HomeMy WebLinkAbout011-300-030e
t
1
2.
3
4, ,
5.
APPENDIX G
NEGATIVE DECLARATION REGARDING ENVIRONMEN'1AL, ''CMPACT
NOTICE IS HEREBY C'TVBN that the project described bylow has been
reviewed pursuant to the provisions of the Calif -ovula Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 (Public Resources Code 211.00, et. soca.) and a
determination. has been made that it will not have a significant.
effect Capon the enviroAment:
.Log # 06-04-25-11
D}:SCRTPrI'TON OF PROJECT: APO 11-30-30
Tentative Parcel Map dividing 13.7 acres into two parcels of
6.b and 7.2 acres each.
LOCATION OF PROJECT;
On the east side of Cable Bridge Drive approximately 1/2 mile
eattof its intersection with Centerville Road.
NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROJECT APPLTCANT:
Robert Silacci Max Albert
4676 Cable Bridge Drive 146 Tonea West
Chico, CA 95926 Chico, CA 95926
MITIGATION MEA8URES
6. A copy of the initial ,study regarding the environmental effect
of this project* is on "i le at 7 County Center .Drive, Orovi lle .
This study was:
Adopted as presented.
Adopted with changes. Specific modifications and
supporting reasons are attached.
7. A public hearing on: this Negative Declaration was held by the
decision making body.
Hearing Body
Date of Determination
Determinations
On the basis of the initial, study of environmental impact, the
information presented at hearings, comments received on the
proposal and our own 'knowledge and independent research:
effect an the oposednpruject COULD NOT have a Significant
{fie (incl the pzaposed prig
t,, , and a NEGATIVE DECLARATI ON is
hereby adopted
We find that the project GOULD have a signif'i(�-ant effect
on the environment but not in this case because of
attached mitigation measure.; described in item 5 above
which are by this reference made condition:$ of project
approval, A conditional NE6ATIVE UECLARA'I`ION is hereby
y
Title
Date
NorETCE CSF DBrUB MXNA,`l`'TON
office of Planning and Research :UOPC)D4 = BiAte CQunty
7CO e
1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Planning Departm001',7 Co .,nty Center: lit` N(A
Sacramento, CA 95$14 oroville, CA 9506
or
X County Clark
County of `) ,tte
s"UBJ$CT : liiling
of Notice of Determination in compliance 'with Se.ctiotl 21,t"
or 21152 of the public Resources Coder
Project Title nr it
Tentative Parcel Map 11.-30-30 Robert Silacci
State Clearinghouse Number
Contact Person TeleFho7ye Number-
(if submitted to Clearinghousz)
Public Works John Mendonsa 534-4266
Project Location on the east side of Cable Bridge give approximately
1/2 mile east of its intersection with Centerville Road.
project DescriptT."n jentative Parcel Map dividing 13. 7 acres into two
parcels Of 6.5 and 7.2 acres each,;
This is to a(ivise that theButte int Advisor A enc
(Lead Agency or Responsible Agency)
and.. has oracle.
has apyVoved the above-described project on (Date)
th.. ;fallowing
determinations regarding the above-described project;
., The project will, will not, have a significant effect on the
environment.
2, An. Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project
pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.
A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the
provisions of GEQA.
3. hJitigatien measureswere, _... were not, trade a condition of the
approval of the project
4. A statement of overriding considerations was, was not, adopted
for this project.
This is to certify that the final EIA with continents and responses and record of
project approval is available to the general public at:
Butte County Planning Department
County Center Drive
otoville, CA 95965
Date Received for Viling and
Posting at Op,R Signature
Title Revised March 1986
Mh
AITENnl X r da
COUNTY ar BTITTT,
1 N'VlR0NMFN'rAi. MIECK1.lST FORM
(to )ae eompl.ctCc �y Lea Al;clYcy)
Log II 86-04-25-01
AP II 11-30-30
x BACK_ ___ CR0YN1.1
1. Name of proponent - :R_CCZ
OBERT S=LA_,,,,..:�.�.., __
2. Address or propon:elit and lepresent_a.tive (i r applica�hlo)
_Robert _Silacci,_ ._ Max-Alkaext_ _. �_
4676 Cable
Chico, 'CA 95926_ _ ..� Chico, CA y 92L6_____
3. project (iescrilatl,onTentative Parcel._MAp., ...,,._<
ZI. IANI)A'1'C1RY 1,1N1)1NGS U1,yTt�Ni1-.JCANC1i YI,, IAYI31'; Na
a, pees the project have the potential to cl.ehxacle tilcw
duality or the environment, substantially reduce
the habitat or a fish or wlAdlif' :41lecies, catlso 11
fish or wiMl1re populati,on to dro,lx below sclr-
sustai.ning levels, threaten to elinllnate a plant 01°
animal ccimmunity, reduce the number or restrict the
range or a rare ur endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of tll rnaior periods r;
of California llistory or prehistory?
b, noes the project have the 1)otentinl to achieve
short-term benefits to the detriment of long-term,
environmental gohls? (A short-te'11 i.lrrpact on the
environment is one which occurs ill tI relatively
brief period or time while long-term impacts will
endure ).,nto the ruture,)
o, I)oes tine project have iIjlrac:ts which ire indiVi.cltt
ally ] lm ted; but rurntlllttivel.y considerable? (A
project may impact on two or more separate resUurcGs
where the i.rr)pac.t on each rosource is rol ativel),
spla
, , i}ut where the ofreet or the total or those
impacts on rill: onvirollmC?nt 'CS Si4;nrriea.ilt+�
d, 1'Oes the proje t )Neve environmellta.l c1I'rs�Gts which
ill cause l substantial R1dvc�I`+c� erie�c is on htlin,>)1 Y
beings, e.1` tli'1'elt1V 01. indireLtl�'?
lit. 1 ETFRMINATION (.i,o I,(, k- ()ilii11 et(qi lly tbt• Lead Agency)
Oil the bay is 0r til is initial ('vIIla t 1 oil
T/WF rind tide 1"1•niMse'd projvct Calll•lr NOT have a :'i�lll`riranteffect
on the (1nvironment, , uncia NI OATTVV 1)liC I ARATION will he prepared,
1'/N1a rind, that although thew �iyrc>p�s cid project (:oul:cl have a signi ri-
dant c FfOc:t can tho envi ronmixnt , there will. not be 7 s 19111 Ncant
e rract ill tills caeQ 11c�c IttiScw tllc� 17'1'1 tif1l"TaN �1f;MSMIES described oft
Nt?C1ATTUI
the attached shvot have becw l ad&'tl icy the projoct, A
T)I.0 LARA'i ON will i)e propar od,
1/Wli rind talc, proposa,tl projoet PIA) bare a siWliric, t cfree,'t 011
the cwnl ir�lnmunt, t+nd t)n IiNVi(tilNDll'.NTAj, TM11ACT Rls'iORT -is, require�A.'
D A'1'ii; June 5, 1986 C,011N'1`l, ()li TitiTti , )bANNING 1)L,, pARTc+Ii;NT
�. .:
li v ;
Laura M
uttleAssogAate Planner
Revi.Qwod'by'
a�.
I
-2-
• IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IM CTS
IE'xpl.anations of all "yes" and "maybe'' ,answers are required
on attached sheet(s),)
YES
MAYBE
NO
1.. EARTH. Will the proposal result in si.gnifica:nt
�
..-
a.
Unstable earth conditions or in changes in
geologic substructures?
b.
Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
overcovexing of the soil?
e.
Change in topography or ground surface
relief features?
d.
Destruction, covering or modification of any
features?
unique geologic or physical
e.
Increase in wand or water erosion of soils,
either on or off-site?
f.
Changes in deposition or erosion of beach
sands, or changes in siltation, deposition
or erosion which may modify the channel of
a river or stream or the bed of the ocean o,t.,
any bay, inlet or lake?`'
g.
Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils
outside designated urban areas?
h.
Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud-
slides, ground failure or similar hazards?
2. ATR.
Will the proposal result in substantial.;:
'97
,Air emissions or deterioration of ambient
air duality?.
b-.
The creation of objectionable odors, smoke
or fumes?
c
Alteration of air movement, moisture, or
temperature, or any change in climate,
locally or regionally?
3. WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial:
a.:Changes
in currents, or the course or
direction of water movements in either
fresh
marine or waters?
b
Changes in absorption rates, drainage 'patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface runoff?
c.
Need for off-site surface drainage improve-
ments, including vegetation removal, channel.-
ization or culvert installation?
d.
Alterations to the course or flow of flood
waters?
e.
Change in the amount of surface stater in any
water body?
f
Discharge into surface waters, or in any
alteration of surface water quality, including
but not limited to temperature, dissolved
OXY991i or turbidity?
g
Alteration of the direction or rate of flow,
of ground waters?
Change in the quantity or quality of around waters,
either through direct additions or with-
drawals or through interception of an
aquifer by cuts or excavations?
I
i.
Reduction in the amount of water otherwise
lies'7
available forublic. water supplies?
p
j.
Exposure of people or property to water
related hazards such as flooding?
'.
-2-
YES
MAYBE IQ
4.
PLANT LIFE, Will the proposal result in substanti€l
a. GHange in the diversityof s
of any species of plants pedes, or number
(including trees.,.
shrubs;
grass, crops, and aquatic plants)?
b• Reduction of the numbers of
any unique, rare
or endangered species of plants?
C' Introduction of new species of plants into an--
area,-or in a barrier to the normal replenish-
ment of existing species?
d. Reduction in acreage of an agricultural crop?
S.
ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial:
a.. CC E--nge� in the diversity
Of species, or numbers
of any species of animals (birds,land animals
including reptiles, fish and shel fish,
benthi.c organisms insects)?
or
b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of animals?
C. Introduction of new
species of animals into
an area, or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of animals?
d.. Deterioration, to existing fish
or wildlife
habitat?
6,.
NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial:
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
- -
7.
LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce
sa.gni _,cant laght and glare?
8,
LAND USE, Will the proposal result in a
sub stantial, alteration ofthe
present or planned
land use of an area?
9,.
NATURAL RESOURCES: Will, the proposal resale in
. stant�a
su'.
a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural,
resources?
b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural
resources?
10.
RISK QE UPSET. Will, the proposal involve:
a.A r7i - of explosion
or the release of hazard-
ous substances (izlcluding, but not limited to,
oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the
event of an accident or ups,;t conditions?
b: Possible interference with
an emergency_
response plan, or emergency evacuation plan?
11.
POPULATION.Will the
proposal alter the location,
population? ys growth rete of the human
12,
HOUSING: Will the proposal, affect existing housing
or
create a. demand for additional Tiousi.ng?'
I
13.
14.
MIS
TRANSPIRTATI.ON/CIRCULATIoN.
result1n; Will the proposal
a. G eneration of substantial additional vehicle
movement?
b. Effects on existing parking -facilities, or
demand for new parking?
c. Substantial impact on existing transportation
Sys terns?
d. Significant alterations to present patterns
Of Circulation or movement of people and/or
goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffjc? —
f. Increase in traffic hazard' to motor vehicles —
bicyclists or pedestrians?
PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services:
a. Fire Protection?
b. Police Protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks ot other recreational facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads'
f. Other govern—,
- al Service$?
MAYBE NO
15,
ENERGY. Will the proposal result in:
a.Useof substantial
amounts Of fuel -or energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources
of energy- or require the development
of
new sources o£ energy?
16.
ILTILITLES. Will the Proposal result in a need for
new
systems, or substantial alterations to the
following:
a. Power or natural. gas?
b. Communications systems?
c. Water availability:
d. Sewer or septic tank?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?
17.
HUMAN HEALTli, Will the proposal. result in:
a. Creation of any health
hazard Or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
b. P�XPO$ure Of People to
hazards? Potential health
18.
AESTHETICS. Will the Proposal result in the
35stFllctlon of any scenic Vista
Or View open to
the public, Or will the proposal result in the
:
creation of an aesthetically Off en8 VO site open
topublic, view?
-4-
ig, R- C --.- IUN. , YES I�1 ' r� No
Upon the iVl� the proposal res
c� u a,l i--�--.-
ul in an
opportunities? y or q'�antify of existin jInpact
g recx �:atior�,�,l
20• CULTURAL RESOURCES.
a Will t "`--~
Proposal result in the alteration
Of or the destruction of a
historic archaeological Prehistoric
b. Will the site?
�c or
Proposal resuit in adverse ,;
or aesthetic effects to a
historic buildir� Phys�ca7: -»-_-
C. re or or
Does the g, structure or object?
Proposal have
a physical change which the Potential to
ethnic,cultural would affect unique ,
d• Will the values?
Proposal restrict e�cas'cin {
or sacred uses within the potential i els T ,
area? � � t� tis ---- �;
1npact
V,
DISCUSSION Ok
ENVTROrIMgNTAL EVALUATION -,.
_ AP 11.-30-30 .,
See attached.
S� DF V T 0 AP 11-30-30
S _
Construction of an additional dwelling will result In compaction
an of the soil surfacer Impacts are not significant.end overcovarin9
l slope east to the bluff of Sutte�Creek
.Icve sten The property steeply slslope of a roximately 15 r and Is
Canyon. The gentlest terrain has aSlopes on tho remainder approach
located on the westerly boundary.
tO
40-50%w cut and flll Will occur with driveway and ttiomesld
Gradings erosion susceptibility could
Steep slopos and high
construc.ion problems-
cause bogoing slope stability
An excavation which Is over 2' in depth or whi
ch creates a cid
mater than 5' height and steeper than '1-•1 /2 horizontal to
slope 8
one vertical will requirea grading permit.
Erosion can be minimized through limiting cut and
cutfill k�anks,•
applicable to culvert installation), reseeding of
(not app w8110,
terracing of slopes and construction of retaining
nave a negative impact on the quality of
1f,af: Ongoing ^sroslon could
Butte Creek's waters. nt has mapped
County General Plan's Seismic Safety Element
1h= Butte Coun y the Tuscan Monocllne in the area. 7'he
potentially active Fault of all ottx e d e the
e of the map is such that its exactSPouldmmap cannot be deter
scat The survey
without a geologic survey's potential rock falls. In
property: faults, slope sten s should
addition, mitigation measures should be IdentiFled.
t extend beyond the
3j: Butte
Creek's Zone A Flood boundary does no
northwest bank.
mmentis.
Surrounding parcel s1zes and
5ctdg Fish and Game had no ct
development must have compromised the suitability of the area for
migratory deer habitat.
g W se i s i on and subsequent
development
has been found in conformance
with the Gonoral' Plan. A rural development pattern is already
established along the creek corridor.
1
Sa;Upto 10 new trips can be generated by development.
c 1 e may need to be upgraded. A registered engineer
Cable er�da ow
� `la" support a fully loaded fire truck.
shall determine that It Gan 3uPp
emergency access. Darr
bridges
surfaced
-
upgraded. with gates impair Fire and em
and su
The road shooid be upgraded. gradedy widened:,
Grades over shall be paved. Consideration should be
Fire hazards on site are high. roofs,or water
given to interior sprinkler -1 nonflammable siding and
storage.
14b d�;eyF Demands for governmental services Will increase.
Y6^
14d,*.Residential development may be subject to school improvement
Bees
20a: The site may contain archaeological resources. A. survey will be
required to determine if artifacts are located on site and whether
development will impact them.
Ila: An archaeological survey w i 1 1 be required to determine potential
Impacts.
Division creating this parcel was recorded May 1`81, 1972,,prior
to implementation of C5QA.
Applicant: Robert Silacc;
Assessor -s
Per(,
01 4
11-30-30
Log # 86-04"2$-0j
ffluffl-M
Qi.'C4i;:iE]et DE35� i of i ern
1- Type of Project: Land Division
2. Brief Description.- Tentative Parcel Map dividing 18.7 acres
Into two parcels of 6.5 and 7.2 acres each.
3. Location: On the east side of Cable Bridge OrIve
approximately 1/2 mile east of its Intersection with
Centerville Road, Butte Creek Canyon area.
. Proposed Density of Development: Two dwelling units.
U. Amount of Impervious Surfacing Four to sin thousand feet per
Parcel depending on house size and length of dr
6. Access and Nearest Public Road(s): iVeWay.
Road, a Access Off Cable Orrldge
frOM
privates drive, 1/� mile Centerville Read.
7. Method of SGW800 Disposal: Septic tank, leachfield.
S. Source of Water Supply. Individual wells.
9. Proximity of Power Lines: To original parcel.
10. Potential for further land divisions and development:
Division Will permit construction Of One dwelling.
1'hvs i cal Env i
at--,
1.
1. Terrain
a. General Topographic Character: Westerly facing slope of
Butte Creek CanYon
b., Slopes: Very little less than 159 majority is 40-509.
c» Elevatton: 400-760' A.S.L.
d. Limiting Factors.*
Sol oi s
Slops, availability of building sites.
a•° Typos and Characteristics:
claY, moderate permeahilty, well draining) Stover 20-40"v red brown, loam
suitability for grazing, med'ium
b• Limiting Factors:
Rask outc
erasionhazards. rops canyon walls,« high
.
3.. Natural Hazards'of the Land
a- Earthquake �anec t'otentlallY active fault of Tuscan
Monocl i,ne crosses area.
bw Erasion. Potentiail: High
c Landalide Potential,., Moderate.
d. Fire Naaard: 'Hleh,
e» Expansive Sot]: Potential:Lo W
4,, Hydrology
a. StArface Water: Butte Creek /-,
600 west.
b. Groundwater:
Unknown rosduree.
-8-
f �h
e Gharact�sr st i cs • Gsn er ra l l y
south and l.le��+ to
ce
Drainage
�^ V •i suet / Scen'i c
.3011F.
Butte Creek •alltnormal 28
voielwone B
rOX I M i
ty to
Btaepslapes,
d Annusl yainftars Creek
and
Limiting sof Butte
creek. HighlyscanlC
Quality
s
its canyon. Excellent
Acoustic Quality"
'� t�ual ity" Good• �
7 Air r
Env i ronMg gal on9 creek o urban
i'3i� icdl Oodlandp riparian
vegetation: Oak
g, t1 c;�l winter deer ran�5a
orname:italS• identified cri
9
Wildlife H fb shery In creek. �
eXcelient
nv i —r on --ary . 10 tho groat High.
Cul tu� _. r81 ResourcS
i ce�i and 1�1 i stor cal a -Ion'*
10•, Archaeolo9 General Plan design
11 Butte County es dential
Agr i cu 1 Lural -R FR-�5 ► l ,_family res i drench
12. existing Zoning= on-site Sing -
Land Us® bees.
13, Bxist�n9 Areas horses and carr�+ls�
1'1 Surrounding Rural r�esidentlals
Lane! Uses 2 d {des i dent i a l Open
�. FR-�S � FR- ri cu1 Lural •.
b, Zoning" designation$= Ag
Gen. Plan 1/2 - 7 common.
and Grazing. Cable Bridoe 2
Parcel •-
Sizes= Al o,
no
d, l Sparse•canyon,
eo Population and Area Ruralfoothill mi lcs.
Character of Site City of Chico
15• Urban Area' a•
.i �; • {yearest Infi uenc�" n� n!a
Spheres of Urban Area"
• Relevant P Stan,dar�ds
g* mi
les .
improvementction Service: irye5tariintt
Protastate) draft fromGre
creek-
1g. Fire county t capacity,
Nearest Engtne
Water Avai1abi
b.
co UntfiedN
�
Schools in Area
u.
_9
PLANNING COMMIS N SUMMARY SHEET FOR LAND VISIONS
APPLICANT Robert Silacca
Log#86-0�25�01.
ADDRESS 4676 Cable Bridge Dr.
Chico, CA 95926
OWNER Same
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 'IPM to divide 14 acres to create
` 7 acre's
LOCATION 2 Parcels on the east side of :Cable Bridge Dr. a rax
mile east of its intersection with Centerville Rd. , .But�l�o area.
., �
. :
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL 1VUMBER(S) 11 -80 -.Sp CreeJt Canyon
ZONING FR -5 ~..... ,
GENERAL PLAN Ag-Resi PROJ'EC','
CONSZSTENT>
GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE REPORT
DATE OFA�' PPLICANT SXG.NATURE ------
LAND CONSERVATION ACT CONTRACTS?
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED April 25
. ,. , 1986
AGENT/SURVEYOR/CIVIL ENGINEER:
Max Albe,r, t
ADDRESS: 146 Tonga West, Chaco, CA 95926
DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT PREPARED
j
HU C'i'E Cptl1`tTy'
G'N_ I"2-AI, P''LM CONIr'QRMANCE''_11SPOiZT DcrO v , t: `
Ii)Ft PARCEL 1�P iSlrBt)IVl,57ON IAP I.,
7wvrrty
lt,emn 1-4 to be caalpleted by APPII.cnnt; ,{rs, t�rovule,, �i+lifrr�.l�
l;, Applicant Nana a�e'r culIJ0x1141
Pro act Uesnr,iptl,oj
3 AsSessor'°s Parcel Number(s) C
Use
llac irux,lowinr; items are to be cOniplet ed by the p1.anninE Depfrt; t Ment:,
CurrentZoning d""ACI w j
�----—=--, ---,-..�.�..4...,».. Latid Cunsr_rva tion A�,reamant /140
General plan Dosigrxation
�A l:lcable t'en.cia.Ci;c�n.�Criteria:�_ �-•-,—._,�._.,�,.,:a;
_!':._._�e_ .A.," l Not Applicable
Agricultural-iteSidential .µ
NO
1. Agricultural Con:patif�lity
2, Water & Sewer Capacity
3. Adequate Eire Facilitits4. Road CUNICity & Maintenance
X
5, Access to C;omrietcitil Schools ,»
Orchard �x Field Crops
1. PredominAnt 5-10 Ac. Purzel Size~
2- Vicinity of Urban Boundaries
3. Agric, viability not impaired w
.. J %heron
Staff Determination.: Project does~�
does not
substantially conl;orm to the General 141 an.�"' �.
Corr nems%
.--•.�L—:...gin»...,,,,..—_;<..,.._.rs-"�»... ._.. �,,,,,.a.,.,,., �w
St„aff.. �J,%Jcttitx,2
Date
AS '1'1IL APPLICANT FOR it{L, i21;QL7L-ST{PD LAND D:CMIONa 1 AM AWAlt}s OF 111',r 4.11i7V,
{tt:1 ,,r{TP4A'1 CpM 1 c�A ll ,P3t; `1? l� Ct'ttNI;"t1R"IANCE WI'-r11 MEC i,;14NEMAL PLAN. 1�
SignUure of A siiCwlrlt >"
{�1 . ,
r.,
NOTICE