Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout028-110-028• t M a A • ) ' ata ' r r • r ' O a n ' Oe ' d i n a r r PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY SHEET 'FOP i,ANI APPLICANT Shirley Adams ADDRESS D hBox 1 7 3 B --gra rA 9 S � 14 OWNER Ha old PROTECT DEScRIPTIoN Tentative Parcel Ma .at_l acres each. LWATION.�,. Al proximately 1400 rt -north of the intersecti.ot, off' P:l.oasan �� Grove Line_ and La Porte Ftoad_1 on the .eas* s dE _ o P] easltl ASSEBE SSOR'S PARCEL NUMR(`S) Z_ 1Grove Lane 1�-28� _ Bangor area ZONING A_-5�� r'EN PLAN. A . Re s i . PROJECT CON8,18TENT? DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED Atu latus 1984 G.D.A. 220 Grand Ave. Oroville CA 95965 DATE PUBLICATION NOTICE WRITTEN PUBLISHED PLACE NEWSPAPER'NOTICE(S) PUBLISHED O. C. P. G. B DATE MAILING LIST PREPARE DATE MAIL.. -OUT NOTICES WRITTEN DATE PLANNING DIRECT0118F:EDREPORT PRBPA MAILED -- ---. NUMBER ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION DAA FILED AND BATE NEGATIVE DECLARATION .» DATE AJOPTED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION DATE ADOPTED ENV, IMPACT R.popT - DATE CERTIFIED SU$. COMMITTEE MEETING DATE ADVISORY AGBNC� ,HEARTNG DATA ADVI80PY AGENCY ACTION BOARD ACTION Is TO: 0 FROM: SUBJECT: :NOTICE OF DETERMINATION 18 Secretary For Resources 1416 Ninth Street, Room 1311 Sacramento, CA 95814 County Clerk, County of Butte 25 County Center Drive Oroville, CA, 95965 APPENDIX II L D OCT 26 1984 ELEANOR M. BECKER, Counly t+ vk By A. JACINTH I Deputy Planning Department 7 County Center Drive (riled) Oroville, CA 95965 Filing of Section2110821152ofthePublic Determination Compliance with n 21108 Resottrccs Code RA..nR.nA_n-t. Project Title 'tentative Parcel_MftP AP 28-11-28 Shixley4Adams State Clearinghouse Number (If submitted to State Clearinghouse) Contact Person t► John Menonsa, Public Works (916) Telephone Number !;,34-4266 Project 1,ocat .on On the east side of rl.casant Grove vane, approx. 1400 feet north. of LaPorte Road, in the Bange;xt' area. Project Description: Dividing 10 acres to create two parcels at 5 acres each. This is to advise that the Butte County ACIVISUxy jkgency (Lead Agency) has made the folloving determinations regarding the above-described project: - 1. The project [D will have�a signmrtt.tant effect on will not 2, An Dnv!ronmenta:l Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant: to the provt"sions of CBQA, and was certified as required by Section 15085(9); 14 California Administrative Code A Negative Declaration was prepared for this pro j Oct st..I t to the 'Provisions of CB copy A. A of. th pux n p Q 1 �' e Negotit�e Doclavation may be ex��tn'l,necl at the Planning Dcpartiaai t, 7 County Centor Drive, Oroville y CA 95965. 3: A Notice of Bxomp�tIon was f -i Indicating this project 3.s exempt from environmental review, .I; A statement Of Ovoi-r ding Coils) devtt tr"icon 0 teas;L/%Z1 was not, adopted for this project mitigati;ot measures adopted by the 1,ead Agency to reduce the impacts of tho approved, pro jec'Yra None ff �11 4L � �; st':phc n A. StTeoter October t 8 Semi i or Pl anne°r 1' ..'� W, 4 1 �.tle I Butt© Co. Planning Comm. OU i 12 1984 oroville.Calitornfa Butte coun O F NATU PAL WEALTH 11 1;.. r•r I � �. fit. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS WILLIAM (13111) CHEFF, director ��uPJTY C! NTErt aRIVd - O0OVILLE, CALIPORNIA 75765 Taiephnnar (716) 534-4651 October 12., 1984 Shirley Adams RE: AP 28-11-28 p. p. Box 113 Tentative Parcel Map Bangor, CA 95914 Dear_ Ms. Adams: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held October 8, 1984, the Agency adopted the negative declaration regarding environmental review and approved the Tentative Parcel Map for AP 28-11-28 subject to the conditions as lasted on the attached sheet. A Adviisor if no appeals are timet filed --within ten (10) days of the date of the Y Agency's y's approval --with the Clerk of he Boar Supervisors, this action will be finAl. wheri the conditions of approval arae complied with, it will be in order for you to file your "final map" with the Bunte County Oepar.tment of Public Works for recordation within twenty-four (24) months of the elate of approval by the Advisory Agency4 If you should have any questions regarding this matter► please contact this office. Fiery truly you,rs,; William CheElf Director of public Works f; J6bn Mendonsa Assistant Director JA;ds Attachment cci "Planning - Environmental Review ;anv rc tyrnental Health Department G CjA t Shirley Adams, Tentative. Parcel Map, 2 parcels on the east side of Pleasant Grove Lane, approx. 1400 ft. north -of La Porte Rd.,'in AP 2the Bangor area. 811-28 Engineer; GDA Public Works conditions: le Deed to the County of Butte 30 ft, right-of-way from the centerline of Pleasant Grove. Lane. 2. indicate a 50 ft, building setback from the Centerline of Pleasant Grove Lane. 3. Show all easements or record on the final map., 4. Pay off any assessments, 5 Obtain encroachment permit for all driveways; new or existing, and construct to county ;standards. y q 6. Pay an delinquent taxes or current taxes as required. health Dept. conditions: 7.. Provide a loo ft. leachfield free setback aroivad existing sta ng Wel 1s either within the property or wi thin 100 ft, of the property boundaries do parcel. 2. i 8. Showa 50 ft,. leachfield setback from the drainjac way on parcels 1 and 2. 9. ShOV tho usable two acre setaa;e disposal area Proven to meet the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance on parcel. 1. 10.. Prove that, the required quancitios 01* domestic tater are available to parcel, 1. PlanninL,, ])ept, condition: 11. All parcels to be at ,leant 5 acrbs. TCia Butte County Advisory Agency FROM Planning Director SUBJECT Report an Tentative Parcel Map of ShirlLy Adams On AF 2e-11-28 DATE: September 26, 1984 'Thiz earh.isha proposal roosal to divide 10 acre% tocreateterra parcels at 5 acres present Zoning is A-S (Agricultural, S acre parcels). The Land Use Pian Map o-f the Butte County General Plan designates this area. as Agricultural-Residential, There are no specific Or community plans four the area. The proposal does not conflict With County zoning nor any adopted or, proposed element of the Butte County General Plan nor any County, specific or, community plan. Recommend approval DRMzlkt CC., Shirley Adams GDA i r� APPENDIX P COUN'T'Y OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST VORM (toBe completed y Lea Agency) ],og )( 84-08-06-01. AP It 28-1.1-28 1, BACKGROUND 1, Name of proponent Shirley Adams anent and. re resentative (if applicable) 2 Address of prop p P. 0. Box 11.3 GDA Bangor CA 05914 220 Grand Avenue Project descriptionentative Parcel Mai 3. iviANDAT01tY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Y�5 btAYB>v NO a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a Fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict, ttc range of a rare or endangered plant or animl or eliminate important examples of the ma,j0 1a of California history or prehistotY? b, Doe tile project have the potential to achieve short -terra benefits to the detriment of longterm, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs term -relatively lte y brier period of time while hong-impacts endure into the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are ind'vidu ally limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively sma11,, but where the e:f`fect of tile tatai of those impacts on the eAvironment is significant.) d, Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, eiiiter directly or indirectly) TCI, _'rL1tNj1N1kTION (`ro be completed by the Load Agency) On the basis Of this initial evaluation; Y/191; find the proposed project COULD NOT have a ;significant effect pan the envzrontttcnt, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION dill be prepared, I/1911 find that although the nt°.thevel�w4ll,enotpbedahsignific.ave a antii� Cant effect Art thi. enviranmet � effect in this iicaase h been because- tile addeldrtdAtheNMEASURES project, Adescribed the attached 5 D1aCLAi3ATi0N will be prcp;rrOd. the find the proposeaninpENVCRONMENTAL IMPAC't"ect MAY have a g12Tii'C11t't'n yeffXeet on 're�tuired' the env1i'onmettt, anti � , 1084 COUNTY OL i3tl r T1:, PLANNING DtpARTN1nNT DATE', , ave. • � ' J. r O 11 �.MU S AsSociato Plati ter iteviewed by 'w IV. OCTS ENVIRONMENTAL ,. xp anations of a i "yes ► and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheet(s)) �• $ARTH,will the proposal. result in significant; YES a. Unstable earth conditions MAYEE NO or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or -` overcorering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? Vic` d. Destruction, covering or modification of any unique X geologic or physical features? e. Increase in wind or water erosion of soils either on or off-site? , f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach" sands, or changes in siltati..in, deposition or- erosion Which may modir the Channel of a river or stream or the bod of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g. Loss of prime agriculturally productive ,soil $ outside designated urban areas? h-. Exposure of people or properLy toeolo `--- hazards such - as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure or similar hazards? 21 AIR, Will the proposal result in substantial. H'47- Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or fumes? c. Alteration Of air movement moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, locally or rAgionally? X 5. {PATER. Willthe proposal result in substantial: a. Changes in . currents, or the course or direction of water movements in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? C. Need for off-site surface drainage improve- mens, including vegetation Vic. removal channel- ization or culvert installation? s di Altorations to the CO'Irse or flow of flood waters? e. change in the t'thio-nt of` surf,!U- water in any water body? f. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface wateruali.t q y, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved uzygen or turbidity? g. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow'-„ 4w Of ground waters? h. Change in the quantity of ground waters' either through direct additions of with- dra�rrals, or though' interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? . z` Reduction in the amount o£ water otherwise available for public water supplies? ?, Exposure of people or property to waver related hazards such as flooding? L2- YES 11AYBE N0 4. PLANT ,LIFE: Will the proposal result in substantialt. a. 1 tinge in the diversity of species, or number* of any species of plants (including trees, �* shrubs; grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction.of the numbers of.any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? X c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replen;i„aj�- X meet of existing species? a. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? S. ANIMAL LIFE: Will the proposal result in substantial: `a: Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell fish, benthic organisms or insects)? b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, raxo or endangered species of animals"? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? ..� 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Increases in existing noise levels? b Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce signi icant light and glare? ,R 8. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a su`stant:ial alteraltion of the present or planned land use of an areal 9. NATURAL RESOURCES: Will the proposal rbsult in substantial: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Depletion of any non-reneWable natural resources?..�. 10,. RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve: , A�r soof explosion or the release of hazard- ous substances (including, but not limited to,, oil; pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions' b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ., 11. POPULATION. lVil.1 the propos�'l alter the location, istri u n, density* or growth rate of the human , population? - r... 12.. HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a, demand for additional. housing? � _- YES MAYBE NO 13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle 13 , ,4 • movement?' b. Effects on existing parking, facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact on existing transportation systems? d. Significant alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or X goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered; governmental services. a4 Fire protection" ._ b, Police protection? ;�C. c. Schools?<> d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads'?. f. Other governmental services?G' 15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel,or energy? b, Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16, UTILITIES. Will the propsal result in a need for new ^ystems, or substantial alterations to the following: a. Power or natural-gas? b, Communications systems?' c. Nater, d. Sewer or septic tank? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? 17. HUMAN..HEALTH,1 Will the proposal result in, a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential, health hazards? ` 1$. AESTHETICS. Will the 'proposal result in the b str-uc�t'on of any scenic v1sta or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the Creation anviewaesthetically offensive site open to of 13 , ,4 I�4A�'EE No 19• RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact ,YES upon the ' p quality or quantity of existing recreational oPportunities? Za. CULTURAL RESOURCES. a Wi1.1 the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical ---' or ;aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? Ci Does the proposal, have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the area? potential impact; V. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP2-8-11-28.. — lbcef• 3bcf: Construction of an additional, building site on etheopeityasil l result in additional of overcoverirtS and compaction ] as displacements associated �v:iztl leveling for ding sites and driveways. Such and overcoverings; displaccments could -result in additional erosion additionaltruns in potential and Because Of the size Of the garcel5'nbeinoed focreatt�Site improvements, pected to be of si.gnificantpconcern.IIIg s this is not eX- Sone �%Ix;T, ZoneAll of. Butte County s Within, a Moderate Earthquake l'ntens' The subjc ct property ws located approximately 1 Miley West of an inferred fault as:�ociatcd ►vita the Foot)�ill Constr��cti.on Shear Zone. of buildings to Universal; Building Code standards for seismically active areas Will provide adequate prOtection for residents in the area, 39,h' The installation of an additional: w6ll Ivil.l incrementally decrease the amount or water available in the local aquifers; Though not significant this piojott Will,represent an incre- mental increase in demand for'Public sajz,vires s:n a rural a •ea, Applicant: Shirley A DATA SKEET A. Project Description I&ssor's Parcel # 28-1:1,28 ERD Log // 84-08-06-01 1. Type of Project: Tentative Parcel Map 2. Brief Descriptions Dividing 10 acres to create two panels at ' 5 acres each j. Location: On the east side of Pleasant Grove Lane apT)roxiWU—Qy 1400 feet north of LaPorte Road, in the Bangor are? 4. Proposed Density of Development:� 5 acres per dweJJJng unit Amount of Impervious Surfacing: Minimal r 6. Access and Nearest Public Roads) Parcels :froltt PIcasant Crowe Lane, a publicly maintained rnasi Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual septic systems g. Source of dater Supply., Individual wells 9. Proximity of Power lines: To property 10. Potential for further land divisions and development: Mone under existing -,zoning B. Environmental Setting Physical Environment 1. Terrain a General Topographic Character: Rolling Sera foothills and ,oak land b. Slopes: 0 to z0a slopes, 30+11, Slopes in area near the ravine that traverses the property c. Elevation: 500 to 550.feet ASI, d. Limiting Factors:._ Steeper slopes near ravine 2 . 4. Soils a Types and Characteristics Auburn soil series with some Argonaut soils to the northeast of the property, Soils b. Limiting Factors: Steep stories near ravine, shallow soils, Slow er__ ah7lti ji1nrr�s Natural. Hazards of the hand a Earthquake Zone: Moderate Barth_quake lntensity Zone VITT b.- Erosion Potential,.__ sli giltto ug4l. Fire Hazard: Moaorate co Landslide Potential: Lots _ e. E-pansivc Soil Potential: . Lour Hydrology a Surface Water*,, IJI�+I 4 �Vison _Creek tra'v Appe.ddix V (a) Data°' Sheet continued AP 2 8a... 2 8 b. Ground Water: Aquifers at varying depths at unknown_ quantities c. Drainage Characteristics: Pro»e Nty drains to tr�i.12jj , 'r Of Wilson Creek located on-site d. Annual Rainfall (normal:) 26 to 28 inches per yoar e. Limiting Factors': None 5. Visual/Scenic Quality:. I-Ig_h 6. Acoustic Quality: High 7. Air Quality High Biological Environment 8. Vegetation: Open field to' the east, grasslands and Mug oal:s and Digger rine to th.e west. 9. Wildlife Habitat`: Lower . Sonoran Life Zone Cultural. Environment 10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area: Low archaeological sen.s°tivitiy 11. Butte County General Plan designation.: Agricultural -Residential 12. Existing Zoning: A -S 13 Existing Land Use on-site:, Orie sin le family dwelling 'ILI•. Surrounding Area: a. Sand Uses: Agricultural uses and -scattered, -residential dwellings at rural densities b. Zoning: A-5 c. Oen. Plan designations:Agricultural-Residential d. Parcel Sizes:._ Cenerall.y 5 to 10 acres e. Population: Sparse 15. Character of Site and Area: dural residential. uses on 5 to 10 acre '16. Nearest Urban Area; Ortivil.le arcels limited agricultural use: 17. Relevant Spheres of influence: ynn�y 18. Improvements Standards Urban Area: I No _ 19. lire Protection Service,: Station 55 in Bangor a. Nearest County (State) Fire Station: Station 75 in I10tcut, "b. Water Availab lity7 On-,site—wells and. tankers only 20. Schools in Area: Bangor School Mstrict and x ova e pion t Appendix F ) � a MESSAGE 9 y TO Steve m Jim Snowden 0 t, _ C�p r OFCtC' 'DI�7'O U I3utla�. plaWng Comm Items 1-4 to bt" CO' nlEted by applicant. X. Applicant Name Ju 19 1984 �`.j 2. Project Description 3. Assenuorib Parcel Number(s) 4. Prorroned Use;/"=car The folluvinS items are to be, coc:pleted by the Plnnnin�i Department; Current zoning � A—,S Land iaanscrvat ,on Agreement C:vne al VLM-rl Deiignatior, ` Anne �blr Cnncti tional C tern; Agri"I tural,-Res idential 1.• Agricultural Compatibility 2. Water & Sewer Capacity 3. Adequate Fire Facilities 4. koad Capacity & 'Maintenance 5. Access to ComiRercial & Schools Orchard & Field Crops' I. Predominant 5-10 Ac. Parcel Size 2. Vicinity of Urban Boundaries 3. Agric, viability not impaired >zaia Aetcrminatior; C ormn et t • Riot t'i( 111if,;r'iW �r'I Ii0 .. X, Project doer, K does ,riot substantially conform to the er•wA,,,,l t'3an. tK�t"rGv%!rte (! .. t'• S r , 1,."L dr`+(C.',. ✓. �i�Y/ 1' . r ,J.�': .�-:,-! >, thG+ "�+!` tom= �' !:"t�/:1 .. t" r�• � 1rS 5 e—. {"y y(rx �„� /'r :• ✓'Y �Cy C^(ryjt M _” „h /L ' f, ..a. � 1^J /5.�«L�� � � r r r '„ " �'J/�.t � . t;:, • i..�.,.. M ,.wr �.,.,�,. ,�� (; e- yam, "'"'.'>_ � / ♦ �,Y-`%_...._,ir'•"` ��"�c;�Lr��.�. / 'dP•%�.Y""�+( yd''. � mow+... rc.,. �_•'t- - + '��r {1 .v ;G+� •, 1 I� '` .''C a'"+4 r �".A r•=+ � - y ... w.,..,'«.-.,�.-�'`,..,-„x7 ,i��`I.l�.r" ' .) �,+^". �.� µ -„ �'l'+r �.x rb ,f./ c; �!✓J�i �i".i.....�_r.�Y.:�� ✓ ! / r' s. �r' /^.�! r? t'7' .�''4 e� { ��: "�i �,�'r i �►F�i'%! t"�;,, Swtt'f Si8nuRix re h A5 T11,"' APPLI C.. wr FOR ntn Rr QUtSTuD L?+ ib r r t r II CO�,.OP..u"t,si L l�wlT11, �CStr} �r'ik11,i"4 U! ME11t ABOVE 8T,,.rr Sigrintuft- 01 Applicant tttilnfitrr5.$•�Y�;i+y015 {•raljt�it% -'��, �"�:!`-'� 'i f1t'il f4 ►lvtrtut. Of0ville" befity Y 17 1i1C1'' ' t'ee i sort f�-":I� (0 16) tti+i'