HomeMy WebLinkAbout027-170-022• r
' p •� J
a �
"
1NEALTF1 AIIt
-- NATUf.AL
LAND OF
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WOFIKS
`'JILLIAM (13M) CNEFF, Direct r
- 7 COU14TY CENTER DRIVE.OROVItJ.C, CALIF004ii+95965
Telephone (916) 53!1•4691 ROt4AL,D D. ,r8LROY
Depu1Y Di'ecio'
,,�_,,�-,�{. April- P"Ls 19f,6
BOOM CO.AP
�FAnT1�11� Va"�"
APR �•3
19$6
o�pYi�ie� `Pera4:al�iVr, Parcel. Mad
'rank OjAith 11
96 Canlino �"i1t T1t1D
,3r1r,ila, CA '
l)ear ml.: mitla Agency 11"113
Y ��" the iiutt',F. (:'aunty AalvieDry �
t ttle �f� xal ' meetir,_, lEy: >�:z� yr�ut' t�rrLat�ve parcel rnx�p
, lf,) t 1 thcv a�,x'ttewI "�
SC
tart April , rrty `the tnall wIa r�i �tmentttUr
ort the �1: rive _i�, 'o.xE:tt E. I ap'
t>aslir'etr►t,:3 oi" tkle lle�alth Uep'
t li A of the d9te Of
Ippeal8 ate +,ime1,�1 t"il��--w thSrz L°� rl da
p5
Cle�'� ��f the hoard of
rte _ M � • .� � *enc,y--wtith the
cif t�inl 'hy the :t 3� pry Ag
encs
thio action will be �` n��.
If' ;pop, have hr�F Ve;4tione �'c
card nb this tr"atter, please CuRtact
Very tX1,1ly
11 iaTri Cheff rlcw
S ir��ct(�r of Publ-ic "O
I
4.� ..
John Kenuu—jtl
1paat.r�tent bre�tor
,Sh, de
cc 1?IW,ttnin�
r ;u(i htky
rF�
j;:K`.va'�
lit, t'oYt�
#, r,�,Fkti~z
AV(- xtill 1`1"3,
"i rt" r+ 3 nF.
a t.';7. F i Y�
iJ.
;�,1'
t ,t: .. .t; t:' IIIc �t°"�
�L"` k l°, t:3F'E"FCti +
.. .#.
�Y l'F1v i��Y!` TCai,
"�f�NK
A
'10
�y111' `3e UY{ F
"til`
,i't �r1 tA; +,
I.
4- 1,—"86
TO: Butte county Advisory Agency
F'ROM4 Planning Di.rectorl"'
$U$jEuC: Report on Tentative Parcel Map for F=rank Smith on AP# 27 -i7-2
DATE: April 21, JIJ86
Thi i proposal to divide 24 acres to create 4parcels. The Land Use
Flan Map of the Mutts County General Plan designates this arca As
AGric�,tltt.�ra�.-Residenti�lr The,oni,ng
is Agricultural - acs"7C"�. There
are no specific or community plans Cdr the area*
application is one on which a negative declaration regarding
This aPp applicant has been
environmental impact have been recommended" the
unable •tro comply with the wealth Department and Subdivision► Ordinance
requiroments
Be -commendations
Find that the applicant has been "Mable to meet the requirements of the
Health Department; tine application has been pending for an extended
period of time, and dery the T.F.hI. �`Ipplication for Frank Smith an
AP027�-17•-221 in accordance with Section 15109 of the CEGlA guideline-""
LOT a mc
cc F=rank Smith x x
Robert Huskey
R,. APPENDIX F
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
(To be completed by Lead Agency)
ERD hog
80-11-03-03
I. BACKGROUNv
1. Name of Proponent Funk Smith 1I
o Proponent s
2., Address and 'Phone T7um er
96 Camino Encinas c/o Robert Husk,
172 ale Avenue
— rovlle
CA 95'965.
3. Date of Checklist. Submitted
�
4, Agency Requiring Checklist _�
proposal, if applica� a Tentative
Parcel LU
5. Name of AP # 2?
-19-22
Ix. MIRON1,1ENTAL IMPACTS
all "yes" and "maybe' answers
are required
(Explanations of
on attached. sheets,)
YES
MAYBE NO
1, Earth. Will the proposal result in significant:
a, Unstable earth conditions or in
substructures?.
changes in geologic
b. Disruptions, displacements, com-
of the soil.?
.._..
paction or overcovering
c. Change in topography or ground sur-
removal of
face relief features or
topsoil?
d. Destruction, covering or modifica-
tion of any unique geologic or
physical features? -,
e, increase in hind or water erosion
the site?
of soils, either on or off
E. Changes 'Changes in deposition or erosion
in
of beach sands, or changes 84ta-
which
tion, deposition or erosion
the channel of a river or
may ttodify
s treattt or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake?
g,, Loss Of prime agriculturally pro--
designated
ductive soils outside
urban areas'': ---
-..--
Appendix F
ae of �
g_ p
Appendix E' page 2 of 9'
4
i
i
YES MAYBE
NO
h,
Exposure of people or property to
geologic hazards such as earthquakes,
landslides, mudslides, ground failure,
17
or similar hazards?
2. Air. Will the proposal result in
a.
Substantial deterioration of
ambient or local air quality?
b,
The creation of objectionable
odors, smoke or fumes?
c
Significant alteration of air
movement, moisture or temperature,
or any change in climate, either
locally or, regionally?
3. Water, Will the proposal result in substantial..
a.
Changes in currents, or the course
or direction of water movements?' --- --
b.
Changes in absorption rates, drainage
patterns, or the rate and amount of
surface water runoff?
c,
Deed for off-site surface drainage
improvements, including vegetation
removal, channel. nation or culvert
installation?
d.
Alterations to the course or flow
of flood waters?
e,
Change in the amount of surface
water in any Crater body?
E4
Discharge into surface waters, or
in any alteration of surface
water quality, including but not
limited to temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity?
gi
Alteration of the direction or
rate of flow of ground waters?
h,
Change in the quantity or quality
of ground wttcrs, either through
direct additions or withdrawals,
or through interception of an
aquifer by cuts or excavations?
Appendix E' page 2 of 9'
4
i
i
.
YES MAYBE
NU
i,
Reduction in the amount of water
otherwise available for public
water supplies? ..__ ._.
j
Exposure of people or property
to water related hazards such as
flooding?
4, Plant'. Life, Will the proposal result
in
ibstantial
a,
Loss of vegetation or change in the
diversity of species or number
of any species of plarts (including
trees, shrubs, grass, crops,
microflora and aquatic plants)?
b.
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of plants?
c,
introduction of new species of
plants into an area, or in a barrier
to the normal replenishment of
existing; species?
d,
Reduction in acreage of any agri-,
gel
oul.tural crop?
.Animal Life, Will the proposal result
in
substantial!
a,
Change In the diversity of species;,
or numbers of any species of
animals (birds, land animals
including reptiles; fish and shell-
fish, benthic organisms, insects or
microfauna)?
b,
Reduction of the numbers of any
utique'tare or endangered species
of animals? .,�--
c.
Introduction of new species of
animals into an area, or result in
a barrier to the migrati6n or
MoVoment of animals
(,
Reduction of, enctoachment upon, or
detotioration to existing fish or
wildlife fe habitat?
Appendix
p page 3 Of
YES 'MAYBE
NO
6, Noise, Will the proposal result in
substantial:
a. Increases in noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to =severe noise
levels?
7. Light and Glare, -----
Will the proposal
c�_
pro uce sYgn� icant light or glare?
8, Land Use, Will the proposal result
i.n a siiinif:i,eant•;
a. Alteration of the planned land use
of
an area, or establish a trend
which will demonstrably lead to such
alteration?
b. Conflict with uses on adjoining
Properties, or conflict with,
established
recreational, educa-
tional, religious or scientific
uses of an area?
9. Natural Resources. Will the. proposal
resu t in.
substantal<
a, Demand for, or increaso in the rate
Of use of
any natural resources?
b. Depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resource?
10, Risk of Upset, Does the proposal
inVo IV76
a risk of an explosion or
the -release of hazardous substances
(including, but not limited to, oil,
pesticides, chemicals or radiation)
in the
event of an accident oi� upset
conditionsl
ll, po ulati,on. Will the proposal
signi icaIt:l,y alter the 1:00a,tion,
distribution, density, or
growth
rate of the human population of an
area or physically divide an
established community?
C
12: Hous Will tlle proposal
sxgniti,antly affect existinghousing.
or create a demand for additonal,
housing?
Appendix V
4
Page of
YES, MAYBE Nb'
13. Trans ortation/Circulation.. Will the
proposal rssu t gin:
a,. Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement?
,
b: Significant effects on existing �r
parking facilities, or demand for
new parking?
C. Substantial impact upon existing
transportation
systems?
d. Significant alterations' to present
patterns of circulation or movement
of people and/or goods? _
(;
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or
traffic?
ai.r
ft Increase it traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have
,
an ect upon, or result in a substantial
need for new or, altered
governmental
services in any of the following areas;
a, 'Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational
facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads?
f, Other governmental services?,
15, finer trill the
,Y proposal: result in:
a, Use of substantial amounts of fuel
or energy?
bi Substantial increase in demand upon
existing sources of energy, or
require the development of new
sources of energy?
15 Utilities, ,Jill the proposal result
in a nee -for
ttew systems or sub-
stantial alterations to the following
util�,ties
Ap'pendi'x V
;, page 5 of 9
�App ,.pg '
e�.d�.x p page � o � 9
YES MAYBE NO
— -
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems?
c: Water?
d. Sewer (will trunk line bsi� extended,
providing capacity to serve new
development)?
e. Storm water drainage?
17.
Human Health, Will the proposal
result in
a, Creation of any health hazard or
potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)?
b. Exposure of people to potential
health hazards?
18.
Solid Waste, Will the proposal result
in any significant impacts associated
with solid waste disposal or litter
control?
19.
Aesthetics, Will the proposal result
itt e o struction of any public
designated -op recognized scenic vista
Open to the
proposal result in the creation of an
aestheticallyoffensive site open try
public view?
20
Recreation. W111 the proposal result
in an impact upon the quality or
quantity of existing public recrea-
tion facilities?
21,
Archeological/Historical,' Will the
proposal result n a— n: alteration of
a significant archeological or
historical site, structure, object
`
or buildin? '
22,
Mandatory 'inriinf 8 of . Si�tificance,
a . Does the project have the potential
to ds7rade the quality of the
enviij meat, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self
�App ,.pg '
e�.d�.x p page � o � 9
Append -ix V - page 7 of 0
YES
MAYBE NO
sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal com-
munity;,'reduc( the number ol� restrict
the
range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal: or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
b. Does th.e. project have the potential
to achieve short term benefits to
the detriment of publicly adopted
long-term em-ironmen,tal, goals?
-
c. Does the project have impacts which
are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? (a project
may impact on two or more separate
resources where the impact; on each
resource is relatively small, but
where the effect of the
total of
those impacts on the environment is
significant.)
d, Does the project have environmental:
effects which will cause substantial:
adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
Append -ix V - page 7 of 0
� it •� %� ` � � `��� } � �—�f � i.r _ aw�,�fl j / 1 �.?as..:���«. �1� tri .r h
c,IV.
1. l + ' � ✓ \J II ,��. _..`�1.�"� s'] , ,,{ �%; rl a,' ; l i � "! I� � ��r .lr sIN,
s « l 's, � /`s �' r /e���/''.'..wry,-,�/'/� I ! "� � •�� C�yti � '1 � l� ` a �y �,, ff/^`•'�` `a ,�l\
IN I
�. 1",. . % r � , �5'' f✓>/.• •.. ,^�— '�`-/ .-. ' " � s rf f • r r/ `�� •.,y 'V �• r�.zs • `r r y '�"!(�7J�/ ,/ y� r
•R"^'. i �y'R'" ` - J..��S���! � l '�..--.. �� � J J � l��Q 1` �"`"' a� / (,(/ �s� .mss. i +�� +'`,:''�..1 ,
iy
Gt �1����,4' G, � r_, I %1`��� r"'a r� ...� .�....~��i � a a,.,..... I r+ �� �r y •.'..:..`,--. i 1:..
F `V.l"yam:
'�A y
�t�r� t ��.f � ( �, r,_ -.. t•---•— .tet _ i• i'r , �` '. �' .'1 j�^"'��-� '� �....r�r� >,yii,� r�`
1 ., �•".y lf• 1 t N, J fr,._-. "'-�•+..- r, __'F �, /'u a /i G ! a' 1 a ,. 1. r• l/ �•'�.v
ti:_,,"�n c{ t •` `,��r�l �.. r--�v { �'�a� ,L.I ...••�'�l rl *� w...✓y./� r•y/,/�� � \ y ♦ (y.\a
4 " `,,� � ---� ✓• v f r r�V'�'or l� i 'r^ •ti ,'J`~ , s � �`+ 1 `" p,y` r r � V� � i a, r
o\ \7, f
t a
)t lt\ L�Ij1, . � ✓ \, � � A�' d � V � \ .�Y \ � 'r� J/ s r 7 / \\•
j ql 4', a� ~�.r -fr / � t �,G' �I. I ��� 'a tF\' \\s �ia4. � t�,\ \„�:•�i`"tr /Yl�. ^1\ I !/ - � � M, {t.
$ ��J r r'xl` � \i `\''�`+s r � \ 1\t � {� •y +\t�'i' a` �+,n� � ` jk.r.,rv,,,� `"^'- a
J 1 �f� � ♦ 5y. \ f ,i'�' . r � f s -a ♦� , r �.,,s.�^�f�����,�� r % f � 1 k�r'�"«+]
iJ �4 �� rt. � '`�il•a � i � S y a� � �`',.'`a��•��,--..+•+•� r” ,\\w w !r i �'� ,'tea,,,. Via/ t i}
r+w 1 113 ♦ `L \ }J .. i ..w..a r'/ r! 1�1 -`+. ` \ t � �^ � `� ,, ,1
IN
Ah A IV
V �V� � �I i x ;\" rf j� j// +� y.,�;� �/ \ '�--':' �,i/ J.', ?'"'�.... ,r°a., �, •a. ,11 ! r /; �1�"''�, t(/•}� C.`.• w 5 ' +d'. �j ,I `i�
rr Y '1'..5 r A \t «'^'*�i1 , .r" �''' ` ;y`' '"',,,V r'r�i� '� `y I 'V. ` ,`�•--•ti,` •, , tst• I
t Ib/ �,,l r' :✓ ^ / w "•�.��.•��-'♦-"� ` (`J I� � •'1 y -W + ! rs � ���`_�,,,1t '' `ws/"�'y, P \�'""1
!� � lt1 .y � -li� �v'�� � �~ t�..J �r'�C/.i � C3 \ .. \ y�y � , � Y7 l `� ```, s�, \ys :���^'�+'i �,./•„
�'�r _ '��, as ."' � • �+ �, r �d f • U v"'.'�. •��.r.�, •, 1 �� t ��� ,, tl �/,,-•� �,t 1�`•.�ia . �1�1.+ fir
l4 t tl \•V a-...�' `� *:.
Y.ls ""s... , •"s• �•�•.�,'✓ r ✓ �'T •`., �,a., 111 s..� - 4t, sa'��t\ ! � ,
. � y ' sq + E �` '4 - -`r� r � %� a"'4Y til a:'+-? y. } y s ,`y` '�,,. � �,11 ♦ v + , i ,; j.
r � ♦~ � r<<,r•r� r• �..._- .y' y } s, `-' °'�., • � I .,.,;�.,� a ,r . ti "`�• J � ,\.,��' .,,• t ,�'i.»;, \` „..
1N;D,•... 1�"'_''�•`, 'y _ '-.4,��:••---�w rr� a'�'♦ y c as♦ 1. 1 �..�'•♦�--� 1•\?\ Ira }�F.•r�.
�� a, •\1 V .,�y�....-mss .�'yw, y�� � � ���--•-'y~`�•-'+�`VZr¢� +�: �w i\1 A ' L "' /•✓� ✓---•• tl i1 f�'�ra i.
s � l � r,✓ , . �, ..��'y,��� a 1�+' I � o Is try •�j y ' , R f,+ter �I ��I � 1� \ .
1 �=
y , ��%"""w'.ay✓ r..r�..";'.r', yt __t.' \1 � �-�-" ••,.� "�' ).11 s, ''h'a l,'...', ,Jy f.,� `y" r'r^' t+•"''�ci� ..4��`�'.
(�� 1
IN '
�ti.�a,a I / �."•J �.�q """�h,.� `�,� ..--��.,`+.,a;�v,, 1(/)�1.�"�+�r"��'t x r�/�'rJ ��y.�`
>tP ! / \.,�a�.+�Y""'.:% �'��1 t J'r�a�. �•..� s lt' �" 'ts,!„�!, (r<,,� �, s�'�.
A11 ✓
fir! r 4 : t Sr~` •} 1 ' r r r r�=� . I� N { ,.� �,r� /, N4
i.. �1"t � l�\ 0 r `` ^,�1 �ti•�" /I�� � p P V!` r,� '-„,,.,..,,�,�� ;�r t �/ ,a�,/f•'��,• rf(/y„......,i,�',. arr.
1w ��'♦.>a;✓'” Ct"'•a i �r /',!' I � �.I:„� l'r”` .!'�i's n 'yam.- ,.,,.�w� � i I•y�' 1 � �'C;t "^t
�+..,� ,�.�'--) ``� '`.. -: ; � �% � � ; �• by \ a., ,i R_ � .rf+ a.i ti '� t, �,y.w •. s
,+n A �� 4 r (fir . J! }° �/,/. • �,r,,.�''``�. 's"0,'`'" 1Av r•„
It
a, •`' '1. * �.r ✓'�.`". , �S ../� 1 +�.•„� v 1 7 1 Ij al, `v s i l �'i Iy, 1 � r
� , �"'tV ✓...�r. � 11 la I ?' r 4 4 tk " � , { y w. '
i. A �`'a \...�� ti �... x-u♦/"^� ��, 1 r A lY''r , SI Is. - i
f l• , �` " r,Gij sl Y % •fi. a j .''.'"'."' r�J !...r�t}
� ,rit 1 ♦-.•w . % rirj� (r�,tri z � . Z � � ✓ l% �� � �� a�
!}p 1.... «••�jl' , 1 t' :'yW'`y ieII
i
yr R tl . r ��' +a •" tir. a 4 aA
It-
it4r of rr •� �� 1\ r.
"",.rR' ,../'.�, r+"✓ �.1 1 11 R R "• + ! • "
..y �^'� r ..Y I/' �„J ' � l j f j•r.n. .•-, r.+' r� �S a s! s r « � � ' `�`�x� .,. , � ' .n. w' , ^ "
y». r r y " +"'` J •.-......%,r `� `i�. , • •Z ;:.=•J li 45. ' ILT
e , , r��} ....4 .`a �" •. � "``•-�;•+"I�..-,/' ,,.,{/ ,..,u .ate.•.._„ ,II % .r � `���-'�`.��Y --+,� , �' � l`"'�1, ' i, + r
"d `1
t �\ ��` ' / - � I . ,q�� n/.. �*+l�a � `�•.'� "..., ��` a �W r•� } � '1 ,,,.�J � /may„
��i�� l !\ d'' 9 • .w a\���`�ir"" r .cha'Ssllp,,-.rI`!
\3 `` \ ,'•
80-11-03-05
III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENh'F►T., EVALUATION
Project Description '
1. Brief Description: Land division of 24 acres to create four
parcels of S to 7 acres for agricultural -residential. use.
2. Location West side of District Center Drive at Turkey Avenue,
0.8 mile south off Grubbs. Road, 3 miles east of Upper
Palermo Road, southeast of Oroville.
3. Access and Nearest Public Road: Existing access off Grubbs Road.
Parcel 4 requires development of a 500 --foot cul-de-sac road
off Turkey Avenue for access. District Center Drive and
Turkey Avenue are undeveloped traveled paths with no
improvements.
4. Method of Sewage Disposal: Septic - leachfield systems
5. Source of Nater Supply: Individual wells
6. Proximity of Power Lines: On the property.
7. Potential for further land divisions and development: Further
land divisions not possible under A-5 zoning.
Environmental Setting
1. Terrain,
a. General Topographic Character: Rolling foothill grassland;
gentle hill -top location sloping south and east into the
on-site ravine.
b. Slopes; Moderate 5-20%. Upslope areas are gentle.
2, Soils
a. Types and Characteristics Newville soil series; a shallow
moderately shallow (20-40"), gravelly, rocky loam/sandy loam
with some clay content. Upslope land areas are very poor.
b. Limiting Factotst Shallow soil. Slow permeability. Medium -
to -low rangeland capability. Some erosion potential.
3. Natural hazards of the Land.
a,. Earthquake Zone: Foothill Shear Zone traverses area;
b. Erosion Potential, Moderate
c. Fire Hazard: Moderate to low
d. Expansive Soil Potential! High
4. Hydrology
a. Surface Water: Intermittent drainage course traverses central
ortiotoofpropertyl, loading w'tlin 14 mile to_North Honcut
( tributary basin ons -site)
b. Ground Water: Unidentified resource. Probable limitations.
c. Drainage Characteristics: Direct drainage of each parcel:
into rgvine/drainage course on south,
S. Visual/Scenic Quality: High 4 isolated area with limited
development.
Appendix' F .. page 8 of 9
80-11-03-03
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (continued)
6. Vegetation: Grassland, with a few transplanted olive tTOOs.
Minimal vegetation within ravine.
7. Wildlife Habitat:: Limited due to open grassland.
8.
9.
10
11.
Butte County General Plan designation: Agri cultural - Res y.dentiai
Existing Zoning: A-5, five -acre minimum parcels
Existing Land Use on-site: Open grassland, undovel.oped
Surrounding Area:
a. Land Uses*. Grazing primarily. A few scattered rural
residences.
b. General Plan designations: Agricultural -Residential.
Grazing -Open Land ', mile south.
A-
d. Parcel Sizes
c. Zorng� .A_s: 6 to 30 acres; generally 10-20 acres.
Character of Site and Area: Outlying rural foothill grassland
area with limited residential development.
Nearest Urban Area: Palermo 5 miles; OrovilTe: 10 miles.
Relevant Spheres of Influence: Within O.W.I.D.
Fire Protection Service Palermo Station 5 miles.
a, Nearest County State) Fire Station:
b Water Availability: Fire truck capacity, O W.I.D. irrigation
canals.
The following impacts and environmental factors have been identified:
lb,e:radin of one -tile
.:Disruption of soil in the construction (upgrading)
of access roads and driveways may result in increased erosion. Develop-
ment of four homesites on the side of gentle -moderate sloping grassland.
may also cause increased soil: erosion. However, parcel sizes are
relatively large, reducing the total percentage of land to be disturbed
(�± acTe building sites are probable) 10% of each parcel). Also, the
proposed cul-de-sac access road will. traverse the more gentle portion
of the property;, further reducing development impacts (The other
three proposed parcels have existing access.)
19, 4d: potential grazing pastureland may be reduced, affecting
adjacent grazing land uses
1h: P,xposUre of people to earthquake 'hazards due to the proximity Of
foothill faults+, and exposure cfproperty and improvements to moderate
:j
erosion and expansive soil bazar
ds
Increased dust will be generated from residential travel on area
roads
Appendix F - page 8a of 9
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (continued)
3h: Soil limitations exist for on-site sewage disposal, and ground-
water limitations for additional area well development.
80 11, 12 Expansion of additional rural residential use in and
outlying area will result. However, the general area is developed
to rural residential uses to the north along Grubbs Road, though the
immediate area has limited use. Development of parcels could sta:mulate
area growth, reducing the grazing potential of the area.
13a,d: New residentialtrafficcirculation will be generated on
District Center Drive .which currently receives minimal use, and on
Grubbs Road. Area roads, which are unimproved traveled paths, will
require development (improvement) to county standards. (1± mile in
length off Grubbs Road.) 4.
14: increased demands for public services will be generated in an
outlying area somewhat remote from existing service areas and urban
areas.
Other nearby laud division proposals in the area
art currently being processed by the county;
1. Frank Smith TPM
Ap# 27-13-08
ERU #80-1.0-20-07
2. Louis Duncan TPM
Ah# 27-1.4-22
ERD #79-01.-1.7._05
Appendix F w pago 8b of 9
I
IV. DETERMINATION
(To be: completed by the Lead Agency,
On the basis of this initial evalttat,i.on
I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a t3S gnifi: ant
effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE b4CLA:RATION
,is rEoemmended.
QI find that although the prof ' ted pro j�ic,t could have a
significant effect on the enNriro',WPaIt+ there will not
be a significant effect in this cess be,-ause the
mitigation measures described on an attached sheet
hc ve been added to the project,: 1% NUGA",TVE DECLARATION
TS REOM M ICED
0 I find the proposed project b..%y hv,,ve a ignificant
effect on the environment, ar;d an 't�17,1IRDN'SENTAL IMPACT
REPORT is required.
Date December 4, 1980
f Slona,tut,n
For: ENV1A0V1','0 WrAfa R J,Y L C�pARTi; ��NT
reviewed by•'
Earl D. Nelson
Enviirciii ,ear, i 5-ovie , Director