HomeMy WebLinkAbout025-200-036iINU_ COMNIISWN SUMMARY
S
APPLICANT William Anglin
ADDhESS19 Gold Run Ct. LQg#86-04-�01.-03
__
. Oroville, CA 95965
OWNER: Same
PROJECT DESC:RIPTI'ON TPM to divide 5.83 acre
3 L�axcels = _ s to create 4 parcels.
1.1 acre each & one parcel
2.52 acres.
LOCATION'. 4 Parcels on the southwest corner Of
the interseciol� o Gold
Run Court�andHwy. 70 ]ht�ra 4- ___
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS) 25-2-36 .._._
ZONING AR -1
GENERAL PLAN Ag-Resi -.
GENERAL PLATA CONFO PROJECT CONSISTENT?
RMANCE REPORT
Hr�LICAN�' S�' I.` GN RE
:LAND CONSERVATION ACT CONTRACTS?
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED April 1. 1986
•-----
AGENT/SURVEYOR/CIVIL ENGINEER: G`. A.��
ADDRESS
220 Grand Avenue; Orov lle
r CA 95 965
DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S
_ REPORT PREPARED
ENVIRONMENTAL _
DETERMINATION CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION
AND DATE DATE FILED
. -- NEGATIVE DECLARATION .,
DATE ADOPTED
MITIGATED NEC. DECLARATION .
ENV, IMPACT REPO -.-` ..�--------�.
DATE AbOPmED r,11�,�� .
-��-�REPORT � DATE CERTIFIED
STATE CLEARINGR'OUSE NO.
8U8, COMMITTEE MEETING`
DATE
Anv.tSORY AGENCY REARINO DATE
ADVISORY AGENCY A(, ION
AIIEALtO
A�'PEAL E
ROARI] ACTION HEARING DAT
COMMENTS FOR PLANNING DIRECTOR'E REPORT `
�-- �.,.. ..._ .. VgiaA. "��',". (,,,Y-_ r".•� .fW:31iN. �„`,",J ., 1.., �_`-.��, �� 'R�.%A'^r,.
Will tarn Angl;i.n, `C['hl,
in<x,sect,ion of C AP '�-02-•56, 4 p.nrc��ls on the southwest
Eng �neer; a1d Run Ct.. and Htr�,
GDA (cont, l 70 interseCtyon.
from J corner °f the
une .l.6, 1986) Palermo area.
Mr. Ftendcansa said that
nothing was received :From
}}CARING GPCN M THE.; Pi1H1,1C the state Yet,
John ChristoF.ferson asked how long
.For the state to mako a move, this item Will be tontine
How long ��s zeas�onable? d to t�a;tt
Mr, Str
so Planning is iaassang it on zas ralset,' the issue ever
eeter said that C.�l '1'ra
, 'not see:i.rag a good rescan sizice the rcpt
Mr. Christofferson to d 4. 5- _zone,
seem to tram: to da dn�thxnat �,ard it
in tea 1lting to Cal Trans,
g about it. The Cal Trans d
Mr, .Stt'Qeter Y just. Wanted to oesn't
said that :rnle raise the issue,
ra
Cees°nable factor to ss findings can be
Consider, CCQA must n made that
}r. Nendortsa said h would call it a s not a
dealt tvitti,
say that too county wanL:a an a .the person Who be contiiaued Ec�r ttieek$, nswer, is replacing Ron
Zrt t}ie meantime the Nelson and
Mr` Christofferson Braid Project irould
Board than he continued he Would rather be denied rant} r(psr �, s
hake the prok?lem hi Indefinitely, If it it
higher to someone who this levy 1 t•nttlant h the
he.,�ern_was7na'rtued can handle
Lake c4,�re or: it
2 weeks.
BtJ:CTI; CU�NTX' F.nV`�SOR'Y �1C1aNCY .Mi1VUTLS ,7uii� 2g
t x.98.
_ ff5;5
],0. William Anglin
,
AP 25-02--86, 44 parcels on the southwest cOrneIr Of
intersection of Gold rut) Cour and Hw , 7q
Engineer GPA Y intersection, Palermo area.
Mr. Streeter said that a letter was received from Ca
necessary to arrive ata r l Trans.
p oportionate share of the cost for rt rew be
and left turn channelitation of HwY. 70 between Palermo f ut:ur. e widening
mo
Rd,
OPEN
and .Grover Lane.
]Bill Geddis said Hint his Firm had contacted Cal Trans
to the CauntY with the .recommendation to con tart certain experts.
then responded
Mr. ,Streeter said ho has not contacted the ,rceommc�nded ex ert ye
Mr. Codd is thau,,'17l f hnt the contact .Sh;nuld he made from the (;c4 yet.
pc�op, Q in Placer (�()untY, at,fnl
Y Lo the
+'hat would "be re aired e up with a cost, if he could
Mr. Geddis said he could com
cl to dig on the urldeninS. kr►oty the extent of
7t W" agreed that Hon Nelson of Cal x'rans would have
to be contacted,
Atr, Geddis said it would have been nice to have thoso Figures
can earlier date, since this cast: was discussed with Butte County and Cal,
runs quite some t i.me ago. available at,
The item was continued to June 16, 1986,
IgoA ' DLT RM
office of Planning lanning and Research
1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 FRcarx' E C inJinsSacramento, CA 9581Pl ?n Dtmt
or 1 unty Centar Dry .t
X County Clerk Oroville
,jUFA1g�pj�
County of Butte -
SU -,B -'ECT _ ~t NORM, BECKER,_C;awiiy Cirmi:
or 21152 of theA. Public Resources Code.
mplance �W ec on �t:ptth!
Filing of Notice of Determination in co
. ..ode,.
Project Title
Teritat.ive Parcel Map AP #25-
Name
2-36 _ Wi.11ia
State Clearinghouse Number m Anglin
(if submitted to Clearinghouse) Contact Person
Telephone Number
Public 4�or{s John Mendonsa
Project LocationSouthwest corner of int 534-4266
and Highway 70
. , Palermo area. erseetion of Gold Run Court
Project Description
Tentative Parcel. Ma
Parcels, , 3 of l.1 acre each andd1Vof12:52' 83 acres to create
acres,
This is to advise that the Butte County
Advisory ARencv
has approved the above-described projLeadodt ongen7y14 Responsible Agency)
86
the following determinations regardn= (Date) and has made
g the above-described Project:
z. The project
environment, allt -�Lw'i11 not, have a significant effect on the
2. An Environmental Impact Report was '
`pursuantpre
to the provisions of CRQA, pared for this project
y A Ne
6atxve Declaration was prepared for this
Provisions of MA Project Pursuant to the
3., Mitigation measures
approval of the project,
joere, coe; a nott made a condition of the
for this..project,erriding considerations..
4i A statement of ov
teas, ,was not, ado;•t.,,;d
This is to curtify that the final. B1R faith coirune
c and
project approVal is available to the general Public an responses and record of
Butte County Planning Department
7 County Center Drive
Oroville; CA 95965
Date lieceived f0t Filing and
Posting at. OPit 715-a5
Si"na r
0'tephen.A. Streeter
_enfo_r P.lahh.r
19%S
7 6 2 'ri 1t e
a Revised Maidh 19$6
Mitigation Measure
William Anglin
AP#25-2-36, TPM
1. Pay a fair-share contribution toward the cost of future
widening and left-turn channelization of Highway 70 between
Palermo Road and Grover Lame. Such payment to be submitted
prior to filing the final snap.
ro
w
®urs
ij
di
OF NATURAL WCA.TV' A
-_ LAND
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Co. planmr9 WILLIAM (Bili) CHEFF, Director
r� Jw 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965
T.I-phone' (916) 534,4681 RONALD D. McELROY
®=pyli�et �I PTww' Deputy DlfectOr
July 15, 1986
R
AP 25-2-36
William Anglin Tentative Parcel r1afi
19 Gold Run Court
0roville, CA 95965
Dear Mr. Anglin:
I
At the regular meeting of
rBedtO County a miti atednegative Visory �tdeclaration
July 14, 1986, thL agency granted
of environmental impact and approved your tentative parcel map on
the above -references operty cubjec-t"to the conditions of approval
lasted on the attached sheet.
If no appeal.:. are timely filed --within ten (10) days of the dale of
the A dv;igory Agency's approval --with the Clerk of the Board of
I
upervisors, this action will be final:.
1Jhen the conditions of approval are complied with* it will be in order
for you to file your "final maps' With the Butte County Department
of Public .Works for recordation within twenty-four (24) months of
the date of approval by the Advisory Agency.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this
office'.
Very truly yours,
William Cheff
Director of Public Works
1
1
Jolt; Mendonsa
Assistant Directot
,irlld
cci Lplanning Department
t.hvironmental. Health Department
GDA
William Anglin, 4 parcels on the southwest corner of intersesction of
Cold 'Run 'Court and Highway 70. Palermo area.
AP 25-2-36
Engineer: GDA
Public Works conditions:
1. Provide two-way traversable access RS-8-Ln-IZ to each par.cci from a
county maintained road or state highway.
2. Access to be reserved in deeds as per county ordinance and offered
for dedication on the final map.
3 Show 50 ft. building setback lime measured from f,�nterl:ine of access
easement.
4. Provide road ma4ntenance agreement.
5 Deed to the County of Bt+tte 40 ft. right-of-way from the centerline of
State Hwy. 70
6. Indicate a 20 ft. building setback from the right -o£ -gray line Of
State 'Hwy 70.
7. Show all easements of record on the final map.
8. Provide street name signs per requirements of the Dept. of public
Works prior to recordation of the :final map.
9. Provide permanent solution for drainage.
10. Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required.
11.. Fleet Cal Trans requirements for, future widening and left turn channel-
iaation of State Hwy. 70 at Gold Run Court:
Hearth conditions:
11. Provide an area for wells and 1.00' leachfield free setback around
those-arev8 on parcels 1, 2, 3, and 4
12, Provide a 1.00, l,oa hfiel,d € rc-o Get:brlek, around existing wells either
within the property or within 1.., ' of i:Le prujur r~t•y boundaries on parcels
i, 2 S; & 4.
13. Show the usable sewage disposal area proven to Meet the requirements of
the Subdivision Ordinance on parcels 1., 2, & 3.
14. Place a note on the map that no water well map be located within 100'
of the usable sewage disposal area on parcels 1. 2, & 3
The following Mitigation measure is also required,
15. Pay a fair share contribution toward the cost of future widening and
l.eft-turn channeligat3oh of Highway 10 between Palermo Rd and Grover.
Lane. Sur.h payment to be submitted prior to filing the filial map.
(916) 741-41198
May 21, 1986
"a 00, Planning Ca„
MAY 2 2 lftb
C0noville, califorpjA
08 -But -70
P.M. 8,9
Anglin Parcel
Mr. John Christofferson
G.D.A. Engineering
220 Grand Avenue
Oroville, CA 95965
Dear Mr. Christofferson;
In response to your letter of May 51 1986, Caltrans has considered the question
of needed roadway ,Improvements on Highway 70 and the means of financing the
improvements,.
The determination of !Monetary contributions toward mitigating adverse impacts
is the responsibi'Lity of Butte County. As discussed with County staff ;in late
1985, Caltrans can contribute Funds up to 135,000 through our minor projects
category. We can also assist by estimating the tota?. cost of the needed
improvements and determine price per roadway stati�an. At this time, we have
not yet estimated this cost.
There are several examples within District 3's jurisdiction which d4rnonstrate
other local agencies' methods of obtaining fair share fees: For information,
we recommend the County contact.
o Mr. Roger IMsdahl, Placer County Public Works. Placer County
assesses for IMProvements to Highway 49 between Auburn and Grass
Valley based on trip ends,
o Mr. Peter Hill, .South Placer Policy Committee. Property owners
are being assessed on a per parcel basis.
We understand the difficulty of initiating a funding plan of this type when
Previous Land divisions have
already been approved. It is not our intention
that the burden of paying adrati(nal. taxes or fees be placed on Mr. 4n lin the
current subdivider, We have rooOhtly reviewed several, opp'licoti,ons, including✓
the Mathews Ready -Mix and the Mai3on RV Park pro,ject$, which also contribute to
the cumulative impacts in this area,
It might be more appropriate for the County to address cumilative impacts oh an
area -wide bisiS, rather than on a project7speo3,fic basis, as they are how
attempting with tho Angl:ini property. A simil ar analysis, althoOt on a larger
scale) was prepared by the County for the construct,n of three new public
road connections on Highway 1pi
l
Mr. John. Christofferson
Page 2
May 21, 1986
We are anxious to further assist Butte County staff both in referring them to
other agencies with experience in this matter and estimating total costs. For
information regarding improvement costs, please contact Mr. 'Ron Nelson,
District Transportation Engineer, telephone (916)741-4362. Other questions
may be directed to Mrs. Jeannie Raker, telephone (916) 741-4498.
,Rincerely,
Jeffrey M. Loudon
Chief, Environmental Branch
cc Mr. Bill Cheff
Butte County Public Works
Mr. Stephen Streeter
Butte County Planning Department
TO: Butte County Advisory Agency
FROM: Planning. Director
SUBJECT: RePort on Tentative Parcel Map far. William An li
25-,2 .,_ a g n on AP
LATE A May 19, 1986
This is a proposal to divide 5.,83 acres to create 4 parcels. The
present zoning is. AR-1 (Agricultural Residential - 1 acre parcel,$), The
.and Use Plan Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area.
as Agricultural Residential. There are no specific or community plans
for the areal.
The proposal does not conflict with County zoning nor any adopted or
proposed element of the 'Butte Counter General. Plan nor, any County,
specific or community plan.
Approval is recommended subject to the Mitigation Measure:
1. PAY a fAlt^ -share contribution ttoward thc: cosh of suture widening and.
left-turn channel. of HighwayG, betlwr-en Palermo Road and
Grover Lane. Such payment to be submitted prior to filing the final
map.
If Caltrans has not responded back by June 2 on the fair-share
contribution mitigation, a continuance of one or more weeks is f
recommended.
SAS:lr I
C0: William Ang'",,i
GDA
4' Nil 01,NDI X 1'
11-NVIRONMI114TAL Cill CKLIST VORM Y1
(to be completec y Lug # 85-10-21-02
r1P If 25-02-36, vile 86-13
13ACK� GROUNn WILLIAM ANGLIN
1. Name of PTOPonont applicable)
Adclrc.ss
of proponent and repvesentativr ('r aIii
247 Ithaca
95965 Street - -w--
Ozovil e, CA
3: project description .__Rezone
YIiS AIAI"l;l.s NC)
NTtYCANCE
I I . DMANI)ATOR FTNDI Nti-IS oP_L --- . the potential to do
environment
lc the
a, goes the pi"" substantially reduce
quality of the environment, ecles, cause V
the habitat o> a fopulationito�droppbelow srlf-
lisia or wilcll fo population a Plant or
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate
animal r omntunity , reduce the number or restrx et the
range or a rare or endangered plant m or animal rinds
eliminate important ex; re of or major p
or Calirornin history of prehistory?
b; pool the project have the potentiaal to achieve
short-term benefits to the detri.nment o.f long
(A
environmental goals" ul olccurstinmaa�relati.act velytic
In & Pe term impacts Will
brier Period of time t�hilc long-term � �-
onduve into the suture.)
hues the project have impacts which are inJ vidtt=
slily limited, but -cumtwoor considerable?earateresources
project mn) impact on ch car mors is
Where the impact onfa affect otfa the total aOf`vthose Y.
mall,, but wncvc t is -
impaacts owthe environment, is sfgni [' cant°1
cl, Does the pra jeet hatiele!idt+c�crsrcAtal effects l onthumanch
+gill ause substantia
qQt c, raitl7clr d rectly ot, indi'r'ectly?
JJTl:RA1TNA'IIt7N I'I'o be cunip'1rtc�il l�� tile Lead A9010)
nn the basis r this initial v,jIuntion:
tc�� ,ei t'talil,lt NOT hq a ti1l;rti prepared,
�(' I/W find the p'rt�pc�RV p "
�'"�' a�it tit4� rn1-�i rc,n�mc�nt , ..arra .act. ;v1 c;,'1'l'TVi 1ti:CI:ACtAI'l�t�I`+ �Wi l'1 iyc
r , signift,
1WV brad that althoulh the pr0PUsc"c1 )�ra,i��.c t caauld lt.atie g
cant rffeet on the �`'nnc�the MITIGATION MHASURUS del not be 0 scribednDn
Urleet in this case because � ti aced: A NTiGA`1`W',
tale attaic'hod sheet bttvc� bion aitcltcl 'tn tltc I t' i
t rChARA'11ON Will b` 11-epatL"I.
Ir141"s l`1taa1 tlac> rroct all
1�a"c,pctnc�d 1�r�tii.�ct 5�1�11' ltatvibil'AC'l'g�ItT,l�ttl�l�niscrequirva' ,
I/W c�tt1 :1rr�nmunt, and stn IAVIf nNM1.NTAl:
1985 t'l7UNT V liU'I"1"i: ,
PW lNU Di:pAli'1'MT-'.NT
December 3 DATHt
liv
St p en4A, treeLe 4—Se nior Planner
Itev ix'wcd by,. _.
T��
•xIMP! PACT "maybe" answers are required
ENVIRONMENTAL
��ons oaYES
MAV NOTVyeS,ad
p ana
an attached sheet(s))
Pr osal resu�,t in signi�$cnt
l . EARTH •
,Will the p' P
;i_
�"tlnstab7e eaxhns or in changes or
geologic substructures?compa,cti —
displacements)
b, Disruptions)of the soil? �(
overcovering or ground Surface
c. "hinge in t',po gx aphy --
relief features? Or moeification of any
d, Destruction, covering
or physical features?
unique geologic,
e,
Increase in wind ax Water erasion of soils, � �^
either on or Off-site?of beaC
Changes in deposit. .onsiltation,ndeposition
s �n
OT changes modyfy the channel Of
orerosion which may
-_
a .river or stream or the: bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lane? roductive soils_ _X_
Loss of prime agriculturally p
g` outside designated urban areas?to geologic
osure of people or property mud-
hazards'
h. EYp landslides,
hazards' such as earthquakes, —. —.
sazards gxouna failure 4r similar hazards?
ATR. Will the proposal result 1.in substantial"•
a, Air emissa.ons ox deterioration of ambieoke
air quality? `ectonabie odors, sm.
b. The creation of obJ
or fumes? movement) moisture, or
c. Alteration of air change in climate:
temperature, or any _ ...
locally or regionally?
the proposal result in substantial.
3, WA,--TE-R• eS Wi11 �,n currentsy or the course or
a. Chang
direction of water movements in either
Marine or fresh waters drainage patterns,
b Changes in absorption rates, the rate and amount of sraf`.nagermprove-
ox channe7�
C4 I4eed for off-site surface
lading vegetation removal,+ —
t zationior culVert installation?
d. Alteration$ to the course or £�,ow of flood ..._.--
graters?the amount Of s,.�rface wat(.r in any X
e: Change in
water body? or in any
e into surface wagers) including
Di5char quality
alteration of surface W� dture, dissolved but nut. limited to temp
om o Or turbidity?
or rate of flout
g+ Alterat�,an of the direction sound wabers►
of ground WaterUantityar qualit'o of .0
h Change in the �l with-
either through direct addatan�`on Qf an C'
r 'or through intercep _.
drawals, cuts or �-
agti1fex by
du
in the amount of water otherwise
'public water supp'i�-e57 �
y available for p ro�erty to water
Exposure o � people or p I
7
` ,,elated hazards such as flooding?
4. PLANT LFE. Will the ro osal resu .YES
a. C in
norunuml�e�itil:
MAYBE NoI
ange the diversity Of species,
Of any species of plants (including trees,
shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of
an), unique, rare -
or endangered species of plants?
C. Introduction
.
of new species of plants into an
area, or in a barrier to the
-�--
normal replenish-
ment of existing species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural drop?
X
S.
ANIMAL LIFE. Will the esult
i ('•flange in the diversityoOflspecies,lorsnumbers stantial-
Of any species of animals (birds, land ani.nlvt1s
including reptiles,
fish and shell fish,
benthic organisms or insects)?
b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare '—�-
or endangered species of
animals?
c. Introduction of new species of animals into
an area, or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of animals?
d. Deterioration to eX sting fi
habitat? sh or wildlife
6.
;NOISE',. Will the proposal result in substanuial:
a. Increases in
existing n.oisr, levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe
noise levels?
7.
LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce
sign; ,icartt light and
glare?
S.
LAND USE. Will the proposal result iri a
su s�5` antial alteration
of the present orplanned
land use of an area?
5.
NATUPAL RESOURCES: p Will the proposal r
substant1 a . esult in
a: Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
b, Depletion of any non-renewable natural --.--
resources?
10.
RISK OP UPSET, Will the proposal involve:
a. A ra.s.� df
explosion or the release of hazard-
ous substances (including, but
not limited to,
Oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiations in the
event of an accident or upset Conditions?
b= Possible interference with
an emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
y
11 .
POPULAT'I'ON tV'x 11 h ,_
L e proposal alter the location,
istrz ut on, density, or growth rate ol~ the human
Population?
lei HOUSING- Will the proposal affect existing housing,
or CrIate a demand, for additional housing?
s
i
7 J. TRANSPORTA
--�
YPS MAYM4lpar;resul.t
in: Will the proposal
a. Generation of substantial. F�dditional vehicle
movement?
b. BffoctS C,n existing tingdemand for "FL2
ybilities, ol,�aika3g;vc
new
Substantial im ract ',.:sansportaton
,.
systems? ng
d.
Significant r-Ilterati,- - i' r.C,.
Of Circulation Present pat4•Frns
or mo i, ;rc
goods? people anai'or
c• Alterations to waterbornr.t or ".
— X
, aT.r ti}�x
£. Increase in 4raffic ha ,u.xtii; ;.a p"M� fic?
bicyclists motor7}ic les,
or pedestrians"
14. PUBLIC SERVICES. iVi11 the
upon, or result in a Hoed �. �F `gri
oa` `'arodn eect
go�ernmertal services: "Aor r �
a. Fire protection?
b Police protection?.
c. Schools?
_
d. Parks of other recreatio
e: 1.lantenanceof
public fac,..y �:
roads? eG, • C1 ,Xing
Other governmental
15' ANERGY, Will the
a, Ls`e of substantalpCa;nounLsuof
fu�zwl.oY ever
b-. Substantial increase in d0man�? `JPLCt
sources of energy,e �,�;;tin
or reau `re .he r�.Vi ,'l�� �.
pm�nt
of energy;
�} 77M1 Tr
16. l./ LITIES •
f _ 11 the
p
newpro osal result jr, a nCs" t for
,y fol systems, or substantial altera; ; etas 1.0
following:
t e
a. power or nat'izra.l gas?
b. Communications
systoms?
c' Nater ava,i. iabij it'd ,-
d: -""
X
Seger or septic tank?
---- `
e Storm water drainage?
f. So".Ad w;as'te and disposal?
_
17. HttMAN REIAL`i'H, Will the. proposal
a, rear:xon of
any health hazard
health. hazard (excluding mental
b.
jtyPosure ole people to potent.i",
�hp zards i
--^-
l8, AEsr��rzcs. Will the proposal
�S`rP c�t of he
--�
any sceni ru ;vw'KI.o;
the public, Or will the t
prbpbsal tes :1t in, thea
creat'1011 of an aesthetically b£fen i• :a s7.t� open
to public viol,?
•y ,1,ti i
YES MAYBE
N�1
19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon
the quality or quantity of existing to^reational
Opportunities?
20. CULTURAL RESOURCES.
a, Will the proposal, result in the alteration
Of or the dPstruction. of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site?'
b. Will the proposa' result in adverse phyysical, "-
or ae,thetic effects to a`prehistoric or
historic building, structure of object?
Does
c. the proposal have th,e potential to cauls
a physical change which would affect
unique
ethnic cultural values?
d. Will the proposal restrict existing rel:igio0s
or sacred uses within the potential impact;
area?
V. D18CUSSION OP ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP 25-02..36, File 86-13
See attached.
�S
P:-
x
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL.. EVALUATION' AP 25-02-36
lb,Sb,c: Eventual construction of up to four dwelling units With
related ifnprovoments would compact and overcover a small Portion of
each parcel. A drainage solution to convey surface water runoff
toward the Feather River is necessary.
1h: The highly expansive soils and p(,L earthquakes are geologic
hazards to future residents on the propii.;I,(�y.
4
Sh I I 6c, d: The Environmental Health Division W I L J I require soil tests
and/or percolation tests to verify usable sewage disposal areas to
comply with requirements of the Butte County Subdivision Ordinance.
The four proposed parcels must receive cle-arance From Environmental
Health prior to any land division approval.
3j: The subject property is 3/4 mile or More away from the Feather
River floodway.
6b: The existing dwelling on the most easterly parcel (near Highway
70) is presently set back at least 200 feet from the highway. Noise
levels of 70 decibels or greater occur on an intermittent basis within
100 feet. Traffic counts in the area show an average daily traffic
(Ab*r) of 7400 on Highway 70 south of Palermo Road with a peak month of
8600 ADT, with the same figures for north of Oroville-Gridley Highway.
8-' The rezone would be compatible with the surrounding area parcel
s Ites and residential development trend.
13c,P: The rezone and subsequent parcel map would eventually add
additional vehicular traffic to Highway 70. Oold Run Court should be
the sole access for EM of the parcels, including the 2,6 -acre
easterly parcel. A 1 -foot no -access strip will be requested for the
Tentative Parcel Map application. Sight distance is good in both
directions entering and leaving Gold Run Court.
14*. The residential use of the property will odd to t -he public
service demand in the'Oroville/Palermo area, Levels of service have
declined In recent years due to budget cutbacks.
18: Residential development of the property will alter the visual
character of this portion of the Highway 70 corridor,
A Negative Declaration regarding environmental Itnpact is recommended
for the rezone. If the rezone application Is apProYdd, the subsequent
Tentative Parcel Map application will bo subject to
condItioM8/m1ti98t1dM Measures to address drainage) nbl8o exposure
along Highway 70) and traffic safety/circUlabibn.
.6"
Applicant: Wlillam Anglin
A. Pr 'eat Descr I t i
Assessor's parcel 4
25-02-s6
Log # 86-10-21-02,
File No. 86-18
DATA SHEFFT
1. Type of Project: Rezone.
2. Brief Description: Rezone frorn 11U,, (Unclassified)
(Agr,icultura l-Residentia l, I - to AR -1
-acre minimuM Parcels) for 5.83
3. Location: Southwest Corner of Highway 70
South of Orovlle.
4. Proposed Densi
i: ty Of DevelopmentOne and GO)d Run Court,
acres. dou./I.1 acres - 2.55
5. Amount of Impervious Surfacing: Less than
over-all. 59 estimated
6- Access and Nearest Public Road(s): Frontage on Gold Run Court
and Highway 70; one proposed par
both roadways. cel Would have frontage on
7. Method of Sewage Disposal:
8. Source of Water Supply: IndividuaI Septic SYswelterns.
l ls.
96 Proximity Of Power Lines: AveIIabIe to the site.
10- Potential for further land divislo ns and development::
Four -Pat -001 land division PrOPOS
one Of the proposed parcels Could be d subsequent to the rezone,
el
!-acre zoning. further divided under
B. Inv i ronmental L
E-1
Terrain
a' General TOP09raPhld Character: Relatively
b. gradual westward slope toward Feather Riverlevel, land,)
i,
SIOPest Less than 39.
Elovatjbh4 100 feet */- A.S.L.
d. Limiting ractbrs.-
a.i Types and Characteristics:
Loom; depth of up to `, f eet I C 1 ass II -SIT type Kimbell
Minutes/inch); coMp8ct dons' hlOdOr'ate percolation (40-60
b, Limiting Factors -
0 Subsoil 1myt,_.
31 Natural Hazards of the Land
"
ak. Earthquake Zbhdi-
b. Erosion Potential " ModoratO �:arthquake Inbonsity ZO
* Low* me Vill.
t, Landslide Pbtdntl'
d, rire alk Nohe.
Ha:zard., Moderate.
4i b' EXPOhsl" Soil Potential" High,
Hydrology
0- Surface Watbi-4 Feather
ea�her River 3/4 mile to the west;
Y slough I/P. mile +/-
b, Ground Watori to the west-.
Valley aquifers,' Mod0rat01Y Shallow
gy,6unowztor table. L m.-nd dr,�a 1 n,5. to t' -Ie West tONard
c. Drainage Characteristics -
the Feather River; soils have good
d. Annual Rainfall (normal)'. 22-24t
0. Limiting Factors: Floodway area to the west.
6. visual/Scenic Quality: Rural area.
6. Acoustic Quality: High ambient noise levels withltl 200 feet
of Highway 70.
7. Air Quality: Moderate; affected by vehicular emiasions from
Highway 70 traffic.
BiologicalEDYJXDSMmeo
8. vegetation: Grassest Star Thistle, pasture; truck farmloq has
occurred In recent years.
9. wildlife Habitat: Open grassland for small mammals and avian
species; Oroville Wildlife Area nearby to thewo8t.
Luj_tural Environment-*
110. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area Low
sensitivity area.
11. Butte County General Plan desi0natIO!'14.
Agricultural -Residential.
112. Existing Zoning: "U" (Unclassified). h some area
13. Existing land Use on-site: Grassland with
cultivated for truck, farming, one double -wide mobile home,
outbulldlngSp one single -Wide mobile home.
14. Surrounding Area:
a. Land Uses: Feather River environs to west, Highway '70
corridor along east; dispersed homesites in the VICIhItY;
limited commercial jjse5 along lilghwaY 70-
b. Zoning'. "U", A-5 to s-outh- ltural-Residentlal; Ore I hard
C. Oen. Plan designations: Agricu
and Field Crops.
d. Parcel Sixes:1-40 acreti
e. population*. e
Low population density.
15. Character of Site and Ara. Rural residential near Oroville
Wildlife Area.
16. Nearest Urban Area.0$ Orovilles 6 mIles north.
114 Relevant Spheres of Influence". Butte county Mosclulto
Abatement District, ultimate sphere Of 01410, Feather River
Recreation and Park District.
le. Improvements standards Urban Area- None.
19. Fire Protection 8& -Vice:
6. Nearest County (State) Fire Station: #72 PalermOi 3 miles
east..
b: Water Availability' Wells, fire truck capacity.
20. Schools In AOebe and Orbylile area schools.
* Pal rmo