Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
025-240-014
14 e 1 t , 1 pop fl t 4 i' i 1 ' 1 r wu- ' tik-' MwY'a M{ • ll•. Y � Npe, : i 1 i 9,.N:,i«.wn ne-,i!u:awi�...r..: a, 4 v A 1 P 1 � k� a - .� rry �, �Y ° r' �, �, � u F�.I COM?'0'L7 ��?y�c='--�:'t' �0�?'SxO�i�3 0- Ervin Clark LaSl1 910 -01-Q1 .90- :,,•,. r' 378 Lone Tree Road, Orov lle, CA 95955- .. Same 1 arcels; : 'll 1 °^' l. DISC=, PTTO�i TENTATIVE; PARCEL MAP to divide 'M.`V acres to create 1 �t 1 at 17,.83 acs., 1 at 17.71 acs., and 1 at 18.99 acs he west side of Lone Tree Road approximately 0.9 miles north of Palermo oy. Oroville area. _....,._: 025-240-014 ,. -+ AftMEi 2.5 C:.`.s ?.+ P3J?.:? AG R>;5I PFtau'rrCT 1:0I�i�asS'T::.%tiT��fl% ....—» +r w .� .. _--..._..... _r r. CCt r'O�a IINC^ zpcj!C 8/9/90 DATE Oz, PPI-liT ;T R=CN?TG:-sr y,xD COMSE''l;N IM ACT COOL -+.,ACT ? .., October 1, 1990 z -_L E.14MI ZMR: Roper,, Associates i r r_ p. -O, Box x';35 Chico, CA 95927 S , . LAOMNI G D7.?=_CTOP, SOFA PPw C.;kTZGOsciCFAT Dr TE F IMED .. �y ..^ _ . D,, :', =.. .S�vA?'sOtT � :Ciz'�'Z �%r Dc,C'iu? r)P, r AIDOP I`:.�D. wvtt bLrhlTGATZ.D IMG. DECD' , Tf]N DA - �D"v SCR txG%�tC:: 3CT=CT1' _. 1Ji3.�iwX{Li r7 'r^O .� kC::1LiY.l�1? 3.� "rV'irrC"'CV,' ri ♦�&i��Oiw~i. :*.l it .r .r- .�.i o"r�__"_� x NATIVE SUBDIVISION PARCEL 14AP PRELDMITh:ff SCJBDIVISIOR WAIVER APPLICATION (Please check appropriate box) APPLICANT: PHONE NO:5:64P7.30-7 ADDRESS': _,37<!!5 OWNER; P11ONE NO: ADDRESS: ENGINEER OR SURVEYOR: p�Ei? . iS crr� . �C PHONE N0: ADDRESS:id % uy'Su «icta C'9 �75Z7 MAIL NOTICE` OF HEARnTG TO: LOCATION OF PROPERTY-, 'TOWNSHIP . 16&j y RANGE 9C SECT2ON ) ASSESSOR t E PARCEL NUMBER: ZS- /y TOTAL ACREAGE PLEASE SUVfIT PRELIMINARY TUIE REPORT OR RECENT POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (dated within last six months) WI ,H APPLICATION. INDICAT9 BELOW THE DATE A'ND RECOR11ING 11WORMATION $Y WldC t THIS PARTIQUTAR PARCEL WAS CREA t R D t DATE IlldG a, 4-11(o2- BOOK 1?_L - PAGE, 41/Ga NUMBER AND SIZE OF PARCELS BEING CREATED (including any ;remainder): 343.3 / 1, 0, A5 kcsc 1 &, 17,?/ Ac_s- I ra. IjCL aa JLr_r syts DISTANCE TO NATURAL MTi•R COURSE OR STORI4 DRAM � 00.1 s ►rte PROPOSED IMOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL. %i J�irgy� 3owAle, (Check Wath Health Department) PROPOSED $IOURCE OF HATER: (Check with Health Department DO POWER AND, PHONE L=S EXIST TO THE BOWL ARY OF THE ORIGINAL P'ARCEM IF NOT, EiTII� Ot W DISTANCE THEY Witt HAVE TO BE EXTENDED i R ,� LD im tE.v'as'ea 7-944 8. tNVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS :AND 14ITIGATION MEASURES Identify potentially significant environmental .impacts associated with the land division. What project design features or special conditions of approval (mitigation measures) are proposed to alleviate potential envirormental impacts? 9i* ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING* a) Describe the 'project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants And animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. bescribe any existing structures onthesite, and the use of the structures, G+arzt.v, Lb «,i� vJ/12c)s]�wc b) Describe the; surrounding properties, including information on plants and animalsand any cultural,, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc,),, intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, depart- ment, stares, _etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage., setback, rear yard, etc.) : e7eAV-)N't" L,4imo CERTIFICATION: t hereby zertify that the statements ,furnished above and in the attached exhibits pre,�ent the data and information required. ;for this initial evaluation to the'Dest of my ability, and that the facts, statements and information press»'ued are true and correct to the best of thy knmtledge and belief. Date Signature For -'arse separate sheet for longer responses 4/85 o66t on a � �v�rE cor.riv'�� � �utfa�:o.P1�iRn�itg C'L�NERAZ. PL�;IV cC�'tVF'CJ%'.M:4N`CE RE'3?oi?T Pon vARcim mA.P or; s`ji3Dzvssrot4 r,.v Oroville, Galifomia( Items 1-4 to be completed by applicant; 1» .APPLICANT NAME AND ADDRESS: F -P -V °fo tLop6e 45SOC.1ATM_S P. o fox Agr' Ct//Go __ S'yL7 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTIORt PAKf /440, 1, ASSESSORIS PARCEL NUMBER(S): & - 14,— 14 4, PROPOSED USS: a �1IJFiC/L �'.r ae .following items are to be completed the Planning Department: M8P„E u ZONING: ARIW! I LA ONSER1vATIO4 AGREEMENT: (rPiEPAL PLAT DESIGNATION: f'o d kional Criteria; Ae;R'MTURAL-RESIDENTIAL YES NO It is reca'mmended that yott perform the 1, Agricultural Compatibility following checked items: 2. Voter and Sewer Capacity �_ ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORDS CHECY. BOTANICAL SURVEY 3� Adequate Fire Facilities � GEOLOGICAL ('.h.....1✓�C�'� 1+, P.oad Capacity and Maintenance `,: SURVEYt..-Jj� Sp0/ 5. Access to Commercial and .SchoolsgN -..X--_ - YES N0 GP, :A.D AND FIELD CROPS WITHIN DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME DEVELOPbTNT ZONE: �c f / �. ' /� 1. Predominant 5-10 ac Parcel Size- 2,Vicinity of Urban Boundarieg WITHIN FLOOD PLAIN: 1- Ag. Viability not Impaired .� Si: f Determination: Substantially conforms tot WITHIN AREA, SPECIFIC OR LAND USE PLAN: OMPAL' ?LAN,: 1, Land Use if Yes, . 2: Conservation Name of Plan 3. Open Space . WITHIN URBAN RESERVE: 4. Safety K _, S. Noise If Yes, 6. Housing; Name of Reserve 7. Circulation, AIRPORT LAND USE PLAN; ZONING: y ` 49 5f4 f��� �j 0 I X Planning Department NAME • ERVI'R CLARK Environmental Health Department ., CDF (Forestry Department) AP:, 25-24-14 Attn: J. Craig Carter (on areas north of red line on map) Butte County Sheriff PG&E (check title report for easement) Paczf is Bell Butte County Mosquito Abatement OR 0roville Mosquito Abatement (areas within large map in cabinet) Sho 1 District 4wall map) MA UAAG UYr; Water Company p y (i£ individual wells are. not indicated on application or map) Durham Irrigation 09 Durham Mutual ldater Co, California Water Service Company (Chico area) Oroville—Wyandotte Irrigation District (Oroville area, SE of, river) Thermalito Irrigation District (Thermalito area NE of river) Limesaddle Community Services District (Paradise area along Pentz Rd. to lake) Del Oro Water (Paradise Pines area) Buzztail Waterworks (Doe till Ridge/Forest Ranch area) Paradise IrrigationDistrict City of . . . (chr :k wall maps ,for spheres of influence) Oroville; Chico Paradise Biggs Gridley Dt*'OVILLE AREA ONLY: Lake Oroville Area Public Utility District (see large map in cabinet) Feather River Recreation District (see large map in cabinet) E1 Medlo Fire District (check wall map, a small portion of Oroville only) BIOSS, RICHVALE, GRIDLEY AREAS (SOUTH BUTTE COUTY)c check wall map and title report to see what applies. Some areas overlap. Drainage District #1 Drainage District #2 Drainage District #100 Drainage District #200' Reclamation -District 9$33 Reclamation District #.2056 Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District Butte Greek Drainage District IN'CERTAIN CASES: Superintendent of Schools (only for subdivisions) p ( Dept. of Fish and. Game near water and in rural and moun"tain areas) C,1 Trans (near Skate Hwy, 32, 10, 95j 149 (Chico cut-off), 162 (Olive Hwy: & Richvale Hwy,), 1.91 (Clark Road) Stato Water Quality Control Board (projects with more than 100 lots or units) United States Forest Service ('if project borders USA land --check AP books) parks and Recreation Department (property near Lake Oroville) State Water resources Department (property near hake Oraville ,- watershed) Rork Creek keclaimation. Dist; (west of Chico Airport, south of Rock Creek and east of Hwy. 99 (see wall. map) Chico Area Recreation & Park Dist (only for subdivitiohs) X-- SPECIAL Ui S. Dept. of the Azmyy Sacramento Dist. Corps bf Engineers CASES. check title report for any mention of special services or easements such as to Thermalito Irrigation District (numbered items) , w # wwr 1' -M -AfF a, , : • ^ _ f • i • ' , , , , .r 1. , • • ' 'l i '. , 1\ .. a t'y I3'. r I. ' » Y " Y 48 M .' .• �: „, /a. ...r.i. .. _. LOt i �' 1 ' 52' :78T•Sisi _/ , r,..'YNe.Ui rr,.\.,.F:. ^„,l.f_...�......,. , .,. ♦.Y..,. ... . «'. ' LOT , ♦. •, . .,,,., 1 =♦, 14 I �t3oa ti� e t1 +„' .�a. , ,•.♦. r r .�., � .r....;.«, �' �• w •b w, .. i. ,. LOT z•l. A.�l B IiQ � � T� •\ •I 'l#.., S Aa•, .., , r LOT 3 3AC ` L• l • ,* • + - I • 1. M1 L s JLOT 900 a{. , , 1. _' ” h ' ♦ � N , •1 �' TI # • 4J 1 Ac8:/ora �•r o C . , a , 55 1 , 1 ♦ •%4�' 9 ° 3• } F ; d 134A`_ f ^ r ^Fr' • ♦ ♦ Y F » r _.. » � • _ r MV ♦ r ♦ r• L ♦• ••1 � ;' ♦ •. • • Y� 1�n ' � r f �',r , r. A. ♦ ! a, r ` e • • , 4 R i � f .5.. • • r A a . } `_ M • xiY a • • • ♦ C. p`L ,i t / r ? y} M l r � 196.032C � ` T -t � • 1 nw 'r. , •' •3, 1 t '' •,ty.L �' r #i r J �# �i� a. P� � « • #Y, V ., ' , ,."r. •aYf'# }» �'l,g dk'* Y� L r„x, » wF . y y ti ^ O i+' ""° ..r.+ l.• �; .. ��`•♦S 1 i•fr• ,r ,�.... ,H 1 •�i . r ♦ 1 s � L� , .r L "+.a }Ei� • • , �» r 1 . » r fY. .ter 1231 :• PM8l.8y f 1»6ZAC1 f x r u •• } ' 1. 47,AC 01 Ad ', 7 F• .♦ `•,.: #. • A. ' j� 0. , a » l , i . • Y , . r #. Q8 C 3 i +4�""w »3Yybr l.:iN:.TAA� 7 r ryr•' .' i azs sa ' } . � r1 ° M •. L C•' °" + • r , ♦# ,1 .a �, YI�iF •• W I1 . 1 �, Y, •, �� �a 1 ^» y #_:a1 1 • • Slilffl, PARCEL MAP • .. /� �•� � Sd. 613 1+�. , 1 � 4 95 # u • 1 , • r h'} +i• R i. » .♦•,F.. N ,..ROAM a♦: �, ix•';, ., ,YF ,• ;• 1. ar • 1. A, 1 ' YI 1,^ j, V, LPALERN0 w , Y ✓ # " 1 , ,G •• ♦ # a .x .k w S " ` "' ' '• " �� Y.•.:Y ,,.,� ». ):. is al•F � . '+r» i } 1''♦" V ti � # , ♦ •, f • • :r Y , i " 1 •4 i �{ '1". { • x , " l " it }. ^ ♦ .M1,:._- 1 •' .' . ,: �'' . }�, eV .>. �i ^ ,yF« �♦ ' "r : •y .'», .: it i' i Y •i♦. .i r 1 . fV L k',r « ... �,: =�V, F ;i. IY • .f. t"1 j"'y '. ':. .i ' , •.Y',: ij._Y� il, 'i.. » 41RY }, »l Y -f. t Y w » r A ry." �Y.L �wY_ / �,,.#♦ + � /iiL ,+ YY �' a ,•iii. ♦! �'' .. � -... •. F. +t �,.. RN. Y. . , ) ,i.#. }Y:1: "ir ♦':N,♦+v r .. tl. ,1'Y'1 lF'.Y♦ Fri 1.. Y t� if ♦.' VY .-.,.. ..y a ..l i a. r :.l • , F•. ,♦ ♦ w. .. i . �»'1Yy i. i. r♦:,.; ,tF .w V• N' xr 'Pl'♦�j: 7i Vt iK 1,.»...i ==yr i' '1' ij : �! %4 , ^wa r L#. 'P b ♦ Y..s,. -'/.. 4 ",. r.. '•. 4n. , �i» ,-» 1. ;, tYa r, Vy' ".i.. r •',y, ,-,r a i \t «Y:i Y il, ., Lr i" ,t ,.1> " 11 uF Ze r#ir_ :l.i ii ...e i. ,i. >w,� YY^/ °r•�: ,.. 4 F i, 3 i•' '1-i4 +'1ri a�i;:P h�,,• f:i, • �')" •. 'i,� i • .. r n ..fir f1=:'•" ' r.r1 ,:, r.p... rip ,,. ar... .. w> � i •� a., �' .: ..... ♦i --F. ,l. ��4.+dlyaL r. e t .�•=i �, .,. ., ,.•".# i' tie4, idi }i .L. "ir{�+t aF „i, FL w ykS • 1.4 :",y' . t., \{+'�' �r'Yr.•/,}�.'°�9>r•7 (ROAD 62 i =s• ',.. > #.iy�"►ai� . Y +Y 1. `♦ • r »L wL _ ni s 6 a ss ASSWOR 5 P ' ` �a.F�c etoc� i � ' iY ,:#L .i* P^ - .1:4L . ',.... •'. 4 ♦1 • 1. f J •'yN it � Z v ..F �.. i '- LFJ• } + `' 'iii i'• d LOt Y Y _ Y ,- Nu . ♦ , Co k JCRs Sh'OWN :• ^ ,. it r-. +.r . , L tib o'� Dutt� - . . •. �..•.1 � • . • ^�». if, alt Y ,Crrltf +,' :./•}♦i ,� .y:♦ ♦r , � i ♦•i i» > �.. ♦:k'. j"i a Ya• tt .s�.'1 }. Y,.l I�' ^rll. • �• ./ •i r.1 NY;• . ♦ ♦•h '., ,•� i mit 'M1 ° 4Y t":l�"l+;l}Jl) s+:i.F r#a ♦.. ,.: s. =i'YFYi L ' '+rl• r.,•..> ilir i.r{: t. #•,��� �: 'l.:yy.. Yi �: r,r".: t!', r. -;' }K.- . � •'s.`r,. iY>�'. y.y.y FYY :. .Lw,�+sL L+!... y, •.+.v„•k li u,,,ti w.s:ww✓S�r:,�•y. ”. r'r,•i��►kw '}v1:•'3 i.,ywrr fe •1.,q;L .•}1 it•. ^'.V f. (;.'.•t •. 4,1 i'�L. ti' �► if L rN:' ... ,. C" r. .�••+. r.r%i}1i i. 8... ... ,,. r✓ L♦ '! •. +•: i:.ie `i • i'♦ i:x V � .. �,� i,; 1 /�'+G� rr!':��'}L14,ry" • L j �i?GA... r1 �? .�';1 ,. a ,+� .:Y'v - C .»...eayr►. A a'. '. a,16.S'^%!Vi•. •t.�.t Olt •T 18 /V R3E MDB� M 25' 2 V*$ 53 48 @.'s °dB.OJAC.- - Y` Lar 1.. -. LOT J �; 'tar .2' ( ` Lor t. tt.d/AC % ♦`- 1 Lori -. .. LG x /� BOC z � r 1 i ^ I 65 40,1Ac "Q " `✓ � �t YJ a.e Aa. y^ — ._ ...� _ .. _ _ , _ ... _ — — Isaac � 34,�� ZE �atai l e—,- p 1709 Awa � ,.�4'.ttAc r1�ac ptsi (,0 4c e. �� ' 1�1pq ,x 6Y i PCL `-P` 'tssesYac t C + L'26 i$ ZS A 5. �.% +?�Sr-d9 6Lc7 62:At 5J7 34.04..0 % rz84,z ..,>.0 J La, c T�a.01,4 2„-.TACt•{ .22.6 :.c 1ue33 .4 x o �4 µx7 3 Z 94 1 A,- �. ... �, � 4fi .II i (T8 Dot ” da tic I P6AS? A 4.1Jc - J. A> 4a ti t"'SSC J my Or'f V 6laAc' : ►a.fsac 47 I. ti .` 2 0 90 Q aP!+99.92 lost lr ro0A Lar, gt td9dC. w i w. :T N.69.7G Jfftt Q p� ?9.44AC. i ;- 6 " ell 'I `�i d. bJ Jc I - � ^ v } k `�C✓liePAC_ f r CAI..aB U XNU ` 49 RUAD'6?. /1c FrCLSN XUAD ( $2 .Assessor's heap �, M. NOSE--1Ss8 Oe$ PARCEL 11tOCK t COUt1 0)< �Uilfe Co�tT� rY RYA NS .SUB. 7 31 a Lbr NUAV.*S SWWN IN dxC�s " i y r p 084,' 635 056 RC C-jpT poo c RTIFIED MAIL. 54r+tl Ln�"[ 9, P "lairrrt1(p 1'0 G t Fed S17ttG �t L1���ry'Fee - - i t wwn ,arid Date'Xtc wzrr d m Retum VaC tpt lova xixr 'tb Whom WOVOY -TOM ptl.stagy ottdv,ees a�g5ttna�al � natr,� t l d ea . a . � x •... , r � •.� '.:.. . �.. 1 . '. D r SI Butte, touldw r .. r`- LAND Of NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY -_ PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY' u-NTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95865.3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 r)ecember 18,, 1990 Ervin Clark 378 Lane Tree Road Oroville, CA 95955 Re: Tentative Parcel Map, APN 025-240-014, Log bio, 90-19-01-01 ..ear Mr. Clark: In response to your proposed, traffic mitigation measure, the Planning Department finds it to be inadequate in addressing the environmental. issues raised by the Initial. Study dated October 15, 1990, The traffic mitigation measure proposed does not resolve the i .sue of traffic impacts, it only confirms a traffic impact exists and suggests the next devel.opor who proposes a parcel Map Or, subdivision map prepare,a. traffic impact analysis. Such A. Mitigation measure does not meet the requireinent5 of the':Public Resources Code, Soction 21002, which forbids agencies from approviing projects as proposed when feasible mitigation measures aro available that would substantially lessen,.>such projects significant environmental effects In addition, the proposed mitigation measure does 'not conform to the 1983 EIR ptepared for the Oroville Area I -And: Use Plan. Which guides the Development of your property. The 19$3 EIR requires a transportation 'study to identify future transportation corridors, transportation, improvements, ar,d a system to financenecessary regional transportation improvements before development occurs, which is allowed by the Plan, tec:ause the initial study for your project. reveals a ibstantial evidence of significant erivironmeiital effects as documented in the 1983 EIR adopted by the Board of Supervisors for the Oroville Area Land Use Plan, and no adequate mitigation measures Have been, proposed to date, an EIR must be prepared analysing traffic impacts and suggesting feasible. means,if Anyi of mitigating them: If. you witch to appeal the ,requirement for an EIR, You may ado so by submitting to the Planning 'Department, within 15 days from the date of this letter, a written notice of protest s pacifying the reasons why tin EIR should not be required and the required appeal .fee of $581.5o. If no written protest is timely tiled, an M will be required, If you choose not to appeal, the preparation of the EIR may be initiated by filing the following with the Planning iDepartment: i. One Authorization and Agreement Farm for the Preparation of Environmental .impact Reports dated and signed by all owners of record or their agents (copy enclosed): 2. Your selection, in writing on Attachment B, of five (5) consultants from the County - approved consultant list to whom Bequest for Proposals (RFPs) shall be sent (a copy of the County -approved consultant list as well as Attachment B on which said selections are to be indicated are enclosed with this letter). 31, A Request for Proposal and Contract Administration Fee of $1100;00. 4. An EIR administration fee of $225.00. Upon receipt of the above, the Planning ;Department will prepare and mail an RFP to the five consultants shown on Attachment B. The Planning Department will review all responses to the;. RFP, choose a consultant, and notify you of the firm selected. Upon receipt of a letter` from you indicating concurrence with the environmental consultant selected, and funds sufficient to cover the consultant's fee, the Planning Department shall execute a contract with the selected consultant. A full copy of the. County's EIt Consultant and Contracting Procedures is enclosed for your process We and the strongly enco sts urage you to read .it in, its entirety to familiarize yourself with the response g within t5 days, the' project will be set for hear nIf we- os before the B and of Supervisors denial: If you do onVenienceoso fhatwish tthe file ncanue 1beh losed,the project, please notify this office at your earliest If you have any questions regarding this atter, please contact this office any weekday between 10:00 a.m. and 3;00 p.m. Sincerely, B. A Kircher Director of rPlat„ ing Brent L Moore Associate Planner BAK:ALM:rdm enclosures ., :Ic; Roper Associates , F � ie ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 1 CONSULTANT SELECTION AND CONTRACTING PROCEDURES i 1,. The County may retain consultants in the preparation and evaluation of. Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs). If a consultant is retained, all costs incurred for administration and preparation of the EIR shall be borne by the applicant for the project. rry� The Planning .Department 'shall establish a list of qualified environmental impact /o report consultants. The established list will also indicate the firm's particular field of expertise. Enm vironental Impact Report 'consultants wishing to be placed on the list shall. submit a resume indicating the firm's principal personnel, work experience, statement of qualifications, areas of expertise, and any other information deemed necessary by the Planning Department. Selection to the list will be based on experience, knowlEdge of the County, and available expertise to ensure high-quality, in-depth and comprehensive environmental impact reports. Consultants with a possible conflict of interest with a project, directly or indirectly, shall not be considered as consultant for the project: C 3. .Following the determination that an Elk will. be required for a project, a lets shall be sent to the applicant stating that a consultant must be retained to prepare the EIR. The letter will also inform the applicant of the issues that wild nedd to be addressed, in the EIR., appeal procedures, and a generalized. descriptionIof the consultant selection process: A list of County -approved consultants,, an A�itho11 tion and Agreement Form for the Preparation of EIRs and any othor pertinent information will also be attached: 4; The applicant may initiate the preparation of the tfR, by riling thr.,: blloi,-4ng with the Planning Department. a, One Authorization and Agreement Form for thea Preparat on of Environmental Impact ,Reports dated and signed by all o% rjers of record or their agent(s), b: Applicant's selection, in writing, of five (5) consultants from the County approved cnnsultant list to whom Requests for Proposals shall be !sent# c, A Request for Proposal and Contract .A,dmim'steittion Feo of $1100. This fee covers Planning Department costs, ii;cludne .Tarafarati�in of the Notice of Preparation, up through submittal of pat. Elk by the consultant and acceptance of the document by tate Plob` r;rg r�ep�irtmenu f� t�1�dd r W{�i�n fit d. An EIR administration fee of $225. This fee is estimated and covers the costs incurred by the County for processing the ETR. Upon completion of the review process, and prior to the certification of the final EIR, the applicant must pay the County any costs in excess of the estimate. The County shall refund to the applicant any surplus deposit. The :County shall not certify the final EIR and act on the project until the applicant has paid the County any costs in excess of the estimate. At such time as the costs are greater than the estimate, the applicant shall pay the additional amount exceeding $200,00 within 10 days of notice by the Environmental Review Coordinator by registered mail. In the event that payment is not received for the additional amount in excess of $200.00, the Environmental Review Coordinator will immediately cease_ processing the EIR and notify the collection agency. All required fees may be submitted on. one check. Upon receipt of the above, the Planning 'Department shall prepare the Request for Proposal and mail it to the selected consultants and the project applicant. 5. Bid proposals will be submitted to the Planning Department by the date specified in the Request :for Proposal, The submitted proposals shall at a minimum agree with the scope of services and proposal specifications as outlined in the Request for Proposal, and shall'be valid for a definite period of time. Incomplete proposals may be rejected. The Planning Department shall review and ,evaluate the scope, content and - completeness of the bid proposals in order to determine the ' bid 'which. 'best demonstrates the ability and qualified staff to provide the services required. The Planning Department may hold interviews with any or all of the selected consultants to help in arriving at a decision. The scope, content, completeness and quality of services provided will be of equal importance with cost: b. The Planning Department's decision shall be contained in a letter to the applicant indicating the date of ekpiration of the proposal. Upon receipt of a letter from the applicant: indicating concurrence with the environmental consultant selected, and funds sufficient to cover the consultant's foe, the Planning Department shall execute the contract. 7, If less than two of the selected consultants submit a bid, or if, following a discussion with the applicant, itis the judgement of the Planning Department that exceptional or extraordinary circumstances exist that would preclude the use of the selected consultant; the Planning Department shall, at the request of the applicant, mail out tip to three additional Request for Proposals. Prior to the Planning Department sending the additional Requests for Proposals, the applicant shall pay an additional fee of $150 to cover administrative costs associated with the distribution of the Request :for Proposals and:review and evaluatoi7 of the responsive bid proposals. 8. If the project is substantially revised during _the term of the EM contract; the - applicant shall pay a $185 project revision fee to cover the costs incurred in redistribution of requests -for -comments, revision of the proposed specifications, and additional contact with responsible agencies. y AUTHORIZATION AND A REEIVIENT FORM FOR ITIE PREPARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTS Project Title: Project Type and Application Number - 1. 1 hereby authorize and request the Butte County Planni.. Department to prepare and send. Requests far Proposals for the preparation of an Environmental Impact' Report for the above project application. to the Consultants indicated on the attached sheet title Attachment B. 2. I understand that the Environmental, Impact Report Administration Fee Is an estimated fee and that prior to certification of the final Environmental Impact Por the: estimate, he abfive project further understand PP ect application I will pay the County any costs in excess of at failure to pay, or to make provision for payment in a manner satisfactory to the County, within .30 days of demand for payment, may be deemed by the County to be an abandonment of the application and the project; 3. I understand and agree that failure to respond within 30 days of mailing, to any request by Butte County to clarify; amplify, correct or otherwise supplement environmental information required by Butte County for this project may be deemed to be an abandonment of the application and the project. I also agree to pay the actural cost of any technical studies or reports required by the Butte County Planning Department and prepared by other experts or professionals, provided I have agreed to the preparation of sauch studies or reports. Signature of Owner of Record or Agent bate 'I Signatur,ci: of Owner of Record or Agent Date Signature of Owner of Record. or Agent Datt; Signature of Owner of Record or Agent Date _ j arc A ITACHM[ENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT CONSULTANT SELECTION 1. Name' Address: Photie: ( ) Name Address: Phone: i 3. Name.• Address: Phone: 4. Mame. Address: Phone: ) 5. Name: Address: Phone: N'o'r xG�E; C?:E,' TSF I✓ tM r7A'T r,UN T_0 Office of Planning and Research FROM Butte County 1400,Tenth Street, Room 121 Planning Department Sacramento, CA 95814 7 County Center Drive or Oroville, CA 95965 ' County Clerk County of Butte y7CJ�13-TE:cx = Filing of Notice of Do-termination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code Project Title AP It Name Tentative Parcel Man 025-240-014 Ervin Clark State Clearinghouse Number Contact Person Telephone Number (if submitted to Clearinghouse,) t., Project Location On the west side. of Lone Tree Road approximately 0.9 miles north of Palermo Road in the south Oroville area: Project Description Tentative Parcel Map to divide 92.8, acres to create 4 parcels; 1 at 38.31 acres, 1 at 17.83 acres, 1 at 17.71 acres and 1 at 18:99 acres. This is to advise that the, Butte County. (Lead Agency or. Responsible Agency) has approved the above:-described pr,,Ject on and has made (Date) the following determinations regarding the above described project: 1. The project will, will not;, have a significant effect on the env ronr�ent. 2. An Environmental impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: A Legative Declaration Lias prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA 3 riitgation measureswere, were riot; made a condition of the approval of the project: 4 A statement of overriding considerations was, was not; adapted for this project, , This is to certify that the final: EIA with comments and response's and record of project apptoval is available to the general public at: ,r Butte County Planning Department 7 County Center Drive orovil:le, CA 9596$ Date, Received for riling and Posting at OPS Signature Title ' ��biaed P9arch i�aG NEGATIVE DECLARATION.REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IriPACT" NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the project described below has been the California Environmental reviewed pursuant to the provisions of Quality Act of 1970 (Public Resources Code 21100, et_. seq.) and a determination has been made that it will not have a significant effect upon the ;environment. Log #90-10-01-01 AP No 025-2.40-014 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Tentative Parcel Map to divide 92.84 acres to create 4 parcels; 1 at 38.31 acres, 1 at 17.83 acres�O1 at 17.71 acres and 1 at 18.99 acres. OF PJECT: LOCATION on the west side of Lone Tree.Road approximately 0.9 miles north of Palermo Road 4. in the south oroville-area. NAME AND,ADDR£S5 OF PROJECT APPLICANT; Ervin Clark _ 378 Lone Tree Road S. Ornv'11e, Cpp 95965 A1I'- I�GATION MEASURES: 6. A copy of the initial study regarding the environmental effect on fife at 7 County Center Drive, Oroville. of this project .is This study was: Adopt:d as presented: (. Adopted with changes. Specific modifications and supporting reasons are attached. 7. A public hearingon this Negative Declaration was held by the decision making body. Hearing Body Date of Determination _ -.--- Determination; On the basis of the initial study of environmental impact, the information presented at hearings, comments received on the Proposal and our own knowledge and independent "research: " z We�find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant and a NEGATIVE OECLARATION is ef�ect on the environments hereby adopted. Ile find that the projectCOULD have a significant effect on the environment but will not inthis,cast because of [] thea- sr described in item 5 abo4•e attached mitigation which are by this reference made conditions of' .pro ject approval. A condition,! NEGATIVE BEttAAATION is hereby adopted. Signature Title r C �lni" DeCembex' , 1,990 µ i ` t Butte County Play `king Department 7 County Center briwe t7�rov�,],ie, California 995965' BUTTE CO, PLANNING DEPARTMENT Attn: :Brent Moore OROVILLZ CAUFORNIA Dear Mr. 'Moore:, Tt�i,s i� in regards to our project, being a Parcel Map of Butte �'=a;anty Assessor's 'Parcel No. 25-24-14. In. your initial study you had three suggested litigation mes'sures 1. Prepare a'traffic site impact analysis to address cumulative impacts of traffic on the areawilde transportion network. 2. Develop drainage plans to the approval of the Butte County Public Works Department.: minae in the Wyman Ravine Drainage Basin. ! .1, Request the formation of a County Service Area for d. 'Jt seems to us that for this size of a 'project these mitigation ;measures seem to bel out of line. We have been thinking and would like to suggest these mitigation measures: 1. Any further dividing of these parcels will require a traffic site analysis to address cumulative impacts of traffic on the area *a de tkansporbion network if, the study has not already been completed 2 At the time of formation of the County service Area. for �dralnage in the Wyman ravine Drainage Baan n, these parcels shall be includes.. The other mitigation measure that you .sugges"ted does not goom to apply to this project, if anl,zrheii%e, Service area is formed the drainage development will be rlet� g5nor, fwz' the whole s.re�a. 'Right now the drainage is existing and t;hee °'� � no. prr�tii em wit,11 the natural VehoPo you will act on this as soon ti s passible► if you. have ani que_ - ons, P104-40 feelt free to ciAl". hank You,, Very truly yours, Ervin Clark, {I. t 77 z Nj Butte cou'a LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT' 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE- OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965.3397 October 291 1990 TELEPHONE, (916) 538-7601 �¢ `Rod 'Weyand Secretary to the Board of Directors Feather River Recreation & Park District Municipal Auditorium 1200 Myers Street Croville, CA 95965 Rea Ervin Clark Tentative Parcel. Map, APN 025-240-014 Dear Rod' Thank you for your comments concerning the Ervin. Clark Tentative Parcel Map project. The Planning Department is acutely aware of the scarce resources local government agi�ncies dace in delivering services. The Planning Department is currently in the process g11 of seeking the adoption of the "Energy, Natural Resources and Recreation Element" of the Butte County General Plari. The Recreation Element calls for the County to adopt and implement an ordinance pursuant to the Quirnby Act Legislation. However; the riimby Act also requires that the County adopt a Recreation Element wh-4ch meets the requirements of the state guidelines and contains policies requiring a park fee prior to. adipting a Quimby Ordinance. w As you are aware, the Cot.yty has established, -park. facility fees for the Chico Urban area; However, these fees have been enacted under the gen-aral police powers authority granted ' to the County by its Charter, and the State Constitution Article XI, Section 7i Tit addition,, these park fees are collected at the building permit stage rather than at the map stage as allowed by the Quimby Act. Please find enclosed as you requested, Article TV of the'Butte County Code pertaining to 'park facility fees in the Chico Urban Area, If you hve any questions regarding tine above rnatter, please advise, Sincerely B.A. Kircher Diritc for of Planning C Brett L: Moore Associate Planner BATC:BLItii;rdin cc' Public WorksDeparti. "ht r -�'k 016-26 PARKS AND RECREATION § 1627 Ai ricup, IV. FA R.K FACILITY FEES IN THE CHICO URBAN AREA Sec: 1646)..Purpose: ,t This :article is enacted pursuant to article I, section 1 of the Butte County Charter and article XI, section 7 of the California Constitution for the purpose of authorizing a park facility fae to be assessed and levied upon any owner ofreal property located in the unincorporated area of the County of Butte 'within the Chico �., Urban Arewadding one (1) or more dwelling waits to such proper Ly. Said fee is to be in an amount determined necessary to fund Y the acquisition and development of park facilities requ:irod to serve the cuniulative recreational needs of those personsres,ding in such dwelling units. (Ord. No. 2750, § 1 5-23.89) Sec. 16-27. Findings. The board of supervisors makes the following findings and determin.litions required by section 66001-of the California Gov- ernment Code iti regard to the park facility fees assessed and levied pursuant to the provisions of this article: (a) lnzportance of Parks, .Increased Need Resulting !from Neuf Residential Development; The presence of park :facilities svlthin the Chico Urban Area contributes significantly to the ",mu6- and ambience of said area, together With the physical health and emotional well-being of its residents. New Tesidential develop y ment octnuxing within said area will create a need for the at,qui� sition, and development of additional park facilities within said area in ):hat "the existing park facilities, including Bidwell Park; are insullicient in number, sizer location, and the kinds of retrea tional oppbrtunities which they present to meet the park and recreatiobal heeds of both the existing residents of said area plus those additional residents who will eventimily inhabit such anew residential development. Based on the general plans of the 1'ality of Chico and the County of Butte as well as the park and reoro- ation plant prepared for the Chico Area Recrealion and Park District, now 'residential development occurring within said area 4� will create the need for at least three and one-hal f t;t,5) acres of `V neighborhood and corrimunity park facilities, dev860od pritnar• x y onal pursuits, for every one thousar;d (1,600) �l for active recre��.ti 188A atbpp, No. .5,80 ,� 116-27 BUTTE COUNTY CODE 116-27 new residents who eventually inhabit such new residential de. velopment, By reason of the foregoing, the board of supervisors determines that there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the park facilities to be .funded with the park facility fees provided for by this article and the residential development union which such fees are imposed. (b) Use of Revenues,From fees To Meet Parc Needs: All reve nues from the park facility fees assessed and lovied on new rosi- dential development pursuant to the provisions of this article will be used for the acquisition and development of additional park facilities within the Chico Urban Area which will meet the need for such facilities caused by such new residential develop- ment. In accordance with the provisions of this article, all such revenues must be deposited in a park fund and thereafter appro• priated by the board of directors of the Chit,o Area Recreation and Park District for the acquisition and development of park' facilities of benefit Ix the persons 'residing in the residential development upon which the fees are unposed. By reason of the foregoing, the board of supervisors ,determines that there is a reasonable relationship between the -use of the ;park facility fees provided for by this article and the residential development upon which such fees are imposed„ (c) Fees Do Not Exceed Level Necessary To Areet Need: The paxk facility fees assessed and levied on new;residontial development pursuant to the provisions of this article Will not exceed that which is necessary to: fund the park facilities attributable to the residential development upon which such fein are imposed. In particular, the parkfacility fees assessed and 'levied on new residential development will be equal to that necessary to fund the three and one-half (34 acres of neighborhood and community park facilities'' heretofore found to be necessary for every one thousand (1,0.00) now'residentis who eventually inhabit such hew development, By reason of the foregoing, the board of supervisors determines that there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the park facility fees provided for by this article and the cost of the park facilities attributable to the new residential development upon which thu fees are impi)sed. (Ord, Mo.. 2570, § " 188.2, Supp: No, 6,80 • .:hyo, i .. Imo.._ _ _ -.. _ • 4 16.28 PARRS AND RE CREATION ,+ Sec. 16-28r NfinitiOns. Unless the contrary is Stated or clearly appears from the con= text, the f ,flowing definitions shall govern the construction of the Words and phrases 'used it this articlo, (a) Bidwell Park; The term "Bidwell. Park" shall mean the predominantly natural park conveyed to the City of Chico by Annie R X Bidwell pursuant to that certain deed dated July 10, 1005, (together with any additions made thereto: (b) {;hico Urban Area:The term "Chico Urban Area" shall mean ►'•he area described on exhibit A which is attached hereto and. incorporated herein'by this reference. Said area is substan* tially the same as but not identical with that area depicted within the 1'ttrban Growth Boundary'' an the map of the Chico Area Recreation and Park District Comprehensive Park and Recre- ation Plant' (c) Community•Park Facilities. The term "cominunity park fa- cilities" shall mean any facilities, other than Bidwell Park, .park are intended to serve the recreational needs of all of `the which residents and other inhabitants of the Chico. Urban Area: The term "comrdunity park facility'+ shall include creekside greenways, trail systems, and other lineal park facilities, (d) Congregate Housing and Gare: the term +`congregate hous- ous-ing;and ing andcare" shall mean housing which provides living quarters are fifty-five (55) years of age or older, and, in for' pertions who addition Thereto as a part of the lease, rental or purchase agree, rinerit, or other terms or conditions of occupancy, also provides, or offers to provide; common recreational; facilities or ser nce& (e) Dwelling Unit: The term 1,dwelling unit" shall mean any buliding or mobilehome; or portion thereof, used or designed for use as a residence by an individual or any group of 1xidiViduals living together as a fam ly (0 Neighborhood Park Facilities: The term "neighborb.'6 park ` " any facilities Which are intended to mean facilities shall. park serve the recreational needs of only a portion of the residents and other inhabitants of the Chico Vrbau area. (g) Park •Facilities: The term "park facilities" or "park fa,ili- ty++ shall mean parkland and all irnproVements to such land and *� Supp, Nb, &'.85 1.5$.3 _ - 3 1fr29 i)L= COUN'T'Y CODE' 3 16.30 the adjoining rights -()f -way which are determined necessary for the dlavelopment and use of the 'land for park and recreational purposes. (Ord. No. 2 i'50, § 1, 5-23-89) Sec. 16-29, jrnposit on of park facility fees. A park facility fee shall be assessed and levied upon any owner of real property located in the unincorporated area of the Chico Urban Area adding one (1) or more new dwelling units to such propeti`ty inc 4cnt to the construction of a ne;y building on the property, the installation of a mobilehome on the property or, connection thereof to utilities, the alteration or construction of an addition to an existing building or mobilehome on the properly, or the change in it e, of a nonresidential building or mobilehoxq e on tho property to a residential use. Fees assessed and levir:d herewider as to the installation of a mobilehome or the claner-' tion of'a mobilehome to utilities shall only be assessed and levied at the initial location of said m,'!,,Uehome in the Chico Urban Area and if such legation is on a space,, site or other property oil which no -other mobilehome was previously located. (Ord. No. 2750, �I 1, 5-23.39) Sec. 18-30 Amount of park facility fees The olmount of the basic park: facility fee assesW- and levied purstwat to the provisions of the ankle shall be equal to, the total numbei, of dwelling units being added to the property multiplied by the park facility fee ,per dwelling unit established by resole tion of the board of supervisors based on the following: (1) 'Phe estimated cost per person of developing a 3,5 'acre pack facility for every one thousand (1,000) new residents in the Ckuco Urban Area, .as determined; whenever possible, from the most recent park faelities acquired and developed in; the Chico Urban Area either by the County bf,Butte, the City of Chico; or the Chico Area Recreation and Park i)igrict, multiplied by (2) The average number of residents per dwelling unit within the Chico Urban Area, as determined by themost recent fedEtsd census or s,censt5s takers by the City of Chico pi rgtiant to the provisions 'of title 4, division 3, part 2 C] s 1ti-31 PARKS AND ItECREATION' $ lti•33 chapter 17, of the California Government Code (commenc- ing with section 40200). (Ord, No, 2.750, § 1, 5.23-89) See. 16-31. Credit for park facility fees paid to City of Chico. Where park facility fees have previously been paid to the C ,y of Chico as to the real property upon which the dwelling units are to be added, the owner of said real property shall be entitled to a credit in the amount thereof against the fees owing this article. (Ord, No. 2750, § 1, 5- ' 23.$9) pursuant to See, 16.32. Exemptions from park facility fees. Notwithstanding any provisions of this article to the contrary, a park'facility fee shall not be assessed and levied upon an owner of real property located in, the Chico Urban Area adding one (1) or more dwelling units to such property under the folk wing Circumstances, (a) Where the dwelling unit is within a building owned .by a governmental -agency: (b) Where the dwelling unit is within a building which is being reconstructed following damage or destruction by fire or other casualty, or the voluntary demolition thereof, provided that the ntunber of dwelling units in such recon- structed building is no greater than the number of dwell- ing g units in the building prior to such damage, destruction or demolition. R (c) Where the dwelling unit is within, a part of, or affiliated with a facility used primarily for the congregate 'housing and care of persons who are fifty-five (55)) years of age or older. (Ord. No, 2750, § 1,'5.23-89) Seca 16.33. Annual adjustment, to park facility fees. If" July 1' 1000, or on duly 1 of any near thereafter, the Chico Area Recreation and Parls`1Jistrict submits documentation auib stantiating that there has been art increase in the cost of acquiring andlor developing park facilities within the Chico Urban Area, q g an increase in the park facility fees assessed gnd and re uestin levied pursuant to the provisions »E this article, the board of 18$,5 Suppi Nd.,5-80 16,34 BLT7 COUNV CODE 116-34 supervisors may increase. such fee, in an 'amount,'proportional to the increase in such costs. The determination of whether there has been am increase in the cost of acquiring and/or developing, such parr facil.ities.and the amount of the increase in the park. facility fee }vfOich is proportional to the increase in such costs shall be made by the board of supervisors based on the following: (a) Information re increase in the cost of acquiring the develop. ing parkfacilities (other than the cost of acquiring parkland: The net percentage increase in the Engineering News Record cost index for San Francisco (based on 1913 U,S. aver- age = 100) as last published in the Engineering News Record McGraw Hill Construction Weekly between the date of ,such increase find the, effective date of this section (June 22y 19891 or any prior increase in the park facility fees made pursuant to the provisions of this section. (b) Information re increase in the cost of acquiring parkland- The best available dE.ta pertaining to increases in the price of land in the Chico Urban Area between the date of such increase and the effective date of this section or any prior increase in the park facility fees trade pursuant to the provisions of this section. (Ord. No. 2150, § 1, 5-23-89) Sec. 16-34. Payment of ltaric facility fees. (a) Time of payment: The park facility fees assessed and levied pursuant to the provisions of this article shall be due and payable prior to., (1) The issuance of a building permit for the construction of any new building in which such dwelling unit is to be locatedor for the alteration or construction of an addition to any existing building or mobilehbme in which such dwelling unit is to be located, or for the change in use of a nonresidential building or mobilehome to a residential iase', (2) The issuance of an installation or utility connection permit for a mobilelome in which such dwelling unit :+s to be located, or (3) The occupation of such dwelling unit. 188.8 supp. Nb. 5s 4 1s -a5 PARX8 AND RECREATION 4 16.6 (b) Payment to Chico Area Recreation and Park Distriry Garti jv-ation of Payment: Such fees shall be paid to the Chico Area xtecreatiou and Park District, which shall certify to the County of Butte, Department of Public Wt"ks Building Division that the fees have been paid: (Ord, No. 2750, § 1, 5.23-89) Sec. 16-35. Deposit of park facility fee revenues in.',park facility fund. All revenues from the park facilities fees assessed and levied pursuant to the provisions of this article shall, when received by the Chico Area Recreation and Park District, be deposited in a separate park fund, and thereafter appropriated and used only for the acquisition. and/or development of either community park facilities or neighborhood park facilities in the manner hereinaf er provided by this article, (Ord: No- 2750, § 1, 5.23-89) ,fin; ropn,ation oIx pack facility fee revenues fo ° the acq=; :ion and development of paris.facilii es I revenues from the park facility fer..sEi assessed and levied P drsuant'to the provisions of this article and received by Chico Area Recreation and Park District and deposited in a separate park fund shall be appropriated by the Chico Area Recreation and park District Boar(i of Directors in, a manner consistent with the comprehensive Park and Recreation.plan of &4 Chico Area. Recreation and Park District and only for the acquisition and/or development of: , aid (1) Neighborhood park facilities which are esididetetg withinst e board to be of benefit to all persons residing zone of benefit established for the neighborhood park for which fees werepaid; in making s-' -,h determination, said board may consider the special recreational needs, if any) of those persons residing within said;zone of benefit; or (2) Community park facilities which are determined by the bnzrd to be of benefit to all persons residing within the unincorporated territory of the Chico Urban Area, (Ord: No. 2750, 1, 5=23-89) Suppe eta. b>sg 188.7 i 616-37 BUTTE COUNTY CODE 4 26-38 , See. 16-37. Use of park facility fees for the ac development of park. facilities a 4uisftion and/or of Chico and operated by caned by the �`ity y Chic and Park District. o Area Recreation All or any part of the revenues from the park facility feo- assessed and levied pursuant to the provisions of this article may be apf,ropriated in the manner hereinbefore ed by this article for the purpose of acquiring and/or develop ngcommun., ommun ty or neighborhood park facilities which are olvned by the City of Chico and are or will be operated by the Chico Area Recreation and Park District pursuant, to the terms and conditions ofa lease. or other operating agreement between said district and the City, of Chico if, at the time of making such a popriation the of Directors of Chico Area Recreation and Park V strict has de- termined that the use of, such revenues for such serve the best interests of the residents of the Purpose will area of the Chico Urban Area. (Ord. ens of unincorporated § 1, 5-23-89) Seca 16-38. Report " disposition of park facility fee rave Hues; action re unappropriated revenues. (a) Report by the Chico Area Recreation alto' Park' District Chico Area Commencing July 1; 1990, and on July 1 of each thereafter, the Recreation and Park District shall;provide the board of supervisors s with a report:. waichsets forth t p .lie total amount of all paras fatuity fee .revenues that were received and deposited .in the park fund in each fiscall year. the disbnrsem,:�nts from said spa for to the date of such sport, mains una , and the amount w,hieh re ppropriated as of the date of the report. (b) Action by the Board of Supervisors.:' Comm fourth fiscal year tbllowing, the first year of recei!ncing with of any rethe noes from park facility fees assessed and levied provisions bf, this article, and in each fiscal year theputreafte11 r, the board of supervisors, following receipt of the Chico area Recre• ation and park District`s report, shall take one of the following actions with respect to any unappropriated park facility fee revs hues in the park fund which wererecefved and de o+ , p , itedr in such �) four der tlz more years prior to ;the date of such report: ` e appropriation of ali_or any part of such unappro priated park facility fee revenues for the acquisitioh and/or S A i 616-37 BUTTE COUNTY CODE 4 26-38 , See. 16-37. Use of park facility fees for the ac development of park. facilities a 4uisftion and/or of Chico and operated by caned by the �`ity y Chic and Park District. o Area Recreation All or any part of the revenues from the park facility feo- assessed and levied pursuant to the provisions of this article may be apf,ropriated in the manner hereinbefore ed by this article for the purpose of acquiring and/or develop ngcommun., ommun ty or neighborhood park facilities which are olvned by the City of Chico and are or will be operated by the Chico Area Recreation and Park District pursuant, to the terms and conditions ofa lease. or other operating agreement between said district and the City, of Chico if, at the time of making such a popriation the of Directors of Chico Area Recreation and Park V strict has de- termined that the use of, such revenues for such serve the best interests of the residents of the Purpose will area of the Chico Urban Area. (Ord. ens of unincorporated § 1, 5-23-89) Seca 16-38. Report " disposition of park facility fee rave Hues; action re unappropriated revenues. (a) Report by the Chico Area Recreation alto' Park' District Chico Area Commencing July 1; 1990, and on July 1 of each thereafter, the Recreation and Park District shall;provide the board of supervisors s with a report:. waichsets forth t p .lie total amount of all paras fatuity fee .revenues that were received and deposited .in the park fund in each fiscall year. the disbnrsem,:�nts from said spa for to the date of such sport, mains una , and the amount w,hieh re ppropriated as of the date of the report. (b) Action by the Board of Supervisors.:' Comm fourth fiscal year tbllowing, the first year of recei!ncing with of any rethe noes from park facility fees assessed and levied provisions bf, this article, and in each fiscal year theputreafte11 r, the board of supervisors, following receipt of the Chico area Recre• ation and park District`s report, shall take one of the following actions with respect to any unappropriated park facility fee revs hues in the park fund which wererecefved and de o+ , p , itedr in such �) four der tlz more years prior to ;the date of such report: ` e appropriation of ali_or any part of such unappro priated park facility fee revenues for the acquisitioh and/or S 116-38 PARIES AND RECREATION + + 116-38 f development of community ty park facilities and/or neigh- � borhood park faclUities in the manner hereinbefore pro vided by this article; (2) Make a finding with respect to all or any part of such unappropriated park facility fee revenues which identifies the purpose to which the revenues are to be put and which demonstrates a reasonable relationship between the fees - from which the revenues are derived and the purpose for Which they were charged; or (3) Order the refund of all or any part of such unappropriated park facility ,fee T'eveniues, together with any interest ac= crued thereon, tb'the current owner of any property for which fees were paid; provided; however, that if the ad- ministrative costs of refunding'" such park facility fee neve- hues exceed the amount to be refunded, the board of su. pervisors, after comidering the matter at a public hearing, notice of which is given in the manner provided for by section 66001(e) of the California Government Code, may order the approprietion of such revenues for any ,other facility or improvement for which .fear are charged or otherwise imposed pursuant to this Code and which the board of supervisors determines .vill iwvtaf t the properties fog» which the pari, facility R -s v.iprvt paid., (Ord. No 2760, 1, 5.23-89) Supp, No. 5.80 r 188.9 .JT N Rltnr.iYfl!d.hitjWsr+aw P,�VAyedkv+'u`oa rokal(a.11aKIfitD�Vrr%"jQGs 7�rlQlw �, i n�.>u gweeat q{+7� 7oi6de Ppb pfa�ll.iAlCI+eW-its ll0a NG "R90A PAPER REOUIRER. Typo of *41's 00 orlolnallmptasslon w111 autp;mttoop appear oh topidt 06M 0 ' ' l 1 ROPER ASSOCIATES P.O. DATE; PRIORITY /J --.a �© 1309' 3 885 - 0 URGENV l 134�a Longfellow Avenue CNIC�►r , CALIFORNIA 95927 ��E r,o, _. 0 .scloN AB Poss18LE wq r+ EKY NEEDED_ 1 iJk) 42y 059 - %/ `�fr w 1944 U f -S -7--S W� xAIVAZ-G a/` 4 L ,9 ..r 4-S SI -W -TO /.V boa ;%,'rte.'.- u 17a"Is 0+ FEATHER RIVER REGREAIION PARX -D*S IRICT rf QRQv1LLE, CALIFORNIA 95365 MUNICIPAL AUDITORIUM, 1200 MYERS STREET )BILI y PHONE: (916) 533.2011 October 22, 1990 , County of Butte Department of Public Works: County Center Drive Orovi)le, CA 95965 RD 'Ervin Clark. - Tentative Parcel itilap Dear Mr. Mendor,sa: 'T he )Fe3,El«;� '�+o +� �'A-orea' fir! a.nd Par]. Dii-A et � nuld l►ke iri 'PVr�*,o$S �1Ur col *q,ra -,1:,i eti�' t ti to 'sY� ?9 1l i�i!i'i Y '6he Gre~- ,fir OMVille area an the affect. s `Vi 1 j♦♦ wi yi f�••� Di a. iyt� �-y�y T+-. d e(•'1 fhzJ �Ylla. lattl b•rk V'�i. Jw°1�j Ll M4.tr :�Y k,x have Oin-1,1 that tjtil incrras6 Irl population is affect hi ! .(wr .hc d,"Wide a sufficient, 'level of ser;+ioes to our congt1tt).ene��aAs oYt� particular su�ritYVYs�un 1s 5 ha11, being only foto lots, but Wbea Wu efolli'de'r x!111 ths! sfrriall projects which we 'nave received in the past few iriunths= rt Q+ ,els tqt, to twit1 r n►r�si Jt V of Ie%l Tesidences We believe that this steady increase is good Por the area -aild that we can alle nate the impact on the District through developer "eros .and foto the larger subdivisions, the creation of Lighting and Landscape Districts. % .�alieve that the Planning Departioent, should recomnieiid to the Planning Commission and the Planning Commission should fecommend to the Board of Supervisors that developer fees be established for the FEtather Olver Recreation and park District and the other special districts which are affected by this i,pereased,population g+'3wth, For the present and the Ervin e to the Feather River Recreation andPark District ral that an equitable settlement should. be mad Clark ,t for the increase in population which this will bring. Thank you, fitSncerelyr , 12od eyand rv��'1Ct A Secretary to the Board of Direcfors M BUTTE C PLANNING 0R90V L ~ WFQRNIA j. ' f C1 717:711777777 77 ij, II Y j Y •""�`•v Y G:Y -- c x• h ffu ite, Coun 1[ �" �`ir► -" LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH ANO BEAUTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER ORIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95955.3397 TELEPHONE: (91.6) 536-7601 October 17, 1990 Ervin Clark 378 Lone Tree Road Oroville, CA 95965 Ren T- entative Parcel Map E�p No. 025-2411-014 Log, #90-10-01-01 Dg, ar Mr. Clark: r Ai. initial study of your propOsed PrOjed, a, Tentative Parcel Map, indicates potentially adverse ,impacts to the environment (refer to the enclosed environmental checklist). To. reduce or eliminate these impacts, suitable mitigation measures are required as part of the priect. Otherwise, An Environineribil Impact Report (EIR) is required pursuant; to t:he California Environmental Quality Act: Aja early early response to this notif cation, sent to the Planning Department, will expedite the scheduling of your proje wt. Please forward your written response within 15 days from the date of this letter. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office between 10:00 a,m. and 100 p.m. Sincerely, 13 A. Kircher Director of Planning rent LY Moore Associate Planner BLMi.bb - Enc cc: Roper Associates Couz�Tyr oa? >�uxT>< ENVIRONMENTAL CHECK.LI EVALUATION OF EINVIRONMEN T F01t29; " t 'A1L IMPB,1�7?" 1: [ Il et No. 025-240-014 Log No. 90=10"01-01 APS No, 02.5-240-614 BACKGROU14D I . ErYin Clark 2, 376 tone Tree ROW. Otovi l to., CA 95965 J. Protect description. Tdnlatitt Parcel Map to divide 92,84 acres to <:reate- lout parcels. s At 11,311 acres,, 1 at 17.83 acres. t at 17.71 acres; and 1 at 18.99 acres. vrs volute x+o,. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION X-r-il MANDATORY FJCMrN(;g OF S GNIFICANCH; i. Does the protect have the potential to degrade f(he x This proposal will hot significantly degrade the envil,onment, -- Mlof the environment, substantiallY reduce he habitat of a fish of wlldlIfe species. cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below set f-sustaIhlrg levels, threaten to eliinihate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or rettrict the range - of a rare or endangered plant or animal or elimlhate important exampres of ma,or periods of California history or prehlstofyf 21 Does the protect have the potential to achieve x Thts prOoslll will not impede long-term environmental sgoflt, short-term benerlls to thd detilment or long-term enVttonment goxist CA short-term Impact on the ehvfrorment,is one which "occurs in a relatively brief period' of tone wh(le� long-term Impacts wilt endure into the future.) 3.: Does the protect have Impici,s which are IndlvldualIV x � _ This praDo54l may have a stgniticanl i,.umulative Inipact on thin 1Imlted but cumUNtively tdntldt�tablet fA protect envfror�mcnt; mayImpact on two or mors! 9epa� 41 .e resources whets the Impact on each tesolIirce Is relatively small, but where the effr�ci pf Ihe,,tolml of thole impacts on the envitonm rit 113 $10nificatit. Whgcau+lth'etbstOW1l,y Adverse dverd effectse on Wman " ,adverse etiecti ,9n human . ,. Thlt Proposer 'WIll hot hive t flghlftcan; bei T, 15EItaE, AMrr1ATIO'.: on'-r,e as s a t Is irllti,al r:ValGlat on; IiWir find the proposed orolect COULD NOT have it 41 nlficant effect oh the 6110tonmeht and A NtOATIVE DECLARATION w1II be prepared, case find becausethethe proposed project Cu1LO have A sl9nifleant elfedt on the environmerit, there will hotbeA ti ghitl ant efiect In this 1 to s described on the attached sheet have beeh added to the ptolect. A NECK1011 Dfdl.AAATION Will be prepared. Nal NvJk0NMtHtAL 4AC� REPORT IS regUlt6d. IIWE "find tate proposed prolett MAY have a significant effect on the environ/ t, antl an vmtler Octoberi5, 1994 BY: . Brent L. , pore" Reviewed by:.. r z I p�� �cci;t ent��3 Ch�scis`list Ev'al.�uat LO a Env coymenta] impact MAYn —W-DISCUSS:CON :OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Iy ENV'IRONMENTALIMPACTS -A-r-5 i EART", will the proposal reiutt In sign)ficanl: X The proposal will not affect subsurface earth conditions'. a Unstable earth condi t1gns, or changes In , geologic substructUtest X Thfs Proposal will result in some dtstuption, displacement, development b, alsruptfon, displacess+eent; compaction or , di the. sant - corpactlon and ovetcoyerino of the site as a result or of addltionai homesIte, driveWays parking areas, etc. The ptolect will oistoptto site is characterized by a telativelY level terrain which requite minor earthwork to provide roadways and building pads. The the' proposed density of four horses per zo acre Will also reduce the and amount of runoff teaching the Uppet WVmah taoacts on rate Ravine drainage basin. The long term cumulative Impacts of Surface could be sign►t►cant, both financially and runort, however, environmentally: damage from flooding could Increase, water quality channel erosion may accelerate, An accurate may be reduced, and assessment Of the changes In runoff brought by the proposed land be made to determine further mltigatlun measures. deve► menl.Should A pbMble:mitigation measUre could be the consideration of creating for drainage within the Wyman Ravine bralnage a county servlte area Basin. Surface Change iet topogravhy or, ground sur �--- X The pro►ect site is characterized by relatively level terrain which will require OnI,Y Moor grading to accommodate the proposed c„ relief roaf,ures't- residential development. modlf lcation of any _ .._.._ —�-- The proiect site has no unlque physical features. d, pestructy'on, coVerinsror unlQue geologic or physical featutest "the Will not cause erosion. e, inctease In wind or iratet eroston of sol is, X� proposal el thet brr Or Ott SRO tel 5- The proposal wlit not affect any watefcourse, i, Changes in deposit►on of erosion of beach sands, or chahget in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify.the.chahnel of A river or stream or the bed of the ocean or ally ba y, Intel or iakO agriculturally productlYe �. Th1S ptbposaF does not represent a sfgnlflcant loss the ur ftr an aatidultUtAt Solis. The ptolect site 'is located with ib the urbbn g= toss of prime se5ils outside designatedUrbanareau Arta of h. Of of property to geologic y k utoYllie buildings to Uniform Building Code xt,andattls "will Al'1 of Butte County it in a Moderate earthquake intensltti zone YI11. Construction or of selAmic actlYity� people haia dfe eatlhoUakes, Iandsildes, provide adequato srtotection to occupants In rase hazarltleS ground and tallute of similar na7atdsr AvR, will the proposal totuft in subsi.AW a* The proposed ptolect Will result In 91 cumulative ythe on air by the ptolect. A. Air emassjohs or deter!"oration of ambient Y � quality due to related increases in ttarflc generated the CalifAlt Resoutces Cb itol Boatd has identified Butt the Alt qu.l1 At,ornia Couhtornia Alt Qu standirds of California Act, AThe Butttta n, eCourtAlt POI IUtIon e=.01 Plan dues not address air uaIItY, Impacts of small resident deytiopments tot 'i+ussibt'e mit,n5tloh r-'aiu+es. 1 The cteatlon of obltctiohabl"e odots, "smoke �---- .` SZ. Will probably result during the co stfuel on hasdt Quality tdevetooplhd tesiideritial hOUSing. Intteased as incriMed dust dutIng site , Of, firmest vehtt anti equipment emissions as Well gtading and preparation will Occur, �y r 1rir'0i0[0lnt 1I ,ElC]C7 ] f3t * 13Vit� uati oxn �► Er fi iranrit a�alt3. _— 3 LAI t ;Z � ailW'�RO�dME]!JT.i�IL T2SPAC`l'� (Continued) q _r'F�S A1Ayec .._� DZSCUSS77N_ OF ENV IRCINkENTAL EVALUA'. IO14 (continued) — e. Alteratlon of air movement, moisture or _ -X The proposal will 'not affect the atmosphete. temperature, or any, change In climate; locally orre9loda IIV? a. WATER. will the proposal result In substantial: a. changes In Currents, or the course or direction of hater movements in eltiior it The proposal will not affect any watercourse. ,marine or fresh watersl b, chang!s In absoplion rates, drainage ii The proposed project will change the absorption rates of the project patterns, or the rate and amount of surface $ite and 3ubcequent coefficient of runoff due to changes In land use runofff and land cover. Development of the project site wlII also impact we concentration time producing larger and 'more frequent peak flows. such impacts may lead to signirlcant overload of the existing drainage system, Stormwater management sttategies should be developed and incorporated Into the as mltigatlon measures ,.pfoject to decrease slormwater discharge offsite. A possible mitigation measure could be the consideration of creating a county service area for drainage within the Wyman Aav0e Drainage Basin. In addition, drainage standards of the Butte county aubflc works dherencesyot Department Is anticipated to mitigate possible impacts to the drainage m. C. nts,olncludingY te getatloh x " SeerDisCussioniol be to accommodate the proposed iimprovemeed race emoval project. project. nab above. above. channelizOlon or `culvert installation, d, ,Aftetatldris• to the course or flow of flood x The proposal may cumulatively Inpact flood control chahnels or waters? watercourses', The project site drains into the Upper Nyman Ravine Drainage basin which is known tot frequent flooding. sea Discussion on ab above. e. change In { ,the amount of surface Wattir In any X The proposal WI i I add to the cumula;live amount of water in the llpper water body? Wyman Ravine drainage systeniby incteasing.slotmwatet runoff and the Intensity of peak flows, I,D)scharge into i,urface valets, of, In any, - x The proposed project Will not Impart surface water quality. alter5tlori of ?'surface water duality, inciudint? but not., l lml ted tri temperature, dissolved bty g. AIteratiOrt ofgen the,�Ilrecrtiohior?rate of 1166 _ X- the proposaI W1II hot atfec �t the direct too or f IotVaf ground waters. of ground waters?it h. change Irl the gn.snitty of quality of ground X.. The proposal will not dlteetly affect any aquifer. 'waters, elthet through direct a dl (tons or withdtawals, or through interception o) an aquliet by cuts or excavationsl l keductbrl keiiuctlon 1 the amount of walet otherwise x- The ptbposed project W111 be servited by the oroville-Wyandotte for or public Water ibPplies? —"" irrigation District. It III anticipated adequate Water supplles are avall'able to Setylce the ptbposed pro)ect. f expbsure al people or propetly to water- x.. The proposal may intensity flooding downstteam in the Wyman Ravin *zJ.1 rrrd. si:ah it flV.WI1V, WithoutorcoarC. and stativards. ser d1scusstotl on b'ilsago ;-Nitrols above, .►. CArtr t.l t= Will t the proposal tesult In su s an a r• MMMMIi Ivitonmefitml Checkl i>;liit * Evaluat i bA a' f. 1 8nv' ' �ommeailal, Impact " a ' P c , EffVn�OMMTAL IMPACTS (continued) 'DISCUSSION vFS MAY -13M No OL' ENVxROj ENTAL EVALUATION (continued) a, change In the diversity of secies, or rgmber of any species of plants, Im uding x rhe divers,iiy of plant species Will be expanded as resldentlal non. Lees, 3hrUbs. grass, crops, and ar�ua;lic planks)p native landscapes are Installed, mUrnber of existing species is antdctpated No substantial rMuclion of the due to tile + sites regUlted by the eXisting zoning classification, paresl b_ Reduction r s numbers of any Unique, rate or endangered species of plants?' X 'rile project site contalns no rare cr endangered plants, c, An area, or in duction of nawbarriers to of the tnotmal mal ' � The proposal Wiil not affect eklsting plant life, replenishment of existing species d' - Reduction in acreage of any adcicurtirtal crops x The site does not contain any COMM rclally viable agricultural croft. 5, ANIMAL LIF 'r Will the proposal te5lrft In susanta r a. change to ther diversity of species Or numbers of any species of animals (birds. land animals includind x Tlie pre5posaf will not affect animal Iife because the site tloes not support significant animal reptiles, fish and she ifish, beorganisms or insects) life or habftat, b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, tate or endangered species or animalsi X The site contains no tare animal t, C. introduction or hew species of animals Into an area, or In,a battler to the migration x... The proposal will not affect Witting animal lite. or movement or animals d. oeterloratlon Or existing'fish bi*jjdfl'fr habitats x the Ole contains nLO sipnlficant wildlife habltat, Will the proposal result fh substantials a: increases in existing noise levels? �- dtealetl onaSi riot hotsUbstantlal lncreai;d In tthe result in a not b. Ekposureof people to severe; noise levels3X-. the proposal wl'jI not expose people to severe 2, sri]17 ANo AARC,, will the proposal produce signrTrcant Ti%ght and glAt Y .= noise levels, the proposal will not result in a substantial Increase 70 light or glata created on S[te e,AAJUs , will the proposal result Ina subslantlaj or ih the vicinity, a teras oh of the present Or planned land use of an area? X The proposal WIII not alter the land use In the area. The project site Is zoned AAMH-2,6 Which allows one dWelllhg Unit per' 2,5 acres Res�Idential . Tlie,Otdooserd by ed prtol c Cont rmsr to both the genetal�plan and zoning, _ 9, r�AnrtA5L R€saxtcEk, wlfi the proposal taiUlt, in su s an a a, l crease In the tate of us,e oT any natural restedid x The proposal wilt. hot at tact any natural resources.. b. tJ--pletlnn "of any non-fenewable naturalv... res6utedit 1w_ glow prlipiiia wilt Iiot u ,`eie ctrl+natural resaUrces, o,rsg K OF UPSET, Will the ptoposal involver a. A "risk of ekinclu tt or tbutno of haYard0u3 substances (including, but ltir MnCted t0. _. , _x_. 'rhe proposal wltl riot involve the use of hazardous materials, hot 13 located oil, pesticides. of, chemicals dr radiation) Ih' the event clt3e to, ahy fagilltitis .which store Or utilize tUrt materials. of ah accident or upset - 1 ' I 5 1« ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (contk`nueO vPs tIA�E ra DTSCTJSt3I09 OF 'ENViRONMEPYTAI, EVALUATIOD+1 t tiro t l nued 1' cpnd l (I oils b. Possible interference with An emergency x The proposal will not affect any emergency services. response plan or emergency evactia toh plant ff. POPUL AT J-15T7n, density crpgr�owihrra et of theahummaan X wil I not ensity~donetsynotfexceedethatuplannedtand barea Thebecause Oopt2. ee QopeIN Proposed In the dadroposal eing wziNa. wIll the proposal affect existing housing, ,_ _ x Me proposal will not signiflcantfy affect hoUsllig demand.. or create A demand for additional housingt is,TATIWICIRC ATICN. Will the Proposal AN, r! + a. t'crlefatlerilol.;:b: ' tilaf aoditt.eaGventcle ;�_ The.. proposals wlII represent an incremental nerease In traff is In (tie nwvctrnentA _ _ arei. The p 0061td project` wlII h^nerate =approximately 40 Vehicle trios pet OYt The project site is located on the southside of the OrovIlle urban area with very few services, which Will require the occupants of the proposed devdlopment to commute to orovlile,or chlco for employment and other serVices. Although the existing street and roadWay network may accommodate 40 more vehicle, treys Per day Indivld.lalky, cumul'attvely the existing street network Will riot, Improvements haveahotlkeptdupe withhthe gtowthftntltFdffl to date.on curtehtly, 16PfOXImAtelY 1066 new residential lots are being .created by aubdlvislon slap In the Orovflte Urban Area, The OrOVklte Area has the. potential lot tevetal thousand lots being created, The propbseld project will contribute to the cumulative traffic Impacts wlthln the otoViiIe Urban Area, The environmental Impact Repitt (11k) prepared In 1983 for the zoning and the OroviIle Area Land Use Plan Indicated that the present circulation system's capacity .Was hot balanced with the traffic volumes generated by the osdi ,land allowed by the cene'rai Plan designation anti Zoning classtrlcatf6n, The 1519thecounty And mat, 'f pnfoeclatlnnedwldet ireasUre hdthtthea turul esIt ecommeneda Transportation study identify future transportation cortid&t , ttansportation Improvements, and a system to finance 'necessary 1 regional ttansportation Improvements. The proposed ptolett, and resulting cumulative traffic Impacts will also 'impact the existing freeway Intetchahges aloha state Route 7o. the `i 963 EIR stated that by the year 3000 Without substantial ttetlspottatlon IMPtovemehtt the Level of setVlce on freeway Interchanges and total stteett Would decline to b or lower. The callfornta itransportatlon commission's policy tot Interchanges requires local jutl3dlctlons 10 finance the improvement costs of ihterchanges At,ioox, Cut"rently, the county of butte has 'no ptoptam to assess financial responsibility to local development far nt costs In td evaluate the cUmuiatfVe tratilc impacts or, t Camput,10er t on on the Otovllle urban area a Erahtportatio systemIntetchahod el Will need to be developed and a site ih*Oact, dhalysls perlotmed, b, i tlects on ekl Mho parktfig tacl i i'tles, or , ".4X The Or o%&I WI I i riot affect patkinq because the proposal 'Wi l i have demand lot ,new pptkingt t0 comp�y Wtth the parkIrij rebultemernts contal nod W1 thin butte County code section 24-3s, c, 5ubstahtlat impact' on dkI's IIng it. see Ua, lran�Portation sYsteinst li w ^a roiane>atr�l ! ;�a�cic 1st IN Y �Vaivati sly o>E: Eneironates� . tal impact 1 EKVr1t0jd E -AL IMPACTS icontinued) YES jI6M rxr Hearings on 'Butte county"s Fiscal cases, county U11 lt.101,3 LWit111GV that police protection services are presently Inadequate,, and do ;not mer,( the setvice expectations of the public, conllnbed rural development has resulted Irl cumulative,Impacts on pollee protectlon services which continues to reduce the sheriff's Department capacity to, provide adequate pollee services. development impacts on the sheriffs department Is countywide and cannot be mitigated by one indlVldUal project. The cumutatlVe lmpacts of development on police protection has been documented by .the County AdminisitatlVe 6111ce, In the report "county of Butte, Annual Ficai kevlew,.. c: school sr (continued) The ptoposat *111 resUlt in a inetem6rital increase In 'demand for school Impact feet ASmes x see, 38, by the local dittrlcts isanti c to schoolis offlelrculationtor movement of people. and/of rmitigationreda to nCedeeveir. hntervischolol a srgniflcant level, iutttiemeasures Yor requ temehts ate allowed In Accordanceon good52 66995, e. Alletalibns to waterborne, call or air X, Incremental Increlase lin traltfcaat these Crode ssln9s wilad l lhtensity the T" peepeattwilteCetult Ina ncremental increase, In demalid for pae'k he htea, And1~. trafficr conflicts between train movements and traffic, resulting In ttalfic The proposa't will 'resUit Ina Incremental increase In the need lot matntenanCe bf roads and other public la ttiilt"es dh the area. P.,area. f congestion. A Iraffle model for the oroVille Urban area is f. � oth<t govi:chmetltat services( anticipated to evaluate potential conflicts between train movements the proposal will tesult In a IncrementalIncteasc In demand tot all other governmental setvlces Ih the l6, ENtRay,. Will the ti WAI result In' and traff.^„ f. Inctease.in, traffic a to motor x sere 13a, w a:1 fuel fit enRrgy. the; :proposal wi f t not utl 11..0 substanti a, vehicles, bicyclists or esirlao 14, pUaLic SERVICES. will the .proposal have an effete upon, or result In a need lot new of altered government services;; _ - , Fire ptotectiont X Th e proposal will result In a iheremeital increase Ih demrnd lot fire protection In the area. The Butte County Fitt.+ Department/ealllrfrnia Division of Forestry has_indlcalted that cumulative deVelopment til the county will Impact tftett abriily to provide fire protection services, The development of a community water sYstem,;with fixe hydrants will partially mitigate the demand lot fire ptotectlon services, b, Police protections k The ptoposai will 'result In a Incremental Increase in demand tot police protection In the area which cannot be serviced by the present sherift's Department. since 1960 the population of Butte county"has increased by over isx, while at tie same time the police force has been decreased ih petsonnei by So." due to fiscal difficultles being expetlenced,by Butte coUnty, currently. Butte county has the lowest Hearings on 'Butte county"s Fiscal cases, county U11 lt.101,3 LWit111GV that police protection services are presently Inadequate,, and do ;not mer,( the setvice expectations of the public, conllnbed rural development has resulted Irl cumulative,Impacts on pollee protectlon services which continues to reduce the sheriff's Department capacity to, provide adequate pollee services. development impacts on the sheriffs department Is countywide and cannot be mitigated by one indlVldUal project. The cumutatlVe lmpacts of development on police protection has been documented by .the County AdminisitatlVe 6111ce, In the report "county of Butte, Annual Ficai kevlew,.. c: school sr X The ptoposat *111 resUlt in a inetem6rital increase In 'demand for school Impact feet ASmes by the local dittrlcts isanti c to schoolis rmitigationreda to nCedeeveir. hntervischolol a srgniflcant level, iutttiemeasures Yor requ temehts ate allowed In Accordanceon 66995, d, Fatks or other recreational facilittest -- .- == T" peepeattwilteCetult Ina ncremental increase, In demalid for pae'k he htea, And1~. AIritenanceof publicfacilities, Including _,:, The proposa't will 'resUit Ina Incremental increase In the need lot matntenanCe bf roads and other public la ttiilt"es dh the area. P.,area. f f. � oth<t govi:chmetltat services( ic- the proposal will tesult In a IncrementalIncteasc In demand tot all other governmental setvlces Ih the l6, ENtRay,. Will the ti WAI result In' - Use 1St stibslaht'lal amgUnl# of fuel at ,.._" x - w a:1 fuel fit enRrgy. the; :proposal wi f t not utl 11..0 substanti a, onetriY� ental Checklist E�lrvaaConm SVaxu�tion . Qf ,Env3, xq antaai "Impact �, TdliiTTTl♦ATTid1t1�TP7�T. TlV(v7\a'timeT .---° � .. ,; ., - _ _ .. ,_. ; 7 -_—------^-- ••,,„ ,���� Yes MAYBE NO 1Jyrccu13l31-M OF .E'NVIRONMERTA IL EVALUATZON (Continued) — bs subs tantIaI increase in demand Upon eXrtttng sources or energy, or require the x,_ The proposal will not substantially Increase the demand tot energy. development of new sources of energy? 16. UVOTtes. Will the Proposal result In a need lot new systems, or substantial alterations to the fol lowing: Power or natural gas? -.LX— proposal will not affect electrical power or natural gas distribution systems. b. communications systems? x The proposal will not affect communitation systems. c, water availability? -X ' The proposal will not affect public Water systems, _ d, sewer or septic systems? - X ' The proposal wlil have to meet the requirements of the guile county Environmentat Health Dept, e. storm Water drainage?, x see tb, ab. & r. I, solid waste and disposal? x The pfoposal wilt have A CUmulative Impact on soled Waste disposal, 17, WALTH. Will the proposal result in., a, creation or any health hazard.or potential hazard (exclUdihg mental health)t X.,, The proposal will not create any health hazard, b, EXpdsUre of People to pote hazal'ds7 ntlal health X - The proposal Will notxPose people to any health hazard. The project site is located )Ust outside of the "buffer" area of a known plUmr_ of groundwater contamination, te, ES1 los. Will, uc the Proposal ie op tti the Obstruction ruction of my scehlc Vista or VIeW open to the L �� x� The Utoposal_ will hot tesult in An aeslhetleally otlensiVe VfeW because pUbltc. or will the proposal result In the creation, it is consistent with sulrounding developmehl, of An lestheticAlly Offehs,lve fl te open to the ` Public views 19, tR CRtAtfDN. will the proposal result In an ltrpaCt upon the quality or gttanttty oI existing k The proposal may result fn an lncremental increase in demand tot park fecrea lona) opportunitiest and recreation facl`f`itlos. 701 CiAtUt&_sttt"cts. a. ord 'the Proposal tesult In the alteratlori r estruCtlorlof a prehistoric or historic X .. The Croiect site is identified as An area of low 3enO tivlty for archaeological archaeological #ltet resource's. b, trill the proposal result in adVerse physlcal or aesthetic effects to a ptehlstotle or __, X The Proposal, Will not affect historic sites, historic building, sttuclure or oblecit- C. hoes the proposal haVe the. potential to cause a physical change which Would affect x The rrlti not at proposalfeet cultural tesoutcet, unique ethnic CUltUtal Values? d, Will the proposal restrict existing tellgloUs or sacred uses Wlthln the the pFoposal Wilt not ailect religious resoUrces, potential impact area? tom. SthjdESTEA MITZGATII-ON MEA$ 4036 f viaconxeataei Cheeltligit A . Evaluation of Mnviromevh , al I�pze t 7_ sonmenital Checil:Xist Sva]vtation of `Envi=`aailaenita�. Iffipaci: ENVIROMIENTAL X"ACTS (continued) YEs MAy E No ^ � DISCUSSSON OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Continued) DATA SHEET 13. F%lsling Land Use on -311e; Vacant ,.roiec[ DcscriDlton 14. Surrounding Area: Land Uses: residential 11 type of Project: Tentative Parcel slapb. arae( Description; Tom to divide 92..84 acres to Create 4 lots of a. toning: ARMH-2.5 C. Con. Plan Designation: Ag -Rosi ans 21 .3a.3t acres. 17.83 acres, 17,71 antes and le,99 ,acres, Location'. Lone Tree Road In south Otovltle. d. Parcel to to 40 acres Population: suburban/Rural Population a, sAmount Proposed Density of Development. t unit/20,aCtes of lavervious surfacing; minimal C. 15. Character of site and Area° Rural Nearest Urban Area! orOVIlle 6, Access and Nearest Public Road(s): Lone Tree Road.. 16. 17. Relevant spheres of InflUCtIC62 oroVflle, owlb. 7. Nathod of 'sewage Disposal• Individual sepliC/leachileld 18. improvements standards Urban Area: rk a, source at water Supply- OWID Water PfoxlnitY of Power Lines• Adjacent to ptoperty 19, Flrc Protectlon Service. , a.Fi Nearest COUnIy (Slate) r'Ir4 statlon: #72 -.. 9. _ 10. Potential /at further land divisions and deveiopn+ent: EXisttng -- zoning Classiftcatfon allows for the divislan of property to 2.5 b. Water Availability' OWiD Hydrants schools In. Area: orovtlle union 09h School District and acre parcel sizes, 2e. Pajermo Elementary sChool.DistliCt. �« Fnytr«�entat.5ettfna Physical Environments i, Ter rain AGeneral Topographic ChaiaCtUt. Relatively flat terrain b, slopes: 0 to 1!4 C. Elevation: 175 to :200' ASL d. Llmting Factors: hone 1. toils Types and Characterlslies. Marvin slits clay Loamt (mvervtoJs 'substratum at 6' deep, Limiting Factors Drainage in some Areas is not good. 3, b. Natutaj Hazards of the Land Earthquake zones Moderate Eatthidake intensity zone a. Vill b. Erosion Potentlai;.lAoderate e. Lltndslide Potenttai: None d. Firetrazaids Modetate Expansive soil P4ten(jai Hfgh 4, o. tP,tdrotogy surface Water small interinittent stream runs Wtougti the eastern edge of the peolect :site, b. Ground Water: N/A: c. Drainage chatacteriStics; Ptoperty drains to:.!Xds the southwest. d, Annual Rainfall (normal): 22' Limiting „ tlooding So �ars,down3tteam Visualiscelc Quality, Good ;.., ' d, AcausticQvatity:d66d y, AliQuality*, Coal 10 _kA Enyircxui>ents 11, Vegetittoa: tion-hative plants. . small birds and atlltMIS ctxrmon to total ateas. 9. Wildlffeliahitat! +s F • izll lural Enylrorlmcnt: iI), Archaeological and WitorldAl Resources In the arca: 'Lbw ii. SensitiVltY Area alutte county General Plan deslgnattbnl AgrlcUltUral-Residdntfai 12. Exiatind Zorling: AjtAVf 2.S ii . S 10 tal ChecDcii t iBvajuation of Envi ronsental Tmpao� sanaion YES AAYBt bTBCIISSiON OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVA.LUA't'iCN '� E1=RU A IMPACTS (continued) (continued) I; ENVIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL Ma 1 1- 1 Earthquake ar�d Fault AGO iV i Sei mio tag ety El tpent,tte ounty General Pan rev se I -�7 , by NX FILM rS b �%(11�2, t. BUi&Cour►tyGeneral t` ta`n revel sQdinl 7�fetyHM Fi i i I , p i I I _l Subsidence & Land`s i lde Potent ta� : 5 fety 3.t m t, butte County General Plan revise 1-7a7, b H�A Pik, i (I . co�inty General nan rev�sed 1-77,yt 1 `Butte �}�, Ma 111-2, Eros n Paie Llai Saf ty iem Butte en co�inC11-3,,erExPaPisanere°lis^�` 1 �a7feb� CH,& HII'I. a < I f Butte county General b. Plan revise i-77,63 y ie n M p 1V -I, Nodise. N _.� t Map V- i , Scenic H i'f�h v,,ben di n 77AheYiM Butte County Genera t aw M p 111�1a1 `utietcounty G neral aPfan rev sed. i-77pebY CN,eivlm Hl ll 8 9, fore9uttteeB�ountye.'1�arin ng Deparbtmentmei98�.Mannin9, 10, 5chooblstrict Map, Butte County Pfianhing Depar mens, hhiCo N'ltratt Study Map, vNit apte concentrattan In 11 hal low WeI,�5, e9B3 rn bDis pis tmeClte %esouf�ceS iesource,ate 0 cals�efornla. to 02 crit Mural PBu7tteVeCo ntjre5BoarldlSoefdbsyuper°visors AN 178, becem er 5r 198 13. Ffood lnsiegeCaiRgmer9ency ManagemehtlAgencY-1988 Program, 14, USG5 Quad Maps, Orovlil'e, 1970p 1 6ali Ma Chico Jlp5�IOroVllle 11926) Area, U,S. epal tandt a Agr cu t re. Soil SurVey 0 chi oC�925)JO"roVllle (192.6) Area. U,S. �6` Departinent o AUROU ture. 17: ut unt ; P i.BUttnroCOu t Onf i,�er De a tment an� ani lr e( department of poYestrY� �u to county Ptahn ng Bepartment, COUN'.Y OF Bj E DEPARUIENT OF iUBLIC WORKS 7 County Center Drive Oroville;'CA 95965 (916) 538--7266 October 1, 1990 Ervin Clark, RE: AP 25-24-14 378 Lone'Tree Rd. Tentative Parcel Map Orovil e, CA 95965 Dear Mr. Clark: This is -to notify you that your application for a tentative map for the above -referenced property is being submitted to the Planning Department fQ environmental determination and to the Environmental Health Department for its revie+a. c This application will be considered, complete when we have received notification from the Planning Department and the Environmental Health Otpartment that'all necessary data have been received. These departments All contact.'you regarding any additional information they may require. "Very truly yours, William Cheff Director of Public Works On Mendonsa sistant Director ,mi/kk cc: Planning. Department. Environmental health Department Roper Associates U fd Co. OCT t 1q00 iJroville Ca!lF�irtC�t LD 1120 (Revised 2%88)