Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout025-220-015v a fl � . Q 8 N a � P L., 1 ' 1 q I �( � ' �, ., _ 1 �� .PLANNING N SUMMARY SI3EET FOR LAND DIVISIONS ...APPLICANT Sian I)Pr Have,. Jan G. & Eva 85=04-18-01 ADDRESS 417 Stimpson Road, Oroville, CA 95965 OWNER Same. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Tentative 'Parcel. Ma dividin 218 + acres tp'C�'eFlte two —p c o at d.fi6 acres and one at 212 acres +� VOCATION On the east side of Stam son Road a plrox. 4000 deet south intersection with_Co:.: Lane Robinsons Corner area ASSESSOR'S PARCELNUMfiER(S)W 25-22--15 ZONING A-5 GEN. PLAN.... _.. O&FC -------- DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED PROJECT CONSISTENT?- 4/18/85 Eng Rooer Assoc. 885, GhicO; CA 9 927 DATE PUBLICATION NOTICE WRITTEN PUBLISHED �3ED PLACE N ; �SPAPER NOTICE(S) PUBLISHED - 0. 0. P. G. B. DATE MAILING LIST PREPARED DATE MAIL -OUT NOTICES WRITTEN MAILED NUMBER DATE PLANNING DIREGTOR,S REPORT PREPARED ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION .. DATE FILED AND DATE NEGATIVE DECLARATION -. DA's ADOPTED r � MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION DATE ADOPTED 14PACT REPORT DATE CERTIFIED SUB. COMMITTEE FETING DATE ,ADvISORY AGENCY HEARING ]SATE ADVISORY AGENCY ACTION BOARD ACTION, 1 COMMENT'S �. Ti - NOTICE OF DETERl+OIRNATS APPENDIX TMJ Office of Planning and Research FROM: P1nglDepLtm t 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 7fuhtZCenter:Drive Sacramento, CA 95814 Orle (:A 959b5 X County Clerk or J.IJI., 18 1985 County of Butte ELEANOR M, BECKER,CO Wy Clerk B X JACINTH ___pepui SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. $5-04-18=01 ect t e AP # Name Tentative Parcel Map AP 25-22-15 Jan and Eva 'Van Dar Rave tate CClearinng ouse Number ContactV'erson Telephone Plum (if submitted to Clearinghouse) John Mendonsa, Public Worits (916) 534-4601 r""j"c" Location On the east side of s Stim on Road, P_ approx. 4000 feet south of its intersection with Cox Lane, Robinson Corner area. ject Description Tentative Parcel Map dividing 218 + acres to create tato parcels, one at 2 This is to advise that the T3utto County Advisor AgencL- (Lead Agency or Responsible Agency has approved the above described project and has made the following determinations regarding the above described project. - 1. rojects1 The project will, will not, have a signif !cant effect on the environment. 2. An Environmental impact Report was prepared for this pr©JeOfi pa4 to the provisions of CEQA. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA The MR or Negative Declaration and record of project approval may be examined at: tette County Planning, Department 7 County Center Drive, or!l2i e, CA 25965 3. MI'1gation measures - were,,X were not, made a condition of the approval of the project: 4 A statement of Overriding Considerations w, . was, -4 was hot, adopted for this project. Date Received for Filing ___7/16/85., . Signa re Stephen A, tPtteetoi. Senior P1awhOr st 0 Revised January' 385 -ice-• ...__ . . Y 0 COUNTY OF BUTTE DEPARTMENT OF ;,UBLIC WORKS 7 County Center Drive Oroviile, CA95965 916-534-4266 916-534-4339 July 16, 1985 Butte Co. Planning cormrm JUL 16 1905 Uroville, oliforala Jan C. & Eva Van Der Have RE AP 25-22-1:5 417 Stimpson Road Tentative Parcel Map Oroville; CA 95965 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Van Der Have: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held July 16, 1985; the Agency adopted the negative declaration regarding Environmental review and approved the tentative parcel map for AP 25-22,15 subject to the conditions as listed on the attached sheet. If no appeals are timely filed --within ten (10) days of the date of the Advisory Agency's approval --with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, this action will be fi al When the conditions of approval are complied with, it will be in order for you to file your "final map" with the Butte County Department of Public Works for recordation within twenty-four (24) months of the date, of approval by the Advisory Agency. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office. Very truly yours, William Cheff' Director of Public Works urtgihal Slgnod by JOHN MENDOW John eta— Assistant Director JM/ns Attachment cc,,G, aoning - Environmental Review Environmental Health Department Roper Associates, Pn 0, Box 885, Chico; CA 95927 LD 1110 (Revised 2-28--84) Jan C & Eva Van Der Have TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, two parcels on the east side of Stimpson Road, approximately 4000 ft south of its intersection with Cox Lane, Robinsons Corner. Assessor's Parcel Number: 25-22-15 Engineer: Roper Asssociates Public Works Department conditions are; 1. Verify legal access 2. Place a note on final map, the note to read: "Any permits for further development or division of the subject property will require the construction of the access road to the R5' -8 -LD -I standard and a road maintenance agreement be provided. 3. Access to be reserved in deeds as pe°r county ordinance. - 4. Show 50 -ft. building setback line measured from centerline of access easement. 5. Provide road maintenance agreement. G. Indicate a 50 -ft. building setback from the centerline of Stimpson Lane. 7, Show all easements of record on the final map. 8. Pay of any assessments. g, pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required. Environmental Health Department condition is 10. Provide proof that adequate area exists on parcel 1 for leachfield replacement, and that existing leachfield is confined to parcel I. 17 Inter-DepartmAntal Memorandum To: Butte County Advisory Agency FROM: Planning Director susJECTi Report on Tentative Parcel Map of Jan & Eva Van Der Have, on AP 25-22-15 DATE: July 1, 1985 This is a proposal to divide 21.8* acres to create two parcels, one @ 6.66 acres and one @ 212 acres*: The present zoning is A-5 (Agri- cultural - 1 acre parcels) The Land Use Plan Map of tho Butte County General Plan designates this area as Orchard and. Field C1,ops. Where are no specific or community plans for the area. - The proposal does not conflict with County zoning nor any adopted or proposed element of the Butte County General Plan nor any County, specific or community plan; Recommend approval DHslr tet Jan & Eva Van Der Have Roper Assoc, LI 64 r' i Inter-gepartme-ptal 'Memorandum To: Advisory Agency FROM; nave Hironimus, Planning Staffe) SUBJECT! Environmental Assessment for Jan Van Der Have Tentative Parcel Map; AP 25-22-15 DATE€ April 29, 1985 This is a proposal to divide 218 + acres to create two parcels, one at 6.66 acres and one at 212 acres +. The attached initial study was prepared for the withdrawal. from the California Land Conservation Act (CLCA) contract for proposed Parcel 1, and is adequate for consideration of this current project, Thi: CLCA withdrawal has been completed and a Certificate of Cancellation was issued on March 10, 1985 A Negative Declaration is recommended for the current parcel, map. DRH:lkt Attachment cc Jan and Eva Van Der Have Roper Assoc. PA I'I AP PON DI X YOUN'1'Y _0E0--,10=r LNtr1RONMINTAT, CHECKl.T�.11' 1-10101 (to -lie complete TY 11,clod Agencyl L09 " 84-11-06-01 BACKGROUN11 AP it 25-22-.1.5 1, Name of proponent ,._,,Jan C,� and )ava Van Der Nave u Address of prnpon nt and representative fir applicable) 417 Stimpson Road Rgaer AP3soc,T ill e CA 95965 CA 95927 _ i. Pro uct description __.Withd>:awa),f;gm W141,amgon Act Contr�irt lIA�DJV1ORY ] 1NhlNt,S (V,"*JIK;ANCI Y1iR h1AY13NCl1i. — s. ., 0 a. Does the project have the pot.er, ial to degrade the quality of the environment, sul stnntiall.y roduce the habitat or a Fish or wildlife specieq, c4115e a Fish or wlidlire population to drop below sew sustaining; levels, threaten to el iminatc a plant or auim►.tl cottmruit:ity, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare; or endangered Kant or animal or el iminate Important examples of the major periods or ca i carnia history or prehi,story? h. Itoes the project have the potential to achieve s short term benefit:;; to the detriment or long-term, environmental gnal.s7 1:A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brier period or time while long-term impacts will endure into the future,) t + lanva the project have impacts which are int ividu- allf limited, but cumulativvJy considerable' f'A project MY impact on two or more separate resources where the ;impact on each rc.source is relatively smiil i , but where tite effec* or the total of these lllrp: 'ts on the onvironmviit is signirictint.) d, it the p'rriject have onvir'ailmental errects which K cause Nuhstnntial adverse effects an human rings, ulther directly or indirectly? , It1' jOk NA719N Wo hay completed by the Lend Agencyi C the 1S"SIS, of ttrS WWI ! "Valuat ion; 1/10! find the proposed project COULD NOT have a signiricant efract on the environment, and a NHGATIVU DECLARATION will he prepared, T/lVii Find that although the proposed project could havea sign rie cant errec't can the onvironmt, there will not he n sign iricar►t erred in this case becanso titre HTTIVA'l`ION l<tT'A1+i1ES described oil. the attached shoat have heed addod to the projoct A Ni:CATTVli 111.Cl.ARA*I1oN will he iirepol-ed, T/iVi's rcn�l the propo,;Cd projvot MAY hove (t sluniricunt erruct on the tilt i ronmrnt, and an HNV T R0NMHNTAl" i h1PACT RT PORT Is required, december 14, 1984 COUNTY OV iltl'1T11, PLANNINC 111:RARTt`ii=N'i 1a y : �>c��✓ � ,� Tlavid "Il, ftronit Uri :. A$soeiate planner Rvv i ewod by V ENVIRONMENTAL X T RONMEN'TAL lT. anatt.ons o Yes" �� �� on attached sheet(s)) Y and maybe an��:ve are required ,rt 1• EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant; YES 'MAYBE No a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic, substructures? y" b. Disruptions, displacements;, compaction or �1 overcove2: ng of the soji" Ci Change in topography cr ground surface X relief features? ""`"" d. Destruction,, covering or modification of any 7C unique geologic or physical features? e. increase in wind or water erosion of soils, X either on or off-site? ` —` f. Changes in deposition or erosi'on of }each ... sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean oj� any bay, inlet or lake? g• Loss of prime agrict.ilturally Productive soils outside designated urban areas? h. Exposure of peoPl.e Or property toeolo -� earthquakes, -landslides, hazards such as earth q, landslides, mutl4 slider ground failure or similar hazards? y Ailt,19i1:1 the proposal result in substantial, a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b'. The creati or fumes?on Of Objectionable odors, smoke -- c. Alteration of air mo�,ement, moistLtre or temperature, ox` any change in climate, locally or regionally? WATER. IVill the pj•oposal result in substantial: a a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water m.7vervents in either marine or fresh waters? b Changes in absorption rates, drainage or the rate and amount of Su'r:ace rtgtno (?terns, o. Deed for off-sits sttrf:ace drainage improve- itten�s, ncludin= ,g i .-- _ iz,ation or culvertoi.nstallatio?removal, channel_ d-, Alterations tothe course or flow of flood avatars? _ e. Change in the "mount of surface coater intiny water body? f . Discharge a._ -- nto Surface waters' or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature? dxssolvod oxygen or turbidity? g. Alteration of the directi.oll of rate of flow � Of ground watdrs? h. Change in the quantity Of ground waters, either through direct additions of with drat}ale, or through interception of an agUi.fer by cats or (I. Ftc.dttctionr in . the amount,.o (roarer atfa k ' d aVailable for public water supplies?'erwise J. Exposure of people or prop0rty to IMter �--- related }razt�rds such as flooding? YES MAYBE NO 4. PLANT L'EFE',W-Lll the proposal result in substantial a. c ,, : hange the diversity of species, or number of anv species of rilwni-s + G. 7. 8, 9, 10. LIGHT AND GLARE, Will the proposal produce slghificant light and glaTo? LAND USE, Will the proposal result in a s65sTan7Eial alteraltion of the nresent or planned land use of an area? NATURAL I I result in, ATURAL R11SC)URCES., Will the roposa SubstH_Tialll. a, Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural resources? RISK OF UPSET, Will the proposal involve-, a A H-skof explosion or the release of 'h,,jz,,,jrd_ ous substances (illcluding, but not limited to, Oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an. accident or upset conditions? b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? POPULATION, Will th(j I)Topo.�,.jj .Ater the he location, distribu_t�on, density, or growth rat -c Of tho human population? HOUSING, Will the proposal affect existing housing, 01' create a demand Cor additional housing? __X a reams . shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers' of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new specis of plants into an area, or it a barrier to the normal replenish- ment of existing, species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 4NIN1AL LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers' of any species of animals birds, land animaj.,s including reptiles, fish and shell fish, benthic organisms or insects)? b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique,'rexre or endangered species of animals? C. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat! NOISE. Will the proposal 'result in substantial: a. increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? LIGHT AND GLARE, Will the proposal produce slghificant light and glaTo? LAND USE, Will the proposal result in a s65sTan7Eial alteraltion of the nresent or planned land use of an area? NATURAL I I result in, ATURAL R11SC)URCES., Will the roposa SubstH_Tialll. a, Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural resources? RISK OF UPSET, Will the proposal involve-, a A H-skof explosion or the release of 'h,,jz,,,jrd_ ous substances (illcluding, but not limited to, Oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an. accident or upset conditions? b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? POPULATION, Will th(j I)Topo.�,.jj .Ater the he location, distribu_t�on, density, or growth rat -c Of tho human population? HOUSING, Will the proposal affect existing housing, 01' create a demand Cor additional housing? __X 1 s , r �, YES r�t�°.r� t� ' � RANSa ORTATiON/CIRCLil ATICN W., ��,... hC result in rl1 the Proposal a• Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement? 'b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for nese parking' C. Substantial impact on existing tt,'Insportatio» systems? d. Significant alterations to present patterns Of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? — f. Increase in traffic hazard's bicyclists or pedestrians?s to motor vehicle;, 14. PUBLIC SERVICES . 15, 16: 17'. 18 upon, or ?•exult i5aneedfor ithe oone OrhalteredefCec t in governmental services: a. Eire protection? b. Police prntecton" C. Schools?' d, Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public roads? facilities, including f. Other governmental services_? ENERGY Will the proposal result in: a Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b Substantial increase in domand upon sup..rrcos of ever << P n e:�5ting new sources of ienergyuxrc tile clevelopitient UTILITIES, will thero sal result in a. n new ms or substantial alterations to ✓�, for following: a: Potyer or natural gas? b Communications s) -stems'? c: Water: d Sewer or septic tank? e• Storm water drainage' Solid waste and dis-Liosal ? HOMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result a• Crew" t o of any health hazard or potential y health hazard (excludi:ng mental health) ? hea sure of peoplo to po terttial ?iea b• Ex o hazards'? ltli AESTHETICS. Will the proposal 'result in tlio o s rucC n of anysce the pubLzcnic vista or view open to , or will the proposal result in the creation of an Aesthetically offensive Site Open to public vietd? .4- X X X X —X— X X � MMU NO, 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the duality or quantify of existing recreational opportunities?, 20, CULTURAL RESOURCES. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? Does c. the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious Or sacred uses within the potential impact area? V. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION A 25;:22-1 See attached x,, n nzscusszfru o _ vrr arar�E ray gVALUATrON AP 25-22-IS Ig.' While a - pproximately 4.06 acres will be remo\,ed from Williamson Act Contract, th�lt property is not currently under cultivation and is to be site of the homesite and agriCUlt.ural outbuildings„ 1h: All of Butte County is within a Moderate Earth Zone VIII. talo new residences are contemplated aced as ag �''e °' ntensi ty project. t zo U+ this 4d Gee Ig. A: The sub3'ect property is Planned for Orchard and Piot d Crop designation. The segregation of a homesite in such 41n area does Conform to the Policies of the General Flan. es i App',icant: Jan C. and Eva Van Der Have Assessor's Parcel 25-22-15 Log * 64-11--06-01 DATA SHEET A. Project Descrip,ior 1. Type of Project: Withdrawal from Williamson Act Ctntract, Use Permit for segregation of a homesite in an agricultural zone, Tentative Parcel Map . Srief Description: Removing approximately 4,02 acres from a 218 acre parcel for a residentialsegregation. !3. Location: Approximately 1800 feet east of Stimpson Road, approximately 1 mile South of Cox Lane, south of Oroville« 4. Proposed Density of Development: N/A S. Amount of Imperviot,ils Surfacing. Minimal 6. Access and Nearest Public Road(s): Viz approximately 25070 feet of private road to StiMpsan Road. 7. Method of Sewage Disposal Individual septic system S. SourcO of Watur Supply: Individual well g. Proximity of Power Lines: To the subject property lo.. Potential for further land divisions and development: None ander the existing zonino on the portion to be removed 4:r.om the LCA contract H. Envir`ormer��al Seth:rig PhySLal-nti�ircanm�r`J�µ 1« Torrain a. General Topographic Character, Nolatively flat vtAlley floor transitioning into rolling hills. b. Slopes: 0-10% cA Elevatiran, 95-120 feet ASL di Limitinj FacturS: Nona 2. Sails a« Types and Character sit it.=' Bedding grav011y sandy loam in the area of the 1•1omesi to ser-?rQn th It and koc�l in fine sandy .loam and Wyman loam on Other portions of the property b Limiting ractors: Shallow srilsslow permeability limiting septic System capabilities. Appe 1 P�, Natural Hazards Of the Land uake Irak.p?,�,/ Zone! VIII a. EarthquaF,'e Zone: Moderate Earthq b. Erosion POtentlal: t4oderate C. Landslide Potential: None do Fire Hazard: Moderate e. Expansive Soil potential: High 4. Hydrology Several seasonal swales the a, Surface Water: the area of the homesitt;4 �.:,nqregationo_ propertyl none to Wymanr Ravine .ifAtt0s the man-made drainage Channel property. Aquifers 04 unknown quan-%',tv gici depth, b. Ground Water: dwater Withd',"'0401 and a This is an area of heavy groun potential subsidence area. Property drain% (jr-110rallY to r risitics_' Drainage GharactL the south and West to Wyman Raine. rinnual Rainfall (normal)-. 20-2 v 2 e. Limiting Factors - None 5. tlisual/Scenic Dual'A--Y-' Good 6. Acoustic Quality: High 7. Air Quality- Good Ind! grasses, valley Oaks it .4 E. jegtation: Grazing la Pasture go tqjIdj4+e Habitat: Lower Sonoran 'Life Zone And Historical Resources in Lo,,l _a; q:�.�nsi4-jvjty areaI Ian designatibnt Orchat'd Feel -outte county qaMeral P °"p -ops -5 l d 11..!"isting L.Oning. (A �.'.Jstinq Land Use Irrigated PAst"rr-' sillgle family dwellingh 14. ourrounding Area:reaicionki ^t pgriCttitural uses and L Land U60st rural densities �1. jdhingi.i A-5 Orchard and Field P - Goo, Plan designations:Same rally its to !�b acre PsA.r Marcel Sizes•- Gene urger p. i'.t scattered small hd"5'tos! acme to :,I -So acre range* F�gpttlatitn Sparse t,ppdndix V 2 ,¢Fp: AP 25-22-15 15. Character of Site and Area: Transitional agricultural land between orchard areas to the west and grazing landst to the east. 16. Nearest Urban Area: Oroville, 10+ miles north, Gridley, 6 +/- miles l-miles 'West 17 Relevant Spheres of Influence: None ,G. Improvements Standards Urban Area: No 19. Fire Protection Service: a. Nearest County (State) Fire 'Station: Station 74 in Gridley, 5 to 6 miles west, Station 75 in Honcut, approximately 7 miles, Station 72 in Palur ttio, approximately 9 miles. b. Water Availability: Wells and fire tanker Only h0. Schools in Area: Palermo Union Elementary School District and Oraville Union High School District