HomeMy WebLinkAbout027-160-009I
' a •
A • �
5
� � l t ti ��l lWlll •. a �', U.�LA �u'el ,
APPLICANT Dale Rash
455 DunstonF;
I
BUTTE COUTIW ADVIS'ORY AGENCY 1tiilifuum Fac 7
January 2$, lg$5
r
E. APC'ROVAi, Or NJ'Ni1=,S, OF JARMRY 14, 1585
Mr. kIironimus said that on pa -9e 7, on the Dale Rash item, AP 27-16-09
the gun paragraph, the second sentence should stat':, ""rhe Whole 14 acres:
or 9 acres does r%ot need to be sarveyed, if there a.s an ds a; of where
development w;141.1 occur,, and. including the existing and :vaybe future driveway."''
V
-. Dale Rash, AP 27-16-09, two Parcels on the east side of Ouhstone
approx. 1000 ft. north of its intersection with Grubbs Rd.
Eng�nee.r: Ron Graves
HEA RING OPEN
Ron Graves, engineer, objected; to the requirement for an arche,eoto
y
because the homesite and Ueptic system are already aical. survey
en
be any excavation. The existing driveway will probablCe y c eane,l iltpThere!
on't
and should bP regarding gravelled.
,• . 4i+ ." .. � ur�eh �Or eabl.e _ nsasaid that. the. miti atideletednon-f'larrraab�.e mate ria 1,
Mr. Reid a�
eked where on the map the creek re erred to In the mi'tS.gztio�i about
a setback was actually locatea.
Mr. Graves indicated where the c-pek i;,
M
Page 7
BUTTE CQU1,TTY
AD QRy EPTCY �2CDTUTF
January 14, 1985 required setbacks from
Mr .
Reid said he would add a condition to show the
creeks and drainage ways. on the driveway, but that would
Mr. Graves said that there would be grading
be about it.
�, Streeter to call Laura Tuttle, and discuss the requirement
IJECESS (for Mr. I survey.)
for an archaeologica
Mr= Streeter
asked if a t was alright for parcel.2 to share a driveway with
parcel 1-
• id that was fine, because parcel. 2 has their orrn access anys�ray.
'btr. Mendonsa sd drainage Way.:
Mr. Streeter :asked. about a culvert crossing over the stream or rain g
m, Graves said it Mould probably require dropping in a culvert....
There was a.discuss on a the cost of an A chaeological survey. survey world.
Th. -re
Streeter said that the condition to require an Archa;eolagacalSif an
P�Ir: S e'Sd Ole 14 acres or'9 acres does not need to be surveyed,bfuture drive�ray.
remain, Th and the existing and rpay
idea of where development will occur, a. clearance �r'thout seeing the
If the archaeologiat will rite a letter prov�ti.�ng
property, that would suffa
either a report or cl;eararice would clear the condition.
that
Viendonsa said 1 either
ied r just a letter
Clearance could be Supp
nAp'niG CLOSED T and
reviewed the .environmental review C�IE'GiCl+Drt of
A and the planning Director;s Rep
Mr. Reid stated having
rant a mitigated nagative declaration
the conversations at thakema~motion to g to create 2 parcels on
l
1984, I will ma arced- map
of eftv%r onmental 'impact for the Dale Tta�h p ation
that the project cash have1an effect on the ecnvironmettt; but
AP 27-16-09 finding t a listed
cant effect in thin case proVeaeareh#1required Sittg
Mill. not have a signifl mitigation measures
in D r ector` s Report of Dec • 31, 1984. lKr tion seconded by
measures axe complied with.
Those mi tig
within, the i)Ianh g
Mr. Streeter and carried una imouslY: dopted
noting mitigated negative aeciarattOh was ash to create
that a miti6 ,rove the parceiw map of Dale Ra
Mr. Read stated: a lowLny conditions;
thts date, 1 will mare a mAiooval is subject to the
2 parcels on AP 27_1,6_09. pp
•ti
BUTTE COUM' ADVISORY AGENCY N"..LTWTES Page 8
January 14, 198
DATE RASH TPM
Public Works conditions:
114 Verify legal. parcel
2. Deed to the County of Butte 30 right--of--:gay from t],11e
centerline of Dunstone Road.
3. Indicate a 50 f t . building setback from the centerline of
Duns tone Road
4. show, all easements of recordon the, final matt).
5. Obtoin encroachment _permit .for all. dr .vewayso. nes4 or •exzs•tzng,:
and construct to county standards.
6. Pay any de-linquent tares or current taxes; as required.
Health Dept. conditions;
7. Provide a 100 ft. leach Field froe setback around existing wells either
within the property or within 100 ft. of the property boundaries on
parcels, .1 and 2
Y 8 Prove that the required quantities of domestic water axe avail.,,%le
to each parcel..
9 ShoV the required sewage disposal setbacks from the creeps and drainage
trays on the property.
Planning Slept,: condition!
10. Have an archaeological survey prepared by a qualified professional on
Parcel 2 and incorporate any recommendations into the final map.
The following mitigation measures are also required:
11. Erosion will. `be held to a minimum by limiting the work to be done to only
the dry season and using proper grading tachni.ques.
12. Mote zn map; no development permitted vrtth3. n Job ft. of cx•eelc centerlino.
jo;,i.on secon:+ed by Mr. Streetet and ca.rtifW ucnalmousl,;-
.44
AP1'1;t1Dl.X 1'
k Cil1NT1 _ OF B1 171.
LhlVIROND1R[QT�Iy GIll:GKI.IST i itltht
cu---��ri�a�Y
I.c11;
84-10-24-02
27-1.6-09
bAGK�NDe Rash .°
oi' proponent t 1` aPP1 1.c ttlalc J
,o
1. ,vnme Itt~4L11tui z c 1
rta orient an rc1 Ron GraVeEir.��_-.-•.�-
2, Address of p. box 986
455 Dunst_ one..--�•�,-- -�.��'. a�, p.� ---
.. e Parcel
project NO
y1y binY YBi.
MAtvI'ATORY r, IN1T.Nt;�_��T ..,,_'�IIIiC��'�I tial to dogi'ade the
1t`oject have the F�osulltiant al7� red110
ilt)eS 'the 1 eC? G'S y caust'. tt
a. of the envixoTttnenrr
qualxty . caf a f isly cal' 1�aildl i Toll sel I
the habitat o in ion to l lent or
fis11 or trildlile POP el in11nt1teestrict the
sus., 0'r
sustaining level") threaten to
-0wee the nu tint �1' animal or
7nimal Comin� 1' or endangerett periods
ales of the maiclr 1
rang of x joxt-.rtt examl
el.iminati imltarn or 1t1ehistory
Of California hit, 1�teltiiitl to �i-lti,eve
'project ltczle tilt l ts7�tlti>
;. t,11c. , detl ilnent to f luno
b. Doe: ttrrpat t on the
shr~xt ei- *rm b�°n ats�tb �, 1;hal c - termly
E1r!'1'r�71tnE'nt;11, te1'tn impacts tVil1
entrironnlent is cane
zWili eh tai curF, ttt 1t relative
ave
bx°e1' Pc�rioct cal' tune talti.l.e 1011�-
ondat,re into the ftrtttre .
z1'G illdiv i d11 W
but �11mu1 zt iv�,s tultich t
t have i111 att'1v collsi'derahle? EA
. �„. 11'
4 . Ut es clic Arta 1+ , rtC Ir;tt �' ra o11Y'Ce's
timxte�t ,t t on relatively
ally' tnllr tivo t7t° more lex
Pro1 e'ct itt`ay ��n e;aell t`as�11t1'c o x= y'
rorc� the in1l�at.t t1tc� crit tl oC those
5ntstl l Y hilt whc rc the ei fc c t of
jlnl]aC�S 111'1
th(' c�nt�°►rrzalknetrt is �t�llifietrnt.1
eCf'eets a�hir+h
t4t1>>i t c7ntnel,tn hMan
4�l . iloos the 1)ro jL��-t htzkt z111�°rz'sa� 0 f i z.ts on
will Cann � ;:ttb:;tantaai
tac�in z c°itht"1° tlitectl)' c1t i_nc%1z`rc t"i d'"
t1ti C"x'ca lw r tattt111t't�`cl by th
t l ettd Ap enc:�v'l
l 1 [ . [tl.ttl°i'itT`1 [ X11' • 11 o k "111t.t'k tall :
t1ti, [11tH: W si,ltit'icarit ol'�`c'`°t
tin tile^ ba" i" c1l t h'l' l 11t1V1. ,t b 11t`erftt't`c1 �
,1 �tlt� 1,11sed 11'c�il.et ,t1lll .1 I'1C1%i mill
1 1'rr ;zticli a Nl O&T11�1�. 1 Ci.r1l2
I ,a'1tiI"� fin have
[,tti [' i
r�rt thc� 01'tu i r°s,nmr rtt , wl cz atlbcl+l Prow" ei c ottld har cllti f i eartt
ntbeaSi
i1Tr t11ct On the t1't1111n011t 1 thel`t' Wi 1 t n A'i 1 1
i?lYl: clad that 11tho1a};11 tltc t l A't°TC1ty hll;A`+llltli5 �ibad t7`t1
rant ell°tct n cle, btwttl,tt:t• the At1`i1G artllcet�
e t'i'ec't 1tt th i s
t11ta attaC hots s11� N llavt, 11 talc trrK �1 tt[c�cl tt, t1t 1 eCl'ert yin
11l l:luA11A i 111v u z 1
l ?iVli t t.rt�l rltt 11> 011o�Ard 111°t+ f c w t t�1A1
11�tr ¢r �tt :�i►;ni, l i � �a'11t tti recl .
ac�r�t s atttl aa1 1;f1� l ittlSvAl['1�`1'AL 1�.lAt.T ANN 1 NC, C 1.1zA1tTAll !;,1
the env i ronr til 13i) i l l' s C 1.
colIN tY
Y
laer:amber 10 19844 .�•.�•—,•"�`�"�'r.;_.: �,rs �:
Assacirl= '�j.nnne>±
tte1.' t t+.tvt"t
{ IV. ENVIRONMENTAI� ACTS
(Expa'� anatx ns o a 14ye,s" and "maybe"
on attached sheet(s)) ybe answers are required
I. EARTH. Will the proposal result in signi.f'icr.1 4 YES A .I E N
a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in
geologic substructures?
b.. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
overcoveri.ng of the soil?
C. Change in topography or ground surface
relief features?
d. Destruction, covering or modification of [Iny -~-
unique geologic or physical. :Features?
e. Increase in wind or water erosion of soil.:,
either on of off-site?
f; Changes in deposition or erosion of beach
sands, or c}la'19F-s in "Itatiori, deposit:ioxl
or erosion which ma)- modify the channel or
a river or stream or the bed of the ocean ol,
any bay, inlet or lake?
g, Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils
outside designated urban areas ?
h. Exposure of people or prope-rtA, to geologic ---�
hazards, such as earthquakes, landslides glad -
slides, ground failure or similar hazards'?
2 AIR, Will ':hp proposal result in substantial;
a: Air emissions or deterioration of ambient
air Quality?
b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke -
or fumes?
.= Alteration of air movement, moisture, or
temperature, or any change in climate,
locally or regionally?
s; WATER. Will the ro
1
x
a,
- changes in. currents, oretcoursebo�snt�.al
direction of water movements in either
marine or fresh
b.
waters?
Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
c:
or the rate and amount of surface runoff?
deed for off-site surface drainage improve-
merits, including vegetation removal, channel.
d.
ization or culveTt installatioft?
to the
`�`�r:lfe't,ations course ar flow of -flood
e,
Change in . -xe aa1'iou,it o surface Water in any
water body?
f:
Discharge into surface waters, or ;in any
alteration of surface water gjja.lity, including
taut not limited to temperature, dissolved
ozygen or turbidity?
g.
alteration of the direction or rate of flow
Of ground waters?
h.
Change in the quantityf ,,
o �,rotrnd waters,
either through direct add:i tions of
._..
with-
drawals, or through interception of an
ag'Lti Fer by
i.
cuts or oxcaratiorjs?
Deduction in the amount of water otherwise
`
,l.
available for public u�rater supplies?
Exposure of people or pp . , ..
Exposure p p
n
property to eater
related hazards such as flooding?
YES
MAYBB No
4. PLANT LIFE, Will the proposal resiat in substantial
a.Change in the diversity of species, or number
of any species of plants (including trees,
shrubs, grass crops, and aquatic plants)? `
b Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of plants?
c. Introduction of new species of plants into an
area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish-
ment of existinG species'?'
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
S.
ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial:
Ti Change^i.n the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of animals `birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shell fish,
berithic organisms or insects)?
b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of animals?
c. Introduction of new species of animals into
an area, or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of animals?
i. Ueter:oraticn to existing fish or wildlife
habitat?
G.
NOISE, Will the proposal result in substantial:
a: Ilncreases in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
?.
LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce
si.gniticant light and glare?
-,-
8.
LAND M. Will the proposal result in a
suhstanni.al alteraltion of the present or planned
land use of an area?
9.
MATURAL RESOURCES: will thc prcposal result in
substantial.
at increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources"
b, Depletion of any non-renevabl.e natural
`---
resources
l0.
RISK OF UPSET. IVill the proposal involve:
Ft A r19k of explosion or the release of hazard-
ous substances (1hcluding, but not limited to,
oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the
event of an accident or unset conditions?
b. Possibie interference with an emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
Y
11.
POPULATION, Will the. proposal altar the location,
tr to on, d onsity, or gro th rate of the human
population.
l'.
tIOUSINC, Will the proposal affect existing housing,
r cre.ite :I deMand i*or additional housing?
15
14.
is
16..
17,
YES M- NO
_TRA.NSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal
result in
da. Generation of substantial adkitional vehicle
movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
c: Substantial impact on existing transportattot
systems?
d. Signif:;ca.nt alterations to present patterns
of circulation or movement of people and/or
goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or, pedestrians?
PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect
upon., or result in a need for now or altered
governmental, services
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection? W
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
e. Maintenance ofi public facilities, including
roads?
f. other governmental services?
ENERGY. Will the proposal result in,
a, Use of substantial amounts of Nuel or energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing
source: o.f energy, or require the development
of new sources of energy?
UTILITIES, Will the propsal result in a need for
new systems, or substantial alterations to the
following:
a Power or natura.i ,gas?'
b Communications systems!
c. Water;
d. Sewer or septic tank.?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?
HUMAN HEALTH, Will the proposal result in
a. CreY of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
b. Exposuro of people to potential health
hatards7
18, AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the
obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result in the
creation of an aesthetically offensive site open
to public view?
.4
0
YES
MAYBrI NO
19. '12E.C]2EATION. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of existing recre4tional
opportunities?
20. CULTURAL RESOURCES;
a,. Will the proposal result in the alteration,
Of or the destruction
of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site?
b. Will
P p
the proposal result in adir,,"se physical
or aesthetic effects to'a prehistoric or
historic building, structure
or object?
C. Does she proposal have the potential to cause
a physical change which
would affect unique
ethnic cultural values?
d. Will �theproposalrestrict
existing �.�a.ous re] J�
'—
or sacred uses Within the potential impact
area?
V4 DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP 27-16-09
See attachment
ySM
DISCUS919NAE-ENVIRON ENTAIL AR 27-16-09
1bye: The homesite Will
creek Probably be located near t
- A 600-700 he
-Foot driveway and homesi t . septir. tank and
overcover a minimum Of E3 e Will compact and
'000 - 9,000 square feet.
will increase along roadways and the stream bank. Erosion OF soils
If: A minor increase in sediment will Tntei- the stream,
1g: This property is within a rural farming
residences visible. Neighboring Community with very fn�4
and grazed. Development parcels are Planted in Olive Orchards
1h: Property is Will remove +/- 1 Planted
agricultural uso.
2 miles east Of the Cleveland H
zone and fault traces. The maximu ills Special Studios
experieViced on-site it 6.5. M earthquake likely to be
ZNb! Grading and COMP$,Ction of soils will result in a decrease soil
of
absorption and an increase in stormwater runof+- s to Parcel 2
Will require crossing the creek. Installing a bridgeAccesto Public Works
specifications and roadway drainage should limit the effect of
development on drainage Patterns.
3J: DoVOIOPmeht On Parcel '2 should be located a minimum of 100 fee
from the creek centerline as a Protection against flood Waters, t
5d: The Creek on-site is unspoiledf -,showing few signs of
Vmcroachmont- Grasse% have established themselves on the Old Iluman,
tai lingsv which now look lij.'L.e
to Parcel 2 across the creel' a natural land form, Providing access
Existin, t Will remove some riparian Vegetation.
_4 fish and wildlife habitat Will be reduced and downgraded,
1:5a: Duftztmme is a dirt road in fair condition, abl
Project rOlatod traffic. 0 to accommodate
14a,17bt
Butte COuhtY General Plan Safety Element indicates this
Property has a high fire hazard. The nearest Stations are *7S ani #55
located 5 and 7 miles distant. Use of nonflammable sg and roci-F
Materials in addition to water storage W,ll mini Mize fire hatards.
Access to Parcel 2 must be able to Support a loaded 4iro truck.
lib -f., All
governmental sorvicos will experience
demand from new'devc-1opment, a Slight increaso in
20at Butte COUMty Maps
amoric indicate the Site May have boo
Ams- A SI-Arvoy will have to be pre n used by native
arthaeologiStl and its recom Pared by -,, qQali+iL-d
map. mendationt ihaorparated into the -Final
•
ARP l can t W Dale Rush
Assessor's Parcel
27-X26-07
Lag # 84-10-24-02
���A_SHEET
A, Froec�L7escri -_ 4
-p'rz crh
1• Type of pro3ect, Tentative
2. brief Description: Parcel Map
at 5 acres Dividing 14.E
and one at acrd into t�rvr
3, Locationv East 10 acres. pa - cels, :,
intersection with side of DQnstane ®nt4
4 pro Grubbs Road, 1r�thq feet h of
Proposed Density of Development: orovai l l e. north its
5•, Amount of lm elopment:6. 1 dwelling Access and Neare.stus Surfacing: Slight g unitfparcel
7. Method` of S I'ub] io Road (S)Dunstc ne
e Source of Sewage Disposal Road,
9. Pr s, Water 5upplYe Individual tanks � frontage
o.: �. mi ty of Power Lines.: ual well
10.' Potential for further~ landTo original
partals at divisions parcel
5 acres eacP�
are possible and development. Three
under A-5 zoning.
S�nwYronmen��l-s�'tti
n9
'F�hys%ca���nv%rorrm�Dt,
XTerrain
a. General Tc,
located Pographit Charar_ter: S14ghtl
bo an birth sides of Y rallin
Slopes: 10-�iS% an intermittent 9 ter rai n
t. Elevation: atream
d. Li ma. ti n S�t��-5�525 feet K�SL
•_
Sails
Eactot s: None
a. "YPes and Character sti t=s Newill'
l
l r-ecnm-Yel
IOW brown e Variant 2D�-4(
drairta.n y +gravelly laarnr slaw ��'
b. Limiting met ium�-lo►a suitabiiftY for a;; pormeabil t
Factors;
Moderately Y, well
t atur~al teriaive range use,
Hazards of the Land Y aci di c
a* Earthquaiae Zone:
Special Studies zoo miles east of
b. Erasion Patent al : ne and ftraces,
ault Cleveland Hills Fault
c Larrdsl do 'Potential Ve oywhigh
d Eire Hazard: Hugh14
e• EYtpansivo Soil potentials done
Appeftdix V (a)
4* Hydrology
a. Surface Water: Honcut Creek southeast of property
b. Ground Water: Required quantities of water for domestic
use to be proven
C. Drainage Characteristics: Drainage on-site discharges
into Honcut Creek
d. Annual Rainfall (normal): 26-28 inches
e. Limiting Factors: None
S. Visual/Scenic Quality: Highly scenic farm lands
6. Acoustic Quality: EXcel lent
7. Air Quality: Good
BiojgUgal,_E_nvironment-
Vegetationi Grasses, few oak trees, very little riparian
vegetation
9. Wildlife Habitat: Open grass land habitats no rare or
endangered species mapped on-site.
10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area: High
11. Butte County General Plan designation-.
Agri cul tural-Residential
12. t�xizting Zwingt A-5
13. Existing Land Use an-sitet One homesite
14. Surrounding Area;
a. Land Ut3es: Very rural residential
b. Zbningt A-5
r_ Gen. Plan designations., Agritultural-Ke%idential
d. Parcel Sizes: 5, 10, 15v 40+
e* Population: Sparse
15. Character of Site and Area: Rural ranching community
16, Nearest Urban Area." Groville
17. Relevant Spheres of Influence: None
18. Improvements Standards Urban Area: N/A
0, Firm Protection Services
R_* Nearest County (State) Fire Station: # 75 5 miles
southwest( # $5 7 miles northeas-t.
b. Water Availabilityt No pre-Asurized water available
,0. Schools in Area: Orovillo EloMentary and High School District
Appendix r- (b)
t` �/gyp �/11���q!/�0I`(■
eUgVrrok , �1 16j"assori
es r, :y79201
266 BUTTE
to k�
C1110VILLE, CA. 959650
December 17, 1984
Butte County Planning Dept.
17 County Center Dr.iVe
Oxoville,, CA 959.65
Attention: Laura Tuttle
sects Dale Rash TPM,
AP�#27-16_og
Proposed mitigation] measures
1b�e�, brodone will be held to a minimum by limita,i�ig in e too k r'
}
y e dry season and. using pf
op � t',d L'i°mss' '
0
t:�3ohniques . �
1 4�
property is marginal agr.icultura7, at
�yf b
one acre will have. a very insignifcyanteffe +�yiiern;vp,, i
3jn note will be placed on the filial map lim tiny' d re1.'op-
:
cel 2 to a minimum of 100 feet from''tht i
eek csentea line.
N ,
Ifte creek is not a " '!
y�.ar round creek; but.. dries 'Up grin. .
the summer time. _ This in itself Jim-' the fish
W,Ildl]_fe habitat.
14a 17b s .,he Proposed use isfor another mobile home. T+,w u0c+
afie ,.tiding of this mobilo will be of metal or otht--ly •,: Nro
re. d, ,cant material
20ai TkY! only cliscrip
tion sof the soil will be for a
paz of which already exists,
Clue to the very disruption small amount of disru ion we propc,t ae
to I; Lace the following note on the final, map:
"If �Ihy archaeological artifacts are discoverers
exc��� ationr a qualified archaeologist :should be; Dors.. ;
sul4-�i and the necessary steps be taken to protect
the ite,a
tes,',,ctfIIIly,
w
Pulid cc P14hntnv fir'"o'*
Cj �k �; Poo 19V
Ron °?Eaves ,
Grov�ily, C�lf�tln� ', ,
:RLC t.it,l
Sll�iV YlhiG PARCEL MAPS
�drA �E2TS
NOTICE OP DETER41NATI&
_ w
Office cif Planning and Research F.RO �i (Public mt
1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Agency) j
Sacramento, CA X5814 Butte County P1 "—"----
or 7 county Center �� ti t mfy Cie;rk
/.�,_ rnunty Clerk Orova 11e, CA 95
_...,:.�,��Depufy
County of Butte
SUBJECT Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Sect'
of the Public Resources Code, ion 21108 or 21152
ject Title _ R4-10-24-02
Tentative Parcel Map AP 27-16-p9
State Clearinghousetdurnber bale Rash
CE submitted to Clearinghouse) Contact Person p Tele
.. hone to]umber
)
John Mendonsa, Public Works Location � (916) 534-4601.
East side of bunstone Road, 1000 feet rnrh of its
ittersection with. Grubbs Road, Orovi .le.
vlect Description
Tentative Parcel Map �idividing 14+ acres into two
and oe,at l0 acres. parcels) one at S acnes
This is to advise that the
Bukte COunty Advisor A Fv�--sponi��Ib��Ie
'
Lead 7gency or hasapprovedthe above describedgency
project and has made the foiloeving determinations
regarding the above described project:
1, Thero'ect
P a •� will, will not, have A ;significant effect tin the ehvirotlment.
2 An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project
to the provisions of CEQA. p P
p 7 p�°surrtt
A Negative Declaration was prepared for this Project s
Provisions of CC -QA. ) Pursuant to the
The Eft or negative Ne-claratirm and record of project approval ,May be
examined at:
Butte County` Planning
7 Cbunty Center Drive; Orovil.le, CA 95965
3• Mlalgatlon measures
Of the project were, � were not, made a condition of the approval
40 A stank ,ent o f rivet riding Considerations was, „ was not adopted this project. r p for
Bate
Received
Piling "_2
7715
-
15
SignatGre ... y y 7-_._.;'„�.
Stephen A, Streeter
Senior PIahner
it e - r...,
y Revised January 1955
4.
t
r{
Mitigation Measures
All 27-16-09
1. Erosion will be held to a minimum by limiting the work to lut
done to only the dry 'season and using proper grading te. • ,J!,Hues
2. Note on map, no development permitted within 100 feet of
creek centerline.
butte, counN
TU RAL WEALTH AND
BEAUTY
LAND Q F N k
' - DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC 1VORKS
WILLIAM (Dill) C1 112; Director
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE , OROVI(,LC, CALIFORNIA 95965
Telephoner (916) 324.A601
RONALD D, McELROY
March 6, 1985 Deputy Oireatar
Butara.'Aiarxie '
Ron Craves & Associates RG: AP 27-15-09
P. O. Box 986 Tentative Parcel Map
Oroville, CA 95965 for pale Rash
Gentlemen:
At the regular meeting of the Butte County Board of Supervisors held on
March 5, 1985, the Board vacatedyour appeal of condition 7#10 on the
above-referenced parcel map per your request.
If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact
this office
Very truly yours,
William Cheff
Director of Public Works.
Original signed by
JOHN MENTONS
John Menlonsa
Assistant Director
�rrijns
cc; Clerk of the Board of Supet"vsors
..Dale Rash, 455 Duns`4ones OroVille; CA 95955
t Planning - Environmental Review