The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About025-220-034P • b v • 1 ' j r i P • b v • PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY SHEET FOR LAND DIVIS.T,ONS APPLICANT— Joy 0. Reeder 85-01-23-01 ADDRESS 420 Stimpson Road Oroville CA 95965 PROJECT DESCRIPTION' Tentative Parcel Map 'to divide 19.2'7 ares :�Y�.ta 3 parcels; 1 at 5.01 acres, 1 at 6.76 acres,, and 1 at 7,34 acres LOOATION on the west side of Stimpson Road, approximately 1 mile south of its intersection with Cox pane_, Palermo area, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER (S) 2S__ Zomm, A-8 GEN. PLAN PROJECT CONSISTENT? '� 5 Richard P. SanrL r, L.S. 556 Little Ave. DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED 1- 2 3 - 8� � Uridley, DATE PUBLICATION NOTICE WRITTEN PUBLISHED PLACE NEWSPAPER NOTICE(S) PUBLISHED - O. C. P. G. E. DATE MAILING LIST PREPARED DATE MAIL -OUT NOTICES WRITTEN MAILED NUMBER DATE PLANNING DIRECTORiS REPORT PREPARED N DLTERM ITTTAN ��. CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION � DATE VILED � s� AND DATE NEGATIVE DECLARATION DATE ADOPTED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION � DATE ADOPTED ENV. IMPACT REPORT DATE CERTIFIED SUE. COMMITTEE MEETING DATE VISORY AGENCY 11tARING DATE r .0. Joy 0. Reeder 420 Stimpson Road Oroville, CA 95965 Dear Ms. Reeder! 604a Co,'o Plar+ri3n UN 5 11985 Orov111OA UiArra(q tte 'oun LAND OF NATURAL wrAI,TN AND 1I1.AUTY` DEPARTMENT Or: PUBLIC WORKS WILLIAM (Bill) CI'i[;i'F, Director 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLt, CALIFORNIA 9$965 Telephone-. (916) 04.4681 RONALD b. McELROY Deputy Director June 4, 1985 RE: AP 25-22-34 and 36 Tentative Parcal, Map At the regularmeeting of the butte County Advisory Agency hold June 3, 1985,.the Agency approved your Tentative Parcel Map for AP 25-22-34 and 36 , noting that the project is categorically exempt from environmental review and subject to the conditions of approval listed on the attached sheet. If no appeals are timely filed—within ten (10) days of the date of the Advisory Agency's approval --with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, this action will be final. When the conditions of approval are complied with, it wil be in order, for you to file your "final mAp" with the Butte County Department of Public Works for recordation within twenty-four (24) months of the date of approval by the Advisory Agency. If you should have any questions regarding this tw ter, please contact this office. Very truly yours, William Cheff Director of Public Works — JL__ )m lh n an ansa istant Director JR.da Attachment cc Planning - Environmental Review Environmental Health Department. ki Sannar I M Joy Q. Reeder, Boundary Line Modification and. Tentative Parcel, Map, 2parcels on the west side of Stimpson Road, approx. one mile soueh of its intersection with Cox Lane. Palermo. AP 25-22-34 and 36 Engineer; Richard Sannar Public Works conditions 1. Deed to the County of Butte 30 right-of-way from the centerline of Stimpson Lane.. 2. tndicate a 50 ft. building setback from the Centerline of Stimpson Lane- 3. Show all easements of record on the .final map. 4. Obtain encroachment permit for, all driveways, new or existing, and construct to county standards. 5. Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required. Health Department condittons 6. Provide a 100 ft. leacheield free setback around existing e. wells either within the property or within too ft. of the property boundaries on parcel numbers 25-22-34 and 36. 7. Place a mote on the map that no leach lines shall be installed in area subject to flooding from Wyman Ravine or the. drainage Swale (delineated by the inundation line) Planning Department condition: 8. Show areas subject to inundation on final map. K)TACE OF EXEMPTION. TO: Office of Planning and Re-rearch 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 X County Clerk County of Butte 25 County Center Drive oroville, CA 95965 APPENDIX A FROM: BUTTE COUNTY PLANNOG 7 County Center Drive Orovill.e, CA. -9-5Q65., I- L t U APR 8 1985 85-01-23-01 FLEANOR M, BECKER, County Clpt� ,v ` I�onti�r Project Title Boundary Line Modification via Tentative Parcel Ma2 AP 25-22-34, 36 ---Joy Reeder to ectLocationpeoi is On the west side of Stimpson Road, apptovimutely 1 mile south of its intersection with Cox Lane, Palermo Pvxijexwt L.ocatiat�-City Project Location -County Palermo ktitte Bc,undary Line Modification viii Tentative Parcel Map Butte County Advisory Agency. ...�.._._.....� Dame of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project ,Toy Reeder .._.._ Exempt tatus: C ec G�rae Class 5(a) Ministerial (Sec, 15073) Declared Emergency (Sec. 15071 (a)) Emergency k'roje:ct (Sec, 15071 (b) and (c)) Categorical Exemption. State type and section numbe=e .. �rM�sry��whrllwY:l4�rwr�i�!rww:. Y..M� iteasoons vV }r prD)FCt e~xemPt Project meets I the definition of a Class 5 al 6—ffl ;tions John '14endopsq. public Jorkr 916) U-50" ,` ipPlicairttt L Attache aertified document at exemption finding. 2. Has a-iiotl0d of exemptlon been filad by the public agency approving the project? 'Yes ,, No � H Date: Received far Filing ��; �•°,�, ignature Ste lien A, Streeter S �1, �f�11YIt+Y Title Revl,.wd 3anuary 1985 TO: FROM, SUSJECTi DATr-t Zoning; A- General Plan: Orchard & Field Crops Land Conservation Agreement; No This proposal is found in conformity with the General enlargement of a Plan.as an substandard lot within the A=5 zone with an existing dwelling. Creation of new lots of 5 acres would not be in conformity for efte reasons cited in the initial study for the prior tentative parcel map: Recommend approval subject to the condition, Show areas subject to inundation on final map, cc: Joy Reeder Richard p.. Sannar T, hter�D per m�nt.01 Memorandum Advisory Agency Steve ;Streeter, Planning BLM for Joy Reeder, AP 25-22-34 and 36 April 4, 1985 f� ,A1'I'liNIlf � I; COUNTY OF 13U"TT1 ENVIRONMENTAL C1ItIC:KLI >T FORM (to be complete , by I,en Agency) Tog 0 85-01-23-01 T. BACKGROUND Ali if 25-22-34,36 1. Nance of proponent _-- Joy D. Reeder 2. Address of proponent and representative (if applicable) 420 Stimpson Road Richard j. Sannttr Oroville, GA 95965 555 LitQ Avert - 3. Project description ___ Tentative _Parcel Map TI. i+tANUATQRY_ CTND[NGS OF STGNII:T.CANCi YES MAYBE NO a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b, Imes the project have the potential to achieve short-term benefit; to the detriment of long; -term, environmental goals"? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief period of time while long-term .impacts will endure into the future.*) c. does the project have impacts which are i.ndavido- ally limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more sepgrate resources where the impact on each resource is relativel e small, but where the effect of the total of those Impacts on the environment is significant,) d, hoes the project have environmental e^rfelc.ts which 1411 cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either dirortly or indirectly? I'll, f1HTIiR_MlNATiON ("Ccs he cumpleturf by the Lead Agency) On the basis or oi,!a initial eV41uati0n; I/i°T find the proposed project COULD NOT have a sIgnificant offect on the environment, , anti a NUATT'hh hHHARA'i ION will be prepared, UWE find that althoug) the proposed project could have a signifi- cant effect an the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the MITIGATION MHASURES described an the attached sheet have been added to the project. A NROATIVTz 11iiCI.ARATI ON will he prepared, WE rind the proposed project MAY have a significant effect an the environment, and an I:WRONMENTAI, IMPACT REPORT is required. DA'Ti.r T'ebi•uary 9, 1985 r' 'fl' OF BUTTE, PLANNTNCI 130PAI:TMONT David Itlitonitus Ass i',ate ?I er Reviewed by: ,� IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPAPTS xpl-anations offal "yes" and "maybe' answers are required on attached sheet(s)) I. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant- YES MAYBE a.–Unstable earth conditions NC or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? c.. Change in topography or ground surface` relief features? d. Destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off-site? -- f.Changes hang eSo ndeposition or erosion of beachsands changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel, of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g Loss of prime agriculturall ---- y productive soils outside designated urban areas? h._ Exposure of people or property to geologic' hazards such as earthquakes, landslidesmud- Slides, ground failure or simila7' hazards? 2 AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke , or fumes? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, locally or regionally? 3; WATER. Will the Proposal result in substantial: T,—Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements i° either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates iraina e Or the rate and amount of !r-,-faceg patterns, runoff? c. Weed for off-site surface 'rainage improve- inents, including vegetati a removal, channel„ ization or culvert inst iLation? d. Alterations to the tour , or fl.o�v 0',., waters? e. Change in the amount surface water in any water body? f. Discharge into surf''a,e waters, or in any alteration of surface a4. water quality, including y but not limited to temperature, dissolved ozygen or turbidity? Alteration g. of the direction or rate of flow of ground " waters? h. Change in the quantity of ground waters ---- -- -=--, either through direct additions or with- drawals; or through i R1 7. 8. 9P 4, YES PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial: ange in the diversity of species, Or number of any species Of plants (including trees, b shrubs? grass, crops, and aquatic Plants)? - Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species Of plantsO c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- .ment of existing species? Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial., a. C ange in the diversity Of species or numbers 0 any species Of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell fish, bent * J. Ic organisms or insects)? b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? C. Introduction of nAlur a an arear or result , pedes Or animals into A a barrier to the migration or movement of animp.1.5? d. Deterioration to existing fish Or wildlife habitat? Will the proposal result in substantial: a. increases in existing noise levels? b, Exposure Of people -#-A r severe noise levels? No �i'�ANDnt .1 GLARE, Will the Proposal produce g'RT ca. ri—ght and glare? LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a 'i—uFS—tantial alteration Of the Present Or Planned land use of an area? NATURAL RESOURCES: Will the Proposal result in s uYs—tR _ataj -. �_'_ � � 4, Increase in the rate Of use of any Y natural bo Depletion Of any non-renewable natural resources? 10' RISK OF UPSET, Will the proOsal involve;n explosjoor tie release of ha2ard- OUS substances (including, but not limited to, 4 Oil, pesticides) chemicals or radiation) in the b. event of an accident or upset conditions? Possible I rge interference with an eme tespot-.e plan Or emergency evacuationcy n Plan? �10P �tATUION Will the proposal alter t strl J� n, density, or he location) Population? growth rate of the human 12: HOUSING, Will the proposal affect existing housing, Or create a demand for additional .housing? r' 1 YES MAYBE NO 1.3 TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking?: c. Substantial impact on existing transportation `— sirs terns ? X d. Significant altLrations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail, or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental. services: a. Fire protection?'r` b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities?c� e. 'Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? 15. ENERGY: Will the proposal result in a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel.or energy?` b. Substantial, increase in demand upon existing sources of energy; or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. UTILITIES. Will the propsal result in a need for new systems, or substantialalterations to the following: a. Power or natural gas? b, Communications systems?° c. Water availability: X d, Sewer or septic tank? ip e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? 17. Hu AN HEAALTH, Will the proposal result in: T. reason of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding 'mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? -' 18, AESTHETICS, Will the proposal, result in the o �6 tract n of any scenic vista or view open to the public )v will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? � 4- YES lg. RECREATION. Will the MAYBE NO NO u p p on t e proposal result in an impact p quality or quantity of existing re:reation�l opportunities? 20 CULTURAL RESOURCES. a Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? pro b Will the proposal result in adverse physwcal or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric ar historic buildi c. Does structure or object? Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d. Will thep pro osal restrict existing religious --- or :sacred uses within the area? potential impact V. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL LVALUATIO N y` AP 25-22�-34136 $be attachment 0' PIP 1b c+g d n . VLIJI 1 7 aN A�'' , tom_ .a - y 36 p • Development crf an additional homesi to w5. Brame disruption, di.splace1ent, com due to development of will w rein t i n an additional ahomesa. ed andpr•"el��ri n such as driveways, garages, otc. g cif the +ail increase in storm water r�Ltnoff , This development could improvements is not coli=�i dered to be si . uO to the size 04 rad l o an gni f i rant. the Parcel, this 19` This project consist_ of Of at�l r ra:<i motel y 1/4 two parcels;ane Of 19. �i . With a °' an acre. The 1/4 acre � acres and cine aini on of the 19 acre p=�rcel, will be combined the remaining 3.4 acres will beparcel to crefitte t� �. t"r acres and One a"F 7, �q aches. divideci intra two ' 1 �`�u,:rc+ parcel and Pasture land from a This will effectiveltrcels ane of 6.76 Probably gra ct.l] tLlr"al use, y rorrrove 19 acres of y not be ab1.e to 5Lt The result ant pard+l�; wr�Ltld Without supplement l feed beiino. brOU,ht in„ Any gra �intJ activities an their own ih The subject Propertyis Withdrawal and there s located in an area of heavy i-•+ a potential. for land s�.tlasicler-rcegroundwater All of >wtLttte County is located within a Nloderat Zone VIII. The sub iect located a � e Earthgr„ta[ne Intensity e"t, soLttheast t f i he property s located a br avi l l e Earth ttof oothi l l 5 pprcx:q a motel y �, Miles g - with quakes of ear~ �t ter which supported the 1975 Soils 1n this area are ,,, �t cheer i nten%i ty b -�/«�� e�, �h:r�emel y e„panni vee Any hams constructed in this area should be built erinaClde standards that will adegLtelyprovide for t}iesails, thQ stabsidenre pot farm lrt, ldi ng 'activit/, eritial, arid the potential highly e,,,passive fear seismic :tY ci than half of the subject i rynLtnd�it a on from the drai n -trle 5wal e and Wyman favi Ino, property is wb)oct to parte ons t f ti mp±jion tad are known to flood on occasion- Additxonally;y, i nodi nrJ i s a 'Bout atncl with the Wyman Kava rrewwl-i inocc firac,dzng► The Let n. ihi re vire t ee County partmont, of Public, Wor eeNry c:anf luence p that tFyr; are��% of i nLtndati on br^4 conditions sites be lcycated , kaove the high shown -And that new building problem On tho roads be d w��t�r.+r �r�trki and that solution% to the attached tra the provided. Tf these ctynditions documents tray beprecect, �tlren a re-»evaluultion Of the are not essku yo environmental Appendix r p g s AP 25 2-34, 36 =� Additional 3h° Adwithdrawels of well in this groundwater throat area may lead to an increased gh tiit� use of subsidence. See item 4 an the data sheet potential for landpr-ivt�, h et and discs-ts��ion item ih. 4d: While 19 acres of pasture l resource, Conversion of this and is not g si. hifi(rpt grazing . it unusable for- any economic parcel into smaller di vi si ons in the neighborhood grazing ch would lead par,,,,ig o will render uses. and may tri e1r.)er similar grazing land. to fug^'9 her lass of B: The proposal for the subject to the General Plan deli property does not assignation is Orchard designation for the area. appe:�ar to conform de The Certeral rlarti A�-20 ( Agri cultural � jd Field Crops parrs stent 7 160 acre minimums). .�. are minimums) through A-1 tiring is listed creation of Conditionally consistent ' is crnsistent parcel; dawn to 5 manes would allow r you would have '� acres. For a pro•jec,t to development C=riteria set to subsitahtiall be deemed are: forth in the Cenerala Onm to the conditional Those criteria 1 * Predominant er, sting par rel: si aes range 2, from u to 11) acres. Adjacent ar in the general vicinity Of urban boundaries. Present status of SignifiCSta Agricultural prodtAation will not be y impair`d. are appro.titrtai.el ti� 1n the immediate vxcxnxty, most parcel which i s y "" j +;Acres in size or larger. ..y parcels part of this praject g ix, the small less than 3 acros within a 1/2 mile ' there are three and 10 acres. This s Out of a total a parcels of located �wi ih:W �, �� two parcels of between n 1 /�: Mile of the subject pprO'r i,natr;lyr predominant parcel; siz .. property. As suchtiparcel,s The 'Subject wea are appror,imatel,y 2t) acres and larger. property is not located in the vicinit boundaries, and is in fact a 8 0 1C:i approximately � y of urban miles from Orovi l l e. y to �, miles . �I-om Cs-idley and While division of this J9 agricultural land in the area srw llWill not si Parcel as an agricultural unit gn�ficantly reduce s and the ��pai.r the viability of this May be to create tddi banal stn�5 an ffept on reighborin the viability of agricultural gaud x��athetentirch in + � parcel, i mmed x att l y to the eAst across ti mp �;oh f 'rand i s G:tnde 1 i mpai. r urn will Conservation Act conracts far �,. r The property contract sire. gr�azirg land with a r„California L»and arca» 1�J acre minimum 1�a: The creation of one adds banal b ,tildi.rlg site tai l,l represent an inCremEnt�`�l inC�re�,�se in traffic onti Sntpsan head �.�And the area ct�nne ting to major collectarm other roads in l�hdix - 1'ge 7 AP 250-34, 36 The DepartmentaF - foot of right-of-way me, Public Works will At thoCa 15ured recluire the Prosorlt time there i from the centerline of Sti(OP1.3on Road. Z parr -C4'1 I that e",to r I s a deal, attached to the home artl In order tonds to within 27 feet of the center C11", PrOP0130-d Provide adeqt.tate right-of-way linq of; St i $TIP son 'MP"'aye(Tients arid increased f U i- U r! C1 to I'0MOVe that portion traffic in the area, it will road right-o+-t-4ay, I+ t of the deck that is located b(77 rlOcOs%ary he deck it, allowed n J -,he pub, MajM1- safety hazard« to remain, it cast]. c1 J)C�r 'ja �oMe .1 Additionally, portions of 'J-timPson rioad are k0own Period% of intense? rain.f,.kll,, to flood dUl-int Addotlal g dovc,lopment in the area Would be subj,at traffic area ted by additional 4ciated with flooding of the road. to any Problems Or hazards 14; Though not significant this 'r1ce"Orliental increase in demand forprolic Will represent an at Pub service-, in a rural are -A. b. While this Project a hon-comforming, substan have a benefit in dar,d Parcel 1_1 the that it WOLIld oll Mi tiate, With a larger Parcel +0 create a e A-5 zone of d be the Ion by Merging it i- lot' t WOulallowing Moro 5 to 7 acre Parcolacro long-range effort to reduce the viability of n this agricultural area agricultural .and. The l0ng-rango the area for Use as of this nature WaLtld - effect of continued development rAl ea4 be to eliminate agricultural uses from this d. Tho eXPOSUI-O of People and property to +100ding 01'1-s'ite and On r1eighborin hazards, both traffic hazards related 9 roads, and the exposure of p I e t Q required 60 foot elated to the encroachment of the d,,,,,Oorjl right -o+ -Way into the 'Md1catOZ that this project tits well as Sight distance cOn on hutmanz. Could have twbstanf,i,�%l cerns) dvorzo effects I ht ApPehdix V - P690 8 Applicant: 0oy 0. Reeder DEA-PHF-91 A%sessor`s Parcel # Log # e5 -01-2Z-01 A. 14 Type of project: Tentative Parcel Map 2-. grief Description% Dividing 19.27 acres into three parcel vi One of .01 acres, one of 6.76 acres, and. one o+ 7.34 acres. 5 :3y LocatIon; On the West side of Stimpson Road, approximately I mile South of its intersection with COX. Lane, south of Paler" mo and east of Gridley. 4, proposed Density of Development; Approximately 6 acres per dwelling unit 5. Amount of Impervious Surfacing'- Minimal 6. Access and Nearest Public (=toad4z): Properties front 00 Stimpson, Road which is publicly maintained. '7» Method of Sewage Disposal-. individual septic systems 9. Sot-trto of Water Supply' . Individual Wells ity Of. power Lines-. 'To existing dwellings on property 9* Proxim,otential for further land divisions and development.- None io. P under existing toning Terraina. rielati.yely flat pasture General. Topographic Character: land b. SloPest rlevation: gill. feet ASL Limiting 5actorzt None 8011 s Ch ar at+ am Typos and eri5tics.� Wyman 1.0, silty phase to the West, Rocklin fine ,lay loam to the east, generally Well drained. b. Limiting r -actors,, None Z. Natural Hazards o+ the Land a. 5art-hquake Zone- Moderate 5iarthqUak'0 tht*nsitY Zone V111 b, �ro%i ' on Potential; Moderate c. Landtlide Pot entiak1w. None do rtre Hazard: Moderate e. Expansive Soil. Potential: H'hh Appetidix F (6) , _ AP 25-22-3 4. Hydrol agy "° S►r F ace Water does W Crosses he Wyman ravine to�, ,�.�� West the as b. Ground Water: Abund6,11a -�1leY a ui ers� groundwater remc,val Y,... 9 Area, o high C Drainage CharaCteri sf t C% subsidence Potential, drainage styal e Property drain: C,o . d Annual Rainfall �(norm�el j 4n�fn Ravine the ansa �� e. Limiting Factors, 20 to ?w , Potential Highly r,::pansi.vefrt is Per year S* Visual /Sceni, c UWal i t and %Qbsi Ciente pa• t"ure area Y� f�lra�w��w �ti:e dry p:�st.tr-e and 6« ACULtSt i s quality: High irrigated 7• Air Duality; High except elr;tf�, n : reate dust or r ,cagri CUItUral �ma4 f= operations that �x bl bgi c�1�w,.1 qnv rbr�m�n�;� t3. Veget at t on Wildlife Ary pasture and.r..t^., Habitat;Small laird, ga,.ed pasture Pasture areas W"' anirrri].s camrrtran to valley ��.:tl,�,ur�].,��rt V Y rrtt�i7ment M ler. Archaeola xcal g • and Historical e=:,':�t.tr �c . in the 11. �ares „ Low archaeolagical sensitivity County General Plan desict��° 13. Crops 0t.,7ard and Hold 13. S',•,isting Zoni Land Use on -S parr' , . 11" Surrounding Aroar mite= TWO s rpc � ! e x a ✓ dtvel l i rtgs a. Land Uses: Shgle family Y r+s,� �,e.7 a "ural i�snsities5 Mg: A-5 — Jand Irrigated b c. Sen. Flan dela 20 d} � xrcel Size& gnQ$t.IYs Circf lr :f ,rid l�sel Crraps dew scattered r�fomesi Lis sea �' cit s y sc+tu�T', in the area gr tart. � , fr�+ h much larger, e anger Parcel. �•� p+apt»t];ati.dh Sparse QI"taractei"' of Sa-t 1.6 Nearest Urban Area.- rea and Area: �astttr Sr ovalle Sr dle 1a+-rP appro.timatel mi ap srY'o, a,rr,a,,.rA,ly ' ; fn les utest� ,� �. Rel �'vant Spheres- Y l� rni 1 es nt�r �w:fti 1 lrnprovOmonsStandar Is Urbane 19. Fire `r-atecta on Service; uc a f\tfrarest Cr•,t,t'ntyStState> �`a♦►�e ty�phx p►„id ��f�prta,tamal:ely milts wts ley atatiah 7 appro"t i matey 6 miles � i» � H(:"��,tt :�fi-4-kt i cath '7S miles" e Alerflo S 4tiert 72 a x.. b• Wa�cr Availabi.lit �} f�prr,.xmately q tti School $ i h Firs �r y: T��nl�er c��p�"1 : i t) and wells Uflit)h High 54hool District Di strict and Oraville AppL,nci i ,c p� �