Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout026-050-038e � k'R '.diP � _ �� , � _ M ` , Y � ' , n � �r A 0 rr'z18 ''+` s,; }t a' K' {11.. ba�. � . n , � ,. f M1 '�,- "tF FILE NO. 026-050'=038 BUTTE COUNT'S PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDINGS - June 4 1991 APPLICANT: Howard L. Kee OWNER. Same REQUEST: Use Permit to allow the expansion of a pre- existing nonconforming use to allow two additional storage buildings. AP NO.: 026-05P,038 SIZE; Approximately 2.6 acres LOCATION: On tho west side of Lincoln Boulevard approximately 1/3 mile north of Messina" Avenue and. Lincoln Boulevard intersection, Palermo. EXISTING ZONING: AR -MH -1 ZONING 'HISTORY: Zoned AR -MR -1 by Ordinance No. 2393 on February 28th, 1984. SURROUNDING ZONING; AR -MH -1 SURROUNDING LAND USE: Commercial to the south; residential to the east and north, vacant land to the west, SITE HISTORY: parcel has had it light industrial type of use on it since at 'Least 1978. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION; Agricultural -Residential APPLICABLE REGULATIONTS: 24-37; 24-47, 24=94 BU17E1 COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDINGS -,June 4, 1991 -COMMENTS 1EIVED. Butte County Department of Public Works: " Project is in flood plain and driveway must meet County standards." .Butte County Department of Environmental 1h-110- "Ne requirements for this project." ANALYSIS: I This is a Use Permit request to allow the expansion of a pre-existing, non -conforming use to allow two additional storage structures: The current use on site is the fabrication of stainless steel food processing equipment for various food processors in the northern California area, There are five full time and one part time employees. The entire manufacturing operation is done within the existing structure. There, is some cutting and grinding of metal, however, it is intermittent And noise is not severe. The noise from the operation that can be heard outside the building is co-tisiderable less than the noise from traffic on Lincoln Boulevard. The closest residential use is approximately 250 feet away. There are only four homes within a 600 foot radius of the proposed structure. The applicant proposes to construct 2 storage structures totaling approximately 8400 square feet. The construction will be in 2 phases. Phase one will consist of a 2035 square foot building to be located to the rear of the main structure that exists on site. Phase two is a proposed 6300 square foot building to be placed along the southerly property boundary. Both will be of steel construction and will be used to house material and equipment. The Planning Commission granted Mr. Kee a Use Permit to expand his use in November of 1989. The approval was for an addition to his workshop structure. The addition has been constructed and is in use and it appears that all the conditions of the previous Use Permit have been complied with May be #2. There still for #1 and except I ll is quite an accumulation of machine parts and material on site. Condition Ion 01 of the previous Use Permit required that all junk not associated with the biisiness be removed from the property. The food drums are gone but it is not known if all the junk on site is business related. Condition two required all materials to be kept a sight observing fence or shrubbery barrier; Mr, Kee has planted oleander bushes along.the Lincoln Boulevard frontage e on 9' to to' centers. The plants 0 .9 are approximately 2' high. it is doubtful that they will provide the desired effect duo to the distance between. the plants and the lack of a watering system, Additional shrubs should b I e planted between the existing plant8 to fill in the large gaps. Of course if the applicant proposes to keep All material and equipment within a 'building, the I shrubbery will not be requiredi The Phase One structure Will not accommodate all of the equipment that currently On site. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIO]V STAFF FINDINGS - June 4, 1991 From a noise, traffic and general land use standpoint the proposal is not in conflict with the surrounding uses. However, the aesthetics of the property could be improved. All equipment and materials should be moved inside cf the new structures, In the interim, the materials; could be moved behind the main structure and kept in a more organized manner, RECOMMENDATIONS: A. Find that the requirements of CEQA have been completed. and considered in making this decision and adopt a Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts; and B. Find that the proposed use of the property will not impair the integrity and, character of the zone in which the land lies and that the use would not be unreasonably incompatible with or injurious to surrounding property or detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood or to the general health, welfare and safety of the County, because and; C. Grant a Use Permit to all the expansion of a pre-existing, non -conforming use to allow the addition of 2 storage buildings on APN #026-050-038 (Howard Kee) subject to the following conditions: 1. All junk not associated with the business shall be removed from the property. 2. All equipment and materials not stored within a building shall be kept behind a 6' sight obscuring fence or shrubbery barrier made of evergreen plants spaced at no less than 5' intervals and watered by a drip irrigation system. 3. Upon +completion , of the Phase two building, no outside storage of equipment or materials shall be- allowed. 4. applicant must also comply with 11 other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances and,_ regulations._ n Howard Kee - proposed Negative -Declaration regarding environmental impact and> i Use Permit expansion of a pre-existing nonconforming use to allow two additional storage buildings, on property zoned AR -MH -1 (Agricultural -Residential -Mobile Home.4 acre parcels) located approximately 5 miles south of Oroville, on the west side of Lincoln Blvd. at 6810 Lincoln. Blvd., identified as AP No. 026-050-038, Oroville area. VIDEO TAKEN The Commission waived the reading of the Staff Findings. A video was shown of the project site. The hearing was opened to the public. Howard E. Kee stated he was the owner of the business: He said Condition No. 1 of the Staff Report says, "All junk not associated with the business shall be removed f om the property", and he would like to know who determines whether it is junk or not. He said there is some small junk on the property that is on gondolas in the back of the property which will be moved out of the way when the new storage building is put in. He said the items are not junk to him, but expensive equipment that is necessary to his business. He said when he planted his shrubbery, he contacted a nursery who recommended he place the shrubs 7 feet apart and they are planted exactly 7 feet, 8 inches apart. The nursery also recommended he water the shrubs bi-weekly and that is what he does. He does T _ not believe the drip irrigation system would be a good idea because there are two gates by the shrubs that would necessitate 'him to dig underground to place the system. Commissioner Lynch suggested they could solve the praMem Mr. Kee has with the drip irrigation system by changing the Condition to read, "All equipment and materials not stored within a building shall be kept behind a 6' sight obscuring fence or shrubbery barrier made of evergreen plants spaced at no less that 8' i intervals, and maintained in a living condition". Mr. Kee said that the Staff Report states that in Phase Two, a 6,300 square foot building will be used to house material and equipment. Mri Yee said that there will also be some light maintenance work done on the special equipment in this building: The hearing was closed to the public. it was moved by Commissioner Ostrowski, seconded by Commissioner Lynch, and unanimously carried as follows; C_00N''x• P TANNING "q 1 s ON01TES �j a � `r. � �lC' GOUt�!Y pl, �TI`iN Mrit MxlTES ,JL�Xje 1 A. Find that the requirements of CEQA have been completed and considered in making this decision and adopt a Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts; and B. Find that the proposed use of the property will not impair the integrity and character of the zone in which the land lies and that the use would not be unreasonably incompatible with or injurious to surrounding property or detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood or to the general health, welfare and safety of the County, because it is an expansion of a pre-existing non -conforming use and will serve to improve both the aesthetics and functions of the current operation. C. Grant a Use Permit for the expansion of a pre-existing, non -conforming use to allow the addition of 2 storage/manufacturing buildings on AP No. 026- 050-038 (Howard Kee) subject to the following conditions; 1. All junk not associated with the business shall be removed from the property. 2. All ;equipment and materials not stored within a building shall be kept I behind a 6' sight obscuring fence or shrubbery barrier made of evergreen plants spaced at no less than 8' intervals, and maintained in a living conditions. 3. Upon completion of the Phase Two building, except in transit, no outside storage of equipment or materials shall be allowed. 4. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, Ordinances and regulations. lations. a � `r. � �lC' GOUt�!Y pl, �TI`iN Mrit MxlTES ,JL�Xje 1 APPLICATI m FOR.USE SER IT BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANT: Read and follow Instructions as set forth on attached sheet. Applicant's name HORARD L. KEE Phone No, 916-533-6550 Applicant's mailing ,address, PO .. BOX 151 PALERMO CA Applicant's interest In property (Owner, lessee, other). j7O1�Niat�a _ Owner's nameHOWARD KEE X837 -and address CA Contact person for project (if other than applicant)„_ JIM CLA'NTON 916-589-o492 -------------- Assessor's parcel fiumber(s)-_ 026-050-038 Present zoning Location and size of parcels) APP 5 MILES SUS OF OROV1111? Oitr LINCOLi`d BL APP. �.,E, Af'i2>♦q Street address 6810 LINCODA-31S-D, Directions for travel to property (rural and mountainous areas only):.. A AP 5 11p7 IPU q 1ncoln Blvd, -QUeh on -J Description of proposed development and use FOR STD)tAtyE n1� MAT] R�A>.S ANr) '>i n�Tppf},,uT J �'[.�E l_'�DN 7/?Uc:�in�I �,� 7'L�)� f3llTlz✓l2 STE""'L $�i� s.2Lti�S . Description of existing land use FABR2TCATION .OF FO 011 PROCES TNG FQfT7PbfF�rT Proposed scheduling/assoclated projects - P}4A6e S Anticipated incremental development -*"E 2 \)mss Building construction (state dimenslons square footage and materials used) �.J r,. A. Bxisting buildings `IyiL—DL0 LL .� b, Proposed buildings J %�?( 74/ im, O:3 Hazardous materials to be used (inflammables, explosives or strong chemicals)- .NONE Dail y hours of operation 7 AM till 4 PM Number of employees. 5- —ul—._ t `tne Numberof off-street parking spaces provided_, 15 i;o 20 ime Exlsting%proposed seWage disposal method Le -P -t c tank Prokimity of power and phone lines'.--=-3--P11DM-e_ 1 n„�_gnrj nn'G�ar 1;;,e DIstance to natural water course or storm drain: Anticipated on and off-site drainage Improvements: none Water source.,:. - htELL RATER l bxlmity of Water for fire fighting purposes (hydrants, ponds, etc,) RYDRANT 500 FT., AXAY AND A CAM A7` iiAClr OF PROPERTY Will excavation or geadlhg be necessary? Cubic yards (estimato).,. A!:221cel ' List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for tiffs project, Including those required by city, regional, State and Federal agencles,•_ IF, RESIDENTIAL., include the number of units, whether units are single, or mu!tf-story in height, schedule of unit sizes; and type of household size expected. IF COMMERCIAL, Indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or 'regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities; IF INDUSTRIAL; Indicate type, estimated employment per.shift, and loading facilities. IF INSTITUTIONAL, indicate the major function, estimated 'employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. ..J ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES* -� Identify potentially significapt environmental Impacts associated with the use permit. What project design features or special conditions of approval (mitigation measures) are proposed to alleviate potential environmental Impacts? M ENVIRONMENTAL. SETTING* Describe the project site as It exist's before the project, including Information on topography, soil stability, plants and and mals, and any cultural; historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures, ...I' Describe the surrounding properties, Including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Ca. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commerelal, etc.) intensity of land use (single-family, apartments; shops, depart ' meet stores, etc.); and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etb,). Use separate sheet for longer responses: I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read and understand the Instructions ano that the foregoing statements are true, complete and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date �/ _. Applicant's signature .: y Date 'M Property owner's signator ' Use Permit Number q0 ,. Request: Use permit to alluwNt "1 Location and size of parcel(s) t VERIFY: t''_ A,P. Number(s)Project Description ✓"" Ownership ✓� zoning and Requ►rements Proof of Agehcy Of needed) ✓ Location ,Description _jam 16 Ooples of Plot Plan W 11 0 " kw g � L IDate Received ! $ [ pecelpt Number CD Appileailon taken by i �g INSTRUCTIONS TO USE PERMIT APPLICANTS 1. If applicant is not the owner, written authorization by the owner or other proof of agency must be submitted in order for the applicant to legally sign the application. Application shall be considered void if not signed by the owner or legal agent. 2. All items on application shall be filled in as completely as possible: If an item is not appli- cable, please indicate by the term "NA". 3. It is important that the applicant supply an acourate description of the location of the proposed project, including the following; a, Assessor's parcel number(s) (from the tax bills or .Assessor's maps). b: Street addresses (if available): c.. Distances and directions to named streets, bodies of water or railroads, C 'Twenty-four (2t) copies of a detailed plot plan of adequate scute to clearly s.hosv proposed build- ings and improvements, folded to 8z x 11 inches, shall accompany and be made part of the "Application for Use Permit", If the use permit is approved, the plot plan becomes the ap- proved development plan for the property, The plot plan shall include the following informations a. A scaled drawing of the parcel(s) boundaries. b. Location and dimensions of nil existing and proposed improvements on the property, including buildings, driveways, parking nrens, wells, septic tanks and leach fields: c. Location and natio of bordering streets, access rouds, nearby crossroads,, Streams, bodies of water and railroads, d. North arrow and scale of drawing. 5. The "Application for Use Permit" is subject to public hearings and approval by Lite Planning Commission.. Any special conditions of approval shall be made a part of Lite approved "Use hermit" and shall be binding on the applicant. The procedures for County action on use Per- mit applications et•misapplications are stated in Chapter 24 of the Butte County Code; G. The Manning Commission, on the busts of the evidence submitted at thepublic houring,may grant use permits When it finds that the proposed tiles of Lite In•operty will not Impair ,th0 I ntegrity and character of the zone in which the land lies and that the use %%ould not be tin - reasonably incompatible with or injurin+ts to surrounding properties nor detrimental to the health and general welfare of Lite persons residing or working in the neighborhood nor to the general health, safety and welfare of the county. In approving a use permit, Lite Planning Comnilssion may include such conditions as are deemed reasonable and necessary under the cireunistnnCes to preserve Lite integrity and churncter of the tone and to secure Lite general purposes of the Butte County Cenetal Plan and Chapter 24, of the Butte County Code. Such conditions may include, but are not liutited tot time limitations, development plan tippeoval, hours of operation, fenctng der tcutron of right -of -tray, kind street and drainage Improvements, Conditions Imposed upon issuance of it use pernilt must be reasonably related to ter use for which the permit is eeq.Vested, a0 ql 8, application fees its of ( (date) are »0s°'' lees may be paid in cash or b cheek made payable to "Treasurer of Butte County". g, Before submitting it use perntit application, applicant is requested to discos;s with staff A questiotis about application retyulrentents, County procedures, ronitig provisions and possible conditions of approval, � r7 OP ~ 11 i i STATES POSTAL SERVICE 'OFFICIAL BUSINESS 4IR 0+ ••'� p' SENDER INSTRUCTIONS �� j I. •+�— .� Print your name, address and ZIP Code Inthe apace below. uta fwl Ic . • Compfat-items1,2,3,and4onthe 1n^i �` nveroe. • • Attkch to front of artich It e00 , i»rmfte� otherwice afi°Ix to back of PENALV FOR PRIVATE ertfcla. USE, 0300 a Endorse article "Return Raceipt to number. RETURN Requested" adjacent Print Sondor'e nems, addreasr and ZIP Code In fhe, space beloWs To rC'Iutm or- i3UT-T8 026=05038 r �Cfounty �.�enle., 0"t�0 -0 B' ri�VI16, l.iF\�C7rJ':3$9' 1 PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE, 5300 . RETURN Print Sender's name, address, and ZIP Code in: She space belotb TO COUNTY 9E- RQ C r UP 2.6-050-03.8 Planning DOOM-'imont 7 QOUOty Gower'Dtive t Oroviile, CA J6065-3397 SENDER: Complete items 1 and 2 when additional sorvlces aiq desired, and complete Items t3 and 4, Put your address in the "RETURN TO" SpaCo on the reverse aid©, Failure to do this will prevent this c'4� from being returned to you, Tha return recol tied will rovide you the nems of the paqton delivered to the date of delivor . For ad it ono ass the e ow ng sery ces aro available. Consult postmaster for b.. an hock box(es)or additional seryicols) requested. 7 CI pestrirtod Delivery Show to whom delivered, dote, and addressee's ad2dress, !`st rl chargee _ (Extra charge) _ 3, Article Addressed tot 4, Article Number Mr, Howard Kee P 780-008-042 P P.O. BOX 151. Type of Ssrvice: pa�:G-rMO, CA 9596.18 ❑Registered Insured' u [TCartlfied ❑ GOD ' (] EKpreos Mail . _ for Merchandise Always cbtaln signature of addressee or b&nt and DATE DELIVERED, g 5, Signature -- Addressee 8. Addressee's Address (ONLY if requested and fee paid) 8, Signs J Agent 10 �. K 7, Date of De very PS Fcrm 3811, Apt, 198^�us,c,ra,108e•zae•ot,s DOMESTIC RETURN RECE. SEPIDER: Complete Items 1 dad 2 whet! additional so less are desired and eo(i 0' to Items 3 and 4. Put your eddreee in the "Rf..-WR4 TO" Space on tho tevarse sldo, iraliUro to do this Wer. „r _ d d card frcm being, rotumad to You.' ho r��urs��� c I t ee I rov de ou hr+ ame oft o Ri[�t r de, id to and the date of deilvs , For ci{dRr0naTfiias a. o, ow ng erry ces a ova u e, on:ulc p'oatmester or ees on c ec ox ae for additional edrvice.(S requested. 1, 13 Show to whom del vorod, date, and adilre9�se's address. 2+ d Restricted(r8) livery &tra,chargc) ~~�,ti.. 3, At!icle Addroessd to: R", i ah ' 4. Article NUM Or P 084 635 M (, r f Howard d Kee T pa of Sorvicet Rsgiatarod Insured 0. $r5k F ®Certified ❑ COD paletmo, C 95968 [3 Express Ma11 13 Retoche cchs Iurn hanTit. so e'ol iln slpneturo of addraeade ty DATE DELIVERED, Signature - Addrosa 8, ( cola Address (ONLY V 6, 'is a1eand fee paid) X c) 6, Signature.— Agent 7. Date of 0811voty Jt 381'1 M arion- * US G P.O, 1988 212-0f3ia DOMESTIC RETURN RE�..,r'T PS Form . .i`w: ' APPENDIX I COUNTY .OF BUTTE - MVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ; FORM:, EVALUATION 6r -ENV IMPACT Ff. f`e Na. 91-22 LOO' No_ 91-02-15-12 AP No., 026-050-038 I tr BACKGROUND t, Name of Proponer.€- Howard Kee 2, Address of proponer..F ane'representative (if applicabte)::P'_ O_ Box 151 Palermo.. CA 95968. S_ Project description: use Pe r -et to allow theexpansionof a pre-existing non-conrorming use to allow two additional storage buildings II.MANDATORY FINDINGS AF'WZGNIFICANCE: YES a"vae f_0 DISCUSSION' OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION . .` t. Does The proiect have the potential to degrade the x see discussion ►or item 20 a, qualfty of the environment., substantially reduce the hahf:tat of- a Ish or, wildlIfe spectes, cause a fish orwildf€fepopulatfon to drop below: self-suskn - ng: levels, threaten to eliminate a- plant or anlmaf community, reduce the number or restrict the range OILa rare or endangered plant or anima1 or el'imfnate important examplesor major periods of California history or prehfstory 2. Does the project have the potential to achieve x This proposal will :not Impede long-term environmental goal's.. short-term benefits. to the detriment of long-term environment goals?- (A short-term Impact on the environment is one which occurs in a: reia2ively brief period or time while long-term ImpF-cs w€li endure into: the ruture_X; 3. Does the project have impactswh€chare Individual i -y x This proposal will not have a significant cumulative impact. on the limited but cumul'aL(vett' considerablei (A 'project environment. r 'nryia�:i' vii c:v v" mole sBVdrate" resources where:' tct on each resource I s relatively smal,I. but where the effect of the totar of those impacts on the: environment Is significant_} 4. Does the project have environmental effects which x This proposal will not have: a significant adver., effect on human w€ll cause substantial adverse eff.ects on human: beings-. r beings;, either directly or Indirectly? III. DETERMINATION oa tpe basrs of tnrs. init€al evaluation: •✓ , [/WE rind the proposed' project COULD NOT have a ;significant effect on the environment and a NECATIVE DF'�L„RATICN will be prepared_ t/wE find that atthough the proposedproject COULD have a"significant effect on the environment, there wit€ not be a significant effect in this case because: The MITtGATICN.MEASURFS described' on the attached 'sheet have: been added' to the project. A.NECATIVE.DECLARATION wi--i'I be prepared �.'.. t/wE rind the Proposed project. MAY have a significant, effect on the env€`ronment, and an EWIRCNMEtrTAL FACT REPORT is required'. COLK17Y OF IItiTT PLANNING DE TMENT DATE: April la 199t By: CG�� ra J Sand s - Reviewed by: Environmental Checklist Evaluation of Environmental 2 Impact N.: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS' vEs snrltE t,o DISCUSSION'OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION' T. EARTH:. W1,11 the Proposal result in`signfficantr a- tinctable earth conditions,, or changes in geologic substructures?' x The Proposal will not affect subsurface earth conditions. b Disruption:,, displacement., compaction. or X overcovering of e soil? oth This Proposal wui result in some disruption.- displacement, compaction and-overcovering of the site as a. result: of development of structures, driveways. parking areas„ etc. 2035 :quare feet of neer building area will occur in phase 1, An additional 5240 square feet are proposed in Phase 2- Carbined with the existing structures, approximately_ 23% Of the project site will be overcovered- to addition_ the soil over much of the remaining,' area has by vehfsies;. been compacted c; Change in topography or ground surface relief features? x The Proposal:witt not affect topography because building nearly level. the site is d- cstruction,coveringormodlficationofany unique geologic or physical features? x The site has no unique physical features°. e_ Incr?ase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or ofr site? X The proposal will not cause: erosion. G. Changes in deposition of erosion of beach sands:, or changes, in'si[tatCondeposition x The Proposal will not affect any. watercourse. , or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocear, or any bay, inlet or take? g- Loss of prime agriculturally productive softs Outside' designated urban areas? X This Proposal does not represent a e'gnificant loss of agricultural coifs. prime l Exposure of people or Property togeolo Ic hazards such as earthquakes. landsl'ides,, x Alt or Butte County is in a Moderate' Earthquake Intensity Zone mudslides, ground fal.lure or simi tar V1Ii. The Subject properly is located _approximately -1.5 mf les west or the hazards?' 1975 Palermo earthquake epicenter. construction of buildings to Uniform Building Code standards will provide adequate protection to occupants in case or seismic activity. Z AIR- wfil the pr000sar res'urt In substantfal_ a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? x The oroposaI will not affect air quality because the increase in the -ntr;nber of The creation of obJeciionabfe odors.. slyke vehicle trips is not significant - or fumes? x The proposal will not create objectionable odors, smoke or fumes, C. Alteration of air movement.;. moisture or temperature, or any change • in,climate. - x _ - The Proposal will not affect the atmosphere, focafty or reg,ionally7 s. wr.TErt- WfII the proposal result in, substantial: a'- Changes in' currents_ of the course or drrection or water movements in either X The proposal WMT- - - not affect any watercourse. marine or fresh waters} b• Changes in absorption rates_ drainage patterns. or the rale and amount of surface x The proposal may, result in an increase in surface water runoffduerunoff? to reduced absorption from impervious surfaces. However. the project is subject to flood water levels of less than t' and addil,ionat overcovering will not increase the site runoff under flood; condttions. Environmental Checklist. * Evaluation of Environmental Impact 3 IV.: ENVIRONMENTAL T14PACTS tcontfnued)YES AAvaE "i DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (continued} C_ - Need for or. r-si:-te -surface drainage _x see discussion for, -I'rem 3b' - improvements., fncludingvegetationremoval. channelizadtion or .culvert- Installation?. - d. Alterations to the course or f'fow, of floodi x The project is surrounded by a loo year flood plain. The site is in waters? a -zone X' flood plain but may still be subject to flood waters less than 1' In depth_ Structures should be constructed: In accordance wi th uniform Building codes for flood hazard :areas_ e. change in the amount of surface water in any X: see discussion for item': 3b-, water brMv? of, a°tee into drrace waters, or in any X The prcposai will not significantly affect surface water quality. -=.Cion of surface water qua llty. including_but not limited to temperature, g. dissolved oxygen or turbidity? Alteration of, the direction or rate of flow- x The proposal: wilt. not affect the direction or flow of ground waters, of ground:waters IV- Change in the quantity or quality of ground x The proposal will not directly affect any aquifer. waters„ either .through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? i. Reduction in: the amount of water otherwise X The project will not affect any public water supply_ j_ available for public water supplies? Exposure' of people or, property to water- x The proposal may expose property to flooding, see discussion for Item related hazards such as froodfngr 3d. PLANT. LrFE.. wi.if-. the proposal : result. is n'. - - - - - - substantial.- a. Change ini the diversity of species. or X The proposal will not affect plant fife because '�e site contains no number of any species of plants (including signtficant plant life_ trees. shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)`? b. Reduction or the numbers of any unique, rare X The site contains no rare plants. or endangered species of plants?' C. rntroducticn of new species of plants intoz X -, The proposal will not affect. existing plant life. anarea, or in a barrier to; the normal' replenishment or existing'speciesj d'. Reduction in: acreage of any agricultural x The sate does not contain any agricultural crops and is ,Presently cropt developed with a commercial use, _ tet_, ANIMAL LIFE_ witI the proposal result in snbsEanCrais a, change in the diversity of species, or x The proposal will. not affect animal isle because the site; does not numbers of any species of animals (birds, support significant animal lire or habitat - abitat.land:animals land animalsincluding reptiles, fish and - shellfish. benthic organisms or insects)? z ; b. Reduction in the: numbers of any unique.. rare X The site contains no rare animals. ar'endangered species or animals? C, Introduction of new species of animals into x The proposal will not affect existing animal lire. _ an area, or in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d+. Deterioration of existing fis_, or wil.Vire _ _ r - X The site containi no significant wildfire habitat. habitat? lnvixonmental Checklist Evaluation of I�:rflonmental.Impact IT- ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS' (continued) _ YES :MAYBE NO DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUPTIOF (Continued), 6_ NOrSE. wff'r the proposal result in substantfaTt a, Increases In existing nof:se levels? x The proposal will not result in a substantial increase in noise created on site or in the vicinity. b. Exposure of 'people to -severe poise levers;? _ x The proposal will not expose people: to severe noise levels,. T. Lrarr A"3 GLARE_ will the proposar produce x outside security lighting.if' installed, could result in an 'increase significant Fight. and glare? in tight and glare produced on site. outdoor lighting should be Installed so.as not to interfere with surrounding; property uses. al. LAND USE. wi.rl tfieproposall result Ina substantial` x Approval of this project will decrease the possibility of the use of alteration of the present or planned land use of"an. this parcel ever changing to a use th.t conforms to the 'existing areal - - zoning. it mayalsoencourage other Uar.;els-. In the area to convert to commercial uses. - - 9L NAMR"AL RESOURCES_ 1vitf the proposal result in - - substantial.- a- increase i.n`ithe .rate of use Of any naturat _2L_ The proposalwill not .affect. any :natural resources. resources2 b. Depfetion or any non-renewable natural' - X The proposal will not deplete any natural resources. - resources`?' '.16. R(SK.OF UPSET_ Wirt the proposal! involves - - a. A. risk or exp(tosion or release of hazardous X Phase l wl l l not involve the use of hazardous materials. Phase Z may substances CinJ uding. but not limited to. include some welding activity using compressed gas fuel.. The oft, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in applicant wilt have to store the gas in accordance wtth existing the event or an accident or upset regulations including the filing of a business plan with the - condhtfons? Environmental Health Department.. -.. b_ Possibfe interference with an emergency x The proposal will not affect any emergency services. response planor emergency, evacuation plan:?' - - tf. POPUtFTrON. wil'r the proposal after location, x The proposal will not significantly affect the population of the area dlstr butrom_ density or growth rate or the human because the proposed density does not exceed that planned and being poputationf developed In the area. T2. FIDt1511,6_ will the proposal' affect exfsting housing, x The proposal wilt not significantly affect lousing demand'. or create a demand for additional] housing? T3_ TRANSPORTATIOWCIRCUtAU04. wt U ' the pro.nosaf[ - - result. rnlS - -- a. Generaticnof substantial additional vehict.e X The proposal will not result is an Increase in traffic In the area. b. Effects on existing; parking'facifities. or x The proposal will not affect pa_rkfng;because the proposal will have> demand for new parking? to comply with the parking Galalned wlthin Butte county '.. 'code section 24-35_ - .. c. 5ubstant:.al impact on existing x The proposal will not resuft in an increase in congestion and transportation Systems?' - - - maintenance -requirements On: area road's.- d'. significant afterat:ions to plresent patterns X TheproPmJ will not at ter thepresentpattern of circulation -in the of c"Irculatfronor movement of peopleand/or area, -- goods?: _ ... - - e. Alterations to waterborne. rail or air - x The proposal will notaffect rail orair traffic. traffic? - Env:] hT. 5; Checklist* Evaluation. of Environmental ':'Impact -onmental DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTALEVALUATION - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS, (continued) YES MAYS No (continued) The proposal wil.l not result in an increase in traffic and related f- tncreasz in [raFlic hazards to motor X traffic hazards in the area. vehicles-. bicycfists or pedestrfans?. T4;. PUBLIC SERVICES. wilt the proposalhave an effect need for new or altered upon_ or result in a': government services -The will not.. result in a-I'ncrementak increase In demand for praoosai fire protection in the area - The proposal. will not result in a incremental increase In demand for b-, Police protection? X' police protection in the area. The proposal will not result in a:incrementai increase in demand for C. Schools X _ ' .school -services in the area. x The proposal will not result in a incremental increase in demand for d. Parks or other recreational' facilities? park and recreation : faciliLies in thr area.- including X The maintenC will not result in a tucks factat increase in the need roads and otheE public facilities in the area - e_ Maintenance of public facilities, for maintenance of roads? The proposal will not result in a incremental increase in demand for other- ' governmental- servicest x all other governmental services in the area. t5. ENERGY. w!I f the proposa:f result. in; The proposal. especially phase z, could increase the energy house equlpoent a- use of substantial amounts o0 fuel or X requirements on site. The phase 2 structure will an additional electricity supply_ energy?' fabrication pant that will need `power be available: through the existing Adequate should Infrastructure. -X_ SubsEantiat increase in demand upon existing see: discussion for i:tem 15 a:, b. sources of energy. or require the development of, new -sources of energy? rte, uTILITIES. Wilt the proposal resuft in a need for substantial alterations to the new systems, or foifowing;; x The proposa l will not affect electrical power or 'natural gas Bower or natural gas? a- - distribution systems. X The proposal will not affect communication systems;. b:. comnunFca[ions systems?- cyst' The proposal will nol affect public water systems, water ava`Ifons _ C, X X the proposal will: have to: meet the of the Butte County -Sewer or septic systems? ' Environmental Health Dept. X Since the property is located within a flood zone 'A'. a:permanent e, storm wafer drainage? solution to drainage is not applicable- pplicable-sotid X The proposal will not affect solid waste dis-,+-sal'- Solidwaste and disDe>alz T. rHEALTH'. witi the ProDosat rdsult ins x The proposal wi1'1; not create any health hazes a. creatFon:of any 11 hazard or potential hazard'(exctuding mentar health)? hazard The proposal wilt not expose People to a mhealth hazard'. b". Exposure of OeoPle to: potential '8ea'tlh X ` hazards? IV`. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (continued); YES MAYBE No , DISCUSSION OF EN67IRONMENTAL 1 VALUAT-LVrt (continued) xs.. AESTHETICS_ will the proposal result in the x The proposal will heap,reduce the existing aesthetically offensive it allow the applicant. to place equipment and obstruct -iron of any 3cenIc vFsta or view open to the the result In the creation: view because. will machinery, Inside,a structure. However. some machinery and parts may public., or wiff proposal or an: aesthetically ortensfve site open to the. stili be kept outside for iimi-led De:fods of Lime and the applicant 'landscaping the took of the public viewx should be required to install to improve site. Ts- RECREATION. will[ the proposal result in an impact x The proposal will not result in an incremental increase to demand' upon. the quaffty or rquan'tty or existing for park and. recrea'Lion facilities. recreatlonat opportunittes;t 20'- CULTURAL RESOURCES_ a:_ Will the proposal result in the alteration x The subject property i located in an area where archeological sites through the or destruction.af a prehistoric or historic may occur- It is necessary tc perform a records check Department of Anthropology at California State University, Chico. in acchaealog`tcai sites order to determine if significant sites may be located ;o,-, the property. If so, an archaeological survey of the property may be necessary, b. wile theproposat result Inadverse physical ' x The -proposal will not affect. historic sites_ or aesthetic effects to a. prehistoric or - historic but.iding_ structure or ob,jectr C. Does the proposal have the potential to x The proposal will not affect cultural resources. cause 'a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural vafuesz d, wftf the proposal restrict existing) x The proposal will not affect religious resources. rel.f lour, or sacred- uses within Itie 9 potential impact areal - SUGGESTED, MITIGATION MEASURES! r. No mitigation measure is recommended at this time regardfng archaeological: impacts_ In order to assess the potential for adverse: impacts and -to determine what, it any, mttip—r=an measures would'b'e appropriate, then apra'cant should contact the Northeast :n6ormation: center at California State University. Chico_ for a. records search and: sons ttvfty evaluation. Should the Center recommend (fiat an archaeological survey be conducted it wiff then :be necessary for a quarified archaeologist to perform- an archaeological' survey of the property. Checklist ,Evaluation, of EnViroitmental 'Iinp act Environmental ;)ATA SHEET a_ Surface Watery Wyman Ravine. runs on the adjacent to the property Ap,,,r��t.Descriytioa or Prosect: use Permit west. b. Ground Water: Abundant valley t. Type Brier Description. use Permit to altow the. expansion Or a z. use to ai tow two additronaF aquifers C_ Drainage' Characteristics:: The parcel pre=existing non-can(orming bus tdings drains LO the south- Annual Rainfall (normal):22 inches _ Locationx Located: on the west side or Lincoln Blvd. approximately 1[3. mile north Of. Messina Ave-_ Pa ermo d_ d- per Year. Limiting Factors: Potential Density or Development: NIA e. downstream flooding Of Wyman : Ravine. Proposed' amount or impervious surracings Approximately 15% of the site 3._ Visual/Scenic Qualfty: Good. wi.I[ be overcovered- Access and':marest Publfc Roadts) Parce •has access on 6. Acoustic Quality: The property is subject B I vd.. s. cincotn Brvd. to vehicle noise from Lincoln T. Method or 'sewage Disposal_ tndivi,duat septic systems'. 7_ Air' Quality: Fair, the parcel, is subject - Lincoln- source of water Supp[± Indivtdual wet 15'- to 'higher vehicle emisslons along Proximity of Power Linens To property. Blvd. 9'- for rrland divisions development: Biological Environment: ` io Potential sa Potential existsroratwo parcel plit g_ Vegetation: N/A B,_ *al` Settin Environmen g Wildlife Habitat: Small birds. and animals Non-critical Physical° Environment. common to valley areas. winter habitat for the deer herd. �. Terrain General Topographic character: Lever cultural l Environment: a_ b_ slopes. 0-3 % C_ Elevation: 170 feet above sea level. 10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in High sensitivity area - the area:: d'_ Limiting Factors: None. 11_, Butte County General Plan designations Ag.riculLural- Residential_ 2, Solis Types and c^aracteristics: HoncUC Loam- reddi h -brown sandy Ioam.12 to 40 12. - . ARMH-1 Existing Zoning- Inches thiclw- Drainage is good, the moisture well- 13,,. Existing Land Use on Light b o'iI retairs b_ Limiting Factors: none manufacturing facility 3� Natural Hazards of the Land. Moderate Earthquake; 14, Surrounding Area: a._ Land Uses, Mixed a,_ Earthquake -one: R'I residential, commercial; and Intens-'ik zone Vlll, Erosion Potential: Moderate - agricultural uses., ARMH-1 b,- e_ Landslide Potential: None b Zoning- Gen_ Plan Designation: Agricultura[- d_ Fire Hazards Moderate Expansive Soil Potential: High _ c_ residential. Parcel Sizes_ 7 ac, o 11 ac., d_ - 4- Hydre l"ogY Env =onmental Che kh t * Evaluation -of Environmental.�Xmpada. 14"_ lisGS Quad Maps, Palermo Ca l i.f. , 1970, ENVIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL lS,_ soil Map. Chico (1925)/Oroville (1926) of Agriculture. Area, U.S. Department [_ Map Ii -f,_ Earthquake and. Fault Activi{tY- Seismic revised 16 Soil ' Survey of Chico('1925)/Orov`ille (1926} Agriculture. Safety Element, Butte County General Plan Area, D -S. Department of 77 , by CHZM H i (t . 17. Butte County Fire Protection ions; fire 2 Map i'-2, Liquefaction Potential: Seismic Safety General Pan revised L-77, by nty,fire and Facilities Map, Butte County Department and California Department of Element, Butte County dement'_ Forestry. Butte county Planning 3_ Map lit -1, Subsidence & Landstide Potential_ General Plan revised Department. Safety Element, Butte County l 77, by CHEM H i I: 4' urlifet7Element, Ma Generaf Panrevised7, ZM: teCounty Butl Hi,`t- 5.. Map f11-3, Expansive Sol Is- Safety Element, Butte 1-77, by CHZM HiII_ County General Plan,rev[sed 6, But MaNoise:. Noise revised.1-77EebynCHzM Hftli_County General"n 7_ Map �'-1, Scenic Hig�'.ways- Scenic Highway Element, Plan revised E 77. by CHZM• Butte County General Hirr_ 8:_ �77. by Element,'ButteuCountyIrl-4, Natral' rGeneraldPlansrevisedalty CHM Hi I l 9- Archaeo[ogical Sensitivity Map by James P'_ Manning. Planning! -Department, 1983. for Butte County 10_ School District Map, Butte County Planning Department_ 11' Chico Ki'trate Study Map -Concentration in by Department of Water 1933, Sha;[ low �ti'el is, 19`33, Northwestern District, The Resources. Resources, Agency, State of California. 12_ Agricultural Preserves. Map. established by Board of ResoEuLfon go- 67-178. Butte County Supervisors December 5, 1987. 1.3 Ffood insurance Rate Maps, Natiorral'Fload insurance Management Agency_ 1988. Program. Federal Emergency }"- p 084 635 211 RECEIPT FOR "RTIF3Ep NtP61L tJ71N5t)RANCt r OWRAGt PPOVIVLtl Not Fon INTONAVONAL MAIL Seal to - cL�tard Stroet and Ne P. 0. Dox 151 P o state , nnd' ZIP Coda Palermo - CA 95968 ` _ Postage .. i Cnrtltied Foe SPOMI Dativery Fee Restnated u(tjjv„ty i'j 1 `-- turn tiECuetd sh tp whdm and Oak rhvnrnd Raln R.-e.celNI sHof omDOW. and AddresolnptoWr , tOTAL Postaga and Fees $ Peslmatk or [)at(] E 4 4 S11GK Pa5tAt3E VAh1P5 ttl "TIGLE 1tl CaVt fi FIflSt CIA$$ PtlStAGE, � �htitl„HAtI hEf1TIFiEtl 61ArL FEE. h; FOR Ally St:LEGTEtl a�pa�hlAL taddre"itltawinq i. it you want this receipt postmarked, $tick I gummed stub In q AlI the ra� n pi the receipt altachcd and present the anicie at a post lrca service window or hand h to Wt rural r.rrler. f tap extra charge) . 2. N you db not vranl this receipt pp,r"aarkbd, tack the gummed xiub 10 the ,righl of the ralurn address of c article, date. detach and' retain the receipt, and meq Inc attiato. MItno and ess On A ObIto tl attaplr it la the tom pt Ihb art'cla by means o'the gambled cads it $pace p-13 " 3. II you want a ratut i NO all whip thn a tom d mall numhbr Andens IN O' the CEIPTrt� QU s7 b tpceipt card, Farm tlgt , mils, odrervaaa, a8ix to hack of article. Eneorae Iron' of articta lE ad�acaat Ip the nUmtrAr, d...11 yet want delivery tt�trittIY en in M3ant of trig arinla° ail authariiod agent bl the addrns Co, bndorco fiL51'R s. Entot leas for the tntv'to tega i to lhb.apiirapriata spaces bn thetrnnt of this receipt. If return rocotpt Is toquetled, bheck the apt. .ola blocks in qpm i el Form 381, t1 r; p 0. t Jett -t7.1 fl7 fi, Save This receipt and pres,01 it It you make inquiry 91-22 .PERMIT NO. AI" 026-050-038 _ _ ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant. to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below: Howard Kee is hereby granted a Use Perm � in accordance with application filed: Use Permit to allow the expansion of a pre-existing nonconforming use to allow the addition of 2 storage/manufacturing buildings on property zoned AR -MH -1 located approximately 5 miles south of Oroville. 1. Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approvalof application and issuance of Permit, constitutes cause for the revocation of said permit in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Brute County Zoning Ordinance; including Butte County Code Sec. 24-62 2i thiless otherwise provided for in a special condition to this use permit, all conditions must be completed by the Permittee within 12 months of the delivery of the countersigned permit to the Permittee. 3; If any use for which a use ` erm1 has been anted is not established within_ p gr One year of the date of receipt of the Wintersigned permit by the Permittee, the permit shall become null and void and reapplication and a new permit shall be required to establish the use, q, The terms and conditions of this permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the Permittee. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: l: All .iunk not associated with the Business shall be removed .froin the property, 2. All equipment and materials not stored within a building shall be kept behind a 6 foot sight obscuring fence or shrubbery barrier made of evergreen plants spaced no less than 8 ft, `intervals; and maintained in a living Gond 3, Upon completion of the Please Two building; except for materials in transit; no outside storage of equipment or materials shall be allowed. 4, Applicant rust also comply with all other applieable State and local statutes, ordinances, and regulations, {M1 s r h- -•�Agate noun PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA95965-3397 TELEPHONE; (916) ,538-7601 Jule 29, 1991 PIowacd Xee P. O. Box 151 Palermo, CA 95968 CERTIFIED MAIL Re Use Permit, AP No. 026-050-038 Dear Mn Kee: Enclosed is your validated Use Permit No. 91-22 to allow the expansion of a pre-existing nonconforming.use to allow the addition of 2 storage/manufacturing bui d' pert buildings on property �y zoned AR -MPI -1 located approximately 5 miles south of Oro V1 lite, Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this officea,' between 10:00 aim.. and 3;00 p.m Sincerely, 11 /B.A,:`rcher %or of Planning BAK.,bd Diclosure cc: Department of Public Works (2) Environmental Health Department of Forestry unt, 'suit" 1c® LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT - 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 June 24, 1991 Mr. Howard Kee P.O. 'Box 151 Palermo, CA 95,068 CERTIFIED MAIL Re: Use Permit, AP 026-050-038 Dear Mr. Kees We are enclosing, the original And one copy of your conditional Use permit No. 91-122 to allow the expansion of a pre-existing nonconforming use to -allow the addition of 2 storage /manufactuth I manufacturing buildings on property zoned AR -MH -1 located approximately 5 miles south of Oroville. Both copies must be signed and returned to this department within 50 days from the receit of this letter. We will then have them,vandated by the Chairan of the Butte CountypPlanning Com'i lm ion and the original Will be returned to you for your records. Commission ssi opies within 80 days will result In the deartment would then be necessary p nit has been signed by the Applicant, Manning Commission, and said permit er, please contact this office between 00 ro E "o O0 CI 10 78 =1.6cr tj nit has been signed by the Applicant, Manning Commission, and said permit er, please contact this office between 00 F t71 r4 15a, PQ a I C, P in 0 t3l i6 13� (6 P4 nit has been signed by the Applicant, Manning Commission, and said permit er, please contact this office between June 24, 1991 Mr. Howard r Kee RO, Box 151 Palermo, CA 9596 CERTIFIED I`IAIL ` Re Use Pernit, AP 026-.050-038 ;I Dear Mr. Kee: We are enclosing the original and one copy of your conditional Use Permit No. 91-22 to allow thee anion o£ a re-existin nonconforming XP p g g use to allow the addition of 2 g/agbuildin s on property zoned AR-MH1 located approximately Smil5 south of0U�lle, Both copies must be signed and returned to this department within 30 days from the receipt of this letter. We will then have them validated by the Chairman of the Butte County Planning Commission and the uriginal will be returned to you for your records. Please be aware that failure to return the signed copies within 30 days will result in the use permit becoming invalid. Re-application to this department would then be necessary ICES FOR ANY SEU 10 LECTED aPT�aNn� RV CESS 1000 fro0, to proceed with the project. lee d, slick the nummed stub to the tight of the retum nddre' Wont the article at a post office setvico window or hand it The Use Permit is deemed ,granted when this permit has been signed by the applicant, postmarked, 00 the gumnlad club to thetightof the ictr is, received by the a lire o£ the Chairman of the Planning Comrriission, and said permit with the counter signature 1 and nd io the toolpt, wid 6nali the artit ie. applicant by registered mall: �d Atttachiti u6 he fronto the �rdtic dor h ansuof thorpunn� Should OU have an questions regarding this matter, lea afiiz to the bank of Nilo, [ntl6rse mint of ndicie w47MM y y q g g , please contact this office between 1001: to the'^urhber, 10:00 am, and 3:00 pain. oIe�3tha nddr6sso ; of to as oulhniltod 60601 o the add J0 , VV qh 1116 !rant of ma;odlcie. ,,Since el y iested Intheappropif6te spam. to 1116 front of this feclpt ���� the appncablo blocks 16 item t of Crum 8ni1. � !l I it you toklltngUiN, *0a,G.P.M 16po;2rw B. A, rcher Director of Planning BAKtIr En+r. Mr. Howard Kee P.O. Box 151 Palermo, CA. 9596$ Re: Use Permit, AP 026-050-038 - Dear Mr. Kee: I At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning 'Commission held June 13, 1991, a t h your request for a Use Pcrmit for the expansion of a pre-existing nonconforming use to ...' allow the addition of 2 storage/manufacturing buildings or�•property zoned AR -MH -1- located approximately 5 miles south of Oroville, was approved; subject to the following •as6' conditions: -,-. 1. All junk not associated with the Business shall -'be removed. from the property. 2. All equipment and materials not stored within a building Shall'be kept behind a 6' sight obscuring fence or shrubbery barrier made of evergreen plants spaced at no less than 8' intervals, and maintained 6 a living 'condition. 3 Upon completion of the Phase two building, except. for materials in transit; no outside storage of equipment or materials shall be allowed. 4. Applicant and also cornply with all other applicable State and local statutes; ordinances, hm1 Should you desire to appeal any of the conditions imposed by the Planning Commission; you must do so in writing with the appeal fee of $502.50, to the Clerk of the Board of fp05County Center Drive, ��laoa, P�to0ptn., Friday, June 211991�you do not appeal ad.fthere senootyeappeal within the 8 -day appeal period, your use permit will be issued after June 21; 1991: Recently enacted 'legislation (AB 3158, Chapter 1706, Statutes of 1990, effective -January 1, 1991) requires that the Department of Fish and Game impose and collect filing fees ff Z _„� �r ,5 ffa tte coun, IANC OF NA7UIZAL l"7EAlTN ASG 3,. ! PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE. OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE; (916) 538-1601 I Tune 4, 1,991 j Howard Kee P.O. Box 151 Palermo, CA 95968 Re 'Use Permit, AP 026-00-03$ Dear Mr. Kee: Enclosed is a copy of the Staff Findings concerning your application for a Use Permit to allow the expansion of a pre' -existing nonconforming use to allow two additional storage buildings on property zoned AR WH -1 located on the west side of Lincoln Blvd., Palermo; A public hearing has been. set for June 13, 1991 at 10:30 a.m. This meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Thrive, Oroville, California. The Planning Commission recommends that the applicant or their authorized representative be present at the hearing to respond to any questions the Commission may have. In the event that no one will represent the applicant, please. contact the Planning ; office prior to the sch>eiduled public hearing. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact thij office between 10:00 a.m m and 3:00 p.. Sincerely, 8, A. Kircher Director of Planning Craig B. Sanders Assistant Planner CBS lr Enc. ti _ _ .B I{1!C �- 1D5OROVILLE•BANGORHWY. c ViewO .jQ • �.�� s•+: ,,,._'9s.1 Idora = i37 hhaca Sc G1 o Ln. Cat Oak Road '@ IMP�j t to m =Rd' YJefferson o tin -7 3 V-7 �, 1 oia ru v dont o i S Deer m 1 ' e �•\s S a q t a D:edserUr a m venue > Q Oroville Gar ( Ranh Rd, r F �`G�. fi e'n -, ,.•• 5 n o Gravest. Q O den ¢ leather �'Oz Chinese o w Q c cl Can. to m 1 a V.6 Road o m ata p Sewage n ent. Parks S ¢ - C, 1.Q � Rand. t g 'maG Plant Rose 3 t Miii St m - Lane n 3 'ie4s £a'lY.f''"^ a Q "Summers Sr.I '°o O` Q.-- - a•[r r r a • 4 a • . 3 §�"" —. .aa m v t civ a - �0 0� ' Uak Knoll Wa f� Z Oak .Knoll.4L" �• - tiumc e`er' '3 n Q 6r 10%k W, ', 2 Clinton Ave mRoz to !y. 'o - w m `% Ftp• old, °. E to as nvf a ¢ 3 �9# ¢. 3� �WA /. ,Road .Las. 1•�.r...0-«os. . Ave.. ¢ A• JRJrT �tG i) o 1L te�a tt �, y : 4 ak � 3 Regent Pliaeton {.. i i i of � ! GFORG/q FACIFi WqY o rir m Oakdale as?lumasl� g f O Looe �S]saise S _ ,a. HeightsSch.- ligh Sch: !. z J ot Or. Lroug am Dr. i ut Vista a V' > Avenue a �- F Mr�mriai :Monte. w CorSe� d- m 5 ForestvievvDr.: n Cctri- _ °• ; < lielen Waco 3 0- r Stuar m o i, m 1- ��� j Via Madero Schutil � j s - Nissen Ranch� i re}ceSL • :: S.x•. Ct 1 V:a: Canela Rd. Via. Layton r a W (, > rLU o c J3 Alverda:Drive S�. : 3 Road` OPHIR ROADP p r /. Hei4°ts Qc- �, `a q. F o Wheeler _ m pac;t\c- •``: , c � r= 3 uo Ca+oo �� � O ¢. - :ylndustriaiv av- �� « S erene m Lane:- - o: o. 4 Kuser - Road •• c ` i I' Pinecrest ^ _ aoaa y fj�. V Q- o ¢o' Drive w J Odie, WY cc ei:c r a � INier E � Hattie Ln -aT IT a m Ma Ie Ave. wy- oad Sam L nn ice. m j c. - f.; � . 70�� « > e y ` G >., v MaaridPa Ln. TP Drivel r O s A E ' 3 3 Bohemi A _ t Ardeth t, ¢Drive- Sutter View Ct. Kenneth r t a�� E¢ o o _ann Qo t� 1 I Sih a ve. 8ofie>,� 0 oMur -Met f, O u+ o l v Rd. I. / C 1. m _ K '9 Cougar - c� Swan Ln� rL _ n Z M6 siva Avenue _ - '" ei J -o F.rr loon' _ Amo• aaoo• good. sow . . o c Prince Road _ a U ��> Vio c Q ALERMO away wu: J a J a d a d - (\d FlI TT V1 C I M V t \ M AP' HOWARD KEE USE Pr --R" C I ?: DrIL0 - CIS 0 — 03 S 22 Declaration recommended. CBS tma cc: Environmental Health Public Works Howard Kee INTER -DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM 9" TO; All Applicable Agencies ' FROM:. Planning Department DATE: April 29, 1991 SUBJECT; Environmental Review, AMENDMENT to .the Checklist for Howard Kee Use Permit/APN'#026-050--038 r This is an Amendment to the environmental checklist prepared for, � a the Howard Kee Use Permit, dated April 10, 1991. Specifically item 20a of the checklist should be changed to read as follows: "The subject property is located in an area designated as having a high archaeological sensitivity due to it's proximity to Wyman Ravine. The site was originally dredger tailings which were leveled by the applicant and fill dirt was brought 7` in to form a top soil layer. The area is level and is used as an equipment yard. with this in niMd the chances that an archaeological site exists that may be disturbed is remote, .rr Should any artifacts be encountered during construction all work shall cease until a qualiLied archaeologist has made a thorough inspection of the site, and gives „learance to 1 continue. ,� with ,this change the checklist can now be nmarked "No" for itme 20a, and item 1 under Mandatory Findings of -Significance and a Negative Declaration recommended. CBS tma cc: Environmental Health Public Works Howard Kee �I Butte # Dunt �-•+ _.'fes,. LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND 9EAUTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT .r- 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 ,i March 29, 1991 { Mr. Howard Kee P.O. Box 151 Palermo, CA 9596$ Re: Use Permit/APN 026-050-038 Log #91-02-15-12 Dear Mr. Kee: An initial study of your proposed project, a Use Permit, indicates potentially adverse impacts to the environment (refer' to the enclosed environmental checklist). To reduce or eliminate these impact+; suitable mitigation measures are roquired as part of the project. Otherwise, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. An early response to this t,-.iification, sent to the Planning Department, will expedite the scheduling of your project',. Please Forward your written response wit, n;'15 days from the date of this letter. A list of local consultants is included. ",These persons can determine the need for a survey by conducting a records search, conduct archaeological surveys or arrange for such surveys. In the event, of an EIR requirement, a subsequent letter will be sent outlining the procedure for the C."ounty to select the consultant to prepare the EIR. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office between 10,00 a.m. and 3:00` p.m.j any weekday. Sincerely, B. A. Kircher Director of Planning Craig B. Sander, r, Assistant Plantitr CBS:tma Enclosure 01 i cou w... //M//I r q, —�_ - LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT .. 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 February 26, 1991 Mr Howard Kee P.O. Box 151 Palermo, CA 95968 RE: PRE -APPLICATION REVIEW AP #016-050-038 Dear Mr. Kee; This is to notify you that we have received sufficient assurances from Butte County Environmental Health and Public Works Departments that your project can meet their requirements. This fulfills the Pre -Application review process. Pursuant to the Butte County Planning ]department Project Review Procedure Manual which states, "Upon tentative approval of a land use permit or variance by the Environmental Health Department and Land Development Division of the Department of Public Works, they applicant must submit a completed formal application, including any required changes from the original submittal and the balance of the fees within 6 months of the tentative ;approval." No additional work shall be performed on this project until we have received the remainder of the application fee in the amount of $780.00 and, if any, required changes from the original submittal Please submit the fee along with any'required changes from the original submittal to the Butte County Planning Department no later than August 4 1991, or your application will become void, and in Order to continue the project, you will be required to re=apply. Please make all checks payable to the Butte County Treasurer, Enclosed is a field marker for identification of the project. Please secure the ribbon in a conspicuous place on the site; preferably visible from the roadway: v' 1.1 r�K� � y•� � .NT+_w couil LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AN'([) BEAUTY. n i 4SE 'PLANNING DEPARTMENT f �t x ii 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 96965-3397 ..; a.��L .f �•, ey � .•, TELEPHONE; (916)'$38-7601 February 25, 1991 Mr. Howard Kee P.O. Box 151 Palermo, CA 95968 RE: USE PERMIT, APN #026-050-038 Dear Mr. Kee: We received your p.re-application review request for the subject Use Permit. Butte County Public Works and Environmental Health have received the information you submitted. The Planning Department will consider this application complete only after we have assurances from the above departments that the project complies with appropriate ordinances and any `? conditions imposed, can be meta It is the applicant's responsibility to provide any additional information i1teded by Public Works or Environmental Health to meet their requirements. Public Works may be contacted by telephone at 538-7266 and Environmental Health at 538- 1281 for further information as to their evaluation of the proposal and their requirements. The Planning Department staff will also be reviewing the application for any special conditions or modifications that are appropriate. Should you have any questions about the pre -application review, please contact this office between 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 pm. Sincerely, B.A, Kircher Director of Planning q Judy Kramer Planning Technician JK/tma 1✓ (r» 05 ..Lw,.w»-..,> r _ .. r 00 O al_ ail ffrx. OI t r 4' _ — a 04 n 1 n A I , p ,r. r „ "buil.dipgs on property zoned AMIH-1 located approximately 5 miles south of Oroville on the west side of Lincoln Blvd., identified as APN X1026-050-03$; Orovi,lle area. We are making an assessment of possible environmental impacts and will be preparing an environmental document, either a Negative Declaration, ,Negative Declaration with Mitigation Measures or an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Please 'provide any factual statements, ideas for investigation, or opinions you can offer in your area of concern or expertise that relate to either physical, social, or economic impacts that this project may generate. Please respond within 14 days of the above -noted date. if no response is generated by this inquiry, then it shall be assumed that there are no significant environmental: impacts which are potential from the project. We appreciate any assistance you can provide. Sincerely, JLF6y KRAM /PLANNING TECHNICIAN BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 (916) 538-7601 TO: County Sheriff Department DATE: March 4, 1991 RE: PROJECT REVIEW & ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION HOWARD KEE/USE, PERMIT APR 41026-050-038%File 1191-22 Enclosed is preliminary data our office has received ar generated concerning the following project; HOWARD KEE USE PERMIT to allow the expansion of a pre-existing ,non conforming use to allow two additional storage buildings on property zoned ARMH-1 located approximately 5 miles south of Oroville on the west side of Lincoln Blvd;, identified as APN #026-050-038, Oroville area. i We are making an assessment of possible environmental impacts and will be preparing an environmental document,, either a Negative Declaration,, Negative Declaration with Mitigation Measures or an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Please provide any -factual statements, ideas for investigation, or opinions you can offer in your area of concern or expertise that relate to either physical, social, or economic impacts that this project may generate. Please respond within 14 days of the above -noted date. if -o response is generated by this inquiry, then it shall be assumed that there are no significant environmental impacts which are potential from the project. We appreciate any assistance you can provide Sincerely, , J y KRAM IPLANNING TECHNICIAN Comments Dges .your agency wish to receive a, copy of the environmental d0cunent (initial study for Negative Declaration (with or without Mitigation Measures) or tIR for this project) VES— NO BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 ,r (916) 538-7601 TO; County Fire Department DATE' March 4, 1991 RE PROJECT REVIEW & ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION !r HOWARD KEEIUSE PERMIT' APN #026-050=038%File #91-22 Enclosed is preliminary data our office has received or generated concerning the following project: HOWARD KEE USE PERMIT to allow the expansion of a pre-ekisting non conforming use to allow two additional storage buildings on property zoned ARMH-1, located approximately 5 miles south of Oroville on the West side of Lincoln Blvd., identified as APN #026-050-038,, Oroville area. We are making An assessment of possible environmental impacts and will be preparing an envirorw-rntal document, either a Negative Declaration, Negative Declaration with Mitigation Measures or an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Please provide any factual statements, ideas for investigation, or opinions you can ofer in your area of concern or expertise that relate to either physical, social, or economic impacts that this project may generate. Please respond within 14 days of the above-noted date, If no response is generated by this inquiry, then it shall: be assumes, that there are no significant environmental impacts which are potential from the project. We appreciate. any assistance you can provide: Sincerely, JOKY KRAM /PLANNING TECHNICIAtV BUTTE COUNTY PLF.NNING COMMISSIOiv` ,; County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 (916) 538-1601 TO: Oroville Wyandotte Irrigation Dist, DATE. March 4, 1991 P.O. Box 581 Oroville, CA 95965 RE: PROJECT REVIEW < & ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION HOWARD KEE%USE PERMIT AVN #026-050=038/File #91-22 Enclosed is preliminary data our office has received or generated concerning i0he following project: HOWARD KEE USE PERMIT to allow the expansion of a pre-existing non conforming use to allow two additional storage L buildings on property zoned ARMH-1 located approximately 5 miles south of Oroville on the west side of Lincoln Blvd., identified as APN #0267050-038, Oroville area. We are makI ng an assessment of possible environmental impacts And will be preparing an environmental document, either a Negative Declaration, Negative Declaration with Mitigation Mecasures or. an Environmental Impact Report (EZR) Please provide any-factual statements, ideas for investigation, br opinions you can offer in your area of concern or expertise that relate to either physical, social, it economic impacts that this project may generate. Please respond within 14 days of the above-noted datei If no response is gencmted by this inquiry, then it shall be assumed that there are no significant environmental imp°2cts which are potential from the projQct. We appreciate any assistance you can provide: Sincerely, J Y KRAM., /PLANNING TECHNICIAN Comments: toes your agency wish to redoi:'ve a copy Of the en=, irotMeni_al document (initial Study for Negu�i"Ve Deci'ardtion (;,pith or without Mitigation Measures) or EZR for this project) YES NO 'c BUTTL COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, C' LRE-APPLICATION REVIEW .FORM. Y Tp; Public Works Deg°artment Date: February 10, 1991 RE; Pre-Application Review Information for: E HOWARD KE/USE PERMIT_ APN 1026-050-038 File #91-22 Enclosed is preliminary data our office has-received or generated concerning the following project: HOWARD KEE USE PFRMrm-_t� ai the + _ j exY�ansion of apre-existing no conformine.use to allow 2 add;tinna7 Grnra go buildings located approx .5 miles south of Oroville-on t-hp waaf, dA of Lincoln Boulevard, Zoned AINH-1, identified as AP #026-050-038, Oroville area. Please indicate your response by checking the nUpropriate box. C� No requirements for th?.s project: rVJ The project as proposed can meet this Departments ,.a requirements. Stitlicient proof has been given that the applicant car, meet the following conditions approved: N _ Enclosed :is preliminary data our office has received or generated „ concerning the following project: HOt+IARD KEF jj,SF PRRMTT- ko a11cuz the expansion of 4 pre-existing non conforming use to allow _2 add4t hna7 gfnrapE buildings located approxi. 5 miles south of, Orovitle on t-he Sipa= g dp pf Linro7.n Boulevard, Zoned ARMH-1 identified as AP 41026-050-03$, Oroville area. Phase indicate your response by checking the appropriate 'box. g project. No requirements for this " The project as proposed can meot this Departments ,,.. requirements. Sufficient proof has been given that r the applicant can meet the following conditions approved Tha project js �,�roposed can/does not meet the, 1—� requirements of this department. Arevisio �.. y of the project will be necessary. Tppcant .s has been contacted with this ihformation. + Signature:,