��Ytlenta,G�3eCk :LSt E valuation + f E.nvir.onatesktr,� to �`.""'°"::�', ' ^�` �ww.7y ' XiP O .� N W +YL6W.`'�7:h�e�=7. A � • ter - ACTS (continued) vcs MAereF I�ISCUSSTON OF ENVSRO]9TM;y�i (Continued) b, Exposure a people hazards? to Potential health x The site curr�nity contains a swimnCng Pool, for an elementary school site, Thea This Is inapp'tt,o, !te 18. a. ,�t�41AFTICS, !Vitt theesult SWIM""'; Pool WiIt be ftiled_in opt slate l;�ybrd he the children. v 4 rJM ruction of any scenic vissttasor the r crenticya, d� view open to, rviWic, or wrir theProPosal result ir! thr. greation of an ae!',theticatlY ortensiv'e site ripen `� The nroPtrsal will not result In an atsthetPca►j� dey� because at is ronsrstent Wittr surrc�ndin a oftew� 'Y# Public view? to the S -, g tfeyetopment. tQ, ut �FATlcxr, will the proposal result in an la Pact upon' lFie" quality or Caantity of extstiri, rtcreztionat oppoltunities? g "—� — x The proposal Wil not result In any IYtcreas recreation xacl7ltles. a iii 2a. CLIL11AtAL IYESCIrtCES: demand fcr pafj;. tPq a. wilt the proposal result in t'te aikeration or destruct iOyj or a rehlstor �"� "— The . or historic archaeological sites �' — proposal will not affect archeological b. IT' 11 the ptoposaI result InadvFr50physbc;rl S tes" or a-*tkhetrc efrets to a prehusrorr^ or historic building, structure Ar -�--- X 'rile ropow will p not affect historic Lbjectx s ices. C. goes the Proposal have the cause a physical chane Which WjUlyd aft affect unique ethnic t ---- __wr The proposal villi not cultural values? affect culturald. trsources: re , Che proposal restrict exisUnq ret or Sacred k- Potentialuses within the putenttai impact area? The pry�nsal Will no affect reltgfous resources, V. SD'GOITIS°1"ED MIT-TGTkTYON MEAsU:f2.ES' r• Contrlbute $75.oa to Fne West Chito fife $tation fund. 2. Fill In the exd;sting swimming pool. 3. Limit the occupancy to 60 Students° and Staff ff until the parcel leas ' sanitary hooked v� to sewer service. '. 4. ,d'how (fiat the $tructuret;�els building code rogUltement$ With � respect to seismic safety hazards for schools prior to occgpancy. 5, lns a t 11 traffic r (ic and dr i a, requited b nage ►r�rroverrnnts the Eilltte Public y?orks-,Y County CePartment of DATA 'Sl-tF'E'r A. ProJecl liescrintfan to the west then nor thwasler,ly into Atud (`r r`ek, I . Type of Project: lase permit The rojeot Is within the Shasta unrbn Urtt,Y,Nge Assessment District 2. Otter mscr,iption: Use hermit to allcW a private elementary d, AnnuAnnual Rainfall (normal 27 to24 inches p, 6ri' school. e, Limiting Factors': Use or septic tanks and feartir 3. Location: Located on the west side or The Esplanade. f I e I d systems for sewage disposal, approximattefy r'.,'an feet north of Shasta: Avenue, in the Chico 5� V1sV%l/Scenic Quality. rood. area' 4. Prpposed Ir Qevelapmen4: icnsity o Not appfrcable, S. Acoustic Quality: Fa1r to poor depending upon traflie volumes along The lisplanade, 5, Amount of Impervious surfacinG. Morierate. 7. Air Quality: Fair, G. Access and Nearest Public Road(s): The project has access to i The Esplanade., 7, Method of 5iewatr- Dlposal:individual septic tank and leach field systems at thss time with the possiblilty of a future sewer hook-up. IIA of W?Itee supply: Individual Well or public Water sSource upply 9.` Proxlmlt.y' of porrer'Lines: EMlsting to property. Id. Potential for further land dfvlsfons and development: No further land division potential given the cdtent impi6yements on site. 3< Enylrorum:ntaf Setting ` Physical envl ionrra6nt. 1. Te: rain a. General Tcraphic Character: Level valley land. C. Elevation. "O,I eeof ,t above sea Iev d. Limiting Factors,None. Z. Solis a. Types and Characteristics,' vino loam and vina rine sandy loam z to 3 Peet df -top sail. good permeabi I I ly, Weil suited to acgrlcultural purposes. prime agricultural $off. b. Limiting Factors, None. 3. Natural Hazards at the Land a. Earthquake zone; Maderata Eatthqualte IntpnsIty zone Vfll.b. ' 10,1/. Landslide C. Potentials Nonep d. Fire'Hazrsrd: Unclassified urban. e. txl,ansCve sdil Potential- LOW. 4. rologY a. Surface Eaters None. b. Crourld Water: Cenerafly abunda,t Iffalley adulfets. The prafect is located within an area of nitrate Concern.. c. Drainage C:haracteristiCss The parcel generally dralrl5 Jl'+1�i �nmrt�a���nu..msda ,, `zs�V: oimexxta J] Cheaci�list - 'Uva3-- iatioan. of nvixonmi6nta ;T �aot. EM V1, RONMEh7AL REFERIENC! MATER l Al I. Map 11-I; Ezrrhaualce and Fault Activity: Seismic USGS Quad Maps, IR,..fson springs, calif., Photo reViw�,.-' 1969. Safety Element, Butte County General Plan,revised 1-77, by CHEM( H1 1 1 . y5, Soil Map, Chico 2. Map it -z; Liquefaction potential: Seismic Safety Area, U.S. (�epartmcnt of agriculture. Element, Butte County General Plan revised 1-77, by16� Soil survey ' of Ch/co(1925')/0rovt i to (1'02-0) CH,h4 Hi I , Area, U.SDepartment of Agriculture, 3. Map ill --1, Subsidence & Landslide potential: General Plan revised 17, Butte Coi9tiesire ProtectiCarantyisdireti6�0s safety Element, Butte County 1-77, by'CHA Hill, aeK)artment and California gepartment Of ti �,;. Map 111-2. kroslon Potential: ,Safety Element, � 1 77, by CHh Forestry-, Butte County Planning Delia r toren t. Butte County General Pian revised Hill'. 51 Map 111-3, Expansive Soils: Safety Etementr Butte revised 1-77, by CHA H1Ii County General ,Plan sy. linty Map Generaliplan rrevisedise 1-77, by aM HIII. 7. Map 'V -I, Scenic HighWaYs: Scenic Highway Element, Butte County Ceneral Plan revised 1-77, by CH,Mt- Hill,', 8 Map 111-4, Natural Fire Hazard Classes• Safety Element: But County General Plan revised 1-77, by CHS4 I H 111. 9. Archaeological Senswtivity Mao 'by James P. Manning. for ',Butte County PlanningDepartment, 1983. 1 rp. School District Map, Butte county Planning I Department. 11. 11. Chico titrate Study ter Concentration in Shallow Wells, 1983, by Department Of Water Resources, Northwestern District, The Resources Agency, State of Cattfornia. 12. Agricultural Preserves M80, established by ReSo lut<Ion,No. 67--178, Butte County Board of supervisors, December 5, 1587., 13, flood insurance gate Maps. National Flood InsuranCe Federal Emergency Maciagement Agency. ,1988. �rgen Program, . ,