HomeMy WebLinkAbout011-280-077J�
�171
1�,
"P
S C
!4;
V, Mir
fi
AF
PAMe_
4V 4c,,s,
k11
lo
.............
4e
2-S
jin
-7
OP
YO S
—7-7-77—
fill
t�h':
...
�
. i
�, � 'e
t
�
�
�• ' j..
''
�.�
_
..
��
�
1
•� � � �
;.y.;� ..
'� .
wY.. `
` ' _
`'
+�
`
•a�
r
+" ;d
��.�s;
. : i
�7,
0'
�.,
J.
II
`
f�;•
.,,
,'�
,, •�_
�
4`'•
•
t '.. -
-„
_
r {A
r•'
�•
•l•
L
+
t
�.
d ••
,.
•� �
a
;,II
.,;v"
'
�
9 ~�
..
k
••
�
•
.. �.
.6.
L
� ' �� - '
� • ..
1
�
�.
1
�,
t 1 i !'
1
f h,���
M
�
I�• tek �
..' „rr,nan�i �rvx�t�t:��� �1CxE3;YGTVO
88-1.0-04-06
Jon Morehead
2200 Oak park Avenue, Chico, CA 95926
.... �---
--------------
S amo ..............
es
Tentative Subdivision Map to divide 100+- acry�,.�,M:,�
PROJECT UBSCRIP TxON _. �-�-. •w-�------
e ] 43+- 4 cres, 2
- 45 acres, 3 - 500�-- acr _
,
4 5.00
create 4 parc7.s , .�...�..w..,�..,�.�..�.�.. -,,, . �
iso_,�..._�.�. _ _,..........._....-.- .,.»,_:.-.....
bordered on the west by Honey Run Road ,a.nc� bordered
f.�dCR'JC ISI -.., property .,_..__-._-.-�---...� -
�,--.... _.._.-.� el 1400' westerly o Ruse1J Driver paradise
on the east by Skyway approximat�1'
PARCEL UMARCEBER Z S) _�.._...� ,......w»« . ... ._.,...
ASSB880Rr r, N _ .�.,.
.
pR- GRNERAI P�,A��- A ~�z�e-S�sr-��enOjan T
ZONING 5
(-,;V, ERAL PLAN 9-12-88
t�o�t�,aRt�:r�cE r�EPORT,�� DAT 0 Arima f(frN sMAT�7���
LAND CONSERVATION ACT CON TRAC
'X'S� No ,,..,.�s»,w•.. ,,k M.,�.:,,.....-.,,..,.....,.,..,..:,..., ».,,.
September 30.1
19$8 �..,... .�._.,..__ ,... ....
REC:1�1'VBU...�.-...._--r_._...._.�...�..
Roper Associates
AGk�I37w,�S(�RV'EYOA/c3IV'I�, B�1GgNEE12; _ �.,,�...._._. _ _
P.0 Box 885, Chico, CA 95927
REPORT P1MPARED
DATE PLANNING OlRECTQCt� S � �_��.
. MtNTNy CATEGORICAL ExEMPT ION -» DATE V Sir;(at9,�,„......�.;��.».�......,...,...
15?g7 :,1,M'U1ATT0tTN u1' iVE X�RC ,ARS�"�'xol - DATE ADOPTLID
J1NC) DATE
MITIGATED MFG* DECLARATION �- ijj�'i,'F� XX)PTV)
STATt-, C1,*i!,,"d'TNGU0US1-`,
still. yy rye. �T r h 4' } y'
nDVIISOUY n,; "IvCY. 111,,A INt, tl: TV', „It .,--.�.�. ..�� �..-....�
GE C`�i' ACT:�ON_
. N , , ,. �»,.....,.....�..--w.,.....,,«.,�.,:.w..,..�..,.....�....�w��........._.�:..w....r
,` 1.1�” . ,..•.w.... ».,a..aw..�..F.+=..�.:r:,. « n.r..-w....,a-n-w..�w.+—..r.�...w•a., s.a..e�..� w.w .r.w�.. . . Wim. ,+er..
(' 1fli i"►d'1'S FOR P�AN�JINC ��;R �'���'C�Rr S r2l"P�12'r'
BUTT8coUNTy
2EPli:12AT, PLAN CO3qj,1Op
,j,jAj,
11 C 1r,RPORx
FORPARC)L, MAP OR SU13DxVISTON 1fAP futlatrp
* �
Items 1-4 to be Comisleted by a annl�tD C'c�, applicant: OCT 2'r 1987
7.. Applicant Na! tnd address JON' /\""o2 Project; Description
F-
3, Assessor's Parcel Number(s)-
4. 22-
Proposed Use %� - � (: � a1
The fnllwing items are to be completed by ,the Planning Department"
Curretit zoning
.and Conservation A$;ooment
General Plan Designation t %
•: Applicitble Conditional Criteri�; � -3:5-
Not APPlicable
Agricultural -,Residential
YRS No
1. Agricultural Compatibility
2. Water & Sewer Capacity 11LLi
3. Adequate Fire Facilities
4. Road Capacity & Maintenance
5. Access to Commercial & Schools 4 r �.
Orchard & Field Crops
1. Predominant 5-10 At. Parcel, Size
2• Vicinity of Urban Boundaries
3. Ageic, viability not impaired
Staff Determination., PtOJect does
substantially iconform stoothe General Plan and zo
Comments: ning,
� ,W �'' ' "y%� ;/;,1= /__✓�i���--��'...'7 / j. � "- ��' %est" �.� �� J/%___-_
i
Staffnatur'g `..r.--�.,�,• - 3
S 1 e
Date / 6/A
�.
AS '=, APPLICANT F '
a� M. �QUGS'iT;'D
LAND4NCE DIVISION
N, [ M' AWOL OF THE ABO�g STAPP
DE'I'F,�CNATION itECAitbTNG '.L'2�IE CONl:0�1,4,�Cg t-r:�Tll TIIE C NERAL PAND ND ZoNI:NG
Dated ,
Signature of Applicant
IZF,7VXAI 7Z,
LD 6
revised -8Q lgbp(
-nat s n ME s rip A.s 77 A
By=rr: COtnvxy
GENERAL. PLAN CONFOi'�N1ANCE RTrPOR-r pu ACc•r4lnningCdtnu7j�
FOR. PARCEL MAP 0.R SUnDT-VTST-ON MAP SEP 6 1988
Items 1-4 to be completed by applicant: Orajlys, Califpm
I. APPLICANT NAME AND ADDRESS: —;,)OKl Ik:09 PE&92
?-00 NYLK._
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION,: LQgA
4
3, ASSESSORI S PARCEL NUMBER(S): Y Tr 5 7 »�' i,'3 D _ ,7
4. PROPOSED USI;:
The following itei;is are to be completed by the Planning Department:
CURRENT 7.ONING: i��' �✓ LAND CONSERVATION AMEDIENT: A�O
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: _ r4�' e26:!5,1 q
.
Conditianal Criteria: ,
AGRICULTURAL -RESIDENTIAL YES NO It is recommendi#d i:hat youperform the
1 ";ricultural. Compatibility 1/ following checkod ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORDS CHECK .1tomg-
2. Water and Sewer Capacity 1/ ,
3. Adequate Fire Facilities I/ BOTANICAL SURVEY
4, Road Capacity and Maintenance ti GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
5. Access to Commercial and Schools _ YES N0
ORCHARD AND FIELD CROPS WITHIN DEPARTMENT OF FISH
1. ,Predominant 5-10 ac. Parcel Size , AND GAME DEVELOPMENT ZONE:
2. Vicinity ov Urban Boundaries WITHIN FLOOD PLAINT V
3. Ag. Viability not Impaired
WITHIN AREA, SPECIFIC OR
Staff Determination: Substantially conform : •LAND USE PLAN; V
GENERAL PLAN: 1. Land Use
— If Yes,: _
2. Conservation Name of Plan
3. Opph Spade - ✓ WITHIN URBAN RESERE:
4. Safety' V
V
✓.
5. Noise t/ If Yes,
6. Housing ,/ �F
Name of Reserve
7. Circulation AIRPORT LAND USE PLAN:
ZONING:
COMMENTS: ___
Staff` Signature 1 Date
syr
ASTM APPLICANT FOR =REQUESTED LAND DIVISION, I A14 AWARE OF THE ABOVE STAFF DETERMINATION REGARDING
THE CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING.
Dated 0 Signature of Applicant
�` / r
Tl1is report will expire and be discarded'. six b, , months from
from the date of the staff sig nature.
LD 1000A (to
vised` 6-87) {�Lf?A�s/-?Uru/4(t/vScU�t�7S
KYSTED* .
4"
R
aq.� .
'
To _ Office of Plannin catch �'+ OM : Butte County
1400.Tenth Street,bom 121??, Planning Department
Sacramento, CA 958;4• JUL 7 County Center Drive:
O ov;ill;e, CA 95965
Or
x County Clerk CANDACE J• l�Rll�l8,�, �....C�.
Deputy
County of Butte
y
S,UB-'EC'T : Filing of. Notice of Determination in compliance wl.th Section 21108'
or 21152 of the Public Resources Code.
Project Title AP 11 11-28-'77, Name
Tentative Subdivision Map
11-30-33 Jon Morehead
State Clearinghouse Number Contact Person Telephone Number
(if submitted to Clearinghouse)
Public Works John Mendonsa 538-7266
Project Location Bordered on west by Honey Run Road and east by Skyway,
approximately 1400 feet westerly of Russell Drive, Paradise area.
Project Description Tentative Subdivision Map dividing 100± acres into
four parcels: 43 acres, 45 acres, 5 acres, and 5 acres.
This is to advise that the Butte County Advisory Agency
(Lead Agency or Responsible Agency)
has approved the above-described project on July 10, 1989 _ and has made
(Date)
the following determinations regarding, the above-described project..
1. The project will, X_will not, have a significant effect on the
environment.
2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project
pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.
X A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the
provisions of CEQA.
3. Mitigation measures were, X were not, made a condition of the
approval of the project.
4. A statement of overriding considerations was,. X was not, -adopted
for this project.
This is to certify that the final BIR with comments and responses and record: of
project approval is available to the general public at
Butte County'Plann ng Department
i County Center Drive
broville, CA 95965
Date Received for riling and
Posting at OPR rCl� t slh p
Signature
Paula Leasure, Senior Planner`
p,/y, Title
CERTIFIED MAIL
Jon Morehead
2200 Oak Park Road
Chico, CA 95926
Dear Mr. Morehead:
-�„u cv R►annrn� �3t7�ttw� _
JUL I
C7rov31fo, C�(farr)
NDutte Gouftfq
Pr LAND OF NATURAL V,!EALTH AND BEAUTY
DEPARTMENT OF PU13L.IC WORKS
WILLIAM (6111) CMEFF», 01roctor
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE . OROVILL1”, CALIFORNIA 95965
Telephone: (916) $30.7601
RONALD D. McELROY
Dapult Orteclor
July 10, 1989
RE:: AP 11-28-77 & 11-30-33
TSM
At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held on
July 10, 1989, the Agency adopted a negative declaration of
environmental impact and approved the tentative parcel map on the
above -referenced property subject to the conditions listed on the
attached sheet
If no appeals are timely filed --within ten (10) days of the date of
the Advisory Agency's approval --with the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors, this action will, be final,
When the conditions of approval are complied with, it will be in order
for you to file your "final map'" with the Butte County Department
of Public Works for recordation within, twenty --four (24) months of
the date o approval by the Advisory Agency.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this
office.
Very truly yours;
JON MOREHEAD, TSM, AP 11-28-77 and 11-30-33, 4 parcels bordered on the
west of Honey Run Road and on the east by Skyway, approx. 1400 ft.
westerly of Russell Drive, Paradise area. Engineer Roper Assocj,ntes
Public Works conditions:
1. Indicate a 50 ft. building setback line from the centQ r1, rrxo
of Honey Run Road.
2. Deed 30 ft.. from the centerline of Honey Run Road to thO County
of Butte.
3. Provide monumentation as required by the Department talc 11t11.71,ic
Works in accordance with accepted standards,
4. Provide permanent solution for drainage.
5. All easements of record to be shown on the final map.
6. Meet requirements of Butte County Fire Department or other
responsible agency.
7. Obtain encroachment permit and construct driveways to each lot
at locations approved by the Dept. of Public Works.
8. Meet the re
quirements of the utility companies (.e., PG&E,
Pacific Telephone, water, sewer);_
9. Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required,
Health Dept. conditions:
10. Show a 50 ft. leachfield setback from the 0-!ainage way on
11. Show a 100 ft. leachfield setback from the spring on parcels 2
and 3.
12: Provide the required usable sewage disposal area on each parcel.
Combine with an adjacent parcel, any parcel not proven to contain
the usable sewage disposal area required by the Subdivision
Ordinance.
13. Place a note on the map that states "Home sites shall be located
to access sewage dis a. 31 areas b v'
p y gravity tiow.
Bud
_ 14AP a
.0 roville, Calitocouldt
nr
. _-.
LAND OF NATURAL V!CAI TIi Aida BEA UT}
A,EPARTMENTOF PUBLIC WORKS
WILLIAM (BIII) CHEFF, LDitac or
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE i OROVILLU, CALIFORNIA 95965
TeIePhonez (916) 558.7601
RONALD D. McELROY
Doputy Dllrl Clor
March 29,, 1989
. Jon Morehead
2200 Oak Park Ave. RE: AP 11-28-77, 11-30-33
Chico, CA 95926 TSM
Dear Mr, Morehead;
At the regular meeting of the Butte County Subdivision Committee held
on March 29, 1.989, the committee reviewed the above-referenced
tentative subdivision. As a result- of this meeting, Public Worcs
will recommend the enclosed list of conditions.
This project has been scheduled for the. Advisory Agency meeting of
April 10, 1989. The meeting will commence at 9:00 a.m. in the Board
of Supervisors Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA.
If you have any questions regarding this matter
office, r please contact. this
Jan Morehead, TSM, AP 11-•28-77 and 11-30-33, 4 parcels bordered on west
bN Honey Run Rd. and east by Skyway, approx. 1400 ft. westerly of Russell
Drive. Paradise area. Engineer: Roper Associates'
Public Works conditions,
1 Indicate a 50 ft. building setback line from the centerline of
Honey Run Road'
2 Deed 30 from the centerline of Honey Run Road to the County of
Butte.
3 Provide monumentation as required by the Department of Public
Works in accordance with accepted standards.
4 Provide permanent solution for drainage.
5 All easements of record to be shown on the final map.
G Meet requirements of Butte County Fire Department or other:
responsible agency.
7 Obtain encroachment permitand construct driveways to each lot at
locations approved by the Department of Public Works,
8 Meet the requirements of the utility companies (i.e-,, PG&E,
Pacific Telephone, water, sewer);.
9 Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required.
AML
It
ou
'^ iA1�Ct �F f. ATI,, �
DEPARTMENT OF PUI31LIC WORKS
WILLIAM (8111) CHEFF, Director
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE . OROVILIyG, CALIFORNIA 95965
TalaPhonea (916) 55(1.7601
RONALD D. M.ELROY
Deputy Director
March 23, 1989
Jon Morehead RE AP 11-28-77,
2200 Oak Park Ave. TSM 11-30-33
Chico, CA 95926
Dear Mr. Morehead,
Please be advised that the above-identi£ed tentative subdivision will
be reviewed by the Butte County Subdivision Committee on March 29,
1989.
Public Works will recommend the conditions of approval as listed on
the attached sheet.
The meeting will commence at 9:00 a.m. in the Conference Room, located
at#3County Center Drive, Oroville, California.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, Please contact this
office,
Very,truly yours,
Gilliam Cheff
Director Of Public Works
10 ohn Mendons
Assistant Director
JMM8
attachment
cc: Planning Department
Environmental Health Department AFI®f n.T4an1110C401"'
Roper Associates
N1I�l 2 4189
Jon-*rehead, TSM, AP 11-28-77 and 1-
IV Honey Run Rd. and east b 30-33, 4 parcels bordered
Drive. Paradise area, En Engineer: Roper
aPprox, 1400 ft. westerlyo►t Rujv0ssell
Roper Associates of Russell
Public Works conditions:
1 Indicate a 50 ft. building. setback line from the c
Honey Run Road. en t►`",; ,
� t� n c cif
2 Deed 30 from the centerline of Honey. Run Road t
Butte. o the Count
y of
3 Provide monumentation as required by the Department of a
Works in accordance with accepted standards, j' Lilal%t
4 Provide permanent solution for drainage.
5 All easements of record to be shown on the final, mai
erequirements
responsible
of Butte County Fire,y
responsible agency,• Department or, othc.r
7 Obtain encroachment permitand construct driveways
locations approved by the Department of Public Works eech lot at
8 Meet the requirements of the utility companies (i.e,'
Pacific Telephone, water, sewer) PG>a,
9 Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as
required.
ANIL
Inter -De arta (n ' , * Map
p a�� �� ��9e��o�anduni
To; Butte County Advisory Agency
FROW Planning Director
SUBJECT: Report on Tentative Subdivision Map for Jon MorehrOad,
AP#11-38-77 etc.
DAYes November 21,► 1988
This is a proposal to divide 100 plan ,acres to create four parcels,
Parcel l- 43+ acres,
Parcel 2-- 45 acres,
Parcel 3-- 5.00 + acres,
Parcel 4- 5,.00 + acres
The present zoning is FR -5. The Lana Use Plait Map oL Butte County
General. Plan designates this area ac Agricultural -Residential, and
grazing and open land. There are no specific or community plans
for the area.
The proposal does not conflict with county zoning nor amy adopted
or proposed element of the Butte County Gen(.,ral Plan nor any County,
specific or community plan.
Recommend approval of the proposed subdivision map subject to the
following mitigation measure:
1. Place a 200 -foot development free/septic free Lone on the
map from the centerline of the intermit -tent streams, and
surrounding the existing springs locat.Md on the project
site.
BM:fb
cc: Roper Associates
APPENDIX F
COUNXY ov BUXT]E
'HNV:EnoNMENTAL. CI EC LYS'?` k'C}l a•i
(To be completed by Lead Agency)
LOG N0: 88-10-04-06
AP NO. 11-28-77, 11-30-33
1. ]3ACKC;i2C7�L7ND
I. N.ymo of proponent JON MOREHEAD
7., Address of proponent and representative (if applicable):
I. Project description; Te111at1V2 SLl)Jd1 V1.S1pT1 Ma
II. MtANI�A'COi2Y' FT1VL71:NG:' Off' STG'NTFTCANC
YES MAXBE NO
I. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self' -sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate
a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare
or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of major periods ,
of California history or prehistory? v
2. Does the project have the potential to achieve .short-term benefits to the
detriment of long-term environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the
onvironm(-nt is one which occurs in a relatively brief period of time while
tang -term impacts will endure into the future.)
3. Does the ;project have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively ._._
considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where
the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the
total of those impar a an the environment is significant.)
4. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? V/
CII, DE7r14::RM:r'j 'A9rT0V1 (To be completed by th.:tread Agency). On the basis of
this initial evaluation.
I/WE find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
l
1/WE find that Although theroposed project COULD have a significant effect
on the environment, there wJl not be a significant effect in this case 'Iyecause
the MITIGATION MEASURES described on the attached sheet have been added to the
project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared,.
_ I/WE find the proposed project._: MAY have a significant effect on the environment,
and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required
COUNTY OV WXTI , PLANNING UPAR'174ENT
DATE:BY
Brent Lo Moore, A8so :rate Planner
Reviewed by,
t
x�• � vry zaNMIE XAT �r P
' A.CT S,
(Explanat bns of all "YES' and "MAYBE" answers
_
are required on attached sheet(s),
1, EARTH, Will the
proposal result in significant:
a. Unstable earth conditions, or changes in geologic substructures?
YES MAYBE NO
b• Disruption, displacement com action or overceverin of
p $ the soil?
c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features?
-
d Destruction, covering or modification of any unique
q
�—
geologic or physical
e. Increase in Wind or water erosion of sails, either on or off site?
fn Changes p
g c ,;n deposition or erosion of beach sands or changes in siltation,
be ,
deposition or erosion which may
y mod the c
or the bed Of the ocean or an ba hannel of a river or stream
Y Y inlet or lake?
g. Loss of prime agriculturally Y productive soils outside designated
urban
h. Exposure of people or propert to g
landslides) mudslides, groundfai.lureli
earthquaktas,
" -=--• ---
orsiroilarahazards7s
2, AIR,. Will the proposal result in substantial:
i
"' "'^ ✓
a. Air Omissions or deterioration of ambient air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or fumes?
-"
c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature? or any change in
climate, locally or regionally?
3JATER, Will the proposal result in Substantial.-
ubstantia?:Changes
Changesits currents, or the course or direction of Water movements in
either marine or fresh waters?
y
b. Changes in absorption rates) drainage patterns, or the rage and
Of surface runoff? amount
e. Need for off-site surface drainage improvements including vegetation
removal, channelization or culvert
installation?
d= Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?L
e. Change in the amount of surface Water in
any Water � body
f- Discharge into surface waters or in
an
quality, 'including but not limited to t<emperaturep�dissolvedcd water
turbidity?
oxygen or
!;. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
h, Change in the ground waters?
quantity or quality of ground waters, either th:hiagh
direct additions or withdrawals
~-
by cuts or excavations? , Or through interception of an aquifer
is Reduction in the am
supplies? ount Of Water otherwise available for
public water
,j, Exposure of people or property to Water -related hazards such
as floodin ,?
G, PLANT Will e proposal result in substantial,
8• Changs in the diversity of species, or number of any spec -es of Plants
(including tree„ shrubs, grass) crops, P n s.
and a
b. Reduction of he numbers aquatic plants)
t hers
plants of any unique, rate Or endangered species of
c. introduction of new species .of plants into an aired, or in a barrier to
the normal replenishment of existing
✓
species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crap?' -
__
43-
Ah
5.
AIIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial:
BE
a, Change ;in the diversity of spec4.es, or numbers of any species of animals
(birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, organisms
or insects)?
�--=-r ----
v. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare .or endangered species of
animals?
M----
c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or in a barrier to
1G
the migration or movement of animals?
d. Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat?
6
NOISE, Will the proposal result in substantial.:
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
b Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
-.
1.
1,LCHT AND GLARE; Will the proposal product significant light and glarp7
B,
LAND USE. Will the proposaa, result in a substantial alteration of the
present or planned land use; of an area?
9.
NATURAL RESOURCES: Will the proposal result in substantial;
V
a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources?
b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural resources?'
t1
10.
Rjg OF UPSET, Will the proposal involve:
a. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but,
not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event
of an accident or upset conditions?
b. Possible interference With an emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
_.
11..
POPULATION. Will the proposal; alter location, distribution, density or
growth rate of the human population?
12.
HOUSING, Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand
for additional housing?
13.
TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULAT , Will the proposal result in:
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement?
b Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking?
C. Substantial impact on existing transportation systems?
d. Significant alterations to present patterns of circulation or
movement of people and/or goods?-�---
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
✓/
f, Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
l4.
PUBLIC SERVICE'S, Will the proposal have an effect upon) or result in, a need
for now or altered government services:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
d. Schools?
d,. Parks or other recreational facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
-
r g
i
f. Other overnmenta�, �ervices2
,
43-
AL AL
QTS, 1sNERf.,Y, Will the p cq oral result in
YES MBE NU ,
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
s-----
b. Substantial: increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or
require the development of new sources of energy?
�---- — ---
ib: UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need for now systems, or
substantial alterations to the following:
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Commupications systemb7
c. Water avatlability7
do Sewer or septic systems?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid Waste and disposal?
17. 1 HEALTH, Will the proposal result In.
Creation of any howalth hazard or potential hazard (excluding mental
a.
health)?
b. Expoat%re of people tv potential h"Alth hazards?
nscenic
18. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any
the proposal res he
vista or view open to the public, or will
creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view?
lq, RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an Impact upon the quality or
v✓
quantity of existing recreational opportunities?
--
20, Culon AL RESOURCES
a, Will the proposal result in the alteration or destruction of a
t/
prehistoric or historic archaeological site?
b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical, or aesthetic effects
or'object?
V
to a prehistoric or historic building, structure
-
Co the to a physical change
r,
culturalause
wDoes
hich would affect niqueeepthnictial
values
do will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses Within
the potential impact area?
�:CSG[JS�St7N Olr' ENV XRQNME19-XAT, V;'VAI':UA'TZON
See attached.
Alk
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP#k11-28-77, 11-30�33
lb,c,f: The development of this property will require :large amounts of
earthwork due to the steep slopes and rugged
the Butte Creek Canyon area. The projecsite eranges rrain ainoelevatia�-�itfrom
approximately s00 feet to 1300 feet above Sea Level. Development of
the project site will result in soil disruption, displacement,
compaction and overcovering,, and local changes in topography, These
impacts could potentially lead to significant increases in soil erosion
and subsequent siltation of Butte Creek via two intermiL,L-ont stream;
which traverse the project site. Cuts in steep slopes may increase
soil erosion. It is anticipated that the newly-adoptedr,
ordinance will mitigate any significant impacts caused ngequired
grading and earthwork. b the
iht
me
zone.SoAllsofsmic ButtecCounty isswQthinradwithin Mocleratethe general foothill
Zone VIII. Construction of buildings to the Uniform Building
standards for seismically active areas, however, should provide
adequate protection to residents in cage of seismic activity.
3b: The project will cause some 'minor changes in absorption rates and
resulting amount of surface runoff to impervious surface related to
residential development. The proposed density of the project will hey
to minimize the amount of impervious surfaces and thus reduce surface p
runoff.
ifs The proposed project site sits on a steep slope against the south
wall of Butte Creek Canyon which drains into Butte Creek, As such,
there exists the potential for degradation of surface water- quality due
to erosion and sedimentation associated with construction activities
and the exposure of bare and/or disturbedround.
paved ground surfaces and rooftops ma
fy cargurom the
typical urban pollutants into Butte Cy organicmateria_ls and
reek. Excessive fertilization of
landscaped areas and irrigation runoff from residential yards and
pastures could generate nutrient -rich flows downstream, thus resu'ltin
in eutrophication of the Butte Creek drainage system. Setback g
requirements of the Butte County Environmental Health Department and
the Butte County Grading Ordinance are anticipated to mitigate an
significant ae'environmental
placed impacts. A no -development zone should be
on the map 200 feet from the centerline of each drainage Swale
located on the project site.
4a,b: The diversity of species will be expanded as residential urban
landscape plantings occur and non -:native species are added to the site.
No substantial reduction in the number of existing species is
the
anticipated due to the proposed parcel. sizes and the overall density of
, development. However, t�, ?3utte Creek Canyon area is a hi hl
sensitive botanical area with�41 the county.,_ Within 'the vicinity of the
project site, locations of rare and endangered plant species are known
to exist. Disturbance caused by earthwork and preparation of building
pads, and the Location of proposed buildings may have an adverse imp act
upon rare or endangered plant species As a result, a botanical survey
should be conducted by a qualified botanist to determine the extent of
impacts and mitigation measures, if needed
5a: The Department of. Fish & Game has indicated that the Butte Creek
Canyon ;area lies within the critical winter. range of the East Tehama
Deer Herd.. Subdivision of land into small parcels has an adverse
impact on migratory deer. As lands within critical winter range are
divided into parcels smaller than 40 acres, deer use becomes impaired,
migratory movement is affected, and the available forage and space drop
below the level needed to sustain herd numbers. Subdivisions have
adversely affected more than 40% of the winter range in. Butte County,
according to the Department of Fish & Game, In an: effort to solve this
subdivision/deer conflict in :Butte County, the Department of Fish &
Game has recommended a series of actions for the Board of Supervisors
to implement. To date, the Board has not taken action on any of the
recommendations offered by the Department of Fish & Game. In order to
mitigate potential adverse effects on the deer herds, subdivisions
within the Butte Creek Canyon area have been required to place the
following note on the final map: "Owner agrees, prior to issuance of
building permits, to pay deer herd mitigation fees as may be required
by county ordinance or resolution. Owner acknowledges that no such
ordinance or resolution is in effect as of the date of this tentative
map approval."
8: The project is designated by the Butte County General Plan as both
Agricultural -Residential and open & Grazing Land. The property which
fronts Honey Run Road is zoned FR --5 and is designated Agricultural -
Residential Farther from the road, up the canyon walls, the property
is designated Open & Grazing Lands with 40 --acre minimum parcel sizes.
Residential development has taken place in the general area. Existing
development is characterized by rural estate densities.
14a: New residential development in the Butte Creek Canyon area
increases the risk of potential for fire. Fire hazards for the canyon
are already considered high, and increased development would require
increased services for fire protection.. It appears that a fire
occurred on the upper slopes of the project site and just west of the
project site, which exemplifies the extreme fire hazard nature of the
Project site. During a time of fiscal constraints it is very
difficult to finance the necessaryfire '
protection level to mitigate
the fire hazards caused by urbanization of the Butte Creek Canyon,
14b The Butte County Sheriff's Department is responsible for law
enforcement and protection inthe project areai increased urban.
development in rural areas and restricted budgets have reduced the
department's capacity for preventivepatrolling and rapid response to
emergency calls
14c The Chico Unified School. District has been impacted by ,rapid
urban growth in the Chicovicinity. School facilities are close to
capacity and, as a result, a school, impact fee has been institute to
finance new facilities. it is anticipated that ,such impact fees will
mitigate any significant impacts to the school systems.
Ask
16d,• BeCause of
associated with the relative7.
disposal s, Y steep slopes ,end
failure, ms may be , septic tank Poor
°o soil condition.
approval of bean for sewaifficult to and leach- 1
that t ge disposal engineer and field sewage
Environmental Posal should be may be Prone to
he Environmental Health De developed
leachfield systems Health De Partment Ped to the
foot septic free will provide thetment Standardslt is anticipated
adjacenE zone should neCessar forse
to all drains be Placed Y mitigation;Ptic and
drainage swales whish and delineated o Also, a 100-
20a: The pro ect traverse the n the map
both histo site is con pro3ect site,
necessary toc and prehistoric dered
Anthropol° Perform a records cuiturato be a very Senj'it
gY at Calxfor heck 1 resources. iv, area for
determine if Significant
State through the DeAs Such,
uch it is
records check gnificant sites University, Chico Par��ment of
the heck
will also deter may be located in order to
Y will be no whether °n the Prnpert
an archaeolo Y- The
gical survey of
Recommended Miti
ati,on Measures;
1.- Place a 200. -
the centerline 200-foot
development
t velo
existinghe irate mitre t septic_
springs locate tent strea free zone on the
2• Obtain d °n the project ms' and Surrounding t from
a records search b site. 9 the
California State Y the De
archaeological survey
partment of
measures urvey is e Chico, to deter Anthropology
are needed for thecessarY, and mine if an at
3. Obtain a bat proposed Pro�`ecOthert. mitigation
Species of botanical survey
are
speciesplants are e to determine
needed. Present and, if so, what mitigation
endangered
ndan
measure;
7..
Applicant: Jon Morehead
AP 011-28-771i
Log #$8-10-04-06
DATA SHEET
A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
1' Type of Project: Tentative Subdivision Ma
2• Brief Description: To divide a
four parcels: Parcel l approximately 100 acres to create.
acres, Parcel 3 - 5 acres nand P approximately y 43 acres parcel 2 _ 45
3• Location The propertyand Parcel 4 5 acres,
Road and on the east bis bordered on the west bHone
westerly of Russell Dr�YVThe Skyway, approximately'X400` Honey
4. Proposed Density of Develo mentY1e Paradise area,
acres. P ` One dwelling unit per 5
5. Amount of Impervious Surfacn
6. Access and Nearest Public Roads Minimal,
70 Method of Sewage Disposal: Honey Run Road
8• Source of Water supply:P Individual septic and leachfields.
9. Proximity of Poweries;Individual wells
10. Potential for Further Land D:ivisonsacent tand
allows 5 -acre property.
for subdividing ism limitedlot sduesto furtherDevelopment: Zoning
However, further Potential
constrains associated with the canyonlandsraphic relief
B• ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
physical Environment
1. Terrain
a• General Topographic character:
southern wall of Butte
Sloping terran�aga3.hst the.
b. Slopes: 5-�30+�% Creek Canyon.
c• Elevation:
Level. Ranges from 5`,25 feet to 1300 feet above Sea,
d Limiting Factors:
2. Soilswales. Sheep slopes over 30%, and drainage
a. Types and Characteristics:
dark reddish brown Guenoc/Stover Soil Series
outcro lars,, of basic ignaceous rock, rock
b. Limitinpings-.and, boulders.
Limiting Factors,Soil depths, stoniness, underl in
volcanic mudf ow, , and rock otatc.ro y g
3• Natural Hazards of the Land pings
a. Earthquake zone:
b. Erosion PotentialModerate Earthquake Intensity y Zone VIII.
c• Landslide potential. Moderate.
d• Fire Hazard: High,
e• Expansive Soil Potentia.; Low,
w8-
4.
5.
6
7.
Hydrology
a. Surface Water.,
springs
small Intermittent
b• Grauncwater;Prings exist nt streams
c' Drainage Generally avaihe site. and two
Creek g Characteristics: able,
d Annual drainage System, Propert
Rainfall y drains into the Butte
e• Limiting Factors normal): 28-3p
Visual/Scenic Quaor Drainage •
Acoustic Y: ExcellentWales on project
Skyway. Quality; Fair -pro
traffic associated With Air Quality; Good. noise
h The
Bim. logical Enviro
nment
8vegetation.;
HabiChaparr
g• Wildlife �al� sparse tat: canyonland
PP r Sonoran Life wood,...,
Cultural EnvironmentZone,
10. Archaeological and Historical
11. Butte Count Resources in t
ButtResidential n y General Plan Designation.he Area; High
12. ;Existin and Grazing & Open
Agriculture
13. Existing zoning: PR -5. pen Land. 1-
14.g Land Use on site,
sting
vacant
a. Land .Surrounding Area; open s
b• Zoning: Open space/estate pace;
9 � F�- ;
Highway), 5 0 residential
C General Plan UPclassifled, and Sland uses,
Grazing & G Designations; (Scenic
d. Parcel '.Pen Land. Agricultural -Residential
Sizes. Ranges from S to and
e'` Population.
15• Character of Rural reside 400 acres.
16;. Nearest Ste and Area; ntial.
17 Urban Area: Open s yonla
Relevant spheres City of c Pace - can
18. Improvement °f Influen hico/Town of nds,
19. Fire Standards ce: n/a, Paradise.
Pr°tection service -ban Area:
Nearest No.
Count
a. approximate Y (State). Fir
bo Water ly 9 miles e Station:
20. Availability• to the west of theStation #44 locate
schools i j,
In Area; Chico Tanker truck only,. project site, d
BLM/sJ s fied school .Distr
Uni
ict•
NOTICE
c } O fto Co. Mannings Come
NOV 4 1988
Orov1118, California
SURVEY FOR THREATENED, RARE, OR ENDANOERED SPECIES Or VASCULAR
PLANTS, CONDUCTED OCTOBER 2$, 1988, ON APPROXIMATELY 98 ACRES OF
PROPERTY OWNED BY JON MOREHEAD AND LOCATED SOUTH OF HONEY RUN
ROAD 'ABOUT TWO MILES SOUTHEAST OF THE COVERED BRIDGE AND NINE
PILES SOUTHEAST OF CHICO, BUTTE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
A4 Habitat.
The habitat consists almost entirely of Foothi.l.1 Woodland,
with elements of Riparian vegetation present in runoffs and
spring seeps. The property, which is fenced along its perimeter,
is accessed via Honey Run Road, which intersects with the S?yway
some seven miles northwest of the project site. There are no
roads or other improvements presently on the proporty, norare
there access gates. The area appears to have berm essentially
undisturbed in recent years, with no evidence of domestic graz-
ing, fires, or construction, although horses receiilly have been
ridden through the lower part. Two springs are evident toward
the west end.of'the site, which generally slopes from south to
north and ranges in elevation from about 525 feet at the lowest.
point near the road to 1,300 feet at the south end on top of a
b1uf s .
Foothill. Woodland
As is typical of Foothill Woodland habitats in northern
California, the project site contains a predominance of blue oaks
and digger pines. Other woody species present include two
species of mantanita, interior live oak, scrub oak, poison oafs,
deerbrush, buckbrush, California bay, toyon, coffeeberry, honey
suckle, snowberry, buckthorn, 'mountain mahogany, yerba Santa;
squawbush, and an introduced European olive. Woody species more
often associated with riparian habitats and present in parts of
the property receiving more water includeo cottonwood, wild roso,
mock orange, willow, wild grape, and Modesto ash.
Herbaceous species present include rose clover, smallhead
clover, star thistle, many -flowered brodiaea, blue dicks, twining
brodiaea, harvest brodiaea, California brodiaea, grass nuts,
smartweed, English plantain, curly dock, smooth lettuce, prickly
lettuce, sow thistle, common thistle, wild geranium, blackberry,
checker, calycadenia, Pursh's lotus, common hedge parsley,,
tarweed, smooth, cat's ear, California knotweed', rattlesnake weed,
grass pink, goldback fern, California soaproot, skullcap, coyote
minti Nuttall's bedstraw, Chinese lanterns, sani.cle, wild onion;
wild iris, pipevine;, agoseris, lupine, vetch, mistletoe, moth
mullein, horseweed,`doveweed, musk flower`, Klamath weed, spurge,
mariposa l.ily,,,clarkia, woolly sunflower, yarrow, chicory, blur--
curls,
luec.arls, loozestrife, canchalagua tinker's penny, vil,lowherb,
self heal, watercress, common monkey flower, maidenhair fern.,
cattail, dogtail grass, bunch grass, brome, baby rattlesnake
grass, paspalum grass, ripgut, bermuda grass, hairgrass, fescue,
Mediterranean barley, umbrella sedge, sedges, rushes, and others.
ly , .
4
Morehead Subdiv. Plant Survey 2
p. Threatened, g—are, or Endangered Species
Several . vascular plants included in federal, atate, or
California Ngtive Plant Society lists of threatenod, rare, or
endangered s,aqieo have been reported from within a few miles Of
the project site.. Those most likely to occur at L,11ig particular
project site include the Butte fritillarY (FritillUia
eastwoodiae) , the Butte morning glory (CalYstegiO OUriPliclfOlia
var. buttensis) , and the Butte checker (Sidalcea robusta) ,
,,although others such as Bidwell's . knotweed (Polygonum bidwc-lliae)
and the shield-bracted monkey flower (Mimulus qlnu(,ascens) have
also been known to occur in such sites.
A systematic field survey was undertaken on October 28,
1988, to determine if the above-mentioned taxa; or any other
similarly listed taxa, were present at the projodt site. The
survey was conducted on foot along transects that were approxi -
'i -:' mately twenty feet apart toward thia west end of the property,
with two east -west transects added from roughly100 yards east Of
Honey Run Road to the foot of the bluff at the east end of the
siteon the date of the survey the area was coming to the end
of the herbaceous
of an unusually long dry season, and much had completed its normal
Ril vegetation (outside of the spring areas)
seasonal growth several weeks, to months previously. Nevertheless
the remains of growth of :;species mentioned above are still detec-
table in the field under such conditions.
Despite the remains of spring growth of Butte fritillary
being in evidence on nearby property, none was found at this par-
ticular site during the systematic search. Kor�was there any
evidence of other threat med taxa discovered, and it is presumed
they are not present at this time. it is understood that the
steep upper reaches of this property will not be developed in the
neat fututt:o Should such development be anticipated at a. later
I date,,a resurvey of the slope below the bluff should be conducted
during a spring growing season, as there is a slight chance of a
small population of Butte checker being present there. Apart
from this consideration mitigations for threatened plant spec es
do rot appear to be required at this time.
0
Kingsley R. Stern, Ph.D.
Senior Botanist
Department of Biological Sciences
California State University
Chico, California 95929-05-15
(91S) 895-538'1 or 343-0056
.Morehead Subdiv. Plant Survey 3
CHHCHLXST OF PLANTS,
THAT WERE IDENTIFIABLE
ON THE DATE
OF THE SURVEY
COMMON NAM,
SCIENTIFIC NAME
Agoseris
Agoseris heteropyll a
Annual fescue
Vulpia sp.
Baby rattlesnake grass
Briza minor
Bermuda grass
Cynodon dacty1ml
Blackberry
Rubus u.rsinus aM
Blue curls
Trichostema lancoolatum
"Bliie dicks
Dichelostemma pulchellum
Bluegrass
Blue oak
Poa sp,
Que- .pus douglasii
• Brome
Bromus sp.
Buckbrush
Ceanothus,cuneatus
Buckthorn
Rhamnus croceus
Hunch grass
MU121onbeegia sp.
California bay
Umbellu.laria calafornica
California, btodiaea
Brod..aea californica
Californias knotweed
Polygonum call. ,rnictim
California soaproot
Chlorogalum pomer•idianum
Calycadenia
Calycadenia sp.
Canary grass
Phalaris sp.
Centaurium floribundum
Canchalagua
Cattail
Typha latifolia
Checker
Sidalcea sp
-Chicory
Cichori um in tybu,s
C%inese lanterns
Ca.lochortus albus
Clirkia
Clarkia sp.
Cocklebur
Xanthium strumarium
Co£feeberry
Rhamnus californica
Common hedge parsley'
Tora.lis heterophylla
Common monkey #lower
,limulus guttatus
Common thistle
Cirsium sp.
Popul us fremon tii
Cottonwood
Coyote mint
Monardella odoratissima
Curly dock
Rumex crispus
Deerbruzh
Ceanc :hus in tegerrimus
Digger pine
Pinus sabiniana
Dogtiail grass
Cenchrus echinabus
Doveweed
E'romocarpus sotigerus
English plantain
Plantago lanceolate
Foxtail grass
Hordeum jubatum
Grape
vitis californica
Grass nubs
Trf:eleia taxa
Grass pink
Petrorhagia velutina
Ha'lr,�grass
Ara caeyophyllea
Hardest brodiaea
Brodiaea elegans
sp„
Hon�aysuck.le
Lo nicpra
Conyza canadensis
Horseweed
r' Morehead Subdiv. Plant Survey 4
cHECKLIST (continued)
ct Dl� PtAM
SCIENTIFIC NAME
anterior live oak
Quercus wislizenii
Lolium multiflarum
Italian rye
Klamath weed
Hypericum perforatum
Loosestrife
Lythrum sp.
Adiantum jordanii
Maidenhair fern
Many -flowered brodiaea
Dichelostemma multi florum
Mediterranean. barley
Hordeum hystrix
.Mistletoe
Phoradendron sp.
Philadelphus Jewish
Mock orange
Modesto ash
Fraxinus latifolia
Moth mullein
verbascum b.7attaria
betuloidcjs
Mountain mahogany
Cercacarpus
Himulus Moschatus
Musk flower
Nuttall's bedstraw
Galium nuttallii
olive
to
olea europaea
Arc-tostaphy.los manzanita
Parry mannan
Paspal�am grass
.Paspalum di-latatum
Aristolochia californica
Pipev ne
Toxicodendron divers,; lobum
Poison oak
Prickly lettuce
La4tuoa serriala
Pursh's lotus
Lotus purshlanus
R'ttleszxalce weed ,
Daucus pusill us
Ripgut
Bromus-dian'drus
'
ipg clover
Trifolium hirtuni
Rush
Juncos sp.
Sanicul,a arctapoides
Sanc:l-e
Scrub atilt
Quercus dumo a
Sedges
Caren spp.
Prunella vulgaris
Self heal
Skullca i
scutellaria sp.
Slender cottonweed
Micropus californicus
Trifolium microdepha,lum
Smailhead clover
Pb.lygonum b stortoides
Smartweed
Smooth cat's ear
Hypochoeris glabra
Smooth lettuce
Lactuca saligna
Symphoricarpos rivularis
Snowaberry
Sow ''thistle,
Sonchus arvensis
Spurge
Euphorbia sp}
Squaw bush
Rhus trilobata
Centaurea solsttialis
Star thistle
Madia spy
'arweed
Hyperi.cum anagalloides
Tinker's penny
Heteromeles arbutavlya
Toy.an
Twining brodiaea
Bxodi aea `vol ubl is
Cyperus eragr'ast�us
Umbrella sedge
Lupinus vaZlico�a
Valley sky lupine
Viola sp,
Vetch
i;
i
� y
Morehead Subdiv. Plant Survey 5
CHECKLIST (continued)
Y
; ?
COMMON NAME
SCIENTIFIC NAME
Whiteleaf maMzanita
Arctostaphyloa v:isclda
Wild geranium
Geranium molle
Wild -iris,
Tris macrosiphoz
Wald oats
Ave,na sp,.
Wild onion
Allium peninsulare'
Wild rose
Rosa sp.
Willow
Salix sp
"willowherb
Epilobium sp.
Woolly sunflower
Eriophyllum lanatU)"
Yarrow
Achill ea millefol;i Um
Yellow mariposa lily
calochortLs luteus
Yerba santa
t
Er odic yazr caZitorn .cum
Il
Iyf'
J` .
q u
aR%
I TO
f �; �;; �i r (�;•I FOR Ai'C'ROvIki,
RE: JO
DATV,;7// o/L
This department has advised the Butte County Department of Public iyc•rks Land Deve
Section that we are }'prepared to act on the above application, lopmcnt
Based on present inforiation, we can, % cannot
approval.recommend approval or conditional
Recom;nended Conditions for ADuroval
Provide an area for wells and 109► leachfield free setback around those area
parcels • -son
Provide a 1000 leachfield Free setback around existing wells either withi
property or within 100' of the property boundaries on parcels n file
Show a 50' leachfield setback from the drainage wa on a
Y p rcel� t
Snow a 100' leachfield setback �'� —•
-'-- :tom the highwater line of the creek on parcels
Show a 100, IeachfieId sctb k
3c from the spring on parcels Z/
I � 4
Show a 200' leachfield setback from the highwater line of the lake on parcels
ShM4 a, leachfield setback r 4 for fou
( ) tides the height of the cut on parcels
Indicate on the map that areas with slopes in eXCCSS of thirty e;
unsuitable for sewabe disposal. Y ( 30 ) p scent are
Show the usable sewage dispsoal area Proven to meet the requiremen s a
division Ordinance on Parcels: f the Sib
Show the unsuitable areas for srwa,ge disposal on parcels
t the required usable sewage disposal arcare-tA� on'Parcele
Combine with an adjacent parcel any parcel not rove
the usable sewage ds osal
nt
P , area. r ... P o co
,e ui nta
Y division Ordinance zn
Ind'
cate on the tentative ma those wells the Sub
re
permit in order to provide recuired us,ablc sewage dis osal arca
P s
Wells unddr permit and connect the_ I1 that are ro osed to be destroyed
fal mapxCs served by the wells to other aj�provod
Water r sources prior to recording final map.
_ Place a note on the m:ln that no water well may
sewage disposal arca on parcels be located within 100 of
the usable
4
es -
RBFf�9VII�tsF�utn�i��neinr..®,....
t h
Prove that the reclwired ijunnt rias of domestic water are ,available to parcol
Prove that the required quantities of domestic water are available or pj,ar.t, the
statement on the man that "there is no evidence that domestic water is nvnilnble''
for parcels_
Provide a letter or other documentation from
stating, that they are willing and able to supply_ domestic
water to parcels
Provide a letter or other dommer,tation 2rom
stating that they are willing and able to supply sewer service to parcels
Place a note on the map that states "development of parcels
will require connection to a public sanitary sewer."
Place a note on the ,:,ap that states "development of parcels.
.r
will require connectionto a public water supply, H
Reason/Reasons for recemmendiation of denial or other recorrrrnendation.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please, contact e7 �
J C � at the ebave listed address or 1 e1P hanc. nunhAt betwei
la nn 8 -nn - 1f1:Slf).
A.;,1K; tr%c,;days.
Very truay your$,
bivi'sion Of Envircn-ia a1 Health
cc
California ong( QM� 13 BUTTE SIERRA
Archaeological r�� CUP GLENN slsRlrou 00artment of Anthropology
Inventory k;. tassEN sutTER Clttlltornla State University, Chico
y Manoc TENAMA Chico, CA 95929
PLUMAS TRINITY
SHASTA (91 G) 895.6256
Date: October. '25
M: Butte County planning Co. Planning C
omm
#7 County Canter Dr.
� T1���
Qrovi.11e, Ca_ 95965 '
C7rnvllle, �nliforrtiq
re TPM AP-11-28-77/Mart 'kx act
Dear County Planners,
A review of the above project has revealed the following':
xxThe area indicated as within the project boundaries is considered to be
archaeologically sensitive. Present are:
x ' Fa-Y access to natural sources of water
Flat meadowland or flat land near water
South and/or east facing slopes
Previously recorded sites in the vicinity
Other:
We strongly ° re=mr*M that an archaeological reconnai
ssance� be the area by a qualified archaeologist and appropriate tionuasuzes�£.
prepared.
A knxown site or sites has/have been previously recorded in the project area.
Project operations will have a negative, i
J mpact on these cultural resources.
W� recomlend that a qualified archaeologist be contacted to assess site
cOmPOnent s and prepare a mitigative proposa] ,;
Other- A survAv i z ne,
p
A4I
-Z A
------------
•
Lb 1170
FE�111�1 1 Fwl;lm BYL
(kev. 6-80)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
p
A4I
-Z A
------------
Lb 1170
FE�111�1 1 Fwl;lm BYL
(kev. 6-80)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA'—THE RESOURCES AGENCY r
DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME GEORGE aeuch►�,IAN, t�v�r,a�
REGION 7 r
1701 NIMBUS ROAD, SUITE A
RANCI-10 CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA 95670 s
(916) 355-7020'x'
OCT 11 1988 Buffe CO, planning Cm m,
Mr. John Mendonsa ou 14 198$
Department of Public Works
7 County Center Drive i�rovillo, California
O1♦oville, CA 95965
Dear Mr. Mendonsar
The Department of Fish and Game(DFG)
Jon Morehead Tentative Subdivisin; has reviewed �nlye
divide two parcels total (TSM). It i0 a
o.F, sbven, five acre g 100+ acres into 10 proposal to
Parcels, one 43 acre parcrIa consisting
Parcels. Located west of Paradise, the TSMlies and two 45 acre
winter range of the East Tehama deer herd.
Ll�xn critical
Subdivision of land into small, parcels has an a
migratory deer. lAs
e lands within critical winteradverse impact on
into parcels smaller than 4U
migratory acres, deer use becomes i are divided
l movement affected and forage and space needs drop
the level to sustain herd numbers.
p below
Subdivisions have adversely affected more than 40
Winter range (i.e., critical and designated winter
Butte County, percent of the
In an effort to resolve the subdivision/deer
conflict in Butte County, the DFG has recommended a
actions for the Board of Supervisors
DFG. also identified �� series of
.ntxf red a Designated Implement. The,
development may occur (DDZ
adopted and mplementodpbovxded certain mitigation measuresaere
rey the Board.
The TPM is in a DDZ that has been impacted b
40 aores, thereforer further residential development
s
With mitigation measures. mailer to
adopt The measures dor migratory deer, ded t is possible
The DFG has recommended that the Board.
mitigation fee would be a Assessing a
ppropriate for the TSM's impact on deer.
However, :until tie Board has an o
Mitigation measures �,pp°rt�an ty to ado t and
g ,
recommend that the TSM be' denied implement
If we can be of further a
r
Patricia PANIl4-i, ,rti! I y •ci+ci .`�`tS nGec
_ �P*GK rn1'�+iYxarit�w 43:et. mMn.�:+.dr,nwFy,.
October 14, 1988
Jon Morehead
2200 Oak park Avenue
ChicCA 959,26
Re: `tentative Subdivision Map
AP 11-28--77, 11-30-33
.Log No. 88-10-04-06
Dear Mr. Morehead:
0 T
PLANNING COMMISSION
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - +OROVILLQ, CALIFORNIA 4!19 65 5.
PHONE:538.7601 47
An initial study of
approximate/ Your Proposed project
adverse c 100 acres to create four a land division of
impacts to the environment parcels
checklist indicates
Measures are required as partmonate�these ier mpacasenalosed environmental
nal Impact Report t the Pro3ect, citable mitigation
California Environmenta]p FIR) is re Otherwise, an
Quality Act:, required pursuant to the
An early
Wilieexpedite thethis to-'fication
forward sent to the plan
your written response within °f your g
letter. 1s days Project, Please
Y from the date of this
Your Project lies
recorded or in an area where
adverse Potentially exnst, archaeological sates
Imp and to In order to have been
would be appropriate determine what, assess the
records search YOU maY contact the an Potent%al for
and s" YOU Mat Y, mitigation measures.
map (Proferab,]_ y evaluation. following office for a
fee of $10.00 Y with Section A site plan and/or location
Payable tot Township and Range) must be
he Information Center for this servicsent eith a
California Archaeological Inventory
Information Center
C/o Department of
California State Anthropology
Chico,CA 9Stat university
040`0
Attention;
Curator of Records
Should the office recommend
it will then be necessaryhat an archaeological sure
fort
you to contact an individual
bo conducted
ndividual, who a_s
professionally qualified to provjde such an evaluation, A list of
qualified consultant:, is etclored. These persons can be hired to
perform an archaeological survey or arrange for such a survey. in the
event of an EiR requiremeriLL, a subsequent letter will be sent
explaining the procedure for the County to select the consultant to
prepare the ETR
Your 'project also lies within an area where rare or endangered plant
species have been known to occur. A survey of the project site must be.
conducted by a qualified botanist in order to determine whether such
species are present and, if so, to recommend appropriate mitigation
measures. A list of qualified botanists is also enclosed
if you have any questions or comments, please contact this office any
weekday between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m.
Sincerely
B.A. KIRCHER
Director of Planning
/ V� 114PAV
Brent L. Moore
Associate Planner
BLM/sj s
Enclosures
cc: Roper Associates, P.Q. Box 885, Chico, CA 95927-0885
Amig
17 20 S0000 �. "Ii
/S 19 1004,$1
45
42,
OgPG �`x
c 1rr.
q hG z
�C� x e�,0 4(f1 Z Iol
-41
21.82 Acs,
cr