HomeMy WebLinkAbout028-100-033{
�I CCOLLUMMIC,I-i ;L TPM
AP oz=loo-033 LG #924$-26`x2,,f
,.
..I^'•h.W.vNM}:nav-..N. y..wwN � n-•• wy F � .,,, r.
Ma 3 ,... 1. %•.. i(^ ¢R :n , � ,. .. ,r I .. I. :"',+�n'�{`n.a..'.:W ar*
..., jjl.. , : .. :.. .. .' .. ..�.. ,... -. "1w..w�uv"+.rv'W 1M'-1 n p. -.E. "�+ , . ,. y... ,: w .,n+�rur.�w x+•u��.,,
1,
..r P "7l"
P
-r .. - f. .shW, rre. . {. # /TwiS, T'N'f... e( LPVh 5" �! i W Ai+. �eliMirw{�..4w:.U•..r.�,
. ... ":;„ I r ... .: ,.,. ,:.....:.,r .. .. .:. ...... .fit^."�r'n- .. �. ry -e :e �,. ..♦t'.v'.y:+.." :..,T,,.t
� ^I
%i. :
r
r
�
is
rSslrea5.00/Acres . 1 �, � 167
brrw
,NOW
,
rSslrea5.00/Acres . 1 �, � 167
,..
..
.. t�- ti,... ,,
,�
PLl TNG CnMMISSION SUtiMAn� 'SHEET .FO T'%I1D DIVISIONS
,INT McCollum, Michael LOG #92-08--26-02
x:774 Clark Avenue Yuba City, CA 95991
Jame as above
��s" a, ,WT D85CRIPTrON:
Tentative Parcel Map to divide 20.08 acres in o 4 parcols
:each at 5.0 acres
EyOC 014: g parc.�As located on the gest side of Fawn Court apprbximately
000Beet south of La Porte Road, Bangor area.
,tssA 50r."`5 PARCEL, NUMBER (S) 028-100-033
e A^ GENERAL PLAN Agri-Resi. PROJECT CONSISTENT '
t eg!MA L PLAN CONFORMANCE itEPORT A f )h
' DATE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE
SzFND CONSERVATION ACT CONTRACTS?
ATZ APPIsICATION RECEIVED August 21; 199
i
i 'i1fr1 `SURVEY R/CIVIL ENGINEER: dame as abode
Amnss : _
�'"Z PLANNING DIRECTOit15 REPORT .,PREPARED 1%111 P\s v I's r-.n
Z:NVIRON-MENTAL CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION - DATE FILED
E ;;MINATION
DATE NEGATIVE DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED
MITIGATED NEG:,DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED -
ENV: IMPACT REPORT DATE .CERTIFIED.
�i
,. .� STATE CLEARINiZOUSE 140, t
0B. COMMITTEE MEE�IA0 DATE
� A�
IWVISORY AGENCYHEARING DATE _ t� I3
IDVISORY AGENCY ACTION, gV1W.ci d-
APPEALED APPEAL HEARING DATE _..
COMMENTS FOR. PLANNING DIRECTOR' 5 REFOitT C� G%AZS �A �-L 1 elo 21.,
f
ASSIGNED TE7: .. DISK_,
Yf
TOR OFFICE USE ONLY:
B11 11.0 County Planif[ing Dept.
Receipt, 11
7 Cfounl,y 'Conter Drive
f I / �y
Appla cant / , Me-
Oi ovf I t-ee. CA 95965-1397
(0 J fi ) 5,38-7601
AP #
Subdivision Name (if appticabLe)
APPENDIX H
011re F1 Ied
LAND DIVISIM APPLICATIONS
Suoylemental Information for Planning Department
1. Lisle: and describe any` other related permits
and other public approvals
required for this project, including those required
by city, regional
state and federal agencies: fi3OA2
2; Proposed schedul.ir,,,/associated° projects:
V\60
I, Anticipated. incremental development:. (phasing
of subdivision units,
Nt.ure development plans): rtO A 4P— -
_
A. " What method' will be atilized to accommodate
surface drainage? Describe
hov on-.kiite and downstream drainage channels
will be affected.
,F'eok mat � water for fire fighting purposes
Y 13 �
(hydrants, ponds') etc.):
}
6 W II�,f4ixcitvit,i,rn or grading be necessary? Cubic yards (estimate)
7, I)i.►'rYc tl0tait-1-bZ foe travel to property (rural. and
m�-r^�'ptai,nous areas only)`
l cif 0 "oct. eE — go vte. i - VIA
/ ..' it.4- nwsH l �iil...+
K , IxNV i RONMEN"TAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATYON MEA5IlRE5«
(cleatiTy potentially significant environmental impacts associated witth
Sl '"
f he 1,r11tl (Jivision. What project design features or special, conditions
of aialrw+uv:tl (mitigation measures) are proposed to alleviate potentia'),
environmental impacts? j
Pro po'5 e A L 'l oy-e G! yLSr i C.� c CJS
t) . 1rNV T RIlNMEWAL . SETTING*
;i pt'` cu lbn the
projectnsite
asitexlsts before the project,
project
i n .1 g topography, soil stabil, 'y, plants
�►►cl acfimais, and any culturali historical or scenic aspects.
Describe tiny existing structures on the site, and the use of
tltr; st.s'�it^tures. � �SSc$ Ci��'icx�l���'�+t9�t,
c t`cc �d�t). , !v
it! nest rthe the surrounding properties, including information On
p ant-; anti animals and any cultural, 'historical or scenic aspects.
[ndicate the LYPe of land use (residentialr commercial, etc.),
Intensity Of :,r'ttd use (one -family, apartment houses; shops, depart
►neat stores,, >s«4.), and scale of development (heights, frontage,
+;et bacit, rea 'r yard, etc.)- ►�i1 Ino
Cyt r4_
t; :it'i'I PR'.A'T10N4 C hereby certifv that the statements furnished above and in
i Itt.it l r� tci"e l if its 'present the data and information 'required for this
eval iat,ioit to Che best of my ability, and that the facts; statements
aiidt liefn1!"illn�t)n -presented } are true and correct to the best of my ,knowledge
'
011
i1;tf cy
Signature .,
blot
s Mso sol,nvate sltt!et for longer responses
'GO$.t�'t1tt1�18A8q �Ut?`', it
acing aC W- no
� d
r �
SUBOiVIDER"S STATEMENT
` �G.krc 2. _, pates__-__��-1 ...�..�.
Name
Project
AP #
-6 28 �- 100
1.
Existing use (s) of the !an
2.
Proposed use (s) of the land
3.
Improvements proposed,(See ch. 20-21 County Code,)_- r'
44
Public areas proposed.
5.
Tree planting/or Y'emoval (approx. number) vt ;fit 2_
6:
Prelimnary copy of any conditibnl restrictive reservati"ons or covenants
or shall be attached to this statement.
existing proposed
attached' none
�,
type of division, ire,, ' r�vater urbanrural etc.
7.
Mate,
y
LD
1040
w
P=..l3N �OI+T�'Oi2M.41VG� F�EPC3RT'
completed try applicant:
Z>weafst 1-4 to be .
/ PLICAtiT MA'n AND AD7lP.FSS:
z. P_Pj3JE= DFS vnom:
3.. .:ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUt ER(S):
4. PR:OPoSED USE:
r
M18 following items are to be compl by the /arming Department:
t►„Z',*iT ZONING;
LAND CONSERVATION AGPIMMIT: ✓l-
�.AL PLAN DESIGNATIaN•. .,J.r /
�zdftioml Criteria. 7,117V ,' lr--
AGLCL(�L"2c AL•P.IDENIIAi. YES 2O It is recommended that you perform the
Agricultural Compatibility following checked items: `r
ARCHA-70LOGICAL RECORDS CHECK J�
1 Z. Water and Sewer Capacity ,
BO'TANiCAL SURVEY
3. Adequate r`•Le Facilities .,
4. ,Road Capacity and Maintenance GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
5, Access to Cc=ercial and Schools YES NO
Cs�tCxiARD AND T= CROPS WITHIN DEPAR�NT OF FISH
AM GAME DEVELOPMENT. ZONE:
Z
Predominant 5-10 ac. israi%l Sixes
., Vicinity of urban Boundaries WIMM FLOOD PLAIN
3. Ag, Viability not, Impaired ___. ,
HIIffiN ARE3a. SPECIFIC OR
Staff Determination Substantially conforms to:: LAND USE PLAN:
6MM7AL PLAN; l: Land Use ,,,'
If Yes, _.
Z. Conservation Name of Plan
3; OpenSpace wr'mm URBAN RESERVE:
k. Safety
S. NoiseXIf Yes, _ ._ .... _
-V-Name of Reserra
6. Housing n
p 7. Circulation � .r AIRPORT LAND USE PLANS
ZOHlitta: _'�
ell�
tk:S J�i �.I`„ ✓�/�!' / Y ''zlz�
r
/'''►�1ff '%4 /e �''i r1i' f '�✓C�z`t!' ,r°e!'1_,�Jr /1i1 .'�,�' %i %� .
F Y •:�,;
644
�..�-�...� c :.� .✓'-.�y'G„�
Sc'aff. Si�O��p�tv:ro� Y..., . r �L..i " /�G..[ .+"�� `/ Date
'er : �j y _. �. ..
AS THE APPLICANT FOR THE MtESTED LARD.DIVISI09y I AH AWARE OF W. ABOVE STAFF bEMMMATION REGARDING
THE CONFORMANCE i.TM fist GEMRAL PLAN AND ZONING.
Dated ,�.. 'J-� .. Signature of Applicant
itn;t report will expire and be d"carded six (6) months from the date of the staff tiSnature.
Lb 1000k (t dVzsed 6-8-1) ,'
Planning g Department NAME: MICAHEL, McCOLLil�t, �
Environmental Health Department A
CDF (Forestry Department) AP:, ?.8-10-33 "
Attn: J. Craig Carter (on areas north of red line on map)
Butte County Sheriff
PG&E (check 'title report for easement)
Pacific Bell
Butte County Mosquito Abatement OR
col ille mosquito
wall ma� (areas within large map in cabinet)
Orov�.11e Mos into Abatement
5 /n'An
W /l f Al U `
Water 06mpany (if individual wells arefnot indicated on application or map)
Durham Irrigation OR Durham Mutual Water Co.
California Water Service Company (Chico area)
Oroville—Wyandotte Irrigation District (Oroville-areal SE of river)
Thermalito Irrigation. District (Thermalito area NE of river)
Limesaddle Community Services District (Paradise area along Pentt Rd.
to lake)
Del Oro Water (Paradise Pines area)
Buzztail Waterworks (Doe Mill Ridge/Forest 'Ranch ,area)
Paradise Irrigation District
City of . . i (check wall maps for spheres of influence)
Or ovi.11e
Chico
Paradise
`Biggs
MMMM 'YUBA COUNTY P1AIJNING DEPT.
00W LLE AREA ONLY:
Lake O.�oville. Area Public Utility District(see large map in cabinet)
Feather River Recreation District (see large map in cabinet)
El Medio Fire District (chock Wall map, a small portion of Oroville only)'
B16Z, RICAVALE, GRIDLEY AREAS (SOUTH BUTTN COUTY): check wall map and title report
to see what applies. Some areas overlap,
_ Drainage District '#1
Drainage District #
Drainage District #100`
Drainage District #200
Reclamation District #833
Reelamataon District #2055
Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District
Butte Creek Drainage District
IN MTAIV CASES:
Superintendent of Schools (only for subdivisions)
X. Dept, of Fish and Game (near water and in rural and mountain area$)
Cal Trans (near State Rw,y. 32, 70, 99, 149 (Chico cut—oEf); 152 (Olive Hwy.
Richvale Rwy.), 191 (Clark Road)
State Water Quality Control Board (projects with i, Sore than 100 bots or units)
United States Forest Service (if project borders USA land --check AP books)
Parks and Recreation Department (property near Lake Oroville)
State Water Resources Department (property near, Lake Oroville r1 watershed)
Rock Creek kteclaimation Dist: (west of Chico Airport, south of Rock Creek and
east of Hwr. 99 (see wall map)
Chico Area Recreation & Park Dist (only for subdivisions)
t3.S. Dept. of the Army, Sacramento bist•, Corps of Engineers (near water and
in rural and mountain areas)
SPECIAL CASES: check tit,ie report for any mention of special services or easements such
ata to 'Thermxla to frrigntion District ('numbered items)
R
w•r
1 l ' +e•.• " � Co A d
LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY
LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES'
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE + OROVRLE, CALIFORNIA 95065•3397
TELEPHONE: 19161 538-7266
FAX- 19161 538.2140` r n
CERTIFIED MAIL
June 25., 1992
MIRE: AP 28-10-33
Michael McCollum
Tent at ; ve Parcel Map
1174 Clark Ave Appeal
{
Yuba City, CA 95991
Dear Mr,. McCollum.
At the regular meeting of the Butte County Board of Supervisors
,
the Board denied your appeal finding that the
held June 23 1992,
_ referenced property does not conform to the Generale Plan
above
policies of the Agricultural -Residential General Plan Designation.
if you have any questions Concerning this matter', please contact
this office at 916--538-7266.
k V?,ry truly yours
Stuart
Edell
Managet Land Development Div.
SE/kp
cc •P�anryi.ng-'DepaF�ttnef'1t t
Envi. tohment al Health Department -
Clerk of the Board
i!
�4
_-=;- JEAN 2
'Ville, Cailf tole
i ,A N 0 +
� ,
F hiA
U
'
RAL "'EA!TI-1 AI'elxr 3GAU
—+ DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
CERTIFIED MAIL7 COUNTY WILLIAM (Bill) CHEFF, Director
UNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965
Telephone* 1916);S38 7681
RONALD D. M.ELROY
DepUly Direcior
i -
i
April 28, 1992
Michael McCollum
1174 Clark Ave., RE: AP 28-10--33
Yuba, City, CA 95391 TentatiVe Parcel Map
Appeal
Dear Mri McCollum.
f
Please be advised that the Bette County Board of Supervisors has
sell as public hearing date of May_1,992 at 10:15 a.m, to hear
Your appeal of Advisory Agency's denial of the above t-eferenced
tentative map at its meeting of A01 -i1 13; 1992, (j
This hearing is being scheduled in order to, complY with the
prOViSionS of Section 66452.5(a) 014 the Gal ifor,) a S
-u`cdiviSion Map:
Act which requi r,4s that an appeal hearing be l: ,t 1 d within 30 days
of the date of the appeal being filed; The hear'i'h5 will be opened;
however, action will not be taken on thci
project on "that day,
Zn order to comaly with the provisions of public Resources Code,
Section 21091, which requires a 30 day public review
period.... for
the enviroMmen#al documents, the hearing of May 19, 1092 will be
contihQed to June 9, 1992 at 104'45 a,m , at which time action may
be taken on the project,
0
The meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors RCoom, County'
Administratio`h Building, 25 County C+ - titer Dr. ,, Oroville,
California,
.i
� Q
ItkINCH MILTON REDM�7, JNR ,}'PEAL WAS UPHELD
UgLi HEARING: QUA(MILTON
..._.. l f n l �i l han P 6-norid ) appeal of Adviso
P � PI' y' s �r--- �
, cn, d tion 7umn6er 3 regarding u I �n far an diligently pursue a 20 acre za,�e
� 9
et1 c/
c: ; 0e aci a tentatiYe prs.cei ;nap, ten lots in 50tte Count (con::urre�t with a map for
it s lata in Yuba Counry), AP 28-03-08 and AP 28.13-09, aoutneast cnr ze► of Loma Krait
GP and La Porte Ra�xd •r as held. at this time.
The Planning 'Vepartment was not present to answer any questions regardir►g
,t j•Cquire,nent to pursue a 20 acre za.e change..
Chairman Lemke stated they head discussed, this recuiremdO beFor► wherry '
r�.•a; nt is required to puraue. pplicozon ng, all they need to do is par/ `One $150 fee,
and file for a zone change,. He fejt the re.�ucement was a little du�nr. «
Ear[ Nelson, enviranmantaI reviewdirector, stated he tett th-re was two
d opf,ons, whether to.ca- tion this project oe find the area rezoned. From his 4,- tPalments
sixid point they svppar•' the policy of the general place.. 'There There etre Icsrge toys in this area.
Supp: visor NAArrston queitl nod if this property was subdivided inter 26 acrc.
` �Fcrce!s and three months from now I am in canf6emity with the. zone and he wanted to
t it into 4 to 5 parcels he woulip�ag, run u c, the General Play that has been
opted which says the density will go to 20 to ages. .
« ,
Nelson stated this urea was within the :Zeidenticsi Agrictalteirz zo,
Mr »,
car ent was aware at the conflicts with the ti
=nd it applies here. The °Tanning Chep tm :t
Gaheral flan rand h-- felt if should
directed-1a.-i'ianning stafF..
Hearing op -m, to the pcahlic. Appe-iring
n Redmond, Yut,a Ci tY . Mr.
r,d stated he. �MSs. a part owner
1
Milton RedmaHe. had gone to a int of
rand lte had hard an extensive PIR prepared for the property .
axpen:e and time. He was not in favor' of four way splittitsg. .He fell the project ryas'
b.eauflful the way it was:
it he �t�eee :n a po,Mion of buying a parcel he would hove«
pp ify Fp y y Split- He Felt that facer way split's should b"
this o orhrrt i to a l far a two wa
e nenPed'ari� that through Podalic Vloeka, Environmental Revie0+ one) plc►n-jing staFFs
this All 'he wcs asking` was that it remain as it is. The respai7se
this �+auld` not he allowed• 5 rriin�«e., o 19 minutes. There is a ,lin the area,
trmr5 For fire has bee pros still a to Groville it t 9 sch�o
e 'high t clnool stud n g «
Vas nox, a oaf are�i foci Sigh density«,
ih _- . � 6i the 20 acre regvirement Twos iMiJhe hest interest I
Sup,,- visor Dolan fele t i
of•' the land: ! ,
�il1r ERVISOR WHEELER ABS NT AT THIS TIME
t
(t;orit:3ti,Ada an next page)
tJTTE COUNTY OAitb op StJ Mi;;Ito-o tjtEinNG - Noaeta`6er 13, L979
, tai
r .
!}hr. Reil" `fid riot feat that four way'splits 1;fou l for nnyo:ie..
an individual had 2 Ric... -s and it was taii'Sarge he shoal ...-est have the opportunif 1
to try to di;vid�a it. i
rvliairman Lemice stated that anything les; than the 20 acres would be
requestvid t<s -joumatically require a Ge'nr''ral, Plan change in the orety before Less,
.than the 20 acres could he broken up
Mr. Nelson felt this was a, que•ttion that should be 'directed ta' he Planning'
peprsrtrrrent. A3 lang as the Genera! Pian rn, governs on the• zo�1E', Q aCf?5 wVUicl
be lihe minimum un#e s that cauld rrneel' the re,duiremerrts.
Dan Blackstock, coup 0 counsel, stated that the coning is suppose to, be•
cransistant with the General Elam,. Tierce ells 6e. .no na _oning iunless if s consistcnt.
There is some pearsievns with, the •cansistanc-, with the to tt. The feevficv bo;h the
rexdi,re and the 5nviraomenfal frees are $325.
Chairman Lernke fait all ass individual has to da. Ts go an appy with. the
.$325 and he can sov he is di#r,,gnnfly pw'suing a. zatie change H,:,,fe.#t it w= shmm.
Mr. 8tackstock felt it was not a sham but would 6ring•eornistancy with the
za►iIng*
`
Hearing cla:gid to the public arid. confined to .,e Board. »
f Of ava l'Ra��n Supervisor
Mon4..d�nond}: a.sAd o,der3 by Suparvisar Moseley that
r
,,, ( Advisory Agency, condi Hart 3 regardi►i
. _ the spu.. �. Q Q -� •��
aPW#y'tng for and dilige`,tly pursue a 20�acre tone crso-igz fist a °td,ta de parcel aia�, ;tiara
lora in Yuba County)AP 28-08.0¢ orad AR 13-10-400, Southe t cor -i=", of Lama Ricci
Rodd nets La Parte Ro�.,ri be upheld.
supervisor Dolan stated sfii_ didnot think the co+,dihio„ would opu#y for 20
acre tone; she did nrst think it was.o'shoni. people e:tpect that 6y 6uying this parcel
.they routd divide 7-0.0 acres into A lot oz' prape,-ty in the area i- in tnA; k
Williamson Act and it fits- it fits hf• Zane W18 it should- be +applied here' t
P p
A'future f3rce1 o,vrh,:r wautd: i,avr3, r„ xc�-iatfe hefluld�i`t wont Four orce#ing..
Chairm'in LerAe stated, that Ghe wat, on hicipatIng that eve► jro,z that tnoued
j
' out• there was goirig fd tto+,- fo do, P „ 4
Vote 6:1 the motion:
AAY5'S: Supervisa•rs .M elaey:. Winsfor, rand. Chairman Lemke ,
h O" S Supervtscit' Dolan
_AtlS;NT: °Si�pe,�•vsor �l�lieela:- � '
Mcg- ion carriod.
;/ `www t y
* '$ T. A►a++ VOUL�{it' Wil or »
1
f
fCTll�yu-
W
r
GDA Engineering - on behalf of Charles Johnson and Don Reich, 'appeals'
i 1Q,i the ,advisory Agency's denial 'of tentative parcel map (proposed mitigated
negative -declaration regarding, environmental impact) to create three
,parcels on the southeast cornu: of LaPorte Road and Loma Rica road,
Bangor `area..
Motion: NOVED THAT THE REQUIRF.ME:NTS OF THE CALIFORNIA ,ENVII aCmTF,L p
QUALITYACT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND, Tu -TS
A, CONSIDERED IN MAKING TS
VECI0141: ADOPTED A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, ACCEPTING'
THE MITIGATION MEASURES AS PROPOSED By THE APPLICANT. THE
ZONING AXD GENERAL PLAN ALLal FOR PARCELS DF THIS SIZE. THE
ARE& HAS; ADEQUATPI FIRE FACILITIES, ROAD CAPACITY AND IS NOT
TOO PAR FROM COMMERCIAL SERVICES AND SCHOOLS FOR, THIS TYPE
OF LOW DENSITY F2UEtAi, RESIDE NTIAL' DEVELOPMENT. T$YS TYPE or
i, USE IS NIT WCOMPATIBLE* WITH NEIGHBORING AGRICUL, LMij.. USES.
FOUND THAT TED::. PRWECT CONFORMS TO THE BUTTE COL`NTY` GENERAL
PLAN AND UPHELD, THE APPEAL OF TETE ADVISORYAGENCY'S DENIAL OF
A TENTATIVE 'dARCI S Diijp FOR CHARDS JOHNSON AND DON R=CH,
AP 281.0-24, CREATUIG THREE PARCELS, WITH PUBLIC WOB.?S CONDITIONS
I TiROUCI, 5 AND ENOTRONMENTAL HEALTH CONDITIONS, 6 TMIOUGH 9,.
vote c I' Y 2 14 3 Y 4 y S Y (Motion carried) s
9UTTE COUNTY BOARD Off' 5UPMISOkV MINIM - NOVembor i3, 98
i�
n
BUTTE COUNxY ADVISORY AGENCY MINUTES
APRIL 13, 1992
PRESENT: STU EDELL, PAULA LEASURE, CRAIG ERICKSON
ALSO PRESENT DIANA SHTJ.EY, MICHAEL MCCOLLUMN,, STEVE MC
------------ ---- ----------------------------
A,.
-- ----- --- -----At,. "1'';ENTATIVEPARCEL MAP FOR CONSiOERATIUN:
1
Michael McCollum, AP 28-10"33, Tentative Parcel 'Map, 3 parcels
located, on the west -side of Fawn CoUrt approx., 1400 ft south of
La' `Porte Road. Bangor area.
Michael McCollum said that regarding items #3 and 5 on the Planning, Director's
that tilabo is are�pr p and est 1�o commercial services, he feels
bout fade uateefiiot re,tection from the Bangor Fire Dept. and he is
,,'Report d
only 20 minutes froin'Marysville for commercial services. Also; he'thinks
hinks`
'that instead of internal sprinklers, he thinks that protectio'from grassland
fire is ,wally more ,important, but tie is willing to install sprinklers
Mr. Edell said that on Planning Dept. mitigation, measuke #3, the wotds;
"and on the deed" should be deleted, which they were. Also Ms. Leasure
said that the word, "nest" should be insetted before `residential structures" I ,
,on Mitigation measure #2.
:Ms. Leasure explained the reasoning t.ehind the finding that there is not
considered, to be adequate fire protection and accesF,to commercial service
and schools.
Mr
. McCollum again said that he feels they are adequate.
Steve hicEnulty a proponent of theoproject; wanted to know about the appeal
process.
Mr. Edell ekplained the appeal process.
.Ms, Leasure said that the Zoning and General, Plan policies have bben in effect
in this area for several years;
Mr. Md8oulty felt that serious farining is ,not practical in this areae anis
parcels make '"hobby" farms, and p `s size
thab:5 acre � d other parcels of thy.
have been approved in this area:
Ms. Leasure said she would have to make a motion for denial. based on thrs' '
staff' report from the Planning Depti She made, a motion for denial basely
on the staff report finding that the project does not.' meet conditions #I
and #5 of the Ceneral Ilan Policies (of the Agpid'uItural-Rdsidetltial
designation;). Motion seconded by Mr. Frick$on and carried unahlffi6usl:y.
rrr+..li:nirrrir�i�.iru.rr'rrr M�:�r�r—r���rr..rwarl�wwir iwa rrrii}L—Lf�—rrr�rLrl..�..r Li—r..wr' Lw.r—.rt�r Lcti+L+
u C 3 5 III v
�. Count,
Butte.
T h I y
- 'LA NJ 1D s,y F �h't Ada 7 i,} LPL Va�A� rH AND S wAU��
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORIts
WILLIAM (Bill) CHEFF, Director
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE-OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965
Telephone: (916) 538.7681
RONALD D, McELROY
Planning Department Dapury Director
J' RJ N 11 199
0rowle, C,611l0rrtla J u h e 9, 1,992
Michael MCCo'llum RE: AP28-10-33
.1174 Clark_Ave. Tentative Parcel Map
I
Yuba Ci'tY, CA 96991 Appeal
pear Mr. McCollum:
Butte County B6ard of supervisors
At the ')'regular meeting of B
ti';e _
held JUHti 9, 1992, the Board c;?ntinued the open hearing to June 23,
1992 at. 11:90 a.m.
If you should have any questions conCerni;ng this matter., please
contact' this office at 816-538--7266;
Very truly yours,
r William Cheff
Director of Public Works
Stuart Ede;l1'
Assistant Director
SE/kp
CC . p.alin�.fly...D€iSr.ti?1et11
Ehvirohmental Health Departmeht
Clerk of the board'
Suite co��ftt
rw�
...
--.
-� - - »A4kt`:
E;"
r NrTtJAi %NEALThfi AhJCr,
�- -
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
WILLIAM (E111) CHEFF, Director
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE . OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965
Telephone: (916) 538.7681
CM- TIF'IED MAIL
RONALDD" McELROY
Deputy Director
April 13,- 199 -
Michael McCollum
RL: AP 28-10-33
1174 Clark Avenue
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
Yuba City, CA 95991
Dear Mr:. McCollum:
At the regular meeting. of the Butte County
Advisory Agency held on
April 131 1992, the agency denied your tentative
parcel map map on
the above -referenced property.. The project
was denied because it
does not conform to the Agricul,,:ural-"Residential
dosigna.tion of the
Butte County General Plan;,specifically
policy items #3 and #5.
If no appeals are filed within lien (1.0)
days with the Clerk of the
Board of Supervisors, With the appropriate
fee, this action will be
final:
If you have arty questiorit,� regarding this: matter, please contact this
office.
Very _truly yours,
Villiain Chaff
Director of Public Corks
gg
,.
Stuart Edell
Assistant Direttor
SE/ids
attachment .�
cc': Planning Department
Health De artment�
Snv�.ronmental p
,
i
SC�G0.'4E,...'G`Al{FORNfA—,iHE'Rk;SOU�CE5 AG�h!'1!� _ I _ __li _ PETE WINSt�N.'Govemo
�
ATM F FIS T AN Di G,AIV1E ;�, ., ,+ � �
DAG
a�
ROAD SUgTE A �aI
l t�tCH) COPOVA, CAMFORNIA 95670
t 91.E .3$5-7020
;March 2 rZ , 1992
14r Stuart Edell:'
Department of Publl.ic WOrks
7 County Ce;ntier Dtive
orov°ill{t, ca i ornia 95965
Dear Mr. Fuell c
Thp
. Michael McCollum k2ev':isOd 41 Tentative Parcel Map did not
address the concorns we express6d in our Sop.tember E, 1991,
letter to y ,ur ctEice regarding the original_ map. Those concerns
remain valid.
If we can be, of tu:;ther asi� ".stance, pl.f�ase_ contact
Mrs Ron, Bertram, Ascor:iate Wildlife Biologist or
Pats ;:f.a ferk ns, Wililife Ikanagement Supervisor, telephone
i' (916) 55-7010,.
Sincerely i
Jami D I�essersm
Regional Manager
cc
Ke, Ron 'Bert7.61,rit
Doptattment o Vish and Gargle
r
�
Rancho Cordova. Cid 95670
Lid
D . + ,
ISM -
!6
anis Gaitte '
Ito � c!6 "dry j C 95670
w x .
1 J
1'
Ir t ItM,}ry 64'
fi} I '^ifrb
�i
1 c
F
1
6u 0 t�tlZ
LA14 OF NATUPAL Vr5AITH ANI I? SEAUTY
DEPARTMENTOF PUSLIC WORKS'
WILLIAM (6111) CHEFF, birector
7 COUNTY CENTER: DRIVE OROVILLEt, CALIFORNIA 95965
OFITZF"YED MAIL I Telephone' (916) $38.7681
Match 5, 1992 RONALD D. M.ELROY
Deputy Direetcr
Michael McCollum " PEi: AP 28-10--53 _
1774 Clark ,Avenue TSNTA,TYYE PARCEL MAI? '
Yuba City, CA 95991
Dear 14r. McCollum;
Please be advised that the Butte County Advisory Agency Will bear
your application on the :above-identified property, on April 11, 1992.
Thel Agency will be reviewing ;he findings from the Planning Di�partment
and; will be considering your tentative parcel crap, Public Wlotks Will
reco=end the conditions of apIraval as listed in the attaches sheet.
The meeting Will commence at 9:00 a.m., in the Board of Supervisors'
Room, C6uI1ty .Adminstrat.on Building, 25 County Center Arive
Orovi.11e, waliforhilai
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contrict this
off ice at 538-7266,
Very truly yours,
William Cheff
Director of Public Works
2Lelo
Stuart Edell
y "� Y ssistarit. Director
8677
8,/as
*'N"u� t�
attachment.
cc' Plann� tig, �ep.x rnl�nir
tInvironmenta7, ' ealth et '
{I
}
fj -
5r
�' 'TEN'1'A` M PARCEL MAP, Al 28-10-33, � parcels located
TdICHAEL MC.ALLum, roh. IOQQ ft. south of La Porte Road.
ori the west .side of fawn Court-,aPp
Bangor area,
Public G;nfcs 'Izonditaonss
Provide two-way traversable access RS -8 -LD -II to each parcel from
a county maintained road or state highway.
Access to be reserved in deeds as per, county n,rdinance and offered
for dedication on the final map.
Show 50 Vit, buildingsetback; line measured from centerline of access
easement.
4 Provide road maintenance agreement,;
5 Show all. easements of record on the final. maps
6 Provide street name signs per requirements of thL Department of
Public. Wor�,.s prior to recordation of the fiaya]. mag:
7. Provide cu]. -de -sac at the end of the street.
Obtain encroachWnt permit and construct standard road approach
4
providing
adequate sight distance at the intersection of, access road
and La Porte. Road
Q Pay any delinquent -taxes ox current taxes as required.
10 Meet the requirements of the Butte County Vire Department.
11 fleet the requirements of
q
�r 11r� •mx�'"'4
�
,i o 3 �"
APPEND I >, 1.
r
COUNTY OF BUTTE
ENV, 1RONX N7' -A , MC M-tbT FORM
(f�iL I
ET?A:LLTATION t�>��' 2';NVIRO2r'j)'2EN'Y' 2iPd�CT�'�
r=1lie. A4o, C28-100-033 LOO NO, 92-08=26-02 AP NO, •028-100-033
I_._• BACRGPD
t . Name :rt propoherit, Mtcltiael McCOI tuna
3. Address nt prop0henl and tepresentative (it applicable): l714 Clark we.., Yuba Clty c.1 950971
project .dtsctlot ton. Tentative parcelMap td divide Jb.oa Attes to create 'four parcels at i acres each,
ids MAYBE DISCUSSION OR EIdVIRONME!! TAL tkV.ALUATxON
II NiAND7�►TORY FIN1":C�+TGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
t,
Does the Noted'; have the
potential to:degratle:the ,� X this pt000sal will not st:IhifteantlY degrade _.th6 envlronnent. seUalfty of the e. ,
ar the discusstrn ICU item 41E, 5b, 2oa and io;
theOIt fish
lolrielcause
a
habitat popun wildlife
or
sustair,ing
levels, threaten to ofIminate a plant or
anlmai community, reduce `the numbet of restrlct the
range bt a rare or endangered Giant or animal: ar
aimtnate Impottant exalrlotes of major 't+etiods o` l
California hlstrsrY or prehlstoryt
1. noes the project have the potentlat to achieve ;K this proposal will not Impede long-teflh environnmental go -Alt,
short-term benefits to the dettlment of long-term
environment goalit to short-term Impact on the
environment is one which otcurs fn a telatfvelY
od of time wile longcta a Impacts will
endur`hInto the f"uture,
i th'Is i�roposat will not have a stgniflcant euaulativx imoact on the
r, fief` oeprujer:l have Impacts which t ndfViduaily
IlmI ed but cumulatively +.olrslde ablet to project r enVirahment.
may Impact on Uta or store separate tesaufces where
the Igort on each feWirce I s rotatively small,
but where the el'(ect of the total of those Impacts
on the envltonmifnt Is sig,llflcant.>
v k . chit Gtopbial wtIl not have a 'significant 'AdVsft�, Wect on human
q, does the project have envitonmenlal ; is on 'Winch _ --- bangs..
will cause subl,tantiat adverse
of
e; on human
beings, either directly or Indlteztty
1
TERMINATION
om toe basis of this initial evaluation:
i/WE tipd` the proposed Projdr,; tXULO NOT have a sightticant effect on the snvitonment Ane, a itEeA:'tvF brdLAAXTlCN wlII be tnopath'I'',
I/we find that aithnuoh the flroposed tttoject COutb have a significant etteet on the ennvlcbhm'0htr„tpote wl.11 not ba, a slgniticatit 6i)tct In thit
Lase because the MiTICATION AIEA5LgES di!Sctlbed on the it►tAdhed sheet have heen added to the' t0tcl. A NEGATIVE oLCLhRAIICN W If be brepafad.
11WE find the ptoposed ptole'ct mAY have a significant i0teet on the envitanrreht, and dj L1+Vl§1JWtt4A1. IMPACT ktpMf Is requited. ;
ctx,i•rt+P Olt wirtq :PLMWI�lt7EPART trdt°
� '
ISAMI Ndvembe r 6. Ml uY c 44�SfLL� 'Cl AT 4s de6&j—
%
ktVfe' wed by:
i
,nvjxoalmenta1 0heck ist *" ` v'aluati.on;, o Elt�vxro�men�aJL Tmpac>~
YES >AAyer r10
DI8CVsSj6 OF ENVIRONMSN'1'AL EVALGATION
aQ:. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
s, Lk1zjH.
Will the proposal re,3uit ril slgniiicanLl
unstable earth conditions. or changes in
The PrOpasal'wlll s
a.
b,
geologic sUbstrUctUrest
Disruption, displacement, compaction or
x
lot result Insomediate es uptlortt dlsplacemen
chompacptSnnoand or the stte as a result of development
oveecovering of the soil?
overcoverIng
of structures, drivetvaYs, park(ng areas, Ott. The slopes on site are
Tittle toll
modetat0. 6% to 15%. Home sites can be developed Wilh
work being necessary.
'the Allect some of the topography depending on home
I
c.
Change In topography or ground surface
x �;
proposal.could
slte torat.lons. However building slid can be found that need
relief teaturest
little grading,
d,
pestfuctlan. cov4,rinOOlaa tnOdlficatfvnof any
X
The site hB 110 Unique physical leatutes,
uaigUe geologic or Physical features?
X--
The propmay cause sbt?te erost0n due to disruption, displacemcnt,
e,
increase In wind or water erosion of sol'Is,,
dither on Of art site?
ovosal
comoact'on and etcovettrig of the site, The Impacts are not
due to the low rainfall amounts in the
expect(,J to be s'ignttirahl
area, lrle amount of dlstuption and the soli types on slid.
r.
changes in deoOsltldn of erosion cct beach
x
Thethe�p opatty Issto(ated�WIthin aeflcodit d zones A" sol I disruption
of
sands , of changes In solation, channel of
Which may modify the channel of
should nol be allowed In this area. X too' "No oevelopment" setback
at er0slon
A tlver or stteam or the bed of the ocean
will prOvIdd the necessary protection,
or any bay, Inlet or laket
toss aorltutEurally ptoductiVe
-
represent a significant toss Of prime
'this proposal does no re rese
of prime
soles outside des('9nated urban areas?
lturs soils
ti
o lc
Exposure of people or property to ge-ol"g
Exposure
-- X--
All rel Build county is in a,Moderat.e catihquake Intensity zone V10 -
Cori truclion of bu; tri 4uatetm auliding code standards for
hazards such as earthgaakes, lapdsiides,
btT; sl�nllat
Wtl(provide auequate protectlbn to occupa"nls in case
selsinIe zone r provide
mud"s(idds, ground failure
.I
of selsmic Activity.
hazardst a
01111 the ptoprssaf result in substrMtal:
a.
Air eualsrto"rs or deterlotallon or amblent
X-.
The -proposal may 91 (0 i alt OUal ity by generating 5dds.t I. C ,,iIValrt ld
patileuiate matldt 'caused by vehicles on grave) roads, CoUr.tY toad
atr_q i ,y
standards (or this protect do hat re0011`0 pavlhg,
b:
the 'treaECorY of ob(tcttonab►e odor smoke
_,_� x _-
The proposal Wilt not abate obiectlonablb bdors, stndke of IUme"s.
or Iumds2
ck
of hit ftYt ent 1011OUre of
Al tetatlui
x
the proposal will not ar tett the atmosphete.
tempo utbt V charig0 in comate,
localleley
Pd n'6
a, WAiE �
Will the proposal t^ mist. _3ul t (Ir SUb3 to
a.
cnangeS it cUrrenls, of the r~t.frtEP or
,,,,,,_;.. _" X ..
the proposal Will not atldct ally tvaIOMOUtse.
ditecl(ort of Water moveinehit In` elthdr
b.
marine of Fresh Wow
Changes In absorpllon ;fates, drainage
,._ _ ,_
The otcposa�' mayppresult in an increase (h sulface valet
i�otHowdvef��no� ICallIlladVcrse
runoff due
pa1,tot n$ Qt the rate Arid amount rs'r sUrlace
therddtalnagcbpatternnon the slid
signls
tun iff
lmi�arts are .anticipated br:cduse bt tilt oalt fel draihage courses on
3
environmental Checklist * Evaluation of Environmerital impact
{rte and the minoramount of Increased iunoff -
c,
meed lot orf-slto surface drainage
x
No off site drainage Improvements will be required for this project.
Improvements, Including vegetation removal,
channelizatlon or culvert Instaliationf
d..
Alterations, to the course or (Ice# of flood
x
The prop, sal Wilt not significantly affect any flood control channels
waters?
of watelCourses, see the dtscutsion for item if.
Q.
Change In the amount of surface water Ih any _,:
x
The proposal will not affect any watercours'r.. see dlsciisslon for
water body?
item it.
f.
Discharge into surface ?raters, or In any
alte:::atitln surface watet
r _. x_
—
The proposal may Affect surface ;rater quality due to siltation
resulting from erosion caused by driveway and
of quality.
Including but not limited to tempefalute,
road and constluction
grading of building sites. This should not be a significant effect
dissolved oxygen or turbidi:ty3
due to the slze of the parcels that could be developed and the use
of Standard constructibn practices to minimize erosion.
g.
Atletatido of the direction or rate: of flow
x
The proposal will not alfect the direction or flow of ground waters,
of ground watets?
h.
dhange in the quantlty of quail ty of ground
x -
around water in the area Is potentially, limited,, withdrawals may
wAters, either ihtou'gh direct additions or
al[ect watel availability onadiacent parceC sutflclent water may
I thdrairais, or thfough Inletception of ati
not be avallable to Support s ac?e parcels.
aquifer by cuts or excavations
1.
(reduction In the amount of `water bthowise
x
see discussion lot item M.
avallAbie fol public water supplies?
),
t:xposute of oepple, or propefxV to Walef-
_ x
see discussion for item it,
telated hazards such as tloodingt
A. PtJ.rrr-
r.rr:E. Will the propo.B result to
_
substantial -,al
A.
Change in the diversity of species, or `�
x _ _,
Tho-ptoposal could row t in a Incremental 'reduction in tmk Woodland
hutribter tlf troy, species of ahts
.pftiniaudiflg
habl sal. This
habitat Is contlddrdd ihmottaht because it provides
tteesl shrubs, grass, '_tops. and aouawt
moit of the ilre
sustaining requltements needed by numerous animal
marts>f
species. There
has been significant cumulative losses of Oak
Woodlands in Calffothia due to tesidsnlial,comiiercial,
and other
development projects. The CalitotnlA
bept, of Fish and dame
recommend several mltigatibb measures
to protect this habitat.
b,
on of a humbsrnfol anylthunique. fare
kedendann
x
the site contains no tare plants.
ot rst
t�
rniroductfon of new species of plants Ihto
x
The proposal will noE Rites;,, eirlsting plant lice.
an area. of ih a battier to the normal
replenlshmeht of 01t ting :species'x
d„
Reduction In acreage of any aaticultu'ral
x
The site, does not contain A-V agricultural crops tend 1s Presentlycrop?
devotoped with ,
a �dltd t
tr r. ivitI the /Otopbtai result In
su stanttais
a, .
Cnahge In the diVersity bl $penes, or
x
hipatfah vegetatlon along south Iioneut wreck ptbvtdes ,tabitat for A
numbars of any S0006 of ahfmals (birds..
humbar of animal spedles. protection of this habitat Wlll mttlgate
:and animals including reptiles, fish And
40Y frroat1l5.
0e1111sh, btnthlc iotgahitio or intects)
b.
Reduction Irilbe numbers of any uhiriue, r A r 0
Y
The Area Is ftequehied by Wthtering isald gagies. the site ,provides.
or ehdAn,getdd toetles of animist
-
foraging ,arch, especially alo;lg South Honcut Creek.
c
-- '#
* va,jU, tion of Env ionulental
Iatp� at
�n ►ental Checklist
introductlon of Mew species of animals Into
x
The proposal will not affect existing animal Ili'e,
c.
an area, or in a barrier to the migration
Of rovement of animals?
x
see the discussion for 4a and sa & sb.
d„ Deterioration of existing fish or Wlldlffe
hal>itaE?
6. tg1jg wttt the proposal result Irr substanttat"'
The not resUlt In a substantial tncleaSe Eh noise
a, increases I eXtstirig noise ICyeISI
x
proposal ,will
created on site or in the viclnItY,
tevetsx
x
The proposal will not expose. People to severe noise levels.
b. Exposure of people to severe noise
x
The.proaosal will not tesUll In a substantial inctca3e In light of
7, Will proposal produce
dig E
—�`— .,
glare '`seated on slid or In OR vic(nily,
(the
g� caant and
Will the ptoposa.l result th a substantial
—X
The
lutaI
land use tes bdef$zoneased on st ea �havingrgdst
a
lcritirlaamtlsllbeapdresnge lentato
g, LAM)USE- land use a{ an
a tetatiort of the pretest or planned !a
pesid ntialosa
'zones have 7o acre_mtnimums or la gr -
de lost, consistent h
consn
conditional less
oleo
than a zo acre minimum, Those criteria area.
i, twoatible With neighboring a9rlcultutal atllvitles.
a, Evldehce of adeduute Water and 'sewage disposal 'capaclty.
a. Availability of adequate fire protection facilities.
4; Adequalel maintained hootoved road access With sutilclenl
capacity to service area,
5. Reasonable accessibility to canmktttal $etvices and schools;
The t�il3tthg A-sP zoite was adopted phot to the aooptlon of the
curtest Cenetal flan ollclet an i"s and
Cotm]I3slats, The conditlortia) ctla not pt
a"res,, Leri? ate present. Co support s
In this area, ISIan3 must be found in
acre parcels
Plan rior to a praval. The findings
conlormlty with the COO PI h p pp
natute of this
cahoot be 44ade In, this cafe, lDue to the Iimtted
protect this ii?uailct Is rot seen as significant
9 NXTIRAI RfwMjgat will the proposal fetult fn
The, proposal H1ll hot of"feet Any natural resources.
a, Incrotse to the rate of useeat shy hatutAl �—X
.. _.
tesoutcest
refs vabie natural
.
The proposal will not deplete eny halUral tesoU"tce3.
b. llepletlan of any non
resourcesf
RM pr, Uosq will the ptoposa', Involve:
x...
Iclwol i not Involve ihr: use o1 hazardous materials, .Mr
o
a ;k tlik of ofhazardous �
t lacaped a to any lacill-files Which store of utilize suelt
stostantes t `tiuding, but ndt limited Io,
swsta pesticides, emit lit IIby I
radiation) In
mated alt,
the event of an accideril., or dpset
tondltlans7
x
the ptaposal will oat affect anY emotehty tovites,
p, possible intdttetente with an linetget►ey __�
tespoitse OIA" or emetboev evacuatlon plant
;
i
Y
s�heckl i t * Eva1uil,tl 02A vt F'a VXrontttental
Impact
I va:ranmental
alter location;
- x
The proposal could open the way for other lands tit the area to divide
parcels, This will have a pnienlial impact on the • area-
tl+
ppptA7r�r�= Witt the proposal
strrbuZinn, density or growth rate of the human
to 5 acre
population. The area hat tint been planned for Ittts density.
popu pilon?
X
7he:propasai will not signllicantly Affect housing demand.
t2.
twios.Msrt4o. Will the proposal affect existing housing.
demand lot additional housing?
t3
or create a
TRANSPMTATJbN cistCaLIL Iar4._ will the proposal
Ih ttailic
result Mn
Conetatioof substanilal addl llonaI vehicle ._
��- st
The pro^n al will represeiit a minor Incremental increase ..
in the area that is not seen as significant,
a,
m.wda�enlz
or
sC._.
The 'Proposal will not affect parking because lhe,pr oposat wiF,1 (have .
toquifoments contained*IthinButtecounty
b, l:ltocts 00 d istlod parkilig facllilles,
.:�--
to comply with the parking
delaand for 'new parkingt
Code section 24-35,
- in congestion and
will represent a be
c, SubStarttl'aI impact on existing
-- st
The proposal slgnl4icanl=
_ roadt haLwl[I
maintenance reouireMents oh area road's that will lot
trdn sportation $Ystemst
`t
will not alter the present batteltl Of circulation in
d nt f (cant Alterations toptetch t palletis
ofsig circulation of moyement of people and/or
...--
thee proposal
gbgds2 V'
x_
The prrK,Gsa� will not affect rail or air traffic.
eraticis to watcrbor'ne, fall. �r atr --
tri
In a minae lnctementt increase to trail lc
will eon as
s
lnlrease ih traffic hazards to motor
-. --
r� x
and related tta►�esuli
and ilc hazards in the area that is not
1.
Yelic[es, btcYcllsls of pedes W alis i
id«
UBltc KEreVictds Wilt the ptoposal have an elfect
In a need for new or a lered
upon, or retail
goYcrnment teryites.
tt
��
� toanmenial Increase in demand lot
rhe t. opos l will 7te BlMtte County �_
a. fire proteGtlont -----
prtl'al
in flip area, 1,at
Impact thelecated Torre �
lite
tsepar lmenticai 1 f otnt a iii _ d y Co
61
t;Gtlotecltoh
�sForlIf
cumulative development in recd wave stated that Inslatlation
se
prpvlde lire. pt lvices= They h
in residential
of automatic fire suppression iptihklet systems
of fire resistance but Who and water
11tuctutes tha.uie .,matertali
sup sys{eni5.adegUate (0,sUppor.t the tprinkiel syttem Wlfl reduce
lite demand for fire ptotection services.
A
poi prooteciio whl h wl 1 I
be 'mi t I o ted by Ipayrne 1, crease of dev�toCc+ent
b, Police prptectlont
- ' `—
nl
lie
Impact tee lot shdo ttrs facilities
pursuant t6 the provl; alts of
Chapter 3, Article It 61 the 60tt6 COUhty Code..
The proposal ivi t i total t ,In' an irictemen►al increase Iii demand lot
c. sehoblst
school services lh ft
a' .to demand
recreatlonal laclliltest
x
_,.•
e
The proposal Will cellon Will t not be
fist k n and recreation fact I i lies i(httlhe n�reat that
d. Parks or ut'her
lot par scant.
iricfutfing
__, x
s ibasihna�a need
V
the 'wt , Iroadt Ina 1lidt bt le Ienlal t that
rt and bllye"t plJbliG facitll
e. Maln(thahteof oubtId [actIIlids
mainteat
tot maot be k h
villi hest be si�iiTfficahl
taadst
X
proposal wilt incremental Increase
Thr hat Wilinnotabe
t, other ttpYernmen'lai scr++icest
«R�+pgjaihsetVices
The III other govt,
significant.
6
EyaZuatian of ;env a
ranm ental
Impact
xtvioutgei►4:al
Checklist .,
r�
t3..
EWERG%`b will the proposal result In'
''fuel
rr
The proposal Will not ul(ICzc iutislanttal fuer at energy.
a, use at substantiae amounts of at
energVtx
+,---
not substantialrY Increase the demand, lot energy,
ThC proposa�•Wlli
b, 5ub3tanUai_I�creaseendemaYdUponezlsting
sources of enetsY: or require- thenrr'
O:`veTopmenl neyl 5aurca'S '�f enefgYr
1•
IlttLsystemfTtES. Will the Irtbptlfal resull to a treeWi l`• ,
subsiantjai alteretions to the
4'
rye" s„ or
following.
-the proposal wltl not affect elec,trlcal power or natural - gds
a, Mower or natural gas?
"'"'"`
dtsttibutIOn SYstPas
x
The proposal will not 31fe0l cc.mmUnlCatton SYStems.
b, Crmmuhltatlons systemSt
x_
The Pfoposaf Will not attest public Water systems.
c, water avaelablitlyt
The proposUl will have to meet the regUltements of the 6utle County'
d, SeWet or septic systems?
x ._
the pta,mehtal Hearth Dept,
solution for drainage.
x.
Thai proposal will have to provide a permanent
a, storm water dtaTnaget --y
x.
The proposal Will not affect soiled Waste dlsposa4M
solid t-asle and disposals --..-�
1.7,
UAa!j K A6 Wit) the Proposal result Int'
"ie proposal will not create any health hazard.
iteattan of any Health hazard at potentia[
a' g mental h"alt""
1'fie Will not eXPose people to ahY health haf
"
6.,� taxpasuree�ofupe�le to' :potential health
fiazardst
proposal
esuit en an ae theticallY offensive v10
will the Proposal result, th the
aecause� tait consistentrwith sufrounding tievetbpment;
obstiuctTon Ui any scenic Vista or V16W"open to the
at 10h
to
ji
b b arc. or ti 11 IV of teniiVA WO Open 'be
minot incremental increase In d,mand
Public vIdwt
the " Dial tiesu'�l In an Impact
: �-. x
. ?lie pkoposal may result In a gniticant.
test park "and recreation facilities Oat Will not be s
19,
uponek1IW. w1I1 atop
quafitY of quantity of ekls,ting
upon the
fe opCortuoltlei7
tecr lioriaM oppts
lo.
At nal
k
1-he proposal could ailed! atthcolodlkal sites; the properly Was
sl s part of an OR ori a
teS a
$, "lilt the proposal result 1n the alteration'
a blitofic
pteVlousi'y surveyed for archaeological
latter project, zs arChaealogicai htsIt Is sites here round In
it is not known If anV of
or detttudl-10 of prehlstarle.or
atahaeotoglcat sltet
oWeand
the area mostly along the creek. However
to
ahiactttart Calptorhla
theAtithr
totdt ctieckntfifuugilbthes7epattmeijt nt jologY
in order to'determtne It 19hifIchht sl 16'
State Unl.vekiity. Chico,,
tie located ail the property.. it to, an archaeological survey of
may
the ptopertY may be necessity.
Hlstortc site haVe been Identified in the area, see the discus5ton
"Mit the t'topbs'ai result inadVersephysic;l
prehistoric or
___ X—
for 11061oa.
tt aesthetle elfecti, to a
`li historic bullding. structure or bbjectt
the potential to
x
- �--
see the IdtSCUtflbn tot Item 204-
C. b6a the proposal have
� t
y�,
o
ETronm
�tal Checklistxtmenal`.impact
"Vx.. ST1CGE.PTB,D MITIGATI-011 M I'llRJ�B
a, tlmeltte9atlding measure Is recommended at tt►In
order to as3ess the potential for adverse
should contatl the If the
any.
impacts and to determine what,
opt late,
mitigation measures would be APN Northeast
aPpltcant
Information center at records
State
Univetsily Chtco. Int a records scarctt and
ser0l(Il itr evaluation. should the ley be
recannend that an archaeOloolzal survey
conducted. it will then be neeessarY lar a
atchaealoo calcsurveynoftthe proo10 e Yform an
z. DeveeIOPment' setback from the top of 1116 bank
of south.Honcut Cteek.
3. 3�iudoa tole rlw.
the final map stating.
•Xutomattc -lite t,uppresslon sptlnkler systems
shall be Ins tireIed In All residential
sltudtutes In accardance With the Natlonal Fire
Itfisia►latlonXotsoSprinkler standard
in one anC
two. t
Installation dOf los and mobile homes, N�f'A
standard V5n. lIlroUtpose of the Installation
of sprinkler systems is lot additional "solely
and property ptotection in the even of
tesidpntlal fires. This Installation fill
t t
eotecte Installed.'
lar stns ural fire
phoyection services in those Instances where
A, Meet thebiattraOnrequittereshnandiCamettegardilig ohe ak
woodland habitat including.
a. No oak tree removal except tat that
to ulted toptovide space lot buildingsmoot
heoalihsond safety standadsand Its meet
b, titabllsh_ a , no dliturbatide setback.
rdnmencitig Copy and extendingeoutwartl
Oak tree 'canopy
a dItt6hCo equal to One-half alt the
NO
canopy radius, around each tree. and
disturbance includes ittlgattcn a
toot damadlnd aclivttles.
o, helain al.l. snags excel>t ihost< which
posc a direct safety hazard,
d' lot,PzatntY purvoset. *beclduoUl Oak3
should be pruned during, the winter
dormant season only and evergreen oaks
duting July - August Only,
9
;nv ronniental Checklist Evaluation of,Bnvaxanmenta1 impact
DATA
SHEET
Praiect bescriotlon
b' Ground Water: Unknown, potentla.fy Ilmited.
6. alhage Chatacterlstics: The parcel drains to`
f.
"Type of Project., Land division
the southwest towards south ktoneut creek.
d. Annual Rainfaft (normal): 24 to 26 Inches per
2.
Brief I)escriptlon., 7entattve parcel map dividing zo.oe acres
to create four 5 acre parcel $,
year
e, Limliing Pactots3 'Possibly groundwatet.
s.
on the wes,t Pawn
area,approxltnalety
Pot N Road, tnide theof
t oO* southLOftadBangot
6.
AcousticCentc qualltyalicood.
q,
Proposed Density of development: i OU pet 5 acte3".
7.
At Qdaitly€ Good,. except during per lods of stagnant
5.
Amount of Impervious surfacing: Mineral.
Valley at(,
-64
Access and Nearest Public Road(s)t" apptoximately lbov to
tsloloaical tnvito�inent
La Porte Rd.
a,
vegetation: oak woodlarld gtasstand plant community.
7.
Method of scWage Dlsposa .' indl^alduat septic systeos.'
9.
wildlife Habitat: small birds and animals common to
6.
Source of water Supply. individual wells.
valIey gtasslands.
9. -
ProzfcMty of Power Lines: A102 La Porle. .Rd.
Cultural Environment:
io
Potential for' further land divisions and development: None
1i0.
Archacological and?istor'lcal Resbtlrces In the area., High
Underexisting Zoning.
sensitivity urea.
[s Envt'ronmentaifinest:I n
it.
Butte couritV cenetal Plan designation: Ag,ticultutal
ij
Residential
pito,_ eat Env l t otenen t
11,,
EXl•sling zoning: 'A=3
1.
retrain
a. General 7opograt,�htc character: Rolling hills.
is.
Existing .,.and Use. on-site: Undeveloped
b. slopes: 5% to 15%,
c.. Elevation! 225 to t7t feet above sea levet.
14,
surrounding ,krait
d: Limiting Factors: None
a. Land Uses: Grazfhg lands, few tesidehtial uses.
b. 70ning: A-5
2+
c. cch, Pian besignation: Agrltultural Residential:.
antis types AM Chataetetlstltt; nedding otaVellY sandy
Grazing and,open Lands,
Loam' - The suktacl soli Is a dense, granular. reds,
d. Parcel sizes., 5 at to top+ acre patcelt.
btoWnith-ted or ydhilowlsh-ted gravelly +andy loam 70
a. Population, Limited
to `,2` thickthe subsoft Is a very compact dull red
tlay that dontalhs gravel_And cobbIts. it Is underlain
ls.
Chatacter of %I it. and Area: Rutal, gtazing lands
by'a stony Iron cetnehted haI'dpan at a depth of 26° to
36 . The surface may t0taln shallow depressions or
16u
Nearest urban area; Marysvttie.
basins mixed with mdurids. Surface dralhage is adcOUate
except in the depresslohs. 5ubdtathage Is telatded by
t7,
Relevant Spheri`S of IntlUencct NIA
the hardpan Laver.
la
impinvemr_hts standards Urban Area, No
b.. Limiting Factors; subsurface dralnage, potentially
ilinited Ior septic tank and leachtleld systems.
19,
Fite Protectlbh Servlte:
a. Nearest County (state) Pire station: volunteer
3,
rlatutai Haratds of the Land
Station a '>5 appioxtmatety 6 miles away In
a. Earthquake zone: Moderate tatthquake Intensity zone
Honcut.
b. water Avallabliily;i Fire tankets only.
vlli.,
b: Erosion Potcnllate slight to moderate
c. Landsltde s'otentlah Low
xo,
schools In Area: nangor Union tlemdhtary School blstrict
d, Piro Imzardt Modetate
and Otoyllie Union High School Listritt,
e, Expansive soft Potential., Nigh
�.
liYdrnogV
. .....
a. surface wat'ci* 'South 1-166MMck Funs aiong :t+e
southwest ptoperty line.
.r y
01
10
t�va:ro=eaatal checklist * Evaluatioh of Eiavitbhftent&j lmpaat
ENVIRoKMENTAL REPERENCE MATERIAL
i,
Butte Count Planning ueparime smTc ..car�1i Ud&U a„4
Fault t Ma 11-1 Selsmlc s 'af et a ent
12,
Butte County Board of Supervisors,
,Actin
orov-i e, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977.
Agricultural Preserves Map, established by
NO. 6annFng
Z.
Butte County Planning Department Llauef�actiioon
Butt County Pon
Department,C198'7,
tentlal.Ma 11.2 Sels is Sa.fei element.-
Ti CA: CH2M H , 1977;.
`13.
National Flood Insurance -Program, flood
orrO e,
Insurance Rate mabs.., Federal Emergency
Butte County Planning department. Subsidence.and
Management Agency, A89..
_
La dsiide..Potential Ma 1`11-1, Safet-v dement,
1 4.
Li,LS Quad Map3, Loma Rlca, Callf.
orov e, CA- C92- H , 1977.
4"
Butte County Planting Department. Erosion.15.
CA
SLil Mao, chico 1925 Oroville 1926
Area,,- Un to states Department
Po ential Ma 111-2- safet Element, roviile,
Agriculture,
CH2M Hill, 1977,
5.
Butte ounty Planning Department, Exognsi�ve Soils
16.
soil surveyof Chico 1925 orov (Ie
192 Area, United States Department of
Mao Safet element, orovI11-6, CA CH2M
Agriculture.
H FTF, 1977,
6.,
Butte County Plannlhg Departmerit. Noise element
CA:
17,
Butte County Planning Department, Butte
u_tis_dic�tioiis an—ic
Ma IV -1. Scenic Hlahwav element. rov e,
FacilitieseMar. Butte coun— ty ti -re
CH2M H� 1977r
Department and California Department of
7.
Butte County Planning Department, scenic _Hl hway�
Porestry, 1989,
' Orov e, CA
Ma V-1 � Scenic HiahwaY Elem�n
M
18.
Final Eft for Tentative Parcel Ma Umbar
CH2M Hi 1977,
x,20, cert eOct, 8, 1979,.: „"
6.
Butte County Planning Department, Natural Fire
Hazard classes MA 11
-4 safety Element,
-
oroV e, CA CH2M 1*1111,
1977,
.
Butte County Planning Department, AechadolbalcAl
Sens ItivitY Map. OroviIIdI CA, lames Mann ng:
1983.
10.-
Butte County Planning Department, school Dlstrict -
�oroville; CA
L:
11.
Northwestern District Department of Water
Resources, fico Nitrate Study M ap,�-Nitrate
CohcA-ht ra't ion - n S _ owa sr, , The a Resources
_a
Agency, State of CallTornlao 1983
i
1 Irl, n, � F.. .h l • i
1 �1
1 ,
4 r
ffa fte uroaft
.-�
- PLANNING DEPARTMENT
7 COUNTY'CENT'ERYDRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 9596,9-3397
TELEPHONE; (916) 538-76101
February 7, 1992
Mr Michael McCollum
1774 Clark Avenue
Yuba City, CA 95991
' 1te Tentative Parcel Map, AP No. 028-100-033
Dear Mr. McCollum:
De artment has completed the env rolimental review of your
The Butte County Planning p CaliforniaProject in accordance w1t11 the (>.�Environmental Quality Act pursues to the
Resources Code Section 21151.5,requadd Y P
the Butte County Agency wi in the
California Public R
In additon, the Planning Director's
P q Tannin to County Subdivision Ordinance
report required by Sections 20-63 and 20-99 of the
Butte
Report
which has been
has been completed. Please find enclosed the F g P
prepared for your project.:
Director's R, -port with conditions of approval if
Please review the enclosed errors Olease 'bion them to
Ple � errors or onussicns in our :evaluation, p g
applicable, if you note any
oar attentibli,
The Planning
Director's Report for your project has been sent to the Butte County
Advisory Agency for their action. California Government Code Sections b59o0e and
65952,1 requires the Butte County Advisory Agency set he and app'
lication Was
disapprove your project within six months from they date onhmandatedch ouapby state la v
w7ll. notifyou of the time and place
received and :accepted: The six month time luzu y project
will occur on April 6, 1992, The Advisory Agency
of the public hearing for your project.
If there are modifications to your project, not related to mitigating an identified impact,
re-evaluation of your project shall be required;
Inter -Departmental Memorandum
TO: Advisory Agency
FROM Planning Director
SUBJECT. Report on Tentative Parcel Map for Michael McCollum
AP No. 028-100-033
DATE; December 11, 1391
This is a proposal to divide 20.08 acres to createA five acre parcels: The present, zoning
is A-5 (Agricultural S acre), minimum parcel size. The Land Use Plan Map of the Butte
General Plan
hartAgricultural General tarea was
zoneA5onJue20,967.Thiswapr prior the current Plan Policeswhi h
were adopted in 1979. The Board of Supervisors has requested the Planning Commission
to review all :A=5 and A-10 zones for conformity with the General Plan policies. The
Agricultural Residential General Plan Designation Policy contains the following
t°,onditional criteria which must be present before land can be zoned for parcels less than
20 acres.
1 C ompatible with neighboring agricultural activities.
2 Evidence of adequate water and sewage disposal capacity.
3 Availability of adequate fire protection facilities.
4i Adequately maintained approved road access with sufficient capacity to
selrvice, area,, -
55, Reasonable accessibility to commercial services and, schools.
i' The proposed project does not meet conditions 3 and 5. It is anticipated that when this
area is reviewed for toningconformity, the -A,-5 zoning 'will not `remain. The most
probable recommendation ;for the area will be A-20 or larger. Approval for this project
can not be recOmniended at this time based an nonconformity with the General Plan.
If the Advisory Agency can malce the required findings and approves the project, the
following mitigation measures and conditions are recommended:,
Mitigation Me?siires:
't
p i Disturbance Setback that coincides
wih the leach trod 8e back 1 ne shown othe tentative map. Place a note
1 Shoe, on the . , n ,
Oki the sheet. stating. "No structures, dumping fill material, or excavattotl
shall be allowed in the No Disturbance Setback: ;Vegetation removal shall,
be limited to that necessary for flood control. All native trees, in a living
r ,
condition shall be retained.
All vegetation removal shall be approved by
the Department of Fish and Game prior to removal:"
gression
sheet that states: "Fire suppression
a, Place a note on the additional map or the installation
.. shall 'be installed in:all residential structures in accordance
sprinides sysfemsocliltiqri
with the National Fire Protection two family dwellings and mobile homes,
of sprinkler systems in on n tw of the dwt ation of sprinkler systems
NFPA Standard 13 D. The P pe protection 'in the event of residential
is for additional safety and property P
fires. This installation will reduce the demand for structural fire protection
services in 'those instances where they are installed:'
Place a note on the additional map sheet and on the deed that states:
3. requiredt for that proace for _
a, No oak tree removal eXcepcessoriestand to meet health and safety
buildings and associated a
standards.
no disturbance setback, commencing from the outer edge
b, Establish a and extending outward a distance equal to
of the oak tree canopy
radius, around each tree. No disturbance
one of the canopy activities.
ircl'�a,teJ :irrigation and root damaging
c. Retain all snags except those which Pose a direct safety hazard.
' of oaks except for safety purposes. Deciduous
d, No pruning or cutiing ' ,
should be pruned during tlYe winter dormant `season only and
- oaks August only.
evergreen oaks daring July
Conte` Work on site,
Should any archaeological artifacts bed archaeologist hasyexamined the
Sh uahfied
the work shrill cease until a
findings and given clearance to continue.
` nt impact fee far Sheriff Facilities shall be paid Pursuant to
A developme P prior to
�` ons of Chapter 3, Article tt of the Butte County Code,
the provisions Perm' or. Use per in the case 'off a mobile home
issuance. of building p
be determined and calculated as of the date
park. Said fee amount will errnit or Use permit,
of application for the building P
CBS+bd
December .9, 1991
Mr. Michael: McCollum
1.774 Clark Ave.
Yuba City, CA, 9599`1
RE APN 028-100-033/14C COLLUM
I.C. n L91-37
T17N, R4E, Section 13
USGS Loma. Rica 7.5' and Bangor 1.5' quads
20.7 acres (Butte County)
Dear Mr'., XtCollurn,
In response to a request.. received November 19, 1991, a record.
search for the above cited project was conducted by examining the
official maps and records for archaeological sites in Butte County.
RESULTS
PREHISTORIC RESOURCES: Out records indicate there are no
previously recorded sites of this type located. with.n the projeict
boundaries. However, ten sites of this 'type' has been recorded
within a one mile radius, These sites all. contain. bedrock mortar
stations, ed with a petroglyph area. One of the
tations one is associated
sites, CA -BUT --438, contained an unusual white quartz bedrock
mortar. Addit onal.l.ye our records indicate there are numerous
sites of this type recorded in Yuba County within the one mile
radius ` of the project location (I. C. Vile 4 179)
HISTORIC RESOURCFs`_z1 There is one previously recorded site of this
type known to be located ltl< in 'the project. boutclaries. CA -BUT -650
is recorded as a historic placer -ground %jAddingminin g operation
containing ground washed areas, test trenches, Waste rock piles,
and outwash. Additionally, there are.tWo additional sites of this-
type
histype recorded within the one mile radius. CA -BUT -649 is recorded.
a's a segment of a historic water canal.. CA -BUT -631 contains a rock.
feature, few pieces of pottery, and. a possible his grave.
Also, numerous sites of this type `have been recorded in Yuba County
within the mile radius I.C. File m 1.79). The USES quad map
indicates the Honcut Cemetery in Section 12. This site may contain
unrecorded historic, cult;.t±al., resources. Records indicate that the
South Feather Water" and 'Union Mining Company Was a major hydraulic
inl firm With a of q historic record in this regian.
PREVIOUS ARCHAEOWGICAL_INVESTIOATIONS: According to oU.x .records,
t2e project area has previously been surveyed: for cultural
f f forma
ll i U�Qu � C l����
BUTTE
SIERFA
Department of. Anthropology
k"�i%t+�i'06,01ogi
LASSE
IASSEN
SISKIypU
SUr1EH
California State University, Chico
jt)yentory
k
4Gll
MOPOG
MOPec
TEHAM
T�HAMA
Chico, CA 95 29
(916)898-6256
SHASTA
December .9, 1991
Mr. Michael: McCollum
1.774 Clark Ave.
Yuba City, CA, 9599`1
RE APN 028-100-033/14C COLLUM
I.C. n L91-37
T17N, R4E, Section 13
USGS Loma. Rica 7.5' and Bangor 1.5' quads
20.7 acres (Butte County)
Dear Mr'., XtCollurn,
In response to a request.. received November 19, 1991, a record.
search for the above cited project was conducted by examining the
official maps and records for archaeological sites in Butte County.
RESULTS
PREHISTORIC RESOURCES: Out records indicate there are no
previously recorded sites of this type located. with.n the projeict
boundaries. However, ten sites of this 'type' has been recorded
within a one mile radius, These sites all. contain. bedrock mortar
stations, ed with a petroglyph area. One of the
tations one is associated
sites, CA -BUT --438, contained an unusual white quartz bedrock
mortar. Addit onal.l.ye our records indicate there are numerous
sites of this type recorded in Yuba County within the one mile
radius ` of the project location (I. C. Vile 4 179)
HISTORIC RESOURCFs`_z1 There is one previously recorded site of this
type known to be located ltl< in 'the project. boutclaries. CA -BUT -650
is recorded as a historic placer -ground %jAddingminin g operation
containing ground washed areas, test trenches, Waste rock piles,
and outwash. Additionally, there are.tWo additional sites of this-
type
histype recorded within the one mile radius. CA -BUT -649 is recorded.
a's a segment of a historic water canal.. CA -BUT -631 contains a rock.
feature, few pieces of pottery, and. a possible his grave.
Also, numerous sites of this type `have been recorded in Yuba County
within the mile radius I.C. File m 1.79). The USES quad map
indicates the Honcut Cemetery in Section 12. This site may contain
unrecorded historic, cult;.t±al., resources. Records indicate that the
South Feather Water" and 'Union Mining Company Was a major hydraulic
inl firm With a of q historic record in this regian.
PREVIOUS ARCHAEOWGICAL_INVESTIOATIONS: According to oU.x .records,
t2e project area has previously been surveyed: for cultural
resources (I.C. File # 179). In 1979 Donald Storm and screw
conducted archaeological ilvestigati.ons along ,- a portion of the
lower reach of South Honcut, Creek in Butte and Yuba County for the
Quail Ranch development. A totalI of :'28 `site"s, 9 historic and 19
prehistoric sites, were reeorded4driitrjarzspe%anon of the property:
The sate recorded within your prq�recty� ��CA z.BU1'-65'0, was recorded at
this time. Mr;. Storm recommended j=:establishing a county -level
protective easement over any or all of the sites within the
property, or establishing a "set back" zone around them. He also
recommended the possibility of nominating to the National Register
of Historic Places the gold mining district, involving CA -BUT -650.
1TERATURE SEARCH: Reviewed were the official records and maps .for
,archaeological sites and surveys in Butte County. Also reviewed
were the National. Registerof Historic Places, the California
Inventory of Historic Resources (1976), California Historical
Landmarks (1990), California Points of Historic Interest,, A Century'
of California Post offices (1955)r A Collection of Places in Butte
County', California, Butte Remembers (1973), and Historic spots in
Califorrnia (1966)
RECOMMENDATIONS'z Based upon the above information ;and the local.
topography, the project is located in an area considered to beextremely sensitive for both prehistoric and historic cultural
resources. in view of the :fact that the project area has been
previously surveyed, we are recommending that no additional
l.
archaeologicasurveys are necessary for this project. However,
since there is a recorded site within the project boundaries, lite do
recommend that. a professional archaeolocrist be contacted to -
relocate-, CA -BUT -650; updaf�e the site record, and prepare.
a::.. �.....:. ...� —4-- _44-.,1. --4- 41 -- _—cli .enc fm's+ 4-1-%i c ci'. J.-- ti —4 rS 4-.m. 41— ^"4 -
operations. A copy of the old site record wil-1 be provided to the:
project archaeologist upon request.
Thank you for your, 'concern in preserving California's cultural
heritage.
sincerely,,
Dr. Makoto Cowta, Coordinator
Northeast Information center
cc's Butte county Planning Department
Craig B. Sanders
Butte County planning Department
7 County Center Drive
Croville, Ca. 95965-3397
:Dear Mr .Sanders,
This letter is to respond to your letter concerning initial
impacts on my tentative parcel map for parcel # 02&--100-033.
l see nu problem complying with the four proposed m Ligation
measures suggested in part V of your letter. I would however like
to make the following comments
I have contacted the Northern California Information Center and
they will proceed with a records search. The only historical sites
that I am aware of are the bridge an Loma Rica Road -end a few
artifacts along Roncut Creek.. As the project has a, proposed no
development setback along the creek and does not front Loina Rica
Road, I do not anticipate any dif f ic`alties with disturbing existing
historical properties. _
2i For the "No Development" setback I propose using the existlaiq.
easement line for the irrigation Bitch This would give more than
the necessary 100' and avoid having to create a new deeded line.
3. Automatic Sprinklers address the indoor fire threat. The major
fire threat in the area is from wilco land fires. In my opinion the
fire threat would be better mitigated by an extekior fire
ptotertion plan in including such things as fire resistant exterior s
building n►a41,erials and landscaping. I propose such a plass to be
approved by, the local fire protection agency at the time of
.issuance of building permit as an alternative to sprinklers:
w
4. Please cla ify ow t�e"°"a::k`ion measures are to bef
codified rs a lr' ` � suf`rcient?
i;J.ncerel
Cry
1
i.f'ETE WILSON, . C01'Sf7lOf
a„SYATj� drr' �,^.AUFORNIC.-•-TF1E RE50URCE5 AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
1701 N4101YJ,- ROAD, SUITE A
4NrORtC) < t%VOVA, CALIFORNIA 95670'
35s-7020
September 6, 1991
14r, John Mendonsa
Butte County Department of
Public works
7 County Center Drive
rjrovillet California 95965
V*ar Mr. Mendonsa
The Department of Fish and Game (DFG) has reviewed the
'michael McCollum Tentative 'Parcel Map (TPM), a proposal to divide:
the 20-acre A.P. 28-10-33y.nto four, 5- acre parcels The parcel
is Iodated east of Honc_77 in an area of oak woodland habitat and
is bounded by. South Honcu:t Creek in Butte County.
oak woodlands are a particularly important habitat because
they, provide most of the essential life sustaining requirements
food, shelter, nesting and. roasting sites) needed by
numerous animal species. There has been significant cumulative
losses of oak woodlands in California due to residential,
commercial, and other development projects. To mitigate the
I: project impacts oft oak woodlands, these restrictions are needed;
a. No oak tree removal except .for that required to
provide space for buildings and associated
accessories and to mrlet health and safety standards,.
bi Establish a no disturbance setback, commencing from
the outer edge of the oak tree canopy and extending
outward.a distance equal to one-half of the canopy
radius; around each tree. No disturbance includes
irrigation and root damaging activities.
c. Retain all shags except those which pose a direct
safety hazard,
d. No pruning or cutting of oaks except for safety,
purposes. Deciduous oaks should be pruned during the
winter dormant season only and exergreen oaks during
July - August only.
Streams and their associated wetland habitats comprise
one of the most valuable eco systems. In addition to
obvious watershed. importance, streams support the greatest
diversity of plant and aniral species (aquatic and
terrestrial) of all inland ecosystems. Protection of
streamside corridors protects water quality, reduces
14r, John Mendonsa
September 6,'1g91
Page Two
sedim,-atation, and provides a continuous habitat, for
numerous spe ies, To mitigate project: impacts on the stream
-;colsystem, the .following measures are needed:
Establishdisturbance setback along both
a. sides ofthe 5stream channelThe setback should
commence from the outside edge of wetland vegetation
or Lank -top, whichever is greater.
b. The applicant should be advised that, any work within
a; the 104 -year floodpl.ainr consisting .of but not
limited to diversion or obstruction of the natural
flow or changes in the channel, bed or bank of any
k stream channel will require prior notification to DVG
pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 1.600 et sec.
The agreement process is an action separate .from the
specific mitigtion measures to be included as
conditions of project approval by the lead agency:
This project site contains the habitat types known to harbor
sensitive plan: :species which have been found in that general
area. A botanical survey should be made to determine if such
species do occur onsite, If present, sensitive plant popt,11ations
should be protected by,
a• tstabflishing a 50= -foot minimum no disturbance
setback; commencing from the outer edge, around each
plant population
b. Constructing barriers to prevent damage by foot and
vehicle traffic-
c4
ra.fficc. Excluding livestock.
d. ro Artificial drainage into ar the placement -of
materials and substances inside of the nondisturbance
area
Thihabitats AssessmentlofhfeesaunderaPubl fish wildlife
project p "
Resources Code
,Section 21089 and:, a.s defined by, Fish and Game Code Section 111.4
is necessary Fees are payable by the projeot appliemftt upon
filing of the Notice of Determination by the lead agency,
This project will have an impact to fish txb-d/ sr wildliia
habitat. Assessment of. fees under Public Ae `oorv,�s Code
s ectiori 21089 and as defined by Fish and Game Cocte Section 7111,4
,i.s necessary. Fees are payable by the project applicant upon ;1
filing of the Notice of Detertihatibb hV the lead agency,
4
1 ))
.F CHER RAVER RECREATI +t PARK DISTRICT
OROVILLE, CAL 12 ORNIA 95965 1
MUNICIPAL AUDITORIUM, 1200 MYERS STREET
VI LE �� PHONE: (916) i33-2011
1 1
September 3, 1991
�! County of.B�:itte
Department of Public Works
7 County Center Drive
Droville, CA 95965
c. r '7
RE: Michael McCollum - Tentative Parcel Map
Dgmr Mr.. Mendonsa
The Feather River Recreation. and Park biAriet would like to express our concern over the
growh.g population ofthe G-=eater Drovile area and the affect this will have on our District. We
have found that this increase an populati ' is severly affecting our ability to provide a sufficient
level of services to our constituency,, .,This particular subdivision is of small size, being four
plircels, and we feel there is an impact tn'bur District from this project : We need to do something
about this increasing problem before it becomes a crisis environment.
We believe that this steady increase is good for the area and that we can allewdate the impact on the
Distract through developer fees and for the larger subdivisions, the creation of Lighting and;
Landscape Distric';s. We believe that the Planning Department should recommend to the
Planning Commission and the Planning Commission should recommend to the Board of
Supervisors that developer fees be established for the Feather River Recreation and Park District,
and the other special districts which are affected by this increased population growth.
For the present and the, "Michael McCollum project, we `'eel that an equitable settlement should be
made to the Feather River Recreation and Park District fo; the Increase in population which this
will bring.
Thunk you,
Sincerely,
We
Secretary the Board of Directors
s
RW/js
er
to
COUNT' ADVISORY AGENCY" MINUTES Page 2
d� er 22) 1984
B. TENTATIVE pAR,CEL MAPS FOR CONSIDERATIO14:
2 Charles Johnson and non Reich, All 28-1.0-24, a parcels on the SE
corner of 1a forte 'Rd. and Loma Rica Rd. Bangor area. Engineers GDA
OPEN
Charles Jotmson3�:*t applicant3read a prepared statement into the record
in response t
agricultural
the: statements in the Planning Director's Report.
ricult�uralcomoatabi.litY and nearness to commercial services
and schools, he ttiinks thatythe situation across the county line should
be considered, The proper, is on the outer growth boundary of Loma Rica.
This type of lost density rural residential development extends clear to
Loma Rica which is about 4 miles away.
There is no conflict with the cattle
grazing
area. Ont reason for that is because the soil will not,allow for
much further development. The roads serve as a buffer also. The'neighboring
cattle ranches ses no conflict. The proposed use of t:he land is the most
feasible economic use,
cies through the 8th grade, There are commercial services
by
n_ e
Mr. Johnson said that Bangor school is close b uncrowded Accessible
school bus :and g_ €�
available in Bangdr and Loma Rica. Mr. Johnson did not reel that there
was anything in, tilde minutes of the rezone hearings or the General: Plan
to find this project unaceeptabl.e.
Bill Geddiu, engineer', said that the Board minutes were rtmbiguous and
therefore it woubl be dif icult to make a dlParcut determination what
policy, if any, wss intended,
Mr, Streeter, said. that the crucial issue was the conditional criteria,
Mr. Geddis acid 'that if the property across the county line is considered,
then this project is not non -conforming at all. This is really within. the
Boma Lica sphere of influence. It also does not seem right to use the
land in a Willi,amsoil Act Contract to halt development on adjoining pr¢aperty:
g y . y iyway.
;Llaenty acre zc.`�r9.' will mostly be contxolledb the soils at
Mr. Mendonsa agreed that the Board minutes are Arkl guous.
He noted the
comments by 14i7.t Redmond and Supervisors :Lemke: �!
Mr; Geddis said that he didn't feel a case could really be made either I`
way from the. in the Board minutes.
Mr. S'treeteW saiia it is diffi.dulty to interpret land use with A -'s zoning:
Mr. Geddis said that the project Meets the A-5 zone add is neal, a growirng
cLlmmunityx
CLOSED MAINE
Advi8b* Agia-ncy Minutes=� Oct.:22, l�g$4
''�'t4k�#�'1."�:Lkl',�dar�rsr.��n+.rr��a«t^t+er�s.;+'e,rr�'-r�;8
`a rl "` •.. .Ala k -� r� �.,,''SA ,-�,y y, ,��y �"�:.1 y'? �,..
�� . .' ... * `. r rt �i �, r s t eLIY. a A9� � '�{►� w �.,�r� N
1 rrOUNTY DEPARTMENT OFSPtJBI, RKS
= $UTA `
w r � `
�i, .+C .� .,' it ,' �(�: � � .� :'.�, h.� i.il. �� I� y,» e r ±` '�.n •� � n ������'�' �� i'�
ZA�tA AZVISIqN REVIEW„rIREQG�2
s ei'(',5pvr!
`� 0 � .DATE � �—�'�'"'•�^7 � i'@,
1” �s �.p*T BYE
AP NO.. »74_Irl r'2c 3.� iVi�i�+
1 I2 ET, MAS
`PROJECT DESCRIPTION:` x iV�:A' T _ `
°t � � .. � 1�. • U: 1 t I of t
APPLICANT:' Mrr*Frn r. �r�T T tiM --
ENGINEER: z.
CONDITIONS ,AND/OR COMENTS :
01
v
NO'I'YCE: Oh' 3D:7E=URM:EN.Wr3:014
!XC> Office of Planning and Research FROM e Butte County
1400,Tenth Street, Room 121 Planning Department
Sacramento, CA 95814 7 County Center Drive
or
Oroville, CA 55965
7CX County Clerk ._...
County of Butte
O'L70,7mcT : Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108
or 21152 of the Public Resources Code:
i j ect `Utle AP # :. Name
"Toentative. Parcel Map 028-1,00-033 Michael McCollum
Sate Clearinghouse Number Contact Person.. Telephone Ner
�if submitted to Clearinghouse) .«
INA Vohs:; Mendonsa (916)538-7266
fttjeat Location 4 parcels located on the 'west sidegbf Fawn Court approximately
1030 feet south of La Porte Road, Bangor area.
?,roject Description Tentative Parcel Map to div`id6�20.08 acrew intol !t parcels
each at 5,0 acres
This is to advise that the Butte County AdyisQry.Agency .............
(Lead Agency or Responsible Agency)
has approved the above-described project on s.. °• .and has Wade
(Date)
lie following determinations regarding the above-described project:
1: The project will, will not, have a significant effect on the
environment:
2,. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project
pursuant to the provisions of CEQA:
A Negative. Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the
Provisions of CEQA
3 Mitigation measures ; were, were not, made a condition of the
Approval of the project:
4. A statement of overriding considerations was; _ was n:ot, adopted
�. for this project.
This is to certify that the final EIA with comments and responses and record of
project approval is available to the general public at:
Butte County Planning Department
7 County Centev Drive
Oroville., CA 95965
Date Received fot Filing and
Pasting at OPA
signature
MIA
n ttf c44 r^� ryn as , ✓ ��.
�, i,,
ARCHAEOLOGICAL, INSPECTION OF
'CA -BUT -650
AT THE MaCOLLNM PARCEL, SOUTH
HONCUTCREEK
BUTTE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By:
Russell ,Bevill ana.Blossom
Hamusek
Pk pared For:
'Michael McCollum
1,174 Clark Avenue ..,"
Yuba City, CA 95,991
Fraxik E>. gayham, Principal :investigator
Archaeological Research Program
bepartment of Anthropology
Cal.]fOrnia State University, Chico
Chico, CA 95929y-4.04'
A
ARP go, _ 92-166
�'anuary 199..2.
4Ai
INTRODUCTION
In January 1992,
Michael and Laura McCollum contracted with the
Archaeological Research
tam at Ca
archaeologicalinspection a proposed Qsit�acz'e
Chico to conduct an
Butte
.parcel split adjacent to, South The u xoCosed proreek jecttcon,,' sts of
County 114ap 1: Project Vicinity) proposed
_ ate parcels, each be -,w)q five
,,litting this land i-nto four separ
acres in size. The'McCr .1111M Parcel is situated wec;t of FatheCsouth
with. LaPorte Rodd to the nisi LI, x,. c South Honcut Creek �czrt:ions
;(3�lap 2: Project Area.) . The parcel
a� �73tha nin T8 7 (USGS Loma,
of Section 13 and T17N R5E p
-7«5v Quad.)• arch. for this land conducted ; `.
An archaeological records se 'Py the
ia Archaeological
Northeast Info�-mae Baled that a previously on Center, recorded historic�siter
(I.C. fi L91-37) revealed
CA-BUT-650, is located within the project boundary. It was
recommended by
the aiortheast Information Center that CA--BUT-;550 be
for the
relocated and an
that record bprepared,. It was
eappropr tet mi iga i one
measures be taken
also recommended
ect p o determine whether the site s was to
. t rith ll the
r�ocate CA BiTT--650 rations. The purpose of this inspection treatment of
rel and to make recommendations for th
• , 1'scCoZlum Parcel. r
the site.
BNVIRoNMENTAL SETTING
The XcColliun Parcel is situated within the foothill region of the
ley provi
Sierra Nevada Range at i feecture. with the in the southernrend ofat lthe parcel to
Elevations vary front 17can be described
'225 feet in the eastern portion. The topography
s ridge to the east and a south-flowing
as a low. wept--slop�.ng
seasonal drainage to the vest. south Honcut Creek borders the
property at the southern boundary.
The geology
of the surrounding area includes sedimentary and
` Soils
of the
volcanic rocks of piesozoic and Nevadan age. The bed
are of a
locality are Primarily metavolcanic gree derived from the, Auburn
Mixed red orange randy and silty loam
oil. These soils are formed from the breakdown of the
Series underlying greenstbhe bedrock. The kcCollum I' ;'cel is underlain by
greenstoney and the soil contains a mic of quartz and metavolcanic
creek cobbles.
Vegetation within the pro? ect a and nts associated immediate
tt glue nOak
types sof ply ,
consists of -those yp �) , xhese woodlands have an
W60dland as described by Hitter 1.988.7
overstory of scattered trees, dominated by blue oak (Quercus
dougllasii). Shrubs are often present, but rarely extensive, while
the typical understory is composed of annual grasses. Grey pine
(Pinus abiniana) is also found scattered in the project area. The
drainages contain riparian species including willow (Salix spp.),
cottonwood (Ponulus fremanti), cattail .(Tvoh_q 1ati�olia), and
blackberry (Rubus ursinus)
The fauna, species common to the project area include deer
(Odoco:i eus hembonus), coyotes (Canis latrans), jackrabbits (Lepus
calif ornicus), and gray squirrels (Sciurus griseus) During this
,inspection several deer were noted grazing in the seasonal drainage
just north of the McCollum Parcel. Birds common to the area
Include magpies (Pica nuttalli), scrub jays (ATJhelocoml
[' coerulescens), acorn woodpeckers (Melanerpes formicivorus), and
j red-tailed hawks (Buteo jamaicensis) The project vicinity is also
1 home to several reptiles and amphibians.,
LITERATURE, REVIEW .AND CULTURE HISTORY
r
Jerald U. Johnson and Dorothea 0` Theodoratus of California' State
Universii-j,, ' Sacramento conducted an extensive survey in the area of
Park's E' it on the Yuba River, south of the project area. This
survey rc,-=ited in the recordation of 409 prehistoric sites. These
sites-, along with nine previously recorded prehistoric sites, were
classified as belonging to six different site types. of the total
418 sites, , 289 were classified as bedrock mortar ,sites (BRMs)
Another ten sites were typed as BRM sites with associated midden
Soils, and sixty-two sites were classified as midden sites with
associated ;BRMs. Clearly, BRM sites are the most common type of
prehistoric site for this area of 'foothills.. Besides the. BRM sites
forty-four sites were typed as midden sites, seven as rock
shelters, and six as lithic scatters (Johnson and Theodoratus
1978) As no excavations were conducted daring their field work,
johnson and Theodoratus were 'unable to develop a cultural historic
model. for the area
Recently; an archaeological survey of 1; 000 acres one mile south of
the Mccoll a Parcel was conducted. by the Archaeological Research
i?rogram of California State University, Chico: This survey, east
of Prairie Creekt resulted in the discovery and recordation of
forty-two prehistoric sites, five historic sites, and fourprehistoric sites possessing a historic component. In addition;
three previously recorded prehistoric sites and one previously
prehistoric, sates were BAk sites four were prehistoric
c of the
r p
recorded historic site were relocated, F historic BRM sites
Cor e
with 'historic components, and sic sites were historic, The,
historic sites included areas of historic ocoupationj mining s test'
' and a small cemetety, This survey indicates that the most common
2
1
prehistoric sites in the immediate vicinity of the project area are
BRMs (Hamusek and Dreyer 1991)
Nearer_ to and including the project area, an archaeological
reconnaissance was conducted by Donald Storm in 1979 along portions
of the lower reaches of South Honcut Creek. This survey resulted
in the recordation of nineteen prehistoric and nine historic sites.
The historic sates recorded consist of features normally assocJ ated,
with early day gold mining and ran, ching activities, and include
water canals, rock alignments, hydralic minin round sluicin
areas, in addition to one homestead site. The ptehistorij sites
o;;countered are all of on,,. site type, bedrock mortar stations.
.tl.though Storm expected to rind prehistoric village and/or lithic
ocatter sires during his survey, none were observed,
.Archaeological excavations within the foothill. region of Butte
County, rarticularly in the hake Oroville area, have contributed to
the creation of a local model of prehistory. According to this
model, perhaps the earliest human occupation in Butte County was
during the time of the Milling Stone Horizon, from 6,000 to 3,000
B. C. At this time there was a heavy use of manos and milling
stones as seed grinding implements. Presently, there is little
recorded evidence of this early occupation in Butte County (Kowta
1988,-58-56). However, there is good evidence of a cultural complex
in Butte County which dates from sometime before 1, 000 B.C. to A, D.
1. This cultural period, named the Mesilla Complex, also had an
emphasis on, the use of manos and milling stones. for seed grinding.
Projectile points chax', ristic-of the Melilla Complexarelarge
shale and basalt leaf --shaped, stemmed, and side -notched types. The
atlatl, or spearthrowdr, was in use at 'this time (Kowta 1988:148)
The Mesilla Complex was followed in 'time by the Bidwell Complex
which gates from A.D.I to 800. This was a transitional 'phase from
the mano and milling stone to the mortar and pestle, with the mano
and milling stone still predominating. Wooden mortars are: more
common than stone, and "steatite vessels are popular. Notched
pebble net weights are characteristic of the Bidwell. Complex.
Projectile point forms became smaller, inferring the introduction
of \.he boW and arrow during this time (Knwta 1988:149):
The sweetwater Complex follows from A.D. 890 to 1;600. This
complex is characterized by a large variety of bone and shell
artifacts. Hopper mortars and flat-endea pestles, as well as
bedrock mortars, come into use as acorn grinding implements.
Tubular :steatite pipes are common while steatite vessels decrease
,in popularity. Small corner -notched projectile points and large
leaf -shaped points with nc:Lpieht side notch,.,s began to dominate
A18o, the"use of Iocal rockshelters and caves began durin5 this
period and continued into the next (Kowta 1.988i192)y
3
J
The final period of the prehistoric era is th,_u Orov;i ll.e Complex..
This complex dates from A.D. 1,600 to 1850. La.ing this time the
Mano and milling stone were still in use, but Ithe portable mortar
and bedrock mortar dominated. Small 0-*cert ;Side-Notched
Cottonwood. Triangular, and Gunther Stemfi-d p c j ectile points were
used along with larger corner-notched and L'-4 4.:•i M,haped forms. For
the most part, many of the traits from the S iin,A-water t'omplex still
remain during the Oroville Complex (Kowta 19, .1:2-154).
The last period of prehistory has been associated with the
ethnographic groups known as the Nisenan azc Southern Maidu. and
XSonkow or Northwestern Maidu. The line of d0ma.�,cryation between, the
Xonkow and their Maidu neighbors, the Nisenan, ,acks clarity for a
number of reasons, among which is the early dieci.mation of these
peoples by disease, slaughter,, and removal t w reservations (Riddell.
:L978:372). Since the language of the pec-ple living along Honeu:t
Creek appears to be dialectically trans i;iJ-On11, at the present time
it is unclear whether the Nisenan or the Xoi.kow actually occupied
and utilized the land in the vicinity of ttie project area.
Culturallyr the Konkow were similar to t§)E, Ni.�i1.yT7an with few minor
6xceptionsi The. Nisenan occupied'villagQs situated on low natural
rises along streams or rivers, while ;,hose of the Konkow were
situated by preference on ridges hi.gj. above the rivers, and
generally on small flats on the ridge +;,rests or elevated knolls.
Both the Nistini3 ,n and Konkow settlements typic-ally took the form of
clusters of dwellings that constituted a principal village with a
Large d•..zlce house, surrounded by a sc,ries of °smaller villages
This principal village, , with its clu,:titer of smaller villages,
formed the basic social unit which wa;� referred to as a village
community or:tribelet. Houses were og 4;evdral types, dependent on
the season, however both groups constructed doge-shaped, semi.
covtettanean houses for the winter mox,ths, 4nd the conical bark::-
ered dwelling and brush shelter i`o*r the more temperate months
(Wilson and. Tome 1978:388)
The Nisenan and Konkow both depended or, a variety of resources,, the
most important of which were acorns, salmon and deer. The
settlement pattern in the project vicA ity Would have most likely,
consisted of semi-permanent villagea, �.aome or which possessed large
dance houses, seasonal camps, fishitq stations, cemeteries, and
food processing sites such as bedrock milling stations4
The historic occupation of the prof ect Vicinity has been Summarized
by Chamberlain (.1819)i and Hoover anti Rensch (1966) : Among ; the
first Euro-Americans to enter present butte. and Yuba counties were
fur trappers of the Hudson Bay Cohipany from 1830 to 184.1. Close to
the project area, Euro-Amer 4 11 sett! e'ment aPpears to have beghr.1 in
1844 when Theodore Cordua, a Pruss anj obtained a grant of seven
leagues,, the liohcut Grant, from the. McXican. government. The iioncut
h
Grant was bordered on the west by the Feather River, on the South
by Sutter ° s N'ew Helveta a land grant, on the east by the foothills,
and on the north by South Honcut creek (Storm 1919:1.9).
{ ;Subseq�lont to'Cordua Is obtaining his grant, a number of ranches and
homesteads were developed within the immediate vicinity of the
Jjccolivm Parcel. During 1850, R.F. Piatt, J.F. Sadorus, and George
Y.atsler settled on South Honcut Creek in T17N R4E Section 24, and
engaged :'n stock raising. Mr. Piatt constructed a house in this
area .in the same year and shortly after Mr. James Bryden arrived
farom Ghio and settled in the immediate vicinity. Piatt and Bryden
ran+ire known to have performed the first agricultural. planting :.n the
'r area during the same year when they planted approximately ten acres
of barley (Storm 1'979). Historical accounts 'relate that this .first
j drop was an excellent harvest, however, much to the despair of
Bryaen and Patt, most of the crop_ was foraged by the Local Native
Americans (chamberlain 1879:46) .
The McCollum Parcel .is located within the Honcut gold. mining
district, which is primarily along Honcut and Wilson ►creaks. The
creeks in this district were first worked by hand methods, and were
later worked by bucket -line and draglihe methods from 1909 to the
19305. The geology of the Honcut district is described as
Pleistocene gravels and. Recent creek gravels which overlie bedrock
of greenstone and green schist, The digging depths averaged about
twenty feet (Clark 1970:65).-
FIELD METHODS
r A. visual examination of the western portion of the McCollum Parcel
Was conducted on January 11, 1992 byyRussell `Bevill. The northern
and western property boundaries were identified by Laura ricCollum.
The ground surface was examined for the presence of site CA -BUT -
650, acid WIs compared to the original sketch map of the site.
ned and a
supplemental 'site record `
After being +relocate rd and sketch mapwascompleted arles were of iThetground
pP ,
surface within the sate was carefully examined for the pre,,-iiln.e. of
features and historic artifacts. Also, black and `white phoogarhs
Were taken ofthe site. Ground surface visibility Was fair to poor`
due to a low covering of green grass.
i,
RESULTS AND REGOMMENDATj ONS
The inspcction. of the McCollum Parcel revealed that site CA -BUT -650
is partir..lAy within the pro'ect area. The site is located within.
the st�ut�!-flowing seasonal. drainage in `thee western portion of the
parcel. 'his site consists of a placer mined area with as many as
nine' sing l piles of cobble tailings and shallow, diggings along ,both
5
GO
sides of the drainage. it, appears that, topsoil was excavated and
washed out through the drainage, pey.hapo washed through rockers or
g �
sluices. At the southern end of the site, cobbles have been
removed from the bed of the drainage to expose bedrock. This was
done perhaps to crevice the bedrock o;r to use the bedrock as e
natural ground sluice. No diagnostic artifacts were noted on the.
urface. The only artifact found Was a sheet of corrugated metal
in the drainage, this appearing to f recent age. There is no
be o
evidence to indicate any subsurface deposits of cultural materials.,
PP materials itisnot possible to determine
the
Without diagnostic
age of these diggings;
'
failings s of this kind axe extremely' common in the
and digging
local area,, particularly along South Honcut Creek, North Honcut
Creek and Wilson Creek. Due to the ephemeral nature of the site and
its lowlevel of: information content, this site is not likely to
yield,signifi.oant information regarding local o regional history.
The potential for a meaningful gain in inuormation from archival
and oral historical. resources is_ judged to be mt�,ch greater than it,
is for archaeological research.
Based upon this inspection, we recommend archaeological clearance
for the ICk.�ollum Parcel during future developments. We feel that
the reco:-atio:z of site. CA-Brt�-��650 should be considered as
apprropriate mitigation for fttt:atr impacts
1 I
6
„r
h
n
BIBLIOGRAPHY AND REFERENCES CITED
'i
Chamberlain, William H.
1.879 The History of Yuba County. Thompson and West
Publishers; Oakland.
Clark, William B.
1970 Gold Districts of_ Caligornia California Division of
Mines and Geology Bulletin 19:?, Sacramento.
11ai:usek, Blossom and William Dreyer
1991 A Cultural_ Resource Surrey of the Proposed Prairie Q 'eek
Planned Unit Development, Yuba County, California. Report
on file at the NC Information Center, CSUS.
Johnson., Jerald J. and Dorothea J. Theodoratus -
1978 Cultural. Resources of the Marysville. Lake, California
Project (Parks Bar Site). _Yuba and Nevada Counties,_
California. Prapared for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Sacramento
XoWta, Makoto
1988 The Archaeology and rrehistory of. Pumas and _Butte
Counties: Cal °fornia:_.An 2ntroductinn and 'Interpretive
Model. Report on file at the NE information Center,
CSUC .
Riddell, Francis
1978 Maidu and'Konkow. In handbook of _'North American Indians,`
Vol: 81 California. Edited by Robert F Heizer.
Smithsonian institution , Washington, b. C.
Ritter, Lyman V
1988 Blue Oak Woodland. In A Guide to Wildlife habitats of
Cal_F.forn .a. USDA Forest SerViCe Region 5':
Storm, Donald J i
1979 Archa South Hohout reek,inv.'stitra.tion8. Alonq a .. portion of.. the
Butte and Yuba Couhtie8 L California
Report on 'file at 'NC ln`ormation Center, c,SUS.
ri,' gxz Norman L. and Atl.eanH. Towne
1978 Nisenah. In Handbook of (tort►
i
Amerioah Indians
Vol. 8, California..Edited by', Robert P Heizer},
Smithsonian Institution , Was;1-,in9t6n, D. C.
t
w
t x> ., i 1ltirouu nu tiftlF p y
D
h7 d. rxk IORE60N L
s. t;zh
iSr �9iL y�D
S43
um ;►:< t w
./1..t
3 1
, r
q K,�^,
12. �d IIwPs! e
rl
n
u
ti Noncut Ce
r-'}-'��i'
X15 1 Ulf
• 1
II � ?7
p -
a rrr96 �r.��ld.
" r�`' 1 pRoi - AREA `
h NOT FOR PUau6'bI8T I5.QTJbN
C U'N I Fpp
,� N,TR -A
FOR RESTRICTED UaS ONLY WLR
State of California The Resources Agency
Department of Parks and Recreation
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE RECORD
PERMANENT TRINOMIAL: CA-BUT-650-fI
OTHER DESIGNATION:-
Paae 1 of 5
1. COUNTY: Butte
2. U5GS QUAD: Lama Rica -7.5'(1947), 151O _REVISED- 1969
3i UTM Zone:1RD
00Easting: 632,280 m
Northing:. 4,355,000 m
4. TOVINSHIP: 17N RAIrGE: 4E Base: MDM
NWI/4 SEI/4 NE1/4 NEI/4 of Section 13
W1/2 NEI/4 NEI/4 NE1/4 of Section 13
5. MAP COORDINATES: 181 mmS 125 mmE (from NW Corner of map)
6. ELEVATION:. 190 feet
7. LOCATION,,From the intersection of Lower Honcut Road and Highway 70,
drive east on Lower Honcut Road for 50 miles and turn left onto
LaPorte Road. Fo]low LaPorte Road east for 2.8 milesandturn right
(south) onto Fawn Ct. Drive south on Fawn Ct. for 0.15 mile and stop
at its intersection with Lilver Fox Drive. From this point, walk due
west for 306 meters to a south- flowirig seasonal drainage. The site is
located within this drainage.
8. Prehistoric O lVistoric (X) Protohistoric O
9. SITE DESCRIP'T'ION: An area of hillside placer mining along a seasonal
drainagedraihave
been due oiltj 'probably
rob bl South
Hhand and ethere hare at Least ninesmallpiles
of cobble ane; gravel. tailingz- scattered in the shallow diggings. At
the southern end. of the site, the bed of the drainage has been cleared
1 of debris to expose the bedrock.
3.0. "EA-- 170 In NS by 507n Edi = 616772 m2
Method of Deterntihation: Visual and pacing with compass.
E]1�.pta.r, al area ,
11. DEPTH: undertermined cm Method of Determination: undetermined
12: FEATURES:� At leas-: nine small ,piles of graved and cobble tailings.
The largest .pile measures 15' X 10' X 2.5' high. Several shallow
washed"dUt areas on hillsides.
of California The Resourc
State es Agency
Department o Parks and Recreation
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE RECORD
PERMANENT TRINOMIAL: CA-BUT-650-H
OTHER DESiGNATION:
P499--? -0f-5
13, ,A.R-TIFACTS: One large sheet of corrugated metal in the drainage at
the south end of the site. No diagnostic artifacts were noted.
14. 2J0,_N--ARTZFAC._ T��AL CONSTITUENTS AND FAUNAL. REMAINS: stone. observed
1.5. DATE REC,QRDED 1/11/92 16 • RECRD D EY- R. Bevill
17. AFFILIATION AND DRESSs Researchological CaliforniaSta e Univers ty Chico, CA,
'Department of Anthropology,
95929-0400
18 « HUMANREMAINS: None found.
19. SITE DySTURBANCES: Natural weathering and erosion..
Some
bioturbation.
20. NEAREST WATER (type,
distance and direction) : Seasonal drainage on
site current]y has a trickle of water dowing through it • South iioncut
Creek is ,Located approximately 200 meters south of the site.
21 : VEGETATZ'JN C iiMtJNTy (site Vicinity): Blue Oak Woodland
re
22. VEGETATION (On site) °: Blue oak► grey (Digger) er gg ) p'ins; willow; and
annual grasses
2.3• SITE,SaILf Red-brown clayey, rocky loam. Some quartz cobbles.
Sul appears to be shailoW
24: SURROUNDING SOILi same as above
25, GEOLOGIC. Volcan
is%metamorphicwith greenstone bedrock and some
creek gravels and red-brown soil above
2a. LANDFORM: South Horicut Creek Drainage, gant;le south and southwest
sloping
hills; seasonal
rainages
27. SLOPES 5 to 10 degrees with a south aspect 28. EXPOSC7RE: 95 0 open
2 - . LANDOWNERLsL tartdlo tenants and Address:. Michael-And'Laura
McCollum/ 1774 Clark Ave/ tuba CtYt CA/ 95991
State of California —The Resources Agency Ptrmsijent Trinomial: 1—
DEPAFRTj.1ENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION Mo. Yr.
ARCHEOLOGICAL SITE LOCATION CA -BUT -660-14
MAP 0ttw Dwilputionsr
LAMA RICA QUADRANGLE
Pogo,- tt 5 CALIFORNIA
7.,14INUTE SEj2IES_e(fOPOOWHIC)
V— dee ��4� • n " � „ .� t � ` , , t vow,/ j �,�
if
/ 1 ui 11 Ih V •4
4:r
II h .
ry t
� .••`}''r,' !, e S. I ••4 1.
oArlcutCCULC it 1
�iem if
/ n P
ell 1 CA-BUT-fi60- H o
INTER -DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM
TO Land Develop.
FROM, 'rai rogram Manager -Environmental Health
SUBJECT: Michael McCollum TPM - AP# 28-10-33
,., DATE: April 13, 1992
Today the butte County Advisory Agency denied the parcel map at the above noted
description. If this decision is appealed to the Butte County. Board of Supervisors the following.
list of onditions is recommended by the Division of Environmental. Health.
I., Show the usable' sewage disposal area proven to"meet the requirements of Subdivision
Ordinance on parcels 1, 2, and 3
2; Place a note on the map that no water well may be located within 100 feet: of the usable
sewage disposal area on parcels 1, 2, and 3.:.
3 Provide a 50 foot sewage disposal setback from any drainage ways
Blease feel free to contact me at 18-B County Center Drive, telephone number 5384282 if you
have any questions;
CJE/m1f