Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout030-100-0027 C i 0 0 FOR LlkND DTVJ�:S1011ik L09486-08-07-02 APPLICANT Paul Baker ADDRESS 2519 Mead Avenuel Biggs, CA OWNER Same TPM to divide 9.92 acres to create 4 parcels------. PROaECT DESCRIPTION—�______...—�— 2 acres, 1" 3.3 acres & 1 - 2.6 acre — --------- of l6th Street & Teheina Ave -r LOCATION on the southeast corner ThermalitO ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS) 30-10-2-9 ZONING A -R GENERAL PLAN_L-D-R--- PROJECT` CONSISTENT?_.._----- GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE R8PC`tTDATE OT ------------ APPLICANT SIGNATURE LAND CONSERVATION ACT CONTRACTS? August 7, 1986 DATE APPLICATION REcElVtD__-- G.D.A. -- ------------- AGENT'/SURVEYOR/CIVIL tNGINEVRI_� 95965 220 Grand Avente, OroVillOt CA DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT PRE FILFD ENVIRONMENTAL CATEGORICAL EXtYA3TIOX DATE DETERMINATION NEGATIVE DECLARATION DATE ADOPM_�-----� AND DATE. ---- DATE AtOPM-Al--gb— MITIGATED NEG- DECLARATION ENV. IMPACT REPORT - DATE SUB4 COMMITTEE MEMINO STATE CLEIARINGHOUSE' . On t; ---- — — ` — -"— ' ;' ADVISORY AGENCY 118ARiNC7 DATE A ".esq: Butte County Office of Planning and 4,10' ea 1400 Tenth Street:., R, Planning'Depafti),Icint Sacramento, CA 95814 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 County Cleric NOR I -A. BECKK, County of Butte DGPuly SUB -Tri CX Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Project Title AP 11 Name Tentative Parcel Map 50-10-2-9 Paul & Eva Baker State Clearinghouse Number Contact Person Telephone Number (if submitted to ClearInghouse) Public Works John Mendonsa 534-4266 Project Location On the southeast corner of 16th Street and Tehama AvenUet Thermalito. Project Descripti011 Tentative Parcel Map dividing 9-92 acres to create four parcels, of 3.04, 1402, 3.28 and 2458 acres, TIiis i, to advise that the Butte CountV, Advisory Agency (Lead Agency or Responsible-A—gency) ha- approved the above-described project on 12-8-86 and has made (Date) the following determinations regarding the above-describod project: 1. Tile project will, will not, have a significant effect on the environment. 2.Environmeiit.r1iPepoit was prepared ioproject this projec pursuant to tile provisions of CEQA, A Negative DOclaration was preparod, for this project putwuatjt to the Provisions of GtQAi 3. Mitigation mea,,111ros M approval of the pro —`rc_ j� —t4ete not, made a condition of the J lalh - 4, A statement of oV(,IrViLij,VIg considerations for this project, - 11 . .,as not, adopted This is to certify that the final EIR with comments and responses and record of project Approval is available to the general public att totte County planning Departments 7 Coullty Center Drive OvOvillt, CA 95965 Date Received for Piling 111d Posting at On 12-9-86 Si "tl.titul:e Steve 8trtotori Senior Planner 07— NOVIged MArit2h 1986 a ,4 a s' Ask Paul Baker TPM, AP#30-10-2-9 Mitigation Measure 1. Pay a traffic study ;and traffic light fee of $25.00 per parcel. Infer -Departmental Memorandum TO, Butte County Advisory Agency PROM: Planning `Director SUBJECT, Report on Tentative Parcel Map of Paul Baker on AP#30-10-2-9 DATE; November 17, 1986 This is a proposal to divide 9.92 acres 'to create 4 parcels, 2 at 2 acres, 1 at 3.3 acres and 1 at 2.6 acres. The Land Use Plan Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Low Density RAsidential.. There are no specific or community plans for the area. The proposal does not conflict with County zoning nor any adopted or proposed element of the Butte County General Plan nor any County, specific or community plan. Recommend approval of revised map subject to the following mitigation measure: 1. Pay a traffic study and traffic light fee of $25.00 per parcel. SB:jmc 006 Paul. Baker O.D.A. K AT PENUiX r Clla_ iUT iTT's I 110 0NT•illN9'AI CliI: MLTSpl 1�0itt,I (C�re� coniT,l Cte�c93'y T,eatl A1;enCy7 Log 11 .86-08-07-02 t' p g-30-10-2-9 i . i3ACKCIt0UN1) 1 . Name of proponent_ PAl7i, & EVA BAILER _ 2, Address of proponent and representative (i f oppl ic;tCla'le) Paul & Eva Baker 25.Mead Avenue 4Y _ 220 Grand A,Yenue _ �,,.�... S:ggs_CA 959178 � Or6v3 61 CA 95965____- 3, 5965__,_3, project description Tetit at ve Pa r_C;P.1.,Map_ ifANl FTN1l1N(S (2til'I,NTI'1C,1N(T 1"I'8 I`lA� Y131, N a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the duality or the environment, saabstantially reduce the habitat or a fish or wildlife species, cause as fish or wildlife population to drop below self - ,,Staining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community", reduce the number or restrict the o range of a rare r endangered plant or animal ot` eliminate important examples of the major periods of Californ:iit history or prehistory? b. lloe the project have the potential to achieve short-term benefits to the cietritament o1' long-term, envirowntal goals? IA short-term impact on the environment .is one which occurs in a relativ&Y brief period of time while long-term imparts will, ✓� endure into the future.) " c, Dines the project have impacts which are MOM - ally limited, but cumolAtiv"ely considerable? (A project maY impact on two or Moto separate resources Where the impact on oath rosource is relative!) small $ but where the effect of the total of those „V1111 impacts on the environment is ;,Igniricant.) µ�� �-- d, floes they pa`oyet have environmental effects which will catase Substantial adverse effects on human beiDgs, either d0vcth' Or indirectly" i?I;fyROI NA' IOM 'I TO be comp l e 0d 17% the Lead Agency) on the bsis Cal tills initial c"ti;aluotions tath c� prC�pa�:e„l pa,a,i'c t C'OU111 NOT have a a1.niflcant effect C��1V1'. rind cin tiro nd th �Iaaueart , 'inhl a NUGATIVF laKI.ARA'1'TI1N tai 11 be prel`lureC i/WE find that although thv presl+oy41 Project c,,Ij have a sign! n snt effect ern the envitaaaiaavO , there will not he a sigati ficant ci'loct in this case` i�e�c�auase the NITI11ATION MEASURES described Oil the attached sheet have bvvn nddvd to the prujert, A N11HATTVI. Ilii( 1.ARA'1 ION will he i'vel'u'”, IOlali fine! ,ha, lrPc�pa��.„cl pvvioc°t MAI have a signincttnt effect oil the env i roilmunt, and .in l.NV I RoNAII.N'I'Al, IMPASI' ltiil'C"11a'1.' is reclui t`ed = (.CtUN`I'1' (ll� fill"f'�l'i:, PJ ANNIN6 DURAIt"l'KIENT llii'1'i� ; Sept yber � is atr yn F3rc 'Senior Planner Reviewed by'. , IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IM#CTS 0 UU.&P-Lallations of a ' rl- "yes" and "maybe') answers are reqjUired on attached sheet(s)) 1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant: T_ -Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements' compaction or overcovering of the soil?c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. Destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic 091c Or Physical features? e, Increase in wind or water erosion of Soils, either on Or Off-site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the any bay) inlet or lake?ocean Or go Loss Of Prime agriculturaljy productive soils outside designated urban areas? h. Exposure Of People or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure Or similar hazards? YES MAYBE NO L 2. AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial; a. Air emissions or deterioration air quality? of ambient b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or fumes? C, Alteration of air movement, moisture, r)r temperature, or any change ill climate, locally Or regionally? 3. WATER. Will the Proposal r("Sult in substantial: a. Changes in current.,,;), or the course or direction of water movements in either marine bi or fresh waters? Changes in absorption rates) drainage c' patterns, or the, rate and amount Of Surface ruhoff? Need for Off-site surface drainage improve - meth ti, including vegetation removal) channel- "atlo" d. Or CUIVOrt installation? Alterations to the Course or Low of flood Waters? Change in the amount OfSurface water in any water body? f. Discharge into Surface waters, or ift any alteration of surface water quality, !POtature) d including but not limited to tehi s"-OlVed OXY990 Or turbidity? gi Alteration of the direction or rate of Of ground waters? lOw h. Change in the qua, nCity pt qual,jj,'Of groand Ovate `r8, either through direct additions or With- drawals, or through interception of, arl aquifer by cuts i. Or excavations? ROdUction in the j. amount Of Water othoi,wi available for p111)lic water supplies? se Exposure of people or PtOPertY to water related hazArds such as floodihgo 'YES MAYBE 4. PLANT LIPB, Will the proposal result in substttntial - a Chanj—e in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of anv unique, rare or endangered species of plant's? ci Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier, to the normal replenish- ment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? S. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial: . Change in the diversity of species or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell fish, benthic organisms or insects), b. Reduction in the numbers of any uniqueo rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d6 b�,lteri6ration to ecisting fish or j�kildlife habitat! 6, NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 7, LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce sigHifiE-antlight and glare? 8, LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a substa tial alteration of the present or plannod Land use of an area? NO 4-� L�- NATURAL RESOURCES: Will the proposal result in — s55stanMal! a, increase in the rate of use oP any natural resources? b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural resources? 10, RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve: T t1sk of explosLon or the release of hazard- ous substances (includlng, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) Ln the event of an accident or upset conditions'? b, Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency ,vacuation plan? 11, POPULATION, Will the pTopos,al alter the location, TIMM n, density, or growth rate of the human population? HOMING, Will the proposal affect existing housing, Or create a demand for additional housing? NO 4-� L�- w. r+ 0. `YES 13. TRANSPORTATI/CIRCULA ION. MAYBE No Will the result 'in..--"�M proposal, a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement? b, Effects on existing parkin; facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact on existing transportation systems? d. Significant alterations to piesent patterns Of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. — increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14; PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services; n. Fire protection? b. Po ICO protection? c. Schools, d: Parks or other recreational facilities? �. e. Maintenance of public facilities including roads? g ,x f. Other governmental services? �.- 15, ENERGY. Wil. the pr-oposal result in: a. Use of substantiae, amoiInts of fuel ,or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources Je ol; energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. UTI,ITTES . 1Y'c11 the result in a ethefor ed new systems, or substantial alterations following: toosal a. Power Or natural gas? b. Communications systems? c, Water a.valilabi.] jt1w, d. Sewer or septic tank? U - e. Storm water drainage'? f, Solid waste and disposal? 17 HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal resillY in.* a. Creation of any health hazard or' potential health hazard. (excluding mental health)? Exposure ......... of people to potential: health hazards? .:...... 18,, AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the o s�tT truuc` tl—"q Of any scenic vista or view Open to the public or will the ro creation of an aesthetica in llooffensive sal tsite topen to public view? .4- tS MAYBE, NO 19.- RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantify of existing recreational opportunities? 20, CULTURAL RESOURCES. T. Willie proposal. result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? ` c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? V. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP 30-10-2-9 See attached. A EVAL, AP BO -10-2-9 OF NVIP(,3 NMENTL L int. All of Butte County Is located within a Moderate EartlUlUOke lsubject property is located OPProx it fiately 2 Intensity Zone VIII. The Shear Zone� which was as8ocloted with miles southwest Of the Foothill Construction of bolldlingS to Uniform the 1975 OrOvIlle earthquake. rds for selsmically active areas sl-loulcl provde Building COd9 stars da adequate protection to residents in case of seismic Octiv"'Y' The development of four additional hom0s"tG,'- Ofl �"`ie Bbjc�16e-' result in some overcoverling, compactlon, C114plocemet'It Property will r oil which Could lead to acceler,oted orosion and and disrupt . Ion of the s ice the area. The sUbJOct siltation of the dr,alnagewaYs which sery 11to Drainage Plan property Is within the area covered by the ThermO conditioned accordingly. Likely conditions Inojude and will be co site and the payment Of providing'a permanent solution to drainage on $I drainage fees towards off-site improvements. 13f: The creation Of additional building sites on the property Will represent an incremental increase In traffic and traffic hazards In area Since sections in the Thermallto area are the ar several inter vy traffic, traffic lights will be necessary In already Impacted by hea the near futures .S _U 9— MqP_9jLr_e jo pay a traffic Study and traffic light fee Of $25 per parcel. "6- I Applicant: Paul and Eva Baker Assessor's, Parcel u 30-110-2-9 Log It 86-08-07-02 DATA SHEET A., 1. Type of Project: Tentative Parcel Map. 2. Brief Description: Dividing 9.92 acres into four Parcels: Parcel 1 of 3iO4 ac., Parcel 2 of 1.02 ac.$ Parcel 8 of 3.2.8 ac., Parcel 4 of 2.58 ac. 3� Location: On the southeast corner of' 16th Street and Tehama Avenue, Thermalito. 4. Proposed Density of Development: 1 dwelling unit per 2.5 acres. 5. Amount of Impervious Sut-facin9t n/a. 6. Accevs and Nearest Public Roadts)4. Parcel 1 Is a corner lot fronting --no Tehama Avenue to the north and 16th Street to the went; Parcel 2 fronts on Tehama Avenue; Parcols 3 and 4 front on 16th Street. 7. Method of Sewage Disposal: Public sanitary sewer. S. Source of Water Supply. Thbrmallto Irrigation District. 9. Proximity of Power Lines: Adjacent to property on 16th Street. 10. Potential for further land divisions 'and development: General Plan allows up to 6 dwelling units to the acre -- minimum parcel size of 6500 sq. ft. for Inside lots, 7500 sq. ft. for corner lots. B. Env I roomeota I r. Sett I n Physical Environment. - 1. Terra i, in ao 00noral Topographic Character.' Gently rolling valley land, b. Slopest 0-6%4 a, Eldv6tiuh: Approximately 221 feet above Sea Level. .I� Limiting ract.orst None. 2 Sr.'s 1 i :; a4 Typ and Chai"aabi-.,rlsticg: ROddll-io Gravelly Sandy Loam. b. ' , rar-L-ors: intone, providing that sowage disposal Is via pwt-.1 k ��!wet-5. 3. Nrl-hlral lfazari-ls, (�1,9 the Land a. Earthquake 4one: 110itkWOte IEW"thqUake Introns it -Y Zone. VIII. b, r=rOS-10h Pot0r#LC�It. 'I'lodcIt-ate. c. Landslide Potontin-It Nonek d. F'%,,e Hazard: Uric I as,•, I f I ed, 6. ExpbhVIVO Soil Potent i,.'O.' Hloh. 4. Oydrolow a. Surface Water: None on site. b. Groundwater: Unknown. Property draina gouthOrlY c. Drainage Characteristics; Prop i within the Ruddy Creek drainage basin to dr1m, Ina 0 facilities which ultimatelY _mpty into tho lLeathiar River. d. Annual Rainfall (normal): 26-28 e. Limiting Factors: None. 5. visual/Scenic Quality: Moderate. 6. Acoustic Quality: Good. 7. Air Quality: Good. o o qJg,,3_L_E_nX LJr_QU_M9D_h_A 8, Vegetation: old orchard that is not In production and grasses. 9. Wildlife Habitat- 21 small birds and animals common to the Valley. 4rchaeoloaldal and Historical Resources in the Area* Low ensjtivity area. JutLu County General Plan designation: Low Density 2esldential. .e. Existing Zonin0% Asricultural-Residemtial. 13. Existinc, Land Use on-site'. old orchard not in production. 14. Surrounding Areat ao Land Uses: Single -family residences at rural densities. b. Zoning." Agricultural-Residel"itiale C. Gen. Plan designations. Low Density Residential. d.. Parcel Sizes'. 1/8 ac. jots to west; 1/4 at. - 5 ac. to east and north. e, Population: Low density resi'dent'ial. 15. character of Site and Area: Urban fringe area. 16. Nearest Urban Area*. Orovilleo 17. Relevant Spheres of Influence: Oroville, Thermalito Irrigation District* Ia. improvements Standards Urban Area: Yes: 19„ 'Fire protection Service: ai Nearest County (State) r4re Station: Nelson Avenue 468. b. Water Availability: TherM811to Irrigation District 'Flre hydr8ntso 11to Union Elementary School and 20. Schoolr� on Area= Thet-�,Ma Orbville Union H10School District.