HomeMy WebLinkAbout027-100-004PLANNING COMMISSION SUM14ARY SHEET FOR LAND DIVISIONS
APPLICANT William Bonder Log#86-12-05-05
ADDRESS 25 Eagle Rock Road, Mill Valley, CA 99941
OWNER Same
PRO ;;C`}: DESCRIPTION Tentative Parcel, Map divide 103�+- acres to create 2
parcels at 5+ acre parcels.,
LOCATION ori the 'northwest corner of the intersection of Resorvoir Rd.
and Van Zan•b Lane,rc:r�L.� �'o� area.
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NTJMBER(S) 27-10-4
Pb -1 c e s Un—di—d aU
ZONING A-5 GENERAL PLAN Ag- Resi PROL7ECT C:Ot+1 STENT?
GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE REPORT
'DATE 0�' AY5PLICANT SIGNATURE
LAND CONSERVATION ACT CONTRACTS ? - �=
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED 12-5-86
AGENT/SURVEYOR/CIVIL tNGINEERt Ron Graves
ADDRESS: P.04 Bax 986, Oroville, CA 955965
DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT PR8PARED
ENVIRONMENTAL CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION - DATE FILED,
DETERMINATION
N
AND DATE»
K�NEGATIVEDECLARATION t�A"L AS�O'TL
MITIGATED NEG. DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED ��
ENV. IMPACT 'REPORT - DATE CERTIFIED
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
SUE. COMMITTEE MEETING DATE
Butte Count Planning Dept.
1 �J
7 County Center ter Drive
Oroville, CA 95965-3391 /r
(916) 534-4601
APPENDIX E
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY:
Receipt It
Applicant
AP #
Subdivision Name (if applicable)
Date Filed 11 Z f / � �' 11 0
LAND DIVISION APPLICATIONS
supplemental Information for Planning Department
1, List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals
required for, this project, includi �, those required by city, regional,
state and federal agencies:
2 Proposed scheduling/associated projects:
3. Anticipated r►cresnental development (phasing of subdivision units,
future development plans); "
it. What method will be utilized to accommodate surface drainage? Describe
how on-site and downstream drainage channels will be affected.
L v w C) u s > P�. 1> $ rte. La ( 5
5: Proximity of
water for
fire fighting purposes
(hydrants, ponds, etc.):
' 0
(\ 0-�5
_ ��'�f' % X
t.� �' l L _G 1--
6, Will excaottion or grading be necdssary? Cubic yards (est'imate)
7, Directions for travel to property (.'ural and mountainous areas onl,y).
rtty) -SO";' VA 000 d w -c. Vwo !-4c vc �, i"��.y r ,. V�c.R.A
0 iv, I u- ►
8. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITT.GATIONrfEASURfiS>'<
Identify potentially significant environmental impacts ,associated with
the land division. Whatproject design features or special; conditions
of approval (mitigation mesures) are proposed to allevir,te potential
environmental impacts? J\,��,.
9. ENVIRONMENTAL SPT'r Mr.*
a) Describe the project site as it exists before the project,
including information on topography, soil :,tability, plants
and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects,
Describe any ex-isting structures on the site, and the use of
the structures, �-u.,� r��,,
STItis3LE: SOIL i U rev Ia>t�nY rtt��« P�P1Zt"(
o�
kit s i�rf (.o%L OX Sc �.5
I �n,t . �s IV 10 91I)OLVIJ eVL_TL'aA2_
�' �
b) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on
plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects.
1.11d3cate the type of land use (residential, commerc;inl, etc,),,
intensity of land use
(one -family, apartment househ shops, depart-
ment stores, etc,), and scale of development (height, frontage,
setback, rear yard, etc,),
� 1��:, �vsLb�.4� xvcitr�, � (��'ter'�v:12.`t-i r:;� Art u r•N
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in
the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this
initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements'
and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
and belief.
ate
Signature
Fedi
*Use separate sheet for longer responses,
4/85
ev"a Co. Eiarmino
BUTTE COUNTY
GEtYRAL PLAN CONFORMANCE REPORT NOV 12 1986
FOR PARCEL MAP OR StiBDYVISION MAP Orovlac" C..ealifoMlA
items 1-4 to be completed by applicant:
l sanC Noii1e and,eddress �C/I L,( �ltl✓�- Cf1 �i�t�iill
1. App `
2. Project Description
3, Assessor°4 Parcel Number(s)
4: .Proposed Use )--6 PA - ---�
irhe following items are to be completeu by the Planning Department:
Current zoning
Fi-15 Land Conservation Agreement
Generz.l Plan Designation POt-fGi�cS ItalDft3
�C�RIGUI_'fUt?.�1 �?SIlYA1T1Ar1.
Not Applicable
Applinable Conditional. Criteria; ,W w
YES No
Agricultural -Residential
1. Agricultural Compatibility
2. Water & Sewer Capacity
3 Adequate Fire Facilities -�
4, Road Capacity & Maintenance
5, Access to Commercial & Schools v
Orchard & Fielcl Crops
1, Predominant 5-10 Ac. Parcel. Size "--�
2, Vicinity of Urban Boundaries
3, Agric : �v;lability not impaired �--
Staff Determination Project does t
does no
substantially conform to the Gercral Plan and zoni g.
AND 2p
AS THE APPLICANT i :R Ta itEQUI STED LAND DIVY 'ZON' 1 Aft AWARE OF Tar., At3OVE S'SAl"P
DE'i'ERIUNA'T10N aCAnINIC THE C`ONF�JRI'WgCx,, WITEt 'THC'GPNRR.4L PLAN NIt,G,
', "t-�j ! � Signature of Applicant
Dated
LD 10001 (revised 540)
0.
NEGATIVE DECLARATION REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the project described below has "been
reviewed pursuant to the prow Bions of the California Bnviyonmenta:l,
Quality Act of 1.970 (Public kesources Code 211,00, et. seq.) and. a
determination hab been made that it will not have a significant
effect upon the environment.
Log # 86-12-05-05
2. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: AP 4 27-3.0-4
Tentative Parcel Map dividing 10± acres to create two parcels of
5± acres:
LOCATION OF PROJECT:
On the northwest corner of the intersection of Reservoir Road and
Van Zant Lane Palermoarea.
4. NAME AND ADDRASS OF PR.JECT APPLICANT:
William Bender Ron Graves
25 Eagle Rock Road P.O. Box 986
Mill Valley, CA 94941 Oroville, CA 959Ei5
5- MITIGATION MEASURES:
6. Acopy of the initial stud), regarding the environmental effect
of this project is on file at 7 COuilty Center Drive, Ovoville.
This stud), was:
m Adopteu as presented.
Adopted with changes. Specific modifications and
supporting reasons are attached.
7. A public hearing on this Negative Declaration was hold by the
decision making body.
Hearing Body
Date of Determination,
Determination:
On the basis of the initjai
31 1 study of environmental Impact, the
information presented at hearings; Comments received ived on the
proposal and Our 01411 JMOWledge and independent research-,
We find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant
EJ effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION is
hereby adopted.
Ile find that the project COULD have a significant 'effect
Elon the environment but will not in this case because of
attached mitioatio,11 measures described in item 5 above
vihich are by this reference made conditions of. project
,Approval, A conditional NtGATIVE DECLARATION is hereby,
;idopted.
Signature
00fte Po. Planning Comn1
APR G 1987 BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Oro4lo, Cali ON44 LAND DIVISION RE -VIEW REQUEST
hml�_Pr 4 1786
To; f
,�
RE -TURN BY:
AP NO27-10- DecemU�r 18 1986
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Wil 7 iam Dander 'Tentative. Parcn 1, Ma
�..„�. ..... tie GO=
� ,. ��... '♦ 1 A rJ D O F
G
—� - `NATURAL WALT1-1 A[N11e lit,AU7Y
PLANNING OOMMISSION
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 9965.3397
P1iONEi SUd:m = 538-7601
January 14, 1987
William T. Bender
25 Eagle Rock Road
Mill Valley, CA 94941
Re: Tentative. Parcel Map
AP 27"10-4
Log No. 86-12-05-05
Dear Mr. Bender:
An initial study of your proposed project, a land division of
10 acres to create two parcels, indicates potentially adverse
impacts to the environment (refer to the enclosed environmental
checklist, Appendix E). To reduce or eliminate these impacts,
suitable mitigation measures are required as part of the
project. Otherwise, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is
required pursuant to the California Environmental. Quality Act.
An early response to this notification, sent to the Planning
Department, Will expedite the scheduling of your project.
Please forward your Written response within 15 days from the
date of this letter.
A list of local consultants is included,. These:; persons can
conduct geological surveys or arrange for such surveys. in the
event of an EIR requirement_, a sugsequent letter Will be sent
outlining the procedure for the County to select the consultant
to prepare the EIR4
if you have any questions or comments, please contact this
office any Weekday between 1`0;00 a.m. and 5t00 p.m.
Sincerely,
B.A:, KIRCHER
Director of Planning
e
Laura M. Tuttle
Associate Planner
LMT/s j s
cc Ron Graves, P.O. Box 985, Orovill.e, CA 95965
t
-M
ourTE COUNTY
COnsu I taht L i st
SPECIALIZED SERVICES
Gt?oTosa s'ts
1 Phi 1 l p Lydon
2948 San Verbena Way
Chico, CA 95926
Jerold Behnke
968 Myrtle Avenue Geology pnd
Chico, CA 95926 HydrooeojogV
A'I'1'1r;Nlll X l=
COUNTY OV 13 Y"ll,
ENVIRONMENTAL C1111CKLl;i'1' pokNt
(to bG��Gt�m ,� � trc . `y Loa.Agonr;y)
T. 13neKG>rGUND "09 rt, 86-12-05-05
AT 1127-10-4
I. Namc of proponent _W.—sWTLL1AM. T—B.EN.DY.R- ...,..;_.,__ _
2. Address of proponent and representative Of ,appl icab i v )
William Ti Bender Ron e_
�2 5 Ea le ,.� _ n GG
rav
g Road Road �-.�P.O. Box 9�C
Mi Va -- .
e3?, CA 94941 orovix162 CA 959G5
3, Project (irseription , Tentative Parcel
AIANDATOItl FINDINGS t)1�Sit;Nrl r(ANC1 1'liw [ttt11',lil; NO
.8 w.
a, floes tile project htavt, fiat, potential to dogracic+ tilt,
gilality of the environment, sgjlbstatltially recluc•1
t
the hubit�at of a tis), or wil(ill.rr Species, cause 11
fish or Wildlife population to drop below self-
sustaining levels, threato.n to eliminate a plant or
animal coinigunity, redact, lite ntunbcr or restrict the
range or a rar,•r or endangered hl ant or animal or
eliminate important examples of' the majar per- ocls
or CRl i roratia history or prehistory"
b, floes tine pec jcct have the potential to achieve
short-term Bene*Pits 'to the dotrinient or Lang -tet
°n
t,nvirhnmental goals? (A short-terill impact earl the
e.i,vironnlent Jo, rine Which occurs in a relatively
brief period of til -110 while long-terlll impacts Will
endure into tlic ruturc, )
C. Does the projt,et have iinpac:ts Which nre individu-
ally l ifllited, but cumulatively con:,iderable? (A
project may impact on tWo or mol`r separate resources
where th-• impact on each resource is relatively
small., but the rfect or the total of those
imparts oil tilt, environment is si1;niricunt.7
d. Dias the pVOjesct hrJvc rnvirottmt,nt;al t,1'l,oct;, Which .
will cause sub!;tantial adverse tqrrcts oil hu►nitn
beings, ritlivi, directly ol. intilrectly*',
111, ilh(, vollipl ototl 11N. tilt. Lead Ago�ttkv )
Oil tilt, basiti c�1" (Irl inatitil G'l.11lr;ltirfn,
UIVP 1'111cl 11rtljcet 0111111.1) WIT hat•v a signiricunt efLec�t
tin tile• rnlrirc�nlgt,tat, ,►nd n 1vIiOT1'Vli 111't"1.AiZA"t1alN rvi17; lie hrpprYrecl
UWL find that at though till` proposvl p oioct. co lti have Il signlri-
cont crl'rct on they rnt^irtr►atllrnt, 010I.� W1.11 not he it :significant
4 flec k in tills c;lsr becat.tsr thQ MITIGATION C•11i.1: URP'S clescr be..i C,n
tilt, athic;'heEl ahoext 11c14v h,•rn ;ultivd to they 111'(61`vt, A NI -WA` TV11.
DECLARATION Wi 1 l lie prcljal,otl
i IVli 'Find tilt' p►'0it0„V(1 Proloc•t MA) havo tl cib,nifi.cant rrrect Oil,
the OtIV 1 a•0n11lent, rued all i:NVI RONAlIXIA1� IIN11,M-1 ltlll'01t`.0 is 1'eriuirecl,
COUNTY OV i11j'.r1l,i?,hLANNTNG illspAtt'1W;N"1'
Laura anne>r
i
a W
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(,Explanations o a 1 ''yes" and "maybe" answers are required
on attached .sheet(s)) YES
MAYBII NO
1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in
geologic substructures? _..._,
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
overcovering of the soil?
C. Change in topography or ground surface
...---
relief features?
d. Destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features?
of soils,
e. Increase in wand or water erosion
either on or off-site?
f; Changes in deposition or erosion of beach
sands, or changes in siltation, deposition
or erosion which may modify the channel of
a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or.
any bay, inlet or lake?
g Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils
outside designated urban areas? l..
h. Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards -such as earthquakes, landslides, mud-
slides, ground failure or similar hazards?
X
2. AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial.:
a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient
air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke
or fumes?
c, Alteration of air movement, moisture, or
temperature, or any change in climate,
locally or regionally?
3. WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial.
Changes in currents, or the course or
in
direction of water Movements either
marine or fresh waters?'
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage pat4errLs,
or the rate and amount of surface runoffs
c. Need for off-site surface drainage improve-
ments, including vegetation removal, channel.-
ization or culvert installation?
d. Alterations to the course or flow of flood
YK
waters?
e . Change in the amount, of surface tater in any
water body'?
---
f. Discharge into surface waters, or in any
alteration of surface water quality, including
but not limited to 'temperature, dissolved
otygon or turbidity?
g. Alteration of the direction 'or rate of flow
of ground. waters?
..-
h*Change , in the tits or que,lity of gtour d waters r
either through direct additions or tvi.th4
drawals, or through intetCePtiOA of an
aquifer by outs or excavations'
i� Reduction in the amount of water otherwise
available for public water supplies?
j Exposure of people ax property to wator
related hazards such as flooding?
`Z �
_
YES MAYBE
4i PLANT LIFE Will the Proposal result in substantial.
a. Chanj–e in the diversity of species, or number
of any species of plants (including trees,
b
shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants) ?
Reduction of the numbers of anv unique, rare
or endangered species Of plants?
C. Introduction of new species of plants into an.
area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish -
Ment of existing species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
S. ANIMAL LIM Will the proposal result in substantial,
a. -Change in the diversity of species,
of any Or nuMbors
species Of animals (birds, land
including reptiles, fish and shell fish,
benthic organisms or insects)?
b. Reductio)l ill I the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of animals'?
C. Introduction Of new species of animals ill.to
411 area, or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of animals?
d. Deteri6ration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat?
6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial:
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
bi Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the Proposal produce,
11,iflcaFt light and glare?
S. LAND U,'.'E. Will the Proposal result in a
sUE—stMial c"Itc-ation Of the Pros'-
land use of an area? Ont Or Plan -nod
9. FNATr—
A
URL RESOURCES Will the pr
su taw—Mj�- OPOsal result in
a, Increase in the rate Of use Of any natural
resources?
b- DepletioEi '' any non�renewab.Le natural
rcsources';
10. RISK 0* Ljpq IT - Will 01'r-1 ri";,11,sal involve:
a. r3"*.qT*-Ot v"Plosion or the 1:,!d,`18e of ha.-.ard,
ous substances (inrludiniq, but %nt limited to,
Oil) pesticides, c1lie'�MiCalS Or *
event of an accident `r Upset COIIJ�itLons? in the
b. Possible interference with an emerge
response plan Or emergency evacuation pjajx.�
11. POPULATION. Will the proposal I s Er i b u alter the location,
Population? n, d0ns1I
tY) or growth rate of the human
12, HOUSING. Will the proposal afr-ect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional liousln&?
NO
X
-4-
- - -L
j
13.
TRANSPORTATION/CIRCUL.4.TION.
result in: ----- Will the
YES LA-1-13,P, NO
proposal
a. Generation of substantial
additional ve}1i
movement? c7o
b. Effects
on existing
demand for parking facilities, or
c• new parking?
Substantial impact on existing transportation
n
d• significant alterations to
Of
circulation or movement a�esent patterns
goods? people and/or
----
e. Alterations to waterborne
f. Increase in traffic hazardsrtol or air tra.iL` c?
bicyclists or pedestrians? motor vehic7 r,
- --
i
14. PUBLIC SERVICES, Will the4
upon, or reproposal. have an effoe,t
sult in a need for new or alte
governmental services.; red
a. Fire protection's
bi
police protection?
C. Schools? -----
d. Parks Ot other recreational facilities?
e. Maintenance ofPublic--
vv.
._._.
roads? ��-`hies including
..
.�.
f. Other governmental s�
15 • ENERGY .44.� • 11 the
a• proposa Ue of subs'Jult in:
tial m�nb.SubstantialincreaseOffuel.cr energy?
sources
of energy, or require theodcvelopment
of new sources of energy?
lo, UTILITIES.Will the --
_... (
result
Proposal in a need for
new systems, or substantial
following; ntial alterations
to the
a. ,Power or natural gas?
b• Communications
systems?
c. Wager aVa7.labj 1 ity,
— X
d. Sewer or septic tangy? --
I X
e. Storm water drainage?
f
Solid waste and disposal?
17= HUMAN HEALTC-. Will the result in:
a. reatsn of proposal any health
hazard or potential
health ha zard�(excluding mental health)?
b. Pxposure of`
P ogle to Potential heltlj
hazards?—~-.
18. A$ST14jtjijeWill the
o str ct oil of Pro xestilt in the
X
,any scenic 'vista or View
the public, or 14111 the
Propoal result inetheo
Creation of an aesthetically s
to Publiview? ofxLnsive site
nOpenc
64-
L
YES
M.A1111-1 NO
19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational
Opportunities?
20. CULTURAL RESOURCES.
a. Will t e proposal result in the alteration
of or the destruction of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site?
b Will
the proposal result in adverse physical:'
or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure or object?
c. Does
the proposal have the potential to cause
a physical change which would affect
unique
ethnic cultural values?
d.
Will the proposal restrict existing religio11;;
or sacred uses within the potential impact
area?
V. DISCUSSION OE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP 27-10-4
See attached.
ISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVA UATION AP 27-10-01
1b: Disruption, displacement and compaction Of the soil 5urr
limited to development Of dr ace Is
Yen the parcel a I zes, gent I VewaYs) homes I tes and I I T I s.
le terrain and ION rainfall 1-ates,
days IOPM,��nt of two homesite d -19
significant impact. s On 1 () acres !vii 1 not resul t In a
19: Solis on site have been mapped as Redding
Although not considered prime agricultural Gra"IlY Sandy Loam.
to the cultivation Of oranges, olives, soils, they int"O well suited
f 19S arid grapog.
hli�torlcally been a grazing community. Palermo has
to t , OPertY Out Or Production, Residoritial <�Gvcilopment serves
PrOPertl(�'U) and crealt,-. stimulate division OF sur.-ounding
attempting to run ani�na land use conflicts with t- I I I
is. Removal Or Proper
Purposes could be 'j significant impac+, but sty for
of the surrounding Farc9l sizes. not In tt'lls Case because
'Ih. All of butte County is
earthConsidered to have a Moderate hazard for
quake activity,
Palermo has one Of the highest potential.
the Occurrence Of earthquakes and earthquake related property damage.
An Inferred fault May cross this property. For
earthquake was The epicenter of the '1975
-1/2 mile to the west, The Foot
active earthquake fault system, is located 1-1111 Shear Zone, an
Surrounding this property 1/2 mile to the east,
— A geological OPItOrlter region or that
1975 quake is the Zlfter,shoci<
survey Will 00 required to
exact Placement Or neighboring faults determine the
this property. In the event th and lineaments
at a fault trace Is lotatedo ross
geologist shall that might c
SLIOgett appropriate Mltig8tlon Measures) the
building setbacks, for Purposes Of reducing Potent,., including
4d* The ProJect will Property damage.
far orazIng dOntribute to a reduction in property available
In the Palermo Community.
8: As noted On the General Plan Conformance Report, the PrOJect was
consistent with surrow SPOcifically) the PrO0080d Parcel size is
ndlhg parcel
WSOS which May be conducted, Five acltz'ess a!ld the -small agricultural
support a Well and septic System in thisIs generally sufficient to
Is provided by the Palermo Stat , commumlt')e' Fire Protection
The prOPertY fronts on keser,,voi on appr'nXimatel y :� miles to the west.
Maintenance schedule. The ,,tr P�o8d$ Nhich is included 1M the COL10ty
road gives the Property e ance to Palermo and condition Of the
schools. 'good access to commercial services and
laa* UP to 20 vehic,
This is an ns igr !cant ainoranlr, be
generated daily by this project,
13f: C�rlveway lot8tlOhs should be des)
Care should be given on parcel OhatOd On both or the parcejS4
easement on the south of R,s,r,,'1,,it0 align the driveway with the access
OCC08S between the two property . , Road- An alternat
should be located a minimum Lane, Thelye is one Common
feet from thvel teon of
Accos8 Can be from alt .gin
road,
Reservoir, Road ohd Van ZaMt Lane, drivway to Parcel 2
14ae As noted under item 8, fire protection is
Palermo Station y proy i c1e�;i OLIt- of t1-10
1a��i< of pressurized water
? approximately matel 2 m i 1 es to the west, To <7f`d.-sot the
in the vicinity, the following Fire
Mitigation measures are suggested:
1. Installation of water tanks totalling 2500 eellens,r)or paroei, or
2 Payment into a water tender fund, if established.
3. Construction of swimming pools With fire hookup,
4. Use of nonflammable siding and roofing in residential
construction.
14b,r: Police protection is extremely limited in a.il rura.l areas.
Response Is provided 7n an on -tall basis only rnurr t Hill 1 serve
Develop l
to marginally increase the demand for governmental scar+vi
impact cannot be readily mitigated. ces. This
Applicant: William T. Bender Assessor"s Parcel 11
27-10-bq•
Lori
6!-A SHEET
A • .Prpyl -9 _bescr i pt 1 an
1 T'Ype ,of Project Land division.
2. Br i o f De!.;Gr i pt i on ; Tentative Parcel Map d i v l d l rte '10 acres
into two parcels of 5 acres each.
Location 00 the northwest corner of the i ntet- ;0rr.i.. i,n of
Reservoir Road and Van Zant Lane, Palermo.
4 Proposed Density of Devo l opment 1 du./5
at;r• � y
5. Amount of Xmpervious Surfacing
6. Ac cess and Nearest Public Road(s): Prorrtage or► Reservoir Road
anc v8 r .Zant Lane.
7. Met+rod "f Sewage Disposal Septic tank, 1 eaoh1 r i el ds
8; Sourtr r Of Water Supply' Tridi v i dual wells.
9. Pro.`n i;mity of Power Lines., l'o original parcel.
10. Potential for further land divisions .and 'dQwpl opn►ent
bivisicert wii1 permit construction of two homesitet.
8., :Env i ranmeor�a1 . Setti nra
EbYgLicaT Envi.ropment
1 1: Terrain
a. Generai Toj�ographic Character: Gently sloping property;
b. S l oPOS h 2-919.
c, l evert., ion: 275-'125 feet above Sea Level
d. !.imit,ng Fat torsi None.
2 Solis
a. Types and Ci .r?+ra te1-+ ;, i cs s Rodd i rlo Gravel i y Sandy Loam,
red -brown, L ;n Jer 1 a i rl -wt approximately 4bf" by a very
compact dull I'ed c i ay w i wh gravel ,and e-obbl esj i rcn
cemented hardpan at 2e -86,O) we'll su i ted to cultivation of
oranges, Olives) F i 98 and 9—apes.
b. Limiting Fattors
S. Natural Hazards of the Laird
a. Earthquake Zone; Generally soder^ate,
b.potential.,locally high.
Eros i r,n Moderate.
c Landslide Potential: Low.
d F i re Oazard H I gh .
e. Expansiile 8011 potential High.
44 Hydrology
a. Surfato Water: Farm ponds 500 and 700 feet north:
b. Groundwatt. r -k: Unknown resource.
ce bra i nags char^actor i st i cs Generally west, ai ?,Oquate
dralnaoo
d. Annual Wt3infal.l (normal )=
5. 9 factors:
40
Visual'/Scenic Quality;
6, Acoustic Quality: Hardpan retards subdrainaGe.
71.
Air Quality: Good. Good,
Nyo10 al
8.
Env i ronnte t=
9. Vegetation. grassland.
W i 1 d 1 i fe Halo i tat.: .Pio rare or endah e
In vicinity, g redmaP e
Plan°i
Cultu;pec t es
r mapped
-------�? Env i ro anent e
10 Archaeological
11, Butte Count and Historical Resource
Agrricultural_Generai Plan designation: s in Lht 4rea
1 n9 Z
ExResidential. Lc7W.
1 2 on i ng,t A-5.
Ex 1 st i n9 sand Use Surrouncd"i n 'e on--site Open space.
9 Arrea.
a~ rand Uses:
b . Zoning: dural resident,. a l cjr• az i ng
"�'r.
c" Gen. Plan
d, des- '9nations-
Parcel Sizes Agricultural-FtasirJentlal.
15" e. Population= sparse. average.
Character S
1�" Nearest of Site and Area.
17. Nearest
vahUrban Areae ClrovilleRailing 9rassla
1 t3" i pheres of In f 1 uence m i l es north....' Palermo.
Improvement, Sta�7dards Urban n/a.
19. Fire protect-, can Service: Area: rlla
" Nearest gaunt
y
b..
(State) ; F' i re
463j�3� 8-9 Station, mi les Water Availability. engine f~n west,
20. Schools in Area.
Palermo lJnion capacity only.
s Ctroville High.