Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout029-030-044rI _ _ __ _ __ .. _,.. __,. _. _ '. r d TOTAL INFORMATION MANAGEMIENT CORPORATION - E I MeryVille 8anta Clara • 8acramento F,BP-6018 lx�y fy �q f�q��y pyo q�,�y �y � �q t, pf { L4%'i�VAY.S.6Yi7 i�'3 L+kV di.&SAk:&k'i!ii3r 4ASa4:�T �'YyOS,A,.^.L�yiYl.� b. 1� XIS ` P: Vs � + Ernest R. Bevan, Jr 86 Callingham Road, ;pittsford.�:NX 14534 Same �.. Tentative Waiver Parcel Maw �:'�tO�i�C�' pESCR:C� TZC?t�.� :i:«w:p+Yi, cVMww.Ye-Ya..rM++aa+nrw.li+,vlwYY�.'..+"•w sw.T s�v.r�.� wi �.wt:., _:..: _- Trw.«.w+Y' -.__. .:.�r.a�.�-... on bath sides of Lower Honcut_Rd.. 1200' ems. of Ralemmo:Rnncxt�. ., r Rc'as�,, FIoncut area. 1 , 5' E=SBOR1 S PARCEL 14MBER (E) 28-03-44 GFiERA P,Ais Grazing & PRCSJ(CT CONSISTENT? NE-� PLAN CONFOM4MCE' REPORT,` October 20, 1988 DATEOF APPLICANT SIGNATUA LAND CON, :A4T CON'PRAC�'S`? Yes, 40 acre minimum w_ DATZ , RPLT CA' TON RECEIVED _ - Ivlarcb 6 ,.. XGp'1n "-1StJRvEYOR/CIVIL ENGINEER, Ro er Associate �- w .... P•O• :Box 885, Chico, c;A' 95927 VATS, PLANN1140 DIRRCTOR' S REPORT PRI PARtb E�-,#V,,4,M, EM. TA t, - CATEGORICAL tXBMPTfON DAJOB FjtA AND, 0AT8 XEGATM DECLARATION - DATI. ADOPTED MITXGAT9D NEG a DECLARATION - DAIM Ar)OPTBD P.W. IMPACT REPORT - bk�l'E CERTYPTIM`m TATR a 1. Y.a. wr.fi.wr isi«.PTr¢u. tcI fps..¢. AY..+..e r:wr. "w:w r.,w1a i �..r..r» ,a,r w. -aW:w ..i::e. xr.d�-.y.Ww6»w.i.,•»+�T+.��+��ifi+'AMYw+rsY:p' +Ww .¢w.. w4s M fwF,N,4 u.. 4 n D �. A��V,:�,01iY A�ri��NCkFr �clt+} �`�i��ti,�j��� ,81? r "' w4�-H�.�v�.iiM Wwu.r�. ,:N.ry �w+r.u. rwW'MM. ... 4.wJX:►:YYiYr►:rYwk.+1.M.4v�tw wn.. e. iu4+4M:M+'i¢ea ¢0V°1' R AGENCY 1CTx t /'�,�'Dk�C7V ((lC) d.i� Cc?rVbl IgA AVPMI LS,D _ AP �? EAR IJC I�.►''E (+ti„AM , JIS 11OR PLANNING GTBEC`1IOR' us REPORT a,,.._ .... .-:.�..�..»..,rw.w.uY..«+o�., :yywra:s".;y,Y..r:,.Ww .•;n¢. ,iwr:Y� `,' ,��r+•ar1 �.+Ir+'i,4.�.�.us:Y..�v �rira,u,w ....,. u._.... � - - .+,..a.,.tY...,.-�-- .wy,a.s��YWY ai�ksa, ..+:u�4.x �a ur +.wi:.�+�+w w MAR S 1969 TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION E:1 T "UTATIVE "EARCEL MAP omvill*, fame PRELIM MY SUHDTVISION a WAIVER .APPLICATION (Please check appropriate tc,.r)` y % APPLICANT: L,/3�Ud�/ PHONE NO; 716-,_�/- ADDRESS: _jE6 C d[u�1G11,dh /LDT �/TTS��,:1 �nl" u1 �iL I45' OtriNER: SAc_ 1 :4s Al�oyF_ PHONE NO ADDRESS: ENGINEER OR SURVEYOR /2.OP6! /1SS c/1 ?,t:►__. PHONE NO: 'rtL 2d5 ADDRESS: MAIL NOTICE CF :HEARING TO lZ1GlA62rs s�Atx. x'17 �'I/ZS_. �yrr_On/�i0o G,4 94/l e � IOCATiON OF PROPERTY: TOWNSHIP SECTION / +7 ASSESSORS PARCEL NUIGER: g D 3 TOTAL ACREAGE PLEASE SUBMIT PR.ELIMMA.RY TITIE -RyPC ;' OR RECENT POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE dated within last six months) WPI APPLICATION. INDICATE' BELOW THE DATE AND RECORDING . IffOR14ATION 13Y MMCH TH1 S EA 2'II ;UTAK PARCEL WAS CRL'ASLEii DATE 6 j 'iii `i 7 _ t')Ok �`L op-sps PACE 38Cv . NUMBER AND SIZE OF PARCELS BEING CFF -,A -MD (including any remainder_ ; DISTANCE TO NAhWAt WATER COURSE OR STORM D]AAIN Q-4,06tS_ _:Sd, ,QOtJry/ PROPOSED METHOD OF SEt'lAGE DISPOSAL:,�+(�pT1G�/X,�„ _ 'Check kith Health Department) PROPOSED SOURCE' OF VIATENI: 4J; Check :a.th Health Department) DO POWER AND PHONE; LINES EXIST TO TLWUN`MRY OF THE ORIGINAL PARCELY 4 1F NOT, ESTIhLA.TE THE DISTANCE THEY k'Ml= RAV,8 TO BE EXTENDED., Lb used 1-24-80 x.020 RQ , �C`JTi'T, U :NT't-IAC..T: k1-1 CTS �J]•.N.AT. T• T.,AN C�T; I�i MAT" r) k :�; t:1 T3 T? 'T` V T S T. Q N MAF' G�PdVV�� tt �Nllflq �%N�.Yfib jt#ng 1-: to be completed b;; applicant: MAR 61989 I APPL!Wrr t.,A E AIND ADDRESS: EE'Al,',& y,C rIA-Al , �.6g F C.gc Gc f 1,��Rc� Pi r7s ppircl DESCRIPTION: Vr-A cFM.4A „ /,SSESSORI S PARCEL 1, (S): 2 S PROPOSED USE: 1e�S�2��i"/mac. 't�-• fi r �G7 t�s.4•L- follo,,ing items are to be cc;:pleted by the Planning Department. /dc 04111, ^?%E ZONING: LAti`D CONSERVATTON AGRMiFlT: ,PLAN DESIGNATION,' ���'�/.(UG � Z-04 V-A ,T p iy1'+1Q% 8nt ?site DOS on Criteria: YES NO D X It is recoamended that you parfara the following checked items: 2 v — AROIAEOLOGICAL RECORDS ►ICY 3. -- _-- BOTANICAL SURVEY' GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 4. YES NO ' WITHIN DEPARLMENT OF FISH �y $. ----- M W14E DEYELOFtMNT ZONE: _^ 94 lO. --_- 1iIT`ciI2i FLOOD PLUM 11: �---- i2. . WITHIN AREAS SPECIFIC OR Staff Dete=ination;: Substantially conforms to' GEr.'?.AL PLAN: I. Land Use X' ,____� if Yes, Name: of Plan 2. Conseevdtion 3, Open Space_ H?filN UP.EAJ1 RESERVE:` k 4. Safety X 5, Noise if Yes, _ b: Housing X Hame of Resew+:, 7t Circulation z AIRPORT LAND USE. PLANS ZOav%iG : .L rG.!/ Sd 7?f:-T rho P•�Q�,pc.� 4; itafi' Signature "`�1�.''�"""�' _ . bate lis Th`E APPLIChtr-T FOR P,EQL`ySTtb LAND DIVISTflity AM AWARE OF TFC ABt1VE STIFF bE"t'ERtiINATION FtEGARb2tiC CO-r-OP"tANCE WITH ntE GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING. elated .�� Signature of Applidattt . nhis p' .. p' r ) rsonths fro: tele date kit the staff signatuee. �' re ort �i11 ex ire ar►d by discarded s,x fb U) rpgq$ (revitod b -B)) : ++ r r, FOR OFFICE USE ONLY' Bette County Planning Dept. t 7 County Center Drive Receipt # 1Q %L Oroville, CA 95965-3397 Applicant 615-11.Q;S 916) 534-4601 AP 1/c�-iii Subdivision Name (if applicable) APPENDIX E Date Filed LAND DIVISION APPLICATIONS Supplemental Information far Plannn De artment 4 project, P P 1, L,i,.t and describe an other related permits and other u Xe Hired for thisincluding those ro Public approvals 8 qu�red by citys regional, state and.federal agencies.; r 2. Proposed scheduling/associated projects: G- 3 Anticipated incremental development " P .(Phasing of subdivision units, future development plans)'! NIA 4, What method will be utilited to accommodate surface drainage? Describe hoV on-site and downstream drainage channels will be affected. E1ST,�n� 5 Proximity of water for fite fightirig purposes (hydrants} pond:,, etc, 6+ WiII excavation or grading be necessary? Cubic yards (estimate): 7 Directions for travel to property crural and mountainous areas only), .S"ocJ'r,�1 /c�/ COY %!i `7n G4rr�n lloclr yi ,� 1:'A it 7— LUUcr Elm _ 1 O�Grrr- lLr�Ae 4 F�.Dstis.� Ji M r { ENVIRONMENTAL I ; I $• E MPACTS ANA MITIGATION MEASURES* Identify potentially significant environmental impacts associated with theland division- What project design features or special conditions Of approval (mitigation measures) are proposed to alleviate potential environmental impacts? t A/0QA 9. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING*' a)' Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structure,. /ZF_SIOF.�JGF -+ AC� LQ4tq _ b) Describe the surrounding proPerti.es, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, apartment houses, shops, depart- mant stores, etc.), and scale of development '(height, frontage„ setback) rear yard, etc.). P—L51064CS4 Ato C CERTIFICATION: I her t+°ttify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits pre.i:nt the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ab.ilityi and that the facts, statements And inliefi and belie£; on.presented are true and corr,.ct to the best of my knoWledge • Date Signature / J Por *Use separate sheet for longer responses x/55 'POSIL"Wc)aIwa ptre-j 6861 0 1 8 �.r1a 40 40a _ c r Planning Department NAME: X Environmental Health Department Ernest R. Bevan, Jr _ CDF FesY Department) AP: _ 28-03-44At*nJCraigCarter(on areas north of red line on map) i Butte County Sheriff PG&E (check title report for easement) Pacific Bell X, Butte County Mosquito Abatement OR Oroville Mosquito Abatement (areas within large map/in cabinet) School Distzict (wall map) ?ate m). AV ['a Water Company (if individual wells are not indicated on application or map) Durham Irrigation OR Durham Mutual Water Co. California Water Service Company (Chico area) Oroville-Vlyandotte Irrigation .District (Oroville area, SE of river) Thermalito irrigation District (Thermalito area NE of river) Limesaddle Community Services District (Paradise area along Pen'tz Rd, to lake) Del Oro Water (Paradise Pines area) Buzztail Waterworks (Doe Mill Ridge/Forest Ranch area) Paradise Irrigation District City of (chetk wall maps for spheres of influence) Oroville Chico Paradise Biggs Gridley COVILLE AREA ONLY; Lake Oroville Area Public Utility District (see large nap in cabinet) _ Feather River Recreation District (see large map 'in cabinet) El Medio Fire District: (check wall map, a small portion of Oroville only) LICGS, RICRYAL, GRIDLEY AREAS (SOUTH BUTTE areas COM)' check wall map and title report to g pp. overlap. Drainage District ill _ Drainage District, 02 Drainage District x100 Drainage District 11200 Reclamation District 11833 Reclamation District n2056 Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District Butte Creek Dralnage,District 15 CERTAIN CASES.; Superintendent of Schools (only for subdivisions) Dept. of Fish and Game (near water and in rural and mountain areas) Cal Frans (near State 8wy. 32, 704 991 149 (Chico cuter -off), 162 (Olive. Rvy; Richvale Hwy.)', 191 (Clark Road) State Water Quality Control Board (projects with more than 100 lots or units) United States Forest Service (if project borders USA land check AP books) Warks and Recreation Department (property near take Oroville) State Water Resources Department (property near Lake Oroville watershed) -� Rock Creek Reclaimation Dist: (west of Chico Airport, south of Rock Creek and east of Hwy, 99 (see wall map) Chico Area Recreation & Park Dist (only for subdivisions) asEtoAL CASES: ThermalitocIrrigatibb. District�(numbemedti�tems) special services or easements such reporty D AND OPEN LOD IG a � . Lirazing, an husbandry; iw'Jenso � onimal uses and animal matter process ng. anon:dary 'Uses: Resource eXtracU' on and processing, forestry, rt7t crops, agricultural support se:,rices, M tdoar recreation ?cil .ties, airports, dwellings, utilities, environmental. pre- ,grva'tion activities, public and o_uasi-public uses and home ,fy;,;cupations . r"` p Desitn.atior Criteria: for natural cOndi�j.ons poorl- suited p_ar�t craps or timber. predominate parcel sizes Of 40 acres or more. 'orraz-96 an 4. Adjacent Buses -conducive toseaonda.livEstOck grazing. 7n',ensit of Use: lxinimum parcel size o' 40 acres'. Where a ra;.-0 is used the minimum gross tensity could' vary from 20 to 40 acres per dweilirlg unit prolrided at least 80% pf the total gar.eage of a pro6ect is set aside for open space uses. One syng p_f'a ily dr�re3:la ng peg.` parcel wZ �h addi i Tonal 'hoes` -ng for ort --site employees=. Oon s i s t crit Zones:1M- thru TM -160i A-40 thru k-1601 `R- 40 th-=u £Fi-'ISO 1 R -C j C ?+ l TP -1601 PA -0. on, inm z y ac toys : Existing parcel-' siz.es and dvtelling densities: . livestock carrying capacities. ?. Slope. Nr, iroximity to urban development. 5. Eft ecys on adjacent uses. 6. focal desi=re a r caF; P S"i D, SEP 0 11989'. R 5 0 CT 0 1 198 Q'= Office of Planning rand Research SROM: Butte County 1400 ,Tenth Street, Roon: 421'— M 1 Planning Department Sacramento, CA9584 ` 7 County Center Drive z or SEP 01 '198 Oroville, CA 95955 Y.X. County Clerk - County of Butte C";i�L� ». Co..�rcrlt B,r `tM-37ECT z Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 t;.- 21152 of the Public Resources Code. ;Project Title AP li Naive Tentative Waiver Parcel Map APu28-03-44 Ernest R. Bevan,_ Jr. State Clearinghouse Number Contact Person ed. t Telephone lumber (if submitClearinghouse J John Mendotisa, Pudic Works (916) 538-7266 Project Location Location ;0fi both :vides of Lower Honcut Road, 12001 east of Palermo-8oticut Rd., ;Project Dascript;.ort _ Honcilt Area, 'Tentative Waiver Parcel Mat; 'This is to advise that the Butte County Advisory Agent (Lead. Agency or Responsible. Agency) has approved the above-described project on _AuQust.28, 1989 and has made (Date) the following determinations regarding tt,e above-described project: 1. The project w]l, X will not, have a significant effect on the, environment. 2. An Envizanmental Impact Report eras prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEOA X A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEOA. 3. Mitigation measures__ t�tere; ..were not, made a condition of the approval of the project, 4. A statement of overriding considerations.was, ;t t4as hotr adopted for this projects This approval yY that the xlgeneral public ata res onset and record o' p J `. Pprovalis availabletothe gutt+a.County Planning Department 7 County Center Drive Orovilleo CA 95965 Date Received for piling and Posting at OPR Sig ure. 8,A MUM -'Dir' f P-aiming Title ector� o LAND, OF NATURAL k?4EAiTH AkiD 8EAU4'e ^z DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIc WORKS' WILLIAM (Bill) CHEFF, Director 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE . OROMLE, CALIFORNIA 45065` Telephone. (9161 538-7266 CIMTUMD BAIL RONALD D, McELROY I'epu"jr -Director August 281 1989 Ernest R. Bevan Jr. PE; A? 28-03-44 86 Cal.lingham .Etoad Waiver Application Pittsford, �W 1458E Dear Mr. Bevan At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held on ,August 28, 1989, the Agency adopted, a negative declaration of environmental impact and approved the tentative parcel map on the above--referenced property, subject oto the conditions listed on the attached sheet„ If no appeals tire timely :filed—within teii (10) days of the date of the Advisory Agency's approval=-with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, this action will be .final. When the conditions Of approval are complied with" it will be in order for you, to file your "final map" with the Butte County Department of Public Works for recordation within twenty-fou,; (24) months of the date of approval, by, the Advi3ory Agency,_ If you, have any questions regarding this :matter, please contact,. this office, Very truly yours, William Cheff Director of Public Works J,Oin Mendohsa ssi,stant bisector 1 JM/ds attachmon+ CC: Planning ;Department✓ Environmental Health Department I (toper Associates _ I t I ' . a ..,..rpt /C,,. �wr►.•Y a �'.-�.. f IF OF bluttC unig .� �. _. - LAND OF NATURAL V.rEAET'r's Aa,"++ P "ia;,`t;': DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC Y/ARKS WILLIAM (Bill) CHEFF, Director 7 COUNTY =ENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 Teleohefiet (9la)8 CERTIFIED MAIL 53-7266RONALD D. McELROY DeputyDirector August 10, 1989 i' Ernest R. Bevan Jr. RE„ AP 28-03-44 86 Callingham. Road ►Waiver Application Pittsford, NY` 14534 V Dear fir. Bevans Please be advised that the Butte County Advisory Agency will hear your, application on the above -identified, property on August 28, 1989, The Agency be reviewing the findings from the Planning Department and will be considering your tentative waiver application. Public Works will recommend the conditions ,of approval as listed on the attached sheet. The meeting will coMnmence at 9600 a.m. in the Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Building, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville California.. If you have an y questions regarding. this matter, please contact this office, Very truly yours;' William Cheff * Director of Public Works hn Mendonsa Assistant Director ,TM/'ds attachment ccl (Planning Departmetlt Environmental x ealth Department Roper Associates 'i 11 1 itto cou, ft LAN, 1) OF NATURAL WEALTH AMID BEAU'T'Y PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE.- OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE. (916) 538-7601 A IAVst 2, 1989 Ernest. R. Bevan, it. #�G Callingham Road Pittsford, NY 14534 , V,6: Tentative Waiver Parcel. 14',ap AP428-03-44 -tear Mr. Bevans she Butte'County Planing DepaItment has completed the Panv ronment4l. review of your project in accordance with the California Environmental. Quality Acs and forwarded to the; Butte !County Advisory Agency within the required 105 days pursuant to the California Public Resources Code Section 21151.5i In addition, the Planning Director's report required by Sections 20- 63 and 20-99 of the Butte County Subdivision Ordinance has been completed. Please find enclosed the Planning Director's Report ohich has been prepared for yav:r proj ect. Pl,'-ase review the enclosed Plannii.ig Director`' s Report with conditions of approval if appl ,cahtle. If you note any errors or Omissions in our evaluation, please bring them to our attention. The Dnviranmen,tA1 Documents and Pl.i:fnning Director's Report for your. prof e.ct has been sent to the Elutte County Advisoty Agency for their action. California Coveri?ment Code Sections 65950 and 65952.1 requires the Butte: County A��visory Agency set hearings and appro��e or disapprove your proj&ct within, six months from the date on which your application was risceived and accepted. The six month time limit for your proj ectt tnandated by sta':e law ► will, occur, on 18eptember 4, 1.9891, The Adv��,sory Agency will notify you of the bine and place of the. publie h,h-aring far your project, r there are modifications to yolzr prdiject, not related to Iaaitigating aft identified impact, re-evaluation of your project Shall,, b'e required i 11 ,� California; 9HITO �� B� SLMY Department of Anthropology imhaeological (Q ��P 4UrH s 7arau ,�„ sums California State University, Chico inventory , aooac 4 Chico, CA 95929 rwmAs 'nuRay SHWA (916)-895-6256 Dater Wi_l 2& 1989 -AHR 28119 -r* n Clroville, calitomia 'Io Butte.Couaty PlannirI5 #7 County ;C a ter Dr. Oroville, Ca_ 95965 d 1 re. AP 28-03=44/Bevan M to du, -4:, Dear County Planners, A review of the above project has revealed the following: The area indicated as within the project botux3aries is considered t c be archaeologically sensitive. Present are: X Ea sy, amass bo natural sources' of water x. Flat meadowland or .flat land near grater x South a.nci/or east facing slopes Previously recoraed sites in the vicinity- 4 prehistotic sites X; =`r Historic mining activity _ within 1 mile of prosect aloncr 14oncut_ Creek'_ W We strorVly recommend that an archaeological reconnaissanc- 'be conducted of j the area icy a qualified archaeologist and appropriate mitigation measures prepared. A known site or sites has/have been prev°ioUsly recorded in the project area. Project or�_rations gill have a negative inpact on these cultural resources. We reccmm--d that a qualified archaeologist be ocnta,--ted to assess site cor rents and prepare a mitigative proposal. Other Tank you for the opportunity to t:eview ,hnd conment on this pt•o�x7sa11: Please let: tis know what decisions are mage regarding the project. 5incet:ely, br. Mekoto i owt a Northeast TnE'or nation Center Coordinator = cc doper AssvciatPs 4 INTRODUCTION' Roper and Associates contracted with the Archaeological. Research Program at California State University; Chico to conduct an archaeological survey of approximately 480 acres located near the small town of Honcut, California (Map 1). The purpose of this survey was to locate, record, and evaluate any cultural resources within the project area: in June of 1989; an on -foot archaeological survey of the project area was performed by Lisa Swillinger, assisted by Bruce Duncan and volunteers Roger. D'edekam and Antoinette Hoelscher. The project area, owned by Mr. Ernest Bevan Sr. is locabod in Butte County in Township 17x1, Range 4E', in portions of Sections 91 16, and 21 on the 'USGS Honcut Quadrangle, 7.5' Series, California (Map 2) . The project will involve the division of this large parcel into three smaller parcels, al.l of which will involve eventual development. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The project area lies on a gently sloping alluvial fan in the Sacramento River 'Valley, east of the Feather River along the North Honcut Creek flood plain. It is located just east of the center of the town of Honcut. To the east rises the northern. Sierra Nevada mounts -in range; _ and the project is located within the Great Valley plant belt as dL,Pined by Storer and 'Unsinger (1963). The project area is basically a rectangular parcel bound in the south by North Honcut Creek and in the north by an unnamed dirt road. The parcel is divided by Lower Honcut Road.. Vegetation along North Honcut Creek is riparian forest, *as defined by Thompson (1961), and is characterized by such species as valley oak, sycamore, willow, buckeye, poison oak, wild rose, wild grape, bull and ,star thistle, dock, and various other wild grasses and grains. The soil is Heavy phase Honcut loam, as defined 'by the U.S. Department of AgrioulturL: Soil map of the Oroville'area. There is a dirt road which runs ,from Lower Honcut Road along the eastern boundary fence line to the creek, and then con'binues along the creek tothe we8torn boundary fence line. These are also numerous trails ceiss�-crossing this riparian forest, some of Which cross the creep at the 'western boundary. These trails appear to be utilized primarily for small, motorized all terrain Vehicles, . Ground vi!�ibility is hampered in areas where no road or trails exist by a Meavy covering of dried grasses, leaves, and an exIeessive amount of modern trash. The remainder of the project„ alyda is characterized by grassland vegetation consisting mainly oJ" star thistle, wild oat, milkweedi gild Morning gloryf vetch, and various -other wild grasses, grains and flowers which occur !Ln patches throughoutthe Project area. There are a few trees l6dated in an area where a residence was once located (s®,e Map 3) These include .fig and walnut trees and one large cactus plant. There are a few small leve oak trees along the eastern boundary fence line, with the number and 71,ze of the oaks increasing in proximity to the creek, The soil, extremely red -In color, is a combination of Kimball, loam and Rocklin fine sandy loam, as defined by the U S. Department ;of Agriculture Soil. Map of the Oroville area. Ground visibility ranges from Moderate to poor. An extremely abundant amount of rodent activity provided the best opportunity to examine %urface and subsurface soil. The heavy vegetation obscured all areas not involved in rodent activity. Several Marsh Hawn nests were encountered during thistwrve The Marsh Hawks were actually chased from their nests on two occasions, and circled above waiting for us to leave. Three atmall, white eggs were observed in one nest, and two eggs were observed in the other: In addition, another nest was found in which a recently broken egg of the same size and shape as the Other Harsh Hawk eggs was observed. Several Redta l hawks were oneaiso observed, as well as on barn owl, numerous pheasants, ducks, doves, swallows, blackbirds, crows, meadowlarks, and buzzards. One Mallard' duck was found dead at a nest location; surrounded by broken eggs; Several Rader snakes were observed, as well as field mice and gophers. As stated above, there was abundant evidence of rodent activity throughout the project area: There were also larger, holes, much too large to have been made by gp fi gophers. They may possibly ,ave been badger dens. However, there was not much direct evidence to suggest what types of animals these larger holes may have been home to, other than some fox droppings observed near the creek. Also observed were the remains of a large animal that had been tied, with a hemp rope, t1b the fence along the eastern boundary line just south of Lower H-aneut Road.. The skin was all that was left, and it was probably th.e skin of a coyote, alt,houg;h no positive identification Was able to be trade. The project area was literally inundated with grasshopper,, and ;aany dragdnflys, butterflys, bumblebees, ladybugs, and spider webs were also noted. BACKOROUND RESEARCH AND CULTURAL CONT8XT .A search of the archaeological records held at the Northeast lnformation Center of the California Archaeological Site Inventory revealed that no archaeological sites had been recorded- within the project troa No previous archaeological surveys had been conducted in the project area. However, the proJeet is located in an area ecnsidered to be sensitive for both prehistoric and historic cultural resouVices by the Northeast Information Center. The Sacramento Valley may have been occupied by prehistoric 9;rotilps as early as 9000 13.0. The first• known ar^chaeolo;gical t:ompIex in the Oroville vieir1ity is the Melilla Complex,, and tsvidenee points to a date for this coripl.ex as sometime before II a � 41000 t1�4;. t?,Xtendin to F3 aPPromimately A .D. 1 , camplex is l�nown as the extendi:7 Bidwell Gom The succeeding t3 i�x"0 M. A.D. 1 to about A.D. Plex, with a follows the B• 800, pPrwatertre date. Bidwell Com lex and The Sweetwater Gomplex t aPPr'oximate .;Y A.D. 1600. P dates from A.D. Come ex, a PcIssible !'awards the end of 800 to resulting population d� the Sweetwaater g in oceupatiorn of sAlacemen;t may, have occurred (Dreyer 1984j the area by Ire groups gthnographicall clai y Y, the project area lies within territory �r:ed b thk. Konkaw (Riddell 1 t 978; Kowta 1988'I, the Northwest Maidta. However Horcut Creek a , also known as appear #0c form the boundary Creek ,and North Honcut, their nei hbors g to the south, the tjis haven the��Konxow and indicates that the people liv3 n roeber (1D25) dialecl;ically transit ona� g along HonouL- Creek were The ?"Onkow Utilized acorn and buckeye nut -m between the Konkoca ��,nd the Nisenan. subs,i:stence starve- and grasshoppers Eats for their 3r, were capture noted in abundance during tct,s for 13sw durin P red and eal;en dry 9,r roasted, many times storied r S the winter (Dixon 1 05i Hunt; Fathering of wild fruits, grains n9) fishin g, and subsistence teehnxques .employed b ' bulbs and roots were other Y the Konkow (Piddell 1978), i-�istor.icallYs the HOncut Grant claimed by T eCt area was Probably .%ncluJed in the 19) • C'ordua lived y� Theodore Cordua .in 184. (Deal 1 i 18497 ��ihen it k ��n �thzs gr+ant raisin 978:18- was then sold in g horses and cantle ;until "' 18ya parcels to various individuals. -., John lanore established toore`t,s Station Althou area) and it is now known as Honeut pro ee jt.tst east of the lumber �� t�oore�s Station began as a mining(1%ansfield 1918:z$3) Industry was the main source Of center, the burgeoning town. 2 - , growth for this small n the . ,8603 s, the Califol'nia an ilort,hern Railroad acted a railroad eonneeting Oraville ai ,' (tea sf'eld 1918:318) , nd . center ,for tra:dd This caused le toabecomela and manufacfcurin Office+as eatablished at Moore is S,taand in 186 ` 9 the first Post (Veiokstad 1955:11 tion in John Moore is hotel j � �`o� 188. A.t beach Lumber Cvmpax±y running f`romeTloodiea and Clipper its the iatountain to Moore is Stt w�i,s built by the me A large lur�be _ ation/Honc zlls u r mal]. was built in Moore'sustatuon/Fi�ncut t , l t on the valley floor. railroad tracks reached ,its a and activity in i�iooreis station/Honcnext t - and Nori%'11ern Peak ield ohan ied8.31$) ttoneut, and the Post', Office dl4t Mira � Zn 1892, the California name of ttoor�t is Station to Hbncut in the same o officially adopted the name of year (}'ridkstad 1955:11', 13) Several large and destr>xctve Fires burned through Honcut 1901 Sat<sfield 1318.3203 ?I , in 11:3$8, 189 , and � t , 378 and hic �a 1970.11) . The Assess oris Platt Book of 18F7 for BOtte Cdu.nt i'o r was cona'Ulted a.nd this record �iho',�s iPi taxes for the fnaJoraty of th. that J: Uphael in thatm was nes �itated that his family shoved to lJoneut in 191? assess d 'and that �a t14'an ,story wooden house stood on the, spot Where 3 eah . i~tri }3ew ere tlr.e existing resldr�noe tin hyla p�`oPerty now stands. fir. Bevan et�Ved thalt t" . w 'l he 41 ;r ,7 crossed his property in order to reach the mill located just west of his property, but no evidence of this flume was observed during the survey. Considering the several large fires which the Honcut area experienced, it is highly likely that no remnants of this flume would exist near, Honcut-­ oncut;.FIELD FI ELDMETHODS A complete on-foot survey of the Bevan property was performed in June 1989. As stated earlier, Bruce Duncan assisted for a small part of this survoy: Volunteers Roger Dedekarn and Antoinette Hoelscher also assi,�ted at various times during the survey. The project ;.area was broken into three sub- areas for logistical purposes (i-tap 3). Sub-area 1 included the 75 to 100 foot strip of riparian forest along the north bank of North Honcut Creel€. Sub-area 2 included all land south of Lower, Honcut .on Road N , excluding the riparian forest area.. .Sub-area 3 included all land north Of Lower Honcut Road, including the existing residenceof ' Mr. Ernest Bevan. S1ib-area '1 was subjected to an intensive 4,urvey with transects varying from 5 t.' 15 meters in width. Sub-area 2 was subjected to an intensive survey with transects varying from 20 to 25) meters in width due to the proximity of North Honcut C2reek. Sub-area 3 was subjected to an intensive survey with transects Varying from 40 to 50 meters in . dtn.rouno Y thiolk, visibility in all sub-areas was hampered by a 'vegetati-on. covering of All, clearings, roads and trails, and rodent di;sturbance were exam,t.ned. Roads, trails; and the abundant anmount of rodent disturbance offered a good opportunity to observe ground surface and subsurface and were exarrined whenever possible. ' In areas of poor visibility, the vegetation Was scraprwd away to examine the ground surface at regular intervals RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Sub-area 1 was criss-Crossed by a dirt: road and numerous smalldirt trails, It also contained a large amount of modern trash which included large and small appliances, mattresses, a couch, numerous modern cans and bottles, used baby diapers, lawn and cactus clippings, spent shotgun shells, and variou-c papers and. wrappers. Sub-area 2 had been previously utilized for agrieultUral Purposes, and some evidence of heavy equipment was evident. Dirt toads are present along both the eaL, am and western boundary lines,, and the 'entire area is sUrround.8d by split rail tend barbed ta�.re fencing. Subs-area .2 b-Ontains the southern portio+j1 of CAW 13UT-10820 an historic split rail and barbed wire fence, 'This Pence was recorded as an historic feature primarily due to the rwmerotts square nails found imbedded in all existing pa: 't iii the portion of fencing that run: along Lower Roncut According to Mr. Bevan, Lower 8oricut Road was part of ilt,l ;stagecoach route to LaPotibe4 This information, combined with ti,1 t 'many presence of so square nails in each rail; c-f this portion of . 8 z� the fence (at 'least 5 to 7 nails in each rail) led to r�eCordat•ion { of this fence as an historic feature. Sub -area 3 had also been preirioUsly utilized for agricultural "purposes, and there were numleroUs bales of "ay still ' sitting in the center of sub -area 3. Sub -ar=ia, 3 included T`a area ~ in which it appeared that a barn or ware:hous,F once stood:, There 3 is a, symbol indicating a barn or waretlou.se on the 1953 tr�aGS Quad map, and several fig and walnut trees Were pt°esent in this area: as well as a large cactus (see Map 3) . The fig r. Saes were growing out of a deep 12' by 2.01 pit in the gx^ound which was overflowing with modern traoh,, This trash included a t'1,,�ltitude of cans and bottles„ fifty gallon betal drum, -ti,, metal, berg springs, a metal file drawer, metal! milk a.tns t pari:, oi' a refrik;etrator, wooden milled boards, and varRious otht'r refuse. None of this refuse appeared to pre -date 1930, all, of it appc.`rring to date from the 1940ts or '1950's on through modern t tnPs No :;uildin*' foundations were observed; This large pit ntav represet« sone. type of basement for the barn or warehouse which is indi-o,ated on tete 1953 USGS Quad map, since the dirt walls of this pit appeared to be uniformly even, Just "north of this pit, two power pcl. s extend into the project area from the road. On the second closest to the pit, there is a modern power meter, supporting I assumption that this pit and associated trash are oi' m6dern origin. Three hundred meters east of this area, two large tra8h wereu � dumpsp -included :" arage g r dumps hese. trate amounts cans and both es non of thosh observed e)3ht b,'.;titlg 1 evidence of dates prior co 1930, Many of the cans were pop­-top,i cans, dating to the 195'01s. At both sites, the metal items were 1 rusted badly, And labels were not vihible. These gash srtr. ers probably the results of modern, lo,;al dumping. Sub -area also included a modern water ump, some mop irrioz�bion equipment and subsurface PVC irrigation line, p s line ower the horthern boundary of the project area and split rail barbed wire fencibg surround the pro j,-ct area in this area as well. The northern portion of CA-SU7-1082 is Located at the ex.t.leme" southern portion of sub -area 3. 4Ihile` CA"BUT-1082 has been recorded as an historic featti-� e, the integrity of this split zail barbed wire fen}ee is very -ow The barbed `wire is common double strand barbed w;tre which ca -A. ,,%0 be firmly dated. The wooden split rail posts used in construction of this fence are in many cases par,itally bur-.tt,i:;, and in some eases noh-�eXistent for short distaftegs on •.oth si,d",sl oft e oad.Numerous historic square na.i.ls) discontinued after the 'sere , present ih each of the. e .i.tting wGoden rails:, At least 5 to quare nails are present. in each or the existing rails, but in mahy cases these nails aro rusbing out of thaair or have partially rusted away, Modern 'hey vy' metal. stepl es 4 Aree� urrentl bie ,. y irig utilized to attach ttz" � bart ed wire tea the rails � leaving the square nails to setive no futrct3onal purpose; As A structure, this historic fence lacks integrity and is not Unique. As dh hittoric site, there io minimal informatioh to be gained Pedm farther studyy and i f REFERENCES CITED' Deal, Krista 1978 The Mexican Land Grants of Butte Courcy. Unpublished manuscript on file at the Northeast Infoi:mation Centex, California Archaeological Site Inventory;, California State University, :y, Chico. p. 18--19. Dixon, Roland °B. 1905 The Northern Ma:du. Bulletin of the, AmYrican Museum of Natural History 17 (3) :191. Dreyer, William 198 Prehistoric Sett:leManL- Strategies ii't .a Portion of the. Northern aacram=_nto Val 1q, Califor.�'tia. Master's Thesis. p. 37-38 F'rickstad, Walter N. 1955 A Century of California Post Offices. Philat#:Iic Research Society pa,)licat n, Oaki�:ind, Cali carnia. p. 11,13. Kowta j Malkotc5 1988 Tap Archaeology an,'I Prehistory of Plumas and Butte Counties, California An Inttoductioin and Interpretive Madel. California ' State University, Chico. P. 8-10. Kraeber, Alfred L. 192$ Handbook, of the Indians of California. ):bureau of AWrican. 8thnalogy Bulletin 781 Washington. p. 393. Mansfield, Gorge C. 1918History of Butte. County, California.Historic "RectO-3 Company, L'as. Angeles. p. 38,283,318,3201378. McGipvt Joseph 19`10 H3:st«ry, of lioncut A Butte County Community ty Butl:e County H:lstofical Society Digging 14 (4) : 1-11, Poland, L7.R. and. R.�. tvehgoft j 1966 lrydrogeology and Land SLbsidence, Great Central. Valley, California. In Oology of Northern California, Bulletin 190. Edited by Ddgar H. Baileyx California blvision of Mines and C0xAoqypublication, San Ptancisco p.240. Ai.ddell, Prancis ''A„ 1978 N,aidu and t`onkow'. In Handbook of North m4rican Indians, Volutzta 8, California. Edited by Robert P Ileiter Smithsonian lnstitutiont Washington, D.C. p. 370-U6i. 8' �Y' .. 8 v.ef6 b +wa. 11 .�. •��� s e o '�. �, � � f J_ d m� s ] MIf Ono�tllt ' r �.....` ^� �wr 'f � b9 .3� ~ • . a �•/�`�� '\ _ C�O�YIL`�7MIX5rd u�i . � _ ..'✓.'r �iK'aa.. y� .• f • t' Ito —ti t5 330 UN D P Isis t + ► . r 8CAZZ inches � 1 tnilta ;; HONCU'� P. M14 COWLEY f5' duACRANbrE �/-`� j` P�OTORp ISEU 1o3 tJ %' �Qi (�+ �J AMS ld 1 SE-=S�RISS ti8b5 MA ? 2 Survey 14cabion 7 i t t y� .• f • t' Ito —ti t5 330 UN D P Isis t + ► . r 8CAZZ inches � 1 tnilta ;; HONCU'� P. M14 COWLEY f5' duACRANbrE �/-`� j` P�OTORp ISEU 1o3 tJ %' �Qi (�+ �J AMS ld 1 SE-=S�RISS ti8b5 MA ? 2 Survey 14cabion 11 C r1 -- •- .. r7 fi :.+.. t v% J. j••" - t 06 f .�x I►GIIQD' " 11 . i� 44 ='Sp'lit tailf'.�a bad W!±e fencing ,• ( i" = 5 to 15 meter transects = 20 to 25 mater transects vo = 40 to 50 mater transects existing residence of Mr. Bevan 10 43 Gr e=Modern trash scatters ����`" Project bounciary14" 6eS " _. �`.`_:` � = ccs--Bt�m-•�osz MAS' 3 5tIeVey Coverage - r " � /Z 9nq,';-P 11 C r1 -- •- .. r7 fi :.+.. t v% J. j••" - t 06 f .�x I►GIIQD' " 11 . i� 44 ='Sp'lit tailf'.�a bad W!±e fencing ,• ( i" = 5 to 15 meter transects = 20 to 25 mater transects vo = 40 to 50 mater transects existing residence of Mr. Bevan 10 43 Gr e=Modern trash scatters ����`" Project bounciary14" 6eS " _. �`.`_:` � = ccs--Bt�m-•�osz MAS' 3 5tIeVey Coverage April 13, 1989 Bump, ' - LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND 8EAUTY PLAiNNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER [)RIVE- OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (1 16) 538-7001 mest R i Bevan; Jr eO Callingham Road Pittsford, NY 14534 8:e. Tentative Waiver Parcel Map AP#28-03-44 Maar Mr. Bevan: An' initial y your, 'stub of proposed Parcel ldap, indicates potentially adveilsF Tentative Waiver environment - y impacts to the (rti.wer to the enclosed environmental Ch.r~cklist Tn �rure or elimi tiate1these it�tpacts, svitahlr>wwka+`n )sr � r a s zi, X' n'r i 1, fieri' EIIV i l o 1~' �;'.:rf..xrf�: ` r, r:���`7 � ,� r' �-� � o ..� �.s.'�i� ..:, . �.r;: ntn+=:rL'�a.l, n�rironra--atal ' �`� pursuant to the caij,: �;nia; Qu -lit' Act: i! to assess the otental for �: st Order to determine what, ,if any, mitigation measuresiaWould ehiemappro riElte regarding archaeological sites, you mai r p , xf's"9 ce for a records search and sensit'i,vit evalct, im following plan and/car location ma � `S evaluation. A site p (preferably with Sai.tion, Township] and Range) must be sent along with a fee of $10:00 payable to the Northeast Center for this service: Northeast Information Center nepartwdnt of Anthropology O'aliforhia State University Chico, GA 95929-0400 Attention: Cutator of Records ,should Ffie office thenrecbendnechat anessary aoy}hae� og ca surge be conducted, it wi�j individual who is professionally �', t� contact: an. evaluation- A list of qualified local a ohsultantPttw di ncsuch an One of these in&viduals can be hired '�oerform the survey and Provide mitigation recommendations as warx.a,hted': An early response to i Departmient Will e undue this notification, send: to t: he the scheduling Planning :Eorwardl your written, this letter, o;� ou'r response within l5 da ,; p�O�ec�, y��; from the Please � , date of Should you have any, stj contact thiseloonregardngthis atter, kwn0 please ai:;00p.m. Sincerely, i Kircher (Director of Planning David R. Hirpftimus Associate planner DRH:Jmc Rnc cc Roper Associates �µ i