Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout027-230-0584 f j , PLANNItIC; COM14I5SIONSTVlWAWl SHEET -'FOR LAND DIVISIONS - Ted Runge Lc3g.#89-=06-09-01 _.. P.O. Box 2042, Oroville, CA 9596th Louis Duncan, 4319 Marl Way, Carmichael.;, CA 95608-1822 �3t0jfBCT DESCRIPTION Tentative Parcel Map to divide 136 +f - acres to create t 40 acre parcels, and one 65 acre parcel . `SOON at the: southeast Corder of the intersection of Bangor Park Road a;3-4 Dunstone Drive, Bangor area S°TOBOR'S PARCEL NUDIRER(8) A-5 GENERAL PLn:3 Agri-resi PROJECT CONSISTENT? (�;EWZR. ,�L FLAX Collro' ICE REPORT t4ay Zb, 1389 DATE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE CONSERVATION ACT CONTRACTS? DA-11% APPLICATION RECEIVED � june 9, 1989 P.GE qT/SuRVEy6R/CIVIL EINGI14EERr Ron Graves ESS P.O.- Box 986; Oroville, CA 959-65 r, ID,;,DWON- INN DIRECTOR`S REPORT PREPAREP,Y --- Tt0i 1E1tiT i CATS+ _gtCAL EXEIMPTSON DATE FILED, OZTZR[lil-'NATION ,AUD 'D, ATT NEGATIVE DECLARrTTTO � � .DATE AbOPTED MITIOAlktD NEC, DECLAPyATION DATE ADOPTED_,_„� Ez�iU. 'I".�pI CT `REPOR!r '- DATE CERTxF ED +...:. STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO SE s. COWlITTEE tiRETIN A&,tjsORy, AGENCY BEARING DATE--�L/—�u. i gwl,80i ACraNVt ACTIONC , ��« y rrt� t t h y}-n-- .`irpptliJ,t HEARING DATE {."O«1v0 :QTS POP.Pz,t�.l�."t x�v`"s DIAECTOFt' S a� `C7i T �� 4� _ APS L,�':r+I1tT: lf-j%Gjt/ PHONE NO; s"Z?y —y 6:c6 Pd,0 Y 1042 QAZ611146 Gam, j r' it moNE NQ 9 )cd7--05V5 AM f�: ; �.3i9 NI1�ZL J Cr}'Zh-�IC94­6 eA 95G �!'�, J`s' C;�C's"ITJIR,r`= OF. -mavv rR: %4d- x C'>/ZoV,6.: ;4-eGS'6C_ PRONE NO: 6-3,2z f AE1uaRS�t Glx ;� �; .^ l�bl.�/Gs'--- . r , MtL NoTICE OF MARINO TO: rlAr .5 DI VVII 6N CP PROPERTY'. `014 THIP %�` � RANGE � �� aSECTION .0 A:* oS; yGGR`5 PARCEL MOM i? r lr�'_t� �TOTAL ACREAGE A?'6 edattd writhin lest sit: months) t� r APPLICATION. INDICA'�'� M � DATE �F. ASk: ;t,�i?�11T W LiVINARX T11" Rte PC1RT 1J RECFFTT POLICY OF TI�r�r THEDATE AND E�LC0RD!14G,114RAWATION BY t^iF3i i MS PAR ICUTAR PARCEL WAS CREATED , BOOK' PAGE., �i�iSt<;td Ai ST:2EOff'' PA'RC'ELS BEING CREATED (iiicluding a, remainder DV*.TAVCM' `tyu IIATGiAIIJ WATER COURGE OR S' OPO MA V1. 1`:8a°Pr ;l,E:l 2 "�` fO +JP MIME bI POsALz /rt D/1// 'D (Va'he&, with Health 'Deprnttment) tit OF WAVRI: (Check with Aealth bq%rtment) ----------------- till Pi W!"'N Afii6, IC? ., LII�"S,s 8XVIT TO TRE liotri Arf OF TkTE ORlrPItAL PARCEL? It., t'uyrY 1.-': 'i*' is TI DILSI Aitt:m. THEY Wi tr TO DE E',C°i'MED :._�' t " . 3utt tCcunty Planning Dept. < ' Receipt Ol ' 7 Caunty Center Driv�t; (Oroville GA 959/x5-39: Applicant� R (916) 538'7601 AP If r Subdivision Name (if applicable) APPENDIX H ,at t t .5 e 7 LAND DIVISION APPLICATIONS SuDolemental Inf.ormati:on for Plannin `Department 1•. List and describe any other related permits and other public approval; required for thisp roiect ' ,, , :.ncludlr.those required by city, regional, state. and federal agenciest/! 2. Proposed scheduling/assoc,iated ro ects• 34 Anticipated incremental development (phasing of subdivision units, future development plans) : "�• What method mill: be utilized to accommodate surface drainage? Describe how do -site ,odd doums,tream drainage channels gill, be affected. PrOxin, ity ofeater k'ar fire fighting purposes (hl drapts, pontis, etc , j Will excavation of grading be necessary'! Cubic Yards (4stiinate}: , D rectIOO's for ttdVei to property (rural and mountainous areas only) 46 V L2 �yi K ,14._1, - 1, i.3' (Jl,r.r� ti l : �, 1 A.a C`l e " s . ENVIRONMENTAL, IMPACTS AND .':MITIGATION MEASURES Identify potentially significant environmental impacts associated with the land division. ghat project; design features or special. conditions of approval (mitigation mea res.) are proposed to alleviate potential environmental impacts? ENVIRONMEINTAL SETTING"` r.) Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural,, historical or scenic asp#lcts. Describe any existing, structures tin the site, and the use of /L, .. 7: _ 1?f i9/lt%S,r'�j` �/O �04C�it� G`Lc1TLf.�li'E ��/ST'�r2/C11L tj/Z C�. S 'o) Describe the. surr.rounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the 'tyjpe of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of 1-ind use (one -family, apartment, houses, shops; depart" ' ment stoles,-Otc,), and .,cafe of develooment (height, frontage,, setback, rear yard, etc.) . ,5.'� � 1 % . j G PaOC �A7" -_ Cf MW % IV �rrtil�r 5l�IG��✓ ���>1'�'1L� ��'S7Dt-..�'r�L I.(Il t,.' LU1,(� 7��,/SI� � CERTIFICATION, I hereby ceetifv that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this ixxhtial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements and information presented Are true and correct .to the best of my knowledge and belief:. Date gignature -Por iuge separate sheet for longer responses. 'aes,)ukUd((Md Pugs 6860 U 9 NNW ti�-z 1` r ` �A �Q• �Ah8hltj �'1uir r��pppt t� �y �y cC}�Ni+"HSA1. 1'T.hN (•f_r�t}^'(1rtihT/�i�Y<:1!: 7+:f•.I'()f+" JINN 9 798. }•'C1f2 f'h1�:(1}+:T.' T TA} Ot':. UBi) r V_;I S- 1'- ON TytAT- ©mvule, Califomib ilsra:r't l�r+ rc� br coripLw..pd by 3pplicant: LCbLl.l S 'D vi Ccuv\ 21,. A111pt.1CANT i;A?*'. AND ADDRESS: ' STkt}Jk:CT DESCRIPTION.ASSE� SSoR'S PARCEL NIMER(9). ` - �.5 S "s�tlw jollouing items ars to be e=pleted by the Planning Department MND 'CONSERVATION AGREEMDiT �l�l,CS "0• V1.0 DL'SICiTAT (tnertt/Is€te Dps'iF^sation Criteria: YES NO V, It is recorsaended -that you perform tho following checked iteras' AR(MAEATAGICAL RECOP.DS CHECK ��siLx.l1 hY i B02'ANICAL SURVEY 1 Y.liMiY:i� W h1'IG VA tL f EOLOGICAL SURVE'1 lei,jYES. No. "+ ----+ Slat• IMI DEPARIMM IF FIST V AL, GAME DEVELOM IT ZOIFEs Wr 2114 FLOOD PLAIt : C yM% --• HI' }TIN AREA, SPEC1 -IC OR T.A 1) USE PLAN: staff Determination: Substantially conforms Names of Plan GEtt�AL PLAN: 1 Land UsL~, I!' Yes, 1. Conservation 3.. Open Spite .+{��•— 4i Safety SMI i{IN UREiAN RESET JE � 4 �`'�° NoiseIf Yes !me of Reserve 6 housing 7. Circulation t _ c rr. /i 5r c AiAil-&-' 'etc e.= Al :PORT LP�»iD tJ5Tr 1 x AN t a vccr �,f �e it'll to e— CLK) i ., j T • "�✓ .�C�l C1L iii.° AS TEfE Ai'PLICAC,T FOR TkiK REQItESTED t.AND DVASION, I AH xSiAFtE 0 1 )E iMVv ttAv, 'rt r WITH E`rERAI9AttON PEGAi2C�OM. jUE S{ . GF..,'E01 PLAN AND xONING, < -- 1 CE i iG4 Attvl;�d .c . Si�in�ture of AppIicant� . A'tiris t+port wi 11 r!}�pire aajtY'be diteardi d si j bra) wnths £ricra the dAte of tfie staff s gnatUet", �,� 117f1(iil C�rrvis0 it i I -t Pr AGRICULTURAI RES: IDM' MAI U 2p_�imary ses: Agricultu:7al uses and single-family dwellings at 'r:,�al densities. Secondary U -,es- Animal husbandry, forestry,intense animal usep, ]d—omeoccupa-cions, *-mining, outdoor recreation facilities, environ - ':i ;;rental'preservation activities, airports, utilities, public and quasi, pub ic uses, group quarters, care homes and transient lodging.. Site Designation Criteria! u -F. Beyond service areas of community'water and sower systems. 2. Less than 30% slopes. 3. Adjacent or near to existing roads, and public utilities. To- within, flood plains or known, Active faults. ist official actions. �' 1ritensit7, of Use: Minimum parcel size of one to forty Acres. wY U-,ne single-family dwelling per parcel. Home occu-cations, farm ;;mals, other uses and setbacks regulated to maintain rural haracter. Gon siststent Zones: A.-20, A-4<,,, TM -201 TM -40, YR -20i FR: 40, & C4., itionally O"DUCL* Consistent Zones: A-5, A-10, Tib -1 thru TM -10 SR -1' AR -M-31 RT -1A. & PA -C, subject to find - _R -2 thru, HR -101 I ing8 of conf ormity with CondItional Zoning and 'Development Vg4 CT teria, listed below. it Gonditional ZoninE and..-Develo-oment 0 Iriteria: I. Com-oatible vr:Lth neighboring a ridultural Activities. 2. Evidence of adequatege disposal capabity. water Mad- seteta _3. Availability of adequate fire protection facilities. M Adeouately maiiltained, approved road access with sufficient capacity to service area., Reasonable accessibility to commercial services and schools: Zoning Factors: -i8ting parcol sizes and residential dehsitie8i 2. Slope 3,. Soil conditions and water availability. 44 Effects on adjacent uses, crop production livestock grazing, -forestry) resources extraction and wildlife habitat. Proximity to public, toads and other public facilJitie84 - In 6. Distognoe fromindustrial Uses. airports, rali1toads and 7. E--tistoing utilitiei and drainage fadilitiesi, 8,4 Potentialfor surface cracking, landslides and erosion. 9. Effects on noise , . traffic, flow and safety; water quality, air quality., wildlife habitat And general environmental . quality. 10, Local desires. 11. Potential for pest insect breeding. ... .... ........ .... tl �` u K_ Planning Department NAME:"D 8L'A'GE It Environmental Health Department CDF (Forestry Department) AP: 27--23-58 Attn:J. Crai g o£ red line on map) . Bunte County Sheriff PG&E (check title report for easement) Pacifell Butte �Cd�nt;- s uito Abate 1'o' � mens OR Orov'Ile Mosquito Abatement (;areas vithi`n large %/map in cabinet) S ool Distriif , (wa 1 map)�7.11.l� I' Sdatar Company (if individual cells are not indicated on applica ion or leap) California water Service Company (Chico area) Durham irrigation OR Durham 14utual kater Co Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation District (Oroville area, SE of river) Thermalitd Irrigation District (Thermalito area NE of river) Limesaddle Community Services District (Paradise area along Pentz Rd' to lake) Del Oro Water (Paradise Pines area). Burtail Waterworks (Roy: mill: Ridge/Forest Ranch area) r Paradise Irrigation District City of (check va" maps .for spheres of iaflue.rce) Oroville Chico Paradise Biggs Gridley �OZGVILLE AREA ONLY: LakeOroville Area PtiblicUtility District (see large map in cabinet) °E Feather River Recreation District (see large map in cabinet) El Medio Fire District (check vall map, a small portion of Oroville only) '" OUTY) checic wall map and title report rGS RICfiVoLsee Gwhat Eapplies,(SSome areas overlapr Drainage. i. st:t4ct Drainage District 2 - Drainage District #1.00 Drainage District 200 Reclamation District X833 Reclamation District 22056 Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District Butte Creek Drainage District i CERTAIN CASBS; Superintendent of Schools (only for subdivisions) Dept. oe Fish and Game (near water and in rural and mountain areas) Cal Trans (near, 8ttte1Pwy.2 3,'70) 99, 149' (Chico cut-otf), 162 (Olive Hwy. & R' chvale 1lwy .) , ( Road) State t&ter Quality Control Board (projec'ts with more than.1110 lots or units) UnitedStates Forest Service (if project borders USA land �-cheek AP books) Parks and Recreation Department (property near Cake Oroville) ��_-.-- Stan Water'Resources Department (property near Lake Oroville watershed) Reek Creels keclaimation Dist, (crest of Chico Airport, south of Rocks' Creels and east Chico Area Recteat �(s Park of Dist (only for subdivisions) SPECIAL CScheck Yrri`ation Distreto(t�umberPdmention items) Special services or easements such as s Ito Thermalitog BUTTE COUNTY . REQU , GENERAL PLPBV CONFORMANCE REPCRI �Q �"o• �rmirig u APR 25,989 arovi!!s, �ah'3 1?,,,erns to be ,completed by applicant, 1. APPLICANT NAME AND ADDRESS: 1 &7 Q's c. A^) 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PA. P `' cam-. I✓1'/� cam' ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERS: 1 23 4 . PROPOSED DISE A'Vjg1VC VAr-A—Al 7" �fJO gerrIAf °rI4tS r'Ak'•tae Y "e,11 Jam" Le A this form with one copy of the tentative map to: �� ,�����^�"�. •� Fichte County Pl Anning department 7 County Centar DriVe Orovil 1 e, Cal ifdrnie 9tP6S .rhe Planning Department Will return the completed cc nformahce report to the appl icatit for his/her signature, The ConFof^mance report v.tst be submitted with the application to the Land De.syeopta tWor Lb IOCDO March `TQ _ Office of 'Plann'ing and R ear4I R t Butte County 1400 Tenth Street, Room' Planning Department Sacramento., CA 95814 7 Countv Center Drive or .41SEP 2 5 1°Rq Oroville, CA 95965 X County Clerk CANDACEI GRUBBS, Butte Co. CJA, County iof Butte By A M'€MERP Deputy � � or 2152 of Che. Public Resources Con compliance 'with Section 21108 sLM—=C= Filing of Notice of Determination iiia. Project Title AP # Name Tentative Parcel Map 27-23-58 Ted P,"ge 5trate Clearinghouse.Jumber Contact Person.Telephone dumber (if submitted to Clearinghouse) John bendonsa, Public Works (9116) .,538-,7266 Project Location At the southeast corner of the intersection of Bangor Bark Road and Dunstone Drive, Bangor area. Project Description Tentative Parcel Map to divide 186+/- acres to create 8 parcels @ 40 acres and l parcel 0 6$ acres This is to advise that the Butte County E (Dead Agency or Responsible Agency) has approved the above-described project on 9/18/89 and 'has made (Date) tha folloIving determinations regarding the: above-described. project; 1. The project will, X will not, have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An Environmental Impact. Report was prepared for % is project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, t A Negative Declaration wras prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of dt% 3. MtiSatiort Pleasures '_. utere, 'were, nots made -a condition of the approval of the project 4, A stdtement of overriding considerations Was; *1 was not, adopted for this project. -This .is to certify that the final 'EIR taith co!ntients and responses ariti record of project approval is available to the general public at Butte County Planning Department i County tenter Drive Otovills, CA 9596 Date,Fteceived for filing and Posting at OPR ,_ SiOgture 13, A. KIRCHER I 1w I Sella Title oo LA14D OF NATURAL w"��Fi+tTW hhi BEAUTY sw DEPARTMENT O1= PUBLIC WORKS INtL.L.IAM (B411)ICHEFF 'Director 7 COUNTY CcNTER DRIVEu'OROVILLi:, CALIrORN"-45965 c T of ephnna: 1916115M 5$p"7266 RONALD D. McELROY Oeputiy Oilei:edr ' CERTIFIED MIL September 18', 198 M: AP 27-23-58 Ted Runge Tp P,, 0. Box 2442 Orovi le, CA 05965 Dear Mr. Runge At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency 'held ori September 18, '[989 the Agency adopted, a negative: decl.arat'ion. with envicorl.inentl mitigations and approved the tentative parcel map on the above -referenced property subject to the conditions fisted on the attached sheet ea'ls are timely =ilea --w tnin ten (i0) days of the date of If no app al -=with the Clerk of the Beard of the Advisory Agen �y's app' , ' Supervisors, this action twill be final., I +?hen the conditions of appr4oval are comp Lied y'ith it will be i.n order for you to :file your "final. map" Butte County ll vith the ep&rtmenC of Public Works for,recordation vi.thin twee-ttyi-four (24) months of the date of approval by the Advisory Agency: if you have, >irly questions tegardiftg this lather', pJdase contact this Office. very truly yours, f Wj:Uit�m Cheff Di,recto'r of Public Works i L JOn Mendonsa Assistant Director �lirtfe'�'-P4�n9 ��:bFncsl. JM/ds SEP I�10i1 attachment De artm M . en t cc Planning, P �Ovn't1�r i�itilrn$ "�l N a rclnrtlental Health Departitegt Ron G;:,aves Associates u .. 1 1 Ted Runge, Tentative Parcel. Map, AP 27-23-58, 4 parcels located at the southeast coorner',!)f the intersection of Bangor Park Road and. Dunstone Drive. Bangor area. En i.neerr: Ron Graves Public Works conditions; 1 Indicate a 50 ft. building setback from the centerline of Dunstone Drive and Bangor hark Road. 2 Show all easements of record on the final map. 3 Obtain encroachment permit for all dri+rnways, new or existing, and construct to county standards, 4 Pay any, dalinquent taxes or current tOxes as required. 5 !feet the .requirements of the Butte Cotfnty Fire Department: Health Dept. conditions.- onditions;6 6 Prove that the required usable sewage.'di sposal area exists on parcel Z or combine with an adjacent parcel any parcel not proven to cor;t9in the usable sewage disposal area required by the Subdivision Ordinance 7 Show the usable sewage disposal: area, proven to meet the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance on parcels 1, 2, 3 and 4, Tht following Mitigation measures are required; Show Zone "'A" tloo& boundaries on Pinel ,lap and designate the flood zone as a "no -development area." No development shall mean no sttatures,, Vegetation removal, and no cultivatjOfti Provisions will be made to allow one driveway/road to cross the creek.. Ltilize: -a common driveway/road to ;acct:ss hotnesite locations on the ,a.. east side of Wilson Greek:: } it d� ff c Suite Url EhI'�7 OF �ATU AL 'AlEALTH Awi�it7 RtAUTY 4 DEPARTMENT of PUBLIC WO.'IKS WILLIAM (Bill) CHEFF, Director 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA -9.596= Telephone., (916) 538-7266 RONALD D. mcELROY CERTIFIED MAIL Aepu+y Oire.Mar September 1 1989 I "fed Runge RE: AP 27-23-58 P. 0; Box 2042en to tive Parcel Map Oroville, CA 95965 'Dear Mr. Runge; Please be advised that the Butte County Advisory Agency will hear your application on the above -identified property on September 18, 1939. The Agency will be reviewing the: findings from the Planning Department and will be considering your, tentative parcel map. Public Works will recommend Ps.p Conditions of approval as listed on the attached sheet: The meeting wdll commence at 9:00 a.m. in the Board of 'Supervisor 1 5' Room, County Administration, 'Building, 25 Cotinty Center Drive, Oroville; California. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please conUldt`thi5 1, office. Very, truly, yours, W lAam Cheff " Director .of Public. WdA8 Jon MendonsI A I ii ,cant D7 t etor JM/ds attachment; cc: Plhft�ing tment Envi-6nmenp talrarti p '�nl�Health De . nt I Ron craves M � . tT �� : rk�hc.: . . . ... .::.. . ..... .... .....:: �_ :....... Ar ��.,,�..�o-ve•aabM .ti iraY.r+r`r 11 �� INTRODUCTION General archaeologicalThis an survey of a land split proposed by Mr. Ted Runge i f Oroville Califurn ias'the results f The project will involve approximately '1.80 acres of unincorporated lands located northwest of Loma Rica in southernmost Butte .County, California. Development for residential use, including home, road, septic, and well - construction, will follow approval from Butte County of the tentative parcel map.. According to State and County definitions, the proposed project constitutes an "undeitaking" which coald adversely affect cultural resources which might be looted within the area of potential effi:ct (AP13). Accordingly, a cultural resources inventory coupled with an assessment of the National Register eligibility status of any recorded sites, as well as a review of potential project impacts and a list of mitigative measures, is required pursuant to Butte County requirements, and in compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U,S.C. 470), and Procedures of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (36 CFJk 800). The remainder of this report details the results of the archaeological -survey and provides a professiional assessment of the cultural resources which might be affected by the project. All fieldwork procedures followed guidelines *provided by the State Historic Preservation Offzcie (Sacramento) and are in conformity with a&epted professional standards. Location The Runge parcel consists ofapproximately 180 acres of land located within a portion of Section 36, Township 18 North, Range 4 East, of the USGS Loma Rica and Bs-ingor, Califoma (194,'7/1969), 73' Ssries Quads. The parcel is bordered around the west and north sides by`Dunsttjne Road, and along and east and, south by Section lines separating Section 36 from Sections 31 and 1, respectively (see.Project Area Map, attached), Records Scinrch Prior to going into the field the archaeological records maintained by the Northeast California Information Center at Chico were examined .for any existing recorded prehistoric or historic sitm in addition, the National Register of HistoricPlaces was also consulted (USDI 1987). No sites were found to be recorded within or adjacent to the Casey project area, although the archaeldgicat sensitivity of the area was indicated by the large number of sites which have been recorded within the general region. However, none of these previau ,ly recorded sires extend onto the Casey parcel, and none will therefore be ,affected by the proposed developments which will accompany the Cd•sey land. split project. General Pro ca Content; The Runge parcel is located within territory which, at tb,e time of initial contact with- Euroamericans in the middle of the 19th' 'CenturY was occupied by the Northwest ldlaidu, or 1{ons .w Indians (Riddell 1978: Figure 1; Forbes 1989). The. basic social unit for the Konkoiv ' Was the family,although the village may also be considered a social, as vCe11 as a political and ': .. .2 economic, unit. Villages were usually located on flats adjoining streams, and were inhabited mainly in the winter as it was necesaty to go out into the hills and higher elevation zones to establish temporary camps during food gathering seasons (i.e., spring, summer and fall). Villages typically consisted of a scatteringt of bark houses, numbering from four or five to ,several dozen in larger villages, each house containing a single family of from three to seven People. As with all northern California Indian groups, economic life revolved around hunting, fishing and the collecting of plant foods. Deer was an important treat source, along with rabbits, gophers, and virwally every other small mammal, and many of the reptiles, which lived in the area. Acorns were the single most important vegetal food, although buckeye, manzanita berries, elderberries, Indian potatoes, clover, hazelnuts, digger pine nuts, wild grapes, ,and many other plant products were also consumed and/or used for medicinal purposes: I The Ma du were very sophisticated in terms of their knowledge of the uses of local animals and plants, and of the availability of raw material sources which could be used in manufacturing an immense array of primary and secondary tools and implements. Unfortunately, only fragmentary evidence of their material culture remains, due in part to perishability, and in part tache impacts to archaeological sites resulting from later (historic) land uses, particularly mining activity. Based on the results of previous survey work Within the vicinity (e.g.., Jensen 1979), the expected range of remnant prehistorieaborig nal site types included the following: (1) middens associated with house pit depressions and other surface features located on undisturbed flats or benches adjacent to Wilson. Creek; Ar B ` g short-term occupation ancVor specialized economic activities; (2) surface scatters of lithic artifacts and debits a resultin 'from (omining hons, including especially •ully mortar holes, where appropriate bedrock outcrops area available, and, (4) isolated finds of aboriginal artifacts and flakes. It was not expected that all of these site types would. be present within the Runge project area, but rather that the above types would be the most likely to be encountered ifany ices were identified at. all. ° FIistodc evidence exists to document that some of the Spanish and. Mexican expeditions arid early fur, trapping ventures may have come through and made brief slays within the general project vicinity. However, the first major incursion by Whites occur `.,4,during the Gold Rust period. Within the present project area; alining of plater depor - i ' xtensive and has been more or less continuous since the middle of the 19th (entur�r, ►nsive tailings piles can be seen virtually everywhere along Honcut COA and its tributarir's, and within the present project area such tailings Were clearly identiCed.on the existing USES quad, maps, The presence of such features indicated not only that histor O, -era sites might be encountered, but also that �aoany of the earliest historic and prehistoric sites�'or scte COmponents which may once have: eusted within the area could already have been destroyed by the later episodes of mining activity:, v ;"Od, Work. and Pield Survey Strateg, Wilson Creek -flows roughly northeast to southwest through the parcel, effectively dividing the parcel into a southeast half and a nnrtltwest half, The northwest half casists primarily or ml. a tailings which occupy virtually all of the originalbed of `'Nilson Creek and which have undoubtedly modified the original course or ,the stream through this area. Vegetation among the tailings piles consists of dense concentrations of berry vine`, willow, and additional. elements of a riparian association. The southeast "half" of the project area ,consists of hilly, generally open terrain, with vegetation dominated by short grasses and scattered oaks and digger pine; this hilly area has been less impacted by past mining and other activities, although a graded road proceeds east -west through this area, crossing Wilson Creek on two small bridges -- one located immediately east of the projtxt parcel, and a second. looted just w .f the center of the parcel. The general project area was considered of moderate to high archaeological sensitivity in consideration of the presence of a significant water source, the proximityof this mrater source to food resources important in prehistoric economies, and the evidence of past alining activity (Le., historic use and occupation) within the immediate area. ,As a eonsequencic, the entire parcel was subjected to an intensive survey by walking non-systematic transects spaced between about 20-30 to apart. However, approximately 70% of thepiles of mine tailor -n could not be inspected in this manner due to impenetrable' berry vines and other vegetation. These ureas of tailings were subjected to a cursory -level inspection only, Overall, however, the survey strategy employed during the present project is believed adequate to have identified all of the significant or potentially signifiL�ant cultural rL ;ources 'ocated'within the,Runge parcel. Field work for the present project was undertaken on August 17 and 18, 0891 by Jensen &.'. Associates' Supervisory Archaeologist William Shapiro. In searching for cultural resources the surveyor tools into account the results of background research, and inspected with particular care knolls, terraces, ridges, mid -slope benches, and bedrock outcrops -- i.e., landforms likely to be archaeologically most ser usitive. The surveyor was also alert far.any unusual. contours, soil changes, distinctive vegetation patterns, exotic materials, artifacts, feature or feature remnants and other possible markers of cultural sites. PROJECT FINDINGS ]Prehistoric Cultural Resources Evidence af'prehistoric utdoccupation was encountered at four widely dispersed locations within the project area. Allrepresent isolated examples of bedrock mortar cups, one of which contained only a single cup (#1), thio contained two cups each (#3 and #8), and one ofwhich contained three cups (96). A thorough examination of the land area surrounding each of these occurrences failed to reveal any additional evidence of prehistoric activities,, and the features Which ;are ubi( itous throughout dzis area (see Jensen 1,979), were thus recorded as Isolated F,datures onlyNumbers 1., 3, 6 and 8); The habitation complex with which one or more these may, have been associated could well have been destroyed long ago by the mining activities along Wilson Creek and its tributaries; in any case, such a site does,iaot exist intact Within the Runge parcels inview of the absence, ofany additional contextual' inii.lirmation, or other data relevant to these features, none is considered eligible for inclusion on the National Register, nor otherwise to retain additional significant information value. The present recording resulted in complete re,overy oft xational and dimensional Information foi all four of these. features, with the former preserved on the wtached Project Area and Feature Z.ocation Map, and the latter preserved in Table 1, below,, w -4 - Table 1: Dimensional Data for Four, Isolated Bedrock MortarFeaurga N4aximum Diameter (Cm) Maximum Depth Runge I.F. #1 Cup #1: 14cm Tan Runge LF. #3 Cup #1 6 2 Cup #2:: 8 1.5 Runge I.F. #6: Cup #1; t2 4 Cup #:!i 13 10 Cup #.,.1: 1.3 10 Runge U.48: Cup #J g 1 Cup #2 6 I Potential EV dente of Historic Mining Activity. Evidence of:probable early historic use/activity was encountered at two separate locations (short walls), and of Qoq ble early'historic activity at two additional locations (ditches), As well, evidence of historic mining was observed in the form .of the mine tailings debris concentrated along Wilson Creek and its miner tributaries, as identified. on existing USGS quad maps. Minor Walls; Two: of the finds,,Isolated Features #4 and 45, represent low, short sections; of rock wall constntcted along the margins of a minor, umamed tributary of Wilson Creek, apparently in conjunctionwith diversion of water from this seasonal channel in order to expose a bead in the stream for gold extractiou. Wall I.F. #4 'measures 28 feet in y . overall length,was constructed b piling Iocal cobbles from 3-4 courses high to achieve a maximum height and width of -.7.5 feet. Wall I.F. #5 measures 65 feet In overall length, and was also constructed by piling l(Kml cobbles, in this case from 5-6 courses high in order to achieve a maximum height of 2.$-3 feet and a maximum width at the base of 3-4 feet. Except for minor tailings debris emanating up this small drainage from WIW.)n Creek, no additional historic features and no historic artifacts or artifact concentrations were observed in association with these features. In view of the: absence of any additional contextual data, neither of the walls is considered eligible for iticlusion on the National Register) noir otherwise considered to retain additional significant infdrmation value. The present recording of both is coosidered adequate mitigation of any potential effects .to these features which might accompany the. proposed Runge development project, and no further treatment is recommended. Minor Ditches; TWo of the;;tinds, Isolated Features 02 and #7, represent short segments of ditch,. bitch I;F. 92 may have diverted Water from from the same unnamcd seasonal tributa alon which the two minor walls were observed., although no headwork$ or �` B other diversionstructures were observed within the project area. The ditch is quite small, measuring 2.3 feet wide across the top, less than l foot wide at the bottom, and less than 1 foot beep, The feature extends abUnd the nose of.,a rninor ridge for C, 500 feet; and then disapp�ws before reaching the bottom of a second small seasonal tributary ofWilson Creek. No other features or artifacts Wore observed along the system,, thi3 entire length ofwhich was examined on foot: c -s- Ditch LF, #7 also represents a very small ditch segment, located near the southwest corner of the project arca. This ditch averages 2-3 feet across the top, l..foot deep, and less than 1 foot in width across the bottom. The western portion of the d'..ch was destroyed in` conjunction with building Dunstone Road, and the eastern end of the system disappears in tailings piles on the west side of Wilson Creek, No other features or artifacts were observed' along the system, and; it is quite probable that the ,feature is not early historic in age. In view of the absence of any additional contextual', data for either, one of these ditches, and in view of the veryreal passibility that neither represe,, s early historic activity, neither 'IS considered eligible for inclusion on the National Regirter nor otherwise significant or potentially significant to local or regional history. The present recording of both is considered adequate mi'igation.. of any potential effects, and no further treatment is wart=ted or recommended. Contemporary Items (1940's a•): Evidence of contemporary use and occupation was observed in the form of tun existing gr within the project area on a beam -supported tided access road'whrch crosse:r� Wilson Creek i; bfidge, and contemporary trash items (including a few unidentified metal objects (some of which may represent "angle -iron" fence posts))f None of this material represents potentially significant historic data, and none was recorded during the present project, RECOMMENDATION FOR, THE PROiPOSED RUNGE PROJECT As noted above; not of the eight isolated Features contain qualities, which would render them eligible for inclusion on the National Register of !aStoric Places. Moreover, the present inventory survey, -t hich has resulted in descriptive and', locational docmn+.ntation for all eight., is seen as t ddquate preservation of the information values which these features possess. Comacquently, the present, recording is also considemd adequate mitigation of any potential effects to these features which might accompany Runge's proposed development of this parcel. In consideration thereof, archaeological clearance is recommended for the proposed undertaking, with the following general provision; should subseq+ueiYt construction or development activities expose burned artiliacts or other evidenctt of prehistorin or historic occupatton, a qualified rtrrhaeoltsgyst should be contat;ted immediately 'in order tO assess the potential impacts of the project to the culltuml resources encanntered„ r i ItEFEP.ENCIES ICI.TED )' N,D%AOR. UTILIZED Buttic l y$x) En��ir<anmelabil Perer;ption of theF�xstirall Kan!kow Rela gi `aizs Landscape-, Co�tnfy, Ca i!fornia. Unpublished Mastet's'I..esis. Department of Anthropmloggy, Cali:,)mia State UrniveNty, if-1uco. fensen,, Pet, -U- M. i9f11 A.rCbaeoj4Ir l Ynyetnti ary Sta3de3• of the F'ropt ed Collins Lake `�e^,t Ssbdivas"ion Project, Yuba County, Cairo-mbL Report on File, Californi • Sof �. PRO.]ECT PRS �4ND I t,��34s FOR 8 Sd T FF1'IUREjS T 1f!q ACRE RU\SR "P-*' t'cYe _r 11171'1,EI] +71��t1�7 1 llEp'plrFtT1Y[FNT Or THE INTERIOR BURIrAU OF RECLAMATION y 0E.OLOOICAL SURVFIY 6 s 30 b` 63000DM,E 31 432 Z o c 27"3'Q" X33 t' L'.ar�ad A P 4 "" •` b �-?y' a ,•d i e-t�i.a \. ,�' r" F �,�vN �l;�Il�• � (J / .,,tet°.. '`« j �.�.`"y.'=� � ,ra�'''�.�:� ";w\,.'�17� e!.a��.� E r •. �•—' w �' fix,, j �.��.- . ��rt �,,� v- •�, : ���..-,:_.,�,�,,..,.�'"""q •">� r,�:� $ .a. ya. ` i �' d� 4 �M': ,y� 11, �O±.a O ��� , �'`1�•.'� ti' tl �. � +siR' 'iy�,wM �'�$'-'� 11jj ��•. a�/ 7 _ 1iy io � ��. f , Yl �, �. \\ \�' } �� ,.+a.�� '.y�.r.:'`t_�..�.�.�`' ,u� ...} ; i. �\ � �( ,�, a aI ♦.�± ,� 1ka �! , 1 � r }. l y a , �� � � �, �'� � k "�, y °'� '✓� "� CJ � Q � I !'� � Ise. � +,� ,1L.a� 1114 �I .r ��4{a^r� �� � �`. '*��� ,�'r k •IY � ,a���,A� � ��� ���:na.� 4('.N��� ! ee +tsr A lr� C r 3 t! S Aj • r W �f Fr. it , rt �� { �. / � aF i� r7'Y ..t ,/(s "^, 'mr�"."'`.w��Y ~ 1 L � .,,,1. �� �' •�,,d ��^' J,�, �.Jr �1,' /� Yy rM ...a a...�r�. � /a? t� r +. vr�� it . a ♦ `� �-/"� � , 9 � ..,, ;GAJ i tiA • j O' .» t J `�'��i-T F r rel:. __��,.'`�'C '"y �� .y� /�,.`l -� \�1� K1 � 1/ / • � �,v',", � � �/' �`�i. �"! MARE E` .. r .. '"-+.. W4 11 .0 Y. h � , ry�t,t„:sa.�..l `ytrl�.� .•...=�:�- y `�. ��,`,`,.w.ra.a.\ ''{""'✓ I a BUTTE tOUNTy' DEPARTMENT OF 'ISL;BLI�C HVAL� TH 3.DFsE�ART D'Vision of Env tonmental health k 7 County &'ftter 'Drive Orov ll e, j;tA 95965 (916) 5316-72131 August 24, 189$ Ron Graves P. o. Box 986 Oroville CA 95965 PE: 'RUNGE, Ted - App 27-23-58, Banger Park Road Duns tale Dear Sir: This department has advised the. RUtte. CountDepartment of public Y Works Land Development. Section that above application. wl;t are prepared to act on the i Based On present info+cmation conditional approval. ' we Can recosamend approval or Recommend Cond ittins for A �pr;aval z 1! Prove eltha t the require tt:sabllb� sewaRi7e disposal area exi:sta 2 ar .cnmHine tth h an adjacent on pr'ven to contain the Usable � `=e5�aparcel any -parcel not the Subdivision 'i�isl�osal area OrdinOrdinance,ge required by 2 o Shaw he Usable sewa e� 9- disposal are rtequ , et,*Mts of. the Sub iv si. a Proven to meet the , and, 4:� ori 0rdJ WIiV,, a an parcels 1, 2, 3 Tomyffu hesou e Or I' s 'ti stiOns regardin this letter. , Please contact B fiat the �}?unber between 8.00 above listed aiddress or telephone - 10 - 00 A M i weekdays, • . Sincerely;. N� Philip ;. Nelson �rAl Stzper'srsin J Rnviroxtmerttal � klealth Epedialist Division of 8hVir0nment4l Heald PtN/-kf' \ • cc p arirng DepartmenC «.►" ,i To Lkutte County Planning 17 r-A=ty Ceiter Dr. Orcrrtlle, Ca_. 9596 re: AP rr27-23:Al Runge Dear grunt v Piarulerri„ A re*riew or the above proje t has revealeri the following XX The area i dicatedas. within the project boundaries is considered t o be archaeolc gic lly sens;i.tive.. Present are: Y Easy access to rAtural sources of water x Flat aea6owlarr3 or flat land bear water cath and/or east facing slopes _ X Previously recorded sites ,in t+he Vicinity X 101 --her: The 'edrir�dg-?r tailings" are probably historic mining -. ta.ilsng` izcft shout by -roxor'ded. _fhi:s area is considered f�sstr ly sertsitrxvp for historic cul"t.'zral re -,sources, There a.s also a good pgssib%lLt�y of prebist irmiic resces beiL--tct present;. XXX We strcr ;gjy i:ec onn---4 that an archaeological recorinaissance_ be cmacted of Uie area by a qualified archaeologist and appropriate Ini.tic�ati�xi visasures pre :aced; Arknown site or sites bas/have. been pirevicusl_y recorded in the. pi cijfict area P_o'e^7toto ations will have a, negative iapact o these cultural rezoUrces. Oe r�;xi that: a at --~''r' .-` ,,i:chadolo3ist<;,be cont+.a;tted too assess -site; !:its rer p .tigative ptcoosal. ��,..> .:. Other Thank ,.you Cor the c9portunity tis 'review and comment ri t:.his� proposal. P1.ease let knob ghat decisions ate made regarding lige projed�.. Sxnce LZ(45�,; el %, i `'e NorUleatt Information Center Ccordinator ui & w , cci Ron Graves Assuciates ms`s 0 California ��U CiQ�tl�fl c� l�d� t�l s"� ��� (11 Department of Anthropology Arcba�o(q icat o o 14 Q Udo c� California St, iJni"varsity, Chir Inventory TEV -W Chico, CA 9592 , 1 AULIRS iAlNiiY (916) 895-6256 i43te:.— �Ug c 1 -y �- a,� 1589 p ..-OtA To Lkutte County Planning 17 r-A=ty Ceiter Dr. Orcrrtlle, Ca_. 9596 re: AP rr27-23:Al Runge Dear grunt v Piarulerri„ A re*riew or the above proje t has revealeri the following XX The area i dicatedas. within the project boundaries is considered t o be archaeolc gic lly sens;i.tive.. Present are: Y Easy access to rAtural sources of water x Flat aea6owlarr3 or flat land bear water cath and/or east facing slopes _ X Previously recorded sites ,in t+he Vicinity X 101 --her: The 'edrir�dg-?r tailings" are probably historic mining -. ta.ilsng` izcft shout by -roxor'ded. _fhi:s area is considered f�sstr ly sertsitrxvp for historic cul"t.'zral re -,sources, There a.s also a good pgssib%lLt�y of prebist irmiic resces beiL--tct present;. XXX We strcr ;gjy i:ec onn---4 that an archaeological recorinaissance_ be cmacted of Uie area by a qualified archaeologist and appropriate Ini.tic�ati�xi visasures pre :aced; Arknown site or sites bas/have. been pirevicusl_y recorded in the. pi cijfict area P_o'e^7toto ations will have a, negative iapact o these cultural rezoUrces. Oe r�;xi that: a at --~''r' .-` ,,i:chadolo3ist<;,be cont+.a;tted too assess -site; !:its rer p .tigative ptcoosal. ��,..> .:. Other Thank ,.you Cor the c9portunity tis 'review and comment ri t:.his� proposal. P1.ease let knob ghat decisions ate made regarding lige projed�.. Sxnce LZ(45�,; el %, i `'e NorUleatt Information Center Ccordinator ui & w , cci Ron Graves Assuciates ms`s 0 Y Thter-Departmental Memorandum s Butte County' Advisory Agency Plarinin.g Director B�kCT. Report on Tentative Parcel. Map for Ted" Runge, AP #027-23-0-0:513 1' ft aUIX 2L 1,89 This is a proposkal to divide 186 +/-, acres to create three 40 ,tCr os parcels, and one 65 acre parcel.. The present zoning is A-$ 0 xicaltural - 8 acre parcels . The Land Use. Plan. Map of the -te County General Pla-A designates this area asAgricultu'ral ae"aid6n,t£al,. There are no specific or community plans dor the ,The proposal does not conflict with County Zoning nor any adopted �ar proposed element of the Butte County General Phar nor any zpocif is or community plan., Negative Dec'laratiun has been, prepared for the proposed project im accordance with the Cali=ornia Environmental Quality Act and forwarded to the Butte County Advlsory Agency within the required 105 days puirsuant to the California Public Resources Code Section ;1151.5. ecommend approval with the>following mitigation measures; UnIGATION MEASURES t 'any Perform an archad,61ogical records search and adhere to the recommendati ons given by the search„ Perform an archaeological su1;,v�3y if rec�ui r~eco `,., Show zone "A'' flood boundaries on Final Mapand designate the llo,�d ione as a Ono -development area:" No development .shall me ,n no ;structuzes., vegetation removals and no cua;i� ,vat%on. PrOvisipft8' will be made to allot: ane dr.lveway/toad to crass the cl:i-,gk,. Utilize a common"driVdway/road to access homesite locations 7n the east s ,cle of in�ilson Cz`eek CBS., fcl ccs TekJ Runge I Rota", Graves t' � Y J t „ JJJJ i • ;.,�,.. "� • ate: .0unt -suite, C CANT? OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY, PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER CIRIVE OROVILLE. CALIFORNIA 95965.3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 53&7601 Illy 21, 1989 `fed Runge ;P.O, Box 2042 Drov:ille, CA 95965 Re: Tentative Parcel Map APi 027--23-0=058 Dear Mr. Runge. Vhe Butte County Planning Department has completed the =environmental review 'of your project in accordance with the California Environmental QLIF-L ty Act and forwarded to the Butte Count y Advisory Agency withii,,the required 105 days pursuant to the California 'Public Resources Code_ Section 21151.5. In addition, the Planning Directorts report required by Sections 10- 63 and 20-99 of the. Butte County subdivision Ordinance has been d6mpleted. Please find enclosed the Planning Director's Report %,h.ich has been prepared for your project,. PA..ease review the enclosed Planning Director's Report with ;conditions of approval .if applidablei if you .note any errors or omissions in our evaluation, please,bring them to our attention. The Environmental Documents and Planning Director's Report for Y,Wr project have been sent to the Butte County Advisory Agency fdro their acti,in. �al';fornia laovernment Code Sections 65950 and 65952.1 requires the Butte county Advisory Agency set hearings and approve or disapprove your project within six months from the date on which your ri�l�,Oived and accepted. The fix month time limit for your prcj ec. mandated by state law, willaccur l �f theotiittenand Place of Advisory Agency Will notify you p pub7.ic .hearing fol: your project,. xf there are modifications to your project, not related to, mitigating an identified impact,, re-evaluation of your prof et t �shal ; be required � l 1, game of proponent _ CO .. uncle 2, Address of proponent and 'representative (if applicable)-. P.o. Box. 20,42 Ron Graves ,3. Project description: TentatiVe Parcel. Map, i,__ driACJT�ATbFtY FYT7i3 NG5 OV SxCN2F",_CA_WCE YES NLITE,, No- 1. Dues tle project have the potential to eegrade, the quality of the enviraiin+enti substantially rend a the habitat of a fish v)v wildlife species cause a fish or wlldlatfe population to drop below self-s%vrtayning levels, threaten to eliminate A plant or animal cc=unity, reduce the cumber or restrict the range of a 'rare or endakngered plant or animal or eliminate irapoi'tant examples of major periods of cal fornia history or prehistory? ----- 7,, floes the project have, lthe 'potential to achieve short-term benefits to the Y - the detri�"nt of 'Aong-terra environmental goalsY {A short-term impact on me °- environnt is one Which occurs in a relatively brief ,period of time while , long-term impacts will endure inti the future,) 1. Does the project have impadti khIth are individually limited but dumulativaly considerable?(A project may impact on two or more separate resosrcFs where the impact on each resource: is relatively ,,mall) but where the effect of tle total, of those impacts on the environment is significant') ax Does the project have environmental effects which will, cause, substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectxy? .. TSr t1 TERM�I AT,TOX (To be completed by tyre lead Agency) , (1n the basis orf this initial evaluation: IJWE rind the proposed project COUM NIOT have a significant effect oh the environment and a NWATIV9 DECLVATION'Villl be prepared, the proje;t coMD have a signi.ficaht effect ` ,I/Wh find that although proposed becausd on the environment, there will not be a $ignifieant effect in this case the MITIGATION WSURE5 described on the. attached sheet have been added to tl:o+, project, A MATYVE DECLLVATIo3t 14111 be prepared. WE I� find the proposed ptolect SAY have a sign P P ificant affect on theeiivironmeht W.---- and an MIRONARTAL IHPACT REPORT is reVired CoUNTY or BUTTE, PLANNING bE11AR'Irt T ' jIATE July. 7 , 15 85 By.. - Cr,aiq Sanders Asst sta PIA hft6 ' IJ Reviewed by. 's - (Explanations of all "YES" and ""MAYB$"" answers are required on attached sheet(s): '1, EAR?Ft. Vill the proposal. result in significants NO YES_ AI�YBE _NO a. unstable earth conaiititms, or changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruption, displacement, compaction or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. Destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Increase In wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off site? C- f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sand,41, or changes in siltation) deposition or erosiron. which. aiy modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Z. toss of prime agriculturally productive soils outside designated urb.',n areas? h. Exposure of peopl or, property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground. failure or similar hazt;ds? j 2. AIR. Will the proposal result in subst"tialt j A. Air e=issions or deterioration of ambient air quality? r b. The .creation of obb$ectionable odors, sma a or fumes? c. Alteration of air tWvement, moisture or temperature, or any change in clinata,; locality or regionally? 3, WATER'. Will the propu kat result in substa+t vial: a. ChRnges in currentso or Lhe_,course or direction of water mCaetFnts " o then fthe Ot fn esfY wate b, Changes itz absorption rates) drainage pat�tezr.tk� or the .rate and amount ace runoff? c, Need for off-site., sitrface drainage improvoineats, including vegetation Installation? removal, ciannelization or culvert JG� d. Alterations to the cou_se or flow of flood Waters? e. Change in the amount'of surface water in Any water body? _ f. bischargo- into or water ` ,;rod quality, including, but riot limiace ted to, temperature, til: o q y. g � s , � + "red oxygen or _ turbidity?, g, lslteration of the dixectiorE or rate of flow of ground wat61.21 !''r h, 'Change in the quantity or quality of ground Waters; either through direct additions or vithdtavale) or through interception of an aquifer f by cats or exra4ations7 � r L P.eduetion in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies'? a J. Exposure of people `or property to water=related :hazards such as floodings A. PI'.An L'%M Will the proposal result in substantial,: a. Cha,-,ge in the diversity of species; or slumber of atly species of plants (including trees) shrubs, grass) crops, and aquatic plants)? .. . b, Rdduetion of tiip nucibers of any unique) rare or endangered species of plants; C. Introduction of hew*ecie9`tf`,plants into ah areas or th a barrios to the norwl replOhifili" Ont of e.�isting speciet t d. Reduction in acreage of only agricultural crop? T 4 l 177777, �. a ,I «YE5 L, LIn, Will the proposa.,l resuX , n s ubstantia] : £, (YMp_ :. trAYBE NO C� �__ oi.s species, or numberu of any species of animals . Change in the diversity p rawtijelir fish, and sheilfish, organisms' animals including ,. _ _ (.tirds, hind of insectl )? in the numbd-r!; of, any uniqueEj rare or endangered species of b. Reduction ankirals? of neN species ni animals ;into an aria, or in a barrier to C. Introduction the -migrat:ion or movement df' animals d. I)'?teriorati.on of existing ii�sh or t+iidlife habitat? Will the proposal result in substantial: v;I a. Increases in existing noise lvels? v✓ b. Exposure of people to severe noire ievels2 — .-. t-jaAIM GLARR, tall, th6 proposal produce signifaeant light and glare? T. --�- ]^ems US£. Will. the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the pre>sezt or planned land use, of an area? NATUF:AI. RE50URCR:15 Will the proposal :result int substantial: �✓ A. Im.rease in the rate of use of amV natural resources? N leIion of any non-renew'ab'le nab%iral resources"+ b. _ p I 1 RiSX C� Er, Will the proposal ;involver t a ,� diat%on� in tk�e eveni a, ^std^.iii 5 9 .' ri ila^�uf ex*ilasion or ralease of ha iss.�bstances inclyide"e �S `+`•�" relJ► ;.r, t' ; « { t S w c of an aocidta'u nx �H` _ i 'tth an energeney respotl;se plant emergency b; p - sib .;e interference, `t/ e . acuatiot. plant Will the proposal alter lotatioitt dist;ributioni density or pOpt?T,,=ON. 0,uU_ t rate of the ht man population's HOUSINGWill the proposal affect existing htkising; or create A demand (J for add-Itio ial housing? S13: TRANS AT?ON%9RgaATItftf. Will the proposal result in: a. Generati.on of substantial additional vehicle movement? b. Effeet t on existing- parking fdci'lit:las, or demand :for new parka � f impact on existing transportation .systemrl c. 5ubsta►tial d. 5ignificauit alterations to present patterns of" dirc�nitltion or y %, Movement of people and/or goods rations to �taterbarne rail or air raffia?6. Alte� in traffic hazards to inotar veh Toles, bicyclists or pedestri.ans� - `-L f . Increac8 effect upon) br resu?* in a'reed Wg p ~nvern�nt 1+4. �tnew or altered se rvscesVe _------- -- fti ' JA a. Fire protection?L . �.• b: Police pzdtectiori2 l S l d; paries or other rdcreaticnal facilities? e: Mit tefiallte of public facilities) including '.r0ads f ; Other gover^nmentai. services? 15. ptERGY. Jill tt a proposal result ins w1 YES MAB—g N� a. 'Use of substantial a=unts of fue'1 or energy? " b. Sut)stzintial .increase in demand Upon ekisting 60uiv9s of energy, or Vi•` requite the develop-�ent:of new so!irces of energy? ;-�.� .._.... 1b,, 1ITir TTIF.a. Will the proposal result in .a need for new systems, or ttubstr�itiai altgrations to the ',Luayo'wi lg3 a,. Pdwer or natural gas;' amu._ V b. Coni-ations Systems? m=J _ c.. Water availability? .-- -- V ✓ d. 5eveL o .septic systeas ' LZ n. Ston l vate^r drainage? ---- 9 f, Solid vaste and disposn17 V { 1i.LkHL�ALi3y, %4ill the proposal result .n; a. Creationof any health hazard or potential hazard (excluding rmnta) y% healt b f %pos' Of pa_opi.c,:; r� :`"' health hazards? . of any e "t` l_ Yom.. oili�, the , propw; result in the obstrbetioji sc itsiilt r� 4G oz view open to the publigA oe will the proposal in ;ate f riration of an aesthetically of�Fensive site open► w; b' W la 'sY� i• . 31 i'4 rxs , �, f .�a• " in en ir5pact ua cn the quality or 1• ®Main ity R P JtisTtpL. ; te.. ,,' ),IkAl oppartuftitics? a. dill the .p�cmposal result in .;3e alteration or destruction of a pze sist�xr c ar historic ardmoological site --r- bi the result in adv aesthetic effects ystructure toll d,p h st�oricior historic building orobject? c. wetPhysical change 4 which Vou affect unique OiEhnicltural valuestcu d. Will the proposal, restrict exisiting religious or sacred uses Vithin the potential impact Area? 5C� 7S S' CJl t ° 'h NVT)rZONMIk, At- r---VATTJA'JC7 Qt xwa attached C, (1 ii IIi{p I 1 1 ,7I(' Iii -1-- iIl 1� 11 1 rl , lo, ij b I, r, 'C 1 SCUSS 1014 of ENv,ENTA1? EVAi.IDAT 1014 AP ProJec divide tl$ a esorIPtIbn This 1s a tentative parcel map application to Pt to create three 40 merle Parcels and one 65 acre parcei. The topography consists of roll Ing hlIis: with a number of dralnage ,swaIes and at naturaI Water course, Wilson Creek There are ,farge daposlto of Placer ,tapings on-site. The natural vegetation' Includes digger pine, oaks, cottonwood trees and annual grasses. There are only three residences in the immediate area: .1b: Thede WIII be :some disruption, compaction and overcovering of the so11 assoc, Iat-ed With future constru;tion of 4 Names on the parol 1.5 laE� I ng created. The amot+nt of disruption will vary depending on homes l to I beat I on. and I eligth of the dr i )feways, If the homes 1 res a.r d proposed east of Wilson Creek drIveway Iengths couI d approach 2200rft, >i;zencof.ding requiring a bl-Idgel. to cross the creek. Due to the lbrtlthe parcels be, Ing ce'e-ated the amount of disruption, c►VerGover I ng, and compact I ng ;sho€l D d ni;5t be s ,gn I f l cant. Je,fi The erosion po`Eent I aI for the Parcel Is moderate Irl, the areas of lesser, slope near WIIson Creek and high 1n the areasof greater :slope on tine eastern part of the parcel. The greatest erosion ,potent i a 1 w I I t occur during construction of dr I veWays and hornes i tes 861118 d i s,rupted during the ra'I ny season WI 11 wash down Into Wilson eCreek. :Any disrupted soils should be stabilizedand revegetated ,ifefor to November, I: Some sediment Washed down toward WI1sort Cree' Will be trapped by the tailings though reach the creek. finer silt WtI1 pass easily to ihx The 13utte--COUMty Seismic sa.fety E i ernent Indicates a, Potentially active fault W 1 th 1 h a 1,/4 :mite of th I s parcel, The Foothill Shear Zone tratvierses Butte County from the northwest to southeast along the lower foothilll. The Seismic Safety Element shows It ending Just Northwest of this parcel: With this In mind and considering the J;arge parcel sizes, a geolog.lc survey WI11 not be required. Adherence to bLI i I d 1 ng codes shou l d. prov I,de adequa�ke m I t I i:lat I on 3b. Some add t IonaI runoff W I I I be g6herabed from overcovering and compact I roti of so l l . on .40 acre: patrct, I s the amount of additional runoff Will not be s i grr t f i cant; 31: W1Ison Creek traverses the parcel and is subject to flooding. 400 ft . I n Width. Thi. extent; of area subject averag I ng The 1988 FERIA map I rid l cated a Zone A f l ood hazard 0 J f rood I rtg and indicated on the map las a no-bui'ldln area: Sd,. There is rlparlan VegetatYcn along Wlison Creek that provides IId1Ife habitat. ori the parcel. shoumdJbevatuabie wd' This habitat preserve Since must of the Vegetatl-on is In the flood zone.► designating the f i oOd z0ne a "nth dove l opnient areae 'Wj I I servd to protect the vegetation= Provlsllon cans be made to have bhe driveway cross the creek to acce;s,s homers i t6 l oca t i oris east o t: the creek: Tile area Is +extreme i y rura I Few ex I I ng par'_Cd l s have been dj)ve I o'ped. Appproua I of this map will cont i nue ` a trend In the a'roa to ,breakdown large parcel's to 40* acrd parcels. Some parcels to the ,otlst have even gone- down to 10 Acres. As these parcel's develop 'there yJII be an increase in people living In the area: joc,f The. roads in the area are not paved and they are narrow, As parcels develop Increased traffic will lead to deterioration of the road, especially during the winter months. Emergency fire services coming from Bangor must travel Bangor Park Road which Is extremely narrow and twisty. Response times will ibe hampered by road coigdltlons. Any land divisions to smallerparcels should require road Improvements and Increased road ma I ntenance cost to the County. AAAA 0 p c;. As development occurs In rural areas It becomes I1ncrE6.'as i ng l y d I f f I cU l ii: for the CoUhty to Prov l de adetILlat e, fire and po I r ole serV I ces . Oeve I opment In this area should not expect' l rnlied.l at:e pti,r I l cc sery I ce exce,pt for I i f threaten I ng emergenc l es. 'lis:, fire. !!!stat I on I! re l at 1 v,� 1 y near however`,, the road! Is In poor slhapE: a,nd narroiy, ii' addition With the 4'�ouni:y's c.Wri!nt fihancial :s 1 t:.uat i on t.ihere- Hit 4 change that fire proi:6,ct i on sOv i ce In the Bab gor a l,ea and the County l n qeherzi,`11 di 1 1 1 Iae sewer! I y cUr td I i ed . The- parct!Is l odgited In the, 1"Ch I c-i0elo. Un I o'in School b l Wtr tot. I f ,c3i 1 1 dren 1] v I nig I n the ,area Mush: go to srhod l t n Pal erMo the d I stance taild Gond I t I on a F the roads Maa,y maka buss I rig d 1 f f lou I t Arwwhaeo Iog I ca I si't:es Nive, be!ell I de:etit i f I ed on, ad j acelwt parcel t. 'Thee site has high sen:s i t I v 1 ty for f I nd l rug h I stoe l e and pre.-Oh l stor I c taut i fact.st An arc"iiaed log i cad l records search Is recommended. IRetctmmended Rei 1 t I gat I on Measures s . Pei-form an archaeuioglcal records search and adhere tci the rec.cimimerndat i oris given by the sefti-ch w Pe t forrra an archaeo i og l cdA '!Urvey If regU11'ed, 21 Broad 'Zoraa "A'f Il bod boUndar I es !;tri V I he[ l flap, and des I gnatie thte t' I ood ,tone gas A "no-adeve l opin0ht tetrts a°' . N!df deve i dr$rftbht Shall meats no st rUctUi regi , Vegetat l Oh rtutitilve1 i , arld na cu l t i vat i on . ; Provisions wi t I be made to Al ,low i c;lr1VewaN'/'road; to cross torr creep. B UtIIIzd 'a. common driveway/road to access homes 1te ioc4tIons on the east~ side of Wilson ;tree", COS :Ir ! A 17 r Fr j 1 W l i crant Ted Runge fi,isseSsorls Parcel 27-23-58 !Log * 89 -06 -019 -OV r r DATA SHEET Project, Descr' pt l on 1. Type of ProJiect: Tentative Parcel Map. i 2 , Brief Description: Parce i Mtip to d i'v I de 1135 acres t0 3. Location: At the sbUtheast corner1 parc'e I of t35 acres. create three. 40 acres parcels arid of F3angor Park Road) and Ounstonie IDI' l ve, Bangor area. 4. Proposed-. iperis i ty of leve l opmerit : I -dWe I I I ng Un I t per 46 acres. 5 Amount of Impervious; SiurfaCirig• Mill Ima,I , Se Access and INetires'I: F'i.ftl I c llodd(s) . All parcels have road front,la£ie. iftthoij sa S+!:vI,tage '.IJ I ::ilMlosa l Individual .septic systE:m , EI . S Urccif WAter SUP13 l y: I nd I V dua i 'we i I s S Prox ImIf ty oiF 'Potyepo 1 .I noes: Adjacent, to parcels. 1 t7 Pc►te3nt II li 0011, f Ur'I. t6r 16tnd divisions and deve 1 opment` Potent J 11 e� l'sts 1ndduT the current zoning amid General Plan., j 8.Enrwa tonmeenta. lS- ft -tit i n Phis 1 ca Enii� i r+ohme:nt I. Te ,rAln a.Gene;ra l T6pogratih i s Character n Ro i I Ing,,- 'a 11 1, ueven, ter ra 1n, tat I Ingis. ti,,; S 1 rape, 'War` I es 4&1269b . t:. I. l iwaii: a cfn"s 2010-411300 ft. A. s L.. cl : L itn l t I nt;l load„tor:l;: Rocky Teri.~a i n o to 1 1 1 rigs 2 st)i i.,Y� 6. Types anr:l Redding g rare I l y _►andy 1 bwur, Maar i !rasa Loam IbUtcrop phase), P I acer g I "ngs . Redding d rave l l y sandy loam conta,l ns cob b (ss gednU I ar soil under I a I n by hardpan iorCjan1 c ; content; tow surface dralnage adequate, subdralnage p66e, Marlposa loam; poor In organic matter, broken wedges of bedrock protrude out of the soil surface,. Poor sUbsUrface drainage, Placer diggings; mounds of gravel and cobbles left from mining operations, supports sparse vegetatlon' k), Limiting Factors,- Subsurface: dralhage, stony soil cons I stenry' 3 'Natural 'Hazards of the Land a, Earthquake Zane: Possible active fault associated'' with P othiil Shear 'Zone which crosses property. b, Erosion: Potentlast High to moderate -7� c . Lands I I de Potent 11 at 1 : Low. 1{ !; 41.i' P I re Hazard: Modprate, 0. Expahs i v'e So 1 l Potent I a l: Lovf to h i rih, generally h i g h r near I ow I ands on -.s I to . f .' Lour I I quiefact I on potential. 4. Hydrology 6. Surface INater : V? l 1 son (reek traversgis property. b., Ground Etter Unk;nowh, near va I I ey aq;u I fees C Cr o f nage Character l stt I <1 s Parcel drains to W I I loll Creek, the creek flows to the south. d, Annual R;e i nfa l I ( normae 1) : 28" per year e r Limiting Fai,ctors; Area;§ of Creek dra I nage flood and are des I gnaited zone " A" on FEMA maps 04 Visual /Scenic Qlaa l (ty Good, fi . Acoustic Quality ; Exc!i- 1 1 era t i 7. A l e Quality: Gdi d. Bioiogical Envlronment: r 8: Vegetatlont Marled, digger pines, poison oak, annual grasses-. characteristic of the foothill woodlands vegetation type; 9. Wildlife Habt,tat Provides habitat for variety of birds, small mammals, coyote, deer, site provides valuable habitat and water. Cultural Envlronmentc to. Archaeological and Historical Resources In the areal High senstt v t' known sites wi'thln i mile. i I y 11. - Butte County General Plan 'designation:-- Agrlcul-tura i Res:tdent!ial 12. FXisting Zf,)ning A-5. 13 . Ex 1 est I ng Lane Use on -s i to : No permanent strUctUres 6'X I st:, I anti has bekdn used to store m i n 1 ng to i I i ngis . 14,: Surround' ng Areae a Land Uses: Open iaand, grazing;,; very IImlted residential uses on "l xrig6 paroel s b. Zon'l ng: C. Gen. Plan lies 1,gnatlont AgrIcuIttlrei Residenttal, Graz I ng and Open ;Lands, d . Parcel Sizes,., 400 acreas to 10 Act' es N e. Population! Sparsely p6pu I ated , O�Wtr'elne 1 y rural. 15. Character of S l to and Area -t Rural Tooth i i' l is. Nearest Urban Ai e1h : OroV I i i a aporo�(I mate i y Is m i i es to the northwest. 116 Relevant Spheres i19f l of I uenciiN/A 18. improveinents Standards Urban Area; No, 19i Fire P rotect l oh Siti.evicot a Nearest.roun'ity (State) F'lre Stat ont Bangor Station 55-, 4,6 m I t etti to the east b Water Ava 1 lab i t "i tY : Tanker truck 20. Schon l ss In Area 4 Pa I'ermo Uh l oh , oroV 1 '1 1 e Un I on H I gh School. 3 A, 9X87 fD'048, allfcrnia t'.tQY liQ 11j __ P.O. BOX 988 »- OROViLLE, CA 05988 Y.CiR"Yt A CAl'tt=p�3NiA,;G�SRPpRA7tOtJ i0p GOLD bF3DiBERIVt~ fit; ,r 13' 1989 Xob+ 485 -045 - ]Butt* County ]PI.anna ng Dept. i .j7 (!7 my Center Dr. ozotville, CA 95965 i catttn c Craig., ig Sanders r -e.- A.P. #27-23-5,8 t i �n response to your recommended mztieta..zon measures for the above. referenced ,parcel map we submit the follows ng, 1le will have an archaeological record .0,a ��rchaeolo(Tist if required. search. we w1.1. contact is. i j 2,w) Cie will comply w .th this provision. y) we will ' comply With this provision . i L. Graves i f n Graie8 and Amsaioiahes i s a f ' i rrrrr11111����� Ile OUT& �.� +'.�- LAND O, hJATUAi v�1 ACTiz AND8I»aJT 1 Y '~ PLANNINGDIEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE- OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 9596S-3391 TELEPHONE (9i6) 538-1601 JAJ 1 y 10p 1989 led, Runge F',.0. Box 2,042 GA. 596I's Pe.- Tentative Parcel Map AP 27-23-=58 Log 089-06-09-;0.I Dear 'Mr. Runge: An initial study of your proposed project, a Tentativls Parcel 04ap0_Indlcates potentl,a,lly adverse Impacts to the environment (refer to the enclosed envlronmental checklist) To reduce or 4e)Iminate these impacts, suitable mitigation measures are required as para of the project. Otherwise, ah Environmental Impact Report (EI.R) i required pursuant to the Callforh1a Env i ronmenta I QUA I I`tY Act. An early response to this notlflcatlon, sent to the Pian�xing Department, wlII expedite the scheduling of your project. Please forward your Written response Within 115 days from the date of this letter. - A list of local consultants Is IhclUd'ed; These p6rsons can determine the heed for a survey by conducting a records search, conduct archaeological surveys or arrange for such surveys. In the event of an EIS rectoirement a subsequent letter Will be sent oUtilning the procedure for the County 1'.b se(ec.t the consultant to prepare the tlR: { C � il i � t p flan COUNT"Y Ok E m--A—.� I i i II, f 7 County CentEir Drive �rti>Yill�a Ca;iiorari�! 'I Croville, CA 95965 (916) 5384266 Jwe 9, 1989 d Ted Runge RE: AP 27-23-58 E.C. Bow 2042 Tentative Parcel Map roville, C,A 95965 Lh-uir Mr. Runge: ! Thi,& is to notify you that your application for a tentative map for the above -"referenced property is being subms,;ted to the Planning Department for eniv-irontentctl daterminatior., and oto the Environmental. Health Department for its review, °Phis application will be considered complete when we have received notification from the Planrr_ang Department and the Environmental Health Department :that all necessary data have been received. These departments -iii x ll contact you regarding any 'additional information they may require ' Very truly y ours i t4illi