HomeMy WebLinkAbout030-270-057yep a
.�� .�
t a
�.
- r �
. .� � •�•
eek
.. '�
.
'
,
:�
~ , e{^
� I ,
�
..
..
� ®�
... _.. ��
�.•
4•
.
P � `, �
,1'
•
i �
1
�'�
r r
. 1 • � �.
r r
\ .e i
.
r
an
� dA
't ,
� i`
„. '
• .0
��
N
r
, �
a
•1
�, ,
. P
� �
,
.
y
.�
� r e
t � - .`
•
�.
�+ � r
j �
'�t
: �
� "r
r � i.
c�ry�
� �` �
� Al ,r.
.
. '
( I t �.
lA�l
�
1� �
�
r ` ` � `1 ILlf ����1 � U[ �
PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY SHEET FOR LAND DIVISIONS
APPLICANT George L. Dobson AP#30-27-57, 58,.59
ADDRESS 2124-1 Ventura Blvd., Suite 151, 'Woodland Hills, CE's 9136
OWNER Same
PROJECT DESCRIPTION TPM to divide 64.4 acres to create , parcels
parcels at +5 acres each and 1 at 49.4 acres
LOCATION on the south side of Fresno Avenue approximatel:y lGDO feet east
Of its intersection with Larkin Rd., Thermalito area
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS) 30-27-57,58,59-
ZONING A -R GENERAL PLAN Low Density PROJECT CONSISTENT?
Residential-
-GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE REPORT
DATE OF APPLICANT SIGNA'1U--RE
LAND CONSERVATION ACT CONTRACTS:
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED September 18, 1986
'GENT/SURVEYOR/CIVIL ENGINEER.: G.D.Ai
ADDRESS 220 Grand Avenue, Oroyille, CA 95`965
DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT ,PREPARED
ENVIRONMENTAL �aCATEGORICAL EXEMP' IO;N DATE FILED
DETERMINATION
AND DATE µ NEGATIVE DFCLARATION .. DATE ADOPTED
a MTTIGATED NEG. DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTt D,Vek
Y ENV, IMPACT REPORT =- DATE CERTIZ,IED
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NOS
8U84 COMMITTEE MEETING, DATE
ADVISORY AGENCY HEARING
ADVISORY AGENCY ACTION �
APPEALED APPEAL HEARING DATE
HOARD ACTION
C014ME-NTS POR PLANNING 7I'RBCTOR' S REPOA1r a '71 ~ „. (3
r f't'.a E ,Nr' r •a''y , e.. 'a i y,
i.
,s t�...........
i.�d. V .1.. J.. t,r CJ 1r �!.L r�•1li'1ILV A M Q'
L'U e Office of Planning and Butte County
Re a.ch} i;q�;
1400 Tenth Street Room lei,
Sacramento, CA 95814 E �+'�j Planning Dep artm(11,1[
of 7 County Centers
11 a +rad, OrOvillei CA 95965
XXX County Clerk
County of Butte ► L211NOR M, BECKER, COMP Clea
SLTT3.7ECT :Dy J"vi JNT
Deputy
Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with
or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Section 21.108
Project Title — AP #
Tentative Parcel Ma N<rmc
P 30-27""5.7, .etc. Geor
State �learinghotise Number I ye L • Dobson
(if submitted to Clearinghouse) Contact Personiel p one Number
JOhn Mendonsa Public Works
Pro— ,i�ut Location 534-4265
'South side of Fre no Avenue a � ,.
Of its iIntersec�tion with Larkin Rd., Thermal to area,
__ Pproxim&tely 1600 feet east
Project Description
Tentative Parcel Map to divide 64.4
Parcels, 3 parcels at +5 acres each and 1 t 45.4 acres to create 4
a
._..,, acres.
`z'his is to advise that the Sutte County Advisor
Y Agency
has a pproved th(Lead Agency or Responsibe above-described project on 12-,8-86 le Agency)
the followiand has made
ng determinations regarding the above-described)
bove-descr bed,,
project
�. The project _Will, ,X—will not, have a significant effect on the
environment,
2, An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project
pursuant to the provisions of CEQA,
A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project ur-
provisions of CEQA, p suint to the
3. rfit,igati,
approval
measures ware, �� were nest; �^ade a condition of the.
o� the prc>jent,
44 A statement of overriding cbnsideratir�ns
foe this project: _Was .,,Ltaas not ad opt d
This is to certify that the final BTR With comments and responses an
Project approval is available to the general public at:i d record of
Butte County Planning Department
7 County Center Drive
Orovilley CA 95065
Date Received JFOV Tiling qnd
postingl2
at bPI� . "9-'�'6
{
Si a re
Stephen A, Streeter
; Senior Planner
u r t
Ti1 w
t �
/����'���i?�ir���a�';,'����t�t,�±.�.,av ;��,�n —. �'c�t►3�r�d Mnr�h 1�8�
w
�'' " fir'` x•
0 z
R.
RA !
DEPARTMENT Or PU13LIC .WORKS
WILLIAM (Bill) C1 r-r—F. Director
9 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965
CERTIFIED MAIL Buije ro, Planning COMA
Telephone: (916) 534.+I601
DEC 10 1986 RONALD D. Mc.ELROY
Deputy Director
Orovilte, CaVHOTnia
December 9, 1986
George Dobson RE: AP 30-27-57, 59, .59
21241 Ventura Blvd., Suite 151 TPM
Woodland Hills, CA 91364,
i Dear Mr, Dobson:
At the 'regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held on
December 8, ,1986; the agency granted a mitigated negative declaration
of environmental impact and approved your tentative parcel map on
the above -referenced property subject to the conuitions of 8pproval
listed on the attachedsheet.
If no appeals are timely filed ---within 'ten (10) days of the date of
the Advisory Agency's approval. --with the Cleric of the Board of
Supervisors, this action will be final.
When the conditions of approval are complied with, it will be in order
.for you to file your "final inapt' with the Butte County Department
of Public Works for recordation within twenty -.four '24)' months of
the date of approval by the Advisory Ag ncy
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this
office,
Very truly yours,
William Choff
Director Of Publ,i !arks
1
d ! Merida rsa
A si.stant Director
cc: fanning Department
Environmental Health Department
ODA
George Dobson, Tentative Parcel Ma
south side of Fresno Avenue approxp�160OBQt�7�57' 58 & 590 on tate
With Larkin Road. Thermal to at-ea.En
• east of its intersection
Engineer: GDA
Public Works conditions:
Deed to the County of Butte 30 ft. right-of-way from tlt tnitterine
of Fresno Avenue;
Z Indicate a 50 ft. building setback from the c
Avenue; enterline
of C"resno
3 Show all easements of record on the final map,
4 Obtain encroachment permit for all driveways, new or existing, and.
construct to county standards,
5 Pay delinquent taxes or : any �
current taxes as required.
h ileet the rer",ir.ements of the Butte flaunty Faire Department,
Show areas subject to iDundat: on. '
B Shaw no building area on
through property; Pc1rc0l i where naLtIral drain runs
Planning Dept. conditions:
9 Show all areas subject `ct to fl 'odi.
. ng on the final map.
10 Establish no development areas around ver
nal pools and within
100 ft. of drainage ways containing riparian habitat;
n 11 Show a 100 ft. wide no buildinj area adjacent to the O
Wildlife Area; Oro
Health Dept. Conditions,
12 Provide a Letter or dther documentation from
Irrigation District stating that they are tv lland able t
the I'herinalito
supply domestic water to parcels t 2,_ S end 4, o
13 Provide a letter or other documentation from
ri sewer to `-ct stating that they are from
theThormalito
.�rri "��tion D�,stra
Supply ' parcels 1, 21 D and 4, g and able to
14 Pace a note on the map that states "development of gar
and 4 will require connection to a public sanitary1 cels 1, 2
�l5 sower,'► ,r
Place a nota on the map that statcros iidevclomonL
Of
3 and 4 will require connection to a pKircel.s + 2
Public water _supply,o
The follow'" mitigation is required;
lei Pay Pro Mata share toward traffic studies or theThermalito a ^es ( 5,(l0 per light b8tallot ohs
r parcel,),
TO: Butte County Advisory Agency
FROM: Planning Director
SUBJECT: Report on. Tentative ,Parcel Map for 'George L. Dobson on AP
30-27-57, 581 55
DATE; October 27, 1986
This is a proposal to divide 64.4 acres to create 4 parcels. The
present, zoning is A-R (Agricultural Residential). The Land Use Flan Map
of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Low Density
Residential There are no specific Or community plans for the area
The proposal does not conflict with County zoning nor any adopted or
proposed element of the Butte County General. Plan nor ,any County,
specific or community plan.
Recommend Approval subject to the f olloWing"Miti ga-bi.on measures:
1. Show all. areas subject to flooding on the final map.
gi Establish no development areas around vernal Pools and within 100
feet of drainage Ways containing riparian habitat.
a. pay pro rata share toward traffic studies or light installations in
the Thermal ito> area ($25.00 per parcel).
4. Show a 100 foot wide no building area adjacent to the Oroville
Wildlife Area
DRH#.Ir
�c George Li Dobson
GDA
r
s
6uite Go. }�nnnin9
ENGINEERING QCT
S U R V E XBPQ&9
220 GRAND AVENUE
1�
PLANNING�z OROVftLE, CA. 9!5965
r A ,
(916) 533-2068
1-4 W
October 20, 1986
Butte County Planning Department
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA. 95965
Atte: Mr, David Hironimus
Ret Tentative Parcel Map
A.P. r 3027-57, etc.
Dear Mr. I-fironimus t
We have reviewed your suggested mitigation measures for
referenced. Project. We can. see no Problems with numbers 1e above
I do, hoWever� dish to Change number 4 to read s 2 & 3,
Wide no building area adjacent to the Orov9lle Wildlife Areaf
shote a 10Q foot
tie feel that "no develo menti
things as a fence, road or irrigation system, wh to include such
not the intent of the condilocguld be stem, uedlc of course is
n. Thank you,
Sincerely,
:John 13. Christoff
G.D.A: Engineering, ony L.S.
Surveying & Planning
C:C" George Dobson
86-094
�r�c�dm
WIL,1 IAM W. EbDlS
JOHN C1, CHRIS'tOPPER50N
KMNNr TH C, L.ENHARO-r
r
11PH Ni)tX r
COUNTY O. 13UTTI?
LN'VI RONm N7'AICHECKLIST DORM
(to ba r:c��ttipletr.Uy I,enc Agen�.y�
13ACK--- GROUNII 1,09 11 86--09-18-01
l., Name oC Proponent GGeorgt:�L.Dobson
----------
2. Address of pt•oponent and representative if a
( ppiie',airlej
Geora�e L. Dobson C.D.A.
212.41 Ventura
�$2
3 1)
ETNTATIVE ] 7_AI
2C1rL MAP
CI. MANQA`i'ORY FINDINGS _OF�;1(',NI�� iT CAh'CI r
Y1i8 i4AYB)v N0
a. Does the project have the potential to degrad--
quality of the enlgr'otrmont, e the' substantially reduce
the habitat of a :Cash or wi.]subs speciescause n
fish or wildlife population to crop below, self"
sustaining Levels, threaten to ,01i1111MILL, <"a plant or
animal community) reducer the number or restrict ,the
range or a rare 01' endangered pl ant or animal Or
eliminate important examples of the major periods
Of California history or• prehi,storv7
b. hors tine
project have rile potential to ar..hiove
short-term benefits to the detriment o long -tent,
environmental goals? (A short-term impa,t on tite
environment is one which Occurs ita a r`elat" ively
1)rief pcsl'iod, of time while long -terns >mpacts will
ondure .into t e� future,)
-,!K
C. ]gyes tile have impacts
Which are ilidividu-
ally* limited, but cumul
project ativelty onsicterabl.e7 (A
where thmay impact on two or more separate resources
e impact on each reasourcc, is relatvelir
sme.l] , but where the cffet`t of the total or thtrser
impacts on rile 01WIronntent is si rt ficar)t.7
dDoes the project have
will rtrvirc�nirtLtrta7 effects Which
C41160 substantialetverse effects oil human
hr3ng,s, caitiic=r dirQetly or rnclire HN.
Till 1t1"r 1:rtrl 1'I'iC1N i'C"a he co,c s 1ete,t) hV t
ii '110 Load Agoncyl
On the Iyac; s ca(` t°I11; initisII c+a tiuettican;
__,.. 1A'1Y1•s fill il tht� proposv(I pro iect t'om,l) N01, hitvc a s i y
oil tine 011 i ronmcttt, and o NFGA'1"tlth U1.CLA1tA'ION wi } l I eIirnt 017
)reptatredfoet
r/M., fitid that A tIlougli then p)oposoproject could have tt si,g;n7 fi.-
c.lnt cfl'ect oil (-Ieen1'I)'e)t)lnt')}i the'r"z! rYi'1 i not he rl sli;ni I'icarrt
Li`I'ec t i n t}t 1 c.rsc' irc'cat180 the M"I GA 1'"C't7N Diisrl.SUi2ls'�, tic^�;r rsil>ecl t,n
the' nt;tat:hrtl ;;at'rt ittt�c pr
1)cstsn atertlr,i tw, t}titilecrjrt;t,, A N1
"iCAl`Tt�i:
r)I:GLARA' I ON w i l l Irt* lr► t'1r3u r+1,
I/IV'i: Hila the }r1'0j)0trki irt'tr,it'ct MAY fate, rr st
1,nI fLt'ar)t rfrect 511
t}ary ctly I 'ronmett'ts t tt incl , link' I Rt)WLNI'Ar, 1 MI AC 1111;1101'`1' is required.
1)i11'i:r October x. 5, .,1986 COUNTY 01: I;U't"`r'r1t rrLANN1N0, 01111Ait'1Mt N'i'
baVid R:. 141 onitnus
Assodlato planner
Ravi Lived by.
,f
IV.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
U-Cxp anations of a l "yes► and "maybe" answers are required'
on attached sheet(;))
I. EARTH: Will the proposal, result in significant„ YES MAYBE NO
a. Unstable earth conditions
or in changes in
geologic substructures?
b Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
overcovering of the soil's
c. Change in topography
or ground surface
relief features?
—X.0
d. Destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical
--,u
features?
e. Increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
either on
or off-site?
f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beachX
sands,
c
or changes in siltation, deposition
or erosion which may modify the channel
of
a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lade?
g Loss`of prime agriculturally soils --
outside designated urban
arasroductive
h: Exposure of 'people orX
hazards'such
as earthquakes,tiandsgides, mud-
slides, ground Failure or similar hazards?
2. AIR. Will the proposal result in, a77al
Air Air emissions or deterioratiox, .bsambient:
air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable oa rs, smoke
or fumes?
�.
C. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or
temperature; or any change in
climate,
locally or regionally?
5. WATER: Will the proposal result in substantial:
a. Changes in
currents, or the course or
direction of water movements in either
marine or fresh waters?
b: Changes in absorption rates, drainage
or the rate and amount Of sur, face runor-- f? ter is ,
c, Need for off-site surface
drainage improve-
ments, including vegetation removal, channel-
dation
.c
or culvert installation?
d.+ Alterations to the
course or flow of flood`
Vat e rs ? ---
----
g y
e. Change in the amount of surface water in any
water body?
f. Discharge into Surface waters, or in any
alteration of surface
water. qualitincluding
'but not limited to tontperattare, dissolved y,, vel
OXYgea or turbidity?
g. r�iteration of the direction or rate of flow
Of ground waters?
h. Change in the quantity or qualit of
Y ground waters
either throughdirect additions
or rvit}i4
drawals, or through interception of an
aquifer by
cuts or excavations?
I. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise .^�
X
available for public water supplies?
j. Exposure of people or
property to water =.=-
related hazards such as flooding?
YES.
4. PLANT LIFE, Will the proposal result in substantial:
b1__YB E No
?C—angs in the diversity of species, or number
anspecies ofpaantes (inclLtdin treelrubs,
grass, crops, and aquatic. plants)?
b• Reduction of the numbers of
i�
any unzq.1e, rare
or endangered species of plants?
c. Introduction of new species of plants into an ---
area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish-
ment of existin- species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
X
S. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in suby,antial:
a. C a�i`ngee in the diversity of
species, or nun,6evs
of any species of animals (birds, sand animals
including
reptiles, fish and shell ftsi,,
benthic organisms or insects) ?
b, Reduction in the numbers of any unique:,: rare-
or endangered species of animals?
X
c. Introduction of new species of animals into
an area,
or result in a barrier to the migration,
or movement of animals?
d: Detexa.oration to existing f:i.sl� or wildlife
habitat?
-�
6, NOISE- Will the proposal result in substantial:
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
bo Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
7. LIGHT AND GLARE: Will the proposal produce
sxgni scant dight
and glare?
3<. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a
su stantial alteration of the
present or planned
land use of an area?
9;X
NATUR.AL_R$SbURCES: Will the sproposal result in
su tantial:
a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
b Depletion of any non-renewable natal:,.`�
resources?
10. RISK OF UPSET, Will the proposal involve:
a, sT—
of explosi,n or the release of hazard-
bus substances (including, but
not limited to
oil, pesticides? chemicals or radiation) in the
ev•ert
of an accident or upset conditions?
b, possible interference with
an emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
ll. POpUi,A'TIC1N. Will theistittion, density,proposal
�rowthalter
ratetof the humahq n
Population?
_
%,
l 140USIING Will the proposal affect existing iyousing,
or create a demand f-Or additional ijousing?
13
TRANSPORTATION/CIRC YES M�1Y}3T,i
result in: '` Wil1 theproposal`--,��'h NC7
-------- ION ,
On
Generation of substantial additional vehicle
movement?
b. Effects on existing
demand fol new parking facilities, ---M�-
or
C. Substantial impactkongeYzstn
systems? g transportation
d•
----�
Significant alterations to
Of circulation or present patterns
goods? mo•tement of people and/or
e• Alterations to waterborne, rail or air trafl' ?
1�.c.
£ Increase in traffic hazards
bicyclists or pedestrians? icles,
to motor vehicles,
144 PUBLIC SE}tesu
u on or Will the proposal: have
t �nVICES
an effect
need for new or al
governmental services, tered
at Pire protection?
b.
Police proteCtioi�?
C, Schools?
d-, Parks or other recreational fail
e- }Maintenance es? —
X
of
roads? public facilities, including '---
Other go'vernmen,tal, 1'ervices7
=ftG'l. Will the propos ax
a, Use o,f, substantial amouLr ine
ntsuof fuel.or energy?
b, Substantial increase
sources of ener in demand upon existing
Of new sources of--)energy"renuir� the development
16, UTILITIES. Will the -.
rxwmS P oposal result in a need foal,
foils r, or substantial alteratio;7s to the
a. '"
b � �cat ions ac gas?
c- tiV ystems?
a�tunLer availa-s itv:
d, Sewer or septic tank?
e, Storm water drainage? --~
f, Solid waste and disposal.?
17. HUMAN HEALTH, Will. the
a, G.reatxori of an proposal result in:
health Of y health hazard or potential
b4 Exposure of People
mental health?
hazards? pie to potential health
18,the
AESTHCS, 1Vi11- ---.
0SItruct on of Will
proposal result in the
the public o y scenic vista.0r view open to
CrY
r will the prop
on of an aesthosal result in the
to public view? qt.
Offensiveensve site upon
4 ,.
yBS
MAYBE NO
19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational
oPhortun.ties?`
20. CULTURAL RESOURCES'.
a. Will the proposal result in the ~alteration
Of or the destruction of a prehistoric or
X
historic archaeological site,?
b. Will the proposal result in adverse phys: cal
or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or
X
historic building, structure or object?
c. Does the proposal have the potenzial to cause
a physical change which would affect unique
ethnic cultural values?`
d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious
or sacred uses within the potential impact
area?
V. DISCUSSION .OF ENVIRONMENTAL, EVALUATION
See At -:ached
DTSCUSSrON OF
11 MENT L EVALUATION AP 30-27-57, etc.
1bsc)e)f,3bpf.: This project will result ir, disruption, comPaotlm and
overcoverIng of the soil for the development of homesites on site, WF11cf-I
Will result in a change of absorption rates, drainage Patterns and (,,ho
rate and amount of surface runoff. These changes couldlead to
increased erosion and discharge Into surface Waters both on and o�f'r
site. Due to the size of the lots being created, this should not be a
significant impact,
1h.: All Of Butte County is within a moderate earthquake Intensity zone
VIII. The subject property is loc&bed approximately iq, miles southwest
of the Foothill Shear Zone Which supported. the 1975 Oroville earthquake.
Construction of buildings to Uniform 8uilding Code standards for
seismically active areas should provide adequate protection to occupants
In case of seismic activity.
3j--' Much of the subject property is subject to flooding and bull I ding
sites should be located Outside of the flood Prone areas.
4bo5d.: The subject property is adjacent to the Oroville Wildlife Area.
Also on site Is riparian habitat on drainagewaYs and a potential for
vernal pools on the southerly Portion of proposed lot 4, These are all
valuable habitats and should be Protected.
6b.: The subject property is located approximately 1/4 mile from the
OrOville Municipal Airport and may be subject to aircraft noise, The
Oroville AIrP-Or'h Environs Plan Indicates that the property is located
Outside the 55 de CNEL boundary. As Such, aircraft M
a significant Impact, ranoise should not be
This project will contribute to traffic In the neighborhood,
Traffic accessing the subject property will travel
via Fresno Avenue and
either 18th Street or Harlan Avenue, thence northerly to State Highway
162, Traffic signals Will be needed In the Thormolito area as the
rest dant ial dev':JlOPm9nt cont lhue8 to occurr. A traffic sure-ey/trarflc
light fund has been establisheO to Provide for traffic studies and
eventual Installation o� traffic lights at appropriate locations.
18e.0 The subject property Is located under safety area 8) as shown In
the Oroville Airport Environs plan. The use is pormltt,.:�
,d by the Zoning
and the density Proposed In the Parcel MaP 18 COMPatibi 0
1 1 With the
Provisions of that plan,
14. This project will represent an increase In demand for pubic
sorviccs ir, on WnIncorpor6tod of'06'
19, The swbJOCt property IS adjacent to the OrovIllo Wildlife Aron%
Development on Proposed Parcel 4 could occur
Wildlife Area and compromise immediately adjacent to the
8r,08, Large U I I d I ng Its value as aWildlife Area and recreation
the Wildlife area
rea to g setbacks. should be established from the edge of
insure compatibility of 0800
Suggested mitigation measures:
lo Show all areas subject to flooding on the final mor
,S
2. Establish no
feet of drainage
development areas around
Ways containing
vernal Pools and wit, -hist 1 00
riparian
habitat,
3• Pay Pro rata share toward traffic studies or light inatallaist_ans in
the Thermalito area ($25.00
Per Parcel).
4. Show a 100 foot Wide no duvel QPment area adjacent to
Wildlife Area.
DRHmc
r
_.7 _
{
•
Applicant: George L. Dobson
Assessor's Parcel #t
30-27-57, etc,
Log # 86-09-18-01
'I
a&i SWEAT
A. F'ro ieci- D �scr i rpt i
1. Type of Project: ,Tentative Parcel map.
�. Brief Description` Dividing approximate Brief D a g 64.4 acres into `4
3.
Location: parcels. of 5 acres e,9ch and 1 Parcel of 49.4 acres,
On the south side of Fresno Avenue
of its intersection with 18th Street ii immediatelyto east
west of Droville. in the 't
4. Proposed Density of Development:
5« Amount of ImperviousSurfacin 5 acres per dwellingunit.
6
Surfacing: Minimal. Access and Nearest Public Roads?: Property friartts on Fres
Avenue.
7. Method of Sewage Disposal: o
Sewers n
Thermalitu Irrigation District
8. Source of Water Supply: pp Y= Thermalito Irrigation District
9- Proximity of Power Lines:
10- Potential for further land division.TO development:Water.
existing zoning would Perrmit parcels down to The
area 4500 square feet in
4#, �nw i ronmental �p� +-,
,errt
K
1a Terrain
'3f• General Topographic Character;
a. Slopes: 0 to 10 Ro11ih3 valley lands.
�+• Elevation: percent,
v,,z +s l feet abol,�e sea level
to approxi mate l y
170 feet above sea levet.
d. Limit.in9
2. Soils Factors c Noma.
a. Typos and Char-racteristics
b• Limiting Factors: 1Ym:arr loam and tailings.
8 Natural Hazards of tits Land
a, Ear�Ghnuaite Zona: Moderate earthquake i ntehs i't
b. Fros i cin poterrti al Moderate, y zone YI T 7 ,
C+ Landslide Potentlal Nana,
d. Fire Hazard: Moderate.
e` Expansive Soil Potential H1gh
4^ Hydrology
a. Surface Water: Seasonal draina
Parcel 1 011dth
d 4. Most of ger way crossia
es proosed
f 1 ood i ng . e property Is subject to seasonal
17. Ground Water: Unknown,
c» brainage Charactoristics;potentlal high water tables.
Property drains to on-site
ase ways thence south to the nrovillo WildlifO Area,
d � A► nUal Rainfall < nrirma l � :
e. L t m i 4,-J ng Factors., 24 to 16 inches icor year- ,
Areas sub,Jer~t to f l ood l ng and setbacks
firrarrr drainage wayU,
5. Visual/Scenic Quality: Good.
6. Acoustic Quality: Good. Compromised due to aircraFb activity
associated with the nearby Oroville Municipal Airport.
7. Air Owality., Good.
Biological Environment:
8. Vegetation.' Oak grass lands with vernal Pools on the SOLO.-horly
portion of proposed lot 4.
9. Wildlife Habitat, Small birds and animals common to Valley Otik
grass lands and the Oroville Wildlife Area adja:ent to the south
and east.
DtAltur-al En-vironment:
10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area: Low
sensitivity area.
11. Butte County General Plan designation,. Low DOnsity Residential
and Agricultural Residential,
12. Existing Zoning: A -R.
1-R. Existing Land Use on-site: Old dairy farm,
14. Surrounding, Areat
a4 Land Uses: Singla family dwellings at urban densities to
the north and northeast, vacant land to the west, Oroville
Municipal Airport to the west, agricultural uses to the
southwest, Oroville Wildlife Area to the south and east.
b. Zoning: City of Orbville zonIng,A-Rp R-3) AR -5 and R --C.
c* Gen. Plan dosigneitions: Low Density Residential,
Agricultural -Residential and Public (Resource areas and Open
Space).
d. Parcel Sizes: Urban Residential lots of less than 1/4 acre
to the north and lots generally of 10 acres and larger to
the west and south with the Oroville Wildlife Area to the
south and east.
e. Population: Low Density Re8ldehtlaI6
15. Character of Site and Area: Urban Fringe arot,
16. Nearest Urban Areat Oroyllie.
17. Relevant Spheres of influence. CSA 26$ Thermallto Irrigation
Olstrldt, Orovillei
18. improvements Standards Urban Area., Fresno Avenue is within the
Urban Improvement Standards arca.
19- Fire Protection Service:
a. Nearest County (St -ate)
Fire Station= Nelson Avenue Station
b. Water Availability: Thormalito Irrigation District
Hydrants. .
904 School's In Area'. Thermailto Union School District and Oroville
Union High School 01strict.
' BUTTE COUNTY -_
GENERALPLAT: CO;:rOFi'u1NAE'Eii�
FC�F. PARCEL 1lAP i7P, SITSDI IOt: D�•: WHO Co. PlannitigCwnm,
Items 1-4 to be coMpleted by ,applicant: AUG 18 I,,jw
1. Applicant Name
/LL Zt 's �w6 1 `9.11� 1?rovdie, Calico ak9
2. Project Description 7
3. nssessor's Parcel Number(a)
4'. Proposed Use CS
The following item; are to be completed by the Planning Department.
Current zoning
Land Conservation Agreement 1A1O
General Plan Designation��,.�
Aoulicable Conditional Criteria: --------,...
N Applicable
Agricultural -Residential
'YES NO
1. Agricultural Compatibility
2. Water & Sewer Capacity
3. Adequate Firs Facilities —;
4. Road Capacity & PEaintenance --
S. Access to Commercial & ScSiools ----
Orchard b Field Crops
1= Pred'omin, '\t S tb Ac Parcel Size
2. Vicinity ., `rhan Boundaries
3. Agrit. vii, ''.xty not impaired
Staff Determin,;ti.otl: Project does
does not
substantially conform to the General I'lEin
Comments:"%
Staff Signature C
---... Cate '>t
AS THE APPLICA?tT STAFF AWARt OF 7
VO
R TEiE ii.: ULS tS
Q b L4I�I) DIV1SlOtr� I AM 11t A 3OVp,
DET1Rt•I17dATI0tt P,.FGAfiDIhG 'TETE COi;FOI�lx�`1i�t!t lti'I.TE T11C GE1r'ERAI, `PLAN.,
Dated
Signature of Applicant
l:nt;mcrrs • Survey&s `Plann Mooing
��'z�1?-�� • ,:� j " � L%'
A, � a
220 Grand Avenue
LI) 10M t'rNt��sed &�Spj dr"4116. CalitUrnta 95965
0916) 533.2068
� ._... .,gnu-, ,......._. _.