The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About028-350-025PLANNING COMMISSION NUMMARY SHEET FOR LAND Dx"Jx--SIO Richard Leglu Legit 85-07-11-01. ADDU,,ySS 2328 Madden Avenue,, San Jose, CA 95116 OWNER Same PROJECT DESCRIPTION A TPM to divide 1__ 11 _+ acres into tt,ro `r arced 0 5 + acres each on ro crt zoned AR -b11-5 LOCATION' At the northwest corner of Oak Drive & Damon Lane, Wyandotte Area: ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER(,S) AN 28-35-25 ZONING AR -NIH -5 GEN. PLAN pp PROJECT CONSISTENT? DATE APPLICATION RECEM, DJuIy 11, 1 J 8 5 -- DATE 'PUBLICATION NOTICE WRITTEN PUBLISIED PLACE.NLWSPAPER NOTICE(S) PUBLISHED 0. tom. p. DATE MAILING LIST PREPA'.qED DATE MAIL -OUT NOTICES WRITTEN _ MAILED NUMBER DATA; PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT PREPARED ENVIRONMENTAL CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION DATE FILED DETERMINATION AND DATE j( .....y``'_ NEGATIVE DECLARATION - DAVE ADOPT'Ell_ MITIGATED NEGATIVE D20LARATION DATE ADOPTED ENV, IMPACT REPORT' DATE CERT.XIED SUB- COMMITTEE MEETING DATE � ADVISORY AGENCY FEARING DATE ADVISORY AGENCY ACTION BOARD ACTION E T or X SUBJECT: NOTICE OF DETERA401ATO APPENDix tl Office of Planning and Research FROM:I L E e 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 PlanFg_DepaxtmEnt Sacramento, CA 95814 7 GoC r Dry Oroville, 5 b5 County Clerk County of, Butte ELEANOR M. BECKER, Counly Clerk 1AC"IMH Deputy Filing of [Notice of Determination in _compliance with Section 21108 of the Public Resources Code. or 21.132 ecttle AP It 28.-35-25 Name Tentative Parcel Map C Baring use Num r Richard Leglu State Contact Person (If suixnitte►d to Clearingho<ise) fele one Number` Public Works John Mendonsa ect Location 534=4266 At the northwest corner of Oak Drive and Damon. La in, W)Ynndotte area, ect I�scr P on �...,..._._,,, - Tentative Parcel Map to divide !I* acres into 2 parcels of 5 acres each. This Is to advise that the � Butte County has approvied the above described TLeald—Agency or Re r�spons lob " �� ""- ---- P► el f and has made the foll"Ing determinations the above project= 1.• The Project ..... will, 1(' will not, have a significant ef£'-ct on the envirottiment An Environmental Impact Report was 'prepared for this project pursuar:t to the provisions of CEQA. A Negative Declaration was provisions of CEQA R need ,nsor this project pursuant to the 7'he EIR or, Negative Declarationand record of Pr�ojrct approval may be examined at: 3. 4. Mitigation measures , +.fro, _X were not, made a condition of the of the project. approval A statement of Overriding Considerations was, this project. was not, adopted for j COUNTY OF BUTTE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 916-534-4266 91.6-ra4-4339 Bute Co. Manning Coed, NOV 5 1985 November g 1985 Oroville,� �lifcrsiq Richard Leglu RE: AP 28-35-�5 2328 Madden Ave. Tentative Parcel Map Josey CA 95116 Bear Mr. leglu,: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held Nov. 4, 1985, the Agency adopted the negative declaration regarding environmental review and approved the tentative parcel map for AP 28-35_25 subject to the conditions as listed on the attached sheet. If no appeals are timely filed. within ten (10) days of the.: date of the Advisory Agency approval -with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors tKis action will be final. When the conditions of approval are complied with, it will be in order for you to file your "final Map" With the Butte County Department of Public Works for recordation Within 'twenty-four ;(24) months of the date, of approval by the Advisory Agency. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office. Very truly yours; William Cheff Director of Public Works n. Men ossa AsiStant Director JM/ns, Attachment cc: Planning - Environmental Review Environmental Health Department Ron Graves LD ?l10 (Revised 2-281i84) 1 is z Richard Le lu of Oak Drive and Damon TENTATIVE Lane. CEL MAP, AP 28-35-25 Wyandotteparea. at the northwest corner Engineer: Ron Graves Public Work's conditions are: � • Provide tw„-tva Y traversable access RS -8 county maintained road or state highway. t° each parcel from a 2• Access to be reserved in deeds as for dedication on the final map, per county ordinance and offered 3 ShoW 50 ft. building setback Tine measured asured fro m cer�t:erline of access 4• Provide road maintenance agreement. 5• Show all easements of record on the final 'map. 6• Provide street Works name signs per requirements of the Dept, .prior to recordation of the final ma p4 of Public 7• Provide cul-de-sac at the end of � the street, 8• Obtain encroachment Providing q permit and construct standard road g ade uate sight distance at the and Mission Olive Road: approach Intersection of Damon Lane 9; Pay any delinquent takes or current Health Dept, condition is: takes as required, 10. Px'ove that the �. �"equixe�3, r�uantt;ies di' domestic "ter � to psxcels I anti xa available Planning Dept, cond4t on is x Provide cixcula kion and the Circuli pax Sec. -X33 Of the Subdivision t�xdiila accesstion Element of tha General p Plan b .�easement t,) Shadow Oaks nhe O Ordinance Y extending later -Departmental Memorandum Toy Butte County Advisory'Agency FaaMt Planning Director SUBJECT;Re,,_ port on Tentative Parcel; Map of Richard Leglu on AP 28-35-25 DATE; October 24, 1935 This is a proposal to divide 11± each, The present zoningis acres into two parcels of 5i acres Mobile Home c AR -MH -5 (Agricultural Residential 5 acre parcels). The Land Use Plan Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Agricultural RCsidential. There are no specific or community plans for the area. The proposal does not conflict With County zoning nor any adopted Butte. County General Plan not any Count ,sor proposed element of the or community plan. y, pecific Approval is recommended subject to the following condition: 1. Provide circulation per Sec. 20-133 Of the Subdivision Ordinance and the Circulation Element of the General Plan SAS;Ir cc Ron Craves JeinSen & A3� 1C Oaft F",-- 0z Archaeological Consulting and Research A$eoclales: A. Fggter Peter M. Jensen, Ph,b, Redding Aron 91612�tA »;) / 14 41 Skymountaln Circle Paul H, Rosendahl, ph,o; Chico, California 95926 Paclflc Basi,; 916/345-9515 909!966.8036 J. Zancanolln Great Basin project planning & development7o2�2es-66aa field survey .,excavation overviews Professional tours August 27, 1985 Ron Graves F Associates P.O Box 986 OrovilleI California 95965 Dear Ron; In reviewing the two parcels for which you ape rec�uEstin I 1VOUld concur with the Countyls recom►nendation for the 35a-chae h g archaeological icel that i be examined in the ,field for cultural resources, eget parcel that it performed a records search and a curse As for the Leglu 11 -acre my budget for t11e Dnget survey and find l�.ttle need ti an archaeological a parcel, I zy field inspection of the area tivfiile preparing naissance within this area. No sites are currently identified fo and the area has been subjected to es logical z•econ- olive orchard which currently occupies term cultivation in conjunct anLwgth thelu accompanied the original planting ofethe orchard and�subse ia I Iturbances must have Moreover, tuilike the En et g property cvlich includes two maj br drainages historic (1 foncut Creek s ) g pop . y prangs and is situated on an eas not dissected by streams an Nelsonis Ra�r.�ne the Leg! ro ext as g t facing slope i:n an area, of relatively low no archapolo ural sonsatavaty; If I can supply additional information on either to call, or write,. of these projeCtsi dont hesitate Regraxid5 Peter r1W ,7ensen 85028 Cb0'� •, �: wcgNaeo �� (916) 534.9587 aunva•o{� 8S, SO C I a e P- 0- BOX 986 - OROVILL8, CA 95965 August 22, 1985 Qutto Co, t'lanning Cpmm Butte County Planning Dept 7 County Center Drive rsvill C Oroville, CA 95965 .�liFnrarer Ref: Richard Leglu A.P. #28--35-25 Item 20a. Attn: Stephen Streeter I have discussed this .project with Peter Jensen, archaeologist. It is his present feeling that an archnoological report is unnecessary. However, I am forwarding his requested information and he Will tallow -up with a leiter to meet your requirements, Respectfully, Ronald L. Craves Ron Graves and Associates �► APlaliNUf.X li COUN'T'Y 17P' l ta7'g1F t.NVIAONMENTAh CtiDCKLTST FORM (to De complete - y Lead Agency) Log 9 85-07-11-01 T . BACKGROUND AP # 28-35-25 1. Name of proponent ..._Richa d—Leglu- 2. Address of proponent and representative (if applicable) Richard Leglu R 2328 Madden Avenue Soman Jose, CA 95116 0rovi].l�ea CA :95965 5. Project description Tentative Parcel Map T F, MANDATORY FINDINGS OF 11UNIFICANCV, YES ptrr 1Y1 r NO a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the duality or tlae environment, substantially reduce the habitat of aa. fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate al plant or . an.im�ql community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered pliant or animal or eliminate important examples or the major periods Of California history or prohlstort,? b. Does the projeet have the po,tentiaal to achieve short-term benerits to thaw detrimont or long-term, environmental goals? (A short-tea`m impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief" period of tiane while long-term impacts will endure into the futuro,) ( c. Does the project have impacts which are individu- ally limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact oil two �,r more repaarate resources where the impact on. each resource is relatively small, but where tile- effect of the total of those impacts on tileY environment is significant.) d Does the project have onvironmental errects which will cause substantial adverse rrfects On human beings, 01ther directl%- or indirectly? .� 1T'I DWI'FMINATION ('f'o lac roanplett,�d b}� tlac� Load Agency). -- Oil tho basis or this initlal v5 ,aluaat.ion; y Ir1Vi: rind thQ p roposeti p rca,i VCt COULD NOT have. ai s 3 gni fi cunt e rfect ort tale ellvirorament, and a NIMIATTllt. DEMARATION will be prepared, I/Wl find that although the i�roposod project eoul.d'have a sigitiri- cant efi'ec�t on the environment, there will not be a significant + eFrert in this rase Iecautiic+ tIa^ PIT'itfIAl" ` ION NMASUIM's described on. . � tine attached sheet have boon added to the pro,Jvct; A Nh IATTV8.' DE'CBARATION wa7 t lac Tat epnreei. I/Ivf, find the l,raiaoSUO pa'c�ieet NIM have;a signiffeaant arrect on tile c4nv rcanmont, nandan tiNVIRONM"NT"AI. TTiPAC,V Ar-,1)0[jt" is required. C)A'1"lit Attgltst5,,].955,. COUNTYi311T`I'li Irl NTIJG t)tiPAtt`Ct�ii:N1` 11y: --» S} en A, Streeter, Senior Plahnbt Reviewed by �,:.- IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPS n attached sheet(s)) xp anata ons n a 1 "yes' and "maybe" o�� ybe answers are required 1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significants a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b Disruptions-, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? C. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. Destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Increase in wind or wager erosion of soils, either on or off-site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or late? g. i:.oss of prime agriculturally productive soils outside designated urban areas? h. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure or similar hazards? 2; AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial. a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b: The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or fumes? c• Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, locally or regionally? 3: WraTER. Will the proposal re<ult in substantial; a. Changes in currents, or he course or direction of water movements in either marine or fresh maters? b. Changes in absorption rates, draina e or the rate and amount of surface runo�fterns, "--- C' Need for off-site surface drainage improve - merits, including vegetation removal, channel- ization or culvert installation? d. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? e. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? f. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved ozygen or turbidity? g. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow Of ground waters? ll• Change in the quantity of ground waters either through direct additions or with' drawals, or thl'ough interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? i. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available :for public water supplies? j. Dxposure of people or property to water ,related hazards such as flooding? YES MAYBE NO C y G YES MAYBE 4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbUrs of ari • unique, rare or endangered species of plants's c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- ment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? S. 21 7 9. 10. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial: a` hange in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animnIs including reptiles, fish and shell fish, benthic organisms or insects)? b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, raro or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d ,Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantialt a. Increases in ex -.sting noise levels?: b. E posure of people to severe noise Levels? LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce significant' light and glare? LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a su stantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? NATURAL RESOURCES.: Will the proposal result in aIantiall ncrease in the rate of use of any natural re; ounces? .�. b. Lepl.,:tior, of any non-renewable runt ral resources? _._.. RISKOV UPSET. Will the proposal involve: T A risk o explosion or the release of hazard- ous substances (including, but not limited to, oil:; pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in 'the event of an accident or upset conditions? Possible with an emergency b, response Planorinterference emergency (Wacuation plan? POPULATION. Will the proposal alter the location, alstri i on density, or growth rate of the human population? HOUSING, Will the proposal, affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? • NO X X w �I ® 1,3 • TRANSPORTA7'I01V,/CIRCi1L.4 TION. Y I+1AY.i3 N 0 result in; Will the proposal _....�..., a• Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement? b• Effects on existing parking facilities demand for new Parking? , or C. Substantial impact systems? on existing transportation d= Significant alterations to Of present Patterns circulation or movement of P rns goods? People and/or -� e. Alterations to waterborne or a f• Increase in rtolmotor�Vehraffic? traffic hazards* bicyclists or pedestrians? cles --- _ �- , 14: PUBLIC SLRVTCES. Will the — proposal have ane upon, or result in a need for new or altered effect governmental servi-ces_: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational, facilities? — e. Maintenance Of � C. roads?Public facilities; including — f. Other governmental services? 15. ENERGY. Will the — a, Use of substantial°amountsun in: C- b. Substantial increase ifuel-Or energy? sources of energy,n demand upon existing -- or require the development Of new sources of energy? 16<. UTT�ES . Will the — propsal result in a new systems, or substantial need for -�. Y following; alterations to the a. Power or natural gas? b4 Communications systems? c. Nater availability: - di Server or septic tank? — e• Storm water drainage? f `- -- - Solid waste and disposal?' 17: HUMAN IEALTH,- Will the proposal result a• rem n of any hins eath --_r hazard or potential hEalth hazard (excluding mental b., health ? Exposure of People to potential health) hazards? 1a AESxt�ETres. {Vrl1 the Proposal result.,� o`Tistru` ton of the any scenic vista or vie-ino the public or will the OPen to creation of an aestheticallyooffensSultsin the to Public View? open `q s ;> 19. RECREATION, YEE Will the r�,IJ NO proposal result in an impact Upon the quality or quantity o£ existing recreational ional 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES. a• Will t eep p sal Tesul.t in the alter of or the destruction of aton a ehist historic archaeological sit or Will �. Will the Proposal result: in adverseh s,•. or aesthetic effects to a p y - c,al historic storic building,prehi or structure or object? C. .Does the proposal have the potential a Physical change which wouldtaffect tocaethnic cultural Values? d• Will the Proposal restrict existing' religises or sacred tries within the a5 po tentiaimpact,) V• DISCUSSION OF ENVIRO�_ NMENTAL EVALUATION AP 28-35-25 See attached, ,CUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVAJ. I UATIO AP 28-35-25 lb,c,Bc,f: Development of two homesItes on the property will require some grading as part of driveway and building site -preparation. The sorface disruption will result in some increase in erosion potential and storm drainage runoff. 1h; The project site Is located immediately southeast of the Cleveland Hills Fault special studies zone and 18 located within, the Foothill Shear Zone. Construction or single-family dwellings o meet the requirements of the Uniform Boilding Code for seismically active areas will provide ,adequate structural protection. ah: Construction of two additional sept1c systems will contribute additional effluent Into the solls. 8,13a,c: The entire area of the subject s1 to ut I I I zov M I ss I on 0 1 1 ve Road. All off' the traffic generated by the residents of the numerous 5- to 10 -acre parcels must traverse the Ounstone Drivo/Misslon Olive Road intersection. Secondary access Is necessary to provide for emergency sitUations. Circulation In the area is difficult due to topography (creek to the east and ridges and ravines to the west). Access to toe south is limited by large parcels devoted to grazing., 1,1* This project will increase the demand for public services in a rural area currently receiving such services. Response times and levels of service will be decreased given the budget cutbacks of personnel In the 1985/86 fiscal year. 20a: The subject property Is located in an area of moderately high archaeological sensitivity. An archaeological survey or written clearance f rom a, qualified archaeo I og I st is necessary to determine whether significant archaeological or historic resources are present. _6- Applicant;Richard Leglw Assossx�r °s P6rco 1 1k 28"5" 25 Los;..b�7..11:�1 RATA SHEAT A. Pro sect Deser i ri- �,n, 1 Type of Project: Tentative Parcel 5.5 acres. a P s Map. ' n";o two parce.) i ;; of 2. Brief Descr•i tion` Dividin 11-.1 acres S. Location: Northwest corner of Oak Dr l e pa „p; Wj ntotl � �irte Wyandotte area. v 1 . Prraposed Density of Development" �, 5w Amount of Impervious Surfacing:" urfac l n 1 DI y ,�: w !� +�cr^ � 6. Access and Nearest_ Publ .i c Roads )Mi nDanlor Laf,ie b014dtars on with south, Mission Olive Road 1 000 feet +/_ to p,�ej',g t ttrIriect i ng utI., one and i�r7. Method ofSewaDrive e I)Sposal:Septic systentt.8. Source of Water St,tp1Y=9. Prokimlty of Po'Individual weisd46. werLsl Available i,r, thPotentiaT for furtherand divisions Indunder AR -MH -5 zonin9. s�or i�lq None »r ronin ntal Serf- t net 1 Terrain a General Topographic Character.* Ueritly rrrl l irt terrain - Cleveland Hill Ridge. g fo+ii,hj l 1 b Slopes'59 or fess generally; i'; twardeast. t:heas,tind c Elevation: 675-725 feat A -SL', d Limiting tactors: 2. Soils, a Types and Character l st i cs: AUbUt-n So_l 1 drained :a with moderate permeability. 1 i ty.Limiting Factors. Shallow so l l depth g• Natural. Hazards of the Land a• Earthquake Zone: Within 1/4 mile of Cleve -,end Pau 1t. Erosioin Potential: Moderate ". Landslide Potential Lots. 0. Fire Hazard: Moderate. ,," Expans i ire Soil 4 Hydrology Potent i al = Low, Surface Water: Land slopes southeast ln.,o kI swat e of North Honcut Croe;, which lies es to i a�* tr j %Utia Ny the east. ; 6. Acoustic Quality: Low ambient noise levels. 7. Air Quality: Moderate to High; within valley Inversion area. F3ioiosalcal Fnv �nme 8. Vegetation: Old olive orchard .Pasture land`wlth oak woodland further east and south. 9. Wildlife Habitat: Lower Sonoran Life Zone; winter dear herd area, but not in area of special biological Importance. Cultural Environ ent` 10. Archaeological and historical Resources in tho area: Moderately high sensitivity. 11. ,Butte County General Plan designation: Agricultural -Residential 12. Existing Zoning: AR -MH --S. 13. Existing Land Use on-site: Unmaintalned olive orchard and open land. 14. Surrounding Area: a. Land Uses: Orchard remnants; some livestock grazing, rural residences-. b. Zoning" A=S C. Gen. Plan designations: Agricultural -Residential and Grazing and Open Land. d. Parcel Sizes: 4.6 - 14 acres. e.. Populauion' Very low density. 15. Character of Site and Area: Rolling foothill area converting to rural residential uses. 16. Nearest Urban Area: Oroville, 7 miles +/ 17. Relevant Spheres of Influence: Butte County+ Mosquito Abatement District. 18. Improvements Standards Urban Area: N/A. 19a Fire Protection Service, ai. Nearest County (State) Fire Station: 472 Palermo; #64 Kelly Ridge. b. Water Availability: Wells, fire tanker capacity, 20 Schools in Area: Orovllle and Palermo School 01stricts. ' BUTTE l JUNT'1 e s GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE REPORT 1� aff a Co. Manning Comm. FOR PARCEL MAP OR SUBDIVISION MAP J U L 11 198 b applicant: oroville, CAlitorola Itemu 1-4 too be completed y 1. Applicant Name and.e_ddress tion pry f' r t~ l /4 , 2. Project Description �_.... 3. Assessor's Parcel Number(s)• 4. 'Proposed Use IT'DT"._. items are to be completed by the Planning Department; The Eollow.;�ng /\Jc� :Current zoning band Conservation Agreement General Plan Des'. nations A li-able Conditional Criteria: Not Applicable YES NO Agriculti,:SI » ,gidenti.cl atibi.lity 1. Agricultural CCapacit x 2. Water & Sever Gap Y S. Adequate Fire Facilities 4. Road Capacity & Matntenance 5. Access to Commercial & Schoole r Orchard & Field Crops 1. predominant 5-10 Ac. Parcel Size 2f Vicinity of Urban Boundaries S. Agric. viaW.1- tY not impaired -- Staff Determination: Project.^ does _.Zdoes not —--- substantially conform to the General Plan and zoninge A .% ri i, i t is Cor menu t Staff Signature Date' AS APPLICANT FOR TETE REQUESTED LAND DIVISIONS I AM A14AR OAN ZONING. F TAB ABOVE STA1:F AS THE REiANCE 4fYTEi THE GENE DETERMINATION REGARDING Tim CONFO "j Signature of Applica►xt -- Dated LD 1.000 f;xevised b»8d) _ ,