Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout022-210-054PLANNING COAMISSION SUMATI'l. 'EMBE7' APPLICANT!" ADDRE SS., TYPE OFAPPLICV11ON: -A- -Va.ri oaLkh a,f.Zaxr.L-q.- ad., --s efX Arl PpX!.S)ZNT Z0Mll-M-._ DAT13' APPLXCATICTAl DATB %M -CES N U 371" R t PDXPM SENT OUT: NOT1 Z,-- SEMY-M HEARING% ADDITIONAL 740NING P8)21TXClq COMMIXSSION ACTXON- BROARD ACTI.M. ORD'.'MANCE, AWL VARIANCE or Z��c���G-� /�pPllC�,�l��' FOR Fi\m Np. Dove filed Heating date Action by Planning Commission Action by Board pfsupervisors PRESENT ZONING: —C" AssessorMoP Book Pago No, Parcel N -Z- 1 REQUEST, —W�;44 STATUS OF APPLICANT'S INTEREST IN PROPERTY: DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY, et I - 'T��� EXPLAIN FULLY REASON FOR APPLICATION' ^ - �f .1 U TE COUNTY PLANHIN6 COWhe above stafernen a cert' led by ilie undersigned fo be correcf. JAN 10 1975 also 0 j: order i,n the amount shown 13010w, paya6le to County of Buttej NOTE, Please su6mlt herewith 0 check or moh eyf existing and proposed structures on your propertyand oil the adjacent detulled plot plan showing the location 0 ' .' ' ' , `� NOTICE TOAPPLICANT ` [ ,d �baouppUed/nm^|dh� 1, If applicant |o udhoxthan mwn*r^ aprnu w�wn� _. in order to legally sign ihm "App|icot|oo |nr UW��_I�M�yvarmxv: . , ` ^ Application shall bmoonm Wanm d void if mu,uighwci by own$/ or 119,11 agent, ' 2. All items oil application bucpmp|ot"d. |yun item is not apvUoub\g. \nd|~ ^ oobebyLhgoymhu n/a. ' ` 8. Explain briefly yet completely the nuiu,o of the promJeed u*n~var|aune. Th � is very Important and ar$quia|ie. |� 4. T -' copies of m detailed plot plan folded �6"x11"shall o�tV `ny and be mg--ert of the "Application for U-.5e=-R4nln#/Variance'.~ The plot plan shall inc|udn ihm following: a. A scaled drawing oftile parcu|(a)bounduriex, e b~ Location of U existing and proposigj tjljil(jinqn and impruv*man\e" u. Locot\onand size of existing arid p/mpnsmd mocoeuiu1hetubimuipu|uO|<s). d. Identify ainsatn bordering property and neaoby crnmarooda. P/uv|dG- n 100a - tion map oca^i|onmap |fnecosmary.Show North Anavv. 5^ Applicant Shall further understand that tha 'AVp|ioo|oV for tile approval of the Planning Commission, Variance" nho|| b� subject 1� e uppro . ur . upon appeal, of tile Board od Gnperviaoro. Any ouhe$Aueni conditions pn#oreo by the Planning Cmnm|muionaha\| bc made m part of tile, approved 'th4,�IVarianco and s1wil hw binding or, aPp|k`u./t' �. Unless conditions of approval have, buen complied with, \n;aone-year period. the "Use pel,mit" will bo deemed expired, | hereby declare under- peoeAty of perjury that | have, read the foregoing ' DATED: ` '. APPLICATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW When application has been made to the County of Butte for approval of a project which is not ministezial and is not categorically exempt from environmental review requirements, the applicant is required to submit this additional application, together with a fee of $10`.001 to the Environmental Review Committee, c/o the Planning Department, 7 . County Center Drive, Orovill,e, California:, pursuant to 'Sections 5B and 5C of the County of Butte Procedures, for implementation o the California Environmental (duality Action of 19 70 . C�1 ',.3U L-/ Vo a� APPLICANT TO COMPLETE',, /� /•r L. Name & Address AP No. 1. ProjDesDescriptionlie,")G? ect 2. Applicant's status (local public agency, state agency, private firm or individual) ,CL- -i�i 3. Funding Source (FHA, HUD, etc.) r►c e,ti 4. Location, general description (Location mala to be provided) r k✓yGG1tittt 5 Generalized physical, description of the project - size, type of terrain, outstanding physical features, etc. L G. Total projected cost 7. Anticipated scheduling 8. Associated projects (include the ultimate project even if the project is to be completed in stager, or phases) . BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COR JAN 10 1975 5g`nature Gz.. AP P-2-21-18 AP 22--22-06 AP 22-21w54 Gary J. & J.B. Rudd 13.F. & S -B. GalveL Rt 3 Box 311.2 ! Rt. 2 Box 696 George Boeger Gridley, CA 95918 Gridley, CA 95948 r AP 22-•21-19 AP 22-22--08 Gary J. & J.B. Rudd L.W. & B. Tyler Rt. 3 Box 142 1071 Remington Dr. Gridley, C 95948 Sunnyvale, CA 94086 AP 22-21--20 AP 22-22--10 August Boeger. Jr. Margaret Kuntz Peal P 0 Box 367 1 377 Tippece,noe Gridley, CA 95948 Hayward,CA 4 94.541 i AP 22-21-53 i AP 22--22-12 1 E.W. & E.J. Boeger etalI P.A. & D.T. Shelgren rr10 1430 Spruce- St. , Rt 2 Box Gridley, CA 95,948 Gridley, CA ;l 95948 AP 22-21--54 j* AP 22--22-13 E.W& E.J. Boeger etal J.R. & F.B. Harris j i 1430 Spruce St. Rpt 1 Box 79 Gridley, CA 95948 j Biggs, CA j 95917 AP 22-21-55 AP 22-22-14 (' I G.J. & E.J.Boeger etal W.L. & A,B. Womach 3564 Boeger Lane Rt 2 Box 704 San Jose, CA 95100 r Gridley, CA z 95 948 ` AP 22-22-01 AP 22-22-..15 Eleanor M Miller Lillian & Tlman 1Gettle j P 0 Box 486 930 Alta Aver Gridley, CA 95948 Mt. View, CA ! AP 22-22-02 r" AP 22-22-1.6 E.T. & S.A. Miller Arlin Gillum M, Rt 2 Box 692 2265 Perras Court p Gri.dl.ey9 CA 95948 ! Fortuna, CA 95540 AP 22-22-03 AP 22--22•-17 N. & M. Lopez L.F. & Romana Galvez Rt 2 Box 694 Rt 2 -Box 695 B Gridley, CA 95948 Gridley, CA 95948 A17 22-22-04 L.G. & Marcelle ONeal Tit 2 Box 694 Gridley, CA 95948 + i r .., Zi]ze Mc,Enes:PY r rtep'L. ,of Public Works 4 A-40 r� ) ^ ftp gilts), . AP '.22.-21..-54 ... .. .. , ... ., ... ., v riance to minimum parcel size, to allowa !r 4.12, acre parcel in an A-40 zone. On the west side of,.,Biggs-Gridley Road, south of FaiHLS Road, ..south_ of Biggs,t. . GEORGE BGEGEI ,. _3564 Boeger ,Lane, pan Jose, CA 95122 ©uttr 0004ty JAN 2 8175 ROVIL LF, CALIF. 3 Before Commission scheduling Z ✓.. . 1/24/7"J iiµ l 0 MIRE 'COUNTIM ", C-PARTME , 1,37 `' �ioward '�oussain', Yeath _A,e kt�, . NAP-Ynt� HF �fP'�x 01406 ' 22 -zip -544.,. p.arcel size -to, to a �dti ,°,rb�� �4 �. o minimum. . ,� °;r, m, u�..k;. Variance t 4.12 acre parcel in an A-40 zone.' On the west side of Biggs- Gridle y Road, -south of Faris Road, south of. Biggs GEORGE BOEGER 3564 Boeger Lane, San Nose, C:A 95122 GJN:I same 2/: /7-5 .. _ p P Before Commi Be Commission'scheduling_ .,A ... .142 4 75 q't?rev'e Stratton, Air Quality Exaq�;s eery Variance to minimum .pps0e1 04AP �. 'to . etiXlow a 4.12 acme parcel JA an A-40 On the wrest arse ofc T33jgq- G id1ey I�oad r goUtIl of Paris 13r ad e south of Big s LL - ........3;56.4 Boeger Lane r . matin t'ose, CA 95X22, �'li 917 e!z siame !f__ �A �1y. RO ..y.. r�} .,_., . Before Commission schedu�.: �g.1/24475 + .,,„ APVXNDIX 1) NEGATIVE DECI,ARMON RECAMING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 1. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Environmental Review CommitLee of the County of Butte has reviewed the projevt described 1)010W pUrsua-,nt; to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1.970 (Public R(-,,aourccs Codo Sections 21100, et seq.), and determined that It. will not have n 4OLpnificaot effect upon the environment. An environmental imonct report: will not be r(,- quired. 2, DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Variance to faIninlunt parcel. size to allow a 4.12 acre parcel in an A-40 (Agricultural) zone on property located on the west side.of Biggs —Gridley ey Rd. , south of Paris Roadt identified as AP 22--21-54, south of Biggs. REASON: This Variance would allow, a land division. which, will I)e setting out existing residential facilities. 1 L 3. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROJECT APPLICANT* G1�ORGE BOEGER 3564 Boeger Lane FED b,) ly,/,) San Uoset CA 951.22 UARK A, NUS014, '4;�);,,1)Ah)w,,1, CI....... ........ ­­­....... rj::p.l"q I 4. A copy of the Environmental Review Committee's determination regarding the environmental effect of this project is nvailable for public inspection at the Butte County Planning Department, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, Cal- ifornia. Copies thereof will be provided to any person upon paymenkl,.- by him of a fee of $1.00 for the first paga and $-50 for each additional. page. 5. Any person wishing to contest this Negative Declaration May file a wxfitten protest specifying the reasons therefor. Such written protest shall be filed with the Butte County Planning ',ommission Ott the Planning D,spartment office i.,ithin fifteen (15) days, from the date this Negative Declaration was filed with the County Clerl<. If a written protest is timely filed, a hearing regarding the Negative Declaration will be held by the Planning Commission. Objections may be presented either orally or in writing at the hearing4 6. if no written protest is timely filed regarding this Negative Declaration, the application for the project may be approved without hearing regarding, the Negative Declaration. W ENVIVWNIMIENT/il, REVIEW COMMITTEE 1. LINDINGS GeoK2o Boecrer Applicant's Name 35G Lio�e�Lade Address San Jose, CA 95122 APPr;IqlX C Variance Type of Project AP 22-21-54 Location or Parcel No. 1/x-0/75 Date Rece3,. Does the project have the potential to degrade theYES NO quality of the environment or curtail the range of t'he environment (narrow the range of beneficial uses of the environment?) Z, Will the project cause impacts which achieve short -terms to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while ,long-term impacts will endure well into the future. _ X 3. Could the project cause impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? A project may impact on two or. more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small. If the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant, an EIR must be prepared. This findi;n:n, does not apply to two or more separate projects tOhere the impact of each is insignificant. X 4. Could the environmental effects of the project cause substarl- tial adverse effects on Human beings, either directly or indirectly? X NOTE; If any of the above four findings questions are answered "YES", the project will be found to have a significant effect on the environment, DETERMINATION This project will not have a significant effect on the environment, A Negative Declaration should be prepared, because this variance would alllow a land division which will be setting out existing resi- dential facilities. This project could have a significant effect on the environment. An EIR is required.. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMM,I'.ITEE Daae F'PL�ruarx--3-r� 7 S gy 1 ai.,rpn cF,�..�ra Director of Planning 1./10/75 GEORGE BOEGER ,AP 22-2i--5 C-1 -ie1"anflill�lf�rfienmtm�� _ DETERMLOATION RE SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON ENVIRONMFNT George Boeger, 3564 Borger Lane,San Jose, CA 95122 r �Applicantas Name'and Address Variance AP 22-21-54 Type of Project Location or Parcel No. DnLe Received An environmental impact: report is required for any project which may have a sig- nificant effect (substantial adverse impact) on the environment. Effects include environmental consequences of both primat,y and secondary nature. The following questions shall be used as guidelines to decide whether to make a negative declaration or an environmental impact report. (If answer is unknown, write "unknown" in yes/no column.) CHECKLIST YES NO 1. Could the project significantly change present uses of the project area? (See Notes.) X 2. Does the project significantly conflict with the Butte County General Plan or any element thereof? X 3. Could the project affect the use of a recreational area? (See Notes.) X 4. Could the project have a substantial and demonstrable neg- ative effect on an area or feature of aesthetic value? X 5. Will any natural or man-made features in the project area which are unique, that is, not found in other parts of the County, State, or Nation, be affected? (See Notes.)_ X 6. Will the project involve construction of facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater? X 7. Will the project involve significant cuts or fills? X 8. Could the project cause substantial flooding, erosion, or siltation? X 9. Will the project involve construction of facilities in an area of geologic hazards? X la. Could the project change existing features or involve con- struction in special building permit areas along the Sacra- mento River, the Feather River Floodway, in any area subject to inundation, in an area in close proximity to any river, stream, lake, reservoir or natural drainage channel? _ X It. Is the project one of a series of cumulative action, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? X 12. Could the project breach any published national, state, or local standards relating to solid waste or litter control? X C-2 bitat, A 13. Does tthe }ro'eLt or the project; site serve as a food SOUtLe, nesting place, source of water, etc. for rare X or endangered 4oildlife or fish species? ljj. Could the project significantly affect fish, wildlife, or plant life or cause substantial interference with the move- fish wildlife species? K ment of any resident or migratory or _ 15. Are there any rare or endangered plant species in the pro- X ject area? 16. Will the project remove substantial amounts of vegetation X including ground cover? 17, Could the project change existing features of any of the region's watercourses or other bodies of water.? _ X 18. Could the project result in significant change in the X hydrology of the area? (See Notes.) 19. Could the project significantly affect the functioning of an X established community? (See Notes.) ------ 2.o. Could the project physically or economically result in the displacement- of community residents? — X 21. Could the project significantly affect an historical or archaelogi.cal site or its setting' (See Notes.) --X--- 22, Could the project serve to encourage development of presently devel- rand-.F,�Joped areas or intensify development of already epee ,^zeas? (See Notes.) 23. Are you k",xe of a substantial body of opinion (present or anticipated) that considers (or will consider) the project X or its effect to be adverse to the environment? w 24. Will the project create new or aggravate existing health X hazards? 25. Will the project iniLilve the application, use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials in an amount sufficient to (See Notes.) X — cause a substantial adverse effect? _ 26. Could the project generate significant amounts of dust, smoke, gas, odors, or other air pollutants? 27. Could the project generate significant noise? X 28. Could the project cause contamination of a public water, supply X system or adversely affect ground water? 29. Could the project significantly affect the potential use,, (See Notes.) X extraction, or conservation of a natural resource? 30, Could the project result in damage to soil capability or loss X of agricultur,al land? 31. Additional remarks; C_3 I 1 U .d�PS .�.Stl.Y: S hdOAi:f J. ....+...�......f.:....w.w`............+.—...»...+ww.....:..ri�:Y.b.r.w,..,.w..o.... r.......w.w.r+!rw�m�+n*�YH�«+«.nw�.W...•r.r... ,P.�XCAM GEORGE BOEGER = ss3564 Bay er Lang San Jo ,@, r1, , 4'0 8 2 3 8- 3 —632— �_..:,.. AP XqO. OR UMMON _AP nm REOMIPT p,XR I,2jgTA REVZZEW � e�+g� � �4a,� .y�pip/.yt^.417 t3 ,pp�y.�}:�;yv,,......_�.�, �..�.. .. AVI:E 8:.8. V l..p: Sl�rdhR'bd",Fa.I..A o d�.7 11�0"D U�I'E.f.:l �s.�ot"1tl.R�.7�. 4e�Jra PROMBOTHBAMNG ., -...............tea..... ��,..........� But 1-mou-m-A APPLICANT NOTIFS-M APPENDIX Do xx APPLICANT SUBMIT llqV0RMWl'l0M---- NOTICE Off' COW T10N 1"ILED a y4rooeO�INTdS SGL. 7��pns�i7,PIFIR � .w...«..�yypAT � kr1.s.. d�,ryrt+4g�c� �» r a"J iaa�R6a�d�6"+.So. Gi 4J`�, ,' .,1V.�C.�.a'Mu.7.Ai 3�.d.'au�W'N.GS.4:.5.'S 5o.R or, sunRv :so �� ���A��. ��� ��� ..._...�..,._.w..... ... ......_...w...,,..��..... �. aJ�Y'"�f.l irJa. ltY.+ xotice is hereby gl Ven by the :Butte C61,Y7rby i.t.anning C(72':�171.,ori,icn that -public :k� wrings will be hold cavy, `xlu rsdav q I"c��a:��7r,►�� � 2? n :� �"9"p n 8,t '� * 30 „T m 3.n. the 13ut to Co�imty Blow}d of $'uperVisO:�°f; u Rnc 1� Butte t�oun V Administration But .Wldirga (xcville v �� ,:i.3 t'�ar�a� a� regavdirig 't;k3e :tri 21 M HAVING A VEGAT.t;VT ;1;1RC L-AR.A'.i.'ION REGARDINGBj4jjRONTMENaTA.`L f1Vl;C..)AM FILED 1. George Roe er � �ira�,a'� a:42�:a.� to YPdi?'1.imlim piaxc el Size to allow a 4,12 acre p.nreal. i1,1 ! "A-4011 Ukee' icu,ltia'etl) zone on P,u opel ty located mile West p " 1�� ;gs — G r�:a»dl.ey Rcaa�.t� n 1 � uii e o0uth a' Farms R a dti we .a c*.?:C 73»t,g',: n Ydentifted air AP 22-21-54o The above u»lx t toned,pp icationku n pc:•t:Lt;jojj fl maps v ftaft aanvi ronmenta: impact reports and/or negt ti7e reports are can. Me rid av al1able for public viewing El t: thO Of'fl.Ce Of he J�'utt;e Covirty, Planning Department; 7 Calmty Center Drive Q 011(;o7:g.11.0 9 Qa0.110rina. Environmentauk, impact Reports are also avrxilablo at Pollewg, end county libro —le.q. BUTTE COMITY PLANNING COMMI;SION LAV'r1:t=.,NTCE Jo LAWSON D',fImw'CTQR. OF .11LANNIN'G TO BE PUBLISHED IV IME, GR:t"MMY BED4000 ON 7'RIDAY; T+YEBRU,ARY 149 19M, ✓ STM Y,''�MOX00s . 1975 i• I. otic: o r, Bon u11'ff or VIrIn"'.7f ro o Parcelrcel size to core }G?:x C �h uW,'wi ,E4 1GB fl` aU foil+ C .4 of EoC",Fh i«o 1/ 'mile welt ,00 I i'� aqyot�� section from the tet—,kid pthe zoning � ing;y.'r �, s taiibes : becmum6 al spit:4«d,al 0jr.'030 shallr?E?1FFi f�� )tcl�ilnYE iSly when, LR thy A hp,{NexY t igaw Si2GOj shape, tx»����erappli- Cationdaprivem such privileges enjoyedbaothat pr the -iy fiPations. k, den ti Cal goAng Mark - grant this mvlanaeb BUTTX COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION r. MINOTES - February 27, 1975 75-22-1-871. B. VARIANCE 1. George Boeqer - Variance to minimum parcel �qize to allow a 4.12 acre parcel in an "A-40 (Agricultural) zone, on property located 1/2 mile west of Biggs - Gridley Road, 1 1/4 mile south of Farms Road, south Of Biggs, identified as All 22-21-54 Staff fil-4dings were read by Mr. Lawson. A Negative Declaration regarding Environmental Impact was filed on February 3, 1975 with the County Clerk and there were no appeals. STaff findings were read by Mr. Lawson. Proponents: George Booger, 3564 Boeger Lane, San Jose, Ca., spoke in favo,r of the variance, as did Mike BoOqer, 419 Randolph, Gridleyo both stating that it was their desire to separate the Property that had the rice dryer on it from the other lands because there was no longer any connection with the dryer operation and the land use of the sures rounding properties. They further stated that they desired to combine the balance of this 40 -acre parcel with surrounding family-owned land and plan to form a corporation. The hearing was closed and Commissioner Watson (999+56) made a motion for approval, stating that this variance would enable Parcel 1 to be added to surrounding agricultural land, whid" would enhance its agri- cultural use and add to the productivity of the area in the spirit of the zoning ordinance that Placed the A-40 zoning on the area. His motion was seconded by commissioner Thebach. AYES: Commissioners Carnenzind, Gilbert, Moore, Hanfordt Thebach, Watson, TvAtterse Smith and Chairman Sylva, NOES: None. ABSENT: None. motion carried. Ms. Mary Dodson County Planning Department 7 County Center Drive groville, CA 95965 RE: AP 2.2-21-54; George Boeg,er, Variance Application Dear Ms. Dodson: Enclosed, pursuant to the Environmental Review Committee's request, are ten copies of a map showing the improvements on the subject parcel. The unmarked building shown on the map is a parts storage shed. Very truly yours, KING, HARRIS & McCABE I 'Neil H:'McCabe NHM/as Encl, cc: George Boeger GOODMAN HOUSIt . . 19 f12TI.1U EtiN1PLANApR . LAW GFFICES 8615 ShNUCS STNIZRT C1,1100. CA 95026n� KING, H�1i RI.S & IvlCCAB. P. 0, SOX DOLS 014104pY, 816 342.7 Bel CA JbbAb JOWN T, WARR14} NEIL M. MCOAUV bill 04 6-5691 TWOMAS c, SANFORD Or COUNnEL. CI•IANI.as L. Ip Na LARnY L„ SwRNINCRN _. PLCASE' REPLY TO January 21, 1975 Gridley Ms. Mary Dodson County Planning Department 7 County Center Drive groville, CA 95965 RE: AP 2.2-21-54; George Boeg,er, Variance Application Dear Ms. Dodson: Enclosed, pursuant to the Environmental Review Committee's request, are ten copies of a map showing the improvements on the subject parcel. The unmarked building shown on the map is a parts storage shed. Very truly yours, KING, HARRIS & McCABE I 'Neil H:'McCabe NHM/as Encl, cc: George Boeger GOODMAN HduSF 13E12 no I I$MANAOr cllwoo CA W;920 916 342-7561 i...AW OITFICF'S KING. HARRIS & MCCAI3r-., JOHN T, HARMS NkIL H—HcCAHK f1.10MAS 0, OANVON0 OV COUNGRI. CHARLES L. KING LARRY L. SWMINa.FN February 3, 1975 DOO P'MUCEr StraMT N, c>. Dox 000 f3rooi rt, CA 05044 010 (340-5601 PLEASE nCPLY TO Gridley Ms. Mary Dodson County planning Department 7 County Center Drive Orovi l l e, CA 95965 RF: AP 22-21-54,* George Boeger, Variance Application Dear Ms. Dodson: After I wrote to you on January 21, 1975, i discovered that there was an error in my letter. l had stated in my letter that the unmarked building shown on the enclosed map was a parts storage shed. That statement was in error. The unmarked building shown on the map is a rice dryer, There is also a parts storage shed on the premises, but it is of such small consequence it was not pictured. Mr. Boeger's objective in obtaining the variance is to enable him to later fife a parcel map dividing the parcel into two smaller parcels as depicted on the map which we sent you. Parcel 2 is, of course, less than forty acres in size and; therefore, it is necessary to obtain the variance before the parcel map can be processed. The purpose in applying for the variance and later filing the parcel map is not to change the land use of either parcel. Both parcel 1 and parcel 2 have his- torically been used for agricultural purposes. The rice dryer was constructed on parcel 2 in 1951 and added to in 1952. The dryer has been used continuously since that time in connection with the Boeger family's agricultural operations and will be so used in the future. The Boegers' plan to file the parcel map will not change any of this but is simply part of a reorganization under which a family owned corporation will own proposed parcel 2. The corporate form of ownership will facilitate use of the dryer and other facilities on parcel 2 by the various family members. It is possible that additional improvements would be installed on parcel 2 in the future, but any such improvements would be consistent with and for the purpose of maintaining the agricultural uses. IL Ask Ms. Mary Dodson February 3, ,1975 Page 2 Please notify us if the Environmental Review Committee or the Subdivislui Committee would like any additional information on these matters. Very truly yours, KING, HARRIS & McCAEE Neil H. McCabe NHM/as Mr. George Boeger 5564 Boeger Lane San Jose, Ca« 95:1.22 Rea AR 22...,;x1,..54 Dear Mr, Bpeger: This letter will serve as your official notification that the Butte County Planning Commission, at its meeting on Vehruary 27, 1975, will consider your application for a variance to minimum parcel size for property on the wast side of Biggs -Gridley Road, sobth of raris Road, south of Biggs. This meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors' Room in the County &dmir istration BuildincIt 1859 Bird Street, Croville, and is scheduled to begin at 7:39 P. M. if you should have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact this office. SiAcerely, Laurence J, Lawson Director of Planning by Z.t . Lia as /h d u I i "„rVt ,r' twrrYt all Mv! rl12estir"7T?E^ n 4 7..r���i �. •. . ,,� llealt.1'4 Sbe�` t 9 George Bo ager 3564 Boeger Lane ca x rTfl e 9 CA 95'122 -V AP 22-21-54, Vol'irAnce Dear 33oe9ere pl`lzi gaiter to congirm the fpr;+ tl'�, i; thea S�utte �.ouxYty l.r xrnin G o ri�xt 4j jj j oy' V_,t tl; e it Tae O nt cYa � c x°ura7"y 7 19759 approved your request foa c, �r��.riaxxc�! to m�,xz�,pnuca �a�x°or�J ��.�e w� �-40" (Agri Oul.tursal ) ,� "� ;.L�.. C► i"V E'�. 4.12 al:x" �: parcel ill � IIA —40" a$ on property l.00ated ?� rn�'lc v : t o i idenfitiegr—Gridled am 1.; mile oouth Of Parma 1�cc�Rd, ;5outlx Of 1. x;.:9 l °vont should have any queetiolin conc+orn"C free to contact this o please Feel � ee iyyycery y PLAIIIIITIG cca Butte Couaaty rtlepM th Dept. Del) t a Of 1 u dal. c ! t 1 �y i r �� �.r i 7-� J i ; � - yr t � ,, � � �.f � �. + i 'b��� - - I® .qtr t � ' ' ¢t i �: � i r � � e �',� � ®� 1 r 0 C b F- P Z