Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout030-270-057yep a .�� .� t a �. - r � . .� � •�• eek .. '� . ' , :� ~ , e{^ � I , � .. .. � ®� ... _.. �� �.• 4• . P � `, � ,1' • i � 1 �'� r r . 1 • � �. r r \ .e i . r an � dA 't , � i` „. ' • .0 �� N r , � a •1 �, , . P � � , . y .� � r e t � - .` • �. �+ � r j � '�t : � � "r r � i. c�ry� � �` � � Al ,r. . . ' ( I t �. lA�l � 1� � � r ` ` � `1 ILlf ����1 � U[ � PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY SHEET FOR LAND DIVISIONS APPLICANT George L. Dobson AP#30-27-57, 58,.59 ADDRESS 2124-1 Ventura Blvd., Suite 151, 'Woodland Hills, CE's 9136 OWNER Same PROJECT DESCRIPTION TPM to divide 64.4 acres to create , parcels parcels at +5 acres each and 1 at 49.4 acres LOCATION on the south side of Fresno Avenue approximatel:y lGDO feet east Of its intersection with Larkin Rd., Thermalito area ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS) 30-27-57,58,59- ZONING A -R GENERAL PLAN Low Density PROJECT CONSISTENT? Residential- -GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE REPORT DATE OF APPLICANT SIGNA'1U--RE LAND CONSERVATION ACT CONTRACTS: DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED September 18, 1986 'GENT/SURVEYOR/CIVIL ENGINEER.: G.D.Ai ADDRESS 220 Grand Avenue, Oroyille, CA 95`965 DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT ,PREPARED ENVIRONMENTAL �aCATEGORICAL EXEMP' IO;N DATE FILED DETERMINATION AND DATE µ NEGATIVE DFCLARATION .. DATE ADOPTED a MTTIGATED NEG. DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTt D,Vek Y ENV, IMPACT REPORT =- DATE CERTIZ,IED STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NOS 8U84 COMMITTEE MEETING, DATE ADVISORY AGENCY HEARING ADVISORY AGENCY ACTION � APPEALED APPEAL HEARING DATE HOARD ACTION C014ME-NTS POR PLANNING 7I'RBCTOR' S REPOA1r a '71 ~ „. (3 r f't'.a E ,Nr' r •a''y , e.. 'a i y, i. ,s t�........... i.�d. V .1.. J.. t,r CJ 1r �!.L r�•1li'1ILV A M Q' L'U e Office of Planning and Butte County Re a.ch} i;q�; 1400 Tenth Street Room lei, Sacramento, CA 95814 E �+'�j Planning Dep artm(11,1[ of 7 County Centers 11 a +rad, OrOvillei CA 95965 XXX County Clerk County of Butte ► L211NOR M, BECKER, COMP Clea SLTT3.7ECT :Dy J"vi JNT Deputy Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Section 21.108 Project Title — AP # Tentative Parcel Ma N<rmc P 30-27""5.7, .etc. Geor State �learinghotise Number I ye L • Dobson (if submitted to Clearinghouse) Contact Personiel p one Number JOhn Mendonsa Public Works Pro— ,i�ut Location 534-4265 'South side of Fre no Avenue a � ,. Of its iIntersec�tion with Larkin Rd., Thermal to area, __ Pproxim&tely 1600 feet east Project Description Tentative Parcel Map to divide 64.4 Parcels, 3 parcels at +5 acres each and 1 t 45.4 acres to create 4 a ._..,, acres. `z'his is to advise that the Sutte County Advisor Y Agency has a pproved th(Lead Agency or Responsibe above-described project on 12-,8-86 le Agency) the followiand has made ng determinations regarding the above-described) bove-descr bed,, project �. The project _Will, ,X—will not, have a significant effect on the environment, 2, An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project ur- provisions of CEQA, p suint to the 3. rfit,igati, approval measures ware, �� were nest; �^ade a condition of the. o� the prc>jent, 44 A statement of overriding cbnsideratir�ns foe this project: _Was .,,Ltaas not ad opt d This is to certify that the final BTR With comments and responses an Project approval is available to the general public at:i d record of Butte County Planning Department 7 County Center Drive Orovilley CA 95065 Date Received JFOV Tiling qnd postingl2 at bPI� . "9-'�'6 { Si a re Stephen A, Streeter ; Senior Planner u r t Ti1 w t � /����'���i?�ir���a�';,'����t�t,�±.�.,av ;��,�n —. �'c�t►3�r�d Mnr�h 1�8� w �'' " fir'` x• 0 z R. RA ! DEPARTMENT Or PU13LIC .WORKS WILLIAM (Bill) C1 r-r—F. Director 9 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 CERTIFIED MAIL Buije ro, Planning COMA Telephone: (916) 534.+I601 DEC 10 1986 RONALD D. Mc.ELROY Deputy Director Orovilte, CaVHOTnia December 9, 1986 George Dobson RE: AP 30-27-57, 59, .59 21241 Ventura Blvd., Suite 151 TPM Woodland Hills, CA 91364, i Dear Mr, Dobson: At the 'regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held on December 8, ,1986; the agency granted a mitigated negative declaration of environmental impact and approved your tentative parcel map on the above -referenced property subject to the conuitions of 8pproval listed on the attachedsheet. If no appeals are timely filed ---within 'ten (10) days of the date of the Advisory Agency's approval. --with the Cleric of the Board of Supervisors, this action will be final. When the conditions of approval are complied with, it will be in order .for you to file your "final inapt' with the Butte County Department of Public Works for recordation within twenty -.four '24)' months of the date of approval by the Advisory Ag ncy If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office, Very truly yours, William Choff Director Of Publ,i !arks 1 d ! Merida rsa A si.stant Director cc: fanning Department Environmental Health Department ODA George Dobson, Tentative Parcel Ma south side of Fresno Avenue approxp�160OBQt�7�57' 58 & 590 on tate With Larkin Road. Thermal to at-ea.En • east of its intersection Engineer: GDA Public Works conditions: Deed to the County of Butte 30 ft. right-of-way from tlt tnitterine of Fresno Avenue; Z Indicate a 50 ft. building setback from the c Avenue; enterline of C"resno 3 Show all easements of record on the final map, 4 Obtain encroachment permit for all driveways, new or existing, and. construct to county standards, 5 Pay delinquent taxes or : any � current taxes as required. h ileet the rer",ir.ements of the Butte flaunty Faire Department, Show areas subject to iDundat: on. ' B Shaw no building area on through property; Pc1rc0l i where naLtIral drain runs Planning Dept. conditions: 9 Show all areas subject `ct to fl 'odi. . ng on the final map. 10 Establish no development areas around ver nal pools and within 100 ft. of drainage ways containing riparian habitat; n 11 Show a 100 ft. wide no buildinj area adjacent to the O Wildlife Area; Oro Health Dept. Conditions, 12 Provide a Letter or dther documentation from Irrigation District stating that they are tv lland able t the I'herinalito supply domestic water to parcels t 2,_ S end 4, o 13 Provide a letter or other documentation from ri sewer to `-ct stating that they are from theThormalito .�rri "��tion D�,stra Supply ' parcels 1, 21 D and 4, g and able to 14 Pace a note on the map that states "development of gar and 4 will require connection to a public sanitary1 cels 1, 2 �l5 sower,'► ,r Place a nota on the map that statcros iidevclomonL Of 3 and 4 will require connection to a pKircel.s + 2 Public water _supply,o The follow'" mitigation is required; lei Pay Pro Mata share toward traffic studies or theThermalito a ^es ( 5,(l0 per light b8tallot ohs r parcel,), TO: Butte County Advisory Agency FROM: Planning Director SUBJECT: Report on. Tentative ,Parcel Map for 'George L. Dobson on AP 30-27-57, 581 55 DATE; October 27, 1986 This is a proposal to divide 64.4 acres to create 4 parcels. The present, zoning is A-R (Agricultural Residential). The Land Use Flan Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Low Density Residential There are no specific Or community plans for the area The proposal does not conflict with County zoning nor any adopted or proposed element of the Butte County General. Plan nor ,any County, specific or community plan. Recommend Approval subject to the f olloWing"Miti ga-bi.on measures: 1. Show all. areas subject to flooding on the final map. gi Establish no development areas around vernal Pools and within 100 feet of drainage Ways containing riparian habitat. a. pay pro rata share toward traffic studies or light installations in the Thermal ito> area ($25.00 per parcel). 4. Show a 100 foot wide no building area adjacent to the Oroville Wildlife Area DRH#.Ir �c George Li Dobson GDA r s 6uite Go. }�nnnin9 ENGINEERING QCT S U R V E XBPQ&9 220 GRAND AVENUE 1� PLANNING�z OROVftLE, CA. 9!5965 r A , (916) 533-2068 1-4 W October 20, 1986 Butte County Planning Department 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA. 95965 Atte: Mr, David Hironimus Ret Tentative Parcel Map A.P. r 3027-57, etc. Dear Mr. I-fironimus t We have reviewed your suggested mitigation measures for referenced. Project. We can. see no Problems with numbers 1e above I do, hoWever� dish to Change number 4 to read s 2 & 3, Wide no building area adjacent to the Orov9lle Wildlife Areaf shote a 10Q foot tie feel that "no develo menti things as a fence, road or irrigation system, wh to include such not the intent of the condilocguld be stem, uedlc of course is n. Thank you, Sincerely, :John 13. Christoff G.D.A: Engineering, ony L.S. Surveying & Planning C:C" George Dobson 86-094 �r�c�dm WIL,1 IAM W. EbDlS JOHN C1, CHRIS'tOPPER50N KMNNr TH C, L.ENHARO-r r 11PH Ni)tX r COUNTY O. 13UTTI? LN'VI RONm N7'AICHECKLIST DORM (to ba r:c��ttipletr.Uy I,enc Agen�.y� 13ACK--- GROUNII 1,09 11 86--09-18-01 l., Name oC Proponent GGeorgt:�L.Dobson ---------- 2. Address of pt•oponent and representative if a ( ppiie',airlej Geora�e L. Dobson C.D.A. 212.41 Ventura �$2 3 1) ETNTATIVE ] 7_AI 2C1rL MAP CI. MANQA`i'ORY FINDINGS _OF�;1(',NI�� iT CAh'CI r Y1i8 i4AYB)v N0 a. Does the project have the potential to degrad-- quality of the enlgr'otrmont, e the' substantially reduce the habitat of a :Cash or wi.]subs speciescause n fish or wildlife population to crop below, self" sustaining Levels, threaten to ,01i1111MILL, <"a plant or animal community) reducer the number or restrict ,the range or a rare 01' endangered pl ant or animal Or eliminate important examples of the major periods Of California history or• prehi,storv7 b. hors tine project have rile potential to ar..hiove short-term benefits to the detriment o long -tent, environmental goals? (A short-term impa,t on tite environment is one which Occurs ita a r`elat" ively 1)rief pcsl'iod, of time while long -terns >mpacts will ondure .into t e� future,) -,!K C. ]gyes tile have impacts Which are ilidividu- ally* limited, but cumul project ativelty onsicterabl.e7 (A where thmay impact on two or more separate resources e impact on each reasourcc, is relatvelir sme.l] , but where the cffet`t of the total or thtrser impacts on rile 01WIronntent is si rt ficar)t.7 dDoes the project have will rtrvirc�nirtLtrta7 effects Which C41160 substantialetverse effects oil human hr3ng,s, caitiic=r dirQetly or rnclire HN. Till 1t1"r 1:rtrl 1'I'iC1N i'C"a he co,c s 1ete,t) hV t ii '110 Load Agoncyl On the Iyac; s ca(` t°I11; initisII c+a tiuettican; __,.. 1A'1Y1•s fill il tht� proposv(I pro iect t'om,l) N01, hitvc a s i y oil tine 011 i ronmcttt, and o NFGA'1"tlth U1.CLA1tA'ION wi } l I eIirnt 017 )reptatredfoet r/M., fitid that A tIlougli then p)oposoproject could have tt si,g;n7 fi.- c.lnt cfl'ect oil (-Ieen1'I)'e)t)lnt')}i the'r"z! rYi'1 i not he rl sli;ni I'icarrt Li`I'ec t i n t}t 1 c.rsc' irc'cat180 the M"I GA 1'"C't7N Diisrl.SUi2ls'�, tic^�;r rsil>ecl t,n the' nt;tat:hrtl ;;at'rt ittt�c pr 1)cstsn atertlr,i tw, t}titilecrjrt;t,, A N1 "iCAl`Tt�i: r)I:GLARA' I ON w i l l Irt* lr► t'1r3u r+1, I/IV'i: Hila the }r1'0j)0trki irt'tr,it'ct MAY fate, rr st 1,nI fLt'ar)t rfrect 511 t}ary ctly I 'ronmett'ts t tt incl , link' I Rt)WLNI'Ar, 1 MI AC 1111;1101'`1' is required. 1)i11'i:r October x. 5, .,1986 COUNTY 01: I;U't"`r'r1t rrLANN1N0, 01111Ait'1Mt N'i' baVid R:. 141 onitnus Assodlato planner Ravi Lived by. ,f IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS U-Cxp anations of a l "yes► and "maybe" answers are required' on attached sheet(;)) I. EARTH: Will the proposal, result in significant„ YES MAYBE NO a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil's c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? —X.0 d. Destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical --,u features? e. Increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off-site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beachX sands, c or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lade? g Loss`of prime agriculturally soils -- outside designated urban arasroductive h: Exposure of 'people orX hazards'such as earthquakes,tiandsgides, mud- slides, ground Failure or similar hazards? 2. AIR. Will the proposal result in, a77al Air Air emissions or deterioratiox, .bsambient: air quality? b. The creation of objectionable oa rs, smoke or fumes? �. C. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature; or any change in climate, locally or regionally? 5. WATER: Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements in either marine or fresh waters? b: Changes in absorption rates, drainage or the rate and amount Of sur, face runor-- f? ter is , c, Need for off-site surface drainage improve- ments, including vegetation removal, channel- dation .c or culvert installation? d.+ Alterations to the course or flow of flood` Vat e rs ? --- ---- g y e. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? f. Discharge into Surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water. qualitincluding 'but not limited to tontperattare, dissolved y,, vel OXYgea or turbidity? g. r�iteration of the direction or rate of flow Of ground waters? h. Change in the quantity or qualit of Y ground waters either throughdirect additions or rvit}i4 drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? I. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise .^� X available for public water supplies? j. Exposure of people or property to water =.=- related hazards such as flooding? YES. 4. PLANT LIFE, Will the proposal result in substantial: b1__YB E No ?C—angs in the diversity of species, or number anspecies ofpaantes (inclLtdin treelrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic. plants)? b• Reduction of the numbers of i� any unzq.1e, rare or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an --- area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- ment of existin- species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X S. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in suby,antial: a. C a�i`ngee in the diversity of species, or nun,6evs of any species of animals (birds, sand animals including reptiles, fish and shell ftsi,, benthic organisms or insects) ? b, Reduction in the numbers of any unique:,: rare- or endangered species of animals? X c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration, or movement of animals? d: Detexa.oration to existing f:i.sl� or wildlife habitat? -� 6, NOISE- Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Increases in existing noise levels? bo Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 7. LIGHT AND GLARE: Will the proposal produce sxgni scant dight and glare? 3<. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a su stantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? 9;X NATUR.AL_R$SbURCES: Will the sproposal result in su tantial: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b Depletion of any non-renewable natal:,.`� resources? 10. RISK OF UPSET, Will the proposal involve: a, sT— of explosi,n or the release of hazard- bus substances (including, but not limited to oil, pesticides? chemicals or radiation) in the ev•ert of an accident or upset conditions? b, possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ll. POpUi,A'TIC1N. Will theistittion, density,proposal �rowthalter ratetof the humahq n Population? _ %, l 140USIING Will the proposal affect existing iyousing, or create a demand f-Or additional ijousing? 13 TRANSPORTATION/CIRC YES M�1Y}3T,i result in: '` Wil1 theproposal`--,��'h NC7 -------- ION , On Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement? b. Effects on existing demand fol new parking facilities, ---M�- or C. Substantial impactkongeYzstn systems? g transportation d• ----� Significant alterations to Of circulation or present patterns goods? mo•tement of people and/or e• Alterations to waterborne, rail or air trafl' ? 1�.c. £ Increase in traffic hazards bicyclists or pedestrians? icles, to motor vehicles, 144 PUBLIC SE}tesu u on or Will the proposal: have t �nVICES an effect need for new or al governmental services, tered at Pire protection? b. Police proteCtioi�? C, Schools? d-, Parks or other recreational fail e- }Maintenance es? — X of roads? public facilities, including '--- Other go'vernmen,tal, 1'ervices7 =ftG'l. Will the propos ax a, Use o,f, substantial amouLr ine ntsuof fuel.or energy? b, Substantial increase sources of ener in demand upon existing Of new sources of--)energy"renuir� the development 16, UTILITIES. Will the -. rxwmS P oposal result in a need foal, foils r, or substantial alteratio;7s to the a. '" b � �cat ions ac gas? c- tiV ystems? a�tunLer availa-s itv: d, Sewer or septic tank? e, Storm water drainage? --~ f, Solid waste and disposal.? 17. HUMAN HEALTH, Will. the a, G.reatxori of an proposal result in: health Of y health hazard or potential b4 Exposure of People mental health? hazards? pie to potential health 18,the AESTHCS, 1Vi11- ---. 0SItruct on of Will proposal result in the the public o y scenic vista.0r view open to CrY r will the prop on of an aesthosal result in the to public view? qt. Offensiveensve site upon 4 ,. yBS MAYBE NO 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational oPhortun.ties?` 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES'. a. Will the proposal result in the ~alteration Of or the destruction of a prehistoric or X historic archaeological site,? b. Will the proposal result in adverse phys: cal or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or X historic building, structure or object? c. Does the proposal have the potenzial to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values?` d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? V. DISCUSSION .OF ENVIRONMENTAL, EVALUATION See At -:ached DTSCUSSrON OF 11 MENT L EVALUATION AP 30-27-57, etc. 1bsc)e)f,3bpf.: This project will result ir, disruption, comPaotlm and overcoverIng of the soil for the development of homesites on site, WF11cf-I Will result in a change of absorption rates, drainage Patterns and (,,ho rate and amount of surface runoff. These changes couldlead to increased erosion and discharge Into surface Waters both on and o�f'r site. Due to the size of the lots being created, this should not be a significant impact, 1h.: All Of Butte County is within a moderate earthquake Intensity zone VIII. The subject property is loc&bed approximately iq, miles southwest of the Foothill Shear Zone Which supported. the 1975 Oroville earthquake. Construction of buildings to Uniform 8uilding Code standards for seismically active areas should provide adequate protection to occupants In case of seismic activity. 3j--' Much of the subject property is subject to flooding and bull I ding sites should be located Outside of the flood Prone areas. 4bo5d.: The subject property is adjacent to the Oroville Wildlife Area. Also on site Is riparian habitat on drainagewaYs and a potential for vernal pools on the southerly Portion of proposed lot 4, These are all valuable habitats and should be Protected. 6b.: The subject property is located approximately 1/4 mile from the OrOville Municipal Airport and may be subject to aircraft noise, The Oroville AIrP-Or'h Environs Plan Indicates that the property is located Outside the 55 de CNEL boundary. As Such, aircraft M a significant Impact, ranoise should not be This project will contribute to traffic In the neighborhood, Traffic accessing the subject property will travel via Fresno Avenue and either 18th Street or Harlan Avenue, thence northerly to State Highway 162, Traffic signals Will be needed In the Thormolito area as the rest dant ial dev':JlOPm9nt cont lhue8 to occurr. A traffic sure-ey/trarflc light fund has been establisheO to Provide for traffic studies and eventual Installation o� traffic lights at appropriate locations. 18e.0 The subject property Is located under safety area 8) as shown In the Oroville Airport Environs plan. The use is pormltt,.:� ,d by the Zoning and the density Proposed In the Parcel MaP 18 COMPatibi 0 1 1 With the Provisions of that plan, 14. This project will represent an increase In demand for pubic sorviccs ir, on WnIncorpor6tod of'06' 19, The swbJOCt property IS adjacent to the OrovIllo Wildlife Aron% Development on Proposed Parcel 4 could occur Wildlife Area and compromise immediately adjacent to the 8r,08, Large U I I d I ng Its value as aWildlife Area and recreation the Wildlife area rea to g setbacks. should be established from the edge of insure compatibility of 0800 Suggested mitigation measures: lo Show all areas subject to flooding on the final mor ,S 2. Establish no feet of drainage development areas around Ways containing vernal Pools and wit, -hist 1 00 riparian habitat, 3• Pay Pro rata share toward traffic studies or light inatallaist_ans in the Thermalito area ($25.00 Per Parcel). 4. Show a 100 foot Wide no duvel QPment area adjacent to Wildlife Area. DRHmc r _.7 _ { • Applicant: George L. Dobson Assessor's Parcel #t 30-27-57, etc, Log # 86-09-18-01 'I a&i SWEAT A. F'ro ieci- D �scr i rpt i 1. Type of Project: ,Tentative Parcel map. �. Brief Description` Dividing approximate Brief D a g 64.4 acres into `4 3. Location: parcels. of 5 acres e,9ch and 1 Parcel of 49.4 acres, On the south side of Fresno Avenue of its intersection with 18th Street ii immediatelyto east west of Droville. in the 't 4. Proposed Density of Development: 5« Amount of ImperviousSurfacin 5 acres per dwellingunit. 6 Surfacing: Minimal. Access and Nearest Public Roads?: Property friartts on Fres Avenue. 7. Method of Sewage Disposal: o Sewers n Thermalitu Irrigation District 8. Source of Water Supply: pp Y= Thermalito Irrigation District 9- Proximity of Power Lines: 10- Potential for further land division.TO development:Water. existing zoning would Perrmit parcels down to The area 4500 square feet in 4#, �nw i ronmental �p� +-, ,errt K 1a Terrain '3f• General Topographic Character; a. Slopes: 0 to 10 Ro11ih3 valley lands. �+• Elevation: percent, v,,z +s l feet abol,�e sea level to approxi mate l y 170 feet above sea levet. d. Limit.in9 2. Soils Factors c Noma. a. Typos and Char-racteristics b• Limiting Factors: 1Ym:arr loam and tailings. 8 Natural Hazards of tits Land a, Ear�Ghnuaite Zona: Moderate earthquake i ntehs i't b. Fros i cin poterrti al Moderate, y zone YI T 7 , C+ Landslide Potentlal Nana, d. Fire Hazard: Moderate. e` Expansive Soil Potential H1gh 4^ Hydrology a. Surface Water: Seasonal draina Parcel 1 011dth d 4. Most of ger way crossia es proosed f 1 ood i ng . e property Is subject to seasonal 17. Ground Water: Unknown, c» brainage Charactoristics;potentlal high water tables. Property drains to on-site ase ways thence south to the nrovillo WildlifO Area, d � A► nUal Rainfall < nrirma l � : e. L t m i 4,-J ng Factors., 24 to 16 inches icor year- , Areas sub,Jer~t to f l ood l ng and setbacks firrarrr drainage wayU, 5. Visual/Scenic Quality: Good. 6. Acoustic Quality: Good. Compromised due to aircraFb activity associated with the nearby Oroville Municipal Airport. 7. Air Owality., Good. Biological Environment: 8. Vegetation.' Oak grass lands with vernal Pools on the SOLO.-horly portion of proposed lot 4. 9. Wildlife Habitat, Small birds and animals common to Valley Otik grass lands and the Oroville Wildlife Area adja:ent to the south and east. DtAltur-al En-vironment: 10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area: Low sensitivity area. 11. Butte County General Plan designation,. Low DOnsity Residential and Agricultural Residential, 12. Existing Zoning: A -R. 1-R. Existing Land Use on-site: Old dairy farm, 14. Surrounding, Areat a4 Land Uses: Singla family dwellings at urban densities to the north and northeast, vacant land to the west, Oroville Municipal Airport to the west, agricultural uses to the southwest, Oroville Wildlife Area to the south and east. b. Zoning: City of Orbville zonIng,A-Rp R-3) AR -5 and R --C. c* Gen. Plan dosigneitions: Low Density Residential, Agricultural -Residential and Public (Resource areas and Open Space). d. Parcel Sizes: Urban Residential lots of less than 1/4 acre to the north and lots generally of 10 acres and larger to the west and south with the Oroville Wildlife Area to the south and east. e. Population: Low Density Re8ldehtlaI6 15. Character of Site and Area: Urban Fringe arot, 16. Nearest Urban Areat Oroyllie. 17. Relevant Spheres of influence. CSA 26$ Thermallto Irrigation Olstrldt, Orovillei 18. improvements Standards Urban Area., Fresno Avenue is within the Urban Improvement Standards arca. 19- Fire Protection Service: a. Nearest County (St -ate) Fire Station= Nelson Avenue Station b. Water Availability: Thormalito Irrigation District Hydrants. . 904 School's In Area'. Thermailto Union School District and Oroville Union High School 01strict. ' BUTTE COUNTY -_ GENERALPLAT: CO;:rOFi'u1NAE'Eii� FC�F. PARCEL 1lAP i7P, SITSDI IOt: D�•: WHO Co. PlannitigCwnm, Items 1-4 to be coMpleted by ,applicant: AUG 18 I,,jw 1. Applicant Name /LL Zt 's �w6 1 `9.11� 1?rovdie, Calico ak9 2. Project Description 7 3. nssessor's Parcel Number(a) 4'. Proposed Use CS The following item; are to be completed by the Planning Department. Current zoning Land Conservation Agreement 1A1O General Plan Designation��,.� Aoulicable Conditional Criteria: --------,... N Applicable Agricultural -Residential 'YES NO 1. Agricultural Compatibility 2. Water & Sewer Capacity 3. Adequate Firs Facilities —; 4. Road Capacity & PEaintenance -- S. Access to Commercial & ScSiools ---- Orchard b Field Crops 1= Pred'omin, '\t S tb Ac Parcel Size 2. Vicinity ., `rhan Boundaries 3. Agrit. vii, ''.xty not impaired Staff Determin,;ti.otl: Project does does not substantially conform to the General I'lEin Comments:"% Staff Signature C ---... Cate '>t AS THE APPLICA?tT STAFF AWARt OF 7 VO R TEiE ii.: ULS tS Q b L4I�I) DIV1SlOtr� I AM 11t A 3OVp, DET1Rt•I17dATI0tt P,.FGAfiDIhG 'TETE COi;FOI�lx�`1i�t!t lti'I.TE T11C GE1r'ERAI, `PLAN., Dated Signature of Applicant l:nt;mcrrs • Survey&s `Plann Mooing ��'z�1?-�� • ,:� j " � L%' A, � a 220 Grand Avenue LI) 10M t'rNt��sed &�Spj dr"4116. CalitUrnta 95965 0916) 533.2068 � ._... .,gnu-, ,......._. _.