Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout028-077-004d -IV/ X o=i , IANa OF NAt l3ltAiV1 F, t.i ANb 8EAQTY PLANNING CONIMIssibtvi C007Y Ct Ot—A DAIVC -- .OIRO)�ILLE, CJlL1POWI119W! PHOHe; iu4m";6I August Sy 1953 p , n Von Geldervi Lngineering Company 00 Second Street J Yuba City, CA 95901 CD Attention: Richard Von G'eldern RB. Tentative Fardel Map Terence J. keeley AP 28-077.04 (ptn) Dear- Mr. Von Geldern: We are in receipt of your letter of July 19, 1:503 addrevsed to Butte County Department of Public:Works requesting v7 `th- drawal of the above project. We can only refund the remaining balance after deducting actual expenses incurred in the processing of a tentative parcel map request. In this case, we processed your project up to the point where it pias ready for public hearing, which included preparation of an initial study and review of 'the proposal, plus,,-1uplicating and mailing costs. We have expended the $220.00 and a refund will not be possible. Sincerely, B,. A. kircher PlaTin.g Director r phen A. Streeter Senior Planner SAS:lkt „• AP 28-077.04 (ptn) A ti A .7 212. 62tt'`t1SBUNOp MVYRON 1'TAL is hI'&UKTION This project is a land division of 1.14 acres to create two parcels at 0.S7 acres + for residential use. The property is located apprtiki- "telt' 600 feel south of Lower Honcut Road, on the east side of Second Street, Honcut area. The General Flan designation is Lour Density Residential; the present stoning is A-2 (General),. The site is characterized by relatively level terrain with a slight slope to the east. Annual grasses and some scattered trees (oak and landscape) are on the site and in the vicinity. Soils are classified'” as Rocklin fine sandy loam. These soils have a relatively shallow, effective depth underlain by a clay layers at 1 to 2 feet in depth and a hardpan iayerlat ids to 3 feet in depth.. The surrounding area is rural residential, in nature. Grating of .._ ieinity with rice and sothorafield reropssgrown further away fvomythe Honcut'town site. p g Y The rural residences include both conventional dwellings and mobile homes. The following impacts and concerns have been identified for this land division. : ib. 3b Compaction and overcoverirg of additional land generating inCTeased surface water runoff. The nearest drainage course is less than 20 feet from the edge of the property. A narrow bridge with culvert occurs near the northwest corner of parcel 1-. A: Exposure of people and property to geologic hazards. The, site lies about a mile west of a fault system of the Foothill Shear Zona. Moderate intensity earthquakes can be expected in the future. 3h: Clearance has yet to be received from the Health Department for sewage disposal and domestic water supply for .each parcel. 13c: Second Street is about a 1.2 foot wide paved road at present:. The Public Works Department indicates that some improvement to Second Street'may be in order. Widening Second Street from the project site to Lower Honcut Road may be appropriate. Such widening would be 4 to 8 feet of additional pavement. 14: This pr6ject will 'increase the lemand for various public services at an outlying location. The nearest urban area is Gridley, 9 miles + to the west, 16e: The property drains to the south, southwest towards North lioncut Creels, located within h anile to the south. Appendix P - pt-ge 8 of 9 ' YES. MAYBE NO r a 22 �il►ttdatory .pindinaa of Si n rice. .r a. Doss Che project have the potential + to degrade the quality o£ the environme,ht, substantially red'ace the habitat of a fish or wildlife sp ttas, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self ,,.,. austilniwng levels, threaten to i lUminete a plant or animal. ,com- munity, reduce the tnumbwi 'oi restrict the range of a rare or endangei;6d , plant or animal or eliminate important "tan of the major periods sof California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potanti.al f to achieve short term bonafi:ts to the detriment. of #ubli.c'l:y adgptdd long-term environmental goals? { �c; Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? -(a proj"ect may Impact on twit or more separate resources where theimpact on each kbmburco is relatively small, but where the effect of the total, of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d. Doss the project have environmental. --�. iffects which will eaute substantial adverse effects on human beings, ' either directly or indirectly? G, j Appendix p - p#$s I of 0 Ap 23.077.04 (ptn) DISCUsSWN of ENVIRONMENTAL EVAURrION (continued) Ob 4Tha Butte Coluttty Mos juito Abatement District has submitted---, the following commOnts "Vernal lidols exist; on thin tentative parcel split. These pools are a source of moos uito. bribeding during the spring of the yaar. Two mbjor species o mos4Uktoes breed :in these pools. They.. are, i Culex tarsalis (tractor for Encephaylttis) o and Anopheles freeboini Cvector for Malaria) .Wh6h developwibn het of thea t parcels bo ifta t we feel that it proper 'problem 'votIld be the grading of these lots so as to eliminate the v61rn6l 11 y Appendix V - page 9' Of � 9 t � x r� 4 i i� • iNY�:H��TiOi� ,, (Tei be acepleted by the Lead AgliftbY)' ��\ 1 on the bawsis of this initial evaluatiohx I find the proposed project COULWWW have► a sighiliclk"t. \' goat"on the anvirbnmant, and a NBCAIM9 OWLAWRION findM xti©ibvos iMoject �aoxLgimiioant,i! on the OftirpnwOnto tpeVIII not ..lbs a significant �t�Ef+�ct iv, this cae• lyeetause thrl <, �, ... ... . ......' .. mitigaation measures described on an attachtd- sh�ret _ haave' been added to the project. A NEW= DECLh'i '216" IS tMOMMMED. 0 1 flud the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environmentt and *n ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Gate__,, Na 26. 18 Y :..........r - `- a regi Stephen A. Streetor . Senior Planner porn HattE CoURY 1113nning . e .. Revieved bye 11 y Appendix V - page 9' Of � 9 t