HomeMy WebLinkAbout011-340-162,\ / I so•22'20"E / I'd 1!
IRM. 54W
saF „`
i
should you iiave any questions xegard*ng the `-tnvirorimerital Documents of tiie
7Dlrector's' repo#P please contact this ,office between 10:00
a.hi a"d,3:00' p,m,`
- Sincerely,
B. A. Kircher
Director of Punning
Dave R. Hiron mus -
Senior Planner
DPH. -bb
Enc.
cc : Public Works
Sierra Vilest Surveying\
.
b r
Il
3.
„4 yl
i
I
Shauld you hive `ani! quest oAis
regarding the
Environmental DopmdA4 9r
the Pfnnixz Dixecfor's report*:,
please contact
this office "between;
:an 1 ,
aa� d 3:00 Psn.
Sin Barely,
13 A. Id'-cher,
Director 4 -Punning
.,
David Ri Hironinius`
Senior PI,
Enc., i
cc:; Public. Vtor ;
Sierra Wq,-d purveying
i,
fM 1,4,
71
;I
i
D
II
�
i
r
V
1
i
a.
J u
f
-
,4...+M+yY�iT.7.1µ■'.ti .ir e.Ar1FW';- �{i/2^.14IrY+r.• �Rp
�.-, �\.real) �y/�
A�T '/ "'[�
(To be complotrd by Lead Agency
tOG No.
AP No, `41 L-39- 61
T. _ DA-0-KIRt7VND
Virginia Van Voris
1, Name of, proponent
Address Of proponent and representative (i£ applicable):
Sierra Vilest Surve in
5,437 Black Ullye Dtav,w--
125U Hemlock Street
Parad—is eCA 95969
C co CAJ;- Y�: 95928
`Parcel Nla
3, ProJeet description:Tentative
II.. 1�l�;Ni7iL�. f?R, g=.Np NGS C?F STC3NTF'yC.AN�%E __E
1. Does project haveuce thee potentia£ aofish ror wi1d11uallpeecies causeiaafishtor
st'the
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining leveisr threaten to eliminate
A rata
communitY,, reduce the numberartantex�amplesct gufanmajor£periods
a piarit or animal
or endangered plant or anizal or eliminate imp
of California history or p rehistorY7
erm e
shorrt�tere BimpactSonathe
'lr pass the project have the potential tooaa achieve
environmental g
detriment of long^term eriod of time while
Qnvironment is one which Occurs in a rnlativeJY brief p
Into the ! uture �
f
1 fig.- term impacts will endure
but tively
indormore�sepm�ate
whichresou1ted
3. Dads the project have impactsxcesawhere,
ht re two
(A project Y p . but the effect of, the
considerable% wY,ere
the impact on each resoutde is relatively small,
on the environment
total of those impacts
ironmental effects which will cause substantlaL
4. Does the project Have env
on human, :beings ,y either directly or indirectly 2
adverse elects
D"E, a `:UN' (To be completed by the head ,!.gency) • On the basis of
I�
thinz.nxtial evaluation: .
find the projeet 'COULD t(CT,hjY6 a s gn1iedcai t effect on the
3/wE, proposed
envi�ronatent a Nf ATI B" �3RCLARC}Iiut w.,lf bap p
�
;arid
d project co= have a significant effect
I/ find that although the propose p j case
Vill netesoxibc
on the e'nvinificAnt
the i�IITIGAT T�N QsUR $ dd on the g tachedslteetehavenbeQnsadde: COCYhe
DgCL, WION,will be prr�pared.
,
project A I�'BGATIVZ
'the project`MAY have a significant- effect on 'the enb`>ronmerit,
l/t1 ,find proposed
and an 'IRbNMEN IMPACT 'REPGKT is required,
;
OUM OF BeM, PLANNING DL'PARcTMENT
�7anuar t 23 199A By --
T�avid R. Hi.ron.iM s
Aveiiior canner
Reviewd bye u a easu�. `
77-7-
r
,ANIMAI,.7 LTn. Wxll, the proposal result in sUbstanti'ai:
E', •
1C 5 .
NO -
a; Change in the diversity: of species, or numbers of any species of animals``
:'
(birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish) organisms
'
or 'insects)?
b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of
animals7
c. introduction of ►ew species of animals inO an area, or in a barrier to
the migration or movement of animals?
d. Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat?
ISE: Will the propotalL result in substantial:
a, Increases in existing" noise levels?
'levels?
I exposure of people to severe noise
I,IGi gniAN3 GLARE. Will th4,t proposal produce sificant light and glareZ
w
a _ ,
s.
aresult in a alter t
LAND USEar `iIthe, P psubstantiala ion of the
�
pro use
p planned
w..
9.
NATURAL I RESOURCES. 'Will tihe proposal result in; substantial;
a. Increase in the .rate ok, use of any natural resources?
b. Depletion of any non-rEtnewable natural resources?
lb.
RISk OP UNSET, Will the proposal involve;
risk of explosion or ;release of hazardous, substances (including, but
a.
not limited toy oil, pesticides, chemicals or. radiation) in the event
of an accident or upset conditionsl n
t; Possible interf4renco with an'- emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
11.
POPttLATION. Will the proposal. alter location, distribution, density or
growth, rate of the human population?
U,
HOUMN Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand
for additional housivag3*
13.
TRANSPigRTATION/CIRCUL6TIO1f. Will the proposal result in'.
A. Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement?
�-w--•
UK tffeOts on existing parking facilities,, or demand for ntv parking?
i<.
Substantial on existiri tri' ortaton systems;,s
Impact p
c, S �'P r:
,
*---=
d, significant alharations to present patterns of circulatioh or
Movement of people an$]or goods?
e.• Alterations to Waterborne, rail or iir traffiel
E. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
-M--
'14-
_ Will the proposal°have an effect upon•, or x1sult in a need
,PUBLIU $tzyll mB, j1
for new or axtered government services:
a� pire protection?
br Pp:A.iCe protection?
d. Parks or 'other recreational fad ilitiesl
e; M, intenance of °public facilities, including roads?
..�.. �
^=`
f; other governmental services?
`r�4 wi-
` f to cr
I ti
r
i4
1
G
EMOY, twill the p roposri, result d;,,:
.. N-«
a, Ilse .of Aubstantial amounts of fuel or energy?
b Substan , tial increase in dem.aitd upon eRisting sources of energy, or
q he development of neW sources of ener 7
re airs t gy,
16,
MIL'ITTES. Will the proposal result in a need for new systbms' or
substantial alterations to the follpwing.
a. Dower or : natural, gas?
b. Conmtunichti,ons systems!
' G•
i
C. Wateravailability?.
d. Sewe r or septic systems?
e. Storm Water drain&7
f. Solid Waste and disposal?
' 17.
MA%j HEAL1114. Will the proposal result in.:
,a. Creation.of any health hazard or potential hazard
healthy (excluding mental
�C
b. Exposure of people topotential health hazards?
18
AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result is the obstruction of any'scenic
?
vfsta or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the
creation of an aesthetically offensipe site open to public view?
19,
8EOREATIOH. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or
quantity of existing ,redreationat;,opportunities?
20.
c;UI�n-ut MbURCE3,
a. Will 'the proposal result 1h the`alteration or destruction of a
prehistoric or historic arebAeological site?
'.
b. Will the _proposal result in rclver„e physical or aesthetic effects
e/
to a p r histoizc building structure or objja;t?
c �`rj J
"
/`•
r
C., Does the proposal laays the potential to cause a physical change
which would affect unique ethnic, cultural values?
d. Will the proposal Tbstti,et existing ;religious or, sacred uses Within
the potential impact azeaT r
1 i S CiJS S 21�2�T fJF 1*,1d7 V =i2c�i�7A�iT'l�d'AS�.'�J ALLTeh' LtyN
� AttaCl�ed.
rf
{1
�
Cyt
it
s,i
'.
I �
lb ,� e f 3V, QN A� # .0.1
r , , .Taevelopmen# of as many, of three Z 34-162
some divavpi on, displacement;: cam .) h��m sites .o
buildings, ,�j.tios, driveways, roads etcpactron;and o'Vercoverin n the; subject prop, causri
ehangc; r i.n drainage patterns which 'i`his overcoverin l es the sail' due to c " '
streams, may cause increased a erosion, ant in f���ali�tiari a(
X1G to tl3e large size, of two an quentass1 f 44,"R ��I��f and
solution for drainag;� an {he smaller i2) of the d Abse
Parcels and the require l'�aipCfd area
parcel this should riot be Ment a
1hP All of Butte a significant im
t a';a`llianent
County is within a pact's
Property is looated a Nfoderate Earth u
Zone Which su Pprox mateAy 1/2 mile north of faults intensity on , 1�bject
supported the 1975
Building Code Standards for se- ally earthquAi�e, Cansssociated with'the +i
tructio 811 car
occupants in case of seismic activity. Y active, n of burldin .,� ,
auld provide ek, 6" tlf s�rm
S,d; rho
subject areas sh adeoate'.,x�fu�lli1 to
The subject J property is located within the c • . r.,
71 ela Property critical winter ran
P �Y is located within an area shown as being: ge ° the
u`nmed ante area. The r rQor will not have signfiant: ad rn heavl eharzpi`' ilerd,
project area is subject to deer drttonal im` impacted] �y i
by, the Board of ;Supervisors. Pact o i' .Ss�Ctr,g
Mitigation fees are re n the deer° he�dt�� Ali? (.lte
Garlic for an erd mitigation fees should
raa%C would be subject to, a ant i eat mended b they b MA
A,a d
Y (�4) acres in this area. Y the X7epart�ent off' ��° . .
P Yment of mitigation fees. M rails
8. The wester] The parcel located
desi Y portion of the subject Property
contains hick requires .for . , d within a Timber �.:
p rtY is locate
Y -bile 21 fort 140) acre mrnirnum r Sountain E
i ) acres and s partially I' hew new lots. g; >:►:r'r
The remaining easter] a
des
3! portion of the the timber Parcel 3'
gnation which requires one Property is .located within the mountain
map of �atiryg the subjec# ro CI) to twenty (20� acres Agrics'�Itr 1+11X?,
additional' ' t erty shoeved a building siteon dwelling
g umt a
parcels being created would
designation w containP x ose ,11.Ie orrgi dX'd `�
{, bleb would allow down fo as LowbuaIdrng sites within' the a� Parcel 3i aU �
criteria. available. �x�
The ei ht
as one il) acre gricu ,tura] r6Q,&)#g
tevelo g �8) acre parcel' as Per dlling;uruf viih ec�, `
pm� ni and can are considered in conifo Proposed confo
located east", f '" rmi rnis w t : +� )
1, Centerville Road consistin of 2. tY with' the general` Pl'an.�lpr�i�� surd,
nor to �ana,ny tf ,the h 1 acres does r P set,
policies of the general plan not conlorcni'fo ' `� �' .''"
Permit the creation of a 2:1 acre parcel in a 5 a the e-eist�r rw
the Envro a applicant has rt
time nme>itat Health De cee zone, iSihoWever al?p�ted fai a
as ade ul a Par1ment indicafe , com,t�e is vary°
9 # sewage disposal. sys#eni a that thin �► receiv'
Accordiri 1 . parcel cannot be `� ,
€ Y, if flus map is a an .adertuate domestic approved
parcels:
Those wiyulq consistl�Proved at this ti e I �. ovat`er are pres� d
m it coula o y be a .
A; single pArcel, f parcel 3 as shown and PPro1 erd show, `
parcel I and, 2; as sh '
7 Q"►trn, combine
11,2. Should the :,.
�, acre
additional demand, fay parcel discussed id iter
n:8 sirnilar size b above be a i
E parcels in the area PProved, �# ,could` lead #€��
13ac;f. r 1 and an increase in densities ir,. e�
this
Pr o ect �gtill represent an incremental increase i Q�"
increased demands far inainfenance in the area,
If! traffic .�d traffic
hazards and
d ........._, 4 .ah,.... iJ ,w. .. ui .2 ._ a . .... ,. .. r, i✓ .,4� ,\�. i/ i
"
,,
" /t►pgle"cant.
Virginia 'Van Voris Asses3gr'e Past
#*34,162
DATA SkIIJT
Project Description
1.
Type of Project: Tentative Parcel Map
2
]Brief Description: 'Dividing 31.25 acres into 3parcels,.1 of 21 acres', 1 � -acres,
3
and i of 2.1 acres.
Location- On both sides of Center. sap Road and iCenterville Rd. a mately
.
2,500 ft. north of their intersection in the Butte Crcek, Canyon areaetOlkeAst of
Chico.
i.
PYoposed Density of Development: 2 acres per dwelling"iinit maxirn,04
So
Amount of Impervious Surfacing: Nnimal4
G.
Access and Nearest Public Road(s): Property fronts on 1 er►i ;rville dW
7.
Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual septic systems.
8.
Source of Water'Supply: Individual,40,11s,
9.
ProAmity of Power Lines: To property.
10
Potential for further land` divisions and development: I.imifed urti�t�� $,,-'sting
zoning and general. plan designations.
B. 1± nvironmental getting
Physical Environment:
I.
Terrain
a. fi eneral To a a hic Character. Generally st. ee _, caan on walls toy above
1? l�' p P 3�-
f,
the Butte Creek Canyon bottom land.
b: Slopes:: Generally 20%u and greater west of Ceinterville.Rd ry'i#h $Oo,areas
in access of 50% slopes: Generally 20% slopes east oi' Centervk� .d
c, i✓levat on: :,From 5?,U A,S�L. east of the toad to' '1,U80 ft'. at t vosterly
boundary line of the property.
d Iimiting Factors:. Areas :of steep slopes.
2.
Soils both
Type3 And Characteristics: Stover soil 5erles and Inks' 3011 Sri
generally well drairied with moderate;peimeability on soils of gal to, Ap inches'
deep on the easterly 2/3 of °the property. The westerly poi; t€o", sr�f the;
property is Toomes soil series, generally well drained �ihh Wderate.
p
71
permeability on soils from 4 to 20 inches deep:
g '"` ,' i perme "A
b: 1L�mitin Factors. ,/hW' as of shallo sods and'made ate rya> � Y.
3.
Natural hazards of the Land
a ta�rthquake Zone: My derate Earthquake Intensity done VU
b Erosion Potential: 1, gh
v,
1,
A
r
c Landslide Potential: Moderate,
'
d. Fire Lazard: High.
e, Expansive Soil Potential: ` Low.
4.
Hydrology the
a, Surface Water: A tributary of Butte , Creek crosses the prop5,t; "
westerly, 113 of the property.
b, Ground Water: Unknown, potentially limited,, e,5 and
C. Drainage Characteristics Generally well drained due to on sU �
drainage ways, fihence south easterly to Butte Creelr,•
I Annual. Rainfall (normal): 40 to 45 inches per year.
e. Limiting Factors:. Setbacks from drainage ways. ' s
S.
Visual/Scenic Quality: Good."
6: -
7.
Acoustic Quality: Good.
Air Quality: Good except duringperiods of stagnant valley airy
Bologecai Environment:
S.
on: `Bare and litter covered ground, grasses, white leaf am4nzanWj4.7 }e oak;
Vegetateiaf
wed eceanothus sea and ots and interior live oak.
g
g.
it
Wildlife Habitat: Critical winter range for the east Tehama deer hexa
I
('ulturaI Environment:
l�.
Archaeological and historical Resources in the area: High senshivii�' 0f
I1•
Butte County General Plan designation: Grazing and open land anti�itural
residential,
12.
13.
Existing Zoning: FR5 and TR20.
Existing land Use on-site: Vacant except for 1 barn.
14.
S'urrou'nding Area:
Land Uses: Scattered single family dwellings at rural dnsia, txey
b, Zoning: FR5, FR20, and FR40.
C Gen. Plan Deseg�xation: Agricultural YZesidentiai and. Oraxitl 'i kOPen
land.
d. Parcel' Sizes Ranging from 5 to 100 acres.
I5.
e. 'P'opulation: Sparse, a.
Character ai'' Site and Area: ;Rural area located above a canyon floor,
AG.
Nearest 'Uirban Areas Chico.
Relevant SphE is of Influence: None.
18.
Improtrements Standards Urban Area: No
Pere Protection Service:
a. Nearest County (State) Fh' Station' Votuntee'r Station #27 ono�rvilCe
Road less than 1 mile. volunfieer St erville Rd l t�ney
titian #2G on Cent
Pull tune station 444 in 'Ch O 9P)PIOXI
Run Rd. a the covered badge.
miles.
b. Water Availability: Fire Tankers only.
20.
Schools in Area: CWCO 'Unified School District
a
7
c,
,
rt
COONV OP BT,IME
DEPARU MT OF PUBLIC WORKS
7 County Center Drive
„
Oroville CA 95965
(916) 538-7268
October 10, 1989
Virginia Van Voris RE AP 11-34-162
-1250;Hemlock St.Tentative Parcel Map'
Chico, CA 9592
Dear Ms. Van Voris
This is to notify You. that your application for a tentative map for the°
above-referenced property is bei%- submitted to the Planning
Departmeu"it
for ern-ironmenta1determination, and to the Envaromn. eht,al Health DePartiftk4l
for its review.
;
This application will be considered complete when we have
received
notification from the Planning Departmei`it and the Environmental Healtft .
Department tkiat all necessary data have been received.
Tiipse deartrri
will contact you regarding any additional_ information their may xe e.>
verb truly yours,
William Cheft'
Director of Public Cggrks
Meiudonsa
slstant �Daxector
dZA/kk, r
ccs Planning Department
`Environmental health Department
�.
Richard Silvera, P- O. Box 327.1,, Chico, CA 9.5927
Sierra West Surveying
T.t' 1190 toii4 acyFi 7,IRSt�,. �? . _....