Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout026-050-046PLANNING COMMISSION SbMMAIY SHEET FOR LAND DIVISIONS APPLICANT Jack Lias Loa485-10-15,-01 P, O. Box 223 ADDRIZ8 Palermo, CA 95968 OWNER Same PROJECT DESCRIPTIONTentative Parcel Map to divide 3 Acres more or less to create 2 at 1.5 acres each LOCATION On the South side of Stanley Drive, approx. 500 feet east of its intersection with Rock Haven Court, Palermo area. ASSM880PIS PAROtt NUMBS (S) AP#26-05-46 ZONING 1112- p ] f-1 i GEN. PLAN PROJECT r:C1i+I a X3'1'Zt�!'i'? DATE APPLICATION YCEIVED October 14, 1985 Barnhart -Brown Assoc a es, P. 5. - 6, Orov lle, CA 95-965 DATE PUB.L.I'jATION NOTICE WRITTEN PUBL13HED PLACE N0,46P'APER NOTICE(S) PUBLISHED -. O. C. P. G. B. DATE MASHING LIST PRS„* -ARI D DATE MAIL -OUT NOTICES WRITTEN MAILED �IZIMBEZ? DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR IS Rt-T-1OTiT PREPS RE0 ENVIRONMt, NTAL CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION - DATE PILED PETERMINATION AND DATE � NEGATIVE DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED 2-/b-% '4lT1`GA'T D t'E:CIA TVE 1) XlATLArT`ICsN W DI Vr'l', ADOP' D ENV. IMPA )T REPORT DATE CERTI%":SEI; SUB., COMMITTEE WZT11110 DAT ADV''' ' -Y AGENCY AEARI'NG DA'I'S. . w 4 ADVISORY AGENCY ACTION Aisla BOARD ACTION COMMENTS 1-:r w1bl 71e, cel forn DEPARTMENT OF P IDLIC WORKS WILLIAM (BIII) CHEJ 11, Director' 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE . OROVILLC, CALIFORNIA 45965 elephonr- (916) � 10.7681 RONALD D, mceLROY Deputy ,Director February 22 1988 _ Barnhart/Brown Assoc. RB: AP 26-05-46 P. 0. Box 1576 Tentative Parcel Map Or.oville, CA 95965 Dear Mr. Brown; At the regular meeting of•, the Butte County Advisory Agency held on %ebruaraly 22, 1988, the Agency granted a time extension of 3 years in order to file the ,final map on the Above-referenced property. ,file new date of expiration is Vebruary 1.0; 1991. If no appeals Etre timely filed--within fifteen (15) darts of the date of the Advisory Agency's approval--with the Cleric of the Board of Supervisors, this action will be final. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contract this office. Ver; truly yours, William Chef f Director of Public Works Jrffn Memdonsa Assistent Director jm/ds attachment cc: Planning Department Environmental linal.th Department Jack Dias, F. 0, Box 2231 Palermo, CA 95968 Jack DiasINTATIVz EL MAP TE PARC2 Parcels on the south,side area. Of Stanley Drive, approx' 500 ft - east of its in'tersectiOn With Rock Haven Court. AP 26-05-46 Palermo Engifteer- Barnhart/Brown Associates xje,A 1111G O,p,-,r Mike Evans had no comment. Edward Smock) a n('ighbor, said that St-n1ey Av, , has been at the intersection of Edward Dr. since 19'(9 Since the inCe and Stanley Ave. He objects to its $ reopening PtiOrl 01' Edward Drive It is a hazard to the neighbors, again abuut 6 Im'onths ago. is deteriorating and is unsafe for trafftc is increasing and t h P I -0a d or the children and other resl-dOntfl, Th e neighbors want the road to remain closed. the conditions of approval. Mr. Smock- Wanted to knew about Mr- MendOnsa said that the roadway -- Stanley Ave. constructed to the minim -- Wil lhave to 1)(, Potholes. minimum toad standard. Hc- Would have to fill up the ar. Smock asked :t the intersect ' the road must go on through or eould It be closed off ion? Also what are the regulations it be closed off completely? on a Private road -can Mv - MendOnss said that anyone who has the right to use the road in their de can use it, The more people involved, the more difficult it 4 For the road to be blocked off, everyone woulds to do, Either that, Or there are lawsuits. have to be in favor of it. -L Sbmecnc might block off the road but they might not, have the legal -ig I ht, to do it, Some of the previous Parcel maps might have the right to use Edwards Drive down to Bohemia. Rr Smock said the other Parcels are only involved with Stanley Drive, Mr- MehdOnsa said that the applicant Will be require to that standard from Lincoln in through his properties,d to do Stanley Drive Mr. Smock said that the PetersOns are Present or, Owners Who feel as tvir Smock does about the are among the property road situation. Or' Smock presented a letter from Mr. and Mrs, McManus regarding the toad situation, They also Want Edwards Drive Closed Off to traff.'C, Mrs- Peterson said that they own two pieces of protyper One home. There are 6 homes down Edwards that are in) and vent out the six are a&a" Ist Opening Edwards Drive. They volved) and Pout, of go down Edwards) Out to Bohemia an Will always be abit, to property here d but. most of the e POP10 Who bought, did 80 with the belief that it Would notbe a tftj.�OUgh road, gUtlrb COUNTY AbV!8opy AGE,- NCY atmu, Mike .Evans said that there are two mobile homes on the intent is to separate them. Property and the uses Stanley Drive out to Lincoln Blvd .parcel is a Parcel of a Parcel a a Parcel within the subject parcel. D There is a map that the lower (southerly) NAP that creates Y) Part of the Y is this land, that leaves to Stanley Drive and out to LincolnBlvd, without a 60 ft right-of-wad obtain a 60 ft right-of-wa The appl7.ca was suggested extend the 60 through the NAPsoutherly along Edwards Drive to Lo to use Stanley Drive, obtain Lhercel.60 ft. Thererighirsst-,wa a Bohemia or a choice to the applicants to use Stanley Drive and Edwards Drive, obtain 60 f�, or if and construct those Y and construct it, or , or use Edwards Drive exclusive) necessary the additional right-Oi-way across the NAP s y� construct :tt and obttlin allow for those options. In any case there must be legal acco improved rc�adwa c qca�°tr: of approval y. Mr: Evans had not knownabout . rrr'►cI an Pard The and iti Mr, Evans said the neighbors and Mr. Dias should the neghbai'hoad i�r�neerns. out the best solution for Staple IlriDi. get together ansa wulik Options available in order to Y The Was's Wo�i1d still 111Avc other get the two existing units separate((. Mrs. Peterson said that the neighbors they thought it .Would be on a dead-end road: had bought the PrOPOrtY because Mr. Mendonsa suggested that the neighbors get together with Mr. Dins, HEARING CLOSED Mr. Reid stated: having reviewed the environmental review Planning Director's .Report of Jan. 24 checklist and the a negative declaration of environment�ll986, 1 Will theke a o motion to grant to create 2 parcels on AD 26-0 as parcel map with the Butte Count. 5 46 finding that the Project is in conformance a significant effect on the environment. Motion seconds g Y moral Plan and Butte Count Ionia and will not have Y carried unanimously, by Mr. Streeter and I W,illimakeaaemntian togathrbv nPgat"ve dealaratiun Was adopted this d approve the <Parcel map ,for Jack Dias parcel;; on AP 26-05-46. Approval is t create 2tc' subject to the following oonditianst Public Works canditi rns: l , Verify legal access, 2, P"Ovide tw.)-WaY trrxversable L1ccc;;a RS -8 -LD -1 "unty maintained road or state highway' r'ach parcel. i'r� a Access to be ruscrved in deeds a" per county ordinance and offs for dedication on the final =P4red 4. Show $0 Pt, bUi1dirag .sotback linLi measured from L:enterl�.ne of accesseasement, 5. Provide road oad mann.++panne agreement, Bement-: 64 ,Show all easements of record. on the h final map.,. 7+ Provide street name signs per requirementE; of the )apt. of publi Works prior to recordation of the final map, c bU`STE COCJiV7�7t "V3:80AY MtNCY 'MINU ES - F`Qbr Mary 10, , 1.586. 8. Provide permanent solution for drainage. 9- Pay Off any assessments: 1.0. Pa delinquent Y any q ent taxes or current taxes as required.. Health Dept. condition: 11: Provide a 100 ft, leachfield free setback around exonting Wells either Within the property or within 100 ft; of the property boun(,jarie;s an parcels 1 and 2, Nation seconded 3y tilr. Streeter ant Carrie •ljn rjously. BUTTV COUNTY AbV180V IMNCY MINU'T'ES - Vebruary 1.0 j 1986 APPENDIX ii otC9TI OF DETERAlkltM l`� TO.- office of Planning and Research FROM Planning Department 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 7 County Center Drive Sacramento, CA 9581E Orovillm, CJ 95 65 or XCounty Clerk County of 13sutte� FEB 1985 SMECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152' of the Public Resources Code. ELEANOR M. BECKER, County Clerk By A. 41AC,1N;w Deputy ect Title AP # _ Name Tentative Parcel Map 26-05-46 Jack. Dias t ate C eating use Nurn Contact erson Telcp;ione .Plumber (if, svbmltted to Clearinghouse) Public Works John Mendonsa (91.6) 534-4266 �� tiOn on the south side of Stanley Drive, approximately 500x' east of its intersection with Rock Haven Court; 'Palermo area. K;!Ri Des P93i Tentative Parcel. Map to divide 3i acres into two parcels at 1.5± acres each. -tee This is to advise that the Butte County T� _..i Eon ®OA71P11 /1P ARRMQiP IA��IHAf'tMl .. has approved the above described project and has made the following determination$ regarding the aabove described project: 1. The project wlll, L will not, have a significant effect on the environment. . An Environmental impact Report was prepared for this project ,pursuant. to the provisions of 'CEQA. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project ipaxrsuant to the provisions of CEQA. The MR mr ' negative Declaration and record of project approval may be ..examined at: Butte County Planning Department. 7_ County Center - • 3. Mitigation measures were, 'k were not, matte a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of Overriding Consideratlons was, , was not, xadopted for this 'project. 01 Date ttecelved for Filing2/12/86 ■ r COUNTY OF BUTTE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS - 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 916.534-4266 916-534-4339 February 111 1986 RE': AP 26-05-h6 Jack Dian Tentative VlAruc l Mal) P. 0, Box 923 Palermo, CA 9596$ Dear toe. Dies: February eld At the regular meeting itheenegative°declarationrregardingi�environmental ��� 1986, the Agency adoptedg AP 26- d5 -h6 review and approved the tentative parcel map for subject to the conditions as listed on the attached sheet. If no app eats are timely filed --within ten (10) days of the date of the Advisory Agency's approval --With the Clerk of the Board of Supervisor,, this action will be final. When the conditions of approval are complied with, itte Countywill be Deptment rdoder for you to file your "final map��with the Public Works for recordation within twenty-four (24) months of the date, of approval by the Advisory Agency. if you should have any questions regarding this matter, phase contact this office: Very truly yours, William Cheff Director of Public Works 41ner,�,Aa s iscant Director JM/ns Attachment cci. Planning Environmental Review �0• Environmental Health Department ,�`� nnjng Baraharb/Drown 0 a, LO 1110 (Revised 2-4U-84) r Jack bias, TENTATIVE PAI3CNZ :MAP approx. 500 ft. east of its intersection parcels ith Rock On the Haven area. ofi4ilrlley Drive; AP 26-05-46 t, Palerm Engineer: Barnhart/Brown Associates Public Works conditions: 1. Verify legal access 2. Provide tw()-way traversable access RS -8 -LD - county maintained road or state highway. T to each Marcel,fr(M n 3. Access to be reserved in deeds as per county ordina y - for dedication on the final map, ncc and offered 4. Show 50 ft. 'building setback leasement. ine measured from Cent'"line of access 5, Provide road maititel-Ince agreement. 6. Show all easornents of record On the f'i,naI tM, p.. '7. Provide street name signs per requirement V70rk8 prior to recordation of the final map°f the Kept; of Public 8. Provide permanent solution for drainage. 9� -'ay off any assessments, payan delinquent taxes or current taxes lb. y � i s require�t Health Dept. condition; 11. i°ruvlae a 100 ft., leachfield free setback around_eist wit;tiira the property or within 10() ft, bf the ing wells> either on Parcels 1 and 2, Property boundaries Inter-Departmehful Memorandum Butte County Advisory Agency gency rhoMI Planning Director susiEc'n Report on Tentative Parcel Map of Jack Dias on AP 26-05-4 DATE: 16 January 29, 1986. This is a proposal to divide 3 acres more or less to c�;y, acres each. The present zoningis AR- to 2 at 1.5 - Mobile Home 1 acre -1 (Agricultural Residential County General Plan designates)thishareanas AgriculturalgPlan There are no specific or community p cel,' the Butte ROS idential. y plans for the area.. The proposal, dogs not conflict with Proposed element of the Butte CountyCGeneralounty oplan nor anning not y adoptad or or community plan. y County, specific Recommend approval subject to the following conditions'; 1. Provide access to each parcel which complies with County Code. ,MT ; lr n I. APPfi.N1)IX t COUNTY Or Bt11'n FiNVYRONMENTAL CHECKLIST VOW (to -be complete 5y i.ea Agancy) 1 c 11 8 5 b 10-15—u BACKGROUND AP 11 26-05-46 I . Name of proponent JACK DIAS 2, Address or proponent and representative (if appl irtable) Jack Dias Barnhart— P.O. arnhart:—P O. Box 223 P.O. Box 1576 Palermo, CA 95968 Orovillet CA 95965 3. 1'rojr_c•t dLusaNri{?ti on .. Tentativa_Par�cel..oMag....,_.. ,..� ,...�.. MANDATORY VINDING -Ol' ' IGNIFTCANCE YIISMAYBE NO a. Does theproject have. the potential to degrade they quality or they environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a rish or wildlife species, cause n fish or wildlife population to drop below scir- sustai,ning levels, threaten to eliminate a, plant or. anima:[ community, reduce the number or restrict I -)Iv range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Hoes the project have the potential to aebleve short-term benefits to the detrimtMnt of lona-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment in Ono which occurs ixt a rola+ivoly brier period or time while long-term impacts 1v11.,. endure into the future,) c. Does the project have impacts which are individu- aally llmltod, but cumulatively* 4cnsid,erable4 (,A PI'Oj ect may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where thc effect or the total of those impacts on 'thea environment is sigiflricant, I d, toes the pr( ct heatie enVi ronmen"I >� r1ey�=ts ►vt,.ielT will cause ubstantial adverse efl'vots on human heings, either directly or indlrrctty? ilHTP RMINA1 ION (To be cojilp'll oted ))a• tho 1"vati A4ettcpl on thr basis or this i ni. t Lal ('Val ua.t;ion t }� I/WL find the' pr0p0:;ex1 prcaiv t COULD NOT have a significant effect ern rlrc' 0ry4"fronriaett'k, and ai N1:'GA'1'lVl: C)i:C:1.ARAT TON talil be prepared, I/Wti find that although they proposed project coutd have a sxgnifi.- ` cant erfect on the c..,nvironmrnt, there will not be as significant effect in this cast because the in,riGATION NIHASUR.S described on the attached short havo been added to tbV project. A NROATIVts JR-CLARATit)N ►Pill he prepart�d, I/M., I'Ind they prtlpoSe 1 project MAY have a sioiricaant erfect on u the (Invironnivnt, and an. tiN1, IRoNMt1NTAI. 'tMPACT RVPORT is required, DATE: I�avember �15 19 5 COUNTY cat' 11L)TT13, PLANNTNC1 DEPARTNIVNT �4a1 Reviewed 15y. A�W tlej A8.i§6aate Pldnner F t IV; ENVIRONMENTAL ACTS xp a.naiions of all -"yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheet(s), 1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant. YES a. Unstable MAYBE NO earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? 1). Disruptions_ displacements, compaction or overcoverin of the soil? x C. Change in topography or ground surface relief features?. d, Destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Increase ae in wind or water• erosion of soil either on or offsite? ' f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltaticnxi, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the Ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g. Loss of prime agriculturally productive soil.; yi outside designated urban areas? h. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud - -�`- Slides, ground failure or similar hazards? Z AIR,. Will the Proposal result in substantial: �~ 77 Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or fumes? c. Alteration XI of air movement, moisture, or tem or an chane in climate, locally or regionally?e, Y or 3. WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements in either marine or fresh waters?' b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? C- Need for off-site Surface drainage improve- ments, including vegetation removal:, channel,.- izatiOn or culvert installations d. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? e, Change in the amount of surface water in any 'Water body? iC f. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface Water quality, includitg but not limited to temperature, dissolved yg turbidity? gnor M Alteration of the da.'recta.oh. or ,rate of flow of ground 4ators? X h. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, ar through interception of w,t aquifer by cuts or excavations?' x i. Reduction in the amount of Water otherwise i available for public water supplies? Exposure J4 of ped le ox p p�raperty to water related hazards such as flooding? 2 4. PLANT LIFE, YES Will the MAYBE No proposal result in substantial: a, ange in the diversity of species, or number Of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops) and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, `rare or endangered species of plants? C. Introduction �( of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the r normal replenish- ment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? S. ANIMAL LIFE. Will.. the,. insnumbert�al . a• C ang in the diversityoOflspeci,es s orult Of any species of animals (birds_, land ani.tt)al,s including reptiles, fish and shell fish, benthic organisms insects)? or b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? C. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier ~. -- to the migration or movement of animals? d. ,Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? _-- .. 6. NOISE. Will the proposal. result i n substantial; a. Increases in existin b. Exposure of g noise levels?. People to severe noise levels? 7. LIGHT AND CLARE. Will the proposal produce s g i .cant light and glare? —._ 8_; LAND USE. }Vi11 the propos.t;, result in a su stantial alteration of the present ax planned land use of an area? NATURAL RESOURCES: }Uil1 the ro osa substantial; P i� l result in a Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural resources? - -. 10: LS� K OF UPSET, Will the proposal. involve; F' A r�`sL o explosion or the release Of hazard- ous substances (including, but not limited to, ail> pesticidest chernicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? b Possible interference with an emergency response pian or emergency evacuation plan? 11 POPULATION. Will the proposal alt er i$tri ution, density, or growth rdtethe of theationhuman population? 12- HOUSING. evide the proposal. af; ect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? w 4 YES MAYBE NO 1.3. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result rn a. Generation of substantial additional: vehicle movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact on existing transportation systems? d. Significant alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods?_ e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f, Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14; PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered, governmental services, a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? .. 15. ENERGY. will the proposal result in: as se of substantial amounts of fuel.or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing -2 sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. UTILITIES. Will the propsal result in a need for new systems, or substantial: alterations to the following a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? c. Water availabil ity' d. Sewer or septic tank? e. Storm grater drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? 17. HUMAN HEALTH. Will, the proposal result in; a.Cr`eat�on of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)?_ b. Exposure of people ple to potential health hazards? 1$: AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the 5struct on of any scenic nista or view open to the, public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? ,. 4 YES MAYBE NO 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an ;imp-ract upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational Opportunities? 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES, a. WI-11—the roposal result in the alter u; ,,-R of or the destruction of a prehistori ,', r), - historic archaeological site?` b. Will the proposal result in adverse phy, fcal or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? spRF�M :rwr� c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique \� ethnic cultural. values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing z e f ig ous or sacred uses within the potential impact area? V. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP 26-°05-46 Zee attached, 8 UISCIIS�Y[tnt n� Eiji--_.1(I1?011 T EVAI DATION AP 26~0 5-46 1h: The property is located within an active earthquake region. Foothill Shear Zone is immediately east representing 7'ie earthquake hazard. g a moderate 3d; Wyman Ravine's flood Flood plain does not extend to the Property. Pattern will not be modified. 4 Dredge tailings are not suitably for agricultural production. bd: Any disturbance of habitat has already occurred with development. lacy A 60' right of way along Stanley and Rack Court is required. lopment. -Stanley is in poor shape$ 1n need of W ired. approach may need improvement, grading and surfacing. The road 13f Sight distance is adequate- at Stanley end Lincoln 20: butte County maps indicate the site may contain archaeological resources. However, past human activities (minin mobiles$ construction of roads) 9s installation of survey will not be required. have disturbed the soil surface. A "5', Applicant: Jack Dias Assessor's Parcql it 26-05-46 Log # 85-10-115-01 A. Pro t Description 1. Type of Project: Tentative Parcel Map. 2. Brief Description: Land division creatIng two parcels at 1.5 acres each. 3. Location: 00 the south side of Stanle, DrIvoo approximately 5000 east of Its Intersection with Rock Haven Court, Palermo area. 4. Proposed Density of Development: 'I dwelling Lgilt/1.5 ac. 6. Amount of impervious Surfacing: 71050 sq: ft. existing. 6. Access and Nearest Public Road(s): Access from Stanley and Pock Haven Courbi Method of Sewage Disposal: Septic systems. C4. Source of Weter Supply., Ind ivtdual wells. 9. Prox I in i ty ---f Power Lines: To or I g, I n6 1 parcel 10. Potential for further land divisions and development". None. 13. Enyjr-+onmental -Spttin P_hyglpal Eny-Irohment". 1. Terrain a. Gdneral Topographic Character= raIrly level. bi Slopes: Loss th8n 5%. di L I _Ihg rbttars% None. 2. Solis a. Types and I Ch6oactertsticst br6dge tailings and plater in I ned areas of mixed rock types, 'rapid parmeab 11 1 ty, 'low rut)6ff potential) 1o4 suitability #or timber. b. Limiting ractors: Excessive drainage. ai, Natural Hazards of the Land a. Earthquake Zone.* Within roothIll Shear Zone) aftershock rog, I on - b. Erosion Potential : LoH, C. Landslide Potentl�jlz None. d. Fire Hakard: Low. e. Expansive Sol! Potential: High. 4. Hydrology a. Surface Water'., Wyman Ravine northwest at Lincoln. b. Ground Waiterw. Unknown resource. a braihbgd characterlstles: Drains to Wym6n RavIriog within upper Wyman Ravine waterthed, d. Annual Rainfall (nortnal): 20-229t. e. Limiting 1=actors: U. Visu.11/8cenid Ouallty., rblri 6. AcdUstid Oval Ity". Goods 7. Air-, Oubiltvt Gbodb IFI I , 131oton! cal Environment 8. Vegetation,: Grasslands Oak -pine woodland. 9. Wildlife Habitat. Limited habitat along Wyman Ravine. Cultural Env i ronmont;e 10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area: High (see Item 20). 11. Butte County General Plan designation: Agricultural -Residential. 12. Ex st i no Zon i no AR-iviH-1 13i Existing Land Use on-site= THo mobiles and one shed. 14. Surrounding. Area A., Land Uses: Rural residential, Butte Horsem4h Association arena. b. Zoning• AR-fhH-1y AR -MH -2-1/2, AR -MH -5. C. Gen. Plan designations: Asiricu1turai-Resideintial. d. -Parcel Sizes. 1 to 10 acres. e. Population: Low density. 1.5. Character of Site and Area: Rural community. 16. Nearest urban Area: Oroville, 3-1l2 miles south. 17. Relevant Spheres of Inffluence Urroville-Wyandotte Irrigation District, Butte County Mosquito Abatement District. 18. Improvements Standards Urban Ares'. N/A. 19 Fire Protectlon Service: a. Nearest Count -.y (State) Fire Station: 4720 1 mile southeast. b. Watoer Avari1abi1ity• Bng1oe copacity. 20. Schools in Areas polermo Union School District.