The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About011-410-146PLANNING C01MISSION rUMMARY SKEET FOR LAND DIV1 TON APPLICANT John D. Drake 85-08-21-o5 ADDpESS 1350 Lassen Avenue, Chico, CA 95926 OWNER Same PROJECT DE,,(:RTP`,C'1:0N Tentative Parcel Map to divided 32+ into 2 parcol,s. 1 of 17.7 acres and 1 of 14.3 acres. LOCATION On the North side of Spanish Carden. Drive, approximately 1600 ;feet Northeast of its intersection with Skyway, Chaco area. A,SaEu,S()R'S T'AirtfIT';L TN'1tBET:r'',) 1i-41 -?r0 11-41-147 ZONING PR -5 GEN. P%.A1aI . AC -REST. August 1 1.985 �... ,..._ ,DA.Th' APPIAPPLICATIONISE �+,,, �lWl,I) g � North Star Engineering, 377 Connors Court, Suite :f T Y Chico CA 9592-tnra. e McEnespy DATE PUB1,T1"VA7EW:J �Y_TV3E YRIE 1tN PLA01,; HOWSPAPER 140TIC'S (' r PUB' ,T.0IISD .. Q. c. p. . Ti. DATB, MAI I,I.NG LLT PREPAriFli DATE MATL-OlrL INOT'IChIr' X1%'1.` T1` ,N � MAIT El.) ,. lDA'l LyI,A�NNxTNG 7?T F:Z'',":`i`t"tI i k. I', �r`T` PREPA,1 F t r DND`11r0Nt-T.;I TA1, GAT&-401,1""AL EH"MPTION DA`M- FITEL) DETERMINATION AND DAA {' IWEGA',i'.IV,' I ECLAI�A'P.Iro i - a` A914 ADOPTIli flla TSA"�l; NEGATIVE 4yi-.':L-A A`.1.'ION - DA',I'I3 ENV. IMIAUT 'DAA. L' 0lL' i°%'IFl%l') SUB, COMMI7°AN"E f° EE 01 `via bji'rE ADVISORY Aa ENC; ' iiEA'1?1tNG I4ATF' Sa"" ADVIS;OPY AG1"i,NOY ACTION � l :BOA0 AC#TIC,IN CQIfiIN`54 Z VL hu- OF NATURAL WEALTH AND I31;A'UTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS WILLIAM (.3111) CHEFF, Director 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 Telephone: (916) $34.4681 RONALD D. McELROY Deputy Diraeicr Buffo Co, Planning Com, NOV 5 1965 November 4, 1985 Orov111®, UforwA John Drake RE AA 11-41-130, 147 & 146 ptn. 1350 Lassen Ave, Tentative parcel Map & Ch co, CA 95926 Boundary Line Modification Dear Mr. Drake: John D. Drake, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP & BOUNDARY LINE MOpr(:lC/1T 2 parcels on the north side of Spanish Garden Drive approx. ION' northeast of its intersection with Skyway. 1600 ft, AP 11-41-130, 147 & 146 ptn, Chico area, Engineer: NorthStar Public Works conditions. 1. Deed to the County of Butte 30 ft right-of-way from the conterli Of Honey Run Road. ne 2. Indicate a 50 ft. building setback from the centerline of Road. Honey. Run 3, Show all easements, of record on the final map. 4. Obtain encroachment permit for all driveways, new or eXist' construct to county standards; driveways to be at saF'e locatonsnd 5. Pay any delinquent taxes or current 'taxes as required. 6. Meet requirements of the Butte County Mosquito Abatement District. 7 Meet the requirements of Ordinance 2463 and Resolution 85-40 regardn Chico Unified School District fees. Place a note on the final ma g .that issuance of development permits,may require payrnent of schooP fees; Hearth Dept. conditions; 8. Provide a 100 ft. leachfield free setback around existing� either within the property or within 100 ft. of the e yells property boundaries, 9. Show a 100 ft, leachfield setback from the highwater line o 10. Show the usable sewage disposal area proven to meet t f the creek. Of the Subdivision Ordinance on 'parcel 1, he requirements 11. Provide the required usable sewage disposal area onarcel required usable sage disposal area shall be provided ewme Of map recording, The area shall be completed in i conformance at the t an engineered plan approved by the department of EnvironmencwHealth. 12. Place a note on the map thtt no water well may be located ! thin 100 ft, of the usable sewage d sposal area on parcel 1, 13. The leachfield area for parcel i shall be accessible t th Proposed homesite. b e Y gravity flow. _ The following mitigation measures are also required 14. Designate a 100 ft. structural $etback buffer aloe But the final map. 9 e Creek on 15. Show:, highwater elevation (areas subject to inund firer, �l';�p• ation) on the Anter -Departmental Memorun um To Butte County Advisory Agency FROM; Planning Director SUBJECT: Report on Tentative Parcel Map of John D. Drake on AP 1-41-146, 11-41-1117 DATE: DATE: October 24, 1985 This is a proposal to divide 32+ acres into 2 parcels.. The present zoning -is FR -5 (Foothill Recreational,- 5 acne parcels)`. The Land Use Plan Map of the Butte County General Pian designates this area as Agricultural -Residential; There are no;ecifc or community plans for the area. The proposal,; does not conflict with County zoning nor any adopted or proposed element of the Butte County General 'Plan nor any County, specific or community plan. Approval is recommended subject to adoption of the following mitigation measures: , 1. Designate a 100 foot ;pdfistructural setback buffer fr m e—h-ighwater ,.I_ins--af Butte Creek on the final map. 2. Show the highwater elevation (areas subject- to inundation) on the final map._ SAS : lr cc, North ;Star Engineering 37 Connors Court, Suite B Chico, Cay 95926 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF A.P.N. n-41-1471 Butte county, California By James P. manning PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed project is for a boundary Line, modification and division of 23.7 acres of land into two parcels, PROJIECT LOCAT!ONa The project site is located adjacent to the south side of Humbug Road approximately 1.0 miles east of the intersection with the Skyway, southeast of the City of Chico. The property 'Covers a portion of the NEI; of Section 49 T. 21 Nio R. 2 E., Chico Quadrangle, 7. series PROJECT APPLICANT: John D. Drake P.O. Box 1448 Chico, CA 9.927 PRIOR DATA R.EVIEWi Prior to conducting the field survey the archaeological site record files maintained by the Northeast Information Center of the California. Archaeological Survey were consulted to determine if any previously recorded cultural resources worelocated within, or adjacent to, the project area. No previously recorded archaeological sites had been recorded within the project boundaries and the nearest recorded site is CA-BUT--623, an historic rock wall> located to the west of,the project area: DATE OF FIELD INSPECTION: October 2 1985 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING: The property is a generally level piece of land located along the north bank of Butte Creek: The majority of the property area haS previously been disturbed by gold dredging and only a thin strip of land along Humbug Road was undisturbed by this; activity. Crouch Ditch flows along the northern boundary. Other modifications ;to the esidence and a small pond located property are an existing r in the eastern portion of the property. SURVEYM%THODOLOGY= The foes of the field survey was a visual inspection of the ground surface for materials or' features indicative of prehistoric or early historic activities, All portions of the`praperty undisturbed by gold dredging were in by walking transects with a five meter interval spacing over the entire area. The area covered by tailings, was, inspected by walking transects with D'U U00j %UUU�Sa¢4�aGd'3� 9) (P4 °��4009li'l1U'S1/11 VG �t 0-15050 a Ask AOL Al'PL;NiDfX T� COUNTY._PF iiil'l,l,r ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST pont l (to e complete y Bead Agency) BACKGROUND Tog It 85-08-21-05 AP ff 11-41-146,147 Name Of proponent JOHN �b DRt1KE 2. Address of Proponent and rel:iresentat 1ve~ (i C -applicable) JDhn D —Drake_.._._.- �T�.rthStar_Engineer rg� 3i 50. L"LSe__ n ,Ave�ir ue 377B Connors Court - �e Chico, CA 95926 �� Chico CA 95926p1 3. project description � P Zenta�ive Parcel Map__« T i MANDATORY P NDINGS OF SICN'rp'T(;ANCT YaS MAYT3B No a. Toes tiie project have the potential.. to degrade the, quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habi'ta.t of a fish or wi.1,11ife species, caL~sG 4i fish or wildlife population to drop below se1:f- sustalnirrg levels, threaten to eliminate a Thant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a ,rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the ninjot' peti.ods or California history or prehistory? C b . Does the Projeot have the potential to achieve short-term benefits to the detriment of Long-term, environmental goals; (A short-term impact on erl: environment is one which occurs in q relatively brief period of time: while long -terns impacts will endure into ,he future.). x C. Does the projr• ` have impacts which are lndividu ally limited, u- Cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more "Par,a;te resources where thr impact on each resource is relatively small) but where the effect of the total of those impacts On the crivironment is signi,ficant.� ci. Does the project have environmental, effects which will, cause substantial adverse effects oil human beings, either directly or indirectly? ITT 1)L7`ls"1tr1TNA'I'ION (To he COMPl eted by the [;cask Agency) Can the basis of this initial cv.,Iurttxon: I'Ii�E -fined the proposed project NOT COIILIl �have tt, Significant effect on the environment, and a _NI;GA`I'IV'Tl DPiCLARATrON 14,111 be pr:parecl, I X-,T/WI,, rind that Gal4hough the proposed project could nave a signi fi- cant effect on the envi rorunent ,, there will not be a s i T effect in this case because the MITT(IATXON MPASUIRr!S described nori p p tile attached sheen. ha.jrc been ad�lccl to ttie`Tsr�o;1ect, d N1;FI IiT;CIaAT�A7'T(1N will be re ared , UWE' find tile pt`oposed project MAY have a sigii.fie,anr effect on. the cavi ronment, and an T.N'V1 RONN1I-'N'k'A'D TMPAr;'T I?Ti Op'1 is required DA'I'li; October 1.5, 1985` - t`(1k1N'k'Y x - _ 13U`C'l'1:, i AN C 1lET�A1tTM)1NT Ste a Streeter, Senior ., F1 inner Reviewed by: IV ENVIRONMENTAL IM` TS xp anations of all ''yes" and "ma ybell' a answers on attached sheet(s)) ,.re required I. EARTH. Will the proposal re'sult in significant; a. Unstable "YES MAYBE NO earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacemeyLts, compaction or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d, Destruction, covering or modification off= any unique 2L geologic or physical features? e. increase in wind or water erosion of soils; either on or off-site? :E. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or Oaa in ges siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean o, any bay, ivilet or lake? g. Loss of prime agriculturall:. y pY'oductiNe soils outside designated urban areas? h. EXposure of people or property to geologic hazards such `--- -- as earthquakes, landslides mud- Islides, ground failure or si�tmilar hazards? 2, ATR, Will the proposal result in substantial,. a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air Quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke .� -�- or fumes? c, Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, _-°- or any change in climate, locally or regionally? 3. WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of Mater movernents in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage pattern.,, or the rate and amount' of surface` runoff? c. Need for of surface drainage improve ments, including vegetation removal,, channel- �... ization or Culvert installation? d. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? -�-- e, Change, in the amount of sux'face wafer in any water, body? f, Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water Quality, including . brit not limited to temperature, dissolved oXygen or turbidity? g Alteration of the direction or rateof flow' Of ground waters? h; Change in the quantity of ground waters, eitixer through direct additions or with- drawals or through interceptaun of an Aquifer by carts or excavations? i- Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? J. Exposure of people or property to, water related hazards such .as flooding? d , PLANT LIVE y---- Will the proposal result mange .� � N0 in substantial: in the diversity of species of any or species of plants , number (including tree's, shxubs31 grass, cro s- b• Reduction of the numbersdofaan)' unique) rare unique) rare or endangered species Of plants? C. Introduction of new species area, or of Plants into an in a barrier to the ment. of existing normal replenish-- • :Reduction species? in Y acreage of an agricultural crop? = 4 S . ANTMAL LIFE, Will the — a• C ange in the diversityoOf�Spec. rosulin substantial. _-- _X_ O£ ariy Spec ies of animals ' numbers including reptiles (bi.rds, land animals fish an:d. shell fish, benthic organisms or insects)? b• �teduction in the numbers of'an or endangered species -of rare animals? c. Introduction Of new species of animals into an area, or i result in barrier nthe mi, or movement of animals? fixation d• ,Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat?' ...� --,_ 6. IVOSSE; Will the proposal result in substantial. Incroases bstantial b. Exposure ofnPeople to severe noise levels? — ---- 7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the pos2�1 Proposal produce s`gni a cant ght and ,glare? 9 . LAND USE . iV'i1.1 the suit n ia1 alteration a al result in a land use of an area? the pxesent or planned 9. NATURAL RESOURCES: tYill the Proposal result sub ntaal: It in a- Increase in the rate of use resoof any natural urces? b. De pletiOn of any, non-`renewable natural resources? Willithe 10 RISK OF UPSET*explosion a. A rxs~ pro oral involve, p exploson or the release of hazard'- ous substances Cncludin g, but not limited,to, e 1, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in event the le n accident or upset conditions? b. Possible interference with y --a-- ---__ an emergency, plan or emer°gency.evacuation plan? -�..� 11 •', POPULATION. W211 the=- =---. istr� onr derisit proposal. alter the location, Y> or 'growth Population? rate of the human l2. HOUSING. Will the or proposal affect nu5�ng,ereate a'demandfor aitnahpxist'g r, p 13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATXON. Will the YES MAS No resu,z,t _ln: proposal a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? C. Substantial impact on existing Itransportation systems? d. Significant alterations to present patterns Of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? ^ e. Alterations- to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X Increase in traffic hazards to motor, vehicicq, bicyclists `--- - - or pedestrians? PUBLIC SERVICES,. Will the proposal have an effectupon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools?._..� d, Parks or other recreational facilities?'--�- e. 'Maintenance -. of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental Services? -- 15. ENERGY. Will the proposal, result in a. se: of substantial amounts of fuel ,or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing '- sources Of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy?, 16. i;JTILITIES. Will the propsal result in a need for new systems or substantial. alterations to the following: A, Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? C. Water r availability d. Sewer or septic tank? Po Storm water drainage?~ f. Solid waste sand disposal? 17. HUMAN HEALTH. Will__._... the proposal, result in: A. Creation of any health hdzard or potential health hazard (excluding mental 'health)? b. Exposure of people to Potential health hazards'?° C-- 18. ,AESTHETICS, Will the proposal result in the 05S ofany Scenic vista Or view open;t0 the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of ars aesthetically offensive site open to Public view? YES MAYBE NO 19,. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity, of existing recreational opportunities? 20 CULTURAL RESOURCES. a. will "the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? x c. Does the proposal have the potential to causes a physical change which would affect: unique ethnic cultural values?`( d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? VY DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP 11-41-146,147 See attached. :.ie L' - Ids SCIJSS I BN OF ENi/ I RONMFPIT�1 1�V ! 4JA O ' AW 11-41-146y147 1b. Some disruption, displacement, compaction and OVercoverIlIg will occur Upon development of parcel 1 Ov 29 ercovering should be less than 1h: Parcel is located 2 miles west of Foothill Sheer Zone/Tuscan Monod Ine, has moderate liquefaction poten potentlal. tial and modera.e landslide 3h2 Water supply is Proposed via an individual well for Pa Adequate aquifer rcel 1. a;_are expected to be available for a domestic well. BJ; Butte Creek is designated on the Zone A flood boundary maps. Areas subject to Inundation must be shown on the final mals Finish floor elevations for building structures on either parcel should be two feet above the high water elevation. 4b,.,"id: Project will result in the lass of some w11d1ife Department of Fish anhabitt. The d Game input is contained In the attachedaletter A 10.0-foot nonstructural setback buffer Is recommended along Butte Creek to protect fish and wildlife resources. 14a-f: The creation of one additional parcel will increase the demand. for Public services 1n an outlying area 'from Chico. Budget cu make It increasingly difficult to to such Provide tbacks ch areas. Schaal an adequate level of service to su n Impact fees will be collected at the time of 9 permit issuance. 16d: The special design mound system for sewage disposal on Parcel 1 requires clearance from the Bnvironmentol Health Div bey the, Reg l anal Water Quality Control Board. ision andp if meed 17b: The Butte County Mosquito Abatement District Is concerned standingr about watesources that will breed mosquitoes. Measures to g Mosquito breeding factor should 'be coin atlbte` ,DetartmenthofFish ,and Game' input P With the p to avoid d d 1'stut^kance of the land and vegetation within 100 feet of Butte Creek. Refer to attached comment' sheet, 20: No known archaeological sites exist on the parcel. However, thiasIshihatentia2 f11'es sand the parec�l is in an area designated. sites g g P car h 1 star i ca l and/or* iW-chaeo l og ! ca 1 sites Much of this al^ea has been prevtnu�ly dlsturbec! by mining operations. Applicent John D. Drake Assessor's Parcel 0 11-41-1469147 - L.og 0 'e5-08-21-05 QAIA SHED A. Pra.lect f 09Qr'1c-tea 1. Type of Pro3'ect: Boundary Line Modification and Tentative Parcel Map. 2. Brief Description: Tentative Parcel Map to create a 17.7-acre parcel and a 14.3-acre parcel from 52 acres: S. Location: South side of Honey Run ;Road, approximately 1 mile north and east of The Skyway, Butte Creek Canyon area. 4. proposed' Density of Development 5. Amount of Impervious Surfacing". 6 x,�ccess and Nearest Public Road(s) Access Is to Honey Run Road. 7. Method of Sewage Disposal: Special design "mound system for Parcel 1 8y Source of Water SupRl_y: Individual well 9. Proximity of Power Lines: AdJacent along Honey Run Road' and to Parcel 2. 1o. Potential for further land divisions and development". Under the present zoning, three more parcels. a-1 511v 1 ronment : Terrain a. General Topographic Character 1=air1y level land with some depressions where tailings have been removed. b. Slopes: Generally less than 59• a. Eldvbtion: 250 feet +f- A.SiL. d. Limiting Factors: 2 Soils a. Types and Characteristics:. Tait 1 r7ta - . soars/a gravel and cobbles piled in ridges and hasps, .non--arable, stony land. b; 'Limiting Factors: Sapt i q capab i 1 i t i es 3. Natural 'Hazards of the Upnd a, Earthquake Zone: 2' m l 1 es wast of Foothill Shear Zone/Tuscan Monpc-;31ne b. Erosion 'Poteny tal, : $1 i ght/Moderate. c.. Landslido Rotential: Moderate. d. !=ire Hazard: High. e. Expansive So 1 Potenti al : Low 4. Hydrology a. Surface Water: Parcel Is, adjacent to !butte, Creek,, b Ground Water c: Dra hage Cheracterist es:, Parcel drains toward Butte Creak to the south . d Annual Ra' jhfat1 (normal >. 26--28 inches. e." Limiting Factor« Norm. 1$. Visual /Scan 1'c ,Duel i ty: Rural - undeveloped. STATE STATE OF CALIpORNIA--THE RESOURCES .. OF . ES A DEPARTMENT 'OF FIS REGION Fi ,4ND (SAME GEORGE DEUKWJIAN, OaYorna 1701 NIMBUS ROAD, SUITE A ""-- RANCHO CORDOVA, CA(IQORNIA 95670 (916) 355-7020 g 1985 t �r ��lYa'yf/l0, Lr361tvrrl,*y a Mr John Mendorisa, Assistant Director 7 Butte county County Department of anty Center Drive Public 'Works Oroville, CA 95965 De8r Mr. Mendonsa; The Department of Fish and Carne has rev Map (TPM), a Proposal to divide 32 acres John D. r each. The subject Tply into Dxalce s 'Ccntative Parcel Of Chico, is located on H lots of 17.'7 and 14.3 by Butte Creek, Is is bordered onthe �7Roadorth bapproxi acres mately one mile east y 'Humbug Road and the south A l thrJugh the property j deer herd p perty is Within desi existing developint alonated winter range of the value as deer hinter range, g Humbug Road has lessened Fast Tehama approval of -the TPM Prov d aTherefore, the De the area's established aloe 100 -foot pertinent does not object alon g Butte Creek to nonstructUral setback buffer i to the g the waterway. protect the high .fish and wildlife values 'The Department appreciates the o cve can be of further assistance Please to on th Services Su please contacp pro comments if �rv�sor, telephone 1916 ' Mensch e TPM. ) 355-70.30. Environmental Sincerely, Paul T Jensen Regional Manager 9` I y,1b�„e ij•� 1}1y