Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout025-160-002PLANNING COMMTSSION SUMMAVY SKEET FOR LAND DIVISIONS APPLICANT Kister 'Ranch 85-04-24-01, ADDRESS6317 Powerhouse Hill Road ---� t Orov ille, CA 95965: OWNER Same PROJECT DESCRIPTION Tentative Parcel Map dividing 306 acres to create seven 40+ acre parcels LOCATION Approxi 1 3f4 miles,north of the intersection of Lone Tree Road and Cox Lane, on the west side of Lone Tee Road, Oroville area. ASSESSoptS PARCEL N-UMBER(y) 25-16-02, 42, 45 ZONING A-5 GEN. PIANFC --_- � PROJECT CONSISTENT? DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED GDA 2Z0_Gra d e e O o ille CA 95955 DATE PU]3LICATION NOTICE WRITTEN PUBLISHED PLACE NEWSPAPER NOTICE(S) PUBLISHtD - 0. C. Pi G. B. DATE MAILING LIST PREPARED DATE MAIL"OUT NOTICES WRITTEN ----- _ _. MAILED t1UMBER DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT PREPARED------,__� _ ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMTNAT rON CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION - DA1T VILED AND DATA,` ------ �_ NEGATIVE DECLARATION w DATE ADOPTED MITIGATED NEGATIVE ----- DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED ENV. IMPACT REPORT DATE CERTIFIED SUB. COMMITTEE MEETING DATE ADVISORY AGENCY HEARING DATA ADVISORY AGENCY ACTION r HOARD ACTION COMMENTS ,,. 0APPENDIX 1l NOTICE OF DETERMINATION L Gni rr-� TO Office of Planning and Research FROM: VLatini.� UcPartillant .._.. 1400 Tenth Street, roam 121 7 c.uua Y Ut vQ51ve Sacramento, CA 95814 Qrov.i.1 ] e, C f or X County Cleric uIEANOR M. BECKER, Cnuniy Cler', County of Butte R1 _ � tAt•It��7-1�� Dopu,y SLMMC'T: Filing o" Notice of Determination in compfidnce with Section 21108 or 21152 of the ` 4vbfic Resources Code, 85-04-24-01 ject Title .gid' ;` -IF,-16-01,4 4 5 Name ...� Tent,at.i vc: Parcel Nlap K i ste r Kinch ire Clearinghouse Number Contact Person Tele one Number (if submitted to Clearinghouse) Public Work!;, 'J'ohn Mendonsa 34 -4 1266 .-'rolect Location rlpproxim;ttoly 1-3/4 milds north df` the intcr.section Of Lone Tree Model and Cox kine, on the nest si o of* [.once Tree !toad, �roj ct LDescrip6m Tentative Parcel Map dividing 500 acres to create seven 40+ acre parcols. This is to advise that the itut" comity Advisory Agency (Lead Agency or Responsible Agency) has approved ths- above described project and has made the following determinations regarding the ab x. , described projeet., L The project __.. will, �K will not, have a significant effect on the environment. 2 An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursu."nt to the provisions of CEQA, A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisiorm of CEQ,A. Tho BIR or Negative Declaration and record of project approval may he examined at; t, 1ti`ttV ca'rttvr Dr1Vk. 9 ' 9,1 ( 6r r. ©Mitigation the j measures were, N were not, made a condition of the approval 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations was, :.:.� Nvas not, adopted for this project. Date Received for Filing %o/8,5zz Si re 8e-lvioe 1?1�a►�r� r Revised ,January 1995, COUNTY OF BUTTE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 916-534-4266 916-534.4339 Huge Co. Planning Comm jl1i. 1� 5 .Oroville, Galitarnls July 8, 1985 Kister Ranch 6317 Power House sill Ftced RE: AIS h5� 1(i -a2., 42 and 45 aroville, CA 95965 Tent&Live Parcel Map Genblement At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held Jury 8, 1985, the Agency adopted the negative declaration regarding environmental review and approved the tentative parcel map for AP 25-16-02 42 and 45 subject to the conditions as listed on the attached sheet. If no appeals are timely filed --within ten (10) days of the date of the Advisory Agency's approval --with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, this action will be final. When the conditions of approval are complied with, it will for you to file your be in order "final map" with the Butte County Department of Public Works for recordation within twenty-four (24) months of the date, Of approval by the Advisory Agency, If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office. Very truly yours, William Cheff Director of Public Works 4,00hnendo_ r nsa sistan't Director JM/"s Attachment cc Planning = Environmental Review GDA ironmental Health Department 1p 1110 (revised 9-28-8.4) KISTEa RANCH, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, AP 25-16-02, 42 and 45 1-3/4 miles north.of the intersection of Lone Tree Road and Cox Lane On west side of Lone Tree Road, Oroville area. 7 parcels a����t"oxo Engineers GDA Engineering , l.lf Public: Works conditions; I. Verify legal access r pr0v4HQ legal access to parcels 6 (And w 2. Provide two-way traversable access RS -8 -LD -1 to each parcel fro county maintained road or state highway; m a 3. Access to be reserved in deeds as per county ordinanro a dedication on the final map; nc1 offered for 4. Show 50 ft. building setback line measured from centerl� easement, rie of access 5. Provide road maintenance agreement 6. Deed to the County of Outte 30 ft. right-of-way from the Lone Tree Road, centerline of 7. Indicate a 50 ft. building setback from the centerline 8. Show all easements of record on the final map.; of Lone Tree Road; g Obtain encroachment permit for all driveways, new construct to county standards. or existing, and 10, Pay any delinquent, taxes or current taxes as required, 11, Portion of AP 25-16-45 (40 acres) west of Parcel 4 must be shoe have note regarding to as remaining lands of owner and must lease or finance;" g not for sale riealth Dep.. condition,,:. 12- a'ov de a lU() f i„ le,, , .j /�' �Y1} •�ch fell Free Oletbsck aroun,j ex �tin8 wells; either Within the lir perty or within Ulu i't, oi' �.lre Zarr�Derty 'bn>a�ndc�riec Oil pal:�cel 4, 73, "how a 50 ft. tench field oetback i'r,)m the carajrjgi,.. 4, 5 and l6. €, wa,y .,n parce18 14, Show the unable "Wo "re sewn8-` dinPosal area proven t requirements of the Subdiv aion Ord.innnce on ,�aa?celn io meet the: a 15. 1:rovide the regQired usible sewn e , . , ajea ' � 5 and �. With nn nc�,iacent Parcel if riot proviaiec�oatltYre timn parcel. 7. combine r�.noltde , the map i - nta efer Departme"o 6 ",,Memorandum TO: Butte County Advisory Agency FROM: Planning Director fiu9JECTt Report on Tentative Parcel heap of Kster Ranch on AP '25-16-02, 42, 45 DATE: ,lune 26, 1985 This is a proposal to divide 806 acres to create seven 40+ acre parcels. The present zoning is A-5 (Agricultural - 5 acre parcels). The Land Use Plan Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Orchard and Field Crops. There are no specific or community plans ;for the area, The P proposal does not conflict with County zoning nor any adopted or proposed t of the Butte County Genual Plan not any County, specific or community plan. Recommend approval, DHslr cct Kister Ranch GDA Buff a Co, �ning Cornm MAY ENGINEERING UrCville, C�{ifaenJtf SURVEYING PLANNING 220 GRAND AVENUE "Mx I1cAt+e, ve �-(-v'e'wed Yr,iar etavit-anrcni:al check j-i$t tvitr}t Sx,jcc:ial attention .fid Tter+s itJr 446r 17r► & 171j IF WILLIAM W. ��bDiS JOHN ti _. rHRIS'rOPPeRsoN _ KPENNr-- ' (aRC>V:ILtE, CA. 95965 (916) 533-206 May 29,. 1.981 rjutL:e County '}'lctnnr,ncr Deparl+rAerit `l County Center Drive t)zcavil]:e, CA 95965 kYttic 'I'Otltai=l.vG Parcel P2ar, Attn: t-lavif.A , 'is tea ;it~Ont 19 & 4,1? no raiticiatzr,,r iaca;;ttra is racamtnenclecl, 2xLansa.ve sai1� 'taesting over t}t�: er�tir4. rcot 11,01, area show that, clue to an existing hard - "!'In layt:rr this is rtat an area ltavit°, }��: �� it has boonu:�u�i �a� g }.rrirta agricultural t`dl)e saais. Int:��; qzot•linq >*'cer but proetuctian was mirtitnel, Iitsc ai0:a.cr; this spring, alfter a matexatal,�• wef* wirt}ae; shatvs a rtiYii�tal Pc,L�:at.ia l ial�s��Q��area0for agxirultuzay')ri±ne cPrazin,� area dor l�.vestaeF};� .���xr��.e ,� �. , ,fur})a.�e�, duotoconstructionof .r f�ina�.„ residences, will not 8evea:ei�.�+ impact, the existing aga:a.e:ta:.i=urul of t}1xa larte]. A one -acre }torik�wa.te a � eo44 acro 1) amounts to�ri].�. � littleOverw �+ex�ccztt of the: total acreage, 1" suggest that, .OecaUstl of: the evaz inCreasing cast zip agri-}>usinus.s,► �lgricultur.dl Varcels tnFtv have more potential to becar4iu producing units toars 1arc,}er: parcel. Titis has certainly bouii tt:tici with ae`zt�:itt sr>ucialty craps sua}t 4'#.�3 to It;c;:i+t 3j' no ittita.+Jktt;ian nie?asurc urcr i=oc;ontraeitcxerl, t �s�.], c.1>:`�tfllarj�t;� aDthoseparcels,wti.th the o:tce�tion of clic one ori j�trcL�7. �l r are scasorta�. illn�.tui�:. The c�xain�yew�,it,� on parcel 4 �, � confined ;.��i:w�:ttn stee:.> c;uti�nrak:. '�`»'ie PtttentzaJ. eetx ylctocdirtcT outsici e of tiieae cutbGtnks 3.s extremely u• ur�.ikel. , P5 to 17a & 171 no mitigation rneasuros as rccr.,mVrncfec}, The ntitgation taic�isuz:es lec�amtne.nc�e� �y t,re ulosejuitu '���tt�:rnrnt: zyi5tx`a e+c arei�ic�a:e in tunewhit d�:vc�:armc�nt in an ux^ratan sctl:�,ttr,�, k.�:rx�diY1K} of it;ttural ::irainuccjray 'tN G. L. t:kVHARD`t" Page 2 Ma;l 29, 1985 and disrulstion of, or elimination of, direct coct on existing water retention areas w the growth of grasses and wilu plants. slants 'i'lxese ha7t;a, provide cover for wildlife and foac7 xor grasses d the fr�U;l)1or to grazing livc�,tc,ck, To r(iquira xado his land and/or drai,rxage ditches so as to acceleratt Ghc: discharge- Of his irriclat .on waters may leo c�ooa for x7asr�uito mai ement is certainly not good agricu,ltral practice.. Acceleration of .flows ;�rogtxr c r��� errosion and sedimentation of downstxean crater courses. t also reduce.... time availablo for ercolata an of waters laac); into Lho i:iparian Or aeini�rip riparian halsitat sai 'Jill tixe State the 47iserLan'r o last at oc untie lire creation high rn± TO reccairo tliat : l U!i ax.aha, k Ott be ela rn �,..� `� d or to �;rr+cluue St's creation is ridiculous. olxix �7. us1> a stiEson, I,.; Gi�t�'ngineeringr MitYeyir�g Planning 194-84 AP]TND[\ l: COUNTY Or BU'1 rF IiNVTRONDIBNTAL rUrrKLrS�' .10RM Civ UV—cntnpl.ete by I,ea< Agency) I BACKGROUNII Log # 85-04-24-01 AIP It 25-16-02,42 t1.1lt1 45 I. Name of pre)pbnent Kistev Ranch 2. Address of proponent and representatirpo (if tippl cable) iCister Ranch --� QDA 637 7 Power I4ouse IIiIl R6ad 220 nand Orovi� Z�; `CA 95965 Avenue --� Oroville, CA 959658 3, Project description Tentative Parcel TIap Tl . MANDATORYFiND.ING,S pl., irGNil TCAUCE ,.r YES MAYBE ;NO a. hoes t11e project have the Potential to (legrarde tilt, duality of the environment, subst ntial.1v reduce the habitat of a fish at• wildlife species, causo tl fish or .Yilcilife po ,ulatinn to drop below Self - Sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or ant",!nal eommunitr, reduce the number or restrict: tite range of a. rare; or endangrevOLI plant or animal or elinliriatc important examples of the major periods of California history or �? y prehistory? b Does the project have the Potential, to 11-Ilieve Short-term benefits to the detriment of lor'g;'term, environmental goals. (A slrort-term impact on the environment Is one 1�rl�ich occurs in a relatively brief period of time while long-term impacts Ivill rndUre into the future.) V C, does the Project have impacts which are Individt.- .6M ally limited, but cumulatively c nsiderable? (A Project may impact on two or more serarate resources Where the zmpae;t 01) each resource is rel.ativelr, impll,acts hint where the effect or the tol,11 or those I ' ' .+ rt is significant.)' rmrac;ts c)ri the t,nbl.t'UnnlC11 -/\ d, Does the lrrujc-ct 11avC environmental cel"!'rets Irhiclt will cause^ subStantinl adverse effects on human brings, Other diroctl4 or irldirec tiv'.' [lIi"iIRDINA I'I'TttN C'Ccr 11K. rarttplotod by. t11c* Lead Agency) .H _ R — on the hasis of tills initial evaluation I,'W[: 1"incl the lrt'opGr;;c�Kl i1r,,1e� t (:(1IIf;t} Nt1`I` 'have a �; i , , tl ern thr, c�nr•ir�lnment, and a Nf;GATIVI: Di1CLAIIA` ION willbetpropared. [, WE find that althuuVo., 1:110 prr�poset pr°b�i ct could �h.ivtr a sign-iCi� cant erfect on the e11virortmRnt 'here will not boa sig effect in this naso 1aoc�at)Sc T11� MITIGATION IIt1301.)R1i;S dO eribednou the attached sheat have 1lcron added to thw project, A NEGATIVE DIXIARATION will he prepzited. ldta'Is 1'111d thQ Propo.gO'd project MAI havtw at n.iricaltit oC'['ect on thot�nvlrilnmc'nt;, a�rtd atu. I:NVIRt�NMI'N'it11, T�ipAC7` 1tli�hCIRT is required, hA'1'[;t h'fa� 24 85 t`t111N'1'Y' til' RUf'I' �i. `-� ., I LANNTNG DC-PAW!'M lNT Kava 1-lironi 118, ssaca.aEe Planner TV. ENVIRONMENTAL TMORTS , xp anations of a 1 ftyeS" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheet(s)) 1. EARTH. Will the proPosal result in significant; YES — -- YIJ T. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil ?y c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. Destructions covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e Increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off-site? f.. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake: g. Loss of outside prime agriculturally productive soils designated urban areas? h. Exposure of people orro ert� to eologic hazards such as earthquakees, landslides, mud- tlides, ground failure or similar hazards? 2; ATR. Will the proposal result in substantial; a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or fumes? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, locally or regionally' r p s. WATER. Will the pio osal %,esul t in substant".al. a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of wator movements in either marine or fresh waters? b Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? C. Need for off -sate surface drainage improve= ments, including Vegetation removal channel ization or culvert installation`? d. Alterations to the course or waters? flew of flood e. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? f. Discharge .into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? g. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground 'Waters h• Change in the q ;ntitv of---- ground waters either through uirect additions or with drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? i• Reduction in the amou41 of water otherwise ` 1 avail abefor p water supplies?Eoseofpeopleorp�perty to water gerrelated hazards such as fl,00di.ng? NO YES MA� YBE NO; 'FE. Will the proposal result in. substantial: 4. PLANT L1� species, or number a. ange in the diversity of sp nclu.ding uses, of any species of plants (i tic p7.ants) ? shrubs, grass, Crops, and aquunique, rare b. Reduction of theeof plantrs of s9 or endangered speciesecies of plants into an c. Introduction of new sp. or in 'a barrier tothe normal replenish- f area, " species? . ment of existinC,of any agricultural crop? d_. Reduction in acreagesubstantial: S. ANIMAL LIPS. Will the proposal result for numbers a—; Cr in the diversity of species species of animals (birds, band animals of any p tile,, fish and shell fish, including reptiles) -- benthic organisms or insects)'' unique, rare b. Reduction in the numbers of any uniq —. species of animals? or endangeredspecies of animals into C. Introduction -of new Sp ration an area, ox'result in a barrier to the migration or movement of exist fish or wildlife 1{ d, >Deteriorati'on to existing habitat? Will the proposal result in substantias: 0„ NOISE- noise bevels? a Increases I e.r�st ng b. Exposure osure of people to severe noise levels? LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the nraposal produce 7. fare? ; sign. scant l�:ght and g Will the proposal result in a fanned S. LAND U5E : resent or p C. su stantial alteration of the p ]...anduse of an area? L TtPSOUI,t Will the proposal result in NATU g , RA — snatural u stantial; a. Increase the rate of use of any .�xl resp L�rdes ? non-renewG ble nat°.tras , b, LePAt bolt of any - resourcesi) Will the proposal involve' 10. RISK OP Up5E'r.eplosion or the release of haxard- a, A r ss o eluding, but not limited to, ous substances (in oily pesticides, chemicals or radiation) _in tte event of an accident or up f �C Interference with an emergency lan7 -`-.- b, Passible � evacuation p ., response plan or emergency T1O1V Will the proposal alter the location; 11. �5tr], ution, density, OT growth rate of the human populationl housing, ro osal affect existing 12, 2 HOUSING, Will the p► or cteate 'foraddxt�oY�al housing? a demand .3. r � 4 `1'BS MAYBENO � w 13. TRANSPORTATION%CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement? X C- b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c, Substantial impact on existing, transportation, systems? .X. d. Significant alterations to present pattern a of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services: a, Fire protection? XC b,. Police protection? c. Schools? d - Parks or other recreational facilities? LG e. Maintenance of public facilities, including _ roads? x f. Other governmental services? 15 ENERGY. Will the proposal result in! - a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel.or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? ,x 16. UTILITIES. Will the propsal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following: ai mower or natural gas? b. Communications systems? c. Water availability; d. Sewer or septic tank?'' e. Storm Water dAinage? f. Solid Waste and disposal? 17. HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in a. Creation of any health hazard. or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? b, Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18: AESTHETICS, Will 'the proposal result in the o 5stiuc iOn Of any scen is vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the Creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? x r � 4 r YES MAYBE NO 10. RECREATION. W,jj the proposal, result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing opportunities? recreatiponal 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES a, Will t e proposal, result in the alteration Of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b. Will the proposal result in adverse physcal or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or' historic building, structure or object? c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious; or sacred uses within the - area? potential impact V• DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTALvALUATTON AP 25-16-02., 42 and 45 See attached. DISCUSSION C)F "RONM !AL E EN --Y"L [Ai i D 0 AP 25-16-02i4P and 45 1bp3b1f: There will be some disruption, compaction and overcoveritg of tbo soil caused by developmen.t of six homesites. Due to the size of tbo parcelso any impacts mpacts associated With this compaction and oVeroovering should not be significant. 1g,4d'. The ,subject Property is subject to a land conservation contract entered into in 1970. The contract calls for minimum Parcel sizes, and is Used iter rice and grazing purposes. While this project conforms to the provisions of the land conservation contract (40 -acre mtnimums), it is likely thtat the dl,VisiOn Of One single hClding Into separatolY-Owned 40 -acre -plus parcels Would Significarttly reduce the grazing capabilities of the land. Unless the land is used for agl-lcultUY'al Uses as required in the contract (Ottachod), significant loss of agricultural land could occur. Any prospective buyers should be made aware of the existence of the contract, or the property should be removed from the provisions of the contrattt through cancellation Procedure8. 1h: All Or Butte County is within a Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VL111. The subject property is located approximately three miles West of the Foothill Shear Zone, which Supported the 4975 Oroville Earthquake. Construction of homes to uniform building code standards for seismically active areas should Provide adequate Protection to residents in case of seismic activity, Sit The area along the Wyman Ravine tributary on Proposed Parcel 4 Is subject to flooding. It is recommended that the area sub.loet to flooding be shown on the final map. 8'. At the Present time the property is in agricultural use. ApproVal of this projoot would likely introduce six homes into an area where none now exist. This may Presage A trend towards the establishment of rural homositos in the area. 'rhe proposed 40 -acre parcels meet the density requirements of the Butte County Goneral Plan. 13a5cjf'- This project would generate additional traffic homes tea I from the six impact that would traffic entering Lode Tree Road and thence mostly north to the Palermo Road Intersection. Due to the r0latJvely light traffic usage of Lone Tree Road and Palermo Road, this increase should not be signipicant, 14* Though not signiPicant, this project will represent an incremental increase in domond for public services, 17. ' Soo the attached lou;ter from Butte County Mosquito, Abatement-, District. Applicants Kister Ranr.h 1�:'i,;�E3s�Ctr'` s Pal'•Cel #�. and 45 DATA `S EE"1 A. . = eCt bespr. 1p� on 9. Type of Project. Tentative Par Irl Map. 2. Brief Description: Dividing into y�r r,yn parcels of 40+ acres each. 3. Locations On the west Side c:z� Lane TrecW ,; 1-3/miles north cif Cox Lar,rt«, °ICa1J' �t7 o� r, r^ �:lc� v approx3mr,,tely rte,lo 4. Proposed Density of Developmr=nt' et s ar; -er p �� dt el ling unit. 5. Amount of 'Impervious SUrfac11 11 gym. -I 6. Access and Nearest Public Road* ? y : Pr -'Jecut ,f'vt►tits Lone Tree 7. Method of Sewage Disposal: lndividAaj 8. Source of Water Supply.* I ''t t�i,'i c '� stems. Intl,.vttaU,�.l Weil,,,; y y. Proximityo of Power Lines: 'r"-ty. 1 0 . Potential for further land" arid ;fie + Lopment None under the existing Cal,ifornl.a Lai :� �',r..:�3t�r^v 7waon Act agreement contract 5• EDyironment�l Setting °h_ysical� nviron�- 1 Terrain a. General Topographic ChG,1acter H�;r?.Yl,» �,„ b. Slopes: 0-11ey lands. c. Elevation: Approximately 11 17) frp. �bc�ve sr=�a level. d. Limiting Factors, hone. 2, Soils a. Types and Characteristics: wy3r�an 1�,`a�rlel,ly Loam, Honcut Loam, and Rocklin Find 8andyt b. Limiting factors: Shallow sL,)jl�� n r1t"at Of,:rt-e,�. 3: Natural Hazards of the Land a Earth4wzke Zone, Moderate Fall th 4t ;�l�.r Intenp . b 'Eros ion Potential : slight tomr�t yx4rt..a. . y Zone V t I I c. Landslide Potential! tone. do P're Hazards Moderate4 e. Expunsivo Soil Potential! fiigh. 4 • Hydrology a. Sur- .ace Water! Tributaries (.r �+�,t,�,;�:i l,�a�3n:� cr°4,µi�� 'the prbperty in several, locations b. Sresund Waters Abundant 'valley ark i��a�r�. Al"oa . f high ground water removal. o. til -^mage Characteristics Pro P�;r .li dti^ain 4rainageways thenco to Wyman Ra„ 0, � to onus t d. Annual Painfall (normal).* 20_2Pa ,. ew Limiting Factors: Setbacks �'to&' r:i�°°s►$,rt�gcrwa,r.1. 5 viaual /ador is Quality" Moderate,, 6. Ar.loustltc 4t1a13 tY food; 7 • Ali, Kuril ity Good} except during; rye avno)�a0, , t jg cultural Y 7 L burning, B.xalori6�1 Envir,�„m.�„+: 8, Vegetation: Rice lands, orchards, open land N: `. Wildlife Habitat; Small birds and animals land, g Azingnd, grasslands. valley Cu t�araT EnY.i �ment, 10• sensitivity ant. Historical Resources in the iAroa- sensitvii;y area.., bnW 11. Butte County General Plan designation: Orchard an Field Crops. 12. Existing Zoning: A--5, Existing Land Use on-site: 14. Surrounding Area; - lands and sptge, rice lands. Open a. Land Uses: Agricultural lands s and mattered single -'family b. Zoning A-5. C. Gen. Plan designations: d Parcel Sizes: parcels. Orchard and Fele! Grops. 10 to 300 acres, mostly 40- to 160-acre e• Population: Sparse. 15, Character of Site and Area: Agricultural, area. 16' Nearest Urban Area: 1 Oroville, approximately 5 miles. Rede ant Spheres of Influence, 18, improvements None. 19. F3-re Protection Serviceroan Area No.: a: Nearest County (State) Fire Station' APPraximately 4 miles: Palermo Station ##72� b. dater Availability: 20. Schools i,i Area: Fire tankars only. Palermo Union School Union High School District, District and OrnVille 1111 C#'1; 0111WIT I)I'''AR it•II.Wr 0!' MI',,A 0 i+;il !A1,11, .1i%,I.;Iu@I Pu"vIEM 1'."'! I),;,I Butte County Mosquito A'SaLement District I)ATI, ; 4-2,J8815 25-16-02) 42 S -,"i it 5-14-85 PF+t.1,Ii (; l' lei ir'['I I' 1`1 ��;;; ° E,WATIVE'. PAW r All cw-l01 1-1 ONF ANIS May 13, 1985 The 3rainage in this tentat,ivo subdivision consist of natural 31,aii;s that, contain p.;tholt^:1 whore wator ootild twt 101, ;tAndirW aft0l* ,.rriotion, 'Yhv; tiatural drains are dry with thu e neption uf Wyman Creek U., I w,ugh" utf the !L'. qu i to jLc ai;or. , iliareh through Solitember.) Tho propi. ,qud 1,:311"0101 zi' irt'ir;atud, tiwciul� cauoo thoae, n�lLural drains to fill with WUL't:rrs.t` of*, v.'ti lnr, a :IFJt'o t#t'iat.IduIg l ubi.tatr Die art ropriatu mit;iL atim i Von this t,e:nt.a.tivu subdivision map are: V All natural dr; imt and main made drai rls for thin purfao,'19 of t'rigrl t:t an drat n ��,%� bt, put Lel glia it!, Thu u draim, bo mainta.inoO by a propurty ownerk awt,oci.ation, Accea,, bo f=ruvidoO for ttlaintunacn(h) and inopoctir,n rat' drattio, 14 All. irr,igutions, be Bono in a to provent twmquitu • breudi lg. 5) Mien possible, sprbiklxx irrigation to be u;a(,d inotead of flood i.rvigatiot , i>I)