Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
025-170-055
I , .k .k TL''N�S' TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION� IVNE. PARCEL MAP 1?ftELnC21MRY SUBDIVISION WA:f fir'- .APPLICATION (Please 'check appropriate box) 4a t APPLICANT Bil-1- 1 Dal ..Mo 1 in PHONE No: 7071 �) � ADDRESS: 851.5.. St r_r."W�, dsor . Calif_; ;'^_ 'alifor954 � 2- t OWNER: Rill D a l Ho 7 J13' _. PHONE NO 70-83$--=2803 ADDRESS:: ,8515 Starr, Windsor, California.,95492 ENGINEER OR SURVEYOR: Rarnha t -Brown ".J3 ,jocia�t, sPHONE NO: 916.333-6457 ADDRESS-., . 2060 PaA Avenue. Oroville, jA 95966 MAIL NOTICE OF HEARING TO Arpl cant.,,t,.,_d,1.Eneineer � LOCATION OF PROPERTY: TOWNSHIP $N RANGE 3E SECTION L5 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 25-11755, -56 -57 TOTAL ACREAGE_ ±50 PLEASE SUBMIT PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT OR 'ZMCENT T'OLTCY OF TITLE INSURANCE (dated" within last six months) WITH' -APPLICATION. INDICATE BELOW THE DATE, AND RECORDING INFORMATION BY WHICH TELLS P<:RTIICI ,A r.{'�.'ARCEL WAS CREATED DATE jimi. 1 7j 19 a 8 BOOL 1. i „. PAGE 444r� 5 NUMBER AND SIZE OF PARCELS BEING, CRti„`AV7 (includl-ng any remainder) iii ar. Parcel' 2 - 5 `i4 ae� !Parcel 3 5.54_ ac, Parcel: 4 - 13,-. Drainage Ditch botWeen ao DISTANCE TO NATURAL WATER COURSE OR ST il.R DRAINS fardels 3 & _4 - PROPOSED .PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL:t; c tank L�.agb..f 7.p1.i�...:.S.e� (Cht& Vith Health Department PROPOSED SOURCE OF WATER; Wel i S m,11ch with Health Department) DO POWER AND PHONE LYIVES EXIST TO THE La t1NDARY OF THE bAjb NAL PARCEL? teC Power js located on Lone TreeRoad con tigUOUS to 25-17-55 IF 146TO ESTIMATE THE DISTANCE THEY WILT, 'RAMIE Tv $E EXTENDED: and. Pacific .8811 w 11 riof cd to be extended l-2"225 L:P'. . to the prop;Ogea inte.r3.or parcel. LD o2O Revised 7-24ia$0 J r p 4 7� , T.. FOR WPICEUSE ONLY; Aw co County Planning; Dept. Receipt 11 7 (;omMy Center Drive Urovi I le,' CA 95965-'1397 APplic�anC _ (� t' (9,1o) 538-7601 AP #-cn 5-17-554 5� r%_ Subdivision Name (if applicable) APPENDIX,A I►wo h'I kepi June 25 , 1992 LAND DIVISION APPLICATIONS` Supplemental Information for Planning Department_ 1• List iind describe any other related permits -'and other, public approvais regtiired for this project, including those required ,�y city, regional, stone and federal agencies: Butte County.Environmental Health 1, Proposed scheduling/associated projects: None 1. Antiripat,ed incremental development (phasing of 'subdivision units, fueuro development plans) Tots to be sold individually A. Wirt -rt 'method will be utilized to _accommodate surface drainage? Describd how on-site and downstream drainage channels will be affected, Theme is an existing drainage ditch on proposed Parcel 4, ,(3--24" diameter C]? beneath access road) Adequately handles ;drainage: 5 Peuxiinity of water for fixe fighting purposes�(hydrants, ponds,,etc.): Theme is no public water system. Un site wells will. have to provide ado uate.waster.'_Nearest fire Station 15 in Palermo approximately 3k5miles northeast, Mee onZsi a trainage contains only minimal water, 6. Wi t i r_xcavat.inn or grading be necessary's Cubic yadrds (estimate); "Future grading will be necessary for rests enRa eonstruction Amount will depend upon typo ,& size of residences to be built. 7, for travel to property (rural and mountainous areas only), efih oft .of Lone .Tr.�pe-8:ad tc.eated between .Cox bane _(east) rues -T.nk"ghL6 -(Wg,� t) H- 1 I SI d r FNV I Nt)NMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES* y r + eassociated with Identify PC) .significant environmentalimpacts assn thw l,1ncl division, What project design features or .ap conditions ,If 11iprOvIJ (m'itlgation measures) are proposed to alleviate potential nr►v i ronmental impacts? 4) . FNV_I RONMEN,rAL SG't"rING'c rt) 1)ei;cribe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants :11,41 animAis, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. eserine any existing structures on the site, and the use of fhc., structures. b) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on pLanty and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of .land use (residential, commercial, etc.), it►I ells i t y of land use (ane family, apartment houses, shops,, depart menti stores,, atc.), and scale of development (height; frontage, setbadk, rear yard, etc.) ta:W1 VICATION.: r hereby certify that: the statements 'furnished above and in I he :i11.,jull C� `P.7CI�if71t5 pr,esenfi the data and information required for this Irr,rl "i:►iavnlu-,Uion to the best of my ability,. and that the facts, statements and irtformatidn pm§ented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge re- For *tl:►: st1):►tat'e shcleh for longer responses. H-2 3, Tfio adverse ent/ ronmenta'l impacts are anticipated, The 4d pining paroels have been developed for residential uses, Proposed Parcel, 4 h -,s been designated as a 13A acre parcel so that adverse impact t.� the dra.µnage ditch will be minimized. Site distance on Lone Tree 'Road is adequate. Cox Lane (vest) is located 950, south of the ingress/egress and Coy, Lane (east) is located 375' north of the ingress/egress.(See attached plat for rQ&d locations.) Cox Lane is an gaff -set road. 9, The existing 3 parcels consists of 29,37 acres, There is ark existing 60' )cress easement .road (aggregate base)at the northern boundary, There is an existing drainage facility beneath the access road (3-24,, diameter CIAP) , The elevation on the west end of the property is approximately 103' ASL, gently sloping Easterly to the drainage ditch where the elevation is.approximately 101' ASL. (Less than M) .East of the 1 drainage ditch the elevation increases to approximately 106' at the boundary line'. (Less than 1%. Accordina Ito the :Butte County General Flan, Seismic Safety Element; Liquifaction potential is moderate.. Subsidence potential is 10w4- Erosion owi.Erosion potential is nc.ne Exnansjve soil potential is rig:{{derate. Nat✓+.tra.t ffie nasard is ni7� ,li4ted as the ,sire is classi- f i ert ae an irrigated area Al tera,tlons Styr dritainage %rO I! �n�'Min-'1 ;h4 assr_tming four singie family d.weinins_�I-Mils. th- ndrainage structures are adequate, The area is E 0f,ated 4-�Yst e t. he Wyman Rav ne Study Area :and an e,.;ist.ing drainage analysis is not available, The site is not desitrnal ed as a flood area oil the Flood. Hazard Boundary Maps.. Department of Housing and Orban DeVelopment. Vegetation oft -sit --h is pyimarz ly annual drrasses. There are some reeds and berry bushes adjacent to the draainag!� ditch. No animas we,ranima I, slpecaesecommonrtoobseve�,va,l le°yon 1geassota ndsrar� 1-4-te' hf,4t�ver it s� assumed that an _ dent , The e-Xisting Jennifer Lane 60' access road on the nort:l7eriv boundary shall be e: -tended 410' to the West V it 'h a t:u 1-ccz-sac ��n props sed< Parae 11'. Yom. o�la7�,TEng •-EP"Q—E-M FOR �Ai�•-•cVr Moy ,01Z SYJBD�`�%ZS7~C7N 'steams^ 4 be completed by aPP licant: ©A l.� fr ►lJ r-1 IJ L% 'i3raRN E:AQ-13R.OW h1 � p�,SO C„ S. h' ' '.GICA2iT NAME. AND AD12RV IsStl 1 vi L-i-a GA. X159 �S �p�ox 15-1'L rzd , 2. P'I a.iEC= DESCRIPTION: � � � :r,\ � 0 5 G o S`� A 3 SSOR S PARCEL NUMHF4(S) a .p rr• c S t TC-e> z,., max oss: • F�tlloVi�c3 items aro to be completed by the Play nitig Department; 00 A J.AM CONSERVATION VATION AGR� Cw0tl ZONING: f' GMMAT. PLAN, DESI('ri.LiION; r2 to Arz E rr_-t-t, Cry Conditional Criteria: it is recommended that you P03:`C= the .$&wac JLTU"RAL-RESIDFNIM YES NO following c = ed items: '±. Agri=ltural Compatibility ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORDS CSC{ Z. Water and Sewer CaPaCit}i ---- -�" BOTANICAL SURVEY ----- . Adequate Fire Facilities -•-- GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ---- 4. Road Capacity and Maintenance YES NO 5. Access to Comercial and Schools WITHIN DEPARMENT OF FS5F2 CRcEARD An FIELD CROPS AND CAME DEVELOPMENT ?ONE:----.-���----- 1. g�do�.nant 5-10 ac.' Parcel Size 'WIMMI FLOOD PLAIN; --- .. .. 2 . Vicinity of Urban Boundaries tArt 3 3. Ag. Viability not Sapaired.,� SPECIFIC 01t ' Stiff Determination: Substantially c-bac sis to: ' CEMERAL PLAN: 1. Land asd If Yes, Nana of Plan 2. Conservation �---- IK 3. Open Space WrMN URBAN RESERVE: ,_... _. t'. SafaGy .--•- 5. Noisfl if Yn:, flame of Reserve 6. Housing t.IRPOin' �►2tD U� PI.At'!s ---- 7: CircuiatiorC .. .. ._..--- ZONiNG:, 1 t N 11 i V A 1. SQ)"Mc$-- M-1 O M C.0-r, r2JC,21 c��' �.b A c•. rr, ry � ,�-.v �..._ , _„'�`'ta t � . �r�.�s�r��- Fav u� . ria i C�rJurZ+h;-. r,t, pr=+n.�vA. >:.._ _ Pt7iE1�1'i'f A .�1.)�u G ry�Lw Date " 2- -- Staff Si F AppLICAN'P FORRFQUESZ�. LAND DIl�ISION}IAM A4JARE OF THE ABOVE STnFF btt q� ATlOtt REGARbjftt AS CAh'FOMWCIE.' W= GMMZAL PLAN At1D ZONING. u µ turd Si of A Beats bated t pp *nlis report "rill "Tire arid, be discarded months from the tate oI the staff signature . N, Y DAL SOL N X . Planning Department -- - _x Environmental Health Department ME x Butte county Sheriff AP-:_ 25 17-55 56 &_57 _ x- Calif. State Forestry/Fire Dept. (and on areas north of red line on map) x U.S, Dept. of the -Army;, Sacramento Dist. Corps of Engineers x Calif. State Dept. of Fish and Game P.G.& E� (check Title Report for easement) Pacific Bell (check Title Report for easement) ;(see map in cabinet) Butte County Mosquito Abatement S� 1 Di.strt• 'dater Company: (if individual wells are not indicated on application or map) Durham Irrigation OR Durham Mutual Water Co. California Wacar service Company (Chico area) OVJID - Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation District (Oroville area, SE of river) TID - Thermalito Irrigation District (Tharmalito area NE of river) Limesaddle Community Services District (Paradise area long Pentz Rd, to lake) Del Oro Water (Paradise Pines Brea) Paradise Irrigation District Buzztail Waterworks (Doe Mill Ridge/Forest Ranch area) _ City of: (check wall maps far spheres of influence) Oroville Chico Paradise, Town of Gridley Biggs CROVILLE AREA ONLY: L.O.A.P.U.D. - Lake Orovil'le Area Public Utility District (see map in cabinet) Feather River Recreation District (see map in cabinet.) E1 Med`io Fire District (check wall map - small area only) aj{,�, RICWALE, GRIDLEY AREAS - soUTH BUTTE COUNTY: (check wall map and Title Report to see what applies. Some areas overlap. Drainage District #1 Drainage District 42 _ Drainage District #100 Drainage District #200 Reclamation District 4833 Reclamation District #2056 Sacramento and Gan Joaquin Drainage District Sutte Creek Drainage. District IN CERTAIN CASES: Superintendent of Schools (only for subdivisions) $2 7O 99 149 (Chico cut --off), 162 (Olive Hwy . & Rchvale Cal trans (near. State HwY � , � ` Hwy.), 191 (Clark Road) _ State Water Quality Control Board (projects with more than 100 lots '0r units) USA - United States Forest Service (if 0toject borders USA land � check AP books) Calif: state Dept. of Parks and Recreation (property near Lake Oroville) �--- (property near Lake Oroville -watershed) Calif: state Water Resources Dept: Rock Creek Reclamation Dist. (west of Chico Airport, south of Rock Creek and east of Hwy. 99 - see map) CARD -- Chico Area Recreation & Park Dist,' (only for subdivisions) Southezn Pacific Transportation Co: SPECIAL CASES: Check Title Report for any mention of special services or easements such as TID or public utilitle.. aJ92 t> BUTTE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES VEBRUARY14, 1994' I Bill Dal Molin, Tentative Parcel Map, AP 025-170-055; 056 and 057, 4 parcels located on the west side of Lone Tree Road, approx. 700 ft. 'north of Cox Lane. Palermo area. L°ngineer Barnhart Brown and Associates (continued from February 7, 1994) DaLn;cook was present from Barnhart Brown and Associates. xr.. 'grickson said that the original parcel map for 3 parcels was recorded with a note that dry well seepage pits were to be utilized for parcels 1, 2' and 3. The statement that the original parcels would septic tanks and leachfield systems was incorrect. ,This proposal would essentially be splitting one of the original parcels in half and the data and site vasitis indicate that the ,proposed parcel would not meet the Appendix VII Subdivision standards. The. Health Dept. recommends denial of the project.. He. Cook had no comment. Kr4 Erickson made, a the Appendix V1.1 Subditis nion r�standproject, t, finding a standards. Moionseconded byMr.S project does not meet y- Sanders and carried uoaiiimousl '.; i if z (TABLED ED FROM EARLIER IN THE MEETING) located y01,1.1 Dal Molin, Tentative Parcel Map, AP 025-170-055, 056 and 057, 4 parcels on the west side of Lone Tree Road, approx. 700 ft. north of Cox Lane. Palermo area. Engineer: Barnhart Brown and Associates (continued from January 3, 1994) Dian Coot' was present from Barnhart Brown Associates. He submitted a packet of correspondence relating to soil tenting on the subject property. He said that Parcel '2 has hgd the most difficulty with adequate soils for sewage disposal. He said that a 3 arcdl map was recorded on Oct. 3, 1987, having met the Health Dept. requirements. There r,;tere ty10 approved dry wells on Parcel.2 as per the Health Dept. letter of October 14, 1985: He said that Parcels 1, 3 and 4 were approved for conventional septics, He said -hat, the groundwater monitoring wells used by DWR are somelghere on Cox Lane. I,r. Zejpkson said he would like to meet with Mr. cook and go through the available' s.nf X , ornation. Some of the Health Dept4 standards have changed over time: 13r,, cook said he would agree to de that. Mr. Edell noted that this item was published as: "Project for Which Environmental Documents ai ;re 14complete," so t would have to be republished in order to take any action except denial. If the item is republished, a list of Public Works conditions 'Will be prepared. The item could be republished as: "item for Which Negative Declaration With Environmental Mitigations Has Been Recommended." if. the Health Dept. c°'uarance is received on or bafore Thursday, February, 10, 1994, the item could be republished, otherwise it could be continued to next Monday, February l4; 1994. ljr. Cook was agreeable to that. He noted that he does not tave the data regarding the original 4 lot lines and the lines of the 3 lots which were recorded, in relation to the proposed 4 lot lines. Hr> Edell said that the County departments might have that triformation. This item was continued to either February 14, ;1994, or to be republished for the next Available, ~ hearing $UTTE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMM110TEE M11MTE8 FEBRUIkRX 7; 104 Un - Ll�hip tJF NATURAE WEA -1"H A"J IE � -_ LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER ORIVE. - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95967.3397 TELEPHONE: (9161 538-7266 FAX: (916) 538.2140 December 27, 1993 RE: AP 25-17-55,, 55 & 57 Bill Dal Malin 8515 Starr Rd. Tentative F�arcel Map Windsor, CA 95452 Dear Mr. Dal Molin At the regular meeting of the Butte County Development Review Committee held december 27, 1998, the Committee continued its review of the abode referenced project to January`8., 1994, at the request of your engineer. The neXt meeting Will commence at 5:00 a.m. in the Board of Supervisors Room, 'County Adm1nistration Buildiho, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, Caiifornia If you have any questions conctDrning this ma;,ter, please contact this office at 91,5-538-7266, Moriday through Tf"urs-"Ajay, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 ppm. Verytr v 01r ours, ,� K r� St wart.:dell Manage:, Land Development Division SE/kp cc, Plannih`g Drvisiort ; Enviranment`al Heclth Department Barnhart-BrdWh & Assoe.'7ates { r. Inter -Departmental Memorandum TO Butte County Development Review Committee FROM: Planning Director SUBJECT: Report on Tentative Parcel Map for Bill Dal Mol.in AP ##025-170-055, 056, & 057 DATES February 2, 1993 This is a proposal to reconfigure three parcels to create four parcels of 5.52, 5.54, 5,54, and 145 Acres. The present zoning is A-5. The Land Use Plan. Map of the 'Butte County General Plan designates this area as Orchardand Field Crops, There are no specific or community plans for the area The proposal does not conflict with County Zoning nor any adopted or proposed Element of the Butte County General. Plan nor any specific or community plan, A. Negative Declaration with mitigation, dEnv measures has been prepared for the proposed project in ,accordance to the California.nmental Quality Act and forwarded to the Butte County Development Review Committee within the required 105 days pursuant to the California Public Resources Code Section 21151.5, This project is subject to the collection of wildlife impact fees pursuant to Public Resources Code 21089 and Department of Fish and Game Code 71.1:4. Recommend approval subject to the following mitigation measures and conditions: MITIGATION 'MEASURES p Disturbance Setback from the top of �, Show on the additional ma sheet A. 50 l�io edge of the riparian along the drainage course that bank or outer j . . , i Place a note on the sheet, and hi the traverses the property whichever is greater, deeds stating'. `'No structures, dumprn& fill material, or eXcavation shallbe allowed iii the No Disturbance Setback, Vegetation removal shall be limited to that necessary for flood control. All native trees, In a living condition shall. be retained; Ail. vegetation removal shall. be approved by the Department of Fish and Garne prior to removal.` 2, Place a nate on the additional map sheet that states", "Fire suppression sprinkler s systems hall be installed in, all residential structures in accordance with the National Are, Protection: Association Standard for the installation of sprinkler systems in one and two family dwellings and mobile l onies :NEPA Standard 13 D," N ' 3. Develop drainage pians to the approval of. the ,Butte County public Works Department that will, not increase peak flows downstream, 4, Identify on the additional map sheet any area subject to flooding in a 1 in 100 year storm (Flood Zone "A" on the FEMA maps). Determine the flood water elevation and a finished floor elevation. Place a note on the map stating the required finished floor elevation. S, Place a note on the additional map sheet and in the deeds that states: "Contact the Department of Fish and Game prior to any work within the designated Flood Zone- A. 6. Contact the Feather Riven ;Recreation. ,and Park District to mitigate impacts to recreation Services. CONDITIONSi 1. A development impact, fee for Sheriff .Facilities shall be paid pursuant to tiie provisions of Chapter 3, Article II of -the Butte County Code, prior to issuance of building ;permits or i�se Permit in. the case of a mobile home park'. Said ;fec amount will be determined and calculated as of the date of application for the building permit or Use Pernut: CRScs A:\dali-ftolin.pdr n.pdr , cc Land Development Environmental Health Barnhart, Brown, && Associates i County �., Department of D evelo ment Services PLANNING DEPATMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE- OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE. (916) 538-7601 'February 2 1993 i Bill Dal Molin 8515 Starr Road Windsor, CA 95492 Re: Tentative Parcel Map on AP# 025-170-055,056,057 Dear Mr. Dal Moon: The Butte County Department of Development Services, Planning Division has completed the environmental review of your project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and forwarded to the Butte County Development Review Committee within the required 1.05 days pursuant to the California Public Resources Code Section 21151.5. in addition,, the Planning Director's report required by Sections 20-63and 20-99 of the .Butte County Subdivision Ordinance has been completed. Please 'find enclosed the Environmental Documentation/Planning Director's Report which has been prepared for your project: Please review the enclosed, Initial. Stud Plannin Director's Report with conditions of Study/Planning � approval. if applicable. if you note any errors or omissions in our evaluation, please bring them to our attention. The Enviromnental Documents and Planning Director's Report for your project has been sent to the Butte County Development Review Committee for their action. California Government Code Sections 65950 and 65952.1 requires the Butte County 'Development Review Committee set hearings and approve or ei ap and aout rr)jdc' within e, six month months time from the date on which your application w P limit for your project mandated, by state law, will occur on ,lune 22, 1993, The Development Review Committee will notify you of the time and place of the public. hearing for your project. ourproject,' mitigating an identified impact, y `p , y q , related to nuts' �. re tevaiu tion of modifications our Toro ecct shall be re`noed. J!' Y Fount h! A T +J R r� ! '�!�"! E A 1 i t-1 A iii D� � A lJ 7 1� DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, +�* 1469 Humboldt Road 7 county Center Drive 747 Elliott Road Aep+yto. Chico, California 95928 oroville, California 95965 Rnradtse, Cn916)i8 2-630 Telephone: (9 16) 891-2727 Telephone: (916) 538-7281 Tolephone: (9 16) 872 1308 Fax: (916) 538-2140 October 1, 1992 Bill Dal Mol e 8515 Starr Road Windsor, CA 95492 lvZolin Parcel Map, WCs Lone Tree Road, Palermo 1',rea RE: Bill Dal AP# 25-11-55,56,57 Dear Mr. Dal. Molin This department has advised Butte County' Development Ser0aces,Land Development Stiction that we are prepared to act on the above application. Based on present information, we cannot recommend approval or conditional approval. Soil data on Jle with this office indicates the parcels do not comply with Appendix Vii, Butte CountySubdivision ordinance Standards for sewage disposal. Data has not been submitted indicating the parcels do comply with the standards. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact the Oroville Office at the above listed address or telephone number between 8:00 -10:w a.m. weekdays. Sincerely, t Crag R Erickson, Program ,Manager Division of environmental Health CJE/mlf cct public Works Planning GDA n A CLEAN INDOOR AIR ENVIRONMENT FOR A HEALTHIER TOMORROW Counfq Z.. r" •s V CF NAYIJIA'L W�'A„ m F D d AU .7epartment of Develo went Services _PLANNING DEPATMENT 7 COUNT I'L'0ENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE. CALIFORNIA 95965=3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 September 18, 1992 bill Dal Molin 8515 Starr Road Windsor, CA 95492 Re: Tentative Parcel Map AP #025-170-055, 056 and 057 Pear Mr. Dal Molina An initial study our pof ronosfd project, a Tentative parcel Map,, indicates, potentially Y adverse impacts to the en%6 onu ent (refer to the enclosed environmental chi:cklist). To reduce., or eliminate these impadts, suitable mitigation measures are required as part of ironmental Impact Report (ET.R) is required pursuant to the project otherwise, an Env the California invronmeutal Quality Acts At early response to this noii ication sent to the Department o£ DevelOpmOnt Services, Flanni g Divisjor will expedite the scheduling o£ your project. Please. forward your written 'ro'sponse within t5 days from the date of this letter. a Should you have any gi1estions regarding this matter, please contact this office between 10- 0 aap. and 3,100 p.tri. Sincerely, B, A. Kircher. Director of Plaonuxg 'Craig -gSan "Sanders Associate Planner BAK:CBSajlo cc: $arnhar $rovers t Inter -Departmental Memorandum Development Review Committee VR©M Planing Staff SUBJECT: Envi + nmental Review for Dal IV[olin TPM - AP 025-170-055, etc. DATE: September 4, 199 } Tlie attached Initial. Study was prepared for a tentative parcel 'map application on the property immediately south of this project. That parcel map created four 5 acre parcels and had the same applicant as this projec l) The initial study can be used for consi(ieration of this project with the following changes: 3a. Should be checked as "maybe" with the following; discussion: A drainage ditch traverses the property from north to south. The Department of Fish and Came are .recommending a 50' No Development setback from the edge of the bank or riparian vegetation, whichever is Rreater, top tare p g , reserve wetlands hath " " . cussioni 1.4b. Should be checked as Into with the following di.� The Butte `County Board of Supervisor.° las adopted an Sheriff impact fee that is collected at the time of building permi.tr. This reduces the impacts of the project to a less than significant level.. 14d. The following discussion is appropriate, Thero osal, will result in an incremental increase in (demand for ark and recreationfacilities to the area. The applicant :,hall contact. the Feather ,River park and Recreation District to appropriately mitigate; this impact. 16d. C'hecle as Y e "Maybe' tfollowing `�quate to support i The soils appear to be adequate iindividual Septc systems, on sitenota on the parcel sizes proposed. The Butte County tnvironmental Health Department is recommending denial of the project for this reason. The following mitigation measures are recornmetided•, 1. Show on the additional map sheet a 501 No Disturbance Setback fromthe top of bank or outer edge of the riparian vegetation along the drainage cou.'se that traverses the property, whichever is greater, Place a note on the sheetand in the deeds stating,: ONo structures; dumping, fill material, or excavation shall be allowed ' in the No Disturbance Setback, Vegetation removal shall be limited to that rtecessary'f r flood control. All native trees, in a living conditi(, shall be retained. All vegetadon removal shall be approved by the Department of tµ sh and Game prior to removal. Nr t states: "Fire suppression sprinkler t 2. Place a note on the additional map sheet that systems sthe Ntional, hall.�e installed n all residential rstructures in. accordancewith the installation of sprinkler systems in one Fire Protection Association Standard fo and two Jamildw�ilings and mobile homes, NFPA Standard 13 D."' 3, Oevelo draif ' g p, ro'val of the Butte County Public Works artment 01ha will not increa peak, flows downstream. Hep ear, Identify on the additional map sheet any area subject .0 the ng i w ternel�eQation: A. Y p Determine storm. (Flood ZOIne ".A` on the FEMA maps), and a.nished fle►ar elevation. Place .a note on the map status'; the rewired finished floor elevation. I r Contact the place a note on. the additional map sheet and li. the deeds thatslt Hatedtes4+'Flood "Lone Department of Fish and Game poor to any work witl��ix the deg A. I r Recreation and Park District to mitigate impacts to 6. Coma i the re,ather. Rive recreation semces. CBS:cs r r 71 I APPENDIXI, COUNTY 01 Hui= ENVZRONmENTAL CHECKLIST FORM EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENI`AL IMPA CT F t I er .ti,o. 025- 1;,'. 1:-048 & 049 Log No, 90-10-23-03 AP No. 025-170-048 &:040 2AgjL' 7�&-1sLNC gaftron and C, ba) Moiln' t. 11Y0 Lone 7tee Road (Datfron) and 633 COX Ane (hal MOlfh), Oroyllie, CA 45765 Pr,alecd description. sounda.ry Lihe Modification and Tentative Parcel Mao 'to divide 20 acres to create tout parcels at s acres each. vEs kmm no DISCUSSXON OF,. BNV'IRONMENTAL E MIMTION . FINDINGS OF S NYFICANCE ta` to degrade the rt tally x. This proposal will -not sleniticantly degrade the environme nt, heeehvttonment,patentl ia�,alltY o1 substan reduce the of a fish or wlldlite species, causefishy „abitat .a :1r wildlife population to drop below self-suslalning leve6s, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal cortminity, reduce the number or restrict the range oreliminate ImporrtantOexampteieotdmajor` PdHOdsaof history or prehitlorVt 'ihe have the achieYe 7his ptopbsal Will hot Impede long-term environmental goals, C noes, protect .potential .lo short-term benefits to the.dettiment of long-term environment 9oalst,' Ck short-term Impact on the environment is one, Which occurs th a teWIVelY btier 'period- 61 t)me white long-term impacts will endure Into the impactswhtch'are Indl'ylduallV' hard li) boes n x � �,_;� �t'hts proposal mt:y have a slgnlLlcant cumuiall've Impact on the 1 the project limited but cumulatively Considerablet (A prolect enVlronment, may lepadt on two or more separale,resources inhere the impact on each rd ource is .telatlValy shalt, but where the Of-, o the total of those Impacts on the envlronme_n is slontricant.) lit l have a si'hlflcanl adverse effect on human boot the project have environmental effects Which k.. In 15 proposer w no 9 n. wi i cause subOahtlaf Adyette,effects on human bel hos, bungs, elthdt directly or 1ndltectlVt • AETERMINATION ��as'� of this Tnitlal eVaiuet.lon: be a h Ortl5h a eltect tn, _ t/Mt find the pTopa ild project dWLb Not have a sighiticant effect on the enViNnment and"a NEb.yTiVE t)ECLN2A710M Mlli he prepared. case findUseithAlthoug 7the proposed de'scrlbedconb have A slgniticahl plteci on. the envltohmett, there Will hot g this bec MtASLRE the Attached sheet have been added to the protect. A MEOA7tYE DECLARATION wilt be prepared, IIMt< find the proposed project MAY have a s►gnl'f'Icant effect on the enVirohment, and An EWIR"EN711L IMIRACt REPORT It teoulred ootktry �t �ia,. art;�� ylo, bk,m I-,ovdn'ber i, i44o sten' L, Moor Rev i awed by e.,,t r I �� i 2 rµ (t�jtame tai f It X11, at * Evaiitiz.tib1i 45;1Env3 ronmeiatal Impact ES M`�9 � DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION EJ RONMEY�'TAL I ;R-1 CTS f, IAr T -H wi II the pr'ocosal result to significant s x the proposal will not affect subsurface earth conditions. a, Unstable earth condition or changes In b. geologic M', displacement. compactlois or ---- x a blsrcoVerl, dffthe on. This proposal will result in some dl-tuptleft displacement, and overcovering of the site ass's result of deVelopmnt $oel? ovefcOverting al the sr�llt compaction of additional homeslte, drlveways, artting i,teas, etc, he project � terrain he Protect le el t which rtlfi site Is characterized by a relatively. requlre Minot earthwork to .provide toadways and bUllding pads. The the proposed density of rout homes per io acre will also reduce Impacts on the rate and amount of tUnoff teaching the Wyman Ravine drainage basin. the longterm cUmulative Itroacts of surface runoff, however, could be signiflcant, both financially and environmentilllyt damage from flooding could Increase, water quality may be reduced. and channel erosion may accelerate. An accurate assessment of the changes In runoff brought by the proposed land development shaufd be _- A possible made to determine further mitigation measures. ty the cthelWyman RAVlne servgicelareae(orrdralNagebWithine Drainage tsas1h, z. change In or ground surface _ M�� .,. _ X the 'project site Is characterized by relatively level terrain which l a minor grading to accommodate the Proposed .rtgpo9faphV .lfre+st relief teat lderequite Wi pm cbv6rIng or modiflcatlon of any x the ptolect site has no unlquP physical features, d. De%ttuctlOnr unique geol)ok. or physical featurest of saals- The ptoposal Will not cause erbslon. el increase tnsillhd of water etosion elther on 01''ol1 slier f,, changes In de+posll`lon of 'eroslott?yof beach X.The �- proposal will hilt affect any WAtercpurse. sands, or cha.hges in siltation, llcposIt'lon or PrOslan ah.Ilch,lnay Modify tilt channel of a rivef f sttettm or the bed of the ocean lakes or any ba ,, ilet or f p in+ nplrlculturally p'trsductta%e � x _ thl's proposal does not feptesent a sagniticant loss of prime agricultural sails. the protect sate currently suPPorts lWo have g s i de 4 tri hated urban ateait � o s slte3 and is not of the s17e to be Viable commercial grazing land, h. to geologic o1 pedplil of p)opetly to geolodta y x_.. Ali of hu(te co -d" is (n ti Moderate tart hquakeexposure, code sty zone V ill ConttfUctlan of buildings to Unllarm Duiiding code standards will ji- hazards Such xyt„m§atlhquakes, , provide adegUate protection to occopahts In case of te1$Mlc Aetivlty, mudilldas, glil (allure of slidesml hazards? , Will the proposal Nsult In iUbstahllal: , Ot opdused project will result In a cumUlat)ve tmoact on alt a Air emissions or'deterloralion of Ahblent x the traffic genefated by the project,_ e to related IhcreasTseinguld) boatd as Identilled Butte p air qualltyt the callfornfa A1► KlesOUfces cohtt'ol county as a Non-allalnmenl Area In meeting this standards of the° calitorhla Alt tiuilltY Act, h county Alt Pollution control Pian does not address alt yquai,ltY Imparts of small residential developments lot possible mfiigatioh meastites, b� The creation of obtitctlonmble odors, smoke x- , soeie short term alt quailtY impacts will otcbably result during the eonjltUetlon phases of devhloping Itesidenlia) hoUfing, incteas�ed or IUaie37 vehicle and equipment pml_sslons as Witt I as Increased dust dtiring if le grading and prepatatlon Will occur. �4 tit o -- -_ —_ 3 1vn,V.;;J-ro mental; Chooklistt * Eval 11i act jj;NVIiRONMENTAT, IMPACTS (continued) vrs s+g_yl} ►4o DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (contInued) C, Alteration of air movement, moisture or x The proposal will not affect the atmosphere, temoeation teriv tature. any change in cilmate, ,or or reglonallyt 3. WATER. will the proposal result In substantial'; A. Changes in currents, or the course or x'- The proposal Will not affect any watercourse. direction of water movements In either b. marine or hash waters Changes In absorption Cates, drainage X The proposed project rilIt change the absorption rates of the project site and subsequent tnef(Iclent of tuna(( due to chhnge..in isnd Use patterns, or the rate and amount of surface and land cover. DeVelopneilt 0 the Project site wfti also Impact the runoff. concentration time "producing larger aqd more frequent 'peak flows. such Impacts may lead to slgnificat+ overload of the existing drainage system, stormwatet manat ,hent stt0pgies should be developed and incorporated into the project as mit`gat Ott measures to decrease stormvater discharge offsite,. A postlble, mitigation tl'brsdrainagedwithihn the Wyman Ravine drainage rs sln(Yinaddition, (rdhefence to drainage standards of the Butte coUntN public works Department is anticipated to mitigate possible l0acts to the drainage system, C. Freed for ott�sfte surface drainage X bra(nage improvements will be necessary to accarrrudate the proposed See blscussion on 3b above, ImOroyements, triclUdin9vegetatlon removal, pto)ut, channellsation or culvert installatlont d, Altetal(ons to the course or flaw of flood! XX- Theproposal may cUrnUlatively Impact flood control channelsor watereoutses, The project site drains Info the Fryman RAVlne watetsr brafnage batik which Is known for (teouent flooding, see DlscUsslon on 3b aboves, e. amount of surface wa Change In th ter In anY X- -- 7110 proposal wlII add to the cumulative amount of water In the wy h Raylne drainage system by increasing stotmrratet runoff and The water bodyre Intensity of peak flows, f otstharge. Into surface Watets, or In any _-_. ._._. X - The proposed project will not Impact stitface water quality, alteration of surface water guailty, Including but hot limited to temp'etaturt. dls plyed oXYgen or tUrbidllyt Af lata"tion of h1e df rection or tate of flow ..,�.. ,_.X�, The pop I will not affect the direction or f row of ground graters. ' rosa g> of Around waters: h, change .In the quantity or OUa11Iy of ground _ ,� X _ The otoposaf will not direcilY affect any aquifer. waters, el War through direct addltlons'or wlthdtactais, or thtough ihterteptich of an aquifer by cUts or eXcavatlonsr �. Reduction Ih the amount of watet otherwise X., (he ptoposed project *111 be serviced by private Wells, availaer eit J. W65 teeoflot peaplecor propet`tyflto Watet�- 'such -�- -- . ` ne the oUlpofa'ler dralnagelty f looIsdinglddownstr am InseeedlscUsalon,on wit3"b.d. related hazards at flooding: Arid 'e,above, Portions of the ptojecl slte_Is located wl:thin a (tone A flood Plain as identified by the Federal Emet WtV AanWmehl Agency, bud to the flood potential at (food meas w thin floor the'ptblticT.si.te must be Went IfIbd an the 'ftindl,map and finish eieyalloit"established by 'A registered civil engltieer, ,4 1110itonei.enhal Checklist * _EVal.uatiaaiEnvixonalenta3, lutea c� 4 .LV • d"MVIKiJrtrtrily AJi 1MVAU7,U (continued) YES MAYBENo DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONTMENTAL EVAY,UATION (continued) 4. PLANT LIFE. wlll the proposal result In "M s a n. a a, Chapge in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including __ X The diversity of plant species will be expanded As residential 'non - native landscapes are Instatted. trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? No substantial reduction of the number of exlsling species Is anticipated due to the paicei sizes required by the existing zoning classification, C Ire Reduction of the numbers of ,any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? the project alto contains no rare, or endangered .Ianls. c. Introduction -of neq-spacl4,rf olitrlts Into _ _ X the ;proposal will not affect existing plant lite, an ares,. or In i bawler Co the normae replenishment of existing species? dr Reduction in acreage of any agticuftufal Crop? x The lite does not conlaln any commerclaity vlable agrlcUltural crop. �I414l_ Lill- iYIIT the:. proDasal result In, _ suban a z— a. Change 'in the dlyerslty. of 90ecles, or numbers of any specles of animal$ (birds; �i The, proposal Will not affect animal fife because the slid does'not support significant animal life or hab)tat. land animalsIncluding re -.tiles, fish and: shellfish, benthle organl-tics of Insects)? b, Reduction in the numbers of any UnlgUe. rare x The site contains no rare 'animals. or endangered species of anlmals? C. introduction of new specles of animals Into an area, or In a barrier to the mtgratlr�f _ _ X The proposal will hot affect existing animal lite., or movement of ahimatsf d. Deterioration of exixting fish or wlldllte habltatx X '� The' Re contains no signllicanl "wt1difte habitat,, igls�, will the proposal result In substantfaft S. incteases in existing noise feudist _ x Tho proposal Will not result In a substantial increase in noise created on site or In the vicinity. b. E OSWe of peoi►le to severe noise levelst, X " the proposal will not, expbsa people to SeVete noise IeVels, 7. tl rt ii%ani Ata CL AR . 11111 the proposal 'produce X The proposal wlII not tesutt in A substantial Increase in 141 Ohl or sign g and glaret glare created oaf Slte or In he vtclnity, e. Luo'li3 wlli.the propos result Ina substantial a era on Of the present of or planned !anti use �. qtr, The proltet s'te 13 Toned -s which allows one d��eilInd uittt per Pleat of an acres .and is r�esignaNd by the Butte County Cer0ai, Plan As orchard And Fidid Crop," The dfovosed project confotms to both the genera! plan doildhalfon and Zoning classification. The outle county Planning COMIS Slon It currently holding public hearings to change the Zoning classification tion A -s to A -lo: The ptoposed project does not meet .the requirements of the Wooled zoning. s, A At s_o_�ttcts: triIf the pioposai result! In su staanCiai-� a.. IncteAse In the rote of use of any hAttfltf x- The t+roposa I`wilt not affect anY natural tesour+es; fesourcest . "* "' b, soul'ceh at Any nanotehewable natutnl �„ .- x . The p opo'sal'selfi not deplete any haluial r6burebi, r ■t 5 nm©rstal :Checkiiiat. * EValuairiOn' ©f EnyfronmeY tat Impact _ap3a� DoBf:YJBBION -OICr ENVI RONMENTAL EVALUATION '. vNvIRONMENTAL :C11pACT8 (continued) yEs MAYOg N0 10« R15KOAF UPSET. will the Proposal Involve; % The Ptoposal WIII not Involve the use l of hazardous material not Js or utl'Ize such A tisk of exp 1os,on or tet ea se of hazardous __ _ It located .close o any tacllittes Which stole a-, substances (111clUdln9t but not Iimtted to, chemicals or radiation) to matetlals. oil, pesticides, the event at an accident or Upscl condi"tionst x The ptodosal will not affect any emergency services. b, Possible Intetterence. with an emer9en Y response Plan or emef9oncY evacuation Plant .. the population ' the area being 1 not stghiticdoes POPULATION. will the Proposal alter location, df: the human x The use the ofaffect xc planned and because the ptoposod dehsity dues hot exceed that PtO s r u on, density or' growth rate of developed In the alae-. populatloni osal hbUsln6, .. :` x q �, a do -sand, I l i,.,r,wtly atiect housing 'ir13 �,.Cpn+l4i ?fir t t nOt, S Sn 12` 10 additional hoUsingftting creak III the proposal or 13, TRANNSPoRTATION 0IRC1J ATION, wlII the proposal res uu n: tepreseft an lncfementai`Ihetease in traffic in the 4o vehtcle a, Ceheratlonilf substantial additional vehicle __ .,.— – -- The proposal,will Brea. The proposed project Will 9enetate app(oxlmately is tike existing street network. wilt mwemer�tt hips, Per day, It anticipated have the necessaryy capacity to accommodate thO traffic generated from from the proposed project the proposed rolect. Tralfic generated expected to sl9nlficantIV reduce the level at service: on Is not nearby roadways. teallltle, of x' ave Proposal n' rulcternlu tocomPlywilh the`Paklh9ereqtementsonaindwithIButte County s, atecls on existing patkfnt demand tot new parking code sectloh 24-35, substantial Impact or, exis'ttfid see t3a. c. transportation "systems) k see tea. d, St-1111cant alterations to present patteths ie and/or of twalelbotne,f goodst r x- The PfopOsal Will `not Impact tall of air trStflc, e, Alodrationsioto alai or air ...— tratlicl ihctease traltic hazards to motor K_ See 13a, 1, ,in vehicles, blcyclis t or pedesltlanst i4, PUpL�C 5 R` E VICE {.t Ytl t I the prbpofal have _alt effect n a he ter now of altered upon of resu government WVlcest x Tilept000n I Will tesult in a Inctemenlal increase In demand for etre lmenUCdlitornin - a. Fite pfoteetlont` -- _. �. indicated thallo�moa pat In the area. The, Butte CoUntY Fite hive develoPment I lite Division Of Forestry iras ittlr tto In - l.hnd prov►de the county will try ability "set- ha3 as a mit-1 " d all tesrdenllai protection vices: CoF proposed s developa areas reed bepplaced �onilon sthenaltethate�or Illi in tUf tl forte additional Map It sheet of the final ma pp: stating: "Automatic f la In all tesidenttal suppression sprinkler systems shall be thstalled In Actotdance With the National Fite Ptotec6lon to one sttuctures Association 5ta ndatd for the Ihslaiiation of sprinkler systems Homes, NFPA Standard M, The and two family dWeilings and mobile 1»IAleoeVenttotsresidentialifires- ietsty-Aod ptopefty plfalettions F. zzviaconntelntA1 ,CheoYK� �lgt * Eva].uar can; of EIV .3"Olilile ll�1A1 zaapact 6 xV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (continued) yes, M&M bio'DISCUBSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATIVA (Continued] This Installation wlll reduce the demand fot structural t H e Protection services In those Instances where they are Installed,- in additlon, the project site has no pressurized water system With IIre hydrants for fire protection. As a result the pfolect site will reoulre water tender trucks to provide water for fire protection. To reduce the Impact on the Fl re Department It will be necessary Ito Contribute S2e0,o0 per lot. Into the BUlte County Fire Department water Tender' Fund prior to the recordation of the final map, b. Pollce protection( x The proposal will result In a Incremental, increase In demand fair police protection In the area which cannot be sefvlced by the present sheriIt % Department, since tvao lha population of Butte County has Increased by over 2sx, while at (he same time the police force has been decreased In personnel by 5o% due to fiscal difficulties being experienced by outte County, Currently, Butte County has the lowrkt -1 at e. R! ,s i.cs+rd , at)rpresent �� dL fus. rsodf e{�0lnittAkri ietvic" uate, ai:�a oo nil y lnadCtluat med, talions of the pacts(, continued rura6 I, the te ro deveicp+nent has resulted In cumulative Impacts ail police protection l th 3r_rvlcom cuntul es y" a reduce 'hs 5i:4rif 1': *eprr twnt..w;V11 ty, to pr ride adequate police services. Development 1MAtts on the sheriff`s department is countywide and cannot be mitigated by one IhdiVldUal project. The cumulative Impacts of deve on police protection hat been documented by the County Adminiopment office In the report County of Bti(le, Annual Fiscal Review,'e, r c+ sch MST X The proposal Will result In a Incremental Increase In demand tot school services in the area, However. school Impact fees collected by the total school districts is anticipated to reduce school Impacts to test than a significant level, No further mltigation measures of requirements are allowed In accordance to Covefnment Code Section �i 65945 - d, Parks of oihe facill'tlest k. The proposal wlII result In a incremental Iicrease In demand for patk _Jecreatlanal and recreation facllltibs in the area, e. Maintenance of public tact titles, 1ncludlno j(_ _ _ The proposal Will result in a Incfemental increase In the need tot road sI maintenance of roads and other public facilities In the area. (, other governmental fervlces# ,..,✓ ii _ The proposal WIII result In a Inctemental Increase In demand for all other govetrunental setvlces In the atea, fs, tNtgoy; will the propasai result In- a, Use of substantial amwtnts of fuel or , , - The proposal will not utilize tUblianlial Judi or energy, energV# IJ b, substantial Increase 'In demand upoPieXIsting - , X - The p(oposal will not substahtla'lly Increase the demand for energy, %butces of , energy;, of tectuIte, the development of new 'sources 'of eneWt 16, Ur i 0 TI Es Milli the or.000sai result Ina need for new systems, or sUbslantlai alteratlon's to the following: ik Powe# or natural gat# x'- The ptoposal will not affect electrical power or na(utal gas distribution0stems, b, dban nitatlons systems# k-: The ptoposai Will not affect comidUnicallon 'systeinsk c, water avafjablllty# _fir_-.. the oroposat Will not atlect public Water systems, , 7 IV. L,-NVIRONMEWRAL IMPACTS (continued) res_ sahve `t DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL .EVALUA►TTUN (continued) d, sewer or septic systems( --- x The proposal wlII have to meet the requirements of the Butte County Enylronmenlal Health Dept, e, stotm (Water dral,nager x�. See 1b, 3b, l f.. (. solid waste and disposalsx The propOSal will have a C,UmUIallSe.ltVael on, solid ,.,.sLO as3ris3i . 47. Lr,*M HEALTH, Will the proposai result in: a, Creation 6t any hpr!I lF, hazard or Dolentlwi an-heman"1.ai hazard or e heallir'%zatd'. the prophsal Nl lr nut t•t.ctrr Arty hazard teof b., pr;lr 900.,t:i10 iwalth,_s. :; ._.2_� ,., f The,propos'al,wl i i n�ot ek oib Op ' 1e 1. d Nttilts.dal i+akaid. i1�t5 dsri r' a �, will the provoidl itesul ( �, In the ' �:�is'frL-iii of any scenic Yl.lo or ltsw+oer tn. file t.^ppse=l ails IMA resul,l' �1 GtItRC it is t,onsis),ent wittl In an aesthetically rilteilslve view surrounding development. n public, or will the prorosai r45ul t r+r tl►'' tYea'ilai at an ar_�tiletlat)iy otfensly� tine '�G-0 la) the J01At 1641 sus t til an impact or� x The proposal may resul t in art Incremental increase In demand for park quenl� the tv of "I ting upon gUaill lye and recreation lacllltleiC. recreatlenai opportunities? 10,, qU&M AL rtESMCES. a._ will the proposal result In theaiteratloh x !t±e project site Is identified as an area of low sensltIMV for or destruction of a ptehtstorlc or historic archaeological resources. archaeological sitel b, I — Incl i;lstor►c sites, the proposal will not. ar , eadverse pof iccor orlaestheticcoeffectslto'ture hlstorlc building, slruc or object( C. noes the proposal have the potential to - x The proposal will not atlect cUltUral resources. cause A Physical. change which would affect unique ethnic cultural VaWett d, Will the proposal restrict existing x The proposal Will not affect tellglo;ts tesources. sacred uses Within of the polentlat impact areat otential w , 8 nv, ,' onmental :' checklist- Evalu �£olai of Lnvilr.onmentt ]l Cttnpact ;I. -- " rvr a.r'ITTOOTM4 nr 'T.wyTPnmmF..WPAL EVATXATION IQ. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (continued) Y€_ M6r Na. --- (continued) V, SUGGESTEID MITIGATION MEASURE S t, It It recommended the rot lowing note: be plared� s, Identity bn the tlna>! map" any areas subject to (r ial hltf f oo(emcnfst'lon on the alternate or additional map sheet of the final map stating, •Automatic flit sUporesslon fofinish aboodI fait mood plait! 1 totinkter "systems shall residential structures be. Installed in all fit accordance with the mational rare Protectlon Association standard Installation ianidrrpmohi e4homehe ✓17, 45e icy ono and two family dwellings ings HOPA standard taD. p J >n1 . G:4>U/fir: `7 1�rCit .aN st"�'.Cs� GI ,l id/r1xt Y Gly �' �,� lWailalion_ of sptl[mkler systems It 14rr o al satet and toperty protectlOh In ;- f�G=k.Il r" %l���r• 7� C,,, the, event dr res the, event Will iclentiat sties,:. This l demand f ter f��duce the _ structural fire.prtalertlon,serIri+ces In thoi e ` instances wheft they are InstalIdd:• " t� To reduce the Impact ori the Plhe'Departinent It 4b per 16t Into �theebutter countyn ai re (Departmrin orattr 'Tender Fund print to the recdolatld-n of the final map: ;t., Dmyelop drainage ppians to the ArProvitl of the eutte County PUbifc works DePai'tloenl,, u. Request the totmallon of a courttV serVice Area lor,, dtalnape In the Wyman ka'tinti Dralrtage �lasln, li; j 1 I j tIy ». Sl 9 + w ental, Checklist OrEvart>;rl,°iiol Of �n�tira�u�e31nil=a� Imp:4lrr� E�tlilrlxanm UICUBSICN OF .�tVIRONMENTA�. E4A?at[TATION v s MAr�. tea_ V. Nii�t'IRONHENTAL I2+iPACTB (continued) --�- tcontlnued) DATA SHEE 14= s0rroundIn9 Area: a. Land Uses: residentlai Prblect Descriotfart Boundary Line mod! fication b+ zoning: A'5, A-10 C, oen. Plan oesignatlont Gfazlnd and OFC I. Type of protect: i TentatlVa parcr_1 Map BLMITPM to divide 10 acres to create 4 lots d. Parcel sizes: t0 lb ao acres e.: .Population, suburban/Rtif Population a, brier Oescrlpllon4 at five acted +:ach, a� Location; Lone T.tee.Road find coX Lane. llctes ts. character of site atld (Area: Rural i6, Nearest Urban Area: orovllle sthetes of ln'tlUences NIA Sps ,{, Proposed nen' beVelolimenl: i.'Unit/s s, Antorrn[ of 111pervfoUL surfacing• minllnalr Lone Vee Road and coz'Lane. its Relevant standallds Urban Ate&; NO 19y Relevant erYl Flrc Protecllon seiint : Fite b» nccess and dearest Public Rbad(s)• Method of exage Uirposai• Individual sepllc/leachlleld 7� Weils Nearest yy (shale) Fite station: 074 b, xalEr Avaiiabtlitjl: CWin Hydrants and source of Mater supI:lly: Individual Wa"Po�rer i�tnci: Adlacent_to property 20. schools In Area. oitovllle Union High school bistrici 9, Proximity so, Potential for further land divisions and deVeloplr+ent: W further' zoning classification. paletmo Elementary School Dil,trlct. subdlvlslons possible under eklstillg 6. Envi"totmenlat sett, Ina physical Enviroraaentt. 14 to cendtal 76009taphtc characict: Relatively flat-tetraln acrr b.. slobes:,o to 1% Eteystlurit 100 to lid, 1+sG C. d, Liseltini Factors: None z. soli} Tipes al„d cttaracteristli:st Retcklin Flnit handy Loam arld a. stratum. , xy man L++am• 1lrpervious nub L nil ling Factors- Dtalnn9ts lei sore stens is not good' b., i s. Natural Hazdrds of the Lana e y E+Irthquake z qualco Tntensit Tori one: Modetale tatlh VI Erosion LI . Potential: Moderate Ca Landslide Fire Potential: Noll itazardc Moddratis d, . ential, HIllh 4,. a clrologY�U�r�acevxnlerlt small 1112etmlttilnt ittetra runs lhtoutJg r the ptbiecl, site._ c. ora nd'Water, C Alitiod', Propetty dtflns towards tfidl southwest: d,, Annual Raintal! (normal t. 2t' ttaclorit_dowh; team flood! n C, Limiting S; Visua!/scenic OualitVt Good read i Ai Air Quat i tVl COW tftoloolca! Enyiton W0t:_ 0101 p, Veiaetation, Hort-nallye pfanis. ldl I le ilabl tat: smal l bi td and animal'i comrnon'to rural areas- reasti►. y, wl AtchaeoIogielk l tilsiorical Resources in the areal L00r 16,.and sehi.tivlt Area and Flald �to11s ©utI coon V cental Plaii'Ydesiflfiallon. O IV 11. A-n�"sites+. single pains iyrchatd s2ti EXtsting L Reiidentlat Exlsting 4. - { I io Ezty �c�+Rmental Chedk] int * EVa4, tan of >�zavixonrnaitt IUl }""ink=at t f )],SCUSSI � V'AI,YTA'f'ION: $NVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (cbntlnUed) v s Mivs _ (Gxillnued) OS of ENVIRC NME ITAL E ENVIRONMENTAL RUPIERENCIE MATET2I a II- Earthquake and Fault ActiyiH Se iseS ;• �$ia ty be ent, Butte ounty Genera an revise �f by �� HIII. SStet 2� �p Irit 'B,utiteu county %dnera i tP�`an rpvei sedicf -7 by j t� subsidence & Landslide Polvlse�i 55 tett - tla �, p I I t, butte county General Plan revise 1-7 , b �-ii 1 1 MaD IIi-2. Er s n PoteritIal: 55 t ty I tl�i Butte Co ntY Genera art revoislesd 1-7 eb b� 55 t le ent Butte 5, UntiylGenerEa' i" (sanerevised 1-7�I: 6 Hi f i 5,Mnl rev"i sed sly -'77N, se E l rrWP,1(.Butte County General 7 h Nt w Map V- Sce l c N ilha CI,I,A Ai 1 1 Butte �ounty%enera ii"reVlsedlu--I , Y SS yy B. kjem 11t,�euttet oun;ty Lenerla �`��an revrsed I-7 teby CAH,hl 1 1 1, 1 D s '` for uUttegCountye"P 'atnn n9YD par menL�e198�,Mantiing> 16gehoorMentbistrict Map; Butte county Planning epar . 11. a ow tWe�,� sSttJfl ap'bNityetar moe entr?t%atei esourcethr1hwe?j?orn},is%t, �e �tesources Agency.ia z.98ric t. I e stile Map, estabi shed b Reso uttonu u 1 + , 6-15uj 19 �I to ounty eoartl of SyuperV l sots: ecember , 13� �� dam�sFeuec 'Mergency anagemenClAAggen%ySu198�$ ral U. USES Quad Maps, Palermo, 1970, epartm nt o Agr cu urs, Area, U.5, 1 5�o.li Ma , Chico, 19�5t)/OeoVllle (1926) 16. soil SurVey o hi of 925)IOroViIle (1926) Area. hepar tment orf gr CU ture+ o ur isd'ict.iOrs an 174 Fat g i t ipsn Ma F iUtt+Per°Cori tti.nt Ie i7e a ment .ane l rng Da art ent of �o estrY� �u to County Rannfnq 8epa tmen t - t I ' � i F'EATA1 M RIVER CREATION & PA,U ,ISI g� IRIG OROV ILLS CA HOHNIA 95905 9 d° pq I MUNICIPAL AUDITORIUM, 1200 MYERS STREET PHONE (919) 539.2011 August 27;199;x coutlty of lQutt4l Di�partment of Public Work 7 l;ouunty venter Drive 17 Oroville, CIA 95965 , -- 7 " �J► 9 r5~ RE Bill DAL ;,'VIOLIN Tentative Parcel 'Map Dear Me, Edell, TheFe River Recreation and Park District would like to express out concern over the growing population of the Greater Oroville area and the affect this will have on our District. We have found that this increase in population is severly affecting our ability to provide a sufficient level of services to our constituency. This particular subdivision is of a small size,, being four parcels, and we feel there is an impact fb our District from this project. We need to do something about this ;increasing problem before it becomes a crisis environment, We believe that this steady increase is good for the area and that we can alleviate the impact on the District through developer fees and for the larger subdivisions, the creation of Lighting and Landscape Districts. We believe that the Planning Department should recommend to the Plannin(; Commission and the Planning Commission should recommend, to the Board of Supervisors that developer fees be established for the Feather River Recreation and Park District and the other special districts which are affected by this increased population growfhI For the present and the Rill DAL MOWN .project, %ve feel that an equitable settlement shot -ad be made to the Feather River Recreation and Patk District for the increase in population Which W:6 will bri4g Thank you, SincerelY0 and Secretary to the Board of Directors RW/j's' PETE 'MIlS4N. Govemw- t A WORN1A—^THE RESOURCEs AG �A'ATE 6i� � tanrrtdg >3e�attment C� � � ,�Y�R M-PAR'.rAAENT OF FISH AND (SAME 1' .-- : Y RfiILf AUG ? �% VW Ft1IA$95'ROAD, SUITE A. ''j UU (U�{ WDOVA, CALIFOI NIA 95670 910 j 355-7020 Orovitt�, Califomta Augu:at 25, 1992 Mr: Stuart Edell ',and Development Division 7 county center Drive oroville,, California 95965 Dear Mr. Edell. The Department of Fish and Game (DFG) has reviewed the. Bill M61JI4 Tentative Parcel Map (TPM),a proposal. to divide APs 25-17"55, 56 and 51 (3o�- acres) into three 5.5tand he Tone PM site Ps 2acre parcels- Located southwest of Palermo, lies icret.a grassland which is crossed by a Wyman Ravine tributary. Streams and their associated wetland habitats comprise one of the most valuable eco;systemsu In additiongreatto obvdiversity of ious watershed importanCe, streams pp plant and animal species (aquatic and terrestrial) of all inland ecosystems, Protection of streamside corridors protects water quality, reduces sedimentation; and provides a continuous habitat for numet0us species. To mitigate - . ect impacts Uii the,:iealii system, tlhe following measures are needed: a. Establish a 50 -foot no disturbance setback along both sides of the stream channel.. The setback should commence from the outside edge of wetland/riparian vegetation or ban:k"top; whichever is greater. b. The applicant should be advised that any work within the 1.00 --year floodplain; consisting of but not limited to diversion or obstruction of the natural flow or changes in the channel,, bed or bank of any stream channel will require prior notification to DFG pursuant to Fish and Garvie Code ,Section 1.600 et seq. The agreement process is an p inciluded as conditions oation� action separate from. the specific mitigation measures to be approval by the 16ad agency: T ect will have an impact to fish and/or This prod wildjife habitat, Assessment of fees under public Resotirces o _ — f I / PlonnIng tie�~�rtmeslt ,r X1992 -"". allf ni Itvi!!e, C a �"�.° q � ✓' .— �- LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY ,. DEPARTMENT OR PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH kid(",® 7 County Center Drive 747 Elliott Road Reply to;, ® Chic Humboldt Roado, California95928 oroviile, California 95965 Paradise, California 95969 Chic Telephone: (916) 891-2727 Telephone: (916) 538=7281 Telephone: (916) 872-6308 Fax:(916) 538-2140 August 17, 1992 Bill Dal Molin 5515 Starr Road Windsor, CA 95492 RE: TPM - W/s Lone T1- 1�-ad - Palermo Area - AP# 25-17-55,56 & 57 Dear Mr. Dal Molin We have reviewed the above-noted parcel map application and existing records i+vth it:gards to soil depth and percolation data. 1. Soil depths on subject pf0perty _ are less than two (2) feet. 2, Percolation test data on file indicates unacceptable rates. 3. Seepage pits were acceptable and for the parcel map recorded June 17, 1.935. 4, Seepage pits are not to be unitized for newly created parcels in Butte County, (See Appendix VII Butte County Subdivsionrdinattces Section D) It appears that the tentatife parcel map does 'not meet minimum requirements " of Appendix YR of the Butte County Subdivision Ordinance. A CLEAN INDOOR AIR ENVIRONMENT FOR A HEALTHIER TOMORROW h �sl ,1 August 4, 1992 RE- AP 25-17-55, 56 & 57 851,1 17ta t Rd. ' Tentative Parcel Map X3515 Stam Rd. Vindsot, CA 95492 IUeat Mr. Dal Molina ifhis is to notify you that your application for a tentative map for ,the above -referenced property is being submitted to the Planning (Department for environmental determination and to the Environmental Health Department for its review. This application will be considered complete When. we have received rabtyf3catlan from the planning Department and te Environmental :Health Department that all necessary data have been receiVedi 'these departments will contact you regarding any additional a.nfo'rmation they may require. Very truly yours Stuart Edell Manager Land ,Development Div. SE/kp cc planning Dep,, rtmenl Environmental Health Department Batnhatt-Bro%ft & Associates LD 1120 (6J92) t