Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout025-160-026� � W � .p �� i' � 15,E 'X �,'r a ',1 i ., � � � � t\ l � � • - ` w � +. - � , a. i q. .. � - V �• `' i � u ' Y. `�1 . J 1 � • \ � 1 4 I a .0 ' � w y t .° f i` i ♦. �, � � � �L ` q. �` `���'i. , taw i . � n y \ '� • � � ���� j�� � �� '� •1 � , � .. , �. � o ` �: � �',, \ i � , ,� .� ' • i . ' � `� v. � � �' ,t ,� APPLICANT Larry Whalen ..w. _...x,�, - ....., Log#87-09-22-02 ADDRSSS 1548 Lone Tree Road, Orovi;lle, CA 95965 OWNER Same PROJECT j f.`T.I (;t PM Lo divide create ,.. 41 acres to pzrcC 4r rix te"" c. ,�r4',� •4 on the LOCATION West Sade of hone Tree Road Pp rcxYm.a_.t.,.,�:. C, y. miles north of COR Lane, Palermo, .�...-<...-„ CA ASSESSOR'S PA xCE1, 25 16-26 ZONING C3 ,tp � Al, Pl :4 C)rcrtard & PRUJLCj! F e1-d-tro�ss- CYEiVI'�RAII PLAN�.'c��3,k'"�Rr1,��;��C'g; 3��E�C�I`i`;` w><.....:,,,:..�..,...�..:,,:,... ale t j`i;ICANr' DATE Ai'IaSl,i'A'i'Wa; September 22, 1981 GDA ADDRESS* 220 Grand Avenue, OroVllle, CA 95565 DATE"L"U�t'�` pp'i " ,j3 ENVIRONMENTAL ��rr�,+t�Yg Y, h �..13r1 iV� MT" ° - F1 AND UA'1'E COX -1}}� }} A{A{ yy{{ YItJr^ ` 11 @ t�l :, i�i #d a' [. f'vf.+ ✓lk Ajtt' ' .0 �e l:)�V M+r}ll�� + ro u, Li. k se's. h �: j (�� ra -• •" P es -1 sWwsW,ruxxniwi4 s'K, ti-_. .V-atia.Nry "R' k/ r BOARD AN'YT.kr ;� x.'�',AN!' � 3t; t.,�" CO, �nnhrng rwhrn� nT JUL zbItems 1-4 to be completed by applicant. Qrpviile, tore 1. APPLICANT NAME AND ADDP.ESS: 1Q��Y Ire/✓�. c ;� F G . 2. PROJECT DESCRIP:.'IONt 3. ASSESSOR',,; PARCEL NUmBER(S): 4. PROPOSED USE:___s"/Dr'.r The ,Following items are to be completed by the Planning Department: C111'klcul-rCURRENTZONING.( 't52A1$) _q37 2 4, *�,� ,� t% 0 LAND CONSERVATION AGRCE ENTt 1 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: nn:a`1 Critr+zin AGRICi7.,TUhAL-REa"1DEnrIAL YES NO 1. Agriculturt:l Compatibility It is recommended that you Perform the following Chucked hems: 2. Eater and Suwer Capacity 3, Adequate Fire Facilities_____ ARCHAEOLOCI,CAI, RECORDS CHECK-' -"'-' k. Rend Capacity and Mantanntice BOTANICAL SURVEY — �. 5: Access to CO mercial and Schools GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 4� --� ORWWD A,'�U FIELD CROPS. �- I. _ YES NO WITHIN DEPAR'�NT OF FISH Pre:do:luinunt 5.10 ac. Parcel Size Vicinity of Urban Boundaries H 1� AND G41t DEVELOPMENT LONE; 3. Ag. Viability not Impaired -t r WITHIN FLOOD PLAIN: ►i � �'��` ell Staff Detarminarion; Substantially conforms to: WITHIN ARP,A, SPECIFIC OR GENEP-kL P1.A1i: I. ;and t. Use. LAM USE PLAN: f✓ ,. -, ....� . 2. Conservation' If Yes, -----_.,- 3. Open Space Ey:' N7tnu of Plat 4. Satety WITHIN MBAN RESERVE, 5. Moira t/ Yasy If64 Housing Name of Ru crib 1. Circulation ZONING:' ��" �Al:1i, p/� '/. r!„Jt' � -._•__- A1.RPOR7' 1j Hr) I!a^E PIAN "!i%,'�"&,Mt4Ai; Staff iili;il.tu C AS `,a �, Ari'�,1C,1h"£ I'TH THE 12MIRAL P LANA p[VISI017, 1 AM AW=- OF 111k I LIOVk� vvAjq `l'll;�ItiitllllEATIC1tJ I;l sr�s.ti7h'r; TFII t hi�NUf u I,IIYCL, WITH . GL�t1:Iv' #L ISJ.N r`D ZONING. Dated CI Signature of Applicant .,:. rt T2:i! n p P re ort will ux ire and be ditooxdod six b,) month's from the dAt:a or t1ju f :;iEtutura: LD 1000A (tdvised 6-87) '4CG Inter-Departn>�e JOY Memorandum ro: A.dvisory Agency vd7b- FROM: Planning Director Su9JEcT, REPORT ON TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FOR LARRY WHALI:}N ON AP#25-16-26 DATE: December 14, 1987 This is a proposal to divide 4.1 acres to cre.11,0 /,' parcels, F / acres each. The present zoning is A-5 (Agricultural, A$• ' �'. 5 acre parcels The Land Use Plan Map of the .i;X['tto County %� C,eneral Plan designates this area as grchard li J;ie1c1 Crops. ' sir rN'G There are no specific or community plans for the area. This project conforms to the existing zoning l)u,t sloes not conform to the A-160 zoning proposed for the area by the Butte County Planning Commission; If approved, this project will represent the creation of the smallest parcels within approximately a one-mi.l,o radius Within one mile, there is one 2 -acre parcel on Power House Hill Road, and one 8 -acre parcel immediately to the southeast of the subject property, across Lone Tree Road. The subject property is surrounded on three sides by Williamson Act Contracts Coit}l 40 acre minimum. Impacts to agricultural viability of these lands are twofold. C~irst, this project may act as a catalyst for other, similar projects in the area, causing withdrawal of other contract Lands from the Williamson Act and the division of those properties into smaller parcels, thus reducing their agricultural viability; Second, :increased use of the subject property for residential purposes axiad other, similar development that may be triggered by this project, will increase the conflicts betwoon agricultural use,,, and residelit.ial uses. These conflicts consist of a variety of problems, including- trespassing, vandalism, dogs running livestock, and sensitivity or residential a os to agricultural nuisances such as dist, spraying, noise, etc The Butte County General Plan designates this area as Orchard and field Crops This designation allows a range of parcel sizes from 5 acros tip to 40 -acre minimum to be -?ound compatible With the General. Plan. Parcels under 20 acres in size ca e my be round compatible with the designation if several conditional criteria are presenti Those criteria area I. Predominant existing parcel sizes range from 5 to 10 acres From the above discus,;ion, _i.t 'i ov�.cont that t is c01-Ld � on does ,not exist: Advisory Agency Paae T'vo December .14, 198 2. Adjacent to or in the 7'he urban boundaries o�e0�Ovllecaxatloctebf�i trox1�ntara.rs� three to four miles north. Although rtoi; a �l� �, �c7 y area, similar development in the Palermo are�x,�,I,�.t�:ocate�laan approximately -t=hree miles by road to tl�e north t�:t�cl oast 3 The •resent status oP a ricultural roduction tv,t:ll not be sxgnx lxcantly mampa rred. See iscttssion above, rt is evident from the above discussion that the project d conform to the Butte County Lloneral. Plan. oes not R1 COlvi IENDATxON pend that elle project does ❑0t conform to the butte Count General Plan and deny the prof Oct pursuant to the reciu�, t,ot�onts of the Subdivision Map Act, Section C�G473.5 and G6re I�D74, tric - cc: Larry Whalen CDA CERTIFIED MAIL DrIPARTMIENT OF PU171„to WORKS WILLIAM(Bill) (Bi'ft, f IPt�sttl� 7 COUNTY CENTpgUQi6Z1 4%p� ALIPORNIA 95965 Tolaphana: i91G) 51f1•7 DEC 4 19V RONALD D. McELROY oroyllleA Callfars1 deputy Olk'stiot December 4, 1987 Larry Whalen RE: AP 25-16-26 1548 hone Tree Road Tentative Parcel Mile Qroville, CA 9596,5 Dear Mr. Whalen Please be advised that- the Butte County Advisory Agency will hear Your application on the abovo-i den ti.Ei ed properr,y cin December 21; 1957. The Agency will be reviewing the findings from the Planning Department and will be considering your tentative parcel neap. Publico Works will recommend the conditions Of approval as listed on the attached sheet. The meeting will commence at 9i0o a.m. in the board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Building, 25 County Center Drive, broville, California. lt; you have any questions regarding tha,s matter, please contact this office Very truiv yours,, William Cheff Hiroctor of Public Works hn Mondonsa A, si st»ac> t Director '7M/d8 attachment (a! Planning Department Environmental Health Department GDA Larry Whalen, Tentative Parcel Hap, AP 25-3.6-26, 4 parcels plus ,remainder on the westside of Mono 'free Road apparox. 1.7 miles north of Cox Vane and 1.7 male,) south of Palermo Road, southwest of Palermo and south of Oroville. Engineer CDA Public Works conditions 1 Provide two-way traversable access RS-8--LD-1 to each parcel from a county maintained, road or state highway. 2 Actress to be reserved in deeds as per county ordinance anti offorod for dedication can the :final map. I Show 50 ft. building setback line measured from crnt:rline of across casement. 4 Provide road maintenance agreement. 5 Deed to rile County of Butte 50 ft. right-of-way from the r olit,erli ne of Lone Free Road_; h Indicate a 50 ft. building setback from the centerline of Lana: Tree Road. 7 Show all casements of retard on the final map S provide street name signs her requirements of the Department of Public Works prior to recordation of the final. snap. 9 Pay off avy assessments 10 Provide cul-de-sat at the end of the street. 11 Obtain encroachment permit and construct standard road approach providing adequate sight distance at the intersection of access row and none Tree Road 12 Pay any delinquent tastes or current taxers as require' 15 rieet the requirements of the Butte County Vire Department; 14 wJeet requirements of Butte County Mosquito Abatement. 15 Show 50 ft. no develupmont line from ri.pjrian, vegetation at top of bank along Wyman Ravine: AI'I't;NM)1';c.1 c°ClUN'1'Y 1)lr 1111'1'T1. i NV11it1NMEN'I'Ah (:1l]?a' I,I ST :FORM Tici '�1r �:rrtn��lrl:c.,,a.�._tay i,cn(�'�t"Al;(araey] 1.o it 87-09-22-01 x. BACKGIt(1t1N1) All 11 7,5"16-26 1. Nwitt' LARRY_--WHALEN.. 2. Addroms tat propoiterlt aand roprv.,wn•ttalivo (if till lyi c;t[710) :L.a=y Mlvi1en...- 1598 Lone Tree. Road 220 Grana_ A Oroville, CA 95965 Orovlllc, GA 95965 1a�a,i ��t t tit"�,� r i 11t l�•ra Tentative�Parce �II�yM RA... ' !� 1NGI". Y118 MAYBE NO 1 [ , riAAllr1'I'tll'ti 1� 1 �;ial Pit; �� rat• r a;ivl l 1 t:�..- .,. ��...�, . it, foes thr prilj(at t h.l`o tilt" pott!r)tial to dognictt 'Tat' (lit aI it oI' tI'c oilvironaurit, stills ttuitita,IIv rt3(1ucv they haahit;it of �l 1 ish lar wi IdI i Cep 4pec:lcs, cilli!,tM a) tl:zli r .�ilt.11l10 poptiI ati%II) to drop hetOil SOI" eYr:�itai11inm it•tc`1thrvii,te'n to v]iill inaty as plaint tar .111-iln,al tolluanaity, .%Iuce tho ntarrnher or 1•estrict fiw rampe tit al rnry ars eiWaangel;red plat or arralmal or (»I imiliato lmpo tali,° exalltples of the nlati(ar periods ill' t'ailiI'll;niaa hi.,itlav of prehistory? 11, holo t11c" pr!ijl'ct hake the" p teliti.l1 to aach.'ievc. "holt t,glia bruit lit to tht., detiaanent of katal;-te!rnM, t»nvir(ramemarl m,(ralrr'.' to short-term impaa4t on the ciivirtlmoilf is ::-inc (,hat,+ oct-ars, in as rolntke'lu hrioI' pviroil (a1 timo wit IIv I(ni - torah imptac'ts 0,1i endure irate) 't1tv Itit ure", ) c, Doe:; tilt" pioJocr haato impacts which aary individu- aal l} 1 in(itoil but t•u.mulaat lvtyiy (:(lnsideraa111c»': ('r'1 prujvi;'t mciv 1111pa ct till two Or more sep;arnto rescllarces avhure tilt. imp`ar't till t'ilch a`vsoljrc(' is rtilnti'vOy swill, blit aki'ertr the l''t'rect (it tilt'.' tot,11 W* 1hos(l imjl-ct:, <cn tfiv vil.vi rotamet)t. i.,; sil+tii, M"1cwit, ) , ti. Ilcic•s a, inti, -t have otiviromit-ntral eil`I'(,1t.S which wi 11 c :a a Et, ".ra)ytaatit4aa1 y1t1%,vI-t V Ncts on htlmaall l+rin:;i, ithp r ,l a;t+ t11 tai illdiroctlr•.' ] Il 1a1 11 1WF! N'i 1.0%" (10 lit" compl otml h- 1`1w Lc!a1d Ag('11cy) (ill liar; h,a> i of thi�> illiti,ai miltar;it!oll: I/141, t"il]Ll t1rc prrailcrlt+cl I)J'Olvet t".t1ULD Nnl' htive it sign'iricitit e'j"feet mi the" cowl rr_inlnt"nt , a-nd as DI:(3,AIWNON will be prepiwed 11'WI, tical tIla t aItht-migl `t1w I)lopt svol projeri' Coll Id litive to s1gillI c'aarit elh ct c)a tilt, vilv'illollallc,lit-, flip a will, lwt he a sigil'ificant 014ect iii this t: as . he*c —'rust, tho 1' ll"1'1'C;A71ON h1(ASljltl ,S dcscribod tan tlat." AI taac �..`d iaht•v"t ItaairV l)evti ;riltIvtI tti tIiv prili("tt. A 'Nt1t;AVV1' MaI a"M.M'.A !Mar, i. i l l liv Iirc p., red , k'1°,I trrt1 flir I'l-oplosek, el'1`eet iib t ia�: Gaal r a t nhrt as®`, aaairl as r1 ) .%VI lWNMLN'IAI. ]P111M."t' 10J10irl' is rctj aire`cl . rA'l 1. a October 26 ,0 1587 Cr " N, M, Illl'1`"I'T:, ll'i,ANN1'NO 01.01t11t'INI:N'I' 17avid R a.roh U. psSOC� d e P ai111Gx David lt�vie!wc�(1 icy». ". ,,_� .. �. �..,.�.�:,... , IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ACTS xp anations ot all 'yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets)) YES 1. EARTH.. Will the proposal; result in significant: MAYBE No a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or ., avercovering of the soil? �G c. Change in topography or ground surface -"-" relief features? d. Destruction, covering or modi,fioat Qn of any .unique geologic or physical features? X e. Increase in wind or water erosion•of soils, either on or off-site? C c f. Changes in deposition or, erosion. ol..beac}a - sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may mojify.the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inl.ot lake? o'r. G g Loss of prime agriculturally produc't.Lve soils �X outside designated urban areas? h. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud' .�,... slides, ground failure or similar hazards? �~ ". AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial a: Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. + The creation of objectionable odors, smoke fumes? x c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, locally or regionally? 3: WATER. Vdill the proposal result in substantial: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements in either marine or fresh waters? }r b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? c. Need for Off-site surface drainage improve- ments, including vegetation removal; channel- ization or colvert installatiun. d; Alterations.o the course or flow of flood waters? e. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body" f. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface.water quality, including but not limited to' temper'ature, d.i.ssolVed oxyggii or turbidity? c g. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? h. Change in the quantity oxo quali.t.V of grouiters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?j i. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? J, Exposure of people or property to water related Hazards such as flooding? lo. Risx op uPsn. Will the proposal invo).Ve! --ris OT explosion or the relof hazard-eas�. ous substances {including but aot limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals 0-1' radiation) in the event of an accident or uptiet c.oliditions? b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation, plan? Ili POPULATION. Will the proposal alter the locatlon, a—MMIYU—t-l'on, density, or growth rate of the human JL population? 12, HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing,____, or create a demand for additionalhousing? YES MAYBE NO 4. PLANT LIFE, Will the proposal result in substantial: a. ZFtinge in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (j�ncluding trees, X shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- ment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? S. ANIMAL LIVE. Will the proposal, result in substantialt. -g7—C-H`6`nge in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including rePtiles, fish and shell fish, benthic organisms or insects)? b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique,, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or -.novement of animals? — d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6. Nol,4,8. Wi!1 the proposal result in substantial: a.fncToases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to soveve noise levels? 7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the propolw-` produce C. Fj—gfiifi�E-a—ntlight and glare? 8, LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a substan i -a-1- altLTation of the present or planned land use of an area? 9. NATURAL RESOURCES: Will the proposal result in suy's-tantial'. ai Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural resources? lo. Risx op uPsn. Will the proposal invo).Ve! --ris OT explosion or the relof hazard-eas�. ous substances {including but aot limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals 0-1' radiation) in the event of an accident or uptiet c.oliditions? b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation, plan? Ili POPULATION. Will the proposal alter the locatlon, a—MMIYU—t-l'on, density, or growth rate of the human JL population? 12, HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing,____, or create a demand for additionalhousing? 13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal —YES MAYBE No result in a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? C. Substantial impact onexisting transportation X systems? d. Significant alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? ?C x 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or -result in a need for` now or altered governmental services; a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? --- c.. Schools? -� d. Parks or other recreational facilities? _- e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? --= x 15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in a. Use of substantial, amounts of inenergy? b. Substantial increase k in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of neva sources of energy? .. 16 UTILITIES. Will th'e proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following: a. Power or natural gas? b, Communications systems? -- G. Water availabili,ty, d Sewer or septic tank? k e. Storm water drainage? -- f. Solid waste and disposal? C. 17. 17. HUr4A.N,HEALTH, Will the proposal result in Creat�.on of any health hazard or potential, health hazard (excluding mental. health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? . 18. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the ion osc of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal. result in the creation of an aesthetically olPensive site open 'to Public view? 19. RECREATION, YE5 r�11E Will Will the no upon the proposal r+esUlt in an it or o acct Opportunities? quantity Of existing xezroat onal r' 20. CULTURAL �Wlla• a tREeSOpUrRoCSsal poresult in the alteration If or the destruction of a historic archaeologicaI s te?ehistaric or b, i�i11 the result in adverse physi cal or EleSt}let1C ef�'ects to tic effects -_ a historic Ullilc�in t prehistoric .or c,, Does the object? proposal'haveuthere to to cause --- a phYsi.cal change which , Would affect ethnic cultural values? °u] d affect unique; d, Will the proposal restrict exast',nor sacred uses "within the g re] gi. ata.area? — --_ potential impact, V. i7ISCU5S.TON� pi: .ENVIRONMENTAL EV�LUA1°TON See --- HP 25-16-2 attached. , DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP�- 1b-26 1b,e,f,3b,df,h�lbee DeYelo property in addition to the Development three additional home )ted ort displacement, compaction and nvercaver i ngWof l the scslndi 1 rM �1e will lead to changes itruptlon, Increased nges i n drainage patterns and a�rrfn�t' * Which i n erosion and siltation oi` on-site tP potent i �� 1 t'c�t+ size of the properties - waterways. l�wio to the a this should not be a s i 9n 1 f can L Kir"�.ii„� i em 19,4d: This project Will divide a generally considered too small to be parcel into agricultural uses. economicaliy parcois agricultural r'f this Project tri viab(q for Y, then even larger areas o triggers similar 'equesi:S ih the from ,production, f agricultural lane) could b4 removed 1h: The subject property i s i As such, a sli P Y n an area of high groundwater removal. Slight chance of subsidence exists All of Butte County in the aritire area, Viii• The subjectproperty is within a Moderate Eartilquake Of the Foots property is located a nUeMSity Zone ill Shear zone, which su approximately '(:i•Jree miles west earthquake: Construction of buildings the 1�3 r Ville s"andards for seismically active areas shouldpro,P rotection to occupants in case of seismic activlt "t9 Code Prop apuate 2-16 Wyman Ravine flows out of the Steep flattens downstream of Lincoln Boulevard, foothills flooding. occur ever ant; its bed slope Y few years in the orchaSheet flow and shallow WymanPacific Railroad: Flood flows over Palermo R©ad lave e Ravine almost as Far west of the Western Ravine between Stimpson Laneand Avenue, extended east of on a Hent^l n Lone Tree Road experiences roach of Wyman Y annual basis, "1'he storm of February P flooding over Lone Tree Road exte ,T Soo feet Y 1986 the creek Tree 5} produced flow north and 1000 feet south of During the dry summer and fall months (June thro flow in Wyman Ravine became ugh Oc%tober) however, shallow s minimaly probably less stream chanhel Duringpools and ponding are Prevalent in than 6 cfs, overtop the bankspofids of winter storm runoff the meandering depths (Flood Zone A� Wyman Ravine and iriurtdat flows occasionally 1 on Exhibit 1>. wide areaz, e1 shallow Two extensive drainage studios are currents Ravine. The f'ir'st stud i, Y avaiiable for Wyman Stud p Y, entitled Wyman Ravine W a Ys com ilea in 1'-"80 81 by Cook Associsips Watershed Drainage Consultants far Butte Count � Engineerlhg thr� study area, y study Cox Lane at the lowermost limit of Emergenc The second sEudY is sponsored by the Federal Y M was Agency for the National Flood ins This stud)+ was performed i surahee program, downstream of Lone Tree Road to Stimpson Lane. n 1'86-.g� and extends sotrfe 2�, OOb feet The FEMA reiaort providesthe fol lowing fiow dotshrJ lhformation applicable to the Lone Tree1ood Road crossing pro f 1 1 11 Drainage Area: 22.9 sq. M14 10 -Year Flood = 1570 cfs 50 --Year Flood 1845 cfs 100 -Year Flood = 1920 cfs W.s. eley. 117.7 500-yOar Flood = 2060 cfs Stream velocity of 2.6 fret per second It indicated aL. Ulla site. I le project This Study indicates that at higher runoff, a PortiOf the ow (approximately 40X) leaves Wyman Ravine upstream ofon Lorio TreeflRoad ad follows a sHale easterly of Wyman (Flood Zone "All on n Exhibit 1 The Cook report indicates a Stream length0 f approximat.ly 11.5 Miles for the basin and a time of concentration Road. Flows are shown at: of 280 mlnul-,os to Lone Tree 10 -Year Flood = 2300 cfs 100 -Year Flood 3300 cfs No Water Surface elevations are Provided In the Cool( report: Also, the Cook report does not Indicate that 8 Portion of higher flow may leave Wyman Ravine before reaching the Lone Tree Road crossing. The FEMA report provide, flow data at location approxim8tely 1.9 miles upstream of Lone Tree Road and before any portion leave Wyman channel. These flows frome Of flows Would miles are given at: a drainage area Of ;�1.6 square 10 -Year Flood 2145 cfs 50 -Year Flood 3010 cfS 100"Year, Flood 3290 crs 500 -Year Flood 8840 cfs Which Is a good correlationWith the Cook re ori of the Portion of flow that may 'leave Wyman channelWithout consideration Observed debris lines from Major storm r'uhOrfS have been recorded by Butte County survey craws to be '117.6 -1-/- for, water, flowing TI -00 Road just hotti,, of the existing bridge. over Lone 5d9 Increased Siltation - channel* May affect Wildlife habitat Within the Or Wyman Ravine (See Items 1 and 31) IDUO to the sj,�--e Or the Properties this should mbb be a 8I9nlflc8nt impact, 7.t The addition of three homes sources. In the area will Due to the rural nature of the area) Increase lighting sionlricani" impact, this Should not be a If approved, tillsProjec smallest t Will represent the creation Of the Parcels within OPPrOXImately a 011theremilr Milej thee Is one 2 -acre parcel Within one 8 -acre p8r%�.ej immediately to �;Ilja On Power Housee Hilladjus. southeast Of the Noad, and one Th across Lome Tree Road. subject property$ t1dot by WIlli8mtOm Act e Subject property Is i3wrroUoded On three Contracts with 40-8cro M1111MLIM8. jMpact��; to agricultural viability Of those lands are I twofold- rlrsty this project may act as a catalyst for other, similar projects In the area$ causing withdrawal of other contract lands from the Williamson Act and the division of those properties into smaller parcelsp W-'ius reducing their agricultural viability. Second, Increased use of 1°he subject property for residential purposes and other, similar devo'lopment that may be triggered by this project, will Increase the conflicts between agricultural uses and residential uses. These conflic.'44 consist of a variety of problems, including tre8passilg, vandalism, (Itigs running livestock, arid sensitivity of residential uses to aqr',Ir,,u11;ural nuisances such as dust, spray1nq, nolse, etc. The Butte County General PIS- -' 191-lates this area as ()Mhard and Field crops. This designation A,,ows a range of parcel sizes from 5 acres up to 40 -acre minimums to be found compatible wilh the General plan'. Parcels under 20 acres In size can only be found compatible with the designation if several conditional criteria are present. Those criteria are: 1. ncl P 1-cel—SiZeS rat'Se Fro _6� -Ig acres. From the above discussion, it i:t4 evident that this condition does not exist. 2. Adjacgnt,to,or-lm the general Ylginity of urban brsundarI es., The urban boundaries or Oroville are located approximately three t CJ four miles north. Although riot a designated urban area, similar devolopment In the Palermo area 18 located approximately three miles by road to the north and east. 8. The present status of.aai-ICUltural --productl on w.il,l not b slonifJcant,ly impaired..See discussion above: it is evident from the above discussion that the project does n( -t conform to the Butte County General Plan. 13a,c,f: This project will generato additiomal traffic through the development of three extra homes. Althorlrah this increase will not be significant in its own right, it will re ot a cumulative Increase in traffic and. traffic hazards on area roads. If other, slmllat• projects are generated as a result Of this Pr-'OJect) additional -traffic hazards would be created and could become significant. 14! This project will represent an Incremental increase In demand for public ssrvlces In a rural arotio 184 If approved) this project will result in 8 cluster of rotidentlal uses in n am area predominantly devoted to agricultural uses) detracting from the spacious vistas that now dominate the area. I Ii. MANDATORY FINDINGS'(gyp"SIONIrICANC-E b e See Items 14 3, F3 1 1 5 12, 13 and 1 e". I M.- 5unnested M t i nat i on Measure 1Redesign the project to yield two 20 -acre parcels w l tf ► one existing home on each parcel Appilcant; Larry Whalen AP Lop IT e7-09-22-02 3:1-j iect Type of Pro '-(%m,1 0 .1. Tentative PfarIcel Map, Brief De .scrit t;on. 71 . of 5-D1vidh')!;) 40 acres into four parcels , two1 acrCIS'each, One of 8.6r.,or,ec,, and one of Oth a 1'-ncre remainder Parcel. 1061 acres Lor_tt 1 t�j; I - I On the west Side Of [,anr-ee 1.7 o Os north Of COX Lane and 1 . 7j f Road, approximately scut, ,,.nest of Palermo and sou t�_, r 1 1 es south of Pa 1 ermo ""'ArI0,80CS Upment,,, ensity of DeveloOp oroville. U -It. r-) ve 19creS Per dwel I I hg -Int Of lft'P ry I bus SLIt"fac I r,16) , P n I mX3 Acc4a$s and Nearest Pub lic Roa Tree Road. Property fronts on Lone ?'Otl)ciclof 8ewa0e D 1 sPOsal Of Water Supp I y , ;�`,Pt I C System,-, . Individual wello. P1 v 1 1�tIwf lty OPower Lines: To proper,ty. for further 181nd di%risloillt due to zoning) General ; and �Jovofopment: rlah ,ani!s-,,l -:Ionditions . g 9 r_onm a �nt M:i „ G; ei^a l Topooraphic. Character-. r!Jt valley Generally 0-2%. 8b.3r-p". _1 0 .1 OPeg near i. b Ion.- 110 to 115 feet above' -ea Level. 1_1111,1--ing !--actors' None. Is 1'VP6JS-, and Characteristics Ravin" - llohtt,tt alons Wyman " and Wyman Gravel l" Y LOam on- OeMa I nder. clay and hardpan from 2C, to Factors: Areas of shall v, deep. P='ordit of the Land E�,-thlWnk� ?ono.,, Vi I I I Moderate 8:a1-'thLjU,1k e Intensity Zone t=rOn I Or' Potent I a I , I S1 9 I ht to mod 06jj,. i. . Potent -a NOhO. jte, I,e HaztIt'-d" Moderate. 8011 Potential: Hioh, . -8urfa--e W .jterit Wyman Rav I ne I'. Ort i or! 0 -' the property, tr�08so�-. t"(e' Mor"thwest 71 crag A matura I 0j -p - 'ji I hL Ig the SOLIthw-ly boijrjdtt-�y of, tF�� ew aY Meanders npmrtyk -10- • b. Groundwater: Abtxidant valley aquifers. C. Drz-,nage Characteristics the west toward WYman Ravine. Portionserty thner.a'Ily b southeasterly a r.� l` the Y prarcel s drain to the dra i n�()r�way to the south. d, Annual Rainfall (normal): 20•-22". e Limiting Factors: Setbacks from draina0,wayS. 5. Visual/Scenic Quality: Good. 6• Acoustic Quality Good. 7 Air Quality: Goad. Qiological Environment: 8 Vegetation- Valley grasslands. 5 Wildlife Hab 1 tat Small birds and an i m�� 1 s c i�inton to valley 1 e grasslands, y Cultural Ei Env r+nnmoMt 10 Archaeological and Historical Resources in bijo area: Low sensitivity area. 1 1 . Butte County General Plan designation- Orchrat-d and P i .s 1 d Crops. 12. Ex i cu i ng Zoning: A-5 13. Existing Land Use on -•site: Two single-family dwellings. 14- Surround"►ng Area: a. Land Uses: Agricultural lands with widely scattered residential uses. b. Zoning. A-5. C, Gen. Plan designations:, cf . Parcel Sizes: Orchard and Field Crops.., Generally 40 acres and larger. (The old 10"acrre parcels in the vicinity are generally encumbored by large --acreage LCA contratts,) e. Population; Sparse. 154 Character of Site and Areal 16. Nearest Urban Areat extensive agricwltural areas. 17'. Relevant Spheres o influence. 18. lmprcvements Standards Urban ArbaoneNo 19. Fire Protection Services a . Nearest County (S #7:�. tate) ,tate) Eire Station; Palermo Station b. Water Availability: i=1re tankers only. 20. Schools 10 Area: Palermo Union School District and orovi'1le ;qh School 1 4 i str i ct, Union hl i Y.Y. .MgYxy 1�awWrc Y sw�iRAiMM1M �stViOw�.�YL iMNOY/6YVEb0kk Kit YRS`.. �I�tlNYMMMY 19 pk�pv y y fell �r �= • X r kv ►YCI 1 r—^"' /,,Y ,- �"� i�r'�Y��i , , � • ,: .. y , Y Il f6G1 a'' J 00,00 `yet +� hh ids" ti ' 9 4 ri +fir' 1 ' �A'. . " -r �^ •� � Y �� I. �d i .r1��F vwwnnwirM�Mrw kNi.� u .. as •^"^'�„w.r M \ i t .'woo r � , N , ,yr+'Y ,{,�:2� �� .irri�,w�.w. iwr.rihri+i+' ri�Wia�'.�• - ._,,, �.wy,�rw.. w�rY.yY�N{�MY” , . x .Myr $ }�W�Y V. Lk Wei I . � f 1 V MS,Nd��.'T' Z ON` N!OGIE OF DIETER. C t Office of Planning and Research FROM Butte County 1400 ,Tenth Street, Room 121 Planning Departnio,111; Sacramento, CA 95814 7 County Center Oroville, CA 05065 or X_ County Cleric County of ButLe SU"B.s'VI= _ Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance Wfl. xr S lrCioll 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. project Title AP I1 Name Tentative Parcel Map 25-16-26 Larry Wha.',o State ,Clearinghouse Number Contact Person 're.1cphone Number (if submitted to Clearinghouse) Public 'Works John Mendonsa 538-7266 Project Location on the west side of Lone Tree Road, approximately 1.7 miles north of Cox Lane and 1.7 miles south of Palermo Road, south- west of Palermo and south of Qrovil P Project ,Description Tentative Parcel Map dividing 40+ acres into four parcels: 5.1, 5.1, 8.6, and 10.1 acres, with a 12 -acre remainder ,Parcel k This is to advise that ',.he .Butte Count- - ('Lead Agency or Responsible Agency) has approved the above-described project on)and has made (Date` the following determinations regarding the above-described 'project; 1,. The project dill, will not; have a significant effect on thea environment. 2; An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of iEQA; A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA' S, hiitigation measures were; i,'ere not, made a, condition of the approval of the project; 4, A statement of overriding considerations _:t4as, _. Midas not; adopted for this project, This is to certify that the final. Eliz with comments and responses and record of project approVal is available to the general public at: Butte County Planning department 7 County Center DriVe 7rovillej CA 95965 Date I ecoiVed for Filing and Posting at OPt _ Signature Title �cvs��i hl�reh ;1�8f� BUTTE COUNTY CO- MatiningCmrM D'OPARTMENT OF PUBLICHEALTH tivision u;L' Environmental Health 0 198% 7 cG,unty Center Dt ive �.7raY(Il, OeltforwE� Or.oville, CA 95965 (916)538-'/281 October 12, 1987 GDA 220 Grand Avenue Oroville, CA 95565 RE: TPM 4- WHALEN, Larry - AP# 25-16-26 Lone Tree Road, Palermo Dear Sirs: This department has advised the Butte County Department of Public works Land Development Section that we are prepared to act on the above application. Based on present information,, we can recommend approval or conditional approval Recommended Conditions for Approval 1i Provide a 100' leachfield free setback around existing weals either within the property or within 100'' of the property boundaries on parcels 1 & 4 2. Flow the usable two acre sewac_xe disposal area proven to meet the %,x;quirements of the Subdivision Ordinance on parcels 2, 3; & 4; if you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Thomas Hughes at the above listed address or telephone number between 8:0.0 10:00 A.M. weekdays, Very truly yours, ?OU t,S pervising Sanitarian Division of Environmental Health Has lml f cot Planning Department '' ,� � • �� � .,,c n :� � , ► /. ' ,• C � '1 � '; rte, \1 ,� • �� „ � e . � �. � � � .. , , �� _ . � � � 4,� j ��; ' y ! a a Lo APPLICANTLarry Whalen��_ .��---�-- 1548 ;done Tree Road, Oroville, GA 95965 ADDRESS—, -,-- Same OWNER,, ...._...,e_ _w __.e Tentative Parcel Map to divide 41, ses toaroal �,..r.a.»..w PROJ� C:T DDSCRIPTION__..._ parcels, 20+ acnes each«,....,«wy,.. on the west side of Lone Tree Road approximately 2 miles south v of Palermo Read, Palermo area . w..�.:«... �..a..., ..� -16-26 25 ASSESSOR'S PARCELNCi�iBDit() Orchard & PR A-5 GENERAL PLAINt7JliC�' C:C�N�S a`J GVN89AL PLAN CONVORMA.NCE RDPORT DATE OF ADPL CT T aItyttilA�rUFAR LAND CONSERVATION ACTT CONTRACTS.2—,,..,,.,, No 1988 DATE A'Pi j,CA""z0,j RV;C.EIVEG May - _ GDA........,.,...._,.,,»,,.,.-�,....,,......... ....:...... AGENVSURVEYOR/CIVIL RNGINEE _ _,.. 220 Grand Avenue, Oroville, CA 95965 DATE PLANNING DIRUCTOR1 S REPORT EDIV.it,110 NT AL CATWO.�ICAL EXEMMIO'N - D.ATE VTLM DVXIDV'M'Wt'1MN NtGATIVI': MC'LARATIOM - DATE AND D AT 4 MITIGATST) NBIG, ULCLARATION - TATtIl ADC7P'I813_.. _ ...,«�....-.. rNV IPA. "y IrIoORIII MTV, TV, A TJ r t 1 'VAT a C"'i ,'1;,�1 N ��i C Ll �a i • Nr ,, . »».:„ 1 N w'li it t' R' '� AAA.._�.nu:w✓_<.uYYr•wr«u1Yw:�...wam w.w.w .rw At�V7 ��s`C)17X �1*��•NC� J a•� .ax 3.NYAS nP�� ApPEAL �t�A��ttJG Ii!`►'i`�^'� ..:.�«.�«.. �»«,�.., .. C:OiQ93''%1`1'S rC)T: T?j"l'C rxj- Mk -i-,. 012 ^+L7IiT7 LV LSZ01�7 1` .h'I' ILL,ms 1�-11 to be Compic.Lod by applicant) 1. APPLICANT NAME AND ADDRESS: GA 7.. i,Ro.iF,0,T UESCRrPTrON: 7----'. M. 3ASSESSOR I S PARCEL NUMER(S) : 1!5- lee" ` 6. i'ROPOSED USE' AeC &I'— %z!'= '-1. 'fli4, ful'iowing items are to be completed by Lhe Planning Department: CURREN'J+ ZONING" A`5 LAND 'CONSERVATION AGRXI!!IEIM — NO C11:Ntf:AL PLAN DlaS'f.GNATION: , , --- -r--- Condi l,rinai t;r teriat AGRICULTURAI,-RESIDENTIAL YES NO It is recommended that; yoit perform the 1, Agrioiltural Campal,.billtyfollowing chocked Iti!oo-, 2:, Water and Sewer Capacity .� ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORDS CHECK BOTANICAL SURVEY 3, Adee{aate Piro Facilities GEOLOGICAL SURVEY4i Road Capacity and Maintenance S. Access to Commercial and Schools YES NO ORCHARD AND FIELD CROPS WI'l'HIN DEPARTMENT of FISII AND GAME DEVELOPMENT ZONE: 1. Peodominant 5-30 ac. Parcel Size 2. Vicinity of Urban touhdaries l WITHIN FLOOD PLAIN; 3, Ag. Viability net Iinpalred / WITHIN AREA, SPECIFIC. OR St,vff Determination: Substantially conforms Ito LAND USE PLAN; GENERAL PLAN., t, Land Use . If Yesf 2, Conservation Name of Plan 3.. Open Space C h. Safety '� WITHIN: URDAN RESERVE: _ %< If Yes► 5� Noise Name of Reserve b. dousing _ 1, circulation 'K AIRPORT LAND USE PLANS ZONING: -- _ C:Ot1MENTS: .eta.�rs i4v'd7- SiJt3J7"' e>G ✓D 7 ra Ajr4 L ti start Signature t.-_.�.�#u --� —� Date AS V*,* APPLICANT FOR T11E MEMO 'LAND DIVISION] I: AM AWARE OF THE ABOVE STAFF DETERMINATION REGARDING THP CONFORMANCE WITi1 THE GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING, Drtl,etl Signatuke of Applir aht �+l'hk eaprt will okpit6 and be discarded six (G) months from the date of the staff slgndture. LD .1000A (rry ged 6-87) Butte Count LA1,4D OF C4ATUIll AL %^fCAIIIt r, It r', r rA1,;TY - DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS WILLIAM (131. CHEFF, plroctor 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE .'oROVILI.E, CALIFORNIA 45965 Teleplicne; (916) 34I b}{:� "nQ-7' v rduffeCo.TIvAni�gC oN LD D. McEL,ROY CERTIFIED MAIL Deputy Director JUL 13 1988 July 12, 1988 orovill©t California Larry Whalen REt AP 25-1626 1548 Lone Tree Road Tentative Parcel. Maj) Oroville; CA 95965 Dear Mr. Mialen# At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held On July 111 1938, the Agency adopted a negative declaration of environmental imp-ct and approved the tentative parcel map on the above -referenced property, subject to the conditions listed on the attached sheet. appeals are timely filed --within ten (10) days of the dale of If no the Advisory Agency's approval --with the dierk of the Board of 8upervisorst this action will be final. When the conditions of approval are complied with, it will be in order for you to file your final maps with the BtLtte County Department of Public Works for recordation within twenty --four (24)months of the date of approval by the Advisory Agency. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this. office: Very truly yours, William Chef f Director of public Works J nMe�donsa A sistSnt Director attachment ccl plannij:lg Department Enviroomental Health department GDA Larry Whalen, Tentative Parcel Map, AP 25-16-26,'2 parcels located on the west side of Lone Tree Road approx. 2 miles south of P41ermo Road. Palermo area. Engineer: G.D.A. Public Works conditions; 1. Deed to the County of Butte 30 ft: right--of—way from the centerline of Lone Tree. Road. 2. Indicate a 50 ft. building setback from the centerline or Lone Tree Road-, 3. Show all easements of record on the final map. 4 Obtain encroachmey.,. permit for all driveways, new or existing, and construct to county standards. 5. Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required. 6. Meet the requirements of the Butte County Fire Department Mealth dept. conditions; 7, Prr,, pie a 100 it. leachfield free setback around existing we! either within the property or within 100 ft. of the property boundaries on parcels 1 and 2 NA'=CE OF D=EI�.1�IMN*VM N T Office of Planning anResearch M Butte County 1400,Tenth Street, Ro��21L *. Planning Department Sacramento, CA 95814 3 7 County Center Drive or JUL 12 198R Oroville CA 95065 _X_ County Clertk County of Butte rANDAUE 1. 9 't c ' utt Go. Clerk . SU33.314:= Filing of NoticeNf-Be'CLrml iff-arioePcoum�liance with Section 21108 or 2.1152 of the Public Resources Code. Project 'Title AP # Name Tentative Parcel Map 25-16-26 Larry Whalen State Clearinghouse Number Contact Person 'telephone Number (if submitted to Clearinghouse) Public Works John Mendonsa 538-7266 Project Location Ort the west side of Lone Tree Road approximately two miles south of Palermo Road, Palermo area. Project Description Tentative Parcel Map to divide 41 acres to create two parcels, of 20+ acres each. s_ This is to advise that the Butte County Advisory Agency (Lead Agency or Responsible Agency) has approved the above-described project on July ll, 1938 and has made (Date) the following determinations regarding the above-described project: 1. The project .gill, X will not, have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An Environmental Impact Report Was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: X.X., A Negativo Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures were; X were not, made a condition of the approval of the project: 4,. A statement of overriding considerations was, X Was not, adopted for this project. This is to certify that the final. = with comments and responses and record of project approval is available to the general public at; Butte County Planning Department: 7 Counter Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 bate Received for riling and, Posting at OPR 1gnatu-e Pill Tu;epin, Senior Planner Title k�ivised hfi�rntt 1��G /0 IV Inter.-Departmemorandum'! 0 TOi Advisory Agency FROM; Planning Director SU SJ ECT, REPORT ON TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FOR LARRY WHALEN, AP1125-16-26 oAi'Et June 28, 1988 This is a proposal to subdivide 41 acres 'to cr0-a1,--,0 LWO parcels of 20+ acres each. The present �,-oning o,Cthe property is A-5 (Agricultural, 5 acre Minimum part,101 size). The project site is designated as Orchax ' r! and i d Field crops by the Butte County General Plan. The project conforms to both the General Plan and Zoning ordinances of Butte County. This project was reviewed by the Advisory Committee last year. At that timetit was proposed to create 5 acre parcels. such a proposal was deemed to be contrary to the General plan designation of orchard and Field Crops due to the project's 's site and situation. The initial study addressed concerns pertaining to land use and this project reflecting the agrarian character of the orchard and Field Crops General Plan designatib,64 The project site -Or, Act .e is surrounded on three sides by Vlillialii�' Contract lands with 40 acre mini=MS. Subaividin-g this 41 acre parcel 1:o twenties may, encourage sittroundintj properties to follbW Suit. The Proposed PrOlect is exempt from development criteria listed within the Orchard and Field crop designation; The twenty acre parcel sizes are considered unconditionally c0n$ist,,ent under this land use categbrV, The proposed subdivisi0r,2701':Iects existing land uses of the 41 acre parCtlla On tho ftbrthern half of the project site 68 located a single 4a;-q'"IV residence. The southern half Of 1L the property also supports a single family residence and accessory farrr, b,uilclings. The subdivision will create two lots for each e �ti8tincl residence. All 0 in accordancenV tonm ,ental documentation has been preparec1 I to the caJfornia Environmental. Quality Act. The project has L been determined not to have a significant effocL on the onvirontaht and as such a Negative Declaration is ,recommended. RV1CC)'S','s1SNbAT ION: t1,0E have a significant effect 1. Find that the PtOJect Will the environment and adopt a Negative Declaration prepared for this project ptr8uant to the PtbViSiOft Of CtOA,o and PIP R Advisory Agency Page Two June 28, ,988 2. Approve the Tentative parcel Map for recor4nU; on. BM:jmc cc Larry Whalen. GDA K n� A6ue LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BC,AUTY DEPARTMENT OF PQUL,IC WORKS WILLIAM (Bill) CIVII-r, director 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE . OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 MCERTIFIED MAIL Telephone; (916 __..538-7266. RONALD D, McELROY Deputy Director Buffe Co N%F4mT tg Corym, JUN 2, 3' 1988 ,Pune 23, 1983 Orovillo, Cdiiitotnle 'Larry Whalen RBS AP 25-16-26 1548 Lone Tree Rd. TeritaLive Parcel. Map 0rovill e, CA 95965 Dear Mr. Whalen: Please be advised that the Butte County Advisory Agency will hear your application on the above—identified property on July 11, 1988. The Agency will be reviewing the findings from the Planning Department and will be considering your tentative parcel map. Public Works will: recommend the conditions of approval a5 listed on the attached sheet. The meeting will commence at 9:00 a.m. in the Board of Supervisors` Room; County Administration Building, 25 County Center Drive, Orovil,le, California: If you have any questions regarding this matter; please contact this office. Very truly yours; William ChefE Director of Public Works .fid___..._.. n Mendonsa ;,ssistant Director JM/kk attachment cc: Planning Department Environmental Health Department G.D.A .i Karry Whalen, Tentative Parcel the west side of Lone Tree RoadP, AP 25-76_�� Palermo area. Engineer; C. approx. 2 2 South ofparceI? located on D, A , miles south of l'r1a ermo Road, Public Works conditions: Y• Deed to the Count of Lone Tree Road. of Butte 3O ft, right—of—way from tl10 centerline 2 Indicate a 50 from t ft, building setback f Road. he cen ter�,ine N' Lone Tree 3• Show all easements of record on the fin 4• Ob Cain encroachment peal maps construct to rmit for all driveways, :new or ex:I< .ting, and 5 ` �'aY any delinquent quent taxes or current taxes as required, 6• Meet the requirements of the Butte County Deportment, a �, Bea {ie O0. ghnning CcmPY1° JON loin 'BUTTE COUNTY Orovillo, Caltfomla DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH Division of: Environmental Health 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (916)538"7281 June 7, 1588 GDA 220 Grand Avenue Oroville, CA 95965 RE: TPM - WHALEN, Larry _ AP# 25-16--26 , Lone Tree Road, Palermo Dear Sirs; This department has advised the Butte County Department of Public Works Land Development Section that we are prepared to act. ern tic' above application. Based on present information, we can recommend approval or conditional approval. Recommended Conditions for AnUroval either within the property or within 100 of the pro 1. Provide a 1001 leachfield free setback around existing wells property boundaries on parcels l and 2. if you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Thomas Huohes at the aboVe listed address of telephone ntimber between 8 � 00 A M . weekdays. Very truly Yours, we")"t' r 9, 1 'S'..' � h Howard J. Snyder Jr., R S. S.on Uporno Sanitarian of Environmental. Health HJS1ml odt Planning Department ,,, r. APPENDIX F COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM (To be completed by Lead Agency) Log No. 88-05-12-01 1» BACKGROUND AP No. 25-16-25 1, ,Name of proponent _LARRY _WHA_LEN 2. Address of proponent and representative it a licakl Larry Whalen GDA d Grand Avctiue o><o.viJ. l .,v ,CA 9.59.65_ ., .. - Drovi ic, CA 959.6.5 3. Project decription � Tenlsa�1�70_.Pdr(3(:1 Map.. II. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIC,;" FICAN+CE YDS MAYBE. Nd 1, Does the project have potential to dogradp the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below soli-r,uslainllig levels, threaten to eliminate rt plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the rariyE of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of major periods of California history or prehristory?................ 2. DOM the project have the potential to achieve short-term benefits to too detriment of long- term. envJrOnrrI.tntal goals,? {A short-term impact on the environment Is ono wh, h occurs in ra relatwel; brief pe: ior, Of 'time whiil(� long -terra "'Wads will endure Into the future ) ......... thi-prog,,c,-'WlVeimpactst hichare?Indlvidu,0ylirnitpd,boltcur,-I,l,ativelyconsiderablo? rA prnjec., i! -JY impact On two or more separate resources whore the leF1G`.act vn each resource is rulatre:?y ,rzl,iil but whole the effUt of tilt' tOW1 of those impact; *jr this environmolit is �rttrllllC.in' , .., .,..... ... .... ............. ..... � Lel t\t" A.. Dors the prnler t have 4:nVtrS,IllilkSrM,��l (Iffficts which will r,ruse substanit;t '1rNvrbe (.4fft cts on human beings, ;�nhor dircctty of indirt?ctly'?......... .... . ........ ......... b tKJ pits D ERMINA C 110iM, l,.y �.,� �r4it�lr.�ti,��p by tnlP :1:ad Agvnt:yr oil thy' 1):1Rw' ref thv; initial evaluiltlon; I'WF find 6-` 1,110posr+d project COULD i, " t �h� vr� r,j �irinifrcarit t±frrGl rattle till) onvuoriment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared, ME find that although tho propos(;+ project cotlid htar,�r+ir odr unt Gtf0:t (in'lenvirortm n'f, than will nett btla,prinlfic,�ntuttectenthiscpsabocauac:theMITIGAY!0tdIli A:,u.ESrlryr,rr rrlti+;thisattt►rxhndatttethary been added to the project, A Nt-GATIUS DO,'CLARATION will I).) lir, , Ittid I,WE find this proposed project MAY h€►ao signiflcari't &furt an the envlrol'l0,rr.,,. ,, �d,trt � �!►Jd���l�df �l� Af. IMPACT REPORT is required CC:1tJN3Or 13U E. I� ' N Ifs .Ci .P is "f6C:�di DATE: May 26, 1988 Bent L AsaCeiate .... .. planh`trlr Fleviewed by:,y: IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "YES" and "MAYBE" answers are required on attached sheet(.-),) 1, EARTH, Will the proposal result in significant YES MAYBE NO a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures') .. , ... . b. Caisruptinns displacements, cc npactior► or overcovering of the weir? .... . . . . ...... . . c. Change in topography or ground surface relief foattnr s? .. . . . . .... . ... Q d, fir'ish uction, covering or modificatiun of any unique geolorfiG or physical f(trtlurrr=,' e. hhrrease in wind or water erosion of soils, (Tither on or off site? . .. . . . ....... 0 0 Z,. I. Changes in deposition or erosion rf beach sands, or changes in siltation, dolrm,rttnh Or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the rrr:r+urr array boo, rnle!t or Inku" . rar ........ ........ ..... .......... . ..... . . . .. . .C CJ 1,-J rf. I.t)95 of prunri agriculturally productive soils outside designated urban arra, h. Exppsurt' of people or property to geologic hazards su..h as earthquaki",;, IirrulgJirte"s. MUdslides, ground failure or similar hazards? ..... , . , .. t ..... C b La 2. AIR, Will the proposal result in substantial; a. Air Unaissions or dratertora:tion of ambient air rtual b. The creation Of oblr:cho'lal odors, smoke or Rini 0 0 Y31 c, Alteration of air movement. moisture, ar tamoel,alu. y unange in climate, inwallyor regionally?.. ..................... ...., 0 0 C!Y 3. WATER. Wa, lhtr plowisal rr sult in substantial: a. Ch ingeas in currents, or the course or directrun of water movements ill rilhor marine fi(.sh watt r4' or• b. C,,ia ?s in ab.wi ph rn raters. drainage paatleirris, or Iho Tatra 8110 ermount ofsurfrictF runoff1. , 0 C c. Nf.�t:d for rjff•sitc� ;;tirfaco drainage imprahvvili ants, Including vrrgtatation remmuvni, 1 rlr7rlrrr'i1 3.1Ct11 fir Luivott inmallationry c1. Aht ratuyrs t(v thea criur,if, Or NOW Of hood waters" .... 66 e, Chanrjo in 1110 ramot;nt Of surface water in ,any water body" . f, Di,r n arcgu tato :,url ai n wa'l0w, or in any aritorat,ora of strrfaacO wattrr ttual►ty_ rm..Ioding but 910t limited to .enaptarilf ire. drssotved oxygen orhirbid th') .:.. g, Alk.-tation of tho dir�lctron ar 1j11(i of flow !)t rryrirrrYtd wtitriryn 11' h "h;atige in the qu inhty Yar grrahty of gru(rnd waters, eithor through diw(;t .►rfrfitrun;i car wllhdrtiawjk er through interception of anaquifer by cuts or exca;oglion,,-) .... : , f. rteciuution rrh the amount of water offherwreie available for public wator supplltvi", .. , .. , , , tj n IV ), Exposure of people or proporty to water related hazards such ars floodjlig,,, , 4, PLANT LIFE, Will the prop�,sal result In substantial; A. � hran setin th .Giver rt of :, pecros, Change 5. and aquatic plants)mber of r of taut firrohidinq Irous � p, p, .. , .. , . .. ,sof . 1.... , ..s C b. RMiuc tion of the niimbers of any unique, rare or ondangere:d speCies of pliant!39 ........ 0 C4' C. Introduction of now species of plants into an jreia, or In a baairier to the; normal replenishrrierit of existing species') .... , • ...... . . ... . . . .. .', ... 0 d, Reduction In acreage ptaray agricultural;Top'.,......... Cl :.......,.,y.......... ..... Cwi f 0 5, ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result In substantial; YES MAYBE NO a, Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell fish, benthic organisms or insects)? ........... D Cb b. Reduction In the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? ...... ❑ ❑ c. Introduction of neva species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? . .... , ... 1-1 .... , . , ....... ....... .... ... f C1Y d, Deterioration to existing fish or wildl,fe habitat?...... , , ... , ............... 0 0 fS 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial: Si a,lncreasesIn existing noise levels? ....................... ...........<..... d. Significant alterations to present IpMterrls of circulation or movement of people and/or b, Exposure of people to severe noise levels .......... . . ....... . .. , ... • .... • ...... C:1 7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce significant light and glare's ... .. ........ Q 0 9. LAND USE. Wilt" :e proposal result in a subst6ritial alteration of the present or plarilled land use of an area? ..............................................................r....,.,.. C] D 9. NATURAL RESOURCES.''vVillthe proposal result in substantial: 1. Increase in traffic hra2ards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?., ,.,.... r ,,,. .. a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? ............. . ........... • ........ o 17 ty b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural resources? .... . ......................... r .... d d 10. RISK OF UPSET, Will the proposal involve, a. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upsetconditions? ..., b. possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan'),. 1J f 11, POPULATION, Will the proposal alter location, distribution, density, ,ir growth rate of the hurrah population? .. ............ ...... . ......... . ..... • r ... , , ........ 12. HOUSING. Willthe proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional ri housing? ...• y ...........demand............ .,..........., 10. 'TAANSPORTATiON/ IACULATION. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle Movement? . . ......................... • . , . b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking') ................. • 411 1 t •St n tr ns brtr�tir%n s Stems? ..,.... 0 C. ubstanha mpar on eN i g , a p d. Significant alterations to present IpMterrls of circulation or movement of people and/or y L7 goods? » ..................r....•.,..... rc-. ... ,., ,..., r....rf.....r.r.. rr, •.r.r. e, Alterations to waterborni3, rail or air traffic'? . . . . . ... . . ...... . j�� 1. Increase in traffic hra2ards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?., ,.,.... r ,,,. .. d 0 i 15, UTILIT18S. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial aiturations to the following. a. Power or natural gas? ................... ........................................... CJ b, Communications systems?.. ..... ....... ,....................................... c. Water avarlabilrtyl ..... , ... , . I ..... ....... . ................... Y ......... C] C1 d. Sewer or septic system? .. ....... ..... . , . .............................. . .... 0 f e, Sturm water drainage?, ........ ......................... ....................... ... 0 f. Solid waste and disposal? ..... .. ............... .... 0 CI 17. HUMAN tAEAL`f H» Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any huaith hazard or ool()ntial health haznrd (excluding mental health)') ... d Ci b. Exposuru of people to potential .ill zards) . . .. . . . ............... C7 18. AFSTI-111TICS. Will the proposal remelt in the obstruction of al ly,,cenic vista or viaw open to tho+ public or will the proposal tesult In the creature elf an -ie_th #;^all is II n to public VIe1N° ... . ............ a. `..5. Y'3 . y o YG'n51LN . R, ope.. 0 0 `,./ 19, RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impn�,t upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities'? ............. k-1 ............ , C 20, CULTURAL AESOURCES. a, Will the proposal alresult In the alteration or the of prehistoric or historic arcp p p site! ............. 0 0 b. WIII the proposal result In advorso physical or aesthetic uffeuts to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? .... ... Y ................. c, hoes the proposal have the potential to oause a physical changc►which would affect unique ethnic cultural values! .. .. Y C 1 d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacrad uses within the potential impact '�yI areal }. .... ..111.1♦IY.Y, .}..1...,. .... I...........Y1/YI} ♦,1I}. I.. Y.Y YY � lw 14, PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services: YES MAYBE NO a. Fire protection? . ........... ....1,. 11. ....... .....1.. .. .... © 0 10- b, Police protection? ............... .................. Y,... ............................ G 0 C. Schools? .................. .,.......1.. ..... .............. ❑ ❑ f� d, Parks or ether recreational facilities? , . Y .............................................. n ci e. Maintenance of public facilities including roads? . ... » .................... ....... f El I" I. Other governmental services? ..................................... .. . ......... , . 0 0 ig/ 15. ENVIGY. Will r , ,sal result in: a. Use of substantial arnounts of fuel or energy'? ... ........................... . .. , . , b. Substantial increase in demand upn.n. existing sources- of energ; , or roquile the development of new sources of energy? . ....... .................. . . ....... . , .. ❑ 0 W/ 15, UTILIT18S. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial aiturations to the following. a. Power or natural gas? ................... ........................................... CJ b, Communications systems?.. ..... ....... ,....................................... c. Water avarlabilrtyl ..... , ... , . I ..... ....... . ................... Y ......... C] C1 d. Sewer or septic system? .. ....... ..... . , . .............................. . .... 0 f e, Sturm water drainage?, ........ ......................... ....................... ... 0 f. Solid waste and disposal? ..... .. ............... .... 0 CI 17. HUMAN tAEAL`f H» Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any huaith hazard or ool()ntial health haznrd (excluding mental health)') ... d Ci b. Exposuru of people to potential .ill zards) . . .. . . . ............... C7 18. AFSTI-111TICS. Will the proposal remelt in the obstruction of al ly,,cenic vista or viaw open to tho+ public or will the proposal tesult In the creature elf an -ie_th #;^all is II n to public VIe1N° ... . ............ a. `..5. Y'3 . y o YG'n51LN . R, ope.. 0 0 `,./ 19, RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impn�,t upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities'? ............. k-1 ............ , C 20, CULTURAL AESOURCES. a, Will the proposal alresult In the alteration or the of prehistoric or historic arcp p p site! ............. 0 0 b. WIII the proposal result In advorso physical or aesthetic uffeuts to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? .... ... Y ................. c, hoes the proposal have the potential to oause a physical changc►which would affect unique ethnic cultural values! .. .. Y C 1 d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacrad uses within the potential impact '�yI areal }. .... ..111.1♦IY.Y, .}..1...,. .... I...........Y1/YI} ♦,1I}. I.. Y.Y YY � lw DISCUSSION Or ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP1125-16-26 1b1e,f,3b,d,fvl106e: the proposed project is to subdivide fl -10-acre parcel Into two 20 -acre parcels. Both parcels currently h.,,wm exiSt'Ing development on them, single-family residential homes and r_lnisoclated outbi»jlldings and barns. No further development could OCCW Und0l'- the existi,19 Z0111119 On these lots, Therefore no slonlficant 11110',-icts 00used by displacement, compaction and overcovering of the soil surfaces will occur'. I 9,4d: This project will divide a par.,,: -0 rjf approximately 40 acrOr, InL-o two pal -cels generally considered too small to be (,ice,nomicallY viable for agricultural uses. If ti -)Is project triew,'ir's similar requests In the vicin!tYv then even laroer areas of onolcultural land Could be removed from production. 1h- The project site Is In an area of hloh qroundvIai;ar r4emoval. As a Such, a slight chance of subsidence exists 'in the entarea re - In add itio-1, tl-le project site is approximately three milot, v4est Of the Poothill Shear Zone, which s,.ipported the 19'75 ot-oville �.arthquake. Construction of buildings tu Uniform Buildi.jIg Code stv-_%Jards For, seismically active areas should provide adequate prote�,.tlon to Occupants In Case of seismic activity. 3j I'tie Wyman Ravine flows across the norti-twestern se,:11"lon Of Parcel 2 I and -thence to the bacl< :sIdtt of Parcel I. Sheet flow .2or. shallow flooding occur every year In the Orchards west of the Union Pacific Railroad as a resuft of Llje Wyman Ravi no flows. Flood flows over paleimo Road have extended east of Wyman Ravine al most L41; far as oc-cident,al Avenue. The reach Of Wyman P;�#vine between Stimpson Lane and Lane Tree Road experlencos flooding on nearly an annual basis. The storm of February 1986 produced fjosis ov(tr Lone Tree Rotid extending 500 feet north and 1000 feet south of the creek, The Wyman Ravine I-ias been s_,t,,LjdIed severF_0 times for- dral-iage control I SSUOS - 11 -le first StUdY) etIt-JJ-,Jed "Wyman -t Ravine Wnt0_rsV,­,J tura lmage Study p,l compiled in 1980-61 by Cook Associate-., engineoririg consult ants. for taut -,0 County, has Cox Lang at the lowermost limit Of Me Study area: 1'I -re second study was sponsored by the r-ederal Emt�,r­ ancy Hanagemem t Agency f or the Nat I anal F I ood ;Insurance I 'th I r, study was performed IM '1986-87 and extend:? some 26 000 fec"tt re am of Lone Troo Road to art impsot: I -Dile. IlIes F-ElvIA report. ; Prov id s the tol lowino- i'low data and flood Pr%6l*il0 information aPPIlrable to the Lone Tree- Road crossing; Drama iwage Area 22.9 SqUarM Miles 192LI afs lo-yeal- Floodt '1570 cfs 50 -Year Flood". lt4ti cfs A stream vOIOI*Jty Of' 2,w feet per second is at �ho, proJect to This study indicates ti-lat. at I-lighor runofi-, -i portion Of the f 1 W4 approxlniabely 409, 1eav08 WYMOM Ravine, upstr.oam of Lone I-ee Road and Ows a st�la I e 'man. Any fUr-thei- developMeni -, of this property toproperty I MPI"O'vements to f I ood hMZards, 8., create some of the smallest,S parce I th I n c I n ity,, 'ithh-, a one -mile radius, there IS only ono 2- ZiLr,��, -4rcel, 017 FOINe,- House Hill Road, and one 8 -acre parcel IMM.jk:ti8tely to the sr-,wtheast o•F the subject property, acros-. Lone Tree P%,ws%J - The proi ec b s I i.e I s surrounded on three s I des by W I I I I emscil I Act Contract lands With 40 -acre M11-11MUMS. Impact potential to agricuitpara l viability of these lar,ris J-, tv,of,old. First, this proposed project may act as a catalyst For- turbhAr subdivisioi,is and withdrapqF-ji of ot[-Iey-, k..)nt)-act I ends f rom the W I I I I aliison Act. SeColid, I ncreased use art the PrOJG-Ct site for res iden t,al I . -.)Urposes and other s 1 In I I err devO I opment that may be tr I g4z;jer�?o I h T v. project w I I I I ncrease the coni" I I cts between aGrICUltura l anc.i residential uses. These conflicts consist of a varletv ef r:-oblerns 111a1LICHI'7o trespassing, vandalism, clogs running livestock, ont.l of res jdl�ntlal use to agricultural nuisances such as dj2-0, noise, et(- . The Buttr-- (-aunty Genera Plan designates this orea aj;:i Cr',Z.hard & Field I.rops. riiis C10—signat ion allows a 0 range , f parce1 sjze8 fI-OM 1-:5 acre.5 Lip to IU -acre mInImums; to be compatiLile pqiblI I he to ner, r I Plan. Parcels which are Crl,'-ated that are 2Q sores ".1r, more do nl-�' 11MV- t.0 can forjn to the development Criteria listed within the Orch,irr• �ir,op category w The proposed gubdivision does not a_mrarlan character c)j° W-fls viclr,".y the courity I I S tYP I i ed by E t -Y I arse acreages o F 1 and. 18 -` The Proposed projec : r, 0 t gin!-) Orate any add I t, I One I tro f f I c as reSU I b Of th I S SULid I V I -t*' EaCh 10'. Is Cst-WIrently developed wth 1�lngle-famlly 1-11 h-*Mes NhIch i4ill generate appro�xjmat V vehicle tril"ps per jay. el 10 oLICh f.j-jpt*, all -v already e>risting, therefore ti'let-0 are no milt iC1IPr'-.ecI tt-n,4-C imt- 149 This project will a rer�r,e�sent n Inwo-ase I,-, demand forpublic public services In rural ark�0-3.' Applicant: Larry Whalen LOW 088-05-12-01 DATA SHEET A. PROJECI DESCRIPTION I Type of Project: Tentative Parcel rqap. Lir i e f Description: To a i v I de 41 aches to create two parcels Of 204- acmes each 3. Location' On the west side of Lone Tree Roads approximately 1 . i miles north o� Cox Lane and I .7 ml les South Of Palermo toad, southwost o1= Pa 1 erms� and South of Orov i 1 1 e, . �l . Proposed Density of Deve l opp en t acres; = Oneawe l l i no.t.rrt it per L --,o 5. Amount of Impervious Surfacing: Minimal Vii. Access and Nearest Public Roads: Property fronts,, on Lone f'rEe Road. 7. Method of :Sewage Disposal: Ind i v i dwa i septic. and 1 caci-►f i el d systems. a- .Sourer:: off` Water Supply Existing wells. g. i'Irox i m i t" Of Power Lines". Adjacent to Property. 1 Potentia' for Further Land Divisions and Dove opthent z Under- the cut -rent zoning, the property may be sUbd i v i der; to -acre parcels which will allow a maximum of e i �h �, parcels. B4 IiNVIRdNMENTAL SE,rTINC l'_. �,Ls_i_ca`1 Fnv i rbrttnerit f Terrain 8. Gemara l TOPo9raph l c Charat;ter -' Rel at:. I vel y f 1 at Val l f— lands. b. Slopes., G +ne-t-a I I y slop +d try.._2,%. $µ f+ RaY I ne: t el�'� 08 near Wyman c. Elevatl ct•i ;, Approximately I l fiW 1 l - feet; above Sea Level, d. L i rrr i t i rtg Factors: southerly boundary of the property. b. Groundwater: Generally accessible. C. Drainage Characteristics: Property drains Wyman Ravine, f a'j I (nornial ): 22-24" e. . d. Annmiting ual Rain ctors: Setbacks from dra1na9OwrAYS- Li Vlsu,al/Scenic 0I.Aality: Good. 6. Acoustic Quality: Good. 7. Air QualltY: Good. gj' IF, _9�10,cL-al Eny1r o nine n -- a. Vegetation: Natural vegetation has been disturbed by farming operations o Property is predominantly being Cultivated as a hayfleld. .. Small birds and animals common to valley 9. Wildlife HabitaL- grasslands. C Archaeological and Historical Resources in the ArOA' Low sensitivity, 11. 'Butte County General Plan DOS!OnatlOn: Orchard & Field 4rOPs- j2. Existing Zoning t A-5. inole-faMilY dNO1111-19s' 13. r-_XistInq Ind Ilse oto Site' Two z 14. Surrounding Area:a. Land Uses= Agricultural lands NJtJ-1 widely scattered residential uses. b. Zoning,. A-5. C. General Plan bas! gnat ions . Orchard & 171eld CrOPS6 di Parcel Sizes: I Generally 40 acres and larger. e. populab,jfan : Sparse, C-Xj,,e1j�5lVe agi-ICUltUrl-31 areas, Character of Site and Area: C by 0 F Orov I I I e anj 16. Nearest Urban Area. IV. RoleVO"t Spheres of Influence'. AB* Improvelnomt Standards Urban Area. Clo 19. Fire 1�robection Service*- County Fire StatIO11 Ne8rost County (State) rlrO SbObl0n' #72, b. Water Avoilobi libYt Tanker tt'Llck aril y. 20, Schools in Arent Palermo Union School District and OrOvIlle Union High School District,