HomeMy WebLinkAbout027-130-017+WSJ ®r
d4 •
PLANNING COM OSION SUMMARY SHEET FOR LAO DIVISIONS
APPLICANT Harold Balaz
Log#86-03-07-0
ADDRESS3- 070 Louis Avenue, Orowille
r CA 95966
OWNER Same
PROJECT DESCRIP�TION�TPM to divide ll+- acres to cl:eate 1-6 acres+-
and 1-5 acre �
LOCATION Two parcels on the east side of
Knob Hill Rd approx_ 7Qnn,
ASS'ESSOR'S PARCEL NUM3ER (S)
27-13--17
ZONING A-5------
GENERAL PLAN A,Resi, PROJECT CONSISTENT?
GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE REPORT
DATE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE
LAND CONSERVATION ACT CONTRACTS?
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED
AGENT/SURVEYOR/CIVIL ENGINEER:
ADDRESS:
DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT PREPARED'
ENVIRONMENTAL CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION - D
AND
DATNATx01V "�`"� ATE FILED
AND`bATE NEGATIVE DECLARATION DATE ADOPTED
;ELLA
MITIGATED NEG. D
... _ --- RATION
DATE ADOPTED�L_
ENV. IMPACT R`SPORT - DATE CERTIFIED
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO.
NO*CR V..1.''
'XO: 02fice of Planning and Res16i
mh µ��s Butte County
1400 Tenth Street, Room 12 p}��lanning bepartment
acramento CA 95814 7 Count Center Drive
S ,IaJ)Crovillei CA 95965
or J U L 1 _r 1986
X County Clerk
County of Butte ,' �-ANOR. I -A, BECKER, Cr,041 Clerk
A, JAC041 k -i .
SUBJECT _ Filing of Notice of Dd'termiee with Section 21108
or 21152 of the Public Resources Code.
Project Title AP # Name
Tentative Parcel Map 27-13-11 Harold Balaz
State Clearinghouse Number Contact Person Telephone Number
(if submitted to Clearinghouse)
Public Works John Mendonsa 34-4266
Project Location East side of Knob Hill Rd. approx. 18001 south of its
intersection with Butte Vista Road., in the Palermo area.
Project Description Tentative Parcel Map dividing 11i acres to create two
parcels, one of 6 acres and one of 5 acres.
This is to advise that the Butte County Adyisoruy
-
(Lead Agency or Responsible Agency)
has approved the abovd-described project on 7-14-86 and has made
(nate)
the following determinations regarding the above-described project:
1 The project will,will not, have a significant effect on the
environment.
2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project
"pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.-
A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the
provisions of CEQA
3. Mitigation measures _ were) ,,were not) made a condition of the
approval of the project:
4, A statement of overriding considerations was) was not) adopted
for this project.
This is to certify that the final. RIR with comments and responses and record of
project approval is available to the general public at
Butte County Planning Department.
7 County Center Drive
Oroville) CA 95963
Date Received for Filing and
Posting at OPR 7-15-86
S il ure
Stephen p; Streeter
Senior.. Planner ,,�,
, Title Rdvited Match 1966
-Suite
- - .•- AID o
Lf
u
_ - rJATURAL WEALThi
DEPARTMENT OF PUBL;C WORKS
WILLIAM (0111) CMEFF, Olr--ctCir
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE . OROVILLC, CALIFORNIA 95.435
Telephone- (916) 534,4601
&Me°�r'o.PlannIngCrOrnn% RONALD D. McELROY
.
JUL. 14 1986
July 14, 1986 Deputy D,reeior
Qroville, Celiforala
Harold B alaz:
3070 Louis Avenue RL': AP 27-13-17
Oroville, CA 95965 Tentative Parcel. Flap
Dear Mr. Balaz
At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held on
Judy 14, 1986, the agency granted a negative declaration of
environmental impact and approved your tentative
above -referenced heet.rty subject to the conditionsroflapprpovaltlis
on the attached sheet, ted
If no appeals are timely filed --within ten (10) days of the elate of
the Advisory Agency's approval --with the Clerk of the [bard of
Supervisors, this action will be fins];;
When the conditions of approval are complied with, it will Per you to file your 'final map" with the Butte County ill iibe in order
rnent
of Public Warl<s for recordation within twenty-four (24) months of
the date of approval by the Advisory Agoncy
L.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact thi:
office. S
Very truly y6Ue8,
William Chef f
Director of Public Works
1 �f
1'. r� .
John Mendonsa
JN/dsh55istaht Director
cc; .planning Department
Environmental Health Department
Pon Graves & Associates
HAROLD BALAZ, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, AP 27-13-17, 2 parcels on the east
side of Knob EIill Road approx. 1800 ft. south of its intersection
with Butte Vista Road.. Palermo area.
Public Works conditions:
I. Provide two-way traversable access RS -8 -Lb -I to each parcel from a county
maintained road or state highway. S
2. Access to be reserved in deeds as per county ordinance and offered for
dedication on the final map,
3. 'Provide road maintenance agreement,
4. Indicate a 50ft. building setback from the centerline of Kn()jt 1fi,1.1 Road.
5. Show all easements of record on the final map.
6. Provide street name signs per requirements of the Department, of
prior to recordation of the final. map. Public Works
7. Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required.
Health Department conditions:
8. Provide a 100' leachfield free setback around existing wells either.
with
in the property or within 1001 of the property boundaries on
parcels #1 and #2.
9. Show a 100' leachfield setback from the highwater line of the creek
on parcels #1 and #2'.
10. Show the usable two (2) acres sewage disposal area proven to meet the
requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance on parcels X11 and 1#2.
11, Prove that. the required quantities of domestic water are available
to Parcels i#1 and #2.
Inter -Departmental Memorandum
Toz Butte County Advisory Agency
-PROMS Planning Director
sunjECT Report on Tentative Parcel Map of Harold Balaz on AP 27-13-17
DATES July 3, 1986
This is a proposal to divide ll± acres to create 2 parcels, The
present zoning is A-5 (Agricultural - 5,aere parcels). The Land Use
Plan Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as
Agricultural Residential. There are no specific or community plans
for the area.
The proposal does not conflict With County zoning not any adopted or
Proposed element of the Butte County General Plan nor any County,
specific or community plan.
Recommendation
Adopt A Negative Declaration of environmental impact and recommend
approval;.
SAB:lr
cc Harold Balaz
Ron Graves
�s
+ APPENDIX X r'
CotiElLy (II, Bu`PTI
,ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKUST FORM
(I-0 be completez )` tHA Agency)
1,09 11 86-03-07-01
T. BACKGROUND AIS '! 27-13-17
1. Name of proponent HAROLD 13ALAZ
z. Address of proponent and representative Cif applicable)
Harold. Balaz Ran_Gra�zes
3070 Louis Avenue
Oroville,. CA 95966_ P_.0'
- J oxoville• CA5965�
3. 17roject description Tentative Parcel
T1. LIANIMTOM1 I-INDINGS OF SI(,NI,FICANCI; 1^fS itAY13t NO
a. Hoes the project have the potential to degrade thV
quality of the environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause Fr.
'fish or wildlife population to drop below self-
sustaining .levels, threaten to eliminate a plant o1
animal community, reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the major periods
of California history o- prehistory?
ti, hoes the Project have the patclitial to achieve
short-term benefits to the detriment of long-term,
environmental goal;a'; (A short-ter,, impact an the
environment is one which occurs in n r.tatively
brief p=rjud of time while long-term impacts wi11
endure .into the future.)
c:. Does the project IltlVe impacts which F11.0 inelividlI-
ally limited, but eumulatively considerable" (A
project may impact on two or more separate resout,ces
where the impact on each resource i.s relativoly
small, but where the effect of tite totill of thc)sr:
intprrcts on theme environment is signi.ficant.l
d. Hoes the 11roie'et havr enolVonment ll el'fects Whicii
Will ealrse substuntia] aelti('I'Si' offescts r]t1 1rUltlFln
110ings, either; directly or lfrdirertl ;' v
1I i r 1111.1 IMIT�NA'1 ION("J'er ife� c'erlrrll I c� teed h4' tiler i.r.�rr�1 Agency)
011 tha 'basis Kof tdli ►rit3al euailrati()il.
find tic proposed pro ioe•t C111H.h NOT hilvv
i
ctrl the 0,11l it wnmc"nt, and a NH;A"i TVV Tri.CURATION'evi ililbei111,011areci,
1/tv1: find t' at although the' propFtsod hrojv t votltd have, 11 sigp.i fi-
catitr efl,oe:t oll the environmollt, thein 1�111 not ho rl significant
L
ffect i11 "Ifs rase bQCUtrsr the MI"IGATTON NII;A,SURM deser bed on
the i
IV, ENVIRONMENTAL I ACTS, eStr and "maybe" answers are required
a 1
Xp anat�.ons o Y YES MA_
attached sheens))
NO
on
1, rA TH, Will. the proposal result in significant:
in changes in
x
a, Unstable earth conditions or
substructures? _
geologic
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
G.
overcovering of the soil'?
in topography ar ground surface
Xr—
c. Change
relief features.—
covering nr modification of any
d. Destruction,
h sical. features? -- .—.-
unique geologic or p y
erosion of soils,
e, Increase in wind or water
off-site?
�
either on or of beach
f. Cha.n;ges in deposition s�lCation�ndepositz
sands, or changes i� the channel o�
which May modify
or erosion
river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
x c
a ,
any bay y :inlet or lake
agricultuxally Productive SOUS
X
g. Loss of p rime
outside designated urban areas? geologic
to
Exposure of people or property
h: Exp landslides, mud-
as earthquake's,
X�
hazards'such
slides, ground failure or similar hazards'?
Z,. AYR. Will the proposal result in substantial;
deterioration of ambient
a Air emissions or
air quality' smoke
The creation of objectodors,
b,
or fumes?
changesinclemate�or
c; Alteration of .sir
y
temperature, or :any
locally oreglonally"
Proposal result in substantial:
3, WATERv Will. the p ro ►
the course or
a. Changes in currents, o1
direction of water movements in either
..
marine or fresh waters? drainage patterns,
b: Changes in absorption rates,:
runoff?
or the rate and amount of surface _.._.
Need for of surface drainage improve.
c' channel-
vegetation removal,
mems , including g
installation?
izatJon or culvert
Alterations to the o1 Y� " nr flow sof flood
j
.
d.
Waters? he
in the amount o:! surface warmer in any
e. Change
water body? o�; in any �-
f, Discharge into surface waters; including
ived
alteration of surface water qualitY,
limited to temperature,
but not
o�yggjl Or turbidity '
of the direction or rate of flow
C
S, alteratiOT!
of ground waters? of ,q'rOUhd wabers s
qu ality
'b, change in the quantityor
either through direct additxor�s or rv�,th�
interception of an
�
�
arawals, or through
.�—
aquiferexcavations?
"ducioj�inutheoamount of water otherwise
k lies"?
supe
ava4 j .jblt for public water
'Exposure of people or property to water
J i ..related hazards such as flooding?
r
YES
LLLYBB NO
4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in substanti,al.-
T.CFFn_ge in the diversity of species, or number
of any species of plants (including trees,
shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of plants?
X
c. Introduction of new species of plants into an
area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish-
ment of existing species?
C>
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
X
S. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial:
a. Changeinthe diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of aiiimals (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shell fish,
benthic organisms or insects)
b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of animals?
x
ct Introduction of new species of animals into
an area, or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of animals?
x
d. Deterioration to cNisting fish or wildlife
habitat?
x C.
6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial,-
47—Increases in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
X
7. LIGHT AND CLARE. Will the proposal produce
signiFscant light and glare?
8. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a
gubstant a! alteration of the Present or planned
land use of an area?
9. NATURAL RESOURCES,: Will the proposal result in
a4 Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
bo Depletion of any non-renewable natural
resources?
10. RISK OF UPSET, Will the proposal involve. -
a. explosion Or the release of hazard-
ous substances (including, but riot limited to,
oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the
event of an accident or upset conditions?
b, Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
11, POPULATION. Will the proposal alter the location,
aist'risut on density, or growth rate of the human
population?
12, HOUSTM Will the proposal affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional hottsing?
- _x C
7 3.
YES I+1AYB E NO
%—'-.N-ISPoiR—.TAT-'ON—/CLR—CUL�kT�ION, Will the proposal:
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle
movement?
b Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for
x
new parking?
c. Substantial impact on existing transportation
systems?
d. Significant alterations to present patterns
of circulation
"—
or movement of people and/or
goods?
e. Alterations TO waterborne, rail or air traffic?
X
Increase in traffic hazards toJC
motor vehicles,
bicyclists
or pedestrians?
144
PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect
Upon, or result.' in a need for
new or altered
governmental, srYry ces;
A. Eire protection?
b. Police Protection?
c. Schools?
.
d. Parts or other recreational facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads?
f, Other governmental, services?
-- -�-
IS.
ENERGY. Will the proposal, result in
a. `Use of substantial
amounts of fuel or energy?
b, Substantial increase in demand upon existing
--
sources of energy, or require the development
Of
new sources of energy?
16:
UTILITIES: Will the proposal result in a nee for
new systems, or substantial:alteratiolis
following; to twee
a, Power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems?
C, Water av,aiiabil i-
d. Sewer or septic tan.lc?
`Jf
e. Storm water drainage?
f: Solid waste and disposal?
17.
HUMAN' HUM, Will the proposal result in;
a.reams oa n or any health hazard
or potential
liealtih ha.tard (excluding mental health) ?
b:
Exposure of people to potential health �—
hazards?
18.
AESTHETICS, Will the proposal result in the
669 rUcti—on of any scenic vista
or view open to
the pul' ic, gx r,ri 1 the proposal, result in the
creatzo.-.
of an aesthetically offensive site open
to public view?
.............
. 4..
19. RECREN. Wil the YES AfA]`81 IV(t
Will the c{uality or proposal result in an impact
opportunities quan�it: of existing recreational
29 CULTURAL RESOURCES.
a • Wi 11� t�`�...` �-- ---� --.
pro osal result in the alteration
Of or the destruction of a
historic archaeological site?eh'storic or
b• Will the proposal result in adverse
or aesthetic effects to phYs_cal _Cc
historic buildinga prehistoric or 4
c• Does the, structure or object?
proposal have the potentia' to Cause
a physical change Which would affect 'unique
--
ethnic cultural values? que
d• Will the
Proposal restrict ecisting•e7igou:
or sacred uses within
the potential impact
V. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONME14TAL EVALU
ATI
See attacheAP 27-13-17
d;.
k
w
O
D I SCUSS �OIV OF Ei4iI�AENT EVALU T I OlV
lb,cre,3b;,f. AP 27-13"17`
Knob H111 AvenuDeVelopment of additional
. home
Avenue will result in some disruptionesdarid the extension :of
compaction and overcoverin v lsplace
slopes up to and exceeds g of the soil. Development mens,
gradlnQ and result€Int changes result in sa E Of homesites on
disruptions will lead to topography h m neCcssitY For
an Increase in p Y on the Property.
on site and changes in absorptionpotential for Tf so
net result will be rates and drainage erosion of soils
drainage channel an increase in potential patterns. The
Due to the large size at �frhes the easterl far siltation in the
expected to be propertles Y portion of the property.
sigh these impacts are not
I g ► yid 3 Development of the, subject property
w111 remove potential J p pert hom�ssites
surrounding devela grazing land from a Y as residential
propert'les have a1peadt and eXist'in agricultural uses. Due to
g parcel sizes in the area, these
Project should not represent compromised as grazing
the area. any further land and this
reduction h gazing land In
i
All of Outte County is within a
4 VTII. The subject Moderate Es�rthquake, Intensity
enters of the property is located near the area of
�heast of a 195 Orovilie Earthquake .and. approximately
names to n inferred fault of unknown actio"i1/
Uniform for:rt Bu i 1 d i rg Code s mile
should pr-avide adequate standards y' Construction of
of seismic activitprotect.lo for seismically active areas
n to residents and occupants In `case
5d' The subject
winter deer property 1 s oi't the wester
herd area. Due to ly edge of an non-crltloal
area;, this pr odect would existing i st i ng' similar, l at sieve
winter range, hot have the effect of l'OrMent in the
further reducing
8e11,12: This Project represents a
residential uses in an Outlying n expansion of additional rural
developed to rural r s , However, the
Grubbs Road. re use, uses, particularl general area is
and to the Mbrthwest imllar d Velopmer�t exists ImmediatelyY to the north along
to the east
1a_ This project will re
Knob H i l l Avenue, Butte present an Incremental i ncrer�se I n traffic on
Taw traffic counts and theme ma LR ad* And Grubbs
this aptould not r presenh number of Road. Due to existing
g homesites being created,
system. significant impact on the trenspor^tatlon
1= This project w111 represent an Incremental
publid services In a rural ares, increase in demand for
being createoiy this will not Due to the small
Fare" , but will contribute to the cumulative h number of lots
represent a �slgnificant lnc►"ease in the
�= The subject notal
sensitivit property, is in an area of
the sub y ` An archao'ol cog i ca l suave high archaeological
Ject property was created in 1yOG6s performed at the revealed that same mine to i l i n s That arc aec h t l mrd that
cperation were found alort the from a small- h logical Survey
alale gold dredglny
g intermittent drainage channel, but no
matc�rinLs
Were found within the area that would '
this operation occurred.
h1stOrica1 or, arc,�aeologicThe survey ind1sated that
In dating when
pt^oper ,Y and arc a l materials were 1 dent i f i eno d other
haeoiogical clearance was on the
granted,
Reference: ansa: -
itie g0_ Frank Smith, Jr., Tentative
1 0-20�-07. Parcel
Map► AP 27,13-08, Log
Applicant Harold Balaz
Assessor's Parcel it
86-03-07..0.1
Log, # 27 -la -17
DAT---A11F�'
A,.ect Deset^
1• Type of Project: .l Tentative Parcel Map,
2. Brief Description: Dividing approximately 11 acres to create
two parcels, one of 6 acres and Cine of 5 acres..
3. Location On the esst side of Knob Hill Road
1800 feet south of Its Intersection with Butte approximate
lin
the PalErmo area. Vista
4. Proposed Density of Development: 5 acres
S. Amount of Impervious Surfadin Per dwelling unit.
6. Access and Nearest Pubi'1c Roadts)Minimal
Butte Vista Road a Via Knob Hill Road and
ned. mately 1 mile to. Grubbm Road, which
l's Publicly maintained.
'�. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual septic systems.
g-, Source of Water Supply: Individual well..
9, Prox9mity'of Power Lines: To property.
10. Potential, for further lend divisions and development, None
under existing zoning.
D. Fnvrohmntai Setyinc
Phys i S , Fne- i roamer
1. Terrain
a. Genera] Topographic, Character:
Rolling foothill
grasslands,
gentle hilltop location on the western portion
along Knob Hill Avenue road allgnment.
bw Slopes; Moderate.* 10 to 209 slopeso increasing to the
East along the drainage channel at the east boundary.
d, 1rlevbt-lonr 350 to 500 feet above Sea Level
d. Limiting Factors: Steeper Slopes
ersterlhear dralnagewby on the
Y Portion of the property.
2. Solis
a. Types and Characteristiesm Newvllle "Soll Series,
moderately Shallow (20 to 40o) ,
loam with some clay content. r grrocky loam/sandy
b. Limit1he Factors: Shallow sails. Slow permeability,
Medium to low rangeland capability. Some ;erosion
potehtial
3 Natural Hazards of the Land
ao Eroon ke Zane.
b. Erosion
PotenModerate Sa�'thquake Intensity Zone VIII.
tial: Moderate.
di Landslide Potentl*
bit Low
d Pire Hazard: Moderate,
e• Expansive Soil Potential: High.
4. Hydrology
a. Surface Water: intermittent drainage course
easterly property boundary, leading within One Mllr-- to
WYandotte Creek to the west.
b. Groundwater: Unidentified resource. Probtlh,14,
limitations.
d. Drainage CharactorlstBcs: Direct drainage on ta,,JK parcel
to drainage course on easterly property boundat—,
d. Annual Rainfall (normal3'- 26 to 28".
0. Limiting Factors: Setbacks from drainaqeNoyg; Votontially
steep slopes.
S., Visual/Scenic, Quality: Good.
6. Acoustic Quality: Good.
7. Air Quality". Good.
13-lologica1 Envlcohment'.,
8. Vegetation" : Foothill grasslands with scattered Osk,-'4,,
9. Wildlife Habitat: Small birds and animals common to foothIll
qr8s:.i I ands.
Cultural Environment
10, Archaeological and Histar ,ical Resources In the brant Mph
8ensit-11vIt-y area,
Il. Butte County General Plan designation:
Agriaultur8l-Residehtlal.
12. Ex I s, I nkla Zoning*. A-5.
13. Exist-liq Land Use ons -site t Vacant gr8zslandsi
14. Surroundlhg Area:
8. Land Uses: Single-family dwelling's at rural densltie�.
b. Zoning : A -5i
'am Gert. Plan designations,. Aoricultural-kesidentlali
d. Pgo--i to I Sizes: 5 acres and up.
e. Popvl at I on Sparsi-d.
i'S. Characti ,v of 8 1, tee . and Area". Sparse 1 y sett I ed tura I g1,11,,.1t-11$, 01nds
and agrIculturtl area:
16. Nearest Urban Ardat Oroville.
17. Relevbvtf Spheres of influence: None.
18. Improvemants Standar&3 Urban Ares: No,
19. Fire PrcUottlan Servicet
a. Pieter ftt County (State) i=1 re Station o Palermo Stat lofl 012
appr,!k.tlmate ly 5 miles.
b, Watiej:- Avallabilityt Fire tankers only.
20. Schools 1tii Area-:- I Palermo Union School District and
Union W- School District,