HomeMy WebLinkAbout027-250-018i
a
•
_,
•
r
I
•I
.p I
r
PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY SHEET FOR LAND DIVISIONS,
APPLICANT Loren Allinder Log#87-01-23-01
ADDRESS P.O. Box 325, Palermo; CA 95968
OTINER Same
PROJECT DESCRIPTION TPM to divide 10h+- acres to create 2 parcols
both 5+- acres each.
LOCATION at the southeast corner of Macintosh Avenue and Homestake
Avenue, Palermo area.
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS}- 21-25-18
ZONING A-55 GENERAL PLAN Poli cies cies in- PROJECT CON,19TSTENT?
d j. -ca Ag=dies dential
GEAtRAL PLAN CONFORMANCE REPORT
DATE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE
LAND CONSERVATION ACT CONTRACTS?
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED 1-22-87
AGENT/SURVEYOR/CIVIL ENGINEER.: Ron Graves
ADDRESS: P.O. Box 986, Oroville, CA 95965
DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPOPT PREPARED_
ENVIRONMENTAL CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION DATE FILED
DETERMINATION
AND DATE NEGATIVE DECLARATION DATE ADOPTED.
MITIGATED NEG. DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED
ENV. IMPACT REPORT – DATE CERTIFIED
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE V9 - h _ - -1 —
dtin "nKir"tMthwV MVrMTMfl-* hAmv
ADVISORY AGENCY HEARING OAT
ADVISORY AGENCY ACTION
APPEALED APP= HEARING DATE
BOARD ACTION,--,.----.
COMMENTS FO's PLANNING DIRECTOR'S AV4PORT_..__
$• ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASi�RES%�
Identify potentially significant environmental impacts sttityui.ated
the land division. What project design features ors with
Of approval (mitigation measures) are proposed to alleviat�y potankroils
environmental impacts? NA
9. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING"?
a) Describe the project site as it exists before the projt,t
including information on topography, soil stability) ,
and animals, and any cultural, historical or sceniba�t�5
Describe any existing structures on thesite, and t11e tHQ of
the sitructuj es, : t eA,
•tDa1. �,�1 �r/.wry
/afr L "^".'L'e°^�.r...•/ a"L ,a-,i�va..e,.'- e;t,.a�;;,er R+t� �l e�. ln.-t�•f•^�i;�i«.n�, �,..,{,r,� y„_,_
0ti • w .fir v
b) Describe the surrounding pro
pexti�.,r ,, including information on
Plants and animals and any cultural, historical or sretii,c aspects.
Indicate the type of land use (residential, commeresiai, otc.)
intensity of land use (One -family, apartment houses
meet stores etc, r shops, depart
-
setback,
and scale of development (height, frontage,
setback, rear yard, etc.),
." w ,r— �,�-y y �t
� �. !+� ��~? a %�� N r.«..�•'pr quay •• r+�,•,;,,�,t�4...C,(,�„� , :Z, ``�;
CLRTIrICATION! I :hereby certify that the statements furnished above Ptd in
the attached exhibits present the data and informationrequires fo
initial evaluation to the best of my abilit r to
and information presented are true and correct thetbest Of thefacts
leddgetege
and belief.
Signature
Por �r'✓�
✓4'4,
'tUse separate sheet for longer responses.
4/85
a
CST' DR'r - RM=NA(_ .' N
xo e Office of `Planning a�a. Re ar L=F �'� orn Butte County
1100 Tenth Street, l l Planning Departmltttt
Sacramento, CA 9581' 7 County Center Dt'lve
Orovi,lle, CA 9596:
or JILL 101981
X county Clerk
County of Butte CANDACE J. GRUBBS, Buhe Co. Clerk
F[�ta
S1EJB-TACT : Filing of NotiBcye ok f� eFA�ermiiiC� aE on Dieguclompliance with Soction 2:.1:108
or 21152 of the Public Resources Code.
Project Title AP It Name
Tentative Parcel Map 27-25=18 Loren All.inder
StateClearinghouse Number Contact Person Telephone Number
(if submitted to Clearinghouse)
Public Woris John Mendonsa _ 538-7266
Project Location At the southeast corner of MacIntosh Avenue and
Homestake Averxuej Palermo area.
Pyo jest Description Tentative Parcel. Map to divide 1014- ±acres to create
two parcels of 5± acres each.
This is to advise that the Berate County Butte County Advisory Agency
(Lead Agency or Responsible Agency)
has approved the above-described project on July 6, 1987 and has made
(Date)
the following determinations regarding the above-described project;
1, The project will, .X will not, have a significant effect on the
environment.
2, An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project
pursuant to the provisions of CtQA,
X A Negative Declaration Na8 prepared for this project pursuant to the
provisions of CEPA,
S, Mitigation measures .____. wore , X._1dere not, made a condition of the
approval of the project.
4, A statement of overriding considerations was, . X was not, adopted
for this project.
This is to certify that the f ingl RIR with coi;iments and responses and record of
project approval is available to the general public at:
Butte County Planning Department
Country Center DrivO
Oroville, CA 95965 y
Date Received for Fs:littg and
. OP}
Posting at t,� _ ,
:Signat:tlxe
Stephen Ai Streeter
4 senior Plann r-
40''Cit lt.
tt�+vised ht�'tkrtt 1086
ru
CERTIFIED MAIL
.�, count
iAll D CF !4ATJRAt 11!1Al'I'll Ai, 6 E A L I .
'-
DEPARTMENT OF PUDLIC WORKS
WILLIAM (13111) 01-1QFF, [)lroetor
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILU!, CALIFORNIA 95965
TCIC.p150p C; (916) A34• �,�'`� "r Y
.290nlng Comm
JUL 8 1987
July 7, 1987.OroviUo, California
LRE: AP 27-25-18
Loren Allinder
P. 0. Box 325 Tentative Parcel.. Hap
Palermo, CA 95968
Dear Mr. Allinder:
At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held on
July 6, 1987, the Agency adopted a negative declaration and approved
the tentative parcel map on the above—referenced property sOject
to the conditions listed ori the attached sheet.
if no appeals are timely filed --within ten (10) days of the date of
the Advisory Agency's approval --with the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors, this action will be final..
When the conditions of approval are complied with, it will be in order
for you to file your "final map' with the Butte County Department
of Public Works for recordation within twenty~ ov-r (24) months of
the date of approval by the Advisory Agency.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, plerse contact this
office.
Very truly yours,
William Cheff
Director of Publ;i•c Works
hn Mendonsa
Assi8t8ftt Director
JM/ds
attachment
cc Planning Department
Environmental health Department
Ron Graves
µ
Laren Allinder, Tentative Parcel Map, AP 27-25-18, 2 parcels at the
southeast corner of'MacTntosh Ave, and Homestake. Ave, Palermo area.
Engineer; Ron Graves Associates
Public Warks conditions:
1 Provide two-way traversable access RS-8-LD-T to each pprael Froin
a county maintained road or state highway,.
2 Access -to be reserved in deeds as per county ordinance and offered
for dedication on the final map,
3 Show 50 fti building setback line measured from centerline of access
easement.
4 Show all easements of record on the final map.
5 Provide street name signs per requirements of the Department of
Public Works prior to recordation of the final map,
6 Pay off any assessments;
7 Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required,
8 Meet the requirements of the Butte County Vire Department.
q Meet the requirements of the Western Area Power Admin.
Health Dept, conditions.
10 Provide a 100 ft. leachfield free setback around existing
wells either within the property or within 100 ft. of the property
boundaries on parcel 2,
11 Show the usable sewage disposal areaprovento meet the
requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance on parcel 1.
12 Prove that the requi:r.ed quantities of domestic water are available
to parcels 1 and 2•
Planning Dept: conditions.;
13 Designate. a 100 ft, building setback line from the original
south property line.
14 Note on ,final map that the second dwelling unit on parcel 1 or 2
is not for human habitation but is storage only,
15 Designate a 75 ft, no residential development area from secondary
lineaments shown on figure 10 of the geologist's report• on the
final map
LOREN ALLINDER, TPM
7
16 All structures to be designed to withstand a rock acce;l.erntion o:
at least .50 g's.
17 Designate a no residential development- area within 160 f1ua from
the outside edge of the transmission, tower base;
A SEISMIC HAZARD EVAL.UFTION
FOR
THE ALLINDER PARCEL
Ser_ 21 ,;T1 s1\1, R4E
By
Jerold JoSel,nke, 'Ph -D.
Registered Cali+or'nxa Geologist, Mei,. 1246
June, 1957
1
I
The provz l l c NTFpDUCT,ON Earthq
need uaF e o At,tgust 1 , 19755
for a reevaluationdeutons
of
smic
Prior to the pr ha-.ards within avi 11 e Earth8tttteor,�t°t
relat v q�+a�I I BQtt
of y sa ,e from e County o
was assttr,7ed
Jennings ea�"th�-:..taF}e damage,: tact
�� (1975) shows only one tau A map
p itb l ;i �1
historic movement the 1a 1t in
within �+utte Cor.tn;1, h-EGv:i'nn
located last X00 years,
appror<i mate, y 8, 4 miles Tha'Ia
es "F1zIu1:L• f n
Wyandotte and Zangor; Sur-
5putheast ofC]rovi l 10
named the Cl evel and Hi dace Tractures from that ��� between
11 Faul t 4t, t 7 � resl ater
Ea�'thgcta„F:;eu;� tsd from the �.
Figure , 97S '�
proville
Fault; 1 shows the location
on of the Cleveland Hill
Y
a --�— "".�"' -- I.._%'�" 1'� '/6 ,,�y 1.i I I���,� 1L•��i`"v'`� °'rrl 1,». f..Y .�.•'1'`�� C
7
�"r`..CSLIZ'c 1• _ �li �.i. "d Cc5t1r14V' s OLIa $.LS i�..02_C3,YYZri' 1iC��.'.Y.T7Er F�aL1�
�: rom Je.*�n .ngs , �:9 i 5 j .�.�.:.
Y
i
Y A
33
Y
in 1963 Burnett published a report entitled Fracture Traces
in the Tuscan Formation, Northern California, which was a
forerunner to the publication of the Geologic Map of the Chico
Monocline and Northeastern Part of the Sacramento Valley, by
Harwood, Hel l ey and Doukas in 1981. The Cl evil and Hill Fault
(Orovi l l e Earthquake) and the map of the Chico Monod: i ne
suggested a northwest trond,ing system of po,tpntially active
faults and fractures crossing central Butte County.
Burnett (1961) used aerial phot,ograph:s to initially
delineate fracture traces within the Tuscan Formation because
they are generally not visible from ground level. In this
study, both aerial photographs and infra- wed variscan analysis
were used to initially locate Faults or fractures which were
later identified in the field whenever possible. For the
purposes of this report, afracture trace is a small
displacemenK linear feature consisting of topographic,
vwyetAtfon or soil alignments visible primarily on aOrill photbl,
Such features are rarely continuous for a distance az great tr
than on`e mile. fracture traces are composed of many hundreds or
thousands of fractures while faults ars+ more discrete, having
lengths greater than a. mile and often having measurable
displacement.
The o+j i ce of Science and Technology, in their 197(:? r'epoir.
entitled Earthquake Hazard koduction, state, "Maps that
di'l eneate relative kinds and degrees of geologic hazards are as
yet rare and no fully +satisfactory trap of earthquake geologic
hazards is available For any urian vwaa It is realitod that
4
such maps prepared in the near future will be littlo more than
crude approximations and continuing decisions will havo to be
made regarding their detail and scale."
There are three published seismic risk.: maps from which it is
possible to estimate mat:imum earthquat,e intensitioo 'icor Butte
County. These maps skvow Modified Mercalli (M.11.) Intensities of
VI, VII and VI or VII respectively for Butte County These maps
suggest that an average 11-Vi- intensity of 6.5 might be
appropriate for Outte County. Table l shown the damage
assessment criterion far establishing I'll-
11-o intensities;
Caution shoald be exercised in using smaIl scale
regionalization maps covering large areas because as Richter
(1959) states. "They should serve as general inde:61, maps from
authority shoal. d pass to
which the engineer or planning
y ..
miG-oi�cgionali.�ation maps for localities where construction is
ementioned maps are not completely
intended." The three afar
satisfactory
because they are not gener°ali ed from more detailed
maps.
MODIFIED MERCALLI EARTHQUAKE INTENSITY SCALE
I. Not Celt except by a very rcw under
spe,:ially favorable circumscancci.
(I)
II. Felt only by a feW, persons at rest,
apctially on upper floors or build.
inSs, Dclicatcly susocndcd objects
msy swing, (I to II)
III: Felt quite noticcabiv indoor;, d.
pccially on upper floors of buidings,
but many people do not retogntzc it
as an earthquake. Standing motor-
Cars m y rock ;lightly, Vibration like
Passing or truck. Duration estimated
(III)
IV. During the day, reit indoor by mx;hv,
Outdoors by a rew. ,',t n,-- some
awakened. Dish=, windows, doors
disturbed; walls make creaking
sound. Sensariun like heavy truck
striktnS 6uilding. Standing motorcar?
reckcd nuiccably, (IV to V)
V, Felt
by nearly evc.-ona. m:,rc,r
awakened, Some dishes, windows,
cc., broke -i; a few instances or
t:rackcd plaster, unstable o'.ticcts
ovcr;trncd_ Dlsturbanecs or trees,
poles, and other tall objects
sometimes noticed. Pendulum clod s
:day stop: (V to Vr)
VI.. Felt by all, mznv rri,',•'ttcned and run
outdoors Som c heaw furniture
tstovcd a' few Inatanccs of fallen
plaster or damaged chimneys.
Dorney: stip;., (VI to VCI)
VTI. Lvcybod}` tuns outdoors. Damage
negl"Xialr in Suitdinp or
$&,jdeign
and Construction; !light to rnodrrau in
wctl-built ordinat? struetsra,
sydtrc�lt incm.poorly built or badly
deli ` ed strut «
rt"'c nsres; some rhtmncy3
brown. • Naieed by per -..ane drib q
m.acrs3rs; (VIII-)
TABLE 1
VIII. Damage night in specialty dtsigttetl
structures; consideraUr in Oratilary,
�•subatantiai buildings, With pzrtixl
Collapse; ,greet in Poorly bull( IItLC.
afros; Panel walls thrown out or
Creme structure, Fall of chimneys
factory stact:s, columna, monutuenta,
Hatvy rurniturt ovrriuttNa3,
Sand and mud cjcttcci` in scroll
amounts, Cham in well wxtn; Per
sons drlving motorcars disturbed.
(Vilf+ to IX)
I.' DamaSt cont darahtt in speeially
dctigncd struc'ures; well-desigricd
frame 3truciur= thrown out of
Plumb; mat in subsuncial buildings,
With partial collapse SuildinSs,shirt.
ed off foundtcions. "found craclted
ccnspicucuui)'. Undcgcund piPa
broitcrL (I.,< +)
X Some Wrl1-built woods:, strzc urzx
destroyed; rncrc masonry and fnne
structures d=trcved with their four-
dations; e•ound badly c;ackci RaICs
brnt Landslides cotuidc.-able from
fere banks and scop sfoocs. Shifted
srtxl and RsucL Water splashed (sloi,•
Pd) c`+'c•• b.uticz. (X)
sl. Fe N, if any, (rrs>sonry) structures
Mnain standing: 3rid.Tes de=coy
Broad fissura i°. ground.. .
de3rossnd pip incunapinrty asc.
Or, ervicc- Earth stumps and land
slips in 'suit ground. p.214 bent
greatly;
XII: Duns !6W, Waves scat on grt.•snd
surlaca. Linea of :tight and Ievzl
into .2air
diuo1r; �
06jxu hrn upward
.
'
"
l
1--�FHQUAPJ�
THE FOOTHILL FAULT SYSTEM AND THE i1?75 OROVILLEEAF
' 11ethere are a numb�r o+
south of the town of Orov�
prominent faults and lineaments which are a part of tho Foothill
Fault System which extends along the eastern margin of the
Sacramento and Gan Joaquin Valleys. The Foothill Faulk GyStem is
tem within the Chiro Monocline
Comparable to the fracture system ` not �omp�
even though their strikes appear simi1ar at some map Scales. �
differences between the two syStOms
Some of the majore
include: '
� a more north—south
. The faults
in the Foothill System have
i
' fractures ax~s
trend than the trend for rac which ^�h �el�nea�e the
^ of the Chico Monoclihe.
s� ten6 horizon-
tally for tent of miles, while the 1� within the Foothill em e,
�, Major faults i1l S
w � _
fractures within the
r��
^ ChicoMonoc1i'ne are Significantly shorter~
�. The fractures within the ChlcoMonoc1ine are nearly
vertical while the esta61ished faQIt planes within the
Foothill
System dip loss Stec -ply to the east or west.
4. Frattures within the Chita Monoc11 ne are probably
d foc�I depths +#r
while measure
sha11ow fract4res '--- .
within
th 1 Sr are a e Signlficant1y
e~rt�quak�� � Foothill
doeper°
' locations of the frattures in the Chita
2 shows the ocs
Figure _ ^ ~�^-~- -
and . faults withiO tho Footh1l1 Fault System"
Mopoc1ine major
-
t faults within the Foothill Sys\tem in Southern 8Utt��
Si�n1f�can
6 Prar�s� Creek Faults P�yne� Peak, Swain R�v1ne an
County are
•!div J.-� •••�•_
.7l
Pcrddhe a;
Chico = �
n
.....+.... ,•.
•''' • Photo nnccmeht\ Cstke• •✓
;a,?owcc�
Probable Fcult M.'5114:61
if known, � � y, 1}• �"--�.'
Crnvl�le js.
�heFmnllto .�. 1 �•
arovrll•
1 Gridley � +t t.•. � �
�7*-• ,p L
al
,IC -IL
• I. r
Yuba
1
Yucc, Col
F t guy l.t he3ilteh Cs and fact i is in tyeo ynviu r
r _
tt rwhwes 4ftr;t 5 r era'°an
' i•n t��tit
•
1
' on August 1,1975 an earthquake having"
' � y��c���r Magni�u*e of
' 5~7 took p1eCe south of Orovil1e near the towM of Palermo.
pigUre :3 shows the location of the August 1° 19" ? npicenter and
major lineaments associated with the foothill Fa#lt 'C"yst�m^
The August 11 1975earthquAkes and after ^
shorzl�o produced c
zone of ground cracking 4.3 Miles east of the epicr;�jMI'er which was
subsequently named the Cleveland Hill Fault which 1a probably a '
northward e:tOMsion of the Swain Rav�ne FauI' showM �n
'_ ^ Figure3,.
Figures 4A and 4B show the Cleveland A11l Fau�t in more detail.
Within a year ufter the mail�l shock, the gnzund r-raahs al
o -,g the
Cleveland HiIl FaU1t e"Itended for a distance 0-F 15,3 miles in a
general nprth-Sout�, direction. Figures 0,48 and 5 zbou/ the
location of the Cleveland Hill FaW1t and the epicOhter
locr-tions for the mainshotk and a considerable num'er of
aftershocks. 1::igure 6 shows how the foci of the larger- aFtersh�cks^
'
define the Cleveland Hill
Fault Plane as dipping 6�defl'ees t.o
the west. Calculations show that the main shock c was �t a dep�h
'ofs\Pprbximate1y5°4 miles.
'
Tbu* faults within
the Foothill rault System W��` �
� � *, formed '
|
Millions of years ago under a d1fferen# stro
gi�e
(co0pI`e�L--sionA1) than eXistt tcxday. Curr-entIy��1
Seve
believe that the observed fau1t
movements are caused by
m reactiVAti#rl of the oIdbr faLlt Planes Under all tOOsioh'1
-
o-aef..ri.. .►°'a'"o,. a--u'�'•+la .•..i 7"[J�Ce slrri -
• • AK IlnC�
� 0 1.awsn� �►++I.S')a tYso•nts
y✓ / J14Rtv1AflQNs
wrw o. mcm-umn„i
mrry C*." ow Dkctmo
AV C;4
^c r.. ►�aea +t w ..r mg,", ooeene
•, 1
• � L� •1 :ter:
L 1-
t l�
a
r ,."y
Ix
Usawt-
rvc�
trr«/i,.,�
IJAAa.s,wre.i+nl Uxwl�t
MO+r
4"i� . l• s..7 bi�y�M+�i '
�' ,�•' �'r•»� ! {'7i �.]�.1,r.� 42.3-
.
a%5E h1Alp j t� fPZ'n'�
�COlei&Rp»��G7t3tit.7�kT'y, >� �,isl�`
a ItiaM icy ��'
Figure 3 � •
,• - Ma,�cr� l•ine�rr`
z tz• 'n, tjte na r• �. was m
Sierran fcat`t I� �y
With f, �Ultina ��. a�ion� leesTi+ti e
VLAI_ 10
' OROVIILc U�— zz >.
Qom.. a Z - .. z' q".
zIt
x LLI _ -• -
<r
t �-- m �'. W - R T -----LAKS
:--- �y" r a P41 4
_ -• ...._ate/"—��•v� `Y __._ ._.rr..�Nl � r.. _.... .J _.III �1
Figure 4A Geonorchic stiir,"aca Cleveland Hill
area, Sucte County. "All, "S" indicate ene
iZo trits or c;os5-sec icn, Figure
ti °1
Fit
FLA- r ESNAKE PC
2ddd C"VE'::AW' HILL FAUL7
S
WYANDOTT,E SUPFAc,-::' BANGiOR SURF',;C �-
IrEPRAM
c--
5(30-
5(374.:, / I �. i l all.
1 `\ ,��"•�7_'+—� .�-'-�•�- \ ��� ` i 1, � � � � j'� /` �
4333,3
r
e 4
5 Cross' -lection View or the Idyandctte and. Eangor gecmceph c stir Yc_
as a ~
nti t`
d1'SSP-=ZCl, McUntoim a
front to the esy. Vlaw facing 1101 -thy, In Vicinity, of Cleveland
I'A" t � f i
fou I t,. Cross -secs ion end points �, � are:. shczqn on rttao , Figure ,
■
11
tifas,-uitudes
a O 0770 rC than 3.0 � �� .r%-�r••� r.;.�.+
O `less than 1.0 °RVH
O ..•. _•.� 4 •eLa 1 .....� ,,,,..,.
A -
. ✓�. �10'•'S''. "%n yam. �.. �'1,+1
.rt `
O^ ./I f4'•
♦ • i
OrovillcGD
Q�
South Orov{lie ° C) °
0 it
i. f
Q ° � : '1 Pro;att
° G=
a plane to
@yJ I surae
.l
o0
titaihsnock E° °O
� _ ,L
s p °Eb 0 0 q
o
o
Qv
OlY '
.�.,� �
Zl�a
qt
Eplc--nters Plotted from the OrovWe earthgtiAa 5equ
]'enee, Fee ary tl rougax
Y,19 � r Y The 6latk square desi
mates the location ofthe seismogaph at the
Oroville station. The ve;tir:a( clashed line represents the projection to the
snr&ce of the E'ult plane (see~ also FI'
iaerit df Stater Fie�onrces.J7e `l), (Cgtlxtesy of
Calu"oinia Depart=
FzcvR� s
Side vi`etiv EhrouglI the Earth's
crustsoukheastofOroville, Cal.
ifotnia, showingthe Iocations of
the foci of some of the larger
earthqua6s in the I975 se=
quence, Projected on an east.
'west cross section. The ausIe of
dip is 620. tCourtesv ofMI Sav-
age, Dr Tocher, and P. Birk;.
hnkm.]
' ESTIMATED SEISMIC HAZARDFnR THE
ALLINDER PROPERTY
The literature an,d
^ data suggest that Butte County urlty is within
an area of 10w to moderate eartMquWke intens1tioo -Which have
relatively long recurrence intervals and are acc0Npmnj.e6 6ym~nor
ground rupture and offset^ The California Dep&�tN°`nt �f - Water
Resources (/^9/9)
/ concludes that there is nothing 1D their stud}°
Which wouId indicate a Richter Magnitude for andbher Or ^
~ �vzI1e^-
typeearthquakegreater than 6~5 (the AugUst, 197� m -
agnitu6e wa�
5.7>.
For comp�ris0n purposes, the 1906 Ban Francisco Earthquake,
had a Richter Magnitude of 8.3° A magnitude of 6.3 '
, Would only be
observed near the epicenter. Figure 7 shows a preliminary
| 1sose'smal map for U"he August l, 1975 O�ov�Il
r o E�r�hqu���
' 'Add6ti��nally, the California Depa. ^ w�men� of . ' ~
Water Resources (.I979)
suggest that the rnamlmUm � offset `r
r om another oroVl1}�~�ypep
_ earthquate,e would be 2.c) inches iin �6e -
� . vertical direction and '*0
inch in the horizontal direction, ^
�
The q4eStion of seismic hazard in the Chico-OroY111p are -
ca ^
essentially becomes One of estimating the de -
degree of atteMuat�-' �n
with distance from the Cleveland Hill or Bw�1n Ravine F
' aU1t
System foj1 an estimate6 maXimLt)n
m Richter agniti/dL- of 6~5.
Most tochMiqueu[ for estimating roctt accelLration a� aa /
functiOn of distance �nce from a fault o� ea���qu��eep1cont'r
n
4til�ze datt and methodologies similar to d �
_ �Ve1o��d
Schnabby
e&hd �ee�� (19��)`
" A����1er�tibh data Obtained by the
��
California DfYi� ic�n of Mines and Geology Cl975> tl�.e ShOwrl ±n
Figures 8A and 88. Figm~e 88�hoWs ���� the r��k a
tcelorgtionss
'�--mm
14
Ile 120rsr trx' tr
Ip' ur fie
/ !�,,,,_,; _'sem •,,_ .r r l ,.. �
i s r flrlll.
,
CAUFO,Rtdfr1I ' NEVQDa '' e'• ,,
• tj
,•
n , l 1 1� idIS
! 't
n i ll .a i
�. 7 1 , i7♦ Lit � ' � i, �• ,'
.i
IIr i i fi a
Is rpt
r .1i
�.0 , �:� •i 1 � i , I ss
c
•or scl r O
i�d 17T In' _ k
Iti' i2d rlr+
�It1tSr % lrCtJxli�ir tl6sttle�t A�► �w lit a�br
ItLt ►lel►iu1[fa lua4Ir1, ti77, Ill 1te1Ili 0rE
L
i
15
. _raradlna ,
o»ae
' .. fii�uotr+PN lE�r+^r.
0.126 o.
s. Oraviila Aar
1 or�111. (4)
tple.atrr
' I
futtar butt" m
.t n. aai
o to 20 3o
KIM
•: kealaro=zspb St.tiJxi. ..
® 'iaisewcopt 3taGibn
Figure 8A Ioeaeioo of attsfn=-ectiou lirootr.plL n,k.r tb orosjU.
"rtb4u+k+ abo.isg 6"t rbeordad rctaleratiusa. tlo trevn4 tiva obtaia.d
ac Luttrr lactra; the ae J. aeul.rsticn it this Mita is ..U_,d C.
ie la" t" tbs imaavmc'r tt4-4.. -- n.Ol a
1 IjI
,4 a Lytle Cra+k; 1910
�' o IkaholdE Yo�ntYr 2975
4 to 40 too
a
E • .
b
b ,
Figure $D blitimca lr�..1 L'aYIMwJ,e.lr
yy6'alaad seed t'!a rock for dirtb�ukxa o1 *aWitvdr
10 taeard�d e!u 703i• Sbe ootid aTabolb rrPrwat
risii tSr ckwiilla withgtuka out td 300 k:»
Q
in thecU~oYille-Chico area are less than those inforrod from the
regional models of 8chnabe1 and Seed (1973). '
10 85 cel located
� � within
TheAIlind�r property is � . acre p�r oca e w n
the northeast 1/4 of Sec 21° TiBN° W^ The proporty c:onsists of
a gently sloping ridge having an average Olevation of
'
approximately 205 feet. Bedrock is composed 0f flat lyihg,
bedded grave15v conglomerates, sands and silts. The
conglomerates are weakly cemented and have a reddish� 6Y-oHn
matrix~ Pebbles and cobbles are locally derived from metamorphic
intruziva and volcanic rocksi The sands and silts are often
cross -bedded and lensoid.
Figure 9 shows the location of the �property and th6 geology.
According to Fi�.re �, �e pr��� ���e�p�ien�� an
earthq\\ake magnitude of between 6 and 7^ Table 1 suggests that
such a magnitude could produce fallen plaster and broWen
chimneys° Damage would be slight to moderate in well built �
structures but could be consi`era6la in poorly built structures. '
The property is located 205 Milos south �f the 1975 Orovi1le !
Epicenter and 4.75 miles wash of the Swain Ravine or Cleveland
H111 Lineament and the Special Studies Zone" TheWain Rayine or
C1e~~lan6 Hill Fault is the bn1y |inea0omt within historical
record of movement (the NO OroYll1e Earthqda|e>" '
In+ra-eed Yarlscan and sterso air photo analysis show two
� northeast !striking secondary lineaments (A and B) near the
parcel" These 11Meamentsare shown in QUre W~ 4 fiel6 10Vwey
17
�iGurtG Location and Coolu�, of
Tfao Allindor Parcca
Cg = Gravol.�; and Conglcmorxatos
0 011 - Quaternary, ;111uti•lum
..........
�f�nt\ (� rlll,l �r� �i�:;u"�_"'%` j.p,M\ 1•,�r�\�.\.^'Ciu�J �c-..
7.5 �
F i tJ L(!-- $� 10 have norecord ,r 19
h 1. s t or i
advi �tab I e -lot to Movement but it Would bo
f . eet, 'F " 0 in them. locate Permanent strUctUr6S nearer th,--tn
This parcel forms gently 60 t 0 7105
qQefact- Z' OPing ridgL,,
ShOtild ho,,- Ion a''Id/Or land Slumping during
be a siQnif' ""'I
-'Cant Problem.
Llf the faults and li, neaftlent-s previously mentJOI'lod
Rayino or, Cleveland Hill Fault hiks a record V only the
ve that the 1975 Oroville 04' histori
activity. EXperts beliecal
Sub SeqUient ground cract4ing along the Cl eve
and
ass, jai aat�zd With the stqtAi = land Hi I Paul t JS
0 ravine Lin.......
11 C., W that the Cleveland Hill Figures 4B and 6
611-c-.-ees West. Sever PraWlt Plane dip, appro"'"'711tttel 62,
"(Pol-
tRi ch t (--r K�kgni tUde to b al L' ts state that t h e ma,"f I M Q fr
p t e d dramanother Orovi I I
tyf"e earthqUaklo WOU.1d be 6.3,
Figure ii shows Curves deve
73) 0 r estimating roa�, I OPL-6 by Schnabel and Seed
,% -leratic,ls based
'�rclm an oarthqua
: 1.:: 0Focal
UPoh distance
mi }res SoUth o+ L, 1-1 e 130i nt, The propqrty is I
197�5 OrovIlle EPI Center, located 2. 25
Orovi lle WOUld be -'Ap p r wt 1 Ma t The focus b,F the
the proper,ty. y 6�1 miles -From
at the ACcord"19 to P�iQUJ-O 11� A Richter 6.5 earth
as
the 197�; Oroville
rock the property, . 'I C1 Q,�A k- e W 0 Q I d produce
ai n av'1'10 became ar
- 8 t'�' R '
If the
_t1vL neardeptfy -
the OrijpL
the ZAMO as the 1-27!5 C,,-Oviljo zrt� ,At
of r!
4 *-S Might bee,,,,pected, Th an
Problem
,ul d bL
shalloWer high
'I �a I d h
K
20
0.9
0.8
Oroville, Calif.
` 0.) earthquake (ML=4,7)
Q O.s Stone Conyon, Calif:
earthquake
W`4.7)
LUw
0.5 0. Probable UPPer bound
Cj
d-¢tea-
tj 0.4
0
cc
0.3
j 114 ..... 5.6
M 5. '
r
312 s.a 9,s
M�,Lw 2 i6 32
/c 64 96 160
OISTANCE F Q 4a 4w /va
RO41 CAUSATIVE FAULT, IN KILOMETEpS
Range of horizontal
Peak acceleration as a function of
distance and
ma el an for rock sites in the Western United
States (from. Schnabel and Seed 1913).
1
11
the Swain Ravine |Fault plane opposite the Property, Tho
California Department of Water Resources (1979) describe
wanthquake hypocenters for aftershocks from the 1971
Qyov11le
Earthquake. The aftershock data presented in tho DWR report
suggest that earthquakes having /s Richter MagnikUUe of 3,0 or
greater wouId occ4r at a depth not shallower than 2� Miles.
s° An
epicenter at a depth of 2.5 miles along the Swainr Ravine i
ne Fault
Plane east of the property Would Place theepicentor 5.4 miles
from the center of the parcel~ A Richter 6.5 ° magnitude located
V°4 miles from the property would produce a rock acceleration of
approximately 0~47 g's,
Ground cracking during the IM O
roviI1O Earthquake Was
o6served along the[2eYe&and-Hll1 Feult approximately 4^75'm1�,
east of the property, It is possible that in the event �f a 666
`magnitude earthquake on the SwatJ1 Ravin, Ltn�ament West of the
property, differential subsidence on the order of 2.0 �
inches (vertical) and 1.(> inch (horizont l
a > cou16 occ4r°
All structures should hw* a minimum setback of 60 feet 'from the
1lMea/nentS A and B shown dM Figure 1b and should be designed to
Withstand
� ro�� acceleration Of ` 1
�� east 04
50
g's" '
Est'mat"Ms of ground motions from earthquakes is OM inexact
science. The various physical processes that ok,xra±e during a`
earthquake are not Well understood and ttet,st,ra1 distrib tion%
for many Mirica1 relatiOnz used �
u o estimate grtxnd motions are
Mot adequately � def1Me6 in spate or time" ToCOmpOhWtxs for the
above, upper boundary values for Peak ground aatolerAti
onz at
.
22
-
selected sites are often used, as� was in this studyv because of
`
the uncertainties associated with regional seismic attenuati=
and local groun6 response to vartous earthquabe jntonnitios^ It
is \'iiwlieved that srzmd empiric/al curves uMderps'Limate ground
accelerations Whp7 the distance to the epicenter IN 1sess than 12'
miles. For examplev Fi�urw 11 shows a ground e\aM1eration of
0.70 g^ss for a Richter Magnitude of only 4"7which is we11 above
the curves of Schhabel and 8ed (l973)^ Hoyt (1980)suggests
that__ �ch points are exceptions or Outliers'
or that the curves
developed by Schnabel and Seed are too low at distances c1oso to
the fault. A plot of all the acceleration versus distance data
from which the Mo g value was selected suggests that ` 6he 0,70 g'
value is indeed an out1ier. It should be remembered, however,
that ground accelerations e ons Mons1dorably higher than 0~509^s are
possible at the property "'u=- to the fact that the of
future ground motions is an inexact' science. The estimate of
V,509^s merely represent, a reatonablo eStiMate batedupon
current iMfOrWatibn and the state of the art fon swl log1�
studies,
It should aIsb be remembered that this study assumesearthquake activity Only on the SAW ��vine-�Ice�m�lan� HiIl Fault
Qztem and that ground motions At the property would be
CodtidorabIy higher tham 0150 g'sif secondx?-y lineaments hOar
the proWty or the Prairie Week Lineament betamne active.
An "it1Ona1 concern is the largo high voltage }lMe near
s'
the 'western boundary of the property (see Figure it:)> . 8ecs23
use of
possibility of fire •from a broE::en line or
collapsed tower.,
fire breat::s on either side of the transmission lines should be
considered. In case of an earthgUall-e induced tower ,off collapse, all
permanent strUctUfres should be located at least 161.) feet from the
outside edge of the tower base.
�
REFERENCES
24
Longwel1'T Chester R~, Flint~ Richard F and gan6
Physical Geology, John Wiley and Sons -Inc., ^ -'�—ers° �ohn E^,
' , 1969, 683p~
Marwood, DaYid S", |1aI1ey* Edward J D#U
Geologic Map of the Chico Mo�ocllr)e an~� Northeastern
Michael p^,
the Sacramento Valley, California Dept" of tn rn Part of
Geol" Sur., Misc. Investigations 8e 1° he interior, U.S.
1981^ r r es Map"1~1��� (I�62v 500)
Burnr tt j John L., Short
�`Cvontr�b��no
'=+ `^'� California Geology, the TusCaFormation,
Cal morthernD�v, pf Mines and Geol.,
Special Report 82,1963
uuyton* �J~W°v Scheel, A.L^, �Ear+hquak^e Hazard in '
ual%forn ex' Regional Programs Monoy���ph No 1 rth t
University, Chico. ' Californiac>rnSt�+e
Jennings, Charles W.. Fault Map of Cal 1fo i
DiVision of Mines & Geology, Geological Date�Maprn �a� Californial
" mo^ 1 1975
Wakinsr R.,Baum, S.L", ```nd Ru��selI J S
�re�aceous OIastic ShelfDeposits, ' ~ ~, Pal e1geography o� Late
c�al1forn�av 1q85 unpub1ish p Northeastern Sacramento Valley
,� ed, in review.
+
California Department of Water Resources,Th
Orov1�1e Earthquake Investigati�msBuI1. 3_�8e Auqust l* l9�197!5� �V , 669 p., Feb~1979
| '
Schnabel, p°B~, & Seed, H' B- Accel bl
Earth9uakeS in the Weste�n United
era� cm t� Rock, fp�
Seismological nzted S�ates B 11
Soc of A - �- ~ , u �� the
° merp,Vol 63 N# 2 - ~ ~^
-. ^. � � . � p. 50l-5167 197:3. -
Sherburne'RW & A
8eo10 y° Or/z~~"�sa �augL* Eds. California Divi of Mines
-Report
l24° lr���,'1 ualifortia Earthquak0 1 AUgu�+ 1975, Speczizkle
' ^ �
ReCalifornia,
al,�
C�^v TOpO�ad�, T.R.x & Par�evD°L°' Earthquake Catalog of �
� January 1,19j)0Min��Decembor ::,1, 1974' Calif ^~
�s and �e��o�y, Bpecial PU6li/�ation 52* I978°°uz\/~ ��
8reohsfelder RW M
thquakeS ,in �a��f��im4m Credible R#ck A�ce1�r�tion from
`
Earet 2:3, R�yisedu liorni��"caIif°Di�/� of M�Me� & G��1ogy�
� ^r/*^ Map
HaysvWk, 7 prtjCbd4res for Estimating Eart�q4��� ��ou
u~8^ �l^G4r" p�o�~Paper 1114* 7-1pv 1980^ nd Motions,
Be
'
miter-Qepart�-"Wo.pMemoraindum
To: Advisory Agency
FROM, Planning Director
SUSJecT; TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FOR LOREN ALLINDER ON AP#27-25-1'8
oATEc June 11, 1987
This .is a proposal to divide 10z acres to create 2 parcels
of 5 acres each. The zoning is A-5. The Land Uot Map of
the Butte County General Plan designates this ana as
Agricultural -Residential. There are no specific: or community
plans for the area.
This application is one on which a Negative Declaration
could be '.,sued providing mitigation measures are attached
to address all identified environmental impacts, Mitigation
measures were submitted With the exception of a geologist
report. On March 12, 1987, the applicant's representative
indicated that a geologist report would be forthcoming. It
has not yet been. received. Without knowing the results of
the geologist report; the environmental documentation cannot
be completed. The applicant has therefore been unable to
comply with the Subdivision Ordinance requirements
and the requirements of the California Environmental Quality
Act.
Recommendation:
Find that the applicant has been unable to meet the requirements
of the Subdivision ordinance, and the California Environmental
Quality Act, and that the application has been pending for an
extended period of time and deny the Tentative Parcel Map
application for Loren Allinder, AP#27-25-18 in accordance with
section 15109 of the CEQA Guidelines.
The six months provided by the Government Code in which to take
action on this Tentative Parcel; Map expires July 22, 1987:
in the event, the geologist report is received in a timely
fashion, Planning recommends approval subject to the following
conditions:
1, Designate a 100 foot building setback line from the original
south property line,
2. Show the P.G;.&E, power line easement as a no development area
on the final map.
"8 Obtain a Use Permit from the Planning Commission for' the
mobile home now on-site or relocate onto a different parcel.
4i implement all mitigation nes.sures identified in the geologist
report.
LT jitic
ddo Ron Graves
co
-{- iLAND
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
WILLIAM (gill) CIIai i', Director
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE . oROVli�LC, CALIFORNIA 9s965
Telephone-.(916+ar i'r5 16"72663 O, McELROY
RONALD
Deputy Director
EIu1�a C;a.
pinnonq Comm,
Cr-,RTTFTBD MAIL
June 11 1987 OrOV11160 (�tltornr�
RE; AP 27-25-18
Loren A1linder Tentative Parcel MOV
P Q, Box 325
Palermo; CA 95968
Dear Mr. A1linder Advisory Agency will hear
above-identified
Butt County
property on June 221 1987.
Please be advised that the Butte County
your application on the 'Department
the findings from the Planning P
will b� reviewing parcel reap Public Works will
Theand Agency considering your tentative P
and will be approval as listed on the attached sheet
recommend the conditions Of pp ervisOrs'
Will commence at 9.00 a.m. in the Board
o Center Driver
The meeting 25 County
Room, County Administration Building#
Orovil].e, California:
uestions regarding this matter, please contact this
If you have any y
office, Very truly yours
William Cheff
Director of Public Works
*hnndonsa
ant llirecto
JM/ds
attachment Department
cc planning. Dep Department
Envirohme.Ital health Dep'a
Ron t3rav
Loren Allinder, Tentative Parcel Map,. AP 27-25-1.8, 2 parcels at the
southeast corner of Macintosh Ave. and Homestake Ave. Palermo area.
Engineer: Ron Graves Associates
Public Works conditions:
1 Provide two-way traversable access RS -8 -LD -I to each parcel from
a county maintained road or state highway.
2 Access to be reserved in deeds as per county ordinance and offered
for dedication on the final map.
3 Show 50 ft. building setback 'line measured from center;l.lne of access
easement.
4 Show all easements of record on the final map.
5 Provide street name signs per requirements of the Depo tment of
Public Works prior to recordation of the final mu..
G Pay off any assessments.
7 Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as rewired.
8 Meet the requirements of the butte County fire Department.
9 Meet the requirements of the Western Area Power Admin,
Catifornla U�UI�J�1 cJISUI`�J� ••,�a, DeVanment of Anthr000togy
rChaeofor)icat d a Catitomia State University, ChsCO
Inventory Q.&) �Q� •'- `�* Cf„co. CA 95929
(9 t GI 095.62$¢
Buffo Oo. Planning Comm, ! ►, t Apr. 3 0, .19 8 7..
-
MAY 4 1987
TO Butte County Planning Orovillo, Oalitorml®
1 #7 County Center Dr.
I oroviller Ca. 95965
Ce. Job #86-120/Gravos tY Assoc
tkar County Planners,
A rcvtew of the above project has revealed the following:
XX The area indicated as within the project boundaries is considered to: be
archaeologically sensitive. Present are
XX Easy access to natural sources of water
Flat meadowland or flat Land near water
XX south and/or east facing slopes
Previously r- prded sites in the vicinity
Other
We strongly recxxrmend that an archaeological reconnaissance be oxidUctkd
of the area by a qualified archaeologist and appropriate mitigation
measures 'prepared.
A known site or sites has'A1ave been previously recorded in the project:
area, Project Operations will have a negative irgMcat, on them ctlltstral
resources. We recaor wrn that a qualified archaeologist be aontaeted
to assess site cbapottents and prepare a mitigative proposal.
xk Other: survey is riot r v�emled for the above project. However, if'
-W-- materia s are cnccunterea' wring
any pre �storlc ort lstortc cultural ase 11Ttt ate y pe ing an inspection
Co ect operations, a wdr 5 u
of the Site aril tnaterla 5 y a alta 1. t arc aeo oll.�i
Thank yo.t for the opportunity to review and oot'Tent of this proposal• Please
let us know what decisions are rrodo re<1arding the Project=
sincer ly>
)r , 1,0k0ty Koutsi
Wrtlwast 1hrormotiom Cetitcr Gotirthilatt)P
__�
coun
PLAMNING COMMISSIQN
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE -. OROVILLC, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397
PHONE $34.7601
Loren Allinder March 9, 1987
P.O. Box 325
Palermo, Ca. 95969
Re; Tentative Parcel Map
AP 27-!25-18
Log #87-01-23.01
Dear Ms. Allinder:
An initial study of your proposed project, a Tentative Marcel Map,
indicates potentially adverse impacts to the environment (4efer to the
enclosed environmental checklist). To reduce or eliminate these
impacts; suitable mitigation measures are required as part of the
project. Otherwise, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required
pursuant to the California Enviornmental Quality Act;
An early response to this notification, sent to the Planning.
Department, will expedite the scheduling of your project. Please
forward your written response within 15 days from the date of this
letter.
A list of local consultants is included, These persons can determine
the need for a survey by conducting a records search, conduct
archaeological and geologic surveys or arrange for such surveys.
An archraQlogical records search msy be requested from the'following
office.-,
Northeastern Information Center
% Department of Anthropology
California State University
Chicc, Ca, 95929-0400
Attention; Curator of Records
A site plan and/or location map (preferably with Section, Township, and
Range) must be sent along faith a fee of $10,00 payable to the
Information Center for this service,
Should the office recommend that an archaeological survey be conducted,,
it will then be necessary for you to contact an individual who is
professionally qualified to provide such an evaluation, A list of
qualified local consultants
perform the surveyand
is included. These individuals. will,
�
provide
mitigation recommendations
as warranted;
In the event of an EIR requirement
outlining the procedure for ter
ent tthe
stou
will. be
prepare the EIR.
the,County select
consultantsent
If you have any questions or
between the hours of 10:0
comments Please contact
this office
.0 a.m,
and 3:00 p,m,
Sincerely,
B, A, Kircher
Director of Planning
All
e+/�
Laura Tuttle
Associate Planner
LMT :'1r
Enc,
cc: Ron Graves
P.O, Box 986
Oroville, Ca, 95965
APPENDIX DI X I'
CcaIIN'I'l" til'' lill'I" l�ll,
l;,NvlRONMl`,N'rAL CIiECK"S'r 1"tnt
(tC�'-Tjcw Cam1'i1 rt:rc by i eTid A�etcy)
J,o Jk 87-01-23-Q1
AIS If 27-25-18
l , Nnt UTTJN;P
Loren A11inder -,__ a
Name or proponent
A;Jaress or proponent alitt repres,)atatiyefit applicable)
Box 325 Rt i Gravel_--
Pa�erino, Ca. 95.968 P.O. BoxA 986�y,.v
m.-., 95965
Oroville
Ca
i 1'a [ojt't't dV• riptat}u
MAYHR No
i 1. �lAtyi)A'I't1ItY.._l'I P�Irf luctir, tal' :, i t;Nl i t ("A�It 1 _�
t'hv pr7juct h; e th, potential to degrade the
Ta, I)c)t`.a Sulr.,Qntiully reclucv
,nulity of the vu%ironua['nr,
Q,,,
the habitat Or ca Itra,
'h ol Jmintatc a plt.tnt taa'
l'Jt�nto atlrn►alalirlowysetarkt, ''Irich or wildore 1.
sustaining Iuo, threaten to ti
vt'
animal t 0mmuaiiQ, r[*t1 1thtaumber or c a restrict Y00 l f
range ear Ta rant �;r endangered I
.11minutr important cxymples 0 the major periods
-
or California 'h • , ory ,ir prehistory?
lay h[at'� the Jcr°oittt h,,, the potential to achieve
%bort -tcrm kno'ith
y to thedet imentortongtrm
tn4ircnmcntTl hrtimpact n
c�nv i rtannarnt i gnu which occur: I n Tl im ut swi
ba iar Period oa �a i•n(s tahilc loals�,�tr�rm imlaracts a�'�i�ll
..ndure into r ht .t urt. , l
which
C. loos linai�iroftl+u[lctiumtalaa�i�`el1�4at-
sidernb1c,CA
ally II : resources
project mist ,ar, a t on
two yr more separate
Small: t b ' A rt• on each
e rlrec•tso�i r the total TaOf those
san«ill haat
irnlguts t,, he environment is signtricant.1
tJ
roes tht t'roivvi have environnacntnt erlo tS
will c•:zc;,„,. ,:rala�; ant ial l�t�r5tr errec.ts cait liaataattn _a .
lrt`1nt;;;, c ltli r tlia"t�t't 1% war' IntiaT'et tl�'1'
r'l o bo r onah l c tett 1)�' the Lead Ala.rICY )
t)ra t1[.� bask initial evnimatio
o! this in
tCant
'1VI' t t , ." tin° raa',,iicc:,t.�tl pr,�ica't t;t7lil.Ia Nt�`I' have Ta �; �a7 i riire �a�►�cxtic�� t
n:a thc; r..ironmvnt,. and Ta RIatA'rtVh DECLARATION will bel I
ve
that altthtaupy lntn��tt[,iatlt+iel5 alltncttcab�yciahyignatric ntr>
.,11t t t ,a)athe trl%Iat
la�at' lies°Tautit� the” Pft'l'II;A'1`lgN MII;A tlltl: described ti)a
r to the Project n �1laiA`>"��VI'
tet t hots been
u[I[It�ti
DI UP" "r' t���! I l lit pr't,r'ptare ,
,ar[7it''t MAN have a :,il;ItlrkCnnt orreet on
tI. peri , taratl ua1 l *v l lttaNDtliiv7,'ti« 'I�IIsr1(.`l IZIa'C�II'I' is required
,., a
I'I,ANNTIJCI 1)i;hilt'1'�IL:N'I`
Marc
rtµ lIl,l, ,r�
lr
D A'l I,'
Laura M: 'tttle
As�aci I?�.: nee
Revi'u'ved by! Set
0
IV, ENVIRONMENTAL ACTS 0
n anations of "'yes" and "maybe" answers are required
on attached sheet(s))
YES MAYBE
NO
1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant,:
_
a,
Unstable earth conditions or in changes in
geologic substructures?
b.
Disruptions, displacements, compaction or :
overcovering of the soil?
n°
c.
Change in topography or ground surface
,
relief features.,:
d.
Destruction, covering or modIifica.t!an of any
.unique geologic or -physical features?
,?
e,
Increase in wind or water erosion -of soils,
either on or off -sate?
f.
Changes in depositi ori or, erosion o f. beach
sands, or c;langes in si`ltatiun, deposition
or erosion which may mod�fy.the channel of
a river or str^hm or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake?,
g,
Loss of prime, agriculturally productive soils
outs•ida designated urban areas'?
h.
Exposure of, people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud-
failure hazards?
slides, ground or similP-r
2i AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial:
T.—
Air emissions or deterioration of ambient
air quality?`
bi
The creation of objectionable odors, smoke
or fumes?
c.
Alteration of air morement, moisture, or
y - g mate
patt•han e �.n climate,.
l.ocal.l,orere�ionall
�
3. WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial:
i
Changes in currents, or the course or
direction of water movements in either
marine or fresh Waters?
b,
Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface runoff?
c.
Need for off-site surface drainage improve-
meats, including vegetation removal, channel
ization or culvert installaticn?
!
di
Alterations to the course or flow of flood
Waters?_
e.
Change in the amount of surface water in any
water body?
f,
j
Discharge into surface waters, or in.any
alteration of surface.water quality, including
but not limited to tomporature; dissolved
oxYBon or turbidit ?
g:
Alteration of Cie direction or rate of Flow
of ,ground waters?
h.
Change in the quantity or clualit.V of waters
,ground
either through direct adtii•ti.ons or W l th-
drawals, or through interception of an
aquifer by cuts or excavations?
i.
Reduction"in the amount of vater othev*ise `
available for public water supplies?
j .
txposuro of people or property to water _
flooding?
related hazards such as �,.
YES
MAYBE NO
4.
PLANT LIFE., Will the proposal result in substantial:
a. Change .n the diversity of species, or number
of any species of plants (including trees,
shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of plants?
C. Introduction of new species of plants into an
area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish-
ment of existing species?
,
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?,
S.
ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial:
a: Change in the diversity of species, or numbOrs
of any species of animal,: (birds, land an )pals
including reptiles, Nish and shell fish,
benthic organisms or insects)?
b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, xraro
or endangered species of animals?
C. Introduction of new species of animals into
an area} or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of a.n!Tia.ls?
d. Doterit?ation to existing fish or wildlife
6
NOISE. Will the proposal result in ,substantial:
a, Increases in existing nc•ise levels?
?�
b, Expos. -re of people to severe noise levels? —"
7:
LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce
signcant light and glare?
8.
LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a
substantial altoration of the present or planned
land use of an area?Rs-
a
9,
NATURAL RESOURCES;: Will the proposal 'result 'It
substantial
a. increase in the rate of use of any natural
b: Depletion of any non-renewable natural`
resources?
10,
RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve:
a:. A r sFt7 explosion' or the 'release of hazard=
otos substances (including, but not limited toy
oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the
event of an accident or upset conditions?"
b. Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
11,
POPULATION, Will the proposal alter the location,
acT stab ion, density, or growth rate of the human
population?..
l2,
housing,
orUcrea.te a�demand forpadditional4houssting
F
y ems, or substantial alterations to the
following:
a. Power or natural gas?
b". Communications systems?
c Yater availability:
d, Sewer Or septic tank? �.
e. Storrs water drainage?
Solid ;paste and disposal? ..~�
17. HUMAN EiEALTR Will the proposal result in
a: CreatlOn of any health hazs.rd or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
b Pxposure of people to potential health
hazards?
1.8 AE8vETIC5. Will the proposal result in the
bHtru an of any scenic: vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result in the
creation of an abstheti.cal,l.y offensive site open
to public view?
�4L
Y
�r
13.
TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION.PORTRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION.Will
YES MAYBE NO
NO
result in., the proposal
--"`--
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle
movement?
b. affects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for
X
new parking?
c. Substantial impact on existing transportation
systems
,-
d. Significant alterations to present patterns--
of circulation
or ,movement of people and/or
goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne nail or air traffic?
`- _
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
v N
14.
PUBLIC SERVICES, Wi11 the proposal have an effect
upon,, or result in
a need. far new or altered
governmental services:
a. Fire protection,"
b, Police Protection?
C. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
e'. Haintenanee of public facilities, including
roads?
f. Other governmental services?
15 •
ENERGY, Will the proposal result in
a. Use of substantial
amounts of fuel.or energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand
upon existing
sources of energy, or require the development
of new
sources of energy?
1.
UTILITIES, j+lill the proposal result in a need for
news st
,
y ems, or substantial alterations to the
following:
a. Power or natural gas?
b". Communications systems?
c Yater availability:
d, Sewer Or septic tank? �.
e. Storrs water drainage?
Solid ;paste and disposal? ..~�
17. HUMAN EiEALTR Will the proposal result in
a: CreatlOn of any health hazs.rd or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
b Pxposure of people to potential health
hazards?
1.8 AE8vETIC5. Will the proposal result in the
bHtru an of any scenic: vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result in the
creation of an abstheti.cal,l.y offensive site open
to public view?
�4L
Y
19 • RECREATION. Will the YES MA���M
110
pxoposal result i
upon the quality or quantity of n an;.impac,t
Opportunities? existing
recreation-,11
20. CULTURAL RESOURCES,
`..
a Wall t e proposal result in the alteration
Of or the destruction of
t
a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site?
b. Will thepµ
:pro osal result in adversephysical �
or aesthetic effects
-----�
to a prehistoric .or
historic building, structure or object?
c. Does the
proposal have the
p Potential to cause
a physical change which would affect
r
unique
ethnic cultural values'?
d. Will the
proposal restrict existing relxl
or sacred uses within the cous
potential
area? mpa
V. DTSCIJSSTOIV np BNVI`RONMENTAL EVALUATION _____
11
(3WF_N4-TrAL 5EVAL-9-6-1-1-0-N
CELS-----------------
,L_IS _.at __EMV-
SI-014 t-. Will
0
Ap it 27-26-18
reqw A re a minimal OMOWIII: Of
rollIng topogrElp►Y
Act The gently,,,,, Ullaings.
,a, 184,1011 of b
g for the sandy wl ti ,jj Fire
grad A n Ing, gravelly' . GIV011 (_,I)e A)t,,,Qjjosod
Solis on-site are Redd potential
Apt moderate erosion
by 11 -site, erosion As not 8
rharacter A zed nd gentle slopes on at though Uloy are not
parcel size$ a on-site are we -11 5LIlted *o Orchard, nes nor,th atIc.,j west are
19 Id: Solls this purpose. 1-arger hOldl a wetiL at 0 Used for
I a for sOU-jij an �C)V,
now being use v4h., A. propert A es A r_ "041 los S of
planted 'I CLAI Sr Property su A t.,
Inted It' This Part tact A Y re s the
nol grazing. air defined 0
S e 8 0 division "I,, no-, on 011st cats 1 a be to the South -
agr CU At tire , The property is Sot" A CU I'Wr*0 A
agricultural sOlIsm cl-iettes an nben-s- I Ve
between ruraA ran ferred fault"
edge hear zone and Itl.� of. the IC),16
is tk-ie footi-till S after shock reg A an A ocated
A h Immediately eO5_A;j, WithIn the 6.r,) earthquaA(e is faults
This general area epicenter of that Once of these Ity. A
oarthquake. 'The e heast - The Pres e Vicin!
2 miles nort, persons and property A T1 th
approv-Amately exact pjaceme
,,,dergit-e hazard to to determine the ex" of this
represent 8 4vey will be reqWlred pose to develoPMeOt
geOloolc sur 11 m !bations they MOY
-ti-tese faults, and any Cor
Act contract
proTaerty south are Under W 1 11 1 O"Ot"t 'Ura I res A dent) zil
SO5_vIdenc6 I., agrjr r Ov)eratloris
, I n
has shown that
_u Itur a
razing a IOU
Ini,-erksl,ve s incompatible W ntens foo,�, building
development 1 land Use Con"lato ertY 110e-
ot-der tO reduce potent A a I -Om b1*10 south Pr P
shoal be d0zlgnatod ft
-qes
setback -6 stand deslgrja�_,ed Agricultural be fout,id
'Y 5 zoned A ve acre de-'elopment Can .1sting
1, t A A-% A t
y uIven the eY
I'ho_ PrOIjet"t General PAO"- Fl ti -I Is -4 rcI81
on the Butte County Plan In a fire 5t8tlons domme
I Una staffed t"klth the Gevierati
Comp6tiblO w"OxImIty to a year 1�,rj
parcel sitp_5 labIlIty Of water' Url I ass
tervlces> and ay8i Ing Unit IS mjjow(�.Cj In the A-6 zone) 8 IJse
residet-ttlal dwell Installed under, rol'. Sot)*
ora,,y mob110
Only temp ft., for an elderly
second ur)j,�, is a greater 1,-jutgn b40 SrAl A"tOUSe and 0 tnobile home
1,I,. or a un It mo gre ,,h 0 Sint Ve sew4oe disposal
ter that, there Is a b 't I
unit 006 thelt- rospeo
1: appear, property tach �e.parabe lots*
on th I s all be lj1_qbaljed on r -tot-Ise now
SytteMs jh I.
t2t APPVOVOI Of this Map has the potential to one I
operitY, .1-IT10 AILArIC"At
to 'r0f" Pale
on the Pr pr,*opertY f �t coumt�v'
the roods I e0al no $Ufflalen b l wide to me oradimu
All vel TheY are 0 , An need of
_d ronds,� but ►art=
VA A obvi a Y are Oro maintain acme8a O(�V of these prtvmt�'e
re ulatlons for Privately par" t8klog neighbors bOCOMet very difficult'
cobperdtlon - 0 many between
and qtraVeii With
rood
The result Is often that the road is not maintained unless one property
owner requests a land division from the County, In any event, a
requirement of this division will be to improve ti -ie road to County
standards up to the nearest County maintained road.
I1ajb,c-,e,f: All development In the rural areas of the County
increases demands for government services which can not be easily inet.
For example, there are no sheriff patrols III the -vicinity, there 15 no
community hydrant system or pressurized water available In case of a
fire.
16a: A major power line passes through this property. The L-oHer
should be designated on the map as a no deve-lopment at -ea. All
easemenL-s owned by the power company shall be shown.
20a: rhere Is a potential for discovering archaeoloolcal resources 0111
thr, property. In order to determine whether an archaeological survey
Sl,00ld be lnrepared$ L -he appl Icenb tray request a records search from the
Northeast Information Center at Chico State University. In the event
the retards search recommends against an archaeo I og I oa I Survey, I b w I I I
hot be required 4 Clearamto from Northeast Informat lren Qenter shall be
submILU'_,d ""o Lhe Planning Department.
118, A records search will determine the potential for Impact to
archnoolrig lcal resources on the proper by.
ED,
ApP1icantr Loren A11i'nder,
Assessor `s is
AP��2ali it
Log
A* ,DA` A SME
''Q,��=c Iscr i �i ivory
i 1 YPe
Of Project,,
�`. grief Toni -at" v
Clescr i h1. ► on e Parce'I i.,iap
acres IJiuiding 1t�
each. acres
Location kt; [nrrc + f,a►"Ceiy f;
Womest! 01 the sot t'R~lie tst
Pro s Avenue ) 1'a l ermp cor her �� fi 'Dirac ,I rt t,c Jh
PQ�ed Dens i t Avercue anr:J
b. Amount: _Y of deVeio >
5. 6- cess o
an Nearest
i ous Sur faC ment a I dwe l 1 i i1 un I t
rc ids. Near -est Publ i nG, hl1 n i Ma l Par 5 acres
near est; Pub I i t~ ltioadC s) .
7. ihatho.d OF Sewn C read is Pr vnt
a 33. Source oi' age D i s Gra i co, 8/4 mile ase an --rival-
Source i ua'i;e
Water sUpp l .sal : Septic r�re11
9• I'roxinritY of Y' Zndlvi aniti leoc:h
10. Poteni: t a l i'ow�r Lines: ctt�a l Wt 1 I s f i e l d
ulider for' furt;he,r, slid To Pdr�ca 1
ex l st; i nrl A-5 -�rd 1 v i s i Ons arra devel oPment�e
B� - .
riP-_Q_CtMohta i None
�'1�.Y� 1�ca'! Pr►v i rorrrnar t»
' 1'erra 1.�1
a. Genera I l.o
vo 1 1 ePocoraPh i o
Sl oPes Cha
b. Y area t o f doth i l r l s ac�:ere i on
Ger7t l5 n ar oa f► erre
c E'1evFttt►c�»
d. Litnitiri 1it.1q fr , AuS.[_.
: So 0 15 a Pacte"rs» None
a • YPes s:ir"J
l oath Ghaa"� cterl st tc
y rod broNn Redd i nc
so i' 1 i Underlain ' `-12+` gradin Grave 1 i
by hardpan , ade n iro a yor" Y, sandy
cult orchards.
b. ed �' quato v cainF�act sub
L i rn i i na raotor�s , surf ace dra I na0e ,
Na t�rwaI Hazards Her>~Ir dr1 retards
Earth ake of +✓he Lana SUbdra lnage
Zone and f Lorre. ThtTned i oto? 1
b. Eras' n Ferred f'a�t'I bs Y adjacent
r ori Potent 1 a 1; moth 1 1 1 Shear
C l..ands I i C, Potent
Potent i a 1 Moderate
d. F= i re Iia Lew
e. E)K Hazard. lylodot Ya _o
4. Par`ws i ve S01 1 Potent i a 1
1-IYdro j o9Y
�. SurfHFah
Wate
bGround W6t..r. U1
.
C-1 i ;tor I ca 1 1 haws farm. Pond o.
Y a+ra 1 1 ab 1 e n s 1��
C. Drainage Characteristics Sheet flow generally satIL11,
southwest,
d. Annual Rainfall (normal) 22-24"
e. Limiting Factors= None
5. Visual/Scenic Quality: Good'
6.. Acoustic duality: Good
7. Air Quality= Good
Bii�Iogiral Fnl,yironmentc
S. Vegetation: Gra;ms l and, few o'l i ves, oaks
9 W i I dl i f Hab i tat No known , rare or er'War,4)ered species In
the vicinity
Cultural Environment.,
10. Arc:hrseo1ogical and Historical Resources In bhe erect: rewords
search required
1l. Butte County General Plan designationt. Policy Indicates
agricultural residential
`12. Existing Zoning: A-5
13., Existing Land Use ort--ss i, to e. THo dwo l l i ng units, ag . building
14. Surrounding Area::
a. Land Uses" L.C.A. contract south (grazing land) olive
orchards, rural residential
b. Zoning= A-5
C. Gen. Plan Oes1onait1on Agricultural Residential, Open
and Grazing
d. i'srcvfl Sizes: Ss 240Wt 5-13� Ne 6, E:12
e. Populat;ion Rural densities
15. Character of Site and Area; Farmland
16 Nearest Urban Area: N/A
'17. Relevant Spheres o F Influence N/A
18. Yinprovemen bs Standards Urban Arent N/A
194 Fire Protection Seroide
e. Nearest County (Sbat:e) i ire Stat i on o. 1172 w l th i n 2 1/2
mi les, W/6 within 5 1111 les
b. Water AvAitabilitye Engine capacii'y only
20r Schools in Arent Palermo Union
NEG—A'IVE
DECLARATION REGARD [,y'
1 • NOTICE IS HER1:1; -�—G ENVIRONMENTA,.I, IMPAC"t'
Y GIVEN that the f. t described below .
reviewed pursuas been
nt to the prO��c
Quality Provisions Of the Cali..f�,t{nia Environmentr,11
deterrnYnation has 7beenuMade the urces
effect upon the environment: Code 2llgpj et, se
it wi11 not hctvt� q•'� and Ft
AP #,27-25,18 a significant
Z. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT; Tentative Log If 87-O1-Z3•-gl
create 2 parcels both 5± acres each, Parcel Map to div cle 1Q 1/2
I _:.acres. to
3 • I,OCATTON OF PROJECT: At the southeast corner of M,a
Homestake Avenue, Palermo area. ca ML'Osh Avenue and
4 • ME ,AND ADDRI ,SS OF PROJECT APPLICANT.
Loren Al'! finder
P.O. Box 325 Ron Graves
Palermo Ca; 95968 P.O. Box 986
5 • MTTTGATTON A1EA UR1 S, OrOvill3, Ca. :95965
6. A copy of the init"C►1 study x`egarditl
of this project is on :file at 7 � the envir"Inental, effect
This study
Coulyty Center Drive, Oro�•illc,
wit -s o
0 Adopted as Presented.
Adopted tqitll changes. Specific modiCie
supporting reasons are attached, ations and
7= A public heal.*
decision maitin Y on this Neatilre Declaration ryas held b
€, body. y the
Hearing, Body
pate Of Determi.na.tion _----
De erminat on -- -----------
On the basis o;r, the
information Presentedn. ia1 study Of environmental impact, the
hearings, cOMints re ;eiv rl on the
rlVe find Lli n kn:awledge and independent research:
proposal andeour oV� c •
El proposu,,l Project t COULD h .
effect ere the enviro)Ament and a NtGATI`VB i)D ,
NOT have a sign.tfi.cant
horeby adopted.
�GL�I2 lTI N i s
1Ve find that the proje;.r, C
at the environment but, jai 1l not in tl;iw c
COULD have a S i�;nx C� cant epi ect
attached lniti,ga
tion measLire8 describe ase because of
wPPrOhich are by this xeferenc` mads conditionstol 5rabove
adoptval. A con�litianh:I NEGATT"I DtC. APATION is hereby
adopted, Project
Date �-r-
NOOCE. OF
,X0 Office of Planning and Research 'IFROM Butte County
1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Planning Departmont
Sacramento, CA 95814 7 County Center 15 t?
orc.-,Jjlj�, CA. 95965
or
X County Clerk
County of Butte
Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Sect -toll 21108
or 21152 of the Public ResOUtLk.:S Code,
Project Title AP # Name,
Tentative Parcel Map 21-25-18 Loren AIIIII-ler
State Clearinghouse Number CoritacV, ;?ei:son qelec hone Number
(if submitted to Clearinghouse)
John Mendonsai Public Works (916) 538-7266
Project Location
At the southeast corner of Macintosh Avenue and Homestake Avenue, P-iletmo area.
- Project Description
Tentative Parcel. Map to divida 10 1/2* acces 'to create 2 parcels both 5± acres
each
Thi; t
,h's is to advise that the Butte Count
(L , -,..d 'gency or Responsible Agency)
has approved the abovp�described proja,r on - (Date) . and has made
the following determinations regarding:, I -he above-described project;
1. The project will, w.L 1, � not, have. a significant effect 61A the
environment.
t. Aft tnvironmental Impnt Ilepott was prepared for this project
pursuant to the proal: ions Of CMA,
A Negative Doclatatio4i -Was prepared for this project pursuant to the
provisions of UQA»
3. Mitigation measures . __'were, wire not, made a condition of the
approval of the ptojecti
4, A statement of overriding considerations was, yag net, adopted
for this project.
This is to certify that the filial RIR with comments and tdspoftses and record of
project approval tg available to the general public at:
tutee County Planning DapArtiffitnt
7 County Center Drive
Otovillaw CA 95065
Date Received for Filing And
Posting at OPR
Signature
I Revised Match 1§86