Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
028-020-054
rz <��-'��-~_-_----__-----_-___-_-tL 16 - - . -_~- Permit #6525�75M(mi-- �rheat pump) S/F ` � .. � ` . . . � stucc SF) 04-3150 629-020-054 LAYMOND � ) / r ' AL HOUSE � `SERVICE yREPLACE ELEC � | � }MISCELLANEOUS, HVAC.Change Out CHANGE OUT HVAC'725 CENTRAL HOUSE RD . � TEESDALE RAYMOND GEN, � ` ' � . � * ' . E " ;• �: � R f Z1 PERMIT NO.. 'i( -)0 -P E M r m MH UTIL. PERMIT NO. PERMIT EXPIRES ll 2f 7- 9, MER William Stafano owner GONTR. "LOCATION (A.P. 28-02-54 21mi.'off NIS Central House Rd., i mi. E. =oIf Lone Tree Rd., oroville rA - 1p. o- Jl l ' Temp. Pow r Pole Calle PG&E Temp. ec. Serv. Ca ed PG&E kS• . Temp Gas Serv. ;j• ailed PG&E J B INALED (Da e) (Signature) i f Z1 PERMIT NO.. 'i( -)0 -P E M r m MH UTIL. PERMIT NO. PERMIT EXPIRES ll 2f 7- 9, MER William Stafano owner GONTR. "LOCATION (A.P. 28-02-54 21mi.'off NIS Central House Rd., i mi. E. =oIf Lone Tree Rd., oroville rA - 1p. o- Jl l ' Temp. Pow r Pole Calle PG&E Temp. ec. Serv. Ca ed PG&E kS• . Temp Gas Serv. ;j• ailed PG&E J B INALED (Da e) (Signature) I v COUNTY OF BUTTE — DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING INSPECTION RECORD BUILDINGI BUILDING (Cont'd) PLUMBING Setback Firewall Soil Piping Forms Parapets 1st Floor Main Bldg. Restroom Finish 2nd Floor Footings Windows ,f lli� 3rd Floor Stemwal I Sidinq To out Slab Piers Roof Sheathin Roofing mm Water Piping Sewer Garage Fdn. Vents Fixtures r Footings Garage Vents Water Htr. / StemwalI Slab Prov. for physically handicapped Heaters Appliances Carport Footings Conformance of ex.."."Gas structure A I Piping & Test Temp. Gas Slab Final e m Sanitation Patio FIREPLACE Final Footings Footing IX ELECTRICAL Reinf. Steel Final Fixtures / - lam' Bond Beam FIRE SPRINKLERS Motors Framing Tesf Water Htr. Stucco Final Subpanels Mesh MECHANIC Grd. Fault Prot. Scratch J;216171 Heating ` Service %v Brown Cooling - Temp. Pole Finish Ducts �` Underground Interior Lath Q Ventilation �, �. Permanent Door Closer Final Final DATE 1`11ah" REMARKS OR CORRECTIONS � -� COUNTY OF BUTTE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 7 County Center Drive — Orov�lle, California 95965 Telephone: 534-4541 APPLICATION AND PERMIT ((( Signature of Per`ni it6 or Ager{t / �a"� y � � Receipt No. ��_ _ White-D.P.W. — Yellow -Assessor — Pink -Inspector — Goldenrod -Applicant I EIdi�nqperrrlit expires Date / �"7 BUILDING Owner S FT. OCC. BUILDING VALUATION Mailing Address �. 30410 ?T roma No. 61/S(� Fireplace Contractor 17ATotal Valuation Mailing Address Permit Fee Plan Checking Fee &/or Penalty Telephone No. Permit Fee $ d O Building Address S PLUMBING No. @ FEE PERMIT FILING FEE $3.00 ,3,Q Each Trap 1.50y SA Repair drainage.or vent piping 1.50 , p Water piping 1.50 , Each gas water heater or vent 1.50 �() A. P. No.�1 pp Zoning & Planning Gas piping system 1 - 5 outlets 1.50 Each additional outlet .30 F Se"tativrP Fire Dep t. FireZone Use Permit Building sewer 5.00 EQA Parking Plans Parcel Declaration parcel Ma P 60' R/W Im rovements P Lawn sprinkler system 2.00 Parcel Approval Plans Approval Permit Fee $ — $ NEW ❑ ADDITION ❑ UTILITIES El OTHER NEW No. @ FEE PERMIT FILING FEE $3.00 .0O Main service 100 AMP OR0V OR LESS5.00 �S`rOo Main service EA. ADD'L 100 AMP 2.50 !® Single Family IAJ Duplex ❑ Mobil Home ❑ Others 1:1Main Main service OVER 000v 100 AMP OR LESS 25.00 service EA. ADD•L 100 AMP 1.00 NEW CONS. 0 ELING OR ADDNST ( ACCLBLOGS. OCCUP. &) 22sgft NEW CONSTR. 1,4ULTI-OUTLET NON.RESID. ( BRANCH CIRCUITS) 2.,50ea NEW CONST. (POWER APARATUS & NON- RP RESID, SINGLE OUTLET CIR, CONTRACTORS LICENSE LAW I am licensed under the provisions of Chapter 9, Div. 3, of the State of California Business & Professions Code under the name style of: 00 E T'd 1-1) /q- ` Ex. Occup(OUTLETS OR FIXTURES)4 BAL@@1 5) Ex. Occu FIXED APP L.NS. OR P• OUTLETS (REST D,) EA) 2•00 Temporary service 10.00 Mobile Home Facilities 15.00 Li5pnse No. Classification Misc. Wiring 6.25 , ZS I am exempt from the Contractors License Laws of the State of California. Permit Fee $ WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE 1 am aware of the provisions of Section3700 of the California Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for Workmen's Compensation. ❑ 1 h e placed on file with the County of Butte a certificate of rkmen's Compensation Insurance. Icertify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workmen's Compensation Laws of California. MECHANICAL No. @ FEE PERMIT FILING FEE $3.00 3,®v Heating Cooling Ventilation Hood 2.00�,pp Permit Fee $ S,E70 $ S 0C I certify that I have read this application and state that the above information is correct. I agree to comply to all County Ordinances and State Laws relating to building construction, and hereby authorize representatives of the County of Butte to enter upon the ab ve-mentioned propertyf ' sp tion purposes. 0X natP TOTAL PERMIT FEE $ L This permit is hereby issued under the applicable provisions of the Butte County Code and/or resolutions to do work indicated above for which fees have been paid. DIRECTOR OF PVVLIC WORKS Signature of Per`ni it6 or Ager{t / �a"� y � � Receipt No. ��_ _ White-D.P.W. — Yellow -Assessor — Pink -Inspector — Goldenrod -Applicant I EIdi�nqperrrlit expires Date / �"7 J COUNTY OF BUTTE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORK 7 County Center Drive — oraville. California 95965 Telephone: 534-4541 APPLICATION AND PERMIT Sas-�s aulnunze representatives of the county of t3utte to enter upon the above- �tioned property or inspection purposes. i % � X Date �0 CG . TS Signal r of jf ermitee or Agent ' Receipt No. _ 1 3 P 6 C 7 White-D.P.W. — Yellow -Assessor — Pink -Inspector — Goldenrod -Applicant This permit is hereby issued under the applicable provisions of the Butte County Code and/or resolutions to do work indicated above for which fees have been paid. DIRECTOR OF LIC WORKS By nate/i-- / -" 7 wilding permit expires Date BUILDING Owner �/ . 4 , O SQ. FT. OCC. BUILDING VALUATION Mailing Address / -- 6:�_.. 'J, Telephone No. Fireplace Contractor Lj O �, Total Valuation Mailing Address � v , �� o Permit Fee Plan Checking Fee &/or Penalty a d Telephone No. Permit Fee $ $ Id Address. v�„� / v PLUMBING No. @ FEE PERMIT FILING FEE $3.00 o Each Trap 1.50 Repair drainage or vent piping 1,50 Water piping 1.50 Each gas water heater or vent 1.50 A. P. No. Z�� O y Zoning & Planning Gas piping system 1 - 5 outlets 1.50 Each additional outlet .30 Fees W. C. Sanitation Fire Dept. Fire Zone Use Permit Building sewer 5.00 EQA Parking Plans Parcel Declaration Parcel Ma P 60' R/W ImprovementsLawn sprinkler system 2.00 Bldg. Plans Recd I Parcel Approval I Plans Approval Permit Fee $ $ NEW ❑ ADDITION ❑ UTILITIES [_OTHER ELECTRICAL No. @ FEE PERMIT FILING FEE $3.00 /c" a.-.. KD Main service soot/ OR LESS 100 AMP OR LESS 5.00 Main service EA. ADD•L 100 AMP 2.50 Single Family Duplex ❑ Mobil Home ❑ Others ❑ Main service OVER 6 oR LESS 25.00 Main service EA. ADD•L 100 AMP 1.00 NEW OR ADDNST ( ACC`BLDGLINGS.OCCUP, &) 2¢sgft NEW CONSTR. MULTI.OUTLET NON-RESID. ( BRANCH CIRCUITS) 2.50ea NEW CONSTR. (POWER APPARATUS & NON.RESID. %SINGLE OUTLET CIR. CONTRACTORS LICENSE LAW I am licensed under the provisions of Chapter 9, Div. 3, of the State of California Business & Professions Code under the name St le Of: Y �c©> 1�2iC�c^7? 4�/�p�l • Ex. Occup(OUTLETS OR FIXTURES) BAL�1¢ FIXED APPLNS. OR EX. -Occup. OUTLETS IRESID.) EA) 2.00 Temporary service 10.00 Mobile Home Facilities 15.00 License No. � Ip -S)4 - Classification Misc. Wiring 6.25 ❑ I am exempt from the Contractors License Laws of the State of California. Permit Fee $ $ WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE I am aware of the provisions of Section3700 of the California Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for Workmen's Compensation. have placed on file with the County of Butte a certificate of Workmen's Compensation Insurance. I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workmen's Compensation Laws of California. MECHANICAL No. @ FEE PERMIT FILING FEE $3.00 Heating 3 % ts� Cooling Ventilation Hood 2.00 Permit Fee $ s p $ Vf I certify that I have read this application and state that the above information is correct. I agree to comply to all County Ordinances and State Laws relating to building construction, and hereby TOTAL PERMIT FEE $ aC aulnunze representatives of the county of t3utte to enter upon the above- �tioned property or inspection purposes. i % � X Date �0 CG . TS Signal r of jf ermitee or Agent ' Receipt No. _ 1 3 P 6 C 7 White-D.P.W. — Yellow -Assessor — Pink -Inspector — Goldenrod -Applicant This permit is hereby issued under the applicable provisions of the Butte County Code and/or resolutions to do work indicated above for which fees have been paid. DIRECTOR OF LIC WORKS By nate/i-- / -" 7 wilding permit expires Date BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUILDING PERMIT 24 HOUR INSPECTION #: (530) 538-7636 (OROVILLE) (530) 891-2834 (CHICO) OFFICE #: (530) 538-7541 FAM (530)538-2140 WEBSITE: www.buttecounty.net\dds PERMIT NO. BP043150 LICENSED CONTRACTORS DECLARATION I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that I am licensed under provisions of Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of Issued Date: 10/27/2004 APN• 028-020-054-000 the Business and Professions Code, and my license is in full force and effect. License Class: License Number: Site Address: 725 CENTRAL HOUSE RD HON Date: Contractor: Map Index: Description: REPLACE ELE SER POLE OWNER -BUILDER DECLARATION I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that I am exempt from the Contractors' State License Law for the following reason (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any city or county which requires a Owner: TEESDALE RAYMOND GENE permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a 725 CENTRAL HOUSE RD signed statement that he or she is licensed pursuant to the provisions of OROVILLE, CA the Contractor's State License Law (Chapter 9 commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he or 95965 she is exempt therefrom and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($500).): ❑ I, as owner of the property, or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work, and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Applicant: TEESDALE RAYMOND GENE Code: The Contractors' State License Law does not apply to an 725 CENTRAL HOUSE RD owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or herself or through his or her own employees, OROVILLE, CA provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for 95965 sale. If however, the building or improvements are sold within one year of completion, the owner -builder will have the burden of proving that he or she did not build or improve for the purpose of sale.). O 1, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code. The Contractors' State License Law does Contractor: A I C ELECTRIC not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who contracts for such projects with a contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractors' State License Law.). 286 WHITE AVE ❑ 1 am E mp under Article�3 of the Business and Profe ions Code CHICO, CA 95926 (530) 899-7489 . Date: G Owner:- 1 t� �� /��52��' License #: 817674 WORKERS' COMPENSATION DECLARATION 1 hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: ❑ I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self -insure for workers' compensation, as provided for by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit Architect: is issued. Engineer: ❑ I have and will maintain workers' compensation insurance, as required by Section 3700 the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My workers' compensation insurance carder and policy number are: Carrier: %$!, Total Square Ft: 0 S. F. Policy #:1 r �� s Valuation: $0.00 Census Code: ❑ 1 certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the workers' compensation laws of California, . and agree that if I should become subject to the workers' o yf' q1, compensation provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code, I shall th those provisions. forthwith mpze, Date: G 7 Applicent::�Ie- k `Y'S 2 r WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest, and attorney's fees. CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the This permit is hereby issued under thin ap licable provisions of the Butte County Code anrUor Resolutio t do work in ' ted e r which fees have been paid. performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec 3097 Civ.) )� a O Name: BY /�(�--- Date: PE4M11T EXPIRES ON: "VIVLOA W Address: to ❑ 1 hereby certify that the use of this facility shall comply with Sections 25505, 25533, and 25534 of the California Health and Safety Code, which regulate the storage, handling and use of hazardous materials. ❑ Notification in accordance with Section 19827.5 of California Health & Safety Code is not applicable to the scheduled construction of this project. ❑ Attached are copies of the required E.P.A. notification forms. I hereby certify that I have read this application, that the above information is correct, and that I am the owner or the duly authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with all county and state laws relating to building construction. I acknowledge it is unlawful to alter the substance of any official form or document of Butte County. I hereby authorize representatives of Butte County to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. 0 ^ re G , Print NameP-�2 c'� Signature��!,C��/�� Date: O 0 Owner ❑ Contractor U(/Agent for Owner 13 Agent for Contractor California Regional Water Quality Control Board.- Central oard-Central Valley Region Karl E. Longley; ScD, P.E., Chair. Linda S. Adams Arnold Schwarzenegger Secretary for Redding Office Environmental Protection 415 Knollcrest Drive, Suite 100, Redding; California 96002 Governor (530) 224-4845 • Fax (530) 224-4857 hftp://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralvalley 20 March 2008 Mr. James Wagoner Mr. Mike Huerta Butte County Air Quality Management Butte County Environmental Health District Department 2525 Dominic Dr, Suite J 202 Mira Loma Dr Chico, CA 95928 Oroville, CA 95965 , SOLID WASTE BURNING AND SOLID WASTE STORAGE ACTIVITIES AT 725 CENTRAL HOUSE ROAD, OROVILLE, BUTTE COUNTY During a 20 February 2008'inspection of Teasdale Food Waste Processing Site (Site), Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Board) staff observed evidence of solid waste burning adjacent to Wyandotte Creek. Laboratory analysis of an ash sample, obtained during the February Regional Board staff inspection, found total threshold limit concentrations of zinc characteristic of hazardous waste. During the March inspection, it appeared to staff that additional burning in the vicinity of the sampled area had occurred. Since local enforcement agencies have responsibility for solid waste burning, Regional Board staff is referring the burning activities at 725 Central House Road to Butte County Air Quality Management District for appropriate action. The Site inspection also discovered large quantities of solid waste including; poly tanks, unmarked barrels, batteries, appliances, tires, partially dismantled vehicles, and other debris. Local enforcement agencies have responsibility for the proper storage of solid.waste, including hazardous materials. Therefore, Regional Board staff is referring the solid waste storage activities at 725 Central House Road to Butte County Environmental Health Department for appropriate action. If you have any questions, please contact Karen Clementsen at (530) 224-4852 or at the letterheacvaddrff,s. , KLC: cc: C. PEDRI, P.E. It Executive Officer Hal Thomas,* Butte County District Attorney's Office, OrovilleL George Barber, Butte County District Attorney's Office, Oroville George Hoag, Delallo Italian Food Inc., Oroville Greg Kelly, California Olive Ranch, Oroville Stacy Jolliffe, Butte Couhty.Planning Department, Oroville Dick and Richard Teesdale, Oroville oaf-oao-o9y U:\Clerical Documents\Correspondence_Final\Groundwater Unit\ClementsenK\2008\March\Solid Waste at Teesdale.doc California Environmental Protection Agency o.. ....r..., n.,..... California Regional Water Quality. Control Board Central Valley Region Karl E. Longley, ScD, P.E., Chair Linda S. Adams Redding Office Arnold Schwarzenegger Secretary for 415 Knollcrest Drive, Suite 100, Redding, California 96002 Govemor Environmental Protection (530) 224-4845 • Fax (530) 224-4857 http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centraIvalley BUTTE COUNTY 21 April 2008 APR 2 3 2008 Mr. Richard and Raymond Teesdale DEVELOPMENT 725 Central House Road SERVICES Oroville, CA 95965 REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, TEESDALE FOOD WASTE PROCESSING SITE, 725 CENTRAL HOUSE ROAD, BUTTE COUNTY On 20 February 2008 and 13 March 2008, California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region (Regional Water Board) staff inspected the subject site. During the inspections, Regional Water Board staff observed: olive, olive pit, olive pomace, peach pit, plum pit, and wastewater discharges to land and/or surface waters. Therefore, on 20 March 2008, Regional Water Board staff requested you submit by 11 April 2008, a Report, of Waste Discharge or operational plan to eliminate the above waste discharges. On 8 April 2008, Richard Teesdale submitted a letter stating his intent to immediately discontinue hauling olive pits from DeLallo and to continue hauling wastewater from DeLallo to Bell Carter in Corning. The letter does not indicate your plan to eliminate potential discharges from the other food processing wastes to land and/or surface waters. Therefore, please submit a report, by 5 May 2008, describing your intent to store and process other food processing wastes (including, but not limited to; olives, olive pomace, peach pits, prune pits, and other fruit waste) at 725 Central House Road. In addition, we request the above .requested report include a full description of your operational plan to transport wastewater directly from DeLallo to _Bell Carter. If you have any questions regarding the above information, please contact me at (530) 224-3249. Jacqueline Matthews. Environmental Scientist JMM: knr. cc: Linda Taverner, SCS Engineers, Santa Rosa Mike Huerta, Butte County Environmental Health Department, Oroville Stacy Joliffe, Butte County Department of Development Services, Oroville Harold Thomas, Butte County District Attorney's Office, Oroville George Barber, Butte County District Attorney's Office; Oroville George Hoag, DeLallo, Oroville U:\Clerical Documents\SA_Correspondence\MatthewsJ\April 2008\Teesdale Operational Plan Response, 21 April 2008.doc California Environmental Protection Agency �a Recycled Paper Environmental Consultants 3843 Brickway Blvd. 707 546-9461 and Contractors Suite 208 FAX 707 544-5769 Santa Rosa, CA 95403 www.scsengineers.com April 18, 2008 BUTTE COUNTY APR' 2 3 2008 Ms. Karen Clementsen DEVELOPMENT Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board, Redding Office SERVICES 415 Knollcrest Drive, Suite 100 Redding, CA 96002 Subject: Request for Workplan extension for 725 Central House Road, Oroville, CA 95965 Dear Mr. Pedri: Mr. Richard Teesdale has recently contacted SCS Engineers (SCS) in an effort to develop a Workplan to assess the nature and extent of soil and groundwater contamination resulting from any food processing wastes discharged to the property located at 725 Central House Road, Oroville, CA.(Site). SCS will be meeting with Mr. Teesdale at 4he Site on Monday, April 21, 2008 to assess conditions at the Site. A Workplan will be developed to assess the water quality of the pond for agricultural reuse and determine if groundwater and/or surface water have been impacted, pursuant to CWC Section 13267. SCS is requesting an extension for the submittal of the Workplan until April'25, 2008. Sincerely, Alex Tuveson Staff Engineer SCS ENGINEERS cc: Hal Thomas, Butte County District Attorney's Office, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 George Barber, Butte County District Attorney's Office, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 Mike Huerta, Butte County Environmental Health Department, 202 Mira Loma Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 Jim Wagoner, Butte County Air Pollution Control District, 2525 Dominic Drive, Chico, CA 95928 Stacy Jolliffe, Butte County Planning Department, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville CA 95965 ' California Regional Water Quality Control Board QW; Central Valley Region Karl E. Longley, ScD, P.E., Chair. Linda S. Adams Secretary for Redding Office Arnold Schwarzenegger Environmental Protection 415 Knollcrest Drive, Suite 100, Redding, California 96002 Govemor (530) 224-4845 • Fax (530) 224-4857 hftp://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralvalley 20 March 2008 Mr. Dick and Richard Teesdale 725 Central House Road Oroville, CA 95965 CERTIFIED MAIL 7006 0810 0001 8417 3394 ORDER TO SUBMIT INFORMATION PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA WATER CODE SECTION 13267, TEESDALE FOOD WASTE PROCESSING SITE, BUTTE COUNTY On 20 March 2008, Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Water Board) staff mailed you a Notice of Violation (NOV) and Inspection Report (Report) describing the discharge of waste to land. and/or a pond at 725 Central House Road. The NOV requires you to submit a Report of Waste Discharge or Operational Plan by 11 April 2008, if food waste processing operations continue. As indicated in the Report, the Teesdale food waste is acidic, salty, and has metal concentrations exceeding the Regional Water Board's water quality objectives. The nature and extent of the discharged waste and its impacts on public health, the environment, and water quality are currently unknown. Dick and Richard Teesdale are named responsible parties because they discharged the waste and have knowledge of the ongoing discharge and the ability to control it.' Richard Teesdale is the current landowner. During our last inspection on 13 March 2008, Dick Teesdale indicated to staff that he would begin removing the food waste when trucking could be arranged. He also indicated that the pond water is generally used to irrigate a portion of his land. Dick and Richard Teesdale are required to submit to our office by 18 April 2008 a work plan to assess the nature and extent of soil and groundwater contamination resulting from any food processing wastes discharge to land. The work plan shall propose a method to assess the water quality of the pond for agricultural reuse and determine if groundwater and/or surface water have been impacted. The work plan shall be prepared by a California Registered Engineer or Professional Geologist and contain a time schedule to complete the investigation. This order to submit a technical report is made pursuant to CWC Section 13267. CWC Section 13267(b) authorizes the Regional Water Board to require any person who has discharged waste to submit technical reports as may be required to investigate the discharge. California Environmental Protection Agency co Recycled Paper Mr. Dick and Richard Teesdale . - 2 - 20 March 2008 The report is needed to determine the extent of pollution and to develop corrective actions protective of public health, the environment, and water quality. The above Report describes the evidence that shows that the persons named in this letter caused or permitted the discharge of waste at the site, and therefore are responsible for cleanup. Failure to comply with this order or other Regional Water Board orders may result in enforcement actions, including preparation of a cleanup and abate order and penalties. Failure or refusal to furnish the technical report required by CWC Section 13267 (b) may result in administrative civil liability not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000) for each day it is late pursuant to CWC Section 13268 or additional enforcement pursuant to CWC Section 13304, or both If you have any questions, please contact Karen Clementsen at (530) 224-4852 or at the letterhead address. MES C. PEDRI, P.E. Assistant Executive Officer KLC: sae cc: Hal Thomas, Butte County District Attorney's Office, Oroville George Barber, Butte County District Attorney's Office, Oroville Mike Huerta, Butte County Environmental Health Department, Oroville Jim Wagoner, Butte County Air Pollution Control District, Chico Stacy Jolliffe, Butte County Planning Department, Oroville George Hoag, Delallo Italian Food Inc., Oroville Greg Kelly, California Olive Ranch, Oroville U Verical Documents\Correspondence_Final\Groundwater Unit\ClementsenK\2008WIarch\Teesdale 13267 Order.doc California Environmental Protection Agency Q,? Recycled Paper - California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region Karl E. Longley, ScD, P.E., Chair. (a Linda S. Adams Arnold Schwarzenegger Secretary for Redding Office Environmental Protection 415 Knollcrest Drive, Suite 100, Redding, California 96002 Govemor (530) 224-4845 • Fax (530) 224-4857 http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralvalley NOTICE OF VIOLATION 20 March 2008 Mr. Dick and Richard Teesdale 725 Central House Road Oroville, CA 95965 CERTIFIED MAIL 7006 0810 0001 8417 3394 NOTICE OF VIOLATION, TRANSMITTAL OF INSPECTION REPORT AND REQUEST FOR REPORT OF WASTE DISCHARGE OR OPERATIONAL PLAN FOR TEESDALE FOOD WASTE PROCESSING SITE, 725 CENTRAL HOUSE ROAD, OROVILLE, BUTTE COUNTY Enclosed is a copy of report detailing inspections of the above-mentioned site on 20 February 2008 and 13 March 2008. The inspections revealed that you are operating a food waste processing operation and have constructed a wastewater pond without proper permits. from the Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Board). Food processing waste on site included: olives, olive pits, olive pomace, peach pits, plum pits, and wastewater. - Discharge of food processing waste to land or surface waters that could impact water quality requires Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) and/or an Industrial Storm Water Permit from the Regional Board. Your discharge of food processing wastes is a violation of Section 13260 of the California Water Code, which states in part: (a) All of the following persons shall file with the appropriate regional board a report of the discharge, containing the information, which may be required by the regional board. (1) Any person discharging waste, or proposing to discharge waste, within any region that could affect the quality of waters of the state, other than into a community sewer system. Regional Board staff sampled the various food processing wastes and Wyandotte Creek during the 20 February 2008 inspection. Analytical results from the food processing wastes (wastewater pond, leachate, and storm water runoff) exceeded numerical water quality objectives for electrical conductivity (EC) and.total dissolved solids (TDS). The leachate samples exceeded numerical water quality objectives for arsenic and vanadium. The food processing wastes also had elevated biological oxygen demand (BOD) and were slightly acidic. The downstream samples for Wyandotte Creek showed a small increase in concentrations for EC, TDS, BOD, nitrogen, tannins and lignins, and metals when compared to upstream samples for Wyandotte Creek. Groundwater impacts at the site are unknown. Continued discharge of food processing wastes is a violation of Section 13260 and could subject you to administrative civil liability under Section 13261, which states in part: California Environmental Protection Agency Mr. Dick and Raymond Teesdale - 2 - 20 March 2008 Teesdale Food Waste Processing Site (a) Any person failing to furnish a report or pay a fee under Section 13260 when so requested by a regional board. is guilty of a misdemeanor and may be liable civilly in accordance with subdivision (b). (b)(1) Civil liability may be administratively imposed by a regional board or the state board in accordance with Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 13323) of Chapter 5 for a violation of subdivision (a) in an amount that may not exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000) for each day in which the violation occurs.... Regional Board staff requests that you cease discharging food processing waste at the subject site. To continue food waste processing operations at the site, you must either submit a Report of Waste Discharge (RWD) or.an Operational Plan. To continue operations at the site with the wastewater pond and the discharge of food processing waste to ground surface, you must submit a Report of. Waste Discharge (RWD) to obtain WDRs. Application for WDRs is not a guarantee that current operations will be permitted; it depends on operational practices, site conditions, wastes, etc. Please note that the discharge of wastewater to the surface shall not occur until WDRs are adopted, and statutorily the Regional Board has 140 days to issue WDRs once a RWD is deemed complete by the Regional Board. If you plan to change operations at the site, for example eliminating the wastewater pond and eliminating the discharge food processing waste to ground surface, you may not need to obtain WDRs; an Operational Plan will need to be submitted to make this determination. The Operational Plan should describe wastes, storage practices, -volumes, best management practices, final disposal practices, etc. The RWD or Operational Plan must be submitted by 11 April 2008 and must be prepared, or under the supervision of, a Registered Professional Engineer or geologist and signed by the professional. Continued operation of a food waste processing operation will likely require permits from Butte County; it is your responsibility to obtain the appropriate permits for your operation. Regional Board; staff is referring the investigation and cleanup of hazardous waste and solid waste to the appropriate local agencies. If you have any questions regarding the enclosed inspection report or requested information, please copoct Jyagqueline M. Matthews at (530) 224-3249. C. Pedri, PE nt Executive Officer JMM: sae Enclosures: Inspection Report Attachments A -C cc: See Attached List California Environmental Protection Agency Qi Recycled Paper Mr. Dick and -Raymond Teesdale. - 3 .20 March 2008 ^: 'Teesdale Food Waste Processing Site cc + enclosures: Hal Thomas, Butte County District Attorney's Office, Oroville George Barber, Butte County District Attorney's Office, Oroville ' George Hoag, Delallo Italian Food Inc., Oroville: . Greg Kelly, California Olive Ranch, Oroville Mike Huerta, Butte County. Environmental Health. Department, Oroville James Wagoner, Butte County Air Quality Management District, Chico Stacy Jolliffe, Butte County Planning Department, Oroville Melvin Morris, Morris Farms, Live Oak WClerical Document icor espondence_FinaRSouth Regulatory. UniAMatthewsJ120081MarchW0V, Teesdale, Insp. cover letter, 19 March 08.doc r California Environmental Protection Agency �a Recycled Paper CENTRAL VALLEY REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD DISCHARGER:. LOCATION & COUNTY: CONTACTS: INSPECTION DATE: INSPECTED BY: ACCOMPANIED BY: 20 March 2008 Dick Teesdale and. Raymond Teesdale 725 Central House Road, Oroville, Butte County Dick Teesdale, Operator, Resides at site Raymond Teesdale, Owner of property 20 February 2008; 13 March 2008 Jacqueline Matthews, RWQCB Dale Stultz, RWQCB Karen Clementsen, RWQCB (3/13/08) George Barber, Special'lnvestigator, Butte County District Attorney's Office (3/13/08) Leslie Morgan, Butte County Environmental Health Department Dick Teesdale, Operator OBSERVATIONS AND COMMENTS: 20 February 2008 The inspection was conducted in response to a referral from the Butte County District Attorney's Office regarding disposal/storage of food processing waste, construction of a wastewater pond, and storage of solid waste and possibly hazardous waste. The site in question is located at 725 Central House Road in Oroville. The affected property impacts Assessor Parcel Number 028-020-054, owned by Raymond Gene Teesdale. Dale Stultz and I. met Mr. George Barber onsite at 1045 hours. The weather conditions at the time of the inspection were overcast and cool. A large tanker truck, belonging to Morris Farms (identified by placards on the truck), was parked at the entrance. As we entered .the property, large poly olive tanks were observed. The olive tanks had the name Delallo written on them; there were several hundred tanks. We then parked adjacent to the wastewater pond. Large piles of food processing waste (olives, olive pits, and olive pomace) were observed at various locations (food waste was on ground surface). Other food processing waste on site included peach and plum pits, which were scattered all over the site. There were also unmarked barrels, tanks, equipment, appliances, batteries, vehicles, and other debris (solid waste). At this time, Dick Teesdale, who resides and operates on site, drove to where we had parked. We introduced ourselves to Mr. Teesdale and told him we would like to inspect the site and take some samples; he agreed to our request. Mr. Teesdale stated that the large poly olive tanks belonged to Delallo, an olive producer in Oroville. He said that the white tanks were new and empty and the black tanks were old and empty. He stated that Delallo could not install the new tanks until they processed the fruit in their existing tanks at their plant in Oroville, therefore in the interim he was storing the tanks on site. Mr. Teesdale said he used the Morris Farms tanker to haul wastewater from Delallo to Bell -Carter Olive Co. in Corning. He stated that the wastewater Inspection Report 2 20 March 2008 Teesdale Food Waste Processing Site pond was used to collect storm water that drained from the site (storm water flow is generally from west to east). We asked if he was dumping anythingi directly into the wastewater pond; he answered no. Mr. Teesdale stated that the wastewater pond was originally used as a septage pond for his hog farm, which is no longer in operation. He informed us that the olives/olive pits are dumped on site, then hauled to a site at the Highway 70 Industrial Park (operated by Morris Farms) to dry, and then taken to a co -generation plant to be burned for fuel. According to Mr. Teesdale, the olive pomace was from the California Olive Ranch (COR), which is located immediately west of the site and produces olive oil. He hauled for COR during the summer when their dryer was not operational: Wyandotte Creek runs through the eastern portion of the property. We told Mr. Teesdale that he dumped the olive pomace too close to Wyandotte Creek and that he should move it further away immediately; he stated he would do so. Mr. Teesdale informed us that several years ago Morris Farms dumped the peach pits and plum pits around the site. We told Mr. Teesdale that we would write an inspection report regarding the -inspection and send it to him. We informed him that we might require cleanup of the site and/or require him to obtain permits for his operations at the site. Mr. Teesdale returned to his house. We then proceeded to walk around the perimeter of the wastewater pond. The pond was black in color. The road that surrounded the wastewater pond was covered in peach and plum pits. Another 'pond' was located east of the wastewater pond. This east 'pond' was much lighter in color and was flowing south; Wyandotte Creek entered the east 'pond' on the north and flowed out of it on the south. Next we walked to center of the site. The center of the site was covered with unmarked barrels and buckets, batteries, equipment, appliances, cars, metal, and other debris. There were several hundred barrels of solidified tar (AC -70 as identified by Mr. Teesdale). Peach and plum pits were scattered on, the ground. A man-made drainage (west pond inlet) ran through the middle of the site and drained to the wastewater pond. The west pond inlet was flowing during the inspection. Storm`water that had co -mingled with food processing waste (pits, fruit, pomace, and leachate) was entering the west pond inlet and could be seen as a dark purple black plume. Large piles of olives, olive pits, and olive pomace were scattered throughout the site. Storm water and leachate were observed at the base of all the piles. Large piles of olive pomace were dumped approximately 50 to 70 feet away from Wyandotte Creek. The topography sloped from the piles of olive pomace to Wyandotte Creek. Leachate was observed draining down the slope from the upper pile; no leachate was observed directly entering Wyandotte Creek. On the southwestern corner of the pond, there was a burn pile. 'It appeared that metal, tires, and various other materials had been burned. The burn pile was located directly above Wyandotte Creek. We then sampled the various wastes at the property. First we took a sample of Wyandotte Creek upstream of the site. We had it analyzed for pH, hardness, specific conductance (EC), total dissolved solids (TDS), biological oxygen demand (BOD), total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), ammonia as N, methylene -blue active substances (MBAS), tannins and lignins, cyanide, total metals (antimony, arsenic, barium, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, lead, mercury, molybdenum, nickel, selenium, silver, thallium, vanadium, and zinc), and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Then we sampled the west pond inlet where the dark purple . plume could be seen; the sample was taken approximately 60 feet upstream from the discharge point into the wastewater pond. The west pond inlet sample was analyzed for pH, hardness, Approved: Inspection Report 3 20 March 2008 Teesdale Food Waste Processing Site EC, TDS, BOD, TKN, ammonia as N, MBAS, tannins and lignins, cyanide, total metals, VOCs, and semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs). We then sampled the wastewater pond; the sample was taken approximately 25 feet north of the west pond inlet. The wastewater pond sample was analyzed for pH, hardness, EC, TDS, BOD, TKN, ammonia as N, MBAS, tannins and lignins, cyanide, and total metals. We then sampled Wyandotte Creek approximately 25 feet downstream from the large pile of olive pomace. The sample was analyzed for pH, hardness, EC, TDS, BOD, TKN, ammonia as N, MBAS, tannins and lignins, cyanide, total metals, and VOCs. A.sample was taken of the ash from the burn pile. The ash sample was analyzed for pH and CAM 17 metals. The last sample was of leachate from one of the large piles of olive pomace located upgradient from Wyandotte Creek. The sample was analyzed for pH, hardness, EC, TDS, BOD, tannins and lignins, cyanide, and total metals. Sample locations are detailed in a site map included as Attachment A. The sample results for the liquid samples and the numerical water quality objective (WQO) are presented below. Parameter Wyandotte Wyandotte West West Leachate Numerical WQO (units)' Up Down Pond Inlet Pond pH (pH units) 7.58 7.24 6.11 7.37 6.82 6.5-8.4 Agricultural Water Quality Goals Hardness 58 58 311 168 1 173 NA EC (µmhos/cm) 171 223 4110 6130 2910 700' Agricultural Water Quality Goals TDS (mg/L) 110 150 1970 3170 5520 450 Agricultural Water Quality Goals BOD (mg/L) ND3 26 224 195 3630 NA TKN (mg/L) 0.4 2.6 19.2 21.6 -- NA Ammonia (mg/L): 0.05 0.11 2.33 0.39 -- 30 USEPA Drinking Water Health Advisory MBAS (mg/L) 0.02 0.05 4 0.10 0.40 -- NA Tannins & Lignins 0.58 4.15 53.4 20.3 622 NA (mg/L) Arsenic ND 3 4 5 29 10 USEPA Primary MCL Barium 30 55 71 67 258 . 1000 DHS Primary MCL Chromium 2 10 25 11 39 50 DHS Primary MCL Cobalt ND 24 12 8 17 4 50 Agricultural Water Quality Goals Copper 4 13 38 25 223 200 Agricultural Water Quality Goals Nickel 2 4 11 38 22 85 100 - DHS Primary MCL Vanadium 3 11 34 22 61 50 CA Notification Level (DHS) Zinc 4 4 21 97 73 187 2000 Agricultural Water Quality Goals Acetone 2.2 6.1 27.8 -- -- 6300 Drinking Water Health Advisories Benzyl alcohol -- -- 12 -- -- NA 2-Butanone ND 2:44 20.9 -- -- NA 4-Methyl-2-pentanone NO ND 1.7 -- -- NA 3 & 4-Methylphenol -- -- 12 -- -- NA Approved: Inspection Report 4- 20 March 2008 Teesdale Food Waste Processing Site Phenol -- — 2 -- -- NA All units in µg/L unless otherwise noted. ZMost stringent WQO for inland surface water (IS) and groundwater (G) designation. Note that IS WQO for aquatic life protection is more stringent than the WQO for IS and G designation. 3 N means not detected. NA means not applicable. °Detected but below reporting limit. The West Pond Inlet, West Pond, and Leachate samples all exceeded numerical WQO for EC and TDS. The Wyandotte Down sample showed an increase for all constituents when compared to the Wyandotte Up samples (except pH); the most significant changes were as follows: the pH decreased by 0.34 standard units, the EC increased by 52 umhos/cm, TDS increased by 40 mg/L, BOD increased by 26 mg/L, and zinc increased by 17- ug/L. The ash sample results showed zinc above hazardous waste levels. Zinc was detected in the ash sample at 77,200 mg/kg. This exceeds the hazardous waste Total Threshold Limit Concentration Wet -Weight value of 5,000 mg/kg (Title 22, Ch. 11, Art. 3.). Mr. Barber contacted Leslie Roberts at Butte County Environmental Health regarding the burn pile and possible storage/disposal of hazardous waste. Ms. Morgan arrived and walked the site and took photographs. Shortly thereafter, a dump truck pulled up to the site and proceeded to dump a load of olives and olive pits. We tried to flag down the driver, but he left abruptly when he saw us. There were no placards on the truck to identify the source of the olive waste. Photographs obtained during the inspection are included as Attachment B. Laboratory data sheets are included as Attachment C. 13 March 2008 Karen Clementsen, Dale Stultz, and I arrived on site at 1145 hours and met with Mr. Dick Teesdale. We told Mr. Teesdale that he would need to cleanup the food processing waste and get appropriate permits for continued operations. Mr. Teesdale stated that he would like to continue his operation of processing food waste to take to the co -generation plant. He had the idea of creating an asphalt pad to dry the food processing waste and a sump to collect leachate. We informed Mr. Teesdale that the sample of his wastewater pond was high for EC and TDS (i.e. salts). Mr. Teesdale stated that he took a sample of the wastewater pond the previous week and it was not high for salts. We noticed that the elevation of the wastewater pond was significantly higher than during our.last inspection;.Mr. Teesdale stated that he had pumped water from Wyandotte. Creek into the wastewater pond. He stated that he uses the wastewater from the wastewater pond to irrigate his pasture. We reiterated to Mr. Teesdale that we were concerned about the olive pomace dumped adjacent to Wyandotte Creek and told him he should move it away from Wyandotte Creek immediately; he stated he would. Mr. Teesdale stated that an agricultural well was located on site; he thought it was 300 feet deep. He stated that he thought first groundwater was at 60 feet. We also told Mr. Teesdale that the sample results from the burn pile showed that it exceeded hazardous waste levels for zinc; we stated that the ash would need to be disposed of at a landfill that accepts hazardous waste. We then walked over to the burn pile; it appeared that more Approved: Inspection Report 5 20 March 2008 Teesdale Food Waste Processing Site waste had been burned since our last inspection. Debris, likely from the burn pile, was noticeable in Wyandotte Creek. We told Mr. Teesdale that an inspection report containing the sample results would be sent to . him. We also informed him that we would be issuing an order requiring him to assess the extent .of surface water; groundwater, and soil contamination and requesting a timeline for cleanup. INSPECTION SUMMARY: The inspection revealed•that Dick Teesdale operates a,food processing waste storage/disposal operation. The food processing waste discovered on site consisted of olive pits,.olives, olive pomace; peach pits, and plum pits' Some of the food processing waste was dumped in close proximity to Wyandotte Creek, which runs through the site. Mr. Teesdale has constructed a wastewater pond. The leachate, west pond inlet, and wastewater pond samples showed' elevated levels of EC and TDS that exceed numerical water quality. objectives. Mr. Teesdale also'has large quantities.of solid waste on site .and is burning.waste. The ash sample results exceeded hazardous waste levels for zinc. To our knowledge, Mr. Teesdale does not have any county or State permits to operate. We informed Mr. Teesdale that the site would need to be - cleaned up' -and he would need to apply for the appropriate permits. ' Jacqueline M. Matthews. Environmental Scientist 'Attachment A. Teesdale Food Waste Processing Site Site Map New Tanks New Tanks W ndotte Cf6ee k �. (_�Qlives/Pits West Pond Inlet Sample Ash Olive Pomace Leachat Sample Old Tanks Wastewater Pond, • West Pond Sam Burn Pile dotte Up East 'Pond' Wyandotte Down Sample -r r_ `�- ; � � � � �. h � r�� �f �,� , .. X - - "mac+'. � - � � ..- ' -�-....�._- _ ' � - . - '� � - — .. _.. _. _ - � 's hn�...' - 1 � �. s- —, � z -- -- c. _ �� 7.�-� - �, Attachment B 2 20 February 2008 Inspection Photos Teesdale Food Waste Processing Site Figure 3. Olives and olive pits on ground surface. Figure 4. Olive pits and storm water/leachate. Attachment B 3 20 February 2008 Inspection Photos Teesdale Food Waste Processing Site Figure 5. Olive pomace and storm water/leachate. Figure 6. Resyn spilt on ground and peach pits. 1. Re s J Li r�- .1, INVII .-y r a? J'k 8� •� 7p".i..if _ a•� - O?�-?_ S L; � ., to .T- "�7rr, t :•�' .A _ _a^kc _�'-� -, � ;"- +.y_ w i - `t'+` ww�c�' �.F- �.+•�..r�.P ��t.z. pct y .� � f-J��T-�—�:-..--__ �t't�ar�•4..-�°�� ��,�,>..�1:��'9r;+?�-'e'c�Fi hex ..R-�� FigureBurn• pile above• • rd olive.pomace background- (note proximity to Creek). 1 �µ� x� Wyand Creek .1• f ' , .Y ?' �=` <3 i. 1. r� i JOU? �"�'x!'.� •t _ %' i} �3'-Tf4i_ .. J � 'yy:lC•. .'ni.S - } - _d.. _ _ _ Y maw. - s•z -y �4 _ .w* � _ � � _ _,; -. ... - of � _ '..., .. _ . _' r. — �. v ...: . f � i {. E I - -14 � � e i'' 1 ky L x-y,�� � � r. +a r x x � t 1� 1� LT3 F-,y�i?•* _ r 4C� Lys � ��?�.nf,.�'i ii �j,� t.�� a �Kj nS�Ey;r 4-yY��'��a.�h•��}': J2.� 't r? ���.• .� '- �G �`t'/ .. is •'- �.�l fir. } r i •. `��C'. �+r. :�J` /S pig .Rl ,.�, ' . e;y�.' •i� i mw 1'•,:o i. '-•; ;ice � ". - � - � �^'`�.. 17 e www.basiclab.com basic voice 530.243.7234 2218 Railroad Avenue l a b o r a t o r y fax 530.243.7494 Redding, California 96001 March 18, 2008 AMENDED W-18 M SIG. Lab ID: 8020643 DALE STULTZ CENTRAL REG WATER QUALITY - RED 415 KNOLLCREST DRIVE SUITE 100 REDDING, CA 96002 RE: GENERAL TESTING TEASDALE Dear DALE STULTZ, . Enclosed are the analysis results for Work Order number 8020643. All analysis were performed under strict adherence to our established Quality Assurance Plan. Any abnormalities are listed in the qualifier section of this report. If you have any questions regarding these results, please feel free to contact us at any time. We appreciate the opportunity to service your environmental testing needs. Sincerely, F� Ricky D. Jensen Laboratory Director Callfomla ELAP CertIflcatlon Number 1677 . ge 1 of 32 Report To: CENTRAL REG WATER QUALITY - RED Lab No: 8020643 415 KNOLLCREST DRIVE SUITE 100 Reported: 03/18/08 REDDING, CA 96002 Phone: 224-4786 Attention: DALE STULTZ P.O. # Project: GENERAL TESTING TEASDALE General Chemistry Analyte Units Results Qualifier MDL RL Method Analyzed Prepared Batch HONCUT UP Water AMENDED MAR 1 s M www.basiclab.com , basic voice 530.243.7234 2218 Railroad Avenue SIG. l a b o r a t o r y fax 530.243.7494 Redding, California 96001 2 Report To: CENTRAL REG WATER QUALITY - RED Lab No: 8020643 415 KNOLLCREST DRIVE SUITE 100 Reported: 03/18/08 REDDING, CA 96002 Phone: 224-4786 Attention: DALE STULTZ P.O. # Project: GENERAL TESTING TEASDALE General Chemistry Analyte Units Results Qualifier MDL RL Method Analyzed Prepared Batch HONCUT UP Water . (8020643-02) Sam pled:02/20/08 11:45 Recelved:02/20/08 16:38 Hardness mg/I 58 2 5 SM 2340C 03/14/08 03/14/08 138C0309 pH . pH Units 7.58 0.01 0.01 • SM 4500H+B 02/20/08 02/20/08 13860437 ' Specific Conductance umhos/cm 171 2 10 SM 2510B 02/20/08 .02/20/08 6860436 Total Dissolved Solids mg/I 110 I-02 2 6 SM 2540C 03/04/08 03/04/08 BBCOD38 BOD ND 3 3 SM 5210 - 02/25/08 02/20/08 BBB0430 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen 0.4 0.1 0.2 EPA 351.2 02/27/08 02/27/08 .113850597 Ammonia as N 0.05 QM -07 0.02 0.05 EPA 350.1 02/29/08 02/29/08 6860629 • MBAS " 0.02 0.01 0.02 SM 554D 02/27/08 02/27/08 BBB059D Cyanide - Total ug/1 ND 2 5 SM 450OCN E 02/24/08 02/22/08 138B0479 Tannins & Lignins mg/I 0.58 0.10 0.50 SM SS50 03/01/08 03/01/08 880003 WEST POND INLET Water (8020643-03) Sampled:02/20/08 12:15 Received:02/20/08 16:38 Hardness mg/l 311 2 5 SM 2340C 03/14/08 03/14/08 BBC0309 pH pH Units 6:11 0.01 0.01- SM 4500H+B OZ/20/08 02/20/08 6880437 Specific Conductance umhos/cm 4110 2 10 SM 25105 02/20/08 02/20/08 68130436 Total Dissolved Solids mg/1 1970 I-02 2 6 SM 2S40C 03/04/08 03/04/08 BSCO038 BOD " 224 3 3 SM 5216 02/25/08 02/20/08 BBBD430 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen 19.2 IS 5.0 -EPA 351.2 02/27/08 02/27/08 8880597 Ammonia as N 2.33 QM -07 044 0.10 EPA 350.1 02/29/08 02/29/08 BBB0629 MBAs 0.10 0.04 0°08 SM 5540 02/27/08 02/27/08 BBB059D Cyanide - Total ug/1 ND 2 5 SM 450OCN E 02/24/08 02/22/08 6860479 Tannins & Lignins mg/I 53.4 5.00 25.0 SM 5550 03/01/08 03/01/08 B8CDO03 HONCUT DOWN Water (8020643-04) Sampled:02/20/08 12:55 Received:02/20/08 16:38 Hardness mg/1 58 2 5 SM 2340C 03/14/08 03/14/08 BBCD309 pH pH Units 7.24 0.01 0.01 SM 450014+13 02/26/08 02/20/08 BBB0437 Specific Conductance umhos/cm 223 2 10 SM 2510B 02/20/08 02/20/08 6860436 Total Dissolved Solids mg/i 150 I-02 2 6 SM 2540C 03/04/08 03/04/08 88CO038 SOD 26 3 3 SM 5210 02/25/08 02/20/08. B8BD430 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen " 2.6 0.5 1.0 EPA 351.2 02/27/08 02/27/08 BBB0597 Ammonia as N 0.11 QM -07 0.02 0.05 EPA 350.1 02/29/08 02/29/08 8890629 MBAs 0.05 1, R-08 0.04 0.08 SM 5540 DZ/27/08 02/27/08 68B0590 Cyanide - Total ug/1 ND 2 5 SM 45000N E 02/24/08 02/22/08 BBBD479 Tannins & Lignins mg/I 4.15 0.50 2.50 SM 5550 03/01/08 03/01/08 BBC0003 WEST POND Water (8020643-05) Sampled:02/20/08 12:40 Received:02/20/0816:38 Hardness mg/i .168 2 5 SM 2340C 03/14/08 03/14/08 BBC0309 pH pH Units 7.37 0.01 0.01 SM 4500H+B 02/20/08 02/20/08 BOBD437 Specific Conductance umhos/an 6130 2 10 SM 25108 02/20/08 02/20/08 BBB0436 Total Dissolved Solids mg/1. 3170 I-02 2 6 SM 2540C 03/04/08 03/04/08 MOMS BOD 195 1-04 3 3 SM 5210 03/03/08 02/27/08 138130592 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen 21.6 2.5 5.0 EPA 351.2 02/27/08 02/27/08 B880597 Ammonia as N 0.39 QM -07 0.04 0.10 EPA 350.1 02/29/08 02/29/08 88B0629 MBAs 0.40 0.04 0.08 SM 5540 02/27/08 02/27/08 88B0590 Cyanide - Total ug/I ND 2 5 SM 450OCN E 02/24/08 02/22/08 88130479 Tannins & Lignins mg/l 203 LOD 5.00 SM 5550 03/01/08 03/01/08 1380003 LEACHATE Water (8020643-06) Sampled:02/20/0813:05 Recelved:02/20/0816:38 Hardness mg/I 173 2 5 SM 2340C 03/14/08 03/14/08 58C0309 PH pH Units 6.82 0.01 0:01 SM 4500H+B 02/20/08 02/20/08 138150437- 860437Specific SpecificConductance umhos/crn 2910 2 10 SM 25106 02/20/08 02/20/08 6880436 Total Dissolved Solids mg/I 5520 I-02 2 6 SM 2540C 03/04/08 03/04/08 138C0038 BOD 3630 3 3 SM 5210 02/25/08 02/20/08 8860430 Cyanide - Total ug/I ND R-08 2 5 SM 450OCN E 02/24/08 02/22/08 BBB0479 Tannins & Lignins mg/I 622 50.0 250 SM 5550 03/01/08 03/01/08 68000D3 Ap o ed By ' 0as1c Laboratory, Inc. i,• ..California, D.O.H.S. Cert #1677 -Page 2 of 32 e AMENDED `� p www.basiclab.com uQ�1M , 8 M basic voice 530.243.7234 2218 Railroad Avenue SIG. laboratory fax 530.243.7494 Redding, California 96001 Report To: CENTRAL REG WATER QUALITY - RED - Lab No: 8020643 415 KNOLLCREST DRIVE SUITE 100 Reported: 03/18/08 REDDING, CA 96002 Phone: 224-4786 Attention: DALE STULTZ P.O. # Project: GENERAL TESTING TEASDALE General Chemistry - Solid Analyte Units Results Qualifier MDL RL Method Analyzed Prepared Batch ASH Ash (8020643-01) Sampled: 02/20/08 13:15 Received:02/20/0816:38 pH pH Units 6.66 0.01 0.01 EPA 9045 02/27/08 02/27/08 BBB0615 ApProAd B.Y ' Wie l b6r.atory, Inc. California D.O.H.S. Cert #1677 Page 3 of 32 y "IBM www.basiclab.com basic voice 530.243.7234 2218 Railroad Avenue $IG" l a b o r a t o r y fax 530.243.7494 Redding, California 96001 Report To: CENTRAL REG WATER QUALITY - RED Lab No: 8020643 415 KNOLLCREST DRIVE SUITE 100 Reported: 03/18/08 REDDING, CA 96002 Phone: 224-4786 Attention: DALE STULTZ P.O. # Project: GENERAL TESTING TEASDALE Metals . Total Analyte Units ` Results Qualifier MDL RL Method Analyzed. Prepared . Batch HONCUT UP Water -(80206431-02) Sampled:02/20/08 11:45 Received:02/20/08 16:38 Antimony ug/I ND 4 20 EPA 60106 02/26/08 0285/08 6860530 Arsenic ND 3 10 Barium ' 30 1 5 Beryllium ND 1 5 ' Cadmium ° ND 1.0 5.0 ° Chromium 2 J 1 5 Cobalt ND 1 5 Copper 4 J 1 5 ° Lead ND 3 15 " Mercury ND ' 0.07 0.20 EPA 7470A .02/27/08 02/27/08 BBB0582 Molybdenum ND 1 5 EPA 60108 02/26/08 02/25/08 BBB0530 Nickel '2 J 1 10, ' Selenium ND 3 15 " Silver ND - 1 5 • " Thallium ND 5 25 " Vanadium 3 1, QR -04 2 10 " Zinc 4 J 2 10 WEST POND INLET Water (8020643-03) Sampled:02/20/08 12:15 Received:02/20/08 16:38 • Antimony ug/I ND 4 20 WA 6010B 02/26/08 02/25/08 8860530 Arsenic _ , ° 4 J 3 10 " Barium 71 1 5 Beryllium " ND 1 5 •• " " " " Cadmium ND 1.0 5.0 " Chromium 25 1 5 " Cobalt 12 1 5 Copper " 38 1. 5 " -Lead " ND 3 15 Mercury ND 0.07 0.20 EPA 7470A 02/27/08 02/27/08 8860582 Molybdenum ND 1 5 EPA'6010B 02/26/08 02/25/08 BBBD530 Nickel " 38 1 10 Selenium ° ND 3 15 Silver ND 1 5 " Thallium ND 5 25 Vanadium 34 QR -04 2 10 Zinc " 97 2 10 HONCUT DOWN Water (8020643-04) Sampled:02/20/08 12:55 Received:02/20/08 16:38. Antimony ug/I ND 4 20 EPA 60108 02/26/08 02/25/08 8860530 Arsenic 3 J 13 10 " Barium 55 1 5 " Beryllium " ND 1 5 " Cadmium ND 1.0 ..5.0 Chromium ° 10 1 5 " Cobalt 2 .J 1 '5 Copper " 13 1 5 Lead ND 3 15 " Mercury ND 0.070.20 EPA 7470A 02/27/08 02/27/08 B8B0582 Molybdenum ND 1 '5 EPA 60108 02/26/08 02/25/08 6880530 Nickel 11 1 10 " Selenium ND 13 15 " Silver ND 1 5 Thallium ND 5- 25 " Vanadium 11 QR -D4 2 10 " A r ed By .Basic Laboratory, Inc. California D.O.H.S. Cert #1677 Page 4 of.32_ AMENDED �, www.basiciab.com mm 182'0 basic voice 530.243.7234 2218 Railroad Avenue SIGIJ laboratory fax 530.243.7494 Redding, California 96001 Report To: CENTRAL REG WATER QUALITY - RED Lab No: 8020643 415 KNOLLCREST DRIVE SUITE 100 Reported: • 03/18/08 REDDING, CA 96002 Phone: 224-4786 Attention: DALE STULTZ P.O. # Project* GENERAL TESTING TEASDALE Metals - Total Analyte, Units Results Qualifier MDL- RL Method Analyzed Prepared Batch Zinc'-- -- 1 21 2 10 02125/08 Antimony ug/l ND 4 20 EPA 60108 02126/08 02/25/08 BBB0530 Arsenic S. j 3 10n, Barium 67 1 5 um Beryill' ND 1 5 Cadmium ND 1.0 10 Chromium 5 Cobalt .5 Copper 25 1 5 Lead- ND 3 is Mercury ND 0.07 0.20 EPA 7470A 02127/08 02/27/08 8880582 Molybdenum ND 1 5 EPA 60108 02/26/08 02/25/08 B890530 Nickel 22 1 10 Selenium ND 3 is Silver ND 1 5 Thallium ND 5 25 Vanadium 22 QR -04 2 10 Zinc 73 2 10 LEACHATE Water (8020643-06) Sampled:02/20/08 13:05 Received:02/20/08 16:38 Antimony ug/1 ND R-08 20 100 EPA 60108 02/26/08 02/25108 8860530 Arsen- ic 29 J, R-08 15' so Bari6m 258 5 25 Beryllium ND R-08 5 25, Cadmium' ND R-08 5.0 i 25.0 Chromium 39 5 25 Cobalt 17 3, R-08 5 25 copper 223 5 25 Lead ND R-08 15 75 Mercury ND 0.07 0.20 EPA 7470A. 02/27/08 02/27/08 8800582 Molybdenum ND R-08 5 25 EPA 60106 02/26/08 02/25/08 88B0530 Nickel 85 5 50 Selenium ND R-08 15 75 Silver ' 1. 1 ND R-08 S 25 Thallium ND R-08 25 125 Vanadium 61- QR -04 10 so Zinc 187 10 so Appfo*d By 130sic Laboratom Inc. California-D.O.H.S. Cert #1677 page 5 of 32 ee AMENDED MAR 18M www.basiclab.com basicvoice 530.243.7234 2218 Railroad Avenue SIG. laboratory fax 530.243.7494 Redding, California 96001 Report To: CENTRAL REG WATER QUALITY - RED Lab No: 8020643 415 KNOLLCREST DRIVE SUITE .100 Reported: 03/18/08 REDDING, CA 96002 •. Phone: 22411786 . Attention: DALE STULTZ P.O. # Project: GENERAL TESTING TEASDALE Metals - TTLC Analyte Units Results Qualifier MDL 'RL Method Analyzed Prepared Batch ASH Ash (8020643-01) Sampled:02/20%0813:15 Received:02/20/0816:38 Antimony mg/kg ND 1.0 4.0 EPA 6D10B 02/27/08 02/25/08 89BDS29 Arsenic " 6.8 0.8 4.0 " Barium 27-6 DA 2.0 Beryllium ND 0.4 2.0 " Cadmium 3.6 0.4 2.0 Chromium 1.8 J 0.4 2.0 " Cobalt ND 2.0 10.0 Copper 113 0.2 1.0 " Lead 27.6 0.5 2.5 " Mercury Nb 0.05 0.3 EPA 7471A' 02/27/08 02/27/08; BBBD583 Molybdenum 1.2 J 1.0 5.0 ' EPA 60106 02/27/08 02/25/08 8880529 Nickel 9:6 0.5 2.0 Selenium ND . O.S 2.0 Silver ND 0.8 . 4.0 Thallium ND 1.0 4'.0 " Vanadium 4.6. J 4.0 20.0 Zinc 77200 20.0 100 " .Appr&o By: : ^ BMslc Laboratory, Inc. ' California D.O.H.S. Cert #1677 L..... age Project: GENERAL TESTING TEASDALE Volatile Organic Compounds Analyte Units Results Qualifier MDL RL Method Analyzed Prepared Batch HONCUT UP Water (8020643-02) Sampled:02/20/08 11:45 Received:02/20/08 16:38 Acetone ug/I ' 2.2 1 AMENDED e Acebonitrlle ND 1.5 5.0 " MAR 18 2W ND www.basiclab.com SIG. basic " ND 0.1 5.0 " voice 530.243.7234 2218 Railroad Avenue ND laboratory fax 530.243.7494 Redding, California 96001 Bromobenzene Report To: CENTRAL REG WATER QUALITY - RED Lab No: 8020643. Bromochloromethane 415 KNOLLCREST DRIVE SUITE. 100 Reported: 03/18/08 0.5 REDDING, CA 96002 Phone: 224-4786 Attention: DALE STULTZ P.O. # Project: GENERAL TESTING TEASDALE Volatile Organic Compounds Analyte Units Results Qualifier MDL RL Method Analyzed Prepared Batch HONCUT UP Water (8020643-02) Sampled:02/20/08 11:45 Received:02/20/08 16:38 Acetone ug/I ' 2.2 1 1.6 5.0 EPA 8260B 02/21/08 .02/21/08 B8BD484 Acebonitrlle ND 1.5 5.0 " Acrylonitrile ND 0.4 5.0 Allyl chlorlde " ND 0.1 5.0 " Benzene ND 0.09 0.5 " Bromobenzene ND 0.1 0.5 Bromochloromethane ND ' 0.1 0.5 Bromodlchloromethane ND 0.1 0.5 " Bromoform ND 0.1 0.5 " Bromomethane ND 0.2 1.0 " 2-Butanone ND 0.7 5.0 " n-Butylbenzene ND 0.1 0.5 sec-Butylbenzene ND 0.08 O.S. tert-Butylbenzene ND 0.1 0.5 " Carbon disulfide ND 0.09 O.S " Carbon tetrachlorlde ND 0.1 0.5 " Chlorobenzene ND 0.08 0.5 " Chloroethane " ND 0.08 0.5 2-MloroethylNnyl ether ND 0.1 1.0 Chloroform ND 0.1 0.5 Chloromethane 0.3 3 0.04 0.5 Chloroprene ND 0.08 5.0 " 2-Chlorotoluene ND 0.1 0.5 4{hlorotoluene " ND 0.1 O.S " Dibromochloromethane " ND 0.08 0.5 " 1,2-Dlbromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) ND 0.2 0.5 " 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) ND 0.04 1.0 Dibromomethane ND 0.1 0.5 " 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND 0.2 0.5 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND 0.1 0.5 " 1,4-Dlchlorobenzene ND 0.1 0.5 Dichlorodifluoromethane (CFC 12) ND 0.2 IS ° 1,1-Dichloroethane ND 0.1 0.5 " 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 0.07 0.5 " 1,1-Dlchloroethene ND 0.1, 0.5 ° ds-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 0.09 0.5 trans-1,2-Dlchloroethene ND 0.1 0.5 " Dichloromethane ND 0.2 2.0 1,2-Dlchloropropane ND 0.1 0.5 1,3-Dlchloropropane " ND 0.06 0.5 " 2,2-Dlchloropropane ND 0.1 0.5 " 1,1-Dichloropropene ND 0.08 0.5 " ds-1,3-Dlchloropmpene " ND 0.1 0.5 " trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.08 0.5 " DI -Isopropyl Ether (RIPE) " ND 0.08 0.5 " 1,4 -Dioxane ND 7.7 25.0 " Ethylbenzene ND 0.08 0.5 Ethyl iert-Butyl Ether (ETBE) " ND 0.1 5.0 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 0.1 0.5 " 2-Hexanone ND . 0.2 2.0 " Isobutanol ND 1.6 5.0 Isopropylbenzene " ND 0.1 O.S By Basic laboratory, Inc. California D.O.H.S. Cert #1677 Page 7 of 32 e AMENDED www.basiciab.com . 1 8 2M r • basic voice 530.243.7234 2218 Railroad Avenue SIG. l a b o r a t o r y fax 530.243.7494 Redding, California 96001 Report To: CENTRAL REG WATER QUALITY - RED Lab•No: 8020643 415 KNOLLCREST DRIVE SUITE 100 Reported: 03/18/08 REDDING, CA 96002 Phone: 224-4786 Attention:. DALE STULTZ- P.O. # Project: GENERAL TESTING TEASDALE Volatile Organic Compounds { Analyte Units . Results Qualifier MDL RL - Method Analyzed Prepared Batch HONCUT UP Water (8020643-02) Sampled:02/20/0811:45 Received:02/20/08 16:38 p-Isopropyltoluene ND - 0.1 0.5 02/21/08 " MethacrylonitrUe ° ND 0.06 5.0 " Methyl methacrylate ND 0.06 5.0 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) " ND 0.2 1.0 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE): ND 0.09 1.0 " Naphthalene ND 0.06 0.5 " Proplonitrfle " ND 1.7 5.0 " n-Propylbenzene ND 0.1 0.5 Styrene " ND. . 0.1 0.5 " tert-Amyl Methyl Ether (TAME) ND 0.08 5.0 - ° tert-Butyl Alcohol (TBA) ° ND 0.9 50.0 " 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane " ND 0.08 0.5 ° 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane " ND 0.05 0.5 " Tetrachloroethene (PCE) " ND 0.1 0.5 Tetrahydrofuran ND 0.9 5.01 Toluene ND 0.1, 0.5 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND' 0.1 0.5 " 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 0.1 0.5 " 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane (TCA) " ND 0.08 0.5 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 0.1 0.5 " Trichloroethene (TCE) ND 0.1 0.5 " Trichlorofluoromethane (CFC 11), ND 0.1 2.0 ° 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND,, 0.2 1.0 " Trlchlorotrifluoroethane ND 0.1 5.0 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 0.1 0.5 " 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 0.1 0.5 Vinyl acetate ND 0.1 5.0 Vinyl chloride ND 0.08 0.5 " m,p-Xylene ND - 0.2 1.0 " o -Xylene ND 0.1 0.5 " Xylenes (total) ND 0.2 1.5 " Surrogate: 1,2-D/ah/oroethane-d4 108% 78145 " Surrogate: Toluene-& 93.6% 52-150 Surrogate: 4-BromoAuorobenzene 95.4% WEST POND INLET Water (8020643-03) Sampled:02/20/08 12:15 Received:02/20/08 16:38 Acetone ug/I 27.8. 1.6 5.0, EPA 82608 02/21/08 02/21/08 6860484 Acetonitrile ND 1.5 5.0 Acrylonitrile ND 0.4 5.0 " Allyl chloride ND 0.1 5.0 " Benzene ND 0.09 0.5 ^ Brombbenzene • ND 0.1 0.5 Bromochloromethane ND 0.1 0.5 Bromodlchloromethane ND 0.1 0.5 " Bromoform ND 0.1 0.5' ^ Bromomethane ND 0.2 1.0 " 2-But3none 20.9" 0.7 5.0 " ^ n-Butylbenzene ND 0.1 0.5 " ^ sec-Butylbenzene ND 0.08 0.5 tert-Butylbenzene ND 0.1 • 0.5 " Carbon disulfide . ND 0.09 0.5 " Carbon tetrachloride ND 0.1 0.5 ^ Chlorobenzene " ND 0.08 0.5 ApprtrVA By Bask I iboratary, Inc. :Califomla D.O.H.S. Cert#1677 r ,P�qp 8 of 32. e kEb_�' basic laboratory www.basiciab.com voice 530.243.7234 2218 Railroad Avenue fax 530.243.7494 Redding, -California 96001 Report To: CENTRAL REG WATER QUALITY - RED 415 KNOLLCREST DRIVE SUITE 100 REDDING, CA 96002 Attention: DALE STULTZ Project: GENERAL TESTING TEASDALE Volatile Organic. Compounds AMENDED" MAR 18, SIG. Lab No: 8020643 Reported: 03/18/08 Phone: 224-4786 P.O. # Analyte Units Results Qualifier MDL RL Method Analyzed Prepared Batch WEST POND INLET Water (8020643-03) Sampled:02/20/08 12:15 Received:02/20/08 16:38 Chloroethane " ND' 0.08 0.5 02/21/08 " 2-ChloroethyMnyl ether ND 0.1 1.0 " Chloroform ND 0.1 .0.5 Chloromethane 0.3 J 0.04 0.5 " Chloroprene ND 0.08 5.0 2-Chlorotoluene ND 0.1 0.5 4-Chlorotoluene ND 0.1 0.5 " Dibromochloromethane ND 0.08 0.5 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) ND 0.2 0.5 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) ND, 0.D4 1.0 Dibromomethane ND 0.1 0.5 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND 0.2 0.5 " 1,3-Dlchlorobenzene ND 0.1 0.5 " 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene - ND 0.1 0.5 Dichlorodi luommethane (CFC 12) ND 0.2 0.5 " 1,1-Dich1oroethane ND 0.1 0.5 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 0.07 0.5 1,1-Dlchloroethene " ND 0.1 0.5 " cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 0.09 0.5 " Vans-1,2-Dichloroethene " ND 0.1 0.5 " Dichloromethane ND 0.2 2.0 1,2-Dichloropropane " ND 0.1 0.5 ° 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 0.06 -0.5 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 0.1 0.5 " 1,1-Dlchloropropene ND 0.08 0.5 cls-1,3-Dlchloropropene ND 0.1 0.5 Vans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND OA8 0.5 " DI -isopropyl Ether (DIPS) ND. 0.08 0.5 ° 1,4 -Dioxane " ND 7.7 25.0 Ethyibenzene ND 0.08 0.5 Ethyl tert-Butyl Ether (ETBE) ND 0.1 5.0 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 0.1 0.5 " 2-Hexanone " 1.6 J 0.2 2.0 lsobutanol ND 1.6 5.0 lsopropylbenzene ND 0.1 0.5 " p-Isopropyltoluene " ND 0.1 0.5 Methacrylonibile ND 0.06 5.0 " Methyl methacrylate ND 0.06 5.0 " 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIRK) 1.7 0.2 1.0 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) ND 0.09. 1.0 Naphthalene ND 0.06 0.5 " Proplonftrlle ND 1.7 5.0 n-Propylbenzene ND 0.1 0:5 " Styrene " ND 0.1 0.5 " tert-Amyl Methyl Ether (TAME) " ND 0.08 5.0 tert-Butyl Alcohol (TBA) ND 0.9 50.0 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 0.08 0.5 " 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane " ND 0.05 0.5 " Tetrachloroethene (PCE) ND 0.1 0.5 " Tetrahydrofuran ND 0.9 5.0 " Toluene " ND 0.1 0.5 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene " ND 0.1 0.5 AP v d By Basic Laboratory, Inc. California D.O.H.S. Cert 61677 2: AMENDED MAR O 200 www.basiclab.com - 5IG. basic voice 530.243.7234 2218 Railroad Avenue l a b o r a t o r y fax 530.243.7494 Redding, Califomia 96001 Report To: CENTRAL REG WATER QUALITY - RED Lab No: 8020643 415 KNOLLCREST DRIVE SUITE 100 Reported: - 03/18/08 REDDING,• CA 96002 Phone: 224-47.86- Attention: 24-4786Attention: DALE STULTZ P.O. # Project: GENERAL TESTING. TEASDALE Volatile Organic Compounds Analyte Units Results qualifier MDL. RL Method Analyzed Prepared Batch WEST POND INLET Water (8020643-03) Sampied:02/20/08 12:15 Received:02/20/08 16:38 , 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 0.1 0.5 ° 02/21/08 " 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane (TCA) ND 0.08 0.5 " 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 0.1 • 0.5 " Trichloroethene (TCE) ND 0.1 0.5 Trichlorofluoromethane (CFC 11) ND 0.1: 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 0.2 10 " Trlchlorotrifluoroethane ND 0.1 5.0 " 1,2,4-Tdmethylbenzene ND 0.1 0.5 1,3,5-Trimethy1benzene ND' 0.1 0.5 " Vinyl acetate ND. 0.1 5.0 " Vinyl chloride " ND s 0.08 0.5 " m,p-Xyle66 " ND 0.2 1:0' " o -Xylene ND 0.1 0.5 " Xylenes (total) ND 0.2 1.5 ° Surrogate: l,2-D/ch1-thane-d4 10206 28-145 Surrogate: Toluene -d8 97.8% 52-150 Surrogate: 4-BromoAumobenzene 10306. 43-155 HONCUT DOWN Water (8020643-04) Sampled:02/20/08 12:55 Received:02/20/08.16:38 Acetone ug/I 6.1 1.6 5.0 EPA 82608 02/21/08 02/21/08 BBB0484 Acetonitrlle " ND 1.5 5.0 Acrylonitrile ND 0.4 5.0 " Allyl chloride ND 0.1 5.0 Benzene ND 0.09 0:5 " Bromobenzene ND 0.1 ' 0.5 Bromochloromethane ND 0.1 0.5 " Bromodlchloromethane ND 0.1 0.5 Bromoform ND 0.1. 0.5 " Bromomethane ND 0.2 • 1.0 " 2-Butanone 2.4 1 0.7 5.0 n-Butylbenzene ND 0.1 0:5 " sec-Butylbenzene ND 0.08 0.5' " tert-Butylbenzene ND 0.1 0.5 " Carbon disulfide ND 0.09 0.5 Carbon tetrachloride ND 0.1 0.5 " Chlorobenzene " ND 0.0B' 0.5 Chloroethane " ND 0.08 0.5 " 2-Chloroethylvinyl ether ND 0.1 1.0 " Chloroform ND 0.1 0.5 " Chloromethane 2.0 0.04 0.5 " Chloroprene ND 0.08 5.0 " 2-Chlorotoluene ND 0.1 0.5 " 4-Chlorotoluene, ND 0.1 0.5 " Dibromochloromethane ND 0,08 0.5 1;2-Dlbromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) ND 0.2 OS " 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) " ND 0.04 1.0 Dlbromomethane ND 0.1 0.5 " 1,2-Dlchlorobenzene ND 0.2 0.5. " 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND 0.1 0.5 1,4-Dlchlorobenzene ND 0.1 O.S " Dichlorodifluoromethane (CFC 12) ND 0.2 0.5 1,1-Dlchloroethane ND 0.1 0.5 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 0.07 0.5 13" APprbj6d By 'Basic Laboratory, Inc. Califomia D.O.H.S. Cert #1677 Page 10 of 32 ° NO AMENDED 0.5 ° 02/21/08 " ds-1,2-Dichloroethene LIAR 18 M 0.09 www.basiclab.com . bans-1,2-Dlchloroethene basic voice 530.243.7234 2218 Railroad Avenue SIG. laboratory fax 530.243.7494 Redding, California 96001 0.2 Report To: CENTRAL REG WATER QUALITY - RED Lab No: 8020643 0.1 415 KNOLLCREST DRIVE SUITE 100 Reported: 03/18/08 NO REDDING, CA 96002 Phone: 224-4786 Attention: DALE STULTZ P.O. # Project: . GENERAL TESTING TEASDALE NO Volatile Organic Compounds Analyte Units Results • Qualifier MDL RL Method Analyzed Prepared Batch HONCUr DOWN Water (8020643-04) Sampled:02/20/0812:55 Received:02/20/08 16:38 1,1-Dichloroethene NO 0.1 0.5 ° 02/21/08 " ds-1,2-Dichloroethene NO 0.09 0.5 " bans-1,2-Dlchloroethene NO 0.1 0.5 " Dichloromethane NO 0.2 2.0 1,2-Dichloropmpane " ND 0.1 0.5 " 1,30chloropropane NO 0.06 0.5 " 2,2-Dlchloropmpane NO 0.1 0.5 " 1,10chloropropene NO 0.08 0.5 ° cis-1,30chloropropene NO 0.1 0.5 " trans-1,30chloropropene " NO 0.08 0.5 DI -Isopropyl Ether (DIPE) NO 0.08 0.5 1,4 -Dioxane " NO 7.7 25.0 " E•thylbenzene 0.2 3 0.08 0.5 Ethyl tert-Butyl Ether (ETBE) NO 0.1 5.0 " Hexachlorobutadiene NO 0.1 0.5 2-Hexanone NO 0.2 2.0 " Isobutanol NO 1.6 5.0 Isopropyibenzene NO 0.1 0.5 p-Isopmpyltoluene NO 0.1 0.5 Methacrylonitrile " NO 0.06 5.0 " Methyl methacrylate NO 0.06 5.0 " 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) NO 0.2 1.0 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) " NO 0.09 1.0 Naphthalene NO r 0.06 0.5 " Proplonttrile NO 1.7 5.0 n-Propylbenzene NO 0.1 0.5 " Styrene NO 0.1 0.5 " tert-Amyl Methyl Ether (TAME) NO 0.08 5.0 tert-Butyl Alcohol (TBA) NO 0.9 50.0 " 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane NO 0.08 0.5 " 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane NO 0.05 0.5 " Tetrachloroethene (PCE) NO .0.1 0.5 " Tetrahydrofuran NO 0.9 5.0 " Toluene " NO 0.1 0.5 " 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene NO 0.1 0.5 " 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene NO 0.1 0.5 " 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane (TCA) NO 0.08 0.5 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane NO 0.1 0.5 Trichloroethene (TCE) NO 0.1 0.5 " Trichlorofluoromethane (CFC 11) NO 0.1 2.0 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 0.2 1.0 Trlchlorotrifluoroethane NO 0.1 5.0 " 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene " NO 0.1 0.5 " 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene NO 0.1 0.5 " Vinyl acetate NO 0.1 5.0 " Vinyl chloride NO 0.08 0.5 " m,p-Xylene NO 0.2 1.0 " o -Xylene NO 0.1 0.5 Xylenes (total) NO 0.2 1.5 " Surrogate: 1,2-D/chloroethane-0 108 % 28-145 " Surrogate: Toluene -d8 93.4% 52-I50 Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 98.6% 43-155 " AppFdWO By 'SIc Laboratory; Inc. .Califomla D.O.H.S. Cert #1677 zz Page 11 of 32 �e Sampled:02/20/08 00:00 AMENDED ug/I 1.7 J Acrylonitrile LIAR 18 Benzene www.basiclab.com Bromobenzene ND, Bromochlommethane SIG.. ' Bromodlchloromethane voice 530.243.7234 2218 Railroad Avenue Bromofor m laboratory fax 530.243.7494 Redding, California 96001 ND Report To: CENTRAL REG WATER QUALITY - RED Lab No: 8020643 ° ND 415 KNOLLCREST DRIVE SUITE 100 Reported: 03/18/08 Cert-Butylbenzene REDDING, CA 96002 Phone:. 224-4786 Attention: DALE STULTZ P.O. # , Project: GENERAL TESTING TEASDALE Chloroethane Volatile Organic Compounds Analyte Units Results Qualifier MDL TRIP BLANK Blank . (8020643-07) Sampled:02/20/08 00:00 Acetone ug/I 1.7 J Acrylonitrile ND Benzene ND Bromobenzene ND, Bromochlommethane ND Bromodlchloromethane ND Bromofor m ND Bromomethane ND 2-Butanone ND n-Butylbenzene ° ND sec-Butylbenzene ND Cert-Butylbenzene ND Carbon disulfide ND . Carbon tetrachloride ND Chlorobenzene - " ND Chloroethane ND 2-Chlomethylvinyl ether ND Chloroform 0.1 J Chloromethane ° 0.3 J 2{hlorotoluene ND 4-Chlorotnluene ND Dlbromochloromethane, ND 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) Na 1,2-Dlbromoethane (EDB). ND Dlbromomethane ND 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene' " ND 1,3-0Ichlombenzene ND 1,4-0Ichlorobenzene ND Dichlorodlfluoromethane (CFC 12) ND 1,1-Dlchloroethane ND 1,2-Dlchlomethane " ND 1,1-Dlchloroethene ND cis-1,2-Dichioroethene " ND trans-l,2-Dichloroethene ND Dichloromethane 0.8 ] 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 1,3-Dlchiompropane ND 2,2-Dkhloropropane- • ND 1,1-Dlchloropropene ND ds-1,3-Dlchloropropene ° ND trans-1,3-Dlchlompmpene ND DI -Isopropyl Ether (DIPE) ND 1,4-Dloxane ND Ethyibenzene ND Ethyl tert-Butyl Ether (ETBE) ND Hexachlorobutadiene ND 2-Hexanone ND Isopropylbenzene ND p-Isopmpyltoluene ND . 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) " ND Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) ° ND Naphthalene ND APP By . l.15691c- :aboratory, Inca Il Califomia D.O.H.S. Cert #1677 F9 RL' , Method Analyzed Prepared Batch 38 1.6 5.0 EPA 82606 02/21/08 02/21/08 B8BD484 0.4 5.0 0.09 0.5 0.1 0.5 " 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.5 ° 0.1 0.5' 0.2 1.0 0.7 5.0 0.1 0.5 0.08 0.5 " 0.1 0.5 0.09 0.5 s " 0.1 0.5 0.08 0.5 0.08 0.5 " 0.1 1.0 0.1 0.5 0.04 0.5 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.5 0.08 0.5 " 0.2 0.5 0.04 0.5 " 0.1 0.5 . 0,2 0.5 , " 0.1 0.5 " 0.1 0.5 " 0.2 0.5 " 0.1 0.5 " 0.07 0.5 " 0.1 0.5 0.09 0.5 0.1 0.5 0.2 . 2.0 " 0.1 0.5 " 0.06 0.5 0.1 0.5 0.08 0.5 " 0.1 0.5 0.08 0.5 0.08 0.5 " 7.7 25.0 " 0.08 0.5 0.1 0.5 " • " " " 0.1 0.5 " " 0.2 5.0 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.5 0.2 5.0 " 0.09 1.0 D.06 0.5 " " Page 12 0 32; ....vet. -•u .,`v�E:;j .. - .. ' Report To: CENTRAL REG WATER QUALITY - RED AMENDED o Reported: 03/18/08 REDDING, CA 96002 MAR 18 200 www.basic'lab.com basic SIG. voice 530.243.7234 2218 Railroad Avenue ND laboratory fax 530.243.7494 Redding, California 96001 0.5 " Report To: CENTRAL REG WATER QUALITY - RED Lab No: 8020643 415 KNOLLCREST DRIVE SUITE 100 Reported: 03/18/08 REDDING, CA 96002 Phone: 224-4786 Attention: DALE STULTZ P.O. # Project: GENERAL TESTING TEASDALE ND Volatile Organic Compounds 0.5 " Analyte Units Results Qualifier MDL RL Method Analyzed Prepared Batch TRIP BLANK Blank '(8020643-07) Sampled:02/20/08 00:00 Received:02/20/08 16:38 n-Propylbenzene ND 0.1 0.5 ° " 02/21/08 ° Styrene ND 0.1 0.5 tert-Amyl Methyl Ether (TAME) ND 0.08 0.5 " tert-Butyl Alcohol (TBA). ND 0.9 50.0 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 0.08 0.5 " 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 0.05 0.5 " Tetrachlomethene (PCE) ND 0.1 0.5 Tetrahydrofuran ND 0.9 5.0 " Toluene " ND 0.1 0.5 1,2,3-Trlchlorobenzene ND 0.1 0.5 1,2,4-Triddorobenzene ND 0.1 0.5 " 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane (TCA) ND 0.08 0.5 " 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 0.1 0.5 " Trichloroethene (TCE) ND 0.1 0.5 " Trichlomfluoromethane (CFC 11) ND 0.1 '0.5 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 0.2 0.5 " Trichlorotrifluoroethane ND 0.1 2.0 " 1,2,4-Tdmethyibenzene ND 0.1 0.5 " 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 0.1 0.5 " Vinyl acetate ND 0.1 0.5 " Vinyl chloride " ND 0.08 0.5 Xylenes (total) ND 0.2 1.0 " Sunvgale. 1,2-D/chloroethane-0 109% 28-145 Sunvgate. Toluene -d8 95.2% 52-150 Suirogafe: 4-Hromofluorobenzene 98.0% 43-I55 'BE#sic Laboratory, Inc. California D.O.H.S. Cert #1677 r+'xcd'rd .. PaRe13.of 32 e Units Results Qualifier AMENDED RL Method Analyzed Prepared Batch WEST POND INLET Water Y8 2W Received:02/20/08 16:38 www.basiclab.com . ba S I C voice 530.243.7234 2218 Railroad Avenue SIo. laboratory fax 530.243.7494 Redding, California 96001 5 " Report To: CENTRAL REG WATER QUALITY - RED Lab No: - 8020643- 5 415 KNOLLCREST DRIVE SUITE 100 - Reported: 03/18/08 0.2 • REDDING; CA 96002 Phone: 224-4786 Attention: DALE STULTZ �' P.O. # Project: GENERAL TESTING TEASDALE Semi Volatile Organic Compounds Analyte Units Results Qualifier MDL RL Method Analyzed Prepared Batch WEST POND INLET Water (8020643-03) Sampled:02/20/0812:15 Received:02/20/08 16:38 Acenaphthene ug/I ND 0.2 1 EPA 8270 02/26/08 02/25/08 6880512 Acenaphthylene ND 0.2 5 " Acetophenone ND 0.7 5 2 -Acetylaminofluorene ND 0.2 • 5 " Alachlor ND 0.2 5 " 4-Aminoblphenyl ND. 0.3 5 Anthracene ND < 0.1 5 " Atrazine " ND 0.3 5 " Benzidine ND 2` 5 " Benzo (a) anthracene ND 0.1 5 Benzo (a) pyrene ND 0.1 5 " Benzo (b) fluoranthene ND 0.2 5 " Benzo (g,h,l) perylene ND 0.4 5 " Benzo (k) fluoranthene ND 0.2 5 Benzoic add ' 5 J 1 10 " Benzyl alcohol 12 0.2 5 Bis(2-ddoroeth0)ether ND 0.2 1 " Bls(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND 0.2 5 Bis(2-chlorolsopropyl)ether ND • 0.2 2 Bls(2-ethy1hexyl)adipate ND 0.5 5 " Bis(2- thylhexyi)phthalate ND 0.9 5 " 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND 0.2 5 Butyl benzyl phthalate ' " ND 0.08 5 " 4-Chforo-3-methylphenol ND 0.2 1 4•Chloroanhine ND 0.4 2 Chlorobenzilate ND 0.4 5 2-Chloronaphthalene ND 0.2 2 •. " 2 -Chlorophenol ND 0.2 5 4-Olorophenyl phenyl ether " ND 0.2 5 Chrysene ND 0.1 5 " Dlallate (ds or trans) ` ND 0.4 5 " Dibenz (a,h) anthracene " ND 0.4 5 " Dlbenzofuran ND 0.2 5 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene " ND 0.2 2 " 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ., ND 0.2 1 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND 0.2 1 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND 0.4 5 " 2,4-Dlchlorophenol ND 0.2 2 2,6-Dlchlorophenol ND 0.2 5 Dlethyl phthalate ND . 0.1 , 2 Dimethylanifnoazobenzene ND 0.5 2 " 7;12-Dimethylbenz (a) anthracene ND 0.3 . 2 3,3'-Dimethylbenzidlne ND 0.3 10 2,4.Dlmethylphenol' " ND 0.4 2 Dimethyl phthalate 0.5 J 0.2 5 Dl -n -butyl phthalate . 0.9 } 0.1 5 Dl-n-octyl phthalate ND 0.07 5 4,6-Dinitro-2-methyiphenol ND 0.2 S 1,3-Dlnitrobenzene ND 0.2 2 2,4-Dlnitrophenol ND 0.1 51• 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND 0.2 5 " 2,6-Dlnttrotoluene " ND 0.2 5 " e AMENDED �, LIAR 1 8 2008 www.basiclab.com ND •basicSIG. voice 530.243.7234 2218 Railroad Avenue - I a b o r a t o r y fax 530.243.7494 Redding, California 96001 ND . Report To: CENTRAL REG WATER QUALITY - RED Lab No: 8020643 415 KNOLLCREST DRIVE SUITE 100 Reported: 03/18/08 REDDING, CA 96002 Phone: 224-4786 Attention: DALE STULTZ P.O. # Project: GENERAL TESTING' TEASDALE Semi Volatile Organic Compounds Analyte Units Results Qualifier MDL RL Method Analyzed Prepared Batch WEST POND INLET Water (8020643-03) Sampled:02/20/08 12:15 Received:02/20/08 16:38 Diphenylamine ND 0.1 2 " 02/25/08 " 1,2-0Iphenylhydrazfne ND 0.2 1 Ethyl methanesulfonate ND . 0.4 5 Famphur ND 1 10 " Fluoranthene " ND 0.1 1 Fluorene ND 0.2 5 Hexachlorobenzene ND 0.2 1 Hexachlorobutadlene ND, 0.2 1 " Hexachlorocydopentadlene ND 0.6 2 " Hexachloroethane ND 0.5 1 Hexachloropropene ND 0.2 2 Indeno (1,2,3 -cd) pyrene " ND 0.4 5 " Isodrin ND 0.4 5 " Isophorone ND 02 1 " Isosafrofe ND 0.5 5 Kepone ND 1 5 Methapyrilene " ND 0.3 2 Methyl methanesulfonate No 0.4 5 3-Methylcholanthrene ND 0.2 5 2 -Methylnaphthalene ND 0.2 5 " 2-Methylphenol 0.2 J 0.2 5 3 & 4-Methylphenol 12 0.2 2 " Naphthalene ND 0.2 1. 1,4 -Naphthoquinone " ND 0.6 2 1 -Naphthylamine ND 0.2 10 " 2 -Naphthylamine ND 0.3 I 5 " 5-Nltro-o-toluldine ° ND 0.04 5 " 2-Nitmanillne ND 0.2 5 ° 3-Nitroanlllne ND 0.2 5 4-141troanlline " ND 0.2 5 Nitrobenzene " ND 0.2 .1 " 2-Nitrophenoi ND 0.2 5 " 4-Nitrophenol " ND 0.D4 5 " N-Nitrosodlethylamine ND 0.3 5 N-Nitrosodl-wpropylamine ND 0.2 5 N-Nltrosodlmethylamine ND 0.5 2 " N-Nitrosomethylethylamine ND 0.5 5 N -Mb -6 11-n-butylamine ND 0.5 1 " N-Nitrosodlphenylamine ND 0.1 2 " N-Nibrosoplperfdlhe " ND 0.3 5 " N-Nltrosopyrrolidlne ND 0.5 5 ° 0,0,0-Trlethyi phosphorothloate ND 0.7 5 " o-Tolufdine " ND 0.5 S " Pentachlorobenzene ND 0.2 10 Pentachloronitrobenzene ND 0.5 5 Pentachlorophenol 2 J 0.2 5 Phenacetin ND 0.4 5 " Phenanthrene ND 0.1 5 " Phenol " 2 0.4 ' 1 1,4-Phenylenediamine ND 1 5 " Pmnamlde ND 0.5 5 Pyrene ND 0.06 5 By "Basic Laboratory, Inc. California D.O.H.S. Cert #1677 fag e.15 of 32 �e AM -ENDED MAR 18 2MB www.basiclab.com basic voice 530.243.7234 '2218. Railroad Avenue l a b o r a t o r y fax 530.243.7494 Redding, California 96001 ReportTo: CENTRAL REG WATER QUALITY = RED Lab No: • 8020643 415KNOLLCREST DRIVE SUITE 100 Reported: 03/18/08 REDDING, CA 96002 Phone: 224-4786 Attention: DALE STULTZ P.O. # Project:. GENERAL TESTING TEASDALE Semi Volatile Organic Compounds Analyte Units - Results .. Qualifier MDL RL Method Analyzed Prepared Batch WEST POND INLET Water (8020643-03) Sampled:02/20/08 12:15 Received:02/20/08 16:38 Safrole ND 0.5 5 02/25/08 " Simazine ND 0.2 5 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzerle ND 0.7 2 " 2,3,4,6-Tetrachlomphenol ND 0.2 5 " 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene " ND 0.2 2 " 2,4,5 -Trichlorophenol ND . 0.3 5 " 2,4,6-Tri6lorophenol ND. 0.2 5 " 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene ND 0.2 5 Surrogate: 2-R'uomphenol 35.9% 30.2-82.4 Surroyate: Phenol-dS 17.0 % 21.3-60.2, " Surrogate: 2,4,6-Tr/bromophenol 100% 62.5-132 Surrogate: Nbvbenzene-dS 80.8% 48.3-126 Surrogate: 2-Huornb/phenj4 68.8% 49.2-116 " ' Surrogate: Terphenyl-04 ' • 39.1% S B/V 52.1-125 .60-0 By. Q0t_Sb6fat&y, Inc: - .California D.O.H.S. Cert #1677 Page 16 of 32 e www.basiclab.com basic voice 530.243.7234 2218 Railroad Avenue l a b o r a t o r y fax 530.243.7494 Redding, California 96001 Report To: CENTRAL REG WATER QUALITY - RED 415 IWOLLCREST DRIVE SUITE 100 REDDING, CA 96002 Attention: DALE STULTZ Project:. GENERAL TESTING TEASDALE Quality Control Data AMENDED LIAR J'8 2008 SIU. � Lab No: 8020643 Reported: 03/18/08 Phone: 224-4786 P.O. # Spike Source %REC RPD Analyte Result RL Units Levet Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Qualifier Blank App ov By B6sie'L6b6eatory, Inc. California D.O.H.S. Cert #1677 Page 17 of 32 General Chemistry Batch BBB0430 - General Prep - GC Blank BOD ND 3 mg/I LCS DOD 182 mg/I 198 91.9 84.8-115.2 Batch 8880436 - General Prep - GC Blank Specific Conductance ND 10 umhos/an LCS Specific Conductance 99.3 umhos/an 100 99.3 80-120 Duplicate Source: 8020643-02 Specific Conductance: 180 10 umhos/ao 171 5.09 20 Batch BBB0437 - General Prep - GC LCS pH 6.99 pH Units 7.0.0 99.9 80-12D Duplicate Source: 8020643-02 pH 7.61 0.01 pH Units 7.58 0.395 20 Batch 88BO479 - General Prep - GC Blank Cyanide - Total ND 5 ug/1 LCS Cyanide - Total 92 5 ug/I 100 92.0 80-120 Duplicate Source: 8020602-01 Cyanlde - Total 12 5 ug/I 10 18.2 20 Matrix Spike Source: 8020602-01 Cyanide - Total 110 5 ug/I 100 10 100 75-125 Batch 688059D - General Prep - GC Blank- MBAS ND 0.02 mg/1 LCS MEAS 0.290 mg/I 0.300 96.7 80-120 Duplicate Source: 8020643-02 MBAs 0.020 0.02 mg/l 0.020 0.00 20 Matrix Spike Source: 8020643-02 MEAS 0.250 0.02 mg/1 0.250 0.020 92.0 75-125 Batch BBB0592 - General Prep - GC Blank App ov By B6sie'L6b6eatory, Inc. California D.O.H.S. Cert #1677 Page 17 of 32 e www.basiclab.com basic voice 530.243.7234 2218 Railroad Avenue l a b o r a t o r y fax 530.243.7494 Redding, California 96001 Report To: CENTRAL REG WATER QUALITY - RED 415 KNOLLCREST DRIVE SUITE 100 REDDING, CA 96002 Attention: DALE STULTZ Project: GENERAL TESTING TEASDALE Quality Control Data AMENDED I�IA� 1 � 2000 SIG. Lab No: 8020643 Reported: 03/18/08 Phone:, 224-4786 P.O. # Spike Source %REC RPD Analyte Result RL Units Level Result %REC Limits ' RPD Limit Qualifier General Chemistry Batch 68BOS92 - General Prep - GC BOD ND 3 mg/I Blank Total. KJeldahl Nitrogen BOD ND 3 mg/I LCS 1.80 100 BOD 168 mg/I 198 84.8 84.8-115.2 LCS BOD 218 mg/I 198 110 84.8-115.2 Batch BBB0597 - General Prep - GC 2.20 0.2 Blank 2.00 0.300 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen ND 0.2 mg/I LCS Total KJeldahl Nitrogen 3.10 0.2 . ' mgA 3.00 103 90-110 Duplicate Source: 8020660-01 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen •1.80 0,2 mg/I 1.80 0.00 20 Duplicate I Source: 8020663-01 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen 0.300 0.2 mg/I 0.300 0.00 20 Matrix Spike Source: 8020660-01 Total. KJeldahl Nitrogen 3.80 0.2 mg/I 2.00 1.80 100 75-125 Matrix Spike Source: 8020663-01 Total KJeldahl Nitrogen 2.20 0.2 mg/I 2.00 0.300 95.0. 75-125 Batch BOB0629 - General Prep - GC Blank Ammonia as N ND 0.05 mg/I• LCS Ammonia as N 2.01 0.05 mg/1 2.00 101 90-110 Duplicate Source: 8020660-01 Ammonia as N 1.29 0.05 mg/1 1.13 13.2 20 Duplicate Source: 802067401 Ammonia as N 10.1 0.25 mg/I 10.5 3.88 20 Matrix Spike Source: 8020660-01 Ammonia as N, 3.31 0.05 mg/I 2.00 1.13 109 90-110 Matrix Spike Source: 8020674-01 Ammonia as N 12.8 0.25 mg/1 2.00 10.5 115 90-110 QM -07 Batch BSC0003 - General Prep - GC Blank Tannins & Ugnins ND 0.50 mg/I LCS i i. Ap ed By' Bas(c Eeti�ratory, Inc. California D.O.H.S. Cert #1677 .t r 16 of 32 Quality Control Data Spike Source %REC RPD Analyte Result RL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Qualifier General Chemistry Batch SBC0003 - General Prep - GC Tannins & Ugnins 4.18 mg/I 4.00 104 80-120 Duplicate Source: 8020643-02 Tannins & Ugnins 0.540 0.50 mg/I 0.580 7.14 20 Duplicate Source: 8020721-01 Tannins & Ugnins 2.42 0.50 mg/I 2.39 1.25 20 Matrix Spike Source: 8020643-02 AMENDED Tannins & Ugnins basic www.basiclab.com voice 530.243.7234 2218 Railroad Avenue SIG. laboratory fax 530.243.7494 Redding, California 96001 Report To: CENTRAL REG WATER QUALITY - RED Lab No: 8020643 Tannins & Ugnins 415 KNOLLCREST DRIVE SUITE 100 Reported: 03/18/08 mg/I REDDING, CA 96002 Phone: 224-4786 Attention: DALE STULTZ P.O. # Project: GENERAL TESTING TEASDALE Quality Control Data Spike Source %REC RPD Analyte Result RL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Qualifier General Chemistry Batch SBC0003 - General Prep - GC Tannins & Ugnins 4.18 mg/I 4.00 104 80-120 Duplicate Source: 8020643-02 Tannins & Ugnins 0.540 0.50 mg/I 0.580 7.14 20 Duplicate Source: 8020721-01 Tannins & Ugnins 2.42 0.50 mg/I 2.39 1.25 20 Matrix Spike Source: 8020643-02 Tannins & Ugnins 2.45 0.50 mgA 2.00 0.580 93.5 75-125 Matrix Spike Source: 8020721-01 104 . 80-120 Duplicate Tannins & Ugnins 4.27 0.50. mg/I 2.00 2.39 94.0 75.125 Batch 88CO038 -General Prep - GC Hardness 56.0 5 mg/1 Blank 3.51 20 Duplicate Source: 8030187-06 Total Dissolved Solids ND 6 mg/I LCS 93.0 5 mg/I 87.0 Total Dissolved Solids 207 Matrix Spike mg/I 200 104 80-120 Duplicate Sounce:8020643-02 Hardness Total Dissolved Solids 115 6 mg/I 110 4.44 20 Duplicate Source: 8020896-03 Matrix Spike Source: 8030187-06 Total Dissolved Solids 542 6 mg/I 523 3.57 20 Batch BBC0309 - General Prep - GC Blank Hardness LCS Hardness 83.0 mg/I 80.0 104 . 80-120 Duplicate Source: 8020643-02 Hardness 56.0 5 mg/1 58.0 3.51 20 Duplicate Source: 8030187-06 Hardness 93.0 5 mg/I 87.0 6.67 20 Matrix Spike Source: 8020643-02 Hardness 162 5 mg/l 100 58.0 104 75-125 Matrix Spike Source: 8030187-06 Hardness 197 5 mg/1 100 General Chemistry - Solid 87.0 110 75-125 Batch 5880615 - General Prep - GC LCS pH 7.00 pH Units 7.00 100 80-120 Duplicate Source: 8020712-01 pH 7.81 0.01 pH Units 7.84 0.383 20 AFP .. By 96"s(c Laboratory; Inc. California D.O.H.S. Cert #1677 Fade 19 of 32. - s• e • www.basiclab.com basic voice 530.243.7234 2218 Railroad Avenue l a b o r a t o r y fax 530.243.7494 Redding, California 96001 Report To: CENTRAL REG WATER QUALITY - RED 415 KNOLLCREST DRIVE SUITE 100 REDDING, CA 96002 Attention: DALE STULTZ ;Project: GENERAL TESTING TEASDALE Quality Control 'Data AMENDED MAR 18 2008 . SIG. Lab No: 8020643 Reported: 03/18/08 Phone: 224-4786 'P.O. # - Spike Source %REC RPD Analyte Result RL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Qualifier Metals -,.Total Batch 8860530 - EPA 3005B Blank Antimony ND 20 ug/I Arsenic ND 10 ug/1 ` . Barium - ND 5 ug/I Beryllium ND 5 ug/I Cadmium ND 5.0 ug/1 Chromium ND- 5 ug/1 Cobalt ND 5 ug/I Copper ND 5 ug/I Lead ND 15 ug/I Molybdenum No 5 u9/1• Nickel ND 10 ug/I Selenium ND 15 ug/I Silver ND 5 ug/I Thallium ND 25 u9A Vanadium ND 10 ug/1 t Zinc No 10 ug/I Blank 'Antimony ND 20 ug/I Arsenic ND 10 ug/I Barium ND 5 ug/I Beryllium ND 5 ug/I Cadmium ND 5.0 ug/i Chromium ND 5 ug/I Cobalt ND 5 ug/I Copper ND 5 ug/I Lead ND 15 ug/I Molybdenum ND 5 u9/1 Nickel ND 10 ug/I Selenium ND 15 ug/I Silver ND 5 ug/I Thallium ND ' 25 ug/l Vanadium ND .10 ug/1 Zinc ND 10 ug/I LCS Antimony 503 20 ug/I 500 101 BO -120 Arsenic 510 '10 ug/I 500 102 80-120 Barium 491 5 ug/1 500 98.2 80-120 Beryllium 502 5 ug/I 500 100 80-120 Cadmium 483 5.0 ug/i 500 96.6 80-120 Chromium 494 5 ug/1 500 98.8 80-120 Cobalt 486 5 ug/I 500 97.2 80-120 Copper S15 5 ug/1 500 103 80-120 Lead 497 15 ug/1 Soo 99.4 80-120 Molybdenum 498 5 ug/I 500 99.6 80-120 Nickel 483 10 ug/I 500 96.6 80-120 basic laboPatory, Inc. _ California D.O.H.S. Cert #1677 20 of 32, -tea; e www.basiclab.com basic voice 530.243.7234 2218 Railroad Avenue l a b o r a t o r y fax 530.243.7494 Redding, California 96001 Report To: 'CENTRAL REG WATER QUALITY - RED 415 KNOLLCREST DRIVE SUITE 100 ' REDDING, CA 96002 Attention: DALE STULTZ Project: GENERAL TESTING TEASDALE Quality. Control Data AMENDED Lab No: 8020643 Reported: 03/18/08 Phone: 224-4786 P.O. # Spike Source %REC RPD Analyte Result RL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Qualifier Metals - Total Batch -B860530 - EPA 3605B Source: 8020630-01 Antimony Selenium 502 15 ug/I 500 100 80-120 Sliver 508 5 ug/l 500 102 80.120 Thallium 508 2S ug/I S00 102 80-120 Vanadium 501 10 ug/I 500 100 80.120 Zinc 504 10 ug/I 500 101 80-120 ----- LCS ND 5 ug/I ND 20 Antimony 523 20 ug/I 500 105 80-120 Arsenic 531 10 ug/l 500 1D6 BD -120 Barium 515 5 ug/I SOD 103 80-120 Beryllium 511 5 ug/1 500 102 SD -120 Cadmium 488 5.0 ug/I 500 97.6 8D-120 Chromium 502 5 u9/1 500 100 80-120 Coban 494 5 ug/I 500 98.8 80-120 Copper 550 5' ugA 500 110 80-120 Lead 507 15 u9/1 500 101 80-120 Molybdenum 510 5 ug/I 500 102 80-120 Nickel 491 10 u9/1 500 98.2 80-120 Selenium 530 15 - ug/I 500 106 80-120 Silver 531 5 ug/I 500 106 80-120 Thallium 527 25 ug/I 500 105 80-120 Vanadium 515 10 ug/I 500 103 80-120 Zinc 516 10 ug/I 500 103 80-120 Duplicate Source: 8020630-01 Antimony Antimony ND 20 ug/I ND Arsenic 20 Arsenic ND 10 ug/1 ND 50.5 20 Barium 91.2 5 ug/I 92.2. 1.09 20 Beryllium ND 5 ug/I ND ug/I 20 .Cadmium 13.9 5.0 ug/l 13.8 0.722 20 Chromium ND 5 ug/I ND 20 Cobalt 6.65 5 ug/l 6.65 0.00 20 Copper 24.8 5 ug/I 25.2 1.60 20 Lead 10.3 15 ug/l 9.63 6.72 20 3 Molybdenum 14 5 ug/I 14 1.42 20 Nickel 12.7 10 ug/I 11.9 6.50 20 Selenium ND 15 ug/I ND 20 Silver ND 5 ug/l ND 20 Thallium ND 25 ug/I ND 20 Vanadium 2.40 10 ug/I ND 20 3, QR -04 Zinc 763 10 ug/I 768 0.653 20 Duplicate Source: 8020693-01 Antimony ND 20 ug/I ND 20 Arsenic ND 10 ug/1 ND 20 Barium 50.5 5 u9/1 50.0 0.995 20 Beryllium ND 5 ug/I ND 20 Cadmium ND 5.0 ug/I ND 20 Chromium ND 5 u9/1 ND 20 Ap v By • Basic Laboratory, Inc. California D.O.H.S. Cert #1677 Page.21 of 32 .e AMENDED _ www.basiblab.com SIG. basic voice 530.243.7234 2218 Railroad Avenue laboratory fax 530.243.7494 Redding, California 96001 Report To: CENTRAL REG WATER QUALM - RED Lab No: 8020643. 415 KNOLLCREST DRIVE SUITE 100 Reported: 03/18/08 REDDING, CA 96002 Phone:. 224-4786 Attention: DALE STULTZ P.O. # Project: GENERAL TESTING TEASDALE Quality Control Data Spike Source %REC RPD Analyte Result RL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Qualifier Metals - Total Batch 8880530 - EPA 30658 Cobalt 5.06 5 ug/I 4.94 2.40 20 Copper 1.93 5 ug/I 1.93 0.00 20 3 Lead ND 15 ug/I ND 20 Motybdenum ND 5 ug/I ND 20 Nickel 9.08 10 ug/I 9.22 1.53 20 3 Selenium ND 15 ug/I ND 20 Silver ND 5 ug/I ND 20 Thallium ND 25 ug/1 ND 20 Vanadium " 4.02 10 ug/I 4.02 0.00 20 3 Zinc 14.2 10 u9A 13.6 4.32 20 Matrix Spike Source: 8020630-01 Antimony 504 , . ' 20 ug/I .500 ND 101 75-125 Arsenic 514 10 ug/I 500 ND 103 75-125 Barium 574 5 ug/I 500 92.2 96.4 75-125 Beryllium 494 5 ug/I 500 ND 98.8 75-125 Cadmium 481 5.0 ug/I 500 13.8 -93.4 75-125 -Chromium 485 5 u9A 500 ND 97.0 75-125 Cobalt 482 5 ug/I 500 6.65 9S.1 75-125 . Copper 554 5 ug/I 500 25.2 106 75-125 Lead 496 15 ug/I 500 9.63 97.3 75-125 Molybdenum 507 5 • ug/I S00 14 98.6 75-125 Nickel 484 10 ug/I 500 11.9 94.4 75-125 Selenium 504 15 ug/I 500 ND 101 75-125' Silver 512 5 ug/l 500 ND 102 75-125 Thalllum 498 25 ug/I 500 ND 99.6 75-125 Vanadium 496 10 ug/I 500 ND 99.2 75-125 Zinc 1220 10, ug/1 500 768 90.4 75-125 Matrix Spike Source: 8620693-01 Antimony 516. 20 ug/I 500 ND 303 75-125 Arsenic -,-522 10 ug/I 500 ND 104 75-125 Barium 558 5 ug/1 500 50.'0 102 75-125 Beryllium 506 5 u9A Soo ND 101 75-125 Cadmium 482 S.0 ug/I _ S00 ND 96.4 75-125 Chromium 498 5 ugA 500 ND 99.6 75-125 Cobalt 490 5 ug/l 500 4.94 97.0 75-125 Copper 545 5 dg/I 500 1.93 109 75-125 Lead 501 15 ug/l 500 ND 100 75-125 Molybdenum 504 5 ug/I 500 ND 101 75-125 Nickel 492 10 u9/1 500 9.22 96.6 75-125 Selenium 521 15 ug/I 500 ND 104 75-125 Silver 523 5 ug/I 500 ND.' 105 75-125 Thallium 519 25 u9A 500 ND 104 75-125 Vanadium 511 10 ug/I S00 4.02 101 75-125 Zinc 519 10 ug/I 500 13.6 101 75-12S Batch 8880582 - EPA 7470A APRt6Vetl.By Basic Laboratory, Inc. i California D.O.H.S. Cert #1677 Paye 29, of 32 e www.basiclab.com basic voice 530.243.7234 2218 Railroad Avenue* l a b o r a t o r y fax 530.243.7494 Redding, California 96001 Report To: CENTRAL REG WATER QUALITY - RED 415 KNOLLCREST DRIVE SUITE 100 REDDING, CA 96002 Attention: DALE STULTZ Project: GENERAL TESTING TEASDALE Ouality Control Data AMENOF 97)" KAR 10 2008 SIG. Lab No: 8020643 . Reported: 03/18/08 Phone: 224-4786 P.O: # Spike Source %REC RPD Analyte Result RL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Qualifier Metals - Total Batch 6860582 - EPA 7470A Blank Antimony Mercury No 0.20 ug/I LCS ND 4.0 mg/kg Mercury 2.08 0.20 ug/1 2.00 1D4 80.120 Duplicate Source: 8020643-02 ND ' mg/kg Mercury ND 0.20' ug/1 No 20 Duplicate Source: 8020669-0S ND 2.0 mg/kg Mercury No 0.20 ug/I ND 20 Matrix Spike Source: 8020643-02 ND 1.0 mg/kg Mercury 2.02 0.20 ug/1 2.00 ND 101 75-125 Matrix Spike Source: 8020669-05 Mercury 1.90 0.20 ug/I 2.00 ND 95.0 75-125 Metals : TTLC Batch BBB0529 - EPA 30508 Blank Antimony Antimony ND 4.0 _ rrig/kg Arsenic ND 4.0 mg/kg Barium ND 2.0 mg/kg Beryllium ND 2.0 mg/kg Cadmium ND 2.0 mg/kg Chromium ND 2.0 mg/kg Cobalt ND 10.0 mg/kg Copper ND 1.0 mg/kg Lead . 0.642 2.5 mg/kg ] Molybdenum ND 5.0 mg/kg f Nickel ND 2.0 mg/kg Selenium ND 2.0 mg/kg Silver No 4.0 mg/kg.. Thalllum ND 4.0. mg/kg Vanadium ND 20.0 mg/kg Zinc ND 10.0 mg/kg LCS Antimony 96.0 4.0 mg/kg 100 96.0 80-120 Arsenic 96.8 4.0 mg/kg 100 96.8 80-120 Barium 99.0 Z.0 mg/kg 100 99.0 80-120 Beryllium 95.8. 2.0 mg/kg 100 95.8 80-120 Cadmium. 93.4 2.0 mg/kg 100 93.4 80-120 Chromium 97.8 2.0 mg/kg 10D 97.8 80-120, Cobalt 93.6 10.0 mg/kg 100 93.6 80-120 Copper 103 1.0 mg/kg 100 , 103 80-120 Lead 96.2 2.5 mg/kg 100 96.2 80-120 Molybdenum 99.4 5.0 mg/kg 10D 99.4 80-120 Ap By., Basic Laboratory, Inc. Califomla D.O.H.S. Cert #1677 Rade 23 of 32. . •e Sul www.basiclab.com basic voice 530.243.7234 2218 Railroad Avenue laboratory fax 530.243.7494 Redding, California 96001 Report To: CENTRAL REG WATER QUALITY - RED 2.0 415 KNOLLCREST DRIVE SUITE 100 100 REDDING, CA 96002 Attention: DALE STULTZ . Project: GENERAL TESTING TEASDALE Quality Control Data AMENDED LIAR 18 M, SIG. Lab No: 8020643 - Reported: 03/18/08 Phone: 224-4786 P.O. # Spike • Source %REC RPD Analyte Result RL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD . Limit Qualifier Batch 8880529 - EPA 30508 1. Nickel 93.6 2.0 mg/kg 100 93.6 80-120 Selenium 89.2 .2.0 mg/kg 100 89.2 _ 80-120 Silver 98.6 4.0 mg/kg` 100 98.6 80-120 Thaillum 98.0 4.0 mg/kg 100 • 98.0 80-120 Vanadium 100 20.0 mg/kg 100 100 80-120 Zinc 94.6 10.0 mg/kg 100 94.6 80-120 Duplicate Source: 8020626-01 Antimony ND 4.0 mg/kg ND 20 Arsenic ND 4.0 mg/kg ND 20 Barium 3.38 2.0. mg/kg 3.44 1.76 20 Berylllum ND 2.0 mg/kg. - ND 20 Cadmium ND 2.0 mg/kg ND 20 Chromium 0.422 2.0 mg/kg 0.484 13.7 20 1 Cobalt ND 10.0 mg/kg ND 20 Copper 3.2 1.0 mg/kg 3.3 0.615 20 Lead 0.918 2.5 mg/kg 1.06 14.2 20 J Molybdenum ND 5.0 mg/kg ND 20 Nickel ND 2.0 mg/kg ND 20 Selenium ND 2.0 mg/kg ND 20 Sliver ND 4.0 mg/kg ND 20 Thallium ND 4.0 mg/kg ND 20 Vanadium ND 20.0 mg/kg ND 20 Zinc 8.04 10.0 mg/kg 8.34' 3.66 20 J , Matrix Spike Source: 8020626-01 Antimony 94.2. 4.0 mg/kg 100 ND 94.2 75-125 Arsenic 95.0 4.0 mg/kg 100 ND 95.0 75-125 Barium 99.8 2.0 mg/kg 100 3.44 96.4 75-125 Berylllum 95.4 2.0 mg/kg 100 ND ; 95.4 75-125 Cadmium 92.2. 2.0 mg/kg 100 ND 92.2 75-125 Chromium 97.2 2.0 mg/kg 100 0.484 '96.7 75-125 Cobalt 92.6 .10.0 mg/kg 100' ND 92.6 75-125 Copper 104 1.0 mg/kg 100 ' 3.3 101 75-125 Lead 95.0 2.5 mg/kg 100 1.06 93.9 75-125 Molybdenum 98.0' S.6 mg/kg 100 ND 98.0 75-125 Nickel 92.6 2.0 mg/kg 100 ND 92.6.. 752125 Selenium 86.8 2.0 mg/kg 100 ND 86.8 75-125 Silver 96.8 4.0 mg/kg 100 ND 96.8 75-125 Thalllum 95.2 4.0 mg/kg 100 ND 95.2 75-125 Vanadium 99.2 20.0 mg/kg 100 ND 99.2 75-125 Zinc 101 10.0 mg/kg 100 8.34 92.9 75-125 Batch 68B0583 -*EPA 7471A Blank Mercury ND 0.3 mg/kg LCS Mercury 9.29. 3.6 mg/kg 10.0., 92.9 80-120 A ffeb) ed BY '.BSic Latratory,'Inc. .. Califomia D.O.H.S. Cert #1677 Pa�e,24 of 33 e www.basiclab.com basic voice 530.243.7234 2218 Railroad Avenue laboratory fax 530.243.7494 Redding, California 96001 Report To: CENTRAL REG WATER QUALITY - RED 415 KNOLLCREST DRIVE SUITE 100 REDDING, CA 96002 Attention: DALE STULTZ Project: GENERAL TESTING TEASDALE - Quality Control Data AMENDED LIAR 18 2008 SIG. Lab No: 8020643 Reported: 03/18/08 Phone: 224-4786 P.O. # Spike Source %REC RPD lnalyte Result RL Units Level Result %REC Urn is RPD Umit Qualifier Metals - TTLC Batch 6880583 - EPA 7471A Duplicate Source: 8020626-01 Mercury ND 0.3 mg/kg ND 20 Matrix Spike Source: 8020626-01 Mercury- - 0.74 0.3 mg/kg 0.667 ND 111 75-125 Volatile Organic Compounds Batch BBS0494 - EPA 50308 Water GCMS Blank Acetone ND 5.0 ug/I Acetonitrile ND 5.0 ug/I Acrylonitrile ND 5.0 u911 Allyl Chloride ND 5.0 ug/I Benzene ND 0.5 ug/I Bromobenzene ND 0.5 ug/l Bromochloromethane ND 0.5 ug/I Bromodichloromethane ND 0.5 ug/I Bromoform ND 0.5 ug/I Bromomethane ND 1.0 ug/I 2-Butanone ND 5.0 ug/I n-Butylbenzene ND 0.5 ug/I sec-Butylbenzene ND 0.5 ug/I tent-Butylbenzene ND 0.5 ug/1 Carbon disulfide ND 0.5 ug/I Carbon tetrachloride ND 0.5 ug/I Chlorobenzene ND 0.5 ug/I Chloroethane ND 0.5 ug/I 2-ChlomethylAnyl ether ND 1.0 ug/I Chloroform ND 0.5 ug/1 Chloromethane 0.170 0.5 ug/I J Chioroprene ND 5.0 ug/I 2{hlorotoluene ND 0.5 ug/I 4-Chlorotoluene ND 0.5 ug/I Dibromochloromethane ND 0.5 ug/I 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) ND 0.5 ug%l 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) ND 1.0 ug/I Dibromomethane ND 0.5 ug/1 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND 0.5 ug/1 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND 0.5 ug/I 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND 0.5 ug/I Dlchlorodlfiuoromethane (CFC 12) ND 0.5 ug/I 1,1-Dichloroethane No 0.5• ug/I 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 0.5 ug/I 1,1-Dlchloroethene ND 0.5 ug/I ds-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 0.5 ug/I trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 0.5 ug/I Dichloromethane ND 2.0 ug/I - - --- - ._...---...._---- - __.:._._..._.. __..__.:.. APO&&BY ;' Basic Laboratory, Inc. California D.O.H.S. Cert #1677 Page 25 of 32 . basic laboratory Report To:' Attention: Project: www.basiciab.com V voice 530.243.7234 2218 Railroad Avenue fax 530.243.7494 Redding, California 96001 CENTRAL REG WATER QUALITY - RED 415 KNOLLCREST DRIVE SUITE 100 REDDING, CA 96002 DALE STULTZ GENERAL TESTING TEASDALE Quality Control Data AMENDEb • SIG. ' Lab No: 8020643 Reported: 03/18/08 Phone: 224-4786 P.O. # . Spike Source %REC RPD lnalyte Result RL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Qualifier volatile Organic uompounas Batch BBB0484 - EPA 5030B Water GCMS 1,2-Dlchloropropane ND 0.5 ug/1 1,3-Dlchloropropane ND 0.5 ug/l 2,2-Dlchloropropane ND 0.5 ug/1 1,1-Dlchloropropene ND 0.5 ug/l ds-1,3-Dlchbropropene ND 0.5 ugA trans-1,3-Dirhloropropene ND 0.5 ' ug/l ; DI -Isopropyl Ether (DIPE) ND 0.5 ug/1 1,4-Dloxane ND, 25.0 u9/1' Ethylbenzene ND 0.5 u9/1 Ethyl tert-Butyl Ether (ETRE) ND 5.0 ug/l Hexachlorobutadlene ND 0.5 ug/l 2-Hexanone ND -2.0 ug/I Isobutanol ND 5.0 ug/l Isopropylbenzene ND 0.5 ug/1 p-Isopropyltoluene ND 0.5 ug/l Methaw,lonItAe ND 5.0 ug/1 Methyl methacrylate - ND 5.0 u9/1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBIQ ND 1.0 ug/1 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) ND 1.0 ug/l Naphthalene ND .0.5. u9/I < Proplonitrile ND 5.0 ug/l n-Propylbenzene ND 0.5 ug/I Styrene ,. ND 0.5 u9/1 tert-Amyl Methyl Ether (TAME). ND 5.0 . ug/l tent -Butyl Alcohol (TBA) ND 50.0 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 0.5 ., ug/I 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 0.5 ug/l ' Tetrarhforoethene (PCE) , ND 0.5 ug/l Tetrahydrofuran ND 5.0 ug/l Toluene ND O'S ug/l 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 0.5 ug/1 , 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 0.5 ug/1 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane (TCA) ND 0.5 ug/1 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 0.5 ug/l , Trichloroethene (TCE) ND 0.5 ug/l Trichlorofluoromethane (CFC 11) ND 2.0 ug/l 1,2,3-Trirhforopropane ND 1.0 ug/l . Trlchlomtrlfluoroethane ND 5.0 ug/l 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 0.5 ug/1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 0.5 ug/1 Vinyl acetate ND 5.0 ug/1 vinyl chloride ND 0.5 ug/l m,p-Xylene ND 1.0 ug/l o -Xylene ND 0.5 ug/I Xylenes (total) ND 1.5. ug/1 Surmgate: 1,2-DloVoroethane-0 5.24 ug/1 5.00 105. 28-145 Surrogate: Toluene -d8 4.75 ug/l 5.00 95.0 52-150 APPFQVkdd gy ' Basic Laboratory, Inc. California D.O.H.S. Cert #1677 F Page 26 of 32. e www.basiclab.com basic voice 530.243.7234 2218 Railroad Avenue l a b o r a t o r y fax 530.243.7494 Redding, Califomia 96001 Report To: CENTRAL REG WATER QUALITY - RED 415 KNOLLCREST DRIVE SUITE 100 REDDING, CA 96002 Attention: DALE STULTZ Project: GENERAL TESTING T EASDALE Quality Control Data AMENDED Lab No: 8020643 Reported: 03/18/08 Phone: 224-4786 P.O: # Spike Source %REC RPD Analyte Result RL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Qualifier Volatile organic Compounds Batch B860484 - EPA 50308 Water GCMS 19.78 0.5 ug/I 20.0 98.9 20-187 Sum7gate:4-Bromofluoroene S.OS 0.5 u S.00 101 43-1S5 LCS 18.88 0.5 ug/I 20.0 94.4 10-182 Benzene 5.000 0.5 ug/I 5.00 100 20-187 Chlorobenzene 5.150 0.5 ug/1 5.00 103 37-179 1,1-Dichloroethene 4.810 0.5 ug/I 5.00 96.2 10-182 Toluene 5.210 0.5 ug/I 5.00 104 37-179 Trichloroethene (TCE) 5.240 0.5 ug/I 5.00 105 34-182 Surrogatw 1,1-D/ah/oroethane-0 5.04 5.00 ug/I S.00 101 18-145 Surrogate: Toluene -dB 5.01 ug/l 5.00 100 52-I50 Surrogate. 4-Brvmofluorobenzene 5.38 Surrogate:4-8mmofluorobenzene ug/I 5.00 108 43-155 LCs 43-155 LCS Dup Benzene 1.700 0.5 ug/I 20-187 Chlorobenzene ND 0.5 ug/1 99.4. 20-187 37-179 1,1-Dlchloroethene ND 0.5 ug/I ug/I 20.0 10-182 Toluene 19.90 0.5 ug/1 19.00 0.5 37-179 Trichloroethene (TCE) ND 0.5 ug/I 20 Toluene .34-182 Su -gate. l,1-D1oMoroethane-d4 5.12 20.0 ug/I 5.00 104 18-145 Surrogate: Toluene d8 5.03 ug/I 5.00 101 52-150 Surrogate. 4-Bromofluombenzene 5.26 ug/I 5.00 105 43-155 LCS ------ Benzene 19.78 0.5 ug/I 20.0 98.9 20-187 Chlorobenzene - 20.68 0.5 ug/I 20.0 103 37-179 1,1-Dichloroethene 18.88 0.5 ug/I 20.0 94.4 10-182 Toluene 20.69 0.5 ug/I 20.0 103 37-179 Trichloroethene (TCE) 20.86 0.5 ug/1 . 20.0 104 34-182 Surrogate: 1,2-DldVoroethane-d4 5.02 5.190 ug/I 5.00 100 28-145 Surrogate: Toluene -d8 5.05 20 ug/I 5.00 101 52-150 Sunugate:4-Bromofluorobenzene 5.43 34-182 ug/I 5.00 109 43-155 LCS Dup Benzene 5.020 0.5 ug/I 5.00 100 20-187 0.399 20 Chlorobenzene 5.240 0.5 ug/I 5.00 105 37-179' 1.73 20 1,1-Dichloroethene 4.730 0.5 ug/I 5.00 94.6 10-182 1.68 20 Toluene 5.190 0.5 ug/I 5.00 104 37-179 0.385 20 Trichloroethene (TCE) 5.160 0.5 ug/I 5.00 103 34-182 1.54 20 Surrogate: 1,2-Dlchloroebhane-0 5.03 ug/I 5.00 101 • 18-145 Surrogate: To/uen"g 5.11 ug/I 5.00 101 51-150 Surrogate:4-8mmofluorobenzene 5.35 ug/I 5.00 107 43-155 LCS Dup Benzene 19.87 0.5 ug/l 20.0 99.4. 20-187 0.454 20 Chlorobenzene 20.67 0.5 ug/I 20.0 103 37-179 0.0484 20 1,1-1)lchloroethene 19.00 0.5 ug/I 20.0 95.0 10-182 0.634 20 Toluene 20.70 0.5 ug/I 20.0 1D4 37-179 0.0483 20 By tc'Lalioratory; Inc. California D.O.H.S. Cert #1677 Page _27 of 32. AMENDED www.basiclab.com SIG. basic voice 530.243.7234 2218 Railroad Avenue i. l a b o r a t o r y fax 530.243.7494 Redding, California 96001 Report To: CENTRAL REG WATER QUALITY - RED Lab No: B020643 415 KNOLLCREST DRIVE SUITE 100 Reported: 03/18/08 REDDING, CA 96002 Phone: 22.4-4786 Attention: DALE STULTZ P.O. # Project: GENERAL TESTING TEASDALE Quality Control Data . -1. Spike Source %REC RPD . , Analyte Result - RL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Qualifier 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether !. ND Volatile organic Compounds ug/I Chrysene Bauch BBB0484 - EPA 50308 Water GCMS 5 ug/1• Dlaliate (ds or trans) ND Trlch oroethene (TCE) 20.78 0.5 ug/I 20.0 104 34-182 0.384 20 Surrogate: 1,2 D/ah/omethane-d4 5.13 ug/1 5.00 103 78-145 Surrogate: Toluene -dB 5.05 ug/1S.00 101 S2-150 Surrogate.4-&bmofiuombenzene 5.52 ug/I 5.00' 110 43-155 1 ug/I Semi Volatile Organic Compounds . ND 5 Batch BBB0512 - EPA 3510C 2,4-Dlchlorophenol ND 2 ug/I Blank Acenaphthene ND 1 ug/1 -Acenaphthylene ND 5 ug/1 Acetophenone ND 5 ug/I 2 -Acetylaminofluorene ND 5 ug/I Alachlor ND 51 ug/1 4-Aminobiphenyl ND 5' ug/I Anthracene ND 5 ug/I Atrazine ND 5 ug/I Benzidine ND 5 ug/I ' Benzo (a) anthracene ND 5 ug/1 Benzo (a) pyrene ND 5 ug/L=' Benzo (b) fluoranthene ND 5 ug/1 Benzo (g,h,l) perylene ND 5 ug/I Benzo (k) fluoranthene ND S ug/l Benzoic acid ND 10 ug/I Benzyl alcohol ND ` 3 ug/1 Bls(2-chloroethyl)ether ND 1 J ug/I Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND 5 ug/I Bis(2-chl6rolsopropyl)ether ND ' 2 ug/I B1s(2-ethylhexyl)ad1pate ND 5 ug/1 . Bls(2-ethy1hexy0phthalate ND 5 Ug/l, 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND .5 ug/I f Butyl benzyl phthalate D.140 5 - ug/1 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol ND 1 ug/I 4-Chloroanlline ND 2 ug/I Chlorobenzilate ND 5 ug/l 2-Chloronaphthalene ND 2 ug/l 2 -Chlorophenol ND 5 ug/I 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether !. ND 5 ug/I Chrysene ND 5 ug/1• Dlaliate (ds or trans) ND 5 ug/l Dibenz (a,h) anthracene ND 5 ug/I Dlbenzofuran ND 5.: ug/1 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND 2 r ug/I a 1,3-Dlchlorobenzene ND 1 ug/1 « 1,4-131chlorobenzene ND ' 1 ug/I 3,3"-Dichlorobenzidine . ND 5 ug/I 2,4-Dlchlorophenol ND 2 ug/I Apffl.:yifd By i';.•8""asi&LabbratorV, Inc. Califomia D.O.H.S. Cert #1677 www'basiciab.com basic voice 530.243.7234 2218 Railroad Avenue l a b o r a t o r y fax 530.243.7494 Redding, California 96001 Report To: CENTRAL REG WATER QUALITY - RED 415 KNOLLCREST DRIVE SUITE 100 REDDING, CA 96002 Attention: DALE STULTZ Project: GENERAL TESTING TEASDALE Quality Control Data A -MENDED i ,,11.; J ../' . Lab No: 8020643 Reported: 03/18/08 Phone: • 224-4786 P.O. # Spike Source %REC RPD Analyte Result RL Units Level Result %REC . Limits RPD Limit Qualifier Semi Volatile Organic Compounds Batch BBBOS12 - EPA 3510C 2,6-Dichlomphenol ND 5 ug/ Dlethyl phthalate ND 2, ug/I ) Dimethylaminoazobenzene ND 2 ug/I 7,12-Dlmethylbenz (a) anthracene ND 2 ug/I 3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine ND 10 ug/I 2,4 -Dimethylphenol ND 2 ug/l Dimethyl phthalate 0.370 5 ug/I ) Dl -n -butyl phthalate 0.630 5 ugp ) DI-n-octyl phthalate ND 5 ug/I 4,6-Dlnitro-2-methylphenol ND 5 ug/I 1,3-Dlnitrobenzene ND 2 ug/I 2,4-Dlnftrophenol ND 5 ug/I 2,4-Dlnitrotoluene ND 5 ug/I 2,6-Dlnftrotoluene ND 5 ug/1 Diphenylamine ND 2 ug/I 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine ND 1 ug/I Ethyl methanesulfonate ND 5 ug/I Famphur ND 10 ug/1 Fluoranthene ND 1 ug/I Fluorene ND 5 ug/I Hexachlorobenzene ND 1 ug/I Hexachlombutadiene ND 1 ug/1 Hexachlorocydopentadiene ND 2 ug/I Hexachloroethane ND 1 ug/I Hexachloropropene ND 2 ug/1 Indeno (1,2,3td) pyrene ND 5 ug/I Isodrin ND 5 ug/I Isophorone ND 1 ug/I. isosafrole ND 5 ug/I Kepone ND 5 ug/1 Methapyrilene ND 2 ug/I Methyl methanesulfonate ND 5 ug/I 3-Methylcholanthrene ND 5 u9/1 2-Methyinaphthalene ND • . 5 ug/i 2-Methylphenol ND 5 ug/I 3 & 4-Methylphenol ND 2 ug/I Naphthalene ND 1 ugll 1,4-Naphthoqulnone ND 2 ug/1 1 -Naphthylamine ND 10 ug/I 2 -Naphthylamine ND 5 ug/l 5 -Nitro -o -toluidine ND 5 ug/I 2-Nitroanlline ND 5 ug/I 3-Nltroanlilne ND 5 ug/I 4-Nitroanlllne ND 5 ug/I Nitrobenzene ND 1 ug/I 2-Nitrophenol ND 5 ug/I 4-Nitrophenol ND 5 ug/I N-Nitrosodlethylamine ND 5 ug/I Ap ed By Basic Laboratory, Inc. California D.O.H.S. Cert #1677 Me 29 of 32 www.basiclab.com basic voice 530.243.7234 .2218 Railroad Avenue l a b o r a t o r y -fax 530.243.7494 Redding, California 96001 Report To: CENTRAL REG WATER QUALITY - RED 415 KNOJ_LCREST DRIVE SUITE 100 REDDING, CA 96002 Attention: DALE STULTZ Project: GENERAL TESTING. TEASDALE Quality Control Data /AMENDED MR 18 20. Lab No: 8020643 Reported: 03/18/08 Phone: 224-4786 P.O. # Spike Source %REC RPD Analyte Result RL Units Level Result %REC Limits. . RPD Limit Qualifier Semi Volatile organic Compounds Batch 8880512 - EPA 3510C N-Nitrosodl-n-propylamine ND 5 ug/I 10.0 82.4 15-104 N-Nltrosodlmethylamine ND 2 ug/I 10.0 79.7 21-138 N-Nitrosomethylethylamine ND 5 ug/I 10.0 70.8 13-118 N-Nltrosodl-n-butylamine ND. 1 ug/I 10.0. 72.3 13-97 N-Nltrosodiphenylamine ND 2 ug/1 10.0 80.6 10-107 ' N-Mmsopiperidine ND 5 ug/I• 10.0 35.5 2-99 N-Nltrosopyrrolicilne ND 5 ug/i ' 10.0 92.3 7-118 0,0,0-Trlethyl phosphorothloate ND 5 ug/1 10.0 80.5 1-170. o-Toiuldlne ND, 5 ug/I 10.0 29.0 -15-99 Pentachlorobenzene ND 10 ug/I . 10.0 93.5 35-180 Pentachloronitrobenzene ND 5 ug/I 10.0 73.4 21-105 Pentachlorophenol ND 5 ug/I 10.0 41.8 30.2-82.4 Phenacetln ND 5 ug/I 20.0 30.7 21.3-60.2 Phenanthrene ND 5 ug/I Phenol ND 1 ug/I 1,4-Phenyienedlamine ND 5 ug/I Pronamlde ND 5 ug/I Pyrene ND 5 ug/1 Safrole ND' 5 ug/I Slmazine ND 5 u9/1 1,2,4,5-Tetrachiorobenzene ND 2 ug/I 2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol ND 5 ug/I 1,2,4-Trichiorobenzene ND 2 ug/I 2,4,5 -Trichlorophenol ND. 5 Ug/l. 2,4,6 -Trichlorophenol ND 5 ug/l 1,3,5-Trinttrobenzene No. 5 Ug/1 Surrogate:2-Ruomphenol 8.67 ug/I 20.0 43.4 30.2.82.4 Surrogate: Phenol-dS 6.40 ug/i 20.0 32.0 21.3-60.2 Surrogate: 2,4,6-Mbromophenol 15.7 ug/I. 20.0 78.7 62.5-132 Surrogate: Nlbobenzene-dS 9.94 ug/l 10.0 99.4 48.3-116 Surrogate: 2-174orgblphenyl 9.35 u6/1 10.0 93.5 49.2-116 Surrogate., Terpheny4-d14 6.35 ug/I 10.0 63.5 5Z.1-125 LCS Acenaphthene 8.24 1 ug/1 10.0 82.4 15-104 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 7.97 1 ug/I 10.0 79.7 21-138 2 -Chlorophenol 7.08 5 u9A 10.0 70.8 13-118 1,4-Dlchiorobenzene 7.23 1 ug/I 10.0. 72.3 13-97 2,4-Dln1trotoluene 8.06 5 ug/I 10.0 80.6 10-107 ' 4-Nitrophenol 3.55 51 ug/I 10.0 35.5 2-99 N-Nitrosodl-n-propylamine 9.23 5 ug/I 10.0 92.3 7-118 Pentachlorophenol 8.05 5 ug/1 10.0 80.5 1-170. Phenol 2.90 1 ug/I 10.0 29.0 -15-99 Pyrene 9.35 5 u9A 10.0 93.5 35-180 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 7.34 2 ug/I 10.0 73.4 21-105 Surrogate:2-Ruorophenol 8.37 ug/I 10.0 41.8 30.2-82.4 Surrogate: Phenol -d5 6.14 ugA 20.0 30.7 21.3-60.2 e www.basiclab.com basic voice 530.243.7234 2218 Railroad Avenue l a b o r a t o r y fax 530.243.7494 Redding, California 96001 Report To: CENTRAL REG WATER QUALITY - RED 415 KNOLLCREST DRIVE SUITE 100 REDDING, CA 96002 Attention: DALE STULTZ Project: GENERAL TESTING TEASDALE Quality Control Data AMENDED 1►IAR Is 2008 Lab No: 8020643 Reported: 03/18/08 Phone: 224-4786 P.O. # Spike Source %REC RPD Analyte ` Result RL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Qualifier Semi volatile Organic Compounds Batch 6880512 - EPA 3530C Surrogate:2,4,6-Trlbromophenol 18.1 ug/1 20.0 90.7 62.5-132 Surrogate: N1bvbenzene-d5 &51 ug/l 10.0 85.1 48.3-126 Surrogate:2-Hu0roblphenyt 8.06 ug/l 10.0 80.6 49.2-116 Surrogate: Terphenyl-dN 5.11 ug/l 10.0 51.1, 52.1-125 SBN LCS Dup Acenaphthene 8.18 1 ug/1 10.0 81.8 15-104 0.731 20 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 8.45 1 ug/l 10.0 84.5 21-138 5.85 20 2{hlorophenol 7.27 5 ug/l 10.0 72.7 13-118 2.65 .20 1,4-Dichlombenzene 7.03 1 ug/1 10.0 70.3 13-97 2.81 20 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 7.98 5 ug/1 10.0 79.8 10-107 0.998 20 4-Nltrophenol 3.26 5 ug/l 10.0 32.6 2-99 8.52 20 N-Nltrosodl-n-propylamine 8.81 5 ug/1 10.0 88.1 7-118 4.66 20 Pentachlorophenol 8.23 5 ug/l 10.0 82.3 1-170 2.21 20 Phenol 2.93 1 ug/l 10.0 29.3 15.99 1.03 20 Pyrene 9.29 5 ug/l 10.0 j 92.9 .35-180 0.644 20 1,2,4-Tdchlorobenzene Th. 2 ug/l 10.0 1 73.1 21-105 0.410 20 Surrogate:2-Ruomphenol 8.42 ug/l 20.0 42.1 30.242.4 Surrogate: Phenol -d5 5.90 1.19/1 20.0. 29.5 21.3-60.2 Sunvgate:2,4,5-Trtbrvmophenol 17.5 ug/l 20.0 87.4 62.5-132 Surrogate: N/bobenzene-dS .8.21 ugp 10.0 82.1 48.3-126 Surrogate.2-Ruoroblphenyt 7.91 ug/l 10.0 79.3 49.2-116 Surrogate: Terpheny4-04 S.11 ug/l 10.0, 51.1 52.1-125 S -BN Ap . o By :"Laboratory, Inc. California D.O.H.S. Cert #1677 P00p 31 of 32. ' e AMENDED uAn www.basiclab.com basic voice 530.243.7234 2218 Railroad Avenue laboratory fax 530.243.7494 Redding, California 96001. Report To: CENTRAL REG WATER QUALITY - RED Lab No: 8020643 415 KNOLLCREST DRIVE SUITE 100 Reported: 03/18/08 REDDING, CA 96002 Phone: 224-4786 Attention: DALE STULTZ P.O. # Project: GENERAL TESTING TEASDALE t • Notes and Definitions =. S -BN Base%Neutral surrogate recovery outside of control limits. The data was accepted based on valid recovery of remaining two base/neutral surrogates. R-08 The sample was diluted due to sample matrix resulting In elevated reporting limits. QR -04 Duplicate results are within one.reporting limit and pass all necessary QC criteria. QM -07 The spike recovery was outside acceptance limits for the.MS and/or MSD.'The batch was accepted based on acceptable LCS recovery. 3 Detected but below the Reporting Limit; therefore, result Is an estimated concentration (CLP J -Flag). The 3 flag Is equivalent to the DNQ Estimated Concentration flag. 1-04 Sample was re -analyzed past the EPA recommended hold time. I-02 Sample was analyzed outside of the EPA recommended, holding -time. DET Analyte DETECTED . ND Analyte NOT DETECTED at or above the detection limit NR Not Reported dry Sample results reported on a dry weight basis RPD Relative Percent Difference < Less than reporting limit < Less than or equal to reporting limit > Greater than reporting limit > Greater than or equal to reporting limit MDL Method Detection limit RL/ML Minimum Level of Quantitation MCL/AL • Maxlum Contaminant level/Action Level mg/kg Results reported as wet weight TTLC Total Threshold Limit Concentration STLC Soluble Threshold Limit concentration - TCLP Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Procedure `iWlc..UwraWN' Inc. ,CMIi bnnia D:O.H.S. Cert #1677 �;', ... ,... ..::C;'r.� .: %!sJ'i� a..'�•�Jdicr.&r!e.,.. .. :•.4f.[C.rR :iz.: +i;.f•�i.`. •.. r �r Workplan for Preliminary Site Investigation Teesdale Food Waste Processing 725 Central House Road Oroville, CA (Butte County Assessor's Parcel # 028-020-054-000) Presented to: Ms. Karen Clementsen Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board 415 Knollcrest Drive, Suite 100 Redding, CA 96002 Presented by: SCS ENGINEERS 3843 Brickway Bloulevard, Suite 208 Santa Rosa, CA (707) 546-9461 April 25, 2008 File No. 01208803.00 Offices Nationwide www.scsengineers.com [ r �'rw r • • i Y • �r 1 .:Y Y� J Workplan for Preliminary Site Investigation Teesdale Food Waste Processing 725 Central House Road Oroville, CA (Butte County Assessor's Parcel # 028-020-054-000) Presented to: Ms. Karen Clementsen Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board 415 Knollcrest Drive, Suite 100 Redding, CA 96002 Presented by: SCS ENGINEERS 3843 Brickway Bloulevard, Suite 208 Santa Rosa, CA (707) 546-9461 April 25, 2008 File No. 01208803.00 Offices Nationwide www.scsengineers.com V BUTTE COUNTY APR 2.9 2008 DEVELOPMENT SEIIZVICES �4 i } r k I i i I k Teesdale Food Waste Processing Workplan for Preliminary Site Investigation Prepared for: Mr. Richard Teesdale Teesdale Food Waste Processing 725 Central House Road Oroville, CA 95965 (APN 028-020-054-000) Prepared by: SCS ENGINEERS 3843 Brickway Boulevard, Suite 208 Santa Rosa, CA 95403 April 25, 2008 File No. 01208803.00 Teesdale Food Waste Processing LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMER This Workplan has been prepared on behalf of Mr. Richard Teesdale of Teesdale Food Waste Processing, for the property at 725 Central House Road (Site), in Oroville, California (Assessor's ' Parcel # 028-020-054-000) with specific application to a limited subsurface investigation for the Site. Field activities and sampling are conducted in accordance with the care and skill generally exercised by reputable professionals, under similar circumstances, in this or similar localities. No other warranty, either expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice presented herein. Access to the Site and the surrounding area is limited by roadways, underground and above -ground utilities, and other miscellaneous Site and Site vicinity features. Therefore, the field exploration and points of subsurface observation are somewhat restricted. Changes in Site use and conditions may occur due to variations in rainfall, temperature, water usage, or other factors. Additional information that was not available to the consultant at the time of this Workplan or changes that may have occurred on the Site or in the surrounding area may result in modification to the Site that would impact the summary presented herein. This report is not a legal opinion. We look forward to continuing to work with you on this project and trust this report provides the information you require at this time. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call SCS at (707) 546-9461. 1 (4105-7009 ' Alex Tilveson, E Date r— Staff Engineer Stephen Kniittel PG 7674 ' CA registration fees paid through 07/31/09 ' 725 Central House Road Oroville, CA z5/o& Date rC O�7`�KN STEPHEN C� aUTTEL Nt �� No. 7674 Ao Workplan for Preliminary Site Investigation Teesdale Food Waste Processin Table of Contents Section Page Limitationsand Disclaimer..................................................:.............................................................................. i Listof Attachments...................................................................................................................................:......... ii List of Acronyms and Abbreviations....................................................................... "' 1 Introduction..............................................................................................................................................1 2 Background..............................................................................................................................................1 3 Site Geology...........................................................................................................................................1 4 Proposed Suface Water and Pond Sediment Investigation...........................................................2 5 Proposed Shallow Soil Investigation....................................................................................................3 6 Field Activities.........................................................................................................................................3 6.1 Site Clearance..............................................................................................................................4 6.2 Mobilization..................................................................................................................................4 6.3 Soil Boring and Soil Sampling...................................................................................................4 6.4 Grab Groundwater Sampling..................................................................................................5 6.5 Sample Handling.................................:.......................................................................................5 6.6 Equipment Decontamination.......................................................................................................5 6.7 Laboratory Analysis....................................................................................................................6 6.8 Management of Investigation Derived Wastes.....................................................................6 6.9 Demobilization.............................................................................................................................6 7 Reporting.................................................................................................................................................6 8 Schedule...................................................................................................................................................7 9 References Cited....................................................................................................................................7 10 Distribution List........................................................................................................................................7 List of Attachments Figure No. 1 Site Location Map 2 Site Plan ' Appendices A Site Health and Safety Plan B Standard Soil and Water Sampling Procedures and QA/QC Protocol C Regulatory Letter from the CVRWQCB, dated March 20, 2008 725 Central House Road ii Workplan for Preliminary Oroville, CA Site Investigation Teesdale Food Waste Processing LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS bgs below ground surface BOD biochemical oxygen demand CFR Code of Federal Regulations COD chemical oxygen demand COPC chemicals of potential concerns CVRWQCB Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board DWR Department of Water Resources EC electrical conductance EPA Environmental Protection Agency ESL Environmental Screening Level MBAS methylene blue active substances mg/kg milligrams per kilogram msl mean sea level OSHA Occupational Safety & Health Administration QA/QC Quality Assurance/Quality Control RDL reportable detection limits SM standard method TDS total dissolved solids TFWP Teesdale Food Waste Processing TKN total Kjeldahl nitrogen UN/DOT United Nations/Department of Transportation USA Underground Service Alert 725 Central House Road iii Workplan for Preliminary Oroville, CA Site Investigation Teesdale Food Waste Processin INTRODUCTION SCS Engineers (SCS) is pleased to present this Workplan for a preliminary subsurface investigation for the Teesdale Food Waste Processing (TFWP) facility (Site) located at 725 Central House Road, Oroville, California (Figure 1). This investigation is being prepared pursuant to a directive letter from the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB) dated March 20, 2008 (CVRWQCB, 2008b). This Workplan has been prepared to assess possible impacts to soil, surface water and groundwater resulting from past food processing wastes discharged to land. Current Site features are shown on Figure 2. 2 BACKGROUND The Site is located approximately 9 miles south of downtown Oroville, California, along the north side of Central House Road at an elevation of approximately 105 feet above mean sea level (msl). Wyandotte Creek flows through the Site and is the principal surface water feature in the area. TFWP operated a fruit pit storage facility on the north side of Central House Road. On February 20, 2008 and March 13, 2008 the CVRWQCB performed inspections at the Site. Fruit wastes observed onsite by the CVRWQCB consists of olives, olive pits, olive pomace, peach pits, and plum pits (CVRWQCB, 2008a). The primary concerns of the CVRWQCB are the dumping of food processing wastes in proximity to Wyandotte Creek (CVRWQCB, 2008a) and potential soil and groundwater contamination resulting from food processing wastes discharged to land (CVRWQCB, 2008b). Mr. Teesdale was informed that he would need to apply for appropriate permits to continue operations at the Site (CVRWQCB, 2008a). Mr. Teesdale has since discontinued bringing in fruit wastes and is in the process of removing and transporting the olive pits to a cogeneration facility. 3 SITE GEOLOGY The Site lies within the East Butte Subbasin which comprises a portion of the Great Valley Geomorphic Province of California. The Great Valley is a broad structural trough bounded by the tilted block of the Sierra Nevada on the east and the complexly folded and faulted Coast Ranges on the west. The East Butte Subbasin is defined by the aerial extent of the unconsolidated to semi -consolidated sedimentary deposits that are bounded by the Feather River to the northwest and west; Stanislaus River on the south; and consolidated bedrock on the east (DWR, 2003). The Eastern Butte Subbasin is bounded on the west and northwest by Butte Creek, on the northeast by the Cascade Ranges, on the southeast by the Feather River and to the south by the Sutter Buttes. The Solano and South American are subbasins of the Sacramento Valley Groundwater Basin. The northwest boundary along the Cascade ranges is primarily a geographic boundary with some ground water recharge occurring beyond that boundary. The subbasin is contiguous with the West Butte Subbasin at depth. Annual.precipitation is approximately 18 inches in the valley increasing to 27 inches towards the eastern foothills (DWR, 2003). 725 Central House Road 1 Workplan for Preliminary Oroville, CA Site Investigation Teesdale Food Waste Processing The East Butte aquifer system is comprised of deposits of late Tertiary to Quaternary age. The Quaternary deposits include Holocene stream channel deposits and basin deposits, Pleistocene deposits of Modesto and Riverbank formations, and Sutter Butte alluvium. The Tertiary deposits include the Tuscan and Laguna formations (DWR, 2003). 4 PROPOSED SUFACE WATER AND POND SEDIMENT INVESTIGATION Based on the inspection report (CVRWQCB, 2008a), the chemicals of potential concern (COPC) in surface water consist primarily of metals with physical properties including pH, electrical conductivity (EC), total dissolved solids (TDS), and biologic/chemical oxygen demand (COD/BOD). To address these concerns, SCS proposes to obtain one water sample from the Hog Pond and one water sample from the East Pond (Figure 2). Surface water samples will be collected using a disposable bailer at each location. Samples will be transferred to appropriate laboratory -supplied containers for analysis. Surface water samples will be labeled, stored under refrigerated conditions, and transported under Chain -of -Custody documentation to a California Department of Health Services -certified laboratory. All samples will be collected in accordance with the SCS Standard Soil and Water Sampling Procedures and Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Protocol (Appendix B). SCS proposes to obtain one sediment sample from the Hog Pond and one sediment sample from the East Pond (Figure 2). A small boat will be used to collect sediment samples near the center of each pond. All sediment samples will be collected in acrylic liners using a gravity driven coring device or hand hammered sampling device and the ends will be covered with Teflon® Tape and then sealed with plastic caps. The sediment samples will be collected and stored following Standard Soil and Water Sampling Procedures and QA/QC Protocol. The pond water samples will be analyzed for: • Total Hardness by Standard Method (SM) 2340B; • Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) by SM 2540F; • Anion IC Scan (F, Cl, Br, NO3, SO4, PO4) by EPA Method 300.0; • Biologic/Chemical Oxygen Demand (BOD/COD) by SM 5520D; • Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) by SM 4500; • Tannins & Lignins by SM5550; • CAM 17 Metals by EPA Method 6010; • Total Cyanide by SM4500. The pond water will be analyzed in the field for: • pH; • Temperature; • Conductivity. 725 Central House Road 2 Workplan for Preliminary Oroville, CA Site Investigation Teesdale Food Waste Processing The sediment samples collected from the ponds will be analyzed for: • CAM 17 Metals by EPA Method 6010; • Total Cyanide by SM4500. ' 5 PROPOSED SHALLOW SOIL INVESTIGATION Based on the inspection report (CVRWQCB, 2008a), the chemicals of potential concern (COP C) in soil and groundwater consist primarily of metals with physical properties including pH, electrical conductivity (EC), total dissolved solids (TDS), and biologic/chemical oxygen demand (COD/BOD). To address these concerns, SCS proposes to drill four soil borings using either four -inch diameter solid -flight auger or seven-inch outside diameter hollow -stem auger at the approximate locations where food processing wastes may have been discharged to land (Figure 2). Two of the boring locations (B-1 and B-2) have been selected to address possible impacts to soil and groundwater from olives, olive pits and pomace. Additionally, two of the boring locations (B-3 and B-4) have been selected to investigate possible impacts to soil and groundwater from the Hog Pond and East Pond. The locations of these borings may be adjusted slightly in the field based on accessibility. Groundwater at the Site is expected to be found at a depth of approximately 60 feet below ground surface (bgs). Grab groundwater samples will be collected from two soil borings (B-1 and B-3). The borings will be advanced until groundwater is encountered or to a maximum depth of approximately 60 feet below ground surface (bgs). Soils will be analyzed for lithology at 2.5 feet and 5.0 foot intervals thereafter to a maximum depth of 60 feet bgs. 6 FIELD ACTIVITIES Field activities will be conducted in compliance.with the SCS Site Specific Health and Safety Plan (Appendix A). The Health and Safety Plan will address accepted industry practices for sampling involving hazardous materials and pertinent regulations of the Federal and State Occupational Safety and Health Administrations (OSHA). QA/QC requirements will follow standard SCS operating procedures for field activities. Specific field tasks and procedures are presented in the sections that follow which are intended to accomplish the goal of evaluating potential soil and groundwater impacts. Several field methods may apply to more than one location or process; rather than repeating descriptions of field tasks and methods for each location, they are generalized in this section to provide an overall understanding of the work effort. 725 Central House Road 3 Workplan for Preliminary Oroville, CA Site Investigation Teesdale Food Waste Processin Field tasks include: • Site Clearance • Mobilization • Soil Boring and soil sampling • Grab groundwater sampling • Equipment decontamination • Management of investigation -derived wastes • Demobilization Each of these tasks is discussed in the sections that follow. 6.1 SITE CLEARANCE The sampling locations are proposed on the Site Plan (Figure 2). Any potential surface or subsurface hazards will be identified by visual observations by the field technician and, if necessary, a private utility locator. Specific site clearance surveys will be conducted at each proposed boring and sampling location. 6.2 MOBILIZATION Mobilization for Site investigation work includes any applicable access agreements, sampling equipment, and sampling materials. Staging areas for sampling equipment, decontamination, and investigation -derived wastes will be designated and prepared at the Site. The Site access will be limited to personnel certified in compliance with Title 29 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 1910.120 as authorized by the SCS Project Manager. 6.3 SOIL BORING AND SOIL SAMPLING The proposed four soil borings will be advanced at the locations shown on Figure 2 to assess the possibility of any surface and deeper (greater than 2.5 feet bgs) impacts to ascertain whether or not COPCs exist in soil from Site operations. The holes with be drilled to a depth of 2.5 feet bgs and a California Modified Split Spoon Sampler with 6 -inch stainless steel sampling sleeve will be used to collect a soil sample. The hole will then be advanced to 5.0 feet bgs and another sample will be collected in a similar matter. SCS anticipates collecting two soil samples from each location at an approximate depth of 2.5 and 5.0 feet bgs and submit them for analysis. Only the 2.5 foot sample will be analyzed initially by the laboratory. If analytical results from a particular shallow surface sample exceeds the Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs), the deeper 5.0 foot soil sample from that location where screening levels were exceeded, will be analyzed. If soil sample results are below ESLs, no further soil analyses will be conducted in that particular location. 725 Central House Road 4 Workplan for Preliminary , Oroville, CA Site Investigation Teesdale Food Waste Processing All soil samples will be collected in brass or stainless steel sampling sleeves and the ends will be covered with Teflon® Tape and then sealed with plastic caps. The soil samples will be collected and stored following Standard Soil and Water Sampling Procedures and QA/QC Protocol (Appendix B). 6.4 GRAB GROUNDWATER SAMPLING A grab groundwater sample will be collected and analyzed from two.soil boring locations (B-1 and B-3). Grab groundwater samples will be analyzed to assess if on Site operations have resulted in COPCs impacting groundwater. Grab groundwater samples will be collected using a clean, disposable bailer for each sampling location. Samples will be transferred to appropriate laboratory -supplied containers for analysis. ' Grab groundwater samples will be labeled, stored under refrigerated conditions, and transported under Chain -of -Custody documentation to a California Department of Health Services -certified laboratory. All samples will be collected in accordance with the SCS Standard Soil and Water ' Sampling Procedures and QA/QC Protocol. 6.5 SAMPLE HANDLING Soil sample sleeves and grab groundwater samples will be secured for transport under standard chain -of -custody documentation in a sealed, refrigerated cooler and sent to a California ' Department of Health Services -certified analytical laboratory, for the appropriate analysis. Soil and Groundwater samples will be collected and labeled with: • Sample number • Sample location • Sample depth • Date • Time • Collector's initials • Client name 6.6 EQUIPMENT DECONTAMINATION The sampling equipment will be detergent washed or steam cleaned to prevent cross ' contamination between sampling locations. The boring equipment will be washed with a detergent solution. The excess soil generated from soil borings will be drummed and sealed. The water generated during decontamination will be stored at the Site in 55 -gallon Untied ' Nations/Department of Transportation (UN/DOT)-approved drums, pending disposal. 725 Central House Road 5 Workplan for Preliminary Oroville, CA Site Investigation Teesdale Food Waste Processin 6.7 LABORATORY ANALYSIS The soil samples collected from the soil borings will be analyzed for: • CAM 17 Metals by EPA Method 6010; • Total Cyanide by SM4500. The grab groundwater samples collected from the soil borings will be analyzed for: • pH by EPA Method 9040; • Total Hardness by SM 2340B; • EC by EPA Method 120.1; • TDS by SM 2540F; • BOD/COD by SM 5520D; • TKN by SM 4500; • Tannins & Lignins by SM5550; • CAM 17 Metals by EPA Method 6010; • Total Cyanide by SM4500. 6.8 MANAGEMENT OF INVESTIGATION DERIVED WASTES All investigation -derived wastes including decontamination waters, personal protective equipment, disposable sampling materials, and field trash will be collected, consolidated separately, evaluated and prepared for proper disposal at the end of the field characterization effort. Used or unserviceable protective clothing, disposable sampling equipment or protective sheeting will be consolidated in plastic bags or lined bins for disposal at a local sanitary landfill. All derived soils with be stockpiled on and covered with plastic. The soil and grab groundwater samples will then be analyzed for the parameters listed in Section 5.7. All investigation -derived waste from onsite activities will be containerized in a transportable container at a designated onsite holding area, sampled and will be disposed of properly after receipt of analytical data. 6.9 DEMOBILIZATION All Site equipment (rental or otherwise) will be decontaminated as required by the Site Health and Safety Plan before leaving the Site or at the conclusion of the field efforts. Signs, fencing or barriers that may exist onsite will be removed from any areas that are unimpacted based on analytical data. 7 REPORTING SCS will prepare a report that will include a map of the soil sampling locations, existing Site features, analytical results, and a discussion of the data. Based on the results of the investigation SCS will make further recommends. 725 Central House Road 6 Workplan for Preliminary Oroville, CA Site Investigation Teesdale Food Waste Processing 8 SCHEDULE SCS will schedule activities within 30 days of the approval of this Workplan by the CVRWQCB. 9 REFERENCES CITED DWR, 2003. California's Groundwater Bulletin 118 — Sacramento River Hydrologic Region, Sacramento Valley Groundwater Basin, East Butte Subbasin, March 27. CVRWQCB, 2008a Inspection Report, 725 Central House Road, Oroville, Butte County, February 20. CVRWQCB, 2008b. Order to Submit Information for the Pursuant to California Water Code Section 13267, Teesdale Food Waste Processing Site, Butte County, March, 20. 10 DISTRIBUTION LIST Harold Thomas Butte County District Attorney's Office 25 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Mike Huerta Butte County Environmental Health Department 202 Mira Loma Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Jim Wagoner Butte County Air Pollution Control District 2525 Dominic Drive Suite J Chico, CA 95928 Stacy Jolliffe Butte County Planning Department 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Mrs. Leslie Roberts Butte County Environmental Health Division 202 Mira Loma Drive Oroville, CA 95965 725 Central House Road 7 Workplan for Preliminary Oroville, CA Site Investigation Figures =4Au n9'1n �jj p m � Robles �x Alito-Ave �t� f bi t n LdVrLn n Xop-A+t Tet o R Ave 1� i- J •k ve C io Ann Cl =Almond'Ava Wniker-Ln, ( �I 70 6 o) - SGuidid Ln� lap Rd—� m {L�.--_Cox Lo y_ _ Ln�L m� 4Rossln -Ln U IUI 1�x� m f 70 ^—FourJwlesW±y Rotrins ns�} % yt E.Czridley R 0 e'ttr � 4 � a m 0. } Ce�nl aLHntcc Rd en4m1 Houso Rd �-- SITE IL t+tiddle-Honcln Rd= tdiddle Honcul Rd=CrBK 4( X222 70jem Rd tf -Jh Ii., C' I C'dWpr ti\ - Coi_vei]idnC6iFd uLu Hoq d Lo—voliq,onC:!:4Y Source of Base Map: GOOGLE PRO 20078 N W E S ENVIRONMENTALCONSULTANTS AND CONTRACTORS SITE LOCATION MAP APPROXSGAL (MILES) 3843 BRICK WAY BOULEVARD SUITE 208 SAHTA ROSA, CA 95403 0 .5 I.0 PH. (707) 546-9461 FAX (707) 544-5769 725 CENTRAL HOUSE ROAD OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA (A P N 028-020-054-000) , FIGURE: 1 Rano: ounce: 01208803.00 .,zror 8803.00 SlteLocMap ATE REATED BY: P. BY: 4/24/08 JJM RSK C>J'A ^' i I,, • y f ti e �• :t F Aqk .6 GRAPHIC SCALE 200 0 200 400 ( IN FEET ) t' = 20OFt. LEGEND PROPOSED SAMPLE LOCATION (SOIL AND GRAB GROUNDWATER) SOURCE OF BASE MAP. GOOGL£ EARTH PROFESSIONAL AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH; 2007 /MAGE. , • T ' LTEESDALE' RESIDENCE. :0 K AREA r STORAGE�_1� r .� / OLIVES/PITS �y EAST POND 1 AREA -V OLD TRAILER ' HOME—/ HOG POND { T • OLIVE B -4,. ..P , , itl� ii - t-♦ � , li 'p ��_----\ BURN' . ; IA 'PIT {� POMACE AREA ♦ Z0 1 1 ` L ? APPROXIMATE ` PROPERTY BOUNDARY " 1 -r ti y '4 —P ti• C>J'A ^' i I,, • y f ti e �• :t F Aqk .6 GRAPHIC SCALE 200 0 200 400 ( IN FEET ) t' = 20OFt. LEGEND PROPOSED SAMPLE LOCATION (SOIL AND GRAB GROUNDWATER) SOURCE OF BASE MAP. GOOGL£ EARTH PROFESSIONAL AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH; 2007 /MAGE. SCRAP STORAGE�_1� .� / OLIVES/PITS �y EAST POND 1 AREA -V OLD TRAILER ' HOME—/ HOG POND { T ASPHALT DRUMS B -4,. ..P , , ! 'p ��_----\ BURN' . ; IA 'PIT {� POMACE AREA r ,W,., Z0 APPROXIMATE ` PROPERTY BOUNDARY " 1 -r ti y '4 —P C>J'A ^' i I,, • y f ti e �• :t F Aqk .6 GRAPHIC SCALE 200 0 200 400 ( IN FEET ) t' = 20OFt. LEGEND PROPOSED SAMPLE LOCATION (SOIL AND GRAB GROUNDWATER) SOURCE OF BASE MAP. GOOGL£ EARTH PROFESSIONAL AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH; 2007 /MAGE. se3ipueddV uald AISJDS pua gllDeH eUS V xipuedd-/ SITE HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN SUMMARY Primary Emergency Contact: - 911 or Secondary Emergency Contacts: SCS Project Manager: (707) 546-9461 Stephen Kniittel Underground Service Alert: (800) 227-2600 Owner: NA Site Location: 725 Central House Road Oroville, California Proposed Work Period: May 2008 Objective of Field Work: Collect soil and grab groundwater samples Type/Status of Site: Agricultural Size of Site: Agricultural Lot (47.03 acres) Land Use of Area Surrounding Facility: Agricultural Factors Prompting Closure: Regulatory compliance Residue Type: CAM 17 metals, cyanide, pH, TDS, COD, and EC Route of Exposure: Possible inhalation, ingestion, and skin contact z Physical Hazards: Slip, trip and fall Proximity to heavy equipment Levels of Protection: Level D, minimum Air Monitoring Equipment: LEL Meter and combustible gas and oxygen Action Levels: OVM>50 ppm LEL>10% 02<19.5% HOSPITAL LOCATION MAP AND DIRECTIONS Oroville Hospital 2767 Olive Hwy Oroville, CA 95966 (530) 533-8500 Starting from: 725 Central House Road, Oroville, CA 95965 Arriving at: Oroville Hospital: 2767 Olive Hwy, Oroville, CA 95966 Distance: 14.74 Miles Approximate Travel Time: 21 Minutes 1: Start out going WEST on CENTRAL HOUSE RD toward LONE TREE 1.9 miles RD. 2: Turn LEFT onto DRY CREEK RD. ® 3: Take the CA -162/ OROVILLE DAM BLVD exit, EXIT 46, toward RICHVALE. 10.7 miles 0.3 miles 4: Turn RIGHT onto CA -162/ OROVILLE DAM BLVD E/ CA -70 BR. 1.7 miles Continue to follow CA -162/ OROVILLE DAM BLVD E. ,A 6: Turn RIGHT onto CA -162/ OLIVE HWY. 0.2 miles 7: End at 2767 Olive Hwy Oroville, CA 95966-6118 MAPS OF HOSPITAL ROUTE AND VICINITY GENERAL ROUTE i 1* D'2J w% i AV l P'- VJvZrOotte Q)r START Palermo 0 — iobinsons Corner J, �.,` ../J�� bares• aomaRica kyyr s I j E Gdd4V FEa Robinsons Comer I{j{ �r \ I i END t I 4r,�1St south Orovllle - '.0. .� _ Green St Li 1 1 Directions and Maos from MaDQuest.com SCS ENGINEERS Site Health and Safety Plan for Hazardous Waste. Site Operations Instructions• 1. Preparation Obtain as much background information as possible on the site. Coordinate with safety management as soon as possible. Address every section of the plan. If no appropriate information is available, say so. If a section is not relevant, state that. General safety directives are given for types of hazards which may be found. If those hazards will not be encountered, those sections may be deleted to facilitate clarity of the plan. 2. Review/Approval Formal approval of this Health and Safety Plan (Plan) requires the signatures of. The Project Manager The Office Health and Safety Officer/Administrator. Approval remains in effect until the Plan expiration date. Extension of the expiration date requires re -review of the Plan by safety management, and the attachment of a letter of extension. 2. Implementation As soon as possible, before the mobilization for field work, a copy of the approved Plan will be given to every member of the field team including subcontractors. Each member of the team will be required to read the Plan. A copy of the Plan will also be given to the client. A safety meeting will be held during which the Plan will be reviewed. Following the review, should there be no questions or problems, all members of the field team will sign a copy of the Plan which will be given to the office health and safety officer/administrator for filing. SCS ENGINEERS Site Health and Safety Plan for Hazardous Waste Site Operations BACKGROUND April 25, 2008 SCS Engineers is committed to providing a safe and healthy work environment for all its employees. In order to assure that the safety and health of each employee is protected at the Site, the SCS Health and Safety Plan shall be in force for the duration of the project. This project control document has been prepared to establish safe procedures and practices in accordance with OSHA's Safety and Health Standard 29 CFR 1910.120. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The scope of work for this project involves collecting soil samples and groundwater samples. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE The following sections describe the personnel who will be directly involved in the project and their responsibilities and authority with respect to enforcing site safety.' One of the most critical elements in worker safety is the attitude of all levels of project management. A strong and visible commitment to worker safety will be present throughout the project. In addition to the internal management structure, several non -company personnel will be interfacing with SCS during the course of the project. These include subcontractors, community regulators, police, fire fighters, and other advisory personnel. Project Manager The Project Manager has the ultimate responsibility for health and safety of all personnel during the project. The Project Manager (Stephen Knuttel) is responsible for procuring proper safety equipment and is also responsible for site audits. Site Safety Officer The Site Safety Officer will be assigned to senior SCS employees during different phases of the field work and has the responsibility for the on-site implementation of the Site Health and Safety Plan. The Site Safety Officer will be present at the site during field activities that require implementation of the Site Health and Safety Plan and will be responsible for checking that this plan is followed by field personnel during site activities. The Site Safety Officer will receive technical support from the Project Manager. The Site Safety Officer's responsibilities also include, but are not limited to the following: ➢ Verify that appropriate personal protective equipment is available and is properly utilized by the necessary personnel. ➢ Ensure that personnel are aware of the provisions of this plan and have been instructed in proper work practices and emergency procedures. ➢ Monitor the activities of the personnel to ensure that safe operating procedures and practices are employed at all times. ➢ Direct the work of technicians who may be required to assist in performing air monitoring activities. ➢ Document all aspects relating to health and safety at the site. ➢ Report unsafe acts or conditions to the appropriate supervisory personnel. ➢ Act as the technical liaison to regulatory agency personnel on matters pertaining to employee, community, April 25, 2008 and environmental health and safety. The Site Safety Officer will communicate on an ongoing basis with the personnel involved in the investigation activities to evaluate changing site conditions. The Site Safety Officer will have the authority to stop all work activities and require modifications to the work practices if violations of the Site Health and Safety Plan are occurring. SCS Job Superintendent's Responsibilities ➢ Read, understand, and accept the Site Health and Safety Plan. ➢ Attend the site safety training. ➢ Conduct daily tailgate safety meetings. ➢ Ensure that the proper personal protective equipment is available at the site. ➢ Ensure that safe work practices are employed at all times. ➢ Enforce corrective action under the direction of the Site Safety Officer. ➢ Act as the Site Safety Officer in the absence of the corporate Safety Officer. Inform the Site Safety Officer of any conditions which may require amendment to the Site Health and Safety Plan, or any other hazard to the health and well being of employees or the community. Subcontractors' Responsibilities Subcontractors are responsible for ensuring that their employees comply with the requirements of the Site Health and Safety Plan. The responsibilities of all subcontractors with respect to safety are: ➢ Read, understand, and accept the Site Health and Safety Plan. ➢ Have all members of the work crew attend the mandatory safety training. ➢ Have all members of the work crew attend all mandatory daily tailgate safety meetings. ➢ Ensure that equipment and other machinery are properly inspected and maintained and in compliance with applicable sections of the Occupational Health and Safety Code. ➢ Supply and maintain the required personal protective equipment. ➢ Ensure that the work crew complies with the Site Health and Safety Plan. ➢ Enforce corrective action under the direction of the Site Safety Officer. Field Team Members' Responsibilities The responsibilities of the field team members with respect to safety are: ➢ Read, understand, and accept the Site Health and Safety Plan. ➢ Follow the directions of the Job Superintendent, Safety Officer, and all contractors' representatives. ➢ Attend the site safety meeting. ➢ Attend all daily tailgate safety meetings. ➢ Perform all work in compliance with this Site Health and Safety Plan, as well as all federal, state, and local occupational safety and health regulations. ➢ Report any condition which that pose a threat to the health and well being of employees or the community to the Site Safety Officer and/or the Project Manager. I. ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION A. A. Project Description: Project Name:, Project No.: Site Location: Work Summary: Prepared by: Proposed Date(s) of Operation: Project Manager Approvals: Date of Issue: Field Investigation Teesdale Food Waste Processing 01208803.00 725 Central House Road Oroville, California Collect soil samples and grab groundwater samples Alex Tuveson Date: April 25, 2008 May 2008 April 25, 2008, Date of Expiration: April 2009 B. Scope of the Safety Plan Date: April 25, 2008 April 25, 2008 This Site Health and Safety Plan is intended to meet the requirements of GISO Title 8, Article 5192, 29 CFR .1910.120 and the EPA Standard Operating Safety Guides for Hazardous Waste Operations (1986). All employees involved in field work at this site have completed the required 40 hours initial training, maintain qualification through annual refresher training, are under a program of medical monitoring, and are certified to wear respiratory protection, as specified in 29 CFR 1910.134. This plan was prepared from the best available evidence concerning site conditions. It is recognized that conditions on a site may change or that more information may become available during the operation. Unless specified in this Site Health and Safety Plan, the field team does not have the option to modify the levels of personal protection in any way. If during the operation, it is determined that the protection specified in the Site Health and Safety Plan requires modifications, work will cease, and the site safety officer (SSO) will contact the project manager and/or safety representative. Work will not resume until authorized. ®1 April 25, 2008 C. Field Team Assignments SCS FIELD TEAMASSIGNMENTS Dutv Name Project Manager: Stephen Kniittel Site Safety Officer: tbd Job Superintendent: tbd D. Subcontractors The following subcontractors will perform work during this operation. All employees of subcontractors performing work with the potential for exposure to hazardous waste shall meet the requirements of 29 CFR 1920.120. Name: Telephone No.: Address: Authorized Representative: Services Provided: Contract No.: Date: April 25, 2008 E. Safety Compliance Agreement Form Site: 725 Central House Road, Oroville, California Project No.: 01208803.00 I the undersigned, acknowledge that I have attended the safety meeting, and received a copy of this Site Health and Safety Plan. If have read and understood the Safety Plan, and do agree to adhere to the requirements specified by it. I understand that I may be prohibited from continuing work on the project for failing to comply with this Safety Plan. Signature/(Names Printed) Company Date Meeting Conducted by: Signature �I April 25, 2008 F. Subcontractor Compliance Agreement Site: 725 Central House Road, Oroville, California Project No.: 01208803.00 Company Name: Telephone No.: I acknowledge that as an authorized representative of this company, I have read and understood the Site Health and Safety Plan to be used for these site activities. I understand that hazardous materials and activities may be encountered during this operation, and that the scope of these operations is covered by 29 CFR 1910.120. I certify that all employees of this company which will be assigned to this operation will be under the company safety program which is in compliance with all federal and local regulations. Name (Printed) Title Signature Date April 25, 2008 H. SITE BACKGROUND A. Site Physical Description: The Site is agricultural. The Site is located approximately 9.0 miles south of downtown Oroville, California, along the north side of Central House Road at an elevation of approximately 105 feet above mean sea level (msl). Wyandotte Creek runs through the Site and is the principal surface water in the area. B. B. Site History: (Activities, Incidents, etc.): Teesdale Food Waste Processing currently operates a temporary fruit pit storage facility on the north side of Central House Road. C. Types of Materials Known to Have Been Used On the Site: N/A D. Materials Known or Suspected to Remain On -Site: Fruit wastes and ash E. Site Status: (Active/Inactive, Agency Actions): Active (agricultural storage facility) Has the site been adequately characterized to the best of your knowledge? Yes No X III. DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED: (the tasks involved) 1. Security The soil borings will be located in a relatively open area of the Site. At the end of the workday, if the soil borings have not been completely backfilled, the work area will be enclosed by a security fence to limit public exposure. In the event that impacted soil and resulting vapor create a health hazard, the temporary fencing will be used to create an exclusion zone to limit personnel access and initiate personal protection equipment. 2. Equipment and Tasks a. Anticipated equipment needs are as follows: • Pickup/Tool Truck 1 • Concrete breaker/saw • Drill Rig • Vibratory Compaction Equipment • Rubber -Tire Loader • 20# Fire Extinguisher 1 • LEL meter 1 • PID 1 e. Traffic Control Traffic flow is anticipated to be very minimal. April 25, 2008 3. Soil Sampling and Analysis A project scientist/geologist will be on-site during the investigation to collect soil samples and grab groundwater samples. The samples will be submitted to a State certified laboratory for the appropriate analysis. IV. HAZARD EVALUATION A. Summary of anticipated Hazards: X Physical hazards inherent to the site. X Physical hazards related to the operations- Working around heavy equipment is dangerous and requires attention to vehicle movement. All equipment shall be maintained in good working condition, including back-up alarms which are audible at a distance of 200 feet. When the backhoe is operating, all personnel will be at a safe distance from the machinery. X Chemical hazards Community hazards. Electrical hazards. X Mechanical hazards. Natural hazards. Biohazards. Radiation hazards. Heat stress. Confined space entry - There is currently no confined space conditions anticipated. X Noise hazards- Use earplugs around operating equipment. Cold stress. X Other- Explosion and Fire hazards exist. NO SMOKING is allowed in the exclusion area B. Chemical Hazards: Chemical Mode of Limits IDLH Intake (PEL/TLV ppm ppm) Key: Ca = NIOSH Carcinogen [9 April 25, 2008 Identify operations when the contaminants are of greatest concern on the site: • During Drilling Pockets of gas may be released • During Sampling: Airborne dust could be generated Comments: Eliminate all potential ignition sources. Minimize or eliminate (if possible) all contact with impacted soil. References used: X NOISH/OSHA X ACGIH (TLV) X SAX PATTY OHS Other C. Physical Hazards 1. Physical Hazards Inherent to the Site: X Fire X Explosion Anoxia ` X Heat Cold Stress X Noise Radiation Biohazards X Other 2. Physical Hazards Related to the Operations X Heat Stress Cold Stress _ Trenching Drilling Lifting X Heavy Equipment Operations D. Community Hazards 1. Potential for contaminant migration: Use caution for heavy wind conditions that may enhance dust transport. Soil should be kept moist which should inhibit dust. A source of HZO for dust control will.be available. 2. Potential for community exposure: Area will be controlled by safety officer. No exposure is likely. HAZARDOUS WASTE FIELD SAFETY DIRECTIVES A. General Rules 1. Safety Plan will be available on-site at all times. 2. Emergency information will be posted. 3. No facial hair is allowed that will interfere with the respirator face seal. B. C. 4. All operations will have first aid kits and fire extinguishers available. 5. Site access will be restricted to authorized personnel only. 6. Hard hats and steel -toed boots will be worn at all times. 7. No contact lenses. 8. No eating or smoking on-site. 9. Substance abuse and alcohol are prohibited. Mechanical Hazards 1. Stand a safe distance from operating heavy equipment. 2. Verify that all equipment is in good condition. 3. Do not stand or walk under elevated loads or ladders. 4. Appropriate guards must be used if equipment has potentially hazardous moving parts. Electrical Hazards 1. Locate and mark buried utilities before drilling, digging, or excavating. Call USA 48 hours in advance of digging or drilling. 2. Maintain at least 10 foot clearance from overhead power lines. 3. Contact utility company for minimum clearance from high voltage power lines: 4. If unavoidably close to buried or overhead power lines, have power turned off, with circuit breaker locked and tagged. 5. Properly ground all electrical equipment. 6. Avoid standing in water when operating electrical equipment. 7. If equipment must be connected by splicing wires, make sure all connections are properly taped. 8. Be familiar with specific operating instructions for each piece of equipment. April 25, 2008 April 25, 2008 D. Chemical Hazards 1. Conduct, direct reading air monitoring on initial entry and periodically at both the work area and at the downwind area to evaluate respiratory and explosion hazards. r 2. Use water to keep dust under control during all operations. 3. LEL monitoring and inert the UST. E. Heat Stress When temperature exceeds 70 degrees F, take frequent breaks in shaded area. Unzip or remove coveralls during breaks. Have cool water or electrolyte replenishment solution available. Drink small amounts frequently to avoid dehydration. Count the pulse rate for 30 seconds as early as possible in the rest period. If the pulse rate exceeds 110 beats per minute at the beginning of the rest period, shorten the work cycle by one third. F. Cold Stress Wear multilayer cold weather outfits. The outer layer should be of wind resistant fabric. 0 degrees to.30 degrees F total.work time is four (4) hours. Alternate one (1) hour out of the low temperature area. Below 30 degrees F; consult industrial hygienist. Drink warm fluid. Provide warm shelter for resting -Use buddy system. Avoid heavy sweating. G. Noise Hazard Use earplugs or earmuffs when noise level prevents conversation in normal voice at distance of three feet. Use hand signals. H. Confined Space Entry 1. Confined spaces include trenches, pits, sumps, elevator shafts, tunnels, or any other area where circulation of fresh air is restricted or ability to readily escape from the area is restricted. 2. Consult HSO and Corporate Health and Safety Policy prior to entering confined space. If confined space entry is required a confined space entry checklist must be completed, and a permit must be obtained from the CHSO. 3. We do not anticipate confined space conditions during this investigation. I. Biohazards N/A I Natural Hazards N/A Page 13 April 25, 2008 K. Traffic Hazards Brightly colored safety vests with reflective tape will be worn by all worksite personnel if necessary. L. Emergency Response SCS Engineers is not an emergency response contractor. Evacuate the scene and notify emergency response personnel (Dial 911). Notify the Project Manager and on-site operations contacts as soon as possible. VI. PLANNING/SITE SETUP A. Site Setup On-site communication method: Voice and hand signals The following hand signals shall be used to communicate with others if not within talking distance: Grip buddy's wrist or waist............................................................... LEAVE AREA IMMEDIATELY Both hands atop head...........................................................................................NEED ASSISTANCE Finger touching nose or respirator ..............................................:. CAN SMELL CONTAMINATION Thumbs up......................................................................... O.K., I'M ALL RIGHT, I UNDERSTAND Thumbsdown...............................................................................................................NO, NEGATIVE Righthand up in tight fist.............................................................................................................. STOP Off-site communication method: Cellular telephone Site security: Safety officer. Identify the water and electrical locations: As shown on Site Map B. Levels of Protection Available or Used _A _B _C X D Modifications/Additions: Full face respirators will be used in areas where monitoring indicate TLV levels greater than 50 ppm. C. Use of Buddy System No work is to be done at any time during the course of the project without the benefit of the buddy system. Before work starts, employees are to select their buddy and remain in direct line of sight with that buddy throughout the workday. No one shall work alone at any time. Partners should provide their partner with assistance, observe their partner for signs of chemical or heat exposure, and periodically check their partner's personal protective equipment for rips and contamination. April 25, 2008 D. Levels of Protection Available or Used _A _B _C X D E. Air Monitoring Guidelines Device Action Level Action to be Taken PID 50 ppm Stop work. Place workers upwind and upgrade level of protection until exposures are below 50 ppm 20% LEL Evacuate the site. Notify the Project Manager. Allow the explosive atmosphere to dissipate. Comments: Periodically check downwind area F. Measures to Control Off-site Migration and Exposure: Control dust. No visible dust allowed and keep soil moist to limit vapors. G. Special Site Considerations: Space limitations. VII. FIELD ACTIVITIES A. Site Entry and Setup: , Initial level of protection: D Modifications: None Special Procedures, Precautions, Equipment: None B. Soil Excavation and Aeration or Drilling operations: (general) Initial level of protection: D Modifications: Half face respirator is necessary Special Procedures, Precautions, Equipment: NA C. Decontamination: (to be completed prior to leaving site) Personnel: Dust off as necessary. Instrumentation: NA Sampling Equipment: Clean tools and wash with alconox, rinse with DI water. Heavy Equipment: General LOP for Decontamination: D Comments: fop, F. April 25, 2008 Disposal of Investigation -derived materials: If any, to be determined (tbd) based on analytical test data. Solids: tbd Liquids: tbd Sample Handling and Precautions: Personnel will wear gloves and other protective equipment as necessary during the handling of contaminated samples. Any analytical or geotechnical laboratory used for this project will be notified prior to shipment of the suspected contaminants at this site. 2. Sample containers will be decontaminated prior to shipping, wrapped in bubble wrap placed in zip -lock bags, and packaged in absorbent material. Shipping containers will be clearly labeled. Samples will be shipped under full chain -of -custody procedures. PPE Selection 1. All PPE shall be selected based upon the performance characteristics of the equipment. For reference, Table 1 lists PPE specifications for EPA levels, B, C, and D. All respiratory equipment selection criteria shall meet the requirements of the Respiratory Protection Program. a. Minimum Protection At a minimum, workers wear a hard hat, safety glasses and steel -toed boots while working at the site. b. Skin Protection Anyone handling soils from contaminated areas will wear Nitrile or Neoprene gloves. Level C skin protection will be invoked when handling known contaminated soils. C. Foot Protection Steel -toed boots shall be worn at all times. d. Respiratory Protection If needed, workers shall don half -face respirators (equipped with organic vapor cartridges). These respirators will protect workers from atmospheres up to 1,000 ppm organic vapors and 0.05 mg/m3 dust. The soil will be screened in the field using an organic vapor analyzer to verify that adequate protection is being provided to workers. Respirators will be used in accordance with the Respiratory Protection Program as outlined in the Health and Safety Manual. Page 16 April 25, 2008 e. Hearing Protection Earplugs shall be worn when working in and around open cab, heavy equipment, or working around drilling equipment. L PPE Use , All employees working on the site have been or shall be trained on the proper selection and use of personal protective equipment. PPE is to be used at all times. April 25, 2008 TABLE 1- PPE SPECIFICATIONS Inspection Schedule (1) or Level of Protection Equipment Work Mission Duration (D) C Half or full -face air- I - Before each use. purifying respirator equipped with organic vapor cartridges. D - (black & purple cartridges) 1 work day or less (if signs of breakthrough occur). Polyethylene -coated D - One working span or regular Tyvek disposable (-4 hours or until torn). clothing (based on hazard). Nitrile gloves. I - Before each use. Steel -toed rubber boots or I - Before each use. steel -toed safety shoes with rubber outer boots. Hardhat. I - Before each use. Eye protection. I - Before each use. D Steel -toed rubber boots or I - Before each use. steel -toed safety shoes with rubber outer boots. Hardhat. I - Before each use. Eye protection. I - Before each use. Miscellaneous gear may be I or D - as needed. required depending on the hazard. g. Work Mission Duration PPE shall be used for the work mission duration. h. PPE inspection, Maintenance and Storage All PPE shall be inspected and maintained to ensure the integrity of the equipment and to assure that it is in good working order at all times. The inspection schedule for PPE is outlined in Table 1. If equipment is not in proper working order, it shall not be used and the problem shall be brought to the attention of the Supervisor. All PPE shall be stored in a clean, dry place in accordance with manufacturer's suggestions. G. April 25, 2008 i. PPE Training and Fitting All personnel shall be properly trained and fitted with PPE prior to working at the site. j. PPE In -Use Monitoring and Effectiveness Evaluation The employees using PPE shall be continually monitored by the SSO and the Supervisor to assure that the employees are properly selecting and wearing the equipment prescribed in this Plan and to ensure that the equipment prescribed is effectively performing as required. Safety Meetings 1. Attendance at all safety meetings is mandatory for all personnel working at the site. a. Pre -construction Safety Meeting All personnel who are to be involved with the drilling proposed for the project are required to attend a pre -construction safety meeting in which the special hazards of the site will be discussed. The person responsible for conducting the pre -construction safety meeting shall keep a daily record of the meeting along with all information discussed. This daily record is to be completed on a Safety Meeting Summary form and shall be kept in a safety binder at the site for the duration of the project. b. Daily Tailgate Safety Meetings Each group of personnel doing work as an individual group (i.e., construction, subcontractors, sampling crew, etc.) is required to conduct daily tailgate safety meetings, prior to the start of work, covering the day's work to be performed, any safety related problems encountered the previous working day, and any new work procedure which will be employed or new hazards which may be encountered or introduced. The person responsible for conducting the tailgate safety meeting shall keep a daily record of the meeting along with all information which was discussed. April 25, 2008 VIII. EQUIPMENT LISTS Personal Protective Equipment [(x) required if level chosen LEVEL C used LEVEL D used X APR used x APR available Full face Full face Half mask x Half mask Cartridge Type: Black OVA Cartridge Type: Escape air pack Escape air pack Surgical gloves x Surgical gloves Outer work gloves x Outer work gloves leather Type: nitrile Type: Protective clothing Protective clothing Type:Tvvek Type: Tvvek x Hooded Hooded Rain suit Safety Vest x Tyvek Safety glasses Safety glasses x Hard hat x Hard hat x Neoprene safety boots x Neoprene safety boots Steel -toed boots x Steel -toed boots x Boot covers x Boot covers Hearing protection x Hearing Protection x Instrumentation Decontamination Equipment OVA Plastic Sheeting x HNU Large Washtubs OVM Small Washtubs x PID x Scrub Brushes x Oxygen/explosimeter (LEL) x Pressurized Sprayers x Dragger Kit Solvent Sprayer(s) Tubes used: Plastic Trash Cans Trash Bags x Water Bottles x Low flow air pumps Paper Towels x High flow air pumps Duct Tape Radiation Monitor -4 Masking Tape Radiation dosimeters Zip Lock Bags Noise meter Detergent WBGT TSP pH meter Sodium Hypochlorite Magnetometer Sodium Bicarbonate GPR Bleach EM Hand Soap x Solvent Rinse Acetone Hexane First Aid Equipment/Supplies First Aid Kit Oxygen Eye wash Stretcher Fire extinguisher Thermometer(s) Blood Pressure Monitor Drinking water Site Security Traffic cones Banner tape Flagging tape Warning signs Waste drum labels Waste drum labels Security guard IX. EMERGENCY INFORMATION (Post Onsite) ACUTE SYMPTOMS Dizziness, nausea, shakey Unconsciousness 11 April 25, 2008 Methanol _ Other: Tables Chairs _ Sampler Rack Tool kit x Other Equipment Camera x Film x Drum Dolly Trowels Pick _ Shovels _ Binoculars _ Megaphone Mobile telephone x Fencing. _ Thieving rods Bung wrench (brass) Spill sorbing pads x Bailers _ Rope _ FIRST AID Exit exclusion zone, rest, shade, fresh air. Get medical help Appendix B I Standard Soil and Water Sampling Procedures and QA/QC Protocol STANDARD SOIL AND WATER SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND QA/QC PROTOCOL December 15, 2003 SCS ENGINEERS ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS STANDARD SOIL SAMPLING PROCEDURES a The following outline describes the standard equipment and procedures used by SCS Engineers (SCS) personnel for the collection of soil samples for laboratory analysis. Equipment Modified California split -spoon drive sampler, standard penetration sampler, or direct push core barrel (Drill rig sampling) Drive sampler (hand auger samples) Typical 1.5 -inch to 2.0 -inch diameter by 6.0 inch long brass or stainless steel liners and plastic end - caps. Teflon sheets or aluminum foil will also be used for samples suspected of containing volatile compounds (gasoline, aromatic hydrocarbons, solvents, etc.) Appropriate sample holders will be used for samples suspected of containing volatile compounds (gasoline, aromatic hydrocarbons, solvents, etc.) when EPA Method 5035 sampling is required by the regulatory agency. Standard sample containers will be used when field preservation occurs for EPA Method 5035 compliance. Typical 1.5 -inch to 2.5 -inch diameter by 6.0 inch long plastic or metal liners for direct push core barrel. PID organic vapor analyzer (OVA) or equivalent Field Detector Sampler and Sample Container Cleaning Equipment: Stiff -bristle brushes Buckets Detergent (Non -phosphate detergent recommended) Deionized/potable water Insulated sample storage and shipping containers (ice chests) and blue ice Insulated sample storage and shipping containers (ice chests) and dry ice for EPA Method 5035 sample holders which cannot be delivered to the laboratory within 48 hours for preservation Personal protective equipment (generally level D protection). General Sampling Procedures Soil samples are collected in accordance with regulatory guidance. Soil sampling procedures are updated as new guidance is provided by regulatory agencies. Sampling equipment (i.e., sample liners, auger bits, sampling devices) are pre -washed as necessary with a brush in a detergent solution, followed by double rinsing with distilled or deionized water prior to each sampling event. All new sample liners will have been pre -washed prior to use. All samples are collected in such a manner as to minimize the volatilization or oxidation due to agitation and/or mixing upon handling. Soil samples collected by hand augering for lithologic logging, and for chemical and physical analyses are typically obtained by pounding the sample tube .into the soil being tested. If an auger -2- hole is drilled with a motorized drill rig, samples are typically collected using a drive sampler, which is driven approximately 18 to 24 inches below the depth of the auger bit. The sampling methodology may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis, depending on the suspected contaminant(s). Where required, EPA Method 5035 sample holders will be filled as rapidly as possible to prevent volatilization from either a sample sleeve or directly from the formation where feasible. Soil samples collected from a backhoe bucket or from an accessible pit or excavation (ramped or shored) are collected by removing excess material to expose as fresh as possible soil. The sample liner is then pushed into the soil until the liner is full. Where required, EPA Method 5035 sample holders will be filled as rapidly as possible to prevent volatilization directly from the formation or from the backhoe bucket after a small amount of material is removed to expose a fresh surface where feasible. Standard metal liners will be submitted for analysis in those circumstances where EPA Method 5035 sample holders are deemed to be unusable (gravel or extremely dense material). EPA Method 5035 preservation times will still be required of the laboratory. When utilizing the split spoon sampler with a drill rig, the portions of the soil sample recovered in additional liners are also examined and noted for any contamination and/or changes in lithology. The soils, when required, are classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). Sample liner ends selected for analysis are typically covered with teflon sheets and sealed with plastic end caps, stored in a cooler (4 ❑ C), and transported to a California Department of Health Services Certified Analytical Laboratory for the requested analyses (except where there is no State certification for the analysis being conducted). If storage is required prior to delivery to the laboratory or laboratory courier, the samples are stored in a secure refrigerator prior to delivery. EPA Method 5035 sample holders used to comply with EPA Method 5035 sample collection procedures will be collected and stored in a cooler (4 ❑ C), and transported to a California Department of Health Services Certified Analytical Laboratory for preservation within 48 hours of sample collection. In the event the samples cannot be delivered to the Laboratory to meet the 48 hour preservation requirement, the samples will be placed in an ice chest with dry ice and kept frozen either in the ice chest with adequate dry ice or in a secure freezer until they can be delivered to the Laboratory for proper preservation. The Laboratory may receive the samples at the job site for field preservation, in which case standard sample tubes will be used. All sample containers are labeled in the field. The sample labels will typically contain the following information: Sample identification number (including depth and stratigraphic position where applicable) -3- Project name Project address Sampler initials Date of collection Other pertinent information Chain -of -Custody documents are completed in the field and accompany the samples to the laboratory. The Chain -of -Custody document will typically contain the following information: Sample identification number (including depth and stratigraphic position where applicable) Project name Project address Project number Sampler (printed and signed) Date and time of collection (for each sample) Matrix type (soil, water, etc.) Analyses and turn -around -time requested Billing Information Other pertinent information Stockpile Sampling Discrete samples from thin stockpiles are collected in brass or stainless steel liners, by removing 6 inches to 1 foot of soil and driving the brass or stainless steel liner into the stockpile. Soil samples are collected from thick stockpiles containing volatile contaminants by either augering or otherwise excavating approximately one third to one half way into the pile and then driving the sample liner into the soil in the hole, or collecting a sample from the backhoe bucket. Surface or near surface samples will be collected from homogenized stockpiles containing non-volatile contaminants such as metals, motor oil, or oil and grease. For final verification characterization, discrete soil samples will be collected at intervals required by regulation, or by the lead regulator for the disposal or treatment option selected. EPA Method 5035 sampling procedures, as indicated above, will be followed for discrete and/or verification sampling when directed by the regulatory agency and/or the receiving facility. EPA Method 5035 sampling procedures, as described above, will not be followed for composite sampling for disposal unless directed by the landfill(s) in order to profile the soil for disposal. STANDARD GROUNDWATER SAMPLING PROCEDURES The following outline describes the standard equipment and procedures which are used by SCS personnel for the collection of groundwater samples for laboratory analysis. IEE IMonitoring Well Development ' After monitoring wells are installed and prior to initial sampling of the wells, well development is conducted. Well development is conducted to create an effective filter pack around the well screen, to optimize hydraulic communication between the formation and the well screen, and to assist in ' restoring the natural water quality near the well. Well development is also conducted to remove fines and to remove any foreign materials introduced during drilling. tWell development will be conducted as follows: 1. Record the static water level and total well depth. i2. Set the pump and record the pumping rate. Pump until the turbidity reaches the desired level, typically measured using a turbidity meter. ' 3. Discontinue pumping and begin surging using a properly designed surge block and proper surging technique. 4. Measure and record well depth to determine the amount of fines and repeat Step 2. 5. Repeat surging and pumping until the well yields water of acceptable turbidity at the ' beginning of a pumping cycle. Depending on the depth of the water, the hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer, and the diameter of the well, pumping may effectively achieve well development. Wells completed in very silty geologic units also may produce consistently turbid samples. Wells of this type will normally be considered to have been properly installed and developed and turbid water samples will be ' considered representative of mobile constituents in;the aquifer. Monitoring Well Samnlin ■' Groundwater sampling and evaluation of monitoring wells begins by removal of the well caps and measuring water levels in all monitoring wells at a site with a water level indicator. The fluid in the ' well is then monitored for the presence of free floating material. If free product is present in the well, its thickness is measured using an oil -water interface probe. A program of free product removal may be initiated. A groundwater sample is typically not collected from any well with ' confirmed free floating product unless a directive to do so is received from the regulatory agency. All monitoring wells are typically checked for free product until authorization has been received from the lead regulatory agency that checking for free product is no longer necessary. Water levels ' will continue to be checked until field measurements indicate that equilibrium has been achieved from which to compute the groundwater flow direction and gradient. If free product is not present in the well being monitored, the well is purged, with groundwater parameters such as pH, conductivity, and temperature measured after each well volume removed. This process continues until parameters being measured such as pH, conductivity, and temperature, have generally stabilized (reproducible within 10%). As a general practice, a minimum of 3 well casing volumes or until the well goes dry constitutes adequate purging. For 2 -inch diameter wells, a minimum of 5 gallons of water should be removed unless the well goes dry. Wells will be purged from least to most contaminated after the initial round of sampling. The purge pump will be placed near the top of the measured water table to assure that fresh water from the formation will move upward in the screen. Water will be purged from the well at a rate that does not cause recharge water to be excessively agitated. The purge pump will be lowered into the well as necessary to achieve the desired removal of groundwater. Once a well has been adequately purged, a groundwater sample is collected using a disposable or pre -cleaned bailer. The groundwater sample is collected from the well in containers appropriate to the analyses being conducted. As examples, 1 liter amber bottles are used for diesel/motor oil/kerosene and oil and grease analyses, 40 milliliter volatile organic analysis vials are used for gasoline BTEX, 8010, 8240, and 8260 analyses, and plastic containers are used for total and/or dissolved metals. Volatile organic analysis vials will be immediately capped after collection and placed on ice to minimize loss of volatiles. All other groundwater sample containers collected will be capped and placed in a storage container in a timely manner and as appropriate for the analysis being conducted. Proper containers, sampling collection procedures, and storage requirements will be verified with the analytical laboratory prior to sample collection. Monitoring wells at a site are purged prior to collection of samples, unless the regulatory agency has approved non -purge samples. After the wells have been adequately purged, they will be allowed to recover to 80% of their original volume prior to sampling. Any well purged to dryness will be sampled after a sufficient volume of groundwater has entered the well to enable the collection of the necessary groundwater samples. All collected groundwater samples are stored in an ice chest on blue ice and transported under Chain -of - Custody documentation. The samples are either transported directly to the analytical laboratory on the day of collection, delivered to the laboratory courier on the day of collection, or are returned to SCS's office where they are stored in a secure refrigerator and then delivered to a California Department of Health Services Certified Analytical Laboratory or a laboratory courier for the requested analyses (except where there is no State certification for the analysis being conducted). Every effort will be made to assure that sample storage will not exceed 72 hours before delivery of the samples to either the laboratory or the laboratory courier. Samples being analyzed for constituents with a longer holding time, such as metals, may be stored for a longer period of time, provided the holding time is not exceeded, before delivery to the laboratory. Where more than one site is sampled on the same day by the sampler, samples from each site will be stored in separate ice chests. If feasible, samples suspected of being highly impacted will be stored separately from samples which are presumed to be clean. To the extent feasible, samples will be separated based on site and suspected degreeof impact while awaiting delivery to or pick up by the analytical laboratory. All purged fluid is stored on-site in DOT 55 -gallon drums pending analysis. The drums and the fluid in the drums are the exclusive property and responsibility of the responsible party. SCS typically samples the drums and arranges for disposal at the appropriate time. Grab Water Samples Grab water samples may be collected from the pits, borings, discrete sampler borings, creeks, ponds, and any other bodies or vessels containing water. If the water sample can be safely collected by hand, it will be, otherwise, a disposable bailer will typically be used to collect the sample. All collected grab water samples will be stored on ice and transported under Chain -of -Custody documentation. The samples will either be delivered directly to the analytical laboratory or to the analytical laboratory courier on the day of the collection, or they will be returned to SCS' office where they will stored in a secure refrigerator a maximum of 72 hours, and then delivered to a California Department of Health Services Certified Analytical Laboratory for the requested analyses (except where there is no State certification for the analysis being conducted) or the laboratory courier. Again, samples being analyzed for constituents with a longer holding time, such as metals, maybe stored for a longer period of time before delivery to the laboratory. Typically, no purge water will be generated during grab water sampling. Should purging occur, the purge water will be stored on-site in either a DOT 55 -gallon drum, or other appropriate vessel, pending analysis. Industry standards are that drums and all produced water are the exclusive property and responsibility of the responsible party. SCS will typically sample such containers and arrange for disposal at the appropriate time. Sample Handling-QA/OC Elements Sample Handling The elapsed time between sample collection and delivery to the laboratory or the laboratory courier will typically not exceed 72 hours. Again, samples being analyzed for constituents with a longer holding time, such as metals, may be stored for a longer period of time before delivery to the laboratory, providing the holding time is not exceeded. Sealed sample containers will only be opened by laboratory personnel during the specified sample extraction process. Chain -of -Custody -7- In order to document and trace sample possession from time of collection, a Chain -of -Custody record will be filled out on the Chain -of -Custody document by the sampler for each sample collected. The Chain -of -Custody document will accompany the sample(s) through laboratory analysis. The completed Chain -of -Custody record for each sample will be included in the analytical report from the laboratory. Blanks Blanks will be used or collected as part of the sampling program at the discretion of the project manager and/or the lead regulatory agency. Trip and/or field blanks will be supplied and analyzed along with the samples, at the discretion of the project manager and/or the lead regulatory agency. Modifications Any modification to the standard sampling procedures and QA/QC protocol outlined in- this document for either soil or water samples will be noted and fully explained in the sampling report. PERSONAL PROTECTION Sampling at environmental sites increases the chance of exposure of the sampling technician to chemicals which pose a threat to the environment and may pose a threat to the sampler=s short-term and/or long-term health at the concentrations present. Each site will be evaluated prior to conducting any field work to ascertain the chemicals detected in the past, the chemicals likely to be detected in the future, and the likely concentrations of those chemicals to be detected. The chemicals will be evaluated for possible routes of exposure at the concentrations likely to be encountered. Appropriate personal protective equipment to prevent contact with contaminants shall be used. Appropriate chemical -specific gloves shall be worn and changed between sampling events. In the event the sampler observes or detects activities occurring on or around the site which could cross contaminate collected samples, the sampler will suspend sampling until the activities which may lead to cross contamination cease. If necessary, the sampler will abort the sampling event. Any aborted sampling event will be rescheduled after the suspicious activities are indicated to have ceased, or the activities can be halted during the sampling event. Any suspension or aborting of sampling will be immediately reported to the appropriate registered professional. Site-specific protection measures are outlined in the Site Health and Safety Plan, where active investigation and/or remediation is occurring. Active Investigation and/or Remediation (Refer to Site Specific Health and Safety Plan) Required personal protective equipment: Hardhats Steel toed boots Recommended personnel protective equipment: Eye protection Hearing protection Gloves to protect against dermal contact with contaminants Skin protection from sunlight Photoionization detector/Gas Tech Respirator (NIOSH approved with appropriate filters for contaminants detected or expected) Detergent wash and rinse water First aid kit Fire extinguisher Route map to and phone number of nearest hospital As indicated above, each site must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis to determine the appropriate personal protection materials to use and personal protection activities to implement in the field. As an example, several sun tan lotions contain chemicals which are detected in the diesel range. Care must be taken to prevent cross contamination by sun tan lotion at diesel impacted sites. Passive Investigation Recommended personnel protective equipment: Skin protection Eye protection Gloves to protect against dermal contact with contaminants Detergent wash and rinse water First aid kit Fire extinguisher . Route map to and phone number of nearest hospital As indicated above, each site must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis to determine the appropriate personal protection materials to use and personal protection activities to implement in the field. If a site is known to be heavily impacted, wells should be sampled from the cleanest to most impacted to minimize the potential for cross contamination. The potential for cross contamination can be further minimized by wearing disposable gloves and disposing of gloves after each sample is collected. As an alternative, hands can be washed and rinsed between each sampling event. Where contaminants are non-volatile and do not migrate readily, such as metals, personal protection can be modified to match the primary routes of exposure, which are inhalation and ingestion. In this case it may be appropriate to wear a dust mask if excessive dust is created during sampling. Washing of hands and face before eating or drinking is highly recommended. Protection of clothing by wearing Tyveks is also to be considered, along with washing clothing after each use in conditions where significant dust is created. Personal protection is designed to prevent or minimize the exposure to the sampler of chemicals or substances which may adversely impact either the short-term or long-term health of the sampler. It is the sampler=s responsibility to adequately protect themselves from exposure. All samplers are encouraged to protect themselves and their health to the extent feasible while in the field. All materials necessary to provide adequate protection are available and should be utilized as appropriate. Cross contamination is to be minimized at all times while sampling. In some instances, proper use and implementation of personal protection will also aid in minimizing cross contamination. The sampler is very highly encouraged to implement proper personal protection, especially where it further minimizes the risk of cross contamination of samples. -10- LI Appendix C Regulatory Letter from the CVRWQCB, dated March 20, 2008 ' California Regional Water Quality Control Board _. Central Valley -Region ' Karl.E. Longley,:ScD, P.E., Chair. Linda S. Adams Secretary.for Redding Office Arnold.Schwarzenegger ' Environmental Protection. 415 Kn011crest.DriVe, suite 1:00, Redding, California 96002 Governor (530)224-4845 • Fax (530)'224-4857 htip://ww.w.waterboards.ca.gov/centr6lvaII6,y ' 20 March'2008, CERTIFIED MAIL 7006 0810 00.01 8417 3394 Mr.. Dick and Richard' Teesdale 725 :C.entral. House Road 'Oroville., .CA 9.5965 ORDER TO SUBMIT INFORMATION PURSUANT TO .CALIFORNIA WATER CODE ' :SECTION 13267, TEESDALE FOOD WASTE' PROCESSING SITE, BUTTE COUNTY On 20 March -2008, :Central Valley Regional Water'QualityControl'Board (Regional Water Board) staff mailed you a Notice of Violation (NOV) and Inspection Report (Report) describing i. the discharge of waste to land and/or a pond at 725 Central House Road. The NOV requires You to submit a Report of Waste Discharge or Operational Plan -,by 11 April.2008, if' food waste ' processing operations continue. As indicated in'the Report, the Teesdale food waste is acidic,, salty,and has metal concentrations exceeding .the Regional Water Board's water quality objectives: The nature and extent of the discharged waste and .its impacts on public health,, the environment,,and water quality are currently unknown. Dick and Richard Teesdale.are named responsible 'parties. because they discharged the :waste and have knowledge of the ongoing discharge.'and the ability to control it. Richard Teesdale is the current landowner. ' 'During our last -inspection :on 13March 2.008, Dick Teesdale' indicated to staff that he would begin removing the food waste when trucking could be: arranged. He also indicated that the pond water is generally usedto irrigate a portion of his land. Dick and "R'ichard Teesdale are :required to submit to our office by 1:8. Apri1.2008 a.work plan to assess the nature and extent of soil -and groundwater contamination resulting from any food processing wastes discharge to land. The, work plan shall: propose a,.method to assess'the water quality .of the pond for agricultural reuse and determine if groundwater.and/or urface water have been impacted. The work plan shall be prepared by a California Registered Engineer or Professional *.Geologist and.contain a time schedule to complete the investigation. ' This,orderto submit a technical report is made pursuant to CWC -Section 13267. CWC C Section 1-3267(b) authorizes the Regional Water.Board to re.quire:any person who has ' discharged waste to. submit technical reports as may be required to investigate. the discharge. California Environmental Protection Agency ' 0 Recycled Paper Mr. Dick and Richard Teesdale -2- :20 March 2008 ' The report is needed to determine the extent of pollution -and to develop corrective_ actions protective of public health, the environment, and water quality. The above Report describes .the evidence that shows-thatthe persons named in this letter caused or permitted the discharge of waste at the site, and therefore are responsible for cleanup. Failure to comply With this.order or other Regional Water Board orders may result in enforcement actions,including preparation of a cleanup and abate order and penalties. Failure or .refusal to -furnish the technical report required by CWC Section 132.67 (b) may result in _admin.istrative civil liability not :to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000;) for each day it is late pursuant to CWC Section 13268 or additional enforcement pursuant to :CWC Section 13304, or both If you have any questions, please contact Karen Clementsen at (.530) 224-4852 or at the letterhead address. Original signed by JAMES C. PEDRI, P.E. Assistant Executive Officer KLC: sae ,cc: Hal Thomas, Butte County District Attorney's Office, Oroville George Barber, Butte County District Attorney'.s Office, Oroville Mike Huerta, Butte County Environmental Health Department, Oroville Jim Wagoner, Butte County Air Pollution Control District, Chico Stacy J.olliffe.,.Butte County Planning :'D.epartment, Oroville George Hoag, Delallo Italian .Food Inc., Oroville Greg :Kelly, California Olive Ranch, .Oroville UAClerical Documents\Correspondence_FinapGroundwater Unit\C1ementsenK\2008\March\Teesdale 13267 Order.doc California Environmental Protection Agency Cj Recycled Paper California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region Karl E. Longley, ScD, P.E., Chair Linda S. Adams Redding Office Amold Schwarzenegger Secretary for 415 Knollcrest Drive, Suite 100, Redding, California 96002 Governor Environmental Protection (530) 224-4845 • Fax (530) 224-4857 hftp://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralvalley BUTTE COUNTY MAY 0 6 2008 DEVELOPMENT . 5 May 2008 SERVICES Mr. Raymond and Richard Teasdale 725 Central House Road Oroville, CA 95965 ' CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF WORKPLAN FOR PRELIMINARY SITE INVESTIGATION, SCP CASE #SLT5R1044, TEESDALE FOOD WASTE PROCESSING SITE, BUTTE COUNTY California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region (Regional Water Board) staff has reviewed the subject work plan submitted by your consultant, SCS Engineers, in response to a California Water Code Section 13267 Regional Water Board Order to submit a plan to assess pond water quality and the nature and extent of soil and groundwater contamination resulting from food processing wastes discharged at the site. The work plan proposes surface water and sediment sampling in the Hog Pond and East Pond, and a shallow soil/groundwater investigation adjacent to the Hog Pond, East Pond, olives/pits area, and olive pomace area. The proposed work includes following field tasks: site clearance, mobilization, soil boring and soil sampling, grab groundwater sampling, sample handling, equipment decontamination, laboratory analyses, management of investigation derived wastes, and demobilization. Regional Water Board staff has no objections with the proposed work, but requests the Hog Pond water, East Pond water, and shallow groundwater be analyzed for the following additional constituents: Aluminum, Boron, Chromium IV, Iron, Manganese, and Sodium. Please submit the Preliminary Site Assessment Report by no later than 1 August 2008. Additional soil and/or groundwater investigation may be required based on the results of the preliminary investigation. If you have any questions regarding the above information, please contact me at (530) 224-4852, Jacqueline Matthews at (530) 224-3249, or at the letterhead address. / REN L. CLEMENTSEN, P.G. Senior Engineering Geologist Tanks, Site Cleanup, Waste Containment Unit California Environmental Protection Agency Qi Recycled Paper Mr. Raymond and Richard Teasdale - 2 - 5 May 2008 KLC: knr cc: Mr. Stephen Knuttel, SCS Engineers, Santa Rosa Howard Tho emas;;Butte County District Attorney's Office, Oroville Mike Huerta,-Butte County Environmental Health Dept, Oroville Leslie Roberts, Butte,County Environmental Health Dept, Oroville Jim Wagoner, Butte`County Air Pollution Control District, Chico Stacy Jolliffe; Butte County Planning Dept, Oroville .. " 3i"r U:\Clerical Documents\SA_Correspondence\ClementsenK\May 2008\Teesdale Conditional PSA Workplan Approval.doc California Environmental Protection Agency Qa Recycled Paper Results of Subsurface Investigation Teesdale Food Waste Processing 725 Central House Road Oroville, CA (Butte County Assessor's Parcel #028-020-054-000) Presented to: Ms. Karen Clementsen Central Valley,Regional Water Quality Control Board 415 Knollcrest Drive, Suite 100 Redding, CA 96002 Presented by: SCS ENGINEERS 3843 Brickway Boulevard, Suite 208 Santa Rosa, CA (707) 546-9461 July 29, 2008 File No. 01208803.00 Offices Nationwide www.scsengineers.com Teesdale Food Waste Processing Results of Subsurface Investigation Prepared for: Mr. Richard Teesdale Teesdale Food Waste Processing 725 Central House Road Oroville, CA 95965 (APN 028-020-054-000) Prepared by: SCS ENGINEERS 3843 Brickway Boulevard, Suite 208 Santa Rosa, CA 95403 July 29, 2008 File No. 01208803.00 Teesdale Food Waste Processing LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMER This report has been prepared on behalf of Mr. Richard Teesdale of Teesdale Food Waste Processing with specific application to the results of a subsurface investigation for the property located at 725 Central House Road (Site), in Oroville, California (Assessor's Parcel #028-020- 054-000). Field activities and sampling were conducted in accordance with the care and skill generally exercised by reputable professionals, under similar circumstances, in this or similar localities. No other warranty, either expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice presented herein. ' Access to the Site and the surrounding area was limited by buildings, roadways, underground and above -ground utilities and other miscellaneous Site and Site vicinity features. Therefore, the field exploration and points of subsurface observation were somewhat restricted. Changes in Site use and conditions may occur due to variations m rainfall, temperature, water usage, or other factors. Additional information that was not available to the consultant at the time of this investigation or changes that may occur on the Site or in the surrounding area may result in modification to the Site that would impact the summary presented herein. This report is not a legal opinion. ' We trust this report provides the information you require at this time and we appreciate the q Pp opportunity to work with you on this project. If you require any additional information, or have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact SCS at (707) 546-9461. Paul Damian PhD, MPH, DABT Date Board Certified Toxicologist b\ ()NAL vc r4 STEPHEi,. KNUTTEL ' No. 7674 Stephen Kniittel, PG 7674 Date CA registration fees paid through 07/31/09 725 Central House Road H Results of Subsurface Orovi,lle, CA Investigation -Teesdale Food Waste Processing I" Table of Contents Section Page Limitationsand Disclaimer................................................................................................................................ii Listof Attachments.............................................................................................. ... Listof Acronyms and Abbreviations......................................:.......................................................................iv 1 Introduction.............................................................................................................................................. 1 2 Background.............................................................................................................................................1 3 Site Geology...........................................................................:.............................................................. 1 4 Soil Borings............................................................................................................................................. 2 5 Surface Water and Pond Sediment Sampling................................................................................. 3 6 Laboratory Analysis.............................................................................................................................. 3 7 ......................................................................... Analytical Results .......................................................... 4 8 Discussion.................................................................................................................................................4 9 Recommendations.................................................................................................................................. 5 10 References Cited.................................................................................................................................... 6 11 Distribution List.........................................................................................................:..............................7 List of Attachments Figure No. 1 Site Location Map 2 Site Plan with Boring Locations ITable No. 1 Soil and Sediment Analytical Results 2 Grab Groundwater and Pond Water Analytical Results Appendices A Unified Soil Classification System Chart and Boring Log Legend ' Boring Logs for Borings B-1 through B-4 B Kiff Analytical LLC Report #63627, dated July 22, 2008 i725 Central House Road iii Results of Subsurface Oroville, CA Investigation r Teesdale Food Waste Processing LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS Ag = silver Al = aluminum ' As = arsenic B = boron Ba = barium ' Be = beryllium bgs = below ground surface BOD = biochemical oxygen demand Br ' = bromine Cd = cadmium Cl = chlorine CN = cyanide ' Co = cobalt COD — chemical oxygen demand Cr ' = chromium Cu = copper CVRWQCB = Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board DWR = Department of Water Resources , EPA = Environmental Protection Agency ESLs = Environmental Screening Levels F = fluorine ' Fe = iron Hg mercury Kiff = Kiff Analytical LLC ' Mg — magnesium mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram µg/l, = micrograms per liter ' Mn = manganese MCLS = Maximum Contaminant Levels Mo = molybdenum ' msl = mean sea level Na = sodium Ni = nickel ' NO3" = nitrate Pb = lead P043" = phosphate QA/QC ' = Quality Assurance/Quality Control Sb = antimony Se = selenium SM ' = standard method SO41- = sulfate TDS = total dissolved solids TFWP = Teesdale Food Waste Processing Tl = thallium House Road iv Results of Subsurface 725 Central Oroville, CA Investigation Teesdale Food Waste Processing TKN = total Kjeldahl nitrogen UN/DOT = United Nations/Department of Transportation V = vanadium Zn = zinc 725 Central House Road v Results of Subsurface Oroville, CA Investigation Teesdale Food Waste Processing INTRODUCTION SCS Engineers (SCS) is pleased to present the results of the subsurface investigation for the Teesdale Food Waste Processing (TFWP) facility (Site) located at 725 Central House Road, Oroville, California (Figure 1). This report has been prepared pursuant to a regulatory directive from the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB) in a letter dated March 20, 2008 (CVRWQCB, 2008b) requesting a Workplan for a subsurface investigation of the Site to evaluate possible impacts to soil, surface water and groundwater resulting from past food processing wastes discharged to land. The work for this subsurface investigation was conducted as proposed in the Workplan (SCS, 2008) which was approved by the CVRWQCB in a letter dated May 5, 2008 (CVRWQCB, 2008c). Current Site features are shown on Figure 2. 2 BACKGROUND The Site is located approximately 9 miles south of downtown Oroville, California, along the north side of Central House Road at an elevation of approximately 105 feet above mean sea level (msl). Wyandotte Creek flows through the Site and is the principal surface water feature in the area. TFWP operated a fruit pit storage facility on the north side of Central House Road. On February 20, 2008 and March 13, 2008 the CVRWQCB performed inspections at the Site. Fruit wastes observed onsite by the CVRWQCB consists of olives, olive pits, olive pomace, peach pits, and plum pits (CVRWQCB, 2008a). The primary concerns of the CVRWQCB are the dumping of food processing wastes in proximity to Wyandotte Creek (CVRWQCB, 2008a) and potential soil and groundwater contamination resulting from food processing wastes discharged to land (CVRWQCB, 2008b). Mr. Teesdale was informed that he would need to apply for appropriate permits to continue operations at the Site (CVRWQCB, 2008a). Mr. Teesdale has since discontinued bringing in fruit wastes and is in the process of removing and transporting the olive pits to a cogeneration facility. 3 SITE GEOLOGY The Site lies within the East Butte Subbasin which comprises a portion of the Great Valley Geomorphic Province of California. The Great Valley is a broad structural trough bounded by the tilted block of the Sierra Nevada on the east and the complexly folded and faulted Coast Ranges on the west. The East Butte Subbasin is defined by the aerial extent of the unconsolidated to semi -consolidated sedimentary deposits that are bounded by the Feather River to the northwest and west; Stanislaus River on the south; and consolidated bedrock on the east (DWR, 2003). The Eastern Butte Subbasin is bounded on the west and northwest by Butte Creek, on the northeast by the Cascade Ranges, on the southeast by the Feather River and to the south by the Sutter Buttes. The Solano and South American are subbasins of the Sacramento Valley Groundwater Basin. The northwest boundary along the Cascade ranges is primarily a geographic boundary with some ground water recharge occurring beyond that boundary. The subbasin is 725 Central House Road 1 Results of Subsurface Oroville, CA Investigation Teesdale Food Waste Processing contiguous with the West Butte Subbasin at depth. Annual precipitation is approximately 18 inches in the valley increasing to 27 inches towards the eastern foothills (DWR, 2003). The East Butte aquifer system is comprised of deposits of late Tertiary to Quaternary age. The Quaternary deposits include Holocene stream channel deposits and basin deposits and ' Pleistocene deposits of the Modesto and Riverbank formations along with Sutter Butte alluvium. The Tertiary deposits include the Tuscan and Laguna formations (DWR, 2003). The Tuscan Formation consists of a series of volcanic mudflows, tuff breccias, tuffaceous sandstones, and volcanic ash layers. The Laguna Formation consists of interbedded alluvial sands, gravel, and silts. 4 SOIL BORINGS Four soil borings (B-1 through B-4) were drilled and sampled at the approximate locations. shown on Figure 2 between July 8 and July 9, 2008. Three borings (B-1 through B-3) were drilled using an 8 -inch diameter hollow stem auger to a maximum depth of approximately 40 feet below ground surface (bgs). Due to overhead high voltage power lines above the location of boring B-4 a backhoe was used to advance the hole and a solid barrel hand-held slide hammer sampler was.used to collect soil sample from approximately 2.5 and 5 feet bgs. Soil samples from the other borings were collected using a split -spoon sampler for lithologic descriptions. The split spoon sampler contained stainless steel sleeves used for collection of soil samples for laboratory analysis. Samples were collected and examined for lithology from each of the borings beginning at an approximate depth of 2.5 feet and every 5 feet thereafter to a maximum depth of approximately 40 feet bgs. Two samples were. collected for laboratory analysis from each boring. The ends of the sample sleeves were covered with Teflon® Tape and sealed with plastic caps. Grab groundwater samples were collected from two of the four borings (B-1 and B-3) using a separate disposable bailer for each borehole and were placed into the appropriate containers supplied by the laboratory for analysis. The water sample from B-1 was collected at an approximate depth of 40 feet bgs which most likely represents water contained within a gravelly layer, at or close to the regional groundwater level. The water sample from B-3 was collected at an approximate depth of 15 feet bgs which represents a perched water layer with little yield. This sample was therefore very turbid when collected. Soil borings B-1 through B-3 were backfilled with neat cement to within 0.5 feet of existing grade, then completed to grade matching surrounding material to the extent feasible. The approximately 4.5 foot deep backhoe sampling hole was backfilled with native soil that was removed from the hole. Soil and grab groundwater samples were labeled, stored under refrigerated conditions, and transported under Chain -of -Custody to the Kiff Analytical LLC (Kiff) laboratory in Davis, California for analysis. Kiff is a California Department of Health Services certified laboratory for the analysis requested. Copies of Kiff s current certifications have been reviewed and are on file with SCS. The soil and groundwater samples were collected following Standard Soil and Water Sampling Procedures and .Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Protocol. 725 Central House Road" 2 Results of Subsurface Oroville, CA Investigation Teesdale Food Waste Processing The augers were pressure washed, and the small sampling equipment was washed in a detergent solution and rinsed. The drill cuttings were placed on and covered with plastic, pending disposal. Water generated by decontamination, and sampling was stored at the Site in 55 gallon United Nations/Department of Transportation (UN/DOT) approved drums, pending disposal. Options for the disposal of the soil and groundwater are being evaluated. 5 SURFACE WATER AND POND SEDIMENT SAMPLING SCS collected one surface water sample from the Hog Pond and one surface water sample from the East Pond (Figure 2). Surface water samples were collected using a separate disposable bailer at each location. SCS collected one sediment sample from the Hog Pond and one sediment sample from the East Pond (Figure 2). The water level in each pond had significantly decreased since submittal of the Workplan in April 2008. As such, SCS was able to collect one sediment sample from each pond without the use of a small boat or other flotation device. Sediment samples were collected in acrylic liners which were directly driven into the soil and the ends were covered with Teflon® Tape and then sealed with plastic caps. Samples were transferred to appropriate laboratory -supplied containers for analysis. 'Surface water and sediment samples were labeled, stored under refrigerated conditions, and transported under Chain -of -Custody to the Kiff laboratory in Davis, California for analysis. Kiff is a California Department of Health Services certified laboratory for the analysis requested. Copies of Kiffls current certifications have been reviewed and are on file with SCS. The surface water and sediment samples were collected following Standard Soil and Water Sampling Procedures and QA/QC Protocol. 6 LABORATORY ANALYSIS The grab groundwater samples were analyzed for: • Total Hardness by Standard Method (SM) 2340; • Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) by SM 2540C; • Anion IC Scan (Al, B, Fe, Mg, Na,) by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 6010B; • Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) by SM 5210B; • Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) by EPA Method 410.4; • Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) by SM 4500; • CAM 17 Metals by EPA Method 6010B and 7470 for mercury; • Total Cyanide by SM 4500. • Specific Conductance by EPA Method 120.1; • pH by SM 4500; • Tannin and Lignin by SM 5550B. 725 Central House Road 3 Results of Subsurface I Oroville, CA Investigation Teesdale Food Waste. Processing The pond water was analyzed for: • Total Hardness by SM 2340; • TDS by SM 2540C; • Anion IC Scan (Al, B, Fe, Mg, Na) by EPA Method 6010B; • Anion IC Scan (Br, Cl, F, NO3-, SO4 2-) by EPA Method 300.0; • P043 by SM 4500; • BOD by SM 5210B; • COD by EPA Method 410.4; •. TKN by SM 4500; • CAM 17 Metals by EPA Method 6010B and 7470 for mercury; • Total Cyanide by SM 4500; • Tannin and Lignin by SM 5550B. The pond water was analyzed in the field for: • pH; • Temperature; • Conductivity, • Turbidity; • Dissolved Oxygen. The soil boring samples and sediment samples collected from the ponds were analyzed for: • CAM 17 Metals by EPA Method 6010 and 7471 for mercury;. • Total Cyanide by EPA Method 9010B/9014. 7 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Analytical results for the soil samples collected from soil borings B-1 through B4 and pond sediment samples for the July 2008 subsurface investigation are presented in Table 1. Analytical results for the grab groundwater samples collected from soil borings B-1 and B-3, and surface water samples for the July 2008 subsurface investigation are presented in Table 2. 8 DISCUSSION Table 1 compares the soil and sediment analytical results to the SFRWQCB's Environmental ' Screening Levels (ESLs). This comparison shows that only arsenic was detected at concentrations slightly exceeding the ESL. However, it should be noted that in a study of 50 uncontaminated soils of California, the natural background concentrations of arsenic ranged up ' to 12 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), with a mean value of 3.5 mg/kg (Bradford et al., 1996). The measured concentrations of arsenic in these samples are well below even the mean natural 7.25 Central House Road 4 Results of Subsurface Oroville, CA Investigation Teesdale Food Waste Processin background concentration of arsenic in California. Therefore, the detected arsenic concentrations are not considered to reflect an impact from the Site. All other analytes were either below their corresponding ESL or not detected. No ESL is available for chromium; however, even the maximum concentration detected (70 mg/kg) is well below the mean concentration (122 mg/kg) of naturally occurring chromium in California (Bradford et al., 1996). Therefore, chromium is also considered to occur at naturally occurring concentrations. Cyanide was not detected in any of the soil or sediment samples. Table 2 compares water concentrations in two boring and two surface waters to state and federal drinking water standards (Maximum Contaminant Levels [MCLs]). Metal concentrations are generally below MCLs in the Hog Pond, the East Pond, and boring B-1, although barium is above the MCL in the East Pond. Chromium and lead in boring B-1 also exceed MCLs; however, the water sample from B-3 exceeds MCLs for most metals. The generally higher concentrations of metals in these borings are likely due to the fact that the laboratory re- suspended the sediment within the grab groundwater sample and analyzed the suspended material with the water fraction. The native occurrence of metals in the volcanic soils and gravels and sands with volcanically derived materials within the area can be associated with concentrations of metal found within this sample. Table 2 also presents the results for numerous standard water quality parameters such as dissolved oxygen, hardness, TDS, etc. Table 2 indicates mainly that all water bodies tested are associated with organic matter which is reducing oxygen content of the water. This is reflected primarily in the high levels of BOD and COD, and the correspondingly low levels of dissolved oxygen. The high levels of sodium and chloride in the surface waters reflect the ongoing evaporation of the ponds and lack of precipitation, resulting in higher concentrations of salt. Cyanide levels are uniformly below detection limits. All other results are unremarkable and within the ranges expected. 9 RECOMMENDATIONS None of the soil or sediment samples collected exceed ESLs or natural background levels for metals. This indicates lack of any long-term chemical release and the lack of any issues related to soil or sediment impacts from the Site. Some water samples, primarily the B-3 water samples, do slightly exceed MCLs for some metals. However, given that the sample was collected in a perched water layer and has little likelihood of being used for a domestic drinking water supply, no additional investigation is warranted. Therefore, based on the soil and water laboratory analysis results, SCS recommends no further action for the Site. SCS recommends that the drill cuttings which were placed on and covered with plastic be disposal of by thin spreading the soils on Site; the water generated by decontamination and sampling should be used on site for dust control. 725 Central House Road 5 Results of Subsurface Oroville, CA Investigation Teesdale Food Waste Processing f 10 REFERENCES CITED Bradford, G.R., A.C. Chang, A.L. Page, D. Bakhtar, J.A. Frampton, and H. Wright. 1996. Background Concentrations of Trace and Major Elements in California Soils. University of California, Riverside. DWR, 2003. California's Groundwater Bulletin 118 — Sacramento River Hydrologic Region, Sacramento Valley Groundwater Basin, East Butte Subbasin, March 27. CVRWQCB, 2008a. Inspection Report, 725 Central House Road, Oroville, Butte County, February 20. CVRWQCB, 2008b.. Order to Submit Information for the Pursuant to California Water Code Section 13267, Teesdale Food Waste Processing Site, Butte County, March, 20. CVRWQCB, 2008c.. Conditional Approval of Workplan for Preliminary Site Investigation, Teesdale Food Waste Processing Site, Butte County, May 5. SCS, 2008. Workplan for Preliminary Site Investigation, Teesdale Food Waste Processing, 725 Central House Road, Oroville, CA, April 25. 725 Central House Road 6 Results of Subsurface Oroville, CA Investigation Teesdale Food Waste Processing 11 DISTRIBUTION LIST Harold Thomas Butte County District Attorney's Office 25 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Mike Huerta Butte County Environmental Health Department 202 Mira Loma Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Jim Wagoner Butte County Air Pollution Control District 2525 Dominic Drive Suite J Chico, CA 95928 Stacy Jolliffe Butte County Planning Department 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Mrs. Leslie Roberts J Butte County Environmental Health Division 202 Mira Loma Drive Oroville, CA 95965 725 Central House Road 7 Results of Subsurface Oroville, CA Investigation Figures v 70 = c/Aoitt�'In^�t� Vlsta �'TE,"_'l n S Robles' cc^r�� Alice-Av jR� n i xon•AVe� Te"iing3 ;edger Ln � �KisLer.nl a`� a` Q-�O `�AanyAva \ �1 s V. ii� }Aacxintosh'Ave `, \\v ,SII NniYer•Ln� �Aimond-A•re . 3 TO ; C;ddIrJ my Rd� en z, (-C coz•Ln �. Cox Ln p w x L•nl m' 01 1 cRoss Ln IAcfo�y L-n m to a L[Four-tlunesWaY 70 a } r,I Robinsons�f z% ���E;G7idey,Rd_,r...�r�Gorn Ie'r �' o � a U m ( {I E9lt ° �- T cnuml House Rd� CeMrel House Rd 1t --T•= - 16 3i SITE TI e � n L---diddle Honcul Rd..-----^Middle Homut Rd=Craig- ate, a 70 'em Rd— Cot�`Nonciif Ftd o� f- Source of Base MBP: GOGGLE PRO 20070 N W E S AFPROXSCAL SITE LOCATION MAP (MILES) ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS AND CONTRACTORS 3843 BRICKWAY BOULEVARD SUITE 208 0 .5 I.0 SANTA ROSA, CA 95403 PH. (707) 546-9461 FAX (707) 544-5769 7 2 5 CENTRAL HOUSE ROAD FIGURE: ROJ. NO: oUaCE: OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 01208803.00 Gotgbi'm tow 8803.00 SiteLmMap (A P N 028-020-054-000) ') nre. 4/24/08 NEaYEoev: P. BY: JJM RSK m m m A m m m m m m " w = m m m m m m Ri � � ` � ` •. � .-. A 'y..+ .�aw-�' .�'-^� S "` i� TEESDALE - ,• - OLIVE TANK -z RESIDENCE - .... t �. �, «•. r.,, AREA ' ; �v3 �' HOG POND i Fasr pow PO�JD ' _ + OLIVES/PITS AREA` � —� `D (SMME1 r & WATU I _ - 1, I �L* OLD TRAILER*HOM c +y Jr 4 ' d 1 v 1 I } 4 HOG ONE do YYAIFR) a. +v4 . "... L� B-2 j) BURN I _ .s •" PIT OLIVE POMACE AREA t_41' N r {' 1 APPROXIMATE PROPERTY BOUNDARY ' � 1, �' i h . 4" j / •' •.. POWER TRANSMISSION LINE ` I POWER TRANSMISSION LINE TO I I- I,` ` dr .v' I " LEGEND _ I r o ,;_#_ — — — -- —• �— SAMPLE LOCATION (SOIL AND GRAB GROUNDWATER) SEDIMENT AND WATER SAMPLE LOCATION GRAPffiC SCALE 200 0 200 400 ( IN FEST ) 1* — 20OFt SOURCE OF 84SE MAP- GOOGL£ EARTH PROFESSIONAL AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH. • 2007 IMAGE. I } i I I } 4 HOG ONE do YYAIFR) a. +v4 . "... L� B-2 j) BURN I _ .s •" PIT OLIVE POMACE AREA t_41' N r {' 1 APPROXIMATE PROPERTY BOUNDARY ' � 1, �' i h . 4" j / •' •.. POWER TRANSMISSION LINE ` I POWER TRANSMISSION LINE TO I I- I,` ` dr .v' I " LEGEND _ I r o ,;_#_ — — — -- —• �— SAMPLE LOCATION (SOIL AND GRAB GROUNDWATER) SEDIMENT AND WATER SAMPLE LOCATION GRAPffiC SCALE 200 0 200 400 ( IN FEST ) 1* — 20OFt SOURCE OF 84SE MAP- GOOGL£ EARTH PROFESSIONAL AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH. • 2007 IMAGE. Tables Table 1: Soil and Sediment Analytical Results 725 Central House Road, Oroville, CA Sample Sb As 7a Be I Cd Cr Co Cu Pb I Mo Ni Se Ag Tl V Zn Hg CN mg/kg B-1 @ 3.0' <0.75 1.1 100 <0.25 <0.50 40 7.2 22 2.9 <0.25 22 <0.75 <0.25 <0.75 40 33 <0.050 <0.50 B-2 @ 3.0' <0.75 1.3 160 0.39 <0.50 70 17 30 2.1 <0.25 59 <0.75 <0.25 <0.75 69 31 <0.050 <0.50 B-3 @ 5.5' <0.75 2.6 160 0.31 <0.50 63 28 30 4.2 <0.25 33 <0.75 <0.25 <0.75 67 28 <0.050 <0.50 B-4 @ 2.5' <0.75 2.3 69 0.33 <0.50 60 17 25 3.8 <0.25 25 <0.75 <0.25 <0.75 65 25 <0.050 <0.50 Soil Hog Pond <0.75 2.3 55 0.29 <0.50 58 14 27 3.5 <0.25 25 <0.75 <0.25 <0.75 63 25 <0.050 <0.50 Soil East Pond <0.75 2.4 150 0.36. <0.50 56 24 29 4.0 <0.25 38 <0.75 <0.25 <0.75 63 30 <0.050 <0.50 ESLD 40 1.6 1,500 8.0 7.4 NL 80 230 750 40 150 10 40 16 200 600 10 0.0036 - Environmental Screening Levels; San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board - Screening for Environmental Concerns at Sites with Contaminated Soil and Groundwater, Interim Final - November 2007 (Revised May 2008). -Table A. Environmental Screening Levels, Shallow Soils (<3m bgs), Groundwater is Current or 'Potential Source of Drinking Water. Comm ercial/Industrial Land Use Only. NL - Not Listed Table I ROI -7-08 Teesdale Food Waste Processing Page 1 of I Table 2: Grab Groundwater and Pond Water Analytical Results 725 Central House Road, Oroville, CA CAM 17 Metals Well Number Date Sb As Ba Be Cd Cr Co Cu Pb Mo Ni Se Ag Tl V Zn Hg mg/L Water Hog Pond 07/08/08 <0.015 <0.015 0.070 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0050 <0.0050 0.010 <0.0050 <0.0050 0.015 <0.015 <0.0050 <0.015 0.015 <0.010 <0.00050 Water East Pond 07/08/08 <0.015 <0.015 4.0 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0050 <0.0050 0.023 <0.0050 <0.0050 0.013 <0.015 <0.0050 <0.015 <0.0050 <0.010 <0.00050 B-1 @W 07/09/08 <0.015 <0.015. 0.56 0.0030 <0.0010 0.44 0.21 0.28 0.051 0.0063 0.32 <0.015 <0.0050 <0.015 0.75 0.32 <0.00050 B-3 @ W 07/08/08 <0.025 1 0.14 14 0.031 0.0075 4.9 2.6 3.0 0.32 <0.0070 3.4 <0.075 <0.015 <0.075 6.0 2.7 0.0017 MCU 0.006 0.01 2.0 0.004 0.005 0.05 NL 1.3 0.015 NL 0.1 0.05 0.12 0.002 NL 5.02. 0.002 Water Parameters and Select Analytes Well Number Date pH Temp Conductivity Turbidity Hardness Dissolved 02 TDS I BOD I COD I NO3 I POa I SOa I TKN I CN" T & L3 °C mmhos/cm NTU mg/I. Water Hog Pond 07/08/08 7.91 30.1 13.2 33 270 0.97 5,700 19 -340 <0.50 22 4.3 12 <0.050 5.2 Water East Pond 07/08/08 7.31 30.9 32.0 10 2,000 0.94 29,000 <6.0 260 <0.50 <0.15 <0.50 3.6 <0.050 0.68 B-1 @W 07/09/08 6.98 NA 6.6 NA 460 NA 420 14 42 NA NA NA 1.1 <0.050 2.4 B-3 @ W 07/08/08 6.53 NA 7.2 NA 1,700 NA 4,600 9.3 230 NA NA NA 2.4 <0.050 0.44 MCLs'. **** NL NL **** NL NL 500 NL NL 10.0 NL 500.0 NL 0.15 NL Additional Select Analytes Well Number Date Al B Br Cl I F Fe Mg Na mg/L Water Hog Pond 07/08/08 0.055 0.24 0.52 3,300 <0.10 0.89 26 1,900 Water East Pond 07/08/08 <0.050 0.31 0.15 10,000 1.5 0.66 1,400 1,800 B-1 @W 07/09/08 110 0.093 NA NA NA 200 78' 35 B-3 @ W 07/08/08 1200 0.068 NA NA NA 1 1800 1 440 1,200 MCLs' 1 NL NL 250' 2.0 1 0.32 1 NL NL ' - Maximum Contaminant Levels. A Compilation of Water Quality Goals by the. Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board, August 2003 with Tables Updated August 2007. Drinking Water Standards (California and Federal). 2 - Primary MCL Not Listed. Secondary MCL Shown Here. 3 - Tannin and Lignin. NL - Not Listed Table 2 ROI -7-08 Teesdale Food Waste Processing Page 1 of 1 Appendices Appendix A ' Unified Soil Classification System Chart and Boring Log Legend ' Boring Logs for B-1 through B-4 GENERAL SOIL CATEGORIES SYMBOLS TYPICAL SOIL TYPES GRAPHIC LETTER Clean Gravel •'• GW well Graded Gravels, Gravel - Sand mixtures Gravel with little or ' More half no fines •� • GP Poorly Graded Gravels, Gravel - Sand mixtures fA J than of coarse fraction is . O a1 d y > larger than No. 4 Gravel with • • GM Sil Gravels, Poorly Graded; Gravel - Sand - Silt Mixtures h v ca 0y sieve size more than • GCJ Clayey Gravels, Poorly Graded; Gravel - Sand - Clay Mixtures UJ •— Z = CD 15% fines QQ to CD 7 L N o. L6 °c Clean Sand o:o v SW well Graded Sands, Gravelly Sands W w Sand with little or d Qno w 0 C fines :•: SP Poorly Graded Sands, Gravelly Sands O More than half of V coarse fraction is smaller than No. 4 Sand with SM Silty Sands, Poorly Graded; Sand - Silt Mixtures sieve size more than 15% fines SC Clayey Sands, Poorly Graded; Sand - Clay Mixtures MLInorganic Silts and Very Fine Sands, Rock Flour, Silty or Clayey Fine Sands or Clayey Silts with Slight Plasticity U) d Silt and Clay J'70O CL Inorganic Clays of Low to Medium Plasticity, Gravelly Clays, p Ea>i Liquid Limit Less Sandy Clays, Silty Clays, Lean Clays V% N 'y than 50%to — — W o -- OL Organic Silts and Organic Silty Clays of Low Plasticity Z M N — MH Inorganic Silts, Micaceous or Diatomaceous Fine Sandy or Silty C ° O A w Silt and Clay Soils, Elastic Silts UJ Z w CH Inorganic Clays of High Plasticity, Fat Clays [L– O Liquid Limit Greater than 50% OH Organic Clays of Medium to High Plasticity Highly Organic Soils PT Peat and Other Highly Organic Soils Bedrock BR Bedrock Aggregate Base B Mixed Fill Asphalt A Asphalt Concrete WC Concrete Q Soil sample submitted for Sampler Type = Initial Static Water Level chemical analysis CBS = Continuous Barrel Sampler ® Soil sample examined for CMSS = CA Modified Split Spoon Q First Identified Free Water soil classification ler DP = Direct Push Sam p GRAB = Grab Sample n.a. = not applicable HA = Hand Auger n.r. = not recorded HP = Hydropunch SPT = Standard Penetration Test SCS ENGINEERS UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM CHART and BORING LOG LEGEND Environmental Consultants Former Geyserville Chevron FQM: 3843 Brickway Boulevard, Suite 208 21020 Geyserville Avenue Appendix A Santa Rosa, California 95403 Geyserville, California A-1 Ph.: 707-546-9461 Fax: 707-544-5769 Job Number: 01203345.00 1 of t Date (start, end): 7/8/08 - 7/9/08 Boring No. Boring Location: Pit Storage Area Drilling Time (start, end) 12:20 - 08:00 B-1 Logged By: Stephen KnOttel See Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) Checked By: Steven Clements for Legend and information not noted. Drilling Contractor: RSI Drilling, Inc. MW Installed: Y ❑ N ® if no, boring backfilled with: Driller's Name: Jorge Morales Cement ® Bentonite: Cement ❑ Grout® Chips❑ Drilling Method: 8 -in. Hollow -Stem Auger Sampling Method: CMSS / SPT Auger Depth, ft: 40.0 Total Depth, ft: 41.5 Hammer weight / fall: 140 lbs / 30 inch Notes: Dilling stopped at 15.0 ft bgs on 7/8/08 and continued on 7/9/08 to total depth. Ground Elevation estimated from USGS Topographic map. v d > o c >n ~ _ o 1° o d o J a tY c E a o > w c r r o o e Lithologic Description and Drilling Comments: N U N O N f0 0 '0 N S N CL 2 �, > 2 MC: o N cn m N a O o 107.0 o 0 1 0 1 (n in U • FILL: brown, fine to medium grained sand, silt, and fine +� gravel. 106.0 SANDY SILT with Gravel: dark brown to dark gray with reddish brown, fine to medium grained sand, fine gravel, :... • dry to moist. 2 8 6 14 20 30 40 10 3 12 U 20 30 40 10 1 12 102.5 -- — -- --- GRAVELLY CLAY (CL): brown to tan with varing 6 4 5 30 10 20 40 colors, fine and coarse gravel, very fine to medium 6 15 rn 30 10 20 40 grained sand, moist, silty. 6 40 U 30 10 20 40 No No 0 15 1 6 25 o- 3 40 rn 94.5 ----------------------- SILT (ML): light brown, clayey, moist. rn 15 5 65 30 6 8 6 5 91'0 10 60 30 SANDY SILT (ML): moderate brown, very fine to fine 6 8 v 30 50 20 grained sand, minor clay, moist. 88.5 ----------------------- BORING LOG B-1 Figure: Teesdale Food Waste Processing Environmental Consultants 3843 Brickway Boulevard, Suite 208 725 Central House Road Santa Rosa, California 95403 B-1 Oroville, Califomia 95965 Ph.: 707-546-9461 Fax: 707-544-5769 Job Number: 01208803.00 1 of 2 0 a o U n >. N O o LL a J~_ a a a) J o > w t o Lithologic Description and Drilling Comments: E a) 0 o � � m o � � � a � > � o � e > M rn E m N a. O o o 0 0 cn in v SILT (ML): light brown to moderate brown, minor very fine grained sand, moist. 6 10 20 10 70 20 6 17 M 10 70 20 6 29 U 10 70 20 6 5 N 25 10 70 20 6 8 g 10 70 20 6 10 v 10 70 20 78.5 SANDY SILT (ML): moderate brown, very fine to fine grained sand, minor clay, moist, random coarse gravel, rounded. 6 6 U) No No 3 30 50 20 6 15 30 50 20 6 16 U 30 50 20 6 4 ( 71.5 35-,o: 30 50 20 SAND (SW): moderate brown, fine to coarse grained 6 11 0 90 5 5 6 23 U ,u ::o, sand, minor silt and clay, wet. .a• .a p^p. . 4 6 8 4 .°P .,• 6 11 U 66.0 90 5 5 SILT (ML): brown, very fine grained sand, clayey, 6 22 65.5 10 70 20 moist. TOTAL DEPTH = 41.5 FEET BORING LOG B-1 Teesdale Food Waste Processing Figura: Environmental Consultants 3843 Brickway Boulevard, Suite 208 725 Central House Road Santa Rosa, California 95403 Oroville, California 95965 B-1 Ph.: 707-546-9461 Fax: 707-544-5769 Job Number: 01208803.00 2 of 2 Date (start, end): 7/8/08 - 7/8/08 Boring No. Boring Location: Olive Pomace Area Drilling Time (start, end) 11:35-12:00 B.2 Logged By: Stephen KnOttel See Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) Checked By: Steven Clements for Legend and information not noted. Drilling Contractor: RSI Drilling, Inc. MW Installed: Y ❑ N R if no, boring backfilled with: Drillers Name: Jorge Morales Cement R Bentonite: Cement ❑ GroutR Chips❑ Drilling Method: 8 -in. Hollow -Stem Auger Sampling Method: CMSS Auger Depth, ft: 5.0 Total Depth, ft: 6.5 Hammer weight / fall: 140 lbs / 30 inch Notes: Ground Elevation estimated from USGS Topographic map. ami OO N D N C O N N m m f0 ~ NE � _ a R o > > - J s c o o Lithologic Description and Drilling Comments: o_ N U N O d N y M O N W r CL a N > N O N e _ >. U) m US� a O o 107.0 0 00 (n in L) SANDY SILT with Gravel (ML): brown to reddish brown, very fine to fine grained sand, minor fine gravel, dry to moist. 1• 2— J 2 12 6 23 U) U No No 3- 20 30 40 10 U 6 50/6" 20 30 40 10 4 4j : 102.5 GRAVELLY SILT (ML): brown to tan with reddish 5 brown, fine gravel, minor very fine to medium grained 6 15 35 25 40 T sand, dry to moist, gravel is angular, primarilly weathered volcanic rocks. 6 31 U)35 U 25 40 T 6 6 50/6" 35 25 40 T 00.57 100.5- 7- TOTAL DEPTH = 6.5 FEET 8 1 11 SCS ENGINEERS BORING LOG B-2 Teesdale Food Waste Processing Figura: Environmental Consultants 3843 Brickway Boulevard, Suite 208 725 Central House Road Santa Rosa, California 95403 B-2 Oroville, Califomia 95965 " Ph.: 707-546-9461 Fax: 707-544-5769 Job Number: 01208803.00 1 of 1 Date (start, end): 7/8/08 - 7/8/08 Boring No. Boring Location: Southwest corner of Hog Pond. Drilling Time (start, end) 09:30 - 11:00 B-3. Logged By: Stephen KnOttel See Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) Checked By: Steven Clements for Legend and information not noted. Drilling Contractor: RSI Drilling, Inc. MW Installed: Y ❑ NO if no, boring backfilled with: Driller's Name: Jorge Morales Cement ® Bentonite: Cement ❑ Grout® Chips ❑ Drilling Method: 8 -in. Hollow -Stem Auger Sampling Method: CMSS Auger Depth, ft: 15.0 Total Depth, ft: 15.0 Hammer weight / fall: 140 lbs / 30 inch Notes: Ground Elevation estimated from USGS Topographic map. v a� 0 C >, H N N_ > r- 0 N a a E a `` o > w C L J L o a� Lithologic Description and Drilling Comments: N 0 N 0 N N O 'S N N CL > 12 v C o o = N cn m v) � a O 5 105.0 o O O U) Un U SILTY SAND with Gravel (SM): brown, fine to medium grained sand, fine gravel, moist (HOG POND BERM FILL). 0 6 6 6 6CO 8 U 99.0 SILTY SAND (SM): brown, fine to medium grained 6 9 No No sand, moist. 97'0 SANDY SILT (ML): dark brown,very fine to fine grained sand, minor clay, moist. 6 4 10 30 50 20 6 6 30 50 20 6 6 U 30 50 20 Moist to wet. 6 10 30 50 20 92'5 SAND with Silt (SP -SM) dark brown, very fine to fine grained sand, minor fine gravel, wet. 90.0 15 ' TOTAL DEPTH = 15.0 FEET SCS ENGINEERS BORING LOG B-3 Teesdale Food Waste Processing Environmental Consultants 3843 Brickway Boulevard, Suite 208 725 Central House Road Santa Rosa, California 95403 B-3 Oroville, California 95965 Ph.: 707-546-9461 Fax: 707-544-5769 Job Number: 01208803.00 1 of 1 Date (start, end): 7/8/08- 7/8/08 Boring No. Boring Location: East Pond. Drilling Time (start, end) 10:30 - 10:50 B-4 Logged By: Jason Greenlee See Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) Checked By: Stephen KnOttel for Legend and information not noted. Drilling Contractor: RSI Drilling, Inc. MW Installed: Y 0 N 0 if no, boring backfilled with: Drillees Name: Jorge Morales Cement 0 Bentonite: Cement [] Grout[] Chips® Drilling Method: 3 -in. Sampler Sampling Method: GRAB Auger Depth, ft: 5.5 Total Depth, ft: 5.5 Hammer weight / fall: n.a. Notes: Hole advanced with backhoe due to overhead high voltage lines; samples collected with hand-held slide hammer and barrel sampler. Ground Elevation estimated from USGS Topographic map. >a) U of C T ~ > ai E O m > N 0 J o a) 8_ a o s L o o Lithologic Description and Drilling Comments: nw r 0 3 o n m ❑ p rn W L d > a o > m U) m um) a O o 102.0 ❑ 0 01 � . U SILT with Sand (ML): brovgn, very fine grained sand, minor clay, dry to moist. 1 2 . 6 n.a. m No No 20 70 10 Moist to wet. U) 3- 98.5- SANDY SILT (ML): brown, very fne to fine grained Co 4 30 60 10 sand, minor clay, moist. 6 n.a. rn 96.5 TOTAL DEPTH = 5.5 FEET 7- 8- 810 9- 10 - I 11 SCS BORING LOG B-4 Teesdale Food Waste Processing Figure: Environmental Consultants 3843 Brickway Boulevard, Suite 208 725 Central House Road Santa Rosa, California 95403 Oroville, California 95965 B-4 Ph.: 707-546-9461 Fax: 707-544-5769 Job Number: 01208803.00 11 Of 1 Appendix B Kiff Analytical LLC Report #63627, dated July 22, 2008 'KIFF Report Number: 63627 Analytical LLCO Date : 07/22/2008 Stephen Knuttel SCS Engineers 3843 Brickway Blvd., Suite 208 Santa Rosa, CA 95403 'Subject: 6 Soil Samples and 4 Water Samples Project Name : Teesdale Property - Oroville Project Number: 01208803.00 ' Dear Mr. Knuttel, ' Chemical analysis of the samples referenced above has been completed. Summaries of the data are contained on the following pages. Sample(s) were received under documented chain-of-custody. US EPA protocols for sample storage and preservation were followed. Kiff Analytical is certified by the State of California (# 2236). If you have any questions regarding procedures or results, please call me at 530-297-4800. ' Sincerely, J 1 Kiff 1 ' 2795 2nd Street, Suite 300 Davis, CA 95618 530-297-4800 KIFF Analytical «c 0 Subject : 6 Soil Samples and 4 Water Samples Project Name : Teesdale Property - Oroville Project Number: 01208803.00 Case Narrative Report Number: 63627 Date: 07/22/2008 , The Method Reporting Limit for Beryllium has been increased due to the presence of an interfering element for sample WATER B-03 @ W. The Method Reporting Limit for Cadmium has been increased due to the presence of an interfering element for sample WATER B-03 @ W. Ivia;rix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate results associated with samples WATER HOG POND, WATER EAST POND, 1AIATER B-03 @ W, and WATER B-01 @ W for the analytes Aluminum and Silver were outside of control limits. This may indicate a bias for the sample that was spiked. Since the LCS recoveries were within control limiis, no data are flagged. Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate results associated with samples WATER HOG POND, WATER EAST POND, WATER B-03 @ W, and WATER B-01 @ W for the analytes Barium, Magnesium, and Sodium were affected by the analyte concentrations already present in the un -spiked sample. Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate results associated with samples SOIL B-3 @ 5.5', SOIL B-2 @ 3.0', SOIL B-1 @ 3.0', SOIL B-4 @ 2.5', SOIL HOG POND, and SOIL EAST POND for the analyte Antimony were outside of control limits. This may indicate a bias for the sample that was spiked. Since the LCS recoveries were within control limits, no data are flagged. Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate results associated with samples SOIL B-3 @ 5.5', SOIL B-2 @ 3.0', SOIL B-1 @ 3.0', SOIL B-4 @ 2.5', SOIL HOG POND, and SOIL EAST POND for the analytes Barium, Chromium, and Vanadium were affected by the analyte concentrations already present in the un -spiked sample. 2795 2nd Street, Suite 300 Davis, CA 95618 530-297-4800 'KIFF Report Number: 63627 Date : 07/22/2008 Analytical LLC 'Project Name : Teesdale Property - Oroville Project Number: 01208803.00 Sample: SOIL B-3 @ 5.5' Matrix: Soil Lab Number: 63627-01 Sample Date :07/08/2008 ' Method Measured Reporting Analysis Date Parameter Value Limit Units Method Analyzed Antimony < 0.75 0.75 mg/Kg EPA 60106. 07/17/2008 Arsenic 2.6 0.75 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Barium 160 0.50 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Beryllium 0.31 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 60106 07/17/2008 Cadmium < 0.50 0.50 mg/Kg EPA 60106 07/17/2008 Chromium 63 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 60106 07/17/2008 Cobalt 28 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 60106 07/17/2008 Copper 30 0.50 mg/Kg EPA 60106 07/17/2008 Lead 4.2 0.50 mg/Kg EPA 60106 07/17/2008 Molybdenum < 0.25 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Nickel 33 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Selenium < 0.75 0.75 mg/Kg EPA 60106 07/17/2008 Silver < 0.25 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Thallium < 0.75 0.75 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Vanadium 67 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 60106 07/17/2008 Zinc 28 1.0 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Mercury < 0.050 0.050 mg/Kg EPA 7471 07/11/2008 Sample: SOIL B-2 @ 3.0 Matrix : Soil Lab Number: 63627-03 Sample Date :07/08/2008 Method Measured Reporting Analysis Date Parameter Value Limit Units Method Analyzed Antimony < 0.75 0.75 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Arsenic 1.3 0.75 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Barium 160 0.50 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 'Beryllium 0.39 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 60106 07/17/2008 Cadmium < 0.50 0.50 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Chromium 70 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 60106 07/17/2008 'Cobalt 17 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 60106 07/17/2008 Copper 30 0.50 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Lead 2.1 0.50 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 'Molybdenum < 0.25 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 60101 07/17/2008 Nickel 59 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 60106 07/17/2008 Selenium < 0.75 0.75 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 2795 2nd St., Suite 300 Davis, CA 95616 •530-297-4800 I<IFF Analytical uc () Project Name : Teesdale Property - Oroville Project Number: 01208803.00 Sample: SOIL B-2 @ 3.0' Sample Date :07/08/2008 Report Number: 63627 Date : 07/22/2008 Matrix: Soil Lab Number: 63627-03 Sample Date :07/08/2008 Method Measured Reporting Analysis Date Parameter Value Limit Units Method Analyzed Silver < 0.25 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Thallium < 0.75 0.75 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Vanadium 69 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 60108 07/17/2008 Zinc 31 1.0 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Mercury < 0.050 0.050 mg/Kg EPA 7471 07/11/2008 Sample: SOIL B-1 @ 3.0' 40 Matrix: Soil mg/Kg Lab Number: 63627-05 07/17/2008 Sample Date :07/08/2008 2795 2nd St., Suite 300 Davis, CA 95616 530-297-4800 Method Measured Reporting Analysis Date Parameter Value Limit Units Method Analyzed Antimony < 0.75 0.75 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Arsenic 1.1 0.75 mg/Kg EPA 60108 07/17/2008 Barium 100 0.50 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Beryllium < 0.25 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 60108 07/17/2008 Cadmium < 0.50 0.50 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Chromium 40 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Cobalt 7.2 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Copper 22 0.50 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Lead 2.9 0.50 mg/Kg EPA 60108 07/17/2008 Molybdenum < 0.25 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Nickel 22 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Selenium < 0.75 0.75 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Silver < 0.25 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Thallium < 0.75 0.75 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Vanadium 40 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Zinc 33 1.0 mg/Kg EPA 60108 07/17/2008 Mercury < 0.050 0.050 mg/Kg EPA 7471 07/11/2008 2795 2nd St., Suite 300 Davis, CA 95616 530-297-4800 'KIFF Report Number: 63627 Date : 07/22/2008 Analytical LLC () IProject Name : Teesdale Property - Oroville Project Number: 01208803.00 Sample: SOIL B-4 @ 2.5' Matrix: Soil Lab Number: 63627-07 Sample Date :07/08/2008 Method Measured Reporting Analysis Date Parameter Value Limit Units Method Analyzed Antimony < 0.75 0.75 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Arsenic 2.3 0.75 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Barium 69 0.50 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Beryllium 0.33 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Cadmium < 0.50 0.50 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Chromium 60 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 'Cobalt 17 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Copper 25 0.50 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Lead 3.8 0.50 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Molybdenum < 0.25 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Nickel 25 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Selenium < 0.75 0.75 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Silver < 0.25 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Thallium < 0.75 0.75 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Vanadium 65 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Zinc 25 1.0 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Mercury < 0.050 0.050 mg/Kg EPA 7471 07/11/2008 Sample: SOIL HOG POND Matrix : Soil Lab Number: 63627-09 ' Sample Date :07/08/2008 Method Measured Reporting Analysis Date Parameter Value Limit Units Method Analyzed Antimony < 0.75 0.75 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Arsenic 2.3 0.75 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Barium 55 0.50 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 'Beryllium 0.29 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 60106 07/17/2008 Cadmium < 0.50 0.50- mg/Kg EPA 60106 07/17/2008 Chromium 58 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 60106 07/17/2008 Cobalt 14 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 60106 07/17/2008 Copper 27 0.50 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Lead 3.5 0.50 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Molybdenum < 0.25 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Nickel 25 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Selenium < 0.75 0.75 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 1 2795 2nd St., Suite 300 Davis, CA 95616 530-297-4800 I<IFF Analytical LLC () Project Name: Teesdale Property - Oroville Project Number: 01208803.00 Sample: SOIL HOG POND Sample Date :07/08/2008 Report Number: 63627 1 Date : 07/22/2008 Matrix : Soil Lab Number: 63627-09 2795 2nd St., Suite 300 Davis, CA 95616 530-297-4800 Method Measured Reporting Analysis Date Parameter Value Limit Units Method Analyzed Silver < 0.25 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Thallium < 0.75 0.75 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Vanadium 63 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Zinc 25 1.0 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Mercury < 0.050 0.050 mg/Kg EPA 7471 07/11/2008 Sample: SOIL EAST POND Matrix: Soil Lab Number: 63627-10 Sample Date :07/08/2008 Method Measured Reporting Analysis Date Parameter Value Limit Units Method Analyzed Antimony < 0.75 0.75 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Arsenic 2.4 0.75 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Barium 150 0.50 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Beryllium 0.36 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Cadmium < 0.50 0.50 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Chromium 56 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Cobalt 24 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Copper 29 0.50 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Lead 4.0 0.50 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Molybdenum < 0.25 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Nickel 38 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Selenium < 0.75 0.75 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Silver < 0.25 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Thallium < 0.75 0.75 mg/Kg EPA 60108 07/17/2008 Vanadium 63 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Zinc 30 1.0 mg/Kg EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Mercury < 0.050 0.050 mg/Kg EPA 7471 07/11/2008 2795 2nd St., Suite 300 Davis, CA 95616 530-297-4800 'KIFF Analytical LLC 'Project Name : Teesdale Property = Oroville Project Number: 01208803.00 I Sample: WATER HOG POND Report Number: 63627 Date: 07/22/2008 Matrix: Water Lab Number: 63627-11. Sample Date :07/08/2008 Method Measured Reporting Analysis Date Parameter Value Limit Units Method Analyzed Antimony < 0.015 0.015 mg/L EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Arsenic < 0.015 0.015 mg/L EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Barium 0.070 0.010 mg/L EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Beryllium < 0.0010 0.0010 mg/L EPA 60108 07/17/2008 Cadmium < 0.0010 0.0010 mg/l- EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Chromium < 0.0050 , 0.0050 mg/L EPA 60101 07/17/2008 'Cobalt 0.0050 0.0050 mg/L EPA 60106 07/17/2008 Copper 0.010 0.0050 mg/L EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Lead < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/L EPA 601013 07/17/2008 1 Molybdenum < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/L EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Nickel 0.015 0.0050 mg/L EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Selenium < 0.015 0.015 mg/L EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Silver < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/L EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Thallium < 0.015 0.015 mg/L EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Vanadium 0.015 0.0050 mg/L EPA 601013 07/17/2008 'Zinc < 0.010 0.010 mg/L EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Mercury < 0.00050 0.00050 mg/L EPA 7470 07/11/2008 Aluminum 0.055 0.050 mg/L EPA 60108 07/18/2008 Boron 0.24 0.020 mg/L EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Magnesium 26 0.10 mg/L EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Sodium 1900 0.50 mg/L EPA 601013 07/17/2008 . Iron 0.89 0.10 mg/L EPA 601013 07/17/2008 2795 2nd St., Suite 300 Davis, CA 95616 530-297-4800 KIFF Analytical LLC () Project Name : Teesdale Property - Oroville Project Number: 01208803.00 Sample: WATER EAST POND Report Number: 63627 Date : 07/22/2008 Matrix: Water Lab Number: 63627-12 Sample Date :07/08/2008 Method Measured Reporting Analysis Date Parameter Value Limit Units Method Analyzed Antimony < 0.015 0.015 mg/L EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Arsenic < 0.015 0.015 mg/L EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Barium 4.0 0.010 mg/L EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Beryllium < 0.0010 0.0010 mg/L EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Cadmium < 0.0010 0.0010 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Chromium < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/l- EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Cobalt < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Copper 0.023 0.0050 mg/L EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Lead < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/L EPA 60106 07/17/2008 Molybdenum < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/L EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Nickel 0.013 0.0050 mg/L EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Selenium < 0.015 0.015 mg/L EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Silver < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/L EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Thallium < 0.015 0.015 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Vanadium < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Zinc < 0.010 0.010 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Mercury < 0.00050 0.00050 mg/L EPA 7470 07/11/2008 Aluminum < 0.050 0.050 mg/L EPA 601013 07/18/2008 Boron 0.31 0.020 mg/L EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Magnesium 1400 0.40 mg/L EPA 601013 07/18/2008 Sodium 1800 0.50 mg/L EPA 601013 07/17/2008 Iron 0.66 0.10 mg/L EPA 601013 07/17/2008 2795 2nd St., Suite 300 Davis, CA 95616 530-2974800 'KIFF Report Number: 63627 Date : 07/22/2008 Analytical LLC (3 Project Name : Teesdale Property - Oroville Project Number: 01208803.00 Sample: WATER B-03 @ W Matrix: Water Lab Number: 63627-13 ' Sample Date :07/08/2008 Method Measured Reporting Analysis Date Parameter Value Limit Units Method Analyzed Antimony < 0.025 0.025 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Arsenic 0.14 0.030 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Barium 14 0.025 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 'Beryllium 0.031 0.025 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Cadmium 0.0075 0.050 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Chromium 4.9 0.025 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Cobalt 2.6 0.015 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Copper 3.0 0.025 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Lead 0.32 0.0090 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Molybdenum < 0.0070 0.0070 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Nickel 3.4 0.0050 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Selenium < 0.075 0.075 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17%2008 Silver < 0.015 0.015 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Thallium < 0.075 0.075 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Vanadium 6.0 0.020 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Zinc 2.7 0.050 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Mercury 0.0017 0.00050 mg/L EPA 7470 07/11/2008 Aluminum 1200 0.050 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Boron 0.068 0.040 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Magnesium 440 0.10 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Sodium 1200 0.50 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Iron 1800 0.10 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 2795 2nd St., Suite 300 Davis, CA 95616 530-297-4800 KIFF Analytical LLC () Project Name : Teesdale Property - Oroville Project Number: 01208803.00 Report Number: 63627 Date: 07/22/2008 Sample: WATER B-01 @ W Matrix: Water Lab Number: 63627-14 Sample Date :07/09/2008 Method Measured Reporting Analysis Date Parameter Value Limit Units Method Analyzed Antimony < 0.015 0.015 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Arsenic < 0.015 0.015 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Barium 0.56 0.010 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Beryllium 0.0030 0.0010 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Cadmium < 0.0010 0.0010 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Chromium 0.44 0.0050 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Cobalt 0.21 0.0050 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Copper 0.28 0.0050 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Lead 0.051 0.0050 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Molybdenum 0.0063 0.0050 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Nickel 0.32 0.0050 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Selenium < 0.015 0.015 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Silver < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/L EPA 60108 07/17/2008 Thallium < 0.015 0.015 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Vanadium 0.75 0.0050 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Zinc 0.32 0.010 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Mercury < 0.00050 0.00050 mg/L EPA 7470 07/11/2008 Aluminum 110 0.050 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Boron 0.093 0.020 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Magnesium 78 0.10 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Sodium 35 0.50 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Iron 200 0.10 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 2795 2nd St., Suite 300 Davis, CA 95616 530-297-4800 QC Report: Method Blank Data Project Name: Teesdale Property - Oroville Project Number: 01208803.00 Parameter Measured Value Method Reporting Limit Units Analysis Method Date Analyzed Antimony < 0.75 0.75 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 07/11/2008 Arsenic < 0.75 0.75 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 07/11/2008 Barium < 0.50 0.50 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 07/11/2008 Beryllium < 0.25 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 07/11/2008 Cadmium <0.50 0.50 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 07/11/2008 Chromium < 0.25 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 07/11/2008 Cobalt < 0.25 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 07/11/2008 Copper < 0.50 0.50 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 07/11/2008 Lead < 0.50 0.50 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 07/11/2008 Molybdenum < 0.25 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 07/11/2008 Nickel < 0.25 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 07/11/2008 Selenium < 0.75 0.75 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 07/11/2008 Silver < 0.25 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 07/11/2008 Thallium < 0.75 0.75 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 07/11/2008 Vanadium < 0.25 0.25 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 07/11/2008 Zinc < 1.0 1.0 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 07/11/2008 Mercury <0.050 0.050 mg/Kg EPA 7471 07/11/2008 Aluminum < 0.050 0.050 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Antimony < 0.015 0.015 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Arsenic < 0.015 0.015 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Barium < 0.010 0.010 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Beryllium < 0.0010 0.0010 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Boron < 0.020 0.020 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Cadmium < 0.0010 0.0010 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Chromium < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Cobalt < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Copper < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Iron < 0.10 0.10 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Lead < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Magnesium < 0.10 0.10 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Molybdenum < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Nickel < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Selenium < 0.015 0.015 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Report Number: 63627 Date : 07/22/2008 KIFF ANALYTICAL, LLC 2795 2nd Street, Suite 300 Davis, CA 95618 530-297-4800 Method Measured Reporting Analysis Date Parameter Value Limit Units Method Analyzed Silver < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Sodium < 0.50 0.50 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Thallium < 0.015 0.015 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Vanadium < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Zinc < 0.010 0.010 mg/L EPA 6010B 07/17/2008 Mercury < 0.00050 0.00050 mg/L EPA 7470 07/11/2008 Aluminum < 0.050 0.050 mg/L EPA 60108 07/21/2008 KIFF ANALYTICAL, LLC 2795 2nd Street, Suite 300 Davis, CA 95618 530-297-4800 QC Report: Matrix Spike/ Matrix Spike Duplicate Project Name : Teesdale Property - Oroville Project Number: 01208803.00 Report Number: 63627 Date : 07/22/2008 KIFF ANALYTICAL, LLC 2795 2nd Street, Suite 300 Davis, CA 95618 530-297-4800 M M M = M M M M = = = = = S Duplicate Spiked Duplicate Spiked Spiked Sample Relative Spike Spiked Spiked Sample Sample Relative Percent Percent Spiked Sample Spike Dup. Sample Sample Analysis Date Percent Percent Percent Recov. Diff. Parameter Sample Value Level Level Value Value Units Method Analyzed Recov. Recov. Diff. Limit Limit Antimony 63627-01 < 0.75 50.0 50.0 11.3 10.8 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 7/11/08 22.3 21.3 4.51 75-120 20 Arsenic 63627-01 3.4 50.0 50.0 50.6 52.0 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 7/11/08 94.4 97.3 2.87 75-120 20 Barium 63627-01 150 50.0 50.0 137 147 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 7/11/08 0.00 0.00 6.64 75-120 20 Beryllium 63627-01 0.33 50.0 50.0 52.6 53.1 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 7/11/08 105 106 0.851 75-120 20 Cadmium 63627-01 < 0.50 50.0 50.0 51.6 52.2 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 7/11/08 103 104 1.20 75-120 20 Chromium 63627-01 62 50.0 50.0 123 126 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 7/11/08 123 128 1.97 75-120 20 Cobalt 63627-01 27 50.0 50.0 66.8 68.2 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 7/11/08 79.1 82.0 2.15 75-120 20 Copper 63627-01 30 50.0 50.0 83.4 85.2 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 7/11/08 107 111 2.10 75-120 20 Lead 63627-01 3.9 50.0 50.0 55.6 56.5 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 7/11/08 103 105 1.56 75-120 20 Molybdenum 63627-01 0.28 50.0 50.0 39.2 40.0 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 7/11/08 77.8 79.4 1.96 75-120 20 Nickel 63627-01 33 50.0 50.0 85.2 86.8 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 7/11/08 105 108 1.86 75-120 20 Selenium 63627-01 < 0.75 50.0 50.0 49.4 50.8 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 7/11/08 98.9 102 2.69 75-120 20 Silver 63627-01 < 0.25 12.5 12.5 13.0 13.0 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 7/11/08 103 102 0.193 75-120 20 Thallium 63627-01 < 0.75 50.0 50.0 52.1 52.6 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 7/11/08 104 105 1.05 75-120 20 Vanadium 63627-01 67 50.0 50.0 126 129 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 7/11/08 119 124 1.70 75-120 20 Zinc 63627-01 27 50.0 50.0 86.0 87.4 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 7/11/08 118 120 1.50 75-120 20 Mercury 63627-01 < 0.050 0.100 0.100 0.122 0.127 mg/Kg EPA 7471 7/11/08 97.2 102 4.02 75-120 20 Aluminum 63627-12 0.064 0.400 0.400 0.559 0.578 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 124 128 3.24 75-120 20 Antimony 63627-12 < 0.015 0.400 0.400 0.468 0.477 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 117 119 1.94 75-120 20 Arsenic 63627-12 < 0.015 0.400 0.400 0.468 0.484 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 116 120 3.42 75-120 20 KIFF ANALYTICAL, LLC 2795 2nd Street, Suite 300 Davis, CA 95618 530-297-4800 M M M = M M M M = = = = = S w W. Report Number: 63627 QC Report: Matrix Spike/ Matrix Spike Duplicate Date : 07/22/2008 Project Name : Teesdale Property - Oroville Project Number: 01208803.00 Aluminum 63761-01 < 0.050 0.400 0.400 0.404 0.403 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/21/08 101 101 0.322 75-120 20 KIFF ANALYTICAL, LLC 2795 2nd Street, Suite 300 Davis, CA,95618 530-297-4800 Duplicate Spiked Duplicate Spiked Spiked Sample Relative Spike Spiked Spiked Sample Sample Relative Percent Percent Spiked Sample Spike Dup. Sample Sample Analysis Date Percent Percent Percent Recov. Diff. Parameter Sample Value Level Level Value Value Units Method Analyzed Recov. Recov. Diff. Limit Limit Barium 63627-12 4.0 0.400 0.400 4.48 4.56 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 114 132 1.66 75-120 20 Beryllium 63627-12 < 0.025 0.400 0.400 0.378 0.389 , mg/L EPA 60108 7/17/08 94.5 97.1 2.68 75-120 20 Boron 63627-12 0.31 0.400 0.400 0.766 0.778 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 115 118 1.57 75-120 20 Cadmium 63627-12 < 0.050 0.400 0.400 0.375 0.384 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 93.8 95.9 2.16 75-120 20 Chromium 63627-12 < 0.0050 0.400 0.400 0.409 0.418 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 102 104 2.32 75-120 20 Cobalt 63627-12 < 0.0050 0.400 0.400 0.380 0.390 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 94.1 96.4 2.36 75-120 20 Copper 63627-12 0.023 0.400 0.400 0.463 0.475 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 110 113 2.47 75-120 20 Iron 63627-12 0.66 0.400 0.400 1.04 1.06 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 96.5 102 2.09 75-120 20 Lead 63627-12 < 0.0050 0.400 0.400 0.362 0.370 mg/L EPA 6010B '7/17/08 90.4 92.4 2.08 75-120. 20 Magnesium 63627-12 220 0.400 0.400 223 222 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 0.00 0.00 0.539 75-120 20 Molybdenum 63627-12 < 0.0050 0.400 0.400 0.411 0.422 , mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 102 105 2.76 75-120 20 Nickel 63627-12 0.013 0.400 0.400 0.381 0.389, mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 91.9 93.9 2.08 75-120 20 Selenium 63627-12 < 0.075 0.400 0.400 0.460 0.476 mg/L` EPA 60106 7/17/08 113 117 3.50 75-120 20 Silver 63627-12 < 0.0050 0.100 0.100 0.120 0.124 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 120 124 '3.52 75-120 20 Sodium 63627-12 1700 0.400 0.400. 1730 1700 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 0.00 0.00 1.87 75-120 20 Thallium 63627-12 < 0.075 0.400 0.400 0.352 0.360 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 87.0 89.0 2.25 75-120 20 Vanadium 63627-12 < 0.0050 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.409 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 98.8 101 2.32 75-120 20 Zinc 63627-12 < 0.010 - 0.400 0.400 0.470 0.480 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 116 118 2.08 75-120 20 Mercury 63669-01 < 0.00050 0.00100 0.00100 0.00108 0.00110 mg/L EPA 7470 7/11/08 101 103 1.83 75-120 20 Aluminum 63761-01 < 0.050 0.400 0.400 0.404 0.403 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/21/08 101 101 0.322 75-120 20 KIFF ANALYTICAL, LLC 2795 2nd Street, Suite 300 Davis, CA,95618 530-297-4800 QC Report: Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) Project Name : Teesdale Property - Oroville Project Number: 01208803.00 Report Number: 63627 Date : 07/22/2008 KIFF ANALYTICAL, LLC _ J95 JJ J ee a 3%Wvis, rA Q561Wf-2%WO l� LCS LCS Percent Spike Analysis Date Percent Recov. Parameter Level Units Method Analyzed Recov. Limit Antimony 50.0 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 7/11/08 100 75-120 Arsenic 50.0 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 7/11/08 101 75-120 Barium 50.0 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 7/11/08 102 75-120 Beryllium 50.0 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 7/11/08 103 75-120 Cadmium 50.0 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 7/11/08 101 75-120 Chromium 50.0 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 7/11/08 104 75-120 Cobalt 50.0 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 7/11/08 102 75-120 Copper 50.0 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 7/11/08 104 75-120 Lead 50.0 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 7/11/08 103 75-120 Molybdenum 50.0 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 7/11/08 99.8 75-120 Nickel 50.0 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 7/11/08 102 75-120 Selenium 50.0 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 7/11/08 100 75-120 Silver 12.5 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 7/11/08 100 75-120 Thallium 50.0 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 7/11/08 104 75-120 Vanadium 50.0 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 7/11/08 99.4 75-120 Zinc 50.0 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 7/11/08 103 75-120 Mercury 0.100 mg/Kg EPA 7471 7/11/08 103 75-120 Aluminum 0.400 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 97.8 75-120 Antimony 0.400 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 101 75-120 Arsenic 0.400 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 99.2 75-120 KIFF ANALYTICAL, LLC _ J95 JJ J ee a 3%Wvis, rA Q561Wf-2%WO l� QC Report: Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) Project Name : Teesdale Property - Oroville Project Number: 01208803.00 Report Number: 63627 Date : 07/22/2008 KIFF ANALYTICAL, LLC 2795 2nd Street, Suite 300 Davis, CA 95618 530-297-4800 LCS LCS Percent Spike Analysis Date Percent Recov. Parameter Level Units Method Analyzed Recov. Limit Barium 0.400 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 100 75-120 Beryllium 0.400 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 97.6 75-120 Boron 0.400 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 97.4 75-120 Cadmium 0.400 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 100 75-120 Chromium 0.400 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 102 75-120 Cobalt 0.400 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 101 75-120 Copper 0.400 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 96.8 75-120 Iron 0.400 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 99.0 75-120 Lead 0.400 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 102 75-120 Magnesium 0.400 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 102 75-120 Molybdenum 0.400 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 98.8 75-120 Nickel 0.400 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 101 75-120 Selenium 0.400 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 99.6 75-120 Silver 0.100 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 100 • 75-120 Sodium 0.400 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 99.2 '75-120 , Thallium 0.400 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 104 75-120 Vanadium 0.400 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 95.5 75-120 Zinc 0.400 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/17/08 103 75-120 Mercury 0.00100 mg/L EPA 7470 7/11/08 106 75-120 Aluminum 0.400 mg/L EPA 6010B 7/21/08 106 75-120 KIFF ANALYTICAL, LLC 2795 2nd Street, Suite 300 Davis, CA 95618 530-297-4800 CALIFORNIA LABORATORY SERVICES 3249 Fitzgerald Road Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 July 16, 2008 CLS Work Order #: CRG0290 COC #: 63627 Angelique Showman KIFF Analytical 2795 Second St. Suite 300 Davis, CA 95616 Project Name: Teesdale Property - Oroville Enclosed are the results of analyses for samples received by the laboratory on 07/09/08 14:32. Samples were analyzed pursuant to client request utilizing EPA or other ELAP approved methodologies. I certify that the results are in compliance both technically and for completeness. Analytical results are attached to this letter. Please call if we can provide additional assistance. Sincerely, J� James Liang, Ph.D. Laboratory Director CA DOHS ELAP Accreditation/Registration number 1233 I CALIFORNIA LABORATORY SERVICES Page 1 of 7 07/16/08 14:10 KIFF Analytical Project: Teesdale Property - Oroville 2795 Second St. Suite 300 Project Number: 01208803.00 CLS Work Order #: CRG0290 Davis, CA 95616 Project Manager: Angelique Showman COC #: 63627 C wl V KIFF Dad's Second Street. Suite 3011 3249 Fitz erald Road Oays, CA 95618 9 Lab 530 297.4800 Rancho Cordova; CA 95742 AnaiytiCal LLC Fac 530.291.4808 916-638-7301 COC No. 63627 Page , of 1 Project(,ontact(HardoopyorPDFto): EDF Report? YES Chain -of -Custody Record and Analysis Request An efique Showman s Company/Address' rt�comne eeaanrms corvn , m Kill Analytical sampling coompany Los code aEND WG Analysis Request .v Phone No.: Flo •r 10ba' 7 iu: PENDING 530-2974800 530-297-4808 Pmicri Kimber J P.O. No:: x Deliverables to (Email Addiies,F �• 01208803.00 63627 inbox kiffanal •7ca1.norn Project Name: Container 1 Preservative Matrix p A i'Kradale PrppHiy - 0100 1e n ' Prosect Address: ' J Sam ling 4 z a `a Sample E W g y° a 9 ° •m " Designation Date Time r W LL ' WATER NOG FOND 07/08/08 12:00 2. 1 X X X X X. WATER EAST POND 07/08/081,13-00 ° 2 1 < X X X X X WATER 8.03 @ W 07/08/CB 10:40 2 1 X X X X X ■ WATER B-01 @ W 07109/08 07;10 2 1 X XIX X X ■ r - i -41I it = —ata 1 -me ReWv8d by: Remarks: Please refer to attached Test ` I" trffAna{j� ta 0908 I'M ,. Retnqulihed by Date Tmte Reueived by: eMd by: Date rm° I'M by o h 3a 1o: Accounts Payable ■ ■ ■ X X X X ■ CA DOHS ELAP Accreditation/Registration Number 1233 3249 Fitzgerald Road Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 www.californialab.com 916-638-7301 Fax: 916-638-4510 CALIFORNIA LABORATORY SERVICES Page 2 of 7 07/16/08 14:10 KIFF Analytical Project: Teesdale Property - Oroville 2795 Second St. Suite 300 Project Number: 01208803.00 CLS Work Order #: CRG0290 Davis, CA 95616 Project Manager: Angelique Showman COC #: 63627 Conventional Chemistry Parameters by APHA/EPA Methods Reporting knalyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes Water Hog Pond (CRG0290-01) Water Sampled: 07/08/08 12:00 Received: 07/09/08 14:32 Biochemical Oxygen Demand 19 3.0 mg/L 1 CRO5651 07/10/08 07:00 07/15/08 SM5210B Bromide 0.52 0.10 " CR05608 07/10/08 06:23 07/10/08 EPA 300.0 Chloride 3300 50 100 07/10/08 06:23 07/11/08 " Fluoride ND 0.10 1 07/10/08 06:23 07/10/08 " Nitrate as N ND 0.50 " " 07/10/08 06:23 07/10/08 " Orthophosphate as PO4 22 3.8 25 CRO5627 07/10/08 09:51 07/10/08 SM4500-P E Sulfate as SO4 4.3 0.50 1 CR05608 07/10/08 06:23 07/10/08 EPA 300.0 Total Dissolved Solids 5700 10 " CRO5626 07/10/08 09:26 07/14/08 SM2540C Water East Pond (CRG0290-02) Water Sampled: 07/08/08 13:00 Received: 07/09/08 14:32 CR05626 Biochemical Oxygen Demand ND 6.0 mg/L 1 CR05651 07/10/08 07:00 07/15/08 SM5210B Bromide 0.15 0.10 " CR05608 07/10/08 06:23 07/10/08 EPA 300.0 Chloride 10000 250 500 07/10/08 06:23 07/14/08 " t Fluoride 1.5 0.10 1 07/10/08 06:23 07/10/08 " Nitrate as N ND 0.50 07/10/08 06:23 07/10/08 Orthophosphate as PO4 ND 0.15 CR05627 07/10/08 09:51 07/10/08 SM4500-P E Sulfate as SO4 ND 0.50 CR05608 07/10/08 06:23 07/10/08 EPA 300.0 Total Dissolved Solids 29000 10 CR05626 07/10/08 09:26 07/14/08 SM2540C Water B-03 @ W (CRG0290-03) Water Sampled: 07/08/0810:40 Received: 07/09/0814:32 ' Biochemical Oxygen Demand 9.3 3.0 mg/L 1 CR05651 07/10/08 07:00 07/15/08 SM5210B Specific Conductance (EC) 7200 1.0 µmhos/cm CR05622 07/10/08 08:52 07/10/08 EPA 120.1 pH 6.53 0.01 pH Units CR05616 07/10/08 07:45 07/10/08 SM4500-H B HT -F Total Dissolved Solids 4600 10 mg/L CR05626 07/10/08 09:26 07/14/08 SM2540C CA DOHS ELAP Accreditation/Registration Number 1233 3249 Fitzgerald Road Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 www.californialab.com 916-638-7301 Fax: 916-638-4510 1 ' CALIFORNIA LABORATORY SERVICES , Conventional Chemistry Parameters by APHA/EPA Methods Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes ' Water B-01 @W (CRG0290-04) Water Sampled: 07/09/0807:10 Received: 07/09/08 14:32 Biochemical Oxygen Demand 14 3.0 mg/L 1 CR05651 07/10/08 07:00 07/15/08 SM5210B Specific Conductance (EC) 660 1.0 µmhos/cm CR05622 07/10/08 08:52 07/10/08 EPA 120.1 ' pH 6.98 0.01 pH Units, CR05616 07/10/08 07:45 07/10/08 SM4500-H B HT -F Total Dissolved Solids 420 10 mg/L II CRO5626 07/10/08 09:26 07/14/08 SM2540C 1 CA DOHS ELAP Accreditation/Registration Number 1233 ' 3249 Fitzgerald Road Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 www.californialab.com 916-638-7301 Fax: 916-638-4510 CALIFORNIA LABORATORY SERVICES Page 4 of 7 07/16/08 14:10 KIFF Analytical Project: Teesdale Property - Oroville 2795 Second St. Suite 300 Project Number: 01208803.00 CLS Work Order #: CRG0290 Davis, CA 95616 Project Manager: Angelique Showman COC #: 63627 Conventional Chemistry Parameters by APHA/EPA Methods - Quality Control Reporting Spike Source %REC RPD Analyte Result Limit Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes Batch CRO5608 - General Prep Blank (CR05608-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 07/10/08 Prepared & Analyzed: 07/10/08 Chloride ND 0.50 mg/L Fluoride ND 0.10 " Bromide ND 0.10 " Sulfate as SO4 ND 0.50 " Nitrate as N ND 0.50 " LCS (CR05608-BS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 07/10/08 Bromide 2.12 0.10 mg/L 2.00 106 80-120 Chloride 2.02 0.50 2.00 101 80-120 Fluoride 2.05 0.10 2.00 102 80-120 Sulfate as SO4 5.03 0.50 5.00 101 80-120 Nitrate as N 0.454 0.50 0.451 101 80-120 LCS Dup (CR05608-BSDI) Prepared & Analyzed: 07/10/08 Bromide 2.15 0.10 mg/L 2.00 108 80-120 1.55 20 Chloride 2.05 0.50 2.00 102 80-120 1.28 20 Fluoride 2.16 0.10 2.00 108 80-120 5.09 20 Sulfate as SO4 5.12 0.50 5.00 102 80-120 1.70 20 Nitrate as N 0.466 0.50 0.451 103 80-120 2.70 20 Matrix Spike (CR05608-MS1) Source: CRG0291-01 Prepared & Analyzed: 07/10/08 Sulfate as SO4 75.1 0.50 mg/L 5.00 73.8 25.2 75-125 QM -4X Bromide 2.30 0.10 2.00 0.0940 110 75-125 Fluoride 2.34 0.10 2.00 0.180 108 75-125 Chloride 21.1 0.50 2.00 19.8 63.4 75-125 QM4X Nitrate as N 1.09 0.50 0.451 0.575 115 80-120 Matrix Spike Dup (CR05608-MSD1) Source: CRG0291-01 Prepared & Analyzed: 07/10/08 Chloride 21.3 0.50 mg/L 2.00 19.8 74.4 75-125 1.04 25 QM -4X Sulfate as SO4 75.2 0.50 5.00 73.8 27.1 75-125 0.128 25 QM4X Fluoride 2.43 0.10 2.00 0.180 113 75-125 3.94 25 Bromide 2.34 0.10 2.00 0.0940 112 75-125 2.07 25 Nitrate as N 1.03 0.50 0.451 0.575 101 80-120 5.68 20 CA DOHS ELAP Accreditation/Registration Number 1233 3249 Fitzgerald Road Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 www.californialab-com 916-638-7301 Fax: 916-638-4510 1 CALIFORNIA LABORATORY SERVICES ' Page 5 of 7 I 07/16/08 14:10 KIFF Analytical Project: Teesdale Property - Oroville 2795 Second St. Suite 300 Project Number: 01208803.00 CLS Work Order #: CRG0290 Davis, CA 95616 Project Manager: Angelique Showman COC #: 63627 Conventional. Chemistry Parameters by APHA/EPA Methods - Quality Control Reporting Spike Source %REC RPD Analyte Result Limit Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes Batch .CR05608 - General Prep Batch CR05622 - General Preparation ' Blank (CR05622-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 07/10/08 Specific Conductance (EC) ND 1.0 µmhos/cm , ' Batch CRO5626 - General Preparation Blank (CR05626-BLK1) Prepared: 07/10/08 Analyzed: 07/14/08 Total Dissolved Solids ND 10 mg/L Duplicate (CR05626-DUPl) Source: CRG0296-04 Prepared: 07/10/08 Analyzed: 07/14/08 Total Dissolved Solids 265 10 mg/L 267 0.752 20 Batch CR05627 - General Preaaration Blank (CR05627-BLKi) Prepared & Analyzed: 07/10/08 Orthophosphate as PO4 ND 0.15 mg/L LCS (CR05627-BS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 07/10/08 Orthophosphate as PO4 0.950 0.15 mg/L 0.918 104 • 80-120 'LCS Dup (CR05627-BSD1) Prepared & Analyzed: 07/10/08 - Orthophosphate as PO4 0.921 0.15 mg/L 0.918 100 80-120 3.11 20 Matrix Spike (CR05627-MS1) Source: CRG0270-02 Prepared & Analyzed: 07/10/08 Orthophosphate as PO4 1.40 0.15 mg/L 0.918 0.504 97.3 75-125 CA DOHS ELAP Accreditation/Registration Number 1233 ' 3249 Fitzgerald Road Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 www.californialab.com 916-638-7301. Fax: 916-638-4510 CALIFORNIA LABORATORY SERVICES Page 6 of 7 07/16/08 14:10 KIFF Analytical Project: Teesdale Property - Oroville 2795 Second St. Suite 300 Project Number: 01208803.00 CLS Work Order #: CRG0290 Davis, CA 95616 Project Manager: Angelique Showman COC #: 63627 Conventional Chemistry Parameters by APHA/EPA Methods - Quality Control Reporting Spike Source %REC RPD Analyte Result Limit Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes Batch CR05627 - General Preparation I Matrix Spike Dup (CR05627-MSDI) Source: CRG0270-02 Prepared & Analyzed: 07/10/08 Orthophosphate as PO4 1.36 0.15 mg/L 0.918 0.504 93.6 75-125 2.46 25 , Batch CR05651 - General Blank (CR05651-BLKI) Prepared: 07/10/08 Analyzed: 07/15/08 Biochemical Oxygen Demand ND 3.0 mg/L LCS (CR05651-BSI) Prepared: 07/10/08 Analyzed: 07/15/08 Biochemical Oxygen Demand 171 3.0 mg/L 167 103 82.3-138 ' LCS Dup (CR05651-BSDI) Prepared: 07/10/08 Analyzed: 07/15/08 Biochemical Oxygen Demand 162 3.0 mg/L 167 97.2 82.3-138 5.41 21 1 CA DOHS ELAP Accreditation/Registration Number 1233 3249 Fitzgerald Road Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 www.californialab.com 916-638-7301 Fax: 916-638-4510 ' 1 CALIFORNIA LABORATORY SERVICES Page 7 of 7 07/16/08 14:10 KIFF Analytical Project: Teesdale Property - Oroville 2795 Second St, Suite 300 Project Number: 01208803.00 CLS Work Order #: CRG0290 Davis, CA 95616 Project Manager: Angelique Showman COC #: 63627 Notes and Definitions ' QM4X The spike recovery was outside of QC acceptance limits for the MS and/or MSD due to analyte concentration at 4 times or greater the spike concentration. The QC batch was accepted based on LCS and/or LCSD recoveries within the acceptance limits. HT -F This is a field test method and it is performed in the lab outside holding time. DET Analyte DETECTED ND Analyte NOT DETECTED at or above the reporting limit ' NR Not Reported dry Sample results reported on a dry weight basis RPD Relative Percent Difference 1 CA DOHS ELAP Accreditation/Registration Number 1233 r3249 Fitzgerald Road Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 www.californialab.com 916-638-7301' Fax: 916-638-4510 alscience . fiw_nvironmental Amw aboratories, Inc. July 18, 2008 Joel Kiff Kiff Analytical 2795 2nd Street, Suite 300 Davis, CA 95616-6593 Subject: Calscience Work Order No.: 08=07-0840 Client Reference: Teesdale Property - Oroville Dear Client: Page 1 of 12 o �N ACC09O Enclosed is an analytical report for the above -referenced project. The samples included in this report were received 7/10/2008 and analyzed in accordance with the attached chain -of -custody. Unless otherwise noted, all analytical testing was accomplished in accordance with the guidelines established in our Quality Systems Manual, applicable standard operating procedures, and other related documentation. The original report of subcontracted analysis, if any, is provided herein, and follows the standard Calscience data package. The results in this analytical report are limited to the samples tested and any reproduction thereof must be made in its entirety. If you have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Sincerely, e �� . "/, ?ft & L Calscience Environmental Laboratories, Inc. Amanda Porter Project Manager CA-ELAP ID: 1230 0 NELAP ID: 03220CA 0 CSDLAC ID: 10109 0 SCAQMD ID: 93LA0830 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 Page 2 of 12 alscience a \%AA C G pqO nvironmental Analytical Report ' '' ¢ Ine 1 � aborator�es, Inc. .a Kiff Analytical Date Received: 07/10/08 2795 2nd Street, Suite 300 Work Order No: 08-07-0840 ' Davis, CA 95616-6593 ' Project: Teesdale Property - Oroville Result RL DF Qual Units Page 1 of 3 Client Sample Number Lab Sample Number. Date . Collect.ed Matrix 0.50 1 ' SOIL B-3 @ 5.5' ` F ..-08-0748404 07/08108; Solid - ' u ' Parameter Result Cyanide, Total ND RL DF Qual Units 0.50 1 mg/kg Date Prepared 07/13/08 Date Analyzed Method 07/14/08 EPA 901013/9014 SOIL B4 @ 3:0' 08-07-08403 07/08/08 Solid " Date Prepared Parameter Result RL DF Qual Units Date Prepared Date Analyzed Method Cyanide, Total ND 0.50 1 mg/kg 07/13/08 07/14/08 EPA 901013/9014 SOIL B-1 @':'3'.0' 08-07-0840-5 07/08/08 Solid Parameter Result RL DF Qual Units Date Prepared Date Analyzed . Method Cyanide, Total ND 0.50 1 mg/kg 07/13/08 07/14/08 EPA 901013/9014 ,SOIL 13.4@ 2.5' �` .08-07-0840-7 07/08/08, Solid y Parameter Result RL DF Qual Units Date Prepared Date Analyzed Method Cyanide, Total ND 0.50 1 mg/kg 07/13/08 07/14/08 EPA 90108/9014 SOIL HOG POND - ' u 0847.0840+9 '07108/08'. Solid Parameter Result RL DFQua[ Units Date Prepared Date Analyzed Method Cyanide, Total ND 0.50 1 mg/kg 07/13/08 07/14/08 EPA 901013/9014 ' RL - Reporting Limit DF - Dilution Factor Qual - Qualifiers 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427. • TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 Page 3 of 12 alscience O , N ACC 0,9 Analytical Report ' nvironmental aboratori - _ �. es, Inc. Kiff Analytical Date Received: 07/10/08 ' 2795 2nd Street, Suite 300 Work Order No: 08-07-0840 Davis, CA 95616-6593 ' Project: Teesdale Property - Oroville Page 2 of 3 ' Lab Sample Number Date Client Sample Number Collected Matrix SOIL EAST POND 08-07-084040 07/08/08 Solid ' Parameter Result RL DF Qual Units Date Prepared Date Analyzed Method ' Cyanide, Total ND 0.50 1 mg/kg 07/13/08 07/14/08 EPA 9010B/9014 WATER HOG POND 08-07-0840-11 07/08/08 Aqueous Parameter Result RL DF Qual Units Date Prepared Date Analyzed Method ' Chemical Oxygen Demand 340 20 1 mg/L 07/15/08 07/15/08 EPA 410.4 Hardness, Total 270 10 5 mg/L N/A 07/15/08 SM 2340 C Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen 12 0.50 1 mg/L 07/14/08 07/14/08 SM 4500 N Org B Cyanide, Total Cyanide, Total ND 0.050 1 mg/L 07/13/08 07/13/08 SM 4500 -CN E WATER EAST POND 08-07-0840-12 07/08/08 Aqueous Parameter Result RL DF Qual Units Date Prepared Date Analyzed Method ' Chemical Oxygen Demand 260 20 1 mg/L 07/15/08 07/15/08 EPA 410.4 Hardness, Total 2000 20 10 mg/L N/A 07/15/08 SM 2340 C Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen 3.6 0.50 1 mg/L 07/14/08 07/14/08 SM 4500 N Org B ' Cyanide, Total ND 0.050 1 mg/L 07/13/08 07/13/08 SM 4500 -CN E Qual -Qualifiers WATER B-03 @ W 08-07-084043 07/08/08 Aqueous Parameter Result RL DF Qual Units Date Prepared Date Analvzed Method ' Chemical Oxygen Demand 230 20 1 mg/L 07/15/08 07/15/08 EPA 410.4 Hardness, Total 1700 20 10 mg/L N/A 07/15/08 SM 2340 C Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen 2.4 0.50 1 mg/L 07/14/08 07/14/08 ' SM 4500 N Org B Cyanide, Total ND 0.050 1 mg/L 07/13/08 07/13/08 SM 4500 -CN E RL -Reporting Limit DF -Dilution Factor Qual -Qualifiers , 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 ' Method Blank - �� , N/A :Aqueous � Parameter Result Page 4 of 12 alscience Units o �N A G C 0,9 Date Analyzed Method V `_nvironmental Analytical Report 1 mg/L a 07/15/08 EPA 410.4 Cyanide, Total ND Am aboratories, Inc. 1 . a , LU U `�1 ' Kiff Analytical 07/14/08 07/10/08 Date Received: 2795 2nd Street, Suite 300 Work Order No: 08-07-0840 Davis, CA 95616-6593 N/A 07/15/08 ' Project: Teesdale Property - Oroville ' Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen Page 3 of 3. 0.50 Lab Sample Number Date mg/L Client Sample Number Collected Matrix SM 4500 N Org B ' WATER B-01 W , ,. M07-0840-14 - 07/09108 Aqueous" 1 mg/L 07/13/08 07/13/08 , SM 4500 -CN E ' Parameter Result RL DF ual Units Date Prepared Date Analyzed Method Chemical Oxygen Demand 42 20 1 mg/L 07/15/08 07/15/08 EPA 410.4 Hardness, Total 460 20 10 mg/L N/A 07/15/08 SM 2340 C Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen 1.1 0.50 1 mg/L 07/14/08 07/14/08 SM 4500 N Org B Cyanide, Total ND 0.050 1 mg/L 07/13/08 07/13/08 SM 4500 -CN E ' Method Blank - �� , N/A :Aqueous � Parameter Result RL DF Qual Units Date Prepared Date Analyzed Method Chemical Oxygen Demand ND 20 1 mg/L 07/15/08 07/15/08 EPA 410.4 Cyanide, Total ND 0.50 1 mg/kg 07/13/08 07/14/08 EPA 901013/9014 Hardness, Total ND 2.0 1 mg/L N/A 07/15/08 SM 2340 C ' Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen ND 0.50 1 mg/L 07/14/08 07/14/08 SM 4500 N Org B Cyanide, Total ND 0.050 1 mg/L 07/13/08 07/13/08 , SM 4500 -CN E ' RL - Reporting Limit DF - Dilution Factor Qual -Qualifiers k ' 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 alscience nvironmental mff aboratories, Inc. Kiff Analytical 2795 2nd Street, Suite 300 Davis, CA 95616-6593 Quality Control - Duplicate Date Received: Work Order No: Page 5 of 12 ��O �N ACC090 - N/A 08-07-0840 Project: Teesdale Property - Oroville , Matrix:, Aqueous ' Parameter Method QC Sample ID Date Analyzed Sample Conc DUP Conc RPD RPD CL Qualifiers Hardness, Total SM 2340 C WATER HOG POND 07/15/08 270 270 0 0-25 Chemical Oxygen Demand EPA 410.4 08-07-1172-1 07/15/08 110 110 2 0-25 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen SM 4500 N Org B WATER B-01 @ W 07/14/08 1.1 1.1 0 0-25 RPD -Relative Percent Difference , CL -Control Limit ' 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427. TEL:(714) 895-5494. FAX: (714) 894-7501 Page 6 of 12 ' � ' alscience �N A C C 0,9 nvironmental Quality Control - LCS/LCS Duplicate Q°\� 20 aboratories, Inc. _ N/A ' Kiff Analytical Date Received: 2795 2nd Street, Suite 300 Work Order No: 08-07-0840 ' Davis, CA 95616-6593 ' Project: Teesdale Property - Oroville M'atrnx: $olid h: - k -�. r� •' ' Quality Control Date Date LCS % LCSD % °o/ REC RPD Parameter Method Sample ID Extracted Analyzed REC REC CL RPD CL clual Cyanide, Total EPA 901013/90 099-05-029-1,854 07/13/08 07/14/08 84 83 80-120 1 0-20 ' Cyanide, Total SM 4500 -CN E 099-05-061-2,324 07/13/08 07/13/08 .84 84 ` 80-120 0 0-20 7 ' RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427. TEL:(714) 895-5494. FAX: (714) 894-7501 Page 7 of 12 alscience tA A C C o , ` ., • :,1 tin ' nvironmental hei ;1' Glossary of Terms and Qualifiers aboratories, Inc. Work Order Number: 08-07-0840 ' Qualifier Definition See applicable analysis comment. 1 Surrogate compound recovery was out of control due to a required sample dilution, ' therefore, the sample data was reported without further clarification. 2 Surrogate compound recovery was out of control due to matrix interference. The ' associated method blank surrogate spike compound was in control and, therefore, the sample data was reported without further clarification. 3 Recovery of the Matrix Spike (MS) or Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) compound was out of control due to matrix interference. The associated LCS and/or LCSD was in control and, therefore, the sample data was reported without further clarification. 4 The MS/MSD RPD was out of control due to matrix interference. The LCS/LCSD RPD , was in control and, therefore, the sample data was reported without further clarification. 5 The PDS/PDSD associated with this batch of samples was out of control due to a matrix , interference effect. The associated batch LCS/LCSD was in control and, hence, the associated sample data was reported with no further corrective action required. A Result is the average of all dilutions, as defined by the method. , B Analyte was present in the associated method blank. C Analyte presence was not confirmed on primary column. , E Concentration exceeds the calibration range. H Sample received and/or analyzed past the recommended holding time. ' J Analyte was detected at a concentration below the reporting limit and above the laboratory method detection limit. Reported value is estimated. ME A Marginal Exceedance (ME) is defined as a LCS percent recovery beyond the normal 3 , standard deviation Control Limits but still within the marginal exceedance limits (set at 4 standard deviations from the mean) N Nontarget Analyte. ' ND Parameter not detected at the indicated reporting limit. Q Spike recovery and RPD control limits do not apply resulting from the parameter ' concentration in the sample exceeding the spike concentration by a factor of four or greater. U Undetected at the laboratory method detection limit. ' X % Recovery and/or RPD out -of -range. Z Analyte presence was not confirmed by second column or GC/MS analysis. ' 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL:(714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501 2795 Second Street, Suite 300 Calscience KIFF Davis, CA 95618 7440 Lincoln Way OFax: Lab: 530.297.4800 Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 O��p Analytical t_Lc 530.297.4808 714-895-5494 COC No. 6 Page 1 of 2 Project Contact (Hardcopy or PDF to): EDF Report? YES Chain-of-Custody Record and Analysis Request Angelique Showman Company/Address: Recommended but not mandatory to complete this section: Klff Analytical Analysis Request a+ d c Sampling Company Log Code: • SCSD Phone No.: FAX No.: Global ID: SL060073434 530-297-4800 530-297-4808 Project Number: P.O. No.: Deliverables to (Email Address): 01208803.00 _ 63627 inbox kiffanal tical.como0 00 N T C N Project Name: Container / Preservative Matrix Teesdale Property - Oroville ca E d c rn o z_ tp �, v N N O N = o z = o z o = Project Address: Sampling = fn N N N T O T _ M ` U. Sample E" 0� a W Y o ' D@S19rlatlOrl Date Time J O Q O O Q J �_ Q y fe ,��, J .- N v� N to U' U= x SOIL B-3 @ 5.5' 07/08/08 09:50 1 X1 I X X k SOIL B-3 @ 10.0' 07/08/08 10:00 1 X1 I X X Z, SOIL B-2 @ 3.0' 07/08/08 11:40 1 X X X SOIL B-2 @ 5.5' 07/08/08 11:50 1 X X X SOIL B-1 @ 3.0' 07/08/08 12:30 1 X X X SOIL B-1 @ 6.0' 07/08/08 12:40 1 X X X SOIL B-4 @ 2.5' 07/08/08 10:35 1 XX X SOIL B-4 @ 5.0' 07/08/08 10:45 1 X X X g SOIL HOG POND 107/08/08 07/08/08 12:35 1 X X X SO AST POND 13:15 1 X X X elinquish by: 14IFF Date Time Received by: Remarks: ,9,a! 7.6 a 19a- Re qu' ed y: Date Time Received by:- Relinquished by: �pc� Date , a,, Time Received y La atory: t��, Bill to: Accounts Payable 2795 Second Street, Suite 300 Calscience KIFF Davis, CA 95618 7440 Lincoln Way �g4 Lab: 530.297.4800 Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 Analytical LLC Fax: 530.297.4808 714-895-5494 COC No. 63627 Page 2 of 2 Project Contact (Hardcopy or PDF to): Angelique Showman EDF Report? YES Chain -of -Custody Record and Analysis Request Company/Address: Kiff Analytical Recommended but not mandatory to complete this section: Analysis Request w d p Sampling Company Log Code: SCSD Phone No.: 530-297-4800 FAX No.: 530-297-4808 Global ID: SL060073434 E _ m O E m 'a) v ct F @0Designation z o z a o 0 N 7 c 0 H to LL Project Number: 01208803.00 P.O. No.: 63627 Deliverables to (Email Address): inbox kiffanal tical.com . Project Name: Teesdale Property - Oroville Container / Preservative Matrix Co = e> ao J0 0 y m (D m `o z = z= , cp E— 0 0. Naeme� ¢O Project Address: Sampling Sample WATER HOG POND 07/08/08 12:00 2.2. 1 1 1 X X X X X X 11 WATER EAST POND 07/08/08 13:00 2 2 1 1 X X X X X X k2- ZWATER WATERB-03 @ W 07/08/08 10:40 2 2 1 1 X X X X X X WATER B-01 @ W 07/09/08 07:10 2 2 1 1 X XIX X X I X nquishe by: t,1 /� T�f sC Date d?cd' Time 1?00 Received by: Remarks: r1oshe Date Time Received by: Relinquished by: o1,20bAd�loC>uc Date 3-\ Time Receive by La story: W �,�, Bill to: Accounts Payable Page 10 of 12 WORK ORDERM OH Cooler of ' SAMPLE RECEIPT FORM CLIENT: V—\VV-, i� VA/A`�7\0-AL DATE:_ "t O -02� 1 TEMPERATURE - SAMPLES RECEIVED BY: CALSCIENCE COURIER: Chilled, cooler with temperature blank provided. Chilled, cooler without temperature blank. Chilled and placed in cooler with wet ice. Ambient and placed in cooler with wet ice. Ambient temperature (For Air & Filter only). _ —. _ ° C Temperature blank. CUSTODY SEAL INTACT: ' Sample(s): Cooler: / SAMPLE CONDITION: LABORATORY (Other than Calscience Courier): _° C Temperature blank. . G ° C IR thermometer. Ambient temperature (For Air & Filter only). Initial: —W') No (Not Intact) : Not Present:' Initial: Yee No N/A Chain -Of -Custody document(s) received with samples ......................... ....... ....... Sampler's name indicated on COC .................................................. ' Sample container label(s) consistent with custody papers ..................... ....... ....... Sample container(s) intact and good condition.... i ....... : ...................... / °...... . Correct containers and volume for analyses requested ....................... Proper preservation noted on sample label(s)..................................... ....... .... VOA vial(s) free of headspace........................................................ ....... ....... Tedlar bag(s) free of condensation................................................... ....... Initial: COMMENTS: X X X w w w w w w to w w w p N -0--1 :? -0cn- n y -v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . cfl �to � �. o �. wo 0 g. � C C C F y. 3 g_ r i N C D v CD 51 s s m z w M W W co 00 00 0o co �_ D(D z O z c0 z� a n a> O N N w, w, M tiD n o .. a C (D or Cr rr � ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ N m w c = a) O c„ N rn w M w CIn C 3 o, 0 v �, — s .11,n r1 Z Z o in o o in o o in 0 o O 0 n ti 3 00 rZ "M0 r n Cn -n w T 0 -n Z z 0 o o 0 0 0 -4 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 00 00 00 0 aa) r► 3 w O00 00 O O O O O O O O O O a fV O O OD 00 00 O OD 00 00 OD 00 v OD 0 0 O w N O O N N O (0 CP CWJI M CCn O O O O O OID -r n0i N) co 1-L Amber H2SO4 v Cr 1D o CO) °1 O M m m m 250ml Glass H2SO4x 4 Oz. Glass None n Q d o v 3 m x Q w' v' w w C o o D c�i CD c(o � -� 500 ml Poly NaOH y c 3 CL -0 v-4 M n CL a n 250ml Poly HNO3 7 N — m v o, 0 A Cn 0 C:) Cr 3 •e ;3. m w o m ori �i °_' (n a d = d y O a O 0 n Cn C O z �p 3 �' H O O C o o fD w =► H O v3 O -4 m w m G) WATER3 (n o C SOIL Q v j X X X X X X X X X X Air " v �G)-f�' OD O O n Chemical Oxygen Demand (D N X X X X X X Cyanide w. 0 � Ci Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen p p CD (0D :3 cfl n m 0 N (D w x n OD sy X X X X HOLDc D y D -' n aa) F N < n v N 0 v 0 0 `G U) C. CD 7 W C. N V N N m M �° (D m Date X X X X X X X X X X July 22, 2008 due: 0 < C o -4Co rn For Lab Use Only V -4.w Z!, 10 L L abed Z l, jo Z l, abed vcnv 0> :' c > c c D —I D D D M d o. �/%� 3 m �. n C:) 0. W Z � 3 v o co a 0 D� ZOZ�z ,�Z• Cu CIL n n W I 03 M 2 2) a3 '� 3 m 0D 3 W v do D n c m p D O a, m v r -r Man ^^� I ^^W 3 o o C:)do 0) y Cn o ;v r) lG Z z 3 ° r� v O v n PC) V1 T 0 0 0 4 0 v 0 -I 0 -4 �0 0 2) d d rn w CD O 00 O 00 O OD O N Oo OD OD OD OD v OD ov o 3 `D fD _ `D o 0 0 C:) '9 d N N N N 1-L Amber H2SO4 v Q rn �jj co co m 250ml Glass H2SO4X '° d °' v , a x N N N N 4 Oz. Glass None 0� Q G r'o m tn CD o o y o c(o m m <' <' <' 500 ml Poly NaOH m fD O fV N n -� Q Q. Q 250ml Poly HNO3 5 m m w m W � � -� ,- 3 3 ; n �, J O O m oo O m N Q a) "• r G ui - C N O U)n <D d C)Z O o N H H O M o a w O W (n0 m UJ WATER (n ^ C Q X X X X SOIL 3 01CID .. 0 o Air " v G) � 00 0 O n X X X X Chemical Oxygen Demand 3 Cn (D in X X X X Cyanide �. � n 0 X X X X Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (p � �CC 0 W m o CD < (� 00 D n v `� 0d 0 0 -46 cy < Q -4 U)CA X 0 c v O U CL (D W 3 Q N sy N N v M�(n m X X X X July 22, 2008 Uate due: N o M ,!^ 0 j Cn C" m For Lab Use Only � N O v Z l, jo Z l, abed McCampbell Analytical, Inc. "WhenOualitvCounts" 1534 Willow Pass Road, Pittsburg, CA 94565-1701 Web: www.mccampbell.com E-mail: main®mccampbell.com Telephone: 877-252-9262 Fax: 925-252-9269 KIFF Analytical Client Project ID: #01208803.00; Teesdale Date Sampled: 07/08/08-07/09/08 Property-Oroville 2795 Second Street, Ste. 300 Date Received: 07/10/08 Davis, CA 95616 Client Contact: Angelique Showman Date Reported: 07/21/08 Client P.O.: #63627 Date Completed: 07/17/08 WorkOrder: 0807243 July 21, 2008 Dear Angelique: Enclosed within are: 1) The results of the 4 analyzed samples from your project: #01208803.00; Teesdale Property -O 2) A QC report for the above samples, 3) A copy of the chain of custody, and 4) An invoice for analytical services. All analyses were completed satisfactorily and all QC samples were found to be within our control limits. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to give me a call. Thank you for choosing McCampbell Analytical Laboratories for your analytical needs. Best regards, ti—_._ Angela Rydelius Laboratory Manager McCampbell Analytical, Inc. ��. � i � � ■� � � � � � � viii � ,�c�!!�a4!�' � . -:i � lo 2795 Second Street, Suite 3.00 McCampbelf Analytical Inc. Davis, CA 95616 1534 Willow Pass Road KIFFO Lab: 530.297.4800 Pittsburg, CA 94565-1701' Analyric.al LLC Fax, 530.297.4808 Ph: 877-252-9262 Lab No. 63627 Page _J_ of _L Project Contact (Hardoopy or PDF to): EDF Report? YES Chain -of -Custody Record and Analysis Request, Angelique Showman Company/Address: Recommended but not rnmidatory to conW4uto WE. s=tlow. 2 4 Kiff Analytical Sampling Company Log Code: . SCS0 Analysis Request Phone No.: FAX No., Global 10: SL060073434 530-297-4800 530-297-4808 EDF Deliverable to (Email Address): C31 Project Number: P.A. No,: 01208803.00 63627 ihbqx@_kM anaKJ�al.aorn 45 E-mail address: CD C) 04 Project Name: Teesdale Property - Oroville !nboXAkiff6naW661.66m Container I Preservative Matrix Project Address: Sampli , � C .0 Lg d co "D 0 z I- 75ti Sample Designation Date Time ft T 0 r Q z 0 -I U) F- CL X X z E4 --A WATER HOG POND 070808 1200 31 1 1 lX1XJ X X 'WATER EAST POND 070808 1300 3 X X, X. X WATER 8-0.3@W 070808 1040 3 X X X X WATER B-01 @W 070908 0710 3 X . X X XL 06GI I STAL31 Re Relin wished y:1 z Date Time Receive b -1/1 cow M' Remarks: 00- �Iriilvi� ( �0'9 ECSD SEALED & INTACT VIA el'inquished by: Date Time Faceived by: Received Relinquished by:. Date Time Received ty Laboratory: Bi] to- A6wunts Payable McCampbell Analytical, Inc. 1534 Willow Pass Rd Pittsburg, CA 94565-1701 (925)252-9262 Report to: Angelique Showman KIFF Analytical 2795 Second Street, Ste. 300 Davis, CA 95616 (530) 297-4800 FAX (530) 297-4808 CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY REq ❑ WriteOn 0 EDF Email: inbox@kiffanalytical.com cc: PO: #63627 ProjectNo: #01208803.00; Teesdale Property- Orovil le WorkOrder: 0807243 CGentCode: ❑ Excel ❑ Fax R] Email Ej Bill to: Accounts Payable ' KIFF Analytical 2795 2nd Street Ste. 300 Davis, CA 95616 ' Requested Tests (S 0807243-001 Water Hog Pond Water 7/8/2008 12:00 A I A 0807243-002 Water East Pond Water 7/8/2008 13:00 ❑ A 0807243-003 Water B -03@W Water 7/8/2008 10:40 ❑ A 0807243-004 Water B-01 @W Water 7/9/2008 7:10 ❑ I A TestLeaend: 1 PREDF REPORT 2 TannLi n W F3F— 6 1 17 1 8 9 1111 1121 Comments: Off hold 7/15/08 per A.S. NOTE: Soil samples are discarded 60 days after results are reported unless other arrangements are made (Water sample Hazardous samples will be returned to client or disposed of at client expense. 1 McCampbell Analytical, Inc. 1534 Willow Pass Road, Pittsburg, CA 94565-1701 Web: www.mccampbell.com E-mail: main@mccampbell.com "When Oualitv Counts" Telephone: 877-252-9262 Fax: 925-252-9269 . I Sample Receipt Checklist Client Name: KIFF Analytical Date and Time Received: 07/10/08 10:16:58 AM Project Name: #01208803.00; Teesdale Property-Oroville Checklist completed and reviewed by: Melissa Valles WorkOrder N°: 0807243 Matrix Water Carrier: CA OverNight Chain of Custody (COC) Information Chain of custody present? Yes ❑ No ❑ Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received? Yes © No ❑ + Chain of custody agrees with sample labels? Yes d❑ No ❑ Sample IDs noted by Client on COC? Yes d❑ No ❑ Date and Time of collection noted by Client on COC? Yes © No ❑ Samplers name noted on COC? Yes ❑ No N❑ Sample Receipt Information Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA N❑ Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Yes N❑ No ❑ Samples in proper containers/bottles? Yes R1 No ❑ Sample containers intact? Yes ® No ❑ Sufficient sample volume for indicated test? Yes R1 No ❑ Sample Preservation and Hold Time (HT) Information All samples received within holding time? Yes 0 No ❑ Container/Temp Blank temperature Cooler Temp: 10.8°C NA ❑ Water - VOA -vials have zero headspace / no bubbles? Yes © No ❑ No VOA vials submitted ❑ Sample labels checked for correct preservation? Yes R1 No ❑ TTLC Metal - pH acceptable upon receipt (pH<2)? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA d❑ NOTE: If the "No" box is checked, see comments below. ------------------------------------- - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Client contacted: Date contacted: Contacted by: Comments: r -\O McCampbell Analytical, Inc. "When Oualitv Counts" 1534 Willow Pass Road, Pittsburg, CA 94565-1701 Web: www.mccampbell.com E-mail: main@mccampbell.com I Telephone: 877-252-9262 Fax: 925-252-9269 KIFF Analytical 2795 Second Street, Ste. 300 Davis, CA 95616 Client Project ID: #01208803.00; Teesdale Property-Oroville Date Sampled: 07/08/08-07/09/08 Date Received: 07/10/08 Client Contact: Angelique Showman Date Extracted: 07/10/08 Client P.O.: #63627 Date Analyzed 07/10/08 Tannin and Lignin / Substances Reducing Folin Phenol Reagent, as Phenol* Analytical Method: SM5550B Work Order: 0807243 Lab ID Client ID Matrix Tannin and Lignin DF 0807243-001 A Water Hog Pond W 5.2 1 0807243-002A Water East Pond W 0.68 1 0807243-003A Water B -03@W W 2.4,bl 1 0807243-004A Water B -01@W W 0.44,b1 1 Reporting Limit for DF = l; ND means not detected at W 0.1 mg phenol/L or above the reporting limit S NA *water samples are reported in mg/L. b 1) aqueous sample that contains greater than —1 vol. % sediment DHS ELAP Certification 1644 `- " " Angela Rydelius, Lab Manager iMcCampbell Analytical, Inc. 1534 Willow Pass Road, Pittsburg, CA 94565-1701 �\ Web: www.mccampbell.com E-mail: main@mccampbell.com "When Oualitv Counts" Telephone: 877-252-9262 Fax: 925-252-9269 LQC SUMMARY REPORT FOR SM5550B W.O. Sample Matrix: Water QC Matrix: Water BatchlD: 36862 WorkOrder 0807243 I EPA Method SM5550B Extraction SM5550B Spiked Sample ID: 0807243-004 Analyte Sample Spiked MS MSD MS -MSD LCS LCSD LCS-LCSD Acceptance Criteria (%) mg phenol/L ig phenob % Rec. % Rec. % RPD % Rec. % Rec. % RPD MS / MSD RPD LCS/LCSD RPD Tannin and Lignin 0.44 2 114 1 1 1 2.52 118 116 2.17 75 - 125 20 80- 120 20 All target compounds in the Method Blank of this extraction batch were ND less than the method RL with the following exceptions: NONE y BATCH 36862 SUMMARY Lab ID Date Sampled Date Extracted ' Date Analyzed Lab ID Date Sampled Date Extracted Date Analyzed 0807243-OOIA 07/08/08 12:00 PM 07/10/08 07/10/08 1:01 PM 0807243-002A 07/08/08 1:00 PM 07/10/08 07/10/08 1:07 PM 0807243-003A 07/08/08 10:40 AM 07/10/08 07/10/08 1:13 PM I 0807243-004A 07/09/08 7:10 AM 07/10/08 .07/10/08 1:19 PM. r- a MS = Matrix Spike; MSD = Matrix Spike Duplicate; LCS = Laboratory Control Sample; LCSD = Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate; RPD = Relative Percent Deviation. % Recovery = 100 ' (MS -Sample) / (Amount Spiked); RPD = 100 ' (MS - MSD) / ((MS + MSD) / 2). MS / MSD spike recoveries and / or %RPD may fall outside of laboratory acceptance criteria due to one or more of the following reasons: a) the sample is inhomogenous AND contains significant concentrations of analyte relative to the, amount spiked, or b) the spiked sample's matrix interferes with the spike recovery. N/A = not applicable to this method. NR = analyte concentration in sample exceeds spike amount for soil matrix or exceeds 2x spike amount for water matrix or sample diluted due to high matrix or analyte content. DHS ELAP Certification 1644 `�"' QA/QC Officer a m m m0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0�ow�'�'� or i r (1v r apr bpaoQ r o o �Cz `4'►39)c'�� CD Q ► I l N �y 1 ti o r Ip a 3 a com -03 t�, 3 Q vL^ `) -C �r� ��Cio a `a- `�' w D ma�St �� Sr c _V4 �a(�!� Ct (,1 1 r o 8 OUP, fn �j O rm �n 0 CL Nt0 N m 4 `1 0 t7 G G 3 to V 0 N o c 40 ml VOAVi .0 m my V }C %� K Sleeve Poly co 3 r\ m 0 v 3 Q 10 m Glass `$ 2 ti 3 v m TedlarCD Ln M r ,5Cr IHCl HNO3 T Z1 aD I r3 None leCL Z Water Isoil m : ° X X XIX XIX X X X X Air pH (EPA 9040)/Electrical Conductivity (EPA 120.1) 7' Z Total Hardness (SM 23408) P m jp Total Dissolved Solids (SM 2450F) Blobgk:W Oxygen Demand (SM 52108) - v ARL C7 Chemical Oxygen Demand (SM 5520C) Total V4eldahl Nitrogen (TKN) T V b N Tannins & Lignings (SM 5550) a C "tv CAM 17 Metals (EPA 6010) o p Chloride, Nitrate, Sulfate (EPA 300.0) � Phosphate, Fluoride, Bromide (EPA 300.0) v a CL `< TPH as Gas, BTEX, 5 Oxy (EPA 82606) � 6 Q m (MS D X X XX X X X X X X CAM 17 Metals (EPA 6010) a B O e t` b a P 5 Waste 01 Metals (Cd,Cr,NI,Pb,Zn) (EPA 200.7 / 6010) o OJ r 3 Mercury (EPA 245.1 / 7470 / 7471) C- CD Total Lead (EPA 200.7 / 6010) g s W.E.T. Lead (STLC) X X X X I X X X X X X ITotal Cyanide (EPA 90108) ` co m c_ M m M Total Cyanide (SM 4500) C CD J For Lab Use Only m 7 m 7x D D D D _� O 3 m v� 0 L N cC rp 'o'er = m f 8 g n az07Ja � lg-<z _ m n co a oO Li w a CL v u o o O 0 d 1 N C N m io o m g r1 o Q o a `o , �Co v b < y < m m co c "xq<m n v N y � m a w A �• v v O O 01W 0 p A+ _ 3 N m 4 --4 r p O oW & co N o c 40 ml HCl VOA y C c -+ — — — 250 mL HDPE unpres 250 mL HOPE HNO3 A ? � N c N *t pm c �• � p a_ � �' w N N N N m C! O 1 L HDPE unpres. 500 HDPE NaOH � � k� n %- 2 3 m p -+ — — — mL N N N N 04 1250 mL glassH,SO, � T m J ty N N N N j L amber glass HzSO a0 mL unvoAs r a I]1 w w w w g pm pm o n x x x X Water o ❑ Soil 3 0 .1 c Air x R_ ' Cr pH (EPA 9040yElectrical Conductivity (EPA 120.1) c 1 X X X IX Total Hardness (SM 23408) m 3 X X X X Total Dissolved Solids (SM 2450F) X X X X biological Oxygen Demand (SM 52108) c H C- ' X X X X Chemical Oxygen Demand (SM 5520C) n X X X X Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) X X X X Tannins & Lignings (SM 5550) EF _ X; X X X CAM 17 Metals (EPA 6010) y C o t%1 p X X Chloride, Nitrate, Sulfate (EPA 300.0) � =a. p `< ' X X Phosphate, Fluoride, Bromide (EPA 300.0) 1D m 0 TPH as Gas, BTEX, 5 Oxy (EPA 8260B) H y O CAM 17 Metals (EPA 6010) O EL ' 5 Waste Oil Metals (Cd,Cr,Ni,Pb,Zn) (EPA 200.716010) m 3 Mercury (EPA 245.1 / 7470 / 7471) CL Total Lead (EPA200.7 / 6010) $ ' W.E.T. Lead (STLC) Total Cyanide (EPA 901 OB) N m X X X X Total Cyanide (SM 4500) M ' v C cD IN El ' 1 N .•�. For Lab Use Only z 0 I� '