The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About027-220-126LA P NNxNG COMMISSION SUMMARY STREET FOR LAND DrV'ISrONS APPLICANT Jack Rogers Loci#8 8-;,6'-03 ADDRESS 215 Melody Lane, Oroville, CA 95966 OWNER Sams PROJECT DESCRIPTION TPM to divide 20 acres to create 2 parcels 10 acres each. LOCATION on the north side of Melody Lane, approx., 3000 east of its intersection with Palermo Honcut Highway. `� Y• , OrOVille. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUM13ER(S)w 27-22-126,127 ZONING A-5GENERAL PLAN Ag'Resi .PROJECT CONSISTENT? GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE REPORT - DATE OT' APPLICAN�1' SIGNATC;TRE LAND CONSERVATION ACT CONTRACTS? DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED 6-18•.,86' AGENT/SURVEYOR/CIVIL ENGINEER:_ Ron Graves & Assoc. ADDRESS: P.O. Dox 986, Orovill;e, CA 95965 DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR Y S REPORT PREPARED ENVIRONMENTAL CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION DATE FILED DETERMINATION AND DATE DECLARATION ECLA'12ATTON - DATE ADOPTED�g�Zd' - MITIGATED NEG. DECLARATION �- DATE ADOPTED ENV. IMPACT REPORT - DATE C.E RTIp1EIJ STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO, - ,,a, B BUTTE G1aNERAL PLAN COUNTY CONFO1tMANCE REPORT �. )R ItSD rOR PARCEI. MAP OR SUBDIVISION MAP ;°uYiity Vahl Items 1-4 to be completed by applicant: 1. Applicant Name and address I tet+. I..� 2. Project Description . '�i� �,!h� % �W.�.� ��.✓/IL o c: x f �2 �r�i'c�,..("'�-"�. ."✓ 3. Assessor's Parcel Number(s) 4. Proposed Use The following items are to be completed by the Planning Department: Current zoning A- �� Land Conservation Agreement _eLo General Plan Designation re - 5t Applicable Conditional. Criteria; Not Applicable Agricultural -Residential YES NO 1. Agricultural Compatibility 2. Slater & Sewer Capacity . i_. �--- 3. Adequate Fire Vacilities --� 4. Road Capacity & Maintenance S. Access to Commercial & Schools `-" --- Orchard & Field Crops 1, Predominant 5-1.0 Ac. Parcel Size 2. Vicinity of Urban Boundaries -'-` --- 3. Agrici viability not impaired Staff Determination Project doesJ,V does not substantially conform to the` General Plan and zoning, Comments; Dcyrr.t�ryT u6c.,.L 0XrL ALUre. Date 2" &Lp_ r AS TME APPLICANT FOR' 1nt REQUESTED LAND DIVISION I A"', "ARE OF THE ABOVE 8TAFF DETEMNA`1'ION Rt;GARDIN0, TNL CONFORMANCE WIT11 1, E GLNLt�AL 1�LAN AND ION;Ctv'G, Daren Sighature of Applicant sl.icant LD 1000 (revised 6-80) N'2rCE 47F i7 �' �-.��xz�a�rraly Office of Planning a ese<"rcl � � '"' 1400 Tenth Street, Ro. 121 n _ Butte 'County Sacramento, CA 95814 ;t� r P1a1111in;, Department or OCT 9 1988 7 County Center btive County Clerk. Oroville, CA 95965 e County of Buttt 1.-ikNOR K BECKER, County Clerk � r 3Y-Deput Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance or 21152 of the Public Resources Code with Section 21108 Project Title _ Tentative Parcel Ma State Clearinghouse Number p 27-22-1. Jack Contact Roger, s Person (if submitted to Clearinghouse) Telephone Number Public Works John Mendonsa Project Location 34i4266 On the north side feet east of its intersection with Pale of Me1odmapproximately - proximately 3000 Proj� e! c D cript3on HoncOt Hwx . , Oroville, Tentatj,ve Parcel, Map to divide 20 acres to create two parcels of 1.0 acres each, ate Th ti is to advise that the Butte Count Advisor A enc (Lead Agency or 1tes onsible A e has approved the above-described project on g 8-25-86 p $ ncy) the following determinations regarding the above•-ddscribte) project: -ry' and has made ed 1 The project will V environment. n wYll not, have a significant effect on the 2. An Environmental Impact Report pursuant wasto the provisas prepared for this project ions of CECA, A Negative Declaration was prepared For this ro provisions of CRQA. P j ect pursuant to the 3+ Mitigation measures were}t3ere not; made a condition of the approval of the project, 4, A statement of overriding considerations for this project, was, -4was not, adopted This is to certify that the final project approval is available `Eto theRgeneralWith opublic ata mments anresponses and record of Butte County Planning Department County Center Drive droville, CA 95955 DateReceived for Filing and Posting at OPR 10-26-86 �" 2. Sign ure Stephen A Streeter t . )(V" Senior Planner '.i Title _._ Revised March 198 ( I , t p , t AUG 27 1986 COUNTY CENTER DRIVC - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 Tdjephonei (916) $34,4681 oroAlo, Q10ornia RONALD D� mrELROY Deputy D4eckpr August 26, 1986 Jack Rogers RV,,: Al.' 27-22-126 & 127 215 Melody Lane Tentative Parcel Map 01-ov,ille, CN 9596.5 Dear Mr. Rogers: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held on August 25, 1986, the agency granted a negative declaration of environmental !,npact and. approved your tentative parcel Mal) on the above -referenced property subject to the conditions of approval listed on the attached sheet: If no appeals are timely filed—within Len (10) days of the date of the Advisory Agency's approval—with the Cleric of the Board of this ACLton will be final, 1k11en the condiuons of approval are complied with, it will be 'in order for you to file your "final map" with the Butte County Department or Public W6rks for recordation within twenty-four (24) months of the date of :approval by the Advisory Agency. If you have anv questions regarding this matter, please contact this Co. Vory truly yours, William Cheff Director of Public Works tMendons�a ASistant DIrector S Planning, Doptirt-1z1vilL 11tivironmental 110alth DepartnionL Ron. Graves Associntes PARCEL MAP, AP 27-22_126 and 127, 2 parcels ,Jack Rogers, TI NTAT7,V Lane, approx. 3000 ft- east: of its anter-- ,p ort the north side of Melody Oro Ville area. Engineer: Roll section with Palermo 11011cut Hwy.. orfaves and Associates Public Works conditions � Verl i.y legal access, Provide two-way traversable access RS-B-LD-Z to each parcel from a county maintained road or state highway: A 3 ►:cess to 'be reserved in deeds as per county ordinance and offered Cor dedication on the Citral map- 1, SI tow 50 ft. building setback line: mensured from centerlit�G of access oasement 5 provide read mainCenance egreement. 6 Shaw all easements of record on the final map. Frovide street name signs per r►•aquirementsof the Department of. 7 Public Works prior to recordation of the final p 8 Provide cul-de---sac at the-, end of the street. 9 pay any delinquent taxes or current tares as required. health Dept. conditionst _ t.lenhf eldf tlk�odieylls 10Provide a 100 i fthe proprt ei.tter within Ipprorwitn boundories on �arrlsiarc2• _ 11 Verlfy that sewa;v systems serving the mobil.ehomc:s on parcels I and 2 are on the _parcels with the respective mob:i:l,ehomes Inter-Departmeatil Memorandum To: Butte County Advisory Agency FROM: Planning Director SUBJECT; Report on Tentative :Parcel. Map for Jack Rogers, AP#27-22-126,127 DATE, August 13, 1986 This is a proposal to divide 20 acres into 2 Parcels of 10 acres each. The Zoning is A-5 (Agricultural., 5 acre) adopted in 1969. The land use map of the Bute County General Plan designates this area as Agricuj,�Liral Residential.. Where are no specific or community plans for the area. A certificate of compliance was issued on AP#27-22-12,6, 127 as one parcel on August 6, 1974. The proposal, does not conflict with Countyzos.ing nor any adopted or proposed element of the Butte. County General Plan not any County, specific ar community plan. Recommend approval. LT<jmc cc Jack Rogors Ron Graves & Associates APPINDT.K F 0 COUNTY OF 13UT HNVIRONNIENTAL CHTICKLIST FORM t� (to be Complete 7-l'" Agency) Log 1186-08-16-03 AP 1127-22--1261127 BACKGROUND 1, Name or proponent JACK ROGERS ------- 2. Address of proponent and representative (if applicable) Jack Rogers Ron Graves iu AssoC,,.Ates � k 10 1) V C 011113 ,Tt, 1W t N Al I ON ctst _.. 11 - I On the basis of this filltial evOltintioll-'. Aicalit ariect 111VII, 1,1110 the llroposeO prolok.1 NO'r have a signir on tile oil\, 1,oniiient ;Ilirla NP1(;A1'1Vl1 - 011CLMVHO110 N Will 110 PVCVOLl- 1/t�l: rUld t1lot olthol gni 11911 tllt' P"o0(`sL'(lep`.OJ Oct ""I'dilav0 tlrsliallt c.nnt effect oil tile elvironment, there "11 'lot he asign :1 :1 'c errect I'll this onset bent lusts the DilTIOA110N N111AS)UMiS d0bcV1'b0d on the attached Sheet have 1),ovil addvl to tho project : A NVIGAVVIII, MIUAIIA11ON 1611 11v prop arL,l. T/Iyl: find the llroponod pi*o1L,ct signirteant effect on 1'0111' is roquired, th(, r Itt' �111 i 1.011111L (10UNI'y OF 11011T� PLANNINO D11111ARTM]IN'r tiA�r1� � Jury 25 1986A88ocia LaUta Ele t Planner i 215 Melody Lane Y.U. zQXV0Q Qe 0 -r70-v — .1 Cie, A9'_5 9 6 6 Oroville, CA 95965- 3, project description Tentative Parcel. Ma DIANDATORY VINDIN(uS 0, STGNrVICANCM. 'YjiS MfBr: NO a. Does the project have the potential to degrade tile quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife Species, cause a to drop below Self- fish or wildlife population levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or sustaining animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal Or important of the major periods eliminate examples of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve Short-term benefits to the Ll.tvimc" nr long-term, the environmental goals? (A short-term 1111pact an Ina relatively e liviron.ment Is one which occurs brief period of time while long-term impacts will endure into the NUIVC-) c. Does the project have Impacts which are individu- but considerable? (A ally limited, cumulatively project may impact on two Or More ScPaT-Itc resources latiVelv where tile impact Oil each resource IS relatively but where the crrect or the total or Small, impicts oil the envil-ollmont is significant.) d, Does tile project have environmental erroets Which adverse orrecig on human will, cause Substantial ,I) C i 11, or indirectly? vithor directly k 10 1) V C 011113 ,Tt, 1W t N Al I ON ctst _.. 11 - I On the basis of this filltial evOltintioll-'. Aicalit ariect 111VII, 1,1110 the llroposeO prolok.1 NO'r have a signir on tile oil\, 1,oniiient ;Ilirla NP1(;A1'1Vl1 - 011CLMVHO110 N Will 110 PVCVOLl- 1/t�l: rUld t1lot olthol gni 11911 tllt' P"o0(`sL'(lep`.OJ Oct ""I'dilav0 tlrsliallt c.nnt effect oil tile elvironment, there "11 'lot he asign :1 :1 'c errect I'll this onset bent lusts the DilTIOA110N N111AS)UMiS d0bcV1'b0d on the attached Sheet have 1),ovil addvl to tho project : A NVIGAVVIII, MIUAIIA11ON 1611 11v prop arL,l. T/Iyl: find the llroponod pi*o1L,ct signirteant effect on 1'0111' is roquired, th(, r Itt' �111 i 1.011111L (10UNI'y OF 11011T� PLANNINO D11111ARTM]IN'r tiA�r1� � Jury 25 1986A88ocia LaUta Ele t Planner i ENVIRONMENTAL TMPOTS XP anations of a -1"yes" and "maybe, answers are required on attached sheet(s)) 1-. EARTH. Will theYES proposal. result in significant:: MAYBE NO --- a Uns*able earth conditions or in chanes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcoverzng of the soil? c, Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d, Destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off-s:i.to? —- f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a raver or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g. Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils outside designated urban areas? h, Elolposure of people or property to geologic hazards, such as earthquakes, l,andsl.ides $ mud- slides, ground failure or similar hazards?2. ,, AIR. Well the proposal result in substantial: 17 Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air duality? b, The creation of objectionable odors) smoke or fumes? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or Z temperature, or any change in climate, locally or regionally? 3 WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial) a. Changes in curreats , or the Course or direction of water movements in either b. marine or fresh waters? Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, C. or the rate and amount of surface runoff? Need for off-site surface drainage improve 7nents, including vegetation removal channel- izaton ' or culvert installation'? d. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? �. e Change bin the amount of surface water in anywater f. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including bnt not Limited to temperature; dissolved oxyg9n or turbidity? , g• Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? h, Change in the gUantity or quality of 9.tbund wate s either through direct additions or 1oith- ..." drawals, or through interception of an aglli er by cuts or excavations? i, Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? j, Exposure of people or property to `water. related hazards such as flooding'? ,, up S 6, 7. 8. 9. 10, I 1. YES MAYBE PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. range in the diversity of species, or numbor of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, tarp or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of now species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal, replen;ivIi merit of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural, crop? ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial: a C ange in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land anianals including reptiles, fish and shell f,�sh benthic organisms or insects)? b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? - c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife `— habitat? NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial: a, increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of ? p people to severe noise levels, LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce signx icant light and glare? LAND USB. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? NATURAL_RDO'OURCES; Will the proposal result in su "stantial; a, increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural resources? RYSK OF UPSET, Will the proposal, involve. a. A risk of explosion or the release of ha.tard- ous substances (including) but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ROPULAT, ION, Will the proposal, alter the location, NO X X IL an population. 5 g X. �.str�. utzon ensxtrr o�' growth rate of the: hum -- 1.2 HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? L �{ a, 0 0 a'ES MAYBE NO 13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, ordemand ipkg• c'Substntalnimpacton exis ''ng transportation r systems? d. Significant alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. `.._` Alterations to waterborne, reit or air traffic? f. Increase - in traffic hazards to motor vehicles -`-" bicyclist-, — or pedestrians? 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services; a. Fire protection? b. Police protection" -�- c. Schools? d. Parks or ether recreational facilities? t e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f.. Other governmental. services! 1S. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts Of txel.. r energy? b. Substantial rrrrease in. demand u pan'existing ' "`- sources of ever energy, require the development of new sources of energy? X 16. UTILITIES, Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following: a. Power or natural gas? b6 Communi,cati.ons systems': c'. water avai.l.abil ity; —_- d. newel, or sepllc tarik;? '. e. Storm mater arainage? Y� --- -w- f. Solid waste and disposal? ----:= 1W,rt 17. HUMAN HEALTH, Will the proposal result in; a. Creat n of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental. health) ? �y b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards 18. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the 35strti n of any scenic crista or view ap to py the public, or will the e proposal, result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? YES MAYBE NO 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact; upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational: opportunities 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES. T.7 -WT -11 the proposal result in the alteration of: or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? c. Does 'he proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect 'unique ethnic cultural values?. d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential, impact area? V. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP 27-22-126,127 Sei-, e.ttached. S1[1 F 1/TFifl 1bx3b: D is ��Nrl—lY�r�.AL� 4/A�y' T) U AP changes i Disruption and compaction 2? -22-126y127 units n absorption rcf;es have of the on each 1 0-» surf acE 19 The so One acre Parcel a l hove ya Occurred. Two ndwsubsequent l l i ne nt oiadY been ling range use. on site are installed. Unit Ten` °r tweht not Prime agr`'icult for grazing ourposes. Parcel ural, The Poses. s 00 not const y aI^e su i ted itutu �o 1h� Earth an economic Property quake The pfaults have been Neither of these rtwofe Crook Li mapped Withln 2200 Mazar linea neament is approximateeet of the Hazards to Persons a meets are historically active. 3/4 mile east; d,.l: The and Property are modest ive. experience prop erty drains e" s flooding durin lata a tributar one dwelling per g Per -i -ads of Y of Honcut runoff or flood 10 acre s Will wet weather, Creek, which hazards. not Measurably DeveluPment of 3hy16c: increase stormwater Parcel. Two wells are currently on side 4b, c . Locate i each sere i n:3 ane 10 Pools. d throu9ho acre These ut the general species Which Pools provide hobitat area are the Palermo change 1 h are dependent drat upon c Ver 1 adverse Yclesrafe and endangered na 1mPactsage patterns, toPoPra inundation plant be regr i r^ed Since these Phy or land and dry l rr Map'* at ,,Since i s time, Pr^oper t i as are de use cau 1 d resu l t 1 n Any or development"A botan i ca l sur;ve. Tile f01 10w i ng note ve I oiled, . survey of irhe y shall be Per formed shoo t o be placed o y NIII parceis,Pr1orOnthe . A Certificate further div parcel anf COMP1iance was i.5ion ust pt=gsent AugAuuse. 6, 1974.Approval land issued for, Ap 27-2 With the eOtte Further d i v Of the map will 2-.126 } 127 Cnuhty General isior Would not dot Chan as ahEa 12; plan, be found in ge the.. Approval in canf'ormance conforaitY 61 f the Tentative parcel ,financed County lode. Each Map will br, of sold. house ing the tw i rn . s can be separate 1 Yawner10 ts into Melody Lane i a 16, Pr^ovements, 2R' gravel r �ubdlvision It: Currentlyoad Parcels. Ordinance prohibit sorve 27 with n0 draft"age Purther div cul -a cs r The B Improvements isi'on of t desacs f uttq County to area hese oars cels torn sery i rig circulation. Wlll ter More than 20 14: Demand1u 1 role substantial dove l aPme swot Pub,, c services nt on site,. 1a generated b Impacts .111 hot change. 16c�d Y the a};1st'rnq TWo wells and_ septic systems have been installed. 6,,; Applicant: Jack Rogers Assessor's Parcel 2-7-22-1,260127 Log # 56-06-18-03 A--SHEE SHEET A. Pro-iect -Description 1. Type of Project; Tentative Parcel Map. 2. Brief Description: Dividing 20 acres Into two parcels of 10 acres each, 3. Location: On the north side of Melody Lane, approximately 3000 feet east of its Intersection with Palermo-Horicut Highway. 4. Proposed Density Of Development: I d.u./10 acres* 5. Amount of I mpery i r,)Us Surf ac 1 no". Minimal., 6. Access and Nearest Public Road(s): Frontage on Melody Lane, private access road to Parcel 1. 7. Method of Sewage Disposal: Septic tank) leachfiolds existing. 8. Source of Water Supply: individual wells existing. 9. Proximity of Power Lines: To original parcel 10. Potential, for further land divisions and development: None4 B. Envirobtental Sett in 14 Terra I n a. General Topographic Character." Level valley lands b. Slopes: Lest, than 89, c. rElevationt 125-140 feet ASL. d. Limiting Fbotors: None. 2. Soils ai Typos and Character-istles" Mixed soils: Agate, Cometa and Red Bluff* 10-801, deep, red/yellow/brown, gravelly loam$ 1,iummocky. Slow to Moderate perMeablllty, well dosining) slight to moderate erosion, low to high range suitability. b. 1-ImIting Itactors: 8. Matural Hazards of the Land ai C-arthquako Zone. Loss than I mile west of inferrod fault of robthlll Shear Zone. b. Eroslon Potential: Moderate. C. Landslide Potontlalt None. d. Fire Hazard'. Moderaio., ei Expansive Soil POA;dntlall High. 4. Hydrology So Surface Water: Drainage on sl to feed 1tiff Into Honcut Creek , b. Groundwatdrg Two wells on site, ci Drainage Characteristictz rt-alht southerly to Honcut Creek , ,-7- d. Annual Ra i nfal 1 (normal).- 22-24" . e. Limiting Factors: Hone. 5« Visual/Scenic Quality: Highly scenic pastoral 6. Acoustic Quality: Excellent. 7 Air Quality: Good. Biolosa'ical Envir r1t 8 Vegetation: Palermo Vernal pools, 9. Wildlife Habitat: Open grassland. Cu l tura 1 Ey ` anmerat 10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area: including unknown. Low 11. Butte County General Plan designation. Agricultural -Residential. 12. Existing Zoning A-5. 13. Existing Land Use on-site: One homosite per parcel. 14. Surrounding Area: a. Land Uses: Rural residential 10+ -acre parcels, ori Ahderson Feed Barn, b. Zoning. A-5. C. Gen. Plan designations: AgriQul'tural-Resluential. d. Parcel Sizes: 10-30+ acres. e. Population: Sparse. 15« Character of Site and Area; Rural grazing area. 16. Nearest Urban Area: Orov i 1 '1 e, 12+ miles, 17. Relevant Spheres of Influence: Hone. 18. Improvements Standards Urban Area.. n/a. 19. Fire Protection Service: a- Nearest Count, north(State) Firel Station: #72 4-1/2 miles ; #'7'5, s miles south. b- Water Availability: Engine capacity onl 20. Schools in Area: Palermo Union, Orovilie-3 Union High. Addross ❑ ",Me," Woy Reply to Chico, Calilorniv 95026 Telephone; 916/891+2727 Ron Graves and Associates P. 0. Box 986 Oroville, CA 95965 t� Nuttly , D c)F" ATURAL Wt.AttH AM() BEAUI), M-41ARTMENT OF PU13LIC HEALTH IVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL. HEALTH Gorr u f'ehtor Drive C ovist" aall/omio 95965 d 747 Elliott Road Tr.frphann: 916/534.4291 P°rad''ro, Caltlornto 95969 7014p4,ono; 916/872>6=3 July 3, 1986 JUL 7 1986 Orabllla, Calitow, IRP: TP-",' — Rogers., Jack A. AP# 27-2 & 1.27 Melody Laney !rovil�.,e Dear Sirs; This department has advised the Butte County Departroenf o1 Works Land Development Section thnt we are Te , Public above application. Prepared ��ry act on the Based on present information, we can recomme,d a ro,, ,_ condi— tional approval. l�P a l , .t:r cotldY. Recommended Condi L402 � for A royal Is Provide a 100' l.eachfield Free either within setback around axis the property or within loot � ; the ,cells on �2� boundaries parcels #1 and he property 2• Verify that sewage systems serving the mol), yeh,,mes on til and #2 are on the pr parcels with the reSi`ectiVe mobileh�tnes, :If YOU have any questions regarding t1iis letter. Tom Rughes at the above listed address or telephone nu contact Very truly Yours,mbar, HowardJ. St der �`1 , Division of E;nvi3-onmenral Realth RJSIkf rc: Planning Department`"" a TRUSTEES 6 p t AD EN MTAOR TOM CONNER,Prna ( .zjno o� o bi GLENN po lniond . Oia1nP1 Sopolintentlpnt BARBARA WANGBERG • Vico Pion, 2261 ESPERANZA AVENUE bawD x. RRAMEn PAUL CNOLLE1 • Clmk Pnncipol BOGERTRABB•Morn"or PALERMO, CALIFORNIA 95 64 ALViiJ OUNN GEORGE FIRESTINE - Mombw 110cipal July 1, 1986 Bulla Co. &f1f ng comu J U L 8 1986 Jahn Mendonsa C)MVII144 COMOMIS County of Butte Department of Public Works 7 County Center Drive Oroville, Ch 95965 Dear Mr, Mendunsa: I have reviewwcd the Jack Rogers Tentative Parcel M41P calling for two 10 -acre parcels arcels on the north side of Melody mane.. The Assessor's Flap Hook Number is 27 Page 22, Pa.rcE is 126 and 127: The ten -acro parcels will riot create a problemfor the Palermo Union School Dis'tric . However., should they be further subdivided to smaller parcels producing more residence units, that could have an impact on us because of already overcrowded classes. Sx 1 e. rely,.. �-- t> h\ G1:nn D. Tabor Superintendent: GDTcrk �co iula