The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About027-110-010v J w l f 1y PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY SHEET FOR LAND DIVISIONS APPLICANT Ted Runge, Log X185-08-08-01 ADDPESS , P.O. Box 2042 Oroville Ca. 95965 OWNER Same PROJECT DESCRIPTION Tentative Parcel Flap to divide 20i- acres to create S Acre parcels LOCATION At the northeast corner of the,Oroville Country Club Road and Grubbs Road ., Intersection, Palermo area. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S) 27-11-10 (ptn) ZONrNG A-5 GEN. PLAN Ag. - Resi; PROJECT CONSISTENT?_ DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED 8/8/85 .� Ron Oraves, P.O. Box. 986, Oroville, Ca. 95965 ------ -- DATE PUBLICATION NnTICE WRITTEN PUBLISHED PLACE 094SPAPEh NOTICES PTJBJ,jGj iED _ 0. i . P. iZ B. DATE MAILING LIST PRE -PARED DATE MAIL -OUT NOTICES' WRITTEN 14AILED NUMB ER DATE, PLANNING DIREuT yid I l Rr-SORT PREPARED. -------------- ENVIRONMENTAL CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FILED DI TERNINAT'ION AND DATE NEGATIVE DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED t-17`Z"Cr7A'�.'1•".D NEGATIVE DECLARATION y DA"I1�, AIiOP'i.`111) ENV. IMPACT REPORT - DATE CE'UTIF111 D APPENDIX 1�1 NOTICE OF DETC-Pa�11�AT1C L E TO: Off' f P J I Office o Planning and Research FROM: PlaEnty ng Department 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 7 GCde er .Drly Sacramento, CA 95814 OrovllJ.e, a or County Clerk ELEANOR M. BECKER, County Clerk County of BLitt.e 1- -1 ,CINTH D �u1y 51U"F�.iECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance: with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public 'Resources Code. ;)Ject 'title AY # Name Tentative Parcel hIap 27-11-10 (ptn) Ted Runge State Clearinghouse Num -r Contact Person Telephone Number (If submitted to Clearinghouse) Public Works Department John.Mendonsa 534-4256 Project Location At the northeast corner of orovil.le-Country Club goad and Grubbs Road; Palermo area. Project Description Tentative Parcel Map to divide 23 acres to create three lots ot 5 acres ,and one lot at 8 acres. This Is to advise that the Butte County (Lead Agency or Responsible Agency) ties �arq)roved the above described project and has made the following eterminations regarding the above described project; 1. The project will, L will not, have a signlf Icant effect on the envlron.*nent. Z An Environmental Impact It.eportwas prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. The EIR or Negative Declaration and record of project approval may bre examined at Butte County Plantint Department 7.Gounty Center Drive, Or ofl , rA 95965 1 Mitigation measures 4 were, _,, Were not* made m condition of the approval of the project. 4i A statement of overriding Considerations was, was not; adopted for this project~ Date Received for Filing 11"20-85 5i attire s ephon A. Strector Senior Planner Title ...... 1, Revised 0anua 1983 Ted Runge, AP#27-11,-10 (ptn), Tentative Parcel Map, Mitigation Measures 1. No cut or fill in excess of 21. 2. No earthwork during the rt-i;ny season. 3. install, properly sized culverts at all drainage swale crossings. 4. All dwellings to he constructed or installed to resist lateral forces from earthquakes. 5. Provide a 60' right-of-way to parcel 4 from Oro -Country Club Drive. 6. Install CDP approved drafting connections on all, wells,. water storage or pools if required by CDP. 7. Note on final Map: Recommend all dwellings to be constructed of flame resistant siding and roofing Rgn Lps-tmatzp(916) 534.9587 LANO --- OUass"Vayo"is (V oc a es P.01BOX986 - OROVILLE,CA96965 Job #85-063 September 17, 1985 Butte County PlWining Dept, 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 re: A.P. #27-11-10 Tod Runge P.M. Attn: Laura Tuttlo cu,ro Co, In response to your letter and appendix F of 9/13/85 we offer the following; I.c-e) There will be,nP cut r ' o- f t ,- I . in excess . O± 2 deet. There will be no earthwork' during the rainy season. All development, roads, etc., Will be held a minimum of 50 feet: away from any drainages except where some drainages may have to be crossed. Properly sized culverts will be installed at these locations as Per county standards. l.h) All dwellings shall be constructed to resist lateral forces from Possible earthquakes. Mobile home installation should use the same orecautioni Development near steep micro - relief close to stream sources should be avoided. 3,b,c) Properly sized culverts will be iqstalled at all. 8wale or drainage crossings a,s per county standards. Any channel- ization or Other work necessary- will be performed. 3J) A 50 foot building setback line will be shown on the map alona Swale aroas to minimi 9p flondingo 8) Parcel 4 will have an addition,1l 60 foot right of way at the northwest corner of the Property. The owners of this property ,,�, have )nSerited to this as they are in the process Of developing the 53 acres immediate1v north of this Parcel 4, Nowoveri WO felt an additional access necessary so we included Parcel 4 frontage on the cul.-dO-sac tor added access, It is no problem to build a driveway front the cul-de-sac around the west end Of the existing pond to the building sits, on the north of Parcel. 4. The hatched area is tho.re at the request of the Health Dept. so sowage will not Polluto the pondi believe our response to item 8 also covers item 13, Parcel 'I'll have access PtOftl Oro County Club Road to the northwest property line. Rgn LAr+n o Wei i916J'634 9587 tlU ttV¢YtaRG � assoc � V S� � P.O.BOX9A6 • OROViLLE,CA95965 page 2 14.) As development occurs and the demand for, governmea1 t„s:.l services increases, so does the tax base as the re -assessed, homes built and re -assessed againi es are ti i vided .. People purchasing this property are aware of the remotc 10cation and the lack of services. This is the main reason they "to get away from it all.” The are y are buying, rates for insurance, etc: y going to have to pay higher._ We agree drafting connections to all wells for standard fire hose h.Ook-uPs should be installed, All dwellings ,should be constructed OEnon-flammable matCrial as much as Possible, 16c) Proof of water will be provided to Envi to recordation of the final map ronmental Health prior 166) We have performed soil tests on all of these pa found, adequate septic areas to meet the ordinance, These and have WOrc given to the Environmental Health Dept, on 8/5/$5results I sincerely hope this adequately addresses all. of Your concerns. If not, we are certainly open to any garding this project. Suggestions you may Have re - Respectfully, Ronald .h. Craves Pon Graves and Associates n.LG : kgl AA I.AND OF NATLIRAL WEALTH AND BCAUTY DEPARTMENT OF PUDLIC WORKS WILLIAM (Bill) CI-JEFF; ►)Ireclor 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILL1', CALIFORNIA 95965 Telephonet(916) 534,4601 y19 RONALD D. M,ELROY 8 5 Deputy Dlreclot November 19 1985 Ted Runge P. 0. Boy 2042 RF: AP 27-1,1-10 ptn, Clrovylle, CA 95965 Tentative Parcel Map Lear Mr, Runge, At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held on NuVeimber 1$, 1985,the agency granted a mitigated negative leclaration, of environmental. ,impact and approves your tentative Parcel map on AP 27-11,.10 ptn. "stzbJect to the conditions listed on the attached sheet. of approval .If no appeals are timely filed--within ten Advisory Agency's (10) days of the date o,: the approva l-.:with the Clerk of the Board of Sup,.rvisors this action will be final, When the conditions of a` f�;r yc,t to file „ pprovalrlare complied with, it will be in order your, final. map with the ublic Works for recordation Butte County Department of Por 'within twenty-foltr (24) months of the date Of approval, by the Advisory Agency,_ 1i' you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this off icei Very truly yours, William the if Director of public 'Works J Menr3ollSa A 3c,tant birector atttw:amen co Planning Nea Ith Ron Graves pa Ted Runge, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAF, 4 reels at the northeast Oroville Country Club Road and Grubbs Road Of AP 27-11-1.0 ptn, intersection. Palermorarea he Engineer: Ron Graves Public Works conditions are: I. Provide two-way traversable access RS-8-LD-1 t county maintained read or state highway. o each parcel from a 2. Access to be reserved in deeds as per county ordi for dedication on the final map, nanCe and offered 3. Show 50 fti building setback line measured from m centerline o f access 4. Provide road maintenance agreement S. Indicate a 50 ft, building setback from the re 6. Show all easements of record on the ficial m- ntcrl Me Of Grubbs Rd. ap. 7. Provide stree, name Signs Per e Works g p r quremehts of the Dept. of Public prior to recordation Of the final map. 8 Pay off any assessments, g• Provide cul-de-sac at the end of the Street. 10•. Obtain encroachment Permit and constructstandar Providing adequate sight distance and Grubbs Road. at the intersection oapproach f access road 11. Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as i re u: q ..red... Planning Dept. conditions 12. All parcels to be a minimum of 5 acre;;. Wealth Dept. conditions: 13, Show a 5o ft, lea chf�eld setback from the drainage way on parcels 1 and 3, 14. Showa 200 ft. leachfield setback on parcel 4. ack from the highwater line of the lake 15. Show the usable two acre sewage disposal area requirements of the Suk,division Ordinance on Proven ;o meet the 16• Marcel 4 Prove that the required quantities of ,. Parcels 1, 2j 3 and 4, domestic water are available to 0 0 RUNGE, TPM, AP 27-11-10 ptn, The following mitigation measures are also required.- 1. equired;1; No cut or fill in excess of 2 feet. 2 No earthwork during the rainy season. 3. Install property sized culverts at all drainage $wale crossings. 4. All dwellings to be constructed or installed to resist lateral forces from earthquakes. 5. Provide a 60 ft. right=of-way to parcel 4 from Oro-Country Club Drive. G. Install CDF approved drafting connections an all wells, water storage o�- pools if required by CDR.. 7. Recommend all dwellings to be constructed of flame re:ista.nt siding and roofing. Inter-pepartminta!, Memorandum 'i`M Butte County advisory Agency FROM: Planning Director SUBJtCr: Report on Tentative Parcel Map of Ted Runge on AP 27-11-10 (ptn) DATE* November 4, 1985 This is a proposal to divide 20± acres to create 5 acre parcels. The present zoning is A-5 (Agricultural - 5 acre parcels), The Land Use Plan Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Agri- cultural Residential. gri-cultural.Residential. There are no specific or community plans for the area. The proposal does not conflict with County zoning nor any adopted or proposed element of the Butte County General ,Plan nor any County, specific or community plan. The map appears to comply with the .conditional criterion under the Agricultural Residential. General Plan designation; Recommend approval subject to the following mitigation measures (M) and conditions: 1, No cut or fill in excess of 2' N. 2, No earthwork during the rainy season (M) 3; Install properly sized culverts at all drainage swale crossings I (M): 4. All dwellings to be constructed or installed to resist lateral forces front earthquakes (M), 5 Provide a 601 right-of-way rala:th°gear- round traversable,oaacdss to parcel 4 front Oro -Country Club Drive (M)+ 6, Install CD? approved drafting connections on all Wells, water storage �y � 7. All dwellings to be constructed of flame resistant siding and roofing (M): 8, All parcels to be a minimum of 5 acres; Ti Redesign parcel; 4, and other parcels a:; necessary, to more closely resemble a rectangle or other simple geometric shape; LMT lr cc! Ron Graves P.O, Box 986 Oroville, Ca, 05065 Al'I'liNDIX to 0 COUNTY Or lityrr}: IINV;I;ROW11INTAt. CHECKLIST VORM (to e complete ay I.ca Agency) Log # 85-08-08-01 r. BACKGROUND AP N 27-11-10 (ptn) 1. Name of proponent TED RUNGE 2. Address or proponent and representative (if applicable) Ted Rine _ Ren Graves P.O.Box 2042 P:O.Box 986Oroville, CA 95965-Or�iC9 5�65 � 3. Project description Tentative Parcel Map 11. MANDATORY—FINDINGS OF STGNIr-l"ANCIi YIN MAYBE NO a., Does the project have the potential to degrade tlr(_1 quality of t}te environment, sUbstantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, effuse a fish or wildlife pOpulatiOn to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the ]lumber or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods Of' California histr)ry or prehistory? b, Does the project have tilt: potential to .achieve short -teem benefits to the Jotriment of long-term, envircnmentil goals? to short-term impact on the environment is one which ocetirs in a relatively brief period of time while long-term .impacts will endure into the ruturo.) C, Does the project have impacts which are individu— ally limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project 01"y impact on two Or more, separate resources where thO impact on cacti resource is rel.ativel%r small, but, whore, the effect or th, total or those impacts on the •nvi.ronmerrt is sipnirxcant.1 x1. Debet;: the project have criviroll lientaa efl,eats which wi I a 6 ause substa,-„ , Sal'�� 1 �r+",r n {` w , ti } on h,nrran beings, either rlirertl\, jr i Nd}rr�ctl;r? 1t'[. 01TT�RMItrATIO (To I)La corniill.c,tLid by tho Load Agency) Ctrl thc, basis; or this initial kyvaaurttolt. .rind the' proPosQd pr'njQct COULD NO'I' .have a slgn,1r1t:ant effect ran the onVircnment, and ra NI*OATIVI: }>iCLARATtt)N will be prepared, TAI., rind that although they prnprased Project Gould have a signifi- cant eff`cet an the environment, there will not be a significant tlrfert In this craso bccwttrse the MITIGATION NIIi-ASURIIBdescribed. on the attached sheet have beorn added to the paojer t : � NICATIVt D1.C;LA�RATtON will hc� I�rrtiparcd. UIVIi fAnd the I)roiiosrid project MAI hove a sign ricallt effect on fihr tinvironment, near are I.NVIRCtNMI.NTAI, IMPAC`t' Rt.1)011' is required, DATE, Se tem�e� l3 1985 t't111NTY C1}r 11011"111, PLANNING DEPARTNIhNT TuLt�e 1 iate Planner iauaia Ass Rer�iewacl lays w ��. IV, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPOTS —p anataons of al–I"+1yestf and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheet(s)) 1. EARTH. Will the YES in anges significant; a. Unstable earthrconditionsuor MAYBE ---- NO in chlt geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering Of the soil? c. Change in topography or relief features? ground surface d. Destruction, covering or modification of an unique geologic or physical y features? e• Increase in wind or' water erosion of soils either on or off-site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in -� siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel a rivei of or stream or the bed Of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g. Losr,, of prime agriculturally soils ---- outside designated _ urban arap7oductive h. Fxposu. e Of roperty to eologic hazards such e or uakes,landslides, --- asearth mud- tlides, ground xai.lure or similar hazards?u� 2 AIR<. Will the proposal result in substantial, a, Air emissions or deterioration — air quality'?' of ambient b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke ar fumes? — –. C. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, ,. or any change in climate, locally or regionally? 3. WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial,. a. Changes in yy cuirent:s, or the course or direction: Of Water marmovements in either ine or fresh waters;' b, Chan 7 he, s in absorption rat, s, drainage or the -rateand c. amount Of surface runoff? c. Need fow 0,." site surface drainage impraVe- rnents including vegetation removal g b ization or culvert installation? > channel. d. Al.teration$ to the course or flow o `flood ? �--- e , C)414,c i w the amount of surface water in any Water hoc1Y', Discharge i" � , f .� aci, iVaters, or in any a .teratioft of surto.,.- Nater ual.ity ince; u�'ing but not .united to �ten��i')¢"ratute dissol.1 ozygOn or turbidity? ' &d g. Alteration of the direct,,–,r1 vr -rate of Zjovj -- Of ground waters? - hi Change in the gti��ittity of ground, tv.,*, rs drawa.lser thprugh additions ii thr t �;ec nt c �noo F aquifer by cuts f ��.n i QV excavations? Reduction ,in the ailount of water otheri,rsr available for public water supplies? txposure of people or property to water .,r...: related hazards stach as j'la+ding? i' YES MAYBE No 4 PLANT LIFE: Will the proposal result in substantial: a. ange in the diversity of 'species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic planrs)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered spec. -,es of plants? 1( c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal, replenish- ment of existing species? d, Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? �l .rL°. S. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial a. C ani nge in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell fish, benthic organisms or insects)? X b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? X c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d, ,Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6 NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial, a. Increases in existing noise levels? bi txposuve of people to severe noise levels? `-- 7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce signitxc�nt l iht; and glare? 8, LAND USE.. Will the proposal result in a su stantial altoratir,n of the present or planned land use of an area?y 9. NATURAL RESOURCES: Will the proposal result ire substantial: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b, Depletion of any non-renewable natural resources? 10, RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve., a. A risk o explosion or the release of hazard - bus substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? b, possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? l.l. POPULATION. Will the proposal alter the location, astral a ion density, or growth rate of the human population? 12, MUSING Will, the proposal affect existing houpi.ng, or create a demand for additional housing? v 4 13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION: YES MAYBE N0 result in: Will the proposal a• Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact on existing transportation systems? d. Significant alterations to present patterns Of circulation JL or Movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?—' f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicle bicyclists or pedestrians? -- 1.4. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services., Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. rioads?nance of ,public facilities �ites, including .X f. Other governmental seriices? 1S. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: T—,Use of substantial amounts of fuel -Or energy?` b. Substantial increase in, demand upon existing sources of ever of gy, or require the development new sources of energy? 16. UTILITIES. Will .�, ll the propsal result in a need for newsy`stems, or substantial alterations to followingthe a. Power, or natural gas? b, Communications systems? C. Water availability: d Sewer or septic tank? e. Storm 'pater drainage? u f. Solid waste and disposal? _ 17. MIAN HEAL"T'H,—�- iVi11 tile proposal result in: a. Creatio f 18: b+ n o any health hazard or potontal heath hazard (excluding mental health)? Exposure of peop1e to potent4h! health hazards? AE�TNETICS. tVill the proposal result in Cho o ruC� tt of any scenic Vista or vietV open to the public, or will the proposal result .in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public vi eta? 4,- YES MAYBE NO 19. RECREATION. Will, the proposal result in an impact upon theduality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20, CULTURAL RESOURCES a Will t proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b. Will, the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? c. Does the proposal. have the potential tocause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious � or sacred uses within the potential impact area? V. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP 27-11-10 (ptn) See attached: =5y AP 27-1 1 -10 lc,e: Solis on sli-e have a moderate to high erosion poten4lal. Grading activities necessary for road and building Pad 47:4,4"W,o-Liction could cause erosion problems. Erosion could be reduced tre idhoring to the following mitigation measures: * no cut or fill In excess, of 2' * no earthwork during the rainy season * no development activity Or earthwork within 501 of dr-sinages * properly sized culverts at any drainage crossInCIV 1h' A geologic survey was prepared on the original S1'Yqr 8ar Tentative Parcel Map* Numerous faults have been maPPe,-J In the vicinity, none of which are on this property. A numtDer recommendations were made by the geologist which shoul H. Iio -wclh&..r-sd to: * ,)r1Sj:,ruct dwe 11 Ings to resist lateral fot-ces Install mobile homes (If any) to resist 1ater,-.0 forr2o.,., steep micro-rollef close to stream cOUr8OS Bb�ct Any e,�ros8l'ne Of the sWalos will necessitate dra'Maoo IM 1 provemcn �t On site 1 te cb I I ect I an of waters I s not requ 1, --ad W" Pial'Mew I S greater thin 3 acros. 3j: A 50, no -development area along sw,tjes should minimi le an'.' f�1006 1-jazai,ds, r In last year, 19 f0,1 - parcels have been proposed - pe—!,ons Whet each lot Is built on, 48+/ original rarth holdlnosi will be add(Ad to the neighborhood. Ambient noise will st Each lot created In Butte CoUnty Mist be buildable. Thk: P -a 4ent % lot design t-t,,�-jders Parcel 4 Virtually unusable. Bu I I d I ng S, t, L -, are 4801 and 94, distant from the access road. The map showld he redesigned. 18., Parcel needs better access. Three alternative S0IUt,',0n8, jr,cludo* pr,,:s*jjdjnq access from Oro -Country Cl I ub Road at 4' t-' noil-i:;h property ljtk,?3 redesign of tiie road; redesign of the Map, 0 will greatly increase demand f6i" 14: tMvel fire, read malmter nor- and �,MImal government 01"Vlcesi such as P011ce� control CQIiS of providing services per person Indrea'a d0hv-'i tY decreai3osv A% 6 result, 100atlon-dopendent services ar-,o bovt pr,)vIded I h urban aro None -1 OcOt I governmental sW-V 1 it�t�s' -- courts, gc',M t. � a1 government are ava I fable t- 0 811 County 1", -'s A dOnts' graft lr-g connect ions. to all Hells end n0n-flammable' r—)"rqtr-Llct' on matel-i al s ai r.,� heeded to offset extreme f1 re hazards.' �6- 7-7 16c: Proof of water is than 20 acres. required prior to creation ofv parte 1 1 es.� 16d.. Large Portions of Pa;jcei s $ and 4 are encumberes areas. d by sept i c-frac Assessor's Parcel it Applicant; Ted Runge 27-11-10 (ptn) Log # 85-08-08-01 DAIA-5-HEE11 A. Pro Jpc � �to n� 1. Type Of Project: Land Divisioni I Map dividinu ?3 acres '. 2. Brief DescriptionTantatlVe-Parce Into three lots at 5 acres and one lot at 8 across 3. Location: Approximately 1400 feet east of the Intel -section of Gr,jbbs and Oro -Country Club Road, Palermo area. 4. Proposed DensitY of Development. . I d.w./5 acron, 5. Amount of Impervious Surfacing,. Dependent on lot design, 4-/- 1-1/2 acre, est Public Road(s)o. Grubbs Road Vr1oM4,-ag0* 6. Access and Near .individual 1 81 Septic Systems. 7. Method of Sewage Disposal - sj Source of Water Supply: indlVidual wells 9. ProxImItY Of Power Lines: Along Grubbs Road. 10. poter,4,"Ia1 for further, land divisions and development'.' None under 5 -acre MI(I'MUM zone - I. Torra I h 'Rolling lower foothill. a. General Topographic Ch8radter: b. Slopes: 6-12%, C. alovation: 825-4000i d. Limit"M9 Factors: None. Soils Corning Gravelly Sandy loam, Types and Characteristics: deep soil to 52,*, unconsolidated alluvial deposits,, grav el surface drainage) rough broken ,strata., well established sur stony lands gently slopingridgeswith rock outcrops, b. Limitino Factors: High percentage of surface rocks low soil fertIlItYi si. Natural Hazards of the Land a. Earthquake Zone: Moderate, faults In Immediate VICIMIty. b. Erosion Poten,,-Ial: Moderate to High. ti Landslide Potdht-181: LQN, d. Fire Hazards Extreme. High. ti Expansive Sol! Potential* Moderate to 4. Hydrology aii Surface Water; Two drainages and one farm pond On site. bi Ground Water: Unknown re8OWCOa c. or-ainage CharacteristIcst . PrsoportY drains west-sOuthW08t In natural swat normal 24-26". d. Annual Rainfall (nOrt"'al )" e, Lim1billig Factors'. Large Percentage 0f property encumbered by SW',10. setbacks. Oublity* Highly Scenic ranches' 6. Acour�tin Quality! Good, 7. Air Quality: Good Bio104ical IE nviwomen±= 8 Vegetationt. Open 9rassland� scrub, pine and oak trees. 9. Wildlife Habitat: Lower Sonoran Life Zone. Cul tUal Env r-onment: 10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area: Low, 11 Butte County General Plan designation Agricultural -Residential 12 Existing Zoning A -S. J3. Existing Land Use on --site: One farm pond, 14. Surrounding Area a. Land Uses: Silver Bar" Ranch aviary, 'Tentative Subdivision Map in process t4 north, rural residential, b. Zoning A -S, AFS=MH-5. c. Gen. Plan designations: Agricultural -Res dential. d. Parcel Sizes: 20*. e. Population Sparse. 15. Character of Site and Area: Ranching community.. 16. Nearest Urban Area: Oroville */- 10 miles, Palermo 2 miles. 17. Relevant Spheres of Influence. Butte County Mosquito Abatement District. 18. Improvements Standards Urban Area: N/A. 19 Fire Protection Service a. Nearest County (State) Fire Station- #72, 2 miles west. b. Water Availability: On-slte pond. 204 Schools in Area: Palermo twinion, Oroville Union High School Dtstrlct, vii\• � ,, ' .. � " awr L> ` W 4 O ' 0 a � f 7 S \ • � z t . a PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY SHEET FOR LAND DxVZSZONS APPLICANT Pat. Bigelow ADDRESS 253 Palermo Drive, grovil.le, CA 95.965 OWNER Same T PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOPMaivide 20 acres into 4 0 5.01 acres` each on property ry A-5 p P Y Zoned .�GCATTUN_ On the noxt} least corner of Oroville Country Club road and Grubbs Road, Palermo area. ASSMSOR, S PARCEL NUMBER(S) 27-.11-10 p o r ZONING _ r'l-5 GEN.. PLAt1�; � ._' .. __._ ----- PROJECT CONSISTENT? DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED A,Jay 7 1985 )ng; Barnhart 9Brown -- a ns On t.. rova e, DATE PUBLICATION NOTICE WRITTEN- �.. PUBLISHED PLACE NEWSPAPER NOTICE(S) PUBLISHED - O C. P_ n DATE MAILING LIST PREPARED .DATE MAIL -OUT NOTICES WRITTEN MAILED _ NUMBER _ DATE PLANNING bIRECTORIS RLTORT__PREPARED ENVIRONMENTAL CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION -. DATE FILED DETERMINATION �"�"" AND BATE \ NEGATIVE 'CECLARATION DATE ADOPTED � C" MITTGAI'ED NEGATIVE DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED E'NV: IMPACT REPORT DATE CERTIFIED SUB. COMt•TITTEE MEETING DATE ADVISOPY AGENCY }EAR= DATE� x-15 , :ADVISORY AG}!'NC` 'CTION BOARD .ACTION COMMENTS d; APPENDIX H No-nCE OF RETE 9UdE0TH id ' D Office of Planning and Research CitO'Rl1z Plano ig Departm.enC. TO: Rvom 121 7 Count Center D � e,,� 1400 Tenth Street, 0r Male, Sacramento, CA 95814 or ELEANOR M. BECKER, Cnuniy Clerk County Clerk try ��.. x: -JA ,_.,.Deputy. County of Butte g Filin of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 S�pCT: of the public Resources Code, 85-06-11-01 AP �� Name ro eft it le to 27-11-10 (P ) Pat Bigelow Tentative Parcel 1taP f-nntnrt erson tate Clearingmuse ►4u,41-- Clearinghouse) ilf submitted ; John.Mendonsa, Public Workts (916) 534-1266 ; Location 0n the north side of Grubbs Road, approu• 2200 feet west of it intersection with Crosacountre Road, Palermo. Pj;'Jre—ctDes&iption Mviding 20 acres to create four parr.els of 5 acres each. This is to advise that the -,,,_ I, County Advisor cY 1 Rgen�-�yr or RWponsi le Agency a,,�_...:..., a®4eArreiifL"Stion3 has approved the above described project and has main ��, .,..�...••n -- regarding the above describedproject: have a s if cant effect on the environment. i. Thep j will, will not, h ' vrsu�anti project _.. �'. � rt .was prepared for this project p An ��vlronmental Impact. Report to the provisions of CFQA. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project Vjesuant to the provisions of CEQA• The EIR be Negative Declaration and record of project approval may be examined at: i Butte county P:l.ant7ing Uerartment . 7 Crnfnt'y_Centpr D-L122,j Ahitlgatlm measures „r,_,\yere, were not, oracle a condition of the approval . of t"le pro1ect. A statement of Overriding Contlderat ons r-- wasi was not, adopted for 44 this project, gate Recoived for Filing 1gria • re Stephen A, Streeter Senior' 1'l.anner.__ Title Revised 3anuary i98S Pvti CR�i is4 COUNTY OF BUTTE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 7 County Center Drive Orovlle, CA 95965 916-534-4266 916-534-4339 August 5, 1985 RE AP 2'7-11-10 Pt;n, S. P. BigelOw Tentative Parcel I'laP 253 Palurmo Drive ()ro%tille, CA 95965 1.1ear Mr, Bigelow At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency h5seld August , 19 the Agency adopted the negative declaration regarding environmental review and approved the tentative parcel map for AP 27-11-10 Ptn. subject to the conditions as listed on the attached sheet; If no appeals are timely filed --within ten (10) days of the date of the Advisory Agency's approval --with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, this action will be final. When the conditions of approval are compiled with, it will be in order for you to file your "final map" with the Butte County Department of Public Works for recordation w'i'thin twenty-four (24) months of the date, of approval by the Advisory Agency, If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office. Very truly yours, William Cheff Director of Public Works oVen ansa ist As ant Director dM/'ns Attachment cc Planning - Environmental Review Environmental Health Departmentanr19 Barnhart/Brown Acaciatct �►p\�4ot LD 1110 (Revised 2-28-84) S. P, Bigelow, Tentative Parcel Map, 4 parcels on the norL•hoant vornor of Oroville Country Club Road and Grubbs Road. Palermo area. AP 27-11-10 ptn, Engineer; Barnhart/Brown Associates Public Works conditions: 1. Indicate a 50 ft, building setback from the cent-rlino oV (.1rubbs Road and Country Club drive. P. Glow all easements of record. on the final map. 3. Obtain encroachment permit for all driveways, new or ox'inting, and construct to county standards, 4, Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required. Health Dept. mond? t "no s 5. Show a 50 ft. leachfield setback from the Jrainage way on parcels 1 2, 3 and 4. 6. Show a 100 ftp, leachfield setback from the pond on pared~ 1 and 2. 7. ;:how the usable -,ewage disposal area proven to meet, the requirements of the Subdivi.sJori Ordinance on parcels 1, as 3 .and 4. 8. Place a note on the trap that nz) water Oell may be loc,�tod within 107 f}:, cf the .sable sewage disposal area on parcels 1, ?., 3 and 4, 9. Prove that the roqui,red quantitates of domostic water are available, to parcels 1, 2, 3 and 4 pn�in9 0000, gub�tix� �jG ' O.. Bt..ttto Cot.tnty Advisory Agency FFtC)IYI, Planninq Oirector �alJl;:r7 1CT' report can Tentative pjkreel I' ap +01- Pat 8igelQ1V;, AP r 7-1.;tw-10 fptn? X3fti I k J"I V 2,,, 199$ 'Chip, 1.pf"nposzl to divide �trr t�►oa�=�� c 801 to Create fctr.0 Parcels n acres The present Lc�nir,q is A-5p4-�rci~�,a). The Land Use PI stn I� tp o � the n"tte COQrIty General I✓1 an �ft~si qn COl this area az Agrictwtl.tQr OI ROsident-jal . Thet�e zar. nc epeP an c1i� �tammttnit +f-')I' the area. y plans Tho .a rop s doesnot Can-F l i ct with County y alnrprroozedelmmOt 0+ the 8Lttte COLIOty 'nePan nor- any adopted crsPrr,,a._Fin or COmmt%nity o]yin. any Couy, Rm.nrrtmend appy-oval c: Pat nioelew Barnhart y Vir-own and Assoc, I �5 API)I.NI)CX P COUNTY Or, "'Y'"I ? ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST VORN1 (to e complete i Lel -Agency) AP It 85-06-11-01 27.1.1.10 (ptn) BACKGROUND 1, Name or proponent Pat Bigelow 2. Address of proponent and representative (if applicoble) 253 Palermo Drive Barnhart, Brown & Assoc. Orov�,lle> GA 95965 P 0, Box 157G �_�,� _— _ �. m.-...®.�>u,�...�. ro , CA 95965 _ Oroville, 3, 1'roje"t description Tentative Parcel. Map Yrs TT. %IAN11AT(10V FINDINGS OT BIGNIFIC.ANCI, b riA1`Ili N� a, Does the proieet have the potential to degrade the duality or the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildli.fk, species, cause a. fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the numbez or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of Calirornia history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term benefits to the detriment 0I' 10719 -ter"" environmental goals? (A short-term imp ct on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief period of time whit' 10119 -term Impacts will: endure into the future,'l �-- C. Does the have impacts which etre individu- ally Limited') but cumulatively considerable? (A pre (';t Inay impart on two or more separate resources ,mall, he whac the effect or is relatively tuht�r�. the impact ell each resource t11e total of rhos; impacts en tilt, c.nvirollmeat'is sign! f icant,I r d. Hoes the project have environmental, efrLsets which . will cause 461:l5tantial adverse effects on human hei)l,gs, Q'ithelr ,:lireetly ojr indirectly" -� 1I1. 1)r -'j RMINA`l`ION ('I,o ,Ie completed 1)), the I,etn1 Agoney°) tail the 1)asis or t11is initial evaluation: 1%1V1i ii.rld the proisosOd p'rO,Ieet C()t"") NC) "C have a sigluricant or:feci Lin the e nv irc nlllont , and a NI"CrA'I'1V1i DI:C I.Aitr TI tN will be prepared,, i/w1i rind that a.tt`hough t1r proposzoject could have a signifi �cl project Callt effect Oil the Cnvironwelit., therC Ali.ll not ho a Significant effect ill `this el50 1)ecausC the TilTIGATION b1i?ASl11Zt:S described on the attached sheet have been added to t11e project: A NIGAMP 011"C.I.A>A` ON will 11e prepared, 1 d r i�rrrpclsGd project MAY have a si-Piric;ant ori`ect o rlvi? rindthn the c±nvi��tilent, alld an 1:NVIRONMiN"PAI, IMPACT REPORT is reqrocl. DA'I I . .tu1y_ 17 rotjN"1' ` CSP BU'I"IT; PLANNING DEPAR1't� VNT av3 d R il.on3 its . As ci ate `Plan -.. t Reviewed 1)y! TV ENVI°RONMENTAL IMP CTS (,Explanations o a �"yes'" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheet(s)) YES MAYBE 1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologf c substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? C. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. Destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off-site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel. of a rimer or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g. Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils outside designated urban areas? h. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- tlides. zround fa lure or similar hazards? 2. AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial: Y.— Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or fumes? c. Alteration of air evement;, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, locally or regionally? 3. WAFER_. Will the proposal result in substantial., a changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,, or the rate and amotint of surface runoff? c. Need for off-site surface drainage improve- ments, including vegetation removal, channel- ization or 'culvert installation? d. Alterations to the course or flaw of waters? e. Change in the amount of surface water in any "water body? f. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality# including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turb7dity? g. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? h. Change in the quantity or, ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? i. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public wa:tr.r° supplies? j . Ext osure of people or property to water related hazardssuch as flooding? NO C' �XG YES NIAYEP NO 4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result: in substantial: a. ChanTte in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare �- or endangered species of plants? x c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- ment of existing species? X d, Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? S. ANIM;aL LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial. a. C.ai`3ange in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell fish, benthic organisms or insects)? X b . Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? �( ci introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? X d. , Deteri'oration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X 6. NOISE. Will the proposal, result in substantial; a. Increases in existing noise levels? ,)( b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce significant light and glare'? S, LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial al:toration of the present or planned Land use of anarea? 9. NATURAL RESOURCES! Will the proposal result in su stantal. a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b, Depletion of any non-renewable natural resources? k 10. RISK OF UPSET_. Will the proposal involve; a. A rise o explosion or the release of hazard- ous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an r upset conditions? o Possible interference enc ewith an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? 11, POPULATION, Will the proposal alter the location, aistri ut on, density, or growth rate of the human population? 12, HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? y =S� 13. TRANSPORTATION/CrR"JL4 YES MAYBE NO 1.4 . result in; _ . TIOIN. Will the proposal a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact on existing transportation systems? d. Significant alterations to present patterns Of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services; a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? -- c. Schools? d, Parks or other recreatiolial facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including g f. Other govexn mental services? 1 S . ENERGY.Us Will the proposal result in e of substantial amounts of fuel.or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 1.6, UTUITIES. Will the prcpsal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? G. Anter availabli ity d. Sewer or septic tank? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? 17, MM HtALTH, Will the proposal result in! H, Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18. AESTHETICS, Will the proposal result in the MtrUCtIon of any scenic vista Or View open to the public, or 'fill the r,roposal result in the . creation of an aesthetically Offensive site open to public view? WIN YES MAYBE NO 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES. a. Will t e proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b. Will the proposal result in adverse Phys cal or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a< a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? V. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP 27-11-10 (ptn) See attachment i a Wp Ek�t'Jtt11�11;11�lTAL�UF�LU1TIgi A' 7-11-10 (p=n) property Will Development odi Our homesikeQmpactionn the �and , overcove►ring rertixt in some disruption, �acement, could lead to an increa5 in storm waterthiso�1 c► t7�1 OJ the soil which 1�►.►r to the size ca the property, a potential For erosion. not be a 000" cant effect, �� 0'0 11 n tutu 11, county i.5 located within i, located within �.ho i, h „ �1. lnten w i, ty Zcar7r-� VIIX.. `ihe s►�ka,�eGt preps=r" Y �1 ormed For the Silver- Bar Ranct��►'e• portal maps w � er '� r 4 ► ►races o�tnd on�-.�ito �� ,er �+hoc1, 'Epi c+�nter Region of the 1�'7 a CJti•ov� �. ], e oar • �� ...,,oi c.al survey was p Which roated the recommended, l significant �a►�l a nc, and clearance � � will result in MOM � pevelcapmunt c�•� �Fot�►r homesites on the ptr roperty e i n i,t� Ont and rel at ed increase i n should s not be a5 � �}�re an t actor l low density tai• the area' to the relatively sgni.ficant eF�ect»M resent an 14: Though not signs.+icant, this project will rep incremental i.ncreave in demand frit~ Public services in a ►rota area: sive Sar Ranch Tentative parcel heap y AFS ��'i~�i.l"" 10 and .e+VrQr►ce» S4-09-2,4-04" AppendjX V ` Paps 6 Applicant% 0 Pat Bigelow ATO-PHAT 0 Assessor's Parcel 27-11-10 (ptn) Log 4 N Pry e0_PPPqrjptVy�, In Typo of Project: Tentative Parcel Map Urie+ WsCriptionx Dividing 20 acres to create Our parcels Of 5 acres each Location: On the north side of Grubbs Road, approximately 2200 feet West of its interzoction with CrOsa=ntry Road, Pal erMo. 4. Proposed Density of Development: $ acres per dwoll,no unit S. Amount of Impervious Surfacing: Minimal 6. Access and Nearest Public Road(s)z Grubbs Road adjacent to the south. 7 thud of Sewage Disposal: Individual septic syztom- arco of Water Supply: Individual wells WMAY Of Power Lines: To parcel ltentiOl for further land divisions and development: None andor exiztinq zoning 1, Terrain a, Genoral Topographic'Character. R01104 KwOr foothill bo Slopos: 5 to 10% c. ElIvationt 275-35o feet ASL. d, Limiting Factorw Some Areas of %tooper 0000% 2. Soils a. Types and Characteristics: QOWWO gravelam ly sandy lo, deep toil to W4 UMCOMsolidatod alluvial dmpo,iQ4 orayll Arsta4 well established surface drainaool rough broken OtOfOy land - 90MUY sloping ridges with bedrock outcrops that cover the greatest part of the surf ocol "zed for qraZWJ4 b. Limiting Fattors; High percent of surface rock, low soil fertility, Natural Hazards of the Land a- Orthquake Wet Foothill Shear Zone, faults and opicontor b. Erosion raotot1ti,_kl: Moderato -High depending on slope Wdllido Votontial: t Wow d. rire Hazard%. ... o' C-ttPll'htivO Wil PotOmhiall Cow -High Upending on soy. lu AP 27-1110 (Ptn) 4- Hydrology Surf8cP Wat0r; A tributary of Nyman Ravino-crosses the northwastenly portion of thesjto. b, Ground Water. Unknown resource CA Drainage Characteristics: Property drains West, in the natural swale. d. Annual p,ainfall (normal); 24-24 inches por ye Ir e. Limiting Fattorsg None Visual /Saenic Ouality: High scenic ranches 6. Acoustic QLAality: Good 7. Air Duality; Mood open grazz landq scrub brush, numerous and Oak treses„pine A Wildlife Hz~bitat-. Sonoran Li+e Zone 106 Arthaoological and Historical Resource! in the area: Low including unknown 114 Butte County General plan designation! Agricultural %sidential 12. Existing ZOMihg; A-5 Wo WAing Land Use on -0 tot open land 14, Surrounding Aroat aLand usays Rural ranchonj few homes north and watt b. Zonings A-5, AR4_HH-5 CA Mon. Plan d0siqmatiMs: Agricultural Rosidtntj4l d- Para0l Sizes: 20 acres +I some 5 acre Parcels poarby e. Pop"Intiont Sparse, 15. Character a+ Sit- and Area: Ranching community, develop,, into suburban residential 16. Nearest Urban Aroa4 Palermo +/" 2 miles west 0. Relavant Sphoros a+ IrflQwnc*: 8utto Count .y Abatement IS- Improvements Standards Urban ArM No 19- rir* Protection Servicat ao WaVOK County <State) tiro Stationg 8tat, wont on 472, 2 miles bo Water AvailabilityOn-situ ponds 20- Schools im n Ar District Polormo Qhi0m, OrOvillo Union HAgh School Appandis Y (b)