Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout028-300-038� •4 ` - _ � u • ♦ +� .. r � .' ♦ .. „ 'I' � � a � � _ � � d _ � o F i � � 0, � �� _ � ,. �'� T ' D� a � . t' +.,� v ,� � . IIj I t i a a ' .1 � .. • ' l' � S t C �� . � . � � ^ b ' � , �' � .� l ' , L • ' i� � � �, • ' ' � e , r � + 11 � u ,. ��� � � . � � � �' i w ./ � � i �- � � v PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY SHEET FOR LAND DIVISIONS APPLICANT Glen Knight Log#86-]0-20-�U4 dk ADDRESS P.O. Box 241, Bangor, CA 95914 OWNER Same TPM to divide 1�r.3 acres to create . two parcels PROJECT DESCRIPTION both being +- 8.6 acres located on the west side of La Porte Rd., approxi, 2200' south LOCATION -- . of its intersection with Oro Bangor Hwy., Bangor area. - ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER�:8-30-38S} .� ZONING A-5 GENERAL PLAN Ag-Resi PROJECT CONSISTENT? GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE REPORT DATE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE LAND CONSERVATION ACT CONTRACTS? DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED ____�� 1.0-20--86 AGENT/SURVEYOR/CIVIL ENGINEER'. G.D.A. _ ADDRESS. 220 Grand Avenue, Oroville,, CA 95965 DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT VABI`AREDru,,,��,,,� .._- - - _,-.—,, , ENVIRONMENTAL CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION DATE FILED DETERMINATION NEGATIVE DECLARAA.T'ION - DATE AbOPTEn �S r AND DATE MITIGATED NM DtCLARATION -- DATt AOOPTEO 1'.i.NV. IMPACT REPORT - DATE CEIt'I':CVIV)��. STATE CLEARINGHOU8B NO � �.�..> ,.., . »m,�_ - _ 8U8-. CO.MMITT8t MEETIW" ' 0--1 n ADVISORY AGENCY HEARING DATE—t.�� 1 ADVISORY AGENCY ACTION APPEALED :APPEAL HEARING BOARD ACTION COMMENTS FSR PLANNING DIRECTOR'S 01" _U E'r TRM = NJ(I!- :]: O CJ X0 Office of Planning and Research Y1ROM ISti,l f.r, County 1400 Tenth Street, Room Pl�li1�'t;ing Department Sacramento, CA 9581I�ILEn' 7 County Center Drive or OVOvi.11e, CA 95965 X County Clerk ©ATE�_��t�k�s County of Butte CANDACE J,.IU ME CO, GI. R9 SU33all"Ecz Filing p�p41 cling of Notice of Determination in compliance With Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Project Title AP 11 Name Tentative Parcel Map 28-3038 Glen Knight State Clearinghouse Number Contact Person Telephone Number (if submitted to Clearinghouse) Public Works John Mendonsa 534-4266 Project :Location West side of LaPorte Road a 2200 feet south of its intersection with Oro -,Bangor Highway, proximatelBangorr area. Project Description Tentative Parcel Map dividing 17.3 acres to crflate two parcels of 8.6+ acres each. Thies is to advise that the so (Lead Agency or Responsible Agency) b%s approved the above-described project on 1-5-87 and has made (Date) the following determinations regarding the above-described project: 1; The project tsill, ,will not, have a significant effect on the environment: 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared ,tor this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the Provisions of CEQA, 3, hiitigatisn me,1sures 4rr:tr=, were not; made a condition of the approval of the project, A statement of overriding considerations was, --.,Y—Was hot, adopted foe this project, This is to certify that the final EIR with comments and responses and record of project approval is available to the general public at t�tltLe County Planning Departmeht: 7 County Canter Drive orovi 11e, nA OAOA Date Received for Vil i erg atl,t Posting at OPtt 1-6-87 k 1 . CERTIFIED MAIL LA .P.. J.1. /) - 4 A I U :A DEPARTMENT Or" PUBLIC WORKS WILLIAM H5111) (,I 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE Director - OROVII.I.C. CALIFORNIA 95965 Tl'leplone (91tJ)7A=-%MRM 938-7681 RONALt) 0, McELRoy Bullio Co. Planning COMM DOPWY Director JAN 6 1981 January 5, 1986 OrOY1110, (raliiornia Glen Knight P. 0. Box 241 RE: AP 28-30 18 Bangor, CA 95914 TPM Dear Mr. Knighto At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency hold on Jahuary 5, 1986, theagency granted a negative declaration of environmental impact and approved Your tentative parcel Map On the above -referenced Property subject to the conditions Of approval on the attached sheet, -listed 1f no appeals are timely filed --within teh (10) days of the date of Elio AdVisory Agencyt 8 approval--%%rith the Clerk of the Board or Supervisors, this action will be final. When the c0i"ditiOns Of approval are complied with, it Will be in order for you to file Your "final inapt with the Butte County Department of Public Works for recordation Within twenty-four (24) months Of the date Of approval by the Advisory Agency.' tf you havo any questions rog,,irding this Matter, please q90 COnLact this VOrV truly y0[1rt;, William Chett' Diroctor Of Public !Jorl'8 John Mend sm", JM/ds CC: 4fahning Department Environmental, Ilealth Department GDA Olen Knight, Tentative Parcel Map, AP 28-30-38 2 parcels on the wo,( side of La Porte Road, approx. 2200 ft. south of its intersection with Oro Bangor f{wy. Bangor area. Engineer: GDA Public Works conditions: J Show 50 ft. building setback line measured from centerline of access easement. 2 Indicate a 50 ft. building setback from the centerline of La i'orte Rod. 3 Show all easements of record on the final reap. 4 Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required. Health Department conditionsi 5 Provide a 100' leachfield free setback around existing; wells oither within the property or within 100' of the property boundaries on Parcel #1; 6 Show the usable two (2) acre sewage disposal areas proven to meet the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance on parcel #2. C .tl�it Inter -Departmental Memorandum To; Butte County Advisory Agency FROM: Planning Director subJECT: REPORT ON TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FOR GLEN KNIGHT, AP428-30--38 OATC,. December 22, 1986 This is a proposal to divide 17.3 acres to create 2 Parcels. The Land Use plan Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Agricultural Residential. There are no specific or community plans for the area. The proposal does not conflict with County zoning nor any adopted or proposed Element of the Butte County General plan nor.. any County, specific or community plan., Recommend. approval. DRH : j me cc: Glen Knight GDA APP1:N'tLTX F (, UNTY 01, 13U`I',I"1 ENVIRONMENTAL C111?GKT,T�'1' l (1Rri Cto is ct2mp7.atc� Ly l;c;t 1GY) 1. BACKGROUND 1,09 x186-10-20-04 AP N28-30-38 1; Name of proponent �_ GLEN KNIGHT 2. Address Or , Glen Kni (i t'oponen t and ru rrsetita t i.ve 1 (IF aiiiil t�ablt,) P.O. Sox 241 2 da_ z Bangc�'r, CA 9591 - 4 Oroville CA 9yµ6 .p 3; Iyroject (lrst ript:ron - Tentative ParceMap_-___ .. 11 , i•1ANUATORY _LLNI)1 VtS OI �I(tNIi'1(`A!J(;1: Y134 NIAY13> No a. Does tiie project have the potential to degrade tltt% quality oC t0 environment, substantially recluct, the habitat, or a Cih or "Id 1 He speea.es, must n: Fish or w,ilcll.ii'e popola;tion to 'li•op below seir- sustaining levels, threaten to cilminate. a plant ()r anitntl'l community, reduce the number or restri:ct 'tho range cai" a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate imliortbn't examples of the major periods of Ga'l.it`ornia history or prehistory? h. hoes tite pi•oJe t have the potential to ,Iclli.ove short-term benerits to the detriment or long-tet*m, environmental gottl:s" IA short-tc�rnt impact oil the environment is ono which, ocetirs in a relatively brief' period or time tvliile long-terns i.tnpacts will endure into the rttture,) C. Does the Pro iect have ittpacts %viiich IV-e inclividu- tilly limited, 111.1t ctunulatively coniderablo? CA project may impact on tivo or rnc�t r yep,trate resnttrtwes tvhorc� tileimpact on each r(.Fsottrce is rel.ati'vo,jv stilt til, but tuliet'r tilt., (,1'1"t,-t of tho total or t110,80 impacts oil tilt.' onvir%,111mwnt is signil icant.) I)OL':4 the VI'OiV" -J lwa v tnvironmenttt] tF'1'oc ks tvhic�h will r,ttrso stl"Is "itt itt�l adirrse rCi't�c s (i ti human beings, t�itht�r clit't,t'tly tic hidliectic• + Ii �1 , iYhi 1 r�rl�i ���'i' i.�i rda ht� c•�, ,,..�.w, .,....�,. ..-...�. tu, 1 c t ed 1iy the l.v,ld Agency I (tti tilt, ba-ts or this initial (q;ttntttion, r I9r. rind rht. propost'd prr')Vt t (001.11 NOT haty a ! igni Cica`iii' 01'1ec t on tilt, cent i l'onntrtt't , chill a NFCATT'I ' Mi(.1.AIMTION will bt, prepni"eti; 11%1: Gina that although thL, I1ro1lo"4cd pt,uject colllcl htttctt �i.I;ni'Ci= (`ao (`ant orroct n tilt, t�ntironmrnt', tlti�rr will ntit lat11111e 7 siitiil"icwnnt t,1"Pert i.n this c•as' har,1115 S tilt, MITIGATION �ii.A�S�l tie;4rihed �n tItCT 'ittachod shirt havv hvon ,tddvd to Hit ,pt'oj(, t: A NfiIGATTVr- 1 UILARAT I o tail 1 1)(, 1,"1V1i find the 111-opWit'd �PI-o vc•t MAI huvt, a signi i'it-atit Orl`ec•t tilt the rnt i rtitttnrttt, tttt(I all I.! VI i ONf,f1 XI M. 1M1'AC'I 1M.11OPT is rcqul rcd. IiA'f"I : Navet'nbet 17y 1986 (`(i11%'1'ti t1t' litl'I"t'}, P'I,d1NNT-1t,"61 I1F1iAfitTDiF:N'1` �w David R.H� ola�mtis, Assoc' �e i?lariher 1a, v t t vt (k h I h v IV. ENVIRONMENTAL LhiPACTS xp anatTons ot ala �`Iyesl' and 'maybe" answers are required on attached sheet(s)) 1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant; YES a: Unstable earth MAYBE NO conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? p b, bisru tions; displacements, compaction or k overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. Destruction) covering or modification of any kC unique geologic or physical features? e, Increase in wind, or water erosion of soils; either on or off-site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in - siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the Led of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g boss of prince agriculturally productive soils outside designated urban areas? h. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards- such �---- x as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides) failure ,ground or similar hazards? jC G 2 AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial; 3. Air emissions o` deterioration of ambient air quality? b.. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or Rimes? Alteration of aYr movement moisture, or c,y , temperature or an change in climate, locally or regionally? X .i. WATER. 'Will the pVoposal result in substantial: !.—Changes in currents or the course or direction of water movements in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in abs .4 ratesa }C drainage patterns or the rate and amount of surface runoff? ' c. ,Meed for --- Off-site surface drainage improve- ments, including vegetation removal, channel - nation or culvert installation? d. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? e, Change in the amount of surface water in any water body?to £, Discharge into , or in an ,..._._. surface waters, alteration of surface water quality; including but X not Limited to temperature; dissolved ox turbidity? g. AlyterationOfthe direction or rate of flow of ?� ground waters? h, Change in the quantity or que" i.by of ground Waters either through direct additi or With- drawals, or through intercept,, at of an F aq iiEeI by cuts or excati?ationS'? L Reduction in the amount of water otherwise tVailable :dor public water supplies? j, Exposure Of people or property to water related hazari ds such as flooding? --�---. . _ A YES A. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal, result in substantial; a.Y`Change in the diversity of species, or number of any ; pecies of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants) ? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier" to the normal replenish- ment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? S. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in, substantial: a.Cid ange in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds) Land animals including reptiles, fish and shell fish, benthic organisms or insects)? b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare Or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial a Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 7. LIGHT ANTI GLARE. Will the proposal produce significant light and glare? 3, LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration Of the present or planned land use of an area? 9. NATURAL _RtSOURCES Will the proposal result in su stantial a. Increase in the rate of use of any .natural resources? b. Depletion of ,any non-renewable natural resources? 10. RISK OF ,'UPSM Will the proposal involve a. A risk of explosion or the release of hazard- ous substances (including, but not limited to oil.., pesticides, chenAicals or radiation) in the event Of an accident or upset conditions? b, Possible interference -with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? 11.. POPULATION, Will the proposal alter the location distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population? iii HOUSINGe Will tie proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? MAYBE NO w 73,, TRANSPORTAITON/CIRCULATION, Mr YES MAYBE NO -� re ult In; Will the proposal a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand /` G :for new parking? C. Substantial impact on existing transportation systems? d. Significant, alterations to present patterns Of circulation or movement of goods people and/or e: Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in X traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 4. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered 90'vernmental services! a. Fire protection? b. Police Protection? c. Schools`' d. Parks or other recreati.nnai, facilities? e: Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? — — 15, ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantialb. amounts of fuel or energy'? Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources �-�- of BrierOr of new sources o��energyuire the development 16 UTILITIES. 'Vill the proposal result in a need for new systerms, or substantial following: alterations �co the a, Power or natural gas? b. COMM-Unicationssystems? C. Water avaxla})il t'v d. Sewer or septic tank'?' e. Storm water drainage.' k f: Solid waste and disposal's 17. HUMAN HEALTH. Will: the proposal.. result in: a. Creation of any health hazard orpotential health hazard (excluding mental, health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards } 18. AESTHETIC. Will the propos -- al result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or Will, the proposal, result in the creation of an aesthetically Offensive site open to public view? .-..:.amu. _ ... YES 19. RECREATION. Will the MAYBE NO proposal result i upon the qualit or n re impact Y c�uantitY of existing recreational. .opportunities? 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES, a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological v. Wsite? ill the proposal result in adverseh s or aesthetic effects P Y cal historic building,to a prehistoric or r e. Does the proposal hst ucture or object? a physical Potential to cause `- change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? �- d• Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses withh the X area? potential impact V. DISCUSSION OP ENVIRONMENTAL �k EVALUATION AP 28- 30-38 See attached. 0 D18CUaS-1QN---0FENVIRONMENTAL IRONMENTA �-!�EyAL0 �AT I ON AP 28-30-atj This project will result in some disr"upti6n, diSplacemento compaction and oyercovering of the soil through development of an additional building site. These disruptions may result In changes in topography and drainage Patterns and an increase in erosion on site. Due to the size of the parcels being created, thi=� should not be a significant Impact. 1h: All Of Butte County Is within a Moderate Earthquake 11-1tems)U'y Zone V111. The subject, property is located approximately .8 mile WL -,-,t Of a fault assOci8ted with the Cleveland Hills fault System, which Sumiorted the 1975 Oroville -,,arthquake. Construction cf homes and buildings to Un'F)rm Building Code ztandards for seismically active areas show ld Provide adequate Protection to occupants in case of seismic activity. 5d: The Subject property is 10clited in a non-critical winter deer herd area. Comments rei'.eived from Department Of Fish and Game imdiO8te that this oroject will not substantially affect deer Ilerds the area. i n 1383iQ,r: This Project will result In additional traffic on Laporte ROO-J. Due to relatively low traffic counts and the small number of trips to be generated by one additional homesite, this should not be a sig"Ificant, effect. 14: 1 h I, project t,,l I I 'I, represent an I ncrementa 1 incl'ezAse In demand for pub' Ic., servIces In .1 I-Ur'al area Appl I cant: 0 0 Glen Knight Assessor's Parcel 28-30-38 Log it 86-10-20-04 DATA SHEET A. 1Pro leat _Qesar ii rpt i on Type of Projoct: Tentative Parcel flap, 2 Brief Description*. Dividing 17.3 act -es Into tvir) parcels approximately 8.6 acreo each. 3. Location; On the west side of LaPorte lRoad, ijjpproximatraly 2200 feet south of its intersection with Oroville-Bangor, H10hway, in the Bangor area. 4. Proposed Density of Development- 8.6 acres Fjordwelling unit. 5. Amount of Impervious Surfacing.* Minimal. 6. Access and Nearest Public Road(s): Property fronts on LaPorte* Road. V. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual sePtiC SYStems. S. Source of Water Supply: Individual Neils. 9 • In . ItY Of PoNer Lines: To property. 10, tial for further land divisions and develoPment; None existing zoning. Q* 'Coy1ronmental Set bing I .nt: 1> Terrain am Goner*al Topographic ChPracter: Rolling foothills. bw. Slopes: Generally 5-1s%, Ck ElOvationt 750 to 800, above Sea Level d. Limiting Factors.* None, 2. Solis a. Types and Char,aatar1StIcsz Auburn and Argonaut soil Seriesi senora lly well dr-ained Nit,, modurat(ia to slow poiAmeab i l i ty b. Limitino Paei�_Ors.* At,eas of shallow S0,11', ani d sl ON ty. 3. Naturol I-Jazards of the Land a bo Earthquake Zone,. M(3det%ate l�arthquaj<o tntensity Zone VIII. Erosion Potent lalt High to Very Highi C* Landslide Potential: Low. d. Fire Hazard: High, 0. ExPansive Sol! Potential': LoiN. 4. Hydrology ai Surface 1481tet-: Norio on site, b. Groljrldwator! Unknown. c- Ora 1M*0e Cha0acter-IsticV9 Land dr%,31nS generally to the "Ist to 1-0611dZide ditcho_q thence to t1-ibutarlas of Soutl-I Hommut d . Annual Rainfall (normal); Approxii mato I y , to". et. LiMitino Factors Potentially limited qi,t'iundNsater. 5 Visual/Scenic Quality: Good. 6. Acoustic Quality: Good. 7. Air Quality: Good. S. Vegetation: Generally oak grasslands Wth buck brush and digger Pines. 9. WildliPe Habitat: Non-critical iAilntei- deer her*d area. Cul tucal ..Enyj.conment-^ 10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area: Low sensitivity area. 11, Butte County General Plan designation; Agr 11 cul turs", -Res 1 dent I a 1. 12. Existing Zoling. A-5. 1S. Existing Land Use on-site. One existing single-family duelling. 14. Surrounding Area: a Land Uses. Scattered sI me I e- f am 1 1 y dpqe 11 1 r.as at rural densities, and agricultural uses. b. Zoning. A-5,. C. Gen. Plan designations' Agricultural -Residential and Grozinqi and Open I -and, d. Parcel Sizes: Generally 1,i- to 20 -acre tparcels to the west, north and Past, with larger grazing lands to the south and southeast. e. Population: Sparse. 16. Character of Site and Area: Rural. 164 Ne8res,t- Urban Aroat Oroville, approximately 113 miles. 17. Relevant Spheres of InflUer1cet- None. 188 Improvements Standards Urban Area .6 Nos 19. !- -ire Protection Servlco.* a. Nearest County C$tate) Fire Station: Station #55 In Bangor, funded at least thi,ouGh the current fiscal year-. b. Water Availability: rime tankers only, 20. Schools in Area: Dangar UnIren Elohientarw School District and Oroville Union High S&iool Olstriat4