HomeMy WebLinkAbout021-131-012o �
}
1
� .
" rt
^. N
r 1
e
�
t
N
C ,
r
r
Va
,
BL7TE CbL7N'CY
GENERAL, PLAN CONFORMANCE REPOR
F,_bR PARCEL MAP bits �TJBD=V SZON MA
Items 1-4 to be completed by applicant::
1,. APPLICANT NAME AND ADDR.CSS: ,L�"iLI/ DiC.�NA.e/i
220
2. PROJECT DEscPrPTION: `r Eli724 ZZI-125 f7. R6A-L
.¢/
3;.ASSESSORf S PARCEL NUM ER('S) ;
4: PROPOSCD USE: lczo'L '! / "i.'., '" A? j.14 EV7
'rhe following items are to be cq..Dl,el td by the Planning Department;
CURRENT ZONING:'
LAND CONSERVATION AGREMIMTt .Aly
(+ENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: &6, 0F,IQr14 G
Conditional Criterias
AGRICULTURAL-RESIDENTIAL YES NO
It is recommendod (lint you pexform the
1. A riculturr,
g 1 Compatibility ve
following checkod ltl+wla. _
`�
2. Welter and SeWer Capacity V
AkHAEO LOGICAL PEC01�1)S CHECK
3. Adequate Fire Facilities
��GF'OLOGJ;
60TANICA.V, ;alJTttt y
4i Road Capacity and Maintenance, l/.,
CAL 8t1R: ve,
5. Access to Commercial and Schools ✓'
_�
.�
ORCHARD AND FIELD CROPS,
YES NO
DEPARTMENT
WITHIN DEPARTMENT Or F`ISH
1. Predominant 5 40 at, Parcel Size.
ARD GAME MVELOP�r
NT ZONE. _jam
2. Vicinity of Urban Boundaries
WITHIN FLOOD PLAIN,,
3, Ag. Viability not Impsired
Staff Determination; Y
Substantiall cohforms to::
WITHIN AREA, SPECIFIC OR
LAND USE PLAN:
GENERAL PLAN: 1. Land Use V
- 2. Conservation �,,,.
If Yes y, r.�e2lDLl11)5
3. 00eh Space 1.-
Tame of ,Plan
445afetyy
WITHIN URBAN R88ERVE6
5. Noise u
If Yes, . .
5. Housing
Name of Redserve
1, tiirculation t.►�SE
ZONING:
AIRPORT LAND U PLAN-. y
Stift Signature
Date '"%�
ay
AS THE APPLICANT 1012 THE REQUESTED LAND bIVSSIONy :I AM AWARE;
THE CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL, PLAN AND ZONING`.
O'F THE ABOVE STAFF b8 EkHtNATION P OARDING
Datod
Sighattire of Applicnn't
r y
�Ois roport will eltpire and be discarded sik(gib) month§ from
dat��j�✓taf
f s 't to r,
Lb 1000A '(ejBvisiad 6 47)
e
�'�ityrr;
a APPENDIX F
Coxn,%TTY C)JF B TE
>t✓l�VC7'NMI�TTAL, CHECKLSS's
(To be completed by Lead Agency)
LOG NQ, $8`'12,12-03
AP No, 21-131-12
1 BA.CT<CRCiUN 7
I. Name Of proponent John Oldham
2. Addressof ,pr p6 and tepresentative (if applicable):
1 eonent
Wl5 Oa}� Road
------ i edT y , CA _ J ----------- GDA
220 Grand AverlUi~
urn
959G5
--- _ ;
3, T>ra jets descriPtinn: Tentative, Parcel. is
to divide parcels 1 @ l acres a1z davxde 20 :at�k�eS to create
acres+
1T. MAN 17A►Tt�RY FZN�Z-No 8 C7]F' SZGNZF C ONCE
YES MAYBE
1. D oes the project have the pat: ntial, to de rads —.__
g the quality al the environment,
sutist:antiuily reduce the habitat of a fistx or
Wildlife
NO
Wildlife s ecies cause a,
population to drop below self-sustaining levelsp threr 0eaten to eliminate
A plant or animal communis the
er endangered restric the
plant or animalzOrueliminace
range aOf a rate
te impnrr le
Of California history or prehistory? major Periods
2. detriment boas the pro ject have ;the potential to achieve shdtt-term benefits to the
E' goals?
einaA
v
(A short-tex•m impact on the
env;ironmentfisoono Whichnoccurs relatively ;brief oriod o
long term impacts will endure into the future.) p f time while
Net the project have impacts which ate individually limited but cumulatively
considerable?P j may impact on two
or more separate resources where
the impact on each resource is teldtiVely small, but whera the -effect
fatal
tat mp
those i acts on the
of the
envirohment is significant.)
t+. project have- environmental effdetgr
advOt
sttialadverse effects an human beings)
�hith i substantial
either, directly orindirectly
CTT, t71'a"'" UUZ+�N (`.Co be cd
C RM NA mpleted by the.'boad Agency),
this initial evaluation. y) On the basis of
1TWt fihd 'Else proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on tile
ehvironmeA and a NEGATIVE OVOLWTION
will be prepared.
TIW8 Nhd that although tht proposed project COULD have a significant effect
on the env3rontnenty there will not be a significant effect in this case because
the M1TiGATION hiEA5URE$ described
on the attached sheet. have "been added to Ete
project, A NEOA'TIVE bECLARATION will be prePared
"WE find the proposed project MAY have a signifieaitt effect on
find an ENVIRONMEN' AL IMPACT WORT is required. the environment)
COUNTY TY OP ttyntPLANNING OVARTMf ,NT
DATE DbdOmber 28
'David R H1, o us
Associate P1 no
keviewed'by,
■
llt. ENV.TRONMENT`AT,
=MPAC'MS
(gxplanat ons of all ilml' and "MAYAE'i answers are required onattachedshpoQti)
1 81A.Will the proposal result in significant:
YI;c Alf YAT
w. -
a.
Unstable earth conditions, or changes in ;geologic substructures?
,...
�.
b.
psrul,tion) displacement) compaction or overcovering of the soil?
c.
Change in topography or ground surface relief features?
d.
Destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or phygUa.1
features?
----�
e.
Increase in wind or Water erosion -cif soils, either on or off site?
f.
Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltatl.ot�)
deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or sUmAni
or the bed of the ocean or any bay) inlet or lake?
g,
Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils outside designaL•ed urbMi
ureas.?
h.
gxposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakug)
X L
landslides, mudslides, ground failure or similar hazards?
L ATR.
Will Uie proposal result in substantial:
a.
Air emissions or deterioration of 'ambient air quality!
b.
The creation of objectionable odors; smoke or fumes?
c:
Alteration of dit movement) moisture or temperature, or any change in
climate) 'locally or regianal.ly?--
_
WATER. 'Will the proposal result in substantial:
a.
Chcurrents) or direction of Water movements in
o
v
marine or Waters?
b.
Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns# or the rate -and amount
of surface runoff?
c.
Need for ofl-site surface drainage improvements) including vegetation
removal) channelization or culvert installation?
d.
Alterations to the course or El:6W Of flood water87
.-�-
e.
Change in the amount of surface wakPr in any Water bOdy7
X
f,
or itoate alteration of surface Water
bliiality�
including but not,limited
q g mperature, dissolved akygeh or
turbidity?
}�.
AlteraL~ion of the direction or rate of flow of ground Waters?
It,
or through
�hulge 'in the quantity or .q lily of ground Waters) either
ty of an aquifer
withdrawals, or through interception Rr
direct-.dditicaV
by trans?
is
:. in the amount of Waterotherws
e avallablo for public Watbrepplies?
�dt,.
_
,j.
txpadure of people or property to WAter'_r`elated hazards such as flooding?
4 pLASt LlF`1', Will the proposal result in eubstantXal:
ac
Change in the diversity of species) or number of Y,ny species of plants
(including trees) shrubs) grads) drops)r and aquatic plants)`#
b.
kbduetion of the numbers of any unique$ rare dt endd geYed; species of
%"
plants?
. .
G.
an ) barrier to
lritroduotiottof new species cf Plants .:area or in a
pinto
the normal re-lenishment of exietin a ecles7
�:..
,
d:
Rkldtletl6h in ,acreage of ahy agriciilturd:l oro ►7'
S.
IMAL 11FE, �,zil p. po tin substantial'
�' esu!
the sal
w. AYUIa No_-
r
a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals
(birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, organisms
or insects)!'
b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species Of
animals?
c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or in a barrier to
the migration or movement of ,animals? -
f
r, Deterioration of existing fish or qildlife habitat!
--
6.
NU b :till the proposal result in substantial.
a. Increases in existing 'noise levels?
�--
b. Exposure of peopl.a to severe noise levels?
" --
7.
LIGHTAND GLARE.Will the proposal product significant light and glar67
g,
NiA D DISE. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the
pxes nt or planned land use of an areal
q
NATURA1. RESOURCM Will the proposal result in substah ial:
yy
a: Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources!"
bE Depletion of any non-renewable natural resources?
.�.:..
lO,
RISK-OF_UPSET. Will the proposal involve;
a. A risk of explosion or release of hatardous substances (including) but
limited to) or radiation) in the event
r
t
Or upses conditions?e:nicals
ofanaccident t
►r, Possible interl'erCnde'with an emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan!
- ,--
11,,
pbpULATIoN.; Will the 'proposal alter locations distribution, density or
growth rate of the human population?
- ---- -
12,
HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing dousing, or create a demand
for additional housing!
-=--
1$':
TF2tN5PORUTI(5N/CIRGULATION, Will the. ¢roposal result in:
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle movements
b. Effects bn existing parking 60'iities, or demand for new parking
�_ r
c substantial impact on existing transportation systems?
Patterns oi' dirculation ord
aa� to
maementof people andorgodb7
v
e� Alterotiohs Lc WatekbCWftey Vail or air 'traffid7
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles} bityeli.sts Or pedeatrians`t
1.4.
POLIO 'MVICM Will 010- proposal, Have an sffedt upon. Or result th a need
for new oY altered government services:
a. Pitt protection?
b. ' polite protectibn't
:,..
d,. Sdhools!
d, parks or other recreational fadilitl-60
e Haintenanoe of public, facilitiet5 odludinD rbada7''
-
r11;.
f' other govornmenta serviaes7
15.
ENERMt. Will the prop osal, result
{ Jig—
a, Use of substantial amounts aE`fuel,or energy'?
b. Substantial increase in demand upon ;existing sources of energyy or
require the development of new sources of energy?
1G.
UTILITI S: Will the proposal result in. a need for, new systems) or
TOstantial alterations to, the following
a, Power or natural pas?
b. Communications systems,?
c. Water availability?
d. Sewer or septic systems?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal'?
17.
'HUMAN IEMAH. Will the proposal result ins
a. Creation of any health hazard or, potential hazed (excluding mental
,health) 2
b, Exposure of people to potential health hazards?
18:
AES1H:'TICS, Will the proposal, result in the Obstruction of ant-
.scenic
vista or view open to the public, or, will the proposal result the
creation of an aesthetically offensive site OPenL to public vie..,j(
19,
RMWTION, Will the proposal
raeosal result in an ihsact upon the unlit or
y
quantity of existing recreational opportunitie? P
20.
CULTURAL RESOURCES:
a. prehistoor orshistorical tarchaeologicalin tile tsite?r desuruotian of a
ca
b, Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects
to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object?
,AL`
c, Does theet
p physical h
p y change
which wouldaAffect uni.0 ethnic cultural values?
d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred use's within
the
potential impact aroal
D CSC>LTSSZf7N OF', 'El�tt F2C��ii I 1VT:AT� _]V'AtjT_ AT:r ON
See Attached.
*4'
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP # 21-1.31-12
lb, e,, f,3b,,c,f Development of an additional homesite on Lhe fifteen:
acre parcel as permitted by the A-5 zone wall lead to some tlsruption
displacement, compaction, and overcovering of the soil which, could lead,
to changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and
amount of surface runoff. This would lead to increased potential for
erosion of soils on-site and discharge into surface waters. 13eause of
the size of the parcels this should not be a significant impac .c
l
tract; into two parcels. Anp additional homes property will core orchard
g: This project will represent the division of a 28
P �
ite on the d; I
reduce the agricultural viability of the property somewhat. Since the
property is not in an area planed for intensive agricultural uses, but
rather as a suburban buffer, this project will not represent a
'significant loss of agricultural land.
lh: All of Butte,County is within a moderate earthquake intensity Zone
VISI, The subject property is located approximately
,> Pp _ y 12 miles Westo.'
the Foothill shear zone which supported the 1975 Oroville earthquake. of buildings to Uniform Building Codes standards for
seismically active arras should provide adequat
e protection to.
occupants in ease of seismic activity, -
3h: The ;project site may be subject to high groundwater which could
limit sewage disposal via on-site septic tank and leachfeld, s
The project ystems
have to meet Bwill utte County Environmental Health
Department standards for sewage disposal. As such,, no s�,cant
impacts should occur. Significant
4d: See item Ig.
8c There are two homes 16cat p p y The
ed on the ro ert" at this tine,
second dwelling was built under permit iri 1977 while the property was,
zoned A-2 (General), The area tva,s rezoned to A=5 (Agricultural - 5
acre parcels) in 1982. While this rezone created a nonconforming Use,,
of 2 dwellin N _ y
g ��' on a single parcel; the overall density of 1� acres per
dwelling unit is lower than the maximum density of 5 acres, per dwelling
allowed by the A�5 zone. However, this current proposal will place
both existing Homes on the same 5 acre, parcel resulting in a higher
density on that parcel than allol;ved by the zone,
that the project be redesi hed to It is recommended
parcel:
5 yi0ld;onIl one dwelling per 5 acre
12: Approval of this projeet may trigger similarro ects in the
i
,immediate vicinity. Since only two or throe parcels could be similarly
developed; this jhould not be a significant impact:
l3a cf:
r Thisro j eft will repr(v�;ent an incremental, increase in
traffic and rel:
related traffic hazards in the area:
14: This project will represent an incremental increase in demand f
public services in a rural area: or
Nb=G"E G�" IJ7E''�C'ER:M=1�7a�iTTO