Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout027-160-008t PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY SHEET FOR LAND DIV18IONS APPLICANT David Wood Logil86-1.1-21-03 ADDRESS 1,951 Gray Street, Oroville, CA 95965 OWNER Arthur Sitch,, 439 Dunstone Drive, Orov-1110, CA 95966 PROJECT DES"IRIPTION'' TPM to divide 12+- acres to create 2 parcels one 5 acre: parcel and one 7,acre + remainder LOCATION on the east side of Dunstone Drive, approximately 1800 feet nortj of ita intersection with Grubbs Road, Palermo area ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S) 27-16-08 ZONING A-5 GENERAL PLAN Ag --Res PROJECT CONSISTENT? GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE REPORT DATE SIGNATURE LAND CONSERVATION ACT CONTRACTS? , DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED 11-21---86 AGENT/SURVEYOR/CIVIL ENGINEER: Ron Graves & Associates ADDRESS: P.O. Box 986, Oroville, CA 95065 DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT PREPARED ENVIRONMENTAL TM� CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION DATE PILED - DETERMINATION AND DATE N.DGATIVE DECLARATION DATt ADOPTED b C- MITIGATED NEG: DECLARATION - DATP3 ADOPTED -- ENV. IMPACTREPORT DATE CERTIFIED STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO, 808, COMMITTEE MEETING DATE ADVISORY AGENCY HEARING DAB s ? � w '_ 1 � -! /C? ''? 4 ADVISORY AGENCY ACTION Z��� � ����,� �" . �' ,.t �, .--._ __.. Y APPEALED APPEAL HEARING DATE_ t BUTTE COUNTY e RAL PIAN CONFORMANCE REPORTS owe Co. Piannino Conm FOR PARCEL MAP OR ,SUBDIVISION MAS Itea.a 1-4 to be completed by applicant: MAY 27 Ibuu . ' and address Applicant Name 2. Project Description eA, !- 3. Assessor's Parcel Number(s) wi '7a 4. proposed Use., ;�►� , . �- The following items are to be completed by the Planning Department,- Current epartment;Current zoning A ' rJ Land Conservation Agreement General Plan Designation A�Cz►G��iui�At �-�tT�Hh)Tl�t Aonlicable Conditional Criteriae Not Applicable • Agricultural -Residential YES NO �s,� vo ,'�3 1. Agricultural Compatibility 1 , 2. Water & Sewer Capacity _ ►/c f<� 3. Adequate Fire Facilities 4. Road Capacity & Maintenance 5. Access to Coamercial & Schools !,r` Orchard & Field Crops 1_. Predominant 5-10 Ac. Parcel Size 2. Vicinity of Urban Boundaries 3. Agric. viability not impaired Staff Determination• Project does does not substantially conform to the General Plan and zoning. Comments; ._ 'f�"u' ,, t . �'.% � .lL rt' r,wi,?'e 0.117 WL AT Id P'l -P►'A Staff Signature 1;.�� ��.: g ✓� - Date, AS THE APPLICANT FOR THE REQUESTED LAND DIVISION, 7 AM AWARE OF THE ABOVE STAFF DETERMINATION REGARDING TETE CONFORMANCE NtITH THE GENERAL PLAN AND 7.0NINO; r Dated Signature of Applicant P/1 �° !> LD 1000(revi6ed 6-80) Ath 1g0�,�C7c: OF' D:�.`r:�:1�.MXNA r -ON' To ; Office of Planning and ReT,,c h %no Butte County 1400 Tenth Street, Room 1Planning nepartment Sacramento, CA 95814 +t b 7 County Center Drive P M Orovill.e, CA 95565 or 1'(11.11 rl � l�iQ t X County Clerk County of Butte ' CAI DACE J, GRUBBOZ GURe Co. Clerk sCrB. F:G c riling of Notice of �� ernrzztaE',A�n �comp�Piancer With Section 21103 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Ptoject Title AP 11 Name: Tentative Parcel Map 27-16-08 David Wood State Clearinghouse Number Contact Person Telephone Number (if submitted to Clearinghouse) John l4endonsa, Public Works (916) 534-4266 Project Location On the east side of Dunstone Drive, approximately 1800 feet north of its intersection with Grubbs Road; Palermo area, Project Description Tentative Parcel 'Map to divide 12± acres to create 2 parcels; one 5 acre parcel and one 7 acre + remainder This is to advise that the Butte County Advisory Agency (Ltahas approved the above-described projecton5-4 87espons Responsible Agency) has pp p � s made (Date) the following determinations regarding the above-described project: 14 The project will, X will not, have a significant effect on the environment, 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. „ X A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, 1i Mitigation measures --Lwere, were not, made a condition of the approval of the project, 4. A statement of overriding considerations was, � was not, adopted for this projact, This is to certify that the final EIR With comments and responses and reroA of project approval is available to the general public at Butte County Planning Department 7 County Center Drive Otoville CA 95965 Date Received for Piling and Posting at OPR . . _ I.,.r. ".,�r�y'��d�. Stepheh A. Strt,?ter 8en16t D1 ann�t F�"�' Title `w r ! - Rois6d Match 1086 "f David wood TPM, Ap##,27-16-08 Mitigation M,asures 1. Utilize standard construction pract3.ces 'Inc1,Uding limiting construction to the dry season to 10.111mize erosion. 2. Show on the final map a 100 ft. no -building al. -ea measured from the banks of the creeks. 3. The parcel map to be subject to deer mitigation fees t the time of the final, map and any future building permits per the fee schedule attached to the April. 151 1987, Fish and Game letter; , ■ CERTIFIED MAIL autte, C;Ounk LAN1) r'iF 1':A1IJkAI v+; r,i'T1a Pi1C ('1A t -5c DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS WILLIAM (Bill) Gf-iBl-F, Diru001' 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE .OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 TelePhOhO! (01 6)MM 538-70 BtrlteCo. PiannIngCaw& RONALD D. McELROY Depuiy Director MAY 6 1987 oroad, (:Aferwfal May 4, 1987 David Wood RB: AP 27-16-08 1951 Gray St. Tentative Parcel M -,p Oroville CA 95965 Dear Mr. Woodt At the regular meeting of the Butte Country Advisory Agency held on May 4, 1987, the Agency adopted a negative declaration with environmental mitigations and approved the tentative parcel map on the above -referenced property subject to the condition.. listed on the attached sheet, If no appear are timely filed—within ten (10) days of the date of the Advisory Agency's approval. -with the Clerk of tete Bourd of Supervisors, this action will be final. Wh.jn the conditions of spproval are complied with, it will by in order for you to file yoiur final leap with the Butte County Department n n of Public Works for recordation within twenty four (24� months of the date of approval by the Advisory Agency. If you have any questions regarding this matters please contact this office. JM/ds attachment cel Planning Department Environmental Health Department Ron Craves Very truly yours, William Cheff Director of Public Works ull/,,-,� I ",-, , hn MendOnsa Assistant Diroctor David Wood, Tentative Parcel Map, AP 27-16-08, on the east side of Dunstone Drive, approx. 1800 ft. north of its intersection with Grubbs Road. Palermo area. Engineer: Ron Graves and Associates Public Works conditions: I Verify legal access. 2 3 4 5 6 7 Provide two-way traversable access R8 -8 -LD -I to each pay eel from a county maintained road or state Iiighway. Access to be reserved in deeds as per county ordinance and offerod for dedication on the final map. Show 50 fto building setback line measured from centerlille of aci;ass easement. Provide road maintenance agreement. Deed to the County of Butte 30 ftright-of-way from the centerline of Dunstone Drive. Indicate a 50 ft, building setback from the cente,.-line of Dunstone Drive. 8 Show till easements of record on the final map. 9 Provide street name signs per requirements of the Department of Public Works prior to recordation of the final map. 10 Obtain encroachment permit and construct standard road, approach providing 'adequate sight distance at the intersection of access road and .Dunstone Drive 11 Obtain encroachment permit for all driveways., new or oxjgGjtig, and Construct to county standards, 12 Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required. Henith Dept, conditions: B Show a 50 ft . leachfield setback frt,m the drainage way on parcel 1i 14 Show the usable two acres se%,arje disposal arca proven to meet the requirements of the Subdivl.,..;.Ion Ordinance on parcels I and 2. The following mitigation measitru8 are required; 15 Utilize standard con,,Lrucaoi, Practices including limiting COnStUICti0h to th(. dry season to minimize erosion. 16 4,how on the finny map a 100 ft. no -building area mea8orud from ;the batiks of thy. creeks. 17 The parcel wi,d to be subject to deer mitigation foes at the time of the final w'p and any future building permits Per the fee schedule attachod U, the April 15, 19870 Fish and Came letter. S 9 OF CALIFJRNIA—THE RESOURCES AGEOICY GEOROE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME REGION 2 1701 NIMBUS ROAD, SVITE A RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA 95670 (916) 355-7020 JAN O€3 1lo/87 mr. John Mendonsa Assistant Director Butte County Department of Public Works 7 County Center Drive Oraville, CA 95965 Dear Mr. Mendonsa: B^j CO, PfannIng C* n, JAN 9 1987 0u0y'404 coulohliA The Department of fish and Game has reviewed David Woodfs Tentative Parcel Map (TPbl), a proposal to divide 12 acres into two parcels of 7 and 5 acres oach. (AP 27-16-08), The property is located about seven Miles southeast of Oroville on DUnstone Drive. The site is within the de8ignabud winter range of the Mooretown Door Herdi Subdivision and development of the parcel will adversely affect migratory deer use: Subdivision of lands into smaller parcels has an adverse impact upon migratory deer use of their rangeS4 As lands become divided into parcels smaller than 20 -acres, this impact becomes more evident; Deer use becomes impaired, migratory movement affected, and the availability of forage drops below that level necessary to sustain herd numbers. As parcels become 5 -acres or less, the lands aro no longer considered as being able to support migratory deer use. In order to mitigate impacts upon migratory deer, habitat must be improved and protected elsewhere to compensate for the loss of viable door ranges. Subdivisions have adversely affected more than 40 percent of, the critteal winter range in Butte County. In an effort to resolve the subdivision - deer conflict in Butte County, the Department has recommended a series of actions for the Board of Supervisors to inlPleffiOht (800 attached December 2, 1986 Door Report, presented to the aoar6). The subject TPM. site is within an area whore further development can occur if mitigation measures are implemented, The TPM 8ito is within a portion of the Moorotown debt herd that has been aff,:ctod by parcels less than 20 -acres. Therefore), we would hot object to the approval of the TPM if the following mitigation Measures are implementredi. 0 1, The TPR be subject to a door Mitigation feed to be adopted by the 8oard of Supovvisom AL '4r. ,7ohn mendonsa Page 2 � 'lcipj` 2. Perimeter fencing of the 7-acre parcel should be limited to barbed wire. To allow passage of deep, the hence should be constructed of five strands or 1,nos of barbed wire. The top strand should be no higho,r than 481" above the ground, the lower strand no less than 1611 above Lhe ground, 3 • i)ags be controlled and not allowed to rurr free pursuant to an ordinance to be adopted by the Bor tr tl of superviso s. 4. A 100 foot. and 50 foot setback buffer1)rr ont;abli:Ohec] along each side of all peVrj�anp+nt and inl,orm ttent streams. tf we can be of further assistance., pioase contact; Jerry ptensch, Lnvironmental Services 5up1t:visor., telephone (91,j*) 355-7030. rlincerely, ,iamc s D. Messer smith gogional Manager Attachmont Dater -Departmental Memoraodum TOC Butte County Advisory Agency FROW Planning Director sUBJECT: Report on Tentative Parcel Map of David Wood on AP#27-16-0'8 DATE, January 8, 1987 This is a proposal to divide 12+- acres to create 2 po cels, 1 of 5 aures and 1 of 7 acres plus remainder. The Land Use Plan Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Agricultural -Residential. There are no specific or community plans for the area. The proposal does not conflict with county zoning nor any adopted or ,pz'oposed element of the Butte County General Plan nor any County, specific or community plan. Recommend approval subject to the following mitigation meawires. 1. Utilize standard cohFtruction practices inclrxding limiting roh$Lruction to the dry season to minimize .erosion. 2. Show on the final map a 100 foot no-t:uilding area measured from the banks of the creaks. DRH:jmc cc; David Wood Ron Graves December 310 1986 OUNO Co. PlannIng Comm. JAN 5 1987 Ron Graves and Associates Pi 0. 8ox oro 986 ville, CallforaI4 oroville, CA 95965 RE: TPM - Wood, David AP# 21-116-08 Dunstone Drive Dear Sirs: This department has advised the Butte County DepartmOnt of Public Works Land Development Section that we are prepared to act on the above application, Based on present inf='�ationl we can recommend approval or conditional aptJrovaI4 Recommended Conditions for Approval 14 Show a 501 leachfield setback from the drainage way on partel #11 2. Show the usable two acres sewage disposal area proven to i%,. -et the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance on parcels: Irl and #2. If vo-,A have, any que.ttions regardincr this letter, please contact ';,dward overhouze at the above listed address or telephone nur�ber bRtweAm 800 - 10.;00 A,N, weekdays. Very trilly yours 466 td J. on nva- Irst P, � S, Division of Ehvironmen'tal Health Hj.,;/kf DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Address U 196 hiamoriat Way Chide caltfornia 95926 tw 7 County Center Drive Oroville, Cali(ornio 95965 [J 747 11111off Road I'arathoo, CnIltarnio 95969 Reply to Telop"na! 916/891-2727 Tolephona' 916/534-4281 Tolepiiono 916/672-6300 December 310 1986 OUNO Co. PlannIng Comm. JAN 5 1987 Ron Graves and Associates Pi 0. 8ox oro 986 ville, CallforaI4 oroville, CA 95965 RE: TPM - Wood, David AP# 21-116-08 Dunstone Drive Dear Sirs: This department has advised the Butte County DepartmOnt of Public Works Land Development Section that we are prepared to act on the above application, Based on present inf='�ationl we can recommend approval or conditional aptJrovaI4 Recommended Conditions for Approval 14 Show a 501 leachfield setback from the drainage way on partel #11 2. Show the usable two acres sewage disposal area proven to i%,. -et the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance on parcels: Irl and #2. If vo-,A have, any que.ttions regardincr this letter, please contact ';,dward overhouze at the above listed address or telephone nur�ber bRtweAm 800 - 10.;00 A,N, weekdays. Very trilly yours 466 td J. on nva- Irst P, � S, Division of Ehvironmen'tal Health Hj.,;/kf Archaeological Reconnoissance of the PropoGod David Wood Land Split, Dunstone Road near, Wyandotte, Butte County, Californit;t. Prepared For: Ron Graves & Associates P.O. BOX 986 Oroville, California 95965 Pr opaved By Jensen li �,w;;rintcs Archw3oln tical Consulthig afid l;esOrch 41 Skymountaln Circle Chico, California 95928 p©comber 1986 Buffe Co. Planning Comm DEC 9 1986 arov►lle, C41140rp4 Introduction In order to assess the archaeological impacts of a proposed land split involving approximately 12 acres of land located south of Wyandotte, Butte County, California, the firm of Ron Graves & Associates, acting on bohalf of the property owner, contracted for a records search and oo—foot reconnaissance of the parcel in compliance with recommendations rocelved from the Butte County Planning Department. Accordingly, or! Sunday, December 7, 1986, the ajOor conducted an Intensive, on—foot reconnaissance of the project area for the purpose of locating and recording any evidence of prehistoric or significant historic use and/or occupation. The 12 acre parcel consists of a nearly rectangular piece of land located southeast of Oroville and about 1.5 miles south of W;-andotte, on the east side of Dunstone Road. The current proposal calls for splitting the land into two separate parcels, each of which would presumably eventually be subjected to homesite and perhaps other developments. In view of the potential adverse effects of future construction to cultural resoupces might exist within the area, and in view of the general archaeo sensitivity of the region, Butte County and other regulations requir• cultural resources be fully inventoried and formally assessed pr project approval, pursuant to Section 106 of the National His,,,ric Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U,.S.C. 970); procedures of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (36 CFR 800), and other legislation and orders. The remainder of this report details the results of the required archaeological survey and 1, entory and provides appropriate recommendations. Ail fieldwork procedures followed guidelines provided by the State Historic Preservation Office (Sacramento) and are in conformity with accepted professional standards. Location The parcel is located within a portion of the northeast quarter of Section 12 of Township 18 North, Range 4 East of the USES Bangor 7,50 quad, as indicated on the attached project location map. The western property boundary is formed by bunstone road; Fine Gold Gulch bisects the pi operty before proceeding southwesterly to merge with North Hondut Creek at a point about 1.5 miles south of the project area. Accords Search Prior to going into the field the archaeological records of the Northeast California Information Center (CSU—Chico) Were examined for any eXistinq 2 recorded prehistoric or historic sites within the project area. In addition, the National Register of Historic Places (USDI 1985) was also consulted. No sites are currently recorded for the project area or immediately adjacent parcels. Ethnographically the project area falls within territory which was occupied by the Northwestern Maidu, or Konkow Indians (Riddell 1978: Figure 1), although the parcel is situated quite close to the border separating the Konkow from the Southern Maidu, or Hill Nisenan, to the south. Although the ethnographic data do not identify any specific sites within the project area for either of these groups, the general ethnographic information in combination with the results obtained from previous archaeological survoys and excavations within the region (e.g., Jensen 1978; 1979; 1982' 1983) suggested that a number of prehistoric site types might be located within the area, including the following: (1) aboriginai middens located on knolls or benches near streamsa tributary to Honcut Creek,; (2) aboriginal miiling stations located on rock outcrops within the vicinity of good acorn collection areas, '(3) surface scatters of lithic flakes and implements resulting from short term use and occupation; (4) isolated finds of aboriginal lithic flakes and artifacts, and (4) various types of historic sites dating to time periods between about 1855 and the present. Such sites have been recorded Within the immediate project vicinity and throughout both Konkow and Hill Nisenan Indian territory generally. Fieldwork As noted, fieldwork for the project was conducted by the author on December 7i 1986. The on—foot survey involved criss—crossing the parcel from northeast to southwest (parallel to the stream) in survey transects ranging from 20 to as much as 40 meters apart; areas of highest resource sensitivity -- creekside -- received the closest scrutiny. Examination of the surface involved inspection of all disturbed areas (including road cuts, rodent middens,, etc. ) for evidence of subsurface cultural material. Vegetation consisted primarily of Willows along Fine Gold Gulch and Vasses elsewhere. Surface visibility was good to eXceilent throughout the 12 acre parcel. Survey Results and Recommendation No evidence 'of prehistoric or early historic usetoccupation Was ocountered. Archaeological clearance Itthe efore ome1ent d dtliefor two proposed land split end subsequent resi de pm parcels, However, should future construction activities reveals eviderce of subsurface prehistoric or historic materialqualified , lif edimpacts of archaeologist gbei should be contacted immediately in order toassess project to the cultural resources involved, Reference's Jensen, Peter M. 1978 Archaeological Test Excavations at Three Prehistoric Sltos within the Mendocino National F'orest's Chico Tree Improvement Farm, Butte County, California. Report on File, Northeast Collfornia Information Center, CSU -Chico. 1979 Archaeological Reconnaissance r-rview for the Prolyosod Southeast Chico Redevelopment project. Report on Filo, Northeavt California Information Center, CSU -Chico, and Cook & Associates,. Oroville. 1982 'Cultural Resources Overview and Field Survey for kilo proposed Collins Lake Basin Development Project, Yuba County, California. Report on File, Foothill Design Group, Marysville, Cal'Ifornia, and North Central California Information Center, CSI-Sacra,mooto. 1983 Archaeological Reconnaissance of the Proposed Masek Subdivision Project on Keefer Road, Butte County, Californian Report on File, Northeast California Information Center, CSU --Chico. Riddell, Francis A. 1978 Maidu and Konkow, IN, Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 8• California, Robert F. Heizer, Editor, pp. 370-385. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. United States Department of the Interior 1983 National Register of Historic Places. Federal Register through December 31, 1983. Washington, D.C. :A�+ 1. ti`tp 4� 4,i1 ••/' � � ,�ti . ��� �� r�Y '' . 1• , �,p � A/1/ � � .. d . �n'i,� j /''~ � i � `� R `� + •'t ^�� G rr .,t` � If Y' .. i � � �,� � HL,.�A ( `y � I"'.. M I~ t i 4,Ik �.� ! • _ ' 1Q``, 1, � '\ �C ?FRMp ��I �, 1 `� ~ �i�'�'ff'/j A `,``fir I %� \��M„ ,r ;` �, � � � � 1. - 1 �C�`• �/���� \v` r " tl' \ � "�\ � r l � d '� �".Qa �� ��,4+. I 11\„_.a.-•... ..�'� r , �++.��JQ. r !i It �' s. •' �, ` ti�. V r l,i � • x Ir , '� �•I'^�`s�"Mt�• \ y \��� � s fJ '- - I � ' ".S,-.\ s����\�� X14 1 �'�✓ 1 � "�. � �f . •'._` l,1 '� ""'�"7 .. ^..'....f'��,-.�M..��� - _ �/I'.0 V a \1���a `e ; `rr .: 1 •� I , � , 1" A'V ;y �" 11 S �r pj ' �. � • Al 1 L` ` 1�.--• A anx - " � % 111 � 11 �y 1` �^ ' � ^II i _..✓" t .r r 1 1 /Jf 1fi`r �,� ;. 'ikV All ,� j � J. \ r_--�. ;!,y�r:L�3 "�= .o�i�l1 r i •- � ( II .=`"tt /� 'jl lr . I •'� u ',� S } ,•-� r` �iA •� !'�'=�1,=,w,,,"w�,,.� _ d �, � •/"�` \�:i �l'r .I""�. �" ".,x'`" «r •vws.. ') / �W'i?) {, lit ✓ JJJ�! /I''` t ` /' y..,;...�. � I+f \\ IN +� �"�,r � -_� �t y ,i pr \\+\ ,J,A i Arr', �1,-✓ � �,1 � �+ ,.4•� ,�«a' •� � ''•"`..-w...`. ��� �I ••� ' ,;aw (. . � „*«„ ; VI Y'1, . F. �.. 1 I1 11 f « 11 " v! i ~ �J � ' � 1 Il� IN �,'�'!'�'� "^tii i t'h � ' I� r1.�i (i� ,�\ �'����� /�A... -..r -.. .•. �.. +....... ,. �... « � .,Yr„1._ .� ... �. N• � ,.-jam 1 'w.' r,- t ! r` w� , y d ,W�..,,,✓rJ . ✓ w- -+ ,,,.,,,.,, i�� ' • b1 { ✓ � 1 � , ""�_-+�.''4.�..✓.. i `'t `� f : � - ti._ y `l . +:. ♦.i t `'• .aJ� 111 e f « •y 11 y .✓- 1� � t �+ +`\ i ' '� r{`i1 %-`•~ 41 ".L�1 `«r, .,� r � 1 Cir 4 � ,��� I . a It . „ 1 / -'. 4 •-vr'..f'" i ...� � �� a� (x I,r r.pie . ha 1 w�( •..✓"��,,... ✓''..' ( »",- ti' • '�~ J�r%'..r )/ '� � �If tea' u� - 1 ♦,\ � 4 t �s �� r a Y l * �''rn �-,,.,+ y 1 . typ 1 tel' � ,..-+' i r+rr� � 4 ��. ��^ d y a •tee 1 r oil 1-4.:x, ` 4. � r•' 1 ,r a au_..-.• 1 ,r.� 't t \� +� / 1 ., "t 1,Mr , -,f •„ �. l+ w.Y M.i:i.,nw i> .wti.�,1� :.r w, ..j.,. � �.I '� 1 � . �' , l lel k ...,...,w,w, rA,' ,. 4 ' k . `" ,. � fx..,u,,/ h , 1',,. { "•�:,� .1'(I ' .-r, `� +• 1 1`\ � y�.� `�,._.« " `.�� :`�''� 1 ; L.•. , , I' �1�+� ��r'�J' �,�� 4 � %'�� ( �j 1 i",-"" y � �x « +' ,+t•!•/ I" � � j" ti w��� 's.:�...'�"+"" .✓''! « ,.��+''A,r,,,,',^,•'"".., � r% C (_,,.°y«�,- 4 r , S y pr.•�y "� ter--' r, r , ----�-:.,.y iR v. ♦ w a 1 .. rte% r '` \� \!1 � +✓r S �� -w'�J ,J �,,,.,.r,��ti.`"+',"..,`4•:.,1 ��� , ....«�~ � 1 i ..��+ w T4,` _- .YCW�. _. �,�. `1�• �•;� '� i'14' »,s..4-�"""...�� `.,_,«-'ww,.r:•�'"y ....w.... r"''� �``, ., �•� "" w'r.,. �`"a..l• ` " ;d�' �� cif ... )� �?' � �::.�" R� ( ��, ✓�n jl• � t ' 1 ,f .+. r r � r-� �1. "� ..... .i .� `,. ``yam �w !"/ C 1 �y:-""`V \ `` ^.+.'.�'`„ ^' \/s �,'.,w, r .•r""„J �,a'.'.,.+,+ �.• �i.aY .r~J «'�/� '.lp• aY ,a1`;"s'1� \'"N� 'i1 ",1'�-�,fa'.t--w,w,y'/%�yj 1 ��sYp M � ° w 1. rl' � Y��„ti _ M '"✓' �,._ x.X.- «..i'�{. w. ` `�d1s �-s' .� 4. \ Y .p.S «, 1. ,,...-Iti+�„r ,y ` � + y, � o i' `I �'1 - '"•'r+'y r .,+� rD ”" „ � r r+^' � ,,,,� `1, � � �. 1 r µal .• 711 43, 01 ,J .tis 117 \' 1°. - i ta. r `,,,,' ,•'4 f'*�-•' ))� r alv, ,+ "".i♦+.: ,` ',.. ��}r' `. A15 r r - `+�r. �4 Y ""'+•:,,!w •A "1''i 1 �11�"'� w �' S" '✓"^i� rYr e� y. f '.� YV w� +s��o y+1. �' - � • gg AI?IIiNI)l� 1� COUNTY 01' II )TTI; ENVIRONMENTAL CIII.ChI,1 S't FO.Pht (to he Completed by t. Cam .%eF cy) Log 1136-11-21-03 I. IIACKCROUNI) AP 1127-16-08. 1. Name or proponent David.. Wood 2 Address o:r proponent and roprusentrltive ( i r nppl icnhl(1) 1951. Gray St�l:eet _ Ron Graves Vis. AssoctuC.a� .. Orovill,n; P.C.lio Cil 95965 x 986 Orovill.e, Ca. 95gG5 3 project description Tentative Parcel. Ma�� , IIANI14TORY VINDINCS OF SIGNIN°IC11NM1: YI ; MAY131i NO ..1. Doe: the project have the poterl-tial. tl I(.I t,tde t1vo tivalit; or the environment, .rtlil$h�;lllti�Il' ,,�t,llco the hal,ltat or a risk or wiltili,re sp_cix:�s, caus(A 11 NMI oe wildl ,re population to drop bulvw aelr- 5us°lnilra+lg levels; threatcn to el itttinate% x. plant or llni,llr.11 community, reduce the number or r;,,strict tilt, relit.;' or tl rare or endangered plant or animal or rlin,;r, ­Ic important examples or tine major periods or C o i 'ornio history or prehistory" 5C h. loos r:I)u project have the potenti.,11 to 0khieve shol' t - t-c rm bene rits to the detriment of' Long-term, 2nviecnlnental goals"? (A short-torm im ac;t on the envi ronnvat is one which occul-s in GI rellil ivcwly bric,i po -1od of time while lona;-tvim impnotts td,l't (ndure II to the future.) C , I1,res the plojec't have impacts which aro ndikrdt1- i1'tly- iim ea, UUt ectmUlnti.vel)' con5id, -uble7 (A PN)j,tct nq ,,mpact oil two or more sepall,lte resource, lvtrepa thr.� itllplct oil each resourc.c, is relatively bw ,herr tho o rfect of" flic tot'd of those rntiuts of the environment is sil;niricarit,) the a' jr�tt hn41t c,lrv.ir°c>nillelrt ll t~+f"IoCts tal)ielr C.ulSV v,rhstanti.al iidvorse r�rro is ern hUmilll ho-Tigs, cf�,,er dirrctly ol• indirectly? ho Complcitt,ci hN, the Lead a1;oney) 0)i the b;ISI; of- this init.itll c,v;llusatiollt tett'.: rind tits. propose(I J)I'ojoct r""01.1) :401, havc n sigoiNvont t rlo t �. rtn the 1. liv"i'(8-vilont, and €i NHGATIV1; III; CI-NItATION will ho prepavod, ,A I Wi rillo thttl tllthoughthe prgposett proim i t ollid huv(t a signi ri- Ciatrl . N,c`ct ell thkl oliv'11,cr111110lit , the I,t` wi,ll 11111 he z1 signi.r'icarr`i` oll`t st In this Casa hreouso 'thc MITIGA110N D1IIA,SUTA S descvihed tin tilt, Otttotbed ,, "et htive hood lidded to tilt' pt`(t,jr~ut. A Nt-GATIVI! I)Ia 1.AIiATIt)N wi 1 is he prrpared . l/h'ii I'111c1 tilc� Il,crjsclsrll pl'tr,ic+Ct MM hove a sivoi ricant orrect ott thTelivivonnlunt, and 1111 IN1IR0NM1,NTA1. IMPACT Itlll'K)RT is required. OATH': Jecr?rnber 17, 19$11 COUNTY 0V AU TE, IIhANNINCY DMIAll`NT11101" k David it, fh r:ohiihui Assac3a ' `" 1 nor Itry by l ewet,l t r»u..r� '' ?-�.._.._.,.,,.�.;; ► r��r IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS TE xp anatxans of all "yes'! and "maybe"' answers are required on attached sheets) I. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant YES a. Unstable MAYBE NO earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil`? c. Change in topography or ground. surface relief features?' � d. Destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Increase in wind X or water erosion of soils, either on or off-site? E. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach "`" X sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g, Loss of prime agricultural) y productive soi,l� outside designated urban G areas? h Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards' such ...x as earthquakes, , round failure landslides, much sli6Os or similar hazards? iCG. 2 AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or fumes? >C C4 Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in r X. climate, locally or regionally? 3., WATER. Will the proposal result in subtantialt !—.Changes in currents, o;: the course OV direction of water movements in either marine or fresh waters? b; Changes in absorption rates, draina F g patterns, or the rate and amount ofsurface runoff? Ca Teed for offsite surface drainage improve- nents, including Vegetation removal, channel. izati0n or culvert installation? d. Alterations to the course or flow of flood -: haters? 0. Change in the amount Of surface water in any water body? "— --X, E. Discharge into surface waters, or in any Alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved I $��o or turbidity? e direction or rate of floe g. Alteration of tei `�-`- -- o� ground waters? h. Change in the gjiantit r orualihy of ground waive s either' through direct additions or W,,th, drarvals, or through interception of an aquifer by Cuts or excavations'? i. � Reduction in the amount of water otherwise, available for public water supplies-? J4 Exposure of people or propet'ty to water related hazards such as flooding? YES 4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. CMEj—e in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrub§, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of tile, numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? C. Tatroduction of new species of plants into an e --,ea, or in a, barrier to the normal replenish- iOent of existing species? C, d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? S. ANIMAL LIFE. 11111 the proposal result in substantial: a. CHange—in the! diversity of species, or numbers of any specil,,s of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell fish, benthic orgdnisms or insects)? b4 Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? MAYBE NO d Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X X X -�L 6. NOISE. Will, the proposal result in substantial: a. Increases in existing noise levels? 'K bo Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X 7. LIGHT AND GLAM Will thn proposal produce signiFicYn—tlight and glare? 8. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a s F— U stantial alt0tatiOn- Of the present or planned land use of an area? 0, NATURAL RESOURCES; Will the proposal result in suBstantial, a. Increase in the rate of use Of any natural resources? b6 Depletion of any non-renewable natural resources`? 10. RISK Or- UPSET. Will the proposal involve-, a. A risk -75 . F explosion o,- the -release of hazard- ous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or 'upset conditions? b, Possible interference with an emergency response, plan or emergency evacuation plan? 11. POPULATION. Will the proposal alter the location, stribution, density, or growth rate of the human p pulation? 12, HOUSING, Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? YES MAYBE NO { �Will the prop -sal 13.p1IQN/CIRCULATION. result in :X substantial additional vehicle G a, Generation of i movement? arkin. facilities, or p g b. Effects onexisting demand for new parking? Substantial impact on existing transportation X G C4 systems?atte•rns d, Significant alterations to present p Movement of people and/or x of circulation Or goods? Alterations to waterborne, rail or :air traffic? f X e. f. Increase in tx'aifc hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists Or pedestrians? 14. PUB1,IC SERIIICF.S.. Will tdeforonewaor alteredal have an ef feet upon, or result in a neo. governmental services, a; Fire protection? b, police pkotection? c. Schools?`X recreational facilities? d. Parks or other of public facilities, including X e, Maintenance X roads? Other governmental services? 15, ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: amounts of fuel•or energy? -- a, Use of substantial b, Substantial increase in demand upon existing require the development sources of energy, or of new sources of energy? u 16.. UT'ILrriES . Will the pioposal result in a need for substantial alterations to the new sr—y ems, or following: Power or natural gas? a<, b. Coilimunications systems? c. Water avai.labilty. d. Sewer or septi(- tank? _e X e. Storm water drainage? disposal', f. Solid waste aitd 17: HUMW�_ HEALT0. Wild. the proposal result in health hazard or potential � a, Creation of any health) health hazard (excludingmental health b, Exposure �penpleto potential --- hazards! 1$: AESTHETxC ill the proposal result in the Will vi8ta or view open to stctlotl of any scenic bru the public, or mill the proposal result in the offensive site open creation of 411aesthetically to public vi.eW? u Y 19• RECREATIONNO Will the LLS AIALIL3 upon the quality o , proposal result in an opportunit quantity of existing recrea,ttonal es? 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES, a. x1 e pr P al result in the alteration If or the destruction of a historic archaeological sit�ehistorie or b. Will the proposal result in adversephos;cai - or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building) structure p oposal have the or object? c• Does the rPotential ential to cause a physical change which `— .. would affect unique ethnic cultural values? a. Will the Proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the �`� area? potential impact llIS_. CUSSTON OF .ENVTRONb1ENAL EVALUA'I'IOIV See attached { plGCUSSION OF ENV IR)WENT L -VALUATTON AP 27-16-08 lb,e,f,Bb�f: Developmer-t of one additional homesIte on the Property wJl,1 result in some disruption, dlsplOceMent, compact ltan and overcovering of the soil which will reSLIlt In a change in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and smou0b of surface runo,'f leading to an Increase in water erosion of soils on-slto and a pc,':'ential for discharge Into surface waters. Due to the size OC the property this should not be a significant Impact. lh: All of Butte County Is located within a moderate 4dr-bhquake Intensity zone V111. The subject property is located tipproximately 1/2 mile Nest of the Cleveland Hills fault system which 1v do area of special study. Other geological surveys . in the area Indicate that the Swain Hill lineament is also Iodated approximately 1/1? Mile to the east. Construction of buildings to Uniform Building Code stohdards for seismically active areas should provide adequate protection to occupants in case of seismic activity- 4s,bd: The drainage ways and creeks traversing the property do suPPOr't some riparian habitat Which should be protected. it Is recommended that a 100 foot building setback line be established measured from the creek banks. 13t one additional dwelling on the property will result In additional traffic an Dunstane Road tend other area roads. Due to low traffic counts and the limited number of trips, tri be generated by this project no s I gri I f I cant- impacts shoul 6 occur i 14'. This project Will represent an incremental Increase in demands for public services In a rural area. 208: Subject property Is loc%at-ed Within a high archaeological sensitivity ores. An archae,al6gltal sure-ey has been performed (attached) and clearance It recommended. on J,,leaqures - 1. UtIlI20 standard construction practices Including limiting construction to the dry season to minimize erosion,, 2. show on the final map 6 100 foot ho -building area Measur-ed from the, banks of the creeks, kef et-6'nto t.Oslo Rash Tentative Pnrcol Map, AP 27-16-09s Log Log #84"10-24-02. 0 Applicant: David Wood DATA -SHEET A .rc,,ject Description Assessor - Is Parcel AP 27-16-08 Log 0 86-11-21-08 j . Type of 'Project: Tentative Parcel Map 2. Brief Description: Dividing approximately 12 acres into two parcels, I of 5 acres and I of 7 acres, plus a remainder3. . Location: On the east tide of Dunstone Drives approximately 1800 feet north of its intersection with Grubbs Rood in the ,;Iglermo-area, southeast Of Orov"le' 4. Ppt.mcmd rcDensity of Development: 6 ai� -es per dwelling unit 6. Amount of lmobrvlotls Surfacing: Minimal 6. Accestrind Nw, rnat; Public Road(s)*. Property fronts on Ounstone Dr Iva. Individual Sep-bic systems 7. Method of Sewsge 8. Source of Water Supply". wells 9. Proximity of PoWet,', Lines: lo t". No!-te jo. Potential for further land dlvinAc4,k-3 arja tjq.,velopmen under existing zOnlrig - 0. A n _q Physical Environmt-nt: 8. 4 i. 6. Terrain a. General Topographic Chbracter: Rolling foothills area b. SIOPeS: Gonorally 10"15% wl+,h some steeper slopes in places a. Elevation: 450-650 A -1$.L. d. Limiting Factors: Some areas of steep slopes Solls mewvlile variant, :P-0-40'* deep; am Types and Characteristics: broWn-yellow brown gravelly loam, slow permeability, Well dralnedo mbdlum-loW sultsibIlItY for extensive range use. b. Limiting Factors. 1,4oderate`ly acidic and slow permeability Natural Hazards of the Land so E6rthquake Lone= Moderate earthqu8ke Intensity t6he V11t b. '!_rosloh PoteritI61! Very high c. Landslide Potential'. Low d. Fire Hazard.* High e. 8Xpatisive Soil Potential". None Hydrology 6. 8ue-fbce Water: Tributaries of North Honcut Creek traverse the pi-operby. for domestic use b. around Water: Required -tiuohtlties oaf water Is to be proven, Pr4opdrjz�y jr8*jns to on-site OrAlnage Charadtorlstid'84- a West to rjoe Gold Gulcho drolotoe wav-so thence south an thehde south to NbY�th Hontut Creek, appro t i inatQ l Y 2 mllos. d. Ahhu8i Rainfall (rIdt-Mal)t 96-' Vq e Limiting Factors: Setbacks from draIM806 Ways VjtU6j/Sdehjt auslity". Highly scenic farmlands 4* 6. Acoustic Quality.* G c,- 7. Air Quality: Good B,,,oA-1cal -.Envlr-qn- ng the ent Vegetation= Oak grass lands with riparian h4bi,bst alo creeks traversing the property. 9. Wildlife Habitat' Small birds and animals colnIllon to oak grass lands and riparian habitat srOss- Cu turaj Fnvironn_ehtz-;'. io. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the are , a- High sensitivity area I esIgnation: Agricul torsi Residential ji. Butte County General Plan d 12. Existing Zoning: A-5 _ One mobi�eonopro� eonth13. Existing Land Use o6-51te:southeasterly port onof the propeo,"ed Parcel 1 14. Surrourlding Area: Scattered I homes Ites at rural dh qslties- a. Land Uses: St b. Zoning: A-6 ignations'. p,gricultural Resit.-lent"al plan des 5-40+ acre parcels d. Parcel Sizes: e. Population". Sparse 'i b. Character of Site ille and OrovArea. Rural agrlcUlbur8l area i6j, Nearest Urban Area: 17. Reieseent spheres of Influences None Is. improvements standards Urban Area: No jq. Fire Protection Service: Station 72 In Palermo 13, Neaest County (State) Fire Station: andrStation 55 in Bangor, 5+ miles each. b. Water Availability: Fire tankers only Schools In Area' oroville Elementary School OistrIct and 20. ct. Oroyllle union High School 01s',�rl