HomeMy WebLinkAbout028-170-087a `
i_•. try
PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY SHEET FOR LAND DIVISIONS
84-10-16-04
APPLICANT Ed Ward
ADDRESS �. 0 Box 841.1,, Santa Cruz, GA 95061
- Yom..
VdNER Same
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Tentative Parcel Map dividing 39 acrea TOcreate
..... ..... .
•th � parcels, - acresacres, 'ten 1 -6 --acres- .
LOCATION On the southeast cornea of Stoney Oaks I,Oor) and.,Bei-T(/�
DIt. Road., Oroville
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER (S) 28-17-87
ZONINGy� M9 R GEN. PLAN. Ag -Res PROJECT CONSISTENT?
DATE APP1,ICATION RECt.tVED 10/16/84
Brg.: Barnhart, Brown & Assoc. P. 0. Box 1576, Orovill.e, CA 95965,' -
DATE PUBLICATION ' NOTICE WPITTEM PUBLISHED
PLACE NEWSPAPER NOTICE(S) PUBLISHED - 0. C P. G B.
DATE MAILING LIST PREPARED
DATE MAIL -OUT NOTICE$ WRITTEN MAILED NUMBER
DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT PREPARED
ENVIRONMENTAL CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION DATE FILED
DETERMINATION
AND DATE NEGATIVE DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED
;ENV. IMPACT REPORT DATE GBIt' IVIED
SUB. COMMITTEE MEETING DATE
ADVISORY AGENCY HEARING DATA;
1% htt-P e4 ^ "111 A^414 Rtn 4t A/4
gutta Co. planning Oon m,,
MAY 2' 2 19F5
tte
j
o x,'F P1,�1't!*.;: r II. ��t'dr. �,a-�lli.�,
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
WILLIAM (Bill) CHEFF, director
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE . OROVILIJ, CALIFORNIA 95965
Telophone- 19161 $34.4601
PONALD O. McELROY
Deputy Dtteelar
May 22, 1985
Barnhart -Brown & Associates RE: AP 28-17-87
Pe o. Box 1576 Tentative Parcel Map
oroville, CA 95965 for Ed Ward
Gentlemen.
At the regular meeting of the Butte County Board of Supervisors held on
May 21, 1985, the Board upheld your appeal of tele denial by the Advisory
Agency of the above -referenced project and adopted the mitigated negative
declaration regarding environmental impact for AP 28-17-87.
Approval of the final map is subject to the conditions as listed on the
attached sheet, When the conditions of approval are complied with, it
will be in order for Mr. Ward to file his "final map" with the Department
of Public Works for recordation within twonty=four months of the date of
the Board ofSupervisors' action.
If you should have any questionsregarding this matter, please contact
this office.
Very truly yours;
William Cheff
Director of Public Works
0001nal sinned by
JOHN M8NDONSA
John Men onsa
Assistant Director
JM/ns
Attachment
cc. Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
Canning - Envi ranmen tal Review
Environmental Wealth
Ed Ward, P. 0. Box 8411, Santa Cruz, CA 95061
Ed Ward TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, two parcels on the southeast corner of Stoney
Oaks Loop and Gold Mountain Road, Oroville area.
Assessor's Parcel Number: 28-17-87
Engineer: Barnhart-Brown & Associates
Public Works Departmont conditions are;
1. Verify legal parcel.
2. Verify legal access.
3. Provide two-way traversable access RS-8-LD--I to each parcel from a
county maintained road or state highway,
4. Access to be reserved in deeds as per county ordinance and offered
for dedication on the final map.
5. Show 50 ft. building setback line measured from centerline of access
easement.
6. Provide road maintenance agreement:
7. Show all easements of record on the final map.
8. Provide street name signs per requirements of the Department of
Public Works prior to r,cordation of Lite final map.
g: Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required.
10, Provide circulation to RS-8-LU-1:
Environmental Health Department conditions area
1.1. Show a 50 foot leach field setback from the drainage way on parcels l
and 2.
12, Show a 100 foot leach field setback from the spring on parcel 2.
'13, Homesites, if shown on the final map; shall be assessible to usable
sewage disposal areas by gravity flow,
Planning Department's condition is:
14. Meet the Subdivision Ordinance requirements for traffic circulation,
The following mitigation measures should also be complied with:
1. Utilize standard erosion control measures and construction practices
to minimize erosion potential and other construction impacts,
Continuod on next page
'f
2.
Cluster the homesites near Gold
Mountain Road as shown on the
tentative map.
3.
Place a note on the final map;
"Perimeter fencing on these parcels
barbed wire placed between 16" and
to be limited to 4 or 5 strand
46" to allow the free movement
of wildlife".
4.
Place a note on the final map:.
"Barrier fencing on these parcels
to be limited to one acre in area".
5.
Place a note on the final map:
"Building permits on these parcels
may be subject to deer habitat
improvement fees".
6.
Place a note on the final map:
"The Stoney Oaks Boulevard culvert
is designed for a 1 in 10 year flood
crossing near Swedes Flat Road
and may be subject to inundation
during intense storms",
7.
Provide circulation to Butte County
Department of Public Works
standards.
85-386 Barnhart -Brown and Associates - on behalf of Ed Ward, appeal the
(2185) Advisory Agency's denial of a tentative parcel map (proposed
mitigated negative declaration regarding environmental impact),
two parcels, AP 28-17-87, property located on the southeast corner
of Stoney Oaks Loop and Gold Mountain Road in'thti Oroville area.
Motion: UPHELD APPEAL OF ED WARD ON THE REVISED TENTATIVE PARCEL
MAP FOR AP 28-17-87, NOTING THAT: (1) THE DEPARTMENT OF
FISH AND GAME HAS NOT PROVIDED EVIDENCE THAT ADVERSE IMPACT
TO MIGRATORY DEER HERDS WILL OCCUR, AND (2) PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 1 - 10, INCLUSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL
HEALTH DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 11 - 13, INCLUSIVE, PLANNING
DEPARTMENT CONDITION 14, AND MITIGATION MEASURES 1 7,
INCLUSIVE, WILL BE MADE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
M S
Vote: 1 Y 2 Y 3 Y' 4 N 5 Y (Motion carried')
Corrected. Motion: UPHELD APPEAL OF ED WARD ON THE REVISED TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP FOR AP 28-17-87, NOTING THAT: (1) THE
DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME HAS NOT PROVIDED EVIDENCE
THAT ADVERSE IMPACT TO MIGRATORY DEER HERDS (JILL OCCUR,.
AND (2) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONDITICHS 1 - 10
INCLUSIVE, ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
11 - 13 INCLUSIVE, PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITION 14,
AND MITIGATION MEASURES 1 7 INCLUSIVE, WILL BE MADE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION,
M S
Vote', 1 Y 2 Y 3 Y 4 N 5' Y (Motion carried)
z�umm covNxlr Bo.ARn or 8UPt9Vx8095 HINUt98 - May 21 t
Al
oY
1
Coun
Datte,
DEPARTMENT OF PU13L.IC WORKS"
WILLIAM (Bill) CI1CF°I, Director
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE . OROV LIFORNIA 95965
' '
Telephone! (916) '` ,538-7266
RONALD D. McELROY
Deputy Director
June 8, 1987 Comm.
f'!u►'IaCci, cc, -Planning
JUN 111961
Eduard Ward, III
RE: AP 28-17-87 orov11lei Gailliornia
)extension of Time
820 N. Lincoln Way #53
Galt, CA 95632
Dear Mr. Ward
At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held on
Agency a time extension of 36 months in
June g, 1987) the granted
file the final map on the above -referenced property. The
order to
nett date of expiration is May 21f 1990.
If no app eels are timely filed -within
Agency's approval -"with
fifteen (15) days of the date
the Clerk of the Board of
of the Advisory
Supervisors, this action will be final.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this
office.
Very truly yours,
William Cheff
Director of Public Works
Jr Mendonsa
A istant Director
M/ds
,n
a
�`, +, �•�'"`� LA1W1) OF NATUIIAL W r A L I I I A 11 11 IYCA"JTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
WILLIAM (Rill) 1°IEM blroctt)f
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • oROVILLf , CALIVORNIA 95965
Telephone: (916) 04-4681
RONALD D McELROY'
April. 22, 1985 Deputy Director
Ed Ward R8: AP 28-17-87
P. oiBox 8411 ,dntative Parcel. Map
Santa Cruz, CA- 95061
Dear Mr. Wand;
At the regular meeting Of the Butte County Advisory :Agency held
April 22, 1985, the Agency denied the Tentative Parcel Map on
28-11-87. The Project was denied; because the revised letter of
March 22, 1985, from the Department of Fish and Came indicates
adverse impacts to migratory deer herds which cannot be completely
mitigated.
If no appeals are timely filed---within ten (10) days of the date of
t1le Advisory Agency's denial=-with the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors_, this ac-tion ,will be final.
It you should have any gaaAt'ions regarding this matter, please
contact this office.
Very truly yours,
William Chef f
Director, Of Public Works
Jill Mendonsa
sistant Director
M:ds
ec: Planning Environmental. RAview
"Envtronmen't,41; 1lealth Department
tatnhart/Brown Assouia`tes
0 APPENDIX G
NEGATIVE DECLARATION REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
1. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the project described below has beet
reviewed. pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 (Public Resources Code 21.100, et: seq.) and a
determination has been made that it will not have a significant
effect upon the environment.
Log # 84-10-16-04
AP 28-17-87
2. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Tentative Parcel MiLp dividing 39 acres to create two parcels, 15 + acres
and 24 + acres.
3. LOCATION OF PROJECT:
On the southeast corner of Stoney Oaks Loop and Gold Mounta.1.11. Road, south
of Swedes Flat Road, east of Oroville.
4. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROJECT APPLICANT:
Ed Ward Barnhart, Brown and Assoc.
P. 0. Box 8411 P. 0. Box 1576
Santa Cruz CA 95061 Oroville, CA 9506$
S. MITIGATIV MEASURES:
See attachment
6. A copy of the initial stud regarding the environmontal effect
y I
o this pTojilct is on file at 7 County Center Drive, Oroville.
This study was:
Adopted as presented..
Adopted with changes. Specific modifications and
supporting reasons are attached.
7. A public hearing on this Negative Declaration was held by the
decision making body,
Hearing Body Butte County Aoard-pf'supervisors
Date of Determination May 21, 1985
Determination,,,
On the basis of the initial study of environmental impact, the
information presented at hearings, comments received on the
proposal and our own knowledge and independent research:
We find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant
El effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION is
hereby adopted.
we find that the pnject COULD have a significant effect
on the environment but will not in this case because of
attached mitigation measures described in item 5 above
which are by this reference mads, conditions of project
approval. A conditional NEGATIVE DECLARATION is hereby
adopted,
4ignaturc
Len Fulton; Chairman
Butte county Board of Supervisors
71 i TO
Mitigation Measures
AP 28-17-87
1. Utilise' standard erosion control measures and construction
practices to minimize erosion potential and other construction
impacts;
2. Cluster the homesites near Gold Mountain {toad as shown on the
tentative map;
3. Place a note on the final map; "Perimeter fencing on these
parcels to be limited to 4 or 5 strand barbed wire placed
between IV and 48" to allow the free movement of wildlife".
4 Place a note on the final map: "harrier fencing on these parcels
to be limited to one acre in area"'.
5. Place a note on the final map, "building permits on these
parcels may be subject to deer habitat improvement fees".
6i Place a note on the final map: "The Stoney Oaks Boulevard
culvert crossing near Swedes Flat Road is designed for a 1 in 10
year flood and may be subject to inundation during intense storms".
7. Provide circulation to Butte County Department of Public Works
standards.
1` APP13NDIX 11
r
140'I'iCk. O)1' DE7d1EMff4ATI .
-r Research F1A:C3M- ni g D par gent
y.,
Office of Planning ar��.
'�Qt �1 un�l C�te1`-Dx'i
1400 Tenth Street, Room 1 oville, CA 95965
Sacramento, CA 95814
-JUN 4 193
or r Ciounty Clerk
County of Butte FL.EANOR M4 CKER County OUk
SEC': Filing of Notice of Determination in comp[ianc@ywti�.h;
RAq)Ai 152
of the Public Resources Code.
84-10-16-014 .,�,...
ect Isle.
AP 4i Name
AP 28-17-87 Ed S+latd ._..
'tentative Parcel Map e•rtnn Telephone {arum r
State ciearingrivu ,.�........
(n sub4nitted to Clearinghouse)
John Mendonsa, Public Works (916) 534-4266
.,p ect Location On the southeast corner of Stoney Oaks Loop and Gold
Mountain Road, south of Swedes Flat Road, east of ol,oville.
00� Dividing 39 acres to create tWo parcels, one of 15
acres and one.. of 24 acres -
_
13utte uvuuL,y nuuL- �x �-
this to advise that the _ €.�.ad agency or Respatisi le Agency
approved the above described pr�aject and has made the following dQtrrmiria,tions
has
eLgard4ng the above described project:
will, will not, have a i ificant effect' on ihd environment.
1. The project...- - significant
2. At, Environmental. Impact Report was prepared for this pnjecl puVA10t
to the provisions- of Cr --QA.
)% Negative
Declaration was pre�r+�d f ere this project pursuant to the
provisions of CEQA.
The ETR c: or rJcgetivclaraticr� cl r x Ord( of project aQ� rovrai may
examined at: Le �a°irae►it
s Btttte county Planning
were not, made a condition of i►"e apprRomt
3. Mitigation measures �, weed i ..._.
of the protect..
'r was not, adopted for
4 A statement of Overriding Considerations was, .�...
this ptt')ect
rate Received for 1.11ing 5 Z2: 85 „: Sign t e
Steplion A: Streeter
Senior planner._ ..._
Title
F
Revised January 1985
Ki igation
Measu es
AP 28-17-87
1.
d construchertion
Utilize standard erosion control) measures nand
uctilon
practices to minimize erosion potential
impacts,
Cluster the homesites near Gold Mountain Road as shown on the
2.
tentative map.
3.
Place a note on the final map. "Perimeter fencing on these
5 strand barbed wire placed
parcels to be limited. to 4 or
4811 to al'loW the free movement of wildlife",
between 16" and
final map. "�3arrier fencing on these parcels
4.
Place a note on the
to he limited to one acre in area
5;
Place a note an the final map• ,Building permits on these
,
deer habitat improvement fees".
parcels may be subject to
G.
Place a note on the final map: "The. Money Gales Boulevardin
Flat ed for
culvert crossing near Swedes intense stor�:>"
be subject iRoadait dedurned
year flood and may
Provide circulation to Butte County Department of public Works
7.
standards.
APPI NDIX F
COUNTY OF 111PT"I'I;
I NVIRONWINTAL CHECKLIST FORM
(to be completes y I,eaGi'Xi eiiev 1
I,og It
84-1.0-1.6-04
BACKGROUND it 28=17-87
1. Name of proponent Bd Ward
2. Address or proponent and represerrrta t ive (" i f app 1 ;i c obl e)
P. 0. Box 8411 Ba -p cart, �.3t,`own. & Assoc.
- _ .....� y . w.., . , _,-. �......,..� -----
Santa Cruz, CA 95 61 ia. 0. Box I TO
S. Project description Tcntat tare Parcel Itiitlji_.,._�®�a
1 1 , MANDATORY VINDINCS OF SIGNI1 ICANCIi
fr` IV. ENVIIZONMENTAL WTS
xp anatlons at all ' n
on attached sheet(s)) Yes and '"ma�rbe'� answers are required
EARTH. Will the proposal result in 5ignifica 'YES
a. Unstable earth conditions
MAYBE
NNot
or in changes in
geologic substructures?
b.
Disruptions, displacements, compaction
x
OvelcoVering of the soil? �'�
or
C. Change in
`--
topography p graphy or groundsurface
relief features?
---
d= Destruction, coverin�x ----
unique ue or modification of any
geologic or physical
'k'
features?
e. Increase in wind Or water erosion of soils,
either On or off-site?
f• Changes in deposition or erosion of beach
sands, Or changes in
x'
siltatioi', deposition
or erosion Whichmay modify the channel
a river
of
or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake?
g, Loss Of prime a ricuitura i
g Productive soils
outside designated urban
X
are
areas?
h4 Exposure Of people or ,
to hazards such a$ earthquakesrtlandsides, geologic
--� .
slides, ground failure or similar hazards7ud=
' Proposal
2 AIR. IU�.11 the ro osal result an sttbstar►vial;
e
a. Air emissions
w C,
or deterioration Of ambient
air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable odors, Smoke
or fumes? ---�
?C
C• Alteration of air ent
temperature, or —�-- �---
or atyOian '.moisture,
locally or regionally'? in
lrt climate,
3. I_ ATER. 1Vill the Proposal result in Substantial,,
a. Changes in Halal:
currents Or the course or
direction of Water movements in either
marine or fresh
b . Waters?
Changes in absorption rates drainage c
Or the rates J g
.. and amount. of patterns,
C, Need for Off-site surface durfaCberim�rolre�
ments, �.
including vegetation removal, prove ;l,
zzation or culvertnstallatiun?
d: to the
course or flow of flood
waters?aters?
waters?
K
e. Change in the amount Of surface waterinany
Water bony? — —_.
�
Discharge into surface waters', or in any
altenot4limitedt�to
but
to water quality including
Oxygen Or turbidity mpEtatu"e dissolved
g: Alteration of the direction or
Of ground waters? rate of flow
h in
`hange the quantity ofgro'und water$ ---
ei,ththrough dacr thror ` -z est additions
of With
drawals, Or through interception Of an
aquifer by
gutsor excaVzltions?
i. Reduction in the Of
availableamount water othorwi.se
fox. jubl.ic water supplies?
' E:�posure o f
peOpJ.e Or Property to water
related haxa.rds such, as flooding?
10. RISK OF UPSET. Will the Proposal twrn)ve:
a. A riS explosion or the z,stoasq o±� ha.Krd-
L
ous substances (iheludingw ' , bn .1 *. I imite, to,
oil, pesticides, chemicals or radlation) .411 the
event of an accident or upset -oll(litions?
b, Possible interference with an �".,Me-rgency
response 'plan or emergency evacuat.lon plan.'
11. POPULATIM Will the proposal al4sa.T tj,,� jocat.i,j
MsTrlbutT on, density, or grotth ,Ito of the hurraft
population?
12. HOU81NO. Will the proposal affec�-- existing
ov create a demand for additionriA 11ousing?
IX
YES
MAYBn :NO
4.
PLANT LIFE. Will, the proposal rosult in substantial:
a. Chanj_e in the diversity ol specles, or number
of any species of plan'ts (including trees,
shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)?
b. Reduction of the numbe-i's of in%r unique, rare
or endangered species of plants?
c. Introduction of new specie!�, of plants into an,
area, or in a barrier i,c normal. replenish-
ment of existing specie,
d. Reduction in acreage ot agricultural crop?
S.
ANIMAL LIFE-. Will the proposal result in substantial:
a. Changeinthe diversity oV' species, or
of any species of animals (birds) land, rmiwals
including reptiles, fish and shell f1s].,
benthic organisms or
b. Reduction in the numbe- of any unique,'rare
- ''t,
or endangered species ij' zinimal. s7
)<
c. Introduction of newspeL,ips of animals into
an area, or result in a biwtji.ev
r , the migration
or movement of animals?
d. Deterioration to existing fish or -,-Wdlife
,habitat?
64
NOISE. Will the proposal -rostilt in sub,tz-.ntia1:
a. Incteases in existin�,t noito ?,.tsrefs'
b, Exposure of people to sevej°e aoise ltwels?
>1
7.
LIGHT AND GLARE, Will the pro�osal pr,,�(,,'uce
signifiEn_tlight and, glare?
8.
LAND USE, Will the proposal regW t in a
4sts.rit
�uBstantial alteraltion of the pro,� r.,Ianned
land use of an area?
9.
NATURAL RtSOURCES.i 11111 the proplsaL resn1,,-. 1A
substantial:
a, increase in the rate of use u., qty natural
resources?
b. Depletion of any non-renewablt� o.,.atl al
resources9
10. RISK OF UPSET. Will the Proposal twrn)ve:
a. A riS explosion or the z,stoasq o±� ha.Krd-
L
ous substances (iheludingw ' , bn .1 *. I imite, to,
oil, pesticides, chemicals or radlation) .411 the
event of an accident or upset -oll(litions?
b, Possible interference with an �".,Me-rgency
response 'plan or emergency evacuat.lon plan.'
11. POPULATIM Will the proposal al4sa.T tj,,� jocat.i,j
MsTrlbutT on, density, or grotth ,Ito of the hurraft
population?
12. HOU81NO. Will the proposal affec�-- existing
ov create a demand for additionriA 11ousing?
IX
rrrr
Y�cs
..
MAYBE
13.
TRA.NSPORTATlbi4/("IRCUL.kTION. Will the proposal
�
result in
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle
movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
X
c. Substantial impact oxc existing transportationsyst
X
d. Significant alterations to present patterns
of circulation or movement of people and/or
goods?.
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air trarf;ic?
f. 11 -crease ..j1 traffic hazards to m6tor vehicles
bicyclists
�.,--
or pedestrians?
14.
PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an efface
upon,
or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services;
a. Fire protection?
X`
b Police protection?
c. Schools?
x
d, parks or other recreational facilities? -
—>(C-
e. Maintenance of public facilities, including
X C»
roads?
f Other governmental services?
15,
ENERGY. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial, amounts of fuel or energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing
�
sources of energy, or require the development
of sources
new of energy?
16i
UTILITIES. Will the propsal-esu.lt in a need. for
new systems, or substantial .terations to the
following
a. Power or natural gas?,
b.
Communications systems?
---y -=
C. Nater;
d. Server or septic tank?
----
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?'
17.
HUMAN .HEALTH. Will the proposal result in:
a. C.eatton of any .health hazard or potential
health hat,ard (excluding mental health)?
b; Exposure
of people to potential health `-
hazards
y
A
AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the
obstruction
of any scenic vista or mew open to
the public, or will 'the proposal result in the
creation of an ae:athetically offensive site open
to public view?�
.4
YES
MAYBE NO
19, RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of existing recreatiolu-1,1
0 o�xtu
pp niti.es?
X`
20, CULTURAL RESOURCES;
a. Will the proposal result in the alteration
of or the destruction of a prehistoric or
z storic archaeological site?
b. Will the proposal result in adversa physical.
or aesthetic effects ;, prehistoric or
historic building, sti-c�4.ure or object?
)(
c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause
a physical change which would affect unique
ethnic, cultural values?
yC
d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious
or sacred uses within the potential impact
area?
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP 28-1.7-87
See attachment:
j
P1999PPigi!-QE-902!kONMENT8L-EVALualIgN AP 26-17-07
le: The property lies in an area susceptible to high t2rosion hazards.
Relatively steep slope on
Portions Of Cle Parcel make„; erosion likely.
111t The Project site lies in an earthquake Prone reqj0h? part of the
general foothills earthquake region.
:3h". Groundwater resources may be limited.
established water supplies. Some nearby parcels have
4a: A light to moderate amount of vegetation clew
is it, ring will occur as
these Parcels are developed. The project
Winter range area. a key migratory deer
5d: Wildlife habitat encroachment and deterioration - the project is
located in an Area of Special Biological Importance (the migratory
Mooretowh doer herd winter rangeY which extends over much Of the
Swedes Flat area. The State Department of Fish and Game policy
indicates that Parcel densities greatertzars I dwelling unit Per 40
acres are incompatible with continued deer usage of range. County
Land Use policies support the protection Of winter deer range,
ObV'Ously) existing development patterns
habitat value of portions Of have somewhat compromised the
t p
I
-Swedes Flat and Swedes Flat roadsm This makes e, rojet
Hurl0ton Swedes Flat, particularly adth,'ar-eno
Vicinity especially important as one, of thert
sizes between the hills to the West and t +ew areas of larger parcel
door range to the east. This its he higher elevation summer
a" ar0awide basis, but each ihdiva concern Which has to be resolved on
idual praject has an incremental
impact On this resource. The project is in a Partsenitive
location. See attached letter- from the D
6a17: Local increases in noise Department icularlOf Fishy andsGame.
and light Can be exPeCtod for
residential use of this property.
density: The poject'Pub"c/cOmmel-c'al services; and residential
is located in an area which has been planned for
residential uses,
the Land 'Use tEleffient- to 40 acre Parcels consistent with
cOnSi%teht. Duo to ' I to 20 acre Parcel% are !�gnqiti(:)nAIIy
the isolated reMOtO hatur I e of area! its
Minimal public service a-vallability (fire
001icOv SchbOltv roads;
commercial services, eltatricitYl and telephone), uncertain domestic
Water availability, and the increased fuel
Commuting, 4 trend toward rcels consumption required for
bars 20 acres in site may be
PromatQr'o' ResidOtlts in this area Must expect -A lower 1 Vol of
service than is typical
Services. fbr lost isolated Properties nearer urban
Appondix I., - Vage 6
4
k
P1999PPigi!-QE-902!kONMENT8L-EVALualIgN AP 26-17-07
le: The property lies in an area susceptible to high t2rosion hazards.
Relatively steep slope on
Portions Of Cle Parcel make„; erosion likely.
111t The Project site lies in an earthquake Prone reqj0h? part of the
general foothills earthquake region.
:3h". Groundwater resources may be limited.
established water supplies. Some nearby parcels have
4a: A light to moderate amount of vegetation clew
is it, ring will occur as
these Parcels are developed. The project
Winter range area. a key migratory deer
5d: Wildlife habitat encroachment and deterioration - the project is
located in an Area of Special Biological Importance (the migratory
Mooretowh doer herd winter rangeY which extends over much Of the
Swedes Flat area. The State Department of Fish and Game policy
indicates that Parcel densities greatertzars I dwelling unit Per 40
acres are incompatible with continued deer usage of range. County
Land Use policies support the protection Of winter deer range,
ObV'Ously) existing development patterns
habitat value of portions Of have somewhat compromised the
t p
I
-Swedes Flat and Swedes Flat roadsm This makes e, rojet
Hurl0ton Swedes Flat, particularly adth,'ar-eno
Vicinity especially important as one, of thert
sizes between the hills to the West and t +ew areas of larger parcel
door range to the east. This its he higher elevation summer
a" ar0awide basis, but each ihdiva concern Which has to be resolved on
idual praject has an incremental
impact On this resource. The project is in a Partsenitive
location. See attached letter- from the D
6a17: Local increases in noise Department icularlOf Fishy andsGame.
and light Can be exPeCtod for
residential use of this property.
density: The poject'Pub"c/cOmmel-c'al services; and residential
is located in an area which has been planned for
residential uses,
the Land 'Use tEleffient- to 40 acre Parcels consistent with
cOnSi%teht. Duo to ' I to 20 acre Parcel% are !�gnqiti(:)nAIIy
the isolated reMOtO hatur I e of area! its
Minimal public service a-vallability (fire
001icOv SchbOltv roads;
commercial services, eltatricitYl and telephone), uncertain domestic
Water availability, and the increased fuel
Commuting, 4 trend toward rcels consumption required for
bars 20 acres in site may be
PromatQr'o' ResidOtlts in this area Must expect -A lower 1 Vol of
service than is typical
Services. fbr lost isolated Properties nearer urban
Appondix I., - Vage 6
AP 207-87
The project is located in an area which is remote from Oroville via a
fairly long unimproved, unmaintained road. Residents in this area
will require upgraded road services, police and fire protection,
commercial services and schools at, increasing levels as the population
grows. The current General Plan Land Use policy for the area supports
20 acre minimum parcel sizes as an appropriate rural residential
density unless five (5) conditional criterial (relating to the above
concerns) are satisfied. As with the other issues noted above,
appropriate residential densities should be dealt with on an areawide
basis (ideally through toning that is consistent with the General
Plan). However, in absence of a consistent zone and minimum parcel
size, each individual project must, be evaluated against General Plan
policies case by case.
13c.. Road circulation - The project would add three more
parcels/residences to a cul-de-sac street pattern (OMway in and out)
which provides sole legal access to more than 50 parcels (20 parcels
is the maximum 'permitted by County Subdivision Ordinance). The poor
circulation pattern must be viewed as an areawide concern south of
Swedes Flat Road, but at some point individual projects have to be
accountable for the incremental increase in parcels serviced by the
subel,-.andord road systema
At the present time there has been a 180% increase in traffic
Potential, over County Subdivision Ordinance standards. All of the
maps creating additional lots approved after the adoption of the
cul-de-tac standards have been conditioned to provide circulation. In
all rases that condition has'been removed on appeal to the Board of
Supervisors. This project will represent an additional increase over
standards. known contemplated projects, if approved will result in
traffic loads over 350% 04 standard, and if the trend towards 10 acre
parcels continued with no circulation providodi traffic loads on
Stoney 'Oaks Blvd. could be 720% of that allowed by Subdivision
Ordinance Standardsfi
21: The Site is located in an area generally considered to have
moddrat'e seris'.''--ivity for arabaoological resourtervi, A survey by a
qualified archaoologist for undiscovered Sites is necessary to
determine if any resources O'gist and what i(TIPActs from -_:,ite
dovelopmomt would be probable, as well as necessary mitigatibilei to
avoid dortruction of archaeological sites if found,
r%'O e r e h C 0 M ;
Smithey TPM, 0) 28-17-831 Log # 82-00-24-02
Smith TPM, AP 28-17-851 Log 4 82'2-00-17-02
8thitdtck TPM, AF, 28-17-64t Log 4 81 -W7 -i6-01
Gold Mt. tnti TPM; AP 28-17-761 Log it 82-04-2:3-01
Pierte/Ubttollo TP11, AP !P_8-17-Y5v Log * 63-02-24-01
Piet -to TPM. AP 28-17-861 Log 4 88-04-25-02
Appendix 11 - paga 7
T
A
SUGGESTED MITIGATION MEASURES AP 28-17-87
I. Utilize standard erosion control treasures in construction
practices to minimize erosion and other construction impacts.
2. Provide circulation to Butte County Department of public Wrarks'.
standards.
It irz suggested that the applicant contact the Department of Fish and
Game eeg4rding deer herd impacts and the Department, of public
Works regarding circulation in order to develop Workable
mitigation treasures or design changes.
Sd Ward
DATA, -9 -HEFT'
0
Assessor's Parcel 4
28-17-87
Log # 84-10-14-04,
A* pr �a,�ect_Descripti�n
1.
Typv of Projev--t- Tentpj-,ive par.., Map
2.
of 10, 13, a';',d 16 acres to create three parcels
3. Location :On the Carnvir
Sold Mountain Road, 'R*�k-111,
SQuth of k op and
OrovIes rt of
4. Proposed Density Of, De
5. Amount of Impervious velC)Pment: 13 acs. per
6 Surfacing. Minimal
Access and, Nearest Public: Road .1 _4
publicly maintained is 10 is)". Swedes Flat Road which J%
the cated approximately I
Property via Stoney Oaks Loop, a privately mile north of
road. maintained
7o Method of Sewage Disposals
0, Source of Water Supply. Individual septic system
I . Individual well, Parcel boundaries
9 Prop; of Power Lines*.
10, Potential for further land divi.%ioh!s and develOPmOnt: Limi
due to soil types, slopes, and access, ted
B. Enyvirunmental.Setti.,
Terrain
a, General Topographic Character: Moderately
Sierra +oothills mountainous
b. Slopes: Generali 5 to j3V
Portions of the Property. . slopes, steeper slopes on
c. tElev4tiont 1:350 to 1450 feet ASL
d, Limiting Pactorst
property Steeper sl opus on some port; ons
of the
Soils
a- TyPeS, and Gharacter,ttics*
I . Wyandotte
'htrus'" Soils
tieneral,ly moderately slow
Argonaut
bk Permeability and well d�-aihQd, ow to slow
Limiting [.,actort,- Shallow stahey toils
Appondix p a.
0
AP 28-1*
:3. Natural Hazards of the Land
a. Earthquake Zone: Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII
b. Erosion Potential: Very high
C. Landslide Potential: Low
d, Fire Hazard: High
0. Expansive Soil Potential: Low
4, Hydrology
a. Surface Water: Tributaries of Lower Rocky Honcut Creek
traverse the property
b. Ground Water: Aquifers of unkh%,Wn quantity and depth
a. Drainage Characteristics-. Property drains generally to
the north toward Lower Rocky Honcut Creek
d. Annual Rainfall (normal): 35
5 to 40 inches per yei&r
e. Limiting Factors: Setbacks �rdm on-site drainageways,
high erosion potential
5. Visual /Scenic Quality: High
6, Acoustic QUC.lity: High
7. Air Quality: High
0. Vegetationt. Generally open land Consisting Of grasses, hare
and litter -covered ground and rocky area%y Slue Oak, Digger
Pimps, and Some interior Live Oak and Valley Oak,
'P. Wildlife Habitat: Critical winter range +or the Mooretown Deor
n
10. Archaeologicei ---.Id HNstorical Resources in the area: High
archaeological sonnitivity area.
il. Butte County Genorol Plan designationt.
Agricultural-kesidbhtial
12. Existing Zoning: M -R (MbLtntal 'VI ker-reatiah)
13. Existing Land Use on-site; Vacant Open land
Appohdix V (b)
AP 28-1 7
14. Surrounding Area.
a. Land Uses: Scattered residential uses at rural densities
b. Zoning-- M-R
C. Gen. Plan designations: Agricultural-Residontial
d. Parcel Sikes: Generally 40 acre and largor parcels, some
10 acre parcels in existing and others approved in the
area
e. Population. Sparse
15. Character of Site and Area; Rural range land
16. Nearest Urbain Area. Oroville
17. Relevant Spheres of lnfluencet None
184 improvements Standards Urhan Area; No
19* Fire Protection Service;
a. Nearest County (State) Fire Station- Robinin;on Mil.,
aeasatal station #54, Bangor Station 455; Ond felly Ridge
Station #64.
b. Water Availability: Fire tanker only
20. Schools in Area: Bangor Union Elementary School District and
Uroville Union High School District
'• STATE OF 'CALIFORNIA --THE RESOURCES
AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
REGION 2
1701 NIMBUS ROAD, SUITE A
RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA 95670
(916) 355-7030
November 13, 1984
Mr. Dave Hironmus
Butte. County Planning Department
7 County Center Drive
provil!0, CA 95670
bear Mr, FLironima>:
The Department of Fish and Game has reviewed the Tentative Parcel Ma
(A•P• 2$-18-87) for Ed Ward's proposal; to split 40 acres into parcels of
1.0.5, 13, and 14.5 acres in the Swede's Flat area. This site consisting
Of oak Woodland habitat is on critical winter range for the Nboretown Deer
herd. Residential development could adversely affect migratory deer.
The Department concurs with Butte County Deer Study Panel's report which
recommends 40 -acre mininum parcels for sites on critical deer winter range
not adjacent to identified transportation corridors. We recommend denial
Tentative Parcel
Panel report.. Map, or amendment to conform to the Deer Study
If the Department can be of further assistance
Environmental Services Supervisor, telephone (916)ease 355-7030 c Jerry Mensch;
Sincerely,
Paul T. Jensen
Regional Manager
"C'o, Planning Comm.
140V 15 1884
e1►��+ille, California
IAN, ddu veno
C441
. dl�
RECEIVED
r a..n��, JAN:2 41985 V SAN 2 4 �� �oe�,
85
orovtlle, .
January Z2, 1985
Barnhart -Brown & Associates
P,0. Box 1576
Oroville CA 95965
Dear Mr. Evans,
At your request on November t1, 1984 1 conducted an archa6o-
logical. survey of approximately 40 acres of land, A.p,
28`17-$7► owned by Ed Ward. The property is located within
the Swedes ;Flat area at the intersection of Stony Oaks Blvd..
and Gold Mountain Road, adjacent to the south side of 'Cold
Mountain Road. The property covers the NWS of the SE,I, of
Section Ii, T. 18 N._, R-15 E-., Bangor and Rackerby Quad
Tangles, 7.5 series. The proposed project is to divide the
property into three parcels.
Prior to conducting a field inspection I consulted the
archaeological site record files maintained at California
State University, Chico to determine if any previously
recorded cultural resources were located within, or adjacent
tt,, the project boundaries. No cultural resources had been
recorded within, or adjacent to, the project area, however,
a number of•prehistoric and historic sites had been recorded
Within the immediate vicinity.
The property is characterized by gently rolling terrain with
a general south to north slope. The property is covered by
an open oak -grassland vegetation with some riparian
vegetation along the two intermittent drainages, Two
intermittent drainages flow across the property area, No
buildings are located within the project area, but a small;
camp site with a small trailer and improved sprhg area
located in the western portion of the property,
The focus of my survey was a visual inspection of the ground
surface fcr materials or features, indicative of prehistoric
Or early historic activity.My inspection was performed by
my walking linear transects with an approximate t5 meter
interval spacing over the entire surface of the project
area. Two cultural features were observed during my
inspection. One historic feature consiO Bing cfa collapsed
rock wall was noted along the western property boundary.
This was probably constructer) as part of an enclosure for
grazing animals. One prehistoric feature consisting of
a single boulder with five small bedrock mortar holes was
Observed in the northern portion of the property along the
t F F,
f
January 12, 1985
Page 2
west bank of the western intermittent drainage. DN,'Ither of
these features was formally recorded as a cultxra,l, rasoizrce
Y� due to the limited nature of the features. Bo-(;h o' `Lhe
features were noted and no additional mitigation mortsures
are recommended. It is. recommended that arc
haE.alog3,ca
clearance be granted for the proposed project.
f? ✓`-� S•' nc erely
! aures P. Manning
Archaeology Consultant
i11
i
r'
i
K
1 ,
ti
i
-�-- arn�iari — Z3,otorZ
Alan G. Brown
A Cnllfornio Corporation
CC 24570
k- RcharBarnhart
RIchard
LS 4202
188/ A RoLinson S/reel Pa gox 15,,6 Thomas odaktrk
OrOV1116, GA 95965
LS 5901
9/6/534-19// NoncyVondorhaar
C/V/L ENG/NEE,RS
CE 37359
0 LAND SURVEYORS Ronald L, Groves
LS q0B5
Thoma: Flblayton
LS 29oo
Noveml-,er 29, 1984
tette County Planning Deet,
7 County
Center Drive
Orovi.11e, CA. 95965
Attentions Mr. D. Hironimus B40d Co. Planning cftm
Re Tentative Parcel Mai N'0Y '0 198
for Ed Ward Orov111a, CaliforrilQ
AP N 28-17-87
LOG W 84-10-16-04
Dear A+lr. H ronimus i
As Per your checklist of November 27, 1984 we respectful,l
Offer the foijoiving "litigation y
measures on behalf of aur
client Mr. Ward.
l Utilize standard erosion control. measures and
construction practices
to minimize erosion pot.
ential and other construction impacts.
2) Cluster the homesites near (Gold Mountain
shown ori the Tentative Map. Road as
Place notes 3-6 on the Final, heap;
5) Perimeter fenc:i iig on these
to 4 or 5 strand barbed e�placcdrceli tbei�t+teeno be
and 48wir ml6a
" to al,lot� the free
movement. Of Wildlife.4a l3ar.r t~r :l e.nc aLg on these
parcels to be limited
to 0710 acre in area.
5) Puild.ang permits on these parcels may bsubject
to deer habitat subect
x,mprovemont fees,
6) The Stoney Oaks Boulevar& Culvert crossing near
Suedes Flat Road is designed
for a 1 in 10 year
flood and may be subject to inundatiol7 during
storms.
7) Provide circulation to Dutte County Department of
Public works,
Standards,
Regarding the circulation the Board of 8upervi8ors has
granted relief Of Cir•cill tion
cOns'ttuction, based upon ease-
ments that have been Provided to the east lines of Se'ct�on
't the Northeast
Corner Of the Gold Mountain i tojlwct„ t}1O 11
easement to the North Line of the
81liitj�ey project which is
1 'parcel. Away from connecting back to Sjgodos
Flat) and tie
Butte County Planning Dept,
Page 2
November 29, 1984
£act that not many of the existing lots in the arca are
.3.ctually 'bualt upon. jlzen 'the p'xOl�elie�connect'iese ions cano>
tat
ments have been extended to develop,
be made.
This property has an easement through it that Will connect
with an easement extension through the Pierce Project back
to the Cold Mountain Road,
Additionally, the Archaeological Report is a ve-ilbal clearance.
The report is in the mail according to Jim Mann.;ing.
Thank you lot your considerations. If you need:"l:dditional
3,.nformation please contact our Office.
Very truly yours,
BARNHAR� , -, ROI; skSSOCIATES
4"'1
Michael Evans
Land. Development Coordinator
:r
Nit/all
84-167
cc Ed Yltilard
,v
GENERAL PLAN..CONF MIANCEREPORT
FOR PARCEL MAP OR�roBAIVJ�STON"
puH� �o• la Moq
.,
items 1-4 to be completed by applican.t: JEP 1 4 1984
�� GVLi drnv�lle, Coliiorna
1 Applicant Name
2 Project Description 77.oe-'7.
3. Assessor's Parcel 'Number(s) Zg -/% -' 87
4. Proposed'Use r! c✓/�-CS_/_`�
The following items are to be completed by the Planning Department::
Current :zoning
M, - Lend. Conservation Agreement �`ld
General flan. Designation
tpglitable. Conditional Criteria:, Not Applicable
Agricultural. -Residential YDS Na
1. Agricultural Compatibility.
2. Water & Sewer Capacity
3. Adequate Fire Facilities:
4 Road Capacity &.Maintenance
5. Access to Commercial & Schools
Orchard & Field Crops
1. Predominant 5»10 Ac: Parcel. Size '
2. Vicinity of TIrban Boundaries
3. Agric: viability not impaired
Staff Determination: Project does does ,not
substantially conform to the General Plan..
Comments
co -5G f
�ff-lJ-i�f 'i G7 G.cTs' f f.d�� S�.p.I// C�'T � ✓�GC.:g f � ?",+i���ersi•,i �,�•�icyt � � s` �.jc
1 �r = t•rilf :L /L" �C� f+I ilJ .. s • �G1 J wt 1f p - �. c d G ��7 l� rr+�
7'h'fiPip✓J4%..�-F
�th. r�ry✓�.: /y4.K?d.C� TfS'z�tit�-ti ac s
�C r G�+ini sr�
St r
aff Signature .'"�-�-z-�"~-� ,..._, Date
AS THE APPLICANT FOR THE R -MIF `Eb LANDDIVI:SIM I AM AWARE
D8TERKNATION RtCARDYNG THE CONFORMANCE' WIV TRE GENERAIrNe.—
bated
. ►o - �; C
UaCed `- Signature w Applicant _
Mo Co. Planning Comm.
CC`i` 16 1984
growile, C�lifnrnla
STATE OF CALIFORNIA --THE RESOURCES AGENCY"
DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
REGION 2
1701 NIMBUS ROAD, SUITE.A
RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA 45670
(916) 355-7020
March 22, 1995
GEORGE DEUKMFJIAN, 4 ,
"0 Co. Planning Com.
IIAR r� 5 1985
0milla, CaUtamia
Ms. Laura Tuttle
Butte County Planning Doll rl,trn 1-
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, Cry 95965
Dear Ms. Turtle:
Thc2 [department rZ Fish and Came has reviewed Ed Ward's revised Tentative
Parcel Map (TPM) which proposes to create twoparcelr
each frost an existing 39 -acre parcel (A.P, 28-18-87).8 of 24Project15 acres
is located in. the Swedes Flat area,
of Bangor. The subject project approximately three miles northeast
is a revision (deletion of one parcel)
Of a TPM we previously commented on in our November 13, 1984 letter.
The TPM revision remains out of conformance with recomm-andations of the
Butte County Deer Study panel's report, and would constitute further
encroachment into areas of mostly 40 -acre parcels on critical deer winter
range. should the existing trend of down parceling in the Swedes Flat
area continue; subsequent development will create a barrier to migratory
deer movement and loss of important winter range for the Mooretown Doer
Herd
The impartment recommends the
The.D (EIR) be eco red project be denied or an Environmental Impact
1 pursuant to CEQA uidelines. The ETP, should
address the significant adverse cumulative impacts caused by subdivision
encroachment onto migratory deer winter range in the Swedes Flat area.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide our Comments. If the Ile
can b. of further assistance nmental
Services Supervisor, telephone (916) 355-7703Oderry 64ensch, Environmental
i3inoerely,
Paul T. Jensen
Regional manager
TO Butte County Advisory Agency
FROM; Planning Director
SUBJECT: Report on Tentative Parcel Map f,or Ed Ward
an AP 28-13-87
DATE': December 31;, 1984
This is a proposal to divide 39 acres to create three parcels. The
present zoning is M-R(Mountain or ,Recreation Subdivision -Residential).
There are no specific or community plans For the area. The Land Use
Plan Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as
Agricultural -Residential. There are no specific or community -plans for
the area.
The project conflicts with two, policies of the Butte County General
Plan. Specifically, the project as submitted does not meet the
following Agiricultural-Residential conditional criteria necessary for
divisions smaller than 24 acre parcel sizes:
4) Road capacity and maintenance
5) Access to commercial and school services
In addition, conditional criteria 43 (availability of adequate fire
protection facilities) is questionable for the subject aru a.
Remoteness of the site location, substandard roads, and inadequate
circulation patterns combine to restrict development capability in this
area. An improved access road to Orovxlle-Bangor Highway, LaPorte Road,
_
Upham Road or back to Swedes Fiat Road should be considered at this time
to provide for traffic circulation to this project and anticipated land
divisions nearby. The area is remote from urban services, has
inadequate traffic circulation for the number of parcels currently
served by the existing road system and is identified as winter range for
migratory deer herds based on Current maps, information and data from
the California Department of Yash and Game.
Currently, +I- 56 parcels have been created aff the single legal access
road: Stoney Oaks Blvd. (7 parcels have current buildings or building
permits on-site), creating potential circulitibn problems on this
cul-de-sac rural gravel road, The County Subdivision Ordinance requires
a maximum of 26 parcels served by any Cul--de-sac road. Additiunal lavd,,
divisions off this access road would further aggravate this problem
2t ng
existi
arcels have hat yet been developed). If ail existing
((which has yet to be experienced on the ground since MbZt and t1 actio
parcels served by this access roadi were to be divided doyen to a iB a&re
+/L density; aver i0o total parcels would result. This does not
consider the regional cumulative impacts throughout the Swedes Flat area
and on Swedes Flat rRbad should this pattern become fully establisher{
AP 28-17-87'
Page 2
December 31, 1984
The project would be inconsistent with General Plan policies to:
a) Relate residential densities to intensity and compatibility of
adjacent uses (Land Use Element, page 34).
b) Balance residential ;densities with traffic -carrying capacities of
existing and proposed circulation plans (Land Use Element, page 34).
c) Suidt development to areas with adequate fire protection services
(Land Use Element, page 47>).
d) Encourage development in and around existing communities With public
sorvires (Land Use Element, page 30).
e) Regulate development in identified winter deer ranges to facilitate
the survival of deer herds <Lane Use Elementi page 41).
The California Department of Fish and Same has indicated that this
project will reduce winter deer range in the area. There -Fare, denial of
the project is rec*mmehded pursuant to Section 66474(e) of the
California Map Act regarding wildlife.
The applicant has submitted proposed mitigation measures designed to
reduce impacts to the deer herds. These have been forwarded to the
Department of Fish and Game for their comments. if the Department
approves, or if the Advisory Agency finds the mitigation measures
adequate and the project can be found in conformity with the General
Plan, then a Mitigated Negative Declaration regarding environmental
impact is recommended and the project approved subject to the following
mitigation measures And condition.
tiLtigati on. Measures
1. Utilize standard oration control measures and construction practices
to minimize erosion potential and other construction impacts,,
2. Cluster the homesitet near Sold Mountain Road at shown an the
tentative map.
3. 'Placd a note on the final map: "Perimeter fencing an thote parcels
to be limited to 4 or 5 strand barbed Wire plated between ire" and
4811 to allow the free movement of wildlife".
4i Place a note on the final inapt "Harrier +ehtinq an these parcels to
be limited to one acre in area".
M
AP 28-17-87
Page 3
December 31, 1984
5. Place a none on the final map;
may but subject to deer habitat
"Building permits on these 'parcels.
improvement
feezI,
6, Place a note on the final map:
crossing near Sr,edes Flat Road
"The Stoney dad's Boulevard culvert
is
designed for a 1 in, 10 year flood
and may be subject to inundation during intense
%�Crms".
7. Provide circulation to Butte County Department of Pub, c Worksstandards.
Cendxtiwn
1, Meet the Subdivision Or
requirements for traffic circulation.
DRH • l kt
Cc., Ed Ward
Barnhart, Brown and Assoc.
A Tr, P1TAT PA' -
L h ' FOR CONSIDEWIT ON;
1. Ed ward, AP 28-17-8- !'
Oaks toop, and Bald 'p' 2 parcels on the southeast.cor
n As eiit. Rd, Orovilie areA, nt:r of Stoney
Tirow (cont. from March 25, 1985 Engineer, Barnhart"
'ARINC; OPEEIV
Mike EVdinS ,•
the lot sizeaid they have submitted a revised ma
the clustering cf taomesites that P with ? Parcels, other smaller parcels, Considering
have made one he feels that this is C.ossiblc and the nearness or
l`,t 15 acres in order to makptadbetterodld be a
line can a right-of-waypProVcd. They
several small raa �that is existing,. 1-jr. Evans g � with the property
Provide smattlaticn� in the neighborhoocJ. noted the locations of
the area. a r• tc� county standard, tr} allry aPPlica t
Bta ,_d upon the proposed mitigat ,an � viate .1rrame of the
n as oi'fered to
the E,ru`,i�act sh �u ld be apprc)vc.d . The De t Fish she red Problems in
any specific inrur�ration to '� ' "` gn of the Project
winter range. R 8uPPort their and C eg has not Provided
pt z oving ttae c:rmrnrynt about degradation of nicer
The :gar iitior►ai criteria , Pridert subject Lea circulation is ver
should not apply br c%ise, of Ptarcel ,,7
Mr-
important,
Mr; Streeter staid that
but also "ad e, , Circulation is riot ranly invralvsd ►�.ith two
ehdition. Iaarce1 sizes mi
is still c nceiin with eammerc, al might be okay ways out,
sec, nd lett' r services artei SchoolsiacceEense, but there
r fa a. ut t in Boa %'ish nno s;arri�� asibilit
the revised map o tut tlrn Board has Which might y• The
herd P'alicy. not done tan � g be more favorable tri,
S thing Yet about interim drier
Mr. h:• t,9rrs:� a;�ke•I Nr. :vans if
�tatirtg that, t.he•�v arra he had Been the> letter .f`rom >i'a,s
at the revised , t 11 in cPPositiotr to t1le pro eet hand Carne da ted %2, 85
rr.dp, j i ven after looking Evans ?old he hrtu 5
ur_Gn tho letter. Rc
been provided raps shiowing surround],) said he hoped that Fish an
criteria shoold ,test apply g pare., 1 sizes. d Game har:I
less than Ppld since the onlyri'o said that conditional
.O acre'; is because of needed ad, is nF.the made
Planning.morcel sizes are slightly
on the basis of grand
Mr. field L;tii,i that tlr,, ar
1'r"m b i ola wind ,r at,; , but l Fer yea ked ,cOCL hlor iePF 1 .,. Y , J
clr nir'c, l)C3*tvaer,,r ,
of Lk1!? t'�>tkame;rtrt;
Mr int nd �a tr r sQre , aaf"fra�. r th(,
tr �
a.,i ttrit the
read i ti z , ,
tl.t+ood a �uanditx in. Tile v , m�rir t���znC�C�� Public p,)ad.
$ wa�itt rat.'C Yl�'�t .:.
to c,ota�dati :tn. grr it iarttrlrih,it�n
There was a di�;cussion of what ,had standard 1Ftrk�ut they rar.�
w adr c;'uA to i n rngarc3
Mr'circulation should be,
but the t4endr,,ad sa Sh:uldttbe atel�rdihances Bio not read cover
y over that St ndrard.
a usable road. ast a minimum of ti; -8 -LD -I,
It would hays to be
It
was agreed to s e� I
p r�ry �Ftc� ��w�-�
c ond't " tea landarcl i.n the Public Works
E.x�.�vidr, circulation,
Mr: ti treeteri visa tf: lj
1 Will mice a motiotr i.',cr eler ,
for k�'ti Stirarai y .�1I' ' 8-a7-8 by the to nF,ative Parc, X map
letter I*r�, t Ire I�r1 rs thr revised rasp i'r)r :j parols, noting that parcel
impacts to 7tip;c�:tt,uVY door Eish And h3rLIg WI 985) hl,xt�ck� 22 r veined
notih* + 7.g�3J, inti teat, ;; tadve;rt3c5
r� ,,hat ttrN r{cviseid map basicity v 1 I)c completely miti.gtated, also
deg ighatican of the uene , (' Provio to the agricu .trrrral%res dentlia'1
to Upham Rd. to y ,,; tal Plan and thr Pr'c�Vision ai' oirculation of circulation
tFae i,.�--Lb-1 sttindari Wottict ittrprove the circulation at road
acetas for the aro'H�lvrMo ;•►atvS Seconded by Mrs keP and stir
aur i� �uulvt t auvlbultr 5 . vied urian m
_ � �.a . Mctipn seta r! czI uo 0
5 Ed Ward REVISED IMA
P, " r AP 28 17-87, 2 parcels on the southeast earner of
utoney Oaks Loop and Bald Mt. Rd Oravilte area. Engineer: Barnhart/
{ lir +wn .Asw,F,cjiatc
ti.r. : tr"tflt, said, than ;his UM had beer, continued to s(?c if the Board would
a:. rt ; ;c;tsrirr, policy• :;;ach 001icy has been adopted ,art,. The item could
1,• r4tr»3 Don in light of "i;.11 and game input, or corntinupd. to spc if one
G ,i" ',�.r, n rvz4ors brings the i;~s^.ir» up again;
_ail that circulation W,jn also a concern sti. 1,
x,f'lt` . ist ^,eetioorF said h„ thought from the discussar>n #ai l,r,rd B,, ,
.. 't Y n yy ] (7
�V1 r " -, Lys Y FVC n'�. that � p �l n
g pcallcy had hr'2n est:tbllshrd ult.klf.,f��h appaz'rt[lt,Ly
;^non ewt4111l shed accur�i ,rig to recent Advis:pry Agr,noy actifjn r>n a
rir:.^erriing dont, herds.
h;e. vara„ said iltat tt,n arr+l cant car go ahead and deal with the circulation
hr knows he has an ""W abl, proJeet, The :nap was revinotj to 2 parcels
with the right-of-way wevcring tLe property being the boundary. The, parcels
:art' 15 and 25 acres in size. If this map is not acceptable, the applicant
wo ld ratter go back to the 3 parcel, map and appeal it. Mr. Evans said he
Wf",;ld like to kn.-,w if there is, or is trot, an interim deer hard policy.
ll", Mer'-aonsa ;clivi that tiro Board ca ' SoPervis0rs wants to handle the situation
tshe wC'fy it is 'being hand led until an interim policy is established . The, Board:
will Iv the= rnti ty ho make, findir;p;s, if any, rogarding the deer herd3.
Xr, kuvans said that ci,rculaf,• on is the large issue that needs to be
worked on, Thr:y Will put in a decent road to county standard:, and get
the n�:cessary right-of-ways, 14owever they really cannot put time and
Monr,;� into dealing. with circulation until thfti deer herd issue is resolved.
:r. treetet said that t;h ,
:parcel,. map cat. on � b� heard by the l;=yard by
.tr.yi:.g it at this lvnl.
gar_. erns askud what it -her issu(-:r are irtVolvc9 in: adfk .i ion to eieculatibn
and the doer herds.
said f�hat i.he c,ondif.aon of r.'aF;f,zi ro;ac38 In the arf.a is a concern,
Yr, "!4.1"'Joftan, la i l the t, no monny can be collected for S4tcdcs plat , fid, un1.ps s
..
it is deemed ter bi-, a maJor thuroughfarc, The County Will maintain thf- road;
was tirr�ed *h;rt rr gat{.li:t circulation, it would be alright to require
than :it�;?a ion bf° pr,vt.lei bef�)rh filing of a final map, but not necessarily
nfCir'"' 'ti.K' ii,ap i ,Von
sti ld ',h.n t a n lnci i ti cart tits
provide rirc'.;lation would have: to bF�
;,, �, , •lyu4.3 w h;� ah,°a,.Ald tit) t3,,pl"c10 y '41114m Pd, grad to the RS -8W a1.S-1
f�..��rall to '� f �,
:•`ar,tar;ln, with +rattle E :;ards ar,.i so forth, 7he applicant should be very clear
.tom •.1
what .W-+..;ld roqui red..
:i: 'W% agreed ` 0 O A,tinur" this item too April. 22" 1985.
.�u_tte county Ad�risbrl► A�ehcy Mirutcg �I�5'185
TENTATIVE PARGE, h�Ap EO; CONSTL`trR4TIONs
3. E4 Ward AF 28,7-8-)
Oaks Loop and Ba7�`i,' 3 parols on the southeast corner
Bal, .'.t. Rd. Oroville area. of Stoney
Brawn Assae#ates (cont. frt�m Feb. 2 Engineer: Barnhart
5> I985) Revised Map
fir• S'tr'etez• ;;aid that;
the input from the Rcpt; of Fish and Ga�1e is unchanged,
%et(; the Board of Supervisors Will
tho engineer warts the item eont n eddfs u swngkthe deer herd policies so i
The item was carYtin"d f iV One weekd
.
t3U7'TE COCJNTY ADVI80Av, AGMY ktNUTCS
4. Ed Ward, AP 28-1787, 3 pa, cels o!j the southeast corner of
Stoney Oaks Loop and Bald Mt. Rd. Oroville area,. 'Engineer;
Barnhart/Brown Associates (cont,. Prom Feb. 25, 1985)
Mme Evans requested that this item be continued for one week, so. it was;