Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout027-240-033PX,P,IVNING COMMISSION Si7MMARY SHEET FOR LAND 11,,,SIONS` APPLICANT Janet K. Lar�tsberger L°g#86`06w16-03 ADDRESS 1.515 Feather Avenue, Oroville, CA 95965 OWNER Same - PROJECT DESCRIPTION TP -M to divide 101-- acres t -o create cane _ parcel at 10 acres �-- LOCATION One parcel, on the west side of Citrus Ave., approx., 1100° ----- north of its intersection with C q pVe, r pal ermo area, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS) 27-24-33 ZONING ~-}'e---r�r�--n- `- GENERAL PLANA r - -' `., • G- la �► PROJECT CONSISTENT? GENERAL, PLAN CONFORMANCE ,REPORT -A OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE LAND CONSERVATION ACT CONTRACTS? DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED June 11 1986 AGENT/Si?RVErOR/ CIVIL ENOINtER. Ron Graves ADDRESS: P O. Box 986, Orovil]er CA 95965 -----��y DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT .PREPARED ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION CATtGORICAL EXEMPTION - DATE FILED AND DATE ,�` NEGATIVE DECLARATION � DATE ADOPTED. MITI:GATVD ICBG, DECLARATION - DATE Al]OriT.EO ENV. `I`mozirm nT'Tlrir — B140 co. Planning C." BUTTE covnTY GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE REPORTAPR , 4 1J86 FOR PARCEL MAP OR SUBDIVISION MAP Qrovillo, CelitonRk Items 1-4 to be completed by applicant: 1. Applicant 'Name end address J AtAG T LAN`r-t, 13ERC;F-K 45-/f /-'CXi,I 114r e> 6- 2. Project Description �fa12CL. - %�I�jh!t. /��/�l !,C' i,,,a''ce-Isrs 3 Assessor's Parcel Number(s) 33 4 Proposed Use I IAo,- E s,i T The following items are to be completed by the Planning Department, Cut,rant zoning _ AA- band Conservation Agreement s Gencral Plan Designation B2 (-e ct P5 ADolicable Conditional Criteria - Agricultural -Residential 1. Agricultural Compatibility 2. Water. & Sewer Capacity 3. Adequate Fire Facilities 4. Road Capacity & Maintenance 5. Access to Commercial. & Schools Orchatd & Field_ Crops 1, Predominant 5.10 Aa. PL.rcel Size- - 2. Vicinity of Urban Boundaries 3. Agric, viability not impaired Not Applicable YES NO JL - Staff Daterminatlon; Project does >e does not i6 substantially conform to the General Plan and zoning. YA AS Vt APPLICANT FOR" =, REQUCSTE'D LAND DIVISION, 1 AM AWAR8 OF TAC, MOVE STAFF D9TE101INATION REGARDING IM CONFORMANCE WITa Ti -m, GENERAL PLAN .AND ZONING. Dated7''7 Signature of Applicant LD 1000 (reviand 6-80) ' XCR OF DIErrrI4 nM=&rr:EU'N xo : Office of Planning andea h L�lf�Dr4,: Butte Cor,ity 1400 Tenth Street,, Roo M{121 � Planning Department:: Sacramento, CA 95814 0 1`��' 7 County Center Dxi,vo AUG Orovil:le, CA 95965 or X County Clerk I.L�t NOP M. BEG"'ER, �G�tr'';'';�r.•ric County of Butte >k �� a U4j)%)ty st B,7EC'T Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Project Title AP # Name Tentative Parcel Map 27--24-33 Janet Lantsberger State Clearinghouse Number Contact Person Telephone Number (if submitted fn Clearinghouse) Public Works John Mendonsa 534-41266 Project Location West side of Citrus Ave., approx. 1100' north of its intersection with Craig Avenue, Palermo area. Project Description Tentative Parcel 'Map creating one parcel of- 10 acres. This is to advise that the Butte County_ Advisory Agency_ ('Lead Agency or Responsible Agency) has approved the above-described project on 8-18--86 and has made (Date) the following determinations regarding the above-described project: 1, The project _Will, will not, have a significant effect on the environment. 2, An Bnvitonmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this ptoject pursuant to the provisions of CEQA 3. Mitigation measures _were, were not, made a condition of the approval of the project: 4i A statement of overriding con.uiderations _ was, ,etas note, adopted for this project. This is to certify that the final Blit with comments and responses and record of project approval is available to the general public at; Butte County Planning Department 7 County Center Drive Otoville, CA 95965 Date Received for Filing and Posting atOPR A' a ure phen Streeter Senior Planner `Title - Rcviced Hatch 1086 Goun LAND 01 t4 AI LI RAI. %'41h1i', BfA[!i DEPARTMENT OF pU11L.1C WORK WILLIAM ([311 1) 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVII.J.U, CALIFORNIA 95965 Telephone' (916) 534-- ittt RONALD D. McEL IZDY Deputy Diroelor Soto r p,�G �,•� 196 {oto August 18, 1986 Rr,,AP 27-24-33 Janet K. Lantsberger TentatiVO 1411 -cel. Map 3.515 1 ea th CA 1,95965 enue Qroville, Bear Ms. Lanl.sbergpr At. the regular meeting Of the Butte County title�declaratiosory n. Of 3d of August 1e, 1986, the agency granted a t g parcel on thee environmental ??tlpact and a protative vesubd your teconditionsofapproval- listed above -reference p p on the attached sheet: 1f no appeals are timely filed—within ten 00)erko(lays Of tie dote of the Advisory Agency's approval.:_wlt Supervisors, this action will be final. 1�'iyen the conditions of approval are complied with, it will be in order for you to file your '"final map„ with the Butte County Department of Public Works for recordation withintweAgency. (2�+) months of the elate of approval by the Advisory 1f ou have any rue.lt t.on re nrding this (hatter, please contact this y office Very truly yours, William Cheff Director of Public Works n,JrTfvw_��. J�tIn Mendonsa Assistant Director JMWds cct Planning Department Environmetttdl 1-lealth Do.parL-menr. Rot, Groves Associates Janet 1Jant sbcrger, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, one parcel on the west side of Citrus Ave. app�rox • 1100 `ft• . north of its intersectev w ss Crate Avenue. Palermo area. AP 27-24-33 Engineer: non Graves Aswith Public Works conditions: 1 Deed to the County of Butte 30 ft. right-of-way ;from the centerlint' of Citrus Avenue= 2 Indicate a 50 ft-. building setback from the centerline of Citrus Avenue: 3 Shaw all easements of record ort the final map. 4 Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required. Health Department conditionst Provide a 100 ft. leachfiel.d free setback around existing wells either within theproperty or within 100 .ft. of the property boundaries of parcel. I. Vii, Show a 100 ft. leachfield setback from the swampy area along the south boundary on parcel. I. TOa Agency County Advieory Y ROM Planning Director er on AP ort: nn Tentative Parcel Map fore ,Janet K- SU"9JBCT ° ReP Lar►tsber� 27-24-33 DA`CB August 5, 1986 arcelo The + acres to create one Pay' Land Use is a proposal to divide lU �- . - 5 eacr� parce�'ls%. This is A-5 (hey-Jcultural as pre600t zoning General PI;�rj eei£ioaorscommunitythis aplans for Pian Map of 'the Butte County There are no aP Agr+i.cultura]: ResidentiAl the r�re�a • nor any County s adopted or zoning They proposal tha Butte County Generz�7 Plan nor any ro Deal does not conflict with County proposed element of Jan. specific or community P Recommend apPrnv6Z SAS % lr cc• Janet K. Lantaberger Ron Graves API)GNDIX P COUNTY Cv lIMT EN1TTnnK1x4P.N'1AL nir-CKLiST FORM (tomecom�l-d y l,ea . Agency) Log #86-06-16-03 Al? 027-24-33 TSA KGROUND 1. Name of proponent 7�ANET r,ANTSflF Z. Address or proponent and representative (if applicable) Janet. T,� its � qtRQn.-GI:a-v.ea.�- 1515 FcIathex Avenue P.O. Box 986 Qrovilat•, 95965 Orovi Ie4� , CA 95965 r 3. project escrrt oai Tentative Parcel -- 1 l . MANpA'I'012Y 1:1Np1Nt1.S- OP S Y GNI1� I CANCi yr ,$ LIA�1313 NO n, Does the 'project ecenvi;ronmentt,osubstantiallytential to greducerade lit` quality of the habitat of a fish orionldlifO 8Pec t fish or wildlife population drop ola plant or sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a 'rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods x of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term benefits to the detriment of 10ng,-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one trlliGh occurs, in FL relatively brief polar[ of time while long-t(,rm impacts will. endure into the -future.) _ _... C, Hoes the project have impacts whit h are i ntiivi.tlA ally limited, but cumulatively considerable" (A project may impact oil two 01* more sepni'tite resources whore the impact on each resource is relatively smnll, but where the effect of the total of those inipa4ts on the onLviroDiilent 'is sigil.ificitnt.) c1: hoes t11e project have envlrclnmelltal effects which will c alase substantial ndvrrse effects on hhnian brings, either di'ret:tl�- or 1101roctly`: �- -- ITt7 111 f(°:1tt+iCNA'l�ltils C'1'a h�� �'uiiiCil+tt��tl I)v tilo ixintl 41oncy'l oil the bosis�oi' tiffs ilittial evulmttioll. OrFect 1/1Yli 'l'lncl rile llrottosv(ld1)I;oj ctI-GA'1'1Coll 1,111 11:('.I�NOT 1111 1'l )Nitw llliibe prepared, tin the c nV i ronnlc 1/tYli flntl tht►t tllthattgh tile ltr�il)Ohave tiiofi,e wil.1 notect �tIle �la signific.ansini�fi,� cunt e r re t cite the env i rollillent e f feet 1n till shc�e te�h}c�SG iihe�c�itt a�lclr.11 t(I thL. 1)iGATTON 'cs j ecttli. » AeNV,GATT ��V the ,lttacllct iJi (.LAitA't'1 ON tv i 1 1 hc^ p"pit rx�`l , MM 1/1V1'i 11nc1 tite 111,011 1WO ltt`��llttlNl�11N'I��1�,�11�iP�Cfgltllfi11�1'ni i1Is required: ilii' Qn i'ronglent �, ontl till 1',Cv July 8i t;t tUN TY toll Iltl'l"Poi III,11NNTNO DIVAIMMINT ate Planner itevtewed by IV, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS• es" and „maybe" answers are required xp anat� on oa�l y on attached sheet(s)) YRS MAYBE NO 1. EARTH. Will the proposal onditionsresult ar in changescint:: a. Unstable earth c geologic substructures?-- b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? ...- c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. Destruction, covering or modification of any XJ unique geologic or physical features?soils, e. Increase in wind or water erosion of either on or off-site? ----- beach f. Changes in depositionor erosion of sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or X L ally bay, inlet or lake? --- g, Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils K outside designated urban areas'? h Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- sides, ground failure or similar hazards? X AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial, .Air emissions or deterioration of ambient F7. . air quality? b The creation of objectionable odors, smokeYL or fumes? c. Alteration of air movement, moist1z�'e, or temperature, or any change in climate, locally or regionally? 3. WATER. Will. the proposaloresultcin substantial: a. Changes in currents, x direction of water movements in either marine or fresh waters? drainage patterns, b, Changes in absorption rates, c or the rate and amount of surface runoff? --- c. Need for off-site surface drainage improve�- ments, including vegetation removal, channel ization or culvert installation' d, Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? e. Change in the amount of surface water in any, water body?anY E, Discharge into surface waters, or in including alteration of surface water qualitysalvod but not limited to temperasure, oxyggn or turbidity? g. Alteration of the direct on or rate of flow of ground waters? h. Change in the quantity at qualit Vr fr gh and waters, drawers, or direct additions either through r through interception of an b �.__. aquifer y cuts o1; excavations? i. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for publj. ic water supplies? Exposure of pdople or property to water related hazards such as flooding? YES MAYBENO 4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial: a.Change' in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)'? b. Reduction of the 'numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- x ment of existing species? _ d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? �c S. ANIMAL LIFE, Will the proposal. result in substantial: a, CTange in the: diversity of species, or numbers of any :species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell fish, benthic organisms or insects) b; Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? C. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d.. Deterioration to ea.isting fish or wildlife habitat? --- 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result: in substantial; a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? w . LIGHT AND GLARE; Will the proposal produce sig ii icant light and glare? S. LANDtJSB . Will 'the proposal result in a su stantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? 9,4 NATURAL RESOURCES; Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Depletion of any non=renewable natural JC re5�LiTi'"CeS'� - 10. RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve; hazard a AA risk of explosion or the release of ous substances (including, but;, not limited to, oll, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? b. Possible interference with an emergency evacuation plan? response plan or emergency I!. POPULATION. Will the proposal alter the location, the human j.stvrYbutson, density, or growth rate of population? 1.2, HOUSING. Will the proposal effect waisting housing, or ,create a demand for additional housing? a- • .. YES' E y S AIAYTTi�. NO r IT TRANSPOTTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. :Substantial impact on existing transpottation systems? d. Significant alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/ox goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon., or result in a need for new or altered governmental services: ai Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks of other recreational facilitieo? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads.? f, other governmental sex -vices? l5. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: a:. "- -o of substantial, amounts of fuel , or energy? b. Substantial increase in denjaild upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. UTILITIES. Will the proposal 'result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following: a, Power or natural gas? -�-- br Communications systems? c, ►rater availabil ity d Sewer or septic tank?' e Sturm water drainage? ..� f, Solid waste and disposal? 17: HUMAN KEALTH. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard. (excluding mental health) ? , b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18. AESTHETICS, Will the proposal result in the OTS truME011. of ally Scenic vista or View open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? w:4- X_ X X x X k YES MAYBn NO 19. RECREATION. will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing reCredtional opportunities? 20 CULTURAL RESOURCES. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b. Will the proposal: result in adverse phys4 cal or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building$ structure or object? c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? X d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact, area? V. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP 27-24-33 See attached. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP 27-24-33 1b,E,f,3b,c,f Development of an additional homesite on the property will result in %some disruption, displacement, :compaction and overcovering of the Soil which may lead to incrfbased erosion and related changes in absorption rates and drainage patterns whi0� :could result In a discharge into surface waters particularly in the {.Aampy area to the south. Due to the size of the property, this should not. be a significant impact. 1h: All of Butte County is within a Moderate Earthqucka Intensity zone V111. The subject property Is located approximately '1 /2 mile west of faults associated with the Foothill Shear Zone which surp-�rted the 1375 Oroville earthquake. Construction of buildings to Uniform Building Cade standards for seismically active areas should provide adequate protection to occupants in casE, of seismic tactivity. 13a9c,f: Development of an additional homesite In the area will represent an incremental increase in traffic and related hazards on roads which are generally substandard. Due to the low traffic counts In the area and the development of only a single homesite, this should hob be a significant impact.. 14: This project will represent an incremental increase In demand for public services in a rural area. Applicant: Janet Lantsberger Assessor's Parcel 4; 27-24-33 Loe # 86-06-16-03 DATA SHEET A. Project Dego iapt ion 1. Type of Project: Tentative Parcel Map. 2. Brief Description:, Creating one parcel of 10 acres. (Project parcel Is a single parcel created at a time at which parcel maps were required, The parent parcel consisted of four legally created subdivision lbts of the Palermo Citrus Tract. The subject pe -cel did not consist of an entire tubdivislon lot or more.) 8. Location: On the west side of Citrus Avenue MpProximately 1100 feet north of Craig Avenues In the Palermo area. 4. Proposed Density of Development,. 10 acres per dwelling unit. 5. Amount of Impervious Surfacing: Minimal. 6. Access and Nearest Public Road(s): Property fronts on Citrus Avenue. 7. Method of Sewage Disposal: individual septic tVttem-, 8. Source of Water Supply: individual wells. 9. Proximity of Power Lines: To property. 10. Potential for further land divisions and development.' The existing zoning permits 5-acr,e parcels. 8, Environmental Sett Ing Physical_ Environments 1w Terrain a. General Topoepaphic Character., Rolling foothills. b. Slopes: 0-107.. c. 816vatloh: Approximately 150 feet above Sea Level. d. Limiting Factors.i None. 2. Solis ai Types and Characteristics% Cometa and Agate variant solls,p generally well drained with slow to Moderately slow permeability. b. Limiting ractors.4 Slow permeability. 8. Natural Hazards of the Land a. r=arthquake Zohe# Moderate Earthquake intensity Zone VIII. b. Erosion Potential: Moderate. t. Lands lido potential: Nombi d, Fire Hazard: Moderatei 0* Experts lvd Soil Potential.* 1-419h. 4m Hydrology a. Surface Water. Swales cross propertyy draining to a large swampy Area IttwIrAdlately adjadeht to the soUti-1, b. Groundwat-drt. Unknown. � 7- C. Drainage Characteristics: Property, drains to the south towards the swampy area through drainageway's #:o the south and west towards Wyandotte Creek. d. Annual Rainfall (normal)'.- 20-24". a. Limiting f=actors: Setbacks from the pond and poteiltlov� for siltation sand pollution of the pond to the sou"-"), 5. Visual/Scenic Quality: Good. 6 Acoustic duality: Good. 1. Mr Quality: Good. Biological -Envanonment i 8. Vegetation: Grasslands. 9. Wildiife Habitat: Small birds and animals common to foothill grasslands. CUltura1 Env i`roinment 10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in tho area- Low.. sensitivity ear 11 Butte County 8ane^ral Plan designation Agricultural-Rasidential. 12.. Existing Zoning: A-5. 13. Existing Land Use on-81te: Vacant. 14. Surrounding Area: a. Land Uses= Farmlands and single-family dNel l i nes at rural densities. b Zoning: A-5. c. Gen. Plan designations! Agricultural--Residentlal d Parcel Sixes: 15-- to 30 -acre parcels. e. Population: Spsfrse. 15. Character of Sita and Area*. Rural agricultural fringe: 1E. Nearest Urban Area: Oroville 17. Relevant Spheres of Jnf1'uience: Nine. 58. Improvemert;s Standard's Urban Area= No. 15. Fire Protorw: i oh Service: a. Nearest County (State) FirStation Palermo Fire Sty" on #72 b4 Water Availability: Fire tankers. 20. Schools in Area. Palermo Union School Dlstrlct and Oroville Union Moh School District.