HomeMy WebLinkAbout028-120-023��'�`
t�'
c � �t r
I
J k'LANN, COMMISSION SUMMARY SHEET rOR. '°?FD DIVISIONS
Richard Mattingly—Log# 91-10-25-.03 "
PO Box 5571 Marysville, CA 95901
«_
Robert Mattingly PO Eox 836, Btyte, CA 95605
PRW= DESCRIYTION:_ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP to divide 10.5 acres to create 2 parcels at
5.25 acre, eAchi'
O ki On the west side of Drobs's.A Road approx. 2500 ft. north of La Porte Rd.
Bangor area.
,ASSESSbV"'S :PARCEL, NUMBER (5) 028-10-023
A-5 AG-REST `Yes
GENERAL.PLAN PROJECT CONSISTENT?
CMML. , PLAN CONFORMANCE REPORT 10/14 %91
DATE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE
:C011SERVATION ACT CONTRACTS? No
DATA . LICATIOt RECEIVED 10.23-91 -
ACRID'/5MVEYOA/CIVIL F`NGINLER: _ Eton Graves & Assoc. `.
AbB17M`54 P.O. Box 986 Oroville,; CA 9:5965
y�.
VAr,V, PLANNING DIRECTOR"S REPORT PREPARED
ENAL CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION DATE PILED,
ON
AND D DATER `'7 NEGATIVE DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED
MITIGATED NEG. .DECLAR.ITION = DATE ADOPTED
FAN. IMPACT REPORT DATE CERTIFIED
STATE CLEARING1400SE N0. _.
oU . �CcK41TTEE, MEETING : TATE
AD 'SOR` AGENCY BEARING DATE. Corti, A- PPS
ADWSOM[ AGENCY ACTION J ~'t
APPE4LE 7 APPEAL g9ARING DAtE
Boo .ACTION
COMIgNTS 7'OR PLANNING DI'TtECTOR' S 1Nrpon, � "? M
'ASSIGNED TO .�2hlla
FOR OrblacF, USE I ONTIIY*
1068.1uGuiddiaAaa
LD IWO Revised 1-94-80
N . { NV i lttlNM8NTAL IMPACTS' AND MITIGATION MEASURRS 't
wont i f y potentially significant environmental impacts associated with
the land (Jivision. What project design features or special conditions
t)F approval (mitigation measures) are proposed to alleviate potential
environmental impacts? N/A
+a , F,NVI RONMEWrAL SETTING
;)Oemgcrlbe the project site as it exists before the projecto
including information on topography, soil stability, .plants
and m0mals, and. Any cultural, historical or scenic aspects'.
Describe any existing structures o- the site, and the. use of
I Ili! sr. i=ueLures, Typical foothill t.dl�:, mphy, stabil soil native plants
and animals. No known cultural, historical or scenic aspects There
is one exist ng single family home on parcel 2.
W Describe the surrounding properties, including information on
iilants and animals and any, cultural, historical or scenic aspects.
Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc,),
tn,teiisity of land use (one-family, apartment. houses, $hops,, depart-
ment s r)res', etc.), and scale of development: (heighti frontage,
serback, rear yard, etc.). Surrounding property has much the same
topography soil, plants and animals. There are no known cultural,
historical or scenic aspects. Typical land use is single family
residential, and open. land.
t:h:i 7'I FIGAT ION: C hereby certifv that the statements furnished above and in Ir
t lie :al t tchod OxHhits present the data and information required for this
ini t is l ixva luation td the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements
alld 'i ri! of-mat ion presented are 'true and correct to the best of my, knowledge
and ho I ief.
..
1).i1.r0 Signature
,For Ri.cilarc Mattingly
M iso tir,iixirate ;sheet _ for longer responses,
�r/qtr
"Js VJOUIdglanad pUE-i
t 10
r ,.
r�
SUBDIVIDER'S STATEMENT
dame
Richard Mattingly Rate a
i Project
Tentative Parcel map
i AP #
28_12-23
Existing Use (s) of the land One single family home
2-
Proposed use (s) of the l and One additional building sate _ _.
3.
Improvehients proposed (See Ch.20-21 bounty Code) N/A
Public areas proposed N/A
Tree planting/or 'removal (approx. number) N/A
6;
preliminary copy df any condition; restrictive reservations of covenants .
existing or proposed glial l„ be attached to this statement.
attached . hone
7.
St&te type of division, 1,,0-,, private raid... urban rural, etc,
Private road rtital paXcel map
µ
LD
164
SC Planning Department NAME: RIGHARD 'AiAT' M .
X Environmental Health Department
CDF (Forestry Department) AP: 28-12-23
Attn: J. Craig Carter (on areas north of red line on map)
x Butte County Sheriff
PG&E (check title report for easement)
Pacific Bell
,^ }C Butte County Mosquito Abatement OR
Oroville Mosq,uito.Abatement (areas within large map in cabinet)
�--
School Dis rift (wa11 ma )
-. Water' Company (if individual welS s are not indicated on application or map)
Durham Irrigation OR Durham Mutual Water Co.
California Water Service Company (Chico area)
C Oroville--Wyandotte Irrigation District (Oroville area, SE of river)
Thermalito LiIrrigation
mesaddle CommunityServicestDistDistricl
rict(Paradise ito NaE of )
rea alongPentz Rd..
to Take)
Del, Oro 'Water (Paradise Pines area)
Buzztail Waterworks (Doe 'Mill Ridge/Forest Ranch area)
Paradise: Ir' agation District
City of (che`, wall maps for spheres of influence)
Oroville
Chico
Paradise
Biggs
Gridley
OROVILLE AREA ONLY:
Lake Oroville Area Public Utility District (see large map in cabinet)
Feather River Recreation District (see large map in cabinet)
El Redio Fire District (check wall map, a small portion ofOroville only)
BIGGS, RTCHVA.LE, GRIDLEY AREAS (SOUTH BUTTE COUTY)a check wall map and title report.
to see *:that applies. Some areas overlap.:
Drainage District #1
Drainage District #2
Drainage District #100
Drainage District #200
Reclamation District #8S3
Reclamation District "#2056
Sacramento and Safi Joaquin Drainage District
'butte Creek Drainage District
Tit CERTAIN CASES:
Superintendent of Schools (only- for subdivisions)
Dept. of Fish. and Game (near i�ater and in rural and mdUhtaih areas)
,a
Cal Trans (near State H",. 32j t�3, 99j 14rn (Chico cut orf), 1b2 (Olsv H
wY.`
I,
Richval;e Hwy.), 191 (Clark Road)
State hater Quality Control Board (projects with more than 100 lots or units)
United States Forest Service (if project borders USA land --check. AP books)
p (property near 'Lake Orville)
Parks and Recreadtces. Department (property+ near Lake Oroville watershed)
Department
State Water Resource
hock Creek Reclaimation Dist., (west of Chico Airport, south of Mock Creek and
east of HWY- '99 (see wall map)
Chico Area Retreati.on & Park Dist (only for subdivisions)
U.S: Dept, of the Army, Sacramento Dist Corps of Engineers (near water and
in rural and m6Ufttaiil areas)
SPECTAL CASES. check title report for any mention of special services or easemofits such
as to Thdemialito lrrigdtion Distriot (numbered items)
w �
fir' e , ` i "'" �•y .�J�� _
count
R
DEPARTMENT OF PUBL)c WORKS
WILLIAM (8111) CNEFF, Director
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - oROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965
Telephone: (916) 538.7681
RONALD D.McELROY
February 24, 1992: Depuiyos,ec,or
Richard Mattingly RE: AP 26-12-23
P 0. Box 557TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
'VJj'eYSV1LLE, CA 95901
I1ea.r Mr . Mattingly:
At the re ul:ar meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held on (February
24, 199 ), the Agency adopted a negative declaration with
environmental mitigations and approved the above-referencedproject subject
to the conditions listed on the attached sheet.
If no appeals are timely filed within ten (10) days of the date of the
Advisory Agency's approval (Plarch 5. 1992 ) - with the Clerk of the
Board of Supervisors, this action will be final:
When the conditions of approval are com lied with,, it will be in order for
PP p
you to file your "final. map" with the Butte County Department of Public Works
for recordation within twenty—four (24) months of the'date of approval by
the Advisory Agency.
Recently enacted Legislation (AB3156, Chapter 17016, Statutes of 1990;
effective January 1, 1991, requires that the Department of Fish and Game
impose and collect filing fees as spe^fied to defray the cost of manag3.ng.
aria protecting fish and wildlife trust resources: These filing fees are
collected during the environmental review protest and ate-to be paid at the
time the County files a "Notice of Determination" 'with the Coun+.y Clerk of
the County in which the project is located. This procedure is regtited
pursuant to Section 21.152 of the Public Resources Code.
To 'increase administrative efficiency; the statute delegated the, Collection
of filing fees to the County Clerk: The fee required in connection ti4it h uW"a
project is checked below'
PAGE 'IW0
PROJECT, WE-
AP NUMBER:
CLASSIFICATION OF MIMONMENTAL DOCUMENT
NOTICE, OF Eb'EMMON/STATFMEN`1' OF EJCEMF"I'ION
A Statutorily or. Categorically Exempt
$25.00 (Twenty-Five Dollars) Clerk's Fee
(, B. De Mininlus Impact Certificate of Fee Exemption
$25.00 (Twenty-Five Dollars) Clerk's Fee
2 NOTICE OF DETERMINATION FEE'REQUIRED
A. Negative Declaration
$1,250..00 (Twelve Hundred Fif q Dollars)
State Filing Fee
$25.00 (Twenty-Five Dollars) Clerk's Fee
B. Environmental Impact Report
$850 (Eight Hundred Fifty Dollars)
State Filing Fee
$25.00 (Twenty-Five Dollars) Clerk's Fee
3. OTHER (Specify)
$25:00 (Twenty-Five Dollars) Clerk's Fee
The fee should be paid to the Planning: Department by (March 9, 1992
in order for the Notice of Determination to be timely filed. Make checks
parable to the County of Butte.
The project applicant should be aware that if he :or she does not remit_ payment
of tho required filing fees, the project approval may be invalid by law and
y not be operative, vested or final, pursuant to the provisions of Public
P.eturxces Code Section 21089 (b), Fish and Game Code Sec: 711.4 (c) and
Section 153.5 (d) (3) and (7)0 Title 14, California Code of Regulations,
Should you have any questions regarding, this matter, please contact this
office.
Very truly yours,
William Cheff
Director of 'Public Works
Stuart Edell
Assistant Director
,SE/ds
cc Planning Department
Environmental Health Department
Pon Graves
' it
RICFUkD MATTINGLY, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, AP 28-12-23 2 parcels located
on the west side of Drobish Road approxi 2300 fit north of La Porte Rd.
Bangor area. Engineer: Ron Graves Associates
Public Works conditions:
Verify legal access to parcel one.
2 Provide two-wags traverfdb?e, access RS-8-LD-11 to each parcel from
a county maintained road or state 'highway,
3 Access to be reserved in deeds as per county ordinance and offered
for dedication on the final nap.
4 Show 50 ft. building setback bane measured from centerline of access
easement.
s Provide road maintenance agreement.
6 Show all easements of record on the final map.
7 Prov1.de s1 reet name signs per requirements of the Department ,of
Public Vbrks prior to recordation of the final map:
8 Provide cul-de-sac at the end of the street;
9 Obtain encroachment permit and construct standard road approach
providing adequate sight distance at the intersection of access road':
and Drobish Roed.
10 Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required.
11 Meet the regvrrements of the Hutto County Fire Department.
Health Dept. conditions;
12. Show the usable sewage disposal area proven to meet the requirements
of the Subdivisioh Ordinance on parcel l and 2.
18 Prove that tbh, required quantities of domestic water are. available
to parcel 1 and 2
Planning Dept, condition;
14 A
to the provisions of Chapter 3, Article 1 oft shall be oust .Code pursuant
fee for Sheriff Fac . F
impact
Prior menu _ Il of the Butte Count God .
p issuance of building permits or Case Permit �n the case of a
mobile home park. Said fee amount will be determined and calculated as
of the date of appiicaf on foir the building permit or''Use Permit.
The following. iriitigatzon measures are required
1 Place a Mote on the final map stating that Deer Ritigatibh Fees are to be
paid at the time of obtaining building permits, if such fees have
been adopted by the Butte County Board of Supervisors.
z;
i
RXCIIARD MATTINGt,Y Teri
'lace a note on the ,final map stating, "Automatic firesuppression
sprinkler systems shall be installed in all new res;'dential structures
in. accordance with the National Fire Protection Assji. Standard for the
installation of sprinkler, systems in one and two faJily dwellings and
mobile homes, NFPA Standard 13 D. the purpose of the installation
of .spinkler systems is foradditional safety and property
protection in the event of residential ,Fires. This installation
will reduce the demand for structural faire pfo'tection services in
those instances where they are installed."
R3 Place a note on the additional map sheet and on the deed that states:
a. No oak tree removal except for that requn,ed to provide space for,
buildings and associated accessories and to meet health and safety
standards.
b. Establish a "No Disturbance" setback, commencing from the outer
edge of the oak trete canopy and extending outward a distance equal
to .one-half of the canopy radius, around each tree. No disturbance
includes irrigation and root damaging activities.
c, Retain all snags except those which pose adirect safety hazard.
d. No pruning or cutting oa oaks -except for safety purposes.
Deciduous oaks should be pruned during the wither dormant seasan only and
evergreen
g . . .oaks during July -August only.
�I
I
Inter -Departmental Memorandum
'TCO: Butte County Advisory Agency
I+RUM; Planning Director
SUBJECT: Report on TentativePaIrcel. Map for'Richard Mattingly, AP No. 028-120-023
DATE: February 20, 1992
17his is a proposal to divide 10.5 acres to create two parcels at 5.25 acres each, The present
zoning is A-5 (Agricultural, 5 acre parcels). The Land LTse Plan Map of the Butte C'ounry
General Plan designates this area ;as Agricultural Residential, There are no specific or
community plans for the area.
The proposal does not conflict with County Zoning nor any adopted or proposed Element
of the Butte Coanty General Plan nor any specific or community plan:
A Ne ative Declaration tion has beien. recommended for the proposed project in accordance .
to the California Bnvironmenta!l Quality Act and forwarded to the Butte County Advisory
.Agency within the required 105 days pursuant to the California Public Resources Code
Section 21151.5.
Recommend approval of the 'Tentative Parcel Map for Richard Mattingly, AP No. 02$-
a20-023, subject to the following M tigatioa Measures and Conditions:
itaation Measures
11 Place a note on. the final map stating that Deer Mitigation Fi6es are to be,paid at
the time of obtaining 'building permits, is such fees have beet adopted by the Butte
County Board of' Supervisors.
2. Place a Mote on the final map stating, "Automatic fire suppression Sprinkler systems
shall be, installed in all new residential structures in accordance'With the National
Fire Protectir)n A.ssoti'ation Standard for the installation of'sprinkl6r systems in one
and two fainly dwellings and mobile homes NFPA Standard 13 D. The purposed
the installation of s i
rinklersYstees is for additional
safe
safety
d property protectton-
in the evens: of residential fires. This installation will reduce the demand for
structural .fire protection services in those instances Wher& they art, installed"
3; Place a note, on: the: additional map sheet acid an the deed that states
a. No oak tree removal except for that required to provide space for bufi ings
,and associated accessories and to meet health and safety suMdards.
„
�ft � ,�`�,,.....✓,-, :arc-�,„ ..wi.^""'`, ....,
oil
LAND OF
71
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE. CALIFORNIA 03965-3397
TELEPHONE, (916)'538-7601
February 20, 1992
Mr. Rictl. rd Mattingly
P. O, BOx 5571
Marysville; CA .`5901
Re Tentative Parcel Map, AP No., 028-120-0123
Dear Mr. Mattingly:`
'.lbe ;Butte County Planning l7epartmeat has completed the 'environmental review of your
project ti accordance with the California I✓nvronrnental Quality Act and forwarded to
the 'Utte County Advisory Agency within the required 105 days pursuant to the
Califdrfd�J Pubili' Resources Code Section 211515. Yn addition, the Planning Director's
feporl. required by .Sections 20-53 and 20-99 of the Butte County subdivision Ordinance
has hls'�i co;�pleted Please find enclosed the Planning Director's Report which has been
Pre a1'(';d for our Pro;!ect
Pleas-: review the enclosed Planning Director's Report with conditions of +approval if i
appli wrible. If ' ?ou note any errors or olTlissioll5 in our evaluation, please bring Mem to
our 41ttention.
sent to the !Ute Coram }
The t1rWito� xental Documents md�oand Planning
.hear Director's Report for your project has been
Advisory Ag tion. California f.3overnmerir Code
Sectii )s 65950 and 65952.1 requires, the Butte County Advisory Agency set he and
appre,i4e or disapprove your pro�ect ,moi` t[hin 1t�ix months from the date on whlch your
appl :.atiort was received and Acc pied. Tlr” sift month time limit for your project."
mat+ gated by to law, will oc ": on : The Advisory Agency will notify you of the time
and place of tbo public hea' n for your prt jest, l
If there, are modifications to yo ^ rp��: 'yy;tt'not related to mitigating ;.111 df�Yitif�xed impact)re °vlu�.ttion of your project sh- +,,"".required.
'�
��16j 53a 9587
�` l LSA
�{ t� associates es
PA, .ROX 986-- OROVIII.E, GA 95965
A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
'100 GOOD DREDGER DRIVE
ruery 7, 1992
# 01-I0
jt.at,t1ng, y T,P, M,
,Sr . # 29-12*-23
but tc CourSty
1 in.l,ng Department
At ont ion : Craig Sander
hear. Cra.rjg�
li 6_.
to
� a are i> re e� Y ,_ letter of
Decetber, 31., 1991 and attached
th ;at�ee refer�onoed property
appendix r 'Fures
s, 1 thru 3
iizr al ien li�rn'
d i�nolusivo or page 7, suggested
augat ] C► tlloEa
Rona. Oraves 1'ftf�
Ron Crravea ander ', V y
��1a14�,d}�L
RLG t T km
�tJdkV�'YiN�. L`1DiL''L`§T11�1',�. �t��l,�}��FiIN{�•
? �.• ai
5 a a !i R� 4NOME OF DEBT. E1l"MATION
jO,_ Office of Planning and Research FROM! Butte County Planning Department
1400 Tenth Street 7 County Center Drive
Sacramento, CA 95814 Oroville, CA 95965
,ox'
X County Clerk _
County of Butte
'SUBTOC -, Filing of Notice of Determination in ,compliance with Section 21,108 or 2152 of the Public Resources
Code.
era. ,Titlo: Tentative Parcel Map
1 iinmbex: JUL 2$-12-23 N 119 21 A 221
aaaie� Richard 'Mattingly CAVDACE J.
GRUi38.S, 9ureCo.a:
tate, clearinghouse Number (If submitted to clearinghouse)t None Dqpui,j
tart Person: Stuart Edell Telephone Number: 538-7266
P76jee4 Loca.tiow. On the west side of Drobisfi Road approx. 2500 ft. north of La Porte Rd. Bangor area.
-V toject Description: TPM ;to divide 10.5 acres to create 2 parcels at 5.2S acres each.
Tris is to advise that the Butte County -Advisory Agency O read Agency br Responsible Agency) has approved the above-
descni 'project on February 24. 1992 and has made the following determinations regarding the above-described
proJe&-
1. The project will, will not; have it significant effect on the environment
An Environmental impact Report Was prepared for this p,^oject pursuant to the provisions of
CEQA:
X! A Negative beclaraton was prepared for this projeck pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.
3: ' Mitigat o►: measures
.Were, _ wer"e not, made it condition of the approval of the project,
4, A statement of 6,Mtrid ng considerations was, ^ was not, adopted for this project.
This' is to codify that the lural OR with comments and responses and record of project approval is availably to the
general public at the Butte County Planning Department, 7 County Center Diive, Oroville, CA 95965.
µ,
l'3at& eceived for Pilingi utd
Postingat, OPR
Signature, Paula S, Uasure
, Assistant PlahAng_Director
Title
't2evismd 1Glarch, `l§86
r
Richzrd Matting!y
TmitiEive Parcel Map
AP# 25-12-23
V1tir. f o Pasitre
i. Mace a note on the final map stating that Deer Mitigation Fees are to be paid at the time of obtaining building
permits, if such fees have been adopted by the Butte County Board of Supervisors.
2. Place a note on the final map stating;' "Automatic fire suppression sprinkler systems shall be installed in all new
residential structures in accordance with the National Fire Protection Assn. Standard for the installation of
sprinkler systems in one and two family dwellings and mobile homes, NFPA Standard 13 D. the purpose of the
installation of sprinkler systems is for additional safety and property protection in the event of residential fires.
This installation will reduce' the demand for structural fire protection services in those instances where they aro
installed."
3.1 Place a note on the additional map sheet and on the deed that states:
a. No oast tree removal except for that vAuired to provide space for buildings and associated < accessories and to
meet health and safety ,:standards .
b. Establish a "No Disturbance" setback, commencing from the outer edge of the oak tree canopy and extending
outward a distance equal to one-half of the canopy 'radius, around each tree. No disturbance includes irrigation
and root damaging activities.
c. Retain all snags except those which pose a direct safety haza,-�i.
A. No pruning or cutting oaks except for safety purposes.
Deciduous oaks should be pruned during the winter dormant season only and evergreen oaks during. July August
only.
z?klt';
i
I.1
J.3
00
6i I.TC,
RLCC j►t
too,
TOYAL 'rUs Lic
macelVCO WORNS
LAICO
UYt
rcpt Mitt
VAAi/�NCCf
rUWLiC
pncuNeNia
20NiM6
6NV
-'
OtHep
-"
APPLICANT
RECEIVED PROM
Nc�LfN
FEATHER RIVER RECRAT�Oh &'SARK DISTRICT
OROVILM CALIFORNIA 95965
�Jt;141CIPAL AUDITORIUM, MOO M ERS STREEx
�N VILLE GP` PHOINCo (016) 533.2011 L'Nt Y 1r:+ G/%+/N1Ne
October 28, 1991 /M
County XButte
Department of Public Works
7 Count Center Dri,,-e
Oeoville, CA 95965
TM Richard 'MATTINGLY - Tentative Pareel Map
Dear Mr Mendon-ma
The Feather River Recreation and Park District would like to express our concern over the
growing population of the, Greater Oroville area and the affect this will have on our District. We
have found that this increase in population is severly affecting our ability to provide a sufficient
level of, services to our constituency. This particular subdivision is of a small size, being two
parcels, and we feel there is an impact to our District from this project. We need to do something
about this increasing ;problem before it becomes a crisis environment.
We believe that this steady increase is good for the area and that we can alleviate the impact on the
District through developer fees and for the larger subdivisions; the cre,,,�tion-of~Lighting and
p � minend to the
Landscape Districts. �'4e believe that the PlanningDe artmerit"slio, a+ reco
Planning Commission and the PlanningCommission should rec% nBT� tarithe Board of
p p the Peafher R1vtt,`Re`atM 6h and Lark District
and the other s t developer fees be established for
Supervisors that pecial districts which are affected by this increased populdt o grolvtlt.
For the present and the Richard Mattingly project, we, .feel that an equitable .settlement should be
made to the Feather River Recreation and Park f Astrid for the increasei in population which 'this
will bring.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
tl
o yand
Secretary to the Board of. Directors
I RW/is
,
H
oull
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKs
WILLIAM (Bill) CWEFF, Director
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE . OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965
CERTIFIED MAIL
Telephones (916) $38.7681
RONALD 0. McE-LROY
January 5, 1992 Dowty Director
Richard
AP 28-12-23
'Mattingly
p.: 0, Box 5571
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
Marysville, CA 95901
'Dear Mr. Mattingly
Please be advised that thi Butte County, Advisory ,Agency will hear
your application on.. the aacve-identified
property on February 10,
1992.
The Agency will be reviewing the findings from the planning Department
god will be cunsidering your tentative parcel map;. Public Works will
recommend the roti("itions of approval as listed on the attached sheet.
Them e-ting will commence at 9s00 aim, in the Board of Supervisors'
Rosim, County Administration Building, 25
County Center Drive,
Orn*ille, Cfzliforn a:
If you have any questions regarding this
matter, please co:itac.t this-
office,:
Very truly yours,
Will.iairt 'Chef f
Directok of Publit Works
'Stuart
Edell
Assistant Director
Sp/ds
t:tachmen t
e. bepi rtment
cPlanning
Rnvironmehtal Aealth Department
Ron Craves
I
I
7' 1
1
r
w Cour
w.
.6l t,. ,
toFf: >-• r
NO
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
WILLIAM (13111) CHEFF, Director
7 roUNTY CENTER t'RIVE • oROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965
Telephone! (916) 539.7681
RONALD D, Mc5LROY
Deputy Director
Fdbniary 10, 1992
Richard Mattingly RE AP 28-12-23
V. 0. Bax 55:1 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
Marytville, CA 95901
Dear Mr Mattingly;
At the regular meeting of the Utte Cobnty Advisory Agency held on
February 10 , 92, the agency continued .ts review of the above
referenced" at ject to February .24, 1992. The Item was continued
at the of your engineer.
"'he next meeting Will commence at 9400 a.m. in the Board of Supervisors
ORM) 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this
,office.
Very truly yours,
William Cheff
Director of public Works l
Stuart Edell
Assistant Director
SE?d ..
1Planning.
ealth
ccl _ .
JJ
1, r4 'r, ., ^,� �•�,r/iL'+. �^..���+^may+-!r✓:`t _ _ )� , II`
gel
coulifq
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
7 COU14TY CENTER DRIVE - tOROVILLE', CALIFORNIA 95965-3397
TELEPHONE- (916) 538-7601
Dacem.ber 31, 1991
Mr. Richard Mattingly
P. 0.. Box 5571
Mary 'Ile, 'CA 95901
Ae Tentative parcel Map
AP No. 0281'010-023
Log #91-10-25-03
De&,r Mr., Mattingly
An initial study of your proposed project, a Tentalve Parcel Map, iladicaltes potentially
adverse eliminate to se
environment (wafer to the evclod environmental checklist): To
reduce or
F these un act.., suitable mitigation measures are required as past of
the project. Otherwise, an invironrnenial Impact Report (EIR) is required pursuant to
the California Environmental Quality Act,
An early response to this notification, sent to ,the Pia wing Department, will ea-ped to the r
scheduling of your project, Please forward yalir wfattoa response Nvithiu l5 days from the
date of this letter.
.
Should you have. any questions regarding this iris°titer, please contact this office between
A 10:G+0 gin. and 3,00 p.m,
sincerely,
v++ B. A. Kireber
y Director of Planning
L4 ; 14"
Q lig V. Sanders
Associate Planner
C,Bs bd
I<<
Enclosure
CC., Ron Graves & Associates
Public 'Works Ibepariment
ro
!f
APPENDIX l
COUNTY OF BUTTE
ENVIRONMENTAL 6HECRLIST POOR
EVALUATION OF BNV± O M NTAL' IM"PA:CT
,5110 No, L )9 No. 91-11,)=zt-u AV NO. u4a-1/-u-,u4-3
Z„ BACKGROUND
t. Name of Proporent: dotard A.attingly
2. Addtess of prg4onehk and representative tit apDllcable)t PO BOX 636. nryte, C.g 0401
3, Ptolect descii.o,tlons Teritative Parcel A1ap to divide 10.6 acres to c(,aate two parcels it. 5.75 acres each.
YFs Auynt �Aq... DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
I MANDATORY FIjTD"C iGB OF S,� GNIFIC ANCE
t. Does the protect have the potential la degrade the This proposal will not slgnlilcantiy deL,'ade the environment.
fly
quality
creduca
tall texAtnvironi wtJxdtifesspecll
fish
fish or WHO Ife population to drop lWow sell-
elfsustaining
sustaininglevels, threaten to ellminatea plant oo'
animal community, teduce the number or testildt the
range of a rare oar Endangered plant or animal oi"
eliminate itnportsr➢t exarmles of major periods of
W itornia history 'or prehlstoryt
2, boas the project trave the potential to 'achieve X _. this ptoposal wilt not Impede longterm ehVitotimental goats,
short-tetm benefits to the detriment of tong -term
envir+ohment goalstto short-term Impact on the
environment Is one which occurs In relatively
brtct period t, time While tong•=t,erm frioatts Will
endute into he W urt,)
3. boes.the project have I"acts which are Individually k_ fill proposal may have a signiticaht cilmulativd impact on the
limited but eumulatively cohslderablev (A project envjronment, see discussion for Item 14 a, b. and d.
ipj f'npact on two or more separate resources where
the IrVAct on each ,telOklyde t s relatively Small;
^totat of those latts
but WWhir, the_ettect of the rl
on the onvlronment Is significant.)
4. Does the project have envlton"Mal enacts whlt'h X rhit, proposal will riot have a slgniticant adverie effect bn human
Will cause sub$tantlal adVerse elfetts on hum>h beIAil+t.
betngt, either directly or indirrecUyt
TII. DETVAMINATION
on tne,hasis of this initial evald`aildn:
itwt: lihd the proposed project tWl'b NOTcave a stghll leant olfoct'n the ohvi+orit^, Ott and a NCOAtIVE `DECLAR01Cki will be prepared.
his
INE find flint Although, the: pfcoosed project 0OULb- have a signitica. effect ptephttd,
there NEGAT VE bECLAitAtl0j4
hthavie been aiid6 tO the project..
A wl III
dase betau3e the A1r7`tGAfiit7iJ A1EASi.rti5 descilbcd "on the att'liched sheer' � d,
/WE find the proposed project Auy have a slgnitttarat eIt*:cl on the envf rbnment. geld an t:NVIk"EWAL IA PACT i2 bR'i' It tequl ted.
C nUTTF. N�irNO t)tPArt7AiENT
pXTt petertiber ii, t991 hY'r
c:V'L
i g s dots, ASSOC a e Planner
i
It6 "l,wed byr
Q,
,I-lva.:robm,ental Checklist * Evaivati.orlof Envikonmeintal� impact
Z ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
YES AAYBE _ No
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMERM EVALUATION
1, EAR'.
will the proposal result in xlgnllicant:
a rivet or stream or the bed of the ocean
a,
Uit table earth conditions, or changes In
_ ,_. x-
The proposal Will riot affect subsurface earth conditions.
geologic substructures?
ri productive
oulprimctive `
X
b.
Ofstuptlon, displacement. compaction or
x
Thls proposal will result In some disruption. dl o., aceme!,tt
IlUialasoidoses
a/etcoVering of the soft?
Exposure of people or ptopetty to geologic
compactlon and overcovetihtl of the rile as a result of ddVelopnw+o'�,
All of County Is In a Modei,ate EAtthouake intensity tone VIII.
hazards such as earthquakes, landsldes�
of structures, driveways, parking areas, tic.. '"K INvactt ,ate not
Butte
The soli ect propetly Is located approximately mile south of a fault
mudslides, ground failure or similar
expected to be significant,
C.
change In topography or ground surface
Wards?
leveling
Hoowever, seenbastaQsignif cantiWadt el building Padr
buildings to uniform nullding code slandards (of selsmic zone s WIJI
relief teaturest
this It
a.
Aesttuctlon, cover Ino or modiiIcatIon of any
X_
the Mehatno urntoue physical teatures.
Jnique geologtc of physical features?
of detetiorat'ton of ambient
X
e.inctease
in wind of Water erosion of soils.
X
The proposal will not cause erosion.
strls hot.
number of VeliIOL'
tither on or off Me?
rhe creation of objectionable odors. smoke , __;
the
X ..
I,
of beach
X--
The proposal will not affect any watercourse.
sanespsorncharpigestln sifttatloslon
n, deposition
titer,allon of air movement. molstu7e of
k
3. WATtkR Will the proposal result In subslantialr
A. Oanges in ,curreht.s, or the coutse or k The proposal 'Will hot Gillett any wale dourit.
direction .of Water movdwrits 10 bIthe"r
Milne of fresh Watetst
h, dwanges In absotptlon fates, drainage r X The proposal nay result, In an Increase Ih surface Water runoff due
piitterns, at the tate end amount of sutracd to reduced absorption rom impervious lut'lAces, and in a change In
rlinofI? the dtarhage patteth on the site. HcOwd r, no slahIricant adverse
Impacts ate anticipated beca0se of the proposed parcel $fres.
C. Ncsd for stilt -site surface dra'lnae x No oft slid drainage lnptoYthienti will be needed for this project.
Im$tovem bl.t.'Includlnd vegetation removal.
cll�innellYation of culVOI. ihstallatiohi
or erosion Which may in Ify the channel of
a rivet or stream or the bed of the ocean
or any.bay. Inlet or lakes
9.
ri productive
oulprimctive `
X
his not represent a slgnlflcant loss' of prime
soils de sggnateduarban gs
IlUialasoidoses
h.
Exposure of people or ptopetty to geologic
X
All of County Is In a Modei,ate EAtthouake intensity tone VIII.
hazards such as earthquakes, landsldes�
Butte
The soli ect propetly Is located approximately mile south of a fault
mudslides, ground failure or similar
trace associated With the Foothill shear zone. Consttuctfon of
Wards?
buildings to uniform nullding code slandards (of selsmic zone s WIJI
provide adequate protection to occupants ih case or selsmlc activity.
i« _nip.
WiII the proposal t 0 W I I. in substantial.,
a,
of detetiorat'ton of ambient
X
notq ease in the
the inti
aft �qualItyt=
strls hot.
number of VeliIOL'
b.
rhe creation of objectionable odors. smoke , __;
the
X ..
The proposal W'lII not create ob)ecttonabte odors, smoke of fumes;
of fumest
c.
titer,allon of air movement. molstu7e of
k
The proposal will not Atledl, the atmosphete.
temperature, or any cha,hge In Olmate.
locally or reglonallyi
3. WATtkR Will the proposal result In subslantialr
A. Oanges in ,curreht.s, or the coutse or k The proposal 'Will hot Gillett any wale dourit.
direction .of Water movdwrits 10 bIthe"r
Milne of fresh Watetst
h, dwanges In absotptlon fates, drainage r X The proposal nay result, In an Increase Ih surface Water runoff due
piitterns, at the tate end amount of sutracd to reduced absorption rom impervious lut'lAces, and in a change In
rlinofI? the dtarhage patteth on the site. HcOwd r, no slahIricant adverse
Impacts ate anticipated beca0se of the proposed parcel $fres.
C. Ncsd for stilt -site surface dra'lnae x No oft slid drainage lnptoYthienti will be needed for this project.
Im$tovem bl.t.'Includlnd vegetation removal.
cll�innellYation of culVOI. ihstallatiohi
,xz',viza=pnta.l Checklist * Evaluation of EnVirortmental' Smpac4
3
d.
to the course of flow of flood
X
Toheproo
will
not
signlficantly affect any flood control channels
waterstions
sal
IF, o
Change fn the amount or surface water In any
x
The
proposal
will
not
affect any Watercourse,
water body?
f,
Discharge Into surface waters, ar In any
x .
The
ptcaosal
will
hot
'slgniticantly affect surface water quality,
alteration of surface Ovate` duaalw
dbut of limited to teiveraltrre',
dlssoived oXygen of turbl;"ity?
g'.
Alteratlor u, lCio dlreclfon or tate at tlo,r
e
x
The
proposal
W f
', I
not
til:; rt itie dttact tnn or 'Mow or, ground water s,
---
of ground water
18.
N
Change In the quantlly or qua,lty of ground
x
The
proposal
will
not
directly affect Any Aquifer.
Waters, P�Ither through direct'addons or
withdrawals, or through interceptionitlof an
aquifer by ,uta of excavallons?
i'
ReductionIn the amoulic nt. Or atter
,-x
he
project
will
not
affect Any -public Water supply
es#erWtsr
1'.
Exposure of people or property to Water-
X
The
ptnposat
will
hot
expose people or property to flooding.
rotated hazaids such as ttooding?
ry..
4. p AW tree: WI II the proposal result In
subs tan a e
a, o►tange in the diversity of specles of X The progoo l.will not affect plant life because the -:site contains
number of any species of plants Concluding no significant plant life,
trees, shtubs, grass. crops, an aquatic
Plants}T
b, iteductlan or the numbers of airy unique, rare XrThe site contains ho rare plaids,
or endangered specles of plahtsr
C. unttoduction of new species of plants into x The plOPosal will hot affect eXIsting, plant life,
an area, or in a battler to the normal
feplenishment 61 exist'fng spoctest
d, Reduction In acreage of any adtkUlturat % The site does not contain any agricultural crops and Is presently
drop? developed with 'one single family dweili'ng,
5. ANIM" trrt will the proposal result in
subs an a
A. change ,In the dlversf y of WOOS. or Xr the ptopbsal will not aftdef animal lire because the site does not
htmbbth of any 'sped. of all a. (birds,. sUPpott significant animal life of habltal,
la ho' ah1'ma13 'Any
rept, res. 12th and
shelitlsh, benthic organisms of trisects)?
b� (reduction 2n the numbers of anyUntque, rare X The Bile contains no rare ahimals,
or �rndangered species of animals?
e'. Introtluctioh Of hew species of animals Into sir The Of606sal WC'II hot affect dkisting'animal 111',
or *'Vement of animalslr to the r ratiom
r<. betattoratiori Of existthg fish or Wildlife X The Site Is located In an area deslgnated as a development areaon
hatritat'? the maps provided to gUtte County by the Callfornia DepattMaht of
Fish And (tame. beVelopment of 't acre parcels:Will ,require paymeht
of mitigation lees When such tees ate adopted byy the butte county
hoard of 5uperVisbts, in addition, the bepattinefrt of Fish and. Came
has stated that the ptoject Is an Oak Woodland habitat. This type
4
ai.�ranmental Check].i;3 Eva fiat on .ot Env iranmentia� trmpaa .
Woohabitand Provldeshaentalglor numelroui5 anlmat spec esatle` The Oak
6. Will the proPOW result In substantial:
.in ektstCng noise leVelst � -X The proposaf will not result In a substantial increase in noise
increasescreated on site or in the vicinity,
b t to evere noise le
velsi' X The proposal will not expose PeoPle to sevete noise levels.
b, t;Xposure of peop ase in 1 tght or
CLAP
1.
Will the proposal ptoduce _ .— x� The proposal will no► result In substantial incte
IL glare created on site or in the Vlcinily.
T 1g, can g '
t and 91are7 a m,`te hot: all,.r the San*► use. lr the area:,
b. r"Uts , Will'' theproposal result !na,suyst"antiai
K aa: pr st'r "xS.
a t"1 era Ton of the Ptetcht or Planned land Use at "an
areae
g, areaf a�so�tI WIII the ptoPosat result In
su scan a s X� The proposal will not attest AnY naiufat resources
�{ A. Increase in therateof use of any natGrat
_ _
AtoUtcet
I, on-reneY.abte natufai X 'rhe proposal 'w'lll not deplete any natural tesourtes.
b, peptetIon of Y
resourcest
to. ttsX OF UPSE- , will the proposal Involve: ill not InVOIV6 the use of hazardous'materi t., not
�ksubstances tCndludingrtbut notollmazard ustb� ms located lel se to any tacilltfes which store of Utilize such
of explosion o _ X t�elocats. _
otl� posticide3, chemicals or radl on1 in
the eVehI of an accident Or upset
cond tIonst X, The Pfpposat Will not attedt 40Y emetgency servldes«
b. Possible intetletende with an emergenCY �--
response plan or emetgencV evacuation Plant
X ah�apbecaUse 'She 1pfnot oposed dehsl tY ,doeslnottekceed othat planned the
it. ►�OStrf Tu on, density Of pgrailon 01
owthlratet after X,
sheahuman bding developed In the area.
population# X The Pfoposat will not. Signll'idahtiy attect housing'demand:
11, Nd, will the Pr000sAl affect eXisting MUsing,
t1
or arcate a demand tot additional hodtingt
13. TRANSP6R1At1 1 G exit ioN.. w111 the pfoposat X__ The P►opos ilhi41lsenoi slgnilieant,►ncremehtal Increase In tratilc
resu nr
a' moVem neon of sUbstontlaladdltlenatvehlctc In the are a
to comply wllh lhe,oatking tequkfements contalnhe Proposal Will have
m
settlor 74-A5, ed within Butte county
The ptaposai will n" g because,
b, t:ffects an eXlsiihg" parh►ng factlitles, of ,_..,.:. .._..__ of street parking
demand lilt new paNinot ;f code
i X._ The roposal" will 1eoresont A mll
ptegUiiar tnctease in congestion ,and
c. Substantial Impact on existing �="` mainlehance remenl3 on area roads that Will not be Sigtiiticnt.
transportation Sy'temv? _ IN area, "itcutatlon In
d. signiticant allerat.fon5 to present."patterns k he proposal will riot a11er the present pattern of c
Of
cltCO, atIon or Mbve,ment of people aridtot
goodsi tt_- The proposal Will hot altedt tali or alt tta(lle,
e. t1104tIOhs'
to wal�arbprne, telt of air .
inviro=ental Checklist * Evaluation of Environmental lnpaati
[,
increase in 'traffic hazards to motor
�� x
The proposal Witt result in a minor Incremental Increase In tratflic
vehicles. bicyclists or pedestrians?
And related ttattic hazards In the area that Is not Significant,
IC
PUBLId
SERVICES, will the ptoposal have an effect
upon,
or resu in a need lot new or altered
goVefnmePt
sergicesr
a.
Fite protection?
x ;
The proposal will result In an InMlmental increase In demand tot
fire protection In the area. The Butte County O to
Departme1jt/Caflfornia Division of Fotestfl, has indicated that
cumuiative development In rural areas will impact their ability to
provide fire protect loft services, They have stat ! that instal lations
of automatic fire suppression sprinkler syst,. is iia residential
la,Jerials
=tructures, the use of fire resistant building and Water
^ply sYstems ademii@,to support the sprInirlef systv.W1I I redtlln
for �t,,. r,arec:�tx actwt.ps.
k
poI toe protedtlrxi't
x
Tn�tproo6salWill tesui t in anti incremental #hctease In demand fol
,_�,
proto!tloa in the. arc t� , ri �.anuo,', ba serviced b) the present
5h.•if► s Depattment. The Board of SupeYvtsots has ehaCted a sltertff
, tiq, ,1% bn
-7 1,tIcm fen that ,r„Is_ ren •t�4 ., the tl,�;. of buttdtri�- -
,, .t , ,
perintt appllcai on.
C.,
schools? __
x
rhe proposel will hot result than Incremental Increase In demand tot
..
school s'etvicet 10 the area,
d.
parks or other tecteational tAcllltIdtl
_„_,-- x
the proposal will result In a minor Incremental increase in demand
for park and tecteatlbn facilities in the area that is hot seen as
significant, However, the Feather River Recteatlon and Park District
feels there Is an ImPACI that needs to be addressed. At present
There are no adopted recteatlon Impact fees for this distrIet and the
County can not initiate or Adopt fees 'without Information from the
the
t'
District, in the Interim, the applicant may Wish to cohiact
District to discuss the Impact.
e,
iaalntenance of public facilities, including
X
The ptoposal Will not result In an Ihcrtmental increase In the need
toads?
for maintenance of toads and other public facilities in the area',
f,
bihor sl+etnmeht al ser#Ices#
x
The proposal WlII not result In An incremental increase in demand tot'
All other goVernmentalservlces lh the Area,
is,
ENERGY. will the proposal resu'tt In.
A.
use of subseintfal ,amounts of fuer or
x
The ptoposal Will not utilhyer'substantlaf Well. or energY.
enetgyt
b.
substantial increasefndemandupdnexi-st[9g
_.''_- x
The ptoposaf will not substAntially Inctease the demand tot 000Y.sources
of eheroy. or requite„ e
development of new sourzes of enerby?
UTILJ`Tltt 'Mill the proposal result to a need lot
new
systems, of substanttat aitetat'ions to the
following.
a,
Powet or haturai
x
l hot affect elddtttal power Or natUfal gas
Thetript000sbutional
,gas#
sWii
b.
corrmuhleatlons systema# ,
_._ :. x
The ptopasal will not alldet commuriltalion Systems,
c,
tVatet avalfabtl3t)t
f Wil ms
The proposal r t not affect public Water syste,
d'.
5ewet• or septic systerho
x
The proposal wlII have to Meet the reouitements of the butte coanty
l5nVltonmehtAl 11datth Dept.
e, storm Water drainages
The
Proposal
1VI I I
have to provide a permanent solution for drainage.
1. solid waste and disposal? �
X
"
Tu;i
proposal
will
hot al`tect sol id waste di't��r�91.
17
LUAAN HEALTH. WILL the proposal result In, i
a, Creation of anY_heallh ha2ard ;,, aotent dal
X
The
pfop0 sad
Oil
'
nit Lrm'w<e any p h hazard.
pAe
hazard (excluding mental hzalth>t
t 1 1,th .
b, Exposute of people d pnten..la he
.rhe .4w�
r,i
nr^cs:,i
tvtl 1
jloteY'poseot• to cny heal (l) hazard,
y1~t
hazards?
t.5 W'l1l I 3 Ck t6pu 5:l test;/T: Irl 'thy
'Or
_ ;. � —,, +�..�
�h
;>i'cp7�al
W\I I
not:.• n,.;l t .ill ay *G,Ih_',.n' ly :', ". ast40. HterC' _.
VNO' -
" zi' �tt� or any t,nthIc vlsto vf'bafopen ttY'the
bt<cnuss.' F 1S ctvsi
tet,•, •with surretthdi ttr
1c. tit tvtlf I�1 t' ,zr; a,, (001t 1n 6-m creation
a
�t'.art ot,i�ens Ve Tse open .,to the
pi)01 c v ewt ,
10.
RtCREAT16q., ttlll MA proposuf ttsutt In a- frrpitct
:;,., ,,w�
A"""",
Th;j
prdonsal
"ma)Ir
reiUll In Yn Incremental Increase In demand lot
epon a quality or quantity or exlx•llr.,g
patk
and tecrnf}lon
t.ellItlrs. see,Ahe dlscrts'slon for Item lad.
ue,4,t0t;IomwI OrodrtunI tfef!
20.
CUtt-RAL Rt L,I..RCES,
a, Will, the proposal result in the alteratlorl
._x.
The
proposal
Will
not atiact ar+heologlc►l sites.
or drrstrUctlori of a prehistoric or historic
archaeological Met
r
b, will the,oroposal:result in adverse phYslcal
—k
The
proposal
will
not aelect historic, sites.
or aes�.elic effects to a ptehistorle or
hlstorlc buildlh9, WOctute bt objects
C. boes tlib proposal have the
af`thci
—'— k
The
proposal
will
not alfeet cultural resources,
uld
-
unigeeieaephniccoilltha I Valitcsi
d, ►VIII the proposal restrict exit tiog
X
e
the
proposal
Will`
not affect teilrilnU3 Tesou Fces.
religiious t tted Uses WIthlb the
-pteImpact
i
iV.
nVr xanmental Checklist * EVAIAaatiplai of Environmental;,, `mpaai;
7
V SUGGESTED MITIGATION. MEAYUREE;
i Mace a note on the final asap stating that met
mitigation feet are to be pard at the time Of
obtaining building permits If suets Ices have
been adopted by the Butte county Board of
sup.'rvl sots...
z. pisco a note on the final map stating,
,Automatic fire suppresslorl sprinkler systems
shall- be Installed in all new residential
structures in accordance with the National rlre
Protection Association standard for the
installation of sprfnkiersystems In one and
- two family dwellings and mobile IlIbrodS, NPPA
standard ISD. The Purpose. of the Installation
of torInkier systems is for additional sarety
and property protection In the event of
etsidentlal fires. This Installation will
reduce the de,nand tor, structural 11 re
protection services in those Instances Where
they are lnstall'ed,"
1, Plate a note on the additional map sheet and on
the deedt that dates:
a. No oak tree removal except for that
Ire Ulred to provide, space for but Idings
and associated acces5orles and to .meet
health and safety tttindardt.
b. Establish a no disturbance setback,
commencing OW the outer edge of t e
oak tree cahmV and extending outward
a distance equal to one-half of the
liluCp ds Irtdlanenfuigition and
toot damaging attivitlity.
C, Detain all triagii except those which
pbte a ditect safety hizard.
d. No Pruning or cut11119 of oaks except
far safety pUrooses. Deciduous oaks
should be pruned during the winter
dormant season only, and evergreen oaks
during July August only.
c0S-bd
I
t4'"�
Iiv,Jton uenta .Chegkl st" * Evaluation of :Vnviranmen, Iml impact
;
DATA s -wa
Aq r+roiect Description
S.
visual/scenic Quality; High - undeveloped region.
1.
Type of Pro)dct Land dlyiston
6.
Acoustic Quality: High = only large ranch land exists
2,
brief oescriptIont tontotiVe parcel snap to AV06 to,5 acres
nearby,
to create 2 parcels at 5,.25 acres each.
7,
Air Quality: Moderate valley air quail`ty problems
a..
Location: on the south side of orobish Road, approximately
during burning season,
1.3oo Leet west of PI easant Grove Lane, one-half mile north of
nlologlcal Environment:
La Potte Road in the 4aftor area,
q,
proposed oerRtlty of Development FIve acres per dwelling
o.
Vegotatlon: Roiling oak woodland with considerable .
anti.
underlying grassland.
Amount of Impervious 5uitacln9= Minimal - - _
9„.
W11011ic Habitat, Upper Sonoran Li le zone supporting
51
small animitls.
6.
Access and Nlearest public;stemd(s), btoblsh Road. Pleasant
trove Lana, and La pored goad are al publicly maintained".
cxitturalyy-lronment:
7.
po dual septic systems.
Oaethod of sewage qis sa', Individu
"o,
achaeologicaleand Historical RISimrces In the arett: .Low
sensitivity
a,
source of water tupoly- Individual 'wells.
11..-
butte county denerat Plan deslghallon: A&ICUl-l:Ural
9.
Pr: ximrty of pd.vv& trines., To property.
Residential i
10.
Potentia) tar further land divisions and dcvetcpaient; None-
gi
under exist(ng zuning.
t3,
� fisting Landuseon5 sltc: One rsingle famtty dwellin;, and
it envirorirro-Mal settlnr
open undeveloped land.
P steal Em1rtNlrK?nt:
14.
surrounding Area:
a. Land Usesr LAtge acreage r+inch lands wlth �-ery
i;
Retrain
to
scattered residences.
b. zoning A-5
benttaf 7opos,raphCc c1r1racter: Moderate gentlyl
sloping 01'i169 tbothill woodland Wrath.
c, ten Plan Designation; Agricttltutal Residential
t►,. slopes: 10 15%. geherally' S to 10%.
in the Immedtate area, crazing and open Land to
the Weiland north.
,Level
c, Elevation: 400 to sod feet above sea level,
d. parcel sizes: t to 156 acre parcels, geiletally
d, Limiting Factetsl Nohe
40+ acres.
sol i3
e. Population: Very light use throughout the area,
2,
a. Types and chardcterlsticst Aiken clay Loam,
chars and zed'by a clay loam subsuttace layer and A
1s.
character of sial and Area: Natural open woodland and
slightly co:Jphct heaVY clay loam 3ubsotl, with same
grassland, rural area,
irrpeded,subdrainage,
b. Li, Itind Factors, RelatlY6ly shalloW clay s011, from
16.
eatest Urban Area; otoville is is Milos to the
l to 3 feet deep on top of bedrock.
3.
Natural Hazards of the Land
il.
Relevant Spheres o1 Ihllumice, None
a. Ear'thOake Zone: Moderate tarthquake Intensity Zone
ta.
lmpPoVements standards Utl,n Area: No
Vlll
b, Erosion Potential.. Moderate to high,
Landslide potential: LOW
19r
Fire protection SorVfc0.
d, Flre rlazard- High:,
POCenliai: Moder ate to low
a. Nearest county (state) Piro station: DAngor
Volunteer conanV approximately h Mlles, Palermo
e, CxpansiVe soil
Station, approximately is taflesw
4,
Itydrotogy
b. water Availability• Welts and fire tankers only.
a. itutdieiirttstrirnnlbtniot Wtdid(ei,weoKng aachRoad.
20.
tehoott lh Areal bangot Union tiemonlaty school Dlslrlet
b. Oaround water• po(ehtlally limited
nd tltoville union High School bistrict,
d. 'Uraloa+,e chatatitdtijilett see above.
d. A,'lnupr Rainfall ihotmal). 26 to 10 Inches pet year.�.ti
e. Limiting Factors, Limited water resources for wefll r,r
EnVi onment:al Checklist * Evaluaat110n of ;Environmental Tmpaat
ENVIRONMENTAL
REFERENCE MAtCRIAL
1
Butte County Planning Department. Earth cake and
Fault ActiVitV Map 11-1 Seismic Sa a—f t Clement,
12.
Butte County Board of Supervisors:
OroviTr, CA t. CH2M H , 1977.
ricultural Preserves Map, establ,ished:bv
.
Resolution No. 67-178, aroville, CA:
2,
Butte, County Planning Department. Li uefact on
Butte County Panning Department, 1987.
Potential Ma 11-2 Seismic Safety element.
orov e, CA! CH2M Hill, 1977,
13.
National Flood Insurance program. Flood
Insurance Rate maps. Federal Emergency
3.._
Butte County Plannindepa,1977n't. Subsidence and
Management Agency, 1989.
Potential Mal? Ma 1111 Safe
Hill, t ement,
1 4.
USES Quad Maps, Bangor, Calif
orodsltee
4
P111-2, Oroville,
15,
t o1926
Area.MaUn
Potential Ma Safety Element, CA:
eeicstatesSDeparrtmenrovI
CH2M Hi_ 1977.
AflTui r
5.
Expansive
Butter ount5afeanning Dmenpt rto ov(IIe, ansiveSoils
i6.
Soil sutyg of Chico 1925 OroVIIle
M= 11
�HTfi—
92 Area. United States Department of
1977.
Agriculture,
6.
Bu'rte County Planning Department. Noise element
17.
Butte County Planning Department. Butte
CoUntV Fire protection ur'isdictions a
Map Iv"I. Scenic H1"tlhwaV element. Oros eTT CA=:
.� _
Fac Ti t i -es h1a Butte County f re,
HI 1171977.
CH2M H 1977.
partm
98g,California Department Of
7,
Butte County Planhig Departments Scenic Highwa s
``
Forestry,1
�a__pp V- Scenic Hi iiwa Element, Orov l e, CA
CHCH M , 1977.
i3.
Butte County Planning Department, Natural Pife
-an d classes _MA 11•-4 Safety Element_
OroVTIle, CA: CH2M Milli 1977.
9.
Butte County Planning Department, ¢rchae016_01cai
Sensitivity Map, Ornville, CAI )aRies P. Manniing,
1983
10.'
Department, 5chool_District
y _
Butte
tL Oronilleia�ing
11:
Northwestern District Dto stmsnt afWater
Resources, C co Nitrate Stud Ma N tfa
Conten trat Ion i n. S 1na7 Iow, �W�T_ .. T e Resources
Agency, State of Ca . orn a, 19$3,
t wj
COUNTY or- `HU I1'*rr
ENV 1'RONMENTAL CCIECKL1$T FOAM
(to Ee complete y [,end Agency)
i,Qg 85-03-06-02
t. 9ACKGROUNTJ AP 28-12-19
1 Name of proponent Norman Edelson
2. Address of proponent and represent rtive (if appli�;able) -
Norman Edelson _Ron Graves
45
s'7b�3`t`fi Street P.O. Box 9$6
a,,esa Oroville, CA 95965
3. Pro jetct description Tentative ParcelMap f
11. i_fANOATOM,, Fl :�`D NGS ^tll° S l eoN1 F I CANCI Y85 <1AY13E tJC
a. Poes the: project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife -species, cause a
fish or wildlife population to drop below self-
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory.,
b.. Does the proje t have the potentlai to achieve
short-term benefits to the detriment or long-term,
environmental goals? ('A short-term impact on the
e"vironment is one which occurs in a relatively
brief fi time
while long-term impacts will
into nto tate lutureal
c floes the project have: impatts -which are Individu-
ally limited, but cumulatively considerable? to
pro;ect may iAlpact on two or more separate resources
where the impnct on each resource is relatively
small, but where the effect of the total of those
imlia4t;; on tho environment is significant.)
d. Does the project have envi,ronm+ental urreets which
Wil.1 caelse substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly?
DI-TERMT.,UATIt)N ('ro he completed by the lead Age►rcy)
on tho'basis vt this initial evl_tlttation
1/VL find they Isropuseel p1-0,lee:t COULD SNOT have a sil;nirlLeant. effect
on the entiironment, and l N8.dAT1VP,. DFCLARATCON will be prepared.
1,lwF rind thot although Ow proposed
project
necould have a signifi-
� � b. C r.oposiel projh�t
.�`. c11 t efteet On iho �en�rlrenment t lie a significant
ei'rec t in this ease because the
"1i'1'itiA1'C'GN til A;llrr8 described on
the attached sheet honve been added to the pi,oject, A NtOATIV8
tai=t"1.:1R.'i,'TtON %011 lie proparod.
1 rlm �1 e11d the proposed 111,01�ec;'t yl�1t�-ht�t°o a r.-igni rieaht er',i`et on
I1
tilt ti nc r 1aarlrtCt Ttt . 1rx ,ft.i' 1T1"s1 lllfl es required.
April 8, 1985 lkl (rl. 1tltl'I'C 15GANNING UIPAif`1`MFINT
ted' : ���z'�--;,'C•� ..,..� �.e...
David' III t4onim. t ssociate planner
1`�c"c 1L°ii p•°� 11 k"
-
r
7 �
4 '1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMP"�.`+�5
_..• _ �: —, "maybe," ,
rp an r�'t *."U] yes aztdanswers are re, uir�sd
on attached sheet(s)) YDS MAYsfi
NO
1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in
X
geologic substructures?
b. Disruptions, displacenter.`s, compaction or
xc
overcovering of the sox
c. Change in topography or g,`ound surface
relief features? _..�
d. Destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features?._
e, Increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
either on or off-site?
f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach
sands, or changes in siltation, deposition
or erosic.n which may modify they channel of
a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, i:,1et or lake?
E g. Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils
,
G outside designated urban areas?
h. Exposure of people or propetty to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud-
i<
tlides, ground failure or similar. hazards?
Z. AIR: Will, the proposal result in substantial:
` T7 Air emissions or deterioration of ambient
air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke
-
or fumes?
c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or
tem eratute, or any change i.'n climate,
p
locally or regionally?
3. WATER, Will the proposal result in substantial:
a. Changes in currents, or the course or
direction. of Water ,movements in either
marine or fresh waters?
absorption rates drainage patterns,
b. Changes in abs
ji or the rate and amount of surface runoff? _
c, for off-site .surface drainage improve-
meed
, channe
,:ents, including vegetation removall
izatian or culvert installation?
t.r flow of flood
d, Alterations to t e course o
'waters?
e. Change in the amount of surface water in any
Water body?
f. discharge into surface 't,raters, or in any
alteration 'of surface water quality, including
'but not limited to temperature, dissolved
oxygen or -turbidity? -
g. Alteration of the riirection or rate of flow
of ground waters?
h,
t ,Change in thee quantity of ground watOrs,
inthe
eithe through direct additions or with
draivsas, or through interception of an
aquifer by cuts or eXcavations?
i. Reduction in the amount of iaater, otiuerwise'
availablefor public water Supplies?
•, Exposure of people or property to water
related' 11;�auards such as t oodlllt :?
YFS . MAYBE"
NO
C -
:
4.
PLANT Lid : Will the p;roposal r6sult in substantial s
a. i ange in the dxver�i;ty of sj��ecies, or number
of any species of plants„(inaudng trees,
shrubs, grass, crops and aq�iatic plants)
b. Reduction of the numbers of sing unique, rare
or endangered species of pl:arits.?
c. introduction of new species elf plants into an
area, or in a barrier to thetnormal replenish-
%1
ment of existing spec;i.es? _
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?'
S.
ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial
a. ta�fi nge in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of animals (birds, ?arid animals
including, reptiles, fish and shell fish,
insects)';?
benthc organisms or
bi Reduction in the numbers of 6.ny .unique, rare
or endangered species of aninGals?
c. Introduction of new species,4if animals into
an area, or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of animals?
d. ,Deterioration to existing fi.s'h or wildlife
habitat?
fi.
NOISE. Will the proposal :result in substantial:
a. Yncreases in existing noise levels?
bt. Exposure of people to severe noise levels'?
7.
LIGHT AND GLARE. Will ,the proposal produce
signer scant light and glare?
8.
LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a
su stantial alteration of the present or planned
land use of an area't
9.
NATURAL RESOURCES.! Will the proposal fesult in
su santial:
a. Increase .in tho rate of use of any natural.
b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural
resources?
'i.
RISK o% UPSET: Will the proposal iiVolve,
a. A Tisk-0-77 explosion or the release of hat=ard-
ous substances (including, but not limited to.
oil., pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the
event of an accident or upset conditions?
b. Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
”
ll;
POPULATION, 14111 the proposal alter the location
z3 str'ibTit'ion i density, or, growth 'rate of the hutttan
population?
l2.
HOUSING._ Will the proposal affect existing housing,
X,
or create a demand for additional housing?
,
l
I SES
f
�!1�lYBE NO
13.
TRANSPORTATIONjCIRCUL.4T'l.Ow. Will the 'proposal
result in:
4
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle
movement?
Std
b'. Effects on existing p?.,rking facilities, or
�
demand for new parking?
c. Substantia . impact on existing trans portatiofi
systems?
X'
d. Significant alterations to present patterns
of circulation or movement of people and/or
goods?
i<
e. Alterations to wate�borne� rail or air traffic?
X
f, Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
� C
bicyclists- or pedestrians?
14
PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have ,an effect
_
upon, or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services;
fie..
a. Fire protections
b. Police protect -,ion?
X
to Schools?
X.
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?c
e. Maintenance of public facilities, includ nb
roads?'
Other governmental. survices?
1:5 ,
ENERGY. Will the proposal result
a. lyse of substantial amounts of fuel.or energy?
b. - Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources o,f-energy, or require the development
of new sources of energy?
lb.
UTILITIES-. Will the propsal result in a need for
new systems, or substantial alterations to the
following;
a. Power oY natural gas?
b. Communications systems?
c. Water availabil i.tytX
d, Sewer or septic tank
X
e. Storm water drainage?
£. Solid waste anis disposal
X
17,
H'UKAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in:
a reatinn of any health hazard o -r potential
heaith; hazard (excluding ' mental health)?
x'
b s Exposure of people to potential health
hazards? __
l8.
AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the
obstruct ori of any scenic nista or view open to
the public► or will. the proposal result in the,
.
creatxo! of an aestihetcaZZ�ti� �'�z P=ensive site open
to public
177
YES ',MAY BE
NO
RECREATION. Will the propo:xal result in an impact
upon tTie quality or quant'it�r of existing recreational,"
6pportunities?
CULTURAL RESOURCE
sal xsu1
a. Will t in the: alteration:
of or thepdestruct"ion of a prehistoric or
.historic archaeological, site?
b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical
or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure or object?
c. hoes the proposal have the potential to cause
a physical change which would affect unique
ethnic cultural_ values l
d. Will the proposal restrict existing religiotis
or sacred uses within the potential impact
x
areal
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP 23-12.0
.See attached,
I i
i
'"CUSSI:C7� �1r �tIt1x�`u�Irj�hiTraL I VALL.IF�TI��h� t�C' �s:3.�1�_lq
i ^,?,.,A., ....n rte...,. ,., _. L.Iw .r • .df. "'
This prmjecx will r*s'ult in some overcovering
_-,,Mp,actjon, disruption and displacement n,r- Lhe soil dLte -to dovelopment
�,r f b"Ai i di ng si, feta and roads, and driveways. chances coni ri l+gad
to an increase in wind or water r,,,rosion n -f fhe soils and changes in
: f rarptibrt rates Intl drainage taat�tc�rnry on 4 -.he property. !-f st"yare
VMOUgh this cottld l.e�td to a need for ,aif-site surf. drainage
I:m
.provemontz inclUdincl dr,,: 1,qe scrttctta,res, itnpr'ta��ement or culver-t
instal 1 ations. Due to the size a+ the pt�•�afieri -s, this is not
v„pected to be _s significant impact,
o Cls tht oxisting 20 adros, apOrO'' matel-Y li lCres xs already
�doyo aped as a hrntrtositr:2 and jssoci ated outbui Ldi.rtcls. This project
will rozult in the rete ain .np M acres bcwi nqj divided into a 5 -acre, and
0 -acre parcol, i A 15 --acro pa, -cal beinq reducod into two parcels is
oot considered a-i-inificant loss ofgraz',Lnr-4 land.
th z All of BtAtte Cot_tntw is within wa intensit,/
Zone VIII.. The subject~ proper+y is located appr ox. i matel y one mile
c-outh of a fault trace associated with the Foothill Shear 'Lone.
Construction of homms to uniform buildioq coded standards for
Seismically active areas should provide adequal.i? protection to
resi.dentz in case of seismic acti .jitY
4d.: See Item 1g;
13a c,fe. The r.rL,aOtion of two additional home iit-es will increase
-'traffic on Drobi sh Ro;dd and Pl oa.sant Grove Lane,' and turning
motions ons canto La Porte goad. An additional tWo 'parcel % woUl d not
+create a sx wn f i can k amount of traffic at ani, Of these points,
3 Thtattt h of *rt n i i.carit this pra ect will represent an
intrerTlertal increase in demand for public str-vic*s in a rurikI area:
Deference: Initial Studies for the HX. M:i Odl.t t on 'Y'rnt tE.i ire t�'ardel
Hap. AP !28-.12-16 L_r,3q Nn, 78--12--01-0--; Har-rlr;!+ rido:l.soh T'ontative
EJ,arctW1. Map Ar, 28-1:2-�1,6, 1.,t3q tin, e0-Ql-lO-()4-
(5rca,� ec ►�cr pt ion
1. Type v+ojoctt _ Aiv QtVIStv,�.,)
2. t f Dpsctt:
"`p "i�Mi+iiding t
one o ap r-nt ' -
acreL-110dif is-AU- n at the northeasterly
_frr_—'r a q o
.3. Loca,t.i,�3n Ory the south side of probist Road appro,timat' ly
1:+t3n.t pet t of Flty
wessant Grow L r,Pe, bne--had;+ mile north of
La Forte Road vn the Bangor ares-A.
4. Proposed Densz,tY of Development; Five acres per dwelling
unit
S. Amount o+ Impervious Sur+acing: Minimal
b. access and Nearest Public Road(s).- Drobish Roads Pleasant
Grotte Lano, and La Porte Road are all publicly maintained.
7. Method of Sewage Disposal': Individual, septic systems.
B. Source of Water Supply Individual wells
9. Pros:i.mity o-F Power Lines: To property. NlotsE -n Lev,
jo. Potential for'. -furtheA"'j G; an_ and deyeloErle
Av%,
'�:t. Envzr�nmerttal S�tfi.r;tr� ,
t�h+1�z c�a,�lwrivi rnnrrren t,e,
a. Gecoeral T0000raph c Charactor: Moderate to gently Sloping
rolling f��'othill woodland torrairn
Slopes: Levre I.,o LSf, penerally 5 to 10%.
r ., C2evatit n: +at".i to Si.ttn i=t5 t above s(--a level
d :inviting actors: Nt7ne.
Soils
a. i' �p and Sharactsri st cs- Ai Far m Clay Loam, char %cteri ed
b%r a clay loaM tUbsU'1 Face layryor and a sli-Otl.y CO1AY aC+-
heavy, clan loam sUbn«oi l , with tomo impeded subdr',,ai.nf,,�),O.
b. Limiting r4c.tOrs: Rt-ldtivoly shall't W clayey st)i.l ; +t~otn 1
to A �eot deep on top o•F bodrock,
- .
Natural NaZa.ards rr►+ the l..arici
Earthguako- Zone'.Ilod6lrLtte ,.SarthgUak tntensi ty 4onts VIII.
b, Er o%lon 1tt)tant; a1 Mo At Or tta htt;hy
Potted l : Low.
d. Pii''e HaOtardt. High,.
tr: 'Srspoh siva_ Loa In Ptntenk i al : tloclt2i+to
W Hydrolo4tr'
a, Sur taco U1,�ter Natural hi,l:l.t-ide tclos drr:ai'n Itieo,
tri but ar iei�*z o+ Ili, l tart 'Uretz-k 4►051' O� 1"'i 0qs, RAt ci r IN'o'.Ad.
kl» Sr'csohd W-:ttrt Patohtl�xll ; limited.
r`. !r'�►ihr"�tat? C.i'i:+t�';�ch_�?t"x+,�t3,o'a wr„r�s t�htav�?.
}
s �
*_..: d. Annual F:', in -Fail (normal? : 2Ej `to, 3,P inches.
i na F -actor'
S. L.imitod 4lai ��.,r rIL-scaurcos for wells.
5. Vis,_Lal/Scora,c ovality-, High -- un&74velaped region.
6. Acoustic ciu. aiity: High - only larje ranch land e:•,i.sts nearby/.
4 7. As', r L"!ual r LY.- Moderate ., al l e�� aiI qu.al i ty problems during
iI burninq season.
B. Vegetation: Rollinq oaf,' woodland with considerable underlying
grassland.
9. Iraildli.fr-. Habitat: tipper Sonoran Life Zone supporting small
An.lmals,
r�� tur�ll fit:�
10. Archa:to.logtr-1 ,and Historical Re-- urces in the area= L01-1
sensitivity al-ea-
118Utte Qovnty Gnner.,411 Plan designation:
12. 5`ti=.tioq �oninq: A..»5,
1-.. E;: i sti nq Land Use on• -site One single-family dwelling,; open
undo' el dO d land.
14. Surro+tndinq Area:
ai Land I1=es. large acr5age ranch lands with Very scattered
r-esi dvmces
b. Zone nq: A-5.
immediate area; QrjLinq and Open Land to ytho .gest an the
r. Uen. Man de4i natic�ns� � gr~�c�l7tur=1-l;�sldghtia] and
north:
d. Parcel Sites: 1- to 150 -acre parcel:j, gent~r�llyy 4tt+
e. Fopttl. ati.an: Very l iclht use thrattq�f but the a►�ea.
aC,rq..
15. Character f Site and Area: Iyat�tral capon t•je�odlanci and
carassland y rural area.
16, t+aoarest Urban Al�-oa: Orovi to is is miles to the nart:hwest.
17helovant apherO.q Of Influence: None
18. mtar fem :n.
Standards Urban No
19. Fire Protection Service.
a. No'aro'st Ct..�unty (St, -,0 -ii) Fire S?� LLipn: Uangtar `��alttntehr
Gompahv* 4 miles; F'al.rj'tsaca Station 15 miles~
b. Wetp-r t= va.i,l.abilit%r: clops and fire tankers onl ,
20. School- in wreat llangor Union 12l,oMe-rotary School District and
orovillo Limon Hieh School:
Di-
g -
s
AS
--z DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
1,469 Humboldt Ave. DNISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Address C7 1�1 it me*iA iu_ 12 7 County Canter Drive 0 747 E111ott Road
Reply to Chico, Cplifomio'95926 Oro,Ille, California 95965 Paradise, California 95969
Telephone: 916/891.2727 Telephone- 91,6/538.7281 Telephone: 916/87,2.6308
?.on Graves
BOX 986
Srov ' ler CA 9596
;::s: Igat ;irigly TPM 'Pr ti8--12-23
Zear Ron: ,
�zh4-5 department has advised the Butte County Department of Public
Works Land Development Section that 'we are prepared to act on the
above application.
used on present information, we can recommend approval or'
conditional approval:
recommended COndit'sons for Approval
14 Show the usable sewage 11dispo< �a proven to meet the
requirements of the Slbdivisiur,, ince on Parcel 1 and 2.
2. Prove: that the required quent'l, ,_.e-9 of domestic water are
available to parcel, 1 and 2:
If you have any questions regarding this letters please contact Mr.
oval or ryself at the anove listed address or telephone: number
batween 8:00 - 10:00 a.m. week6ay,§ .
Very truly
Phjli;p E. 1jelsbii.
SUpertrisin,g E.ri.S.
Division of Environmental Realth
PEt; sg
bc: Planning Department
IO
'` Li) ORNIA—TH'c Ri SOURCES AGENIC y RETE WILSON, Governor
' h1 --
P,,r iMENT OF, FISH AND GAl,1E
FIt�''"1S3NIi "� „Mz
t'ri .j4I) 0VZ ,ROAD, SUITE A ,.
SFcV of ,, OOVA, CALIFORNIA 95670
�9,T66) ;,55-7020 j
November 14, 1991
Mr John Mendonsa
County of Butte
Department of PublicWorks
I County Center Drive
broville, California 95965
Dear Mr. Mendonsa.:
The Department of Fish and G-gime (DFG) has reviewed the
Aichard Mattingly Tentative Parcel Map (TPM), a proposal to
divide AV 28-12-23 of 10.5 acres into two, 5.25 -acre parcels.
located west of Bangor, the parcel lies within Mooretown deer
herd ,winter range which is covered by an oak woodland habitat.
Since the TPM is within a Designated Development Zone, the
.DFG does not object to the land division provided that the
following mitigation measures are imposed as conditions of
approval on the Final parcel Map:
1. Assessment of deer habitat improvement fees
2. Fencing to meet approved standards.
Oak woodlands are a particularly impotant habitat because
they provide most of the essential life sustaining requirements
food,' shelter, nesting and roosting sites) needed by
.numerous animal species.- There has been significant cumulative?
losses of oak woodlands in California due to residential,
commercial, and other development projects. To mitigate the
project impacts on oak woodlands; these.restrictions are needed;
1: No oak tree removal except for that required to
i provide space for buildings and associated
accessories and to meet health and safety standards.
26 Fstablisk a no distutbanee setbackl� commencing from
the outer edge of the oa}. tree canopy and extending
outward a distance equal to one-half of the canopy
radius, around each tree. No disturbance includes
irrigation and root damaging act vities ;
3. Iketain all snags except those which pose a direct
safety hazard.
'll
John Mendonsa
'Nov,ember 14, 1991
Page Two
4. No pruning or cutting of,oaks except for safety
purposes Deciduous oars should be pruned durir,i3 the
winter dormant season only and evergreen oaks during
` July August only.
Pursuant to Public Resources Code Sections 21052 and
21092.2, the DDG :requests written notification of ,proposed
' actions and_ pending decisions regarding this project.
Mitten notifications should be directed to this office.
This project will have an impact to fish and/or,
Wildlife habitat. Assessment of fees under Public Resources
Code Section 21080 and as defined by Fish and Game Code
Section 711.4 is necessary. Fees are payable by the project
applicant upon filing of the Notice of Determination by the
lead agency
If W be, of further assistance, please Contact
Mr. gon Bertram, Associate Wildlife Biologist or
`Ms. 'Patricia Perkins, Wildlife. Management Supervisor, telephone
( 916) 355-7010 .
Sincerely,
�T es D. Messersmi
egional Manager
IUO"
I„.
X11 .
FEATHER RIVER RECREATION 8i PARD Dx5TRIC'T' `
OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965
MUNIC;IPAI AUnI' ORIUM, 1290 A YERS STREET
-n4VILLE �'� PHOM (01.9) 533,2011
October 28, 1991
County of Butte
Department of Public Works
7 County Center Drive
Oroville , CA 95965, A,
I
Rt Richard MA'PTINGLY Tentative Parcel Map
Dear Mr. Mendonsa
The Feather River Recreation and Park District would like to express our concern over the
growing population of the Greater Oroville area and the affect this will have on our District, We
have found that ,this increase in population is saverly affecting our ability to provide a sufficient
level of services to our constituency. This particular subdivision is of a small size, being two
parcels, and we feel there is an impact to Our District from this project. We need to do something
about this increasing problem before it becomes a crisis environment.
We believe-that this steady increase is good for the area and that; Ni,- can alleviate the impact on the
District through de odopor fees and for the larger subdivision:, the creUion of Lighting and
Landscape Districts. Svc, believe that the Planning Department _should recommend to the
Planning Commission and. the Planning Commission should recommend to .the Board of
Supervisors that deveioper fees be established for the Feather River .Recreation and Park District
and the other ?special districts which are affected by this increased population growth.
For the present and th < Richard Mattingly project, we feel that an Pvuitable settlement should be
made to the Feather River Recreation and Park District for the it %tt�se in population which this
will 'bring,
Thank, .you:
8hicerely,,
od. �eyandSecretaryto the Board of Directors
RW/js
COUNTY OF BUTTE
DEPARTi"i[ VT OF PUBLIC WORKB 9;
7 County Center Drive
Ck 95565
1916) 538•-7266
October 22, 1991
RE: AP 28-12-25
Richard Mattingly Tentative parcel Map
P.O. Box 5571
Marysville, CA 95901
Dear 11r. Mattingly:
You that your, application for a tentative map for the.
This is to notify � De ��rtrnent
abovereferenced property is being submitted to the Planning p tment
for environmental determination, and to the Environmental Health i?epar
for its review.
This application will be considered cor,'p
lete when we have received
notification from the Plarit ing Department and the Environmental Health
Department that all necessary data have been received.. These departments
will ]. contact you regar.3� rig- any, :?A-dit onal information they may rzquire.
VeL
-Y truly your':;, -
Sjilliam Gheff
Director of Public C3orlts
r
Jqhn Mendonsa
A.gsistant Director
JM/kp
cc:
Do p
Planting
Ltv ent
Enviionmen I 'Health Department
Roil' 'Ctaves & Associates
BUM CO. PLANNI lb DtP' Aft MENT
OROIE(I:LE� CA1�FORN�A
Lb U20 (Revised 2/88
,.,
r'
,B13TT�E OOUNTY'-.Ar _' cORv ACI,,JCY KT1t1TF3 . AGE1 ;�
>
,.
FtMARY 24, 1992
G. TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAPS FOR CONSIDERATION:
51
Richard Mattingly, Tentative Parcell Maps, AP 28-1- x-23, 2 parcels
located on the west side of Drobish Road approx. 2500 ft, north
of J -a Porte Ron Graves Associates
R�JFeb8ruararea,
(continued from ,y10, 1992)ngineer,
Doug Sutherland. was present.
There was a discussion; of the mitigation measure about the no disturbance
area. The Dept: lof Fish and Game could be'consulted about the details
of what the requirements- mean.
Mr. Sutherland waYYed timely receipt of the Planning Director's ROport.
The project is subject do Fish and Game Fees,
Mr. Reid statedr having teviewed the environmental review checkli
BUTTE' COUNTY ADVTSORY AGENCY MINUTES' PAG} 9 y,
IPEBRUARY 24, 1 �%'
MATTINGLY, TPM
3
Place a note on the additional. map shzet and on the deed that states:
No
a, oak tree removal except for that requried to provide space f,*
buildings and associated accessories and to meet health
standards. and safety
b. Establish a "No Disturbance" setback, commencing from the outer
edge of the oak tree
canopy and extending outward a distance equal
to one --half of the canopy" radius, around
each tree.. No disturbance
includes irrigation and root damaging activities.
c. Retpltn all snags except those which pose a direct safety hazard.
d. No pruning or cutting oaks
except for safety purposes.
Deciduous oaks should be pruned during the winter dormant season only
and
evergreen oaks during July — August only.
Motion seconded 'by Mr, Sanders and carried unanimously;.
6.
St even Roc -hi, Tent at f ve Pars 01 Maps AP 36-24-20, 4 p'a'rcels
located 1t the northeast corner of Art's Lane and Gritnont 'Road:.
Oroville''area. Engineer: Ron Graves Associates
There was a discussion of Planning Dept. condition #1 and that it refers
to; "permanent dwellings" within. 75 feet: Would that exclude a mobile home.?.
"Residential"
would allow a barn. PG&E has a 55 ft. wide easoment
through there, which would exclude buildings, It was suggested that there
be no buildings or wells or leachfields 75 ft. from the centerline of
that easement.;
Doug Sutherland said he might want to discuss that condition with his
client.
Mr, Edell said that the project ;is on wells and there is no fire
sprinkler mitigation
Mr. Sanders said that mitigation should be required.
Mri Edell said thilt Mri Rocchi should write a letter agreeing to 'the fire
sprinkler mitigation
it was agreed to continue this item for one week.
'
BUTTE 00UNTY ADVISORY AGENCY MINUTES' rAcExs�,ti,
FEBRUARY 24j 1992 ' )
'
MAITINCLYs TPM
3d,e—sac
at the n i �. of . the stt eet.
Provide cul- ; e� .
19
Obtain encroachment permit ,and cbnstrYjet 6tandard 'road appr6ach
providing adequate sight distance at the'xnte'rsdot ori of access road
k
and Drobish Road.
p
Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required.
'' 1l
Meet the requirements of the Butte County Fire Department:
Oealth Dept. conditions.
12
Show the usable sewage disposal area proven to meet the requirements
r
of the Subdivision Ordinance on parcel. 1 and 2.
13
Prove that the required quantities of domestic water are available
to parcel I :and 2
Planning Dept: condition;,
14
A development impact fee for Sheriff 'Facilities 'shall be paid :pursuant
to the provisions of Chapter 3,,Article I2 of the Butte County .Code_,
prior to issuance of building pertits or Use Permit in t•he;case of, a
mobile home park: Said fee amount will be determined and=c$lculated-;as
of the ;date -of application. for the building permit or Use Permit.
The
following mitigation measures are requreds
1
Place a note on•the final map stating that Deer Mitigation Fees are to be
paid at the time of obtaining building permits, if such fees have
been adopted. by the Butte County Board of Supervisors.
2
Place a note on the :Final- map stating,; "Automatic fire, suppression
sprinkler systems shall be installed in all new resiidential Structures
in accordance with the National Fire Protection Assn. .Standard for the,
f systems sn one and tw o.family dwellings and
ystems
sprinkler
mobile A Standard 13 D the purpose of the installation
mobile homes;
kler sation
is for. additional. safety and.. ro erty -,
of spin- _ y Y P p
protection in the event of residential fires. This installation
will reduce the demand for structural -fire p'otection services in
those instances where they ;are installed...'