Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout028-270-166�s, e �/ � � � � . �, �i - � k O ' .. ¢. '� • � . ' ' •., P , e � k O P ¢. '� • A %" O S'., e� �� � i � � . p 9 ' y �, • .i Mw ��. • .�o'� .. �� i � +��, ' �����. � � f..�y s ��P ,� e � '�(* 7 � ,� r{:� t .. l� < �; �� �� /� � 4 ,t' �� M 1: ' � + �erL 4'�. I y� J\ � � + i 4� t - k � �!". ', Y�> "� + � {a .. / ti'-. 'Rit z�' :-� - ' �. r�:. i 'R �' .�a` �. ,ra �, 1� '�'�� a 1 Iy }Y . ��L A• ti .. 7 � �ry • ' �� 1 • 11 „�; i '�� �. �, !`M11� t M •t V � ��,: M 'Y�, I • �. e�y'..,. A\ . �+11 4, p 9 ' � ,�,f. i .. k . ;: .. NOTICE OV DETEVINATION TO I Secretary for Resources 1416 Ninth Street, Room 1.311 AP Vk; has nade the follDwing 4ebarnilnatior4s regarding the .6LUve-ft'scrllbed projects 1. The project w i.1 l have a significant -Ofa *4 the environment, sail! not 2. An Environmental Impact 'Report was prepwf�M for this project pursuant to the provisions of and eras certified as required by 'Section ISD85(g),, 14 iftlifornia Admini,.strative Code. A Negative ;DeclaretLon was prepared for ?,,-,his Pr-OjtC# PUrsbant to the provisions of CEQA6 A cbpy of the Negative Declarati-on may be examined at Ithe Plallning DepArtment, '7 :County Center Drive, Drovil,.1e, CA, 95S6S,. 3,1 A Notice of Exew-ion was filed inditatiz. .5 this project is exempt from environmental review,. 4,6 A statement of Oven-i'd3ing tonsi,deration p—] wase was no t ,adopted for this project. Mitigation measures adopted by the Lead #',gency to reduce the impacts ,,f the approved project7're! None KI V zz azure I a aa,9 7,6 StePlien. 4. Streeter 2,9-. 19-U 4i .w n r M ffm its , � ytt V-AV CA's fiik itstAAy.0i+ Mfr 7 OliifiC CibN7Urit13iti�' , 41" ►"i'1,ML 'CAI Ufb1 mA,9'l4S �, I 1 '' Trr'I+�Airms K+DI#Cj 3"Aw fi Mi1t Rmd"nd ?I: A? ',9 -21- U25,9illettat Ave. milt Redwpd "notitive Yuba 'City';r °C► '951' i Ssabdtvt sib ti' Mr. Redi1 nd 'p r 6u tti stx to Bounty' Advisory A errcy l At the re �r meet�� c� , ou Novti.mber 15, 19W2 the Agftcy adopted the neptive decuration rarurag .onvirozaantaX itggxirrt and approved the tentiilti subdiv3sars MP for AP t8-2717'mlfbJect to the condittoma Ton the aittached aheet (1 the Jxlo'no akwai -at* *ctbae file& yir W�.thtx� ten -,(10) �di�ye of thedate of mY y" afi.parraveilJ�-Vjth the Clerk .of the`oard {of 84"rviea>rb, thea Action, "Will 'be ,final. When the condhib= ora ro=L are "c pp oonplimd xith, .it will be :3.n ordal for you to file ;your "'fIfAl. imp" with the Butte 'County Dept. P Cblic Vorks for recotdatxon within twenty-four (241 months dere off'►pprtl by the Advisory Agency;.., Tuve stxry question ons regarding this matter, please contatt thLi office. Very truly yours, j y , Clay !Castleberry, Director of Publ.ie 'Works f A. bn Mendonsa sisiwvt Director mt�wacba�nt ,, ;yea lth Robert ;11uskey k t M Xtit Aedmond, IMITM SMIMION NKP, Is parcels *n south Oide wr Bad �par`!c Read, atppr4wtlwtely 2400 ft. east or Bangor Park Road and dOrotrille I 'bangor IU*A iay Intersection. ftngoi Nrk Load intersects north corner of Marc*l. Bangor area. Asotsm l s Areel Number 2847-466 tr4gloor., Robert H%Ukay iubl,ie WoOkk eoMitions are- L. Wt it toad and dx*Ittage. piano to the bepaAeent itst Bublie Works .for etpprt wI and 'Instail the ve(tulvedfIlellitie- IM. 2. Udltaate a 50 -ft. building set'be k line tkom'ithe coottrUm of all access araads. S Street signs shall be proviklad by the dee'aeelbsr tt, all .street int+ers6ttiouns per County requirements. (Submit 5 alternste .stratt nates for �ftch street to the County mess coordlt*_ for for approval of tstt* e't rA mes . 4 Cott'istittct fuU street sect's �,on access roads to FS1.4 geometric stanlard, u1n, is u 'structural: section and 4" AM and SC Z50 3. Provide :ionumentation as required by the bepartmtnt of AtbXit:' Worko Oiacoordanea ttith accepted standards. Street .grades and -other features :shall ,comply xltk the 'Butte County Ordinances, ,design resolution nand other accepted: engineering standards. Provide per= ent solution for .drainage.. ; . All easements Df record to �be shdwn :a*i the final asap. 9. Meet requireaz nts of Butte County Fire Departmentor athe�`s -responsible agency. r � M Pay :off atssessments. ( . 11. Meet the requirements of the utility eorkmnies (i.e. y PGG,& E, Pacific Telephone$ water, sewer). 0 19 Pay iaztir delincitlent taxes. , 3. Provide +erossing at :creek :aible to .support 20 ton fire truck. Pl,annice Dept. uoud,ition U.- 14. -` 4 Add parceis to be 5 .acnes tdninvum to conform to the zone. Mase ,foll.cuing-page .for reaaaSnder of conditions) E .f.�l (Milt Redmond Tentative ''Subdivision Health Dept. conditional. 15. provide a 100 ft. leach 'ieJA .free setback around ezintiM '611a either rtithin the property or within 10 'ft. of the property b iundari is e 16. Shot a 50 f't.< laachfltld setback trwr the drainaafe Vay on paftels 4o 5 and 6. 'i. Show A 1.00 ft. leachfield setback from the uphill side and. '2!"ft. frcea the downhill sidle oj. the hip Ater 'line 'of they Orovillo mot' 1i U Irrigation. District ditch on,paecels 1. 2, '7, 9, 110 abd U. 1.8. °'snow a 200 ft. leachf'ielu aet'ba:ik. from the hiahaataar line of the 'hake on parcels 4 and 8. , 1.9. Show the usable 'seWC a disposal area proven to ,most the ror �i�w�t+r of the Bubdlkvisi.on Ordinance on pare6la 1, throau& 14. 26. Go ibine with ad jacert .parcel anyl*'ftel not prruv eti` to cobtRIA. � the usable sevxge disposal area re4x4 red 'by the SubdiYisiW Ordl nawo 21. Prove at the required quantities of domestic water are awailibleR C, to parcels 'i 'through 14. 'J 4 south ei a of Bangor Park R. approx. Aw tt, cart of MMM Rd arA.0rovi4o BOROT, HtPy. interseactton Ban or, PA* M intersects north corner ofel. pare or Parkar4a, ��i +zi Robert kiosk MMO nPM I* me PMLI Rabort Huskey, engineers submitted an amended `es►p with,14 instead of 1$. l parceli. He said that one lot did not .pare atd a slightlr di.ttie mt design ) seemed better !.n another :area. It is beaieal3:y the :same lop,. Re iav%ad about the road section. He said 'he 'would submit a letter about. ,the and dMIZOSe puma lair. Mendonsasaid that the road v%nild be inspected ;lige . _ parceVuLp, but a set of road plans would not be 'required. Mr. Streeter said Haat all penels 'would need to be ,S acres. Buryl Battei.be, Bangor Park Road, said that there 'would tentatively be ,more houses in this project than already on the rest of Bangor Paft. Road now 'ail the . down to DwIstone. Bangor Pates Road Li very, varraM &tad winding.. H6 asked if there are any glans fort lsapx'o�ving .'the roORMY. Mr. Mendonsa said that there are not any that he its of. Mr. Battall:a mentio ead the situation of Swedes Flat Road,. lie said tbAt some of the dost of the,road should be put on the developers. Mr. Mendonsa explAitw d );'OV the Swedes . Flat Road Fund vox-cs,. Mr. Battelle eaid that he would l:.ike the Boomd of Supervisors to tkIve the same uetion oa Bangor~ Park Rd. that they did on Swedes Flat P ..`.'_ it .., ... ,. .. �..._ -t-o', I Adviso" Agency does not have the alft*ltr T fees this a rod That"would have to be done by the Board 'Of S�,,Yirvis ors". Batt*UO- Asked how WAM tlmtapersontat divide his ,PrOJ?GVtV- Mr. Mandc"a *jTjAjAed the procedures WO1V`Md, Vitb A Oubdivisiolm VA' Louise LancastatBangor Park Road) anked If this PrOedt** *W*Vlkl- it already cut and 14;W6 onga e*]Ain*d that the COMAttlee, mist condition Us 10P U mend , jx1autg tW,, can be brought UP trtlththll reed by county Or'dimncex- the envirormse-MI dOcUmnt- that ba" not been SPOkOn :to In jaM&jjter said that It in not des1resb1e,-'to.bAV0 a subdivision er"t" neal*- said that the same thing could be done by a sarlso jrjr, *mel, �r. -mendonxa is tandarft V111 be 106ta Bfi-,�USintl, mpg.. but 'with a subdivision M&P9 the 8 No, Lanmator asked haw the water supply of the other.people in the area would be effected. Mr. Reid said that it 1j;', *equirad that water be available On all parcels Some :wells 1AV6 all-cady been dug thatappear befdre the map Is recorded. to,mfiet the requiremezte. jp=axter vondered If this subdivision V6uld 'take away water ftoM Other Valle in tae area. Mr.. Raid doubted that it would since households use relativelYlittle 'crater and there is same distance between the V-1-118 A largo- lrrlg*tiOn would be a Alfferent matter, Bangor it seems like rapid JutV ",',a, Lancaster said that for people in in population siA a big 13APact on the comnmitY- Mt. Reid said that parcel Maps might create A less gatigftatory design. *fiery concerned about the she is Kmtby Wbitcr&ft, S�'SaPark Roadq'sKI& Mater effect. She\,,hets a,vell at 600 ft. deep that produces 1/4 rMon a mute. in the area are not much better. She is 0180 Other wells at of additional families On the schooL 'system' concerned about the impact there is.uo vork available. and just In, the general. area as Wo Reid said that venterhas een . bfound on this particular subdivision - Water availability can change in'R very short distance. Water vas doubtful On this projects vbich is vhy test wells vere required, ADVISORY AGENM MMUTES 11/1.5/82 ire.. `t% dma it "Mrs wat air' W.*,to Oet Vater Into the %mew, ar*t. She mentioned the ,prohibitive cont of getting aaiD to bArg aama Va ir in. There yule Ya di,smijon `of the problem of not 'being :Abli to get Vater,. W. Remi discussed the p.\ ostibililt of sett" A seater rystw'.I' "sd` a fairly food v *1:1. 91d1'R G =SID TO Tl P(MLIZ AND CCNF']`M `, O'TBS ADV'tSM` ArMiI'3C Mr, "8treeter vandered alaout • OV* -:site '"C2`!ts 'C1Yt AW"ft• dfrow. , W. XbndojWa said that 1%ibllsa •Wotk*-had discussed the roak$ buit tad Aoclded not to ask this developer to do anything that would be worthsbiliv although the, - road is somewhat quastiontb�e. MSS. MGhdbunt sited Wd- . ;oaskor lf,hivi client :had made :any couniants r::gar" Bei or Pa -. Road. kr.. Harkey bald that Bangor Parc 'Rd. is at . the xIn1Win 'wiitth-, buts is substantially better than many goads in Butte County. U ---is 4U to capable of ban dl ng the additional „loads, Also, just because 14 'parcels are beitt created doer not ,necessarily mean that '14 families will buy then and UMTS � there right awAy, 'To the west it could stand 1considerable 1"royament. This project does not want to be responsible for improvement,:to the asst. Mr. Reid said that the Health Dapt. `;conditions would have to be charged ;slightly because of, thtt one less .lot. j Mr. Streeter said that the minutes should reflect the comments. about the )I off-site road sitiAtion. W10Reid stated; having reviewed the environmental review checklist and the conversations,at this meeting, I will make a motion to grant a. negative declaration of environmental impact for the Milt Redmond. subdivision to create 14 parcels on AP.P-8-27-166 finding that the project is in cote ormance with the Butte County General Plan:and Butte ;County Zoning and will: not have a significant effect on the environment, and also noting that this motion ;is for the revised map .for 14 parcels. 'Motion seconded by Mt. Streeter sand carried ;unanimously. Mr. Reid stated: noting that a negative d4ec7:aration'was adopted this date, T Will make a motion to .approve the stibdivitton map of Milt Redmond .to create 14 lots on AP 28-27-166. Appr.ov�l of the map is subject to the ,following conditions Public Works conditions are: Submit road and ,drainage plans to the Department of Public: Works for approval and install the required facilities. i ] Loer3rag. pegee for rematoder of 1condi tions ) ,ADVISORY ,AGENCY MINUS"ES 11/15/82 V ;WTZ COUIRTy AVItORY" AG NCY N¢NUT Fags 16 �WA Reduond, 'Tentative "Subdivision) _> 2. Indicate a 'SG-ft. building setback line frm the centerline stvwt aim shall, be ;provided by tn6 deve10aer at .a51 "sttetet Jutek,,soctionx per tonhty requixementg. (Sub ait •nl'terMU ` street s for each :street to the 'County Ada'resa c" tore r*r iapparcval of Street nsuam's..) i¢ ste t ftl:l stte+et section ,on ,aiccesa roado; to 'R9 7 • (( ger�ltt�tlrlc :titan ard, ,s$xuetura aect3 an and A'S and SC 2$0 pr,UM. 5 provide z0amointation as rrgnlxed by the Departmeht of ftblic Works in a+ecordance with accepted etanda`rds. . �Strawet graders anal( other fe�ntuxee ;sha11 ;comply with th+e Zsitte° c, a ty Ordinances,, design resolution and other accepted engiiaering standards. 7y ,?rovide ,permanent solutiov.lfor .drainage... .Al.l vatemOl-Its of record to be shown on the fin ai map. 9, meet requirements of Z, tte ;County Fire Department or other reaponsi6le agencyr. G,, Pay ,off asueasments,. 31. N.eet the requirements of the utility co=D nig s {�,,e:., PG da E Pacific Telephone, vater., sewer}, V fty gnydelinquent taxes.. roy da, crossing at creek ;able to support :24� ton f?re txuclt. PlAwIng Dept. condition is: 1 All parcels to be 5, ._acres minimum to contozm to the :zone. health. Dept. conditio:ls 15. Provide a 100 ft. leachfield free :sQtback around existing VeMA either vitbin the property or vithin 100 ft.:of the property boundaries.. 16a Showa 0 ft., 10-O."fie]d setback from the drainage stay :on parcels 4!, 5 and -6- 17,, Show ,a 100 ft. 1ee:chfield se:,back from the uphill side and 25 ft,. from the,downhilL side oL the highwater line,of the oroville Wyandotte Irrigation District ditch ion parcels 1, 2, 70 '8P 90 3.0and 11. Mov. I$, i"g92 �m ;parcels 4 =d 8 ow the Uaa"ble sewn* .digs � �kr p!bm], area Vtoveffi to :Mest the revuu b : the Subdivision ordinance on pads I o'Vagah 14.. CO1�UiM th asp adJec" . "Cel az5y .diet �s+cn+s n `? o 4 20. �abdlv�+ioa � • the b]A aeVage ,d spoSaL Wry z s�a9arstd ,, r*s©ire that t e5du3tgA ;quantities o d�ti water are U1, ►aiie to ,parcels 'Z throw X. Nation a+sccade(4 by Yx- StrctstQr and rie'd sxx�a:aliat+r� � , WON ,ADVI SQRY' AGZZ ,Cy T11, N TES 11/15/S2 t I i 3 ,ADVI SQRY' AGZZ ,Cy T11, N TES 11/15/S2 mkxI E SuBmaSxoN TEIM"rIv PARCEL YAP WAn R APMIC TION (Pleas* A:htck apprtVr1ate box) _ r Ap"Tt. rtl mmmst mom Ian NOTI � SOF BRAAM' 10: e��'�►im�►.� TOWNSHIP SECTION / Rt�fiIGE 5r , YAL)AT,IOI�1' SOF �tOPER�� �` ._...�_ A88E$scRI t PARCEL NMR: .. Z' �- iG TOTAL, ACRALL GE .. ,t .. PL'EAEE SUMIT ML=1A.RY 'TITLE 'REPORT OR RECENT Po=mr Op' z= mL7aocm (4&tead within,3Ast .six monttls) tn'ITH APPLICATION,. INDICATE BELOW 'THE DATE AND MCORD NG INFORYAT1,01T BY WHICX THIS PARTIMMM PARCEL S �CREAI MATE _ . .. -- BOOK., PAGE -Nm-WR AM .5122 OF ORCELS MING ,CREAATED (4neluditig any rem l nder) � %STANCE ,Te UNTWEAL WATER COURSE OR STORM DRAT' FROpo=, MTHM �OF ;SEWA0E BISPOSP.L; { Check with health Department) � AoposED BQURCE 09 Vl�'",ER; . ' dtsh 'I ealth Ve-partment) LO -xm A.ND v�von LtniES EXIST TO THE BOtJ MRX OF TIM ORIGINAL PARCEL! { IF 0%1. EGTINtATE tM DISTANCE 'THMy WILL HAVE TO EE E",mEE: m: „ oz r' QtaV�b caook,l 1 i jrr LD =0 geirided 7-24-$0 Nas 2 PIL`BLIC ROAD 0C ?,gooe OF �NEMST W DIST C1,10 NEAREST PnL'IC RMD-. *n teareat 'public 'road, check Vitt ,Pablk Vorks DepairtmArit) Ir'n&wS X-8 :By I�RrkRIPT:LVE RIMHV� OV-WAY3, ATTAM DOCNIERAMICTO MMS it Atcmg' is BY RECORDED FRZVATE RMDEA5F4E3 'IMICA73 VE= FxawAzmmt VOMME PAGE TV TAM ARE AXf NO ACdE88 STRIPS O ITHESE NUS SM DSII M tN MM MCMTI-U AP 'PAGE DMSTANCE'Td ,CIV -MOTS-4 - /Soo 'Dont THE MMOPTIaS PARCEt,14M OWV4 OR HAS IM IN 111M PAST Olqmt AwonfM-G =9 PROPMTY? A SZ=T= 'OT' APPLICANT AU G 11982 SIGNATURE, 0F,OWNEIR OF RECORD I) FOR 'OF'F'ICE'USE ZHEY, ,To Stibdivisitt Co=ittee-. .......... Age hcar ,:,*, ,Must Take Action �:i ,Kpptal to Posrd of supervisom: Shvimtion date,- �517'3 9, Total Aecei-veat s5a -4 tg LD IWO Revised 1-24-80 AP 28-27-166 DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (continued) Vii. Parcel Sites: Range - 5 to 30 acres-, generally S and 10 ,acres to I south. 'larger in immediate Banjor Park ?.=d area to the West. I.Z. Nearest Urban ,Area: '11angori 34 mile. Orovilles, 12+ **,.is. M. Relevant Spheres of Influence. tandt -Withiyl"OWlb in area. 14. Fire Protection Service: 'a. Nearest County" Fire, Station. Sanjot, + h xile'# b,. W*tbv, Availigbility! Fire truck capacity, olli-$Ttoi VOT4- Q, lboo; 3f,,.- Conttructionof the + 42001-tobt long tu'140-Sit *tCOSO road oft ngor Park Road could7generate erosion and Sftdii6nt*ti60k of WtiUsbn Creek. However, terrain is moderately gentlo Ajj Ltht ,z%rd$kose'd rot"d location*., generally follow, surface tohtOoTs - Wold and driveway construction should be restricted to the noh-i*WY, 1. seow�i and the reads should bestab'liz6d soon- cOnst'ruction to roAuce pOtt �e erosion. 1h.*'v,16e site is subject to neismic Activity, Site, pud soil limitations exist for on-site s"w'A goditp6sil Sy8tojks O individual well develorNzent. ft, "'Li"ited vegetation removal will be nociessary- for road, itolmlittuctiork and jiftoen 5s -acre h6MeSites. In the location of the 3/4 -Milt Of access roadwaylibe larger trees should be avoided by placing the road glignment around such obstacies along the prdpbsod easexent. . Rural residential and populatior'., growth will resulto, genorating increased public service demands "in an Outlying -��*UAtY arf4a. Howevptr, the surrounding area has some devolpient- or' Similar hj&urt-, and area parcels are generally 5 acres 0 thoU01 full vai ddhtial development Of those innumerable parcels hat -yet to or-tur* ii t It fi 13a,c�: Bangor 'Park Road currently receives very li-mitta r at t This I)roje ctwIilw 100 Aub 9E,l eventually generate an Odaitlbntl traffic on these area substandard rural roads. l5a, Residential committing into OroVille from this outlying site WE consume greater -than -normal fuel quantities. I 21! An -archaeological survey rbVealed several artifacts on the property (refer to the attached letter). Clearance has been given since those bedrock mortars are common to the area and any important information has beef. recorded. Appendix V - page 8a of 0 (To be,;c+aMpletod by the lead Agtneyj' On �,ha basis of this initial evaluttion " I find the proposed project COMD NOT -haves, a sigf�iif� effect on theenVLrordnent and. a 0WATIVR oE�GX �TITOW",? 0 E find that although theproposedp project could ha'v*/ signfficant effect on the on0l,rdnatnti, thdta41it tot 9 !/p \ be a' signif`ictAt effect in <tl4s case k►atnr�E; tt��e, � mitigation »east res �d6tcri'be6 on an �at ' *d i�heet : a eEbeen addit W Pro ject � _ , A N9GATrft DmLkiW,'�;I* have been addax to the C� I fid the proposed prop kect MY have a aignif$'ant �? "✓ effect on the anviroamiente and an ENVIR014MEN',jj"yri„'�"� kEPOEtT is required. \d\ wi Af ds gne,ture Richard C. Moltar Associate Pianie•r Foa? 1 butte 1(1 h Reviewed by. r�&3/o'POW TOM ... , ESD Le -40 ff—//- oyr ,j , �,; j Ii, ... . • apt v c I _ Ntov'em'bet S r 1980 v Oro p CA 95965 c\ . 'ear Mr. RUVAkey, a � roximatel 120 acreu- of &ftd a'wn*'d' r�eto t cicrs ►ce of p y 160'ato do Tuesday # NoveMber � 1�8a i conduated aft Aid hA60 t�gd to I n .,hi The property Irmo aw,4t h o angor ar o'ad, approxim�etely I Mile *YA*'t of the Intersection 'with Oro Bangor Highway, west of Bsdagop. 'The property is .,a portion of the Sk or,section Section 28, T. 18 94.0 5 SoV, Bangor Quadrangle 7.5 ° t3eri�' acid the 'proposed R* ° project in to divide the property into two parcels. The eastern half of the prop6i ty is rely:tively 18ve1 with ' the northern portion being anL opian meadow and the southern portion bsji.ttg covered by oak and, pine trees, The wgstern i , portion of the property is chatiOteriz6d by two low ridges %-,I ing:southeACt to northwest. Two intermittent drainage channols in thio portion of the property join Wilson Creek at the north` e',iia property c,ornor. The vegetation of the generally w+eettern rt , is mainly of oak, pine enerall more dense Mian. the eau�tet�a portion Mut cpnsis tion along' ties drainages. i�`wt c_ the property s w acid ,grass+�,�. witri>- some riparian vegeta g XA portion Bangor Ditch mens along the eastern boundary and throw , thk southern portion of the "property. A small spring is,looated immediately to the south of the one reaidenao ;,rota ad on the property. I ` i; Pixar to . rec�ranaissance of the property area I cori$ult+e�l *6 arch"tr; lip,ral site record files maintained at California state Chico to determine if any archaeological ` si.teis proylously been recorded within the property area. No a,r .�a�h I Taal or historical sites had been recorded 1 ' Jthijj' OV adjacent to the project area. a r > that themy re0vv;rai sarca of the property, we:s complete i- entiv� property .area was systematically examined 'b�r walking a ae` *�tAa of linear transects with a thirty matter 1iiterval i . M v acr�+�,os the :entire ground surface of the propertyk Ground vis'r tili,ty 'Was f�airV good ,for most of of roc`on'halssance was for materials the area. The focus or features indicative of rehistori�: or historic activities that may have occurr>d witg3ra the property area. No historic materfils or features ` l i N. 1` . Uig l i,I (��"rI., Ir• 2911 ^ 1 J , ,lk Ij y;.,,�.--,,. , Y' _... /,."'�'` ► �•..% �� 1� j � �"�..I�,rlr, 1\� 1�� \ {— � j � •t � '` ••,"` f� ,f \ r '1 +,.JLJc' , `' NO W 1-0 t.'r 74 ►LONA 416A) ►rai tv sw SCALE 114 AiME—aa7, o a tat ecr6 xxw • November1980 Page 2 , wore recorded with£n'the pros of boundaries Two ?'w x��hietorio ..`bouts of the t ut 1 +� by the aboriginal � means YPe people food r6souroesi such as acoth't Wild tta o e area for ro wa�rYoua ��t+ of d Wild gre►aa ,. ateedrr. ohs Site oortsists of two shallow bedrock mortars ! s mall Qpp`�^�hJust ' } a istits' res' `denoet drainage other ar3,ts s located that ire in boulder a,d�acent to the a withhinothe s ea `oonei�eto or eight snal1ow bedrock mortars round ` nto ° sbutthern ntetrrr�itt�ari ge 'oh�anne , Into � ° @60tion of exposed ' k. Mone of the mortars } basalt betlrQc involatn found at either of the Bites is over 500 aa1.. aid therefore they are not suitable fat* scientific Mesbura ►t iare •P ail �iamber and sire of the ergor','tars Ohd the lack of ahyr other Oat�erials 'found within the area indicates that "al o lotion did not intensiv`e�,y oocuPY the � the abox�igin p pu atyeaa More li'kelyt these two ,sites were probab)$ Ohly viol -tied occassiCnailY when these peoPle were Passing thr6ulh he area, probably in the early fall. ' t t e a rrerseiioe►ot ussoti; 7; tem reicc riled Vith n the proPerCy axwra f ant scientific data can be gathorod and .x`�n� �.ssrther s ,g� from lose sites t�eyond the dat& obtained when these elite's were recorded durimy redblInaiss8nce. ng �t is therefore Sincerely Y6�re ' O'atne a P. Manning •"rArchaeoloConsultaht 'V