Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout029-250-058I M a BAUCRA E),Jvf'O�vs-I APRC)Ksc/,)�r /I Ott Pci d f j WHS # GAS f, n 0 4..Otq 10 0 QT a 11 0 R A 0 IrA N K N 11 0 4 m I.AikI.NIII Ir I M a BAUCRA E),Jvf'O�vs-I APRC)Ksc/,)�r /I Ott Pci d f j WHS # GAS f, n 0 4..Otq 10 0 QT a 11 0 R A 0 IrA N K N 11 0 4 m I.AikI.NIII P � „ �, r 1 ., t �;A • i � > i � \ i r a L I-��. .! a i � > i � \ i r a L I-��. .! a •} r .i i' t fib. .a • � ii d I +. \ �\. �- ° 'r' f"• a \ �� w � • 1. °. � • L. a 4'4.1 ��� �O. r ar � l ;�� �`' 1 Y, � �n �� °Rt 'tip,` `�, !�� �� y,r� M p4 r �; t t k IN! J U. 7. P�.i �►°�'�.t �9 VCR USE BUTTE COUNTY PLA14,44NG COMMIS IM A �PI.tCANTt Rarari Ahtf tCll �vt tnKttttctloi►; as 0101 forth on;r_�'_VENI) 4110 of tW '•'t,'n j Butte County Rice Growers •—------• P.O. Dox 128 Richvaler .Ca. ,'5974 ppplictfnt'n rnailtny xldrasa ...,............�..�....,.,-..-.,...r- 74 Aps lcunr`s intemst in property (OWntn, 106809, other) owner Butte County rower bHntar's name and ndJroasRc.... •� "'""' Contact parson for project (it other thanappllcant):. J N 1= S 3'pIxi11 �?'c a Assussiu'a pa+cal ►utnbur(s) 029 -24 -0-058-0 Pieseni zoning A -4o �ceatlnn and size of P00-1101)1121 Richvale Highway Richvale Ca. 95974_ 17 acres ' 1121• Richvale Highway - 974 Sheet addreas g s atom only); R�.� hvaR�chyale iii�hway�,l 4 ..mile East pltkc;lons frit travel to property (rtirtll and tnountpinou y of Rich.vale .- -- To allow the storage of flammable fuel prroduets 0-..st,T1!tn*10 proposed development auJ dispensing of such products. Dese'rlpUon of tnnd usrl Sales of fertilizer, aciri. chemicals, hardaa -fil- .,..,,.,,,:. grease ✓ oils. propoet�tu ;i^ttdduitntl/r�:taaotdl�+ l::z�l��str Estimate::.Apx1:1..r1..--�'P��-oh ' AntlalpoWd incremental d6vel6p'm0r.t None _., �1�Ild�itg oon5thlzli+�rt (state dintentilcr % Allard 1,00tep! "d nararrels usdi3) Stl':t31� wDOd cOnCret 800 SStl�3rr" fPe�' -- None._. -- b Proposeti'?�tlJtng9 _.. None Na atttous materials to Le used (1011arnrttablu6, expinyivak of stroo! Chaminil). _.�...�..�. Z Daily hourt. of Operation,,_ 4 hours — titimter n► emplomis _.� ——•----- 75lus .... ,M Nu^tL;Nr 61 olfratrersl patking ?;?dt:ry.prbviJAtl . _.. septic tank leach lines ..-,._....r_._- Pryit,rmoV nl pnw)r vnd plOni:l 180feat ...�. btMten4�s rq nbkur%+l wattst bh!h!:f till ntarm dra .tt 4, None Ah1t��p��ed ryt� ran8 �+ff-slta rtr,ltrtAgo .mwt�al.*4nt4. �'irlter Gotrrr� Well •_.,�.:.�. „�.�.,.��..d,.�. .�.:.�:._�...�..,.�,.,�.. , A rove h ctrah 50 .„._ i-"rioxinlity of walrtr hlv ltro No trKaly-tlki7n .r tot�t�. oa bn +ivftossttty� Cu►#r� yatd t�: tirr�- i,,.. ,.. .. ...�. .uu.-. ..-,.,rrn,�....., .cm.,:.+�.arw-,. ... r ............ ..... mob:."s,.. {'A.-P......_.N .. ,.-....i ...,e., ww, a * i i it,nnd tlerorrbn nnV ether totaled perinita and other public :, proVeis imlitiutd for this ptojnct, including'thusd taqufirt~d by !. ens ection by Battalion Chief' of Butte Co. ire city, regional, Slate and I"edetal awandId1 - - - -- De t. Palnlero, Ca► Mr. late Wang el Storage _.mm be .'50 feet from the,, Fertilizer lahsee #7 and 30 feet from other Whse. tF A�StpENTIA'L, include thtr number of units, whether units are single or tnulti=story in height, schedule of unit sizes, and type of tioudehotd size expected. 'N/A IF Cot,ltiIEFIC1AL, indicate the type, whether neighbn `food, city or regionally oriented, squaro tootago of satas area, and f Ioading facilities. N/A IF INDusTHIAL, indicate type, cotimated employment per shilt, and loading facltltioa. N/A' IF INSTITUTICNAh, Indicate the major function, estimated employment par shift, estimated occupancy, loading [tt`iallli6C, and community banalits to be derived Item ills project. N/A ENvIRONNTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES S 00 Sheet J mF *, J P To Identify potentially significant environmental Impacts associated wit the usp permit. What project design taatures or`osstPeCIGl ignlion mriasures) ate proposed to alleviate pot,mtiAl environmental impacts? hold hoes - oval (rnittanks will be on slab with retaining +Nall that ible spills all would ho l( conditions of appr the volume of the :Largest tank. Auto shut off on a11, ,+-wzz'els, wa.th 2, lb. pressure vents on all tanks. Auto shut off valve 011 tanks in case Of fire.`, Fueling pads will be cement. " FNVIFAoNMRNTAL SETTING" t,'h soil slablltt ►ants and ani- Describe iiia project site as it exists before the prolect, including information on topography, y, y, p r mals, and any cultural, historical or sceni 3 aspects.br;�afibe any axisting stnictures'on Rhe site, and the usrt of the stntctures. ' ,,a Compacted 3/4 base rock, with 3/8 cr shed roc ori t,o� NP o`r�ica�or cerica speN.S. 11n– Pah:. n animas an a,t ultura , h�s Describe, the surrounding properties, including Inrormation ortZin"'� wh t l p� r�ri oFiaS 0. rE1rt1�Y,Pa infint5,f 5, der ps tL, S,n NfA'ti�Ic'typeiP�s��s(te���rliat�Cd�+rrY��r�� afc.l ,nt n t y o u si8�orage warehouse Mehl. stores, etc,), and shale of development (height, Itontage, setback, rear yard, err..)+ One (1) largest storage tante, "Use separate -jheei for longer res pollsetR� Ce F;at m Land, i 28 feet tall, two (2) 26 feet tanks, two (2) 14 feet tanks tail. See drawing for setback and location of bulk fuel. I hereby dec into under penalty of perjury that I have rend and urderstand the Insinictions ;and that the foregoing statements— are true, coinplete and c0trect to the best of my knowlrelga and belief. Clads--! , J ��qli+� .� Applicant's sitjnaturo Ptopertyowner's signature Date Use. Permit Numher neques►t Use permit to allow_.., Location and 3110 of Q LU Vl~alf: Nutiibat(s) Project baticripiiom 4=' xoning and giigtiir�.ttiiNnts `l ucaIIUh begdelpliort ED' Ptool of Agency ;(it nwad0d) -- iii Copios of Plat Plan t;t.I 0• tibiae Aerp►$ cy 1.polit,,etion taken by __ f IIIST��UCT ti Y USE PERMIT PLICAfI 1, If applicant Is Plot the, owner, written autlogization by the owner or tither proof of agency moat be submlited in order for diel upplicont to legally Sign ilea applicatlon. Application shall br. considered void if not digl,�tlily the owner or legal agent. 2, All Sema on application trill)!( be filled in alt completely as possible. if .nil item is not oppll cable, please indicate by the tram 3. It h] import ant that the uppiitpnt Supply an accurate description of the locution of the proposed project, loeludinK the followl,$: a, Assessors parcel ni ober(s) (from the lex bills or Assessor's neaps). h, Street addresses (if avAilable). e. Distances and dircetl ►ns to named atreetr+, hodies of Water or railroads. A. Sixteen copies of a dote`ied plot plan of adequate scale to plearly show proposed build- ings: , id ilnprovcmcnls, to tits x Il inches, shall occompaxy and he made part of 'the "Applltdlian for Use Permit", It At use 'permit to approved, the plot plan becomes ti►e ap. proved development plait for the property,The plot Phan shall Include the following Information, u, A scaled drawing of aht. parcel(s) boundaries. b, Location and dlmeair•+)ng of.all existing and proposed lmproventents on the property, I ncluding Buildings, S;ivcways, parking areas, Wells, septic Loafs and lentil fieldsi c, location and annre ..t bordering streets, 'uceess roads, nearby crossr'uda, slreama, bodies of Water and ,ril lronds• d. North arrow and scull, orf drawing,. 6. The "Applieutlon for Use I elmit" Is subject to public hearings and approval by the Non Ong Commission. Any special cot7v'ataon4 .ti approval whop he tnude a part at the approved "116c Permit" and shall be bit,41 4; ;qtr the egyalicant. The procedures for County actlon an use per - alit. appllralions lire stated in i:hu,ltler 24 of the Butte Call Crack, 6. The Planning Commission, o., the bosis of tite evidenve Submitted at thopublic licaring,niny grana ase pertititS When ;it "i���ls ti+at the. proposed Bella of the propel ty will not impair lite integriOIC ty attd ehoeae.ter of lilt: +lie !u which the iniad lies and that the use Would not til to un- i�O 110 reasonably Incompatible ti tali lir injurlou�s esidipl to oor�w•`ti kinglIt, rlil►a nail IJnil►ood tnnr+'Lo tilt hoa)th and general Welfare of ilia 'persom general haulth, safety and #rWIle of the county, 7, In approving it use peruill, Ili'Planning Coniaiission may htvludc sveh ruudit�ions Its are deemed tonsonalils anti under lhv ria'cunislulica.v to preserve" the Integrity and ehnraeler ,af the -cone and to seeury tho gat►eral purposes (if Ilia Butte County General Plan and Chnplt�r wd, oar tiie pular Coupty Cnde;. Such renditions Duty inplvde, but ory n+it limited f tae time I;imltutlotts, plan upprovnl, hours or operntitn►, f enciutt, dedicutlon o ; ht-of�a►�tty, noel street and �l�rtinai�e inrprnvuments. Conditions �lmposeti upolt issunnee of o use pomitlt iliust 60 reawtJnuli , , eluted in tilt+. ul,4e tar wi►ivh ►hr pe alit is requested, �G 1Glatt) urt, g, Applivation fees els uf� 0, - - ,+ Foes tinily be 1110( !n en*,lt .or i�y cfirek made puyuble to "'1'rc,asutor of Bulte� County". h. l3c •fnry sate n lmlliling Usti opirliealion, upplienlit.Is Iequeslod to di'sekmg will, staff all ,,iuestions abl'o i►i►pi4,111.6n rfriahrrtne ills County prove:dut"% inning proOlil" s and possible ,•rtidilivits of uirprisrFtl. WPM lot Departmentot, Memoranduw- ro. Board of Supervisors FnoM: planning Director �up�ecT: Chemical operation on Dayton Road oAm April 30, 1982 Prior to the application for the building permits for the agriculturni storage of chemicals on AP 39-17-12 located on the west side of Dayton Road, approximately 15 feet south Of Rogers Avenue, Mr. Bob Vanella talked with the planning Department explaining the extent of the proposed occupancy to have of the property. He stated that they intendedretail will bebulk sales of chemicals, fertiliizers, etc. storage, no packaging, and some outside storage. The business known as Jacks Orchard Supply, currently located on 'Dayton t)urham ti ghway would be located on this site. In accordance %jith ti.q Planning Commission's determination on August 8, 1977 at which time the Commission found that the "Construction of a building for agricultural chemicals, fertilize'rs,.,insecticides, etc:, for said in an agricultural zone should be allowed", staff dial not discourage Mro Vanella Additionally under the ne£Anition of Agricultural in the County Code Section 24-21.1 the intended use of the property could be i de£xned a�;, an accessory use: The necessary building permits were itsued on Cebruttry 10, 1982 and the proj,..ct is near completion. Subsequent to the construction commencing, Mr, and Mrs . Lord, Mrs Noyes and Mr. Cottingham voiced concerns regarding the intended development. Attached is a copy of the Planning Commission's minutes of Augu:t s, 1977 for your convenience and a letter from Mr, Jack Vanella describing the i-ntensity o£ the retail sales - DAY,,. I r ales. 8A}lr 0 Et1TT1 COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION rJJNUTHS - August 8, 1977 Before je,hvwmeeting staff is to draft a now legend for the land +use map sort areas for communities such as Richvale, Nord, Forest Rwt::h, etc. V11. ADD IMIS A. INTURLINK CHEMICA, Mr. Lawson reported that Dick Curtis representing Interlinl Chemical had inquired about the construction of a bui.ding for agricultural chemicals, fertilizers, insecticides, etc., for sale in an Agri- cultural A-10 zone, and that staff was asking for an interpretation as to whether this would .be an agricultural related use and allowable in the A-10 zone, After short discussion it wai, agreed that the use should be allowed, B. R -N RESIDENTIAL NON -CONFORMING Mr. Lawson reported that the Board of Supervisors would consider. tomorrow a new interim zone -- 1t -N Residential Non-Confortaing, in an attempt to solve the problems encountered in the rehabilitation effort in South Oroville regarding side yard setback lines. The CatAmissioner inquired as to how the Dire Department teacted to this proposal. Staff did not have an answer. Tho Commissioritts expressed concern about sotting a precedent. Counsel Sicroset agreed that once created, the zone would be available to evvarybody in county. 10 No formal action was taken. C» STM & DOROTHY :FtGSS AV 41-47.59 fi,1r. Lawson explained that on August 2,_ 1.977, t'he Board of Stapervisors had referred to the Commission the problem resulting from an application of Steve and Dorothy Wess for a building permit tar a r0Lrer,c10nal vehicle stOrdge building on Ake 41*47-59 that had been den cd because of nonconformity with the 8-11 (Scenic Highway) zone. it leas ngreed that the S -EM Ordinance needs to bca revised and staff win -strutted instructed to work on a revision. i 4� * • -, " r. . . rt q' i ��. «l . �: � � � •� _ it 1� w • � r 4, n,, t-)nr 5 nIj Ttli•,' rz,A.tr�{ C�«l1T•�' n t; ;�� r�r,.w�,1,��`� ,�r;� I'+'t'.�.i i 3 ►tir5 nr �- �'n3..ca1 �� 1 i. t ci hr" N t,"J rlrg t rs^i+ ..,� jtl:ynl;► tri 1.s nY'r1[''n&- Chit Ari' h•i r nn� fn}�m nr it")OI, rt , -)P nur.' SA.L s 'h► -a cii rr�C`k Ifr•n + .gin , rn r > ,�rnnr n+ir1 sola ,qtr, foc1Crat"f3.t' �rr�c try rhe s��nso�+, fka'r r►nne to •nayh 12 nor arv� (l�dtr t*tic;k S t r:t].'' at Lcr�Ci.c�n t,gI'l A1'f ?y�r yt�a�n"i t•tj"� tXt?"It? «n rC�`" �t1r?k1i{t, YO t—;: vp:w � truI-Y t ,]•ir•'r-'►s C1t'„'+arrat���Wrl.�r -o;� 1-019 Mayti4, 194.2 ai w• a n r p m ci 82 -vote on motion: AYES. Supervisors* Dolan, Fulton, Most �,�,� ,°joj,,;ceni and Chairmen Wheeler Motion carried. goo REPORT TO THE BOARD ON POPULATION Bette Kircher, planning director, stated they have still not received any written comments to the population report. Chairman Wheeler accepted the report as information at this time, 80.1 REPORT TO 'TO TETE BOARD CONCERNS OVER A CHEMICAL OPERATION ON DAYTON ROAD PLANNING � A report to the Board over concerns from a chemficai operation on Dayton Road was held at this time. Bettye Kircher, planning director, stated she provided a memo from her office relative to the chemical operation. eapad on Planning Commission actions from August_8*,,11977,minutes it was an allowed 00e in the "A-104' zone. She visited the site on Friday. It is located aA Durham Dayton Highway, east of Dayton Four Corners. Whers the new building is on Dayton Road at the existing location. There were fork lifts moving pallets of fertilizer onto large ,flat beds. Storage at the location was all included in the corrigated warehouse. She went to the new site with Me. Vanella. There was a large hopper for the new fertilizer where people come in with sprdr,dert;4 She had received a letter from Mr. Vanella explaining his operation. There will be no bagging or mixing of chemical fertilizer on the project. She had talked with Tony Landin and it was her understanding thi:xe was several small operations where they do no bagging or mixing. 1:;tec Duality Control was not monitoring because they were in bags. They do intuad to build another M' structure on the site. it would be for protection of agriculture equipment. Supervisor Moseley questioned if they would have a handle on the operation if there were problems in the future. Mrs. Kircher felt since there was an interpretation that came down from the Punning Commission to staff, if it were to be 'further broadened by the Board for the dispencing of fertilizer there would not be as an Allowed use. Ski& felt it would be expanded that way. Supervisor Moseley :stated the neighbors in the area do not Want to cause any problems, they recognize this is para of agriculture, but they do not want �o get into anything that is harmful. Met. kircher 'stated she heaO the concerns last week regarding liquid ammonia. tor. 'Vanella indicated they would hot. Again they could broaden the limits in an agriculture use. Mrs. Kircher presented pictures �t to the Board at this tilne of her visit. Supervisor DO Ian stated slip gavo members a copy of A letter from I the y.,ords'. She did tial ,know what to dib with this. It appears there are a i coUple concerrra,, OnL U plaohing Commiosion, and she did not mean to find fault, giving a legif�it:,'�e determination of what it is used and allowed in 1977: Staff having that approximate proceeded without discoVeringthe use or what was perceived at the time and what ends tip physically on the Site. There are Neighbors, even though it is an agelcultUte zone. Five to six J+ears creates all kinds of problems. She waO uhs.Ure if they came to an agreement what is to occur and What is not. That :s to proceed as long as there are industrial aspects there and not on Farming. There will be probL ms. P�ge479. May 4, 1982 10 There be problems downa�the,linerwith Planning inapec�ion or someone." The 82- p building was built and it appropriate and it conforms. There is another big building and now a big tank. Part of the use is chemical. 'They could change the application rethod. it could start a new problem to=resolve. Supervisor Fulton questioned if the L W. Lords' had first hand infortaation or knowledge regarding the fumes. Mr. L. W. Lord, Dayton Road, thanked the Board for making the aai�estigation. He questioned several items in the document presented to him. Several members of the ,family owning the operation are giving different statements. An individual living one-fourth mile away has trouble breathing ',at times because of the ammonia fumes. He wanted assurances there would be I'no fumes. farming in the area. This,w$ll be fourth Mrs. Lord the individual who complained about the fumes was in business the vanella's have built. They recently had an area leveled prior to the front business. She did not feel. they were seeing the whole picture. They are removing stumps in the second place where this building is being bui?,t. Behind, the original building is an open builk storage container with no lids on. There are maybe two or three dozen right behind that. Was it going to emit fumes, in the past there have been fumes. All of the homes have been established for 25 ,years. A school bus goes past the area several times a day. One road is lets than 100 feet from that place. There is a lot of traffic hazards; They do not want them to store chemicals where it :is agriculture. There should be a restriction or limit. It should be limited from close residences. The new building will be close to a residence. Chairman Wheeler stated she did not think, they could 'resolve the issue today. Supervisor Fulton questioned what Environmental, Health people felt on this issue. Didn't this have 'some implications from Environmental Health. Mrs. Kircher states? Mr.=vanhart has been involved in the sewage disposal problem and domestic water supp,'Jes. She did not know if there were health hazards. She would contact him. Chairman Wheeler indicated there were several issues to analyze and she had not visited the site. Supervisor Fulton stated he Was concevned about the septics. He felt they Were after some other health hazards: He questioned surface water runoff. Mrs. Kircher stated that was handled by Mr. Landis. That is who she contacted, Supervisor Dolan stated the concerns of the Lords' should be answered. There should be some recr)rd of what they can do. Septic permits could not be an issue. The health questions and waster storage and drainage on the lot. Does the allowable use consttt.ute mixing. If there are reports of ammonia fumesi are they accurate. Could it be controlled. Mrs. Kircher 'had talked with public tlorks on Water runoff. They only become involved in off-site improvements. There is no ordinance putting the responsibility on anyone* Emily Fortier; Durham, "stated they Nave done business with the Vanellais for ).d years. Mr. 'Vsnello=s family lives close and would not harm them: They should look at both #`ides. � Page 4101 ,F May 4j 1982 aP�ps�ss►yaAMRMmy.4a.9n2swnossomnnnnao■nownM goon 82- Louis Camenzindr Jr., Chico Highway, stated they are to protect .b agriculture. This is an agriculture enterprise. There are all kinds of fertilizer, paaticides and herbicides used in farming all the Bounty. They are all. dangerous. He felt the concerns were out of propottion. The matter was continued for further information from the Environmental Stealth Director. 802 PUBLIC HEARING: DAN HAYS PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLA ATION REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND REZONE FROM "A,!9" (GENERAL) AND "A-40" (AGRICULTURAL - 40 ,ACRE PARCELS) To "M-1" (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL), PROPERTY LOCATED ON BOTH SIDES OF STATE HIGHWAY 99 AT THE DURHAM-OROVILLE HIGHWAY PENTZ ROAD INTERCHANGE, IDENTIFIED AS AP 40-12-22,.23 AND 24, SOUTHEAST OF CHICO - CONTINUE TO MAY 'l8, 1902 The closed hearing on Dan Hays propooad negative declaration regarding environmental impact and rezone from "Ar2" (general) and "ALSO~ (agricultural - 40 acre parcels) to "M -l" (light industrial), property located on both sides of State Highway 99 at the Durham-deiville Highway Pentz Road interchange, identified as AP 40-12-22, 23 and 24, southeast of Chico was held as continued, Bettye Kircher, planning director, stated this was a closed hearing, There was a request from Supervisor Saraceni for additional information relating to the Genezaj. Flan ,and incorporated and unincorporated U areas. The hearing was continued to May 18 ,1982 at 11:00 a.m. to allow applicant to meet with County Counsel and Planning Director to answer some of the is6des. i i 803 DISCUSSIONS AIR POLLUTION TASK FORCE COMMITEE_CLARIFICATION, Discussion regarding the air Pollution Task Force Commit^Q clarification of their faction held at this time. l Gerald Geiser, Chico, stated they would like clarification from the Hoard before proceeding further oh the Air Pollution Task Force Committee. 'there function was to look at the fee schedule. There was only input from I agriculture and business at the two meetings. They have presented a tentative. G budget that shows a.zero dollar amount for Air Pollution Control. They have agreed'on three areas: 1) The state should appropriate the funds; 2) Reason- able fees should be oollected for service performed for inspection of stationary, sources; and 3) The general public and General Fund to fund other areas. �. r ture and business should pick up the ftotal tcosts tofythLdprogram. with calzero boianecdeintiherocessin�l' Mr. hot feel felt this was the Board's direction. There was more cost ihV P g permits for burning barrels than would be collected. i Supervisor Dolan felt this was a mathmatical formula in determining 1 the budgets for the departments. The. recordmehdation would be taken on face Value. They Fund asked them to go from no percentage to 100 percentage of fees. I Mr. Geiser stated they did not want the function t!» -nod over to the state. They must snatch every dollar from the state by two dollars. Chairman wheeler stated she did not want to see the state come in, They were looking for an equitable amount for each department,. The departments are to explain why or why hot they can live within the budget# Larry Rhinehart, Durham, stated they are not creating pollution todayo it has been here for a lonq time. There are volcahoes and foreat fires Which create pollution also. They are trying to shift a large burden. There should be cooperation Page 480. May 4# '1902 blay 18# 1982 s as @� w w r a o w r ■ ae w w a a n r re r ee a w 's o w rt s e r an rs �e ■ 82--876 APPEARARCES1 PATRICK PORGANS a Patrick Porganse, research specialist, Chico, statcd he had a water report he had paid for himself. 1u) would present two copies to the Board. He has been studying water for ten l+earm. After the Hoard has reviewed the report he would like to come back ihd discuss it in the near future., Chairman Wheeler indicated they would hold a public discussion. 877 APPEARANCES: GARY YOUNGER Gary Younger# stated he and Bernard Knapp ware running for Sheriff. There were c=Sncers of the deportment and whats was going to be constftted: Chairman Wheeler indicated they would not be considering any budget at this time. They would tike the information under submission and caonsiditt° it at budget session on May 27, 1982 at 100 p m. 878 IAPPEAIANCES., L. W. LORI) 879 L000001* 860 L. W. Lord, Dayton RoFad, Chico, presented a booklet of data he and his wife had accumulated .regarding the selling of fertilizer 16 an agriculture zone. firs. Lord read from ,the report for the Board toi§mbers. The matter was submitted to Planning Department to 01e 'if there was a zoning 3.5sue. They are within the law, rhe matter was taken under submission. OPT RESOLUTION 82-81 - HONORING RAY CO03LER,,PUBLIC WORKS Rod Weyman, BCEA representative, stated a former Butte County ployee of approximately 27 years had recently passed away: He was a dicated worker and liked by everyone. He would like the Board to adopt resolution. ' on motion of supervisor Moseley] seconded by 8upe-e icor Saraceni anO unanimously carried? Resolution 82-81 in honor of Ray Cobbler a former Public works employee for 27 years Was adopted and the Chairman authorized to sign. 3124 p.m, ENE: 3:37 p,m. ORDINANCE 2285 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNV*,�; COWISSION GRIOVEY-OIGGS AREA Consideration of adoption t, <4 ordinance on the Butte County Planning Commiscioni Gridley -Biggs area rezane=(item on which the environn+bnta impact report has previously been certifi�ad) in order ko bring the zoning into consistency With the adopted General, Plan for that area as required by state law. The area under Consideration contains approximately 42 square miles of publicly and privately owned unincorporated laild bounded generally by Highway- 162 ighway162 on the north# the peather River on the east, the Butto County line on the - sooth and a line extending south from the Richvale-South Highway on the .west, and lt,ncluding the Unihcorporated areas surrounding Gridley and Biggs wag helm at this time. Chairman Wheelersindi0ated there Was concerns from residento in ley over the area around the Sphere of Influence of City of Gridley. supervisor Moseley stated Mr, Tanitnot:a had a petition he wanted to went. 'rine would cause Complications in the county. There will be a aflict if they open the hearing. They had indicated earlier the Nearing a closed. Chairman `rVhueler indicated they Were just going to 411OW hien to Ubmit a document. i'a$e 12. May le► 19.82 Jun@$, 182 se s sa' o ea a w w s s w w w s st wr A s s'. 82- a moratorium if the Hoard had a master plan to follow, then the residents and citizes�.s would find it easier t o follow the leadership of the Board. Chairman Wheeler advised that was the purpose of the General Plan., Mr. Luvaes was- one of the master dasignsrs of the wane and language of the° General Plan. It is not as- though 'there weer not public participation in the process and total responab"ity lies. with this hoardb The citizens of the county have been active participants, in the framing of dev$lOpmont and where it; will he placed in the county. The reasOn the counties iui the state are facing shortfalls, is because of mora people and growth. Growth is inevitable. A moratorium would stop future development ands construction in this- counts. That womild Have an effact on that growth and economy of the county. Mr. Reivua was not saying ehere should be no growth, It is projected there will be many more people coming to this county. She felt that: for this reason there should be a mastet plan of whets the people would be -located. Supervisor Moseley felt that a moratorium would eiffdrt all the citizens in the county. It is a dangerous thing to impose. Ms. Reivus felt that the developers should be paying their shatd rather than imposing additional expenses on the residents -of the cd4ntJ. She felt they needed to be more involved in the fiscal responsibility of the land divisions and developments. 965 APPEARANCE: JOHN LUVAAS Mr. Luvaas telt that perhaps the Board was a little excite3d about the word moratorium. The request was for +w temporary moratorium on all rural residential subdivisions. they were not talking about commercial areas. They were not talking about approved divisions. T,he request was to atop all new rural subdivisions until a fiscal analysi can be made of the fiscalo needs and environmental concerns. The ddi'ti Ching they were asking for is a study of what it would cost the, taxpayers in the county, to find out the overall cumulative effects that would be plaCed on the county. 1966 DISCUSSION Or CREMICAL PLANT ON DAYTON ROAD Mrs. Alice Lord spoke regarding the chemical plant on Dayton Road. Supervisor Dolan presented the following letters in opposition to she operation of the retail sales chemical plant on Dayton Rnaadt Byron Tobey Ruby Real 5tilley Mrs, Halon Parks mart' Merrick Iva Morgan Vera Summers Aill Cottingham Supervisor Dolan,:mede a report on the situawtian at this time. The retail sales was legally established. The legal determination dames from the Planning .tommispioh0a discussion that the sake of, fertilizer was appropri in the 01,A-10'� zone. Thera have been concerns: from adjoining property owners about hack e't7rdhard Supply whtth seem to center around three thingst 1) dommerci&I use creatihG incotupatibility vith residences and agricultural. area; 2) safety concerns about the high speed atterial road and the fact co�ainercial use of the property will attvact large trucks, personal health concerns because of the jading of fertilizer and chemicals from, overhead, V884 109. 1982 4� F, June 8 1982 v a 0 w M w+ w s Leo a o 9r � e� a M 0 s ss N o m r R s it s 82- potential of ghat 'happens if the chemicals and fertilizers arca on the it ground and drain off onto the adjoining properties, and the possibility of some kind of accident and spill; 3), the understanding by everyone of hat the extent of the use will be. The Planning "Commi.suion minutes- indicated izgricultitral chemical. 'ertil zer insecticide sales. Then there was an April, 1982 letter defining ind narrowing the definition. She suggested that in the future that any. lotential incompatible use and the question of whether it would be allowable ender the zoning ordinance should come to the Board rather than the 'lanning Commission. She suggested that she sit down with the Planning taff-to work out�some agreement on the use of the property and the safety :oncecas and any expansion of the use. She was not suggesting that the sou;-nty tell Mr. Vanell.a to move nis business but to come to an understanding and containment so there can be co -existence. Mrs. 'Lord stated there were five other chemical fertilizer plants :hat are not anywhere near residences. She wanted to know why this one came L00 -feet from their residence. She asked why they were being pushed out. Chere were too iou�rs when there was the filling of the bulk storage that :here were fumes and blowing residue. She had nose bleeds for three days after that. Last Thursday they again filled the bulk storage. Thay have to stay away from their property. She set out the other conditions she zad suffered after the filling, of the bulk storage. She felt. the operation Should be closed down. d Larry Lord advised that when he checked into this matter, he 3 as told that the plant was allowed to move into the area because of the ;I interpretation of a gray area in the zoning book. He read from the zoning book, page 49, section 24-75, part A, subsection 1 about agricultural, processing plants. He felt that they should have considered page 9, section 24-21.34 under definition of agricultural processing plants. He read from the minutes of May 4, 1982 and referred to the article in the. Chico Enterprise Recird on May 29, 198,2 about this problem, and the overtura of A tanker and how it might a fecU take Shasta. The truck was loaded with thick propane that was used for fertilizer. He wondered if the Board could afford to have this type of use in this zone surrounded by people. The Environmental HLealth Director's report was given on May 11, 1982, and. he trade reference to the comments in the report about the fumas and odor. Supervisor Dolan stated she 'would like this matter also referred to County Counsel, The Concerns should be answered and a person should not be afraid to use their property or have their health effected by going out" the=ir door. At the same time, the county has issued this permit legally. Dal Siemsen, county counsel, understood the problem as being the fact that the county has said this could be placed on this property and issued aC building permit. He felt that at this point, the cut:►aty would be unable to reject the permit on the basis that the Planning Commission gave the authorization. They could change the zoning codes to make surh this type of use will not be permitted. This would give the county control over any oxpanbion, Another thing that could tape place is to have the At pollution Control ()fiicet run 8 check on the odors and see if there can be some immediate relief. Unl�.,ss there was something in the building peimit relative to the distance away from the property 1,,kne or structures, there is no control over the location of the building. ,There is always the option of Mr. and Mrs. Lord pursuing the private nuisance theory. Since the county has taken the position this is' a permuted use, th-hy cannot go into court on a public nuisance complaint. if the country tried to do this; he felt they would have a lawsuit brought Against the county. VCage 110. June 81 1991 a .. # � .ft -!� � ! O' • ■Y.. � � O r..O b. ! p. � JI ! >a' its ! �; O Y Jb d O � tY A ! ! JM' M 82 Mrs. Lord stated that originally the permit was for a 'barn. There have been things moved and: hidden behind the two-story old house on the property'. This is next tto their house and well. When these people known anyone is coming, they mcave these things. The matter g as, referred to tocaty ,,,,:oriel, staff. and Supervisor Dolan to get this matter resolved, 'Mr'. Lord stated,"that according to the May 4, 1982 minutes of the Board sweeting d-!scus&ion was -held that if there was to be a Boaru interpretation for dispensing of fertilizer, this would not be an allowed use. Bettye Kirsher, planning director, stated ,that when this was originally discussed, she told the Board she felt in deferring to Counsel' in effect that if the Board chose to make :the decision there might be limits. If there is a need for further interpretation on that, the Board could limit to what use could be through an allowable use. 961 APPEARANCE: THELMA DALBY Pis. Dalby stated that in 1972 .she purchased -40 acres of land -`in the Bloomer Mountain area that was illegally subdivided. In 1974, the courts found this to be an illegal subdivision and they, were informed that. there would be a $'100 fee for a certificate of compliance on each parcel. She had given two parcels to her sister in 1973. Her sister is now ready to sell the parcels. She is a semi. -invalid and wodowed and this $200 fee would be a hardship. The matter was referred to Supervisor Saraceni to report back. to the Board. 968 969 John Mendonza, public works department, advised that the lots had to be combined to meet the Health Department requirements and therefore there would be one fee. APPEARANCE: ROD WEYAND, BCE.A Mr. Weyand asked that the Board consider holding occasional evening meetings. He also spoke regarding SB 1850 which passed in 1980. on the disclosure of information. He was having a problem getting some of the information that is presented to the Board. This comes from department heado who come into the meeting to discuss a mattet and hand out the paper- work at information tInetheTfuture,e law sheshoped that 4hsnhas people broughtsee in thethat informati i that the people would have the right to see that information. He would like to see the Board stick closer to the agenda. Comments taken under submission. The Board will consider looking into holding some night meetings. RECESS: 1:12 p.m. AECOM'VENE: 1:25 p.m. HEARING. JOHN Lt, DRAKE & HOWARD ISOM REZONE FROM ►►A-2" AND "S -Ho TO ►►PA"C►► TO. ALLO14 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMT .NORTHEAS'T OF _CHICO. The closed public hearing on John D. Drake and Howard Isom rezone (item on which an ETR was previous certified) from O'A-210 (general) and "S-H'l (scedic highway) to "kA-C►� ('planned area -cluster) to allow a residential development of 109 parcels of one-half to three acres each aria a common open space with public facilities to be maintained by a hoineow hers association on appto5ctmately 1, 08O acres. located on the east side of State Highway „ 32 and Humboldt Road, approximately five miles northeast of Chicdy identified as, AP 4641.-111, 46-11-18 Zporti.onj; 46-35-4 and 46-36-23 was held as continued page 111,. 1 June 8, 1.982 Jung 22, 1982 � s, ss s w a m rw' s se w a r s w s sD a s sy w• w w a as s ss s a s s e a w r1 � s' t 82- On motion of Supervisor Fulton, seconded by Supervisor Wheeler. rior 83 and unaaimously carried, tha agreements with.the Northwest SPCA.and Sup California Humane:Societyttofprovide the nanimal services' eachoagre�ement t three years wit rated areas o£ Butte County, being; $70,000 for fiscal year 198.2--83 were approved; the Chairman sand housing to sign; and showing intent to provide telephone service toil free and houein8 in Chico. l OF APPROVE SITE LEASE C�tTTH CHARLES L, AND BEATRICE I - IMM4ANN 1053 LEASE TO PIONEEROLUNTEERe RE COMPANY y ervisor'Mcsel�►y ** On motion iedsuthe site leaseSarace6etween seconded Charles L pand Beatrice L and unanimously t of lease betwnlen the County Herman and the County of Butte and the assignment construction of a fire c. of 'Butte and the Pioneer Volunteer Fire Campnay statement were approved and the Chairman authorized .to sign. r WAIVE SECOND READING OF SALARY ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 1054 AnOPT ORDINI!'ICE 292. seconded try* Supervisor Dolan On motion a£ Supervisor Maseleys of the salary ordinance and uimously carried, the second reading emends n;; ,;hick implements the personnel actions' indicated in the pxaposed budget t:as waived; Ordinance 2292 was adopted and the Chairman authoxi.zed �! to sign. ., 1055 ADOP'� �JitULlVtvu� 447J • .... .. _ -- - on mot3.on of Supervisor Dolan, seconded y uPe and unanimously carried, the 8econdradactiof the within the ry ordinance dinances amendment that mplenaents the Personnel. Department indicated in the proposed budgetwas waived; Ordinance 2293, � was adopted and the Chairman authorized to sign. $2-511 SUPPORTING BENE'F'IT 1056 REPORT RE--5COUNTt, RICAN RiE�R FLOODTO RESOLCONTROL DISTRICT AND STATE MAINTENANCEASSSSf AREAS Mike 'Pyeatt, interim administrative officer,.. advised the Board with state s the that the basic concerned to AB 3737athatnwduldnce aprovide fo beri%kreas as a -whole k. sesg amendment being propos that the meats on the tnsintenance districts. Sacramento County was asking Hoard adopt a resolution in support of their resolution. The matter taken off the agenda at this time to find out where the legislation is in the process.' AND 1057 CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING: DAN IPCULTOUS� NE 40 REDECLARATION�TO (LIGHT 1057ONE nA..2'� (GL'NERAL} AND "Ar -40" iaGi• INDWTRIAL) s PROPERTY LOCATED ON BOTH SIDES OF STATE HIGHLdAY 99 AT DURHAi� OROVILLE HIHGWAY PENT2 RO.ADID TO�JUNEE29ID1982FIED As AP 40-yZW 22, 23 & 24, SOUTHEAST OF CHICO - CONTINUED on Dan Has roposea negative declaration closed public hearing Y P e parcels) and rezoneTf om "A 2" (general) and "A-40" (agricultural : 40 acs (light indi►strial), property located on both sides oz State Highway wo 'iM-J." iyi8 pentt Road :nterc'hdnge, identified as AP 40-12' 99 at Durham-Oroville Highway, 23 and 24, gout headt of Chico was held as continued. The hearing was continued to June 29 1982 since the State clearinghouse reviews comments have not boe received. {JACK VANrLLA i2E(�UEST FOR BUILDING PERMIT TO EXPAND HIS AGRxCUL-- DISCUS8j0g': 1055 TURAL CNi"MICA'L OPERATION ON DAYTON direct t Dirt the background df Bettye Kircher, planning brie request far a bUilding�,rerm# to expand the agricultural chemical tan niperatsn on Day ttoad, Chico by. Jack Vanella. Page 150; .% Jdne 22, 1982 0 C 82- 0 June 22, 1982 rW .N of N sat N W N, 0 0 ON 0 0 M w= r s NO 'b A A b. N at 0 Y r rt N alt at) :i 1m Ri& Booth, air pollution control office, set nt the inspection that was, made on the .hack. V'anella property. Theta was nr, visible omission coming out Of the control device. Alice Lord advised that fox eighteen years there were all Tesidences on Dayton Road. The first time they appeared before the Board was on April 27, 1982 before the building of the plant was finished. She felt there should have been an EIR ,required. Thare to the possibility of contamination to their water well which ,is - about fifteen feet from their property line. She was concerned about the health hazards presented by the planta Mrs. Lord set out the definition of agricultural devinded assessory uses and agricultural chemical plants•.are not one of them. They should be located in industrial locations. L. W. Lord was,concerned about .his wife's health,problems due to the location of -the chemical plant. Mr. Lord referred to the report by the Air Pollution Control Office on their inspection of the premises. He felt the standard had been developed for industrial areas. They were exposed to the contamination each and everyday. He wes,concerned about the contamination to the fruit trees by non-visible items. Mr. Booth responded to the standards that are required and what the tolerance level is set at. Neil McCabe, representing Mr. and Mrs. Lord, spoke regarding the law as it relates to the "A-10" zoning and possible remedies. The primary concern is to ask the Board to take appropriate action to stop the expansion of the use. He felt that a zoning ordinance could.be adopted that would prevent the expansion of the use by adoption of an interim zoning that would be effective immediately. He felt that the Board could make an interpretation even though the Planning Commission made an inte?;pretation in'1977. He set out page 48 of the zoning ordinance. The county has a secion in the ordinance on page 9 that defines agricultural processing plants. He set out the definition of agricUlture on page 4 He asked that the Board make an interpretation to stop the use in the future and expansion of the use. He set out industrial zones from page 81 in the zoning ordinance book. Discussion of hors the Board would proceed on making a change in the wording to prevent retail sales of agricultural products held at this time. Del 5iemsen, county counsel, recommended that the Board do an amendment to the "A IW zoninge ordinance to prohibit the usor res uire a use permit in the "A-10" and all agricultural zones. He was not surf w1.,t►t position a court might take with regard to an interim ordinance. The interpretation was issued by an agent of the county. He felt that if t1# Board went with the prohibiting of retail operations, then the farmers who run hulling operations would be prohibited also. Mr. Lord felt that the use should not be expanded and the business should be relocated, its wondered why they were the only family exposed to t,,is type of thing,. Chaizman 'Wheeler suggested that each of the Board members tike the opportunity to visit the area and contact both Mr. Vanella and Mr. Loid. Uass:, 8:50 P.M. RECO"MEE 4:10 p.m. k'ag151. e J unE 12, 1982 MW K 1 4 June 22, 1982 awexw as 4W0"asaaae wwtrwnrwwww•eorwisww•wsmnrsw gx, Bettya Kircher, planning director, referred to a memo dated 4 April 23, 1982 relative to the -Department of Fish.and Game letter of March 3, 1982. gearing closed to the public and confined to the Board. it was moved by�uupervia'or Saraceni that the approval of the final map may not be tdcommended until the California State Transportation Commission has. approved the public road connection at the intersection of Alta Tina Drive and Highway ;32 and that the map be approved subject to the conditions set out in the Advisory Agency minutes cf June 9, 1982+ The matter was 'continued until later in the meeting. 1046 CHANGE HEARING DATE YUX UUrIz-LIJC.W"--.VLI yr .w.+..- —. ----. Archie McDonald asked to at the 'doard conslder cYianging the date for consideration of the Adult Day Hes th Care CO%AIci.l in the county from July 13, 1982 to July 20, 1982. on motion of Supervisor Moseley, seconded by Supervisor Saraceni.. and unanimously carried, the public hearing date of July 13; 1982 was changed to July 20, 1982 at 11:15 a.m. for consideration of intention to' form an Adult Day Health Care Council in the county for the purpose of investigating the possible development of an Adult Day Health. Care Center as seL out in Resolution 82--96. 1047 REPORT: JACK VANELLA _ick u�a r rvn �.��••�t--' --�--------- - Mrs. Lord asked if the Board could consider the report on the Jack Vanella request for a building permit to expand his agricultural chemical operation on Dayton Road, Chico. There are people present in the audience who would like to speak to the matter and they would be unable to attend the meeting this afternoon. " 1 chemical operation on Dayton RoLd. for expansion Ruby Stilly spoke against the building permit of an agricultura Sona Noyes was against the expansion of the chemical operation and Lived approximately 500 feet from this operation. ^~ Mrs. Lord stated that Mrs. Solley is approximately 300 feet from the plant; RECESS: 11:55 a.m. ` RECOWVENE.i 1:30 p.m. CLOSRD,SESSIOM: The Board recessed at 1:31 p.m. to hold a closed session on litigation- RECONVENE; The Board reconvened At 2:22 p.m. following a closed session on litigation. lOkB PUBLIC BEARING: MARINO GARBIS A`L'pEAL OF DENIAL OF TE'N'TATIVE PARCEL MAP, AP 56-05-61, CREi'- PARCELS ON ALTA TINA DRIVE, 1j2 ALE NORTH OF TEN %FILE MOUSE TRAIL FOREST RANCH AREA t,CTEM ON WHICH EIR CTAS =' LESTED)_ The closed public hearing on Marino Garbis appeal of denial of tentatiVe parcel map, 0 56-05-61, four parcels,, on Alta Tina Drive, l!2 mile north of Ten Mile House Trail; Forest Ranch ared (,iteim on which EIR was regttestad) was held as continued. Bettye Kircher, yplanning directory advised the Board had^ Ja,,.j ^-Ni June 29 1982 �.. �. . +m r-rr COst 82- B,235 - Snot_,, 1„_em�a�l .fie s bower Y1 ta].tMa�apowec Px �camration toF�S35Q ive 3 Pte. Proposaa an increase is th Pp awl program and a decrease in of unanticipated revenue from the Federal 'Manp ro riations for the various line items, of $4'70,537.90+ to establish, app p 20 1982. Supplemental Manpower program to reflect changes on NFA 95, May 1082 ADOPT 'RESOLUTION 82-109: PUBLLC HEpaNG; rOTENTTON TO RENAME NON -COUNTY ADOPTARESO RTION 2-109 COUNTY - TYI�OTHX LANE C%p`RKiN R��.J TO END) TO FARRAR LANA The public hearing on the intention to rename non -county maintained road in Butte County, Timothy Lane (Larkin Road to end) to Farrar'Lane was held as, advertised., Hearing open to the public. Appearing' No one. Hearing closed to the public and confined to the Board. on motion of Supervisor Saraceni, seconded by Supervisor Fulton and carried, the renaming of non -county maintained road in Butte County, Timothy Lane ('Larkin Road to end) to Farrar Lane was approved; Resolution 82-109 was adopted and the Chairman authorized to sign. 1083 UPUBLIS HEAKLiVIs: uiuc� ••• y....._ ----ell appeal of conditions ou The public hearing on Dick Chapp located on tentative: parcel map (conditions 12, 13 and 14) on property Ap 41-01,.•1410 hummer Road, approximately 1,000 feet west of Doe Mill Road, Forest Ranch area was held as continued. The hearing was continued to July 20, 1982 at 10:00.a.m. W A REQUEST FOR, A BUILDING PERMIT TO EXPAND HIS 1084 REPORT ON THE JACK VANE AGRICULTURAL CHEMICAL OPERATION ON DAYTON ROAD d;F�ICO The report on the Jack Vanella request i0t' a building permit to i expand his agricultural chemical operation on Dayton Road, Chico was considered at this time. The AgrLcultural Commissioner hassubmitted a report to the Board also. It was fele. the mattet should be held over luntil from Nlater in the meeting when SuPOVvisor Dolan will d present 'McCabe, attorney representing Mr and Mrs. Lord, have been received. Xr. Lord presented a suggestion to solve the problems at thio time. tte read a prepared statemdIlt at this time which was presented to the Boatd. His. Alice Lord advised that they had t::ied to figure out options. She wanted to know why the operator had never appeared before the Board. the Agricultural Commissioner had said that the sock was to btheVtxailers er the p of the tae 0 n3t .hen it wes being filed. N&ev, they are filling they Bio t��t cover ad. the Agric�xitural Commissioner has sal.:. There is no en though are required to have one. Because high £erica around them, evthere is of the high speed highway and the chemiroveedi ofgthe�e:spansior, at to to hurt, harm or kill. She did not app to their, well. The matter was continued to later in.the meeting. CONTINUED TO iffy 20. 1982 1085 pppOINTM9NTS - - - .:ate„ed -to Oaiiy x0. _,1987 d June 9Lw9v2mwsw®ms���a�+ + ��°°�er w a- AYES. Supervisors M seicv, Saraceni and Chairman Wheeler NO S : Suirexvisors Dolan a d Fu],ton Lotion carried. I'E MIT FOR AGRICULTURAL 1107 REPORT ON THE JACK VMELLA REgUEST.,,FOR BUILDING CHEMICAL OPERATIONEXPANSION ON DAYTON ROAD; CHICO permit to _peration onDa ton The report on the Jack Vanella request forRa building poad, Chico was. held as expand his agricultural chemical o continued from earlier in ti:a meeting. Del Siemsen, county counsel, advised that the building permit ' process is generally a ministerial process and normally if the plans and�t. specifications meet the standards, the county caa�ns�t deny the buildimg p The question was whether the Board was requesting consideration of changing the zone to limit further projects like this, and whether the cc,rnty could make it applicable to this particular building permit. He had a letter from Neil McCabe, attorney at laws addressing the issue eartng asefar as whether or nOt the county can deny or issue a building permit oing in to prohibit the use. The ordinance would have to redefine the term agri- culture to specifically limit retail sale of fertilizer. Chairman Wheeler telt it would be the proper procedure to send the proposed ordinance to the Planning Commission and staff to hold hearings. An interim zone could be adopted pending adoption by the normal pror�;ss. The question is whether an interim ordinance would be sufficient to stop a ez building permit request. Her research has shown thaet;orhe normally ee a rsaid takes place and the effort is to frustrate a develop no. The courts have upheld in some instance where the Board was considering changing the zone prior to the request for a permit. Mr. Siesmsen advised that only. after the building permit application was made, was this brought to the Board's attention. The Board at the tints of previous discussions, had riot given specific directions as to what to do. He felt that in his opini.ou the court would take the position f Astra frustrate al He issue a building permit would be on the basis of trying In 1979, the Board in granting a building Permit to Allen applicant. Thompson took the position that applying for a building permit prior to rezonin y -g was a vested interest. Mr. Vanella made application for a building permit around Juni: 15 1982. Chairman Wheeler felordinanat cesel had prohibitingekda retail�sal.es 09 fextili ze building pissue on the ermdt. As far as theCommission and public hearings she felt this needed to be sent to the Planning need to be hello promise situation after thei neighborssit rdown and discuss is will impact aiculture n total' possibility of compromise this matter. hearing + ermorni M, that this couldaber sol ed wi,thoutrany' problems µ1e esentat, on sup. earlier in rile morning, Mr. end tars. Lord are making a very forthright effort to resolve this problem, Supervisor Dolan advise A that•she had not been present tot Mr' Lords p resentation but had been handed a letters She felt they wrere being d very coopetative. Mrs. Lord wondered if the Board wanted Mr. Lord to review his `She knew the Board had received a copy proposal that teas made earlieri of the attaraeyis lett,�r. �,.,, i Me, W. T,otd,asked :f,someone would pass their proposal on to the other party. rt looks 13kP they might be able to salve the problem. page 176. .Tune 290 1581 enwsmdnr�,er 'sib 1982 . . r. s*w,amm.•wwoMMSam 82- tie is willing to take this on and to contribute quite h lot if, necessary 8 to solve the problem to diffuse the situation. YJhen'their attorney is wailp he will handle hits partin this matter. Supervisor Dolan felt'Mr. and Mrs. Lord had come a long way in that initially, the request was to abate the uses. and clone the business down. Now, if some sgreemant cern he made.to alleviate the problems, the business could stay. She would convene a neighborhood meeting,if she had to. What she was struggling with before wav why.'was the business there. She found oat the business was :here by interpretation of the Planning Commission'67en after the Board passed an ordinance that it was the Board who decided policy. 4 Chairman Wheeler felt it would be interesting to send the ordinance to the agricultural community for their comment. As far as many people in. agriculture are concerned, the storage of any fertilizer is an on-going part of the operation and, certainly, retail sales of fertilizer are a part of it to offset the cost. Supervisor Dolan did not read the ordinance as:stopping fertilizer. They are struggling with hulling also. She felt the county should try to prevent these types of problems in the future. Maybe the county might went to make the use allowable with a use permit so there can be review and conditions, to negate the problems that could arise. The ordinance was referred to the Agricultural Adviaory Commission, Farm Bureau, Women in Agriculture and the Chamber of Commerce agricultural committees before the matter goes to hearing before the Planning Commission. Mr. Lord asked if they could get copies of the minutes to see what was said. it could be that Mr. McCabe's description is more accurate, otherwise it would be different. He felt that some of the minutes would ' rrobably give the facts. i, Mrs, Lord felt that what Mr. Lord was saying was there should be 'no expansion of the building;. j Mr. Siemsen advised that it was the Board's decision whether they wished to withhold the building permit-. Technically speaking, Mr. Vanella could go into court with a Writ of Mandate to force the Board to issue .the permit, with t that the Board 9took the onts ng for a building permit prior anordinancegoing into effect a vested right. The Board would have to revese their policy: 6. q'L Supe e could call Mr, Vanella and ask him to politelyr not�buildan nanything until dered if nthe neighborhood meeting. Pethaps' th4o could be done by someone in the Building Department who could make thn caj.'1 to Mr, Vanella and indicate that Mr. Lord warted an amicable solution and would they not do anything until the solution has been reached. Supervisor sarac�ni stated that he had visited Mr. Vanella yesterday - and the "reason for the building permit is to put the motorized equipment behini the building under the overhang instead of on the property line: Mrs. Lord stated that when Mr. Vanella requeated the new building, it was requested for within ten or twen�y feet from they well. Supervisor Dolan to hold a ne ghborhood merating with all parties and the mattor will be brought 'back on July 13, IOU,, U the matter is not solved it will be placed back on the agenda. page 17.7: dune -29, 1582 july 13 ?6 1982 a W 0 0 0 W Es W 0 pj 'lie surrounding counties to discuss future Manpower services a2- Cs and staff in t tile idea Butte County could be the central distribution center. The ' outer counties are balance of state. They showed interest in participating. On motion of Supervisor I Moseley, seconded by Supervisor Sar$Aceni and carried, the following action' was taken: 1, jppz6ved the modification to Title 1v Youth Employment and Traning Program (YETP) that has been prepared showing the increased activities in the Youth Program this year concurring with CETAC and authorized the Director to sign. 2. Concur with C8TAC and authorize submission of preliminary plan for C8TA for next year 3. Concur with CET&C and authorize' committee to make informal contract with contiguous counties to discuss future manpower services in the counties. 1982-83 111tOP - OSED BUDGET _DOCUMtINT 1125 vice Chair Dolan there was a new precedent for EIRs for' 1i recover labor costs also. She felt that if the county made trying t able for the libraries it would not (:OpiC�13 07 the Proposed budget avail. but this is a thick document and the countYil c 0 for see the budget, bu c-tc,ul anyone .4houid recover more than the ink acid paper . qj(a py,cutto interim atlillinistrative officer,, advised khat in the past this matter had been debated. To what extent that would discourage people from purchasing the documents if the labor costs were included he did not know. They could try to maintain statistics as far as the budgets sold and report back at a later date. Jim Johansen, auditor, stated that the cost is $8.60 with a total of $9.12 with taxes for producing the budget. On motion of Supervisor Moseley, seconded by Supervisor Saraceni and carried, the sale price for the 1982-83 proposed budget document was set at $3.29 to reimburse the cost of materials. 1.126 AUTHORIZE 'OUT -OF -COUNTY WEATI111qIZATION PROGRAM APPLICATION FOR SUTTER COUNTY iNL,1,11TS INSTANCE ONLY hill Thompson, interim executive director of CAA, spoke regarding . the application for out -of -county weatherization program as requested by office of Economic opportunity. tie set out the memo that had been re 9tfiatd jLted to the Board. he suggested that because Of the distance involved gL�bnji in servicing ColUsa COUhtY that the Board only consider oat -of -county for Sutter County. this could be handled from the south county aroa and would not involve the same amount of travel and transportation and would not necessitate the purchase of another vehicle. On motion of Supervisor Satacefti, seconded by Supervisor Moseley and carried, otic -of -county weatherization program application for Sutter. County in this instance only was authorized, 1127 REPORT ON T111.,, JACK VANE -LLA REQUEST FOR A BUILDING PERMIT TO EXPAND ittS U\t 011rWCAL OP8RATION ON DAYTON RO-A-P-t _C111'00 Vice chair Dolan advisedthat the Public Works Director had met with Mri and Mrs. Lord and/or their attorney representative and Mt. Vdhella6 on Friday she discussed the proposed agreement with Mr* Castleberry and the moving or the bulk loader, Mt. Castleberry is out Of town and she has been unable to determine what happened during the meeting, page 195. July 130 1982 July 13, 1982 m e n O m m On O" s O M m m Mt a m m m a on on m MOMMOOMMOMON 82. Mrs. Lord read a letter from tit. Lord setting forth his feels about y leaving to sit through an entire Board meeting. The Public Storks Director , clic► v001e out to their property and advised that the operator did not accept their propostzl but he would move the tank to the other side and put in a } writ valve south of Chem and would not build 500 feet south of them. The operator was planning to £111 the tank only once for five months and would move the tank in six to eight months. Mr. Lord spent threa days in the hospital and it appeared to have been from the extreme stress of the Board meeting. They authorized their attorney to arrange a meeting with the Public [corks Director and the operator to discuss this. matter. The operator refused any meetings. They were against thr expansion of the business. the hullar process is for nuts brown on the ground and the fertilizer is tutmu actured e,tsewhere and shot►l.d be kept at the ground level and not flying through the air. They have a right to nonpolluted air on their property. There should be no building or expansion allowed 100 feet from their property line and welfnessecameninsonrtheryres residet allowed nces. be ACterilt tlienlas'crain th planes 'aur t1►_s business train the area sin►,.Lled like an open gas line. The Public Works Director. made mention to them o£ the high speed ac dangers. Last weekend there were two near rent fatal accig to enter their drive., There are diffe dents with people trying at lie wants to do with this expansion. stories From Gtr. Vatiella as to wh Supervisor Saraceni was told it was to cover his machinery and the Public Works Director was told lie wants to add 1,500 feet to the building. They have also heard he wanted to add big truck scales. What else is he planning on butting on the property. Vice Chair. Dolan was at a loss as to what to do since the Public f Works I)3rector did not leave any word on the meeting. She did not think the l� rum. She understood the situation to be Board meeting was tate appropriate to that when Mr. Lord. react his letter and made an offer on June 7.9, 1982, the � Public Works Director took this offer to the operator who countered the offer. T'he matters under contention appear to be when and where to move the storage tank. Mrs. Lord stated that Mr. Lord made an offer which was immediately turned down and then the operator came back with a counterproposal to add. 1,5010 feet to the ba,.k of the building. The Public Works Director mentioned to them ho did not think the access roads were wide enough or easy enough to enter by. They have refused to sign a document that they would not harass or sue Mr. Vanel:la. Tile Public Works director advised them that ; the area between the property ltne and the house should not be used and tilt" present road should possibly be widened for a new entrance on the far side of the business. No action taken: 1126 CO�n�GN1GA'i'xDN5 David W. Lciitt'iu Cl►ic u: hlr+ Lands provides information regarding the ireenline, titformation to the considered at the time of the hearings.. U. R, Roper, engineer,, thico. Tile engineer, on behalf of ,lames 1;. UdIlIndr, I appeals condition 18 on tentative parcel mpa, four parcels, on approximately 4,000 feet north of Be11 Road, north Oussick Avenue, app y Chico, AP 42-01-70 and 71,: Set for hearing August S, 1982 at 1,0:15 a.m. Scott Atnbulanee lac., urovil.le. 11111 Scott offers his resignation Uom the Butte County Emergency Medical Care Committee, Administrative Officer to post and letter to be sent to flim. Page 196, July 13, 1982 82- ll56 ,Tul:y 20,l q82� g' w r a w s 0IftirT p rupALH w y" °► sIE M an Day NOTICE oi" INTCNT TO PO1iM AN A�nLtheDAY ndticc'fofCil ten , rossibleadevel p alt qhe public hearing of investigating the Health Care Council for the puroose Cenher was held as advert sed. t of an Adult Day Health Care , men Appearing Hearing open to the Vublic. Council of a Chico, on behalf of the Butte County 1. Harlan Adam.r Health Council with Senior. Citizan.ot thirteen enemy board of of directorsp V. set out the background of what a Adult sY would do. It would be comprises y tilC Butte county six appointed by the Board, six by resident. The purpose of this Council woubeen fifteen ld be to try an. and one, a past p possible. There CFetsedetheir willingness keep seniors in the homes as long as p representatives in the designated area who have exp to serve on this Council. tie asked that the Board form the council and make the appointments as reconunended. committee. Ms. Taylor chairman of tong -term Care ,v The 2. Council work Peg 'Taylorr the vo].unte�_s. empht to the coon"•Y' asized all the work that was done by Will be done by volunteers at n o cos� 3, Anita Bell► Butte County Iealth Planning Commission. Ms. Bel] Mated that their commission welcomed and recommended the formation of the council. to the public and confined to the Board• Hearing closed seconded by Supervisor Fulton On motion of Supervisor Masean Health Ca%:e Council for ind unanimously carried, fcrmation of an Adult Day the purpose of investigating the possible development of an Adult paY Health Care Center was approved. o Supervisor intment of the members of to matter at this time. There are others who might Dulan asked that the app the council be a separa nd nominate themselvess want to come forward a OD C4DYANb, nctA`arding the 11100 o'clock open time slot on 1157 APPEARANM R lashed to speak today Mr. %I_yand spoke reg �, people in the audience who th�aBoard allowed them to ttye aL30nda. �wou .are l 1 in the past that if the Board held do so listless at eleven and would not be able to problem, speak at this tl.me. there had bt ld nottbepthi.s an evening meeting AP>?EAt�iNC11: WIS. LOPj) Larry Lord at ,his time. There; li5g significant Mrs. Loed read a letter from �1r• OO Bandy when they tion of >zicharcl pcothe and bulk plant changed is an item that was not in the minutes of dune 8 that: � was ver when Sat aceniaboutaBolred, He Celt that bolting th subject to a building Weed talking ertY to real property and sub] that from personal proptor obtained one building Now is the time foe timethe for°action permit. Itiatd senow in Violationnof theOperhIdWionty permit and They have Waited a long to take action to rezone this area. {y the Board. her mind it Supervieor Bolan understoahoOf wanting trdo �yclis thing today6 frustration to was allowed in something to be done] but she could toss not zoning but. adiscussion of the iitterpretati+�n of What agricultural zones. Lord stated that according to the permit he would be allows Mrs. Lo There Were three proposals that Were'mader to put in more bulk Container• Page 2144 July 100 1982 July 20, 1982 _..,p. 0 tl' 90 w a Is m." M e' m M A 'N o a Y IR. o r r$ 111 K.. A m %A Q VA �' r •� Y is 82 and the operator turned those down. He is in no mood to agree to anything. 1150 1 bTSCUS'a"IOhl OF 80TTE COUNTY LAW ENFoRcrlaNT OFFICERS ASSOCIATION IIZOUEST TO Ken Klatssen and Maul ;falters, from the Butte County Law Enforcement Officers Association, were present to discuss the request to place an initia- tive on the November ballot relative to staffing. Mr. Klaussen asked that the hoard take action to either approve or deny their request. Chairman Wheeler had: not IvW an opportunity to consider the ,.reoposal. She asked that she be allowed to review and take the matter under submission. She would want to study this matter and had not had an opportunity to do so. Her primary concern would be th'financial mechan- ism and if it would be tied into the ballot measure. Mr. Klaussen advised that this Was a measure to deal with staffing levels and they Were not involved in the funding mechanism. That has nothing to do with the Board's ability to place this matter on the ballot. if they voted to put it on the ballot it would stop the initi^hive process, if the Board placed a financing mechanism on the ballot measure they would circulate the petitions for an initiative. Supervisor Fulton Felt that in fairness to the associatiroh the Board should take action on the request for the blllot measure as it stands. If the hoard amended it it would not be what they want0d and they would have Lu LJO through the initiative process. Ile did not savor putting it on the ballot without the funding mechanism. Mr. Elaussen made the suggestion that the Board could add an additional ballot measure dealing with the funding mechanism. He was not asking for the Board to support the ballot measure: it Is Just a matter of time until a citizen or a police officer is hurt: On motion of Supervisor VUlton, seconded by `'apervisor Doi<n and unanimously carried, decision to not place this measure on the ballot as currently written was made. 1160 j\pj1EARANC8- ElLEEN BOONE tis. Boone stated that she,was a taxpayer and county employee. She had fifty -s k signed statements in support of the employea''s positions. These were signed by non-employee persons. She felt that the county Wit being unfair as far as what they were asking the employees to give up. in the fifLoon years oho has sport with the county she has always heard that there was no money available. She was sorry blit bile did not believe that. it seims as if every year the employees are the last consideration of the Board during budget sessions. The Board whs able to build libraries► Supervisor Moseley stated that they always ran into the question of libraries, she never saw anyone concerned about the Oroville and Para- dise libraries. 1.161 AWEARANCC: LEROY SP,1111i GRIMM Mr, Smith W66 employee and taxpayer of the county and has worked dor the public Works DopartmehL for the past twenty one years. Ile felt that his Lime and knowledge and expertise in the field of road h;.intenance were to the advantage of the coi►nhy And the citizens, lie would like to sec: the board consider night mootings to that the general citizens of the county would be available to attend. This would only have to be two or three times ,n year. burgng the twenty -ole years that he has been all employee of the county he has seen the employees concede each year oonsistently, The co►lsumer price indox states that sittce 1567 the cost of living has gone up 202%. The pagd 215. .. July 20,1982 2 Inter-Dapartme NtO "Memorandum FROM:., SUBJECT: a14A DATE,* i 7/1''J� r.� v,.. L.�► .s.v l Tv / TO, F ROmi SUBJEGT3 oATEI lntepDepurhm rr a IA omorandum Board of Supervisors Planning Interpretation Regarding Accessory use to Agricultural rebruary 26, 1985 X) Request an interpretation PurErvisors shall ant to Code Shave �the Lauthority Paragraph d "The board of S p the interpretation or apPX, to decide any questions involving „ regarding assessory cation of any Provision of this chapter. use to agricultural:.. erty is zoned A-40 (Agricultural - 40 acre parcels) with The prop A rice dryer and agricultural chemical storage in excessno`ng%0 area. The rice dryer has been on the property roximately l years and the chemical storage was established app years ago under the A-2 (General) zoning. The. Butte County Rice Growers Association is requesting a permit to store inflammables on their property identified as AP 29-24-58► zoned A>40 They prapos2 to have above ground tanks onx for diesel ("0'>000 gallons)) two for gasoline (10,000 gallons ead1)) two for oil (4,000 gallons dath), for the benefit of the members of their rice growers association, business and personal Use. ory The agrl,cultural definition 'provides for Cthehe dBoarryer d (referendet an sJack°seg the chemical storage ha�� been ac'eptedagysn accessory use. Now the requested orchard Supply) on Dayton Road) 982) interpretation of retail sale:) of inflammables to co-op members also as an accessory use. bK:1r cc: County Counsel, tutte County Rice Oro wete Association - Mr. Jas Townsend AttachiAent6t Code Section 24-20 24-21.1 24-81 I AYITICL E It. G91VERAU ZONING REGULATIONS AND V'ROCE DURUB Sec. 24.20. Nature and purpose of zoning plan. (a) This chapter divides the unincorporated territory of the county into geographical districts designated' as zoning dia- tricts. Ii, establishes regulationa limiting the use of land and structures, location, height and bulk .of the structures, the open spaces about building nil provides for atich other m6ai sures as will accomplish the purposes of this chapter, (b) This chapter is adopted to promote and protect the public health, safety and general welfare for the following more particularly specified purposes": (1) To assist in providing a definite plan of dovelop-irient for the county, and to facilitate, encourage, guide, con- trol and regulate the future growth of the county, (2) To protect the charleter, social and economic stability of agricultural, residential, commercial, industrial and other areas within the county; to assure the orderly and beneficial development of such areta; and more particu- larly, to protide adequate light anti alr; to avoid undue concentration of population; to facilitate the adequate provi,sioii for transportation, water, sewage, dralna& facilities, schools, parks and other public developments; to conserve and develop natural resources; to protect the food supply; to Conserve property Values to con- serve energy; and to promote efficient urban design and arrangement, and to securo economy in govern. mental expenditur8a, vl�•u41 a�wrr'.ii � i� .e f a,SSta (b) To obvitato Ule wtaaa,ato Itt tltt, pilltlle Natfcjfy t"estIKhtlf f"roitt the localiotl ni lsualdltiy4, att.Rt huiicttr.;=a• vl-ld @ai, la3Y. mj S ifw• v, 3 n .rfN "r".,a k`a,�lits.,� fA°]r aaat, to � Bart of tale a vuol-v and hlghll•ny;a el(uacnt of the goliel"Al Plan oi`- the county, Or other thoroughfares, At) that exiatl►►t, of limptsetive traf `le circulation on amid high. WAY13 Will be fAcilitated, car It itll 0)er InYa►•assly declaared that nil of, thio provisions of thio ' apply to all hroporty within the uaiineorporateai torriory of Hutto Countsf whother oawted by prina, valo, perso ;firma Corr Corporaatinns, Or by the governnteltt of the luso ed 1 States of Amerien, or ally of its aallenries, or by the Stato of I California or any of lt4 politirul stlbalivlsiotts ar agenc ics, or by ally county hicluding the County of Butte, town or traunioi. pal corporation or any of ,its or their ngettcfes, or by any district formed under the 1MV-4 of the State of California. (d) The board of supervisors shall haves the authority to decide _ally question involving the interpretation or nppticaltion Of any prevision of this chapter, Said lwovisionti of this chapter and the applications thereof shall bo held to Ebel the minimum requiremr.Ints necerteary to protnote the public health, safety aznd goneral welfare. P"xcept as speelficaliy .herrftt provided, it In or in ttyt way o impair O this dere with alio], abrogate, inion p I` y y p y existinrf provision of law or ordinance, or -illy rule, regulatlon or permit proviotisly adapted or issued or which may be a(loptecl or isaued pursuant to )mv relating c:o the -vm of buildings or premises, or relating to the erection. construction, establishment, moving; alteration or enlargement of any building improvement; not is it intended by this chAI)ter to interfere with or abrogate or annul ally easement, covenant ,ir other aIgtoement between parties or to annul or abrogate the ptiblie i;- tprovements emplaced and paid for by property ownorspw sub :,t to previously adopted county plans; provided, however, that in cases in Which this chapter imposes a greater restiiet ttit upon the erection, ConFgtruetiotl, estab:lshirtent, moving, olteraition or enlargetnetit of buildings or i;he use of any su +h building or pretenses in said several districts, or any of them, than is imposed or retiuired by such existing provisions of law or ordinance, or by such Miles, regu- lations or permits, or by such ena;ementm, covenants or agree- ments, then in toth Case the provisiotm of this chapter shall ` control. (Ord, No. i76o, § Y, h�ht�7d) Ser, U-21. Dot hitiontl, Unleas the context clearly roquires to the cott,rary the deli- nitions of terms provided in thia motion abaill govern Conattruc. bolt within Articles II and III of this chapter: 24-21.1 Agi*ulture; The :use of land for agricultural puir. poses, including farming, dairying, pasturage, Agri culture, horticulture, floriculture, viticulture, api arien and animal and poultry husbandry, and the necessary accessory uses; provided, however, that the operation of any such accessory uses shall Abe second. ary to that of the normal agricultural activities, As used in this definition "accessory use" means those supply, service, storage and processing areas and facilities for any other agricultural land. The rbove uses shall not include stockyards, slaughterl-zouses, hog, farms, fertilizer works or plants for the reduc- tion of animal matter, 24-21,2 AgIieulture employees An individual who verifies, by personal affidavit and by affidavl4 of his em- ployee$ that he is, or will be, employed at least thirty- two (32) hours leer week for at least sixteen (1.6) weeks per year, or that his primacy source�of annual income is, or is anticipated to be, derived from, any of the following described occupations (a) The preparation, care and treatment of fhMi land, pipelines of ditches, including leveling for agricultural purposes, plowing, discing and ferti- liziing the soil; (b) The sowing and planting of any agricultural or horticultural commodity; (c) The care of any agricultural or horticultural commodity, As used in this subdivision, 11carelo includes, but is not limited to, cultivation, irri. gation, weed control, thinning, heating, pruning, or tihing, fumigating, 'spraying and dusting; (d) The harvesting of any agricultural or hottleul- tural commodity including, but not limited I-% kicking, eutting, thrashing, mowing, knocking off, field chopping, bunching, baling, balling, field packing, and placing in field containers or in the Vehicle in Which the commodity will be haulad tln the farm or to the place of firs prodessing; (a) elle assembly and storage of any agricultural or horticultural commodity including, but not. limiti;d to, loading, roadgiding, banking, staci ing► biiiiiing and filing; (f) The raising, feeding and management of live. ptock, fur-bearlii.g anis cls, fish; frogs and other taquatic anlmala, and beds Including, but not limited to, herding, housing) hatching► milking, sliearinit, harndling eggs and extraatitlg Honey; (g) The Operations, candevation, Improvadmit or main'OnaMe of such farin and its tools and equlpmont, 24,21,3 Afloys Any publia or Iniv ttr, thnl`otiirhture lass than f1rty Taus revi i:I %VI-IIh v IIWh to ur t �.vl�y it seitr►nd- nry 11witiis or accees to 'abui:'tin)v property, .6- v e (b) Uses requiring use permits; The following uses aru perniitted subject to securing a use per nit in each case: (1:) Segregation of homesites, putsuarnt to the require- mento of section 24.54. (2) Spgregation of agricultural processing Uses, Pursuant to the requirements of section 24-55. (c) Minimum tot area required: Minimum lot are�A shall not be less than twenty (20) ,acres. (d) Front yard setback: Minimum front yard setback. shall be fifty (50) feet frown the centerline of the road; except where the road is classified by the county as a Vederal Aid Secondary Road, the ininitnUtn building setback require ments shall be fifty-five (55) feet from the center line of the road. (e) Side and rear yard required', Minimum side and rear , yard shall not be less than twenty-five (25) feet. (Ord. No. 1750, § 10 803i -M, Ord, No. 21.67, § , 11-25.80) Ste. 24.70, 24.80. Reserved. See. 24.81. A•40 (Agricultural) Zone. (a) Uses peri>t t to : (1) One single-family dwelling pet parcel, including indbile homes; (2) Queral agriculture faratung, horticulture, conuneftlal livestock, poultry production, growing and harvesting forestry products, warehousing and storage; (8) Accessory buildings attd uses pertinent to the permitted useo, including agricultural processing plants; (4) Rousing facilities (Including trailers) to accommodate 'nnly etnployeeo and their families employed by tris owuev or operator of the premises i and provided fur then that such housing 'facility ';all be considered ac- t 6 �d cessory to the main building and shall conform to the provisions pertaining to required yard ,r.nd open space for dwellings; (5) Dfining, quarrying, commercial excavation and wood processing plants; (6) Hunting and fishing camps, including those which accommodate recreational vehicles and travel trailers, providing that said recreational vehicles and travel trailers shall not be used for year-round occupancy. (b) Uses requiring use pOrm ts: The following uses are permitted subject to securing it, use permit in each case: (1) Segregation of homesites, pursuant to the require- ments of section 24.54. (2) Segregation of agricultur©l processing Mises, pursuant to the requirements of seetion 24-55 (c) MmIrnUm lot area required; Minimunn lot area shall not be less th,4n forty (40) acres, (d) Front yarn! setback, Minimum front yard iwtback shall bo fifty (50) feet from the center line of the road; except where the road is classified by tho county as a Federal Arid Secondary 11oad, the minimum building setback require- meats shall be fifty -fine (55) feet from the center lithe of the road, (e) Side and rent yard required., Minimum siAe at4d rear yards shall not be less than twenty-five Mie) feet, (Orel. No, 17,,51), q 1, 8-31.76; Ord. No. 2167, § d, 11-25-80) Se&t. 24.82, 24.88 Reserved, Sec 24.84: A-160 1Agricultural) Zone. (a) Uses per*416d., (1) One single-family dtivelling per parcel; (2) General agiriculture, fsoominil) horticulture, eomtnero clal llveatock, 3trction, grossing and harvest ins forest products, Warehausitng and storage, I , AUM i odC i w LAiND Or NA URAL WEALTH AND .rALPfTY' ` PLANNING co m, .tMON 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIIrORNIA 95965-3397 PHOrM 534.1601 March 20, 1985 Butte County Rice GroweY's Assuciatian P.O. Box 128 Richvale, CA 05974 RE: Refund of Pees Use Permit AP 29-24-58 Gentlemen. lie are in receipt of your reqquest to Withdraw the abov,q- mentioned application and refund any monies collected. Attached are two claim forms; one for planning and one for Environmental Review. Please !ate and sign the Claim forms and return them to this Uff;ce for further processing. Included in the total fee of $410.00 is $24.00 for Environ - .'00 for Ptabii.c Works. you. should mental Health and $104 contact these departments regarding a possible refund of their fees, if We can be of further assistance in the future, please feel free to contact this department. Sincerely, 'rcher- W roctor of planning 13AK hic cc Public Works Environmental Health thi . �I G it gif OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA %1 GENERAL CLAIM CLAIMANTS Butte County Rice Growers Association ..-.,'�.—.�.,. _..�.. ADI.w SS: P.O. Box -128 CITY 6 STATES .�B,i chmale, CA -95974- _ IMPORTANT . - "SEE -SEE INSTRUCTIONS DATE OF CLAIM: 3-20-8$ ON REVERSE SIDE SUBMIT CLAW TO DEPARTMENT RECEIVING GOODS '0;i'SEAVICES DATE DESCRIPTIrlN OF CLAIM (DESCRIEiC FULLY TO AVOID DELAY) AMOUNT _Refund_o£ _Fees . Coll.ectet3 for Use PLrmit which has been withdrawn. AP 29-24-58 Receipt 8110 is, 00 -7 -7 -- J i TOTAL Y5 00 W, the unr,',eralttned; declare under poneity of perjury that the aervlcea or nNielet claimed hllvo boort Oettofmrd 61 dellverod, grid that this 'm la fitio and oorrect ar aimed. i �rj3_ 1 YA//� Cyt bated thla.4,....... �e. i1..11�.I�rl day *f ......IIi�Y11i1r:........... r to U 1.0 a5 ti11fill.:....,Yt11111F1Y..lrllit t`ttll r. .y/1/.. ri`iiM1l Signature,'" of lalm t h the Ui4deralttied, hw,reby iertily thott to the wk' at 'my klfnwled¢e, the iirMcea or artiele`e k0ee d ab y hovobeen 00, foamed livered ind that there is a Midget Appraprlallonor Spedlilo boarpV tovoli ��IC,bCorokUof.net for a t JA f '.. Dad ttla ,.. , .day of 9 al f%�no.,:y�r�rH Uopart rot tied at Atiihorlted be�uly )epi .. Cbde ,.n.r,u...w„yc„,AYAItH H3p6t ,1 a0 210ccide rr...,iuNb 900 .... .... __ _ ....� -..... �—m•.n , ..., _ .. � =w a�-..cwwa-.u..=.»+w..+u.:+aw._...r-.. . v.;aow , r M -DO NOT'WRITEVOlL01d TIIIS--LINE-ITOR'S USE ONLYy� V f NbOp y� OtOT, SUB. CLAIM INVOICE INV61r. WtS CbbE b. W6, 00.1. ori), NO, No, OATH bi5C, AMOUNT ENCUMb+ 4 3Ug Ol5T. I t p,r An SOO& Of OROVILLEt CALIFORNIA GENERAL, CLAIM Bu to Count Rice Growers AssOcigtion.,, CLAl1�ANTt-----»--- ` ADDRESS, _ iMPOR7 ANT: CITY i STATE: 1 — ` — SEE INSTRUCTIONS 3-20" 85 ON REVERSE SIDE aar� OF CLAW jUBV4TE17 CLAIM 1'0 GEPARTMENp RECEIVING GOODS OR SERVICES', DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM (DE5Cf�1®E FUL� Y TO AVOID DELAY) OATS Refund of Fees collected for Use Permit which has., �_�... been withdrawn• AP 29-24-58 _.--�•w..:. ReceiPt 4 8110 AMOUNT 220. 00, --.__ --= 'T07AL j 220. 00 ., h the undetai�trd, declare under penalty of ptrJury ih♦t ►hu aasVleee or erlicles claimedhoWi hekh perfom+e�i or dalivkretl. 6110 that th k ^^ .tetra is true ohd correct as its , Calltcei � •';1;'�" Jr dMy of .,....,i w. , ..r... si, gtitiFnaturr cI Claimant .. Doted thli• •• 15 soraict" I pecifled above h ren do ad dM kruwledgk 1ilie +etultke nr tltilclke e e uu „ ...«n ceikjj� that. -tb the Y omp lc Dtlord A prtivpl �� (Check..,,,, t ailf. „ .. .... Ilvtrndaand that Ih%ert' (oeoyBudtiatslADPr nt�ll*+tl Jrt' be S f9 i„�` yt (lr+fFuF �{i F.�tf.•% ' Urparlmr cad at iV tad pepbW Detrdthlit..b u.,uuµN.uuuIR17� ('�F►' .._.—'. -^" . 21ra�lit____ tly y pAi'ACIL FROM , , �."�ti! •,.r,�,+ ,code .....rc cod• ,,.. O THIS WINE AUDITOR'S US 0 -- DO NOT WRITE `- _ 171SC'c OR05S ENCUMB� 5UB.DISt. SUB. CLAIM I INVOICE (Np0tE AMOUNT VENDOR DEpi. 0007r OBJ. NDS „ N0. CODE d SUB. I