Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout025-060-037+ ' � � � � \ ' r * C � n .. a .. �. . " 'i' �, . . 5. ,� ., n . i ,. n % b I.. y - ` �� • � I s , ` � � � .• e. � ' •. V 1 ' t i ' ' � �• \ . � .. • i • � k' � � , 4 O � J � 5 ' �� � � ,: s � 9 ` V �. ^ 0 i �� 1 � p � T l9` ' �. `� ^„ _ / � , � ,f �, i '- .a � - / t• t � ,�. PLANNING COMNIISS:iON SUMMZ�.RY APPLICANT Gregory Davidson SHEET ADDRESS 3266 Dos Rios ,Rd., Biggs, CA 95917 40 OWNER Helen Davidson, 3156 Dos Rios Rd. Biggs,, CA 93917„ PROJECT DESCRIPTION TPM/BLMTPM t"o divide 18.06 acrcr esa `Lo create 3 parcels, 2 @ 5 acre Parcels and 1-:-� @ 5.54 acre. Remaining 2.5 acres Y LOCATION on the east side o 7 f Dos Rios .._..� . Rd., apProx., 0-0 ► nortiyof Lattin Rd., East Biggs area ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NCTMBER S25-06-36,37 .. C )"��— r 2� 06-'36, 37 ZONING A-5 GENEP.AL PLAN Ag-Resi "--- r 'R00EC'1' GENERAL PLAN CONFORMP, '0N.83�.,ISTENT? NCE REPORT--------- DAT -1.;0 TS' APPLICANT �GNATURE LAND CONSERVATION ACT CONT;RAnTp7 DATE APPLICATION RECEIVEb-- . August 1, 1986 AGENT/SDRV YOR/CIVIL ENGINEER: Richard F. Sannsr �. L.S: ADDRESS 556 Little Ave., Gridle`i""°" -- , x`409594$ DATE PLANNING DxrttCTOR'S REPORT PREPARED ENVIRONMENTAL,__ _. DETERMINATION CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION �» AND DATE -" DATE I'I1,ED NEGATIVE MCLARATION --, DATE ADOPTEDLL 1 - , ._ MITIGATED NEO;. DECLARATION - DAVE' ADOPTED W ENV- IMPACT ,REPORTr ` DATE CER.Z'IP.'CED STATE CUARTNGHOUSn NO. ------ SUB, COMMITTEE NIEE" ING DATE ---- ---�� ADVISORY AGENCY HEARING DATE��O ADVISORY AGENCY ACTIONY""""` APPEALEb -- .-�.... . tit, ARING DATt;� BOARD ACTION r Butte County Planning Dept: 7 County Center Drive Orovlle, CA 95965-3397 (916) 534-4601 a r_ WR OFFICEUSE ONLY: Receipt APplieant AP 11 Subdivision Name (if aPplioable) APPENDIX R Date Filed. 's /Zwo b 47 LAND DIVISION APPLICATIONS ftboAEVr Vra Supplemental Inforination for Plannin De arpn�" 3 11986 1. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including thost.required by city, regional, state and federal agencies:—hLnr,,a 2. Proposed scheduling/associated projects: %Ione 3. Anticipated incremental development (phasing of subdivision units, future development plans): Nobe 4. What method will be utilized to accommodate. surface drainage? Describe how on-site and downstream drainage channels will be affected: - Existing surface drainage will be perpetuated, which is sheet flog to a draiftage sump at the east end of the parcel. 5. Proximity of water for fire fighting purposes (hydrants, ponds, etc.): a large irrigation canal is 1.5 Miles west of the parcel. y. 6. Will excavation or grading be necessary? Cubicaids y , (estimate). No 7. Directions for travel to property (rural and mountainous areas only), Brom nrovil0 south nn Larkin Rd. to Dom Rios .-Rd,.. ► than south on Dos Rios Rd. kmile to the parcel, $. ENVIi?ONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES* Identify potentially significant environmental impacts associated with the land division. What project design features or special conditions of approval (mitigation measures) are proposed to alleviato potential environmental impacts? No potentially significant anv:ironmental impacts are anticipated, therefore no Mitigation Measures are Proposed., 9. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING* a) Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stabilit lants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic laspects. Describe any existing structures on the sited and the use of the structures. Bite is relatively flat pextnanon't pasture land with' one single family dwelling parcel: and one barn on the b) Describe the surrounding properties, in'cluding information on Plants and animals and any cultural, historical orscenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, apartment houses, shops, 'depart- ment stores) etc,), and scale of development (height, frontage, setback) rear yard, etc:)- North & West- Prjtnes4 East=Walnuts and prunese South -Almonds & Permanentfamily dwell lings,, pasture with single CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements And information presented are true and correct and belief; to the best of my knowledge 4/85 . ",..t ✓ Date Staff Signature ';�!'c `` �' AS T11E APPLICANT FOR THE R OMSTED LAND DIVISION; I AM AWARE OIC' T" ABOVE STAFF DETEMnMATION REGARDING `THF CONFORMANCE WIT11 THE GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING, Dated _:/' , Signature of Applicant LD 1000(Yevised 640) • BUTTE COUNTY Buff® CO. Fiannsng Carnes, GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE ART FOR PARCEL MAP OR SUBDI_ISION MAP JUL 1986 Items 1-4 to be completed by applicant: OraViil®, California 1. Applicant N,-.,ie and address Gregory. hayidgnn 3266 Dos Rios Rd. Bir-mg,-GA-95917 2. protect Description .�_T� � iye Paree]. N'ap '& BoundaryLi_r►e Modiicatioii _ 3. Assessor's Parcel Number(s)25-06-36-& 37 4 Proposed Use Agricultural - The following items are co be completed by the Planning Department: 001b, 722% Current zoning " �� L1 2� -•5'?� -!And Conservation Agreement General Plan Designation Applicable Conditional Criteria: Not Applicable ; r- Agricultural-Residential YES NO 1. Agricultural. Compatibility 1. C-- �' n 2. Water & Sewer Capacity 3. Adequate Fire Facilities J.,'' 4. Road Capacity & Maintenance C 5. Access to commercial & Schools Orchard & Field Crops 1 Predominant5-10 Ac. Parcel Size 2. Vicinity of Urban Boundaries 3. Agric, viability not impaired a Staff Determination: Project does V" does nt substantially conform to the General Plan and zoning.: . ",..t ✓ Date Staff Signature ';�!'c `` �' AS T11E APPLICANT FOR THE R OMSTED LAND DIVISION; I AM AWARE OIC' T" ABOVE STAFF DETEMnMATION REGARDING `THF CONFORMANCE WIT11 THE GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING, Dated _:/' , Signature of Applicant LD 1000(Yevised 640) (M Office of Plarining and RV esea L 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121F 19M t'to County Sacramento* CA 95814 Danwing Depart►)ijijyt, 7 Comity Celittr 1)1�jve or OroVille, CA 95965 X County Clerk ELEANOR M. DECKER', COUOIY Clerk County of Butte BY -4 Depuly Filing Of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21.108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code, Project Title AP # 25-06-36 & 37 Name Tentative Parcel Map and Boundary Line Modification State Clearinghouse Number Contact Person QrYq a n (if submitted to Clearinghouse) Telephone Number Public Works John Mendonsa 534-4266 Project Location East side of Dos Rios Road , approximately 1200 feet north of Lattin Road, East Biggs area. Project Da8ctiPtiOn Tentative Parcel Map dividing 18406 ac to create three parcels at 5,54 and 5.54 ac., remaining 2.5 ac. to be added to AP 25-06-31 -by Boundary t This is to advise that the . Butte County Advisory Agency (Lead Agencytesponsiblo Agency)— has approved the above-described project oil , 10-6-86--- 1 and has made (Date)-- - the following determinations regarding the above-desetibed project: 1. The project _Will, environment, —will not, have a significant effect on the 2, An Environmental Impact Ropol, -t was prepared fott this project Pursuant to tilt provisions of CEQA, A Negative Declaration was prepared for this Project Pursuant to the provisions Of 09QA. 3, Mitigation MeaSUreS --w(Ire$ I'—`WttG nOt, made a condition of the approval of the projeot, 4, A statement of Overriding considorations­�Was, for this project. not, adopted T71is is to certify that the final EIR with coments And rosponses and Utacoed of PrOJdct approval is available to the general public at.i nQttd County Planning Department 7 COUAtY Center Drive OrOville, CA 05965 Date Received for Filill and Posting at Opp 16-7-06 8 Stephen A. stteotbt 8e - niot Revised March 1946 r M �-Du o un i A I i C) F t I !M, T 0 k A i 1, I A t T C4 DEPARTMENT of PUBLIC WORKS WILLIAM (UM) OFIEFr`, Director 7 COUNTY MITER DRIVG . UROVILLE, CALIFORNIA °45965 CERTIFIED MAIL Tetephronn 1916) 534,4681 RONALD D, mrELRoY OUffO Co. Planning COnuM Deputy Director OCT 8 1996 October 6, J986 Oroville, CaliforAk Gregory Davidson RE: AP 25-4)6-36- & 37 3266 Dos Rios Road TPIM VIA BIA Biggs, CA 95917 Dear Mr. Davidson: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held on October 6, 1986; the agency granted a negative declaration of environmental impact and approved your tentative parcel map by boundary line modification on the above--referenced property subject to the conditions of approval listed on the attached sheot. If no appeals are timely .filed--within ten (10) days of the date of the Advisory Agency's approval--with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, Lhis action will be .final. When the conditions of apprnval are complied with, it %�il.l be in order for Nou to file your "final map" with the Butte C ounq Derortment of Public forks for recordation within twenty—fo it (24) months of tho dale of approval. by Lfie Advisory Agency If you linve any questions regarding tWs matter; plouse contact this cif fire. Very truly yours William C:heff Director of Public 'Works Jahn Mendonsa Api.sLdnt Director JI~ M cr: .Plioali.ng Dopartment )"r.,,ironmontal. HenlLh Department "r; Lchard Sannar ti 01 Gre orY and Melody Davidson Tentative Parcel Map and Boundary Line Modification, AP 25-06-36 and 37 the east side of Dos Rios Road approxarS270 ft.cels on property IOUILed on last Biggs area. north Qf' I,tttttin Road, Public Works conditions: 1 Deed to the County of Butte 30 ft, right-of-way from the renter of Dos Rios Road. line 2 Tndicate a 50 ft. building setback .ir,,m the centerl'i.ne of Road, Dos Rios 3 Show all easements of record on the final map: 4 Obtain encroachment permit for all driveways, new ora r� r Construct to county standards. xl.�l.ing, and S Pay any y del:inqut nt taxes or current taxes as requiretf. lieEtlth Dept.: conditions, 6 Provide a 1,00 ft: leachfield tree setback around exit either within the properyt or within 100 ft, Of the ting wells boundaries on parcels 1, 2, 3 and AP 23-06-37, property Showa 200 ft. leoch£ield setback from the highwater line of the pond on parcel. 3. , M Buff® Co. Planning Convu BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS OCT 6 � U LAND DIVISION REVIEW REQUEST 0,.Ville, coulo(RIA E',,Au AP NO.: 25-06--36 1, 37 Rir'lURN BX: Augun 4 Ira, 1986 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Gregory Davidson Tentative Parcel. Ntrij) & Boundary ;Ci un Modiiicn APPLICANT: Gregory Davi.dgon ENGINEER: Richard L Sannur CONDITIONS APID/OR COIKA ENTS: �!7c't�t f' LD 1110 (Rev. 6-80) CERTIFIED MAIL L A 1,4 It Na ','(J RAI k%; Al III A 11 I DEPARTMENT Of, PU13LIC WORKS WILLIAM (Bill) Director 7 COUNTY CENTCR DRIVC, , C)IiOVILLE, CALIrORNIA 05965 Telephorso (016) $34,4681 RONALD 1). McELROY Deptily Director. September 18, 1986 Buie CO. Plaiming C6nn SEP 24 1 86 Gregory DavidsonOrov,110, QHWAIA 0266 Dos Rios Road RE: AP 25-06-30 and 37 n TPM VIA BLm 199s 0 UA 95917 Dear Mr, D,-1yidson Please be advised that the Butte County Advisory Agency will Ilear your application on the above-idenLified property on OcLober 6, 1986. The Agency will be reviewing the findings front the Planning Department and will be Considering Your tentative parcel map by boundary line mWification. Public Works will recommend the conditions of approval ,-S list( -JI on thL aLLached shoet. The meet"19 will commence at 9;00 a -mi in the board of Supertlisors' Room, County Administration Buildings 25 County Center Drive, Orovillej California. It YOU have any questions regarding this matter, Dlease contact this office, Very truly YOUVSt William Cheri' r Director of J)Ublfc: Works I Jphn Mendonan Assistant Director JM/d 8 a t L achmion I. Planning Department Environmental 110BIL11 D(�partm(:tq Richard V, Sannar, 556 Little Ave., Gridley. CA 95948 ' Gregory y and Melody Davidson; Tentative Parcel Md McidiEitatian, AP 25-�06-3G and 37 P and �oundrxry I,�.no the cast s -de of nos Rios Road approx. on Property located on East Biggs area, north of 1rUtta.n Road, Public Works conditirarrs: Deed to the Count Butte _ aC Dos RioS Road. Y til BuLteO Ft, right-of-tvay fro", rhe t°ry literl III(, 2 Indicate a 50 .ft. building setback from the contorli Road. 1C' cit" 11cas Ric,;, 13 Shots all easements of, record on the :final ma 4 P Obtain encroachment permit .for all, dra.vcwa s corerti nstruct �a county standards.or and 5 Pay any delinquent lazes or current faxes as re qua.rrcl, le Meet the requirements of the Butte CarrotyFire l?e�a.r,•tti i rent;. Inter-DepartM" (-%Memorundum ro, Butte County Advisory Agency rROM! Planning Director SUBACr:. Report on Tentative Parcel. Map/Boundary Line Modification of Gregory Davidson, AP#25--06-36-,37 DATE; September 22, 1986 This is a proposal F.o divide 18.06 acres to create 3 parcelst two at 5 acres each and one at 5.54 acres. The Land Use Plan Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Agricultural Residential:. There are no specific or community plans for the area. The proposal does not conf'4ct with County zoning not any adopted or proposed elen,ant of the Butte County General Plan nor any County, specific or community plan. Recommend approvarl. DRH = j me cc Gregory Davidson Richard F. Sannar y, n aufFe�. Planntitgsa �E tie tzlo1i �Il tie lq DEPARTMENT OF PUQUc HEALTH DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AddrossE".r 196 Mamatiat Vray Reply to Chico, California 95926 `'' 7 County Caelor Drive. Telephoner 916 891.2737 0 v"le, California 95965 [1 :+iY G11101t RiraJ Tolophonar 916/53A.428i a"a�1Se« CaIvv.n 95969 f`nlophona� 916�c2,�i3t18 September 5; 1986 Richard F'. Sannar, L . S 556 Little Avenue Gridley, CA 959,d8 RE: TPM & nLM DAVIDSON, Hele Dos Rios Road n L: Dear Mr APO 25-06-36 & 37 . Samar.: This department has Public Workas .sed the Butte Count to act on Land Development Section Y Department o.t the above applicatiart. that we are preAared Lased on present information conditional apprav�,1,, , we can recommend a poraval or Recommended Conditions far A". rov2; 1. Provide a 100` leachfield fee Weils eithew within the e setbac} around existing propertY boundaries on props, ter or Within x,00 t parcels of the 1 i 2, 3 and APO 25-06--37: 2' Show a 200' leachfield setback f of the pond on parcel 3. -rom the highwater lane If you have an contact Y questions regarding this tblephoneTn�umber Hughes at the above letter Listed please at 5:00 10.00 Weekdays. or Ver Weekda s, Y truly yours, Y 1� fir. Howard -T. Sri C! , Jri , R.6: Division of L"nvronmontal fie,,,lth HJ5/inl,f cc., Planning Department a A1111UNDI ,X T; COLJN'1'1' t)T 13t11'T1 Iil1VTIt0'NT`iIiNTAICUP.ChIAS"T'm_VORM (to Tie complete by Laid Agency) Log It 86 -o8 -of -o^ AP 11 25-06-36 & ^37 I. BACKCLROUND 1, Name or praponcnt _ GREi;ORYDAVIDSON Acldi'ess o � proponent and. representa.t ive f i f apta':l i,cttb7 cj Gr .ory�a s_on �' Y W _ 5�.5 6,,..Littlev.Avenue Road 3266 Dos. Rios rr ri'l,=v. C7x 95 tlfl <. Md�.i<ica` 3_. Project ticscriptioii �_ Tenta�tiY __par.�.�1 Map�Bodifica i ne tion Y is hIAy N 0 l I : MANDATORYi T vI)I NGS Ul l CN I. C CANGfl - a;, Does they projcct have the potential to degrade the quAl-itY Of the environmentsubstaittia�Lly reduce the habitat or n fi.sh or wil,dlileperi.es, eausu a Iish Or wildlire population to drop belOW self sustain -ng levels, threaten to ollmxn"ite a plant or animal colmlionity+, rectuct the ni.mbor or rvitric t rile range or + rare or endangered plant ur Vtn1 mn.l. or cli:mi.nate important examples o'r the major periods of :Cali.foril.i.a history or prchistary".- b, Does the project have the potential to cchi.rve short-term bellefits to the detriment 01' lcstt„-telalll, env'ironniental goal -.,."(A short-tcritl ilnpt Ct an the cnvi.roniiicnt is ane which occurs in a relatively envi.r!CF period -Sf time while long-tOr"i incl"arts Will entlurc into rite tuturc-.7 e. hoes the project have impacts which tiro indi.vidu- iiLTylimitol, but eumulativcily c:onsidcrable'? (A project mrd)' ltilpac't on tido or more cepnratc` )'C!5ci11rC('S where the impact ai) each resource it; reltttively smtlll, bot whoa' the ci I'e> t Of' the total of those � Lnlpact•s oit the environment, is 51giliNcallt,) -- d, in)cts the lira jc'c f Irak, env i l,oninont�ii c�1'.l'cc is tal> icli x will Valise sub:itantlal advorscr of i`vots oil human beings, cither directly til indtrectly? _w �-�- L1C. bkI1a1 ITN11'C�IC1N 1"I't� btu c'tinili1c`ti�d in tlie` 1xild A olt4'y'1 Oil the basis cif this initial v-Auutlow. IMF!"ind rite pt't�pr�sc`cl pro lc^ct (VA1,1i Null haU'o a '4 i)"ni rican t rw;t f ect Oil the 01IN:1i onitlent , and a N11,GA'1 IVI" i) U'LAIIATION wl I 1 110` prcliiit•ecl 1/wii 1'iiid that although tiro prciltci�sod project coold have ti signifi- cant r�rroct oil theonv_i,"oll" Ilt, tltc`rc� i,,i11 lot be a gIgnirictint' c"l'1`ect iii tills Case boc�aw�w �tho t11TIGATTON i c1t�`•ci`ibrd on tile attached shvvt hrivc* hc`c?a ad,dOd tLi tllc` 1irc�Cc�s"t. A N1it1A`i'TVET Mu"LAIZA'I lt1N %Nil I he pr011al'o'l. I /M., Cind the l}roj)o'w(1 pro lvc•t MA) have a sil,ni l"icant ef1;'ect oil the cnvii'Onlil"t, and an NN71 lt()NN1);N'rAl, IMPACT It1i1'OP1 is r4c1iii3•cc1. aeptember` 3 y 1986 t't)t1N'i 1 ()l lltl'1"1'il, I'1.+11rN'i�lCl illipARTF13 N`1' DATT'. - DaVid R. nimtts o ate plainne nevtewed byt L ' 9 IV . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPPC TS_ xp a.na tions of all "yes" and "maybe," answers are required on attached sheet(s)) `YES MAYBE NO 1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant; a.IUnstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions,, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? C. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. Destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? Increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on o: off-site?� f, Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils outside designated urban areas? h. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards`suc;h as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure or similar hazards"? 2. AXR. Will the proposal result in substantial; a: Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or fumes? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, locally or regionally? 3,; WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial. a, 'Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements in either marine or, fresh waters? b Changes In absorption rates ,drainage terns, s�r or the rate and amount of t frunoff? c.. Need for off-site surface drainage improve- ments, including vegetation removal, channel - d Alterations or culvert installations to the course or flow of flood waters'? e. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? E, Discharge into surface waters, or, in any alteration of surface water quality, incltzdi'ng but not limited to temperature, dissolved + oxygon, or turbidity' g. Alteration of the direction or rate of flaw of ground Maters? h. Change in the quantity or quality ofground waters, either through. direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? i. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies?j Exposure of people or property to 'water related hazards such as tloodi.ng? X XC ' IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS xp anations o a l "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attachhd sheet(s)) 1.. EARTH. Will the proposal, result in significant: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? C. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. Destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off-site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocei��n or any bay, inlet or lake? gi, Loss of prime agriculturally productivesoils outside designated urban areas? b. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards' such as tatar.thquakes, Landslides., mud- slides) ground fAilui e or similar hazards'? YES MAYB13 NO Z, AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial, g7 Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b; The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or fumes? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, locally or regionally? 3i WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? c. Need for off-site surface drainage improve- ments, including vegetation removal, channel- ization or culvert installation' d. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? e, Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? f. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygopi or turbidity? g. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? h: Change in the quantity or quality of ,ground Wa e.'4:g, either through direct additions or w�.th drawals, or through interception of an aquifer 'by cuts or excavations? i. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? j . Exposure of people or property `to water related hazards such as flooding! X X X.. YES M1\} 1..+al±� >V.w 4, PLANT LIFE. W�L`1 r` .� r�',�' a'y result in substantial' a G�ian, e �r� 3,ha di�r� �i"Y o species, or number of arty spec.Ff eF 00 pl »nr. ; (including treses, x shrubs, gra.eys ,crops , and aquatic plants) ? b. reduc,-:i all of the ,Aumbers of ani, unique, -rare .. i.) onda-argert-d spec,,es of plants? — - r , Ln1, roductc�n sof new species of plants into an Y area, or In a barrier to the normal replenish meet of eYi.sti.nG species? W--- d. Reduction in ae-,eoage of any agricultural. crop? 5, AIJIMAL LIFE. Will the Ia.:oposal result in substantial a. C Inge in the direr-'its of species, or numbers of any species of g',zimals birds, land anilral.s inelilding reptil ets fish and shell fish, benthic urge ni.,'i'hs or 4, sects)? b, Reduiction ii, ' . IA!mbers of any unique, rare or endangered s"aw::ies of animals? c, Introductior t ttj.w species of animals into an area, or r �:u"A., *�. a 'barrier to the migar�ltion or movement of anlmal5�' A Deterioration to t'tist,ji fish or wildli. e d X habitat? ..�� NOISE: Will the —ro"01,11 xvz:ul.t in substantial.; 6.a. Increases in e- fisting noise levels? a b hxpos�are of people to e fere noise levels? ?f` 7 LIGHT AND GLARE 1K'a.;i t;:s r)j uposal px'oduce significant light 8, LAND USE. 1V„il tho proposal yesalt i„I a su stantia� altrratic,1 r�f t�ie pry . en�w oto planned land use of an e 9: N'.ATURAL_RESOURCES', LVill •tile proposal. result in substantial: a. increase in the gate �� y use of an; i L�-- rtll resources? b, Depletion of any nt-;rl,.xenewable natura]: resources? 1p RISK OF UPSET. Will tha proposal involve a. A ,I,-`af explcwiOn 0" the release of ous substances (i;tcl:uding,, but not limltea tO, oil; pesticides, che'llicals or radiation) in 'ho event of an accid,int. or upset conditions? b. Possible inter for-;Wt e jq th an emergency response plan or ,)jnergagcy evacuation pian? ll. POPULATION, Lill. the „Ot�rjpi)sal alter the locat'a.on, str _Uut on, dens;Lty, ur growth rate of the human population? 1. . HOUSING. Will the pruposa.- affect existing housing, ov create a demand fogy 4ddi.tionai housing? JS. 0 lk%b 0 Yes MAYBE NO 1,3. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result irl t a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement? b. Efff-cts on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? C. ")ubs'tantial impact on existing transportation systems? d.: Significant alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e jklterati'ons to Waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards -Co motor vehic,l.os,' 'bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal, have an effoc,'t• upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services; a. r"ire protection? b. Police protection' _ c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, inAudin roads? f. Ocher governmental services? 15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel.or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. UTIL'ITIM Will the proposal result in: a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? c. Wafer availability- d. vai.labilityd. Sewer or septic tank? e Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? 17. HUMkN HEALTH Will the proposal result in.: a. creation of any health hazard or potentizz,l health hazard (excluding mental health)'? b; Exposure of 'people to potential health hazards 18 AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the `n tru�ctxon of any se-enic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation, of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? , 4 1. X X G YES MAY11n NO 1.9., RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quant, l"» of existing recreational opportunities?( 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES. a. Will t e proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b. Will the proposal result in adverse phys ca'L or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? 7C c. Does the proposal have the 'potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing TCligiou5 or sacred uses within the potential impact area?. V. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATIONAP 25-06-36 and 37 See attached. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP 25-06-86 sand 37 lb,3b,,f: Development of two additional homesites on tho property will lead to some disruptionp d'splacement, compaction and Overcoyerinc.1 of, 4 -he soll which could lead to a change in absorption rates and dralfult-ye patterns or the amount of sk„rface runoff into the existing drainacio sump located on site. Due no the size of the parcels;, this should hot be a significant impact. 1g: The subject property Is currently in permanent Pasture. Development of two additional homesItes and the development of 5 -acre parcels will reduce the capability of the land to swpport livestock. Due to the relatively small size of the original Parcel and the surrounding land uses, this should not be a significant loss in livestock. capabilities In the area. 1h4 All of Butte Countv Is within a Moderate Earthquake Intensity zone VIII. The subject. property Is located approximately a miles southwest of faults associated with the Foothill Shear Zone which supported the 1975 Oroyillo earthquake, Construction of buildings to Uniform Building Code s-Landards for seismically active areas should provide adequate protection to residents In case of seismic activity, 4d: Sob Item 19. 13a)c,f, Development of two 8dd,.:ion81 homesites on the property will represent an incremental increase In traffic on Dos Rios Road and connecting streets and roads. Because of the rural nature of the area, this should not be a 810hificant impact. 14! This project will represent an Incremental 'Increase in demand for public services In a rural area at a time or severe budget limitations within the governmental system. Appicant'-' Gregory Davidson Assessor's Parcel it 25-06-36 and 37 Log # E36-08-01-01 DATA SHEET A. Pr-o.ieoLt—P-e—s--cr--'LP-ti-go 1. Type of Project: Tentative Parcel Map and Downdary Line Modification. 2. Brief Description: Dividing 18.06 acres to create throe parcels, two of 5 acres each and one of 5.54 ,:Acres, with the remaining 2.5 acres to be added to a 1.15 -acre neighboring parcel (AP 25-06-37). 3. Location: On the east side Of Dos Rios Road approximately 1200 feet north of Lattin Road, in .he East 810gs aresa 4. Proposed Dehsl!;Y of bevelopmOnt: 5 acres per dwelling unit. 5. Amount of Impervious Surfacing: Minimal. 64 Access and Nearest Public Road(s)*. Properti0v front on Dos Rios Road. Method of SeW609 Disposal: individual septic sy$tOmSi 8. Source of Water Supply: Individual wells. 9.Proximity of Power Lines: To existing property. 10. Potential for further land divisions and devOlopmeot'. None under existing zoning. B. r=nY1Cgnwent3l Sebt L'Lng It hys i cal Env ic-q�e—�- 1. 1 Terra i n Flat valley land. a. General Topographic Character: b. 81000s." 0-29. ti Elevation: 110 feet abovo Sea Level. d. Limiting Parton 4: None. 2,. 8011S n Fine Sandy Loam on the a. Typos and Characteristics* Rock li southerly Portion Of the property transitioning into Gridley Clay Loam to the north. b. Limiting rattors: Areas of shallow soils and potentially slow permeabilitYo 84 Natural Hazards of the Land Zone:V111. a Earthquake Zohd" Moderate Earthquake Intensity b, Erosion POtOlIttOlt NOMe- c. Landslide Potent lal'. Nbh04 d. Fire Hazard: Unclass lfled. 0 r -Xpah;_mlVa Soil potbhtlalModerat, a.t 4. Hydrology a. surface Water: None on tltbi b. GroundWatert. Abundant valley aquifers, area of high oroundwater 4 0 C. M-alnage Characteri✓tics Land drains gor)orally to the Kest to roadside ditches. d. Annual Rainfall 'normal): 20-22". e Limiting ;Facto -s, None. 5. Visual/Scenic GIS gal l ty * Good. 6. Acoustic bual i zy Gooe9. 7. Air 'Quality Goods exaept during peri ods of agrr I cultural burning. i3 i ol an i ca 1 Env i r~onment a. Vegetation: Orchards and permanent pasture. 'q. Wildlife Habitat= Small birds and animals common to the valley agricultural areas. Cultural Eriv i ronment 10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area: LOW sensitivity area. 11 butte County General Plan designation Agricultural -Residential. 12. Existing Zoning': A-5. 15 Existing Land Use on-site. Permanent pasture with one single-family dwelling and one barn. 14. Surrounding Area a. Land Uses Agricultural uses b. Zoning: A-5 and A-40': c. Gen. Plan designations: Agricultural -Residential and Orchard and Field Crops. d. Parcel Sizes: 1/2-acrle parcels to 10 -acre parcels. Matey parcels in large holdings of '100 acres and larger. e. Population: Rural densities. 15:� Charact er of Site and Area: Agricultural area. 16. Nearest Urban Area,'; Biggs, approximal ely 3 miles West 17. Relevant Sphere's of Influence*. None. 18. lmprovenientJ Standards Urban Area; No. 19. Fire Protection 5ervic64. aa. Nearest County (State) Fire Stationg Station 473 in 81 ggs. b. Water Availability: