Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
027-170-017
w 0 ;PLAANNT=,XORRISS`tON SUMMARY SHEET FOR DIVISIONS a 3?!L. cAM - Sherr $radford Carey Log# 91-10-03-02 ADDs' S: P.O. BGx 26CII Oroville, CA 05065 Same P-QjBvT DESCRIPTION: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP to create four parcels all 5± acres. F�CaCAT ON; between Dunstone Dr. and Alta. Airosa Dr. approx. 600 ft, east of Candy Cane Lane,"East Orovilla area. ASSSE.. OV'S PARCEL NUMBER (S) 027-170-017 Z0NRjG A`-5 GENERAL PLAN A -R PROJECT CONSISTENT.? Yes GM'ERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE REPORT 6-12-91 DATE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE LA0, CONSERVATION ACT. CONTRACTS?. No R= A1'PLICATION RECEIVED_, __ 10-3-91 I Arw,7 ssu VEXOR/CIS,11 ENGINEER: GDA _ Arm1it 220 Grand Avenue, Oroville, CA 85965 DIATE, ?LANNING DIRECTOR"S REPORT PREPARED, Iq 2- (� VW EDIMENTAA CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION - DAME FILED DJ'`'TE•�'�I:NATION -� AND DATE NEGATIIT DECLARATION DATE ADOPTED;:_ F4 6r Ea -5 MITIGATED NEG. DECLARATION - DAZE ADOPTED. EW, IMPACT :REPORT DATE CERTIFIED STATE CLEA tINGHOUsE NO ,8. COMMITTEE MEETING DATE ^'Q i AV"�..�`RY AGENCY HEARING DATE AWTS6.RY AGENCY ACTION. APPEAL HEARING DATE EOgs AOTTON_- COMM 'S FOR PLAWING DIRECTOR'S :REPORT. AHSIGL TL°,� 'a" :,► tilrl,f_101101)"_. _ DISK „w LID J l% .Q i 1Gl �i k t s r rt w8 'PNVTRONMENTAL_IMPA S AND MITIGATION`MEASURES* Identify potentially significant environmental impacts associated with the land division: What project design features or special conditions of approval (mitigation measures') are proposed to alleviate potential environmental impacts'? N 4, ENVIRONMENTAL: SETTING* a) Describe the project site As it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and an-y cultural, 'historical or scenic aspects. Describe anv existing; structures on the site; and the use of J NFADOWS t�lM SCA1TMW TRESS ,IRRTi(�MM MOCERA'�Y SUOPM SLIGMMY UMM SOUS' NMM SML ANDWZ IWAL DOGS,& CATS. EMEME RAL NWU- E +- i ii'lt�' IN FDE I M GMCH,c.. sit. rRIPtART.Ati' EI MMkT. EXdMMC SME FAHMY RESMENCE. NO SCURC tDiSTMCAL CR tUt MMAL Fi - gPP p F , b) bescribe the qurroundin ro erties, 'including informa�t$,on on I+t.irit:: and an•.mals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, III(IlCaLe thp type of land use (residential, commercial, etti ), int-ensity of land use (ope-family, apartment houses, shops, depart- ment stores; etc.), and cale of development (height, frontage,' setback., rear yard , etc .) . SJREi�O0t� M EROPERTIES IUEM1T AL IN NAOURE?, I�N1T.Y 5 '10 1O ACRES IN SIE. SIMZ FAMMY IN NMUIRE. FASY AO=, VI& t:tOMW ,M$ S (MMU E, S1O[TM VIU A, f tt7O ML) TO OCtt!!E?t= 'SEFC l= y h - t:pR'f'I FICO'lON., 1 hereby cQrtifvthat the statements furnished above and in tlW W IM-11(jt1 eXh'ihxts present the data and information requiVe,i for this il111 tri( evaluation to the best of my ability, and that thU facts, statements and 1100rnilti011 pre-Sehted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge attrl (S(?_l i P f I)rtta• Signature j Por OuR Qom' MIEtRY BRADFM CAktL'1C U;(= ti1+1►rftatt� Otsttt fo! lottigt�r t-espon.ses. 4/85 �Sattalu�a e... ! neO pugs 1661 d3S ;H- SUBDIVIDER''S STATEMENT rl i KaMe MMY MADRama CAM Date { M-15-91 e. t 3 AP 1 27-170-17 i 1`. j Existing use (s) of the land; ac,4m Z. ?roposed use (s) of the. hand Ad-am 3 Improvements proposed (see Ch. 20-21 County Cade) 4., Public areas proposed' S.. "free planl'ng/or removal (approx. number)_ S. Preliminary copy of any condition, restrictive resorvations W Covonantt, oxist'ng or proposed sta11 be attached to 'this` stat►iient attachod _ XKKI:•" __ hone State typo, Iof divition; i,e,j private roa.d; urban ru'i*a1etc._. _ TRUAtM PAROEt HAP LD 1040 a 1 I to � ,.C.,JL .M.ANCE REisOR� =17, PARC•- OR S 1-31: 'V= SC9N MAP :It4ws 1-14. Co be cotitplet:ed by applic=: APPLIC= xaAME, AND ADDRESS: arL,nr 02.D iia C-, ©,r -2ZO '&Q-4N h�AOC bZ01-Ji" G CA ._. m FrRO.T%= DESCR=024 t ,P, J ASScSSORIS PARCZ MMM.(S): 1-7 ata. PM PCs= Usk: A G , :its► following items are to be ==plated by the Planning Department: caFIMIT ZONMG: Q — ,Cj L!►im "WNSZRVATION AGREM�e AJ IP GEMWL PLvf DESIG:{ATIax: AG;--- 21551 Conditional Criteria: YC;aCC*LT?AL :.zmsIDvaiAL us 190 It is reccc vended that you perform the 1. Agricultwa-1. Compatibility 7G � following checked items: 2. Water and Sewer Capacity - ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORDS CHEF 1 ,Adequate Fire Facilites ? "��` BOTANICAL SURVE: 4. Road Capacitj and Xiintenancs _ GEOLOGICAL SURVEv 5. Access to Ccmercial and'Schools y, Sr NO ._. C?CHARD AND TM-D CROPS DEFART` a OF Fim AM 1. :oredomfnant 5-10 ac. Pascal Siete GAME DEVELOR WZ ZONE, .2., vicinity of Urba= Boundaries MEIN 'LOOD PLAN: Y .a« Mcpaired Viability not S:aff Determination: Subst=tially 'conforms toe 4123IN ARS,., SPECIFIC OR LAND USE 2L1,'{i ✓� ., _ G"AL FLAX., 1. Land qse �` If Yes,. �, • 2. Conservation ?c' Name of ?Ian 3.. Open Space 'URRM SERVE: k. Sa=e 54 Noise JC If Yes, _ b, Hausirs3 S _._.._ Hama of Res+e- 7 Circa at ion . AIRPORT LAND USE PLAN: ' ZONnGe c =.M G- Vis- 0Q6Vrt_L Tre,Ay;'pGa0. • _ all►'�'T'GC.i '�'O f7E�.t2 4-tC'2.� .tY`�1"Th��,=�"ic�tJ '1 w.�Pat i_ �.:..G S _ _.._ _ __ �2c"�t/fi`b� Ars ��t3fi''t'e'` tJ�''�`�2..Ald'y. 5t�1;+aC•-i t�iSnt's�r�L �..t�Far31L..�� )�.rs. u3� thtr►J +v ��ib r Carziu9JAte-t_ SfaCAr? ""10M Mk+ QC-W{Rrs- t: ` Staff Signature . rr�,e ^lGi�-,SG'2- Date'! • As InE AFFLyc= FOR THE RmUEsmn ulm DIVISidtt, I AH AGAPE` OF THr A$OVE STAFF DE RMMIATTON �sRZVJ L1fG •—sr. CONFOFL MCZ WTM THE Co MAL PLN Atm ZONMG. ' Dated Sighactira of App L` Is report will exp ••e aM be ditearded sik (b)`nanths i_ rhe da!` =the ttajo sib 1� ;.:. �{ X Pian ning Department NAME: SHERRY BRADF_ORD-LREy X Environmental Health Department X CDF (Forestry Department) AP: Attn: J. Crai13 Carter (on areas north of red line on map,) X Butte County Sheriff PG&E (check title report for easement) Pacific Bell Butte County Mosquito Abatement OR ' Oroville Mosquito Abatement ement (areas 'within large map in kabinet:) S pool Disfrict ! -(wall map). Water. Company (if individual oils are not indicated on application or map) Durham Irrigation OR Durham. Mutual Water Co, California Water Service Company (Chicoarea) Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation District (Oroville area, SE of river) Thermalito Irrigation District (Thermalito area NE of river) Limesaddle Community Services District (Paradise area along Pentz Rd. to lake) , Del Oro Water (Paradise Pines area) Buzztail Waterworks Doe Mill Ridge/Fo-past Ranch area) Paradise Irrigation District - City of . . . (check wall maps for spheres of influence) Oroville Chico, Paradise Biggs Gridley OROVILLE AREA ONLY: Lake Oroville Area Public Utility District (see large map in cabinet)_ JC Feather Rimer Recreation Mstrict (see large map in cabinet) - - El Medio Fire District (check wall map, a small portion of Oroville only) BIGGS, RIC11VLE, GRtDLEY AREAS (SOUTH aBUTTE H:check wall map and title report oreas overlap. Drainage Dstrict ..'#i _ Drainage Distract 1#2 Drainage District #100 Drainage Distrf ct #200 Reclamation Districts #533 Reclamation District #2056 Sacramento and San Joaquin 'Drainage District Butte Creek Drainage District Ire' CERTAIN CASES. Superintendent of Schools (only for subdivisions) Dept: of Fish and Game (near Water and in rural and mountain area s) Cal 'Trans (near State Hwy, 32, 70, 99j 149 (Chico cut-off), 162 (Olive Hwy, $r Richvale Hwy.), Al (Clark Road) State 'Water Quality Control Board (pro3ects with more than 10U lots or units) United States Forest Service (if'project borders USA .land --check AP books) Parks and Retteatiorl Department (property near Lake Oroville) State Vater Resources Department (property near Lake Orovil.le --- watershed) -. Rock Creek Roclaimatyon Dist. (West of Chico Airport, south of Rock Creek and east of Hwy, 50 (see wall map) Chico Area Recreation & Park Dist (6nly for 'subdivisions) U.S, Dept: of the Army; Sacramento Dist, Corps of Engineers (near water and in Lural and Mountain areas) SPECIAL CASES* check report for any mention of spedial services or easements such ds to ThermalitO trrigat�.on Disttict. numbered items) ,BUTTE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES PAGE 2 JULY 20, 1992 MCDANILL ELM 9 Place a note on. the plot or mnp_stating "The Health Dept may require an engineered soil import sewage disposal system.' 10 Show the proposed usable sewage disposal area on parcel AP•11-25-67. .Motion seconded'by Bill Eheff and carried unanimously. ---------------------------- Sherry B. Carey, Tentative Parcel Map, AP 27-17-17, 4 parc.els located betwen Dunston Drive and Alta Airosa Drive approx. 600 feet east of Candy Cane Lane. East Ar-oville area. Engineer: SDA John Christofferson of ODA was present. He said that Public Works condit;;on #1 should be RS -8 -LD -II: and not RS -8 -LD -TIT as per a conversation with Stuart Edell on June 17, 1992. He said that the third Health Dept. condition rolor8 to a setback from a stream, which is actually an ephemeral drain. He would prefer t}ie condition to be a 100 .ft. setback if the stream is determined to be a year around stream and a 50 ft, setback if it is ephemeral. Mr. Christofferson said that regarding mitigation measure+#1, he noted that the top of thrs bank in this case is far beyond the edge of the riparian ;vegctation, 1. ).ince the aim, of the mitigation is to protect the riparian vegetati.c..: ho, would prefer to have the part deleted about the top of the batik since that would make a lot of land unusable unnecessarily. Thebank was formed by dredger tailings and is not a natural bank. Also, on mitigation #5 he said that the notes or, the map about oak woodlands should be placed on the additional map' sheet rather than the deed's: Asi teasure agreed to remove the part about "top of the bank` since the point is to protect the riparian vegetations Ms. Leasure stated: having reviewed the environmental review checklist, ;a'nd Conversatidns at this meeting, and the Planning Director's Revised Report of June 12, 1992, 1'Make a motion to adopt A mitigated negative declara"tion for the Sherry Bradford Carey tentative parcel map to create 4 parcel's on AP 27-17-17 finding that the project could have an effect on the environment, but will not have a significant effett,in this -+,case provided the required mitigations erre complied Pith, Those mitigations are listed in the revised Planni,ag Director's Reporthic!-;ever is rester" andgmi.`ti ati.on 5 has been to remove "oz` tap of ni June 1i, l>92. Miti anon #1 has been amen bank w g g amended to delete "it the deedsif and add "on the additional map sheet," The hiotioh is made finding that the JULY 0, Ul TY DEVELOP ENT REVIEW COMITTEE '' NUTE'S PAGE 3 7pjlect is in conformance with, the Butte County General Plan and and Butte County Zoning andithat`theproject is -subject to Fish and Game fees. Having found the above I further move to approve the project subject to the f6llowing conditions and finding that. approval will not be detrimental to the health ;safety and welfare of the people of Butte: County provided, the required conditions are complied with Public Works conditions: 1 Provide two-way traversable access gG_8-LD-II to each parcel -from a county maintained road or state highway.' 2 Access to be reservbd in deeds as per county ordinance and offered for dedication on the f:lal map. 3 Show 50 ft. building setback line measured from centerline of access easement. 4 Provide road maintenance agreement. 5 Deed to the County of Butte 30 ft. right-of-way from the centerline of Di nstone Drive„ 6 Indicate a 50 ft, building setback from the centerline of Dunstone, Drive: 7 Shoe all easements of record' on the final map Provide street, name signs per ,requirements of the Department of Public Works prior to recordation of the ,final. map 9 Provide cul-de=sac ,at`rhe end of the street. 10 Obtain encroachment permit and construct standard road approac�: providing adequate sight distance at the intersection of access road and Dunstone Drive ll Obtain it o ncrachmen permit. f or all driveways, new or existing, and ddhs1:2 Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required. 1� Meet the requirements of the Butte `County Fire Department: Health Dept. conditions. 14 Provide a 100 ft: leachfield free setback arocind ex` t ngr wet s either within the property or within 100 ft. off! parcel 4: of the property boundaries JI I. BUTTE COUNTY 'DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMITTEL MINUTES PAGE 4 JWf 2t) 1992 CAREY, TFM 15 Show a 50 ft. leachfield setback from the draiange way on parcels!--and 2. 16 Show 100 fti leachfield setback from the highwater'line of the creek on parcels 2 and 3 if determined to be a year around stream. 17 Indicate on the map that areas with slopes in excess of 30 percent' are unsuitable for sewage disposal. 18 Show the usable sewage disposal area proven to meet the. requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance on parcels 1, 2'and 3. Planning Dept. conditions# 19 Place a note on the finial map stating: "Development o!:'these parcels may be subject to the payment of Sheriff Impact mitigation ;fees as adopted by the. Butte County 'Board of Supervisors:" I 20 A Development impact Pee for Sheriff's facilities shrll be paid pursuant to the provisions of Chatter 1, Article II of the $utte County Code, prior to issuance of building permits or Use Permit in the case of a mobile home park. Said fee amount will be determined and calculated'as or the date of Application for th4 building pertait or Use Permit. The follow4ng mitigation measures are required: ;tl Show on the filial map a 100 ft. building .setback line from both sides of .Fine Gold Gulch stream. Also show a 50 ft. "No Disturbance Setback"' on both sides )of the stream. The setback shall commence from the outtiide edge of the wetland/riparian vegetation. Place a not»e^on the additional ma" sheet statin "No structures, fill material, or P g excavation shall be allowed inithe No Disturbanct Setback: Vegetation ret0val shall be limited to that necessary for flood control: All native trees, in, a Living. condition shall be retained; All veget'at:on removal shall. be approved' by tfe Dept. of Fish and Game prig, _, o removal. r' 22 Place a 'nounal the additional map sheet; that states'. "Deer Mitigation, fees ac.e to bepaid at the time of obtaining 'building permits if such fees havid been adopted by the Butte County Board of Sapervisors.`r 23 Place a, note cll the final mzpx stating, "Automatir. fire suppression sprinkler systems shall be installed in all new residential; structures In accordandt� with the National Fire Protection Assn. Standard br the a installation of sprinkler systems ill one and two family dwellignt'and mobile homes, NEPA Standard 13 D'. ►r 24 Revd9ditate, mulch protect, or otherwise stabilize exposed erodible, material, on slopes of. 15% or'greater prior to November 1. a BUTTE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES PAGE 5 JULY 20, 1992` CAREY, TPM 25 Meet the requirements from the Calif Dept. of Fish and Game regarding oak woodland habitat by including the following nates on `he additional map sheet. a. No oak tree removal except for that required to provide space for buildings and associated accessories and to meet health and safety standards. b. Establish a no disturbance tecback, commencing Froin the outer edge; of the oak tree canopy and extending outward a distance equal to 1-1/2 of the canopy, radius, around etch tree with a diameter greater than 4" dbh4 No disturbance includes irrigation and roof damaging activities`. c. Retain all snags except those which pose a direct safety hazard. d. No priming or cutting of oaks except for safety purposes. ` Deciduous oaks should be pruned during the, winter dormant season only and evergreen oaks during July — August only. )' Motion seconded ;;y Mr. Erickson and carried unanimously. -------------------------- (Time Extension Requests:) S. Joe Mello Tentat i Ve Pareel Map) AP 40-10-15, 3 parcels oil the West side of Lott Road a pprax. 500 ft southw - of Garden Road. blurham area. Engineer: Not•th star Enoineeri 11g Mr. Farrel made a motion to gvAnt a 3 year extension of ti(W to the Joe Mello tentative parcel map. The hew expiration date to be June 30, 19955 Motion seconded by ;Ms, Leasure; and carried unanimmisly : MEETING ADJOURNED UNTIL 10-15 f1herry Bradford car(�y Ouly 20, 1992 AP 27-17-17 Page 2 CLASSIVIOATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT 1. NOTICE OF EXEMPTION/STATEMENT OF EXEMPT1O[4 A. Statutorily or Categorically 8xempt #25.00 Clerk's Fee )3. , De Minimus Impact - Certificate of Fee Exemption $25.0`0 Clerk's Fee 2, NOTICE OF DBTEIZMiNATION _ FEE REQUIRED Y ) A. Negative Declaration $1,250.00 State Filing Fee 25, 00. Clerk's knee B, Environment 1, impact Report $850:0$';' State Filing' Fee $25.00 r 3, Cx9ER (Specify) ) $ 25.00 CIe-rk Is k'en 1+` The fee should be paid to the Pl#nniftq, Department by August 31 1992, in order for the Notice of De trmization to be. timely. �+ payable, y Butte. �,- filed. Mike checks a ably. to the Count of C The p.ro3ect applicant should be aware that if he or she toes not- remit otCemit payment of the required filing fees, the project a:pprov'Al may be invalid by law and may not be operative, vested or finai, Pursuant to the provisions of public resources Code Section 2105,9 (b), Fish and Oahe Code Sec. 711,4 (c) and Section 753.5 (d) ("1) and (1)4 Title 14, Califo"i,a Code of regulations. Should yoti . have any` questions �r regarding this matter, please contact tt.',s Office at 538-7,266. ti Very truly your, { 0S� art Ed 1 ;. nage't,Land Development Divis-ion Departme'PYt of Development Sorvicses cc Planning )Division Environmental eal h D ::pa tymer�t OSSA j� r 441 f I f ERMINATION l , zr ', N07"i CE OF DET =41 Off ioin'+,f Plan.& Research Dept. 1400 '¢is„it)t Street Sacrarciintr), CA 958,14 -., or � X Buttes 4:ourtty Clerk AO G 0 A 1992 p t 1+Js Butte c!bunty Planning CIaNDACE J. GRUMS— 841t4 r. , Orovitle 95965 By A, Willer. . ocouty 7 Cos.�n�:y Center D , Ott l7OCT F3;li.jg of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 2110b or 2152 of, the Pullilic Resources Code, Pr:04ct Titles 1r,4intat ,ve Parcel 'Map pZ,-j VVMber: 017-A70��Oi7 I�'.amet Sherry Bradfotd Carey stste Clearingh ^uset Ilumber (if submitted to cleazinghouse): None, C ntact Persons S'Liigart Edell Telephone Number: 538=7266 -PtoJact Location: between Dunstone,Dr. and Alta Airosa Dr: approx. 600 ft. east of candy Cane Lane.. Project Descri. tion• p Tentative Parcel Map to 'create four parcels all 5+ acres. ,T"als 10 to advi,'se that the Butte County Deyelobm`a+nt 'Reveiw Committee (Lead, Agency or :Responsible Agency) has approved the above-described project on July 5, 16Cj2, and has made the following determinations Cegarding the above-described p'rojLie t1 1. The prgjact will,. �X will not, ;have ;a .significant effect on the _. OM ironment 2: An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA X A Negative Declaration' aas 'prepared for this p: oject pursuant to ;the provisions of CEQA. 3. xiitiation traeasures )t. were, were not, made a condition of the !,�pp {l of the project. xovz� 4. aof overri.dsng considerations, was, ;_X_ was noti adopted to t)i sprnjeatri This is to ce.ltify that the final EIR with comments and 'responses and record of project r ,approval is u'vailable to the general public at 7County Dri ang Department y e 6rovilldi CA 95965 Date Received far Piling and Pdstihy at OPA _ 8?Lv-y2 Si0hatutd Paula Si tdaa4're Aaaatn1- A1�5nfn1^r.SlJ.;.�r' pev �s:';,NIR�reh.; 1,986 Title ,i t� �- ., !Arnerry Bradford tiati;ve Parcel Map' _ 1 A,19$ 627-1,70-017 i,otion Measure: .. Shot on the f;Lnal map a 100 ft. building setback line from both sides of Fina Go),c? Gulch stream. Also show a 50 ft. "No Disturbance Setback" on both sides of the,, stream. T.he;setback shall commence from the outside edge of the wetlandjriparian vegetation. Place a note on the additional map sheet stating: "No structures, fill material, or excavation shall be allowed int he No Disturbance Setback. Vegetation removal shall, be limited to that necessary for flood control:. All native treen, in a living condition shall be retained. All vegetation removal shall be approve3 by the Departmeilit of Fish and Game prior to removal." 2 Place.a. note�on the additional map sheet that states: "Deer Mitigation fees are to be paid at the time of obtaining building permits if such fees have been yadoPted by the Butte County Board of supervisors. Place a not0l on the additional map stating, "Automatic fire suppression spr{t.nkler systems 'shall be installed in all new residential. structures in accordance with the National 'Fij.e Protection Assn. Standard '.--`�Or the Installation of sprinkler systems In one and two family dwellings and mobile homes, NFPA Standard 13 D." ,d. Revegetate, mulch protect, or otherwise stabilize exposed erodible material on slopes; of 15? -,:or greater prio%'to November 1 Meet the r¢iquirements from the California Department of Fish and Game retarding oak woodland htibitat by Includinrj the following notes on the additional map sheet. a. No oak tree removal ekdept for that required to provide space for buildings and -associated accessol.°ies and to meet healthand safety standards. bo kstcanopy abno end xt dutb4ncesetback, commencing from the outer edge of the oak, 1 g otward a diatance,equal to 1=1/2 of the canopy radius, around each tree with a diameter. greater than 4" dbh. No, disturbance includes: irrigation and root damaging activities., C. $tetain all snags except those which pose a direct safety hazard., d. No pruning or cuttizig of oaks except for safety purposes. Deciduous oaks. should be pruned di;riflig the winter dormant season only and evotgreen oaks during July August Only. III �� FCT ARAT].0 OF FEES -Ur (California Fiske and Game Code Section 711.4) N,,M AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT n Sherry Bradford Carey FILING NO. P.O. Box 260. Oroville; CA. 95965.----.--------�---- CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: 1„ NOTICE OF EXL"MPTION/STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION [ ] A. Statutorily or Categorically Exempt $25.00 dlerk's Documentary Handling Fee ] B. DeMinlmus Impact - Certificate of Fee I, Exemption $25,00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Few 2 NOTICE OF DETER1,119ATION - FEE REQUIRED [X] A,. Negative Declaration $1,250 state Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee .J B Environmental Impact Report $850 state Filing Fee $25,00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee- ee3. 3.[ ;] OTHER (Specify) $25.00 Clerk's` Documentary Handling Fee PAYMENT/NON=-PAYMENT OF FEES: - 1 Xj PAYMENT. The _above fees have been paid.; see attached receipt(s), 2. [ j NON-PAYMENT. The above :fees are_ required., Not paid. Chief Planning Offidial By; Paula Leasuke Assistant Planning Director Lead Agency: Devsalopment Rev rnw Ommmiftee 'TWO CO = -S OF THIS FORM MUST 13E COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED' WITH ALL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMEr'dS FILED WITH THE BUTTE a:OUNTy CLERK'5 01FICE. iREr� COPIES OF ALL NECESSARY DOCIt MENTATION ARE REQUIRED" FOR' FILING. ATI :APPLtt)Ahll )t FEES ARE. DUE AND FAYI►BLt PRIOR TO THE FILING Cat ANY ENVIRONME2rTX6 DOCUMENT WITH THE BUTTE COUN71Y tLEAX'IS ,OFFICE.: MAKE CHECKS PAYE TO THE COUNTY OF btfnisi. 4 ; .4 -7-J13025d REcItIPT 13075 OFFICIAL .RECEIPT COUNTY OF'BUTTE ... PUnLICLAFCO STATE OF CALIFORNIA us VwRIANCEfi PUBLIC r td{ilwp cwv 116ALTH bloc" APPLICANT RECEIVED FROM 155uEb NY r rrct Circ YOTAL tGi/. - IrOx RCGCfVKO WpRk1.. PC.{IMIY! OtlGUMt{1TY REcItIPT 13075 OFFICIAL .RECEIPT COUNTY OF'BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA I, QFFICI: OF PLANNING 1 155uEb NY r 1 il•, i 1 t , • . r 1. a '� • r • 1 • �i ` . r Nl1 r �ti � RfR _ SA, # e Co �un. T. i t,AND OF NHiURAL WEHl7!-( Atv(C3 BEAUTY LAND DEVELOPMENT' DIVISION O:pARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 9005.3397 TF.LEMiONE' (9161538-7206 FAX: (91 61 638-2140 CZRTIFIED MAIL July i0,. x.992 Sherry Bradford Carey R1: AP 27-17-17 . 0. Box 2601 TI-2ITA'TIV8 "PARCEL MAF Ozoville'; CA 95966 Dear Ms, Careyr At the regular meeting of the Butte County Development Services Committee held on July 20, 1.992; the Commmittee adopted a negative declaration with environmental mitigations and approved t.'he above -referenced, project subject to the Conditions listed on the attached sheet: If ha appeals are timely filed --- within ten (10) days of the date of. the Development Services Committee's approval (July 39,` 1992) -- 'with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, this action will be final, when the conditions Of approval are Complied with; it will be in order for you to file your "final map" with the Butte County' Department of Development Services for recordation within twenty- four (24) months of the date of approval by the Development` Services Committee: State law requires that the Department of "'Fish and Game impose and collect filing fees as specified to defray the cost of managing and ptotecting fish and wildlife trust reSburCes, These filitt , fees are- c6lle,cted 0,11ri.ng the environmental review process and are to be paid 'at the time the County files a IlNotice ofLeterm na't 6nI1 with the County Clerk of the County in which the project is locatdd Th;�s procedure is required pursuaht to Section 21162 of the Public Resources Code: To inctease adrninistrat�ive efficiency, the statute delegated the coi],ection of filing fees to.,the County Clerk. The fee requi.ret] i;r., tLnhect .oh with your ,,'project is checked below= Jai f Sherry Eradford Carey July 20, 1992 AP 27-17-17 Page 2 - CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT 1 NOTICE OF EXEMPTION/STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION (; ) A. Statutorily or Categorically Exempt 925.00 Clerk's, Fee B., De Minimus Im a.ct - Cerri.flcate of Fee Exemption $25-.00 Clerk's Fee 2, NOTICE OF DETERMINATION - FEE REQUIRED ( x. ) A. Negative Declaration $1,250,0`0 State Filing Fee $25,00 C3er:k's Fee (, ) B. Environmental Impact Report $550.00 State Filing Fee $25.00 3j OTRER (Specify) $25.00- C erk's Fee The fee should be paid to tie Planning Department by August 3, 1992, in order for the Notice of Determination to be timely filed. Make checks payable to the County of Butte. The project applicant should be aware that if he or she, does not remit. payment of the required filing fees, the project approval may be inva]id by haw and may not be operative, vested or final, pursuant to the provisions of Public Resources Code Sec.tio.n. 21089 E sh and Game Code Sec. 711.4 (0 and Section 753.5 (d) (3) and (1), Title 14 Califarr..ia Cone of Regulations Should you. off any 538s726ns regatdih.g this matte ,, please 3 8i very truly yours, WtiaqetjLand Development. Division: Department of Development Ser;vicet SP,/ds cc Planning Division Ftvirohmental. Stealth Department ODA ,i v SHERRY BRADFORD CASEY, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, AP 27-17-17, 4 parcels located between Dunstone Drive and Alta Airosa Drive approx. 600 ft. east of Candy Cane Lane. East Oroville area. Engineer; GDA V�jblic Works conditions Provide two-way trav�rsoble access RS -8 -LD -I2 to each parcel,from a county maintain:'d road or state highway, Access to be reserved in deeds as per county ordinance :and offered for dedication on the final map. Show 50 ft. building setback line measured from centerline of access easement;; 4 Provide road maintenance agreement. 5 Deed to the County of Butte 30 ft right-of-way from the centerline of Dunstone Drive.. 6 Indicate 'a 50 ft, building setback from the centerline of Dunstone Drive. -.7 Show all 'easements of record an the final map. Provide street name signs per requirements of the Department of Public Works prior to recordation of the final map;; 9 Provide cul-de-sac at the end of the street. 10 Obtain .encroachment permit and construct standard road approach adequate sight distance at the intersection of access providing road and'Dunstone Drive 11 Obtain encroachment permit for all driveways, new or exist_ngl and construct to county standards, 12 Pay, any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required. 13 Meet the requirements of the Butte County Fire Department,. Health De`p't. conditions: +` 14 Provide a 1001 ft, l.eachfield .free setback -around existifig" Wells either within theproperty or within 100 ft, of the property boundaries oh ;parcel 4. 15 Show" a 50 ft, leachfidid setback from the dra ange Wray on parcels Y' and 2 16 Shows 100 ft. 1.eachf field "setback from the highwat6r line of the o Eek on parcels 2: and. 3 if determined to be a year around stream= �, ,t CAREY, TPM 17 Indicate on the 'map that areas with slopes 'in excess of 3O percent are unsuitable for sewage disposal. 18 Show the usable sewage disposal area prove, to meet the .requirements, of the Subdivision Ordinance on parcels 1, 2 and 3. Planning Dept. conditions: 19 Place a nate on the final map stating.: "Development of these parcels may be suu.,ject to the payment of Sheriff Impact mitigation fees as adopted by the Butte County Board of Supervisors,-" 20 A Development Impact Fee for Sheriff's facilities shall be paid puiscant to thm provisions of Chapter 3, Article II of the Butte County Code, prior to issuance of building permits or Use 'Permit in the case of a mobile home park. Said fee amount will be determined and calculated as of the date of application for the building permit or Use Permit. The following mitigation measures are required 21 Show on the final map a 100 ft, building setback. line from both sides of Pine Gold Gulch scream, Also show a 50 ft. "No Disturbance Setback" on both sides of the stream. The setback shall commence from the outside edge of the wetl'andjri.parian vegetation: Place a note,on the additonai"- map sheet stating: "No structures, fill material, or excavation ,shall be allowed in`the No Disturbance ,Setback. Vegetation removal shall be limited to that necessary for"fl:ood control; All native trees, in a living condition shall be retained, All vegetation removal shall be approved by the. Dept: of Fish and Game prior to reinoval.r' 22 Place a note -on the additional map sheet that states; ''Deer Mitigation fees are tpaid time obtaining lofn5upermits if such fees havebeen adopted by y theButteCounty Boardperyi.sors:4" 23 Place a note on the final Wisp stating, 'Automatic fire suppression sprinkler systems shall be installed in all new residential structures in accordance. with the National Fire Protection Assn, Standard fpr the i installation of sprinkler systems in one and two family dwelligis'and ,mobile homes; NEPA Standard 13 D." 24Revegetate., mulch protOct# protector otherwise stabilize exposed erodible material on slopes of 15% or greater prior to '.November 1, 25 Meet the requirements from. the Calif. Dept: of Fish and Game regarding oak woodland habitat by including the following notes on the additional .map sheet a. No oak tree removal except fr)r that required to provide space. for buildings and associated accessories and to meet health and safety standards. Inter-Departmental Memorandum TO: Butte County Advisory Agency FROM: Planning Director` SUBJECT REVISED Report on Tentative 'Parcel Map for Sherry Bradford Carey AP X027-170--017 ,DATE: June 12., 1992 I This is a proposal to divide 21 acres to create 4 parcels at 5f cr_es each. The present zoning is A-5. The band Use Plan Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Agricultural Residential. Theile are no specific or community plans for the a area. .The proposal does not conflict with County Zoning nor any adopted or proposed. Element of the 'butte county General Plan nor any Specific or community plan. A Negative Declar, tion with mitigation measures hats been prepared for the proposed p~oject 111h accordance to the California Znvironmental Quality Act and forwarded to the Butte. County AdViso California Publicency ��lkebourcesithin eC'ode 0 Section/ill uired 105. 1 5 .pursuant The Department' of Fish and Game his ��tated that this pro��ect will impact wildlife and is subject to the collection of Fish and Game fees. Recommend approval subject to the following conditions: MITIGATION MEASURES >I 1. Shots on the anal. map a 100 fti building setback line t om both sides of Fine Gold Gulch stream. Also show a 50' ONO D .sturbapce Setback" on both s' des of the stream; The setbackshaill coinmence from the outside �>f the wetland/tipai ian - vegetat 0nt ai =- .a place a note on, the a,dditibnal m"p sheet statinL,:9 '1140 -structures, fill material j or eIicavaton shall be allotvtyd in. the No n ► sturl7ance Setback. Vegetation remora) shall.' be limited to that necessary. for flood control. All n6tive trees in ,., ,,living o6tdition shall be retained. All vedetati.on removal `shall be �r.,oved 1?y the Department of Fish and Game prior to removal, it 2. Place a h0te on the additional map si ieet that states: fibder Mii: gation r :es are to be paid at the. t me of obtaining building permits if such fees have bd,en adopted by the Butte Cotinty Board of Supervisors . it i Cr {�! 3. ' note on the f ` p stating, "Automatic .lire Place a nal ma ( `' suppression sprinkler systems shall be installed in all new r' residential structures in accordance with the National Fire Protection Association Standard for the installation �,)f aprink�ler syste°Zs in one and two family dwellings and. mobile homes, NEPA standard 13D,�r 4. Rev'egetate mulch protect, or otherwise stabilize exposed erodible material: on slopes of 15% or greater prior to Nov.'L. S. Meet the requirements from the California Department of, fish and Came regaLd.ing oak woodland by including the � �habitat, followingstes i__ �,' ), a. No oak tree removal: except fcr that required to provide space for buiidi.ngs and associated accessories and to meet health and safety, standards. b. Establish a no disturbance setback, commencing from the otzte'r edge of the oak tree canopy a:ad extending outward ". a distance equal to 1 1/2 of the :canopy radius, around each tree with a diameter greater than 411 dbh. No disturbance: includes irrigation and root damaging activities; G.. Retain all snags except those which pose a direct safety + hazard, d. Pio pruning or cutting of oaks except for safety purposes. Deciduous oaks should be pruned during the winter dormant season only and evergreen oaks during X:uly =- August only. _PONDZTIONS 1.1 PlAzd a nota on the f',nal map stating: "Development of these parcels may, be sub;ect to the payment of She riff Ila)7act mitigaetion fees as adopted by the Butte County Board of ' SuperV'isbrs`�r 2. A Development Impact Fee for sheriff � s faca"Ilties shall;. be, paid pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3, Article 11 of ;the Butte County Code, prior to issuance of building permits or Use 'Permit in the case of ,a mobile home parr. said fee, amount will be determined and calculated as of the date of application for the bii ding permit or Use Permit. CBS -ds r Sunt LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AN1) BEAUTY Department of Developinelnt eri�icC, PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE -'OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 959653397 'TELEPHONE, (916,'5;18-7601 June 22, 1992 Sherry Bradford Carey P.O. Box 2601 Oroville, CA '95965 Re Tentative Parcel Map on AP# 027470-01',7 Dear Ms: Carey; The Butte County Deparkrne,nt of Development Services, Planning Division has completed the environla�ental. review of 'your project in accordance with the California' Environmental. ity Act. and forwarded to the Butte County Advisory Agency'within- the required 105Qual . days ,pursuant � the Califon' 6a Publiy Resources Code section 21151.5. In .addition, the Planning Director.- ,report " quired 'by Sections 20.63 and 20.99 of the Butte County , ubdivisi= Ordiraace has been completed. Please find enclosed the Environmental f, �ocumentAtiop/Planning D'irector's Report which has been prepared for your project Please review 4tl1e enclosed Initial Study/Planning Director's Report urith cl7nditions of PP ti� r n. y „ . o� please approval �t app,�GKtble. If you note an errors or omiss" us 1n our evaluate bring theta to our attentlo The EnvironnaPntal Docc=ents and Planning Director's Peport for your projer`t has been; sent to the Butte County Advisory Age ney for thein on. actiCalifonua Coverntnent Code Sections 65950 and 65952.1 requires the Butte County Advisory Agency set hearings 'and App or disapprove your project within six months ,from. the date in which: your ` p edit e sit h, time linut. for yoar project i � � The s>,x month, Advisory .Agency will .:notify 1n application ted by ate law�will odc�urcoft Aug,g, :. ' , you, of the time and place of the public hearing foryourproject If there are modifications to your project; not related to mitigating ari identified impact, re-evaluation of your project shall be required; { .r Ji, 3 `� Ba tte, o.ung — C r,_EP) IRTMENT of PUBLIC 'WORKS' 1MLIAM (Bill) CHEFF, Director 7 COUNTY CE)ITER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFOR`11A 95965 Pt+?`iDt' pt�eti Tatephonec (916) 5S$-7681 RONALD D. hMeELROY 1 G Deputy Director CERTIFIED 14AIL June 12, 1992 Sherry Bradford Carey RE: AP 27-17-17 P. 0. Box. 2601: Tb-k1V1'akTTVE .PARC HL MAP 0rorille, CA 95965 Dear Mrs.: Carey;. Please be advised that the Butte County Advipo:ry Agency will heat your,applicat on on the above --identified property on. July 20, 1992; The Agency will be reviewing the findings tont the Planning Department and will be considering your tentative parcEl map:. Public Works krill recommend the candit:"ons of approval as listed on the attached shE!et. The vieeting will commence at 9-010 a=m. in the Board of Supervisors' 'doom; County Administration Building, 25 Coilnty Center Drive, 0roville, California. office at an), �' S fter, please contact. this If you havee an questions re 'ardan this tr�a1 7266. vej`y =truly yours, tdi] ? am i✓iie�'� Ditector of Public Works Stuart Edell Ass'',stant Director �EJds I atta Bent tc: Luanhing Department Environmental Realth 'department GDA t. i U { SHERRY BRADFORD CAREY, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, AP 27-11-17, 4 parcels located between Dunstone Drive and Alta Airoso Drive approx. 600 ft. east of Candy Cane Lane. East Orovill.e area. Engineer: GDA pvIllic Works conditions Provide two --way trove . ,able access RS -8 -LD -III to each parcel from a county maintained read or state highway. 2 Access to be reserved in deeds as per county ordinance and 'offered for dedication on the final map: Show 50 ft, building setback ,fine measured from centerline of access easement. 4 Provide road maintenance agreement. 5 Deed to the County of Butte 30 f t. ri'ht-of-wa,v from the centerline of Dunstone Drive: 5 Indicate a.50 ft. building setback from the centerline of1unstozie Drive 7' Show all easements of record on the final trap: Provide street name :signs per requirements of the nepartmer,,t of ,zb1c.rrsrk prrr to recordation of the final map. 9 Provide cul-de- sac t. Gthe end of the stye �. I IC? Obtain encroachment permit and construct sta'.ndard road ata'prcach providing td .sight distance at the intersection of access road and Ddnstone Drive 11 Obtain encroachment permit for all drivetiays, new or existing, and Construct to county standards 3.2 Pay ,any delinquent taxeE; or current taxes as required 13Mee} the requirements of the Butte County Fire Department; Inter -Departmental NCemorandum TO:, Butte County Advisory Agency FROM: Planning Director SUBJECT Report on Tentative Parcel Map for Sherry Bradford Carey AP #027=170- 017 DAT8 June 4, 1992 This is a proposal to divide 21:, acres to create 4 parcels at 5+ acres each. The present zoning is A-5. The LandUse Pian. Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Agricultural Residential. There are no specific ur Community plans for the area. The proposal does not conflict with County Zoning nor any adopted or proposed Element of the Butte County General Plan nor any specific or community plan. A Negative Declaration with mitigation 'measures has been prepared for the proposed project in accordance to the California Environmental, Quality Act and forwarded to the Butte County Advisory Agency w shin the required 105 days pursuant to the California Public Resources Code Section 9211S,,;5. The :Department of Fish and Oaxnt ,bas, stated that . x ,hispA. �af'.i �'�'fi1 �'rr"C...t l t '1 +1 � b �• t 1, f t.� d t xT x tmond approval subject, to the following conditioccss MITIGA'T'ION MEASURES 11 Shove on the final map a 100 ft. no disturbance setback along both sides of Fine Gold Gulch stream. The setback shall commence from the outside edge of the wetland/riparian vegetation or top of bank which ever is greater. 2. Place is note on the additional map sheet that states: ":Deer Mitigation fees are to i be paid at the time of obtaining building permits if such fees have been adopted by the Butte County Board of Supervisors.,, i 3. Place a note on the final map stating, "Automatic fire suppression sprinkler systems ;ball be installed in all new residential st `ucture8 in accordance with the National 7r` ,re Protection Association Standard for the installation of sprinkler systems in one a�,O two family dwellings: and mobile homes, NVPA Standard 1.3D," 4. Reyegetate mulch protect, or otherwise stabilize exposed erodible material an slopes of l,5% or greater prior to Novi: 1 Y S. Meet the -requirements from the California Department of Fish and Game regarding oak woodland habitat by including the following notes in the deeds: a. N,0 oak tree removal except for that required to provide space for buildings and associated accessories and to meet health and safety standards, b. Establish a no disbirbance setback, commencing from the outer edge of the oak tree canopy and extending outward a dista;tce equal to 1 1/2 of the canopy radius, around each tree with a diameter greater than 4" dbh No disturbance includes irrigation and root damaging activities. y - ? co Retain all snags except the ;e which pose a direct safety hazard. d, No pruning or cutting of oaks except for safety purposes. Deciduous oaks should be pruned during the winter dormai,� season only and evergreen maks during July - August only, CONDITIONS 1. Place a note on the final ma stating: "Develo rw.,nt of these 7 � P a p par':,c.'is r,Zr1y bj:, to the payment of Sheriff impact mitigation ftp as adopted by tate Fl,& ttc p S".. Board of Supervisor .51'.. ���xerit Xti1 i�ct, F of f S riff - {,p � r i 1 t o� �e rwsa. r.,'[i,,5 rent t0 the pioWims of".Cliaptcr �, Ariirle lT. c;f t1c;1 �tuttc t 6111ity �:�ue, V111JOr t►5 issuance of build n �ercrt?ts or I15o PPrir, :r �h. ',ls uf'a mobile hofbop rk, Said cee amount h x i. �,, r will ;be di tern Fwd and e,Wv alatod .,.as of the date of apphc,1tion for the building per.± Permit, CBS:cs ',e .1 I W oun lop He LA,NGt OPNATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY Department of Development Services ;,Y.�• `'L PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CE14TER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE; (916) 536-77661 June 8, 199 Sherry Bradford.,Carey. P.O. Box 2601 Oroville, CA 95965 Re: Tentative ,parcel Map AP# 027-170-017 Dear Ms. C;irey; The Butte County Planning completed the enmiromnenW. review of your project in accord:Lnce with the .iliforniw 7:nvirownental Civauty Act and, forwa'sde13 to the Butte County Advisory Agd ncy vnith :n the required 10$ days pursrtant 'to fate California Public Resources ("ode Section 211151.1. In addition, the Planning Directory's report required by Sections 20-63 and 20-5 91 of the Butte County Subdivision Ordinance has been completed. Please find enclosed 'tile Environmental Documentation/Planning Director's Report which has been prepared for your project:. Please review the enclosed Initial Study/Planning Director',; Report with conditiom of approval if appliti le. If you note any errors or ornissiorL9 in our evaluation, please bring them to our attention. The Environmental 'Documents and Planning; Director's Report for your project has been sent to the Butte lCotinty Advisory Agency for their action. California Government Code Sections 65950 and 65952.1 require", the Butte County .,Atdvisoij Agency set hearings artd, approve or disapprove your project within aix months froni the date on which your application was received and accepted. The six month time limit for your project mandated by statet lav, will occur on August 11, 1992: The Advisory Agency will, notify you of the time and place of the public hearing f�. your project: )f there are mod% catlow to your project, not related to nilt gating an identified impacf re-evaluation of yotnr project shall be required. a 1 , M 720GfiANn�pyENUE (R0(lf��.,.____.-___k���.�_,____---- II Y CA 96960,ff�1f 53«t; ...�.. a .. Count, ipf Butte PlannJLna4 Department 7 Courtt.�Y Center Drive Proville, CA 95961 ATTg; Craig Sanders tE: Tentati: .Parcel Map ':# 027-170-01,7 S eI rry Bradford Carey Dear Craig; We have just reviewed he Evaluation completed b on of Environmental impact as �' your office. We note that the Section X fPMandatory Findings of Significances ion ch under for all items: ked ! We have reviewed Your recommended. mitigation measures as: shown in Section V inclusi n of item:: 1, 2 3 p ur +client is agreeable td the r page 7 ,r.)f the report. C approval of this protect. and 7, as proposed; into the Final ' Item 04 is an item addressing the preservation of oak trees- client is adamantly oppclsed to destruction of oak trees. iur realizes the value of the trees and hay. Re designed with one except.i Oh fined his improvements in such a manner as to avoid damage to their well being. � g. Our client is not OppoSed to abiding by any reasonable, county wide, Ordinance enacted by the Hoard of be sin leci out to goverowever' feel that -it is unfair for him to Supervisors. Ne does, h e menta i regu:l.a`UOh when fiundti c!d or acre Of blue oaks located in the ioncut area are. heYng, and have been h4rvested, for fire mood. to It is da.fficult to see how the proposed, mitigation measure rel. trees h pp p ` atin, . Y o be im lemented. and enforced: Will all the oak.. have �s t to be ma ed and then inventor e a violation ,_. n has occurred? Khat if a ' hear oak tree year ee if I ,it be dealt with? p How 67e suggest that your proposed mitigation irieasure be delet Y With ed It has seem been alb owed n a happenoUt When viewed With respect to what appeara to be unenforceable: ewhere in the county. It also J�FffY fy: CNRfSToFliC1N L.S. ;. ct APPENDIX 1, COUNTY OV BUTTE _ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM EVAI DATION OF ENVVtONMENTAL IMPACT- Fitz No. 027-170-00 Log No. 91-10.03-02 AP Nb, 027470.01.7 I BACKGROUND 1r }lame of Proponentl 'Sherry Bradford Carty 2. Address of proponentand representative (if app,litable)t p, b. bol° 2601 Orbville, CA 050,65 3. Project descriptlohi Tentative parcel Map divf'ding 73 +sues to create four 5+ acre parcels I2. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIO"NIF.YC�1NCF lis HA"r No DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALOATION - 1, boas the p:ojeet have the potential to degrade tho duality _ V lhi:y proposal Will hot significantly degrade the bnviroemant: of the duvironment, substahtially rgd'uce the habitat' of n fith or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below/ sell -sustaining levels, threaten' to elimihdts i plant or animal egmmunttyo reduce the nwrrdrer or rastridt the range of a, 'rare or endangered plant. Or ehimai or ellm1hata important exempla's of major paribds of California history or prehistoryl 2. boss the project have the potahtial to achieve short-term _ _, k this peoposal will not impede long-term ehvifthmantaj.goals, benefits to the detriment of lehg-tarts environment goalst -.: (A #Mort=term impadt on the environment is one whch bacurs in a 'relatively briar period of time whtla lonij-term impactt'will endure into the futire,} 3. boss the project have jo-;:`_ts which, are individually - " _ X'._. this proposal will hot have a significant cumulative impgtt on the limited but eumulativei� rvsnaiderablel (A pr)ject aaay environment, impact on two or- more separate roiburrdes wb•wr+'tha imiract on eseh resource i s relatively smalli-uut Where the effect . of the total of those impacts on the environmeht is signiftcdnt.) Does the project have envirohmel,tal ef7edts which will P X. . this propose) will not have a sighifteant aduarse effect, on human being's, cause aubstantia1 advbeis Offsets on huiniin beings, either directly or indirectiyl I$i DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial 6vaivatinh _-_ 1j,4t find th'e''p'roposad prbjhdt `COULD NOT .lava a siiiritfitant effect on the ahuirdnhOsht and 'a NEGATIVE bECLARAMN will be prepared, 11WE find that,atthouoh the proposed project COUL6 have a sionificaht effect on the anv',r6nmant, there will het 1,c a :ig'n'if4tant effort In tbli case becau b litTtdA*ION MEASUqES described In a the the attacyec' h±:c bcr.. on skirl• a:d4a Cu file ili'uje:.f', A NLGAtL4C bE'tLXRATION will Iia propered. 3jWE find the proposed project MAY nava a •significant sffact on the 'environmeht, and an NVIA00tNT,AI IMPACT OtObAT is requireds COUNTY lyp hUTTt,piAiydilNG bEP' 'WENT iXtTta iierch 11; 199x BYtu,_il5ldt�Y "f�,�i.h'i-ir•b.E.E — Creiii f5�n�tler�i�— hevfevreel Eh`rq�"Qi' r ontail Checklist * Evaluation of; Envir nmentarl Mmpac 'ENV ITtONMENTAL IMPACTS _LES MAYBE - NO DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 1. iAnao Will the propotal result In slgnificantt a. Unstable earth et editions, or cF,ehgns in geotog r. _.1 X The proposal will hot effect subsurface earth condition %. substrvtturesl b« �ti'sruptionr displaaament, compaction or X� Thi; proposal will resultfn some disraptfbnr displacement, compaction and overcoverlttg of the $0113 _ overcovering of the site as a result bar the potahtfai development, of these additional Names and associated structures, driveways, parking Arent„ a*c; the site has slopes exeeedirg 30141 daysla,ma..t of horse= art tita5e oei i will requi'ra some changes in topography to create level building ane... living areas. The effects of the soil disruption and overcovering are not expected to be significant due to the parcel sizes proposed and low nmol>nt of rainfall the area receives. Significant amounts of additional rune.{f Is not expected; a,. _ Chang* in tbpogYaphy -ot ground surface relief _ _X See the discussion for it4inlb, featurasl I d. 0estiuct,Ioh. covering er, modification of any, „ X.. The site has no unique physical featw,as, unique geologic at, Physical faaturest Inceesse in wind at stater, groxian of soils,, X Thera wilt'ba some potential for 4rosiod due to soil disruptioh, the amount aithb). on or oft Otei of erosion Wi1T hot be significant unless the steeper areas of the site are disturbed. Area that haves"topes of 30 %. or greater should he cvoided far deveibpmaht. In addition. all disturbed' areas that are of erodible mAterial and have a slope of 15% or greater shell be mulch 'protected, rat6tded and Otherwise stabilized prf,,r to Nov. 1. f. Changes 16 deposition oil erosion of beach sands, y X Ti* parcel It travorsnd by pine Gold Gutch stream. The proposed: read will or change► in siltation, deposition ar erosion trtls.s #h"': stream dace. The culvert for the stream crossfng has already been which tray modffy the ehahnel of a river at, stream iait fled .ender permit from the DepArtmeht of Fish and Gane. In addition, the or the bad of the ocean or any bay. inlet 3r 040artniont of Pith and Gane is requesting a 100' no diskurbance sone along laket the stream. This will raduce any erosion impacts to a less than'significant level. The proposal Pay result in 'soma siltation, deposition or at`o%166 of area drainage ways. g.. Loss of prime agriculturally productive soii;; X This proposal does not represent a Aignlftcant loss of 'prime agyfc+xftural outside dasignatad urban areas? soils. hr Exposure of people tlr proptety to geologic X .. _ , Ali of 0utte county is in a Moderate parthqueke lhtensfty Zone VIII. The itaZards tubi it; eorthquakes, landslides. Subject property is located apprakimately 3.5 miles east of the 1975 pal'ermo ground }'allure or s'im,Ilar hazards? mudslides. grou oarthqunke eplcantbe, Construction of buildings to Uniform butlda 'ding Co standards for 3eismid, zone 3 Will provide adequate protactitln to oceupahts In tett of seismic activity. 21 6 Ii:,` 1lill the. 'pteposil result In vubstantialt, A. Air, emistfoAt or deterioration of ambient 'air 7t., the proposal i+411 not affect air quality batituse the Increase in the number quaiity3 of .'vehicle trips is hot signffics.nt. b= The creation 'of objec'ttohable odors. %make oil X:� The 'proposal will not dreata objectionable odort, smoke or fumes, fumes? c. AiteYatfoh of bis movement, inaitture df"-_.: y X the propasal' will hot affkct the stmasphere. tampi'Aturer nr Any chshge in climate. iachily or rdglbneiyl 3. GATt0, will the proposal resin{: In iubtitintinit- v 1 1 A . .. �.... , ._.. 3. Environmental checklist * 'Evaluation of Environmental Impact e., changes in gurrenito or the tours& or direction X. See the diseusslon for item 1f. of Nater Klaveronts in either marine or fresh waters E' b,. 06hges fn absorption rates, drainage patterns, X. the proposal may result in an increase in surface Water runoff due to reduoed or the rat:: and amount of surface runoff? �„ absorption,from Impervious surfacesi and In a. change In the drainage pattern on the site, HoWeverp no signifitant adverseimpacts are ahtfeipated because of the size of the proposed parcels and limited overcoVering. e. Need for off-site surface drainage improvement's, — X Na off site drainage improvements Will be required for this project. incluSInj vegetation r*:M6Val, channellziltion or culvert fhstal'lktiool d. flow ,. Alterations to the course or ' of flood X The proposal will not significantly affect any #foodcontrol channel or water%T watereoursos. e, Change in the amount of aurfat'e Water in hnY _. _ .. X See the discussion for item It. water bcgyt 41 Discharge into• surface waters, of bi any' _., _, X The proposal *AY significantly affect surfaee water quai<ty dud to siltation alteration of surface stater quality, inclodiil retulting from erosion dat%sed by road and driveway construction gild rSra¢1ng but not lisaited to teMptratil", dissolved oaygan of building sites. ,bit should hot be s significant effect due t3 the tll e' or turbidity?', of the parcels that could be developed the 100" stream setback and the v•so of stihdard obnstructl'on prattle., to 10himixt erosiwia g. Altoratfon of the direction or rate of flow of X The ,proposal will not: affect the direction or flow of ground waters. ground Waterst h; clung* 16 the quehtity or quality of ground X__ the proposal will :lot directly affect any aquifer. waters, either through direct additions or, wlthdeawAU, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts be excivationsT i. Reduction in the amount. of water otherwise __ k, The pro,lact will not affect any public crater supply. avetlsble fol- public water supplies? i, Expbiure of people orproperty to water related' , _ X_ The proposal Will hbt,expose people br property to floodthg, hazards such as flooding? 4. PLANT Wr. Will the proposal result In substantial; a, Ehange In the. diversity of spe>:fes,•or':humaer of X.._ Thepr'operty_'does have some rlparian Vegeta"ti" along i;ine said Gulch. the any species of piahts (ihtludi'hg trees, shrubs, Department at Fish and Gema to requesting a 1001 no dev*lapment'setback fr%5* grass, crops* and aquatfe piants)T the creek io pratett the Vaget0ion and stres�t.:, b, keduction of the humbart of any unique, 'gar* br ,_ _ X the site cdhte hs no ,'rare plants. ehdahgered spetiea-ef'plants? g• jhtroductibh of hew speties of plants into an % The propbeal 0 11 not affect exoting plant life creat or ih a barrier to the nbtl a" replehishmapt at eA.ltting sbecleal d. keduction In atreage of boy agricultural cropl __ X - The site dues bot Contain Shy egritultural trepf and is presently developed with bhe single family easidohnu. fir ;A404At Oft, Jill the proposal NtMlt In substantial% �, .lsaspr th t14e, di�eraity tt s1p4t4*%, ar humbnrs k.., The proposal will hot iillnitfcehtly the diversity or huhibar of animal Ms. .ts fi irds, tend Ahimuls beeeu'se the site woes nal support signMthht ahimal life bi itebitat, ngI rep'Eita#, $s!i'sW� stlrnllvf fir'.�:.Saic orgahfisas or `in.,hott�l � ' 4 pironmdtltal" Checklist * Evaluation of Environmental Impact u ue, mare dr .. _�' The site, contains he role Animals, b+ peductloo ersltngeredio the speei suOfers Of animalsly niq -- - t, Introduction of new spetles of animals tato en —yam The proposal will not Affect existing animal life. area; or in a barrier to the migration of+' _ mavtment of enir*-aist d, Doter!btetion of aitfistipg fish ah Myildltte % _ _ the site is located in an area designated hi a epartment area en the Game. provided to Butte county by the Celitornia Dopnrtment of Fish and Geme. habitat? 0evolooment of 5 acre parcels will require payment of mitigation fees when such fees aro Adopted by the Butte county Board of Supervisors, the proposal Mould also result in A incremental reduction in oak Woodland habitat- This habitat is eohsidered important because it provides most of the life sustaining requirement's heeded by numerous animai specios. There has been of oak woddlands in California due to signifitsnt cumulative tosses resitls,nkial, �,ommercialr and other development projects, The California boot, of Fish and Gahie recommend several MM gatloh measures to-protect this habitat. G+ �fDI5E, Will: Vie prapbael result in substahtialt siteporptn the viciottr 9ndeease in noise created on e. Increases ih existing noise 1'evelst _ �_ % The proposal 0!111 hat Mes?1t iii a substentinl oiso lslelsY % the proposal Will hot expose people to severe noise levels, b. Qxposur• of people to severe h LIGHT AND WA—RCL Will the propcreaoitel produce sijnifileatt %, the proposal will not result in a substantini increase in light or glare ted on site or in the vicinity. light —Ad 01er8l "46 usg. 91,111 tan proposal result in a substantial aX The phoposAl will not Altar the dead use in the area, 8, ltdratirn of'!hR iirakent ar plalnad land uaa 6f an areal g� substentioi5 Wilt tNe Pu{ pawl result tti NATURAL RfSa11RCE5. �I� the prapo"l Will hot effect any natural resources, A. Inrretse in the rate of a of GOY nature;- reseurcesl lac prdpoiel b+ Depiction of any nen=tenowab'le natural resoureesi lf_ ' WI'1 not tlopleEe Any natural rbsourco"s. to, ttiSlC 0. Ups Y. Will the 'proposal invoiyet e jk risk of exploaiotr lir reloese of ha#erdaus _ X the proposal will not involve lha use of hazardous h m arinlsi rat is located J ._ :+ sr.lsitnhchs (lnciuditig, but hot iimiked Eo, bill � dose to eny''feciliEias whish alcor• or: utilize 'each materials. pesticides+ chemicals or radiatibn) in the *bot x of an accideh! or upset candltibhs? pos"sibl"e %terferefid6 With. ah amergency response the propo el 14111 not affect "any smargency seriiees. e'er one evhcubtion 'pwit en ar, in. rg Y e a ea bttausa plan the r a of p u aki n Affect the o 1 A Ei f p p _, %. The proposed will not signiot n y iY, pOPULAtICti. Will the propoaai' a1Enr loeatibni the proposed density;rloea not exceed that planned and bding'dovelopnd in the distribution, dahsti:y Or growth rate of the human Area, pdpudatl°n`ekiatiM housing The prbpasal will not s+gnificantly affecE housing demand, Yx+ GU}t SINd. Wtdl the 0"06441 affect create a demand for iddltional hauling? 114 TOANS 601dtUN)CYhCULATION. Will the peopesbl ebtuit ilkt iineratidn of substenkiad Additional vehicle, %... the. propa'sal will represent a mihar fincremental increase in traffic i.ti the d+ areA, The area reeiis hove 'lite dhpacity to handie the Additional traffic, awvemontl ' F �vironmental" Checklist * Evaluation of EnViront"ental Ini pact b, Effects onexisting park Irig fat II ItIas, or demand X The proposal Hill not affect parking because the proposal will have to comply for new parking# with the parking requirements contained within Butte County Code taction 24- 35. V, Substantial impact on existing transportation " x The proposal will represent a minor ihcreaae in congestion and malhtanance systemsl requirements on Area "ads that will not be significant. d. Significant alterations to present pagttorhs of circulation or movement of e0ple and oPgoods? People x The proposal will "not alter the present pattern of eirculttioh in the area, - a. Alterations to waterborne, rail or, air traffic? R The propposa.. l will hot affect rail or air` traffic f. Increase in traffic r hazards to motor- vehicles, bicyclists or padestriansl k The pro oxat will result in a minor incremental increase in traffic and related traffic hazards in the area that will not be significant.. 14. PUBLIC-SERVICES.Vill the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for newer altered government services: Fire: protection? 7_ the proposal will result in 'an ihcremahtal increase in demand for flet protection in too arae. The Butte County Fire DepartmentlCaIItorn ia blvision of forestry has indicated that Cumulative deVelop ht in rural areas Will impact their, ability to provide firs protection servites. They have stated that installation a` automatic tiro $upprassioh sprinkler systins in residential structures, the use of fire rosistance building material% and avatar supply systems adequate to 'support the sprinkler system will reduce the demand far p fixe rotection service's. B. Polito ,Protect ant % The proposal will result in an 'incremental increase ih demand' for police protect oh in the area. The goa"rd of Supervts>iYs has Adopted a Shwi'f' Impact' mitigation fee that is coilbetod at the time of building permit submittal, This condition redutds the impact to patioe services to a lass than sisi.ifics.ht Laval+" Tho pYnposnl Will result in an 'Incremental inci'easi iii demand. for school' services in the tree that is mitigated by the collection of School impact' faes� fioWeVor, the broville Elementary S:hool Mittict has stated that thio tea does hot fully cbvetr the impacts of development, the applicant must, contact the school district for additional mitigetians. d, parks or other recreational 'ficil W eit % ., The proposal will Yasult th a Minor incremental 'Wereise iii demand for park and reereW on facilities in the Area that is fiat jean as signlficant. Nawever, the Feather River Recreation and Parks bistrict fuels there is in impact that needs to be addrassed.. At present that,* are he adopted recreation ihipact fees for thii< alstrict and the County ren hot initiate 'ir Adopt foot without WbIrmatibn from the bistriet. th the interim, th,� a01plica6t flay With to contact the: District to dist'us± tho impact. \, e. Malirtankhce of public facilities, iodluditig `X The 11 pYoposbl Wf11 result. in A 'niiMor indr-dMihtel' lncrease''tn :he Beed tor'I toads l #aaintehance of .'bads Air ;ler public facilities to the it6ik that isnot seem( at significant, 'to ether governmental Eervtcest 1.+111. ra►ttit in a Minor incremental '+l+creasei in demand for ail otrrr geuar a*` shat'cos it the xraa that Wihot be sioifiei Will hot 16. blEndy, Will the proposal result int p AO Use of EubstAiltial amounts of furl or 'ahergy? X..: The proposal Will hot utilike ioblitaritiel feel ar ehergy. b,ubstantial txI iodeerae'r, k,"' The pl`oposai will hot tubstantiAl'1y increase the demand for anergy, require the deVn ntiafibf how sources of endrat lb, Utti-Al'tet.. Will thi proposal rasult in a need far hew nvi�ohm,ental 'Checklist `* Evaluation of Ehviron' Oientsl Impact systems. or substantial alterations to the follow nor a, power or natural gest_ % the proposal will not affect electrical power or natural gas distribution systems. b. Commuttfcsitions systams] 4, k_. The proposal kill not affect eaminieatton system!:. C. water availabilityd __ _^ w,% the proposal' will not affect public water systems. d'. Sewer or septic systems? _ ,- X- Theproposal will have: to meet the requiremei!ts of the butte County a Envirohmental Health Dept. e.. Stow O*tsr dr,slnagef .% The proposal will have to provide a petr-anent solution for dralnage. Y. Solid waste and disposalf k the proposal x01 not affect solid mast* disposal. -, 17... MOAN HEALTH.. Vill ;tie proposal result in: s. Ceeat bh of any health hazard or potential hazard „X The proposal will not create, any health !lizard. (excluding menta) health)? h• Exposure ,bf people to potential .bealth hizardsZ X,.. The propose! will not expose people to any health hazard 13. AESTNE11CS, Hill the proposal result th the obstruction k The proposal will not result In an aeithatically offensive vl,* bieause it of an s y; cenic gists or view opeh to the public, or Will the is conilstehIt with turroundino developmeht. Ordooresult ILOthecreation of an aesthetically sal afeenF ve site open to the public view! 10. LECRtnLt M, Witt the proposal result ih an impact upon the Sev the discussion toe tea idit. qualtly or, quantity of existing recreational opportunitios2' _X 2C. OJOUftAt RESOUncts. I a. will the 'proposal result in the alteration or k ., the proposal Will trot affect ircheoloolcil sites. An archraologieal survey destrocitfon of a prehistoric or historic of the property has ,beth pertarned and clearanea is reccasaended. archaeological sitet ' b. 'Will tha proposal eojlt th idvarse physj'dal at- x The propasal will not affect historic sites. desthat'lc effects to a prehistoeje or histbric bulidirig, structure at, abJectt 4. Does the propaWl rave the potential to Cause a k',.,, the prapxtil will 'not affect dulturil resources. physttal chehy6'wtwith would affect unique ethnic tultural 'wxluest d. frill the propbkal raitritt existing religious or � 1C. The proposal will asst & ,,ct r6114tous resouecati. sacred uses Within the potantial inhact areal A I� tarp Checklist * Evaivation of Environmental �.:. Svironrners nmea7tal Imptkea 7 2L. SUGGESTED 'MITIGATION MEASURES r. Show on the final map a 100 ft, no disturbance tetbeck along both sides cof pine Gold Gulch stream. The setback shall Commahce from the oUtside edge of the wetland/riparian vegeta ion or top of bank which toot is greater. 2„ Place a note on the additional map sheet that stetesl "Dean Httigation fees ora to be paid at the time of obtaining building permits if such fees have bean adopted by the Butte County Board of Supervisoes.I ?- place a note on the final mapstating. "Automatic fire supprosaion s H"Oer syttems shall be, Installed in all new residahtial structures in accordance with the Nations! Fire Proteotfovi Association Standard for the installation of sprthkler systems in one and two family dNallings and mbbile homes, tlhpA Standard 13D. The purpose of the instillation at "pHhkler systeins is ion additional safety and property :protection in the avant of residential fire's. This installstioh will reduce the demand for structural fire protection services 1n those instancab" where they are- Ihstel!ad ." K. Moet the requirements from the California Dipartmant of Fish and Game regarding oak woodland habitat includings v, a., No oak tree removal except for that required ,to provide apace for buildings and associated acbessories end to meet health j and safety stenderds. 6, Cstablish a no disturbance satbocki commencing from the outar edge of the oak tree canopy cnd axtehdtng outward a distance equal to one-half of the canopy radius, - arouhd each 'tragi, lie distuebihce 'includes - irrigatioh and root damaging Attivitiet. c. Retain all snags except those which pdbe a dtva t safety ha}ar _ d. No pruning at- cutting of eats except fiat safety purposes. beciduous oak's should be pruned during. the winter dor"aht teeson"only_ .. and evergreen, oaks during July - AugOst ' only, S. Place a note on the final map atating3 PDevelopinent bf those, parcels may be subject to the payment of,; Sheriff Impact mitigation fees as adopted by 'the Butte County Board of 5upervis'nrt"'' S. Zbntatt the Crbville klementeiy School bisttlet and enter Into ah agreihisnt-to mitigate school impact'!, 7* Aevegetataif mulch protect, 6P otharwisp stabil.iao expesed erodible matoelal on slopes of 15X br gro6ter prior to Nov.1, U + r. =EnVirg,ninnental Checklist i=valuation of Environmental Impact 8 A6. ,➢roiect Description IMTA SNEE7 1. Typn of ProJactt Lend division d.; Annual Rainfall (normal): 28 inches per year, perdrayear, e• Limiting Fectorsi Steep lopes neer courses Z. Brief Tentative parcel Fxep dividing 21 noes }o 5+ Viswl/Scenic qualitl.: God. + bd,.bpttoht four 5� er,s perce11, create 3. Location: Located on the westaida of Duhstohe Drive approximately mile 7. Acoustic quality:. Good+ south of Grubbs Poed, east of palermo, "'7 4. Proposed Air qualityt Good Density of Developments 1 DU per 6 acres, a nlonicel' Envtronmentt 5+ Amount of Impervious Surfaciiigs Minimal+ a. Vogetationz Oak woodlands 'vegetation type With 6, Access and blic �' property outage on some riparian vregetatioh along Fine Gold Gulch 0unstune Drive, !r -p -- - 9+ Wildlife Habitati Small birda and animals oommon' to-vaYley grasslands-, Noh�critiCal %+ MatFind of Sieterresbinuaaal.RoI dividual setie s sta g - p Y alsi i winter habitat for the deer he6' Source of Nate Bas, r Supplyt Individual wall(� ,Chliurai EhW ronmtnti l prow imity of Power Linaat To p'ropnrty. 10, Archaeological andill sto'r{cd1 Raaourcas in the stoat NoneS: 30+ Potential for further lend divisions and develo + pment.: Nona 11; Butte County General Plan des{gnat{on: Ar;rioultural Residential ,_ existing zontng+ under 12.; .,, C#tlsting 'Toning; A-5 $r Environmental 5nttinn 13+ Existing Land Use on-site. Restdbhtlalrbpell land phys/enl EnVfromm�ht: 14. Surrounding Area: 1+ Terrain a+ Land Uses: Aural eesideht al and grazing Uses b. Zonings A=5 a; General Topographic'Cbaracters Rolling fosthiiis. b+ Stupes- 0 to 30 % c+ Gen+ Plan Dosignetion: pg'ricultuCs qac{den}tel d; c. Elovationt JGO to &60 feat above sea level. Parcel S{zdst n ate, to $Ot cults °+ population' Limited d+ Limiting Paotors: Some slopes over 3G% 2> 5nila Aroe;_Rulel tharact15+ Corning Grevelfy 36hdy Loerti u Types and Citaraetes a rt The aurfaua is NearestUrban Area: Orovill appro"mately id m{lbs to the sail d n reV,to-brawn gravelly sandy loam with e d'{sltnc[ ya11oN tint, 1" to L think, with a granuiae 17; north Relevant Spheres of lnfluencot peetliar River 'parks structure. The subsurface is a pale ,reddish+brown gravelly seedy loam ton Amereation Distelct and depth of a" fo 12'x, The subsoils to a depth , of 24" to 520, It a pets red or yellawlih lred compact 18 1mProvcments Standards Urban Area: No gravelly material conte{n{ng nUmerout cobbles. water readily ansa moist and retcins it watt. It absorbs the 14+ Fire Protection`Servlcet "1116g4 but ganeraily smooth'. Surface drainage esia ltshad. steeper slopes surface is IS Well, a+ Nearest county (Stets) Fire Stations Statioh iit approximately are subjetit to erasion. 4"mlles away. b. Vater Limiting Facibrst it to poor tubsurfeuo drainage Ka only. E 3+ Naturalitaterdl of the Lad r Schools in AreeAvb o {11e lementar�and Ni h School tiistriel, y g a+ Earthil"ka Zonet Moderate Earthquake Ihtan tty tons V111. �'. Erosion Potentials Nigh on steeper slopes Landslide Potential- Low d. Fire rliaznrdz Very High ev Expansive Soli PotenEidlk High 4. itydro e9y s.- Surface Iditert the parcel is traversed by pine Ga d Gulch b. Ground Watert Unkhoµn <. r+ brain"-do Charactnriaticsi the Parcel`dralhs to thi east to Pins Gold Guich: is vironmental Checklist * Mrah),'a4filOn of Environmental impact w ENVIRONMENTAL MATERIAL 9 11 Butte County Planning Department. Urthauaks and Fault Fault Activity Maxi 11-1, Sei sr,�ta_c_ fe EIeE Oroville, CA. CH2M Hill; 197.x r�n1'" 1''• autce County Board or supervisors: ButtAaticultural pr, serves Maio, established by Count PlanningDeparte, �,. ao ifn Potential Mao a6olutin.N koo RU =17 8. 'Oroville, CA:Butte Bt`,e County -an,ling Department, 19,874 CH2M Hill,197. 134 National Vkod TI -A rance Program. Flood 3. Butte County Planning department:+ ; Ubb'aEmnb : and insurance Fte t;ct�cs. Federal Emergency Management 8,goi,c�,O 1989. Landslide potential MaR 111-1 ti oroville, CM CH214 HI-lIj 1977. 14. USGS Quad Ra'au, Erangbr,, Calif. 4 But te County Planning Department Vii, jai �n __. Potential Mai 111-2: Safety Tem; l..�, Or6viIlgj 154 Soil Man, ch'ict� 19251 loroville (19261 -CA CH2M Hill, 1977+- - Area. United atittes Department of Agriculture.; 5. Butt: Count Planning De .t��-tmenm"�"' Y 9 P k n iiv� ��y� is Man, t,. yrov 1.i,e G'A Safety elemeg� 111-3,♦ `' F 5 �Cj �C..r 16. So11, survey of Chico (19251 lorovil.le Hi r Hill 1977 L19261 _Area. tt.iited States Department. of , � Agriculture.. 6.. CountyButte Man TVlsceniaf� ing Department. t�« eui :elwf +rat ahway. element leo ' Y4! 17 Butte County Planning DepajAhlent, Butte Counter , ., CH2F( Hill, 1977. Fire_:PY.ot ctl JuO adictions and _ _ ' But `e ccnlEat� fire 7 But y g partment r 2!'"L4.4w H,'� ab` -o � Decartmeet aid Cul3,iicrnka Department p Forests 19,89. nt of Map�V-�10 ScenpoaHiahwgy-Element Choi e11,le, Y CH2M Hill, 19774 8. Butte Count PlanningDepartment. Hazard classes;. Mal> 11-41 safety 51 Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill; 1977. 9+ Butte CountyPlanningDe artment. SensitiVityMan. Orville, CA' Lfam .li 1983. 10:: Butte County Planning Department„r YL-ADy.°„ictt Max,, OroVille, CA 11� ivorthwestern District Department of Wtittei Resources: Chico Nitrate, Studw IIAO .. Uoncentration in Shallow Wells. ":he cis sourF&$B Agency, State of Cali.fotnia, 198:1. L� ti ` 511 ' _ I , . l _t _ �r� T f $ ,E O ��! � 0 _ a - 3. Preparation of a report which identifies project effects and recommends INTRODUCTION appropriate P ro riate mitigation measures for any significant sites identified within. the APE`. This report details the results of an archaeological 'inventory survey of a proposed subdivision pro ectinvolving a total The remainder of the present report ofc. 2.1' acres. of land located adjacent to the detailsT the results of the records search and west side of Dunstone 3rive and a. short: inventory survey 'work and provides a distance north ofHoncut Creek, in southern - professional: assessment of the cultural Butte. Countynear'Bangor, California. Land resources which might be affected by the use change involving future residential and:. proposed undertaking. All; field weak related''. developments will follow Butte procedures followed guidelines provided by County I- provat of a tentative. parcel map' the State Historic Preservation Office which has been submitted by GDA (Sacramento) and are in conformity with Engineering ofOroville,. Califbmia, on behalf . accepted professionalstandards. _ of the owner,, Ms- Sherry Bradford. Carey: According t& agency definitions,, this level: of development. cogst Lutes an LOCATION - "undertaking" which could adversely affect cultural resources which might be Iocated within the area of potential effect (APE). The Carcyproject area is irregular in Evaluation of project tffects to such shape and consists of atotal of C. 21 acres resources is thus- required by Butte County located within southern Butte County;., rules and regulations, pursuant to CEQA and, bordered on the east by Dunstone Drive and generally, in compliance with. Section: 106 of Fine Gold Gulch along the south by an the National` Historic Preservation Act. and its existing electrical distribution line, along the implementing regulations (36 CFRPart 800),, west. by Alta Arosa Drive, and along the Section 2(b) of Executive Order 11593, north by the centerline of a shallow, Section 10`1(b)(4) of the National ephemeral drainage which, trends easterly and Environmental Policy Act, the Archaeological empties into Fine Gold Gulch adjacent to Resources Protection Act,,, and other rules and: Dunstone Drive. As shown on the USGS regulations. For the present project, these Bangor, California, 7.5' series quad, the requirements translate into" the following: Carey property is located within a portion of general archaeological, study objectives:. the northeast quarter of Section 1:3 of Township 1`8 North,. Rang, d East (see. Undertake an, inventory, and evaluate the - attached "Archaeological Survey and Project National Register of. Historic Places '' Location Map") . - (NRNP) eligibility status of properties which may, be directly or, ir.'irectly The parcel is located within the affected by proposed future lowermost foothills of the northern Sierra: developments. These general objectives, Nevada,Mountains at an approximate average in turn; require completing the following elevation of c. 500 feet above mean sea level. specific, tasks: Vegetation. consists of a mixed Foothill Woodland Community comprised of avariety I, A recordsl search to determine ifany of oaks, pine,, and brush species.. A. previously recorded sites exist within the permanent or, semi. -permanent source of water projectareaT wasprehistorically available: on-site in the form of Fine Gold Gulch; the confluence of 2. A pedestrian. fieid survey of` the this stream with.Honcut Creek, itself'a fairly property in. order, to record and_ evaluate substantial water source in this area, is previously unidentified resources* and, located approximately l mile to the southeast. - ,ptglrcr V-5: Cart Sulscl i a�, �Y t 1 rcs �lr r t?xr r F The land is. currently undeveloped PROJECT CONTEXT except for (a) evidence of intensive past dredging along Pine Gold Gulch, and (b) moderate-Ievel disturbancetoa portion of. the Several types of information were to evaluating the types of southr'iestem portion, of the property during construction of a modern residence and considered relevant archaeological sites and site distribution associated outbuildings and access roads. which might be encountered within the Major residential, and.other developments, ,are; currently in progress within the immediate present protact area. The inFormation. evaluated prior- to conducting field work and general vicinity in conjunction with rapid includes data on regional prehistory, residential; expansion out of the: Oroville ethnography, and early historic developments locality. in the region. Prehistory: The earliest definite evidence of human occupation in north RECORDS SEARCI3'. central California is from: site CA -SHA -475 located north of Redding on Squaw Creek, where a charcoal based C-14 date suggests initial Native American presence around Prior to conducting the field survey work, thaarchaeological' records;maintained 6,500years ago, with continuos use of the - region indicated on the basis of evidence by the Northeastern California Information. from this and other' regional sites.. Most of CenteratCSU-Chico were examined for any historic sites the, arti factual material dating to this early time suggests cultural affiliation with the existing recorded prehistoric or within orimmed'iately adjacent to=the, project period Borax Lake area -- the presence of Targe area (correspondence dated December 11, from Information. Center, to GDA wide -stemmed projectile points and manos and metates being them wcpromnentartifact: 199 1, Engineering,- Inc., Oroville Califomia). The existing records identify the following types represented.: Tl:e possibility exists that, this earl; culture represents Hokan-speaking' existing conditions: peoples who were also ancestral to those who subsequently expanded into the northern Sierra Nevada, the southern Cascade, the 1. Previous survey. None of the. southern. Klamath and the northern Coast present project area has, been formally. Range areas. Thesepeoplc may represent the Sacramento Valley occupants in surveyed for cultural` resources; earliest Tehama, and Butte Counties as. well - 2. No prehistoric or. historic sites Sometime around A.D. 100-200, the are. currently recorded.wiunn or immediately first major disruption of this presumed` adjacent tor the Carey property, although numerous prehistoric. and historic sites have. Hokan-speakin population by Penutian immigrants occurred. Eventually these later been identified within this area of southern arrivals displaced at least some. ofthe Hokan Butte County; populations who had been occupying the Sacramento Valley floor and the margins of the Sacramento River :s far as the Oroville 3.: Inview of estimated levels of area; at the time of contact Euroamencan cultural resource sensitivity,: the Northeast populations, these Penutian-speaking peoples CaIiforniainformation-Center-recommended were still expanding. into areas previously' that an appropriate level o fpedestriani survey occupied by Hokan-speakers. Presumably introduced. by the Penutian-speaking peoples be undertaken within the project area,; followed by preparation of a report were more extensive, use of bulbs and; other containing recommendations for any additional work which might be justified on plant foods, animal and fishing products processed with mortars and pestles, and the basis ofspecifc findings. perhaps the bow and .arrow and associated i Project 92-S2S Catry Sobtiiyis 21 pa, c� 44cm {year &vVc small stemmed -and comernotched projectile: points. (1) surface scatters: of lithic artifacts and debitag;, associated with: dark t h n a sr r. a n iiy; The Carey "midden" deposits resulting. from village' encampments, development parcel is Iocated within territory some of which were occupied:' which- was occupied by the Northwestern Maidu, or Konkow Indians (Riddell 1978; nearly year-round'. For the present project area, the most likely location of suet site, Figure l),. although the property is located would be benches orllatsadjacent or close to, Fine Gold Gulch; close to the border separating the Konkow from the Nisenan Indians to the south - ;and southeast. The basic social. unit for of (2) surface scattersof lthic all the Maidu and Nisenan. was- the: family, although artifacts and debitage without: associated middens, resulting from thevillagemayalso beconsidered;a.social,.as welt as a political', short-term occupation andJor specialized ecor omic and economic, unit. Villages were usually located: on flats activities; Idjoiningstreams`andwereinhabited mainly in the winter as it was necessary (3) benrock milling stations, to go out into the; hills and higher elevation zones to including, especiallymortar ;ioles but occasionally metateslicks, where app-,-- establish temporary, camps during food gathering seasons (ie., priate bedrock outcrops are available; spring, summer and fall). Villages typically consisted of a scattering of bark houses from (4) isolated finds af aboriginal -,numbering four or five: to several dozen in larger' artifacts and flakes. - villages, each house containing a single family offromthreetoseven people. Larger villaSes,, with from twelve to fifteen historic Contex:; Historic or more houses,.mightalsocontain anearth lodge. evidence exists to document that some of the Spanish and Mexican exnedi_ions and early As with all northern California Indian fur trapping ventures may base ccme through and made brief stays within the groups', economic life for the Maidu and: Nisenan revolved around hunting, fishing: general project vicinity. It was during one such and the: collecting of plant foods, with deer, expedition that Arguello nc, er the Feather River itself. However,- the first major acorns,- and salmon representing: primary staples.. The collection and processing, of incursion byWhite men occurred during the Gold Rush these various food resources was accomplished with the use of period;. The pIa`er lodes of regional streams, particula ly 1'- oncut and wide variety of wooden, bone and ;stone artifacts., Moreoverr these Indian people& were very Wyandottei Creeks and their tAutaries, were vigorously mined shottl:y a4ier 1850,. For a: short sophisticated in terms of their knowledge of o period (between c.. -952-55), mining grew so rapidly that viriukcly all: aspect; of y the. uses of local animals and plants, and° of the availability of raw material sources traditional Native, America r aldisappeared which cauid beused in manufacturittg immense as Indians were efthe'r, fer{ , out of the :,rea an array of primary and secondary tools and completely or, in some ch err conscripted as laborers on wllite-oNvrc implements. However, only fragmentary .,rcrations. evidence of their material culture remains, due in part to perishability, and in -.part to Once tht 'easily extracted gold deposits the impacts to archaeological sites resulting- from began to .li;nt ;ish,. more and more residents turneJ to Fal.,mipg and ranc::?ng, later (historic)' land uses. Bascd on the results of previous survey work within the Ho never, new tecl ii urs of mining and ncNv sources general and immediate, project area (e.g., Jensen and Wren 19.78; Jensen 1989- a; Jensen of Iabor (R"l:inese. in particular) ushered in a second - -;Bing era which peaked 1.990a; 1-990b;. I990c),. the expected range of prehistorickboriginaf site: types included during the 18$0'r ''exposed' quartz veins led to explotator , rrtr.t g operations throughout the following: the general pro:- --, vicinity, and -numerous adits were bory.J in search of high quality Project 92-S25 Carcy,SabdivI on7, a 21 A=ncarRwgor i'aga4 lodes which could be, profitably extracted. stream. cjurses, and the north-central portion Many of these adim and shafts are identified of the: parcel which. is dominated by sloping on existing maps, incl;rding,the USGS quad. lands away from water courses.. sheet ;for the present project area. Mine Approximately 65% of the project area was tailings piles are ei. prominent man-made inspected in this fashion. features which attest to the extent of earlier mining activities,; some of which date to the. In addition; to implementation of the latterpart ofthe 19th, with, the latest major above field survey strategics, in searching for episode occurring during the 1930's. cultural resources the surveyors took into Extensive tailings debris, dating to this latter account the results of background research: period-are curtcntlyshown for that'-portion of (outlined above) and inspected with particular Fine Gold Gr*lchwhichproceeds north-south`, care knolls, terraces, ridges, mid-slope through the eastern: portion of the Carey benches, bedrock; outcrops, and any other property. Most often such tailings piles are landforms likely-to be archaeologically most not associated- with additional; historic-era. sensitive. The surveyors were also alert, for features, but occasional a variety ofmining- any unusual contours, soil changes, and habitation-related features (structural distincti = r vjccc YL-Jla 6mY Sdb&v cn. C. 21 Acres nest Mtngar PW, S : visibility anywhere within the project area, none recommended for this feature in relation and no other obstacles were encountered to nofential effects which may derive from during the course of field work. Carey's,proposed subdivision and residential.` development project. PROJECT FINDINGS CONTEMPORARY ELEMENTS PREHISTORIC RESOURCES, Evidence of contemporary use and activity was; observed in the form of existing fences, access roads, an existing occupied Evidence ofprehistoric activity was residence with associated outbuildings, and. observed` at two Iocales within tha project small quantities of contemporary trash. None area, both of which consist of isolated of this material represents potentially unmodified flakes of basalt (1) and obsidian significant cultural data, and no further. (I): A thorough examination of surrounding treatment is warranted, or recommended. lands failed to identify any additional - evidence of prehistoric use or occupation, and both finds were treated as non-significant RECOMMENDATION "isolates-` It is possible that additional evidence of prehistoric activity may once have existed, but that: it was destroyed or Neither the prehistoric waste flakes` coveredwith tailings associated with historic (2) observed within the project area, nor the and/or modem mining, especially, dredging, historic ditch segment. (l), are considered along Fine Gold Gulch., significant for residual information content or other values. The present level of archaeological recording and documentation EARLY HISTORIC RESOURCES; is seen as having effectively mitigated any adverse effects which the proposed. Carey residential subdivis'tls� may have on these Evidence of potentially early historic three isolates, and no further treatment is activity' was observed along the west side of warranted or recommended. Fine Gold Gulch in the form of"a segment of' ditch. The ditch segment extends In view ofthe absence of significance approximately 70 meters north -south within for these three isolates, and based on the the project area, averaging I meter in. negative findings elsewhere within the project maximum width and 0.6 meters' average area, archaeological, clearance i s. depth. No additional features or -artifacts recommended. for the proposed Carey were observed in association with the, -ditch subdivision project, with the following segment, which diverted water from Fine general provision.- rovision:Gold GoldGulch, perhaps. to expose the bottom for mining operations,. orperhapsfor use elsewhere along the creek: or along, Honcut `ThF present, evaluatian a n d Creek to the south. In any case, the 'isolated recommendations are based on the segment of ditch is not considered significant findings of an inventory -level surface according to CEQA Guidelines, nor would it reconnaissance. There is always the qualify for inclusion on the National Register possibility' that potentially significant of Historic Places under any of the relevant_ unidentified, cultural materials could be significance criteria. The 'location of the encountered duringthe course of future feature, recorded. as an historic "Isolate", has! development and construction activities. been identified. on the attached Survey Area In such. a situation, archaeological and Project Location Map. No further consultation should' be sought treatment or consideration iswarranted, and immediately: PMICct 21 v$ Omy S'ubdlvlslaar e. 21: Actr3. near Blum.: t 6 REFERENCES CITED' AND/OR 1U`TILIZED Clark, William. B. 1970 ColdDistricts of California'. Califomi� Division of Mines, Bulletin 1.93. San: - Francisco, Callfbmia. Elsasser, Albert R. 1960 The Archaeology of the Sierra Nevada in California and Nevada.. University of California, Archaeological: Survey Report No. 51. Berkeley. Jensen,: Peter MV 1977 Cultural Resources Overview and Recommendations for the Proposed Southeast Chico Redevelopment Project Area, Butte County, California; Prepared for Cook and Associates, Orovillc, California. Report on. Filc,. Northeast Cali fornialnformation Center,. CSU -Chico, and City of Chicox Califomia. 1984 Archaeological Survey of 6500 Acres within the Coon Hollow Land Exchange of the, Plumas National Forest. Report on File,,Plumas National Forest, Quincy,. California.. 1985 Archaeological Suryeyof 7000 Acres within the Galen-Campoodie Area - oftha Plumaq NationalForest, Report on Tile,_ 1'lumas Nntiona(Forest, Quincy,,Catifornla 1987 Archaeological Test Excavations at the" Vilest Rockshelter Site", California Park. Subdivision, Chico, Butte County, California. Report on File, City orChico, and Northeast California Information Center, CSL%Chico. 1990. Archaeological Inventory Survey of a Proposed 14 acre Subdivision Tnvol+ting the Durham :House, Durham, Butte County, California: Report on File, Northeast California Information Ccntcr, CSU -Chico. 1990a: Archaeological Inventory Survey for Bett rSimpson'aProposed 750 -acre- Subdivision nearHoncut, Butte County,; California.: Report on Fite, Northeast; California Information Center; CSU -Chico. 1990b Archaeological Inventory Survey ofRunges400acsubdivisionprojectnear Bangor, Butte County, Call fomia. Report on. File, Northeast California Information Center, CSU -Chico. 1990c Archaeological Inventory' Survey of the Locatelli. Subdivision Project near. /Wyandotte, Butte County, California. Report on File, Northeast California Information Center, CSU -Chico. 1990d Archaeological Survey for'Subdivision Projects` Proposed for Segments of Lower -Doe Mill Ridge near'Bruce Road, Chico, Butte. County, California. Report. on File, Northeast California Information Center, CSU -Chico. 199E of,%RrrP&Pear TaulcMour, in— Thermalito,; Butte County; C-alifomia. R_po,-::on File Nor1iieasi,UT1-,. i Infonnat:on Center, CSU -Chico. J Project' QZ- "f i t cx $t?bdtF situs, 0� «'1 Acm near Bangor Jensen, Peter- M. and Paul R Reed ;19R!)Ag A rd,a ,eologicai and Cultural AnthropologicalOverview, of the Northern; SacramentoValieyand Southern.:Cascades. Special- Publieution of the Bureau. of Land Management, Redd! r`�� ; trici� fficc. Jensen, Peter M..an(ManeWren 1978 A Cultural Resources Overview ote est Side irtthe r 1UMt S NJ alioltal Forest. Report on dile, U.S. Forest Service, Plumas stational Forest, Quincy California,, and Northeast Californialnformation Center, CSU-Chico. Johnson, Jerald Jay '1979 Yam, IN, Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 8: California, Robert F, Heizer; Editor, pp. 361=369. Smithsonian'Institution, Washington, D.C. O'Connell, James F. 1967 The Prehistory of. Surprise: Valley, Lassen County,, California. Unpublished Ph.D, Dissertation; University of California, Berkeley. Riddell; Francis A. 1979 Ivlaidu and IConkow, TN,. Handbook. ofNorth. American Indians, Volume 8:. Ca',fornia; Robert F. Heizer, Editor, pg 370-379. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.0 Ritter, Edc:W. 1970 Archaeology of Tie Wah near Oroville, Butte County,, California: Culture History. vs; Culture Process. Center for Archaeological Research at Davis, Publication No. 2. United States De ariment of the Interior F 1990.National Regis_er of.-Historic Places. Federal Register. Washington, D.C. Wilson, Norman L. an&Arlean H. Towne 1978` Nisenan,,IN, Handbook ofNorth American Indians, Volume 8: California, RobertF. Heizer} Editor; pp. 387-397.. Smithsonianlnstitution, Washington,. D.C.- r_ MAI ARCHAEOLOGICR SURVEY AREA AND I kZGIt.q LOCATION .0 h fbr the "CAREY C. 21.1 � .ACRE PROPOSED S.LI�3DTY1�IC?N Rt�� IV C'I'".� - USGS BANGOR, CALIP., 7.5' SLRIt S, POR.. SRC. t 3t TIM ME* Al st}f7 ��w 'tom• �r .���'�a��y�".�\ O``�� 1 ��y, < PROJECT AND SURVEY AREA FOR THE 21.1B, SUBDIVISION � i! •��t. / / tttt % V, r d `x „� � 3a� 4 " � "rt/7'K � 7 � ' .cuh J � "✓ 3z! 4� �- �q 1� � \- � 1 Wil' ��� its `� r�_ •! t,/'�!` � ri''� .✓'`y z �. '4 t7�, ,s ; ../ yet• a"' �- � � � � .✓� �� �;�#. iltS'\'�. tP titil}. "'�s:/,. _ :�+�•° �'1.../ ���'��+b��fc,3 ����r ��On/v. %7 � �l yi_ \�\` "t 3• _ �•� ,{(ISOLATE #1 DITCH amu`" '��� � : •--r ,''�-� J' i �\1 � Yx'l . -ats� !, � - ��� - Al t `s, � �t`I`f ✓ °a,— � e s'. 1 �/:yrl� � �r �,� t•� r�:tl q$ 4, is . `ter-Y JENSEN ASSOCIATES' CHICO, CALIFORNIA ARCHAEOLOGICAL - HISTORICAL CULTURAL RESOURCE MAYAGEMENT SERVICES i Y; r} 'Su fte coun rr PLANNING DEPARTMENT' 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROViLLE; CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE; (916) 538-7601 r March 23, 1992 Sherry Bradford Carey P.U. Box 2601. Oroville, CA. 95965 Re: Tentative Parcel Map AP #027-.170-0'17 Log #91-� 0-03-02 Dear Ms. Carey: Art initial study of your proposed project, a Tentative Parcel Map, indicates potentially e e impacts., suitable mitigation ation measures are requiredcldlst). To •tal the art of radverse educe or impacts the refer to the closed environmen as p p > � theproject, Otherwise, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. An early response to this notification, sent to the Planning Department, will expedite the scheduling of your project: Please forward your written response within 15 days, from the date of this letter. Should you hav any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office between 10:00 a.rn. and, 100 p.m. Sincerely, E. A. Kircher Director of Planning j} Craig Sanders C� Associate Planner BAK:PSL CBS jlo CC CrDA Ccaiifornl$ UHUl�JU U000.1MR BUM SIERRA DepartiltentofAnthropology iS1rchae1`jQglcal (�{� fiftF Ga'a LASSER SISMYOU SUTTER California State University, Chico inventory ;. �c u u u MOOOC 1E�ax Chico, CA 95929 PLUUAS TFUNM (916)9§8-6256 SIOSTA December 11, 1991 ,?anise D. Taylor GDA Engineering, Surveying, Planning 220 Grand Avenue Oroville, CA 95965 RE': APN 27-.170-=17/BRADFORD-CAREY I.C; # L91-36 T18N, R4E, Section 13; USGS Bangor 7.51and 15" quads 21..18 acres; Butte County Dear Ms. Taylor, In response to a request reca_.ved November 25, 1991, a record search for the above cited project was conducted by examining the official haps and records for archaeological sites in Butte County, RESULTS:. PREA19TORIC RESOURCES: Our records indicate there are no previously recorded sites of this type known to be located within arses. However, four sites of this type have been recorded within ina one} -mile radius of the project area. These sites' include one 'major occupation site, two bedrock milling station sites, and one 1 this scatter, The project is located in territory ethnographically claimed by the Maidu H18TORIC RESOURCE.• our records indicate that there are no sites of this type known to be located within project boundaries. However., two of the sites mentioned above also contain historic components which include an. historic ditch and dumps and- an historic mining flame.. Additionally,, the 15' USES I quad map indicates mine tailings located along the entire length of Fine Gold Gulch (including the project area), and the project map indicates a "Minedi+ area within prof ect boundaries : This may be ars unrecorded historic resource. The project is located within. the Bangor "Gold District, and the nearby Blue Dead Dine was mined for gold from the 1850ts to the 18901s. The entire region is known to have been mined during the historic period. project area has note been pre NS: According to our records, thePREVIOUS. "&JAEOLOGYCAL INVt8TIGkTi p Previously surveyed for cultural resources. ,I & "tt bITERATURE SEARCH. Reviewed, were the official records and maps for archaeological sites and surveys in: Butte County. Also reviewed were the National Register of Historic Places, the California Inventory of Historic Resources (1976), California Histori'kil Zandmarks (1990),, California Points of Historic Interest, A Collection of Places in Butte County, California (1971), and: 'Historic Spots in California (1966) =-COMMENDATIONS: Based upon the above information and the local topography, the project is located in an area considered to be extremely sensitive for cultural resources. An unrecorded historic resource may be located within project boundaries. Therefore, we recommend that the project area be surveyed for both historic and prehistoric cultural resources by a professional archaeologist prior to any project operations. This person will be able to locate, record, and assess any cultural resources which may be present within project boundaries, as well as suggest appropriate. mitigation measures for those resources. Thank you for your concern in preserving Cal;farnia's cultural heritage:. Please feel free to contact us 'if you have any questions, Si.ncerely, riia Dr. Makoto Nowta, Coordinator s Northeast Information Center I: cc: Butte County planning Department II 1y v ZZV QMANU AVtNua 1916) 533-2068 i'. November 20, 1991 .Butte County Planning Department County Center Drive Droville, Ca. 95966 Atm. Mr. Craig Sanders Rei' TPM Sherry Bradford Carey AP> 027470-017 Dear Craig; This letter is written concerning your request for a botanical survey on the above referenced project l have personally walked all the Carey lands. l am very familiar with the existing habitat, or la k there of on this parcel. In addition, we are currently Working on a tentative subdivision almost adjacent to this project. .. y _. � In conjunction with said subdivision, our client hired Eco -Anal -Analysts to conduct ., botanical/biological review of the property. The property propo aed for the subdivision and -1he Carey lands are almost identical. No concerns were noted by Fco�.artarrsts The Carey property can b9 divided into two categories. First; the higher lands consist of mostly open ridges and a dry ravine. There are no lands flat enough to support vernal pools. Oak trees begin about midway across the property and increase in density as you proceed easterly across the property. i .`' M of `, . a The second type of habitat Is riparian in nature A small amount of � iPgation runoff intermittently eaters the drainage way that crosses the eastern portion of these lands, if it were ,not for this runoff, the creek would be dry most of the year. Small animals frequent this habitat and it should be ,protected, We propose as a mitigation' measure to thin project that a "no building setback line" 50 feet in width and measured from the top of the stream bank be established. The one exception to this protection zono would be the road crossing which is currently being constructed under a 1609 permit issued by Fish and Gam6. KENNCtH 0. LEN'FIARbT P.5. JOHN D, CHRI51'C PPtASON L. t. t-� •fj V Suffe, Coun tq --z PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA. 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601' November 12 1991, Sherry Bradford Carey P. O. Box 2,601 Oroville, CA, 95965 SUBJECT- Status of .Application for Proposed Tentative Parcel Map AP No;. 027-170-017 :Dear Ms. Carey; i The: I Butte County Planning Department staff has reviewed the application and accompanying information for the referenced proposal. The purpose of this notice is to advise you whether your application is complete. The following status information pertains to your application. Tease call the assigned Planner named below if there are any questions concerning your proposal or this notice.' I _ j The application is complete and is being processed, Planning staff will y y ' or additional information is needed. At' a latera date you will (receive a letter and analysis of your project and a notification of your scheduled hearing dote. _ x The application is incomplete; see the attached form for required information to be received before the application can be processed. T1se California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) requires payment of a filing fee for all projects that result in the potential lass of fish, wildlife, or their habitat through w urbanization and land use conversion. I'hrs filing fee is applicable to your project and Will be collected by this Departf ent on behalf of CDFG'. You will be notified prior to;' your project'$ hearing date of tine exact amount clue. Failure to pay the fee will prevent,; your project from, becoming, operative,. vested, or final (Public Resources Code Section 21089 (b) ) i r� • P , g Before your application, can, be considered conn Tete the following items see checked i boxes must be prepared and submitted to the Planning Department. 4, Your project is in a high archaeological sensitivity area. Contact the Northeast Infori iation Center in the Anthropology Lab at Chico State University. Piave a. records search performed forour y project. If an Archaeological Survey' is required, have it performed by a qualified 91.1rchaeologist (a hist is provided). Submit the report to the Planning Department. [�V—�(�Your 'project is in, a sensitive botanical area. Contact a qualified Botanist o determine it .a Botanical. Survey for rare;, threatened or endangered planU should be performed. If a Botanical Survey is required, have it performed by a qualified botanist (a list is provided.). Submit the report to the Planing !,Department. (--j Your project- is in _a serisitive geologic area. Contact a qualified Geologist or Soils Engineer to have a Geologic Survey performed. Submit the report. to the Planning Department. Your prtvr;,ct is in ars area of special biological importance. Contact the Departm&�,it of Fish &. Gam(: to determine if a Wildlife Survey is required. If' species of concern are present, perform a Wildlife Survey, as required.. Submit the ieppk to the Planning Department. Other:. y _4s ^�Tr'�'�� of CALIFO$NIA--THE RESOURCES ,AGENCY - ---- _ Q WILSON, -C-i )Vemcr, DEPARTMENT OF �FISH AND !GAME " rar ct� � 1T70U oaMIp:fi6u ROAD, SUITE A. IRANC.400 609DOYA, cALIFORNIA 45676 c(916) 355-7020 October 18, 1991 Mr. John Mendonsa County of Butte Department of Public Works 1 County Center Drive Oroville, California. 95965 Dear Mr. Mendonsa: The Department of Fish and Game (DFG) has ;reviewed the Sherry Bradford Carey Tentative Parcel Map (TPM.), a proposal. to divide AP 27-17-17 of 21.96 acres into four, 5+ acre parcels. Located east of Palermo, the TPM lies in Mooretown deer herd winter range which contains oak-woodland-chaparral and riparian habitats_. Qence the TPM is within a Designated L-avelopment Zone, the DFG d s no,c object to the land division provided-that appropriate mitigation measures are impose6 as conditions of approval on the final Parcel Map. Those measures include but are not limiter' to: a; Assessment of deer habitat improvement fees, b. Fencing to meet. approved standards: Oak woodlands are a particularly important habitat because r they provide most of the essential life sustainingreguirements (e.g., food, shelter; nesting and roosting sites) needed by numerous animal species. There has been significant cumulative losses of oak woodlands in California due to residentiali commercialand other development projects. 'To mitigate the project impacts on oak, woodlands, these restrictions are 'needed: a. No oak tree removal except as required to provide space for buildings and associated accessories and to meet health and safety standards', b:. setback Fstabl:�sh a , comiitencing from the ou:Ler edge ofstheboak tree canopy and extending outward a distance 'equal to one-half of the canopy radius,; around each tree: No disturbance includes irrigation and root damaging activities Retain d1l snags except 'those which pose a direct safety hAzard i John , Mendonsa October 1E, 1991 ' Age Two d No pruning or cutting of oaks except for safety Purposes. Aecio',uous oaks should be winter dormant season only and evergreeneoaksring durringe July - August only. This project site contains the habitat types sensitive plant species which have, been foundiinthatwg to harbor I area. A botanical_ survey should be made to determine fnsucl species do occur onsite If should be protected by; Present, sensitive Plant: populations a. Establishing a 50-f©ot minimum no disturbance` setback, commencing from the Outer edge; around each I plant population. I b. Constructing barriers to prevent damage by foot vehicle traffic. and; C. Excluding livestock,, r d. No artificial drainage into or the placement of materials and substances inside of the nondisturbance area. Streams: andtheirassociated Wetland habitrats,comprse one of the most valuable ec��systems. In addition to obvious watershed importance, Xs=jhms su plant and animal, spec' PPort the greatest diversity of ies 4aquatic and terrestrial) of all inland ecosystems. Protection qg streamside corridors rotect quality, numerous specs`sed ment4 for numerous spati6n, and provides a Continuousahabitat ecosystem, the ; ies. To rr..itigate project impacts on the stream followita_ L,6asures are needed; a. Establish a 1013 -foot: no disturbance setback along b6th sides of tile stream channel. The setback should gmence from., t�„e 66tside edge of wetland/riparian ve et:ation or bank top, coin whichever is greater. b, The applicant 411041d be advised that any 'work within the 100-yeas f'aoodplain, consisting of but not limited to 2?1,11P, rsion or obstrudtioix or the natural' flow or chare� in the channel, bed or batik of any stream channel ''till requite pursuant to Pith and Game Code�Sect onor f 1600iet so i�FC The agreemeut: eq, s �,_ process is an action separate from the pectlf c m,tigation measures to be included as coed%tions of project approval by the lead agency. i FL*r1%R RIVER RECREAV & P RK DISTRICT �] OROVILLE CALCF RNTh 95�J6 i SNICli'AI'. AUDI1'01iiUM, 1200 MYL16 STREET PHONE- (910) 533-2011 VILLE October 10,.199;1 County of Butte Department, of Public Works 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 96965 RE Sherry Bradford CAREY - Tentative Parcel Map Dear Mr. Mendonsal The Feather River Recreation and Park District would like to express our concern over the growing population of the Greater Oroville area and the affect this will have on our District. We have found that this increase in population is Beverly affecting our ability to provide a suificiert` level of services to our constituency; This particular subdivision is of a small sizer being four parcels, and we feel there is an impact to our District from this project We need to do something about this increasing problem before it becomes a, crisis environment, We believe that this steady increase is good for the area and that we can alleviate the impact on the District througl developer fees and for the larger subdivisions, the creation of Lighting and Landscape Districts. We believe that the Planning Department should recommend to the Planning Commission and the Planning Commission should rei:ommend to the Board of Supervisors that developer fees be established for the Feather River Recreation 3Nn Park District and the other special districts which are affected ley this; increased population growth„ For the present and the Sherry Bradford Carey project, we feel that an equitable settlement should be made to the Feather River Recreation and Park District for the increase in population which this will bring. Thahk you, Sincerely.:,.. 6d and Secretary to the'Board of Directors RW/js' r OfSUILLE ELEMENTARY 40^HOOL IjISTRZCT �w�lr 95966-6096 '0094ALO L,, fifi$ BEY. U. o, aSt�YNdCe#er�r MC� {�J6}.3�dg95 max: j91G`1,433•QO.t VL a W,04«R October 14, 1991 st��6y5 -4759 25 RS n�r�,5 ers� Mr. Jobb :Mendonsa, Assistant Director !aoaR�.o'l3usrEEs:County of �BUtte Department of Public Works U �nEU, $015N 7 County Center Drive F'Ar61VENs Oroville, CA 95965 rGYE tEW A. FXM6 Re Sherry Bradford Carey -, Tentative Parcel Map, APN' 27.17-17 0IA4aYA9CHER nrsn Dear Mr. Mendonsa � AKIt�?;C.SFI'IiuNON: I have reviewad the tentative parcel map for the Sherry BradfordCarey property,- APN 27.17-17. The parcel split appears to create four residential parcels from an existing single parcel. The property lies within the Oroviile Elementary School District. Students generated from the, development would attend Ophir School for grades K-6, and Central Middle: School for grades 7.8. Unfortunately, both schools have insufficient permanent facilities to house the current student populations at the schools. Because the $1.58 per square foot of developer fees are not sufficient to provide adequate perm,,,.)hent school facilities for students, the District is currently conducting a study of needed revenues to mitigate the impact that further development in Oroville will cause on our schools. until the District is able to complete the study, i am requesting that all development, including parcel splits be delayed froth final approval. At the conclusion of the study, the District will be able to tell the County What will be required of each development to mitigate the Impact. Please contact me of further assistance to you: S ce ely Donald L. Remiey, Ed,D.; Superintendent DLR kmr/wdr16092 Itr xcs Development t=ile COUNTY OF BUTTE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 7 County Center Drive Orovi7.Ie'CA 95965 (916) 538-7266 PATE': October 3, 1991` SUBJECT: Sherry Bradford CAREY - TMMTIVE PARCEL ;MAP ASSESSOR'S PARCEL N .ZIBER(S) ? `r-17-17 LOCATION: .` 4 parcelslocated between Diinstone Drive and AlPe ta Ansa P aDDr07C. 6QO ft: east of Candy Cane tangy. fast Oroy,'lla arae .,attached are documents regarding, aryl a copy of, the above --described tentative map ;for, your review. If you'hive any concerning suggestions, additions or recomendations this Project, please return them to this office no later than Octo45er 24 1991 i_` _ _ Very truly yours, William Cheff Director of Public Works I; yJbIe donsat Director attachments DUtTE 004 PLANNING DLPARTMCNT DROVI�L , WFO NIA Lb 1160 (4IS9) ,; I _ i ..... , , COUNTY OF BUTTE DEPARTMENT OF .PUBLIC WORKS 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (916) 538-7266 t October 3, 1991 Sherry Bradford Carey RE: AP 27-1.7-17 P.O. Boy: 2601 Tentative Parcel Map Oroville, CA 95965 Dear Mrs. Carey:, This is to notify you that your application for a tc'u%ative map for the above-referenced property is being submitted to the Planning Department for environmental determination for its review., and to the Environmental Health Department This application will be considered complete when we have received notification from the Planning Department and the Environmental Health Department that all necessary data have been received. These departments . wyl:l contact you regarding any additional information they may require, Very truly yours, William Cheff Director of Public t+orks 4(,#m Mendonsa sistant Director jM/kp cc Planning Department Environmental Health Department G.D.A. 80WE'CO. PLANNING DEPA IEUT LD 11201120(Reviseded 2%MVILLE o OLIFORNIA 11 _ _. �. Ys ' i DISTRPGT CENTER TR. tJ.,NIT O. I T.IBN.R 4 M.D. 17 N9 Tax Area Cade $y 91-.36 12 7 /6 13 L8 1658.95 c .�2 ' 138q :1206.75 O 298 93 919.64 i N .Q " . X00 N 76.516,09 �' , b) 32 +� �,� 5,03AC to * 543.10 ,9�Sr�R C?C M 2 ;� ) r ,4°� i3 303' Ac t�` (� = 400, Z Ian., 6.03o• 030Ga,PL fi 3 W 3 I1.E24 we t3.6T4 A C 5.42AC .� " _2►7 9, " dy 13 21.963;Ac 4 3 5,65AC rn fi `0 S 16.52 AC � � � "'"'- � 458.18. OA Q 14 i 34 x:6021 +` s 1,:224 -4 -Ac B K 2g PJN 9s-2� W �� L 250 � \ ¢�• ,Y a RS 78-92 292.93 59,0 -b 20 17.48AC/ J � � 22 ttr.65u1►c) 23 r z5 m J _. 21 - N (9 �` \ 24,6IAC y ILO 3 0 J .. -►, y 20 ! M659AG do s. 0 7 - ti k� 11833AC r 11 754 Ac 16.71 ACS. w "' ' (73d6ac) ^h !� 31,73 At >1 7 ,t 22 p,4 t 30007 �" r �� 28, 0 ! •29635 .y • M 8:6517 160p7 2 t,2\. 22.✓457 A bi6.1631�s4 ft 5 61.. 5 g �. 'w Lr Q' _ x 5,13AC. 24 61 k� 5 14393- 17605 t n 14 92AG'; a i' �f +' w, 31:.05 P' O r0 tI 1 is ... � .j���.o:ti��;�,u.�te, Calr ., . biSTRicT GEI-TER�iV�. r y.,.. _ . �'RAC,T l�Nl i fNl 9`