Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout028-170-078PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY SPIFFY FOR LAND DIV113TON8 APPLICANT,`^Bob Strassner Log#85-10-02,-01 ADDRESr) P- 0. Box 106, Bangor, CA 95914 OWNER Same PROJECT' 'Ot"SCRIPTION Parcel h7a divide.. 0 aoa res to cxeate —2at7:5 acres more or .less, 2 at 12.5 acres more or less. LOCATION On both sides of Swedes Flat Road, a -- PproxiMately 3200 ft. East of its intersection with Hurleton Swedes Flat Road r Swedes Flat area. ASSESSORIS PARCEL NUMBER(S) AP# 28-11-78: ZONING I.� CEN . PLAN .�G- `- --- PROJECT CONSUTENT` DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED September 3 0 , 19 85 Barnhart -Brawn Assoc., P. O; Box 5I Orovi e, DATE PUBLICATION NOTICE WRITTEN ..� PI1�3DI.iI�EU PLACE NI-14SPAPER NOTICE(S) PUBLIOHED - 0. C. P. la. DATE MAILING LIST PREPARED DATE MAIL..OUT NOTICES Wp,,'.CTrl N MAILS, ri NUMBER DATE PLANNING DIRECTO Ra REPORT PREPARED ----------------------- ENVIROMTENTAL CATI,GOk�I A�. � DETtRMINATION M- MP'TION _ I;A`1 FILED AND .BATE NEGATIVE DBOLARATION -:'DA,'E ADOPTED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DEOLARA'a JONDA.TE' ADOPTED ENV. IMPACT REPORT DAT SUB. cOMMITTE-r, MEETING DATu - ADVISORY AGENCY IIEARXNC DATE ... � ..�.�:.� ,ay `; ., j oc,J •..s, � "`.�%'-fir - .._ ,. ,� ADVISORY AGENCY ACTION BOARD ACTION COMMENTS TEFLNY=I\1A XON TO Office of Planning and Research FROM ' Butte County 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento„ CA 95814 Pla iEhg pa flt;ma`" y or 7 C Y Y nt Dtve 4 XX Oro I Ile, CA 95965 County Clerk*` County of Butte ,��. 71986 SUBJECT._ g y Film of Notice of Determination in compliance �tityNOR '• �iCou Y �A, QE('K�� Count ClerI� or 21152 of the Public Resource., Code, U th Sectit��t Nputy Project Title AP ,` Tentative Parcel Ma Name Ft p A.P�2}3-17--78 Bob Strays State Clearinghouse Number no (if submitted to Clearinghouse) Contact Person Telephone Number Public hiorks John Mendoncisa olo) X34-4266 Project Location , On both sides of Swedes Flat Rd. ^� east of its intersection with Hurleton-Swedes *'� Y 3200 feet • a, ",proxiMatel Project Description J. Rd-, Swedes Flat area Tentative Marcel M� a — 0 at 20 acres each. P dividing 40 acres to create 2 Parcels This is to advise that the __Butte: (Lead Agency or Responsible Agency) has approved the above-described Project on 7--14-86 the following determinations regarding the above-described and has made (Date) project: 1. The project�'..will,:X Will not, have a significant effect ffect on the 26 An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this "Pursuant to the provisions of CRQA, pr°ject �X A Negative Declaration was prepared for this Project Provisions of CEQA; p ct pursuant to the 3y Mitigation measures X approval of the — were► _Were riot, made a project. condition of the 4, A statement of overriding considerations for this project. = was, X 'Was not, adopted This is to certify that the final EII2 with comments and res project approval is available to the general public at: ponce s and record of Butte County Planning Department 7 County Centex Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Date Received for N.1ing and .< Posting at SPR 7"1.,5-$6 �i✓�.�11. .��'_.... Stephen A. Streeter —.__, itevised tlarch 1966 Mitigation Measures Bob Strassner TPM, AP#28-17-7 1. Cluster the homesites within 300 feet of Swedes Flat Road to minimize impacts to wildlife. Z. Show a 100 foot septic setback, building sstback,a nd vegetation retention area around Rooky Honcut Creek. 3. Construct a water storage facilit p facility'with a 10,00o gallon minimum for anallWeather road and parking Provide a standpipe facility to the Fire Department's standards for construction of this facility. 4. Place a note on the final map stating site development p 'Incorporate accepted construction practices and incorporatererosion control measures tominimize erosio potential. n J ti1 'Saito cozen , � r _ rte NATURAL VVEAITII A17 I;A11; DEPARTMENT OF PUeLIc WORKS WILLIAM (8111) C1-EFF. Director 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE . OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 Telephone:(916) 534.4661 RONALD 0, MIELROY July 16, 1986 Dcpuly Dkeetar Me Co. iietoq ing "'mm JUL 17 1986 Robert Strassner lDrMla, �ftfifmtk P. 0. Box 106 Re AP 28-17-78 Bangor,CA 95914 Tentative parcel Tiap Dear Mr. Stra;ssnerc This is in referenceto our Jul 15 Y 1986 letter We sent ,you, co the attachment listing the conditions of approval, a r condition #10 was inadvertantly left off. (vee attached #10). ealth Department sheet listing If you have any questions regarding this matter,le p ase call this office. Very truly yours, William Cheff birectt r of Public Works Jhh hiefidon Attach sa tss Stant Director cc! darning Department �nvirohmental Health Department. Barhha'rt/BroWn Associates, P, 0 Bops 1576, Oroville, CA 05965 ffealth�,Department conditions: 7' Provide a ':100' leach field free setback Within the property or within 100' of tharound existing wells either e ro ert boundaries, gh $• Showa 200' Leach field setback from the h p y water line of the creek... 9. Prove with percolation tests that the required usable sewa&e disposal area exists on parcels 1 and 2. proven to contain the usable sewage md sposalbine w' .ithareaan areq�iredpby til, any Subdivision Ordinance, by the 1.0. Homesites if shown on final ma disposal areas by gravity n shall be ,accessible y flog, Co usable sewage The following are mitigation measures; 1• Cluster the homesites within 300 feet of Swedes Flat , nond to minimiz impacts to wildlife.e' 2. Showa 100 foot sepCic setback, building setback,.. and retention area around Rocky Honcut Creek: vegetation 3. Construct a water storage facility wit a 10,000 gallon mi Provide an all weather road and parking space for a fire truck provide a standpipe facility to the Fire Department's nimum capacity. construction of this facility. uck and standards for 4. Place a note on the final map stating site tedevelopment shouldincorporate accepted construction control measurescicand incorporatec ros.%onto minimize erosion potential, .: R. ' LAND OF 1`4ATUR % DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS WILUAIA (8111) CI -TEFF, Director y COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95955 Telephone: (916) 534-4681 9ut4ect),i�fartn"ng�° RONALD D. McELROY' JULDeputy Ditecict pro, iIgej CaJoT A July '15, 1986 Robert Strassner RC: AP 28-17-78 P. 0., Box 106 Tentative Parcel Map Bangor, CA 95914 Dear Mr. Strassner: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held on July 14, 1986, the agency granted a mitigated negative declaratioi of environmental impact and approved your tentative parcel map on the above -referenced property subject to the conditions of approval Listed on the attached sheer. It no appeals are timely Filed --within ten (10) days of the date of SueAvisorervisorsy hiscacti.anp r�1i.l'be`�finaith l�e Clerk of the Board of p When the conditions of approval are complied with, it will be in order for you to file your "final map" with the Butte County Department of Public Worcs for recordation within twenty --four (24) months of the date of approval by the Advisory Agency. if you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office. Very truly yours, William Cheff Director of Public Works J hn Mendonsa A sistant 'Director al/ds cc (Punning Department rnvironrttental Health Department Barnhart/8rowh Associatos, P, 0, Box 15761 Oroville, CA 95065 a Robert St-rassner, Tentative Parcel Map; four parcel Swedes Flat Road, approximately3200' east of itsntersectai.ori rvq.L17 Hurleton Swedes Flat road, Swedes Flat area, son beth witJc.s of AP 28--17-7$ Engineer: Barnhart -Brown & Associates Public Works conditions: 1, Frontage on Swedes Flat Road to be constructed 2. Deed to the Count to RS-8-,(�, y f Swedes Flat Road andf60uFt. 30 ft. right of wa Road, right of way ei;hPr s he Ofrom Swedes of Fiat 3. Indicate a 50 ft. huildng setback Road. from the centerl' Of Swedes Fla:. 4, Show all casements of record on the final map. B, Obtain encroachment permit for all drivewa s struct to county standards, y�� new or existing, and: Con - 6i Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required. Health Department conditions:9-fired. 7' Provide a 100' leach field free setback around existing wells either within the pl•opert y or within 100'of the property boundaries. 8. Show a 100' leach field setback from the hi ghwater :Line of the creek. ' 04 Prove with percolation tests that therequired usable area exists an parcels and 2; a sewage disposal proven to contain the usable sewagemdisposalhataeaa�eac� Subdivision Ordinance; y adjacent parcel an Haired by the. The following are mitigation measures_: 1• Cluster the homesites within 300 feet of Swedes impacts to wildlife. Flat Road to minimize 2• Shaw a 100 :foot septic setback. Wilding setback, rot' area �3'"Ul"l l�t�c.�c and vegetation 3 t1"tinea t Greek.; 3• Construct a water storage Provide an faciTit.y wit a 10;000 .ally all weather road and parking spafrrtruck and iHiMUM acity. Provide a s>andxA�' facility ce for a constriict•ion offto the Fire Department's Standar this ,facility. ds for. 4. Place a note on the final incorporate acceptedconstructioi� practices and p stating site development should control measures to minimize ero5]'oll potential, iticorpor7te erosion Inter-Departmental Memorandum To: Butte County Advisory Agency FROM: Planning Director sueJEar Report On Tentative Parcel 'Map of Bob Str-assner on AP 28-17-78 DATE' February 7 1986 This is a proposal to divide 40 acres into four parcels, 2 of 7,5 acres each and 2 of 12.5 acres each. The present zoning is M-R (Mountain or Recreation Subdivision-Residential). The Lana Use Plan Map of the Butte County General Plan specific or community plans for the area. Prior to creation of Parcelsofless than 20 acres, five conditional criteria must be met; 1. Agricultural compatibility, 2. Proof of adequate water and sewage capacity, 3, Adequate fire facilities. 4: Road capacity and maintenance, 5. Access to co;nmercial services and schools. As noted on the General Plan Conformance kepurt; Criteria 3, 4, and 5 are not met. Major commercial services and the high school, are 20-25 Miles distant. The nearest year-round staffed fire station is at Yslly Ridge, approximately 15 miles distant, Cry statistics indioate that fi8es�f Theseall afiresre pcanmbebl tcausedresponses neSarg for structural and'improvement faulty and water heartens. Structural fire projection isinadequate woodstorves Near the project, Sweden Flat is in poor condition., Additional traffic Will increase demands for roan maintenance, Ci.rculatinn Element Polic 4.1-.10 states new Land divisions sho uld y be held responsii�le for their fair share of the off-site road improventnts needed to handle the traffic increases that they cause, Recommended Actions Deny the TPM. Finding that the map does ,not cofiply Plani with the General The applicant submitted the following mitigation measures; 1, Cluster the homesitea within 300 feet o;E Swedes Flat Road to minimize impacts to wildlife, Show a lOQ foot septic setback, building .setbadk, and vegetation retention area around Rocky Honcut Creek;. 3, Construct a tater' storage facility with a 10,000 gallon minimum capacity, Provide an all weather road and parking space for a fire truck and provide a standpipe facility r�o the Fire Department's ;standards for construction of this facility, Butte County Advisory Agency Bob Strassner Page -2- February 7, 1986 4. Place a note on the final map stating site development should incorporate accepted construction practices and incorporate erosion control measures to minimize erosion potential. DRH:lr cc: Bob Strassner Barnhart -Brown TO: Butte County Advi;.-)ry Agency FROM., Planning Director SUBJECT: Revised Report on Tentative Parcel Map for Bob Strassner on AP 28-17-78 DATE., June 10, 1986 This proJect has been revised two Parcels Of 20 ac to Propose the division 0,P 40 acre Re re$ each. The present zoy s into Creational). The Land Use Plan Map (hountatn designates this area as Agricul f the Butte "general Plan tural Residential. There are no speeifi-- or tOmmunitY Plans :for the area. The Proposed 20 acre General Plan. Parcels conform to the The conditional policies Of the Butte County designation do criteria Of the Agrjcul,�ural mit.tgation not apply to Parcels Over 20 acres in size. Residential measures submitted by the applicant The f our Approval of the projett Is recomMended subj are still aPProPriate, Mitigation measures as listed in the PI ect tree adoption Of the Pour February 7) 1986. annint Ditop*s Report of DRH:lr cc Bob Strassner Barnhart -91 -own Associate,,,, V:�a�tzfiar,�- -~rorVn � ���ociat A fornio Corporation 1881 A RObMSOn Slreel -0 801,1576 Orwale, CA 95965 9161534-1-911 CIVIL ENGIMFERS LAND SURVEYORS • November 81 1985 Butte County 'Tanning Department 7 County Center Drive Oraville, CA 95965 Attention;: David. R H:ronimus Re: Tentative Parcel Map - for Bob Strassner 1P i 28-17-78 hear ,sir. Hi.ronimus: Ion G, Drown CE 24578 Rkhord Barnhart LS 4202 Thojnas ddekirk. LS 3991 NIM&Onderhoar CE 37359 Ronald L. Graves L5 4085 Ihomoi C'inloyson LS 2900 On behalf of our client, Mr. Strassner, we wish to offer the following mitigations and information responding to your checklis 30 1985, t of October `Ir. Strassner 'purchased this property in 1974,Currentl }e and his W-*fe live on the property in the Housesany shown on Parcel 2, These houses have been in existence myears and show up on the 1917 quad map, His mother lives in the mobile on Parcel s, PIT, Strassner would like to build another home On Parcel 1 or one for his children on the remaining p5 Lece , 110 -with Swefeel that 4 and Flat Road. and Floncut Creek ""sellar , ating"" tho property des figuration of the parcels best utilizes the land., � t}�at the con- along the east property line serves a house tothe Arisoutght of way MITIGATTONSii 1) Cluster the homesites within 300 feet of Swedes flair Road to minimize impacts to tvi.tdllfe, 2) Show a 100 foot septic setback, buil.din setback and vegetation retention area around Rocky Honcut Creek. Yuba County Water District facilities do not have. crnough pressure to install a fare hydrant. The well on this property produces 65 gallons Per mix7ute Strassner intends to construct a water storage er 111i;ty with a Mfr mini.muttt of 10,000- ,gallons and hook his tivellI. to the raci,l.i:t will, most likely be a poild in the northwest Corner. OX Parcel 2 i i Butte CountyP1annin g Department nt D� Page Z 1985 November 81 MITIGATION: Construct a water storage facyroadhan.dlpairkin00 gaminimum spacefora� Capacity. provide an all weather fixe truck and provide a standpipe facility to the Fire Depart- mems standards for construction of this facility. Currently area residents inciuThegCounty hasSrecentivirequ ete n that Swedes Flat Road malitenance, articularly gxadinng. Mr. they not do so. The maintenance eae'xal ticul.tion of Swedes Flat Road. Strassner is satisfied with the p 1.iis daily trips take him easterlYfeelsobh�atohisif'amil.yRoad, knowsPorte what Road and Oro Bangor Hi.ghw�ay • H Swedes Flat Road is like and recentochange oft have yTpositionerelative�tos to offer due to the County ,5 the road. However, mitigations will be considered residents grading if proposed by others. the Vox mity of homesites to Swedes Flat Road; and Creek flue to p setbacks �:rosion potential will be minimal. \�fITZGA,TION: snap stating site development should place a note on the final incorporate acceimeas`�rCsstoumi.ni.mizeaeros:`�:oncticesa-potont al, erosion control. An Archaeological 8Urvey is being prepared and will be forwarded available. t�11en a ler will .also respond to the road and schools issue. �1x . 8trassi please consider our miti,gatiOns and call us to further discuss pnssi.11e alternativ0s; Very truly yours' BARNHART_BROWN 4 pfiSOMTB5 Michael Evans Land peveloPment Coovdinator July 25, 1984 BEAUTY Y -� ;VJIVII 66 1 ON 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OpOVI1 t Cl CALIFORNIA 95968 PHONE, 534.4601 RE: Terry Grcrrrty Tentative parcel Map AP 25-17-07 and AY 72-•39-03 Log # 84-01-13-01 All interested persons are Hereby notified that two certified Fnvironme t't�al Impact Reports are being Utilized fol, the above Project. previously 7 Also being utilized is the Initial Study Checklist tvhic}i has been prepared for the project, T}A . description of the above project is as kollotvs c "lent Par�:el Map div;idi.n 1vc�Ited a Tentative ppxoaimat L 01g00� eetonorocateth tI;enty 20 acre parcels, FIu2lc�ton Swedes PlatRoad and S�vcdes 1�1.at Road, Oie n o E a1" Hux eters Swedes Plat Road, east of of oville. 1i sides The two previously certi<Fiec:nvxaneare ntal Impact Reports Curtis E, Rossitcr, AP 28-17-00 and Joe Shrecengailst; Ali 28-17-65 Swedes Plat Subdiv sio.n (Robort braro r 1975) incl AP 72-'29-26 'Incl 72-32-19, 4 and 5�(,Tuly 1980 To 81-01d any t t nticcess,xry costs, Un.r.lYersit} thdoetto ri.tate e Orr tict ti.;t,t brt in" th : i ;agartciesndiV.duals or duIla Tato copies to ptbix e for c7eva ev at the CO, o �r11ptalae1.Urovllle, piannng1v)elartmont at7 Corinty4heat Library branches, CCntex Drive) tL0 :lco StagergZaxy, Thc;l i.s a chary' of $20.67 •Fox, tlio d.ocument~s. ,. this orrice he documents, tl7c}r wi1:1 be � � }'E )ou Would like a copy a .t o X2(1,67 plus �o�ti �evnt to You 'upon r�:Cei t - 1 gc o f' $,1, 90 .rari to a1 0.l' $2.6G �1"OUl.d vote htivve an), questions) PtcasC contact this departme•rit, Sincerely, Assoc'Al DLOLVId R. Gi tci Rl aitrter 7 Ma #1 APPEND l X P COUNTY 0r BU7" i 1 ENVIRONMENTAL Crir CKLIST P(-Rr1 (to_` e�`_completet�Leac� A;�esrc.ti•� I, BACK -----GROUND 1,09 U 85-10-02-01 ire N 28-17-78 1. Name of proponent BOB ST.RASSNER 2. Address of Proponent and representa'tivo AB Bob Strassner ' applicable) P.O. Boat 106 Barnhart=B�aiPrtt ti� Assorjate P 0. -B-0-x 15�EG' Bad, CA 5 14 0roville CA" JJY+� 6Y s• i>rojeet trescription Tentative Parcel Max,"`""' II, MANDATORY FINDINGS Or, SrGNIpTC:INCB � 7. Does the project l YI"S MAYBE NO duality of the environmeinve tnt,aptential substantialiy�'Te{ tjjc� the habitat of a :Fish, or wildlife species. ,;�tu.:,a a fish or wil:dlif4 population to drop below 51 f. sustaining levels, threaten to oliminate� a plaitt� 07 animal community, reduce the number or re,.+14.t 111r. range of a rare or endangered plant oW anima ;i eliminate important examples of the +,,;,yr 0.1, California history or prehistoryry s petio s b. goes the project have the potential to achieve short-term bencrits to the detriment s!i' lonf,_t(>r,n, environmental goals? (A short-term impact +n t=,",. brief period's is one tvh:ieh occurs in a relativt�l.v brief period of time while Zang -term impacts wit, endure into the future.) r . does the project have impacts wlhi:ch at,e ,ind vititx. ally limited,. but cumulatively considerable? pt`oject may impact on two or moie separate where the impact on eacll resource is relativeiv small, but where the et`fect of the total of thos,;. Impacts on thL' ttnVi ronment is si,gni ficant, ) d. rbcs the yro'r�:t have environmental off*Let$ whic°% wi.li. Cause siul,stanttal adverse er feces on htatii+tn be r.ttgs, either crirectly tet. indirectly? t)rTCRNtTNA 1"ION (To he com l e µ _ _ p tOO by the hoard Agency) ()n the basis of this initial eVr+luation: TJWI:i find tat" liropose" prtriect COULD NOT have it Oil the ertvi ronm��nt, and a NT:GATIVr; IMCLARATICIN wi i ,'iih I`r"t=int el"fe: * repared.. i find that altho rdhr;rit rffer t on theugh the prriposed project rtulr haj'e environment,x si nil w thou tivili rtu be afroct In this rase because the t1T`I`)GATIONNt1lA`� r `,n,-ibpdnt the attached sheet have been adtletl to the P-roje1„t, Ae1rCC,A T1�Fion iiC;C T,ARA ,Tt)N tvi 1 r be prc+p�ared, .,._.,S i lI]Vrl Ci,nd the prol�)oscyd project MAI' Have a , . „ he env' ronn'ent, rind ren rNVTRONNII:NTAI, TNIPAc,`l'ral2Tl1 C?11 is t. c required, rcsi"t oil cr C1A'i'I?t ,, October � n$5 �. .. _ .� 30 co OVIt UT'r,li, ray, . David H ronimiis, A oci;��� F�J, n ter 1tev1,01 �r E IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPTC xp anatxons of a I_"y " an f. es d '!maybe answer are rewired on attached sheet(s)) 1• ,EARTH, well the proposal result in signifa.ca:nt YES a._ Unstable earth conditions MAYEE No or in changes in geologic; substructures'? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or �--- overcovering of the soil's _ x C. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? "" -- do Destruction, covering or modification of any unique PAY y - e• Increaseei.nowindoor yatr aerosion of? either on or soils, x off-site'? Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel a river or stream or the bed of the oceaof any bay; inlet or lake? n or, g= Loss of prime agriculturall soils '`'--- outside designated urban ---�, areasgoductive h. EXPasure of people or property to ic hazards such geolog as earthquakes, landslides, slidemud-, s, ground failure or similar hazards? Z AXR. Will the� proposal result in substantial: a• Air emissions k'G or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation' of objectionable odors, smoke or fumes? '`— ---. C. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any Change in climate, locally or regionally? 3. NATER. Will the proposal result in substatttla a. Changes in 1, currents, or the course or direction of water movements in either or fresh waters? b. �ha;n es in absorption rates —, —. drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of s C, Need for off-site uiface runoff? i surface drainage improve- ntents, ineluEting lu Vegetation removal channel ization or culvert installation? ' d, Alterations to the cotItse or flow o,f flood waters ? —_- ----- e: Chane in the amount of surface water water body? in any -W`.-, .x f= Discharge into surface watersoi ,rn any alteration of Surface k water ualit- but not limited to temperature, dissolveduding ozygen or turbidity? g• Altoration of the direction or rate of flow Of ground waters? G h: Change in the quantity Of ground waters_ either through direct additions or with, clr 'eor through .interception of an aquifer r by cuts or excavations? a. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public wager, Supplies? jExposure ofeo P ple or property to water related hazards Such as flooding? 2- w• '14 011V L 7 SEs MAYBE No 4 . PLANT LIFE. FE . Wall the proposal result in substantial. - a• ange in the diversity of o species, or number t any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)?' b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare at endangered species of plants? C. Introduction of new species Of Plants into an area, or in a barrier to the --- v norma- rf ment of existing species'? Alenish- d. R eduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? _ x I S. ANIMAL L LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial; a. C ange in the diversity of —.— X species, or numbers of any species of animals (b rds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell fish, benthic organisms insects)? or b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique; --- rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in"a barrier to the migration or move+ gjent tyf animals? d. , Detc 3oratioij to exls:tilig Fish or wildlife habitat? ---- NOISE- Will the ai Increases in proposal noisetleVels substantial: b: Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 7. LIGHT p AND GLARE. Will the Proposal signs scant"light and glare? produce 8.-- LANA USE. Will the proposal result in a su stantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? 9. NATURAL RESOURCES: Will the proposal result in su stant�.al: a. Increase in the rate of use Of any natural resources? b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural resources? 10 RISK OF LrPSfiT. Will the proposal involvet a. A ria a o - explosion or the "release of hazard- ous substances (including, but not limited to,, gal, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? b•Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? -- ll• POPULATION, Will the proposal alter the location, densi.tY: or pulis l ion?hO growth rate of the human Population? lz lOiiSTjvG. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional lxousi.ng? e . i . i of ener upon existi gy or re of 1`1ew' sources of energy?q ire the development l3• TRANSPORTATION C I IRCULATION result in ,------- _ _= Will the YES MAYBE NO -----_ proposal a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle icle b• effects on existing parking facilities, or parkin.? C. Substantial impact oxgW'existing t-ranspoxtation systems? _ d• Significant alteratiorYs to Of circulation -X or movement Present patterns goods? people and/or e• -•.-- !� Alterations to waterborne f• Increase in traffic hazar�lsrtol or air traffic? bicyclists or motor vehicles} pedestrians? X `— — — 14. PUBLIC SERV1cES. Will the --�- upon, or result in a proposal have an effect, need for new or altered governmental services - �, � -a. a Fire protection? b. Po]:ice protecti c. Schools? on; d• Parks or other recreational -facilities? X e. Maintenance of lues? — _ Xr— roads? public facilities, including y f• OtherQuern 15. g mental services? X a• Use ofi11 the Proposal result substantial amounts in' b. Substantial increase in of fu'energy'? sources demand of ener upon existi gy or re of 1`1ew' sources of energy?q ire the development 16 UTI_ LITIES. �ViIY the news stems o propsal result in a need for �', n , r substantial alterations io �W3'Ag .iC . to the a. Power or natural, gas? b. Communications Systems? c• Water availability,. d. Sewer or septic tank? e' Storm water drainage? f. _ So1.id, Waste and disposal? .—. 17. HUMAN HEALTH, Will the a - reation of an proposal result health - k b. Ehealth hazard hazardor potential Exposure ing mental of eoelelu health)? hazards? people potential health 18. AESTHETICS, Will the o s� ct o� o proposal. result i --- f any n the �, � th.e scenic vista or vi public.., or will the ew open to creation of anaesthetitg1l, result in: oal to Public the View? Y f.fens've site open E YES MAYBE N0 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result ;n ar: impact upon the Quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historarchaeolo ical site? result b. Will the proposal in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? C. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? x d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? V'. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP 28-17-78 See attached. J WFA.Mrr. 7-7 DISCU "NTA AP 28-17-78 1b,c,ejfj3b9f: Development o: two additional homesitas or) the property will lead to some di.-splacement, disruption, compaction or overcovering of the soil which could change drainage patterns and increase stormwater runoff and related erosion. Any erosion occurring could enter the streams traversing the site, Increasing turbidity and lowering water quality. 1h All of Butte County is within a Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. The subject property Is located approximately four miles east of faults associated with the Foothill Shear Zones which supported the 1975 orovIlle earthquake. Construction of buildings to Uniform Building Code standards for seismically active al-eas shoLjld provide adequate Protection to residents In case Of seismic activity* 5d: The subject property Is 1O.cat6a in an area of critical winter deer habitat for the Mooretown Deer Herd. The Department of Fish and Game has recommended that no new parcels of less than 40 acres be treated. The subject property Is located adjacent to Swedes Flat Roads which is a designated transportation corridor per the Butte County beer Herd Study panel report. The Department of Fish and Game has permitted development of parcels Of less than 40 acres when building sites can be spotted adjacent to or in close (;.roxjmjty to the identified transportation corridors. 8,1 The Butte County General Plan designates the subject property Five conditional criteria must be as Agricultural -Residential. present in order to find parcels of less than 20 acres in conformity with the General Plan. Of the five conditional criteria, three are significant In discWsoloh of this project. They relate directly to the location of the property In respect to the roads In the area and their condition. The Tentative Parcel Map shows access from Swedes Flat Road. Swedes Flat Road Is A County-maintalmed road taut Is not constructed to County staridardso in periods of Inclement weather, Swedes Flat Road can deteriorate and could become Impastablei Sven in periods of good weathers Swedes Flat Road Is Mal-girial. The subject property is lot8ted 8 to ib Miles from Bangor Fire Stations which is funded at least through fiscal year 1906. The next Closest full-time manned station Is in orovIlle, approximately 16 miles distant. Major commercial services, medical facilitiess and high schools are located in orov Iles approximately 15 Miles distant. Jqa,c,fl. Additional traffic on Swedes 51,ab Road will aggravate an already bad sItLi8ti6he Some provision Must be made for maintaining this substandard road and improving it to construction standards for County mgIhten8hce4 See also Items a and 11, 14aset See Items 8 0 11 and 1S. 14% This project will -represent an incremental IMtr,,1i34to In demand for public services I a rural area, stpeelally affected are road maintenance and fire protection, School bus service to the area Is limit-od due to the substandard roads* �6- 20: The subject property is located In an area of high archaeological sensitivity. An archaeological survey will be necessary In order to determine If archaeologically sensitive $lt*ve sites exist on the property, and If SO, to determine appropriate mitigation mOSSUres, IIa: Information received from the California State Department of Fish and Game has Indicated that any creation of parcels less than 40 acres within the critical winter deer herd areas such as this will have 8 significant effect on Wildlife, except when homesltet are spotted close to Identlfl--d transportation corridors. If homesites are spofted within !'$00 to 400 feet of Swedes Flat Road$ impocts to wildlife will bi-a rAlhiMizod, The subject Property is In an area -,f '- Mi'chaeological sensitivity. An archaeological survfsy H,11 ih order to determine If sites exist on the Property, adequate mitigation measures. and 1-T to Ilc: Potential Impacts to winter deer habitat, archaeological resources, road maintenance and traffic generationw nd the I demand for public services In a rural Area represent CumulativelaImpacts which are significant- Most of the above impacts have been discussed In EIRs Prepared for other Projects in the area. The addition of an archaoologic8l survey at a supplement to the addition EIRs Should adequately address these potential impacts. keferonce'w Terry Greerty Tentative Parcel Map EIR, Log No84-01-13-01. Butte County beer Herd study Panel Report, May 1984 NOTE; The Terry Greerty EIR referenced above includes by reference the E!Rs prepared for Curtis F. Rossiter, AP 28-17-60, and Joe Shreckengaust, AP 28-17--68 (July 1975) and the Swedes, Fiat Subdivision (Robert Drapel-), AP 72-29-26 and 072-32-19$ (July '1980). 4 and 5 1: *1 m Applicant: Bob Strassner A. Pro-lect Description Assessoros Parcel it 28-17-78 Log # 85-10-02-01 DATA SHEET 1. Type of Project: Tentative Parcel Map. 2. Brief Description: Dividing 40 acres Into two parcels of 7.5 acres each and two parcels of 1265 acres each. 3. Location: On both sides of Swedes Flat Road, approximMtelY 3200 feet east of Hurieton-Swedes Flat Road, In the Swedes Flat area east of OrovIlle. 4— Proposed Density of Development: Averages 10 acres per dwelling unit. 5. Amount of Impervious Surfacing: Minimal. 6. Access and Nearest Public Roads) .4 Swedes Flat Road is a publicly maintained road. 7. Method of Sewage Disposal: individual septic sy8temS4 6. Source of Water Supply: individual wells, 9. Proximity of Power Lines: To property. 10. Pot6ntlal for further land divisions And development: Limited due to sewage disposal requirements. Myl _ronmenta I _Sett I no I - 9. 8. 4 VA -1-:EL,61 ronmgnt Terra I n 8. General Topograp4,04t Clru,racter: Moderately mountalmous Sierra foothills. b. Slopes: Generally 10 to 15% slopes,* some areas considerably steeper, part;cularly near Lower Rocky Honcut Creek and draInaqdw6Yti t. Elevationo. 1350 to 1425 feet above sea level. di LimitIng Faatdrsk. Steeper S1006s On some port larts Of the propert-y. Soils a, Types Ailid Characteristics: Wyandotte -Argonaut Sol' Set -los, sandy/gravelly loamg) shallow (20 to 4011)s moderately slow to slow Parmeab1lltY, well dralnedo high erosion hazardo high runoff potential, b. Liiii ltlno Factors" Slow pdr(h6abIlIty. 'Natural Hazards of the Land a. Earthquake Zonet Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone V111, b. Erosion Potdntlal. Very High. c, Landslide Potential, Low,. dA Fire Hazards Hloh,, da Expansive 8611 Potentibih Lbws Hydrology A. Surface Water" Lower 0ocky Honout Creek and its trlbutarlot* b. Ground Waterm. Unknown, c4 Drainage Charbdtdristics'. lofil-briatiom And surface flow towards Lower Rocky Honcut Creek and Its tr^ibuteries- d. Annual Rainfall (normal)'- 35". e. Limiting Factors: Groundwater may be limited. Setbacks from drainageways. 5. Visual/Scenic Quality: High. 6.` Acoustic Quality High - 7. Air Quality: High. Biological Environment 8. Vegetation. Foothill Oak Wood l ands/grass land tar abs . 9 Wildlife Habitat: Upper Sonoran Life Zone Crit -seal winter deer herd area for the Mooretown peer Herd. Easitorly portion of the; property within a designated deer migration window along the designated transportation corrldor. Cultural.Environment 10. Archaeological ani Historical Resources In the+ area: High archaeological sensitivity area. 11. Butte County General Plan designation Agricultural-ResIdentlal 12. Existing Zoning,. M -R. 13. Exlsting 'Land Use oh -site: Two single-family dwellings and open land. 14. Surrounding Area: a. Land Usas Widely scattered rural residences and open land. b. Zoning M -R and A-5• c. Gen. Plan dnsighatIonst. Agricultural Residentlal. d. Parc-, Sizes: Generally ?0- to 40 -acre parcels. 1 00i- ,acre parcel to the easi` , three parcels of less than 10 acres within 1/4 mile. e. Population: Sparse. 15. Che'r•acter of Site and Area: Remote rural residontla /agricultural area located 10 the canYon bottom 16.4 Nearest Urban Area Or^ov 1 l 1 e 17. Relevant Spheres of Influence". None. 18. Improvements Standards Urban Area: No, 19. Fire Protection Service. aL Nearest County (State) Fire Station Bangor Station #55 ('funded for at least fiscal year 1986), approximately ip miles distant. Seasonal Station #54 at Robinson 1!1111, approximately 7 station 4164 'In aroviller approximately 15 b. Water Availability: r1re tanker only. 20. Schools in Area: Bangor Union Elementary School pistr`rt and Orov 1 1 1 e Union H 1 gh School D i str i ct _9� Bufle Co. Planning Corn, JAN 3 0 198b Oroville, Galiforeja z. ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF A.P.N. 28-17-78. BUTTE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA BY JAMES P. MANNING PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed project is to divide approximately 40 acres of land into four lots for residential development. The property to be divided is identified as A.P.N. 28'-17-78. PROJECT APPLICANT; Robert Strassner P.O.- Box 106 Bangor, CA 95914 PROJECT LOCATION; The project site is located along Swedes Flat Road approximately 0.5 miles to the east of the intersection with Hurleton-Swedes Flat Road. The property covers a portion of the W 1/2 of Section 1, T. 18 N., R. 5 E., Rackerby Quadrangle, 7.5" series. PRIOR DATA REVIEW: Prior to conducting the field survey the archaeological site record files maintained by the Northwest Information -Center of the California Archaeological Inventory were consulted to determine if any previously recorded cultural resources were located within; or adjacent to the project area. No previously recorded cultural resources were located within, or adjacent to the project boundaries. A number of prehistoric sites have been recorded within the vicinity of the 'project area. These consist of food processing sites (bedrock mortars) and habitation ;sites. Gold mining was the primary activity In this area during the early historic times: DATE OF FIELD INSPECTION- December 4, 1985 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING: The project area' is located in the Sierra Nevada between elevations of 13751 and 14501, The terrain has a gentle east to west. slope. The vegetatiun consists of open oak -grassland with some manzanita, buckbrush and blackberry vines, The only surface water source is Lower Rocky Honcut Creek, whisk flows east to west through the northwestern portion of the property. One existing residence with four out -buildings and one mobile home are Currently located on the property, SURVEY METHODOLOGY: The focus of the field survey was a visual of the ground surface for materials or features indicative of prehistoric�poreearly historic activities. The survey was accomplished by walking linear trahsects, generally east -west, with a 10 meter inter area. Ground visibility was vval spacing over the entire property ery good over most of the project area. FINDINGS: No materials or features indi activity were identified during the field Inspectionve fof prehistoric project �rareal,Y historic RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommehded that archaeological cleart�nce be granted for the proposed project area, ames P. Manning rchaeology Consultant 'I. UiE .....,�.. ,.......... -Vin,..., . , -... �_ BUTTE COUNTY GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE REPORT s FOR PARCEL MAP OR ,SUBDIV SIGN MA.P b applicant: RECEIVED Items 1-4 to be completes y pppp�� 1. Applicant Name 5o'J r SEP 2 Q 1985 2: Project Description r p t' 3. Assessor's Parcel Numbers) L —l'--- 4. Proposed Use SCLC P-C't'Z The following items are to be completed by the Planning Department; - :Land Conservation Agreement Current zoning g General Plan Designation :Ac, =-r'-- t Ap2li ble Conditional_Cx£teria Not Applicable Agricoltural-Residential YES NO I. Agricultural Compatibility 112L 2, Water & Sewer Capacity 3. Adequate Fire Facilities 4. Road. Capacity & Maintenance 5. Access to Comtriercial & Schools orchard & Field Crops 1. Predominant 5-10 Ac. Parcel Size 2, Vicinity of Urban Boundaries �. 3. Agric. viability not impaired Staff Deterniination; Projoct does _ does not substantially conform to the General Plan.. Comments: Staff 'Signature /�------``''`".."-:,, Dates AS T11E APPLICANT FOR THE REQUESTED LAND DIVISIONS 1 AM AWARE OF TUE ABOVE STAFF DETERH1NATI0r1 CARD NG THE CONFORMANCE WIT$1 Ot ERAL PLAN. BA A9T © SS Dated �r 2e�... `u�