Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout011-360-001r � X !•w � t i 1 J;h •h J • s' j u ! r , •.Y a� e k Y'^ sl, Y w a � { t� 'i'.. n j Y • ! e a 4, as ' J f� P._ Oki PLANNING ISSION SUMMARY SHEEN.` FO mD DIVISIONS APPLICANT Elly_ N. Xelly Log##86-01-24-01 ADDRESS 377 Mandarin Drive, Daly City, CA 914015 OWNER Same PROJECT DESCRIPTION Tentative Parcel Map to divide 40 acKcsA, Lo create parcels, 29 acre parcels. LOCATION 2,parce_ls on the north end of Bean Flat Road a)i ox. k mile north of its intersection with Centerville Road, Butte croak Canyon area. A8 ESSARIS PARCEL NUMBER(s)11-36-«7 lf� _' 2 _ 11� '? ZONING GENERAL PLAN P17C)w7`FCT CONa1STENT GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE REPORT DATE OF APPLtC'ANT SIGNATURE LAND CONSEPVATION ACT '.CONTRACTS:? DATE APPLICATION RECEI'VE1D January 24, 1986 AGENT/SURVEYOR/CIVIL ENGINEERe Sierra West _Surveying ADnRE8Si 5437 Black Olive Dr., Paradise, CA 95969 DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT PREPARED ENVIRONMENTAL CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION - DATE FILED ! DETERMINATION AND DATE NEGATIVE DECLARATION DATE ADOPTED MITIGATED NEG. DECLARATION DATE ADOPTED ENV. IMPACT REPORT - DATE CERTIFIED STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO, SUB. COiIaMITTEE MEETING DATE ADVISORY AGENCY HEARING DATE_ , ADVISORY AGENCY ACTION_ a APEALED APPEAL REARING DATE BOARD ACTION COMMENTS FOR PLANNING DIRECTOR''S REPORT Public Ht -'k °IQVR And 1*01d Items 85w 526Si "a erra West Surveying W on behalf of Elly Kelly, appeals the Advisory (2439);' Agency's denial of tentative parcel ma declaration regarding environmental imps t), AP 1.4�3osed .01gatnegative AP 11-�36-0) ttiRad parcels, prdper,�� (new number, Flat Lane., approximately l/z mile' located �.� �5 north end of "Bean intersecien with Centerville Road, in the Butte Creek Canyon area, 86-526 (Cont'd, Motion: FOUND THAT SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE HAS NOT S VERIFY THAT THIS PROJECT WOULD CAUSE DAMAGETOSWIrLDLI E Op WILDLIFE HABITAT; ADOPTED NEGATIVE DECLARATION REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR THE ELLY KELLY TENTATIVE PARCEL 14AP ON AP 11.36.01; FOUND THAT THIS PROJECT CONFORMS TO THE THE BUTTE COUNTY GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING; - APPEAL OF THE ADVISORY AGENCY'S DENIAL OF THIS PROJECT �ANDHAPPROVED THE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FOR ELLY ,KELLY ON AP 11-36-01 APPROVAL IS SUBJECT TO PUBLIC WORKS) ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ,, AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT'S CONDITIONS As STATED ON tdEh1O DAZED AUGUST Ria, 1986 FROM DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TO THE 80ARD OF SUPERVISORS. Vote: 1 Y 2 Y S M 3 Y 4 Y 5 Y (Unanimously carried) BOARD OF SUpE,AVISORS MTVJ P,gS for Sep o Mber 1.6, 19D6 Elly Kelly, ITNTATIVE PARCEL MAP, 2 parcels at the north end Of Bean Flat Vane approx. i/2 mile north of i.ts intersection with Centerville Road, Butte Creek Canyon area* AP 11-36-1 Engineer: Sierra West HEARING OPEN TO' T1 -1E PUBLIC Mr. Streeter said tha=t the project does not met the requirements of the Fish and Game dept, It is in critical, range with 20 acre parcels, Twenty acres meets the Genera=l Plan criteria but not the wildlife c:Qn:ern, Mr. Streeter asked if one of the problems its not being able 1ho homesites because of. Lopography. to cluster Mr. Wrinkle said that is correct. This is in fact boat the hist ridge in this area tha=t has areas for homesi.t:es for several: miles. The rest is too vertical. The Fish and Game Dept:i refused to come out and look at the property. Mr, Wrinkle said he did not feel there was much point in continui=ng the item for more discussion with Fish and Game. 1 HEARING CLOSED M TIM PUBLIC., AND CONFINED TO Tffr ADVISORY AGENCY M17, Streeter stated: T will make a motion to deny the tentative map for F11y Ke .ly A1� 11-36 -Oi proposing 2 parcels, due to Conflict with Policies of ` the Genera"( flan concerning preservations of mi,g,ratory t� ldlife habl.tat in that t he design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantiall.y and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat ((that is referencing Section 66474(e) of the Subdivision Map Act.)) Motion seconded by Mr. Reid and carried unanimously BUTTE GQT1TY .AAVS(?RY,GEIX 1t+XxiJ'Z'ES f... 1 BUTTE COUNTY Co. ERAI. PLAN CONFORMANCE REPORTir+i�f'� FOR PARCEL MAP OR SUBDIVISION MAP N0 27 ��1Q Items 1-4 to be completed by applicant; 1 Applicant Name, and address 2 Project Description 3. Assessor's Parcel Number(s) 36 - o / `m u 4. Proposed Use 12 7-1-t e— The following items are to be completed by the Planning Department: Current zoning EE�lZ /D ANO 1=2 - 20 Land Conservation Agreement YuE ' General Plan 'Designation Applicable Conditional Criteria. Not Applicable_ Agricciltural-Residential YES NO 1. Agricultural Compatibility 2. Water & Sewer Capacity - - 3. Adequate Fire Facilities " 4. Road Capacity & Maintenance '- 5. Access to Commercial & Schools Orchard & Field Crops 1. Predominant 5-10 Ac. Parcel Size 2. Vicinity of Urban Boundaries 3. Agric viability not impaired —" Staff .Determination: Project does does not -----'-" � _ co substantially nfoi.m to the General Plan and Zoning. ng. Comments : _ - /tom 2-,�vrh . Lac= ✓.e G�-7"" �Ll/fid ia✓f� �i G- �� 8 Y ee©A-y 660y"' 5rs— Staff Signature Date c AS THE APPLICANT FOR'TH91 REQUESTED LAND DIVISION, I AM AWARE "0'F 11tt ABOVE S'T'A�'k' DETERMCNATION 'REGARDING THE CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PJ;AN AND ZONING. Dated Signature of Applicant LD :1000 (revised 6-86) APPENDIX H NO77CE OF DETERMINATION : Tom: + r Office of Planning and 9wea h �rt F �M- �: 8 ,, k,�larinin�, Department 1400 'Tenth Street, Roo' 121 L V County Center Drive or Sacramento, CA 95814' IST 1�g orovillo, E 9590, o _y County Clerk County of Butts cv...'.i CJr", K BECKER�Cutfly Clerk ;i A. JAC19P iae u1 S11MIEa� T Piling of Notice of Dete�m riatxi sn in comp7'an2'eywlth Section 21108 or 21,152 of the.. Public Resources Code, PFojFct Title AP # Name Tentative Parcel Map 11-36-1 Elly N, 1(allyy State Clearinghouse Number Contact Person Telephone `Number (if submitted to Clearinghouse) w Public Works Ighn Mendg=`---- - 534-4266 Project Location off the north end of Bean Flat Roaci, approx. I Mile north of its intersection with°Centerville Rd., Butte Creek Canyon. jpct LDesC�i P Tentative Parcel Map dividing 40 acres to create two. parcels of approximately 20 acres each. This is to advise that the Butte CountyBoard ofASus�erV,sors Lead Agency or Responsible Agency has approved the above described project and has made the following determinations regarding the above described project. 1. The project - will, L will not, have a significant effect on rhe environment. 1 Z An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project ,pursuant to the provisions o1 CEQA. X A Negativ Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQAi Th` iirl, or Negative Declaration and record of project approval ;may be examined at Butte County Planning Departmeot 7 County Center Drlye.� Yciy .. 9596-q J Mitigation measures were, o were not, made a hondition of the approval of the project. - 40 A staternnt of Overriding Considerations was; X was not, adopted for this p►•oject. y Date Received for Filing 9/le/86 - Si�nat�3 e S' n3hen Q, Streeter', ..�' or Manner �ai'!. Revised January 1,95 q gofer-DeparM&MIalbMew orandum TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Department of Public Works -Land Development Section tuajEct: Elly Kelly -Tentative Parcel lvlap-AP# 11-36-1 OAT4s August 26, 1986 You will be considering an appeal of the Advisory Agency in dQcision to deny the tentative parcel map for Elly Kelly., APS 11-36-1. This item has been se -t for public hearing t7n r;ptember 16, 1986, Tf the Board of Supervis,Qrs decide to uphold the appeal, the following conditions nre ;recommended conditions o1' apprewals :Iublic Works Department conditions are; I Vorify ,leg.11 access, 1'rovi de two -wny trraversablo access PS -8 -LO -1 l p (mch parcel frat,n a county maintained road or state highway. )lcccss to be reserved 1:n doods as per county ordinance and offered ,(jr dodicat.•i on on the r'l nal map. j Choi; 50 ft, building � setbracic Eine measured from centerline of access oascmi' nt. 5 Pmr ide road mzlintenonce agreement. f, hOw .all owsements of rotord on the final maps I Provide: stroot nsimo s.i.gnv per requirements of .the Department of Public l4nrlc8 prior to recordation of the final, map. , r 1'rc7 id�� rcil-cie:�F�c at the ond of the stroot,, �f Obtain oncroactiment permit and construct standard road approach proN'iding adequate siAht distance at the intersection of access road ijU ConLerville Road,' arl fay any doli,nquent takes or current 'taxes as required. 11 Knce note on final =I), regard: ng Chico Unified' School District' :r7pnc,t fees, 8nvironmental Health Department conditions are; I. Show a 50'° leachfield setback Prom the drainage'way on parcels 1 and 2. 2, Show a 100' leachPi,e.ld setback from the spring on parcel 2. 3. 0h, -,W thu unable sewage disposal area proven to meet the re,quiramenta of the taubdivisioa Ordinance on parcel 1, Elly Kelly Tentative Parcel Map Page 2 Continued r� Planning Department, conditions are; 1. D(,isignate homesites on the final map in a cluster ar v,ti a(1omont. x . Place nota on Sinal map: No fences to be constructed on proporty lines c,xcept barbod wire of Five strands or less with 48 1:noh maximum Haight and 16 inch clearance at bottom. Utilize standard construction and erosion control mr',i,tlod a to minimize erosion. 1t All ,road work and driveway work to take place duvl ntr, t,h o dry season, Revegetate all cut slopes with natural vegetation, TO Autte.County Advisory Agency FROM: Planning Director 8UBJVCTs Report on Tentative Parcel Map for Elly N. Kelly on AP 11-36-1 BATEi Adguot ll, 1986 This is a proposal to divide 40 acres to create two parcels. The present zoning; is FR -10 and 20 ( Foothill Recreational, - 10 and 20 acre parcels) (adopted June 27, 1978). The Lancs Use Plan Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Agricultural Residential. There are no specific or community plans for the area. The proposal does not conflict with County zoning nor any adopted or proposed element of tlie Butte County General Plan nor any County, specific or, community plan. The proposed parcels comply with most policies of the General, Plan at twenty (20) acres in size. Conditional criteria apply for parcels less than 20 acnes in size for the Agricultural Residential designation. The California Department of Fish and Game (DFG) has submitted two letters on this project) one dated February 27, 1986 and one dated May 81 1966. Both letters hold to the position of 40 acre parcels for the critical deer winter range, Mitigation of the migratory deer factor was offered by the applicant by way of clustering the hamea;i,tes with no fences on the property lines. In the absence of DFG acceptance of clustering -the homesitesy denial of the tentative map is recommended based on Section 66474(e_) of the ;State Subdivision Map Act and policies of the General Plan concerning preservation of migratory wildlife habitat (Conservation, Open Space, Land Use Elements). Retommendat i:on I. Allow applicant and staff to negotiate with DFG to seek means to allow two parcels of 20 acres with; clustered homesi,tes and any other appropriate measures a 2. Deny the tentative map for AP 11-36-01 due to ,its coyifli:ct with Policies of the General Plan: concerning preservation of migratory wildlife habitat and "that the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause substant,fal environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or; wildlife or their habitat" (Sec. 66474(e) of the Subdivision Map Act). DR:SAS:ir Attachments letters ers of May ,:8, March '5, March 6, at%d February 27, . 1986. -_ cc' S1].y Kelly - Sierra'West Surveying CAN IAT11to rkAt �, 1 ,! (t DEPARTMENT OF P"WO hl Al.TH DIVISION OF CNVIRONNSWTAi Addrtss !;] 196. Momariol'Way I'IL'Ai.,1'hI Ropiy to Chtso, CulilorniQ 95926 n 7 County Contpe Dr,V, Talophot,o: 916/891.2727 U1OViIIa, Cgltf�tnia 9596$ 1I 5'!f l.11trstt Rodd Tolaphona! 9161534.4261 l rtrn'1r�o (.*011drnio 95969 Tnlht)lrftttrr 916/872.2961, E,,. 58 1986 Ellin N. 7{el,ly 377 'Mandarin Drive RE Elly N. Kelly Rev oo Parcel _ , Bean. Flat d aroe�. Ma Daly City, CA 94015 Road, Chico Butte Co;xnty AsS00sora Parcel Number 11-36-01 Dear E. Kelly: This department has advised the Butte County 1)epar tment of Public Works Land Development Section that we are act on the above application, prepared to Based on ;present inf. ormation, Conditional, approvalwe can recommend approval or Recommended Conditions ,for_7� royal ] . Show a 50' leaohfield setback from the on parcels 1 and 2. drainage way 2• Show a 100'` leechfe�d Parcel 2. setback from the spring on the requirements cable sewage disposal ' r area of the proven to Meet Subdivxsion Ordinance on Parcel 1 T£ you have any questions regarding tact the Chico office, gazding this letter, please conte Very truly yours, Supexvsi.ng Sanitarian 0 Division Of Enirronmental I3 al�h cc Public Works Planning Sietra West Surveying Bu}fe Co. Plonning Comm, OCOYMO, t..u11TCiiiiitl March 5, 1986 Mr. David R. Hironimu5 Associate Planner Butte County Planning Commission 7 County Center Drive; Oroville, CA 95965-3397 re; Tentative Parcel. Map AP 11-36-1 Log Vo . 86-01-24-01 Dear Mr. Hironimus, Thank you for your letter of Vebruary 28 and attachments I shall address your "Suggested Mitigation. Measures" in order: 1. 1 do not plan any construction on the property and amydividing the parcel into `two halves only for the purposes of having my estate neat and tardy (so that my heirs will not someday have to divide up the property). l might add that I am In excellent health. 2. Since 'I do not plan any construction, there wil no incremental increase in traffic on the local toads. 3. 2 will not be cutting any slopes. Thank you very much for your concern ,about the environmental effects of dividing this property. 1, with you, am very interested in keeping our California lands beautiful and am only too happyto share your concern: Please let me know if 1 can be of: any further assistance; Sincerely, 1 11 pul Elly N. elly 377 Mandarin Drive #202 - Daly, .City,-CA 9401 cc: Sierra West Survey,inc r 1 Ell ae, G 0 "t a.. . LAND OF NACURAI WEALTH ANU BEAUTY a DEPARTMENT OF PU13LIC WORKS' WILLIAM (Dill) GilLzrr, 1)4ec'te'r 7 COUNTY TENTER DRIVE- OROVII.LE, CALIFORNIA r,9Ls Telephone: (916) 534-4691 RONALD D. McELkOY Bufta CO. Planning Con» Qapufy D1rtiCtor AUG a 1988 August 1, 1986 Aroville, C 6forAlal Elly Na 'Kelly RE: AP 11-36-1 377 Mandarin Drive 'Tentative Parcel Map Daly City, CA 94015 Dear. Ms. Kelly Please be advised that the Butte County Advisory Agency will hear yourapplication on the above -identified property on August 18, 1986, The Agency will be reviewing the findings ;From the 'Planning Department and will be considering your tentative parcel map. Public Works will recommend the conditions of approval as listed on the attached sheet. The meeting will commence at 9:00 a.m. in the Board of Supervisors` Room, County Administration Building, 25 County Center Drive, Orov:ille, Caliiornia. if you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this Office: Very 'truly yours., William Cheff Director of Public Works J in Mendonsa Assistant Director JM/ds attachment cc Planning Department, Environmental. Health Department Sierra West Surveyor qW Elly Kelly, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, 2'parcels at the north !rid of Bean Flat Lane approx. 1/2 mile north of its -�36-1 Engintersectiol en Road. Butte Creek Canyon area. AP 11-36-1 Eng' n wl,tjjCenterville end West Surveyors Public Works cinditions: Verify legal access. 2 Provide two-way traversable access RS -8. -LD -I to each pax e a county maintained road or state highway, from 3 Access to be reserved in deeds as per county ordinance on(I off �: for dedication on the final map.Dred' 4 Show 50 ft, building setback line measured from centerl„ine of easement. Access 5 Provide road maintenance agreement, 6 Show all easements of record on the final map, 7 Provide street name signs per s of Public Works prior to recordat-ionuofethe tfinaltma Department of P 8 Provide cul-de-sac at the end of the street. providing adequate sight it and construct standard road approach 9 Obtain encroachment permit PP q distance at the intersect.i.on of access road .and Centerville Road' 10 Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required. 11 Place note on final map regarding Chico Unified School District impact fees. t AI'I'I;NDI X 11 COUN'T'Y CSP BUT11' ENVIROWIENTAL C1113CI(LIS1' VOIti•1 (to be 6o111p1;,et:C Jay f,o:ad Agency) Log It 86}-01-24-01 I BACKGROUND Ar) tl 11�36W 1. Name or proponent ELLY N. KELLY 2. Address Or prn ,or.tint and. represen;tat i:ve (if tappl. ica1)1 E11yNt�`I : p.s._ y` � Y Sierra We_q1i�v(��'�.k��. ._.. 37 andar n Drive 5437 Black O1iv.0 i)Vive Daly City CA 94 015 Paradise CA 9��� 3, Project dc�cript io`n _Tentative,.Parcel �V�ap_ __ _...��.�... , IT. MANDATORY I-NDINGS 01' S H NIFIt;ANrl, Y1'i.5 DiAYBT NO a, Does the project have the potential to degrade tho quality of the envi,ronnrent, substantially reclrwo the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, ca,tyc+ tt .fish or wildlife population to Atop below se1i'a sustaining lovels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal communit}r, reduce the number or rest ri t 00 ranelitMnatre or ai'are or i.mportanteeaaniples f tale or i��limal c�7i of tho ma i or peri ads of California history or prehistory`., K. b. floes the project have 'Ole potential to achieve short-term benefits to the detriment or long-term, environmental goals? (A short-tertrt impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief period of time while long—term impacts 1gi1"l Ordure into the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are individu- all} limited, but crnnul tively considerablo? (A project May impact on two or more 'separate resources where the impact oil each resa'urce is relatively smal i , but where the efi'ect o1' the total. of those impacts on tine environment is significtint. d' floes tiro project have 011vl1-011111errtzal effects which will cause ndvel-se efi"ecis On Iluman beings, 01ther directly or indirectly:' y 1Il. IEVIIR I NATION ('1'o I)r camplct'ctci I)N ho l.'nLI Ag y) ,On the basis c�C` th.i initia cvraucit;lcrn. T/wIs NMI thc1 pr0i)0',cid Project i'(1ULD NOT have ct �i�Vllii`icaltt of oat oil thO 011 i roti�mcn't', and a Nl:(;ATIVEI Ili;('LAItl1'1`ION %V 1 IL he Prepared, I/iv): find that', '01,0101,1911 010 l)ropm,;vd project could hatrr~•a signi ri-. cant curet cin the ellvi1.onment, theta will not he a signiriotint effect 111 th l s casO b0cnti::e thO W'l'.I GAVON Mr-Astt" RS described on. the= att ached ; hr°et Jlavo hVell tuldod to the projoct, A Nl'1CIA" TVE, DI.(3 AIIATI ON will he prop'll-ed . I/m., rind tine prallosrrl .pt'o,iocwt MAY bavo a ;xio,I Ci.eant efroct oil t40 envil:•unmt~nt, tlnd in ;ENVIItr1NMIMPAh TMPAG'i,REPOWr TIS rC(Iui1,Td. I) V'1:. Fgbruary, 2.8., ,�86. . _ C OUN'rY 01 11 Will.. PI,r1, NNINO DEPARI'M iN'I' David RHironimus,+A is e Planner itovi.c.wed Ir .tet 'd v i Ilraron��., - "IV. ENVIRONMENTAL I ACTS exp anataons o•• I aS' " on attached sheet( s), :��,esand "maybe" answers are r. c�<t�irect 1. EARTH.' W ` a, ill the proposal result in significant Unstable earth conditions YES MAYBE NO or in c geologic substructures? changes in b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction o overcovering of thr e soil? — -- C. Change in topography relief features? y orground surface ' d. Destruction, covering or modification o unique geologic or f any e. Increase in wind or water erosion either On or Off-site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach --- sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel a o river or stream or the bed of the any bay, inlet car lake? ocean or g. boss of prime agricultural) y productive soils � outside designated urban �X areas? h= Exposure of people or property to geologic - hazards, such as Xearthqua.kes, Zandslides, n.ud- slides, ground s;ailure or similar hazards? __.�.. Z, AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial: a• Air emissions �C or deterioration of ambient air quality? b• The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or fumes ? --X c-. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, locally or regionally? 3. WAFER. Will the proposal result in su'bstan'tial: a. Changes, in currents or the course or direction of water movements ins either marine or fresh Waters? b Changes in absorption rates, drainage or the patterns, rate and amount of. surface runoff? C. Need foroff-site surface drainer, ments, improve- - ge including vegetation removal ch zzation or culvert installation? ' iannel- d• Alterations to the course or flow waters? of flood eChange in the amount of surface, wager in any bony? Xwater f. Discharge into surface waters, or in anv alteration of surface water ' quali t i but. :not limited to temperat;ure,, dissolveduding °Yg n or turbidity? g. of the direction k ofground or rate of h of ground waters ? Change in the either throughgdirect yadd q additions waters, with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? i, Reduction in the amount of available for -.�. water otherwise J. of public water supplies?, .Exposure people or propertyto , water related hazards such as flooding; �. ..........: YES MAYBE NO 4 PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, X shrubs, grassy crops, and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any, unique, rare . or endangered, species of plants? �{ c. Introduction of new species of plants into an, area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- ment of existing species' x d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? S. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial; a. Change i.n the diversity of species; or numbers of any speciesof animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell fish, benthic organisms or insects)? b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rams or endangered species of animals? j< c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier' to the migration or movement of animals?' ,X d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial; a. Increases in existing noise levels?' , b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce sign lcant light and glare? 8. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a suyoistaantial alteTa.•tioli of the present or planned land use of an area.? 9. NATURAL RESOURCES; Will the proposal result in suFstantial a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural resources 10. RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve: a.A xis of explosion or the release of hazard- ous substances (including, but not limited to) oil, pesticides; chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? x b: Possible interference with an emergency, response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Ile 11. POPULATION. Will. the _proposal alter the: ,location, Esta ibu nj density, or growth rate of the human population? 12. HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing hou,%•.hg; ox croate a demand for additional housing? -4- - v" YES MAYBE N0 13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION., Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking;? c. Substantial impact on existing transportation systems? X G d. Significant alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. ;Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? 1 f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,, bicyclists or 'pedestrians?. -.- C- 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services; a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? X d. Parks of other recreational: facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? X; S. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: a. Use o substantial amounts of Eu energy? - b. Substantial increase in demand upon e upon existing.. sources of energy, or regt,i,re the development of new sources of energy: x 16. UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following' a. Power or natural gas? }( b. Communications systems? c. Water availability:X d. Sewer or septic tank? e. Stormwater drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? X 1.7. HUMAN HEALTH. Will. the proposal result in: a. CreatloTI of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of peopleto potential health hazards? 18. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? _ -4- - 19. RECREATION. Will the r "" u on the �- p result t in an rt�?,c t P �{uality or quantitay of existing. recrr-p,,tional opportunities? 20 . CULTURAL RESOURCES 4 Iii ll t e proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction Of' a prehistoric or historic atchaeo;7ogical site? b. Will the- pro o5p a1 resul-t in adverse}r si p Y c ��ld ter aesthetic effects' }� �• -� to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? c Does the proposal have the potential to cau. a physical chang;e which would affect uniqu ethnic cultural Values? d. Will thep pro osal restrict existing re1.igJ.oL1s or sacred uses within the "•µ--~• area? potential impact; V. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EV,- LUTON 11-36..1 See attached, M` �5 Ike .:. .._ ..... D I S+GUSS I0N OF ci,�tI1R(7iWY1ENi't AP 11 -86-1 lbr,cpe,f,8b,f: Development of homesites on the relatively steep slopes predominant on the property and the development Of a driveway to those building sites will result in disruption, d splacementp overcoverine sand compaction of the soil which will lead to increased runoff and change In drainage patterns which could lead to erosion and siltation of` ne?tIR � sxr: ap qh: All of gjtto County is lok..ated within a Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone V111- Construction of structures to Un 1 Perin Building Code standards for seismically active areas should provide adequate pt^otection to residents and occupants in case of seismia 6CtivitY. 5d The subject property is located within Critical door* herd area for the East Tehama Deer Herd The Department of Fish u11°1d Game has recommended no new parcels less than 40 acnes in such areas. This project has been forwarded to the Department of Fish and Came for comments and as of this writing no specific recommendations Or comments have been received. aa,c,f Development of additional homesltes will 'load to an incremental increase in traffic on local roads and an assaclated increase in traffic hazards. Due to the low traffic counts and the low number of parcels being created, this should not be a significant Impact. 14This project will represent an incremental increase in demand for public services in a rural area. At the present time services including fire and police protection, schools and medical faclllt`ie5 are located approximately 15 miles distant in Chico. 20: An archaeological survey has been performed on this property in conjunction with previous projects and clearance was recommended TI MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: at See Item 5d Suggested Mf 1 t 3 scat i on Mea .area 1 Utilize standard Construction and erosion control method-- to minimize erosion. 2 All road worm ac?d driveway work to take place during the dry` 'season i vegetat1'on Revegetate all cut slopes with natural . Applicant: E l 1 y N. Kelly Assessor `s. Parcim 1 lk 1 1'x»36..1 Log it 86-01-24*iOl DATA. SiiEET A. f!rp.legt Descriptio f 1. Type, of Project., Tentative Parcel i"lap Brief Description Dividing 40 acres to create two parcels of approximately 20 acres each. S. Location: Off the north end of Bean Flat road, approximately 1/2 mile north of Its intersection with Centerville Road, in the 'Butte. Creek Canyon area. 4. Proposed Density of Developments: 20 acres per dwelling unit. 5. Amount of Impervious SUrfacing= Minimal 6. Access and Nearest Public Roads > e Via Bean Flat Road r approximately 1/2 mile to Centerville Road 7. Method of Sewage Disposal Individual septic systems. 8. Source of Water Supply:Individual wells. 9. Proximity of Power Lines: To property. 10. Potential for further land d i is i s l ons and development'. None under existing zoning configuration. B. Environmental S,att i t,ra I Physical Environment:I 1. Terrain a. General Topographic Character: Foothill cany,gnland b. Slopes.' Generally 15 to 40X. c. Elevation. 6001 to 1000 'feet above Sea Level,1 d. Limiting Factors: Many areas of.steep slopes. 2. Soil's a. Types, and Characteristids: Gavlota Soil 'Series, generally well drained with moderately rapid permeabili{y. b. Limiting Factors: Many oraas of shallow soils» S. Natural Hazards of the :Land a. Earthquake Zone: Moderate earthquakes Intensity Zone VIII. b. Erosion Potentials High. C. Landslide Potential Moderate. d. Fire Hazard: High e, rmxpansive:Soil Potential'» Low. 4. HydroI ogy II a. c;tr: Swale's cross the Property which drain into Butte Creek. b. Groundwater: Unknown. c . [Bra i rage Character i st i ds : Land drains to on-�s i to swa l.'es thence oast to Butte Creek» d„ Annual PalnfalI (normal): 60 to55.01 e* Limiting Factors: Setbacks from dralnageWays 7