Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout027-600-042r _f i i � 1, j - ,, 77 w o ►1VFORma reoN SHEET FILE/DOCUMENT TITLE -SHEET TOTAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT COROORATION �p� Sr; ^- �D=- T02 .. .._..,..�_ -CSR Log# 90-10-24-QI John Freeman g 2715 Bohemia AveCroville, C 9596E x _ Same. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP to divide, 10 acres into 2 parcels of 5 acres - each at the southeast corner of Upper Palermo Rd. and Bohemia Ave. Palermo area. I , S;s"10E,SaR° S P,iAn:.r'".- I3 ER (S) 021-060!042 ARMH 2,5 SR L PI AT AR PROZ£CT CO SSiS �2r^_'3 :,;.. PLAIT CON---O*P 1;-, ' ?tMPOR`I 10/9%90 L7ATF, Or --'APPLICANT S 1 MNAtU RE R/CI'V EL MTGI'I CRs Baxnhattr Brown & Assdci yes O -- `- . 1841 Robinson.;its Oroville,-Ca 95965 i 'x7'p,^CTQ S OF.Szmon Dx ' PARED ;� ��.-it��P� -� n NLi'IIGT.�i� iiSl7' D C-RAT?C3N -c I0t7;= AL'dn'-"D. �r `. �tiry �� y ram AC -IT a,, :PORT - DA= CZA: = :.i3...._.,.., r: ts.'� Ij Wol fi:NTAT:I:VE''PARCEL MAP . TEN%.MTE SUBDIVISION LJ - VYALVEF. AF'PLiCP�TiON j u PgELy�Q;ARY SUBDIVISION (Please c"heck approplriat6, .,yox) r i John Freexan PHONE NO: 'i34-6228 A'PPDYCANT. r ADDRESS: �5 Bohemia Avenue, C�rc�ri7 'l�a�" , ChJNETt Sartre PHONFI . �� r 1 BAP, M. F.T BROIM F�5soclA`PES PHONE NO: 5�34�1. _ i.—. • SEP. OR SU}+� 1EXOR • ._.. � ro�,t J�,,:_...�.-»_M..—..._. ENG] ' 189E Robinson Street :' , Coil,. 95965 ADDRESS:—,�.�,_ ;`4IZ, NOTICE OF _ r,Ol i carve t Fj gqj neor -- DM sr3;CA'x'TOI3 Ox �t�PER.T;!' TOYii3�S'rLP _ RANGE R4_ E._,_� SECTION t` TOTAL ?'CREAGE' ±10;+ A'SSE ,SOIL'S .PA.Rl",tL 14 MBEE'R: 27-6-47A. aCitT OR RECENT POLICY OF TITLE :�"�iSURANCE - ;�ir1ASR SUBMIT ]'FcET �LiiARY TITLE- jr,,L , (dated; within last Six months � WT'�,j A�PL"�I�AT70N. "INDICATE 13EI,dW ' DATE AND Ri COnING INF"+GPJAATTON HY' Wi M-11 Ti S P ITTC[TLAR PARCEL WAS CREATED PAGE BO'JK -- DATE NUhtHEFt A_NfJ SIZE Off' PARCELS BEMi CRE/�TED ��� aclud nl3 arty renis;Ender) : _ rya � Mkt: r; 2 parce75 �i acres each (more 0"'r M : ' I. NIA IiM DRAIN NCE TvRa�NATURAL WATER COU PROPOSED ,tHOD' OF SEWAGE DIarC8 � N �dirrac ua Kse Dl" etk W7 t Department C; PROPOSED SOURCE OF MATER. ' : Th'l;ivz h M H eia m t �t ent k D . � ��•' ,': r 1! ORiG'INAI, pAFtCEI,Y Yes DO POWER AND PHONE MES ES EXIST NOT ESTIMATEDTSTANCEr THEY WILL HAVE TO BE EXTENDED : hk�A utt,i%ecl 7.-24-80 1 , y 1)a go 2 AMS OF NEAREST PUBLIC ROAD : Upper paled Road. inter -x Bohemia,Avenue, . -- pISTANCE TO NEAREST PUBLIC ROC`�D: Contiguous with at frontage * `}For 3nformat ori on nearasv public roach check with Public Works Department TF ACCESS IS BY'PRESCRIpTIVE RIGHT -CF OF -WAY, ATTACH DOCutlEli 1TI0N,TO THIS AjppLTCATICX. N/ M IF ACCESS IS BY A RECORDED PRIVATE ROAD EASEMENT, IM)ICATE DEED REFERENCE: tiCLUt+IE PAGE THERE ARE ANY 110 ACCESS STRIPS, THESE,MST BE ShOWN ON 1HE. TENTATIVE MAF' AND Tn RECORDMG DATA ,,INDICATED BELOW: NAA VOLUME PAGE --- r DISTADiCE; TO CITY IMCi;'Ss _ 5 iia?es HAS THE OWNER OF TO& PARCEL -CREATED ANY CONTIGHOHS PARGELSy_ No S7L(RTAZiTftE OF APPffMT SIC- aTum OF OWNER OF RFPCORD i FOR OFFICE USE CITLY v r; To SCtZ}31V .Sick �pOIpIYL7 tee; To Advisory Ag4ncy.:- M't t Take Ac'ian Byt_:� i } )peal. to B�iaxid. of Supervisors : _ E xpiratibft r date: .. — Pl.r�n ,,' -� All RecdiVed;f ( 'Total. i Q3 Reel'"t tumh!t�r: 1020Re=viled 724--80 FUR E USE /ONLY', B1111,rt, tsslrity ;P1a01 i.g �ePt,Receipt" 11 7 tcisn.t,y Cent'.4r t1lrive pp Orovi I lr+, CA 95965-336 Applicant OW 538-7601 AP Il�-'�� Subdivision Name (if applicable) r APPENDIX H li,tro Filed LAND DIVISION APPLICATIONS Supplemental Information for Planning Department 1, List and describe any other related permits and other public aoirovals t c�clrrired for t'hfs project, including those, r :,wir'ed by city, regional; - 'qt4te a.nd federal agencies: None: 2 I'voposed scheduling/associated !projects, None V11 `} Anticipated incremental development (phasing of subdivision units, fctture development plans): None. A What method till be utilized to accommodate surface drainage? Describe how on-site and. dbWnstream drainage chantieis Will be affected j�;sti.rig surface drainage southerly r 1'ruximity of wator for fife fighting purposes (iiydear ts; ponds, ett.) z None n k, Wi i l oxonval lon tit- grading be necessary? Cubic yard,,; (estimate;), Minima, :for buUding pad cm9struc i:on. ;t `600 Yatft 1)ivoc:l Ions foe travel to property (rural and inttitittairSotts r�rn+. only), SWtherly ori Lincoln $lvd tr) Messina Ayentie,_l.eft to mar Pa.eiftio f oar.; Parcel l,tes at the inter-k of Upper Pyalertrio Raod and &i&,Mia H- I } 8. ENVIVONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURESI-t ' (clen't i ry potentially significant environmental impacts assoc: att:d with Ilw land division. What project design features or special conditions of appruvnl (mitigation measures) are proposed to alleviate potential onvi ron(nental impact$? There is no sxgnificznt enviromEntal upset to be mitigated. Mn site is zaie AR4 i 2.5 aai tt n pmml a's ba im split to (2) – (5) a=ePM-Cels - t w fl. ENVIRONMENTAL Si:'i"I'l'NC' -il i)eseri'bn the project site as it exists before the project, hi0 t+d ing information on topography, soil stability, plants ivl :attiitnnJs, rind any cul;irral, hi,storiral nr scenic aspects. Do,;cribn ,noy exi.stir►g structures on tate site, and the use of t 1 is :, t i' i, c: t u"8 4 L e r1. terrain, A nrm c r ,less . Locat N=th aft Pai=o 'having sWe soil. within site ad within clax pttadmity to an Ar_dha 1c='L" I SasitiIA-- area. hJ Do-t;rriho the surrounding properties, includi)ig information oil plant..,; and aMina)sand any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (res;identiali commercial, etc,), itifeinsiiy of land use (one -family, apartment douses, shops, dcpart- ment stotle' , .otc. ), and s .�,te of development: (hi.Jght, .frontage, +>Oback, tear yard, etc:'. -4 ],arri use is p =T=1Y as►�rulb tra7 & resi ns] wit'. sirig7e stony sus. t:1r12'i'1�iEMATIUN: f hereby certify that the: statements furnished above and it Iho, .11Int-lied 003111ts present the data atlid information required for this iti►f I'll ev;aivatiott to the bEst of my ability, and that the facts, statements a►itl 1►ilormhtion' presented' :are true and correct to the best, of my knowledge ,ititl Itt! 1 i r1=. , y� !..."?�`+.! I):►t'c• �%% Sigh«�aturt, �✓ For 'rtlaisclirtt=;►t iy et fur longer responses. t{ , I Hsi Aems 1-4 to be completed by applicant; 1. A'PLICAN"T NAME AND ADDRESS: _._►' n 3_ 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 5, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMER(S): G. PROPOSED USE: �'S1�2i"1"1�t--t✓ ' TP,e items Are to be completed by the Planning Departient .following J U CONSERVATION AG^RtM- 07'. CUP.P„MIT. ZONING: GEMr Al. PLANDESIGNATION; Conditional Criteria:, GPICIJLTURAL=RESZDrtTIAL YE HO It is recommended that you perform the 1.• Agricultural Compatibility . following checked items: ARCHAEOLOGICAL. RECORDS' 2.. Nater and Sewer Capacity CHECK' 3. Adequate. Fire Facilities BOTANICAL SURVEY A. Road Capacity and Haintenance GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 5- Access to Commercial and Schools YES NO WITHIN D£PA.Rt"tElff O FISH ORCHARD AND FIELD CROPS AND GAME DEVELOPMENT ZONE.' /t L. Predominant $-1q ac. Parcel Size 2. Vicinity of Urban Boundaries WITHIN FLOOD' PLAIN; 1. Ag. 'Viability not Iapaired � kITHIN AItEAt SPECIFIC OR Staff Determination: Substantiaily conforms to LAND USE PLAN:i GESERAL PLAN: 1. Land Use it Yes 2. Conservation _.. Name of Plast S. Open Space -111� WITHIN UR&SN USERYE: 4. Safety S. No 'Ise If Yet, Nave of Reserve 6, Housing AIRPORT LAND USE PLAN:_: 7. Circulation �_ y ZONING:_ Ccs illsrS : % lL- Q-- • 4 Staff' Signature Date AS THE APPLICANT OR REQUESTED LAND D'ZVISIONj I AN AWARE OF THE ABOVE STAFF DETEMINATIO'N REGA WNG 'THE CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN AND t6NING. r. '�--t:5-;.r.,,.' ell �✓"°':.''�i`c.���,....-...... / / - dated .. .r.. Signature of Applicant . phis report will "pito and be i! Bearded six {b months from th date of the staff si tUra. ism 1 • Ga,�4 fir" ��x >~ ro�.:•� o � �.. }�DZ� •y a M f��^.44i'Vpe++.5 • 11 R c�,�,.^v ¢ lJ AJOQ� �F{r+.'-• � :° `I I� • � D i / y^7 � _ � ar , e :ynAyU:M oJ.LwaiN:.i+.M.ua at#.J'IM'#• t G CJ - . Planning Department NAME: JOHN 1+'RE.EMAN Environmental'Health Department CDF (Forestry Department) AP: 27-06-42'_ Attn: J. Craig Cartier (on areas north of red line on map) w...... Butte County Sheriff PG&E (check title report for easement) Pacific Bell Butte County Mosquito Abatement OR Oroville Mosquito Abatement (areas within large map in cabinet) S o 1 Dstric wal map) AD Li Water Company (if individual wells are not indicated on application or map) Durham Irrigation OR Durham Mutual Water Co. California Water Service Company (Chico area) Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation District (Oroville area, SE of river) Tnermalito Irrigation District (Thermalito area NE of river) Limesaddle Community Services District (Paradise area along Pen= Rd. to lake) Del Oro Water (Paradise Pines area) Buzztail Waterworks (Doe Mill Ridge/Forest Ranch area) Paradise Irrigation District City of (check wall maps for spheres of influence) Oroville Chico Paradise Biggs Gridley 01!CjTILLE AREA ONLY: Lake Oroville Area Public Utility District see lar Feather River Recreation District (see large map in cabinet) ma in cabinet) abinet) tl Medio Fire District (check 'wall mapi a .small portion of Oroville only) BIGGSRICHVALE, GRIDLEY AREAS (SOUTH BUTTE COUTX): check wall map and title report: to see what applie8i Sone areas overlap,. Drainage District #1 Drainage District 1#2 Drainage District; #100 Drainage District #200 Reclamation District #833 Reclamation District #2056 . Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District, Butte Creek Drainage District Ids" CERTiJNt CASES; Superintendent o£ Schools (only for subdivisions) Dept. of Fish and Game (near water and in rural and mountain areas) Cal Trans (near State Hwy. 32, 70y 99, 149 (Chico cut-off), 161 (Olive Hwy, & Ri,chvale Hwy,), 191 (Clark: 'Road) State Water Quality Control Board (projects with more than 100 lots or units) United States Forest Service (i£ project borders USA land =check AP books) Parks and Reczeation Department (property near Lake Oroville) State eater Resources Department (property near Lake Orovzlle =- watershed) Rock Creek Rdclaimation Dist, (west of Chico Airport, south of kock Creek and east of Hw:y, 99 (see wall map) • Chico Area Recrtati:on & Park Dist (only for subdivisions) U,S. Dept, of the Army, Sacramento Dist, Corps of Engineers (near water and in rural and mountain areas) , SPECIAL CASES: t04heck title report for any mention of special services or easements such as to Thernal.ito Irrigation Diotri dt ('numbered items) AP Number: 27-06-49 County of Butte Department of Development services After recording return to: County of butte Department of Development Services 7 County Center Drive Orovlle,, CA 95965 AGREEMENT RUNNING WITH THE LAND RE MITIGATION OF IMPACT ON TRAFFIC IN THE OROVI:LLE AREA WHEREAS, the undersigned is presently the owner of that land commonly known as APNo. 27-06-42: , which is located in the unincorporated area of Butte. County, California, near _Bohemia X tipper Palermo Road the legal description of which is set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein key this reference; and WHEREAS, :said owner proposes to develop his said Land., and; in connection. with his development proposal., has submitted an application to the. County Of Butte for the following discretionary land use entitlement: Parcel TJap WHEREAS, said owner recognizes that the cumulative impact of development inUnincorporated. areas of'Butte .county, ,including his proposed development, has created created and is, creating a significant impact on the transportation system of the Orovlle Area; and WHEREAS, the 1983 Oroville Area Land Use Plan EIR recommended a, traffic study be conducted prior to substantial growth occurring in order to balance the new land Ube scenario allowed by the Oroville Area Land Use. Plan with transportation system would continue to move traffic at a reasonable level of service; and WHEREAS, such a traffic study is currently being conducted, and WHEREAS) the growth: in population and employment in the OroVil.le Area has g p threatens the levelro of service lGoft the increases existin travel trans demand art tion which stem unless transportation improvements are made to reflect the land Use scenario` allowed. by the oroville area Land Use Plan;. and WHEREAS, the Oroville Area Land Use Plan policies require coordinating City and County transportation► planning in the urban :area and cooperat.ihq streets>e Cithighwaysville in developing a capital. improvement program' for '•rte, { ; i r w , WHEREAS, the Oroville Area Land Use Plan proposes that transportation impact fees be exacted as to all new development which requires City and ,county cooperation in order for impact fees to be successful and equitable, ;ani it is anticipated that the City of oroville and the: county of Butte still assess and levy traffic impact fees in an amount and in a manner zubstantially the same; and WHEREAS, the county of Butte, in implementing the oroville Area Land Use. Plan and said traffic study may assess and levy said traffic impact fees by establishing mechanisms such as the following; developer fees; formation of a county service area and levying of service charges therein; f6rmation of an assessment district and levying of assessmeftts therein; or ,so~ple similar`, fair, reasonable and appropriate funding mechanism to finance '��a:ffic infrastructure improvements or environmental studies or other planning studies deemed necessary to determine the needs for. traffic .infrastructure improvements; and WHEREAS, said owners recognize that the imposition of traffic impact fees or .such other Funding mechanism or combination: of mechanisms will benefit their said property by providing abetter transportation system, and WHEREAS, said owners wish to mitigate the impact of their proposed' development on the transportation system and recognize that the County of Butte does not at present have a funding mechanism in place. or othew adequate resources necessary to provide such mitigation: NoW, THEREFORE, said owner does hereby agree and consent as follows: 1Said owner consents to the establishment of traffic impact fees or ;such other funding mechanism, or combination of mechanisms, agree not w1 protest against establishment of the same, and agree to pay their pro rata ::,bare thereof. 2 Said owner agrees to cooperate and k 1ppott the County of Butt+e in obtaining to approval of such funding !.mechanisms from other property owners within'the unincorporated area of the County in the Oroville Land Use Plan :area. 3 said owner a ree to a forthwith thy,. g p y folloWing fee as o(1 er:el/parcels''and_ beinct c: eated by the subject parcel ma d ven-hundred and Fifty do ars ($150.00) as to parcel/parcels ''`arid 2 m _ of the subject parcel map for traffic mitigation, It is''undErstoo that such fees shall be deposited by the County into a separate designated County fund 'limited to use for the intended purposes of mitigating impacts on the transportation system Within the oroville Area Land Use Plan area. 4 It is 'understood that suoh gees paid at this time are based upon current estimates and shall be treated as deposits against the actual fees ultimately determihed by the County of Butte to be owinc; for such traffic .impact mitigation. Said Owner agrees to pay su,.,h ttAIERI impact unitigat+ .on Said owner agrees to pay I uch traffic impact mitigation ion fees as maybe ultimately assessed and levii3d by an action of general application taken by the Board of Supervisors Of the County cf Butte as to discrationary land use entitlement reviewed and approved by the County. If the actual developer fees, service charges, assessments, or other charges assessed and levied for traffic mitigation are greater in the aggregate -than said denosit, said owner shall be responsible to pay any additional araounts owin6. If the actual developer fees, service charges, assessments or other charges assessed' and levied are less in the aggregate than said deposit, said owner shall be entitled to receive a refund of that portion of his -deposit which is in excess of the actual developer, fees, service charges, assessments or other charges. If any parcel is sold or otherwise transferred I then such additional amounts owing shall be paid by and such refund ' shall be paid to the person or persons who own parcel 2 at the time the additional payment or refund becomes due and payable. In consideration the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, the undersigned owner expressly agrees that the foregoing shall be an agreement running with the 'land and shall be binding upon his heirs, successors, and assigns, re C. Fteeman DATE Patricia L. Freeman State of Ca foia Coun ofr l on Yfab' r l I-bef ore me, personally appeared--ee p t/� .fr tip er�sonally h trJr1 fri :� _ , known to me (or proved -to ie on i'Yr B sis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name (s) is/are subscribed -to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that'. hat he/'she/they executed the same in hats/her/their authorized capacity(ies)I instrument t` the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s), acted, executed the instrument. WIMSS my hand and official seal. 4v a.rw. . �f}yjj•vsr `n,yi otrp�NRR}4q�S�ryqy� ±L r* .w+L!E�.�%...+ !7('1k't l tdD.1J'M.►1� Notary P L_C4W*rfiW dota y Public my CO��t1UtiY M Exp. MY 'Ail i 083 State of California 55. County, of Butte on October 1 1992 before me, BL-verly J. ,Green _. Notary sonaPubkno+, personally mi. or to me o ed 6� C. MMMN � d FREIZM � > pe y ( p �n the basis of satisfactory ev.*dence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) klake subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that ire/they executed the same in /them authorized capacity(ies), and that,by hidkmhheir signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the persoll(s) acted., executed the instrument. VVMMSSM hand and of icial Signature - V " w.4�. (Seal) �dnatsnn�n .� l3 VERLY I GREEN n 1 1AHYPUKI"At,FCANIA a tt gRu Coup , e q * r My CommI6410n i 104 M �j1 02/90) �e,++N✓fwuo►n�s+wonnwiee�,anrn Deed: Octc..)ber 1, 1992 � John G. Freeman Patricia L. Freeman IN WITNESS. WHA', OIT, said corporation has cawed its corporate name to be hereunto subscribedand its corporate seal to be affixed hereto,. this _......:.........'dray of .......... ...........,........�...., 'h' .........__. ... .. :...._............. ......:............ ................................ By..... .. ............. .....,. _ .....x...._....k , .., ..,,., . Presideot By:...K.................................................._ ... . ..................... Secretary t t ORIII�i3. 'i' ;� 5;� 1 ) STATE OF C'ALI OIINILA, - s_...ss- . .......... ......... County of ..... ...... _.... ............. .....: On thin... ..day of .. 19 _-,-before me,,the- undersigned, a Notary Public in and. for said. ................... County, personally appeared ............ .,-....._............. _ mown to, mo to be the ............................... ... President, and ................. .......... .................... la►own to me; tu�Iae the ..............Secretary .......... >................................ of. the cc-poration described in and that` � ,avited_ the within instrumout,, and also l nown tot me k �:be the person... who executed it on behalf" of the cornor��tion-there i:: rtarrncd, and ...,..he.;;... acknowledged tome that such, corporation executed- tlte, within instrument pursuant, twits by-laWs-oi �_resolut on of its board of directors.. WITNESS my hand and official sear signature ................................... - _ `~Fame (Typed or Printed). _ Notary Public in and for Said County and State This; is to, certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the ,within deed or grant dated ... .. ... ..........._, from .. . .. ...... ....... . ......................................... , ..... . ................ tai. County µ of Buttes, a ppaticail subdivision is Hereby accepted by order of the Hoard o Supervi"sons, on ..................._. . ..................... and the grantee consents to recordation, thereof by Ws fluty authorized' officer. ... Chairman of the Board of SuperuhWrs of the County of Butte . State of California. , EXHIBIT "Alp All het",int Real Property situated In Section 4 T18N R4E MDM Butte County, California being a portion of Lot 1 Block 85 of that certain map ,entitled "Map of Palermo and Subdivisions l and 2, with Addition to No,. 1 of the Palermo Citrus Tract" which map its filed in the office "f the Butte County 'Recorder on September 17, 1888 and more particularly described as followsz 'Beginning at the northwest corner of said Lot 1 thence Easterly. along the north line of said Lot 1, North 88 33, 54" East a distance of 659.83 feet; thence leaving said north line South 01' 25' 34" East a distance of 30.00 feet; thence South 880 33' S4" 'West a distance of 609.81 feet to the beginning of a 20 00 foot tangent curve, -concave to the Southeast; thence southwesterly, along said curve, through a central angle of 90' 00' 10" an arc distance of 31.42 'feet; thence tangent, to said curve, South016 26' 16" East a distance of 700.35 feet) thence South 88 33' '26" West a distance of 30.01 feet to the west line 'of said Lot 1 thence north along west line North 01` 261 1611 West a distance of7i50y35 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 0.95 acres more or fess r rte, y P OUVs .tel LAND GF WATLIR+AI WEALTH AND BEAUTY �- LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICER 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA Sr '05.3a97 TEL EPNONE, ;9161538-1266 Pi FAX: 1916) 536.2140 e►nnitLg DQQII(i1110t1t CERTIFIED MAIL August 1, 1992 AUG 5 1992 OT�Yfiit;I ��Itiurttlz9 ohn Freeman RE! AP 27-06-42 2715 Bohemia Avenue TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP arovill.e, CP 95965 tear Mt. Freeman;: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Development Services Committee held on August r, 1992, Commmittee adopted a negative declaration with environmental mitigations and approved the above -referenced project subject to the conditions listed on the attached sheet. If no appeals are timely filed within ten (10) days of the date of the Development Sorvi�as Committee's approval (August 13, 1992) -- with the ,Clerk of tete Board of Supervisors, this action will: be final when the conditions of approval, are complied. with, it will be in; order for you to file your "final map'' with the Butte County Departmerit of Development Services for tecordation within twenty four (2;4) months of the date of appt•oval by the Development SerViCes committee; Stage law requires that the Department of Fish and Game impose,, ,and collect filing fees as specified to ddfray, the cosh of0, managing and protecting fish and.7wildlife trust resources. These filing fees ate collected during the environmental review process and are to be paid at the time the County files a "Notice of Detttminationl► With the County Clerk Of the County in which the project is located. This pr�bcedure is required pursuant to Section 21152 of 'the Public Resources erode. the ated the To increase admriistrativeoethecceuntl' ClerktatThe dfeegrequred collection of filing fees Y in connection with your pro-Ject is checked below. ,ohr Freeman AuguStt, 4, 1992 A 27-06-4 Page a A` CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONM811TAL DOCUMENT 1l NOTICE OF EXEMPT 10&1/ S TATEMENT OF EXEMPTION r A. Statutorily or Categorically Exempt ( ) #25.00 Clerk's Fee ( X j g, Da Minimus Impact - Certificate of Fee Exemption $25.00 clerk's Fee NOTICE OF DETERMINATION - FEE REQUIRED ( ) A. Negative Declaration $1,,250.00 Stag Filing Fee $2.5,00 Clerk's Fee } B; Environmental Impact Report ;8$0.00 State Filing Fee $25.00 .. OTHER (Specify) ( ) $25.00 Clerk's Fee The fee should be paid to tR,e Planning Department by August -17 x..5'92, in order for the Not"ice of Determination to be timely Jiled. Make checks payable tO the County of Butte• that,or she does 110t The project applicant should be ae feeiltheeproject approval payment o ',emit f the' requ�.r'ed filing s,, may be invalid by last and may not be operat�.ve vested or final, ,af5uant to the vrovisions o1'Public Resources Code Section 21.089 ('b ) , Fish and Game Code Sec. 111.4 (c) and Section 753.5 td) C�) and (7), Title 1.4, California Code of Regulations. :Should you have any q uestions regarding this matter] please contact this of.i John freeman, Tentative Parcel Map, AP 21-06-42r 2 parcels located at the southeast corner of Upper Palermo Road and Bohemia Avenue. Palermo area. Engineer: Barnhart/Brown Associates Public Warks conditions; Deed to the County of Butte 30 ft. righa-of-Way from the centerline of Bohemia Avenue and Upper Palermo Road. 2Indicate a 50 ft, building setback from the,.centerline of Bohemia Avenue and Upper Palermo Road. Show all easements of record on the final map. 4 )btain encroachment permit for all drivei,ays, new or existing, and construct to county standards. 5 Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required: 6 Meet the requirements of the Butte County Farre Department. Health Dept. conditions: 7 Provide a IGO ft leachfield free setback around existing wells either within the property or within 100 ft. lof the property boundaries on parcel 1 and 2. 8 Show the usable sewage disposal area proven to meet the requirements ` of the Subdivision Ordinance on parcels 1 and 2. 9 Place a note on. the map that no Water well may be located within 100 it. of the usable sewage disposal aired on parcels 1 and 2. The following mitigation measures are required: applicantbas the option to wait for Oroville Area Traffic Impact 10 The app the ro riate fee, or sign an agreement fees to be determined and "pay PP p The estimated fee is $150' (per undeveloped to make a deposit of estimated impact fees: lot) with the right to either a refund for any overpayment or request the under payment amount once the actual fees are determined." 11 Jt„ id; recommended the following note be placed on the alternate r>r additional map sheet of the final map stating, "Automatic fire suppression sprinkler systems shall in all new resittential hall be it^stAlle structures in accordance With the National Fire PfOtection Standard for the installation of sprinkler rIltd lsystems it one rrsedof the two amily dwellings and mobile homes, Ntet Stan installation of sprinklt�" systems is for additional Safety and property, protection in the event of residential fires. This installation reduce the demand for structural fire protectJon services in those instances where they are installed ;I t i Wpa 11992 C19 IP" Ill i LAND '�) fv N! A T J � A� L W E A L T � �� h� � � : ,r ;l LAND 'DEVEU.,,jP TENT DIVISION I — DEPARTMENT OF 1;1EVELOPMEN.T SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - !OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 9596544 i' TELEPNONIE: 19161 536.7266 a, FAX: f!1116) SSB -2140 1` CERTIE-FIED MAIL June. 26, 199x1 John Freeman RE: AP 2'7-06-42 2715 Bahemis Avenue TENTATIVE PAk L MAP Oro-ville, CA 95965 Dear Mr. Freertii�n p County Advisory Ageniwy will hear our,sapplication donhthe above -identified property on ,August 3, 1992. y The Agency will be reviewing the f -(ridings from the Pi;ginning Department and will be considering your tentative parcel map: the Land Development Vvision will recommend the conditions of approval as listed on the attached sheet. The meeting will commence at 9:00 a.m. in the Board 0:f Supervisorsl Roam, County Administration BuildiAg, 25 County Centex Dri°,,e, Oroville, California: If you have any, q � e contact this questions rrti`�s'di matter, pleai afirice at 538-7266. this matt ng Very truly ytlLrs Stuart Edell Manager Land Ilevelopment Divijion nepartlhol ht Of Development Services attachment ac. Planning Ddpartmet t. Environmental Health Depaitment $yl nhart 'Brown A886cidtot a _ 1i.'A � t � �''4 p1aClRitt� t�yfi�l3i' j�ii*4Fy11t � �; ,. r` I1 BUTTE COUNTY HEAL�T i i?tT1Yi1�8r 0i�li�c�r���?t DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC DivisiOn of Enriron;aental Health 7 CourxtY Cente'Drive Oroville CA '95365 (9116) 538-7281 Jun s 17, 199-2 Barnhart Associates .O. Box 1576 oroville, Ck 95965 RE: Freeman TPM"-= AP# 27-06-.42 _ Dear Sir; This department has advised the Butte Cou��r Department are a„2blia to act ,fin the 'Woyk5 Land De.velopme,zt Septi - on that we prepared above applicAti0ri:w Based on present ' i•syorMAtion, wA can recommenda �f<7rova ui conditional approval - Recommended Condi;tlons for �A_'pprova7 property 1 Provide a 103' leaeh-lgeled or with n 1,0ck 0"'ofxheing property either Within the, Property Y - boundaries on parcels I and 2. 2. Shote the usable sewage disposal area proven �:+ta Iro meet the, :r is 1 2 sion Ordiila require:rient of the Subdivir ce on 3. place a not#'on the map that no `,pater well ,trs:r be located disposal. ari � c't� parcel's 1 within 100' If the usable sewage & 2. 1f you haV•e a ly questions regarding this lettei`, . i.c.+<:Se contact 'Mr; tel eph.`14 number between Dour Fogel at the above listed. addr<ss or 8:00 _10;00 a-im. Weekdays, very truly yours Philip E. 11e1s0n Supervising E.H.S. Oivisjon of tnvIronmental 'Health. I PEN/S9 cc: v/pl.anning Department - ',Public Works D partm ent II' [i • w �� w � - PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE. CALIFORNIA 55905-3357 TELEPHONE (916) 5384601 February 7, 1992 Njr. �,ohn Freeman 2715 Bohemia Avenue oroville, CA 95965 {e; Tentative Parcel Map, AP No. 027-060-042 ,Dear Mr. Freeman} The Butte County Planning Department. has completed the environmental review Of your project in accordance with the Galiforiva nviranmental Quality d sursu nct and t forwarded tphe� Butte County AdN isory Agency 1Nithin the reT . y P California Public 'Reso�l.rces Code Section 21151:5. In addition, Su divihe �s Planning ordinance report required by Sec'JI.ons 20-63 and 20-99 of the Butte County b has been cot*apieted. please find enclosed the REVISED Planning Director's Report which has been prepar.4:d for your project. Director's Report with conditions of Please review the enclosed REVISED Y lamm�g . P lease approval if applicable. if you nate any errors or omissions in our evaluation, p brig' , tioni a them to our a en* ���t _and Plannin Director's Report for your project has been °The Environmentr DiaClui�. + A for their action, Cahforma CTovernrrient Code a sent to the Butte; County h\dvxsar�� gene' i � set bearings and Sections G:`i9 U and 65952.1 requites the Butte County Advisory Agency approve or disappr�ave your :project within six months from the date on which your hcatioti was ret�etvel,l and accepted; six month `time lin for your project app , The ,,ut m mandated by state law, will occur oil July �9, 1992• The ,kdvi$ory Agency Will notify you of the timeand p r public hearing for your project. . l�,.e. oI� the there are .rnodifcatiloa to your project, 1,ot related to mitigating an identified irripact if re-evaluation of yoor project sha11 be re�qulrr.ci; Inter -Departmental Memorandum 'ro: Butte County Advisory Agency FROM: Planning Director. .SUBJECT: DEVISED Report on Tentative Parcel Map for John Freeman, AP No 027- 060-042, DATE: February .5, 1992 'this is a� proposal to divide 10 acres to create two parce'r at five acres each. The present ZoningIS AR i-2.5 (Agricultural .Residential, Mobile Home, 2 k). The Land lase Plait Map of th,e 'Butte County General Plan" designates this area as Agricultural Residential. There are no specific or community plaits for the area. The proposal does not conflict, with County Zoning nor any adopted or proposed Element of the Butte County General, Plan not any specific or commur"=ty plan. .AA Negative Declaration has been recommended for the proposed project in accordance to the California Environmental Quality Act and forwarded to -lie Butte- County Advisory A� cy -required 105 days pursuant to the California Public .esources Code aen within. the . Section 21151.5: kecorrmend approval of the Tentr_tive Parcel Map for John Freeman, subject to the followir:g Conditions: Conditions 1. All lots shall, be subject to the Droville Area Traffid Impact Fees and said owners agree, prior to [recordation of their sinal snap], [issuance of. any building permit in connection with or related to their Use Permit], to pay such Transportation impact Mitigation Fees as may be imposed by an Ordinance of general application adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte as to discretionary land use entitlement reviewed and, approved by the County: It is understood that such fees shall. be deposited by the County into a separate designated County fund limited[ to use for the intended pul'poses of mitigating impacts on the 1 ,.. January 2 accordance transp�artation Sys �em within the Qroville Area I..anri I,7'se Plan. Area, in ac with. the Agreement signLd J ry 9, 1992. the f owing note be laced on the alternate or additional 2, llt is ri.commended g p " ire suppression sprinkler systems shall b,e installed in all residential structures in accordance with tYie National Fixe, map sheet of the final ap stating; Automatic } ' i ion of s riiiider systems in one 1?'rotecon Association Standard for the installaf` p obil lio is for A Standard 13 D, The purpose acid two family dwellings s et` Homes; 'additional safety and property of the inaahation , p + systems protection i -I the ovent of residential fires. This installation will reduce the demand for structural fire protection services ih those instances Where they are installed" i � APPENDIX 1 COU'%1T-Y Oh' BUTTE ` NVIIiONMERTAL .CH19CKLIAT : FOiiM �1 EDAL`UATIOPZ , O]?" E".12ONM NTA1v 11:PACT , �rifo No, 027-060-042 Loft No. 90,610-24-01 AP No; 027-060-042 BACKGROUND t. Jahn Freeman 2, 27is i3ohettila Avenue, oroville, CA 95965 3» Project descriptlonr tentative Parcel Map to divide fo acres, to create two parcels at five acres "each, -19s""^ ►!° DISdUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUAiT10N ? A9IMDATOR"Y F NDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE i, Does the pro have the potential to de9ra,1a the _, X_ This proposal will hot slgnl'Icahtly degrade the environment, quaIItV of the environment, subs tant[at ly reduce the habl`la' of a (Ish or Wildlife specfes, mouse a fish - or wildlife populatlon to drop below selfrs'ustalhing levels, thrceten to eliminate a plant or animal community, redute the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animat or 'eliminate important okamples of major periods of Caiffornla blstoty or prehistoryT 2. MISS the project have 'the potentia! io achieve _� k- This proposal will hot Impede font+ -term environmental goals, shL�rl:-term benefits to the detriment of long-term environment goalst, (A short-term fmoact on the environment is one;,whicli occurs in a relatively brief period of time while long-term 1m03cts Will endure Into the tttltlfo,) i, Does the projectI�Ave"Impatts 01 th.ate individually R This ptoposal may have -6 "sighihlcant cumulative Impact oh the limited but cumulatively cor,siderablet (A project environment, may impact on two or more sepafate'tesaurces Where the it on each resource It reiatiweiy small, rbedi but where the effect of the total of those impacts in the 'ipt,relr� h is signif Icant.) have ehVlronmental effects which a, boas lho h X,; Tills proposal Will trot have effect a sfgniflcant adverse on humall Wily Cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, bel:tigs, either directly or tndltectiyt YT�i,_. DBTEAMINATION on the as s of EMS initial aVafuatlorl: 1/wE find the propo,+ed project coULb NOT have it 'lgntfitant M ledl On the enViroriment and a Ht0ATIVE ptCLAliAT1CN Will be ptepared, i/WE fihd that although the proposed prdledt collo have a significant a felt on""the ,enYI(ohmeht, thhhere Will not be a slghificaht affect iii .this case bescau3e the MI'rIcKTI'0N MWURtS descrlbed on the attifthed sheet have beef) added to the proleCI, A NEGATIVE UECLARATICN'will be prepated, i/WE find the proposed ptoleet MAY have a;sldniflcant eftect bit the Chvi"ronmeht, and an t;NVIR"Ert01 WAbT REPrxi7 is terluired, COUttrY OF rt t4&'6 � ant BATE: tovember 1. 050 Ay; t, Bren JNole .�_�.. I by Itr:V CWCd 2 r ozuctontal Checkli»;t * •EYaluAtion of, MhWxgnmental • Impad'.: 4, a ENVIRONMENTAL _IIS -PACTS rEs euyn w: DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION t. EARTH. Will the proposal result In signiticant; a. unstable earth Conditions, or chal,aesIn - X- The proposal ' Ill not affect subsurface earth conditions, geologic• sub2lructutest b. Disruption, displacement, compaction or X This proposal will result in some disruption, displacement, overcoveting of the: soil? compaction and overcovertng of the site as a result of develocm*nt of additional homesttes, drivewayys, parking areas, etc. The proJect site Is characterized by a telatively level terrain which Will require minor earthwork to provide roadways and building pads, The onotheeratenandyamount Ravine ofcrunoffsreachingll(lie Wyman drainage basin. The Fong terry: cumulative Impacts of surface runoff, however, could be significant. both financially and environmantallyr damage from flooding could Increase, rater quality may be reducedr and channel ero.Slon may accelerate. An accurate rissessment of tht, development e changes eS ttmbdthhil galashould made deerinfurther mtionmeapossible be mllgaton measure could the consideration of creating a county A, service area lot drainage within the Wyman Ravine Drainage Basin. cM change In. topography or ground surface X The project kfte Is characterized by relatively level teftalh which relief featutest will require only minor grading to accomodate the proposed resldentlal develoPWnt. d. Destruction,. covet Ind or modl ( Ication of any, - x_-, Thet,rbjecl site has' no unique physical featutes. UnlgUe geologic or ph!slcal featUtest' e. increase lwind or water erosion of solo n' '' X - The Proposal W ill not cause erosion, etcher on off d wet jl IN Changes in deposition of Option of i~each X .. The proposalWillnot affect Any Watetcourse, sands. or changes In siltalibn, depositiort or er.oslon Which may modify the channei>,ot a tlVeror stream or the bed of the ocean "! or any bay, Inlet or Jake? g, Loss of prime agriculturally 0rodur,tIvd �_ k : !hit proposal does not represent a signiticant loss of prime so115 outside designated urban ardikO AgricuicUral lolls. The ptolect site It located Within the urban , area of oroviile. h, Exposure bf.neople or property to geologic x. All of Butte county Is Ina Moderate eatthquake Intenrtty Zone Vlil`, hazards such As earingUakes, landslides, C6h3ttudllon of buildings to unifoim building Cone standards wt l mUdsl Ides, ground fallute or slml lar provide adequate protect Ion to 0tcupatrts Incase of seismic actikt'ty. hazatdst 2. AIR, Will the Proposal tesult Instibstantlal. a, Alt emissions of de'terforallbn Of ambient X-. The proposed project will tewitIn a cumulative ►head on air ' aft qualityt quallty due to tetated increases in ttalllc generated by the project. The Callfornta Alt. ROdUtces Control Board has identified Butte d� County as a Noaattatnment Area In meetind the standards of the Catl(ornla Al QUality Act . The butte County Or Poltution control PlAn does not addtess alt quality Impacts of small tefident;tal- developments lot posfible mlllgatlon measures. b, The creatlon'"of objectionable odor's. smoke ,;. ;r,_'. k..: s(A6 short term alr OUillty Impacts Will Probably result dutiho the or Ifume$? _ ebnstrUcllon phases of deVelcping residential housing. theteased, Vehit a and egUiprtrent emistiont as well as incteased dUrt during siteg gradinand preparation WI 11 occur, , 3 ; v :ro=e.ntaJ. ,Check1iBt It Eiora ivation of _EhViroxttuerktAi Impact . ENVI)IONMENTAL IMPACTS, DISCUS9±ON OF ENVIRdNMENTAL_EVALUATION YES MAYBE NO tcontinur,di , c. Alteratico of alt movement, moisture or x_ The prop0al will not affect the atmosphere., temperature,, of any change in ellmate;, locally or rw onallY a« WATER will the proposal result in substanti'ai, a, changes in currents, or the course or `_ X The proposal will not affect Lny watercourse. directlon of water rsovements in elther marine or fresh wa'tetsl b. In patternt, k – Site th osed of elandject or trt!es ratei and amount of surIacc – subsequent;coefficientteofhrun ffrdueoto changes inates 4se runOflt•. and rand cover. Development of the project sjte Vial also Imaact lhe 40r7c.2,4trnt+t, tt— l;1Vrvr Ane pme 1,esquenl pee, �,ohY, - geHIcant overload of the rst't � r► 5uctl• ,te nts x,V `fir► •,, drainage mystl:m., Sior*&,bt management sttategles r:h„irf be developed and Incorporated into the project at mttl9atlo(V4AdAsures to dectease stormWa-ter, dllcharbe offsite. A possible mltfgatfon meaium :Wld be thz Wiltideration of creating a county lerVice arl= lot v:alhAee wltb(n the Wyman Ravhie Drainage 8asNs: 1.1 addition. adhetente to drainage standatds of the butte county Pub►.lc works Department is auticlpated to iiniiigate ,ossible Impacts to the drainage systema it., reed forolf–site surface drainage x” Drainage lmprovertxints H)II be necessary to acctmmodate the ptoposed Imr_cvementv,including V0,96tatlon removal, project. See blscussion on -ib above, channelization or culvert InstailatIont if. AIVttatiorit -to the cortrse of flow of flood x - The ptoposal may cumulatively Impact flood control channel's or waters Watercoutses. The project. site dtains Into the 0jman RaVjne bt61nage ba$In which Is known for Itequent hooding. See Discussion on ab above, or change In the amount of surlaLe walet in anyx . _ The proposal will add to the cumUlatlVe amount of water in the Wyman water body?' Wine drainage system by Intreati I stormwater runoff and the intensity of peak flows, j tsischar a 1 1 , stfti f ace watet.s or In any gg X Tim proposed project will not Impact surtare water quailty. afleratlon of tuttace water quality'. Including but not Ilmited.to `ampetoa.t�te, dissolved okygen of tuttrldltyl g, At terat on of the-Al,tactton of f 1 ' ",,� x The rbposal Wtil not at the dl P rection or f loin of gtoohd water#. of grou d watetst, il` thande in the quarftity or quality of ground X _ The propoi8j will hat directly affect anyaguiler,. waters, either through ditect add,',tlo t or wllthdraWais, of through Interception Of An Aquifer by cuts or 'excavatlonst 1. RedUttion In the AWUnt Of water otherwise x - the ptopased project will not impact public Watet Iuppljes. syAtlable for public Water suppliesz j. t:xposute of peootr or p cperty to water- x..: The. proposal ntay intenslly tlobdlhh dowilstteam In the Wyi;na;1 RAVIne, dlscutston related hazards such as Ioodinot Without pdtoPdt drainage controls and standards, see on pt ART U r. Will the proposal result I`tt su stantia a i^ arige In the dlVetslty .of spades. of it.. The 0 versity of plant species will be ekpanded as tesiddntlal hon- numhet of any si,«cles of plants tincludlng „ nalivo Iandstapes, ate installed. No substantial reduction of the .'trees, shrubs, grass, 'ttoos, and aquatic numbet of existing speaids is anticipateddue to the pari:et sizes bisntslr I _ . requlydd by the ekl"MAt zorilho t1miltication, • 4a I u \ \ 4 �n a ro titenti41:,Checkl,isf, * `.Eva!Wktionl Of k,>ixv rcriatentai:l xmpna ENVIRONkMN-TAL IMPACTS (continued) y, -,s No DISCUSSION OF _ ENVIRONMENTAL EVALOATIL'��1 (continued) b.. Reduction of the numbers of am/ unique, tare k .ted planf4. The protect site contains no rare or endangP or endangered species of plants( _ C. Introduction of new speole% ',t plants intoy The proposal will . not affect exisVm. p r.+yl l:fe, an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenlshm:nt of �existirli, d. Reductlin 1,1 aer96i,.- a. A* aJficulIMal _ k : The sltL does hot, contain `qY crA;1ti_rw"iwlly'1ia�rL;, brlcirttmal cip{i, crgtst t will the proposal tosuit in �uh _C___ __ svus�rah_i a a + In �_. k u The proposalwlil not affect animal Ilte because the site dies not numbers of any specie$ of arimnrs (b raj,' �M $upp�srt sigti,dicant animal life or habitat landge atilmaishtnc LG�tiin1 ry"aa �sFr,`►ilsh anil shellfl\h, benth+L;Grgam."t ot`Ihsocts)? li, Reductio1 in the numbers of anYlunique', rarex- The'flte contains no rate anlmals. or endangered speeles of animals( c. introduction or new 0ecles of allmals` nto -X The proposalWII'I not affect eXisting animal life. an area, of in a baNl er to the migration or movement of anlmai-$t d. Doterlor ation of existing fish of Wlldiifa _tel x'- Tho:,sIto contains no significant Wildlife hribitat. 6, NO I skr, �l,ll.the proposal tesutt In subtthhtlalz a. ,ndrealds In eXisting nolse loYbIs; _ _ k 'The wii( not re`suit In 3ubstantla'1 increasd tir'hOise created on f'te of In the vicinity, b: txposure of people to seVete noise (eyei'sp _ X —, The proposal wl,:, not ekpote people to severe noise revels.' T, �r» ttu; WI11 the proposal produce X — The proposal will'not.resuit In a sUbstan_ilal Increase. in light or s � g, d can rBht antl gla.e't glare created on site of In the vleln)ty; a'. ahr,U5F. WIII the proposal result in a substantial x The, proposal will not altef the land use In the area, The pfolecl a cr`al-fon of the present or planned land use of an site It zoned AkW-2 ,5 Which allows one dwelling Unit per 2.5 a0d$ steal Is designated by the nUlte county central elan as Agriculturai� dential. The ptoposed ptolect conformi to both the ge'netal 01 h,, and zoning• g. rrscsac s, wil'I the proposal result In subs n a. Inctease in the rate of use of oily natU"fat % The proposal Will hot Affect anV hatUral resourcei, resources b. beplai on of any non-teneWable natural x The proposal will not tleplu+te any natut1 resouftti. �''. rpiielI io. R15'ir.OF Msec. Will the proobsal InVolve. ,i A. n risk of expiasfon or release of Hazardous _ The ptoposal Will iii nor is 1''d aOV nvoIlacllltCes whIthastore"oterlAl substances (including,, but hot limited to, It, close I or U(I1ize :loch off, pesticides,chefolcals Of tadlatlon) In .located ta',teriels. { of An accident of upset tnlerlciente roustttoi b. Pass[hle 1 With an emergenc;i "�—...; �, x, The prWosat will nbt altecl ahy emefgeney,lr�rvlces. response 1 p ah of einfge�'lcy evacUaCibn plant Impact n +� ;iGc�.lzinental' C�1 !�ck1i" tt ;*f- , va4„juiijtitsn dV EkkVik j Unent4,T; IV. i12fVIROi;HE1,VTAL IMIACILS (corltinw,u) YEs , Jwu ho DISCUSSION OF B14VIROIRENTAL 11EMALUA""TION (continued) 11« will the Propnsali al ser IOcatNait. w; _ x.� �` NileproFo:+al wlIi not sIgnlIIcant flya(itect this papul.atIonof Oe area §%AT1 istr u ion, density or grt3ltth tatkf of +the hilhon because the proposed densltlr does not exceed 04t planned and being population? doelbpt:d in the area. 12, __NaJS�tNo, Will the pi!+iposal afxect eX111Iou hoosl01, ,w .,, .a, _.x.�, The, protiota'I wG'll not sighillcahtiy alle," housIng demand, or-create a demand Lor additional hdtislin,ol ,' e+ rspnIla t ULN= will th is. TRArrsPcaTATioHlctacATIO P result n': a. ceneratlonof substantial add, tldnai wlihltrlis .» _» , ;,„;; The pi000sai wll t r;piesent An Inctemantal Itrtirea"s,e inrai`f lc in trill movements area, 1'IIe proposed project Will generate approxintitely ;20 vOltilib trips per d,sy. Thit protect site Is located oh the soUthi'lO of the I Otoyllte union atea with Veit rew serirlcgs, >th{ch blit tequ+t+r ti the occt.ipants of the propose-1 devi;.lopaient to cainiute to:Orbvl i�e or Chico tot emiiloyment and olhel` serVtces. ,4lthough the eXlstihg str&et and, roadway network may ai:cormodate to more vehicle iflps pet day Individually, cumulattveiy the eklsting street network will ..not, in addition, due. to the lack of funding transportation improvements have hot kept up with the growth In traffic to elate. currently, atsproximately 1660 new residential lots are being created by subdivision Map in the Orovltie Urban Area. The Orovllle Area has the potential for several thousand lots being -:tented. The ptoposed�project will contribute to the ctrmulatfve traffic Impacts within the Orovtlle Urban Area,. The tnvltonmental ltr0ici Report MP) preolited In 1983 tot the zoning and the broyllle Area land Use Platt Indicated that thepresent clrcutatton sys'tem•s caimdrty wAs not balanced with the traiile volumes generated by the 'land Uses alliowed by the General Plan designation and zoning classification. Tir1983 Filo fecommarided as'A mitigation measure that the county and cite y of orOvllle undertake an area w_Ide traffic study to eXAmine and plan for future circulation needs. It wan recommended that the Transportatlon study Identify tutUre transportation corridors, I Improverients, and a system to finance necessary =portatlon feglonal ttaniportation lVubvemerits. The 5toposed project and tesUlting cumulative ttaffie Impacts will also impact the existlhg freeway interchanges along state Route 70 The 1493 elk stated that. by the year lobo wi'ttibut substantial i trans ortat[on Improvements the leuel of .,ervice on freeway Interchanges and local sheets would detilne to D 'of bower. The California 'transportation cotantss.ioh's policy for Interchanges requltes local jurisdictions to finance the Improvement costs of Interchanges at 106%, curtenti.y , the county of autte has _iia"ptogram to assess financial tesponslblt'Ity to local developor1111 for Intdtt:hange Im4,tovement costs, In order to evaluate the cumulative 1�1e "a` ltaffic Impact3 or the project on broVftle urban area ItanspottnlIon system computer model WIII need to be developed and a site Impact analYsls performed, b. O reds on eklaling parking facilities. or X - The proposal will not affect parking because the proposal will have demand for new parking? to d6hol y With the parking rdquirements contained within Butte crwnty code section 24-35« eXlstin. b a"tiat Impact on g CI, 3u st n p t see .3a. ti"antport$'tlbh systems? d,_slgnificantaiteratichs topreseht"patterns _ see'sa, rid,, tit cleculatloh or movement of people and/or goods r, �Q,, 3 #. Cpnla ►nta� C�IQa;;c,Yi t :ZVa:lti&�Aojm o!° 'Environiueri�rn1 imppact . .. yF ...r•n n�•n�ti' nnn.na171Y�T T. t*cYT T:Tta TTC11J I V3,ROIiM EUTAL XKPACTS Ccon(Inued)' YES wsrlr _;Ivo i' i a., Alterations to watiltbornt°y twill or a11 traffic) I. Iocroase in trot11chatslrifl no MOW ti�it>ui;les, dlcpillsts 61�eooitrliinsr H, 'tem . s. I1flsil the p`rc�pt�t�al tiptan ellllti't WPM or res:iIn a need tot limit/ ol, tri ttl l d puveirU,N3r+t I:eivicesr d;, Fi'tl�� 7totacti�b]T x — �k, I+rilpte protections � _ c, schooist x ._,. �I �E r u LJ JLA�.r ti OLl J. vi¶ 'vr... iJi�7111.✓`�raa+i�+. a-saa wa •��.....=..a ...��. - (coritInued),- The City Or ttroville has several at -grade ralli?lad crossings. The tntt.&menta.l Increase Intralliciii these cr�ossingt'wiIi Intensity the corvf,llcts between train mavemenls and traffic, r4.sulting In ttaiflc congestion; A It;afftc model lot the 'oroviile urban area is antic Ipattld to ev&iusie potential tonfilcts between ttaln movements And traffic. See 1Ia. the proposal Will 'fesult in an Inctemert^ai ihctease- in demand for fire protection "In the area, Phe $Otte county Fire Department/cailforni.a Department of Forestfir has indicated that - cumulative develoament in the county will Impact their ability to provide fife protection services. CDF hll$ proposed as A mitigation measure all residential homes in rural areas develop a tire suppression sprinkler, system. it is restnriended the following note be nn the alternate of additiona� map sheet of the final map placed stating: Aotomatte fire sutiptess,on spunkiershall be ,systems nstlI ft all ;reildentfal stfuctUrds In accordance With the installed National Fire Protection Assoclation Starldatd for ,the installation ofsprinkler systems In one and two family dwellings and mobtle ,homes, HFPA Standard 13D. The purpose Of the Installation of sprrhitlar systems is for additional safety and property protection In the event of residential ittes. This installation will reduce the demand for sttucttirai lite protection services In those instances Where they ate installed." The project site will not be serviced by a community Water system with hydrants which wlll lncrease the demand an the fire depattments existing wstei tender vehicles. To mitigate the setvice demands Impacts art the fire department tot the lack of a pressurized water system it Is recommended the applicant pay s200,0e pet lot to the Butte County Fito Department water Tender Fund prior to tecordinil,the r, nal man. The proposal WI11 tesult in an Incremental Increase In demand .lot police protection in the area which can not be serviced by the present Shetitt-i bepattmdtrt. Since 080, the population of Butte County has lhcrealed by over 25t, while att� the same time, the police force has been decreased in petsonnel by sox due to fiscal difficulties helniti experienced by Butte county.Currently. butte Courtly has the lowest otflcets pet daplta In the state. Al recent leyi3 allve committee hearings On Butte county`s llsdal ctlses, county olll_cials testified that police protection sel'Vlces are presently inadequate. and do not meet the +service expectatlons of the publlc, Continued rutal development hat testified in cumUlat,IVe Impacts on police ptotectlon setVices which cont(nties to reduce the shetl Wi b0atimr!ht, capacity� to, provide Adequate police services. Devefopmeht trivacls° oU the Sheriff's Department is county wide and cannot be mitigated by on# Indlvidnat project. the ptoposal will letup in a Incremental increase to demand ,or school services in the area. �rvevet, by the focal, 3thool dWslcts is anticipated school Impact tee's c011ec'bd to reduce school Impacts to less than A flgjijIjejjnj level. No further mitigation measures of tetlultements are allowed In accotdaUk, to covetnmeht Code section Cr5995 . i t r;i q -- Win Elim to- en Ai Checklist * Evalua>rx®n of Xnvironmeri> al Ympact , stt: 174 RNVTRONMEbVTAL iMPACTB (continued) Avh M �. _Lo DTsCDSf3ION OF ENVIRONMEwmAL EVALI7A'I'ION (continued) d, Parks or other recreational facrlftlest k The proposal w1iI tesult In a incremental Increase In demand e, Maintenance of-pubiic racliltles, lncluding and recreation facilities In the area. for park roadst 1. `� x The proposal wlII result In a incremental Increase In the .heed for maintenance of roads and other public tacilitles Other govdrnmental servlcest x In the area. The proposal WtI I'resuft In a Incremental Increase in demand rs, eN:aev, Will the proposal resUl't itis other governmental services In the area. for all a use of substantial amounts of fuel of ena dyt x The proposal Will not UIIIIze substantial fuel or b, substantial Increase In demand upon exkUing energy. sduftes of energy, ur require ;the development of new it the proposal will hot substantlalfy increase the demand lot energy, sources of energV7 16. ti iTrts. Will the proposa) result In a need fol, new systems, or substAhtlal) alterations to thk` following. a, Power or natural gAts The proposal Will not affect .electrical power or natural gas distribution systems, systems e, waiter Availab3 Water x The 'proposal Will hot affect communication systems, . or septi syt � d, sewer or Septic systems, _ ^ The proposal Will hot affect public Water systems, X "— The proposal Will have to meet the requltemehts o1 the e invitonmental Heal-th;Dept, quite county e, sCormr watet dralnagei i, solid waste and disposal, x_ see 1b, 3b, z f. 1�, 17. AN NeAttH. WIII the ptoposal resuft in: the Proposal will have a cUmulali Vc ImRact on solid Waste disposal, a. creation of any health hazard or potehttAt hazard (exciuding mental health),' .�L.j. The proposal Will not create any health hazard. b. Wdsufe of people to potentia., health hazatdst x The proposal will not exposd people lb any health hazard, 1a AEstHtTic Will the ptoposal result In the ous ruc ion of any scenic vista or View open to the public, or will the proposal �-9 The proposal Will hot retell In an Aesthelitally offensive View because It result; In the treatton of an adsth'etically offehsive site Is consistent With sUtrotlhdlhi deVelopmeht, public v(dwt open to the 19. EotEAT►ON..; Will ► the proposal testi► t In An ImpAct x upon a quality or quantity of existing tetteatlonal oPpoftunitlest "—`-' The bropbsat may resUl t In ori tncre V mynial increase In 'demand for pa'tk And recteatlon facilities, 30. cxJL7tftAt ttsriirtc€s a. Will the proposal result in the alteration or ddstructlon ol"A ptehistorle of historic x_ 'The, project` site Is Identified as�An area of low archaeological slid? atigltal archaeolresoureds, sensCtivity for b, Wilt the'ploposal result In adverse'pphysltai or aesthetic effects to A ptehistotic or -- ---- x The proposal Will hot aftoet h0 tbric sltes. i� hIstbric bul'lding, sttncture of oblectt 7, s. r:ironmeatal �Checkl�ist � Evil.ua1V�,o>n o� Erivfroram@nt4l,'Impact _. '' Imo• ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (contrnued) Yes MAYBE NO HZ$90 ixON O L ENVTRANHEAI'i°�1T, 'EVAfJATICN lconttnued> C. noes the Proposal have the po{entiat' to cause a physlcaI change Which would affect X !be proposal Will not affect cultural resources, unique ethnic cul lural Values,► d. Will the Proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses Within the X . The Proposal will not affect religious resources. Potential Impact area? �• SUGGESTED MZTIGAT a" MEASURES ti, Prepare a ttarf 1G site Irrrpact analysis ion address cumulatiVa impacts of traffic on the area 4• It Is recormended the following liote be placed Vl.de transportatlon.netWotk, - on the alternate or addfliairaf map sheet of 'the sprinkler systems 1's for addititnal safety and final map stating,, "Automatic fire supptesslon property Protection In the Qvent of residential alnage to the val r sprinkler systems shall be instaifed to ail fires• This tnstalfatlon Wlll reduce the to to County bl orks ntp residential structures In accordance with the demand for strut IIIc protectiion services. national t=ire Protection Association Standard :for in those Instances xhere They are (ns tatted," qu st t 'me n of county se iea the instaflatton of sprinkler systema In one .and iVr,rat ad int m n R in n a CO—i,tL-- two family dwallings and mobile homes, NFAA 5, To mitigate the service demands impacts on standard 1JU, The purpose of the 10 tal'tatlon of the fire department for the lack of a (# / P� pretsuriied water system it I+ li c�at� appllcant pay $2o0.o0 retamnended the county Fire Department Per lot nd prior to recording the fine[ map, w i, i ENVIRONMENTAL ,IMPACTS (t+ontinued) YEs t!xvn' . No DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (+`on I i hued) DATA SHEET t -w., r!ct_ oescrlption a. Land uses: residential b; Zoning: ARMIH-2.S 1. Type of Prolect: Tentative Parcel Map C. con. Plrfn besfgnation: Ag:Resi 2, orlef Deseriptionr.'TPA t0 divide 10 acres to create 2 lots of S % d.. Parcel sizes: 2 to 10 acres acres each. e. Population: sUburban/Rural Population s. Location, Corner of 60hemla Ave» and Upper Pale(mo Rd. is, Chatacter of site and Area: Rural. 4. Proposed Density of Develop:rr• arts i ttnit/5 acres te. Nearest Urban Area;: orOVIlie S, A+raunt of ftervious surfacing:.mitlimal 77, Relevant spheres of Influence: OroVillei 6. Access and Nearest P:d)IIC Rondfs). Elohemia Ave. 18, lntprovements Standards Urban Area:, No 7. Method of sewage Disposal: IltdiVIdUM septic/leachhieid 19. Piro Protection service: a, source of Crater supyly: Individual ,rells a. Nearest County (state) Fite station: 04 9. Proximity or -Power Lines- Adjacent to -property b. Water Availabil,itY: Water Tender OnIV 10. Potential for further land dicislons and development: Existing 20, schools in Area: Oroville U,,lon High school oistPlct ,and . allows for ►.he division of property to 2.5 . Palermo Union FlementarY 'school plitrlct. atnrcnoarceisification >i. EnYI rormentai, set_ f ind Physical fnvfrormenl: t, aerratn General Topograph)c'char acter. Relatively flat terrain b. slopes: 0 to is c, efcvatlon: 2t5" ASL d. Limiting Factors: None 2. aa. Types and 'tharacte"rI's tics! PA(Vih Sli.ty Clay Loam; Ir+petvlous.Substtatum at 6' deep. b. Liaoning Factors: Dtainaod In tune areas Is not good. .s. Natural Hazards of the Lang a. Earthquake Zone: godetate Earthquake Iritenslty Zone Vlll. b.: iauslon Potential: High C, Landslide Poterrtlat. Norle d. Fire hazard. M!ent �re c. Expansiso!! Potential., Laer 4. HVdibtogy a. sutface Prater. None b, around Water: CenetafiY AVallable. , C. Drainage chatacteristics. Property drains towaidls the souttlwesl', d. Annual Rainfall (notinaf): 22`.to 241 e. Liml.ting Factors: downstream flooding s. Visual/scenit Quality: Cood 6, AcoustId Quallt . cood r. 7. Alf quall[y Cook gfofoAtcai Envlrorve,cntx a. vbgotatlon: tion -native plants...,,.d 9. Wf ldl i to Nabi tat: MMIl birds aflahitr4i4 earewrti to tutal areas, Cuf'tUral t7ny00 menu to, Archaeological and Nistorlttk4 irdsources In the arca: Lo1r sensll]VItyy area It. ticitte bbdhty'tenet* I Pfan.s7ot ghatloni Agricuilural=Residential 12,. t0ttiha Zoning: Ak4-1-2.i CI, EXIitIno Land Use, on -0 0;rt Vatant 14. Surrounding Area: 3n! r4::0 ten'td C heck? lst *, Evaluati.an a Ener xonntenta0 7C�ipa�t 10 .,... ...,v &A.N -z%jr-&.-a9 tuontinuea) YES MLAYOE N3 V151:UNISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL .EVALUATION tcontinued) ENVTRC?LAMENT,..U, 'REFERENCE MA'T'ERIAL 1 May t 1- Earthquake a d Fault Act i i y: SeVI miC� a tyby [ tph,, f E,Ile bounty Genera i �lan rev. seS. 2. Map II-!. iQuefaction Patentlat; Se.ISM lt`, 5 fety Elem t, Butte County cer7eral Plan r�:vised i-79, b CH2M �i (I 3, �p 111-1' Subsidence Lands 11de Potent aj, fety 9.1 vlm�i&I butte County�ueneraI Plan rev1se I -i by M �i Co611t1ICener� s n Potent4e l: �SS febyy Mti,l Butte, y � ��an revl�ed i-77, 5. eUotylGeneralaPtsanerevIsed 1-77 eb CH22lyitl,I I Butte 6« M p lV-i, Noise: Noise Ete t Butte County General' Plaan revised 1--77, by CN2M �I r, 7' Butte oUhty ncenera9hP l an`rev I sendl of gnuY�C1 81 g,emV,1,,,p It1-j, Nat&aI Fire Nada"�i C1asjesx ,S fet utte ounty Genera Nlahrev setl-7b 9. Arch eo ogicaIttepg Itl�r lty Map.bY�i lamesg 'P Manning. for �Ute County Plannlllg �eparUent, 1988, - 10, sSchool District Map. Butte COUntY Planning` Depa r anent, 11. ejplmvsorJrcelt at orStU prn,bNItDrabte Concentrrat1 1 ih . ai spt 19558ttee, _1st icttttnett a Kesauates Agency, giate of Cafirorhlaz rn rico to I P tte fount Board o ,Wu e v sols 12. �4 �gLl P. rve Map es tab l l stiefd b petro ut iott Decem er15,'1587. 13. -iood insur nce-R to Matte�s. National Flood insuran rogram, Fener,alrnergehcy Management Agency, 198e, 14, USG5 Quad Maps, Palermo, 1970, 15.`ie°partmcnt oql A°Br i�ufiurer'oVl i Ie (1526) Area, U,S. 18, 6011 Survey ooi �gr ocuL916)10tovil Ie (1926) Area, U. S, epa17, t1t oun P a protectlon urlsdiet.lons an� Cayl]lt��s a , .butte coo t tl�e De artment; an Pannrrtgepaptrnenient of PaYestry, �'utte County i a i y A r •• I o . s. ` PLANNING DEPARTMENT' 7 COUNTY CENTER -DRIVE- OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95985-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 February 5, 1992 Mr John Freeman 2715 Bohemia Avenue Oroville, CA ,95966 Re Tentative Parcel Map, AP No., OV -060-042 Dear Mr. Freeman: The Butte County Planning Department has completed. the environmental review of your Project m accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and forwarded to the Butte County Advisory Agency within the required 105 days pursuant to the C:a to 'a Public Resources Code Section 21151:5. In addition, the Planning Director's report required by Sections 20-65 and 20-99 of the Butte County Subdivision Ordinance has been completed. Please find enclosed the Planning Director's Report which has been prepared for your project. Please review the enclosed Planning Director's Report with conditions of approval if applicable. if you note any errors or omissions in: our evaluation, please bring therm to our attention. The Environmental Documents and Planning Director's Report 'for your project has been sent to the Butte County Advisory Agency for their action. California Government Code Sections 65950 and 65952.1 requires the Butte County Advisory Agency set hearings and approve- or disapprove your project within six months from the date on which your application was received and accepted. Thd six 'month time limit for your project mandated by state lain; will occur on. July 20; 1992. The Advisory Agency will notify' you of the time and plate of the public hearing for your project: it there are modifications to your project, not related to mitigating, an identified impact, re-evaluation of your project shall be required: 'I Inter.-Departrnental Memorandum TO: Butte County Advisory Agency FROM: Planning Director SUBJECT: Report on Tentative Parcel Map for John Freeman, AP No. 027-060-042 DATE- February 51 5992 This is a proposal to divide 10 acres to createtwo parcels at five acres each, The p The Land present zoning is � 2.5 (Agricultural Residential,P'tonre, 2 �). Use Plan Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Agricultural Residential. There are no specific or community plans for the area. T proposal does not conflict with County Zoning nor any adopted or proposed ,lie Element of the Butte County General Plan nor any specific or community plan. A: Negative Declaration has been recommended for the proposed project in accordance to the California Environmental Quality Act and forwarded to the Butte County Advisory Agency within the required 105 days pursuant to the California Public Resources Code Section 21151.5. Recommend approval of the Tentative Parcel Map for John Freeman, subject to the following Conditions; -Conditions 1 All lots shall be subject to the Orovlle Area Traffic Impact Fees and said owners agree, prior to [recordation of 'their final map], [issuance of any building permit to conn&itrorn, with or related to their Use Permit], to pay such Transportation Impact Mitigation Fees as may be imposed byan Ordinance of general application adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte as to discretionary hand use entitlement reviewed and approved by the County, It is understood that: such fees shall be deposited by the County into a separate designated. County fund limited to use for the intended purposes of mitigating impacts on the` p y lie Oroville Area Land Use Plan Area, in accordance trans ortation system within t with the Agreement signed J'ativary 29, 1992 2, It is t..conimended the following mote be placed on the alternate lir additional map sheet of the final neap stating, "Y matie fire suppressi>=sn rd.ential 4uto p cordance with the residential ati actures 'in accord- e with the stol('tt_r �n ac National Fire Iprotection Association Standard for he installatio of sprinkler systema in one and two family dtivellings and rnobi hone; ivy{`A Standard 1 p 's i tallation safety ;tnd LS, The purpose of the installation of s rrnlcler system is fo' ` . • addttronal prothe event of perty ial res. will redo-0, the Bertrand tforr structural fire protection sety ces in thos�'e nstatices where they are installed" AGREEMENT RUNIZI14G WI'S'H THE LAND RE MITIGA'CIOr, �OF IIWACT ON TRAFFIC IN THE OROVIILh AREA WHEREAS, the undersigned are presently the owners of that own as AP No, 27-06-42 , which is located land commonly htyj California, near Bohemia No- in the unYnco orated area of Butte Gou x L�rper pales�no=, the legal description of which is set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this :reference; and WHEREAS, said owners pz'opose to develop their` said land, and, in connection with thoir development proposal, have submitted an application to the County of Butte for the following discretionary sand use entitlement: subdivision map._,._ x use permit _,other (specify) parcel map and WHEREAS, said owners recognize that the cumulative impact of development in unincorporated areas of Butte County, including their proposed development; has created and is creating a significant iiupact on the transportation system of the Oroville Area; and WHEREAS, said owners are aware that in jo,83 the Butte County Boelyd of Supervisors adopted an Environmental. Impact Report (EIR) pertaining to the Oroville Area Land Use Plan, which =R ;.dentified said plan as having a significant impacin t on the transportatio system of the Oroville Area; and WHEREAS, the 1983 Orovil.le. ArQ sub Use P? an EIR recommended a traffic study be: conducted prior substantial growth occurring in order to balance the new land use scenario allowed by the oroville Area Land. Use Plan with transportation infrastructure inVestmeMt to ensure that the transportation system would continue to ,rove traffic at a reasonable level of service,; and WHEREAS, trie growth in population and employment in the' Oroville Axea has producers significant i;icreases n travel demand, which threatens the level of service of the existing transportation system unless transportation improvements are made to reflect the system use scenario allowed by the Orovill area Land Use Plan; and WHEREP,S the Orov,lle Are- Land Use Plan policies require. coordinatirg City and county transportation planning in the t,r'ban dtda o ram far streets and ille in deveJ oping a City ?,i'kCl. ca itald mprc000vement pr g h the Cit of and highways; P AMPL WHEREAa, the Orovil'le Area Lana Use Flan proposes that 4 transportation impact fees be exacted as to all new development } which requires City and County cooperation in order for impact fees to' be successful. and, equitable, and it is anticipated that the City of provlle will assessall e'the same astraffic mpact fees r qu�an amount red bynthe County and in a manner substant y of Butte; and wHEREA5, said owners- recognize that the imposition of traffic ,impact 'fees or such other funding mechanism or combination of Mechanisms will benefiteyr said property by providing abetter. transportation system, and WHEREAS, said owners wish to mitigate the impact of their proposed development on the transportt o sem and have a recognize that the County of Butte does not present mechanism in place or other adequate resources necessary to provide such. mitigation. NOW, THEREFORE, said owners do hereby agree and consent as follows'. 1. said owners consent to the establishment of traffic impact fees or such other funding mechanism, or combination of 'mechanisms, g a share thereof.agree agree not pratrat against esta.bl'isZunent of the same,, and to pay t p 2. Said owners agree to cooperate and support the County of Butte in O'bta' ning the , approval of such funding mechanisms froom property p the County other Orov�.11e Land Use Plan areawithin the �.ncor orated area of in the 3: Said owners agree, prior to Crecordation of their, final- MAPS] [issuance, of any building permit in connection wth or related to their use permit] to pay such transportation impact g may be imposed by an ordinance of general mti ati©r� fees as application adopters by the Board as Supervisors of the County of Butte as to d scretionaty land use entitlements reviewed and the Coutnty, it is understood that such fees shall be deposited approved b by the County into a separate designated county fund limited to use for the intended purposes of mitigating impacts on. the transportation system within the oroville Area Land Use Plan area. 4. Iri consider 1. the fore oing and other good and valuable g considerat11 ion, the undersigned owners expressly agree that the farec;o nct shall 'be an agree.mert running `with the land and Shallbe heirs and all successors and assigns in binding Ripon their i yhteret�t a 1 eCountrq PLANNING[)EPA R i MENT P - _ 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965TELEPHONE: (916) 538-'1601 "3397 TO John Freeman 1'MOIv Butte County Planning Department i� SUBJECT Mitigation of Traffic Impactsin the Oroville Area DATE: December 9, 1991 'Development projects in the Oroville area, excluding Thbermalito, have been required to address the cumulative impact a£ traffic generated by each development. The options were to prepare an independent traffic impact study through an Environmental d bythe Butte P Report. or towait .until, the Oroville Area. Traffic Model wascomplete County AsWdation of Govenunents (BCAG)a The B AO traffic model has now been completed and identifies traffic impacts for the area which .r+fast be mitigated. Since a Capital: Improvement Program has not yet been with the and, P as authorized an agreement, running com le j,ud, the Board of ;Supervisors h' owner to establish impact fees and the that p;'ovi Aes for the consent of the propel' payment c�S such impact fees as an acceptable: method to mitigate traffic impacts and allow ptojects to proceed at this time; Tf you agr4:e with this method of mitigating traffic impacts and sign and notarize t��e y , g P Y application. attached a reer,�ent, the Plannin Department car: continue to process our a plicate 1: JH -bbd u o m 1 V44 � '� y,� 4 { ^�'�Sl t•�r'1F��� ,�,?.A �(Iry }''3M�`�' ��.r�'1 r�. ° ✓rJG4 ° r. ! t, y l.: iS + Ya* d qi a.,.,ss=.,#,, r� vCi(�1cK� p;. � ".:spa n��fab�. nth xAsr t .w �./�y�tMllt,° r~ e*t�t'• �1� �`�i0�: �.. � _ .r • k.%,. - r ,r „r .d 4.111 . ' r ^ SMR ! ..• � 5 M iY•-.+�.Xe='e .0 F , �.' ,/ .."! +�y'M, p L,.S/i(/.�/i.' k4 4'j',�C"� �.I}`� "i � �; i � a,�^'l }� i r a •t. W + r i, • \ " s�narr�rwwl+ralwi �Abh 0 Riorm m 94674 �.a.wrery 114m ° r X CyC01100010C01100010 Corporollon - Richard h.n ,LXaxon _ fihanr0dckk a k LA �N1. . /88/ A RoBinron Street PQ Box /576 Oiov/lle, CA 95965 9/6/59'9- MI Thm"t OdoryovP ClV/L ENGINEERS 0 LANG SURVEYORS thomisFln4yoon t s4co November 27, 1990 Butte COUuhty Public Works 7 County venter Drive Qroville, CAi 95965 Attns Jahn Mendonsa REi John Freeman AP# 27--06-4 bear Mr. Mendohsa Pursuailt to the requirfAnents of the California Environmental: Quality Act, yr a -- spo.ctful �i _request to waive our rights .of a decision within the required time limits set forth. Please advise us of any further decisions regarding the above. referenced protect. Sincerely', • a Robe s R'1R MART-BROSr` N' & J�SSOCIATLS DRjrs ccButt Preeman cc: john e County Planning bepartment 90 -abs y a n n aM ar aaa Atan ar broWo, CE 2079 A Caiffarnia Gorpataiion- glchard nornhart 0 4202 1$81A Avbin,s'W 5/res/ PQ BOX /576 6edvIlley CA' 95965 916-1534- /,91/ Thomas OdWfk LS 3901 1VJL EN611yiThomas o LAND SURVEYORS MioFvana VP malmna FfnloysohLS 3800 November 29, 1990 90-088 Brent Moore Butte County Planning Department B County .Center Drive O=Ville, CA. 95965 E,., FREEMAN TENTATivE AP# 21-06-42 Bear Brent.; in reference to your initial study dated 11/7/90, we disagree with -the suggested mitigation measures No. 1 & 2. The project is a simple parcel map with two (5)- acre parcels,, one of which has an existing residence. The only impact .on the existing environment would .be 1 Additional home. Mitigation measure No. I requires a traffic site impact analysis supported by your comtents on Item 18a that states, we will generate approximately twenty vehicle trips per day which is substantial additional vehicle movements Wiih ona,y one additional .residence p' p , is number should be ten. You had told us that the ro osed this pr -. 1-ses within, 0rn :g oville Urban, which acc-ording to the irequires tha traffic analres yss. The project is not within the Urban Reserve nor is it within the tdville,: Urban Area Major Street and Highway..Network Map. Mitigation No.measure No. 2 requires a drainage plan:suppokted by Your comments on Item 3b that states, the change in absopt%on rates, coefficient of run off and peak flows M -lead to sigaificatnt overload of the existing drainage system. If we calculate the actual: increase in runoff, we find an additional 0.11 CFS Will be added to the system. 'Re do not believe any one could seriously determine that this is a si di i.fidant impact. Wei believe there are approximately 1000 lots being pronosed at this time not being created; 60% to'90% of these lots have not been approved and are prefoXt`hq various studies necessary., q f LAND 4F' NATURAL WEALTf1 Atlp 9EAUTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601' November $, 1990' John Freeman 2715 Bohemia Avenue ,Oroville, CA 95966 Re: Tentative Parcel Map APN 027-060-042 Log # 90-10-24-01 Dear Mr. Freeman. An initial study of your proposed project, a Tentative Parcel' Map, indicates potentially adverse impacts to the environment (refer to the enclosed environmental checklist). To reduce or eliminate these impacts, suitable mitigation measures are required, as part of the project: Otherwise, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, An early response to this notifi'cationj sent to the Planning Department, will expedite the scheduling of your project. Please forward your written response within 15 days fromthe date of this letter. Should yvu `ww :any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office between 10:00 a.m. ariJ•S:00 p.m., any weekday, Sincerely, B. AA Kircher Director of Planning Brent L. Moore "Associate Planner BAK Bi..ivfirdm Enclosure W. Barnhart -Brown Associates, 1851 Robinson Street, Oroville; CA 95965 zrorc c7-VrERMrz��zc�zv • ca Office of Planning and Research :FROM: Butte County 1400 Tenth Strvr,;t, Roam 121 Planning. Department Sacramento, CA 4358111 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 or X County Clerk County of Butte �i;7SJ�GT Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance With _Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. 1'r j ea Title AP lf` Name °cnttive`Parcel Map 027-460-042 John Freeman atE 1,e Clearinghouse Number l Contact Person Telephone Number' submitted to Clearinghouse,} John Mendonsa (916) 538.7266 Project Location At the southeast cprner of'U?per Palermo Road and Bohemia Avenue, Palermo area. Project Description 'Tentative Parcei Map to divide 10 acres into 2 parcels of'5 acres each/ This is to advise that the Butte County Advisory Agency (Lead Agency or Responsible Agency). has approved the aboveV-described project on, and- has made (Date) the following determinations regarding the above-described project: 1. The project Will not, have a significant effect, on the environment. 2, An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: A Negative Declaration vas prepared for'this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA 3. Mitigation measures were, were not, 'made A condition of the approval of the project„ 4i A statement of overriding considerations y was, was not, adopted for this project, This is to certify that the final EI:R with comments and responses and record of ,project approval is available to the general public at: Butte County Planning Depattftiit 7 County Center Drive Orovilrl.e CA 00165 Date Reeceived for Filing and at C1Pit , Signature cv1wed R azc2i x t3� Title r... ..Tx, * v 'Kt,. ... .. -, C �•. ., �,. ,:> ..� r .,. t . r , „ , ,AW � # ����,� ��. Ise, f �]s} �� . t i r „ c , n "TRANt FR 'M :., 1 e 59 - r.G.'1. ., r J+ •,{ji d' 1,,.i•, 607SLL 6116f 4.D: C �.0, Ac. � � 4��ii 44 s a xr' 6 2C7,Rs ,4C 3 car 1+ �' J CIDIfIlUl— ROOKyo ,. 6 , RS 47-9J 41 3 81 R I1,-21d01 � C1 441za 72^.G1 ree.ei (� yy . C(1' �. 95 .7lAC�• y 43. 'St d wAw _ r y� r - ��� r�,�%4/�d' 1-40 BOOK 6R-449-n 7 Ju r , Xv 08 f , Cr , l', •gyp y� ., .. 1 JI A !1 1 r 1506 8 r A �A�_� , n 6 lt�i L 1PAMM, W1,`V,59 Vi?t�i; . .. Y1f it '7 ¢t 1 ti J, .,, 1K j 9 10 if t , , : 4 r , ' c , e I T , rE , . �a4E• , 1,A ; u r . ► . J " pAl.l�.E'{ =kl'Tt:1S f.. (}, 14�4.l. 1AL„� �h..3 „ t . _ �" ���}16,� K Il ii j� 9t 1 1 � R. L 00� T ;w ab' d, �'